Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/colon/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2025-04.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 95 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 96 Oncological Outcome after Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer.
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Korean Soc Coloproctol > Volume 22(6); 2006 > Article
Original Article
Oncological Outcome after Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer.
Oh, Seung Yeop , Lee, Ho Won , Suh, Kwang Wook
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology 2006;22(6):396-401

Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. suhkw@ajou.ac.kr
prev next
  • 1,148 Views
  • 4 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus

PURPOSE
Literature shows that low rectal cancer, that especially undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR), is worse than mid or high rectal cancer. Two reasons have been proposed: diverse lymphatic channels in the low rectum, and technical difficulty in performing the APR. By comparison with the results reported in representative literature, we tried to find out whether low rectal cancer is really worse oncologically than high rectal cancer.
METHODS
For 133 patients who underwent an APR from 1995 to 2005, we examined the pathological characteristics of the cancer, the recurrence, the metastasis, the survival rates, and the prognostic factors.
RESULTS
The patient distribution according to stage was 15.9% in stage I, 33.6% in stage II, and 50.4% in stage III. The overall 5-year actuarial survival rate (5SR) of patients undergoing a curative resection (n=113) was 74.6%. Local pelvic recurrence was found in 11.5% of the patiennts, and systemic metastasis was noted in 14.2%. Among several prognostic variables, lymph node metastasis, the number of metastatic lymph nodes, adjuvant chemotherapy, and the distance between the tumor border and the dentate line were significant factors. In the multivariate analysis, lymph node metastasis was the most significant prognostic factor.
CONCLUSIONS
It is true that a curative resection in low rectal cancer is difficult due to the anatomy of pelvis, so knowledge of the anatomic features of the pelvis and surgical skill are important. definitely, acceptable oncological results can be attamed if the rule of curative resection is obeyed. We also found that lymph node involvement was the most significant prognostic factor in low rectal cancer.


Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP