 |
|
Anorectal Manometry Versus Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as a Predictor of Maximal Treatment for Fecal Incontinence
Lisa Ramage, Shengyang Qiu, Zhu Yeap, Constantinos Simillis, Christos Kontovounisios, Paris Tekkis, Emile Tan
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(6):319-326. Published online 2019 Dec 31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.16
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 Pelvic floor investigations for anal incontinence: Are they useful to predict outcomes from conservative treatment?
Karina Cuinas, Linda Ferrari, Carlene Igbedioh, Deepa Solanki, Andrew Williams, Alexis Schizas, Alison Hainsworth
Neurourology and Urodynamics.2023; 42(5): 1122. CrossRef Anorectal dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients: A pilot study on the effect of an individualized rehabilitation approach
Martina Kovari, Jan Stovicek, Jakub Novak, Michaela Havlickova, Sarka Mala, Andrew Busch, Pavel Kolar, Alena Kobesova
NeuroRehabilitation.2022; 50(1): 89. CrossRef Postpartum fecal incontinence. State of the problem
D.R. Markaryan, A.M. Lukyanov, T.N. Garmanova, M.A. Agapov, V.A. Kubyshkin
Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2022; (6): 127. CrossRef Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review
Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164. CrossRef Usefulness of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Anorectal Physiologic Tests in Predicting Clinical Outcome for Fecal Incontinence
Chang-Nam Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(6): 289. CrossRef
|