Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Most cited articles

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Most cited articles
138 Most cited articles
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles

From articles published in Annals of Coloproctology during the past two years (2022 ~ ).

Review
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Colorectal cancer,Prognosis,Biomarker & risk factor
Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer
Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(2):97-108.   Published online March 29, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.01004.0143
  • 5,375 View
  • 194 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 20 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
We aimed to review whether pretreatment inflammatory markers reflect the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colon cancer, rectal cancer, colon and rectal cancers, and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We found that pretreatment complete blood count and blood chemistry tests reflect short-term and long-term oncological outcomes in patients with CRC. Specifically, in patients with colon cancer, hypoalbuminemia was associated with worse postoperative morbidity, mortality, and inferior survival. In patients with rectal cancer, elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and thrombocytosis were associated with postoperative complications, poor overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). A high C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) was associated with poor OS and DFS. In patients with metastatic CRC, increased NLR and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were associated with poor OS, DFS, and progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, high CAR and a low albumin/globulin ratio on blood chemistry tests were associated with poor OS and PFS. Although universal cut-off values were not available, various types of pretreatment laboratory markers could be utilized as adjuncts to predict prognosis in patients with CRC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • THE ROLE OF SERUM MIDKINE IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS OF THE COLORECTAL CARCINOMA
    Ali H. Abd-Allah, Haider A. Jabbar, Mazen J. Ibrahim
    Military Medical Science Letters.2024; 93(3): 274.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the efficacy and safety of single-port versus multi-port robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis
    Hye Jin Kim, Gyu-Seog Choi, Jun Seok Park, Soo Yeun Park, Seung Ho Song, Sung Min Lee, Min Hye Jeong
    Surgery.2024; 175(2): 297.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of Timely Initiation and Completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II/III Colorectal Adenocarcinoma
    Said Alnajjar, Sami Shoucair, Anyelin Almanzar, Kan Zheng, David Lisle, Vinay Gupta
    The American Surgeon™.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Associations of lifestyle characteristics with circulating immune markers in the general population based on NHANES 1999 to 2014
    Linfen Guo, Yating Huang, Jing He, Deng Li, Wei Li, Haitao Xiao, Xuewen Xu, Yange Zhang, Ru Wang
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer with intraoperative use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging
    Tatsunosuke Harada, Masakatsu Numata, Shota Izukawa, Yosuke Atsumi, Keisuke Kazama, Sho Sawazaki, Teni Godai, Hiroyuki Mushiake, Nobuhiro Sugano, Mamoru Uchiyama, Akio Higuchi, Hiroshi Tamagawa, Yusuke Suwa, Jun Watanabe, Tsutomu Sato, Chikara Kunisaki, A
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(8): 4236.     CrossRef
  • The conditional recurrence-free survival after R0 hepatectomy for locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A competing risk analysis based on inflammation-nutritional status
    Guizhong Huang, Pu Xi, Zehui Yao, Chongyu Zhao, Xiaohui Li, Xiaojun Lin
    Heliyon.2024; 10(13): e33931.     CrossRef
  • Predictive value of flexible proctosigmoidoscopy and laboratory findings for complete clinical responses after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Alireza Hadizadeh, Hamed Kazemi-Khaledi, Mohammad-Sadegh Fazeli, Seyed-Mohsen Ahmadi-Tafti, Amir Keshvari, Reza Akbari-Asbagh, Mohammad-Reza Keramati, Alireza Kazemeini, Amir-Reza Fazeli, Behnam Behboudi, Mohammadamin Parsaei
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical significance of positive resection margin for patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors within 20 mm following initial endoscopic resection: A multi-center study
    Mengping Duan, Zhanzhen Liu, Yan Qiao, Pinzhu Huang, Hao Xie, Wei Xiao, Shuangling Luo, Zhuochao Xie, Qiufeng Sun, Liwei Wang, Taixuan Wan, Zhihong Zhang, Huashan Liu, Haoqi Zheng, Yebohao Zhou, Dongxu Lei, Yunxing Shi, Sichong Lai, Ziwei Zhou, Fujin Ye,
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 50(11): 108651.     CrossRef
  • Machine-Learning Algorithms Using Systemic Inflammatory Markers to Predict the Oncologic Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer After Surgery
    Songsoo Yang, Hyosoon Jang, In Kyu Park, Hye Sun Lee, Kang Young Lee, Ga Eul Oh, Chihyun Park, Jeonghyun Kang
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(13): 8717.     CrossRef
  • Predictive and prognostic value of inflammatory markers in locally advanced rectal cancer (PILLAR) – A multicentric analysis by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Gastrointestinal Study Group
    Giuditta Chiloiro, Angela Romano, Silvia Mariani, Gabriella Macchia, Diana Giannarelli, Luciana Caravatta, Pierfrancesco Franco, Luca Boldrini, Alessandra Arcelli, Almalina Bacigalupo, Liliana Belgioia, Antonella Fontana, Elisa Meldolesi, Giampaolo Montes
    Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology.2023; 39: 100579.     CrossRef
  • A Novel Prognostic Index for Metastatic Colon Cancer: The Prognostic Immune Nutritional Index
    Erkan Kayikcioglu, Gokce Iscan
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Combining prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a valuable prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with stage I–III colorectal cancer
    Harin Kim, Dong-Min Shin, Jae-Hoon Lee, Eun-Suk Cho, Hye Sun Lee, Su-Jin Shin, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Jeonghyun Kang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development of preoperative and postoperative machine learning models to predict the recurrence of huge hepatocellular carcinoma following surgical resection
    Qinghua Zhang, Guoxu Fang, Tiancong Huang, Guangya Wei, Haitao Li, Jingfeng Liu
    Oncology Letters.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancer and Diabetes: Predictive Factors in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
    Mihai Cosmin Stan, Daniel Georgescu, Ciprian Camil Mireștean, Florinel Bădulescu
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(16): 2647.     CrossRef
  • ASO Author Reflections: Could the Application of Machine Learning Enhance the Accuracy of Prognosis Estimation Using Serum Inflammatory Markers in Colorectal Cancer Patients?
    Jeonghyun Kang
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(13): 8522.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic prediction of colorectal cancer using the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio: the importance of inflammatory biomarkers and their association with long-term outcomes
    Chul Seung Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 287.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Significance of Combining Preoperative and Postoperative Albumin-Bilirubin Score in Colorectal Cancer
    Doyoun Kim, Jae-Hoon Lee, Eun-Suk Cho, Su-Jin Shin, Hye Sun Lee, Hwa-Hee Koh, Kang Young Lee, Jeonghyun Kang
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(4): 1261.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
    Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preoperative albumin–bilirubin score as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage III colon cancer
    Hyun Gu Lee, Seok-Byung Lim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Articles
Malignant disease,Colorectal cancer,Epidemiology & etiology
Clinicopathologic characteristics of early-onset colorectal cancer
Kui Seon Park, Young Ki Hong, Yoon Jung Choi, Jung Gu Kang
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(5):362-369.   Published online March 11, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00976.0139
  • 4,817 View
  • 186 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The aim of this study was to analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) under the age of 50 years.
Methods
Between January 2009 and December 2018, 1,126 primary CRC patients were included from National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital. The patients were divided into group 1 (n=111, ≤50 years) and group 2 (n=1,015, >50 years). The clinicopathologic features and prognostic outcomes were compared. In addition, to analyze whether there were any differences of those characteristics in 3 groups, patients aged under 50 years were divided into their 20s, 30s, and 40s.
Results
Group 1 had a slightly higher distribution in the left colon and rectum, lower T stage I and higher T stage IV rate, and a significantly higher distribution in stage N2 than group 2 (30.6%:16.3%, P<0.001). Poor histological differentiation of tumors was significantly high in group 1 (P=0.003). The 5-year survival rate for those in their 30s (69.2%) and 40s (91.6%) was higher than those in their 20s who died immediately after surgery (P<0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was also confirmed to be meaningful for each age group, with 0% in their 20s, 53.8% in their 30s, 79.2% in their 40s (P<0.001).
Conclusion
Although the age was not an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in this study, the early onset group of CRCs is more advanced at the time of diagnosis and has a more aggressive histologic type.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Multiethnic Trends in Early Onset Colorectal Cancer
    Michelle Nagata, Kohei Miyagi, Brenda Y. Hernandez, Scott K. Kuwada
    Cancers.2024; 16(2): 398.     CrossRef
  • Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus R0 resection for resectable colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases and low peritoneal cancer index scores: a collaborative observational study from Korea and Japan
    Daichi Kitaguchi, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Shoma Sasaki, Yuichiro Tsukada, Masaaki Ito
    International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(1): 45.     CrossRef
  • Surgical and survival outcomes of early‐onset colorectal cancer patients: a single‐centre descriptive Australian study
    Celine Garrett, Daniel Steffens, Michael Solomon, Cherry Koh
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(9): 1584.     CrossRef
  • Global epidemiology of early‐onset upper gastrointestinal cancer: trend from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
    Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Thanida Auttapracha, Siwanart Kongarin, Ben Ponvilawan, Daniel M. Simadibrata, Kwanjit Duangsonk, Supitchaya Jaruvattanadilok, Sakditad Saowapa, Kanokphong Suparan, Rashid N. Lui, Suthat Liangpunsakul, Michael B. Wallace, Karn Wija
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(9): 1856.     CrossRef
  • Early onset metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia
    A. Jalali, S. Smith, G. Kim, H. Wong, M. Lee, J. Yeung, M. Loft, R. Wong, J.D. Shapiro, S. Kosmider, J. Tie, S. Ananda, B. Ma, M. Burge, R. Jennens, B. Lee, J. Johns, L. Lim, A. Dean, L. Nott, P. Gibbs
    Cancer Treatment and Research Communications.2024; 40: 100827.     CrossRef
  • The prognostic significance of clinicopathological characteristics in early-onset versus late-onset colorectal cancer liver metastases
    Yi-Tong Li, Xiang-Yu Wang, Bo Zhang, Bao-Rui Tao, Zhen-Mei Chen, Xiao-Chen Ma, Jia-Hao Han, Chong Zhang, Rui Zhang, Jin-Hong Chen
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical implication of tissue carcinoembryonic antigen expression in association with serum carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer
    Abdulmohsin Fawzi Aldilaijan, Young Il Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jihun Kim, Jun-Soo Ro, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Patients younger than 40 years with colorectal cancer have a similar prognosis to older patients
    Tomoki Abe, Takeru Matsuda, Ryuichiro Sawada, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Kimihiro Yamashita, Takashi Kato, Hitoshi Harada, Naoki Urakawa, Hironobu Goto, Shingo Kanaji, Taro Oshikiri, Yoshihiro Kakeji
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical and pathological characteristics of early-onset colorectal cancer in South Korea
    Su Bee Park, Jin Young Yoon, Min Seob Kwak, Jae Myung Cha
    Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(6): 358.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer
    Gyoung Tae Noh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Is the oncological impact of vascular invasion more important in right colon cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(2): 49.     CrossRef
  • Different Oncologic Outcomes in Early-Onset and Late-Onset Sporadic Colorectal Cancer: A Regression Analysis on 2073 Patients
    Caterina Foppa, Annalisa Maroli, Sara Lauricella, Antonio Luberto, Carlotta La Raja, Francesca Bunino, Michele Carvello, Matteo Sacchi, Francesca De Lucia, Giuseppe Clerico, Marco Montorsi, Antonino Spinelli
    Cancers.2022; 14(24): 6239.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Epidemiology & etiology
Colorectal cancer mortality trends in the era of cancer survivorship in Korea: 2000–2020
Min Hyun Kim, Sanghee Park, Nari Yi, Bobae Kang, In Ja Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(5):343-352.   Published online October 28, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00535.0076
  • 4,643 View
  • 157 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 13 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Korea has implemented an early screening for colorectal cancer since 2004. However, it is not known whether this has translated into improved survival over the years.
Methods
We acquired colorectal cancer mortality data from the Cause of Death Statistics in Korea from 2000 to 2020. We characterized the data into year of death, cancer-specific loci, and age group. We analyzed age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) according to year of death, age group, and primary location to find trends in colorectal cancer mortality over a 20-year period.
Results
The crude mortality rate of colorectal cancer increased from 8.78 per 100,000 in 2000 to 17.27 per 100,000 in 2020. The second decade was slower in increments compared to the first decade. ASMR showed a decrease over the second decade after an initial increase in the first decade. The decrease was primarily from the lowering of ASMR for rectosigmoid cancers. Age group analysis showed a lowering of ASMR mainly in the 45–59-year, 60–74-year, and ≥ 75-year age groups; however, 0–29-year and 30–44-year age groups showed generally unchanged ASMR over the total period.
Conclusion
After a brief incline of age-specific mortality of colorectal cancers during the early 2000s, colorectal cancer mortality has gradually been decreasing in the past decade. This was mainly due to decreased mortalities in rectosigmoid colon cancers especially in the age groups that were the target of early screening.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Performance reporting design in artificial intelligence studies using image-based TNM staging and prognostic parameters in rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Minsung Kim, Taeyong Park, Bo Young Oh, Min Jeong Kim, Bum-Joo Cho, Il Tae Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • In-Hospital Mortality and Associated Factors among Colorectal Cancer Patients in Germany
    Karel Kostev, Sarah Krieg, Andreas Krieg, Tom Luedde, Sven H. Loosen, Christoph Roderburg
    Cancers.2024; 16(6): 1219.     CrossRef
  • Clinical implication of tissue carcinoembryonic antigen expression in association with serum carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer
    Abdulmohsin Fawzi Aldilaijan, Young Il Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jihun Kim, Jun-Soo Ro, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of nomogram models to predict radiotherapy or chemotherapy benefit in stage III/IV gastric adenocarcinoma with surgery
    Xiangqing Ren, Tian Huang, Xiaolong Tang, Qian Ma, Ya Zheng, Zenan Hu, Yuping Wang, Yongning Zhou
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic prediction of colorectal cancer using the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio: the importance of inflammatory biomarkers and their association with long-term outcomes
    Chul Seung Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 287.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
  • National cancer screening program for colorectal cancer in Korea
    Seung Min Baik, Ryung-Ah Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 333.     CrossRef
  • Recurrence Patterns and Risk Factors after Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Insights for Postoperative Surveillance Strategies
    Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim, Ye Ryung Park, Eun Hae Cho, Jeong Min Choo, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak
    Cancers.2023; 15(24): 5791.     CrossRef
  • Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • How Can We Improve the Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?
