Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Articles

ERAS

The efficacy of mosapride on recovery of intestinal motility after elective colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial: Tharin Thampongsa, Bensita Saengsawang, Chairat Supsamutchai, Chumpon Wilasrusmee, Jakrapan Jirasiritham, Puvee Punmeechao, Visarat Palitnonkiat, Napaphat Poprom, Pattawia Choikrua, Pongsasit Singhathas; Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(3):232-238. Published online June 25, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00892.0127

1,193 View
182 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose
Postoperative ileus is the physiologic hypomotility of the gastrointestinal tract that occurs immediately after abdominal surgery. Mosapride citrate is known to enhance gastrointestinal motility. This study aimed to evaluate mosapride’s impact on postoperative ileus and gastrointestinal motility in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.
Methods
Forty-four patients with colorectal cancer undergoing surgery at Ramathibodi Hospital between July 2021 and August 2022 were randomly assigned to either a mosapride group or a control group. The mosapride group received 5 mg of mosapride via the enteric route with 50 mL of water 3 times daily, beginning on postoperative day 1, while the control group received 5 mg of a placebo with 50 mL of water on the same schedule. A single investigator, blinded to the treatment assignments in this triple-blind study, evaluated the postoperative time to the first bowel movement and passage of flatus. Secondary outcomes included the time to step diet, length of postoperative hospital stay, and adverse effects.
Results
There were 23 patients in the control group and 21 in the mosapride group. There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics between the 2 groups. The mosapride group demonstrated significantly shorter times to the first bowel movement (26 hours vs. 50 hours, P=0.004) and passage of flatus (40 hours vs. 70 hours, P=0.003).
Conclusion
Mosapride significantly improved the recovery of gastrointestinal motility and reduced the length of hospital stay without causing any serious adverse effects in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04905147

Colorectal cancer

How appropriately can generative artificial intelligence platforms, including GPT-4, Gemini, Bing, and Wrtn, answer questions about colon cancer in the Korean language?: Sun Huh; Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(3):190-197. Published online June 25, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00122.0017

817 View
22 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose
This study aims to assess the performance of 4 generative artificial intelligence (AI) platforms—Gemini (formerly Bard), Bing, GPT-4, and Wrtn—in answering questions about colon cancer in the Korean language. Two main research questions guided this study. First, which AI platform provides the most accurate answers? Second, can these AI-generated answers be reliably used to educate patients and their families about colon cancer?
Methods
Ten questions selected by the author were posed to the 4 generative AI platforms on February 22, 2024. Two colorectal surgeons in Korea, each with over 20 years of clinical experience, independently evaluated the answers provided by these generative AI platforms.
Results
The generative AI platforms scored an average of 5.5 out of 10 points. Wrtn achieved the highest score at 6 points, followed by GPT-4 and Gemini, each with 5.5, and Bing, scoring 5 points. The weighted κ for inter-rater reliability was 0.597 (P<0.001). The generative AI platforms performed well in explaining the occult blood test for cancer screening, keyhole surgery, and dietary recommendations for cancer prevention. However, they demonstrated significant limitations in answering more complex topics, such as estimating survival rates following surgery, choosing targeted therapy after surgery, and accurately reporting the mortality rate due to colon cancer in Korea.
Conclusion
The findings suggest that using these generative AI platforms as educational resources for patients and their families regarding colon cancer is premature. Further training on colorectal diseases is required before these AI platforms can be considered reliable information sources for the general public in Korea.

Minimally invasive surgery

Minimally invasive transanal excision for rectal tumors: technical feasibility compared to conventional approach: Ji Yeon Mun, Gyu Sung Geong, Nina Yoo, Hyung Jin Kim, Hyeon-Min Cho, Bong-Hyeon Kye; Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(2):162-168. Published online April 29, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00864.0123

1,436 View
79 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Citations

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
The technique for transanal resection of rectal tumors has evolved from conventional methods to minimally invasive approaches. However, the research comparing long-term results between these approaches is limited.
Methods
Between 2016 and 2022, a total of 133 patients who underwent transanal excision were analyzed. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to surgical approach: conventional transanal approach (CTA) and minimally invasive transanal approach (MTA). Medical records were analyzed to compare surgical and oncological outcomes between the 2 groups.
Results
There were no significant differences observed in patient’s demographics and tumor characteristics, except the MTA group exhibited a statistically longer distance from the anal verge. Although statistical significance was not reached, the MTA group demonstrated a 100% margin-negative rate in contrast to the CTA group, which had worse outcomes for both margin status and fragmentation. Recurrence was observed only in the CTA group containing pT1 rectal cancer and grade 1 neuroendocrine tumor, with negative margins and no fragmentation.
Conclusion
The minimally invasive approach did not demonstrate statistical superiority but showed technical feasibility through the absence of margin-positive cases and the use of the clip handle method. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and assess broader applicability.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Minimally invasive transanal excision over conventional transanal excision: pursuing the perfect removal of early rectal cancer
HyungJoo Baik
Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(2): 105. CrossRef

