Annals of Coloproctology

Original Articles

Impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program on the management of complications after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer: Victoria Weets, Hélène Meillat, Jacques Emmanuel Saadoun, Marie Dazza, Cécile de Chaisemartin, Bernard Lelong; Received November 29, 2023 Accepted January 23, 2024 Published online September 20, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00850.0121 [Epub ahead of print]

13 View
2 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) reduces postoperative complications (POCs) after colorectal surgery; however, its impact on the management of POCs remains unclear. This study compared the diagnosis and management of POCs before and after implementing our ERAS protocol after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer and examined the short- and mid-term oncologic impacts.
Methods
This single-center, retrospective study evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer between 2012 and 2021, focusing on the incidence of POCs within 90 days. We compared outcomes before (standard group) and after (ERAS group) the implementation of our ERAS protocol in January 2016.
Results
Significantly fewer patients in the ERAS group developed POCs (standard vs. ERAS, 136 of 380 patients [35.8%] vs.136 of 660 patients [20.6%]; P<0.01). The ERAS group had a significantly shorter mean total length of stay after POCs (13.1 days vs. 11.4 days, P=0.04), and the rates of life-threatening complications (6.7% vs. 0.7%) and 1-year mortality (7.4% vs. 1.5%) were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the standard group. Among patients with anastomotic complications, laparoscopic reoperation was significantly more common in the ERAS group than in the standard group (8.3% vs. 75.0%, P<0.01). Among patients with postoperative ileus, the diagnosis and recovery times were significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the standard group, resulting in a shorter total length of stay (13.5 days vs. 10 days, P<0.01).
Conclusion
The implementation of an ERAS protocol did not eliminate all POCs, but it did accelerate their diagnosis and management and improved patient outcomes.

The impact of short-course total neoadjuvant therapy, long-course chemoradiotherapy, and upfront surgery on the technical difficulty of total mesorectal excision: an observational study with an intraoperative perspective: Cheryl Xi-Zi Chong, Frederick H. Koh, Hui-Lin Tan, Sharmini Su Sivarajah, Jia-Lin Ng, Leonard Ming-Li Ho, Darius Kang-Lie Aw, Wen-Hsin Koo, Shuting Han, Si-Lin Koo, Connie Siew-Poh Yip, Fu-Qiang Wang, Fung-Joon Foo, Winson Jianhong Tan; Received December 27, 2023 Accepted March 31, 2024 Published online September 19, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00899.0128 [Epub ahead of print]

24 View
2 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is becoming the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, surgery is deferred for months after completion, which may lead to fibrosis and increased surgical difficulty. The aim of this study was to assess whether TNT (TNT-RAPIDO) is associated with increased difficulty of total mesorectal excision (TME) compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) and upfront surgery.
Methods
Twelve laparoscopic videos of low anterior resection with TME for rectal cancer were prospectively collected from January 2020 to October 2021, with 4 videos in each arm. Seven colorectal surgeons assessed the videos independently, graded the difficulty of TME using a visual analog scale and attempted to identify which category the videos belonged to.
Results
The median age was 67 years, and 10 patients were male. The median interval to surgery from radiotherapy was 13 weeks in the LCRT group and 24 weeks in the TNT-RAPIDO group. There was no significant difference in the visual analog scale for difficulty in TME between the 3 groups (LCRT, 3.2; TNT-RAPIDO, 4.6; upfront, 4.1; P=0.12). A subgroup analysis showed similar difficulty between groups (LCRT 3.2 vs. TNT-RAPIDO 4.6, P=0.05; TNT-RAPIDO 4.6 vs. upfront 4.1, P=0.54). During video assessments, surgeons correctly identified the prior treatment modality in 42% of the cases. TNT-RAPIDO videos had the highest recognition rate (71%), significantly outperforming both LCRT (29%) and upfront surgery (25%, P=0.01).
Conclusion
TNT does not appear to increase the surgical difficulty of TME.

Review

Colorectal cancer

The role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and outcomes: Gyu-Seog Choi, Hye Jin Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):363-374. Published online August 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00521.0074

1,081 View
208 Download

Abstract PDF: Metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs) in rectal cancer significantly impact the prognosis and treatment strategies. Western practices emphasize neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), whereas Eastern approaches often rely on LPN dissection (LPND). This review examines the evolving role of LPND in the context of modern treatments, including total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and the impact of CRT on the management of clinically suspicious LPNs. We comprehensively reviewed the key literature comparing the outcomes of LPND versus preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, focusing on recent advancements and ongoing debates. Key studies, including the JCOG0212 trial and recent multicenter trials, were analyzed to assess the efficacy of LPND, particularly in conjunction with preoperative CRT or TNT. Current evidence indicates that LPND can reduce local recurrence rates compared to total mesorectal excision alone in patients not receiving radiation therapy. However, the benefit of LPND in the context of neoadjuvant CRT is influenced by the size and pretreatment characteristics of LPNs. While CRT can effectively control smaller metastatic LPNs, larger or clinically suspicious LPNs may require LPND for optimal outcomes. Advances in surgical techniques, such as robotic-assisted LPND, offer potential benefits but also present challenges and complications. The role of TNT in controlling metastatic LPNs and improving patient outcomes is emerging but remains underexplored. The decision to perform LPND should be individualized based on patient-specific factors, including LPN size, response to neoadjuvant treatment, and surgeon expertise. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and further evaluating the role of TNT in managing metastatic LPNs.

Editorial

From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology: In Ja Park; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):285-286. Published online August 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00514.0073

414 View
26 Download

PDF

Reviews

Minimally invasive surgery

Robotic colorectal surgery training: Portsmouth perspective: Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Sentilnathan Subramaniam, Diana Ronconi Di Giuseppe, Rauand Duhoky, Jim S. Khan; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):350-362. Published online August 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00444.0063

577 View
34 Download

Abstract PDF: This study aims to discuss the principles and pillars of robotic colorectal surgery training and share the training pathway at Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust. A narrative review is presented to discuss all the relevant and critical steps in robotic surgical training. Robotic training requires a stepwise approach, including theoretical knowledge, case observation, simulation, dry lab, wet lab, tutored programs, proctoring (in person or telementoring), procedure-specific training, and follow-up. Portsmouth Colorectal has an established robotic training model with a safe stepwise approach that has been demonstrated through perioperative and oncological results. Robotic surgery training should enable a trainee to use the robotic platform safely and effectively, minimize errors, and enhance performance with improved outcomes. Portsmouth Colorectal has provided such a stepwise training program since 2015 and continues to promote and augment safe robotic training in its field. Safe and efficient training programs are essential to upholding the optimal standard of care.

Translational/basic research

Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches in colorectal surgery: Bigyan B. Mainali, James J. Yoo, Mitchell R. Ladd; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):336-349. Published online August 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00437.0062

473 View
31 Download

Abstract PDF: Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM) is an emerging field that has provided new therapeutic opportunities by delivering innovative solutions. The development of nontraditional therapies for previously unsolvable diseases and conditions has brought hope and excitement to countless individuals globally. Many regenerative medicine therapies have been developed and delivered to patients clinically. The technology platforms developed in regenerative medicine have been expanded to various medical areas; however, their applications in colorectal surgery remain limited. Applying TERM technologies to engineer biological tissue and organ substitutes may address the current therapeutic challenges and overcome some complications in colorectal surgery, such as inflammatory bowel diseases, short bowel syndrome, and diseases of motility and neuromuscular function. This review provides a comprehensive overview of TERM applications in colorectal surgery, highlighting the current state of the art, including preclinical and clinical studies, current challenges, and future perspectives. This article synthesizes the latest findings, providing a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers aiming to integrate TERM into colorectal surgical practice.

Colorectal cancer

Essential knowledge and technical tips for total mesorectal excision and related procedures for rectal cancer: Min Soo Cho, Hyeon Woo Bae, Nam Kyu Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):384-411. Published online August 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00388.0055

561 View
44 Download

Abstract PDF: Total mesorectal excision (TME) has greatly improved rectal cancer surgery outcomes by reducing local recurrence and enhancing patient survival. This review outlines essential knowledge and techniques for performing TME. TME emphasizes the complete resection of the mesorectum along embryologic planes to minimize recurrence. Key anatomical insights include understanding the rectal proper fascia, Denonvilliers fascia, rectosacral fascia, and the pelvic autonomic nerves. Technical tips cover a step-by-step approach to pelvic dissection, the Gate approach, and tailored excision of Denonvilliers fascia, focusing on preserving pelvic autonomic nerves and ensuring negative circumferential resection margins. In Korea, TME has led to significant improvements in local recurrence rates and survival with well-adopted multidisciplinary approaches. Surgical techniques of TME have been optimized and standardized over several decades in Korea, and minimally invasive surgery for TME has been rapidly and successfully adopted. The review emphasizes the need for continuous research on tumor biology and precise surgical techniques to further improve rectal cancer management. The ultimate goal of TME is to achieve curative resection and function preservation, thereby enhancing the patient’s quality of life. Accurate TME, multidisciplinary-based neoadjuvant therapy, refined sphincter-preserving techniques, and ongoing tumor research are essential for optimal treatment outcomes.

Anorectal benign disease

Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of complex anal fistula: Pankaj Garg, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Vipul D. Yagnik, G. Mahak; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):321-335. Published online August 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00325.0046

1,363 View
283 Download

Abstract PDF: Anal fistula can be a challenging condition to manage, with complex fistulas presenting even greater difficulties. The primary concerns in treating this condition are a risk of damage to the anal sphincters, which can compromise fecal continence, and refractoriness to treatment, as evidenced by a high recurrence rate. Furthermore, the treatment of complex anal fistula involves several additional challenges. Satisfactory solutions to many of these obstacles remain elusive, and no consensus has been established regarding the available treatment options. In summary, complex anal fistula has no established gold-standard treatment, and the quest for effective therapies continues. This review discusses and highlights groundbreaking advances in the management of complex anal fistula over the past decade.

Colorectal cancer

Dissection layer selection based on an understanding of pelvic fascial anatomy in transanal total mesorectal excision: Daichi Kitaguchi, Masaaki Ito; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):375-383. Published online August 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00178.0025

413 View
29 Download

Abstract PDF: This study aimed to review the historical transition of rectal cancer surgery and recent evidence regarding transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Additionally, it outlined the anatomical landmarks and technical considerations essential for successful TaTME. Anatomical studies and surgical techniques were analyzed to identify key landmarks and procedural steps crucial for TaTME. TaTME offers improved visibility and maneuverability even in the deep and narrow pelvis and is expected to contribute to tumor radical cure rates. By securing the circumferential resection margin and distal margin while preserving pelvic autonomic nerve function, TaTME holds promise for maintaining postoperative urinary and sexual functions. Key anatomical landmarks include the endopelvic fascia posteriorly, the S4-pelvic splanchnic nerve laterally, and the prostate or posterior vaginal wall anteriorly. Selecting the appropriate dissection layer based on tumor depth and ensuring precise incision of the tendinous arch of the pelvic fascia contributes to successful TaTME outcomes. TaTME represents a significant advancement in rectal cancer surgery, offering improved outcomes through meticulous attention to anatomical detail and precise dissection techniques. Understanding the historical context of rectal cancer surgery alongside recent evidence on TaTME is essential for optimizing patient outcomes and expanding the safe implementation of this innovative approach.

Guideline

Anorectal benign disease

The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease: Antonio Brillantino, Adolfo Renzi, Pasquale Talento, Luigi Brusciano, Luigi Marano, Maurizio Grillo, Mauro Natale Maglio, Fabrizio Foroni, Alessio Palumbo, Maria Laura Sandoval Sotelo, Luciano Vicenzo, Michele Lanza, Giovanna Frezza, Massimo Antropoli, Claudio Gambardella, Luigi Monaco, Ilaria Ferrante, Domenico Izzo, Alfredo Giordano, Michele Pinto, Corrado Fantini, Marcello Gasparrini, Michele Schiano Di Visconte, Francesca Milazzo, Giovanni Ferreri, Andrea Braini, Umberto Cocozza, Massimo Pezzatini, Valeria Gianfreda, Alberto Di Leo, Vincenzo Landolfi, Umberto Favetta, Sergio Agradi, Giovanni Marino, Massimiliano Varriale, Massimo Mongardini, Claudio Eduardo Fernando Antonio Pagano, Riccardo Brachet Contul, Nando Gallese, Giampiero Ucchino, Michele D’Ambra, Roberto Rizzato, Giacomo Sarzo, Bruno Masci, Francesca Da Pozzo, Simona Ascanelli, Patrizia Liguori, Angela Pezzolla, Francesca Iacobellis, Erika Boriani, Eugenio Cudazzo, Francesca Babic, Carmelo Geremia, Alessandro Bussotti, Mario Cicconi, Antonia Di Sarno, Federico Maria Mongardini, Antonio Brescia, Leonardo Lenisa, Massimiliano Mistrangelo, Matteo Zuin, Marta Mozzon, Alessandro Paolo Chiriatti, Vincenzo Bottino, Antonio Ferronetti, Corrado Rispoli, Ludovico Carbone, Giuseppe Calabrò, Antonino Tirrò, Domenico de Vito, Giovanna Ioia, Giovanni Luca Lamanna, Lorenzo Asciore, Ettore Greco, Pierluigi Bianchi, Giuseppe D’Oriano, Alessandro Stazi, Nicola Antonacci, Raffaella Marina Di Renzo, Gianmario Edoardo Poto, Giuseppe Paolo Ferulano, Antonio Longo, Ludovico Docimo; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):287-320. Published online August 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00871.0124

1,203 View
200 Download

Abstract PDF: The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia, SIUCP) on the diagnosis and management of hemorrhoidal disease, with the goal of guiding physicians in the choice of the best treatment option. A panel of experts was charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key questions on the main topics related to the management of hemorrhoidal disease and to perform an accurate and comprehensive literature search on each topic, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in multiple rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) criteria, and the statements were developed adopting the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) methodology. In cases of grade 1 hemorrhoidal prolapse, outpatient procedures including hemorrhoidal laser procedure and sclerotherapy may be considered the preferred surgical options. For grade 2 prolapse, nonexcisional procedures including outpatient treatments, hemorrhoidal artery ligation and mucopexy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, the Rafaelo procedure, and stapled hemorrhoidopexy may represent the first-line treatment options, whereas excisional surgery may be considered in selected cases. In cases of grades 3 and 4, stapled hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoidectomy may represent the most effective procedures, even if, in the expert panel opinion, stapled hemorrhoidopexy represents the gold-standard treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal prolapse.

Brief Communication

Minimally invasive surgery

First clinical experience using augmented intelligence in robotic colorectal surgery with the Senhance robotic platform: Narimantas Evaldas Samalavicius, Audrius Dulskas; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):412-414. Published online August 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00815.0116

243 View
16 Download

PDF

Original Articles

Analysis of adenoma detection rate of colonoscopy among trainees: Young Min Song, Kyung Su Han, Byung Chang Kim, Chang Won Hong, Bun Kim, Min Chul Kim, Myeong Jae Jin, Dae Kyung Sohn; Received March 10, 2023 Accepted July 20, 2023 Published online August 28, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00199.0028 [Epub ahead of print]

436 View
12 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose
To analyze adenoma detection rate (ADR) and related quality indicators of colonoscopy among trainees and make recommendations for appropriate colonoscopy training.
Methods
ADR and related indicators of colonoscopies performed by 3 trainees and 5 colonoscopy experts between March and November 2022 were analyzed. These indicators were analyzed in both the entire patients and the screening/surveillance group. In addition, the training period of the 3 trainees was divided into 3 sections, and the changes in these indicators were examined.
Results
The mean ADR of the 3 trainees was 50.6%. In the screening/surveillance group, the mean ADR of the 3 trainees was 51.8%, showing no significant difference from the experts' ADR (53.4%). When the training period was divided into 3 sections and analyzed in the screening/surveillance group, the mean ADR of the trainees gradually increased to 49.4%, 52.6%, and 53.6%, respectively; however, the difference was insignificant. Analyzing each trainee’s ADR, there was a significant difference among the 3 trainees (58.5% vs. 44.7% vs. 50.2%, P=0.008). However, in the third section of the training period, the 3 trainees’ ADRs were 53.0%, 49.2%, and 57.3%, respectively, showing no significant difference (P=0.606).
Conclusion
In the early stages of training, the ADR was higher than recommended; however, there were variances in ADR between individuals. As the training period passed, the ADR became similar at the expert level, whereas the difference in ADR between trainees decreased. Therefore, efforts to increase ADR should be made actively from the beginning of training and continued during the training period.

Colonic stenting: is the bridge to surgery worth its cost? A cost-effectiveness analysis at a single Asian institution: Michelle Shi Qing Khoo, Frederick H. Koh, Sharmini Su Sivarajah, Leonard Ming-Li Ho, Darius Kang-Lie Aw, Cheryl Xi-Zi Chong, Fung Joon Foo, Winson Jianhong Tan; Received October 28, 2023 Accepted December 12, 2023 Published online August 5, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00738.0105 [Epub ahead of print]

478 View
12 Download

Abstract PDF: Purpose
In patients with acute left-sided colonic obstruction, stenting can convert an emergency operation into a semi-elective procedure. However, its use continues to be debated. We performed a cost-effective analysis using our institution’s experiences.
Methods
Endoscopic, surgical, and financial details were prospectively collected for patients who presented with acute colonic obstruction and underwent stenting between 2019 and 2022. Outcomes were defined as technical/clinical success and successful surgical resection. The financial cost of stenting was compared with the expected cost without stenting.
Results
Forty patients were included, with 29 undergoing definitive resection. The most common pathology was primary colon cancer (27 patients, 93%). Endoscopic stenting had high technical (90%) and clinical (83%) success rates, with low rates of complications such as perforation (2 patients, 7%) and migration (0 patients, 0%). As a bridge to surgery, the median procedure time was 226 minutes and the surgical outcomes also showed a low rate of complications (3 patients, 11%), such as anastomotic leakage (0 patients, 0%), intraabdominal abscesses (2 patients, 7%), and 30-day postoperative mortality (0 patients, 0%). The cumulative costs with colonic stenting were $32,900, while the expected costs with emergency surgery, including stoma reversal, were $40,700 (healthcare cost-savings of $7,800 per person). The difference was mainly due to the avoidance of upfront emergency surgery. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 0.81, favoring colonic stenting over upfront emergency surgery.
Conclusion
Colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery is safe and cost-effective for treating left-sided colonic obstruction with high success rates and low complication rates.

Oncologic outcomes and associated factors of colon cancer patients aged 70 years and older: Byeo Lee Lim, In Ja Park, Jun-Soo Ro, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu; Received June 7, 2023 Accepted September 11, 2023 Published online August 5, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00367.0052 [Epub ahead of print]

541 View
6 Download

Abstract PDF: Purpose
The aim of this study was to examine the prognosis and associated risk factors, including adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx), in elderly patients with colon cancer.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who underwent radical resection for colon cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 at Asan Medical Center. The effects of stage, risk factors, and chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared in patients aged ≥70 and <70 years.
Results
Of 3,313 patients, 933 (28.1%) was aged ≥70 years. Of the 1,921 patients indicated for adjuvant CTx, 1,294 of 1,395 patients (92.8%) aged <70 years and 369 of 526 patients (70.2%) aged ≥70 years received adjuvant CTx. Old age (≥70 years) was independently associated with RFS in overall cohort. Among patients aged ≥70 years indicated for adjuvant CTx, the 5-year OS (81.6% vs. 50.4%, P<0.001) and RFS (82.9% vs. 67.4%, P=0.025) rates were significantly higher in those who did than did not receive adjuvant CTx. Additionally, adjuvant CTx was confirmed as independent risk factor of both OS and RFS in patients aged ≥70 years indicated for adjuvant CTx.
Conclusion
Old age was associated with poor RFS and adjuvant CTx had benefits in OS as well as RFS in elderly patients eligible for adjuvant CTx.

Review

Colorectal screening following appendectomy in adult patients: a systematic review: Francesco Esposito, Marco Del Prete, Matilde Magri, Fanny Dufour, Alexandre Cortes; Received August 16, 2023 Accepted November 5, 2023 Published online August 1, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00528.0075 [Epub ahead of print]

472 View
15 Download

Abstract PDF: Purpose
Although the association between appendicitis and colorectal cancer in older patients has received attention, postoperative colorectal screening through endoscopy is not currently recommended. This study conducted a systematic review of the literature on colorectal screening following appendectomy in adult patients.
Methods
A literature search was performed using online databases. Studies reporting colorectal surveillance after appendectomy in adult patients were retrieved for assessment.
Results
Eight articles including a total of 3,995 patients were published between 2013 and 2023. An age of 40 years was the lower threshold in 6 of the 8 articles. Postoperative colorectal screening occurred in 771 patients (19.3%). Endoscopy was performed in 95.2% of cases and computed tomography–colonography in 4.8%. During endoscopic examinations, a lesion was discovered in 184 of 771 patients (24.0%), and an adenomatous polyp was found in 154 of 686 patients (22.5%). The overall cancer rate was 3.9% (30 of 771 patients). The tumor was located in the right-sided colon in 46.7% of the patients, in the cecum in 20.0%, in the rectum in 16.7%, in the left-sided colon in 10.0%, and in the sigmoid colon in 6.7%.
Conclusion
Performing post-appendectomy colorectal screening in patients >40 years of age could allow early detection of an underlying lesion.

First
Prev
Page of 137
Next
Last

Article Category