    Jeonghee Han
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
    Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
    Hyun Gu Lee
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis,Biomarker & risk factor
Can pretreatment platelet-to-lymphocyte and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios predict long-term oncologic outcomes after preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer?
Sang Hyun An, Ik Yong Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):253-261.   Published online March 7, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00633.0090
  • 3,870 View
  • 132 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 12 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Systemic inflammation is associated with various malignancies, including colorectal cancer, as possible prognostic predictors. We aimed to evaluate the correlation of pretreatment the platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratio with long-term oncologic outcomes and pathologic complete response (pCR) in locally ad vanced rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by curative resection.
Methods
Between October 1996 and December 2015, 168 rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative CRT followed by surgery were enrolled. The set cut-off/mean PLR and NLR were 170 and 2.8. We analyzed the relationship between PLR, NLR, and the 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and pCR rate.
Results
The 5-year OS rates were 75.9% and 59.8% in the highand low-PLR groups. The 5-year DFS rates were 62.9% and 50.8% in the high- and low-PLR groups, with no significant difference. In addition, the 5-year OS rates were 75.7% and 58.4%, and the 5-year DFS rates were 62.5% and 50.0% in the high- and low-NLR groups, respectively, both without any significant difference. Multivariate analysis showed only pretreatment PLR as an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio, 1.850; 95% confidence interval, 1.041–3.287; P=0.036), and both serologic markers were not independent prognostic factors for 5-year DFS.
Conclusion
Neither PLR nor NLR was associated with 5-year DFS nor pCR to neoadjuvant CRT. Only pretreatment PLR can be used in predicting OS in locally advanced rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant CRT followed by curative resection.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of preoperative pan-immune-inflammation value on clinical and oncologic outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective study
    Yun Ju Seo, Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Sung Uk Bae
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2024; 106(3): 169.     CrossRef
  • Systemic Inflammatory Response Following Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Can Affect Oncologic Outcomes in MSI-H/dMMR Rectal Cancer
    Hyukjin Choi, Jin Ho Baek, An Na Seo, Su Yeon Park, Hye Jin Kim, Jun Seok Park, Gyu Seog Choi, Jong Gwang Kim, Byung Woog Kang
    Chonnam Medical Journal.2024; 60(2): 105.     CrossRef
  • Predictive and prognostic value of inflammatory markers in locally advanced rectal cancer (PILLAR) – A multicentric analysis by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Gastrointestinal Study Group
    Giuditta Chiloiro, Angela Romano, Silvia Mariani, Gabriella Macchia, Diana Giannarelli, Luciana Caravatta, Pierfrancesco Franco, Luca Boldrini, Alessandra Arcelli, Almalina Bacigalupo, Liliana Belgioia, Antonella Fontana, Elisa Meldolesi, Giampaolo Montes
    Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology.2023; 39: 100579.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in operated rectal cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Giuseppe Portale, Patrizia Bartolotta, Danila Azzolina, Dario Gregori, Valentino Fiscon
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts survival of patients with rectal cancer receiving neo-adjuvant chemoradiation followed by radical resection: a meta-analysis
    Giuseppe Colloca, Antonella Venturino, Domenico Guarneri
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2023; 23(4): 421.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic prediction of colorectal cancer using the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio: the importance of inflammatory biomarkers and their association with long-term outcomes
    Chul Seung Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 287.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Body composition parameters combined with blood biomarkers and magnetic resonance imaging predict responses to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Jianguo Yang, Qican Deng, Zhenzhou Chen, Yajun Chen, Zhongxue Fu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
    Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • How Can We Improve the Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?
    Jeonghee Han
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy determines the prognostic impact of anastomotic leakage in advanced rectal cancer
    Bo Young Oh, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Wook Huh, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(4): 235.     CrossRef
  • Study on the Relationship between NEUT, NLR, PLR and the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with ACS
    延春 蒋
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2022; 12(11): 9836.     CrossRef
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Colorectal cancer,Surgical technique
The “reverse air leak test”: a new technique for the assessment of low colorectal anastomosis
Francesco Crafa, Augusto Striano, Francesco Esposito, Amalia Rosaria Rita Rossetti, Mario Baiamonte, Valeria Gianfreda, Antonio Longo
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):20-27.   Published online December 4, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.09.21.1
  • 4,633 View
  • 209 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 12 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Anastomotic leakage is a fearsome complication in rectal surgery. Surgeons perform the classic air leak test, although its real effectiveness is still debated. The aim of this study was to describe a personal technique of reverse air leak test in which low colorectal anastomosis was assessed transanally through the intrarectal irrigation of a few mL of saline solution.
Methods
From October 2014 to November 2019, 11 patients with low rectal cancer (type 1 in Roullier classification) were included in this study. At the beginning of the procedure, a circular anal dilator was inserted into the anus. A side-to-end colorectal anastomosis was performed. A few mL of saline solution were injected into the rectum and the entire anastomotic line was directly explored. The appearance of bubbles was considered as an anastomotic defect and repaired with an interrupted suture. A fluorescence angiography after intravenous injection of indocyanine green was performed in order to evaluate the perfusion of the anastomosis.
Results
The reverse air leak test was positive in 4 cases (36.4%). The defect was repaired and a confirmation test was performed. In all patients, near-infrared evaluation showed no perfusion defect (grade 0) in low colorectal anastomosis. No postoperative fistula was detected in cohort study. A protective stoma was performed in 10 patients. On day 90, there were no complications and stoma closure was performed as planned.