Minimally invasive surgery

Impact of single-port laparoscopic approach on scar assessment by patients and observers: a multicenter retrospective study: Sung Uk Bae, Kyeong Eui Kim, Chang-Woo Kim, Ji-Hoon Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Yoon-Suk Lee, Seong Kyu Baek, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(2):154-161. Published online April 29, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00563.0080

1,010 View
59 Download
1 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This study aimed to compare the wound cosmesis of a single-incision approach on scar assessment after laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.
Methods
This study included 32 patients undergoing single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and 61 patients undergoing multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for colon cancer at 3 tertiary referral hospitals between September 2011 and December 2019. We modified and applied the Korean version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) to assess cosmetic outcomes. To assess the interobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient values for the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), the surgeons evaluated 5 images of postoperative scars.
Results
No significant differences were observed in the time before the return of normal bowel function, time to sips of water and soft diet initiation, length of in-hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate. The SPLS group had a shorter total incision length than the MPLS group. The POSAS favored the SPLS approach, revealing significant differences in the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), OSAS, and overall scores. The SPLS approach was an independent factor influencing the POSAS, PSAS, and OSAS scores. Eleven colorectal surgeons had a significantly substantial intraclass coefficient.
Conclusion
The cosmetic outcomes of SPLS as assessed by the patients and surgeons were superior to those of MPLS in colon cancer. Reducing the number of ports is an independent factor affecting scar assessment by patients and observers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Investigating the Efficacy of Layered Moderate Tension Reduction Suturing in Facial Aesthetic Surgery
Gui H Wang, Jin Y Gang, Yan Li
Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef

Complications

Bedside endoscopic inspection of colorectal anastomoses in the early postoperative period: a 2-center prospective feasibility study: David J. Nijssen, Roel Hompes, Jurriaan Tuynman, Jimme K. Wiggers, Willem A. Bemelman, Saidah Sahid, James Kinross, Wytze Laméris; Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(2):127-135. Published online April 14, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00584.0083

1,447 View
93 Download
1 Web of Science

Abstract PDF: Purpose
Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery can reduce severe postoperative morbidity and ensure successful treatment. This study evaluated the feasibility of bedside endoscopic inspection of the anastomosis early postoperatively using a point-of-care digital rectoscope.
Methods
This prospective study was conducted at 2 tertiary centers. Patients who underwent minimally invasive or open sphincter-preserving surgery with creation of a colorectal or coloanal anastomosis were included. Data were collected from December 2022 to October 2023. Bedside anastomotic inspections were performed postoperative day (POD) 3 to 5 using a point-of-care digital rectoscope. The primary outcome was feasibility, defined as adequate clinical assessment of the anastomosis during bedside inspection. Secondary outcomes included patient tolerability, efficacy compared to other diagnostic methods, and clinical outcomes during 90 days of follow-up.
Results
In total, 35 patients were included. All bedside anastomotic inspections were carried out successfully. The examination showed complete visibility of the entire anastomosis in 30 patients (85.7%), with minimal discomfort reported by 3 (8.6%). No adverse events were recorded. AL occurred in 6 patients (17.1%), with 3 cases detected during bedside inspections between POD 3 and 5. Two leaks were detected without clinical or biochemical suspicion. Three patients with negative rectoscopy between POD 3 and 5 were later diagnosed with AL: 2 by a computed tomography scan and 1 by a bedside rectoscopy.
Conclusion
Bedside inspection of rectal anastomoses early postoperatively is feasible and tolerable for patients. Routine anastomotic inspections can detect early AL even without clear clinical or biochemical signs.

Guideline

ERAS

The 2024 Korean Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines for colorectal cancer: a secondary publication: Kil-yong Lee, Soo Young Lee, Miyoung Choi, Moonjin Kim, Ji Hong Kim, Ju Myung Song, Seung Yoon Yang, In Jun Yang, Moon Suk Choi, Seung Rim Han, Eon Chul Han, Sang Hyun Hong, Do Joong Park, Sang-Jae Park, the Korean Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Committee within the Korean Society of Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition; Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(1):3-26. Published online February 20, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00836.0119

4,838 View
236 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: The Korean Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Committee within the Korean Society of Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition was established to develop ERAS guidelines tailored to the Korean context. This guideline focuses on creating the most current evidence-based practice guidelines for ERAS purposes, based on systematic reviews. All key questions targeted randomized controlled trials exclusively, and if fewer than 2 were available, studies employing propensity score matching were also included. Recommendations for each key question were marked with strength of recommendation and level of evidence following internal and external review processes by the committee.

Original Articles

Colorectal cancer

Comparison of colorectal cancer surgery patients in intensive care between rural and metropolitan hospitals in Australia: a national cohort study: Jessica A. Paynter, Zakary Doherty, Chun Hin Angus Lee, Kirby R. Qin, Janelle Brennan, David Pilcher; Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(1):68-76. Published online January 24, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00269.0038

1,415 View
103 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose
A small proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) surgical patients will require an admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) within the early postoperative period. This study aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to an ICU following CRC surgery per hospital type (metropolitan vs. rural) over a decade in Australia.
Methods
A retrospective cohort analysis was undertaken of all adult patients admitted to a participating Australian ICUs following CRC surgery between January 2011 and December 2021. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.
Results
Over the 10-year period, 19,611 patients were treated in 122 metropolitan ICUs and 4,108 patients were treated in 42 rural ICUs. Rural ICUs had a lower proportion of annual admissions following CRC surgery (20 vs. 36, P<0.001). Patients admitted to a rural ICU were more likely to have undergone emergency CRC surgery compared to those admitted to a metropolitan cohort (28.5% vs. 13.8%, P<0.001). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between metropolitan and rural hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73–1.35; P=0.500). There was a general trend for lower mortality in later years of the study with the odds of death in the final year of the study (2021) almost half that of the first study year (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34–0.80; P=0.003).
Conclusion
There was no difference between in-hospital mortality outcomes for CRC surgical patients requiring ICU admission between metropolitan and rural hospitals. These findings may contribute to discussions regarding rural scope of colorectal practice within Australia and globally.

Minimally invasive surgery

Robotic surgery may lead to reduced postoperative inflammatory stress in colon cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis: Eun Ji Park, Gyong Tae Noh, Yong Joon Lee, Min Young Park, Seung Yoon Yang, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Kang Young Lee, Byung Soh Min; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):594-601. Published online December 6, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00171.0024

1,337 View
74 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Citations

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
Robot-assisted surgery is readily applied to every type of colorectal surgeries. However, studies showing the safety and feasibility of robotic surgery (RS) have dealt with rectal cancer more than colon cancer. This study aimed to investigate how technical advantages of RS can translate into actual clinical outcomes that represent postoperative systemic response.
Methods
This study retrospectively reviewed consecutive cases in a single tertiary medical center in Korea. Patients with primary colon cancer who underwent curative resection between 2006 and 2012 were included. Propensity score matching was done to adjust baseline patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, tumor profile, pathologic stage, operating surgeon, surgery extent) between open surgery (OS), laparoscopic surgery (LS), and RS groups.
Results
After propensity score matching, there were 66 patients in each group for analysis, and there was no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics. Maximal postoperative leukocyte count was lowest in the RS group and highest in the OS group (P=0.021). Similar results were observed for postoperative neutrophil count (P=0.024). Postoperative prognostic nutritional index was highest in the RS group and lowest in the OS group (P<0.001). The time taken to first flatus and soft diet resumption was longest in the OS group and shortest in the RS group (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Among all groups, other short-term postoperative outcomes such as hospital stay and complications did not show significant difference, and oncological survival results were similar.
Conclusion
Better postoperative inflammatory indices in the RS group may correlate with their faster recovery of bowel motility and diet resumption compared to LS and OS groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Übergangsphase zur roboterassistierten Chirurgie beim kolorektalen Karzinom: eine vergleichende konsekutive Kohortenstudie
U. A. Dietz, M. Kalisvaart, S. Maksimovic, R. Frey, M. Ramser, B. M. Erhart, U. Pfefferkorn
Die Chirurgie.2025;[Epub] CrossRef

Video

Minimally invasive surgery

Robotic abdominoperineal resection, bilateral robotic groin node dissection and simultaneous perineal gracilis flap reconstruction for locally advanced node-positive anal squamous cell carcinoma: Mohammed Ali, Melanie Holzgang, Vivekanandan Kumar, Dhalia Masud, Sandeep Kapur, Ahmed El-Hadi, Dolly Dowsett, Irshad Shaikh; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):613-615. Published online December 2, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00801.0114

1,386 View
52 Download

PDF Supplementary Material

Original Article

ERAS

Impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program on the management of complications after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer: Victoria Weets, Hélène Meillat, Jacques Emmanuel Saadoun, Marie Dazza, Cécile de Chaisemartin, Bernard Lelong; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(5):440-450. Published online September 20, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00850.0121

4,927 View
173 Download
1 Web of Science
2 Citations

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) reduces postoperative complications (POCs) after colorectal surgery; however, its impact on the management of POCs remains unclear. This study compared the diagnosis and management of POCs before and after implementing our ERAS protocol after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer and examined the short- and mid-term oncologic impacts.
Methods
This single-center, retrospective study evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer between 2012 and 2021, focusing on the incidence of POCs within 90 days. We compared outcomes before (standard group) and after (ERAS group) the implementation of our ERAS protocol in January 2016.
Results
Significantly fewer patients in the ERAS group developed POCs (standard vs. ERAS, 136 of 380 patients [35.8%] vs.136 of 660 patients [20.6%]; P<0.01). The ERAS group had a significantly shorter mean total length of stay after POCs (13.1 days vs. 11.4 days, P=0.04), and the rates of life-threatening complications (6.7% vs. 0.7%) and 1-year mortality (7.4% vs. 1.5%) were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the standard group. Among patients with anastomotic complications, laparoscopic reoperation was significantly more common in the ERAS group than in the standard group (8.3% vs. 75.0%, P<0.01). Among patients with postoperative ileus, the diagnosis and recovery times were significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the standard group, resulting in a shorter total length of stay (13.5 days vs. 10 days, P<0.01).
Conclusion
The implementation of an ERAS protocol did not eliminate all POCs, but it did accelerate their diagnosis and management and improved patient outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Less is more: simplifying patient-centered cancer care
In Ja Park
Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(3): 173. CrossRef
Optimizing postoperative pain management in minimally invasive colorectal surgery
Soo Young Lee
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 525. CrossRef

Reviews

Minimally invasive surgery

Robotic colorectal surgery training: Portsmouth perspective: Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Sentilnathan Subramaniam, Diana Ronconi Di Giuseppe, Rauand Duhoky, Jim S. Khan; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):350-362. Published online August 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00444.0063

4,257 View
115 Download
3 Web of Science
3 Citations

Abstract PDF

This study aims to discuss the principles and pillars of robotic colorectal surgery training and share the training pathway at Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust. A narrative review is presented to discuss all the relevant and critical steps in robotic surgical training. Robotic training requires a stepwise approach, including theoretical knowledge, case observation, simulation, dry lab, wet lab, tutored programs, proctoring (in person or telementoring), procedure-specific training, and follow-up. Portsmouth Colorectal has an established robotic training model with a safe stepwise approach that has been demonstrated through perioperative and oncological results. Robotic surgery training should enable a trainee to use the robotic platform safely and effectively, minimize errors, and enhance performance with improved outcomes. Portsmouth Colorectal has provided such a stepwise training program since 2015 and continues to promote and augment safe robotic training in its field. Safe and efficient training programs are essential to upholding the optimal standard of care.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in colorectal cancer management: a narrative review of clinical efficacy and multidisciplinary integration
Engeng Chen, Li Chen, Wei Zhang
Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Entwicklung und Implementation eines strukturierten Ausbildungsprogramms in der robotischen Chirurgie
Sarah Englert, Natascha Tschukewitsch, Alexa Wölfl, Christoph Justinger
Die Chirurgie.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology
In Ja Park
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 285. CrossRef

Translational/basic research

Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches in colorectal surgery: Bigyan B. Mainali, James J. Yoo, Mitchell R. Ladd; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):336-349. Published online August 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00437.0062

3,681 View
75 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Citations

Abstract PDF

Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM) is an emerging field that has provided new therapeutic opportunities by delivering innovative solutions. The development of nontraditional therapies for previously unsolvable diseases and conditions has brought hope and excitement to countless individuals globally. Many regenerative medicine therapies have been developed and delivered to patients clinically. The technology platforms developed in regenerative medicine have been expanded to various medical areas; however, their applications in colorectal surgery remain limited. Applying TERM technologies to engineer biological tissue and organ substitutes may address the current therapeutic challenges and overcome some complications in colorectal surgery, such as inflammatory bowel diseases, short bowel syndrome, and diseases of motility and neuromuscular function. This review provides a comprehensive overview of TERM applications in colorectal surgery, highlighting the current state of the art, including preclinical and clinical studies, current challenges, and future perspectives. This article synthesizes the latest findings, providing a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers aiming to integrate TERM into colorectal surgical practice.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology
In Ja Park
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 285. CrossRef

Colorectal cancer

Dissection layer selection based on an understanding of pelvic fascial anatomy in transanal total mesorectal excision: Daichi Kitaguchi, Masaaki Ito; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):375-383. Published online August 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00178.0025

3,243 View
122 Download
2 Web of Science
2 Citations

Abstract PDF

This study aimed to review the historical transition of rectal cancer surgery and recent evidence regarding transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Additionally, it outlined the anatomical landmarks and technical considerations essential for successful TaTME. Anatomical studies and surgical techniques were analyzed to identify key landmarks and procedural steps crucial for TaTME. TaTME offers improved visibility and maneuverability even in the deep and narrow pelvis and is expected to contribute to tumor radical cure rates. By securing the circumferential resection margin and distal margin while preserving pelvic autonomic nerve function, TaTME holds promise for maintaining postoperative urinary and sexual functions. Key anatomical landmarks include the endopelvic fascia posteriorly, the S4-pelvic splanchnic nerve laterally, and the prostate or posterior vaginal wall anteriorly. Selecting the appropriate dissection layer based on tumor depth and ensuring precise incision of the tendinous arch of the pelvic fascia contributes to successful TaTME outcomes. TaTME represents a significant advancement in rectal cancer surgery, offering improved outcomes through meticulous attention to anatomical detail and precise dissection techniques. Understanding the historical context of rectal cancer surgery alongside recent evidence on TaTME is essential for optimizing patient outcomes and expanding the safe implementation of this innovative approach.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology
In Ja Park
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 285. CrossRef
Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280. CrossRef

ERAS

Tolerance to and postoperative outcomes with early oral feeding following elective bowel surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis: Lord Mvoula, Evelyn Irizarry; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):538-547. Published online July 31, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00472.0067

2,876 View
102 Download

Abstract PDF: Purpose
Advancements in gastrointestinal surgery have directed attention toward optimizing recovery, including through the use of feeding methods that reduce prolonged postoperative hospital stays, complications, and mortality, among other undesirable outcomes. This study’s primary goals were to identify current peer-reviewed literature reporting the postoperative outcomes of elective bowel surgery and to evaluate the clinical evidence of patients’ tolerance to oral feeding following elective bowel surgery.
Methods
An exhaustive literature search was conducted via PubMed and Scopus. The search results were screened for potential articles, and articles were assessed for eligibility based on prespecified eligibility criteria. The data were synthesized, and the results were reported and discussed thematically.
Results
The database search yielded 1,667 articles, from which 18 randomized controlled trials were chosen for inclusion in this study. This study included 874 early oral feeding (EOF) patients, 865 traditional oral feeding patients, and 91 patients whose postoperative care was unspecified. Data synthesis was done, and meta-analyses were conducted. The results showed that EOF patients required a significantly shorter time to tolerate a solid diet and had shorter hospital stays. In addition, bowel function was restored earlier in EOF groups.
Conclusion
The results show good tolerance to EOF, shorter hospitalizations, and faster restoration of bowel function, suggesting that EOF after elective bowel surgery is relatively safe. However, further studies with similar baseline conditions should be conducted to verify these results.

Original Article

Minimally invasive surgery

Preoperative localization of potentially invisible colonic lesions on the laparoscopic operation field: using autologous blood tattooing: Ji Yeon Mun, Hyunjoon An, Ri Na Yoo, Hyeon-Min Cho, Bong-Hyeon Kye; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):225-233. Published online June 19, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00059.0008

3,010 View
189 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Citations

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF

Purpose
Preoperative colonoscopic (POC) localization is recommended for patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colectomy for early colon cancer. Among the various localization method, POC tattooing localization has been widely used. Several dyes have been used for tattooing, but dye has disadvantages, including foreign body reactions. For this reason, we have used autologous blood tattooing for POC localization. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the autologous blood tattooing method.
Methods
This study included patients who required POC localization of the colonic neoplasm among the patients who were scheduled for elective colon resection. The indication for localization was early colon cancer (clinically T1 or T2) or colonic neoplasms that could not be resected endoscopically. POC autologous blood tattooing was performed after saline injection, and 2 hemoclips were applied.
Results
A total of 45 patients who underwent autologous blood tattooing and laparoscopic colectomy were included in this study. All POC localization sites were visible in the laparoscopic view. POC localization sites showed almost perfect agreement with intraoperative surgical findings. There were no complications like bowel perforation, peritonitis, hemoperitoneum, and mesenteric hematoma.
Conclusion
Autologous blood is a safe and effective agent for localizing materials that can replace previous dyes. However, a large prospective case-control study is required for the routine application of this procedure in early colon cancer or colonic neoplasms.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Meeting report on the 8th Asian Science Editors’ Conference and Workshop 2024
Eun Jung Park
Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 66. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 12
Next
Last

Search