Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Most cited articles

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Most cited articles
98 Most cited articles
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles

From articles published in Annals of Coloproctology during the past two years (2023 ~ ).

Reviews
Benign bowel disease
Multimodal prerehabilitation for elderly patients with sarcopenia in colorectal surgery
Jingting Wu, Hannah Chi, Shawn Kok, Jason M.W. Chua, Xi-Xiao Huang, Shipin Zhang, Shimin Mah, Li-Xin Foo, Hui-Yee Peh, Hui-Bing Lee, Phoebe Tay, Cherie Tong, Jasmine Ladlad, Cheryl H.M. Tan, Nathanelle Khoo, Darius Aw, Cheryl X.Z. Chong, Leonard M.L. Ho, Sharmini S. Sivarajah, Jialin Ng, Winson J.H. Tan, Fung-Joon Foo, Bin-Tean Teh, Frederick H. Koh
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):3-12.   Published online March 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01207.0172
  • 5,009 View
  • 307 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 19 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Sarcopenia, which is characterized by progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, has been well described to be associated with numerous poor postoperative outcomes, such as increased perioperative mortality, postoperative sepsis, prolonged length of stay, increased cost of care, decreased functional outcome, and poorer oncological outcomes in cancer surgery. Multimodal prehabilitation, as a concept that involves boosting and optimizing the preoperative condition of a patient prior to the upcoming stressors of a surgical procedure, has the purported benefits of reversing the effects of sarcopenia, shortening hospitalization, improving the rate of return to bowel activity, reducing the costs of hospitalization, and improving quality of life. This review aims to present the current literature surrounding the concept of sarcopenia, its implications pertaining to colorectal cancer and surgery, a summary of studied multimodal prehabilitation interventions, and potential future advances in the management of sarcopenia.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic impact of preoperative osteosarcopenia on esophageal cancer surgery outcomes: a retrospective analysis
    Yuki Hirase, Ken Sasaki, Yusuke Tsuruda, Masataka Shimonosono, Yasuto Uchikado, Daisuke Matsushita, Takaaki Arigami, Nobuhiro Tada, Kenji Baba, Yota Kawasaki, Takao Ohtsuka
    Esophagus.2025; 22(1): 77.     CrossRef
  • Continuum of Care - Building bridges between different phases of the patient's pathway
    Michael Adolph, Marek Lichota
    Clinical Nutrition Open Science.2025; 59: 111.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Management of the Adult Oncology Patient
    Shannon M. Popovich, Thomas R. Vetter
    Anesthesiology Clinics.2024; 42(1): 145.     CrossRef
  • The potential use of perioperative rectus femoris ultrasonography in guiding prehabilitation strategies
    W.R. Martis
    Journal of Clinical Anesthesia.2024; 92: 111302.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential® versus robotic approach in patients with rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    I. K. Kim, C. S. Lee, J. H. Bae, S. R. Han, W. Alshalawi, B. C. Kim, I. K. Lee, D. S. Lee, Y. S. Lee
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Differences in Functional Capacity between Oncologic and Non-Oncologic Populations: Reference Values
    Egoitz Mojas, Aitor Santisteban, Iker Muñoz-Pérez, Arkaitz Larrinaga-Undabarrena, Maria Soledad Arietaleanizbeaskoa, Nere Mendizabal-Gallastegui, Gonzalo Grandes, Jon Cacicedo, Xabier Río
    Healthcare.2024; 12(3): 318.     CrossRef
  • The use of technology in cancer prehabilitation: a systematic review
    San San Tay, Fuquan Zhang, Edmund Jin Rui Neo
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sarcopenia as a Preoperative Risk Stratification Tool among Older Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

    Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analysis of effect of colonoscopy combined with laparoscopy in the treatment of colorectal tumors
    Deyu Zhao, Xun Sun, Xun Guo, Wang Jianfeng
    Technology and Health Care.2024; 32(4): 2115.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosing Sarcopenia with AI-Aided Ultrasound (DINOSAUR)—A Pilot Study
    Vanessa Yik, Shawn Shi Xian Kok, Esther Chean, Yi-En Lam, Wei-Tian Chua, Winson Jianhong Tan, Fung Joon Foo, Jia Lin Ng, Sharmini Sivarajah Su, Cheryl Xi-Zi Chong, Darius Kang-Lie Aw, Nathanelle Ann Xiaolian Khoo, Paul E. Wischmeyer, Jeroen Molinger, Stev
    Nutrients.2024; 16(16): 2768.     CrossRef
  • The relation between preoperative radiological sarcopenia and postoperative recovery of physical activity in older surgical cancer patients; an explorative study
    S. Hendriks, M.G. Huisman, L. Weerink, L.T. Jonker, B.C. van Munster, J.J. de Haan, G.H. de Bock, B.L. van Leeuwen
    The Journal of nutrition, health and aging.2024; 28(10): 100345.     CrossRef
  • Effects of the Strength, Assistance in walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs, and Falls score on postoperative clinical outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective study
    Young Jae Kim, Sung Uk Bae, Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical impact of multidisciplinary team management on postoperative short-term outcomes in colorectral cancer surgery
    Shota Kuwabara, Keita Ishido, Yuma Aoki, Kazuyuki Yamamoto, Yasuhito Shoji, Tatsunosuke Ichimura, Hiroto Manase, Satoshi Hirano
    Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(8): 2777.     CrossRef
  • Soft Tissue Sarcoma with Lower Limb Impairment: Development of a Specific Rehabilitation Protocol Based on Demolitive and Reconstructive Surgery Types
    Caterina Galluccio, Marco Germanotta, Sergio Valeri, Beniamino Brunetti, Bruno Vincenzi, Stefania Tenna, Chiara Pagnoni, Rossana Alloni, Michela Angelucci, Rosa Salzillo, Marco Morelli Coppola, Alice Valeri, Roberto Passa, Francesca Falchini, Arianna Pava
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(23): 7023.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the Impact of Multimodal Prehabilitation with High Protein Oral Nutritional Supplementation (HP ONS) with Beta-Hydroxy Beta-Methylbutyrate (HMB) on Sarcopenic Surgical Patients—Interim Analysis of the HEROS Study
    Frederick Hong-Xiang Koh, Vanessa Yik, Shuen-Ern Chin, Shawn Shi-Xian Kok, Hui-Bing Lee, Cherie Tong, Phoebe Tay, Esther Chean, Yi-En Lam, Shi-Min Mah, Li-Xin Foo, Clement C Yan, Wei-Tian Chua, Haziq bin Jamil, Khasthuri G, Lester Wei-Lin Ong, Alvin Yong-
    Nutrients.2024; 16(24): 4351.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of osteosarcopenia in patients with stage IV gastric cancer undergoing conversion surgery
    Yuki Hirase, Takaaki Arigami, Daisuke Matsushita, Masataka Shimonosono, Yusuke Tsuruda, Ken Sasaki, Kenji Baba, Yota Kawasaki, Takao Ohtsuka
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Get Fit: Muscle Health for Crohn’s Disease Surgical Outcome Optimization
    Sara Massironi, Pierpaolo Sileri, Silvio Danese
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recommendations on the use of prehabilitation, i.e. comprehensive preparation of the patient for surgery
    Tomasz Banasiewicz, Jarosław Kobiela, Jarosław Cwaliński, Piotr Spychalski, Patrycja Przybylska, Karolina Kornacka, Dagmara Bogdanowska-Charkiewicz, Magdalena Leyk-Kolańczak, Maciej Borejsza-Wysocki, Dominika Batycka-Stachnik, Rafał Drwiła
    Polish Journal of Surgery.2023; 95(4): 62.     CrossRef
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade II/III hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ian Jun Yan Wee, Chee Hoe Koo, Isaac Seow-En, Yvonne Ying Ru Ng, Wenjie Lin, Emile John Kwong-Wei Tan
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(1):3-10.   Published online January 3, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00598.0085
  • 4,792 View
  • 341 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 15 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This study compared the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) vs. conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) in patients with grade II/III hemorrhoids.
Methods
PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing LH against CH in grade II/III hemorrhoids. The primary outcomes included postoperative use of analgesia, postoperative morbidity (bleeding, urinary retention, pain, thrombosis), and time of return to work/daily activities.
Results
Nine studies totaling 661 patients (LH, 336 and CH, 325) were included. The LH group had shorter operative time (P<0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (P<0.001). Postoperative pain was lower in the LH group, with lower postoperative day 1 (mean difference [MD], –2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], –3.44 to –0.75; P=0.002) and postoperative day 7 (MD, –3.94; 95% CI, –6.36 to –1.52; P=0.001) visual analogue scores and use of analgesia (risk ratio [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42–0.81; P=0.001). The risk of postoperative bleeding was also lower in the LH group (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.12– 0.28; P<0.001), with a quicker return to work or daily activities (P=0.002). The 12-month risks of bleeding (P>0.999) and prolapse (P=0.240), and the likelihood of complete resolution at 12 months, were similar (P=0.240).
Conclusion
LH offers more favorable short-term clinical outcomes than CH, with reduced morbidity and pain and earlier return to work or daily activities. Medium-term symptom recurrence at 12 months was similar. Our results should be verified in future well-designed trials with larger samples.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of surgically indicated hemorrhoids in inflammatory bowel patients: a randomized comparative clinical study
    Reham Zakaria, Mohamed Mahmoud Amin, Heba Alhussein Abo-Alella, Yasmine Hany Hegab
    Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(1): 249.     CrossRef
  • Best clinical practice recommendations for the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids via laser hemorrhoidoplasty: the LHP recommendations
    P. C. Ambe, G. P. Martin-Martin, N. Vasas, I. Piponski, I. H. Roman, J. D. P. Hernandez, H. Ma, H.C. Lin, G. Weyand, L. Mazlan, L. J. García Flórez, K. Wolff, M. Dessily, C. Wang, V. Dobricanin, W. Yang, T. Bruketa, X.D. Zeng, S. Avdicausevic, Z.G. Zhang,
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Which Technique is Preferable for Grade 2–3 Hemorrhoidal Disease: Laser vs. Rubber Band Ligation? A Retrospective Study
    Ahmet Cihangir Emral, Merter Gülen, Bahadır Ege
    Bratislava Medical Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Quand et comment traiter des hémorroïdes
    Thierry Higuero
    La Presse Médicale Formation.2024; 5(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Spectrum of Diagnoses in Female Patients With Proctologic Symptoms Presenting to the Surgery Unit of a Tertiary Care Center
    Sana Sahar, Tamjeed Gul, Muhammad Ihtesham Khan
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Precision and Power: A Comprehensive Review of Exploring the Role of Laser Treatment in Hemorrhoidal Management
    Dheeraj Surya, Pankaj Gharde
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diode laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoids: Meta-analysis
    Po-Lung Cheng, Chang-Cyuan Chen, Jian-Syun Chen, Po-Li Wei, Yan-Jiun Huang
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2024; 47(11): 4681.     CrossRef
  • Laser hemorrhoidoplasty vs. rubber band ligation: a randomized trial comparing 2 mini-invasive treatment for grade II hemorrhoids
    Lei Jin, Kaijian Qin, Renjie Wu, Haojie Yang, Can Cui, Zhenyi Wang, Jiong Wu
    BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Quality of Life of Patients Before and After Hemorrhoid Surgery: A Single-Center Study in Vietnam
    Nguyen Thi Thuy Anh, Nguyen Ngoc Huynh Nhu, Tran Ngoc Hong, Pham Thi Ly, Nguyen Thi Hong Huyen, Doan Thi Minh, Ho Tat Bang, Nguyen Trung Tin
    Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Propensity-Score Matching Analysis for Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Circumferential Stapler Hemorrhoidectomy: One-Year Outcomes
    Tran V Hung, Duong V Hai
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty for grade II–IV hemorrhoidal disease in Bangladesh
    Md. Saiful Islam, Abhigan B. Shrestha, Faisal Chowdhury, Md. R.K. Ziko
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(11): 6514.     CrossRef
  • Lower pain, less itching, and faster healing after ultrasound scalpel-assisted hemorrhoidectomy using an intimate cleaner containing chlorhexidine, acid hyaluronic acid, and natural anti-inflammatories: a multicenter observational case-control study
    Antonio Brillantino, Luigi Marano, Maurizio Grillo, Alessio Palumbo, Fabrizio Foroni, Luciano Vicenzo, Alessio Antropoli, Michele Lanza, Maria Laura Sandoval Sotelo, Nicola Sangiuliano, Mauro Maglio, Rosanna Filosa, Lucia Abbatiello, Maria Preziosa Romano
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 602.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive laser technologies in the surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: problems and prospects (literature review)
    N. D. Yartseva, L. V. Kornev, E. K. Naumov, G. V. Rodoman, L. A. Laberko
    Hirurg (Surgeon).2023; (3): 20.     CrossRef
  • Laser interventions in coloproctology. A plea for standardized treatment protocols
    P. C. Ambe
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(10): 953.     CrossRef
  • Comments on “Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade II/III hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis”
    Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Amine Gouader, Bassem Krimi, Hani Oweira
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 442.     CrossRef
Original Article
Anorectal benign disease
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty in the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids: a pilot Australian study
Anshini Jain, Chen Lew, Gamze Aksakal, Richard Hiscock, Naseem Mirbagheri
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):52-61.   Published online May 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00164.0023
  • 11,643 View
  • 488 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 11 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Traditional therapeutic approaches to the surgical management of hemorrhoid disease such as hemorrhoidectomies are plagued with severe postoperative pain and protracted recovery. Our pilot study aims to the laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) patients with symptomatic hemorrhoid disease that have failed conservative management for the first time in an Australian population.
Methods
Thirty patients were prospectively enrolled to undergo LH. Postoperative pain, time to return to function, and quality of life (QoL) were determined through the Hemorrhoid Disease Symptom Score and Short Health Scale adapted for hemorrhoidal disease and compared to a historical group of 43 patients who underwent a Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy by the same surgeon at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Results
The LH group had significantly lower mean predicted pain scores on days 1 and 2 and lower defecation pain scores and lower opioid analgesia use on days 1, 2, 3, and 4. The median time to return to normal function was significantly lower in the LH group (2 days vs. 9 days, P<0.001). Similarly, the median days to return to the workplace was significantly lower in the LH group (6 days vs. 13 days, P=0.007). During long-term follow-up (12 months), hemorrhoid symptoms and all QoL measures were significantly improved, especially among those with grade II to III disease.
Conclusion
This pilot study demonstrates low pain scores with this revivified procedure in an Australian population, indicating possible expansion of the therapeutic options available for this common condition. Further head-to-head studies comparing LH to other hemorrhoid therapies are required to further determine the most efficacious therapeutic approach.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Best clinical practice recommendations for the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids via laser hemorrhoidoplasty: the LHP recommendations
    P. C. Ambe, G. P. Martin-Martin, N. Vasas, I. Piponski, I. H. Roman, J. D. P. Hernandez, H. Ma, H.C. Lin, G. Weyand, L. Mazlan, L. J. García Flórez, K. Wolff, M. Dessily, C. Wang, V. Dobricanin, W. Yang, T. Bruketa, X.D. Zeng, S. Avdicausevic, Z.G. Zhang,
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus LigaSure™ hemorrhoidectomy versus diathermy hemorrhoidectomy in treatment of grade III and IV Hemorrhoids: A non-randomized prospective trial
    Mohammad Ashour Khadr, Walid Galal El Shazly, Mohamed Mazloum Zakria, Ahmed Mohamed Moaz
    Surgery Open Digestive Advance.2024; 13: 100129.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty and Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy Techniques in the Treatment of Grade 2 and 3 Hemorrhoidal Disease
    Adas Cemil, Kesici Ugur, Genc M. Salih, Karadag Merve, Duman M. Guray, Boluk S. Emine
    The American Surgeon™.2024; 90(4): 662.     CrossRef
  • Global International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons in collaboration with European Society of Coloproctology audit on office‐based and surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease: Study protocol
    Audrius Dulskas, Dovile Cerkauskaite, Joseph Nunoo‐Mensah, Richard Fortunato, Gaetano Gallo, Alaa El Hussuna, Varut Lohsiriwat, Tomas Aukstikalnis, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
    Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(6): 1266.     CrossRef
  • Ethnomedical knowledge of plants used in alternative medicine to treat hemorrhoidal diseases in Lubumbashi, Haut-Katanga province, Southern Democratic Republic of Congo
    Bashige Chiribagula Valentin, Okusa Ndjolo Philippe, Muhona Melman, Manya Mboni Henry, Bakari Amuri Salvius, Lumbu Simbi Jean Baptiste
    BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty for grade II–IV hemorrhoidal disease in Bangladesh
    Md. Saiful Islam, Abhigan B. Shrestha, Faisal Chowdhury, Md. R.K. Ziko
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(11): 6514.     CrossRef
  • The efficacy of laser haemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) in the treatment of symptomatic haemorrhoidal disease: An observational cohort study
    Nadim H. P. Boerhave, Rutger J. Klicks, Kemal Dogan
    Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(6): 1202.     CrossRef
  • Comparing outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty and LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy in grade II–III hemorrhoidal disease: a retrospective analysis
    Haluk Tümer, Mevlüt Harun Ağca
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2023; 93(7-8): 1885.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the efficacy of LigaSure and laser for grade 2-3 hemorrhoids
    Ali Kemal Taşkin, Bülent Özçetin
    Journal of Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan.2023; 20(4): 33.     CrossRef
  • Laser hemorrhoidoplasty combined with blind hemorrhoidal artery ligation compared to Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in patients with second and third degree piles; a prospective randomized study
    Amir F. Abdelhamid, Mohamed M. Elsheikh, Osama H. Abdraboh
    The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2023; 42(3): 669.     CrossRef
  • Laser hemorrhoidoplasty for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hendry Lie, Evelyn Franca Caesarini, Antonius Agung Purnama, Andry Irawan, Taufik Sudirman, Wifanto Saditya Jeo, Bernardus Parish Budiono, Erik Prabowo, M. Iqbal Rivai, Ryanto Karobuana Sitepu
    Lasers in Medical Science.2022; 37(9): 3621.     CrossRef
Reviews
Optimal anastomotic technique in rectal surgery to prevent anastomotic leakage
Daichi Kitaguchi, Masaaki Ito
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(2):97-105.   Published online January 3, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00787.0112
  • 5,146 View
  • 411 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Complications after colorectal surgery remain inevitable, and anastomotic leakage is one of the most severe and potentially fatal complications. Generally, anastomotic leakage is associated with severe peritonitis, the need for emergency reoperation, and an increased mortality rate. Additionally, particularly after rectal cancer surgery, it has a negative impact on long-term outcomes, including postoperative anorectal function, local recurrence, and survival. To prevent anastomotic leakage, understanding the characteristics of each anastomotic technique and establishing a stable anastomotic procedure are important. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a relatively new advanced surgical access technique for pelvic dissection and facilitates different anastomotic techniques without the need for transabdominal rectal transection. Especially, stapled anastomosis in TaTME, also known as double purse-string circular stapled anastomosis or the single stapling technique (SST), has gained much attention as an alternative to the conventional double stapling technique (DST). In this article, we describe the DST, SST, and hand-sewn anastomosis as anastomotic techniques after rectal surgery, focusing mainly on the differences between conventional anastomotic techniques and SST in TaTME. Furthermore, the blood flow evaluation method for the reconstructive colon before anastomosis, which is extremely important in anastomotic leakage prevention regardless of the anastomotic type, is also described.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Dissection layer selection based on an understanding of pelvic fascial anatomy in transanal total mesorectal excision
    Daichi Kitaguchi, Masaaki Ito
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 375.     CrossRef
  • Successful Clinical Avoidance of Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage through Local Decontamination
    Gerhard Ernst Steyer, Markus Puchinger, Johann Pfeifer
    Antibiotics.2024; 13(1): 79.     CrossRef
  • Combined Robotic Transanal Transection Single-Stapled Technique in Ultralow Rectal Endometriosis Involvement Associated With Parametrial and Vaginal Infiltration
    Gianmarco D'Ancona, Benjamin Merlot, Quentin Denost, Stefano Angioni, Thomas Dennis, Horace Roman
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2024; 31(4): 267.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for the failure of endoscopic balloon dilation to manage anastomotic stricture from colorectal surgery: retrospective cohort study
    Young Il Kim, Seung Wook Hong, Seok-Byung Lim, Dong-Hoon Yang, Eon Bin Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Chang Sik Yu
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(4): 1775.     CrossRef
  • The impact of powered circular staplers on anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal cancer surgeries
    Hayoung Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Young Il Kim, Eun Jung Park, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(10): 6111.     CrossRef
  • Effect of powered circular stapler in colorectal anastomosis after left-sided colic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Andrea Scardino, Carlo Galdino Riva, Luca Sorrentino, Sara Lauricella, Alberto Aiolfi, Matteo Rottoli, Gianluca Bonitta, Marco Vitellaro, Luigi Bonavina, Davide Bona, Michael Kelly, Emanuele Rausa
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Indocyanine Green Dosage for Repetitive Angiography for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
    Gyung Mo Son, Sang-Ho Park, Nam Su Kim, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Myeong-Sook Kwon, Tae Kyun Kim, Eun Hwa Lee, Eun Jung Hwang, Kwang-Ryul Baek
    Medicina.2024; 60(12): 1966.     CrossRef
  • The Safe Values of Quantitative Perfusion Parameters of ICG Angiography Based on Tissue Oxygenation of Hyperspectral Imaging for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study
    Gyung Son, Armaan Nazir, Mi Yun, In Lee, Sun Im, Jae Kwak, Sang-Ho Park, Kwang-Ryul Baek, Ines Gockel
    Biomedicines.2023; 11(7): 2029.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: evidence and challenge
Suk-Hwan Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(4):301-306.   Published online August 29, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00269.0038
  • 2,770 View
  • 134 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Recent advances in the management of rectal cancer have dramatically changed the clinical practice of colorectal surgeons because the main focus of rectal cancer treatment has changed from sphincter-saving to an organ-preserving strategies. Modifying the delivery of systemic chemotherapy to improve patients’ survival is another progress in colorectal cancer management, known as total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). TNT is a new strategy used by colorectal surgeons to improve the quality of life and survival of patients after treatment. TNT poses limitations or obstacles, such as overtreatment issues in patients with stage I rectal cancer. However, considering the quality-of-life issues in patients with low-lying rectal cancer necessitating a permanent colostomy, the indication for TNT will be expanded. This review summarizes the recently conducted clinical trials and foresees future perspectives on TNT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Current Surgical Methods in Local Rectal Excision
    Kristina Šemanjski, Karla Lužaić, Jure Brkić
    Gastrointestinal Tumors.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Tailoring rectal cancer surgery: Surgical approaches and anatomical insights during deep pelvic dissection for optimal outcomes in low‐lying rectal cancer
    Youn Young Park, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2024; 8(5): 761.     CrossRef
  • A nomogram for predicting the overall survival in rectal cancer patients after total neoadjuvant therapy
    Z. Liu, M. He, X. Wang
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of the laparoscopic approach, early closure and preoperative stimulation on outcomes of ileostomy closure after rectal resection
    Andrea Norte, Carmen Martínez, Ana Pasalodos, Ivette Tort, Anna Sánchez, Pilar Hernández, Jesús Bollo, Eduard Maria Targarona
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2024; 102(11): 590.     CrossRef
  • Impact of the laparoscopic approach, early closure and preoperative stimulation on outcomes of ileostomy closure after rectal resection
    Andrea Norte, Carmen Martínez, Ana Pasalodos, Ivette Tort, Anna Sánchez, Pilar Hernández, Jesús Bollo, Eduard Maria Targarona
    Cirugía Española.2024; 102(11): 590.     CrossRef
  • Reply to the Letter to the Editor ‘Circulating tumor DNA after definitive therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer’ by Drs Sorscher and Rocha Lima
    A. Bercz, J.J. Smith, P.B. Romesser
    Annals of Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials
Sergey Sychev, Aleksey Ponomarenko, Stanislav Chernyshov, Mikhail Alekseev, Zaman Mamedli, Dmitriy Kuzmichev, Andrey Polynovskiy, Evgeny Rybakov
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(4):289-300.   Published online April 11, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00920.0131
  • 4,427 View
  • 209 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
To assess the efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for rectal carcinoma in comparison with conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
Methods
A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was done using NetMetaXL and WinBUGS. This study was registered in PROSPERO on March 3, 2022 (No. CRD-42022307867).
Results
Outcomes of 2,719 patients from 10 randomized trials between 2010 and 2022 were selected. Of these 1,191 (44%) had conventional long-course CRT (50–54 Gy) and capecitabine, 506 (18%) had induction chemotherapy followed by CRT (50–54 Gy) and capecitabine (iTNT), 230 (9%) had long-course CRT (50–54 Gy) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (cTNT), and 792 (29%) undergone modified short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy) with subsequent chemotherapy (mTNT). Total pathologic complete response (pCR) was 20% in the iTNT group, 21% in the mTNT group, 22% in the cTNT group, and 12% in the CRT group. Statistically significant difference in pCR rates was detected when comparing iTNT with CRT (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% credible interval [CrI], 1.06–2.8), mTNT with CRT (OR, 1.90; 95% CrI, 1.25–2.74), and cTNT with CRT groups (OR, 2.54; 95% CrI, 1.26–5.08). No differences were found in R0 resection rates. No significant difference was found in long-term outcomes.
Conclusion
The early administration of systemic chemotherapy in the TNT regimen has improved short-term outcomes, though long-term results are underreported. Randomized trials with survival as the endpoint are necessary to evaluate the possible advantages of TNT modes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Predictive Value of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Ki-67 for Pathological Response to Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer
    Amrallah Mohammed, Adel Bakry, Shimaa Gharieb, Amira Hanna, Ahmed Obaya, Waleed Abdelhady, Abdelrahman Metwalli
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2024; 55(2): 869.     CrossRef
  • Changes in clinical guidelines for the treatment of colorectal cancer in 2024
    S. S. Gordeev, M. Yu. Fedyanin, M. V. Chernykh, Ye. G. Rubakov, A. M. Karachun, A. A. Nevolskikh, A. A. Tryakin, Z. Z. Mamedli
    Surgery and Oncology.2024; 14(1): 21.     CrossRef
  • Oncological Outcomes and Response Rate After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Induction vs. Consolidation Chemotherapy vs. Standard Chemoradiation
    Sergei Bedrikovetski, Luke Traeger, Warren Seow, Nagendra N. Dudi-Venkata, Sudarsha Selva-Nayagam, Michael Penniment, Tarik Sammour
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2024; 23(4): 326.     CrossRef
  • Executive Summary of the American Radium Society on Appropriate Use Criteria for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines
    Christopher J. Anker, Leila T. Tchelebi, J. Eva Selfridge, Salma K. Jabbour, Dmitriy Akselrod, Peter Cataldo, Gerard Abood, Jordan Berlin, Christopher L. Hallemeier, Krishan R. Jethwa, Ed Kim, Timothy Kennedy, Percy Lee, Navesh Sharma, William Small, Vone
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2024; 120(4): 946.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280.     CrossRef
  • A randomized phase 3 trial of total neoadjuvant therapy (induction chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and surgery) vs. standard long-term chemoradiation therapy (neoadjuvant chemoradiation, surgery, and adjuvant chemothera
    Freshte Foroughi, Seyed Alireza Javadinia, Roham Salek
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients
    Won Beom Jung
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Predisposing factors for high output stoma in patients with a diverting loop ileostomy after colorectal surgeries
Dan Assaf, David Hazzan, Almog Ben-Yaacov, Shachar Laks, Douglas Zippel, Lior Segev
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(2):168-174.   Published online August 6, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00241.0034
  • 4,792 View
  • 214 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
One of the most common ileostomy-related complications is high output stoma (HOS) which causes significant fluids and electrolytes disturbances. We aimed to analyze the incidence, severity, and risk factors for readmission for HOS.
Methods
We reviewed all patients who underwent loop ileostomy closure in a single institution between 2010 and 2020. Patients that were readmitted for dehydration due to HOS during the time interval between the creation and the closure of the stoma were identified and divided into a study (HOS) group. The remaining patients constructed the control group.
Results
A total of 307 patients were included in this study, out of which, 41 patients were readmitted 73 times (23.7% readmission rate) for the HOS group, and the remaining 266 patients constructed the control group. Multivariate analysis identified; advanced American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (PS) classification, elevated baseline creatinine, and open surgery as risk factors for HOS. Renal function worsened among the entire cohort between the construction of the stoma to its closure (mean creatinine of 0.82 vs. 0.96, P<0.0001).
Conclusion
Loop ileostomy formation is associated with a substantial readmission rate for dehydration as a result of HOS, and increasing the risk for renal impairment during the duration of the diversion. We identified advanced ASA PS classification, open surgery, and elevated baseline creatinine as predictors for HOS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • High output stoma after surgery for rectal cancer - a risk factor for low anterior resection syndrome?
    Xuena Zhang, Qingyu Meng, Jianna Du, Zhongtao Tian, Yinju Li, Bin Yu, Wenbo Niu
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A review of chyme reinfusion: new tech solutions for age old problems
    Chen Liu, Sameer Bhat, Ian Bissett, Gregory O'Grady
    Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand.2024; 54(2): 161.     CrossRef
  • Knowledge, attitudes, practices and associated factors regarding high output stoma of ileostomy among colorectal surgical nurses: a multicentre cross-sectional study
    Qing Zhang, Jianan Sun, Dongxue Wang, Quan Wang, Haiyan Hu
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Morphological predictors of water-electrolyte disorders in patients with preventive ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer
    A.I. Maksimkin, Z.A. Bagatelia, V.M. Kulushev, E.N. Gordienko, M.S. Lebedko, S.S. Anikina, E.P. Shin
    Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery.2024; (4): 16.     CrossRef
  • The Frequency of Stoma-Related Readmissions After Emergency and Elective Ileostomy Formation: The Leicester Experience
    Ting-Wei Wu, Wen Yuan Chung, Hui En Jewel Ng, Ashley Yap, Konstantinos Baronos, Deepak Paul, Christopher P Neal, David Bowrey
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictors of High-output Stoma in Diverting Ileostomy for Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Hiroaki Uehara, Hitoshi Kameyama, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Yuya Enoki
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2023; 76(3): 286.     CrossRef
  • Morpho-functional aspects of various parts of the intestine and risk factors associated with the preventive ileostomy (review)
    A. I. Maksimkin, Z. A. Bagatelia, E. N. Gordienko, E. B. Emelyanova, D. M. Sakaeva
    Koloproktologia.2023; 22(4): 147.     CrossRef
  • Obstructive and secretory complications of diverting ileostomy
    Shingo Tsujinaka, Hideyuki Suzuki, Tomoya Miura, Yoshihiro Sato, Chikashi Shibata
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(47): 6732.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life
Angelina Di Re, Salam Tooza, Jason Diab, Charbel Karam, Mina Sarofim, Kevin Ooi, Catherine Turner, Daniel Kozman, David Blomberg, Matthew Morgan
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(5):395-401.   Published online April 14, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00073.0010
  • 4,100 View
  • 135 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Anastomotic leak (AL) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication after rectal resection. We aim to provide an updated assessment of bowel function and quality of life after AL, as well as associated short- and long-term outcomes.
Methods
A retrospective audit of all rectal resections performed at a colorectal unit and associated private hospitals over the past 10 years was performed. Relevant demographic, operative, and histopathological data were collected. A prospective survey was performed regarding patients’ quality of life and fecal continence. These patients were matched with nonAL patients who completed the same survey.
Results
One hundred patients (out of 1,394 resections) were included. AL was contained in 66.0%, not contained in 10.0%, and only anastomotic stricture in 24.0%. Management was antibiotics only in 39.0%, percutaneous drainage in 9.0%, operative abdominal drainage in 19.0%, transrectal drainage in 6.0%, combination of percutaneous drainage and transrectal drainage in 2.0%, and combination abdominal/transrectal drainage in 1.0%. The 1-year stoma rate was 15.0%. Overall, mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Instrument scores were higher for AL patients than their matched counterparts (8.06±10.5 vs. 2.92±4.92, P=0.002). Patients with an AL had a mean EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) of 76.23±19.85; this was lower than the matched mean EQ-VAS for non-AL patients of 81.64±18.07, although not statistically significant (P=0.180).
Conclusion
The majority of AL patients in this study were managed with antibiotics only. AL was associated with higher fecal incontinence scores in the long-term; however, this did not equate to lower quality of life scores.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Cancer Surgery on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review
    Anke H.C. Gielen, Danique J.I. Heuvelings, Patricia Sylla, Yu-Ting van Loon, Jarno Melenhorst, Nicole D. Bouvy, Merel L. Kimman, Stephanie O. Breukink
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(2): 154.     CrossRef
  • Fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green for low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective before and after study
    J. Charbonneau, É. Papillon-Dion, R. Brière, N. Singbo, A. Legault-Dupuis, S. Drolet, F. Rouleau-Fournier, P. Bouchard, A. Bouchard, C. Thibault, F. Letarte
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Post‐Treatment Combined Lifestyle Interventions on Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Patients – A Systematic Review
    Anke H. C. Gielen, Britt J. M. Thomassen, Tim J. Bult, Jarno Melenhorst, Merel L. Kimman, Stephanie O. Breukink
    Lifestyle Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Serum nutritional predictive biomarkers and risk assessment for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patients
    Paerhati Shayimu, Maitisaidi Awula, Chang-Yong Wang, Rexida Jiapaer, Yi-Peng Pan, Zhi-Min Wu, Yi Chen, Ze-Liang Zhao
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(10): 3142.     CrossRef
  • Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Indocyanine Green Dosage for Repetitive Angiography for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
    Gyung Mo Son, Sang-Ho Park, Nam Su Kim, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Myeong-Sook Kwon, Tae Kyun Kim, Eun Hwa Lee, Eun Jung Hwang, Kwang-Ryul Baek
    Medicina.2024; 60(12): 1966.     CrossRef
  • Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients
    Won Beom Jung
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527.     CrossRef
The importance of topical metronidazole in the treatment of acute anal fissure: a double-blind study controlled for prospective randomization
Tuba Mert
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(2):131-138.   Published online January 18, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00675.0096
  • 4,798 View
  • 269 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Acute anal fissure, a disease characterized by severe pain in the anorectal area, reduces quality of life and becomes chronic absent appropriate treatment. More recently, anaerobic infections have been noted as contributive to etiopathogenesis. This study investigates topical metronidazole’s effect in the treatment of acute anal fissure.
Methods
Our prospective randomized controlled double-blind study included 2 groups of 100 patients older than 18 years from our General Surgery Clinic with anal fissure complaints for less than 8 weeks. Topical diltiazem treatment was started in group 1, and topical diltiazem and metronidazole treatment in group 2. Pain levels were evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and recovery status was evaluated by physical examination findings ab initio and at the 1st, 4th, and 6th weeks. VAS score levels, demographic, clinical, and recovery status were then compared.
Results
There was no difference between the groups as to age, sex, pain on defecation, bleeding, constipation, and duration of pain, bleeding and constipation (P>0.05). From week 1, fissure epithelialization and healing rates were higher in group 2 (P<0.001); group 2 VAS score levels were lower than in group 1 (P<0.001) and achieved by group 1 only in week 4 (P=0.073).
Conclusion
Adding topical metronidazole to treatment reduces the duration and severity of pain, shortens healing time, and increases the healing rate.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy of local metronidazole with glyceryl trinitrate versus topical glyceryl trinitrate alone in the treatment of acute anal fissure: a randomized clinical trial
    Hesham M. Elgendy, Ahmed AbdelMawla, Ahmed F. Hussein
    The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2024; 43(1): 304.     CrossRef
  • Belgian consensus guideline on the management of anal fissures
    P Roelandt, G Bislenghi, G Coremans, D De Looze, M.A. Denis, H De Schepper, P Dewint, J Geldof, I Gijsen, N Komen, H Ruymbeke, J Stijns, M Surmont, D Van de Putte, S Van den Broeck, B Van Geluwe, J Wyndaele
    Acta Gastro Enterologica Belgica.2024; 87(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Avances terapéuticos en el abordaje de las fisuras anales: explorando la sinergia entre Farmacología y Nanotecnología
    Carlos Ostwaldo Pazmiño-Chiluiza, María Luisa González Rodríguez
    Ars Pharmaceutica (Internet).2024; 65(4): 409.     CrossRef
  • Local plus oral antibiotics and strict avoidance of constipation is effective and helps prevents surgery in most cases of anal fissure
    Pankaj Garg, Vipul D. Yagnik, Kaushik Bhattacharya
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(2): 188.     CrossRef
  • COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EFFICACY OF TOPICAL METRONIDAZOLE, TOPICAL NITROGLYCERINE, AND TOPICAL DILTIAZEM IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC ANAL FISSURE
    PURSHOTAM DASS GUPTA, FAHAD TAUHEED, ANURAG SARASWAT, Karthik P
    Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research.2023; : 141.     CrossRef
  • The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of anal fissure
    Antonio Brillantino, Adolfo Renzi, Pasquale Talento, Francesca Iacobellis, Luigi Brusciano, Luigi Monaco, Domenico Izzo, Alfredo Giordano, Michele Pinto, Corrado Fantini, Marcello Gasparrini, Michele Schiano Di Visconte, Francesca Milazzo, Giovanni Ferrer
    BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparative Efficacy of Topical Metronidazole and Glyceryl Trinitrate Versus Topical Glyceryl Trinitrate Alone in the Treatment of Acute Anal Fissure: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    M Hasaan Shahid, Sidra Javed, Saryia Javed, Anwar Zeb Khan, Adeel Kaiser, Reda H Mithany
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
Radiofrequency ablation (Rafaelo Procedure) for the treatment of hemorrhoids: a case series in the United Kingdom
Sarah Hassan, Daniel McGrath, Richard Barnes, Simon Middleton
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(2):164-167.   Published online August 18, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00276.0039
  • 5,006 View
  • 297 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Hemorrhoidal disease remains a common condition that can have a significant effect on a patient’s quality of life. Various methods have been introduced over the years; however, their overall success rates remain low. Although the traditional Milligan Morgan technique is effective, the associated pain level prevents it from being an attractive form of treatment. This study was devised to assess the safety and efficacy associated with a novel minimally invasive approach, radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
Methods
Forty-two patients underwent RFA at a single center, by 1 of 2 surgeons. This was performed under local anesthetic and sedation. Outcomes including postoperative pain levels, recurrence rates, and patient satisfaction scores were recorded and analyzed using medians and interquartile ranges
Results
The median postoperative pain score was 2.5/10 (interquartile range [IQR], 0–4.5) and the overall patient satisfaction score was 9 out of 10 (IQR, 6.5–10). Recurrence rates (6–12 months following the procedure) were low at 12% and all patients reported milder symptoms at recurrence. There were no serious adverse complications
Conclusion
The results from this case series supports other limited data in concluding that RFA is a safe and effective method in the treatment of hemorrhoids and patients report a high level of satisfaction following

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Radiofrequency Ablation for Internal Hemorrhoids: A Case Series
    Kean leong Koay, Nabil Mohammad Azmi, Soma Chandrakanthan, Nurafdzillah Abdul Rahman, Diana Melissa Dualim
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What can patients expect in the long term from radiofrequency thermocoagulation of hemorrhoids on bleeding, prolapse, quality of life, and recurrence: “no pain, no gain” or “no pain but a gain”?
    Jean-Michel Didelot, Benjamin Raux, Romain Didelot, Franz Rudler, Aurelien Mulliez, Anthony Buisson, Armando Abergel, Pierre Blanc
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 481.     CrossRef
  • Protocol for the ORION trial (RadiO fRequency ablatION for haemorrhoids): a randomised controlled trial
    C. Girling, M. J. Lee, D. Vimalchandran, D. J. Jayne, S. Stancliffe, A. Wailoo, M. Bradburn, D. Hind, M. Bursnall, L. K. Robinson, S. R. Brown
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(2): 117.     CrossRef
  • The role of the Rafaelo procedure in the management of hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Prokopis Christodoulou, Ioannis Baloyiannis, Konstantinos Perivoliotis, Dimitrios Symeonidis, George Tzovaras
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(2): 103.     CrossRef
  • Radiofrequency thermocoagulation of haemorrhoids: learning curve of a novel approach
    Valentin Butnari, Ahmer Mansuri, Sandeep Kaul, Veeranna Shatkar, Richard Boulton
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • French multicentre prospective evaluation of radiofrequency ablation in the management of haemorrhoidal disease
    A. Laurain, D. Bouchard, J.-M. Rouillon, P. Petit, A. Liddo, B. Vinson Bonnet, A. Venara, J.-M. Didelot, G. Bonnaud, A. Senéjoux, T. Higuero, P. Delasalle, A.-L. Tarrerias, F. Devulder, A. Castinel, C. Thomas, H. Pillant Le Moult, C. Favreau-Weltzer, L. A
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(10): 873.     CrossRef
  • Early and midterm results of radiofrequency ablation (Rafaelo® procedure) for third-degree haemorrhoids: a prospective, two-centre study
    S. Tolksdorf, D. Tübergen, C. Vivaldi, M. Pisek, F. Klug, M. Kemmerling, H. Schäfer
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2022; 26(6): 479.     CrossRef
Guideline
Colorectal cancer
Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment
Hyo Seon Ryu, Hyun Jung Kim, Woong Bae Ji, Byung Chang Kim, Ji Hun Kim, Sung Kyung Moon, Sung Il Kang, Han Deok Kwak, Eun Sun Kim, Chang Hyun Kim, Tae Hyung Kim, Gyoung Tae Noh, Byung-Soo Park, Hyeung-Min Park, Jeong Mo Bae, Jung Hoon Bae, Ni Eun Seo, Chang Hoon Song, Mi Sun Ahn, Jae Seon Eo, Young Chul Yoon, Joon-Kee Yoon, Kyung Ha Lee, Kyung Hee Lee, Kil-Yong Lee, Myung Su Lee, Sung Hak Lee, Jong Min Lee, Ji Eun Lee, Han Hee Lee, Myong Hoon Ihn, Je-Ho Jang, Sun Kyung Jeon, Kum Ju Chae, Jin-Ho Choi, Dae Hee Pyo, Gi Won Ha, Kyung Su Han, Young Ki Hong, Chang Won Hong, Jung-Myun Kwak, Korean Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary Committee
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):89-113.   Published online April 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00059.0008
  • 3,937 View
  • 276 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients’ values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Optimal extent of lymph node dissection in clinical early-stage right colon cancer: a retrospective analysis
    Hyeung-min Park, Jaram Lee, Soo Young Lee, Suk Hee Heo, Yong Yeon Jeong, Hyeong Rok Kim, Chang Hyun Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2025; 108(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Microsatellite Instability on the Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of Colon Cancer and the Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative Abdominal CT Scans
    Rıdvan Yavuz, Orhan Aras, Hüseyin Çiyiltepe, Onur İlkay Dinçer, Ahmet Şükrü Alparslan, Tebessüm Çakır
    Diagnostics.2025; 15(2): 190.     CrossRef
  • 2023 Korean Multidisciplinary Guidelines for Colon Cancer Management: Summary of Radiological Points
    Nieun Seo, Hyo Seon Ryu, Myungsu Lee, Sun Kyung Jeon, Kum Ju Chae, Joon-Kee Yoon, Kyung Su Han, Ji Eun Lee, Jae Seon Eo, Young Chul Yoon, Sung Kyung Moon, Hyun Jung Kim, Jung-Myun Kwak
    Korean Journal of Radiology.2024; 25(9): 769.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping on Improving Diagnostic Values of CT D3 Lymph Node Staging for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Mi Sook Yun, ChangYeop Kim, In Young Lee, Su Bum Park, Dong-Hoon Shin, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3496.     CrossRef
  • Nuclear medicine based multimodal molecular imaging facilitates precision medicine for gastrointestinal tumors
    Jing Zhao, Fei Wang, Rong-Fu Wang
    World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2024; 32(10): 727.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Early Oral Feeding on Postoperative Outcomes after Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Soo Young Lee, Eon Chul Han
    Digestive Surgery.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Colorectal cancer
International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
Audrius Dulskas, Philip F. Caushaj, Domas Grigoravicius, Liu Zheng, Richard Fortunato, Joseph W. Nunoo-Mensah, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(4):307-314.   Published online October 11, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00255.0036
  • 4,106 View
  • 117 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Rectal cancer treatment has a wide range of possible approaches from radical extirpative surgery to nonoperative watchful waiting following chemoradiotherapy, with or without, additional chemotherapy. Our goal was to assess the personal opinion of active practicing surgeons on rectal cancer treatment if he/she was the patient.
Methods
A panel of the International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ISUCRS) selected 10 questions that were included in a questionnaire that included other items including demographics. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to ISUCRS fellows and other surgeons included in our database and remained open from April 16 to 28, 2020.
Results
One hundred sixty-three specialists completed the survey. The majority of surgeons (n=65, 39.9%) chose the minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery for their personal treatment of rectal cancer. For low-lying rectal cancer T1 and T2, the treatment choice was standard chemoradiation+local excision (n=60, 36.8%) followed by local excision±chemoradiotherapy if needed (n=55, 33.7%). In regards to locally advanced low rectal cancer T3 or greater, the preference of the responders was for laparoscopic surgery (n=65, 39.9%). We found a statistically significant relationship between surgeons’ age and their preference for minimally invasive techniques demonstrating an age-based bias on senior surgeons’ inclination toward open approach.
Conclusion
Our survey reveals an age-based preference by surgeons for minimally invasive surgical techniques as well as organ-preserving techniques for personal treatment of treating rectal cancer. Only 1/4 of specialists do adhere to the international guidelines for treating early rectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Performance reporting design in artificial intelligence studies using image-based TNM staging and prognostic parameters in rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Minsung Kim, Taeyong Park, Bo Young Oh, Min Jeong Kim, Bum-Joo Cho, Il Tae Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients With Stage ⅡA Rectal Cancer Above the Peritoneal Reflection Who Did Not Undergo Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Hyo Seon Ryu, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Yong Sang Hong, Tae Won Kim, Chang Sik Yu
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2024; 23(4): 392.     CrossRef
  • Comparative analysis of organ preservation attempt and radical surgery in clinical T2N0 mid to low rectal cancer
    Hyeung-min Park, Jaram Lee, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients
    Won Beom Jung
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a retrospective cohort study of anastomotic complications
Jonathan Frigault, Samuel Avoine, Sébastien Drolet, François Letarte, Alexandre Bouchard, Jean-Pierre Gagné, Claude Thibault, Roger C. Grégoire, Naomee Jutras Bouthillette, Maude Gosselin, Philippe Bouchard
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(2):147-155.   Published online March 29, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00983.0140
  • 3,616 View
  • 165 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) can be performed with an intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) or extracorporeal anastomosis (EA). It is not clear which technique is best. This study evaluated the impact of each anastomosis technique on perioperative safety and postoperative evolution.
Methods
We performed a retrospective study at a tertiary colorectal surgery center. All patients who had an elective LRH from 2015 to 2019 were analyzed according to the anastomosis technique used.
Results
In total, 285 patients were included in the study. IA was performed in 64 patients (22.5%). Mean operative time was longer in the patients with IA (IA, 160±31 minutes vs. EA, 138±42 minutes; P<0.001). No differences were observed in intraoperative complications, time to first bowel movement, length of stay, reoperation, or rehospitalization. Time to first flatus was longer in the patients with IA (P=0.049). At 30 days after surgery, there were no differences in the frequency of anastomotic leak (IA, 0% vs. EA, 2.3%; P=0.59), bleeding (IA, 3.1% vs. EA, 2.7%; P>0.99), or intraabdominal abscess (IA, 0% vs. EA, 0.5%; P>0.99). During follow-up, we noted more incisional hernias in patients with EA (IA, 1.6% vs. EA, 11.3%; P=0.01) and a trend toward more hernia in patients with EA in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 7.13; P=0.06). Anastomosis technique had no influence on recurrence.
Conclusion
For LRH, both IA and EA are safe, with a low incidence of complications when performed by experienced surgeons. IA may be associated with a lower incidence of incisional hernia.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Konstantinos Perivoliotis, George Tzovaras, Konstantinos Tepetes, Ioannis Baloyiannis
    Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(2): 375.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness and safety of self-pulling and latter transection reconstruction in totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy
    Fuyu Yang, Fan He, Chenglin Tang, Defei Chen, Junjie Xiong, Yu Zou, Saed Woraikat, Kun Qian, Hui Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Single-Center Experiences: A Comparison of Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Anastomosis Outcomes in Right Hemicolectomy
    Audrey Kim, Munyaradzi G Nyandoro, Linda Vu, Ruben Rajan, Abraham Jacob
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparing extracorporeal, semi-extracorporeal, and intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: introducing a bridging technique for colorectal surgeons
    Hye Jung Cho, Jong Woo Kim, Woo Ram Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2024; 107(1): 42.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Specimen Extraction Site on Postoperative Incisional Hernia after Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy
    Josh A Johnson, Andrea Mesiti, Margo Herre, Cyrus Farzaneh, Ying Li, Wini Zambare, Joseph Carmichael, Alessio Pigazzi, Mehraneh D Jafari
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2024; 239(2): 107.     CrossRef
  • Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for right colon cancer surgery
    Seong Kyu Baek
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(3): 91.     CrossRef
Review
Colorectal cancer
Survival outcomes of salvage surgery in the watch-and-wait approach for rectal cancer with clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Wenjie Lin, Ian Jun Yan Wee, Isaac Seow-En, Aik Yong Chok, Emile Kwong-Wei Tan
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):447-456.   Published online December 28, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01221.0174
  • 3,076 View
  • 159 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the outcomes of the watch-and-wait (WW) approach versus radical surgery (RS) in rectal cancers with clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Methods
This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. Major databases were searched to identify relevant articles. WW and RS were compared through meta-analyses of pooled proportions. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence, and distant metastasis rates. Pooled salvage surgery rates and outcomes were also collected. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was employed to assess the risk of bias.
Results
Eleven studies including 1,112 rectal cancer patients showing cCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation were included. Of these patients, 378 were treated nonoperatively with WW, 663 underwent RS, and 71 underwent local excision. The 2-year OS (risk ratio [RR], 0.95; P = 0.94), 5-year OS (RR, 2.59; P = 0.25), and distant metastasis rates (RR, 1.05; P = 0.80) showed no significant differences between WW and RS. Local recurrence was more frequent in the WW group (RR, 6.93; P < 0.001), and 78.4% of patients later underwent salvage surgery (R0 resection rate, 97.5%). The 2-year DFS (RR, 1.58; P = 0.05) and 5-year DFS (RR, 2.07; P = 0.02) were higher among RS cases. However, after adjustment for R0 salvage surgery, DFS showed no significant between-group difference (RR, 0.82; P = 0.41).
Conclusion
Local recurrence rates are higher for WW than RS, but complete salvage surgery is often possible with similar long-term outcomes. WW is a viable strategy for rectal cancer with cCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, but further research is required to improve patient selection.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Advancing Personalized Medicine in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Francesco Giulio Sullo, Alessandro Passardi, Chiara Gallio, Chiara Molinari, Giorgia Marisi, Eleonora Pozzi, Leonardo Solaini, Alessandro Bittoni
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(9): 2562.     CrossRef
  • Tailoring rectal cancer surgery: Surgical approaches and anatomical insights during deep pelvic dissection for optimal outcomes in low‐lying rectal cancer
    Youn Young Park, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2024; 8(5): 761.     CrossRef
  • Combined Transanal and Laparoscopic Approach for Full-Thickness Local Excision of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following Near-Complete Response after Chemotherapy
    Joshua S. H. Lim, Si-Lin Koo, Iain Beehuat Tan, Isaac Seow-En
    World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2024; 13(3): 95.     CrossRef
  • Watch‐and‐Wait Approach Following Neoadjuvant Chemo‐Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Single‐Center Cohort Study
    Georgi Kalev, Sylvia Buettner, Tianzuo Zhan, Ralf‐Dieter Hofheinz, Judit Boda‐Heggemann, Christoph Reissfelder, Steffen Seyfried, Georgi Vassilev, Julia Hardt
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-label, Nonrandomized Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Liposomal Irinotecan With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin, Followed by Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer in a Watch-and-Wait Program
    César Muñoz, María-C. Riesco Martinez, Lisardo Ugidos, Pilar García-Alfonso, Rafael Alvarez-Gallego, Paloma Peinado, Carmen Toledano, Luka Mihic-Góngora, Justo Gabriel Ortega Anselmi, Enrique Sanz Garcia, Emilio Vicente, Yolanda Quijano, Hipólito J. Durán
    American Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
Technical Note
Transanal opening of the intersphincteric space (TROPIS): a novel procedure on the horizon to effectively manage high complex anal fistulas
Pankaj Garg, Anvesha Mongia
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):74-81.   Published online October 24, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01263.0180
  • 3,104 View
  • 254 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Anal fistulas, especially complex and high fistulas, are difficult to manage. The transanal opening of the intersphincteric space (TROPIS) procedure was first described in 2017, and a high success rate of over 90% was reported in high complex fistulas. Since then, more studies and even a meta-analysis have corroborated the high efficacy of this procedure in high fistulas. Conventionally, the main focus was to close the internal (primary) opening for the fistula to heal. However, most complex fistulas have a component of the fistula tract in the intersphincteric plane. This component is like an abscess (sepsis) in a closed space (2 muscle layers). It is a well-known fact that in the presence of sepsis, healing by secondary intention leads to better results than attempting to heal by primary intention. Therefore, TROPIS is the first procedure in which, instead of closing the internal opening, the opening is widened by laying open the fistula tract in the intersphincteric plane so that healing can occur by secondary intention. Although the drainage of high intersphincteric abscesses through the transanal route was described 5 decades ago, the routine utilization of TROPIS for the definitive management of high complex fistulas was first described in 2017. The external anal sphincter (EAS) is completely spared in TROPIS, as the fistula tract on either side of the EAS is managed separately—inner (medial) to the EAS by laying open the intersphincteric space and outer (lateral) to the EAS by curettage or excision.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of complex anal fistula
    Pankaj Garg, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Vipul D. Yagnik, G. Mahak
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 321.     CrossRef
  • Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches in colorectal surgery
    Bigyan B. Mainali, James J. Yoo, Mitchell R. Ladd
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 336.     CrossRef
  • Achieving a high cure rate in complex anal fistulas: understanding the conceptual role of the Garg cardinal principles
    Pankaj Garg, Nicola Clemente, James C. W. Khaw
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 521.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Evaluation Between Cutting of the Intersphincteric Space vs Cutting Seton in High Anal Fistula: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jiawei Qin, Yanlan Wu, Xueping Zheng, Kunlan Wu, Gongjian Dai, Yanyan Tan, Xu Yang, Yuqing Sun
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2024; 239(6): 563.     CrossRef
  • Invited Commentary: The Quest for the Panacea Treatment for Anal Fistula
    Steven D Wexner
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2024; 239(6): 573.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP