Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/colon/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 95 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 96 Achieving a high cure rate in complex anal fistulas: understanding the conceptual role of the Garg cardinal principles
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search
Advanced Search
mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Ann Coloproctol > Volume 40(5); 2024 > Article
Letter to the Editor
 Achieving a high cure rate in complex anal fistulas: understanding the conceptual role of the Garg cardinal principles
Pankaj Garg1orcid, Nicola Clemente2orcid, James C. W. Khaw3orcid
Annals of Coloproctology 2024;40(5):521-523.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00430.0061
Published online: October 25, 2024

1Department of Colorectal Surgery, Garg Fistula Research Institute, Panchkula, India

2Department of General Surgery, Montebelluna Hospital, ULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana, Montebelluna, Italy

3Department of Colorectal Surgery, Penang General Hospital, George Town, Malaysia

Correspondence to: Pankaj Garg, MS, FASCRS Department of Colorectal Surgery, Garg Fistula Research Institute, 1042, Sector-15, Panchkula 134113, India Email: drgargpankaj@yahoo.com
• Received: July 28, 2024   • Revised: September 19, 2024   • Accepted: October 4, 2024

© 2024 The Korean Society of Coloproctology

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev
  • 275 Views
  • 20 Download
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

We read with great interest the article by Abbas et al. [1], in which they discussed their excellent results with fistulotomy with immediate primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS) and demonstrated that the outcomes of FIPS are comparable to those of fistulotomy alone. However, there are a few questions and relevant points that we believe merit further discussion based on our experience.
The authors performed a fistulotomy followed by immediate primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS), a procedure that is technically distinct from fistulectomy with primary sphincter repair (FPR). However, the authors did not clearly differentiate between these 2 techniques. In the discussion, the term FIPS is used while citing papers on FPR. Furthermore, Table 3 is titled "Summary of studies reporting the results of FIPS," yet of the 20 studies listed, 17 pertain to FPR and only 3 to FIPS [1].
FPR was initially described by Parkash et al. [2] in 1985, while the first description of FIPS was published by Ratto et al. [3] in 2013. In a systematic review conducted by Ratto et al. [4] in 2015, which aimed to evaluate the literature on fistulotomy or fistulectomy and primary sphincter reconstruction, they identified 14 studies involving FPR and only 1 involving FIPS. It was not until the publication of the first study on FIPS in 2013 [3], and subsequent research in 2019 [5], that the procedure became more common [6].
FIPS and FPR are conceptually similar surgical procedures with comparable outcomes, but it is important to recognize that they differ technically. In FPR, a fistulectomy is performed, involving the complete removal of the fistula tract. In contrast, FIPS involves a fistulotomy, where the fistula tract is merely opened, cleaned, and curetted without completely excising its posterior wall. Technically, a fistulotomy is easier to perform than a fistulectomy. Initially, there was concern that performing a fistulotomy without sphincter repair and without fully excising all tracts might lead to increased septic complications and recurrence rates. However, these concerns were mitigated by the findings of Litta et al. [5] in 2019, and further supported by the study in question [1], which demonstrated that FIPS does not lead to an increase in septic complications and has a success rate comparable to that of FPR.
In the study conducted by Abbas et al. [1], suprasphincteric fistulas were present in both groups, with 5 out of 45 cases in the FIPS group and 4 out of 107 in the fistulotomy group. This finding is notable because a suprasphincteric fistula encompasses the entire external anal sphincter, making it an absolute contraindication for fistulotomy and a strong contraindication for FIPS. Performing a fistulotomy or even FIPS on a suprasphincteric fistula would necessitate cutting through the entire external anal sphincter, an approach that is neither logical nor recommended. Similarly, Litta et al. [5] excluded suprasphincteric fistulas from their study on FIPS.
Over the past 15 years, several gadget-based sphincter-sparing procedures have been introduced, including video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT), fistula-tract laser closure (FiLac), fixcision, anal fistula plug (AFP), over-the-scope clip (OTSC), and stem cell treatments. However, their success rates in treating high complex fistulas are not promising, ranging from 25% to 65% [7]. In contrast, studies on FIPS and FPR have consistently shown high success rates in high complex fistulas. It would be pertinent to analyze the pathophysiological basis behind the high success rate of FIPS and FPR, and this understanding is provided by the 3 Garg cardinal principles for managing complex fistula in ano [8, 9].
The 3 cardinal principles are ISTAC (intersphincteric tract acts like an abscess in a closed space), DRAPED (drainage of all pus and ensuring continued drainage in the postoperative period till complete healing occurs), and HOPTIC (healing occurs progressively till it is interrupted irreversibly by a collection) [8].
ISTAC implies that a fistula tract in the intersphincteric space, confined by 2 anal sphincter muscles, behaves similarly to an abscess and should therefore be drained and treated as such. DRAPED highlights the necessity of evacuating pus and maintaining effective drainage until complete healing is achieved. HOPTIC indicates that the healing process is ongoing unless it is halted or permanently obstructed by an accumulation of pus or serous fluid. A surgical procedure adhering to these 3 principles is likely to be highly effective in treating complex fistulas. Conversely, ignoring these principles may result in lower success rates [8].
Once these principles are understood, it becomes clear why recent gadget-based sphincter-sparing procedures (VAAFT, FiLac, fixcision, AFP, OTSC, etc.) yield poor outcomes in treating high complex fistulas. These procedures fail to adhere to the ISTAC principle, which involves addressing the intersphincteric portion of the fistula tract; instead, they focus solely on managing the external tracts and the internal opening. Consequently, most simple fistulas, which typically lack a significant intersphincteric portion, see a moderate success rate of 50% to 75% with these procedures. The ligation of intersphincteric tract (LIFT) procedure addresses the ISTAC principle by opening and cleaning the intersphincteric tract and space. However, it neglects the second principle, DRAPED, as it allows the opened-up intersphincteric tract to collapse and close during the postoperative period. This oversight results in a moderate success rate of 50% to 75% in complex fistulas. A recently described procedure, transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS) [10, 11], effectively addresses both the ISTAC and DRAPED principles. It involves deroofing the intersphincteric portion of the fistula tract through the transanal route, allowing it to heal by secondary intention. A recent meta-analysis has shown that among all sphincter-preserving procedures, TROPIS achieved the highest cure rate (85%–92%) [7]. In the FPR/FIPS procedures, the intersphincteric portion of the fistula tract is excised, laid open, and allowed to heal by secondary intention in fistulotomy. This approach adheres to both the ISTAC and DRAPED principles, resulting in a high success rate.
The Garg cardinal principles offer valuable insights into which procedures are more effective for treating high complexity fistulas. These principles should be considered when developing new methods to manage complex fistulas.