Conclusion
The reverse air leak test is a simple, feasible, and effective procedure to identify anastomotic leaks in low colorectal anastomoses.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Solo surgery for low rectal cancer: trans‐circular anal dilator low rectal dissection associated with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision—A Video Vignette
    Crafa Francesco, Vanella Serafino, Emanuele Caruso, Madoka Hamada, Nozomi Ueno
    Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(4): 805.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal eversion technique combined with modified single‐stapled double‐purse‐string low colorectal anastomosis
    Crafa Francesco, Vanella Serafino
    Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(4): 772.     CrossRef
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery by endoluminal vacuum therapy with the VACStent avoiding a stoma - a pilot study
    Markus M. Heiss, Jonas Lange, Judith Knievel, Alexander Yohannes, Ulrich Hügle, Arno J. Dormann, Claus F. Eisenberger
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk stratification of anastomotic leakages after colonic resection and reconstructive procedures
    A. A. Vaganov, A. Yu. Korol’kov, P. I. Bogdanov, Z. Kh. Osmanov, V. P. Morozov, A. V. Babich
    Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery.2023; 181(6): 98.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal eversion technique combined with modified DST (CET‐M‐DST) for low colorectal anastomosis after laparoscopic TME for colorectal cancer – Video correspondence
    Crafa Francesco, Vanella Serafino, Baiamonte Mario, Longo Antonio
    Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(12): 2473.     CrossRef
  • Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
    Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252.     CrossRef
  • Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
    Hyun Gu Lee
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic PME with colorectal anstomosis with transanal control – A video vignette
    Francesco Crafa, Serafino Vanella, Adele Noviello, Giuseppe Longo, Francesco Longo
    Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(7): 887.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic TME and hepatic resection after total neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus short course radiotherapy for low rectal cancer with single synchronous liver metastases – A video vignette
    Francesco Crafa, Serafino Vanella
    Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(10): 1264.     CrossRef
  • Initial experience with intraoperative testing and repair of colorectal anastomosis using a TAMIS approach after a positive leak test
    J. Valdes-Hernandez, J. Cintas-Catena, F. J. Del Rio-Lafuente, A. Cano-Matias, C. Torres-Arcos, A. Perez-Sanchez, L. Capitan-Morales, F. Oliva-Mompean, J. C. Gomez-Rosado
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2022; 26(11): 901.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive colorectal surgery learning curve
    Serafino Vanella, Enrico Coppola Bottazzi, Giancarlo Farese, Rosa Murano, Adele Noviello, Tommaso Palma, Maria Godas, Francesco Crafa
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 14(11): 731.     CrossRef
Review
Benign bowel disease
Multimodal prerehabilitation for elderly patients with sarcopenia in colorectal surgery
Jingting Wu, Hannah Chi, Shawn Kok, Jason M.W. Chua, Xi-Xiao Huang, Shipin Zhang, Shimin Mah, Li-Xin Foo, Hui-Yee Peh, Hui-Bing Lee, Phoebe Tay, Cherie Tong, Jasmine Ladlad, Cheryl H.M. Tan, Nathanelle Khoo, Darius Aw, Cheryl X.Z. Chong, Leonard M.L. Ho, Sharmini S. Sivarajah, Jialin Ng, Winson J.H. Tan, Fung-Joon Foo, Bin-Tean Teh, Frederick H. Koh
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):3-12.   Published online March 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01207.0172
  • 3,957 View
  • 291 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Sarcopenia, which is characterized by progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, has been well described to be associated with numerous poor postoperative outcomes, such as increased perioperative mortality, postoperative sepsis, prolonged length of stay, increased cost of care, decreased functional outcome, and poorer oncological outcomes in cancer surgery. Multimodal prehabilitation, as a concept that involves boosting and optimizing the preoperative condition of a patient prior to the upcoming stressors of a surgical procedure, has the purported benefits of reversing the effects of sarcopenia, shortening hospitalization, improving the rate of return to bowel activity, reducing the costs of hospitalization, and improving quality of life. This review aims to present the current literature surrounding the concept of sarcopenia, its implications pertaining to colorectal cancer and surgery, a summary of studied multimodal prehabilitation interventions, and potential future advances in the management of sarcopenia.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Preoperative Management of the Adult Oncology Patient
    Shannon M. Popovich, Thomas R. Vetter
    Anesthesiology Clinics.2024; 42(1): 145.     CrossRef
  • The potential use of perioperative rectus femoris ultrasonography in guiding prehabilitation strategies
    W.R. Martis
    Journal of Clinical Anesthesia.2024; 92: 111302.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential® versus robotic approach in patients with rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    I. K. Kim, C. S. Lee, J. H. Bae, S. R. Han, W. Alshalawi, B. C. Kim, I. K. Lee, D. S. Lee, Y. S. Lee
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Differences in Functional Capacity between Oncologic and Non-Oncologic Populations: Reference Values
    Egoitz Mojas, Aitor Santisteban, Iker Muñoz-Pérez, Arkaitz Larrinaga-Undabarrena, Maria Soledad Arietaleanizbeaskoa, Nere Mendizabal-Gallastegui, Gonzalo Grandes, Jon Cacicedo, Xabier Río
    Healthcare.2024; 12(3): 318.     CrossRef
  • The use of technology in cancer prehabilitation: a systematic review
    San San Tay, Fuquan Zhang, Edmund Jin Rui Neo
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sarcopenia as a Preoperative Risk Stratification Tool among Older Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

    Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analysis of effect of colonoscopy combined with laparoscopy in the treatment of colorectal tumors
    Deyu Zhao, Xun Sun, Xun Guo, Wang Jianfeng
    Technology and Health Care.2024; 32(4): 2115.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosing Sarcopenia with AI-Aided Ultrasound (DINOSAUR)—A Pilot Study
    Vanessa Yik, Shawn Shi Xian Kok, Esther Chean, Yi-En Lam, Wei-Tian Chua, Winson Jianhong Tan, Fung Joon Foo, Jia Lin Ng, Sharmini Sivarajah Su, Cheryl Xi-Zi Chong, Darius Kang-Lie Aw, Nathanelle Ann Xiaolian Khoo, Paul E. Wischmeyer, Jeroen Molinger, Stev
    Nutrients.2024; 16(16): 2768.     CrossRef
  • The relation between preoperative radiological sarcopenia and postoperative recovery of physical activity in older surgical cancer patients; an explorative study
    S. Hendriks, M.G. Huisman, L. Weerink, L.T. Jonker, B.C. van Munster, J.J. de Haan, G.H. de Bock, B.L. van Leeuwen
    The Journal of nutrition, health and aging.2024; 28(10): 100345.     CrossRef
  • Get Fit: Muscle Health for Crohn’s Disease Surgical Outcome Optimization
    Sara Massironi, Pierpaolo Sileri, Silvio Danese
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recommendations on the use of prehabilitation, i.e. comprehensive preparation of the patient for surgery
    Tomasz Banasiewicz, Jarosław Kobiela, Jarosław Cwaliński, Piotr Spychalski, Patrycja Przybylska, Karolina Kornacka, Dagmara Bogdanowska-Charkiewicz, Magdalena Leyk-Kolańczak, Maciej Borejsza-Wysocki, Dominika Batycka-Stachnik, Rafał Drwiła
    Polish Journal of Surgery.2023; 95(4): 62.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Complication,Biomarker & risk factor
Intraoperative fluorescence angiography as an independent factor of anastomotic leakage and a nomogram for predicting leak for colorectal anastomoses
Mikhail Alekseev, Evgeny Rybakov, Evgeniy Khomyakov, Irina Zarodnyuk, Yuri Shelygin
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(5):380-386.   Published online July 22, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00171.0024
  • 3,829 View
  • 160 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) is a life-threatening complication, which increases morbidity, hospital stay and cost of treatment. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors, including intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG FA), associated with the leak of stapled colorectal anastomosis.
Methods
Four hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients underwent surgery between 2017 and 2019 for benign (n=10, 2.3%) or malignant (n=419, 97.7%) and rectal (n=349, 81.4%) or distal sigmoid (n=80, 18.6%) lesions with double-stapling technique reconstruction were included into retrospective study. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression of the tumor-, patient- and treatment-related risk factors of AL was performed.
Results
An AL developed in 52 patients (12.1%). In multivariate analysis following variables were independently associated with AL; male sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9−7.7; P<0.01), anastomosis at ≤6.5 cm from anal verge (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3−7.5; P=0.01), and age of ≤62.5 years (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1−4.1; P=0.03). ICG FA was found as independent factor reducing colorectal AL rate (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2−0.8; P=0.02). A nomogram with high discriminative ability (concordance index, 0.81) was created.
Conclusion
ICG FA is a modifiable surgery-related risk factor associated with a decrease of colorectal AL rate. A suggested nomogram, which takes into consideration ICG FA, might be helpful to identify the individual risk of AL.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • RISK FACTORS AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES OF SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF RECTAL CANCER
    Світлана Віталіївна Маліборська, Y.D. Partykevych, A.E. Kryzhanivska
    Art of Medicine.2024; : 282.     CrossRef
  • The impact of powered circular staplers on anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal cancer surgeries
    Hayoung Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Young Il Kim, Eun Jung Park, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(10): 6111.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?
    Christos Tsalikidis, Athanasia Mitsala, Vasileios I. Mentonis, Konstantinos Romanidis, George Pappas-Gogos, Alexandra K. Tsaroucha, Michail Pitiakoudis
    Current Oncology.2023; 30(3): 3111.     CrossRef
  • The effect of neoadjuvant treatment on postoperative morbidity in upper rectal cancer
    S. N. Lukmonov, Ya. V. Belenkaya, M. S. Lebedko, S. S. Gordeev, Z. Z. Mammadli
    Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2023; 13(2): 46.     CrossRef
  • The Safe Values of Quantitative Perfusion Parameters of ICG Angiography Based on Tissue Oxygenation of Hyperspectral Imaging for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study
    Gyung Son, Armaan Nazir, Mi Yun, In Lee, Sun Im, Jae Kwak, Sang-Ho Park, Kwang-Ryul Baek, Ines Gockel
    Biomedicines.2023; 11(7): 2029.     CrossRef
  • Risk assessment of rectal anastomotic leakage (RAREAL) after DIXON in non-emergency patients with rectal cancer
    Xue-Cong Zheng, Jin-Bo Su, Jin-Jie Zheng
    BMC Gastroenterology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
    Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252.     CrossRef
  • Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
    Hyun Gu Lee
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Updates of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Surgery
    Eugenia Claudia Zarnescu, Narcis Octavian Zarnescu, Radu Costea
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(12): 2382.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Functional outcomes,Colorectal cancer,Postoperative outcome & ERAS
Clinical validation of implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol in elderly colorectal cancer patients
Wooree Koh, Chul Seung Lee, Jung Hoon Bae, Abdullah Al-Sawat, In Kyu Lee, Hyeong Yong Jin
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):47-52.   Published online July 21, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00283.0040
  • 3,742 View
  • 177 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of applying enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in elderly colorectal cancer patients.
Methods
The medical records of patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer surgery at our institution, from January 2017 to December 2017, were reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the young group (YG, patients aged 70 and under 70 years) and the old group (OG, patients over 70 years old). Perioperative outcomes and length of hospital stay were compared between both groups.
Results
In total, 335 patients were enrolled; 237 were YG and 98 were OG. Despite the poorer baseline characteristics of OG, the perioperative outcomes were similar. Length of hospital stay was not different between the groups (YG, 5 days vs. OG, 5 days; P=0.320). When comparing the postoperative complications using the comprehensive complication index (CCI), there was no significant difference (YG, 8.0±13.2 vs. OG, 11.7±23.0; P=0.130). In regression analysis, old age (>70 years) was not a risk factor for high CCI in all patients. In multivariate analysis, C-reactive protein (CRP) level on postoperative day (POD) 3 to 4 was the only strong predictive factor for high CCI in elderly patients.
Conclusion
Implementing the ERAS protocol in patients aged >70 years is safe and feasible. High CRP (≥6.47 mg/dL) on POD 3 to 4 can be used as a safety index to postpone discharge in elderly patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential® versus robotic approach in patients with rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    I. K. Kim, C. S. Lee, J. H. Bae, S. R. Han, W. Alshalawi, B. C. Kim, I. K. Lee, D. S. Lee, Y. S. Lee
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Challenging issues of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery programs in South Korea
    Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Ho-Jin Lee
    Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.2024; 19(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Effects of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on the postoperative stress state and short‐term complications in elderly patients with colorectal cancer
    He Han, Rong Wan, Jixiang Chen, Xin Fan, LiWen Zhang
    Cancer Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Application of ERAS in older patients with gastric cancer
    Kuanxuan You, He Han
    Medicine.2024; 103(22): e38409.     CrossRef
  • Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery is a safe and effective pathway for older patients: a pooling up analysis
    Xu-Rui Liu, Xiao-Yu Liu, Bin Zhang, Fei Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Chao Yuan, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of preoperative bicarbonate and lactate levels on short-term outcomes and prognosis in elderly patients with colorectal cancer
    Xiao-Yu Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Bin Zhang, Fei Liu, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng
    BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery
    Min Ki Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Future direction of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in colorectal surgery
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Implementation and improvement of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for colorectal cancer surgery
    Bo Yoon Choi, Jung Hoon Bae, Chul Seung Lee, Seung Rim Han, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyu Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(4): 223.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Functional outcomes,Postoperative outcome & ERAS
The impact of variations in care and complications within a colorectal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program on length of stay
James Wei Tatt Toh, Jack Cecire, Kerry Hitos, Karen Shedden, Fiona Gavegan, Nimalan Pathmanathan, Toufic El Khoury, Angelina Di Re, Annelise Cocco, Alex Limmer, Tom Liang, Kar Yin Fok, James Rogers, Edgardo Solis, Grahame Ctercteko
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):36-46.   Published online May 6, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.11.23
  • 4,711 View
  • 200 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become standard of care in colorectal surgery. However, there is not a universally accepted colorectal ERAS protocol and significant variations in care exist between institutions. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of variations in ERAS interventions and complications on length of stay (LOS).
Methods
This study was a single-center review of the first 200 consecutive patients recruited into our prospectively collected ERAS database. The primary outcome of this study was to examine the rate of compliance to ERAS interventions and the impact of these interventions on LOS. The secondary outcome was to assess the impact of complications (anastomotic leak, ileus, and surgical site infections) on LOS. ERAS interventions, rate of adherence, LOS, readmissions, morbidity, and mortality were recorded, and statistical analysis was performed.
Results
ERAS variations and complications significantly influenced patient LOS on both univariate and multivariate analysis. ERAS interventions identified as the most important strategies in reducing LOS included laparoscopic surgery, mobilization twice daily postoperative day (POD) 0 to 1, discontinuation of intravenous fluids on POD 0 to 1, upgrading to solid diet by POD 0 to 2, removal of indwelling catheter by POD 0 to 2, avoiding nasogastric tube reinsertion and removing drains early. Both major and minor complications increased LOS. Anastomotic leak and ileus were associated with the greatest increase in LOS.
Conclusion
Seven high-yield ERAS interventions reduced LOS. Major and minor complications increased LOS. Reducing variations in care and complications can improve outcomes following colorectal surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • So many measures in ERAS protocol: Which matters most?
    Nan Xie, Hua Xie, Wei Li, Zhongxian Zhu, Xu Wang, Weibing Tang
    Nutrition.2024; 122: 112384.     CrossRef
  • Results of selective decontamination with oral neomycin and metronidazole for major colorectal surgery in Australia: A cohort study
    James Wei Tatt Toh, Devansh Shah, Henry Wang, Charlotte Kwik, Joseph Do Woong Choi, Chelsie Leonie Beinke, Paul Morris, Eleni Baird-Gunning, Geoffrey Peter Collins, Fiona Gavegan, Karen Shedden, Toufic El-Khoury, Nimalan Pathma-Nathan, Kerry Hitos
    Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery.2024; 7(2): 72.     CrossRef
  • Influence of additional prophylactic oral antibiotics during mechanical bowel preparation on surgical site infection in patients receiving colorectal surgery
    Hayoung Lee, Jong Lyul Lee, Ji Sung Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok‐Byung Lim
    World Journal of Surgery.2024; 48(6): 1534.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes before and after Implementation of the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery after Surgery) Protocol in Open and Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Comparative Real-World Study from Northern Italy
    Lucia Mangone, Federica Mereu, Maurizio Zizzo, Andrea Morini, Magda Zanelli, Francesco Marinelli, Isabella Bisceglia, Maria Barbara Braghiroli, Fortunato Morabito, Antonino Neri, Massimiliano Fabozzi
    Current Oncology.2024; 31(6): 2907.     CrossRef
  • Current perioperative care in patients undergoing a beyond total mesorectal excision procedure for rectal cancer: What are the differences with the colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery protocol?
    Stefi Nordkamp, Stijn H. J. Ketelaers, Floor Piqeur, Harm J. Scholten, Silvie van de Calseijde, Jip L. Tolenaar, Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, Harm J. T. Rutten, Jacobus W. A. Burger, Johanne G. Bloemen
    Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol in Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer Patients after beyond Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery: A Feasibility Study
    Stefi Nordkamp, Davy M. J. Creemers, Sofie Glazemakers, Stijn H. J. Ketelaers, Harm J. Scholten, Silvie van de Calseijde, Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, Jip L. Tolenaar, Hendi W. Crezee, Harm J. T. Rutten, Jacobus W. A. Burger, Johanne G. Bloemen
    Cancers.2023; 15(18): 4523.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery
    Min Ki Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Future direction of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in colorectal surgery
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(1): 1.     CrossRef
Review
Malignant disease,Rectal cancer,Surgical technique
Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: it’s come a long way and here to stay
Jing Yu Ng, Chien-Chih Chen
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(4):283-289.   Published online August 29, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00374.0053
  • 3,215 View
  • 144 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) was introduced as a novel technique to deal with rectal cancers. Its transanal approach offered the shortest distance to approach a challenging location, allowing an excellent visualization of the distal resection margin. Since its introduction in 2010, a significant amount of research has been put in to measure its development. In this review, we look at its ancestry, the genesis for its introduction and continued evolution as well as some of the important outcomes in its journey thus far. The importance of a structured and proctored learning journey is also stressed to enable the safe application and development of this technique. Beyond this, the TaTME movement has progressed relentlessly and its utility has been expanded to the management of benign conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease, Hartman reversals, and anastomotic strictures. We believe that the continued development and adoption of TaTME worldwide is here to stay.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang Yi Chi, Ou Gang, Feng Xiao Li, Lu Ya, Zhou Zhijun, Du Yong Gang, Ran Dan, Liu Xin, Liu Yang, Zhang Peng, Luo Yi, Lin Dong, Zhang De Chun
    Medicine.2024; 103(4): e36859.     CrossRef
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Quality of life and functional outcomes after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME) and transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer. an updated meta-analysis
    Sara Lauricella, Francesco Brucchi, Francesco Maria Carrano, Diletta Cassini, Roberto Cirocchi, Patricia Sylla
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Case report on a rare complication after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal malignancy vesicorectal fistula
    Sapphire Melody Ho, Kishore Rajaguru, Jing Yu Ng, Choon Sheong Seow
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2023; 105: 108009.     CrossRef
  • Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach
    Ji-Hyun Seo, In-Ja Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5211.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer
    Gyoung Tae Noh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
    Hyun Gu Lee
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • How Can We Improve the Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?
    Jeonghee Han
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Article
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis
Initial local excision for clinical T1 rectal cancer showed comparable overall survival despite high local recurrence rate: a propensity-matched analysis
Jong Hee Hyun, Mohamed K. Alhanafy, Hyoung-Chul Park, Su Min Park, Sung-Chan Park, Dae Kyung Sohn, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, Jae Hwan Oh, on behalf of the Seoul Colorectal Research Group (SECOG)
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(2):166-175.   Published online October 6, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00479.0068
  • 3,849 View
  • 162 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Local excision (LE) is an alternative initial treatment for clinical T1 rectal cancer, and has avoided potential morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of LE compared with total mesorectal excision (TME) for clinical T1 rectal cancer.
Methods
Between January 2000 and December 2011, we retrospectively reviewed from multicenter data in patients with clinically suspected T1 rectal cancer treated with either LE or TME. Of 1,071 patients, 106 were treated with LE and 965 were treated with TME. The data were analyzed using propensity score matching, with each group comprising 91 patients.
Results
After propensity score matching, the median follow-up time was 60.8 months (range, 0.6–150.6 months). After adjustment for the necessary variables, patients who underwent LE showed a significantly higher local recurrence rate than did those who underwent TME; however, there were no differences in disease-free survival and overall survival. In the multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 9.620; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.415–27.098; P<0.001) and angiolymphatic invasion (HR, 3.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.33–9.89; P=0.012) were independently associated with overall survival. However, LE was neither associated with overall survival nor disease-free survival.