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

None.

  • 1. Abbas M, T Tsay A, Abbass M. Immediate sphincter repair following fistulotomy for anal fistula: does it impact the healing rate and septic complications? Ann Coloproctol 2024;40:217–24.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 2. Parkash S, Lakshmiratan V, Gajendran V. Fistula-in-ano: treatment by fistulectomy, primary closure and reconstitution. Aust N Z J Surg 1985;55:23–7.ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Ratto C, Litta F, Parello A, Zaccone G, Donisi L, De Simone V. Fistulotomy with end-to-end primary sphincteroplasty for anal fistula: results from a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56:226–33.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Ratto C, Litta F, Donisi L, Parello A. Fistulotomy or fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty for anal fistula (FIPS): a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 2015;19:391–400.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 5. Litta F, Parello A, De Simone V, Grossi U, Orefice R, Ratto C. Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty for anal fistula: long-term data on continence and patient satisfaction. Tech Coloproctol 2019;23:993–1001.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 6. Aguilar-Martínez MD, Sánchez-Guillén L, Barber-Valles X, Alcaide-Quirós MJ, Bosch-Ramírez M, López-Delgado A, et al. Long-term evaluation of fistulotomy and immediate sphincteroplasty as a treatment for complex anal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 2021;64:1374–84.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Huang H, Ji L, Gu Y, Li Y, Xu S. Efficacy and safety of sphincter-preserving surgery in the treatment of complex anal fistula: a network meta-analysis. Front Surg 2022;9:825166. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 8. Garg P. A new understanding of the principles in the management of complex anal fistula. Med Hypotheses 2019;132:109329. ArticlePubMed
  • 9. Włodarczyk M, Włodarczyk J, Sobolewska-Włodarczyk A, Trzciński R, Dziki Ł, Fichna J. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of cryptoglandular perianal fistula. J Int Med Res 2021;49:300060520986669. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 10. Garg P, Mongia A. Transanal opening of the intersphincteric space (TROPIS): a novel procedure on the horizon to effectively manage high complex anal fistulas. Ann Coloproctol 2024;40:74–81.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 11. Wang C, Huang T, Wang X. Efficacy and safety of transanal opening of intersphincteric space in the treatment of high complex anal fistula: a meta‑analysis. Exp Ther Med 2024;28:306. ArticlePubMedPMC

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • PubReader PubReader
      • Cite this Article
        Cite this Article
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Achieving a high cure rate in complex anal fistulas: understanding the conceptual role of the Garg cardinal principles
        Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(5):521-523.   Published online October 25, 2024
        DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00430.0061
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Achieving a high cure rate in complex anal fistulas: understanding the conceptual role of the Garg cardinal principles
      Achieving a high cure rate in complex anal fistulas: understanding the conceptual role of the Garg cardinal principles
      Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
      © Korean Society of Coloproctology.
      TOP