Conclusion
LE for clinical T1 rectal cancer yielded a higher local recurrence rate than did TME. Nevertheless, LE provided comparable overall survival rate and can be proposed as an optional treatment in terms of organ-preserving strategies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Performance reporting design in artificial intelligence studies using image-based TNM staging and prognostic parameters in rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Minsung Kim, Taeyong Park, Bo Young Oh, Min Jeong Kim, Bum-Joo Cho, Il Tae Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Survival prognostic in different age groups of patients undergoing local versus radical excision for rectal cancer: a study based on the SEER database
    Jinghui Li, Liang Wen, Yongli Ma, Guosheng Zhang, Ping Wang, Chengzhi Huang, Xueqing Yao
    Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(3): 975.     CrossRef
  • Comparative analysis of organ preservation attempt and radical surgery in clinical T2N0 mid to low rectal cancer
    Hyeung-min Park, Jaram Lee, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Organ preservation for early rectal cancer using preoperative chemoradiotherapy
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(3): 191.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer
    Gyoung Tae Noh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • How Can We Improve the Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?
    Jeonghee Han
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early rectal cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Sung Hwan Cho, Byung-Soo Park, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Bum Park, Hyung Wook Kim, Sang Bo Oh, Tae Un Kim, Dong Hoon Shin
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • The risk-benefit trade-off in local excision of early rectal cancer
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Applications of propensity score matching: a case series of articles published in Annals of Coloproctology
    Hwa Jung Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(6): 398.     CrossRef
Review
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade II/III hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ian Jun Yan Wee, Chee Hoe Koo, Isaac Seow-En, Yvonne Ying Ru Ng, Wenjie Lin, Emile John Kwong-Wei Tan
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(1):3-10.   Published online January 3, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00598.0085
  • 3,661 View
  • 305 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 9 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This study compared the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) vs. conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) in patients with grade II/III hemorrhoids.
Methods
PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing LH against CH in grade II/III hemorrhoids. The primary outcomes included postoperative use of analgesia, postoperative morbidity (bleeding, urinary retention, pain, thrombosis), and time of return to work/daily activities.
Results
Nine studies totaling 661 patients (LH, 336 and CH, 325) were included. The LH group had shorter operative time (P<0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (P<0.001). Postoperative pain was lower in the LH group, with lower postoperative day 1 (mean difference [MD], –2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], –3.44 to –0.75; P=0.002) and postoperative day 7 (MD, –3.94; 95% CI, –6.36 to –1.52; P=0.001) visual analogue scores and use of analgesia (risk ratio [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42–0.81; P=0.001). The risk of postoperative bleeding was also lower in the LH group (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.12– 0.28; P<0.001), with a quicker return to work or daily activities (P=0.002). The 12-month risks of bleeding (P>0.999) and prolapse (P=0.240), and the likelihood of complete resolution at 12 months, were similar (P=0.240).
Conclusion
LH offers more favorable short-term clinical outcomes than CH, with reduced morbidity and pain and earlier return to work or daily activities. Medium-term symptom recurrence at 12 months was similar. Our results should be verified in future well-designed trials with larger samples.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Quand et comment traiter des hémorroïdes
    Thierry Higuero
    La Presse Médicale Formation.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Spectrum of Diagnoses in Female Patients With Proctologic Symptoms Presenting to the Surgery Unit of a Tertiary Care Center
    Sana Sahar, Tamjeed Gul, Muhammad Ihtesham Khan
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Precision and Power: A Comprehensive Review of Exploring the Role of Laser Treatment in Hemorrhoidal Management
    Dheeraj Surya, Pankaj Gharde
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diode laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoids: Meta-analysis
    Po-Lung Cheng, Chang-Cyuan Chen, Jian-Syun Chen, Po-Li Wei, Yan-Jiun Huang
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laser hemorrhoidoplasty vs. rubber band ligation: a randomized trial comparing 2 mini-invasive treatment for grade II hemorrhoids
    Lei Jin, Kaijian Qin, Renjie Wu, Haojie Yang, Can Cui, Zhenyi Wang, Jiong Wu
    BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Quality of Life of Patients Before and After Hemorrhoid Surgery: A Single-Center Study in Vietnam
    Nguyen Thi Thuy Anh, Nguyen Ngoc Huynh Nhu, Tran Ngoc Hong, Pham Thi Ly, Nguyen Thi Hong Huyen, Doan Thi Minh, Ho Tat Bang, Nguyen Trung Tin
    Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive laser technologies in the surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: problems and prospects (literature review)
    N. D. Yartseva, L. V. Kornev, E. K. Naumov, G. V. Rodoman, L. A. Laberko
    Hirurg (Surgeon).2023; (3): 20.     CrossRef
  • Laser interventions in coloproctology. A plea for standardized treatment protocols
    P. C. Ambe
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(10): 953.     CrossRef
  • Comments on “Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade II/III hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis”
    Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Amine Gouader, Bassem Krimi, Hani Oweira
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 442.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Malignant disease,Rectal cancer,Complication,Biomarker & risk factor
Cross-sectional area of psoas muscle as a predictive marker of anastomotic failure in male rectal cancer patients: Japanese single institutional retrospective observational study
Yusuke Mizuuchi, Yoshitaka Tanabe, Masafumi Sada, Koji Tamura, Kinuko Nagayoshi, Shuntaro Nagai, Yusuke Watanabe, Sadafumi Tamiya, Kohei Nakata, Kenoki Ohuchida, Toru Nakano, Masafumi Nakamura
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(5):353-361.   Published online April 12, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00122.0017
  • 3,843 View
  • 164 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 9 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Preoperative sarcopenia worsens postoperative outcomes in various cancer types including colorectal cancer. However, we often experienced postoperative anastomotic leakage in muscular male patients such as Judo players, especially in rectal cancer surgery with lower anastomosis. It is controversial whether the whole skeletal muscle mass impacts the potential for anastomotic failure in male rectal cancer patients. Thus, the purpose of this study was to clarify whether skeletal muscle mass impacts anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer in men.
Methods
We reviewed the medical charts of male patients suffering from rectal cancer who underwent colo-procto anastomosis below the peritoneal reflection without a protective diverting stoma. We measured the psoas muscle area and calculated the psoas muscle index.
Results
One hundred ninety-seven male rectal cancer patients were enrolled in this study. The psoas muscle index was significantly higher in patients with anastomotic leakage (P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve determined the optimal cut-off value of the psoas muscle index for predicting anastomotic leakage as 812.67 cm2/m2 (sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 74.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that high psoas muscle index (risk ratio [RR], 3.933; P<0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.917–8.070) and super low anastomosis (RR, 2.792; P=0.015; 95% CI, 1.221–6.384) were independent predictive factors of anastomotic leakage.
Conclusion
This study showed that male rectal cancer patients with a large psoas muscle mass who underwent lower anastomosis had a higher rate of postoperative anastomotic leakage.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Unraveling the role of computed tomography derived body composition metrics on anastomotic leakages rates in rectal cancer surgery: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mark Broekman, Charlotte M. S. Genders, Ritchie T. J. Geitenbeek, Klaas Havenga, Schelto Kruijff, Joost M. Klaase, Alain R. Viddeleer, Esther C. J. Consten, Ozlem Boybeyi-Turer
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(7): e0307606.     CrossRef
  • Association of computed tomography‐derived body composition and complications after colorectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Claire P.M. van Helsdingen, Job G.A. van Wijlick, Ralph de Vries, Nicole D. Bouvy, Mariska M.G. Leeflang, Robert Hemke, Joep P.M. Derikx
    Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Driven, Computed Tomography-Based, Volumetric Assessment of the Volume and Density of Muscle in Patients With Colon Cancer
    Minsung Kim, Sang Min Lee, Il Tae Son, Taeyong Park, Bo Young Oh
    Korean Journal of Radiology.2023; 24(9): 849.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
    Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252.     CrossRef
  • Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
    Hyun Gu Lee
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Can the cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle be a predictor of anastomotic failure in male rectal cancer patients?
    Myong Hoon Ihn
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(5): 333.     CrossRef
  • Psoas Muscle Index – Could It Be an Indicator of Postoperative Complications in Colorectal Cancer? Case Presentation and Review of the Literature
    Georgiana Alexandra Scurtu, Zsolt Zoltán Fülöp, Botond Kiss, Patricia Simu, Diana Burlacu, Tivadar Bara
    Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine.2022; 7(4): 100.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer,Epidemiology & etiology
Characteristics and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery by age in a tertiary center in Korea: a retrospective review
Tae-Hoon Lee, Jeong Min Choo, Jeong Sub Kim, Seon Hui Shin, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak, Jin Kim, Seon-Hahn Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):244-252.   Published online November 4, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00619.0088
  • 4,055 View
  • 152 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 9 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Colorectal cancer (CRC) occurs in all age groups, and the application of treatment may vary according to age. The study was designed to identify the characteristics of CRC by age.
Methods
A total of 4,326 patients undergoing primary resection for CRC from September 2006 to July 2019 were reviewed. Patient and tumor characteristics, operative and postoperative data, and oncologic outcome were compared
Results
Patients aged 60 to 69 years comprised the largest age group (29.7%), followed by those aged 50 to 59 and 70 to 79 (24.5% and 23.9%, respectively). Rectal cancer was common in all age groups, but right-sided colon cancer tended to be more frequent in older patients. In very elderly patients, there were significant numbers of emergency surgeries, and the frequencies of open surgery and permanent stoma were greater. In contrast, total abdominal colectomy or total proctocolectomy was performed frequently in patients in their teens and twenties. The elderly patients showed more advanced tumor stages and postoperative ileus. The incidence of adjuvant treatment was low in elderly patients, who also had shorter follow-up periods. Overall survival was reduced in older patients with stages 0 to 3 CRC (P<0.001), but disease-free survival did not differ by age (P=0.391).
Conclusion
CRC screening at an earlier age than is currently undertaken may be necessary in Korea. In addition, improved surgical and oncological outcomes can be achieved through active treatment of the growing number of elderly CRC patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Influence of additional prophylactic oral antibiotics during mechanical bowel preparation on surgical site infection in patients receiving colorectal surgery
    Hayoung Lee, Jong Lyul Lee, Ji Sung Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok‐Byung Lim
    World Journal of Surgery.2024; 48(6): 1534.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
  • The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery
    Min Ki Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer
    Gyoung Tae Noh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Is the oncological impact of vascular invasion more important in right colon cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(2): 49.     CrossRef
  • Tailoring strategies for colorectal cancer screening and treatment based on age in colorectal cancer patients
    Eun Jung Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(3): 181.     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 568.     CrossRef
  • Recent Advance in the Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 213.     CrossRef
Review
Optimal anastomotic technique in rectal surgery to prevent anastomotic leakage
Daichi Kitaguchi, Masaaki Ito
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(2):97-105.   Published online January 3, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00787.0112
  • 4,344 View
  • 346 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Complications after colorectal surgery remain inevitable, and anastomotic leakage is one of the most severe and potentially fatal complications. Generally, anastomotic leakage is associated with severe peritonitis, the need for emergency reoperation, and an increased mortality rate. Additionally, particularly after rectal cancer surgery, it has a negative impact on long-term outcomes, including postoperative anorectal function, local recurrence, and survival. To prevent anastomotic leakage, understanding the characteristics of each anastomotic technique and establishing a stable anastomotic procedure are important. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a relatively new advanced surgical access technique for pelvic dissection and facilitates different anastomotic techniques without the need for transabdominal rectal transection. Especially, stapled anastomosis in TaTME, also known as double purse-string circular stapled anastomosis or the single stapling technique (SST), has gained much attention as an alternative to the conventional double stapling technique (DST). In this article, we describe the DST, SST, and hand-sewn anastomosis as anastomotic techniques after rectal surgery, focusing mainly on the differences between conventional anastomotic techniques and SST in TaTME. Furthermore, the blood flow evaluation method for the reconstructive colon before anastomosis, which is extremely important in anastomotic leakage prevention regardless of the anastomotic type, is also described.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Dissection layer selection based on an understanding of pelvic fascial anatomy in transanal total mesorectal excision
    Daichi Kitaguchi, Masaaki Ito
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 375.     CrossRef
  • Successful Clinical Avoidance of Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage through Local Decontamination
    Gerhard Ernst Steyer, Markus Puchinger, Johann Pfeifer
    Antibiotics.2024; 13(1): 79.     CrossRef
  • Combined Robotic Transanal Transection Single-Stapled Technique in Ultralow Rectal Endometriosis Involvement Associated With Parametrial and Vaginal Infiltration
    Gianmarco D'Ancona, Benjamin Merlot, Quentin Denost, Stefano Angioni, Thomas Dennis, Horace Roman
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2024; 31(4): 267.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for the failure of endoscopic balloon dilation to manage anastomotic stricture from colorectal surgery: retrospective cohort study
    Young Il Kim, Seung Wook Hong, Seok-Byung Lim, Dong-Hoon Yang, Eon Bin Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Chang Sik Yu
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(4): 1775.     CrossRef
  • The impact of powered circular staplers on anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal cancer surgeries
    Hayoung Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Young Il Kim, Eun Jung Park, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(10): 6111.     CrossRef
  • Effect of powered circular stapler in colorectal anastomosis after left-sided colic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Andrea Scardino, Carlo Galdino Riva, Luca Sorrentino, Sara Lauricella, Alberto Aiolfi, Matteo Rottoli, Gianluca Bonitta, Marco Vitellaro, Luigi Bonavina, Davide Bona, Michael Kelly, Emanuele Rausa
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Safe Values of Quantitative Perfusion Parameters of ICG Angiography Based on Tissue Oxygenation of Hyperspectral Imaging for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study
    Gyung Son, Armaan Nazir, Mi Yun, In Lee, Sun Im, Jae Kwak, Sang-Ho Park, Kwang-Ryul Baek, Ines Gockel
    Biomedicines.2023; 11(7): 2029.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP