Purpose Traditionally, fasting from midnight has been a standard practice in elective surgery for reduce the risk of aspiration. However, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs recommend clear fluid intake until 2 hours before anesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and patient satisfaction of preoperative carbohydrate drink intake until 2 hours before colorectal cancer surgery.
Methods Sixty patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery between April 2021 and February 2023 at Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center were enrolled. This study included 30 patients who fasted from midnight (nothing by mouth [NPO] group) and 30 patients who consumed a high concentration of complex carbohydrate fluids (New Care NO-NPO) until 2 hours before surgery (No-NPO group). Patient satisfaction was assessed using a visual analog scale. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared.
Results Basic characteristics of patients were similar for the 2 groups. The No-NPO group had a significantly higher patient satisfaction score than the NPO group (3.7 vs. 2.2, P=0.040). Scores of operative difficulty, operation time, blood loss, postoperative recovery parameters, and postoperative complication rates were similar for the 2 groups. Pathological outcomes were also comparable. No mortality occurred in either group.
Conclusion High-concentration carbohydrate fluid intake until 2 hours before induction of anesthesia could improve patient satisfaction without increasing postoperative complications, demonstrating its safety and feasibility in colorectal cancer surgery.
Trial registration CRIS (cris.nih.go.kr) identifier: KCT0011323.
Purpose Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a significant cause of morbidity following colorectal surgery. While mechanical bowel preparation combined with oral antibiotics is known to reduce SSIs, the independent effect of oral antibiotics alone remains unclear. This study compared the efficacy of oral antibiotic bowel preparation (OABP) versus no bowel preparation (NBP) in reducing SSIs among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.
Methods A prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial was performed at a tertiary care center in India. Eighty-six patients scheduled for elective colorectal surgery were randomized to receive either OABP (oral ciprofloxacin and metronidazole) or placebo, in addition to standard intravenous antibiotics. The primary outcome was the rate of SSIs. Secondary outcomes included anastomotic leak, length of hospital stay, overall morbidity, and readmission rates.
Results Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The incidence of SSI was significantly lower in the OABP group compared to the NBP group (14.0% vs. 41.9%, P<0.01). The severity of infections and postoperative complications was also reduced in the OABP group (P<0.01). Although rates of anastomotic leak, readmission, and reoperation were higher in the NBP group, these differences were not statistically significant. The mean duration of hospital stay was shorter for patients in the OABP group (8.09 days vs. 11.28 days, P<0.01). No adverse effects related to oral antibiotics were observed.
Conclusion OABP without mechanical cleansing significantly reduces SSIs, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay in elective colorectal surgery. This approach is safe and effective, offering a strategy to improve surgical outcomes.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Oral antibiotics alone for bowel preparation in colorectal surgery: time to rethink tradition? Soo Young Lee Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(5): 367. CrossRef
Ricardo Purchio Galletti, Gabriel Andrade Agareno, Lucas de Abreu Sesconetto, Rafael Benjamim Rosa da Silva, Rafael Vaz Pandini, Lucas Soares Gerbasi, Victor Edmond Seid, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Francisco Tustumi
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(5):375-384. Published online December 20, 2022
Purpose This study aimed to review the outcomes of redo procedures for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses.
Methods A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases. The inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing colectomy with primary colorectal or coloanal anastomosis and studies that assessed the postoperative results. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42021267715).
Results Eleven articles met the eligibility criteria and were selected. The studied population size ranged from 7 to 78 patients. The overall mortality rate was 0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%–0.01%). The postoperative complication rate was 40% (95% CI, 40%–50%). The length of hospital stay was 13.68 days (95% CI, 11.3–16.06 days). After redo surgery, 82% of the patients were free of stoma (95% CI, 75%–90%), and 24% of patients (95% CI, 0%–39%) had fecal incontinence. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (P=0.002) was associated with a lower probability of being free of stoma in meta-regression.
Conclusion Redo colorectal and coloanal anastomoses are strategies to restore colonic continuity. The decision to perform a redo operation should be based on a proper evaluation of the morbidity and mortality risks, the probability of remaining free of stoma, the quality of life, and a functional assessment.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Abdominoperineal pull-through with delayed coloanal anastomosis for pelvic anastomotic failure—a systematic review T. J. K. Tan, S.-M. Ng, T. S. Q. Lee, E. K.-W. Tan, I. Seow-En Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic redo endorectal pull‐through procedure for complex rectovaginal fistula after rectal resection for endometriosis: A Video Vignette Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Francisco Tustumi, Ana Sarah Portilho, Lucas de Araujo Horcel, Victor Edmond Seid Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(11): 2284. CrossRef
Purpose This study was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) in older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing curative resection.
Methods We retrospectively analyzed 244 older patients (aged 75 years or higher) with pathological stage II or III CRC who underwent curative surgery between 2008 and 2016. The optimal value of CAR was calculated and its correlation with the clinicopathological factors and prognosis was examined.
Results The optimal cutoff value of the CAR was 0.085. High preoperative CAR was significantly associated with high carcinoembryonic antigen levels (P=0.001), larger tumor size (P<0.001), and pT factor (P=0.001). On multivariate analysis, high CAR was independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival (P=0.042) and overall survival (P=0.001).
Conclusion Preoperative elevated CAR could be considered as an adverse predictor of both relapse-free survival and overall survival in older patients with CRC undergoing curative surgery.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio Is an Independent Risk Factor for Recurrence and Survival Following Curative Resection of Stage I–III Colorectal Cancer in Older Patients Tomoaki Bekki, Manabu Shimomura, Minoru Hattori, Saki Sato, Atsuhiro Watanabe, Sho Ishikawa, Kouki Imaoka, Kosuke Ono, Keiso Matsubara, Tetsuya Mochizuki, Shintaro Akabane, Takuya Yano, Hideki Ohdan Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(7): 4812. CrossRef
Towards a Gradual Optimization of Oncologic Prognostic Factors in the Era of the Frail Patient: The Potential Role of Preoperative Inflammation and Nutritional Status Giuseppe Zimmitti Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(8): 4853. CrossRef
Prognostic role of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis Menglu Dai, Wei Wu Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The association of blood biomarkers with treatment response and adverse health outcomes in older patients with solid tumors: A systematic review Yara van Holstein, P. Janne E. van den Berkmortel, Stella Trompet, Diana van Heemst, Frederiek van den Bos, Marieke Roemeling-van Rhijn, Nienke A. de Glas, Marian Beekman, P. Eline Slagboom, Johanneke E.A. Portielje, Simon P. Mooijaart, Barbara C. van Mun Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2023; 14(7): 101567. CrossRef
Prognostic prediction of colorectal cancer using the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio: the importance of inflammatory biomarkers and their association with long-term outcomes Chul Seung Lee Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 287. CrossRef
Purpose In the West, diverticular disease is located mainly in the left colon. However, it can also present in the right colon, with an incidence of 1% to 2% in Caucasians. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience in right-sided acute diverticulitis (RD).
Methods In this retrospective study, 410 patients with acute diverticulitis treated from 2013 to 2020 were included in a university hospital in Córdoba, Argentina. Colonic diverticulitis was stratified into 2 groups; RD and left-sided acute diverticulitis. Demographic and clinical variables, laboratory and imaging findings, type of treatment, follow-up, and recurrence were analyzed.
Results Sixteen patients (3.9%) with RD were identified; 62.5% were male and the mean age was 40.7±11.7 years. A total of 81.3% were Caucasian and 18.7% Native American. Significant differences were found between both groups of diverticulitis; patients with RD were younger (P=0.001), with lower BMI (P=0.01), comorbidity rate (P=0.01), Charlson comorbidity index (P=0.02), hospital stay (P=0.01), severity according to the Hinchey classification (P=0.001) and had a lower recurrence rate (P=0.001). There were no significant differences in sex (P=0.95), duration of pain until admission (P=0.05), laboratory findings (P=0.23) and treatment (P=0.34).
Conclusion Conservative treatment predominated in RD, with a lower rate of complications and recurrences, providing data that support conservative therapy as initial treatment in RD in our environment.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comparison of surgical management and outcomes of acute right
colic and sigmoid diverticulitis: a French national retrospective cohort study E. Karam, C. Sabbagh, L. Beyer-Bergeot, P. Zerbib, V. Bridoux, G. Manceau, Y. Panis, E. Buscail, A. Venara, I. Khaoudy, M. Gaillard, M. Viennet, A. Thobie, B. Menahem, C. Eveno, C. Bonnel, J.-Y. Mabrut, B. Badic, C. Godet, Y. Eid, E. Duchalais, Z. Lakkis, Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose One of the most common ileostomy-related complications is high output stoma (HOS) which causes significant fluids and electrolytes disturbances. We aimed to analyze the incidence, severity, and risk factors for readmission for HOS.
Methods We reviewed all patients who underwent loop ileostomy closure in a single institution between 2010 and 2020. Patients that were readmitted for dehydration due to HOS during the time interval between the creation and the closure of the stoma were identified and divided into a study (HOS) group. The remaining patients constructed the control group.
Results A total of 307 patients were included in this study, out of which, 41 patients were readmitted 73 times (23.7% readmission rate) for the HOS group, and the remaining 266 patients constructed the control group. Multivariate analysis identified; advanced American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (PS) classification, elevated baseline creatinine, and open surgery as risk factors for HOS. Renal function worsened among the entire cohort between the construction of the stoma to its closure (mean creatinine of 0.82 vs. 0.96, P<0.0001).
Conclusion Loop ileostomy formation is associated with a substantial readmission rate for dehydration as a result of HOS, and increasing the risk for renal impairment during the duration of the diversion. We identified advanced ASA PS classification, open surgery, and elevated baseline creatinine as predictors for HOS.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
High output stoma after surgery for rectal cancer - a risk factor for low anterior resection syndrome? Xuena Zhang, Qingyu Meng, Jianna Du, Zhongtao Tian, Yinju Li, Bin Yu, Wenbo Niu BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Atrial Flutter With Intraventricular Conduction Delay, Hypotension, and Bradycardia in the Setting of High-Output Ileostomy With Renal Failure, Hyperkalemia, and Metabolic Acidosis: A Case Report With Brief Literature Review Edinen Asuka, Barbara Odac, Andrew Ndakotsu, Anastasia Postoev Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Preoperative High Agatston Score in Aorta Leads to Postoperative High-Output Ileostomy Yusuke Kono, Manabu Yamamoto, Chiharu Yasui, Ryo Ishiguro, Takuki Yagyu, Kyoichi Kihara, Tomoyuki Matsunaga, Shuichi Takano, Naruo Tokuyasu, Teruhisa Sakamoto, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara Journal of Surgical Research.2025; 314: 139. CrossRef
A review of chyme reinfusion: new tech solutions for age old problems Chen Liu, Sameer Bhat, Ian Bissett, Gregory O'Grady Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand.2024; 54(2): 161. CrossRef
Knowledge, attitudes, practices and associated factors regarding high output stoma of ileostomy among colorectal surgical nurses: a multicentre cross-sectional study Qing Zhang, Jianan Sun, Dongxue Wang, Quan Wang, Haiyan Hu Supportive Care in Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Morphological predictors of water-electrolyte disorders in patients with preventive ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer A.I. Maksimkin, Z.A. Bagatelia, V.M. Kulushev, E.N. Gordienko, M.S. Lebedko, S.S. Anikina, E.P. Shin Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery.2024; (4): 16. CrossRef
The Frequency of Stoma-Related Readmissions After Emergency and Elective Ileostomy Formation: The Leicester Experience Ting-Wei Wu, Wen Yuan Chung, Hui En Jewel Ng, Ashley Yap, Konstantinos Baronos, Deepak Paul, Christopher P Neal, David Bowrey Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Predictors of High-output Stoma in Diverting Ileostomy for Rectal Cancer Surgery Hiroaki Uehara, Hitoshi Kameyama, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Yuya Enoki Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2023; 76(3): 286. CrossRef
Morpho-functional aspects of various parts of the intestine and risk factors associated with the preventive ileostomy (review) A. I. Maksimkin, Z. A. Bagatelia, E. N. Gordienko, E. B. Emelyanova, D. M. Sakaeva Koloproktologia.2023; 22(4): 147. CrossRef
Obstructive and secretory complications of diverting ileostomy Shingo Tsujinaka, Hideyuki Suzuki, Tomoya Miura, Yoshihiro Sato, Chikashi Shibata World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(47): 6732. CrossRef
With the advent of checkpoint inhibitors, it has opened up opportunities for numerous cancer patients. However, as is the case with every treatment, complications need to be weighed. Gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as diarrhea and colitis are well-known complications for checkpoint inhibitors. In severe cases, colitis-induced colonic perforation may occur with an estimation of 1.0% to 1.5% in anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. However, only a handful of cases of such devastating complications have been reported in anti-PD-1 antibodies such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab. We here report a case of intestinal perforation in a patient treated with nivolumab.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Intestinal perforation in recurrent cervical cancer following bevacizumab and pembrolizumab therapy: A case report Yuanchun Fan, Shihao Liu, Jiangjing Zhao, Yawei Fu, Jiahui Yang, Chunyang Wang, Hui Zhang Medicine.2025; 104(15): e40473. CrossRef
Iatrogenic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies on the lower gastrointestinal tract Dua Abuquteish, Ahmad Yousef Alazzam, Aws Khalid Abushanab, Omar Amjad Almajdoubah, Sara Aljfout, Mahmoud Taysir Mousa, Mus’ab Theeb Mustafa, Bashar Khater, Maher Sughayer Frontline Gastroenterology.2025; : flgastro-2025-103094. CrossRef
Chemotherapy-associated pneumoperitoneum in cancer patients: a scoping review Renee M. Maina, Caroline Rader, Jeevan Kypa, Constantine Asahngwa, Hilary M. Jasmin, Nia N. Zalamea, John S. Nelson, Jonathan L. Altomar, Mary Brinson Owens, Clarisse S. Muenyi, Denis A. Foretia Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(5): 2828. CrossRef
Gastrointestinal perforation associated with novel antineoplastic agents: A real-world study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Zicheng Yu, Haibin Zhu, Hongjun Chen, Lifei Zhu, Xiaolan Liao Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Immune-related Adverse Events: A Histopathologic Review Zainab I. Alruwaii, Elizabeth A. Montgomery Advances in Anatomic Pathology.2023; 30(3): 230. CrossRef
An updated review of gastrointestinal toxicity induced by PD-1 inhibitors: from mechanisms to management Yiyu Cheng, Fangmei Ling, Junrong Li, Yidong Chen, Mingyang Xu, Shuang Li, Liangru Zhu Frontiers in Immunology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Immune-related Adverse Events: A Histopathologic Review Zainab I. Alruwaii, Elizabeth A. Montgomery Advances in Anatomic Pathology.2022; 29(4): 183. CrossRef
Purpose Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported to predict adverse survival outcomes among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study evaluates the prognostic value of NLR among patients with obstructing CRC who successfully underwent stenting before curative surgery.
Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent stenting before surgery. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative outcomes, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. NLR was calculated from the differential white blood cell counts at least 4 days after successful stenting, before elective surgery. Optimal cutoff to dichotomize NLR was obtained by maximizing log-rank test statistic with recursive partitioning of KaplanMeier RFS and OS curves. The optimal cutoff for high NLR was ≥ 5 at presentation before stenting, and ≥ 4 after stenting.
Results Fifty-seven patients with localized obstructing CRC underwent successful endoscopic stenting before curative surgery. High NLR was associated with lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.006) and apical lymph node involvement (P = 0.034). Major perioperative complication(s) (hazard ratio [HR], 11.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.49 to 51.56; P < 0.01) and high NLR (HR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.46 to 9.35; P < 0.01) negatively impacted OS on univariate and multivariate analyses. High NLR negatively impacted RFS on univariate analysis (HR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.29 to 6.60; P = 0.01).
Conclusion NLR of ≥ 4 after stenting is an independent prognostic factor among patients with obstructing localized CRC who are successfully decompressed by endoscopic stenting before curative surgery.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098. CrossRef
Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 97. CrossRef
Gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Concomitant cytomegalovirus (CMV) enteritis worsens the prognosis of this condition. We report a case of small bowel perforation associated with gastrointestinal GVHD and CMV enteritis in a patient with leukemia who was successfully treated surgically. A 39-year-old man presented with intestinal perforation necessitating emergency surgical intervention. He was diagnosed with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and developed severe gastrointestinal GVHD and CMV enteritis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. His terminal ileum showed a perforation with diffuse wall thinning, and petechiae were observed over long segments of the distal ileum and the proximal colon. Small bowel segmental resection and a subtotal colectomy with a double-barreled ileocolostomy were performed. The patient recovered uneventfully after the operation. Based on reports described in the literature, surgery plays a minor role in the management of gastrointestinal GVHD; however, timely surgical intervention could be effective in selected patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Cytomegalovirus enteritis resistant to antiviral drugs improved following total colectomy Sae Kawata, Jumpei Takamatsu, Yuichi Yasue, Aya Fukuhara, Jinkoo Kang Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose To identify factors significantly associated with the mortality of patients with left colonic perforation, and to compare the outcome of Hartmann’s procedure (HP) and primary repair (PR) or primary anastomosis (PA) in patients with left colonic perforation without factors associated with mortality.
Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery for left colonic perforation from January 2009 to February 2018. Preoperative factors related to postoperative mortality, including vital signs, laboratory findings, and intraoperative findings, were analyzed by type of operation. The chi-square, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to analyze the data.
Results Ninety-one patients were included (36 men, 55 women), and 15 (16.5%) died postoperatively. Prognostic factors were age, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, bleeding tendency, acute kidney injury, hemodynamic instability, and the existence of feculent ascites. Leukopenia and longer operative time were independent risk factors for mortality. Seventy-nine patients did not have leukopenia and 30 of these patients who underwent PR without diversion were excluded from the subanalysis. HP was performed in 30 patients, and PR with diversion and PA with or without diversion were performed in 19. Compared to the other operative methods, HP had no advantage in reducing hospital mortality (P=0.458) and morbidity.
Conclusion Leukopenia could be an objective prognostic factor for left colonic perforation. Although HP is the gold standard for septic left colonic perforation, it did not improve the hospital mortality of the patients without leukopenia. For such patients, PR or PA may be suggested as an alternative option for left colonic perforation.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Risk Factors for Postoperative Major Morbidity, Anastomotic Leakage, Re-Surgery and Mortality in Patients with Colonic Perforation Maximilian Brunner, Lara Gärtner, Andreas Weiß, Klaus Weber, Axel Denz, Christian Krautz, Georg F. Weber, Robert Grützmann Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(17): 5220. CrossRef
Evaluation of Morbidity and Mortality in Iatrogenic Colonic Perforation During Colonoscopy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Ajibola A Adebisi, Daniel E Onobun, Adeola Adediran, Reginald N Ononye, Ethel O Ojo, Adedayo Oluyi, Ayotunde Ojo, Stephen Oputa Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Patient outcomes and prognostic factors associated with colonic perforation surgery: a retrospective study Do-bin Lee, Seonhui Shin, Chun-Seok Yang Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science.2022; 39(2): 133. CrossRef
Morbidity and Mortality of Neutropenic Patients in Visceral Surgery: A Narrative Review Ann-Kathrin Lederer, Fabian Bartsch, Markus Moehler, Peter Gaßmann, Hauke Lang Cells.2022; 11(20): 3314. CrossRef
Infectious complications are the biggest problem during bowel surgery, and one of the approaches to minimize them is the bowel cleaning method. It was expected that bowel cleaning could facilitate bowel manipulation as well as prevent infectious complications and further reduce anastomotic leakage. In the past, with the development of antibiotics, bowel cleaning and oral antibiotics (OA) were used together. However, with the success of emergency surgery and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, bowel cleaning was not routinely performed. Consequently, bowel cleaning using OA was gradually no longer used. Recently, there have been reports that only bowel cleaning is not helpful in reducing infectious complications such as surgical site infection (SSI) compared to OA and bowel cleaning. Accordingly, in order to reduce SSI, guidelines are changing the trend of only intestinal cleaning. However, a consistent regimen has not yet been established, and there is still controversy depending on the location of the lesion and the surgical method. Moreover, complications such as Clostridium difficile infection have not been clearly analyzed. In the present review, we considered the overall bowel preparation trends and identified the areas that require further research.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
General Principles of Risk Mitigation before Colorectal Surgery Sarah Atoui, A. Sender Liberman Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2026; 39(01): 015. CrossRef
Curiosity and the Cat Lester Gottesman Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2026; 69(1): 1. CrossRef
Advanced Protocols for Preoperative Colon Preparation: Enhancing Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery Marian Cerny, Ľudovít Danihel, Milan Schnorrer, Stefan Durdik Polish Journal of Surgery.2025; 97(5): 37. CrossRef
Feasibility of the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) Protocol in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgeries in a Tertiary Care Hospital—A Prospective Interventional Study Surya Theja, Seema Mishra, Sandeep Bhoriwal, Rakesh Garg, Sachidanand Jee Bharati, Vinod Kumar, Nishkarsh Gupta, Saurabh Vig, Sunil Kumar, S. V. S. Deo, Sushma Bhatnagar Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 15(2): 304. CrossRef
Influence of additional prophylactic oral antibiotics during mechanical bowel preparation on surgical site infection in patients receiving colorectal surgery Hayoung Lee, Jong Lyul Lee, Ji Sung Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok‐Byung Lim World Journal of Surgery.2024; 48(6): 1534. CrossRef
The Impact of Surgical Bowel Preparation on the Microbiome in Colon and Rectal Surgery Lauren Weaver, Alexander Troester, Cyrus Jahansouz Antibiotics.2024; 13(7): 580. CrossRef
Pre-Operative Mechanical Bowel Preparation Does Not Affect the Impact of Anastomosis Leakage in Left-Side Colorectal Surgery—A Single Center Observational Study Ludovít Danihel, Marian Cerny, Ivor Dropco, Petra Zrnikova, Milan Schnorrer, Marek Smolar, Miloslav Misanik, Stefan Durdik Life.2024; 14(9): 1092. CrossRef
Bowel cleansing, dysbiosis, and postoperative infection: the dots are starting to connect John C Alverdy British Journal of Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A prospective, randomized assessment of a novel, local antibiotic releasing platform for the prevention of superficial and deep surgical site infections O. Zmora, Y. Stark, O. Belotserkovsky, M. Reichert, G. A. Kozloski, N. Wasserberg, H. Tulchinsky, L. Segev, A. J. Senagore, N. Emanuel Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(3): 209. CrossRef
Bacterial Decontamination: Bowel Preparation and Chlorhexidine Bathing Yadin Bornstein, Elizabeth C. Wick Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2023; 36(03): 201. CrossRef
Effect of non-mechanical bowel preparation on postoperative gastrointestinal recovery following surgery on malignant gynecological tumors: A randomized controlled trial Shan-shan Wang, Hong-yan Xu, Xing-xia Li, Su-wen Feng European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2023; 64: 102320. CrossRef
The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery Min Ki Kim The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The Impact of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol on Colorectal Surgery in a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital Catarina Lopes, Mariana Vaz Gomes, Manuel Rosete, Ana Almeida, Luisa Isabel Silva, José Guilherme Tralhão Acta Médica Portuguesa.2022; 36(4): 254. CrossRef
Case Reports
Benign GI diease,Rare disease & stoma,Complication
Sung Hoon Kang, Hee Seok Moon, Jae Ho Park, Ju Seok Kim, Sun Hyung Kang, Eaum Seok Lee, Seok Hyun Kim, Byung Seok Lee, Jae Kyu Sung, Hyun Yong Jeong, Kyung Ha Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(Suppl 1):S18-S23. Published online May 15, 2020
Paradoxical reactions to tuberculosis (TB) treatment are characterized by an initial improvement of the clinical symptoms followed by clinical or radiological deterioration of existing tuberculous lesions, or by development of new lesions. Intestinal perforation in gastrointestinal TB can occur as a paradoxical reaction to antitubercular therapy. A 55-year-old man visited the outpatient department with lower abdominal pain and weight loss. He was diagnosed with intestinal TB and started antitubercular therapy. After 3 months of antitubercular therapy, a colonoscopy revealed improvement of the disease. Three days after the colonoscopy, the patient visited the emergency room complaining of abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography revealed extraluminal air-filled spaces in the pelvic cavity. We diagnosed a small bowel perforation and performed an emergency laparotomy and a right hemicolectomy with small bowel resection. This report describes the case of intestinal perforation presenting as a paradoxical reaction to antitubercular and provides a brief literature review.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Paradoxical ileocecal perforation during early anti-tuberculosis therapy: A rare case report Yoseph Mulatu Habte, Binyam Mulatu Habte, Yabetse Alemayehu Kifle, Esimael Musema Abdu, Makida Mulatu Habte, Shimelis Ayalew Yimer International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2025; 137: 112100. CrossRef
Réaction paradoxale tuberculeuse L.-D. Azoulay, A.-L. Houist, E. Feredj, W. Vindrios, S. Gallien La Revue de Médecine Interne.2024; 45(5): 279. CrossRef
Left hand abscess as a paradoxical reaction during treatment of disseminated tuberculosis in immunocompetent patient: case report and review of literature Aisha Alharbi, Aseel Aljahdali, Mohamed Firoze Ahamed, Hassan Almarhabi BMC Infectious Diseases.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Everolimus (Afinitor) is an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin. Polmacoxib (Acelex) is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that belongs to the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor family and is mainly used for treatment of arthritis. Intestinal perforation has not been reported previously as a complication of everolimus, and perforation of the lower intestinal tract caused by a selective COX-2 inhibitor is extremely rare. We present here a case of colon perforation that occurred after use of polmacoxib in a metastatic breast cancer patient who had been treated with everolimus for the preceding six months.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Identification of Drugs Associated With Oral Ulcers Based on Pharmacovigilance Xinyue Zhang, Xueqing Li, Wuda Huoshen, Shiting Li International Dental Journal.2025; 75(6): 103957. CrossRef
Multiple ulcers and perforation of small intestine with everolimus use in a patient with rectal neuroendocrine tumor: A case report Kentaro Abe, Shigenobu Emoto, Kazuhito Sasaki, Hiroaki Nozawa, Yoichi Yasunaga, Soichiro Ishihara International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2023; 106: 108094. CrossRef
Lymph node metastasis is regarded as an indubitable prognostic factor for predicting disease recurrence and survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Lymph node status based on examination of a resected specimen is a key element of the current staging system and is also a crucial factor to determine use of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection. However, the current tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system only incorporates the number of metastatic lymph nodes in the N category. Numerous attempts have been made to supplement this simplified N staging including lymph node ratio, distribution of metastatic lymph nodes, tumor deposits, or extracapsular invasion. In addition, several attempts have been made to identify more specific prognostic factors in resected colorectal specimens than lymph node status. In this review, we will discuss controversies in lymph node staging and factors that may influence survival beyond lymph node status.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Dual RPA-CRISPR/Cas13a parallel detection of serum cell-free RNA and internal SDK1 m7G for diagnosis of early colorectal cancer metastasis Chenxi Wu, Jie Zhang, Huirong Wu, Min Jiang, Jiaqi Cui, Lin Huang, Xiaofeng Zeng, Yun Lan, Haoyu Xiao, Tiantian Zhou, Jianfeng Zhang, Weifeng Ding Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical.2026; 450: 139236. CrossRef
Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Surgical Resection of Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer—A Multicenter Retrospective Study Hiroaki Nozawa, Sono Ito, Kazuhito Sasaki, Koji Murono, Shigenobu Emoto, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Shinichi Yamauchi, Yusuke Kinugasa, Yoichi Ajioka, Soichiro Ishihara Annals of Surgical Oncology.2025; 32(4): 2282. CrossRef
Lighthouses illuminating tumor metastasis: The application of fluorescent probes in the localization and imaging metastatic lymph nodes across various tumors Qi Dang, Linhao Zhang, Huipeng Ma, Xiaoshan Sun, Anguo Ren, Jiuyang Chen, Xiaohua Huang, Boyu Zhang, Wen Sun Biomaterials.2025; 316: 123020. CrossRef
Lymph node yield does not affect the cancer-specific survival of patients with T1 colorectal cancer: a population-based retrospective study of the U.S. database and a Chinese registry Jiyun Li, Ruoxi Tian, Fei Huang, Pu Cheng, Fuqiang Zhao, Zhixun Zhao, Qian Liu, Zhaoxu Zheng International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Long‐Term Outcomes of Sigmoid, Rectosigmoid, and Rectal Cancers: A Matched Analysis Cigdem Benlice, Atilla Halil Elhan, Emre Gorgun, Mehmet Ayhan Kuzu World Journal of Surgery.2025; 49(4): 819. CrossRef
The Value of Spectroscopic CT for Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer 冬冬 穆 Journal of Clinical Personalized Medicine.2025; 04(01): 501. CrossRef
A novel pN stage prediction model for resectable rectal adenocarcinoma based on preoperative MRI features and multiregional apparent diffusion coefficients Hui Luo, Yue-qin Gou, Yue-su Wang, Hui-lin Qin, Hai-ying Zhou, Xiao-ming Zhang, Tian-wu Chen European Radiology.2025; 35(9): 5760. CrossRef
Indocyanine Green Near-Infrared Fluorescence-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Colon Cancer Vlad Fagarasan, Vasile V. Bintintan, Radu I. Seicean, Giorgiana Fagarasan, David Andras, Emil Botan, Gabriel Samasca, George C. Dindelegan, Calin I. Cainap Biomedicines.2025; 13(4): 902. CrossRef
Performance and Prognostic Relevance of Lymph Node Assessment by One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification Assay in Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study Qing Liu, Sandra Lopez-Prades, Karmele Saez de Gordoa, Maite Rodrigo-Calvo, Mireia Garcia, Juan Ruiz Martin, Angel Romo, Ignacio Pinilla, Jordi Tarragona, Begoña Otero Alen, Jordi Camps, Ivan Archilla, Miriam Cuatrecasas Cancers.2025; 17(13): 2141. CrossRef
Prognostic value of metastatic lymph node ratio and its effect on disease-free survival in colon cancer Orhan Aslan, Ramazan Topcu, İsmail Sezikli, Mahmut A. Yüksek, Aşkın K. Perçem, Furkan Uğur Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
B7-H3: a consistent marker in metastatic colorectal cancer with potential for targeted treatment Julia M. Ott, Verena Gassenmaier, Michael Bitzer, Christian M. Schürch, Jonas S. Heitmann, Ilona Hagelstein Pathology and Oncology Research.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The application of random forest-based models in prognostication of gastrointestinal tract malignancies: a systematic review Zhina Mohamadi, Ahmad Shafizadeh, Yasaman Aliyan, Seyedeh Fatemeh Shayesteh, Parsa Goudarzi, Alireza Khodabandeh, Amirali Vaghari, Helma Ashrafi, Omid Bahrami, Armin ZarinKhat, Yalda Khodabandeh, Kimia Pouyan Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Mutation profiling of KRAS and BRAF in primary tumours and circulating tumour cells of colorectal cancer patients using PNA-LNA molecular switch Md Sajedul Islam, Eliza Ranjit, Sharmin Aktar, Neda Moetamedirad, Cu Tai Lu, Muhammad J.A. Shiddiky, Vinod Gopalan, Alfred K. Lam Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease.2025; 1871(7): 167982. CrossRef
Utilizing tumor deposit count as a stratification criterion in revising TNM staging system for patients with colorectal cancer: a nomogram review study Lifei Zhang, Yunna Ma, Jiantao Dong, Jianhui Cai Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
An Uncharted Path of Metastasis: A Case Report of Sigmoid Colon Cancer with Synchronous Vaginal and Urethral Spread John Fernando Montenegro, Giovanna Patricia Rivas Tafur, Miguel Diaz, Diego Fernando Alzate, María Camila Faria, Daniel Florez, Richard Andrés Acuña, Cesar Eduardo, Yamil Liscano Diseases.2025; 13(8): 251. CrossRef
Construction of a risk prediction model for early postoperative recurrence in stage II/III colorectal cancer Feng-Chun Xiong, Ming-Peng Luo, Shan-Ming Ruan World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Peritoneal Lavage Cytology Predicts Peritoneal Metastasis and is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer Dewei Kong, Yingjie Li, Shenyi Yin, Yunfei Tan, Boyang Qu, Lei Huang, Jianzhong Jeff Xi, Aiwen Wu Annals of Surgical Oncology.2025; 32(13): 9712. CrossRef
Insights from the Muk and Maseb Radiotherapy Centre in Kinshasa: A Study of 43 Cases of Rectal Cancer Abou Dao, Emmanuel Franck Elame, Mahomed Yessoufou, Ismael Coulibaly, Kanta Ka, Vandrome Nakundi, Ruth Rosine Mapenya Mekah, Anne-Marthe Maison Mayeh, Guilaine Mopoh, Nicolas A. A. Minoungou, Franck Mukeng, Mah-Soune Apithy, Babaka Donatien Batalansi, Sta Journal of Cancer Therapy.2025; 16(12): 472. CrossRef
Machine learning-based survival prediction in colorectal cancer combining clinical and biological features Lucas M. Vieira, Natasha A.N. Jorge, João B. Sousa, João C. Setubal, Peter F. Stadler, Maria E.M.T. Walter Oncotarget.2025; 16(1): 834. CrossRef
TRAIL‐conjugated liposomes that bind natural killer cells to induce colorectal cancer cell apoptosis Joshua D. Greenlee, Zhenjiang Zhang, Tejas Subramanian, Kevin Liu, Michael R. King Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A.2024; 112(1): 110. CrossRef
Lymph Node Ratio as a Predictor of Survival for Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Simarpreet Ichhpuniani, Tyler McKechnie, Jay Lee, Jeremy Biro, Yung Lee, Lily Park, Aristithes Doumouras, Dennis Hong, Cagla Eskicioglu The American Surgeon™.2024; 90(4): 840. CrossRef
Acetone compression improves lymph node yield and metastasis detection in colorectal cancer Christina Schnoz, Katrin Schmid, Guacimara Ortega Sanchez, Sabina Schacher-Kaufmann, Michel Adamina, Georgios Peros, Dieter Erdin, Peter Karl Bode Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.2024; 41(1): 45. CrossRef
Computational methods for metastasis detection in lymph nodes and characterization of the metastasis-free lymph node microarchitecture: A systematic-narrative hybrid review Elzbieta Budginaite, Derek R. Magee, Maximilian Kloft, Henry C. Woodruff, Heike I. Grabsch Journal of Pathology Informatics.2024; 15: 100367. CrossRef
Sequential Lateral Lymphatic Metastasis Shows Similar Oncologic Outcomes to Upward Spread in Advanced Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Hye Jin Kim, Gyu-Seog Choi, Seung Hyun Cho, Min Kyu Kang, Jun Seok Park, Soo Yeun Park, Byung Woog Kang, Jong Gwang Kim Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(3): 359. CrossRef
The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Histopathology: An Update D. Chamil Codipilly, Shahriar Faghani, Catherine Hagan, Jason Lewis, Bradley J. Erickson, Prasad G. Iyer Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 22(6): 1170. CrossRef
INFLUENCE OF NEOADJUVANT THERAPY ON THE RATIO OF LYMPH NODES Laura CREDIDIO, Carlos Augusto Real MARTINEZ, Daniéla Oliveira MAGRO, Rita Barbosa de CARVALHO, Maria de Lourdes Setsuko AYRIZONO, Cláudio Saddy Rodrigues COY Arquivos de Gastroenterologia.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
National screening for colorectal cancer is associated with stage shift to earlier diagnosis Mina Sarofim, Amir Ashrafizadeh, Anthony J. Gill, Keshani de Silva, Justin Evans, Stephen Clarke, Nick Pavlakis, Ian Norton, Alexander Engel ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(7-8): 1279. CrossRef
Competing‐risks model for predicting the prognosis of patients with regressive melanoma based on the SEER database Chaodi Huang, Liying Huang, Jianguo Huang, Xinkai Zheng, Congjun Jiang, Kong Ching Tom, U. Tim Wu, WenHsien Ethan Huang, Yunfei Gao, Fangmin Situ, Hai Yu, Liehua Deng, Jun Lyu Malignancy Spectrum.2024; 1(2): 123. CrossRef
The Relationship between Tumor Budding and Tumor Deposits in Patients with Stage III Colorectal Carcinoma Zdenko Bilić, Mario Zovak, Goran Glavčić, Dubravka Mužina, Amir Ibukić, Andro Košec, Davor Tomas, Alma Demirović Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(9): 2583. CrossRef
Standardizing data collection in adjuvant colon cancer trials: A consensus project from the IDEA and ACCENT international consortia and national experts Julien Taieb, Debora Basile, Jenny Seligmann, Guillem Argiles, Thierry André, Claire Gallois, Richard M. Goldberg, Greg Yothers, Alberto Sobrero, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt, John Souglakos, Roberto Labianca, Tim Iveson, David N. Church, Dirk Arnold, Jeanne Tie European Journal of Cancer.2024; 206: 114118. CrossRef
GLI1 and PTTG1 expression in colorectal carcinoma patients undergoing radical surgery and their correlation with lymph node metastasis Feng Cao, Yang-Yan Chen, Hong-Cheng Wang World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(5): 1328. CrossRef
Application of radiomics for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Elahe Abbaspour, Sahand Karimzadhagh, Abbas Monsef, Farahnaz Joukar, Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei, Soheil Hassanipour International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(6): 3795. CrossRef
A pathologist–AI collaboration framework for enhancing diagnostic accuracies and efficiencies Zhi Huang, Eric Yang, Jeanne Shen, Dita Gratzinger, Frederick Eyerer, Brooke Liang, Jeffrey Nirschl, David Bingham, Alex M. Dussaq, Christian Kunder, Rebecca Rojansky, Aubre Gilbert, Alexandra L. Chang-Graham, Brooke E. Howitt, Ying Liu, Emily E. Ryan, Tr Nature Biomedical Engineering.2024; 9(4): 455. CrossRef
OPTIMIZATION OF THE DIAGNOSIS OF LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL CANCER USING RADIOLOGICAL IMAGING METHODS S.V. Maliborska, V.V. Holotiuk Art of Medicine.2024; : 63. CrossRef
Low muscle mass-to-fat ratio is an independent factor that predicts worse overall survival and complications in patients with colon cancer: a retrospective single-center cohort study Jiabao Tang, Jingwen Xu, Xiaohua Li, Chun Cao Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2024; 107(2): 68. CrossRef
Biomarkers of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: update Xiao Zhu, Shui-quan Lin, Jun Xie, Li-hui Wang, Li-juan Zhang, Ling-ling Xu, Jian-guang Xu, Yang-bo Lv Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
SURGICAL TREATMENT OF RECTAL CANCER WITH PRESERVATION OF THE LEFT COLIC ARTERY AND ICG NAVIGATION S.V. Maliborska Art of Medicine.2024; : 86. CrossRef
Assessing the clinical utility of tumor invasion proportion of lymph nodes for enhanced risk stratification in N1 colorectal cancer Ru-Jie Chen American Journal of Cancer Research.2024; 14(12): 5826. CrossRef
Survival outcomes after synchronous para‐aortic lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review Conor Aylward, Jawed Noori, Jack Tyrrell, Niall O'sullivan, Dara O. Kavanagh, John O. Larkin, Brian J. Mehigan, Paul H. McCormick, Michael E. Kelly Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 127(4): 645. CrossRef
National assessment of lymph node status indicators & predictors in pediatric head and neck rhabdomyosarcomas in the US David J. Fei-Zhang, Asher C. Park, Joseph M. Berry, Rebecca S. Arch, Daniel C. Chelius, Anthony M. Sheyn, Jeffrey C. Rastatter International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology.2023; 164: 111419. CrossRef
Increased Kremen2 predicts worse prognosis in colon cancer Junxian Long, Fengyun Cong, Yousheng Wei, Jungang Liu, Weizhong Tang Pathology and Oncology Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Predictors and survival outcomes of having less than 12 harvested lymph nodes in proctectomy for rectal cancer Sameh Hany Emile, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Peige Zhou, Steven D. Wexner International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Lymph node metastasis in cancer progression: molecular mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic interventions Haoran Ji, Chuang Hu, Xuhui Yang, Yuanhao Liu, Guangyu Ji, Shengfang Ge, Xiansong Wang, Mingsong Wang Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The Role of Nonmetastatic Lymph Nodes in the Survival of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review Alexander J. Pennings, Brecht A. van der Velden, Maximilian Kloft, Loes F. S. Kooreman, Jos M. P. Kleijnen, Stephanie O. Breukink, Geerard L. Beets, Heike I. Grabsch, Jarno Melenhorst Annals of Surgery Open.2023; 4(4): e336. CrossRef
Multicenter study of prognostic factors in paraaortic lymph node dissection for metastatic colorectal cancer Jun Woo Bong, Sanghee Kang, Pyoungjae Park Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 271. CrossRef
Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Resection of Pathologically Confirmed Isolated Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review Maurizio Zizzo, Maria Pia Federica Dorma, Magda Zanelli, Francesca Sanguedolce, Maria Chiara Bassi, Andrea Palicelli, Stefano Ascani, Alessandro Giunta Cancers.2022; 14(3): 661. CrossRef
Risk factors for long-term survival in patients with ypN+ M0 rectal cancer after radical anterior resection Marcin Zeman, Władysław Skałba, Piotr Szymański, Grzegorz Hadasik, Dmytro Żaworonkow, Dominik A. Walczak, Agnieszka Czarniecka BMC Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review In Ja Park Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91. CrossRef
An unusual case of right-sided colon cancer with isolated lateral pelvic side wall lymph node metastases Rishaan Pawaskar, James Wei Tatt Toh Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery.2022; 5(3): 121. CrossRef
High-resolution MRI-based radiomics analysis to predict lymph node metastasis and tumor deposits respectively in rectal cancer Yan-song Yang, Feng Feng, Yong-juan Qiu, Gui-hua Zheng, Ya-qiong Ge, Yue-tao Wang Abdominal Radiology.2021; 46(3): 873. CrossRef
Extricating the Association Between the Prognostic Factors of Colorectal Cancer Younis Mohd, Balamuralikrishnan Balasubramanian, Arun Meyyazhagan, Haripriya Kuchi Bhotla, Suresh Kumar Shanmugam, Mithun Kumar Ramesh Kumar, Manikantan Pappusamy, Karthick Kumar Alagamuthu, Sasikala Keshavarao, Vijaya Anand Arumugam Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2021; 52(3): 1022. CrossRef
Retrospective survival analysis of stage II–III rectal cancer: tumour regression grade, grading and lymphovascular invasion are the only predictors Andrea Morini, Alfredo Annicchiarico, Andrea Romboli, Matteo Ricco', Pellegrino Crafa, Filippo Montali, Paolo Dell'Abate, Renato Costi ANZ Journal of Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Competitive Risk Analysis of Prognosis in Patients With Cecum Cancer: A Population-Based Study Wentao Wu, Jin Yang, Daning Li, Qiao Huang, Fanfan Zhao, Xiaojie Feng, Hong Yan, Jun Lyu Cancer Control.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Increased Expression of VANGL1 is Predictive of Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: Results from a 20-Gene Expression Signature Noshad Peyravian, Stefania Nobili, Zahra Pezeshkian, Meysam Olfatifar, Afshin Moradi, Kaveh Baghaei, Fakhrosadat Anaraki, Kimia Nazari, Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei, Mohammad Reza Zali, Enrico Mini, Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojarad Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(2): 126. CrossRef
Management of indeterminate hepatic nodules and evaluation of factors predicting their malignant potential in patients with colorectal cancer Mizelle D’Silva, Jai Young Cho, Ho-Seong Han, Taupyk Yerlan, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Hae Won Lee, Jun Suh Lee, Boram Lee, Moonhwan Kim Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Optimal Postoperative Surveillance Strategies for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study Min-Young Park, In-Ja Park, Hyo-Seon Ryu, Jay Jung, Min-Sung Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang-Sik Yu, Jin-Cheon Kim Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3502. CrossRef
Outcomes of Level of Ligation of Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Colorectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Pavan Kumar Jonnada, Monish Karunakaran, Dayakar Rao Future Oncology.2021; 17(27): 3645. CrossRef
Gastrointestinal cancer classification and prognostication from histology using deep learning: Systematic review Sara Kuntz, Eva Krieghoff-Henning, Jakob N. Kather, Tanja Jutzi, Julia Höhn, Lennard Kiehl, Achim Hekler, Elizabeth Alwers, Christof von Kalle, Stefan Fröhling, Jochen S. Utikal, Hermann Brenner, Michael Hoffmeister, Titus J. Brinker European Journal of Cancer.2021; 155: 200. CrossRef
One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) of Sentinel Lymph Node in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Spanish Multicenter Study (ENDO-OSNA) María Diestro, Alberto Berjón, Ignacio Zapardiel, Laura Yébenes, Irune Ruiz, Arantza Lekuona, Marta Rezola, Ibon Jaunarena, Jaime Siegrist, Margarita Sánchez-Pastor, María Cuadra, Amaia Sagasta, Isabel Guerra, Luis Lete, Fernando Roldán, Carlo Marta, Marí Cancers.2021; 13(17): 4465. CrossRef
Deep learning can predict lymph node status directly from histology in colorectal cancer Lennard Kiehl, Sara Kuntz, Julia Höhn, Tanja Jutzi, Eva Krieghoff-Henning, Jakob N. Kather, Tim Holland-Letz, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Jenny Chang-Claude, Alexander Brobeil, Christof von Kalle, Stefan Fröhling, Elizabeth Alwers, Hermann Brenner, Michael Ho European Journal of Cancer.2021; 157: 464. CrossRef
Pathological Features and Prognostication in Colorectal Cancer Kabytto Chen, Geoffrey Collins, Henry Wang, James Wei Tatt Toh Current Oncology.2021; 28(6): 5356. CrossRef
Distant Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer Patients—Do We Have New Predicting Clinicopathological and Molecular Biomarkers? A Comprehensive Review Stanislav Filip, Veronika Vymetalkova, Jiri Petera, Ludmila Vodickova, Ondrej Kubecek, Stanislav John, Filip Cecka, Marketa Krupova, Monika Manethova, Klara Cervena, Pavel Vodicka International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2020; 21(15): 5255. CrossRef
Small Molecules for Multi-Wavelength Near-Infrared Fluorescent Mapping of Regional and Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Colorectal Cancer Staging Victor M. Baart, Marion M. Deken, Mark W. Bordo, Shadhvi S. Bhairosingh, Daniela C. F. Salvatori, Hoon Hyun, Maged Henary, Hak Soo Choi, Cornelis F. M. Sier, Peter J. K. Kuppen, Anton G. T. Terwisscha van Scheltinga, Taryn L. March, Adrianus R. P. M. Vale Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
The pneumatic colorectal injury caused by high pressure compressed air are rare and can be fatal. Herein, we present a case of 45-year-old male who developed sudden onset of severe abdominal pain after cleaning the dust on his pants with high pressure compressed air gun dust cleaner. Emergent exploratory laparotomy was done which findings are a huge rectal perforation with multiple serosal and subserosal tear in sigmoid to splenic flexure of colon. Anterior resection with left hemicolectomy, and temporary transverse colostomy was performed. Postoperative course was uneventful. Recently, prognosis is generally favorable because of prompt diagnosis and emergent surgical management.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Laparoscopic Repair of Colorectal Perforations Induced by Compressed Air Pressure: A Case Report Ibrahim Elnogoomi, Hoorieh Qasemi, Mariam Aylan Alshamsi, Majid Alhammadi, Omar Elnogoomi Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Air Nozzle Injury: Barotrauma Resulted From an Industrial Accident Ashok N Mhaske, Nishi Gupta, Abhishek Mishra, Shubham Jaiswal, Chirag Dausage, Jyoti Meena, Gourav Goyal Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Emergency laparoscopic resection of the anterior rectum due to rectal trauma secondary to compressed air, case report Daniel Gómez, Luis F. Cabrera, Mauricio Pedraza, Andres Mendoza-Zuchini, Nicolás Sánchez, Hector W. Cure, Héctor O. Cure Bulicie, Jean A. Pulido International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2020; 76(C): 288. CrossRef
Purpose In this study, we investigated the role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictor of tumor response and as a prognostic factor in patients with rectal cancer who had undergone curative surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT).
Methods Between January 2009 and July 2016, we collected 140 consecutive patients who had undergone curative intent surgery after nCRT due to rectal adenocarcinoma. We obtained the pre- and post-nCRT NLR by dividing the neutrophil count by the lymphocyte count. The cutoff value was obtained using receiver operating characteristic analysis for tumor response and using maximally selected rank analysis for recurrence-free survival (RFS). The relationship among NLR, tumor response, and RFS was assessed by adjusting the possible clinico-pathological confounding factors.
Results The possibility of pathologic complete response (pCR) was significantly decreased in high pre- (>2.77) and postnCRT NLR (>3.23) in univariate regression analysis. In multivariate analysis, high post-nCRT NLR was an independent negative predictive factor for pCR (adjusted odds ratio, 0.365; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.145–0.918). The 5-year RFS of all patients was 74.6% during the median 37 months of follow-up. Patients with higher pre- (>2.66) and post-nCRT NLR (>5.21) showed lower 5-year RFS rates (53.1 vs. 83.3%, P = 0.006) (69.2 vs. 75.7%, P = 0.054). In multivariate Cox analysis, high pre-nCRT NLR was an independent poor prognostic factor for RFS (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.300; 95% CI, 1.061–4.985).
Conclusion Elevated NLR was a negative predictive marker for pCR and was independently associated with decreased RFS. For confirmation, a large-scale study with appropriate controls is needed.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Recurrence risk following rectal cancer surgery: a survival analysis of key predictors Neda Gorjizadeh, Reza Hajebi, Matin Vahedi, Mahsa Mottahedi, Elham Nazar Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2025; 55(8): 880. CrossRef
Circulating Markers of Systemic Inflammation, Measured After Completion of Neoadjuvant Therapy, Associated With Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Ross K. McMahon, Sean M. O’Cathail, Colin W. Steele, Harikrishnan S. Nair, Jonathan J. Platt, Donald C. McMillan, Paul G. Horgan, Campbell S. Roxburgh Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(6): 713. CrossRef
Response Prediction to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Based on Systemic Inflammatory Markers (NLR, PLR, and LMR) Roger Beltrati Coser, Caio Sergio R. Nahas, Alex Jones Flores Cassenote, Omar S. T. Ghani, Rafaela B. B. Pinheiro, Sergio Carlos Nahas, Carlos Frederico S. Marques Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic Value of Dynamic Changes in Immune-Inflammatory and Tumor Biomarkers Following Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Mahmoud Al-Masri, Yasmin Safi, Mohammad Almasri, Ramiz Kardan, Daliana Mustafa, Osama Alayyan, Bilal Kahalah, Rama AlMasri Cancers.2025; 17(20): 3383. CrossRef
Hematological markers as prognostic predictors in patients undergoing colon cancer surgery Jessica Patricia Gonzales Stuva, Carlos Pérez-López, Marcelo Sebastian Ramírez Romero, Ana Bernabeu García, Pamela Vivas Angeles, Diana Escolà Ripoll, Sandra López Gordo Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Landscape of Biomarkers and Pathologic Response in Rectal Cancer: Where We Stand? Abrahams Ocanto, Macarena Teja, Francesco Amorelli, Felipe Couñago, Ariel Gomez Palacios, Diego Alcaraz, Ramón Cantero Cancers.2024; 16(23): 4047. CrossRef
Prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in operated rectal cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis Giuseppe Portale, Patrizia Bartolotta, Danila Azzolina, Dario Gregori, Valentino Fiscon Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
NEUTROPHIL-LYMPHOCYTE RATIO (NLR) AND LYMPHOPENIAAS PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF OVERALL SURVIVAL IN LOCALADVANCED RECTAL CANCER Ocanto A, Morera R, Rodríguez I, Cantero R INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH.2023; : 11. CrossRef
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts survival of patients with rectal cancer receiving neo-adjuvant chemoradiation followed by radical resection: a meta-analysis Giuseppe Colloca, Antonella Venturino, Domenico Guarneri Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2023; 23(4): 421. CrossRef
Efficacy of concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous metastasis receiving systemic therapy Tzu-Chieh Yin, Po-Jung Chen, Yung-Sung Yeh, Ching-Chun Li, Yen-Cheng Chen, Wei-Chih Su, Tsung-Kun Chang, Ching-Wen Huang, Chun-Ming Huang, Hsiang-Lin Tsai, Jaw-Yuan Wang Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The Crying Need for a Better Response Assessment in Rectal Cancer Samuel Amintas, Nicolas Giraud, Benjamin Fernandez, Charles Dupin, Quentin Denost, Aurelie Garant, Nora Frulio, Denis Smith, Anne Rullier, Eric Rullier, Te Vuong, Sandrine Dabernat, Véronique Vendrely Current Treatment Options in Oncology.2023; 24(11): 1507. CrossRef
Prognostic Role of Peripheral Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) in Patients with Rectal Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Şefika Arzu Ergen, Ceren Barlas, Cumhur Yıldırım, Didem Çolpan Öksüz Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2022; 53(1): 151. CrossRef
Deep regional hyperthermia combined with modern concurrent chemoradiotherapy increases T-downstaging rate in locally advanced rectal cancer Yuxia Wang, Siyi Lu, Yuxia Shao, Ran Peng, Xuemin Li, Junjie Wang, Hao Wang International Journal of Hyperthermia.2022; 39(1): 431. CrossRef
High Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio and Low Lymphocyte Levels Are Correlated With Worse Pathological Complete Response Rates Serdar Karakaya, İbrahim Karadağ, Mehmet Emin Yılmaz, Ömür Berna Çakmak Öksüzoğlu Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 97. CrossRef
Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review In Ja Park Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91. CrossRef
Histopathological and Haemogram Features Correlate with Prognosis in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation without Pathological Complete Response Yu-Ming Huang, Hsi-Hsien Hsu, Chien-Kuo Liu, Ching-Kuo Yang, Po-Li Tsai, Tzu-Yin Tang, Shih-Ming Hsu, Yu-Jen Chen Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(17): 4947. CrossRef
Prognostic and predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after curative rectal cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis Hytham K.S. Hamid, George N. Davis, Mario Trejo-Avila, Patrick O. Igwe, Andrés Garcia-Marín Surgical Oncology.2021; 37: 101556. CrossRef
The prognostic utility of pre‐treatment neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte‐ratio (NLR) in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Mate Naszai, Alina Kurjan, Timothy S. Maughan Cancer Medicine.2021; 10(17): 5983. CrossRef
Predictive Ability of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Determining Tumor Staging in Colorectal Cancer Chirag Pereira, Jiju Mohan, Shankar Gururaj, Prajwal Chandrashekhara Cureus.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
An inflammation index-based prediction of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma Yanwu Sun, Zhekun Huang, Pan Chi International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2020; 25(7): 1299. CrossRef
An inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a solid tumor of unknown etiology frequently affecting children and young adults and commonly affecting the lung or orbital region. We present a case involving a 41-year-old man who had an IMT combined with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in the retroperitoneum. He presented with only pain in the right lower abdomen without accompanying symptoms; a retroperitoneal mass was found on computed tomography. The tumor had invaded the end of the ileum and was attached to the omentum, so mass excision could not be performed. The tumor was completely excised surgically and had histological features diagnostic of an IMT. Histologic findings of the omentum were positive for Ziehl-Nielsen staining for acid-fast bacilli and for a positive polymerase chain reaction for M. tuberculosis. The patient had no apparent immune disorder. These findings made this case exceptional because IMTs, which are mostly due to atypical mycobacteria, have been found mainly in immunocompromised patients.
Purpose Hartmann operation is widely recognized as a useful procedure, especially in emergencies involving the rectosigmoid colon. One of the surgeon’s foremost concerns after Hartmann operation is future colostomy reversal, as colostomy reversal after a Hartmann procedure is associated with relatively high morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic surgical techniques continue to prove useful for an ever-increasing variety of indications. We analyzed the outcomes of laparoscopic Hartmann colostomy reversals at our center.
Methods We retrospectively analyzed the hospital records of 170 patients who had undergone Hartmann operation between January 2010 and June 2017 at Wonkwang University Hospital. Among 68 Hartmann colostomy reversals, we evaluated and compared the outcomes of 3 groups of patients: 29 patients in the open colostomy reversal group (OG) who had undergone laparotomies for Hartmann reversals, 19 patients in the conversion group (CG) whose laparoscopic procedures had required conversion to a laparotomy, and 20 patients in the laparoscopy group (LG).
Results The overall reversal rate for Hartmann colostomies was 40.5% during this time period. The duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter among LG patients (10.15 ± 2.94 days) than among OG patients (16 ± 9.5 days). The overall complication rate among OG patients was higher than that among LG patients (adjusted odds ratio, 8.78; P = 0.01). The most common complication was postoperative ileus (19.1%).
Conclusion If no contraindications to laparoscopy exist, surgeons should favor a laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann operation over an open reversal.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Complete prevention of anastomotic leakage using total enteric flow diversion Tao Hu, Jing Wang, Nan-Hui Yu World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical Outcomes of Open and Laparoscopic Hartmann Reversal: A Single-Center Comparative Study Mu-Han Tsai, Ming-Jenn Chen, Khaa-Hoo Ong, Chih-Ying Lu, Chung-Han Ho, Hsuan-Yi Huang, Yu-Feng Tian, I-Ning Yang Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann reversal: a propensity score matching analysis Li Tan, Xiao-Yu Liu, Bin Zhang, Lian-Lian Wang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic and open Hartmann's reversal: A single‐center retrospective study in Japan Aya Sato, Ken Imaizumi, Hiroyuki Kasajima, Keisuke Obuchi, Kentaro Sato, Daisuke Yamana, Yosuke Tsuruga, Minoru Umehara, Michihiro Kurushima, Kazuaki Nakanishi Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2022; 15(1): 137. CrossRef
A Case of Laparoscopic Hartmann's Procedure Followed by Laparoscopic Reversal for Perforated Diverticulitis Ryo Maemoto, Shingo Tsujinaka, Ryotaro Sakio, Nao Kakizawa, Rei Takahashi, Yuuri Hatsuzawa, Yasuaki Kimura, Erika Machida, Sawako Tamaki, Hideki Ishikawa, Yasuyuki Miyakura, Toshiki Rikiyama Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2022; 75(1): 36. CrossRef
Is laparoscopy a reliable alternative to laparotomy in Hartmann's reversal? An updated meta-analysis D. Chavrier, A. Alves, B. Menahem Techniques in Coloproctology.2022; 26(4): 239. CrossRef
Laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal has better clinical outcomes compared to open surgery: An international multicenter cohort study involving 502 patients Anwar Medellin Abueta, Nairo Javier Senejoa, Mauricio Pedraza Ciro, Lina Fory, Carlos Perez Rivera, Carlos Edmundo Martinez Jaramillo, Lina Maria Mateus Barbosa, Heinz Orlando Ibañez Varela, Javier A. Carrera, Rafael Garcia Duperly, Luis A Sanchez, Ivan D Health Science Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic Hartmann reversal: experiences from a developing country Dung Anh Nguyen, Tuong-Anh Mai-Phan, Truc Thanh Thai, Hai Van Nguyen Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(4): 297. CrossRef
Open versus laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yingjia Zhang, Chunxi Liu, Kameswara Rishi Yeshayahu Nistala, Choon Seng Chong International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(12): 2421. CrossRef
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hartmann Reversal: A Case-Control Study Paolo Panaccio, Tommaso Grottola, Rossana Percario, Federico Selvaggi, Severino Cericola, Alfonso Lapergola, Maira Farrukh, Giuseppe Di Martino, Marco Ricciardiello, Pierluigi Di Sebastiano, Fabio Francesco Di Mola, Todd Pesavento Surgery Research and Practice.2021; 2021: 1. CrossRef
Effects of Laparoscopic Hartmann Reversal on Short-term Operative Outcomes Among Vietnamese Patients Viet Van Ung, Bang Cong Huynh, Vinh Chi Le, Dang Ngoc Tran, Trung Nguyen Vo, Tan Van Pham, Bac Hoang Nguyen Journal of Coloproctology.2021; 41(02): 117. CrossRef
A comparative study between open versus laparoscopic Hartmann reversal Hye Jung Cho, Woo Ram Kim, Jong Woo Kim Medicine.2021; 100(47): e27976. CrossRef
Colorectal reconstructions following Hartmann’s procedure: challenges and solutions A. N. Igolkin, V. V. Polovinkin Innovative medicine of Kuban.2020; (4): 51. CrossRef
Emergency Hartmann’s Procedure and its Reversal: A Totally Laparoscopic 2-Step Surgery for the Treatment of Hinchey III and IV Diverticulitis Diletta Cassini, Michelangelo Miccini, Farshad Manoochehri, Matteo Gregori, Gianandrea Baldazzi Surgical Innovation.2019; 26(6): 770. CrossRef
The intrauterine device (IUD) is a widely used contraceptive method. One of the most serious and rare complications of using an IUD is colon perforation. We report a case of colonoscopic removal of an IUD that had perforated into the rectosigmoid colon in a 42-year-old woman who presented with no symptoms. Colonoscopy showed that the IUD had penetrated into rectosigmoid colon wall and that an arm of the IUD was embedded in the colon wall. We were able to remove the IUD easily by using colonoscopy. The endoscopic approach may be considered the first choice therapy for selected patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Migrated Foreign Body Perforating the Colon: Scope for Colonoscopy Aparimita Das, Tarun S Joseph, Gangireddy Siva Sankar Reddy, Amrit Pipara, Sumit Mukhopadhyay Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Retroperitoneal Displacement of an Intrauterine Device (IUD): A Case Report Godwin Silas Macheku, Fidelis Clarence Jungulu, Ezekiel Kalibugwe Kiyogoma, Kheri Kagya, Salehe Mrutu, Michael Johnson Mahande International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology.2025; : 713. CrossRef
Rectal Foreign Body Shaped Like an Endoscopic Clip: Migrated Intrauterine Devices to the Rectum Xinyu Xie, BoYuan, Chunmei Li, Lina Cao Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2025; 70(9): 2899. CrossRef
Endoscopic Removal of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device From the Descending Colon: A Case Report Muhammad Shabbir, Mishal A Aljohani, Abdurahman Alfaiz, Msab Aldakheel, Zeeshan Ali Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Colonoscopic removal of an intrauterine device with rectal perforation: A case report Lingrun Ye, Yuanyuan Zhu, Fanglai Zhu Medicine.2024; 103(28): e38872. CrossRef
Is It a “Colon Perforation”? A Case Report and Review of the Literature Shuangshuang Lu, Xinyu Yao, Jun Shi, Jian Huang, Shaohua Zhuang, Junfang Ma, Yan Liu, Wei Zhang, Lifei Yu, Ping Zhu, Qiuwei Zhu, Ruxia Shi, Hong Zheng, Dong Shao, Yuyan Pan, Shizhen Bao, Li Qin, Lijie Huang, Wenjia Liu, Jin Huang Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic removal of an intrauterine device from the lumen of the sigmoid colon V. V. Bereshchenko, D. V. Lazarevich, N. N. Goncharov, P. V. Khodanovich Health and Ecology Issues.2022; 19(1): 145. CrossRef
Incomplete Removal of an Intrauterine Device Perforating the Sigmoid Colon Junseak Lee, Jung Hwan Oh, Jinsu Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim, Sung Hoon Jung The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 78(1): 48. CrossRef
Endoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device: Case Report and Review of Literature and Technique Yang Lei, Vadim Iablakov, Riaz J. Karmali, Nauzer Forbes ACG Case Reports Journal.2019; 6(6): e00090. CrossRef
The management of a colonoscopic perforation (CP) varies from conservative to surgical. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes between surgical and conservative treatment of patients with a CP.
Methods
From 2003 to 2016, the medical records of patients with CP were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they initially received conservative or surgical treatment.
Results
During the study period, a total of 48 patients with a CP were treated. Among them, 5 patients had underlying colorectal cancer and underwent emergency radical cancer surgery; these patients were excluded. The mean age of the remaining 43 patients was 64.5 years old, and the most common perforation site was the sigmoid colon (15 patients). The initial conservative care group included 16 patients, and the surgery group included 27 patients. In the conservative group, 5 patients required conversion to surgery (failure rate: 5 of 16 [31.3%]). Of the surgery group, laparoscopic surgery was performed on 19 patients and open surgery on 8 patients, including 2 conversion cases. Major postoperative complications developed in 11 patients (34.4%), and postoperative mortality developed in 4 patients (12.5%). The only predictor for poor prognosis after surgery was a high American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification.
Conclusion
In this study, conservative treatment for patients with a CP had a relatively high failure rate. Furthermore, surgical treatment showed significant rates of complications and mortality, which depended on the general status of the patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Multicenter retrospective evaluation of ileocecocolic perforations associated with diagnostic lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in dogs and cats Vanessa L. Woolhead, Jacqueline C. Whittemore, Sarah A. Stewart Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2020; 34(2): 684. CrossRef
We experienced 3 cases of manometry-induced colon perforation. A 75-year-old man (case 1) underwent anorectal manometry (ARM) 3 years after radiotherapy for prostate cancer and a laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. A 70-year-old man (case 2) underwent ARM 3 months after conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and a laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. A 78-year-old man (case 3) underwent ARM 2 months after a laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. In all cases, a colon perforation with fecal peritonitis occurred. All were treated successfully using prompt and active operations and were discharged without any complications. ARM with a balloon, as a measure of rectal compliance, should be performed 2 months or longer after surgery. If a perforation occurs, prompt and active surgical intervention is necessary due to the high possibility of extensive fecal peritonitis.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Japan Society of Coloproctology Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence 2024 (Revised Second Edition) Keiji Koda, Toshiki Mimura, Tetsuo Yamana, Mitsuru Ishizuka, Tomoko Takahashi, Shota Takano, Tatsuya Abe, Yuji Nishizawa, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Masami Sato, Kaoru Nishimura, Masahiro Yoshida, Kotaro Maeda Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2026; 10(1): 64. CrossRef
Colorectal perforation following anorectal manometry in a patient with anal stenosis post rectal prolapse repair: a rare complication Leanne Iorio, Monique Couto Matos, Benjamin Linkous, Marco Ferrara, Antonio Caycedo Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of low anterior resection syndrome on quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: A retrospective observational study Dong-Ai Jin, Fang-Ping Gu, Tao-Li Meng, Xuan-Xuan Zhang World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 15(10): 2123. CrossRef
Functional anorectal studies in patients with low anterior resection syndrome Ssu‐Chi Chen, Kaori Futaba, Wing Wa Leung, Cherry Wong, Tony Mak, Simon Ng, Hans Gregersen Neurogastroenterology & Motility.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer Bin Zhang, Ke Zhao, Yu‐Juan Zhao, Shu‐Hui Yin, Guang‐Zuan Zhuo, Yong Zhao, Jian‐Hua Ding Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(2): 424. CrossRef
Broken beer bottle as a cause of sigmoid perforation Christian German Ospina-Pérez, Ana Milena Álvarez-Acuña, Lina María López-Álvarez, Rosa María Ospina-Pérez, Ivan David Lozada-Martínez, Sabrina Rahman International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2021; 85(C): 106261. CrossRef
Assessment of defecation function after sphincter-saving resection for mid to low rectal cancer: A cross-sectional study Bao-Jia Luo, Mei-Chun Zheng, Yang Xia, Zhu Ying, Jian-Hong Peng, Li-Ren Li, Zhi-Zhong Pan, Hui-Ying Qin European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2021; 55: 102059. CrossRef
The adenoma detection rate is commonly used as a measure of the quality of colonoscopy. This study assessed both the association between the adenoma detection rate and the quality of bowel preparation and the risk factors associated with the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy.
Methods
This retrospective analysis involved 1,079 individuals who underwent screening colonoscopy at the National Cancer Center between December 2012 and April 2014. Bowel preparation was classified by using the Aronchick scale. Individuals with inadequate bowel preparations (n = 47, 4.4%) were excluded because additional bowel preparation was needed. The results of 1,032 colonoscopies were included in the analysis.
Results
The subjects' mean age was 53.1 years, and 657 subjects (63.7%) were men. The mean cecal intubation time was 6.7 minutes, and the mean withdrawal time was 8.7 minutes. The adenoma and polyp detection rates were 28.1% and 41.8%, respectively. The polyp, adenoma, and advanced adenoma detection rates did not correlate with the quality of bowel preparation. The multivariate analysis showed age ≥ 60 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.97; P = 0.040), body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.17–2.08; P = 0.002) and current smoking (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.01–2.06; P = 0.014) to be independent risk factors for adenoma detection.
Conclusion
The adenoma detection rate was unrelated to the quality of bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy. Older age, obesity, and smoking were independent risk factors for adenoma detection.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Age and Sex Adenoma Detection Rates in Colonoscopy and Optimization of Screening Age: A Retrospective Analysis Burak Sakar, Osman Zekai Oner, Ali Celik, Omer Celik, Turan Can Yıldız, Ugur Dogan, Onur Ilkay Dincer Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2025; 35(8): 596. CrossRef
Efficacy and Safety of L-Menthol During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Dorottya Gergő, Andrea Tóth-Mészáros, Alexander Schulze Wenning, Péter Fehérvári, Uyen Nguyen Do To, Péter Hegyi, Bálint Erőss, Attila Ványolós, Dezső Csupor Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(12): 4296. CrossRef
Assessment of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation With Mannitol for Colonoscopy: The SATISFACTION Study Gian Eugenio Tontini, Cristiano Spada, Peter Uebel, Renato Cannizzaro, Giorgio Ciprandi, Maurizio Vecchi JGH Open.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical outcomes of bowel preparation education strategies in colonoscopy: An evidence map of systematic reviews Ningning Li, Mengdan Ye, Qihan Wu, Bingru Li, Yingying Wang, Wen Li Medicine.2025; 104(39): e44644. CrossRef
Evaluating the Efficacy of Resect-and-Discard and Resect-and-Retrieve Strategies for Diminutive Colonic Polyps Andrei Lucian Groza, Bogdan Miutescu, Cristian Tefas, Alexandru Popa, Iulia Ratiu, Roxana Sirli, Alina Popescu, Alexandru Catalin Motofelea, Marcel Tantau Life.2024; 14(4): 532. CrossRef
Split doses versus whole dose bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy: A multicentric prospective Lebanese randomized trial between 2021 and 2023 Blaybel Sara, Hammoud Ghinwa, Mourda Layla, Hallal Mahmoud, Khalil Ali, Mckey Remy Health Science Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Overall Polyp Detection Rate as a Surrogate Measure for Screening Efficacy Independent of Histopathology: Evidence from National Endoscopy Database Mark Aloysius, Hemant Goyal, Tejas Nikumbh, Niraj Shah, Ganesh Aswath, Savio John, Amol Bapaye, Sushovan Guha, Nirav Thosani Life.2024; 14(6): 654. CrossRef
Application of linaclotide in bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients with constipation: A prospective randomized controlled study Haoxin Xu, Zhu He, Yulin Liu, Hong Xu, Pengfei Liu Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(12): 2752. CrossRef
Assessment of the Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Adenoma Detection Rate in Screening Colonoscopy: A Multicenter Study Altaf Ahmad, Muhammad Ishaq, Shafaq Farooq, Hafeez Ullah, Muhammad Adil Raza, Asma Abdul Razzak, Syed Kumail Abbas Razvi Indus Journal of Bioscience Research.2024; 3(2): 478. CrossRef
Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Association Between Time of Day and Colonoscopy Quality Zihua Lu, Lihui Zhang, Liwen Yao, Dexin Gong, Lianlian Wu, Meiqing Xia, Jun Zhang, Wei Zhou, Xu Huang, Chunping He, Huiling Wu, Chenxia Zhang, Xun Li, Honggang Yu JAMA Network Open.2023; 6(1): e2253840. CrossRef
Correlation between prescribing doctor attributes and intestinal cleanliness in colonoscopy: a study of 22522 patients Haibin Zhou, Hayat Khizar, Xiaofeng Zhang, Jianfeng Yang Annals of Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Enhancing the Quality of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Current Indicators and Future Trends Caesar Ferrari, Micheal Tadros Gastroenterology Insights.2023; 15(1): 1. CrossRef
Reinforced education by short message service improves the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy Peng Li, Xueqian He, Jie Dong, Youwei Chen, Qin Zhou International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(4): 815. CrossRef
Supplementary education can improve the rate of adequate bowel preparation in outpatients: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials Shicheng Peng, Sixu Liu, Jiaming Lei, Wensen Ren, Lijun Xiao, Xiaolan Liu, Muhan Lü, Kai Zhou, Antonio Z. Gimeno-Garcia PLOS ONE.2022; 17(4): e0266780. CrossRef
Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopic Screening with Ketamine-based Sedation: A Prospective Observational Study Mirza KOVACEVIC, Nermina RIZVANOVIC, Adisa SABANOVIC ADILOVIC, Nedim BARUCIJA, Anida ABAZOVIC Medeniyet Medical Journal.2022; 37(1): 79. CrossRef
Colonic bowel prep and body mass index: does one size fit all? A multi-centre review Brodie D. Laurie, Mary M. K. Teoh, Alfredo Noches-Garcia, Munyaradzi G. Nyandoro International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(12): 2451. CrossRef
Multimedia based education on bowel preparation improves adenoma detection rate: Systematic review & meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials Saurabh Chandan, Sumant Arora, Babu P. Mohan, Shahab R. Khan, Ojasvini C. Chandan, Lena L. Kassab, Arvind R. Murali Digestive Endoscopy.2021; 33(5): 730. CrossRef
Role of Bowel Preparation in Adenoma Detection Rate and Follow-up Recommendations in African American Dominant Patient Population Hamid-Reza Moein, Eskara Pervez, Salina Faidhalla, Heba Habbal, Hajra Khan, Anshu Wadehra, Mahvish Khalid, Diana Kakos, Paul Naylor, Bashar Mohamad Cureus.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation Gian E Tontini, Alberto Prada, Sandro Sferrazza, Giorgio Ciprandi, Maurizio Vecchi JGH Open.2021; 5(10): 1135. CrossRef
When should we perform colonoscopy to increase the adenoma detection rate? Sang Hoon Kim, Jae Hak Kim World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 13(12): 619. CrossRef
Quality of Preoperative Colonoscopy Affects Missed Postoperative Adenoma Detection in Colorectal Cancer Patients Jae Ho Park, Hee Seok Moon, In Sun Kwon, Ju Seok Kim, Sun Hyung Kang, Eaum Seok Lee, Seok Hyun Kim, Jae Kyu Sung, Byung Seok Lee, Hyun Yong Jeong Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2020; 65(7): 2063. CrossRef
Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in 2020: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future Valentine Ongeri Millien, Nabil M. Mansour Current Gastroenterology Reports.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of Sending Educational Video Clips via Smartphone Mobile Messenger on Bowel Preparation before Colonoscopy Sung Chan Jeon, Jae Hyun Kim, Sun Jung Kim, Hye Jung Kwon, Youn Jung Choi, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(1): 53. CrossRef
Efficacy of 1.2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparations Hiroyuki Tamaki, Teruyo Noda, Masahiro Morita, Akina Omura, Atsushi Kubo, Chikara Ogawa, Toshihiro Matsunaka, Mitsushige Shibatoge World Journal of Clinical Cases.2019; 7(4): 452. CrossRef
Microbiome and morbid obesity increase pathogenic stimulus diversity Björn L.D.M. Brücher, Ijaz S. Jamall, Obul R. Bandapalli 4open.2019; 2: 10. CrossRef
Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate Maryan Cavicchi, Gaëlle Tharsis, Pascal Burtin, Philippe Cattan, Franck Venezia, Gilles Tordjman, Agnès Gillet, Joëlle Samama, Karine Nahon-Uzan, David Karsenti Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2019; 64(12): 3579. CrossRef
Impact of diet restriction on bowel preparation for colonoscopy Seung-Joo Nam, Young Jin Kim, Bora Keum, Jae Min Lee, Seung Han Kim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Eun Sun Kim, Yeon Seok Seo, Yoon Tae Jeen, Hong Sik Lee, Hoon Jai Chun, Soon Ho Um, Chang Duck Kim Medicine.2018; 97(41): e12645. CrossRef
Limitation and Value of Using the Adenoma Detection Rate for Colonoscopy Quality Assurance Jun Hur, Moo-Jun Baek Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(3): 81. CrossRef
We report a case of urinary bladder perforation during colonoscopy. A 67-year-old female, who had undergone a transabdominal hysterectomy for uterine myomas 15 years ago, visited the emergency department with complaint of abdominal pain after a screening colonoscopy. Laparoscopic examination revealed severe adhesion between the sigmoid colon and the urinary bladder. The urinary bladder wall was weakened, and several perforation sites were found. The surgery was converted to a laparotomy. After a thorough examination, we performed primary repair for the perforation sites, followed by an omentopexy.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Trauma to the solid abdominal organs: The missed dark box of colonoscopy Mohamed H Emara, Usama Mazid, Yasmine A Elshaer, Mahmoud A Elkerdawy, Dilaver Farooq Malik, Aya M Mahros World Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 30(7): 624. CrossRef
Mesenteric laceration of the sigmoid colon after colonoscopy: A rare complication Min Wu, Yonghua Lin, Zhichao Chen, Jianfeng Wei Asian Journal of Surgery.2023; 46(11): 5391. CrossRef
Intramural colonic hemorrhage is rare and often secondary to trauma or anticoagulation therapy. Idiopathic intramural hemorrhages in the alimentary tract have rarely been reported. While several reports of spontaneous perforation of an intramural rectal hematoma have been published, no reports of spontaneous perforation in the ascending colon due to a hematoma have. We describe a patient with an ascending colonic perforation secondary to spontaneous intramural hemorrhage. The patient is a 35-year-old male, who presented with acute abdominal pain and no history of trauma. An abdominal computed tomography scan showed a high-density area around the ascending colon, and nonoperative management was instituted. On the eighth hospital day, the pain worsened, and abdominal computed tomography scan showed free air. An emergent right hemicolectomy was performed. Intramural hematoma and ischemia with perforation, with no obvious etiology, were found. The patient was discharged on the 14th postoperative day.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A case of gastrointestinal perforation following transarterial embolization for an intramural hematoma after cold snare polypectomy of an adenoma in the transverse colon Yuu Kodama, Yuji Mizokami, Yuzo Toyama, Hiroyasu Kusaka, Gen Maeda, Shingo Asahara, Ryuji Nagahama, Shin‐ichiro Horiguchi, Hiroki Aoyama DEN Open.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Giant Proximal Right Colon Submucosal Hematoma Leading to a Large Bowel Obstruction Arham Siddiqui, Hijab Ahmed, Muhammad H Nazim, Basem Soliman, Izi Obokhare Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Spontaneous colonic perforation in adults: Evaluation of a pooled case series Ren Chongxi, Ji Jinggang, Shi Yan, Wang Hongqiao, Liu Yan, Yang Fengshuo Science Progress.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Idiopathic intramural hematoma of the right colon. A case report and review of the literature Rosario Vecchio, Emma Cacciola, Michele Figuera, Renato Catalano, Giuseppe Giulla, Emanuele Rosario Distefano, Eva Intagliata International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2019; 60(C): 16. CrossRef
Intramural Hematoma Causing Hematochezia After Colonoscopy With Polypectomy Aleksandar Gavrić, Rok Dežman, Sebastian Stefanović, Jan Drnovšek, Borut Štabuc ACG Case Reports Journal.2019; 6(7): e00129. CrossRef
An endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective and safe therapeutic technique for treating a patient with a laterally-spreading tumor (LST). Colonoscopic-procedure-related complications are noted to be about 2.8% worldwide, and a perforation is the most common. Most colon perforations cause pneumoperitoneum. However, a perforation within the retroperitoneal portion of the colon (rectum and some of sigmoid colon) may cause an extraperitoneal perforation, and the leaking free air may induce pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema, depending on the amount of discharged air. Herein, we present the case of a patient with an extraperitoneal colon microperforation which manifested as pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema after an EMR for a sigmoid LST, which was successfully treated with medical treatment and endoscopic clipping.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Asymptomatic sigmoid diverticulum perforation-induced subcutaneous, mediastinal, and retroperitoneal emphysema: A case report and literature review Daichi Setoguchi, Naoki Iwanaga, Kotaro Nema, Tomoya Hagiwara, Kotaro Hayashida, Koki Yamashita, Tatsuro Hirayama, Masataka Yoshida, Kazuaki Takeda, Shotaro Ide, Masato Tashiro, Takahiro Takazono, Masachika Kitajima, Noriho Sakamoto, Koichi Izumikawa, Kat Respiratory Medicine Case Reports.2025; 56: 102229. CrossRef
Pneumoretroperitoneum mimicking rectal perforation, secondary to vaginal wall laceration following sexual intercourse in a 19-year-old woman in Korea: a case report Sung Pil Choo, Ki Eun Seon, Jae Cheol Jung, Kyeong Deok Kim, Moon Suk Choi Journal of Acute Care Surgery.2025; 15(2): 86. CrossRef
The Close Relationship between Large Bowel and Heart: When a Colonic Perforation Mimics an Acute Myocardial Infarction Maria Francesca Secchi, Carlo Torre, Giovanni Dui, Francesco Virdis, Mauro Podda Case Reports in Surgery.2018; 2018: 1. CrossRef
Pneumoretroperitoneum, Pneumomediastinum, Pneumothorax, and Subcutaneous Emphysema after Diagnostic Colonoscopy Hee Sung Lee, Hwan Hee Park, Ju Seok Kim, Sun Hyung Kang, Hee Seok Moon, Jae Kyu Sung, Byung Seok Lee, Hyun Yong Jeong The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 70(3): 145. CrossRef
Rumi Shin, Sang Mok Lee, Beonghoon Sohn, Dong Woon Lee, Inho Song, Young Jun Chai, Hae Won Lee, Hye Seong Ahn, In Mok Jung, Jung Kee Chung, Seung Chul Heo
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(6):221-227. Published online December 31, 2016
An intestinal perforation is a rare condition, but has a high mortality rate, even after immediate surgical intervention. The clinical predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality are still not well established, so this study attempted to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality after surgery for an intestinal perforation.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 117 patients who underwent surgery for an intestinal perforation at a single institution in Korea from November 2008 to June 2014. Factors related with postoperative mortality at 1 month and other postoperative complications were investigated.
Results
The mean age of enrolled patients was 66.0 ± 15.8 years and 66% of the patients were male. Fifteen patients (13%) died within 1 month after surgical treatment. Univariate analysis indicated that patient-related factors associated with mortality were low systolic and diastolic blood pressure, low serum albumin, low serum protein, low total cholesterol, and high blood urea nitrogen; the surgery-related factor associated with mortality was feculent ascites. Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression indicated that low systolic blood pressure and feculent ascites independently increased the risk for mortality; postoperative complications were more likely in both females and those with low estimated glomerular filtration rates and elevated serum C-reactive protein levels.
Conclusion
Various factors were associated with postoperative clinical outcomes of patients with an intestinal perforation. Morbidity and mortality following an intestinal perforation were greater in patients with unstable initial vital signs, poor nutritional status, and feculent ascites.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Emergency physician ultrasound diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum in intraoperative patients with peritoneal insufflation Amy Sanghvi, Makoto Tanigawa, Michael Danta, Jeff Yang, Mohammad Hamshow, Errel Khordipour, Lawrence Haines, Leily Naraghi The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2025; 90: 120. CrossRef
Prognostic determinants in surgical critial patients undergoing emergency surgery for Stage III or higher colorectal cancer Hyun Ho Kim, Sanguk Hwang, Jinbeom Cho Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Advances in natural biomacromolecule-based Janus materials: preparation, applications and future prospects in food science Ying Xu, Xuan Tao, Liubin Li, Yao Chen, Rong He, Xingrong Ju, Zhigao Wang Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition.2025; : 1. CrossRef
Instruction Video for Endosponge Construction JC Chen, Vijay Raj, Syed Husain Videoscopy.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Marine predator strikes rectally inserted eel fish causing colonic perforation: a rare case report and review of literature Akash Saha, Mohammad Mashiur Rahman, Abidur Rahman, Israt Jahan, Faisal Nasim Sunny, Md. Imran Ahmed, A. M. Zubayed Hassan Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2025; 87(12): 8909. CrossRef
A sharp plant stem causing terminal ileal perforation with clinical presentation resembling acute appendicitis: a case report Pirada Yincharoen, Weeratian Tawanwongsri Frontiers in Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
In Situ 4D Printing of Polyelectrolyte/Magnetic Composites for Sutureless Gastric Perforation Sealing Yunsong Shi, Sihan Tang, Xi Yuan, Zhuofan Li, Shifeng Wen, Zhongwei Li, Bin Su, Chunze Yan, Lili Chen Advanced Materials.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Small Intestinal Perforation after 360-Degree Liposuction: A Case Report Jenna C. Bekeny, Samuel S. Huffman, Chris Thomas, Mariana Tumminello, Anna Kata, Rajiv Parikh, Laura K. Tom, Grant M. Kleiber Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.2024; 48(5): 946. CrossRef
Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings Forrest Bohler, Allison Garden Journal of Osteopathic Medicine.2024; 124(1): 39. CrossRef
Prevalence, Pattern, Mortality, and Morbidity of Traumatic Small Bowel Perforation at King Abdulaziz Medical City: A Retrospective Cohort Study Fahad Aljehaiman, Faisal J Almalki, Abdulah Alhusain, Faris Alsalamah, Khaled Alzahrani, Abdulkareem Alharbi, Hani Alkhulaiwi Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Abdominal pain after a food crawl Danier Ong, Rajiv Yogendran, Emily Fite Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Case of abdominal whirl sign with small bowel obstruction and free gas successfully managed by conservative management instead of laparoscopic surgery Giuleta Jamsari, James Wei Tatt Toh Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery.2024; 7(3): 128. CrossRef
Emergent Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Malignancy Is Associated with Higher Rates of Perioperative Complications but No Independent Impact on Short-Term Mortality Yahya Alwatari, Devon C. Freudenberger, Jad Khoraki, Lena Bless, Riley Payne, Walker A. Julliard, Rachit D. Shah, Carlos A. Puig Journal of Chest Surgery.2024; 57(2): 160. CrossRef
Urea to Albumin Ratio Is an Excellent Predictor of Death in Patients With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections Evgeni Dimitrov, Krasimira Halacheva, Georgi Minkov, Emil Enchev, Yovcho Yovtchev Surgical Infections.2024; 25(3): 225. CrossRef
Postoperative Complications in Emergency Surgeries at a Referral Hospital in Eastern Venezuela Victor Castañeda-Marquez, Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Enrique Avila-Liendo, Gabriel Gonzalez-Quinde, Wilson Garcia-Cazorla, Georcimar Mendez-Meneses, Yoalkris E Salcedo, Tamara Rodriguez-Rugel, Jackner Antigua-Herrera, Miguel Rivas-Perez, Silvia Agudelo-Mendoz Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Gastrointestinal tract perforation after radiofrequency ablation for hepatic tumor: Incidence and risk factors Kyowon Gu, Tae Wook Kang, Seungchul Han, Dong Ik Cha, Kyoung Doo Song, Min Woo Lee, Hyunchul Rhim, Go Eun Park European Journal of Radiology.2024; 177: 111560. CrossRef
Revisiting Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth-POSSUM (P-POSSUM) Scores: Are They Valid in Cases of Ileal Perforation? Saikrishna Eswaravaka, Chirantan Suhrid, Bhavya Rao, Sundaresh Prabhakar, Jayashri Pandya Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A giant trichobezoar in a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A case report M. Forooghi, R. Shahrokhi, Sh. Yousufzai International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 123: 110283. CrossRef
Factors related to cardiac rupture after acute myocardial infarction Xue Gao, Ying Guo, Xiaoting Zhu, Chunlei Du, Beibei Ma, Yinghua Cui, Shuai Wang Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Investigating the association between osteopenia and bowel perforation through a multicenter radiologic analysis Sebastian Sanduleanu, Koray Ersahin, Jonathan Kottlors, Johannes Bremm, Narmin Talibova, Tim Damer, Merve Erdogan, Nils Groβe Hokamp, Lukas Goertz, Nijat Nasirov, Vilayat Valiyev, Christiane Bruns, David Maintz, Nuran Abdullayev Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Case report: Migratory biliary stent resulting in sigmoid colon perforation Jasmine B Beloy, Nicholas P Lund, Annika M Van Hell, Shyam Allamaneni Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic factors in patients with gastrointestinal perforation under the acute care surgery model : a retrospective cohort study Kiyoung Sung, Sanguk Hwang, Jaeheon Lee, Jinbeom Cho BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with bowel perforation after immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure Antonio Pizuorno Machado, Malek Shatila, Cynthia Liu, Yang Lu, Mehmet Altan, Isabella C. Glitza Oliva, Dan Zhao, Hao Chi Zhang, Anusha Thomas, Yinghong Wang Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(9): 5989. CrossRef
Abdominal emergency surgery in patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective single-center analysis Philipp H. von Kroge, Anna Duprée, Oliver Mann, Jakob R. Izbicki, Jonas Wagner, Paymon Ahmadi, Sören Weidemann, Raissa Adjallé, Nicolaus Kröger, Carsten Bokemeyer, Walter Fiedler, Franziska Modemann, Susanne Ghandili World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Acute Spontaneous Colonic Perforation in a Case of Newly Confirmed Scleroderma: Case Report Glenn Goodwin, Christian Ryckeley, Davide Fox, Michael Ashley, Laurence Dubensky, Mauricio Danckers, Todd Slesinger Interactive Journal of Medical Research.2023; 12: e43295. CrossRef
Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with emergency left colonic surgery Dauda Bawa, Yasser Mohammad Khalifa, Saleem Khan, Waddah Norah, Nibras Noman Annals of Saudi Medicine.2023; 43(2): 97. CrossRef
Fatal Case of Perforated Cytomegalovirus Colitis: Case Report and Systematic Review Andrea T. Fisher, Kovi E. Bessoff, Veronica Nicholas, James Badger, Lisa Knowlton, Joseph D. Forrester Surgical Infections.2022; 23(2): 127. CrossRef
An adhesive and resilient hydrogel for the sealing and treatment of gastric perforation Jing Chen, Julia S. Caserto, Ida Ang, Kaavian Shariati, James Webb, Bo Wang, Xi Wang, Nikolaos Bouklas, Minglin Ma Bioactive Materials.2022; 14: 52. CrossRef
Predictors of mortality in patients with acute small-bowel perforation transferred to ICU after emergency surgery: a single-centre retrospective cohort study Jianzhang Wu, Ping Shu, Hongyong He, Haojie Li, Zhaoqing Tang, Yihong Sun, Fenglin Liu Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Delayed ileal perforation following lollipop-stick ingestion in a two year old Tareq Swedan, Mohamed Morjan, Mulham Jarjanazi, Nafiza Martini, Alaa Aldin Ismail, Hebatullah Awad, Shamseh Benbash Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports.2022; 81: 102276. CrossRef
The Clinical Significance of Shock Index and GFR in the Differential Diagnosis of Perforated Appendicitis Ferhat ÇAY, Ali DURAN Journal of Contemporary Medicine.2022; 12(4): 504. CrossRef
The Impact of Delayed Surgical Care on Patient Outcomes With Alimentary Tract Perforation: Insight From a Low-Middle Income Country Muhammad H Zafar, Taha A Zaka Ur Rehman, Muhammad Sohaib Khan, Shayan Ahmed, Amir Shariff Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Gangrene of the Colon Ascendens, Colon Transversum, and Lienal Flexure in a Massive Strangulated Umbilical Hernia Stanko Baco, Milos Mitric Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Facility of Origin Predicts Mortality After Colonic Perforation Samuel D. Butensky, Emma Gazzara, Gainosuke Sugiyama, Gene F. Coppa, Antonio Alfonso, Paul J. Chung The American Surgeon™.2021; 87(8): 1327. CrossRef
Effect of Malnutrition Assessed by Comprehensive Nutritional Screening Tool on In-Hospital Mortality after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Perforation Seung-Young Oh, Hannah Lee, Ho Geol Ryu, Hyuk-Joon Lee Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition.2021; 12(1): 1. CrossRef
Machine Learning-based Model for Predicting Postoperative Complications among Patients with Colonic Perforation: A Retrospective study Hiroka Hosaka, Masashi Takeuchi, Tomohiro Imoto, Haruka Yagishita, Ayaka Yu, Yusuke Maeda, Yosuke Kobayashi, Yoshie Kadota, Masanori Odaira, Fumiki Toriumi, Takashi Endo, Hirohisa Harada Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2021; 5(3): 274. CrossRef
Bevacizumab and gastrointestinal perforations: a review from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database Thomas A. Wichelmann, Sufyan Abdulmujeeb, Eli D. Ehrenpreis Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2021; 54(10): 1290. CrossRef
A Rare Presentation of Gastric Carcinoma With Gastric Perforation and Septic Shock Reem Moala AlHazmi, Dunya Nasrallah Alfaraj, Shaykhah Nasser AlNaimi, Sarah Mohammed AlQahtani, Mashael Hamed AlJuwayed, Hazem Mohammed Zakriea, Mohammed S Foula Cureus.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
C-Reactive Protein as a Marker of Postoperative Complication of Emergency Colorectal Surgery Luis R. M. Nadal, Artur M. A. da Silva, Larissa Johann, Shuaib H. El Boustani, Maria Beatriz A. S. Medrado, Jose F. M. Farah, Renato A. Lupinacci Journal of Coloproctology.2021; 41(04): 375. CrossRef
Modified frailty index and hypoalbuminemia as predictors of adverse outcomes in older adults presenting to acute general surgical unit Angela Abraham, Sally Burrows, Neelankal John Abraham, Bhaskar Mandal Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología.2020; 55(2): 70. CrossRef
Prognostic Factors and Management for Left Colonic Perforation: Can Hartmann’s Procedure Be Preventable? Yilseok Joo, Yujin Lee, Taeyoung Yoo, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(3): 178. CrossRef
Intestinal Perforation: A Surgeon's Nightmare Enlightened by Scientific Research Byung Soh Min Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(6): 205. CrossRef
Optimal management of colonoscopic perforation (CP) is controversial because early diagnosis and prompt management play critical roles in morbidity and mortality. Herein, we evaluate the outcomes and clinical characteristics of patients with CP according to treatment modality to help establish guidelines for managing CP.
Methods
Our retrospective analysis included 40 CP patients from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2014. Patients with CP were categorized into 2 groups according to therapeutic modality: operation (surgery) and nonoperation (endo-luminal clip application or conservative treatment) groups.
Results
The postoperative morbidity rate was 40%, and no mortalities were noted. The incidence of abdominal pain and tenderness in patients who received only conservative management was significantly lower than in those who underwent surgery (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively). Patients tended to undergo surgery more often for diagnosis times longer than 24 hours and for diagnostic CPs. The mean hospital stays for the operation and nonoperation groups were 14.6 ± 7.77 and 5.9 ± 1.62 days, respectively (P < 0.001). Compared to the operation group, the nonoperation group began intake of liquid diets significantly earlier after perforation (3.8 ± 1.32 days vs. 5.6 ± 1.25 days, P < 0.001) and used antibiotics for a shorter duration (4.7 ± 1.29 days vs. 8.7 ± 2.23 days, P < 0.001).
Conclusion
The time of diagnosis and the injury mechanism may be useful indications for conservative management. Nonoperative management, such as endo-luminal clip application, might be beneficial, when feasible, for the treatment of patients with CP.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Risk Factors for Perforation in Endoscopic Treatment for Early Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide ENTER-K Study Ik Hyun Jo, Hyun Gun Kim, Young-Seok Cho, Hyun Jung Lee, Eun Ran Kim, Yoo Jin Lee, Sung Wook Hwang, Kyeong-Ok Kim, Jun Lee, Hyuk Soon Choi, Yunho Jung, Chang Mo Moon Gut and Liver.2025; 19(1): 95. CrossRef
Cold Versus Hot Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for ≥15 mm Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps Sneh Sonaiya, Dushyant S. Dahiya, Raj Patel, Shahryar Khan, Charmy Parikh, Karan Yagnik, Chun-Han Lo, Kyaw Min Tun, Pranav D. Patel, Bradley Confer, Harshit S. Khara, Sumant Inamdar, Babu P. Mohan Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Luminal electrophysiological neuroprofiling system for gastrointestinal neuromuscular diseases Shriya S. Srinivasan, Sabrina Liu, Ryo Hotta, Sukhada Bhave, Amro Alshareef, Binbin Ying, George Selsing, Johannes Kuosmanen, Keiko Ishida, Joshua Jenkins, Wiam Abdalla Mohammed Madani, Alison Hayward, Niora Fabian, Allan M. Goldstein, Giovanni Traverso Device.2024; 2(7): 100400. CrossRef
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colonoscopic perforation: A systematic review and meta-analysis Wu Zhong, Chuanyuan Liu, Chuanfa Fang, Lei Zhang, Xianping He, Weiquan Zhu, Xueyun Guan Medicine.2023; 102(24): e34057. CrossRef
Analysis of the Characteristics of Colonoscopy Perforation and Risk Factors for Failure of Endoscopic Treatment Zhi Jiehua, Ali Kashif , Che YaoSheng , Sun YunYun , Liang Lanyu Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Iatrogenic colon perforation during colonoscopy, diagnosis/treatment, and follow-up processes: A single-center experience Nihat Gülaydın, Raim İliaz, Atakan Özkan, A Hande Gökçe, Hanifi Önalan, Berrin Önalan, Aziz Arı Turkish Journal of Surgery.2022; 38(3): 221. CrossRef
The analysis of outcomes of surgical management for colonoscopic perforations: A 16-years experiences at a single institution Dae Ro Lim, Jung Kul Kuk, Taehyung Kim, Eung Jin Shin Asian Journal of Surgery.2020; 43(5): 577. CrossRef
Multicenter retrospective evaluation of ileocecocolic perforations associated with diagnostic lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in dogs and cats Vanessa L. Woolhead, Jacqueline C. Whittemore, Sarah A. Stewart Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2020; 34(2): 684. CrossRef
Clinical Characteristics of Colonoscopic Perforation and Risk Factors for Complications After Surgical Treatment Liang Li, Bing Xue, Chunxia Yang, Zhongbo Han, Hongqiang Xie, Meng Wang Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2020; 30(11): 1153. CrossRef
ESTUDO RETROSPECTIVO DA PREVALÊNCIA DE PERFURAÇÕES GASTROINTESTINAIS EM PACIENTES SUBMETIDOS A COLONOSCOPIAS NO HOSPITAL REGIONAL HANS DIETER SCHMIDT Viviane Helena Raimundo, Paula Fernanda Partika, Haroldo Luiz Jordelino da Luz, Eduardo Manoel Pereira Arquivos Catarinenses de Medicina.2020; 49(2): 14. CrossRef
Adverse events related to colonoscopy: Global trends and future challenges Su Young Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Hong Jun Park World Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 25(2): 190. CrossRef
Iatrogenic Colonic Perforations: Changing the Paradigm Jose Luis Ulla-Rocha, Angel Salgado, Raquel Sardina, Raquel Souto, Raquel Sanchez-Santos, Juan Turnes Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2019; 29(3): 173. CrossRef
Diagnosis and Management of Colonoscopy-related Perforation Nam Seok Ham, Jung Ho Bae, Dong-Hoon Yang The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 73(6): 327. CrossRef
Management Outcomes of Colonoscopic Perforations Are Affected by the General Condition of the Patients Jae Ho Park, Kyung Jong Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(1): 16. CrossRef
2017 WSES guidelines for the management of iatrogenic colonoscopy perforation Nicola de’Angelis, Salomone Di Saverio, Osvaldo Chiara, Massimo Sartelli, Aleix Martínez-Pérez, Franca Patrizi, Dieter G. Weber, Luca Ansaloni, Walter Biffl, Offir Ben-Ishay, Miklosh Bala, Francesco Brunetti, Federica Gaiani, Solafah Abdalla, Aurelien Ami World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Crohn disease is characterized by high rates of recurrence and reoperations. However, few studies have investigated long-term surgical outcomes in Asian populations. We investigated risk factors for reoperation, particularly those associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) antibody use, and long-term follow-up results.
Methods
We reviewed the records of 148 patients (100 males and 48 females) who underwent surgery for gastrointestinal Crohn disease and retrospectively analyzed long-term outcomes and risk factors.
Results
The mean age at diagnosis was 28.8 years. Thirty-eight patients (25.7%) received monoclonal antibody treatment before reoperation. A small bowel and colon resection was most commonly performed (83 patients, 56.1%). The median follow-up was 149 months, during which 47 patients underwent reoperation. The median interval between the primary and the secondary surgeries was 65 months, with accumulated reoperation rates of 16.5%, 31.8%, and 57.2% after 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Obstruction was the most common indication for reoperation (37 patients, 25.0%). In a multivariable analysis, age <17 years at diagnosis (A1) (odds ratio [OR], 2.20; P = 0.023), penetrating behavior (B3) (OR, 4.39; P < 0.001), and no azathioprine use (OR, 2.87; P = 0.003) were associated with reoperation. Anti-TNF-α antibody use did not affect the reoperation rate (P = 0.767).
Conclusion
We showed a high reoperation rate regardless of treatment with anti-TNF-α antibody, which indicates that recurrent surgery is still needed to cure patients with gastrointestinal Crohn diseases. Younger age at primary operation, penetrating behavior, and no azathioprine use were significant factors associated with reoperation for gastrointestinal Crohn disease.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Reoperation Rate Has Decreased Over Time If Corrected by Prevalence Mafalda Santiago, Fernando Magro, Luís Correia, Francisco Portela, Paula Ministro, Paula Lago, Eunice Trindade, Cláudia Camila Dias Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology.2020; 11(9): e00227. CrossRef
Effect of Thiopurine on Potential Surgical Intervention in Crohn’s Disease in Korea: Results from the CONNECT Study Hee Man Kim, Jin Woo Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Joo Sung Kim, You Sun Kim, Jae Hee Cheon, Won Ho Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Won Moon, Sung Hee Jung, Young-Ho Kim, Dong Soo Han Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 10(1): 25. CrossRef
Risk factors for postoperative surgical site infections in patients with Crohn’s disease receiving definitive bowel resection Song Liu, Ji Miao, Gefei Wang, Meng Wang, Xiuwen Wu, Kun Guo, Min Feng, Wenxian Guan, Jianan Ren Scientific Reports.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Advanced age impacts surgical characteristics and postoperative course in patients with Crohn's disease Stanislaus Argeny, Anton Stift, Martina Mittlböck, Amy C. Lord, Svenja Maschke, Mathias Schneeweiß, Stefan Riss International Journal of Surgery.2016; 33: 182. CrossRef
Effect of Tripterygium Wilfordii Polyglycoside on Experimental Prostatitis Caused by Ureaplasma Urealyticum in Rats Pingnan Shan, Zhiyong Lu, Lihong Ye, Yaqin Fang, Suhong Tan, Guohong Xuan, Jincheng Ru, Liming Mao Medical Science Monitor.2016; 22: 3722. CrossRef
Endoscopy-based management decreases the risk of postoperative recurrences in Crohn’s disease Anne-Laure Boucher, Bruno Pereira, Stéphanie Decousus, Marion Goutte, Felix Goutorbe, Anne Dubois, Johan Gagniere, Corinne Borderon, Juliette Joubert, Denis Pezet, Michel Dapoigny, Pierre J Déchelotte, Gilles Bommelaer, Anthony Buisson World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(21): 5068. CrossRef
Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy for Crohn Disease: Friend or Foe to the Surgeon? Hungdai Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(4): 121. CrossRef
This research was conducted to compare the management and the outcome of patients with colovesical fistulae of different aetiologies.
Methods
Retrospective data were collected from 2002 to 2012 and analyzed with SPSS ver. 17. Age, gender, aetiology, management,
hospital stay, postoperative complications, and mortality were studied and compared among colovesical fistulae of different aetiologies.
Results
A total of 55 patients, 46 males (84%) and 9 females (16%), with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 48-75 years) were studied. Diverticular disease was the most common benign cause and recto-sigmoid cancer the most common malignancy. Anterior resection and bladder repair were the most frequent operations in benign cases, as was total pelvic exenteration in the malignant group. Multiple intestinal loop involvement and subsequent resection were significantly higher in those with Crohn disease than it was in patients of colovesical fistula due to all other causes collectively (60% vs. 6%, P = 0.006). Patients with malignancy had a higher postoperative complication rate than patients who did not (12 [80%] vs. 7 [32%], P = 0.0005). Pelvic collection (11, 22%) was the most frequent early complication (predominantly in the malignant group) whereas incisional hernia (8, 22%) was the most common late complication, with a predominance in the benign group. The median hospital stay was significantly prolonged in the malignant group (32 days; IQR, 17-70 days vs. 16 days; IQR, 11-25 days; P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Despite their having similar clinical presentation, colovesical fistulae of various aetiologies differ significantly in management and outcome.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Laparoscopic management of colovesical fistula in different clinical scenarios Davide Campobasso, Maurizio Zizzo, Federico Biolchini, Carolina Castro-Ruiz, Antonio Frattini, Alessandro Giunta Journal of Minimal Access Surgery.2024; 20(2): 175. CrossRef
Successful management of malignant colovesical fistula using covered colonic self-expanding metallic stent: a case report Goro Takahashi, Akihisa Matsuda, Takeshi Yamada, Kay Uehara, Seiichi Shinji, Yasuyuki Yokoyama, Takuma Iwai, Kohki Takeda, Sho Kuriyama, Toshimitsu Miyasaka, Shintaro Kanaka, Tai Terayachi, Tetsuya Okino, Hiroshi Yoshida Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Emphysematous cystitis as a potential marker of severe Crohn's disease S. M. Mahmudul Hasan, Baljinder S. Salh BMC Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Management of colovesical fistula: a systematic review Maurizio ZIZZO, David TUMIATI, Maria C. BASSI, Magda ZANELLI, Francesca SANGUEDOLCE, Francesco PORPIGLIA, Cristian FIORI, Davide CAMPOBASSO, Carolina CASTRO RUIZ, Franco A. BERGAMASCHI, Umberto V. MAESTRONI, Giuseppe CARRIERI, Luigi CORMIO, Federico BIOLC Minerva Urology and Nephrology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Burden of Colovesical Fistula and Changing Treatment Pathways: A Systematic Literature Review Caterina Froiio, Daniele Bernardi, Emanuele Asti, Giulia Bonavina, Andrea Conti, Luca Carmignani, Luigi Bonavina Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2022; 32(5): 577. CrossRef
Colovesical Fistulae: The Varying Aetiologies Mansoor Zafar, Sara Lee, Serena Tieger, William Sacre, Mark Whitehead Cureus.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Urinary bladder fistulae and the role of CT cystography: a pictorial review Daniel F. Fouladi, Shahab Shayesteh, Elliot K. Fishman, Linda C. Chu Abdominal Radiology.2020; 45(6): 1883. CrossRef
Fístula colovesical: aplicabilidad del abordaje laparoscópico y resultados según su etiología Noa de la Fuente Hernández, Carmen Martínez Sánchez, Mireia Solans Solerdelcoll, Pilar Hernández Casanovas, Jesús Bollo Rodríguez, Josep María Gaya Sopena, Eduard Targarona Soler Cirugía Española.2020; 98(6): 336. CrossRef
Colovesical Fistula: Applicability of the Laparoscopic Approach and Results According to Etiology Noa de la Fuente Hernández, Carmen Martínez Sánchez, Mireia Solans Solerdelcoll, Pilar Hernández Casanovas, Jesús Bollo Rodríguez, Josep María Gaya Sopena, Eduard Targarona Soler Cirugía Española (English Edition).2020; 98(6): 336. CrossRef
Manejo laparoscópico de fístulas colovesicales de origen benigno, resultados y revisión de la literatura José Nicolás García Martin del Campo, José Luis Serna Soto, Carolina León Mancilla, Rogelio Romero Pérez, Jorge Alberto Cancino, Betsabé López Vázquez, Julio César Sotelo Estévez Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica.2020; 21(3): 149. CrossRef
Perioperative Management of Patients with Colovesical Fistula Scott C. Dolejs, Alyssa J. Penning, Michael J. Guzman, Alyssa D. Fajardo, Bryan K. Holcomb, Bruce W. Robb, Joshua A. Waters Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2019; 23(9): 1867. CrossRef
Laparoscopic approaches to complicated diverticulitis M. Gachabayov, R. Essani, R. Bergamaschi Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2018; 403(1): 11. CrossRef
A colovesical fistula with a persistent descending mesocolon due to partial situs inversus: A case report Tetsuya Mochizuki, Hirofumi Tazawa, Yuzo Hirata, Yoshio Kuga, Tomohiro Miwata, Sotaro Fukuhara, Kouki Imaoka, Seiji Fujisaki, Mamoru Takahashi, Saburo Fukuda, Toshihiro Nishida, Hideto Sakimoto International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2017; 37: 109. CrossRef
Diagnosis and Treatments for Vesico-Enteric Fistulas: a 2017 Current Review Justin W. Fincher, Ehab Eltahawy Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports.2017; 12(3): 212. CrossRef
Incidental adenocarcinoma in patients undergoing surgery for stricturing Crohn's disease Ivan Kristo, Stefan Riss, Stanislaus Argeny, Svenja Maschke, Praminthra Chitsabesan, Anton Stift World Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 23(3): 472. CrossRef
Risk factors associated with postoperative morbidity in over 500 colovesical fistula patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a retrospective cohort study from ACS-NSQIP database H. Hande Aydinli, Cigdem Benlice, Gokhan Ozuner, Emre Gorgun, Maher A. Abbas International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2017; 32(4): 469. CrossRef
Different Strategies for Treating a Colovesical Fistula Moo Jun Baek Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(2): 45. CrossRef
Is laparoscopic surgery the best treatment in fistulas complicating diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon? A systematic review Roberto Cirocchi, Alberto Arezzo, Claudio Renzi, Giovanni Cochetti, Vito D'Andrea, Abe Fingerhut, Ettore Mearini, Gian Andrea Binda International Journal of Surgery.2015; 24: 95. CrossRef
Colovesical fistula caused by glucocorticoid therapy for IgG4-related intrapelvic mass Yohei Yabuuchi World Journal of Clinical Cases.2015; 3(12): 1000. CrossRef
Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (Picolight Powder), which is used as a bowel preparation for the colon and the rectum, can cause a severe electrolyte imbalance like hyponatremia. When hyponatremia gets severe or occurs rapidly, it can lead to death due to associated complications. We have experienced a case of hyponatremia associated with seizure and loss of consciousness in a 76-year-old woman, who took sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy. She was taking thiazide and synthroid for the treatment of hypertension and hypothyroidism, respectively, and she had other underlying medical conditions such as a history of seizure and dementia. Following the diagnosis of hyponatremia, we used an intravenous injection of 3% NaCl to normalize the sodium level in her serum, and her associated symptoms soon disappeared.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Using the Cardiac–Electrophysiological Balance Index to Predict Arrhythmia Risk After Colonoscopy Seyit Ali Volkan Polatkan, Seyda Gunay-Polatkan, Ozgen Isik, Deniz Sigirli Medicina.2024; 61(1): 13. CrossRef
Hyponatremia‐induced generalized seizure after taking polyethylene glycol for colon preparation—A case report and brief review of the literature Shiva Seyrafian, Vahid Sebghatollahi, Bahar Bastani Clinical Case Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Hyponatremic Seizure after Ingestion of an Oral Sulfate Tablet for Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Sung Hyun Hong, Dong Seok Lee, Ji Won Kim, Kook Lae Lee, Hyoun Woo Kang, Su Hwan Kim The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(3): 154. CrossRef
Seizure from water intoxication following bowel preparation: a case report Ting-Hsuan Chiang, Jui-Hsiang Tan, Chun-Chao Chang, Kuan-Chieh Fang BMC Nephrology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Severe symptomatic hyponatraemia secondary to bowel preparation Krishan Pratap, Manasi Jiwrajka, Liam Weber, Alan Richardson BMJ Case Reports.2019; 12(10): e230385. CrossRef
Preparation for colonoscopy: Recommendations by an expert panel in Italy Cristiano Spada, Renato Cannizzaro, Maria Antonietta Bianco, Rita Conigliaro, Emilio Di Giulio, Cesare Hassan, Riccardo Marmo, Pietro Occhipinti, Franco Radaelli, Alessandro Repici, Enrico Ricci, Guido Costamagna Digestive and Liver Disease.2018; 50(11): 1124. CrossRef
Severe hyponatremia secondary to preparation for colonoscopy with sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate Olatz Azcune Echeverria Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
“Bowel prep hyponatremia“ – a state of acute water intoxication facilitated by low dietary solute intake: case report and literature review Martin Windpessl, Christoph Schwarz, Manfred Wallner BMC Nephrology.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Severe Hyponatremia with Mental Change after Ingestion of Picosulfate Sodium/Magnesium Citrate for Bowel Preparation Woojung Kim, Sang Young Park, Mi Jeoung Kim, Hyang Mo Koo The Korean Journal of Medicine.2016; 91(2): 206. CrossRef
Upper airway obstruction resulting from acute mucosal injury induced by direct ingestion of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate powder Gyeong Bo Kim, Sung Yeon Hwang, Tae Gun Shin, Tae Rim Lee, Won Chul Cha, Min Seob Sim, Ik Joon Jo, Keun Jeong Song, Joong Eui Rhee, Yeon Kwon Jeong Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine.2016; 3(2): 109. CrossRef
Combination could be another tool for bowel preparation? Jae Seung Soh, Kyung-Jo Kim World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(10): 2915. CrossRef
A randomized trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate solution vs. 4 L polyethylene glycol solution as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy Miguel Muñoz-Navas, José Luis Calleja, Guillermo Payeras, Antonio José Hervás, Luis Esteban Abreu, Víctor Orive, Pedro L. Menchén, José María Bordas, José Ramón Armengol, Cristina Carretero, Vicente Pons Beltrán, Inmaculada Alonso-Abreu, Román Manteca, Ad International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2015; 30(10): 1407. CrossRef
A barium enema is a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure commonly used for colon and rectum problems. Rectal perforation with extensive intra- and/or extraperitoneal spillage of barium is a devastating complication of a barium enema that leads to a significant increase in patient mortality. Due to the low number of reported cases in recent scientific literature and the lack of experience with the management of these cases, we would like to present our treatment approach to a rare case of retroperitoneal contamination with barium, followed by its intraperitoneal involvement during a diagnostic barium enema. Our experience with long-term management of the patient and the good outcome will be depicted in this paper.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Barium granuloma formation following barium peritonitis: A case report Baiquan Zhou, Lin Liu, Yufan Tang, Ruifang Fan Asian Journal of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Perforation of barium sulfate enterography in an infant: A case report Yixing Lu, Lixian Mo, Junhong Chen, Wei Peng Medicine.2024; 103(17): e37926. CrossRef
A Case of Sigmoid Colon Perforation Caused by Barium that was Treated by Laparoscopic Surgery Shoichiro HARA, Junichi HAMADA, Kenichi TAKEMOTO, Kei NAITO, Toshiya OCHIAI, Eigo OTSUJI Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association).2024; 85(4): 546. CrossRef
The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative complications for single-stage surgery after mechanical bowel preparation in patients who experienced obstruction and those who did not.
Methods
From 2000 to 2011, 1,224 patients underwent a single-stage operation for left colorectal cancer after bowel preparation. Nonobstruction (NOB) and obstruction (OB) colorectal cancer patients were 1,053 (86.0%) and 171 (14.0%), respectively. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were compared between groups.
Results
The OB group had poor preoperative conditions (age, white blood cell, hemoglobin, albumin level, and advanced tumor stage) compared with the NOB group (P < 0.05). Mean on-table lavage time for the OB group was 17.5 minutes (range, 14-60 minutes). Mean operation time for the OB group was statistically longer than that of the NOB group (OB: 210 minutes; range, 120-480 minutes vs. NOB: 180 minutes; range, 60-420 minutes; P < 0.001). Overall morbidity was similar between groups (NOB: 19.7% vs. OB: 23.4%, P = 0.259). Major morbidity was more common in the OB group than in the NOB group, but the difference was without significance (OB: 11.7% vs. NOB: 7.6%, P = 0.070). Postoperative death occurred in 16 patients (1.3%), and death in the OB group (n = 7) was significantly higher than it was in the NOB group (n = 9) (4.1% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.001). Twelve patients had surgical complications, which were the leading cause of postoperative death: postoperative bleeding in five patients and leakage in seven patients.
Conclusion
Postoperative morbidity for a single-stage operation for obstructive left colorectal cancer is comparable to that for NOB, regardless of poor conditions of the patient.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Associated factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality following surgery of obstructive colon tumors Mseddi Mohamed Ali, Siala Rakia, Yakoubi Chaima, Hsairi Mariem, Hssin Hajer, Krifa Nesrine, Trifa Fatma, Boubaker Radhia, Sallemi Karim, Khemakhem Emna, Mghirbi Abdelwaheb, Bhira Amal, Yosra Yahia, Mestiri Souhir, Guizeni Rami, Ghariani Brahim, Sassi Kari F1000Research.2025; 14: 875. CrossRef
Clinical characteristics and risk factors of post-operative intestinal flora disorder following laparoscopic colonic surgery: A propensity-score-matching analysis Gan-Bin Li, Chen-Tong Wang, Xiao Zhang, Xiao-Yuan Qiu, Wei-Jie Chen, Jun-Yang Lu, Lai Xu, Bin Wu, Yi Xiao, Guo-Le Lin World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(5): 1259. CrossRef
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for obese patients with rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study Hiroyuki Matsuzaki, Soichiro Ishihara, Kazushige Kawai, Koji Murono, Kensuke Otani, Koji Yasuda, Takeshi Nishikawa, Toshiaki Tanaka, Tomomichi Kiyomatsu, Keisuke Hata, Hiroaki Nozawa, Hironori Yamaguchi, Toshiaki Watanabe Surgery Today.2017; 47(5): 627. CrossRef
Surgical Treatment of Obstructed Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer Patients Young Jin Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(6): 245. CrossRef
The incidence of complications after colonoscopy is very low. The complications after colonoscopy that are of clinical concern are bleeding and perforation. The present study was conducted to determine the clinical outcomes and the risk factors of a colostomy or a colectomy after colonoscopic colon perforation.
Methods
From March 2009 to December 2012, the records of all patients who were treated for colorectal perforation after colonoscopy were reviewed retrospectively. The following parameters were evaluated: age, sex, purpose of colonoscopy, management of the colonic perforation, and interval from colonoscopy to the diagnosis of a colonic perforation. A retrospective analysis was performed to determine the risk factors associated with major surgery for the treatment of a colon perforation after colonoscopy.
Results
A total 27 patients were included in the present study. The mean age was 62 years, and 16 were males. The purpose of colonoscopy was diagnostic in 18 patients. The most common perforation site was the sigmoid colon. Colonic perforation was diagnosed during colonoscopy in 14 patients, just after colonoscopy in 5 patients, and 24 hours or more after colonoscopy in 8 patients. For the treatment of colonic perforation, endoscopic clipping was performed in 3 patients, primary closure in 15 patients, colon resection in 2 patients, Hartmann's procedures in 4 patients, and diverting colostomy in 3 patients. If the diagnosis of perforation after colonoscopy was delayed for more than 24 hours, the need for major treatment was increased significantly.
Conclusion
Although a colonic perforation after colonoscopy is rare, if the morbidity and the mortality associated with the colonic perforation are to be reduced, prompt diagnosis and management are very important.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Iatrogenic colon perforation: endoscopic management or surgery Seung Bum Lee Clinical Endoscopy.2026; 59(1): 33. CrossRef
Clinical outcomes and risk factors of post-polypectomy microperforation in patients with colorectal neoplasia: a case-control study Seung Yong Shin, Min Soo Cho, Jinhoon Nam, Jie-Hyun Kim, Young Hoon Yoon, Hyojin Park, Jeonghyun Kang, Jae Jun Park Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Iatrogenic colon perforation during colonoscopy, diagnosis/treatment, and follow-up processes: A single-center experience Nihat Gülaydın, Raim İliaz, Atakan Özkan, A Hande Gökçe, Hanifi Önalan, Berrin Önalan, Aziz Arı Turkish Journal of Surgery.2022; 38(3): 221. CrossRef
Multicenter retrospective evaluation of ileocecocolic perforations associated with diagnostic lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in dogs and cats Vanessa L. Woolhead, Jacqueline C. Whittemore, Sarah A. Stewart Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2020; 34(2): 684. CrossRef
Clinical Characteristics of Colonoscopic Perforation and Risk Factors for Complications After Surgical Treatment Liang Li, Bing Xue, Chunxia Yang, Zhongbo Han, Hongqiang Xie, Meng Wang Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2020; 30(11): 1153. CrossRef
Treatment of colonoscopic perforation: outcomes from a major single tertiary institution Carolyn R. Chew, Justin M. C. Yeung, Ian G. Faragher ANZ Journal of Surgery.2019; 89(5): 546. CrossRef
Iatrogenic Colonic Perforations: Changing the Paradigm Jose Luis Ulla-Rocha, Angel Salgado, Raquel Sardina, Raquel Souto, Raquel Sanchez-Santos, Juan Turnes Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2019; 29(3): 173. CrossRef
Concurrent retroperitoneal, mediastinal, cervical and subcutaneous emphysema secondary to iatrogenic sigmoid colon perforation Zehui Wu, Huaping Xu, Yisheng Zhang, Lianghui Shi Postgraduate Medical Journal.2019; 95(1125): 396. CrossRef
Management of colonoscopic perforations: A systematic review Alexander T. Hawkins, Kenneth W. Sharp, Molly M. Ford, Roberta L. Muldoon, M. Benjamin Hopkins, Timothy M. Geiger The American Journal of Surgery.2018; 215(4): 712. CrossRef
2017 WSES guidelines for the management of iatrogenic colonoscopy perforation Nicola de’Angelis, Salomone Di Saverio, Osvaldo Chiara, Massimo Sartelli, Aleix Martínez-Pérez, Franca Patrizi, Dieter G. Weber, Luca Ansaloni, Walter Biffl, Offir Ben-Ishay, Miklosh Bala, Francesco Brunetti, Federica Gaiani, Solafah Abdalla, Aurelien Ami World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Management Outcomes of Colonoscopic Perforations Are Affected by the General Condition of the Patients Jae Ho Park, Kyung Jong Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(1): 16. CrossRef
Managing a Colonoscopic Perforation in a Patient with No Abdominal Wall Jayan George, Michael Peirson, Samuel Birks, Paul Skinner Case Reports in Surgery.2018; 2018: 1. CrossRef
Air and its Sonographic Appearance: Understanding the Artifacts Simran Buttar, Denrick Cooper, Patrick Olivieri, Michael Barca, Aaran B. Drake, Melvin Ku, Gabriel Rose, Sebastian D. Siadecki, Turandot Saul The Journal of Emergency Medicine.2017; 53(2): 241. CrossRef
Colonoscopic Perforations, What is Our Experience in a Training Hospital? Abbas Aras, Ebru Oran, Hakan Seyit, Mehmet Karabulut, İlhan Gök, Halil Aliş Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2016; 26(1): 44. CrossRef
Endoscopic Therapy in Crohnʼs Disease Min Chen, Bo Shen Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2015; 21(9): 2222. CrossRef
Importance of Prompt Diagnosis in the Management of Colonoscopic Perforation In Ja Park Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(5): 208. CrossRef
Ki Hwan Song, Wu Seok Suh, Jin Sik Jeong, Dong Sik Kim, Sang Woo Kim, Dong Min Kwak, Jong Seong Hwang, Hyun Jin Kim, Man Woo Park, Min Chul Shim, Ja-Il Koo, Jae Hwang Kim, Dae Ho Shon
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(5):222-227. Published online October 28, 2014
Bowel preparation with sodium phosphate was recently prohibited by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is safe and effective; however, it is difficult to drink. To identify an easy bowel preparation method for colonoscopy, we evaluated three different bowel preparation regimens regarding their efficacy and patient satisfaction.
Methods
In this randomized, comparative study, 892 patients who visited a secondary referral hospital for a colonoscopy between November 2012 and February 2013 were enrolled. Three regimens were evaluated: three packets of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (PICO, group A), two packets of PICO with 1 L of PEG (PICO + PEG 1 L, group B), and two packets of PICO with 2 L of PEG (PICO + PEG 2 L, group C). A questionnaire survey regarding the patients' preference for the bowel preparation regimen and satisfaction was conducted before the colonoscopies. The quality of bowel cleansing was scored by the colonoscopists who used the Aronchick scoring scale and the Ottawa scale.
Results
The patients' satisfaction rate regarding the regimens were 72% in group A, 64% in group B, and 45.9% in group C. Nausea and abdominal bloating caused by the regimens were more frequent in group C than in group A or group B (P < 0.01). Group C showed the lowest preference rate compared to the other groups (P < 0.01). Group C showed better right colon cleansing efficacy than group A or group B.
Conclusion
Group A exhibited a better result than group B or group C in patient satisfaction and preference. In the cleansing quality, no difference was noted between groups A and C.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Rehabilitation for Chronic Constipation: Integrative Approaches to Diagnosis and Treatment Luana Alexandrescu, Ionut Eduard Iordache, Alina Mihaela Stanigut, Laura Maria Condur, Doina Ecaterina Tofolean, Razvan Catalin Popescu, Andreea Nelson Twakor, Eugen Dumitru, Andrei Dumitru, Cristina Tocia, Alexandra Herlo, Ionut Tiberiu Tofolean Gastrointestinal Disorders.2025; 7(1): 11. CrossRef
Acidifying agents impact erlotinib and gefitinib pharmacokinetic parameters and elevate liver enzymes in Wistar rats Amsha S. Alsegiani, Aliyah Almomen, Maria Arafah, Nourah Z. Alzoman, Abdullah K.Alshememry Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
White Diet with split‐dose Picosalax is preferred, better tolerated, and non‐inferior to day‐before clear fluids with polyethylene glycol plus sodium picosulfate‐magnesium citrate for morning colonoscopy: A randomized, non‐inferiority trial Jeremy P Dwyer, Jonathan Y C Tan, Eldho Paul, Catherine Bunn, Dileep Mangira, Robyn Secomb, Peter R Gibson, Gregor Brown JGH Open.2017; 1(1): 38. CrossRef
Randomized clinical trial comparing fixed-time split dosing and split dosing of oral Picosulfate regimen for bowel preparation Jae Hyuck Jun, Koon Hee Han, Jong Kyu Park, Hyun Il Seo, Young Don Kim, Sang Jin Lee, Baek Gyu Jun, Min Sik Hwang, Yoon Kyoo Park, Myeong Jong Kim, Gab Jin Cheon World Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 23(32): 5986. CrossRef
Upper airway obstruction resulting from acute mucosal injury induced by direct ingestion of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate powder Gyeong Bo Kim, Sung Yeon Hwang, Tae Gun Shin, Tae Rim Lee, Won Chul Cha, Min Seob Sim, Ik Joon Jo, Keun Jeong Song, Joong Eui Rhee, Yeon Kwon Jeong Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine.2016; 3(2): 109. CrossRef
Combination could be another tool for bowel preparation? Jae Seung Soh, Kyung-Jo Kim World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(10): 2915. CrossRef
Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial of Combined Oral laxatives Medication for BOwel PREParation (COMBO-PREP study) Min Jung Kim, Chang Won Hong, Byung Chang Kim, Sung Chan Park, Kyung Su Han, Jungnam Joo, Jae Hwan Oh, Dae Kyung Sohn Medicine.2016; 95(7): e2824. CrossRef
Frustration Still Exists Hyun Shig Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(5): 207. CrossRef
Malnutrition is associated with an increased risk of developing complications following gastrointestinal surgery, especially following radical surgeries such as pelvic exenteration. This study aims to determine if preoperative body mass index (BMI) is associated with 30-day morbidity, length of hospital stay and/or quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration surgery for recurrent and locally-advanced rectal cancer prior to a prospective trial.
Methods
A review of all patients who underwent pelvic exenteration surgery prior to 2008 was performed. Patients were included if they had a documented BMI as well as a QoL measurement (Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Colorectal questionnaire).
Results
Thirty-one patients, with a mean age of 56 years, had preoperative height and weight data, as well as measures of postoperative QoL, and formed the study group. The numbers of patients with recurrent (n = 17) or locally-advanced rectal cancer (n = 14) were similar. The mean length of stay was 21 days while the mean BMI of the patients was 24.3 (± 5.9) kg/m2. The majority of the patients were either of normal weight (n = 15) or overweight/obese (n = 11). The average length of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who were underweight compared to those who were of normal weight (F = 6.508, P = 0.006) and those who were overweight and obese (F = 6.508, P = 0.007).
Conclusion
This study suggests that a lower body mass index preoperatively is associated with a longer length of hospital stay. BMI is not associated with long-term QoL in this patient group. However, further prospective research is required.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Prospective longitudinal trajectory of cancer survivorship among patients with recurrent rectal cancer: impact of treatment modalities and resection status Tarik Sammour, Oliver Peacock, Brian K. Bednarski, Arvind Dasari, Prajnan Das, Benny Johnson, Grace L. Smith, George J. Chang, John Skibber, Y. Nancy You Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Living After Pelvic Exenteration: A Mixed-Methods Synthesis of Quality-of-Life Outcomes and Patient Perspectives Vlad Rotaru, Elena Chitoran, Aisa Gelal, Giuseppe Gullo, Daniela-Cristina Stefan, Laurentiu Simion Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(18): 6541. CrossRef
Defining Standard Data Reporting in Pelvic Exenteration Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A PelvEx Collaborative Review of Current Data Reporting
Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer Niamh McKigney, Fergus Houston, Ellen Ross, Galina Velikova, Julia Brown, Deena Pravin Harji Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(7): 3969. CrossRef
Prevention and management of complications in pelvic exenteration Pia Persson, Peter Chong, Colin W Steele, Martha Quinn European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 48(11): 2277. CrossRef
Patient‐reported outcomes after pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: A systematic review Andreas Denys, Yves van Nieuwenhove, Dirk Van de putte, Eva Pape, Piet Pattyn, Wim Ceelen, Gabriëlle H. van Ramshorst Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(4): 353. CrossRef
Pelvic exenteration: Pre-, intra-, and post-operative considerations Kheng-Seong Ng, Peter J.M. Lee Surgical Oncology.2022; 43: 101787. CrossRef
Pelvic exenteration: Pre-, intra-, and post-operative considerations Kheng-Seong Ng, Peter J.M. Lee Surgical Oncology.2021; 37: 101546. CrossRef
Functional outcomes following pelvic exenteration: results from a prospective cohort study Preet G. S. Makker, Cherry E. Koh, Michael J. Solomon, James Ratcliffe, Daniel Steffens Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(10): 2647. CrossRef
Quality of life outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer Tamara Glyn, Frank Frizelle Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2020; 31(3): 100767. CrossRef
The obesity paradox in beyond total mesorectal excision surgery for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer Daniel L. H. Baird, Constantinos Simillis, Gianluca Pellino, Christos Kontovounisios, Shahnawaz Rasheed, Paris P. Tekkis Updates in Surgery.2019; 71(2): 313. CrossRef
The effect of preoperative nutritional status on postoperative complications and overall survival in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration: A multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional cohort study N.J. Lyell, M. Kitano, B. Smith, A.L. Gleisner, F.J. Backes, G. Cheng, M.D. McCarter, S. Abdel-Misih, E.L. Jones The American Journal of Surgery.2019; 218(2): 275. CrossRef
Preoperative Nutrition Status and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Lauren Reece, Helen Dragicevich, Claire Lewis, Caila Rothwell, Oliver M. Fisher, Sharon Carey, Nayef A. Alzahrani, Winston Liauw, David L. Morris Annals of Surgical Oncology.2019; 26(8): 2622. CrossRef
Factors affecting hospital length of stay following pelvic exenteration surgery Ying Guo, Eugene Chang, Mehtap Bozkurt, Minjeong Park, Diane Liu, Jack B. Fu Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 117(3): 529. CrossRef
Is BMI associated with post‐operative complication risk among patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for cancer? A systematic review Tasha M. Hughes, Kejal Shah, Sabrena Noria, Timothy Pawlik Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 117(5): 1009. CrossRef
A systematic review examining quality of life following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer E. Rausa, M. E. Kelly, L. Bonavina, P. R. O'Connell, D. C. Winter Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(5): 430. CrossRef
The Evolution of Pelvic Exenteration Practice at a Single Center: Lessons Learned from over 500 Cases Cherry E. Koh, Michael J. Solomon, Kilian G. Brown, Kirk Austin, Christopher M. Byrne, Peter Lee, Jane M. Young Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2017; 60(6): 627. CrossRef
Pelvic exenteration for advanced malignancy in elderly patients R W Radwan, M D Evans, M Davies, D A Harris, J Beynon, O Hatcher, P Bose, M G Lucas, J Featherstone, U Khot, T V Chandrasekaran, N D Carr, S Gwynne, P Drew, M D Phan Journal of British Surgery.2016; 103(2): e115. CrossRef
Systematic review of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration D.P. Harji, B. Griffiths, G. Velikova, P.M. Sagar, J. Brown European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO).2016; 42(8): 1132. CrossRef
Exenteración pélvica total por cáncer primario del recto: resultados inmediatos y alejados Guillermo Bannura, Alejandro Barrera, Carlos Melo, Felipe Illanes, Cristián Gallardo Revista Chilena de Cirugía.2016; 68(3): 237. CrossRef
Translation from clinical trials to routine practice: How to demonstrate community benefit David Roder, Elizabeth Buckley Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2015; 11(1): 1. CrossRef
Preoperative Body Mass Index and Postoperative Complications After Pelvic Exenteration in Recurrent or Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Moo-Jun Baek Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(2): 60. CrossRef
Transrectal evisceration caused by colorectal injury is an unusual entity. This pathology is more frequent in elderly patients and it is usually produced spontaneously. Rectal prolapse is the principal predisposing factor. An 81-year-old woman was taken to the hospital presenting exit of intestinal loops through the anus. After first reanimation measures, an urgent surgery was indicated. We observed the absence of almost every small intestine loop in the abdominal cavity; these had been moved to the pelvis. After doing the reduction, a 3 to 4 cm linear craniocaudal perforation in upper rectum was objectified, and Hartmann's procedure was performed. We investigated and knew that she frequently manipulate herself to extract her faeces. The fast preoperative management avoided a fatal conclusion or an extensive intestinal resection. Reasons that make us consider rectal self-injury as the etiologic factor are explained.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Transanal evisceration of small bowel in two patients with chronic rectal prolapse: case presentation and literature review S Hajiev, A Ezzat, V Sivarajah, G Reese, N El-Masry The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.2021; 103(1): e29. CrossRef
Evisceración de asas intestinales a través de periné posterior por traumatismo en paciente anciano Ana Alicia Tejera Hernández, David Fernández San Millan, Carlos David Trujillo Flores, Juan Ramón Hernández Hernández Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología.2016; 51(1): 58. CrossRef
Transanal Evisceration of Small Bowel about One Case at the University Hospital Yalgado Ouédraogo of Ouagadougou Adama Sanou, Moussa Bazongo, Edgar Ouangré, Maurice Zida, Gilbert Patindé Bonkoungou, Rodrique Namékinsba Doamba, Sylvain Wendmi Karfo, Elie Yamba Sawadogo, Nayi Zongo, Si Simon Traoré Surgical Science.2016; 07(07): 291. CrossRef
The usefulness of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) in colon surgery was recently challenged by many multicenter clinical trials and meta-analyses. The objectives of this study were to investigate current national opinions about MBP and prophylactic antibiotics (PA) and to provide preliminary data for developing future Korean guidelines for MBP and PA administration in colorectal surgery.
Methods
A questionnaire was mailed to 129 colorectal specialists. The questionnaires addressed the characteristics of the hospital, the MBP methods, and the uses of oral and intravenous antibiotics.
Results
A total of 73 questionnaires (56.6%) were returned. First, in regard to MBP methods, most surgeons (97.3%) used MBP for a mean of 1.36 days. Most surgeons (98.6%) implemented whole bowel irrigation and used polyethylene glycol (83.3%). Oral antibiotic use was indicated in over half (52.1%) of the responses, the average number of preoperative doses was three, and the mean time of administration was 24.2 hours prior to the operation. Finally, the majority of responders stated that they used intravenous antibiotics (95.9%). The responses demonstrated that second-generation cephalosporin-based regimens were most commonly prescribed, and 75% of the surgeons administered these regimens until three days after the operation.
Conclusion
The results indicate that most surgeons used MBP and intravenous antibiotics and that half of them administered oral PA in colorectal surgery preparations. The study recommends that the current Korean guidelines should be adapted to adequately reflect the medical status in Korea, to consider the medical environment of the various hospitals, and to establish more accurate and relevant guidelines.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
RETRACTED: A meta‐analysis of the risk factors for surgical site infection in patients with colorectal cancer Yani Chen, Hua Guo, Tian Gao, Jiale Yu, Yujia Wang, Haiquan Yu International Wound Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical Site Infections in Colorectal Cancer Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Surgical Approach and Associated Risk Factors Valentin Calu, Catalin Piriianu, Adrian Miron, Valentin Titus Grigorean Life.2024; 14(7): 850. CrossRef
Uncovering the Function of MBP and Antibiotics in Preventing Surgical Site Infections during Colorectal Procedures Agnes Sara Shibu, Rojin G. Raj, Rohit Singh Deo Journal of Coloproctology.2024; 44(03): e209. CrossRef
Single-Dose Versus Multiple-Dose Prophylactic Antibiotics in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis Ga Yoon Ku, Beom-jin Kim, Ji Won Park, Min Jung Kim, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation using conventional versus hyperosmolar polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution before laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer (TLUMP test): a phase III, multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiori Tadashi Yoshida, Shigenori Homma, Nobuki Ichikawa, Yosuke Ohno, Yoichi Miyaoka, Hiroki Matsui, Ken Imaizumi, Hiroyuki Ishizu, Tohru Funakoshi, Masahiko Koike, Hirofumi Kon, Yo Kamiizumi, Yasuhiro Tani, Yoichi Minagawa Ito, Kazufumi Okada, Akinobu Taketomi Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 58(9): 883. CrossRef
The risk of surgical site infection of oral sulfate tablet versus sodium picosulfate for bowel preparation in colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial Sung Sil Park, Sung Chan Park, Dong-Eun Lee, Dong Woon Lee, Kiho Yu, Hyoung-Chul Park, Chang Won Hong, Dae Kyung Sohn, Kyung Su Han, Bun Kim, Byung Chang Kim, Jae Hwan Oh Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(2): 96. CrossRef
Preoperative Elemental Diet before Laparoscopic Anterior Resection in Patients with Advanced Stenotic Rectal Cancer Tadashi Yoshida, Shigenori Homma, Nobuki Ichikawa, Hiroaki Iijima, Akinobu Taketomi Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2021; 5(4): 395. CrossRef
Orale Antibiotikaprophylaxe zur Darmdekontamination vor elektiver kolorektaler Chirurgie S. Flemming, C.-T. Germer Der Chirurg.2020; 91(2): 128. CrossRef
Role of Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Surgery Ik Yong Kim The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 75(2): 79. CrossRef
Update on risk factors of surgical site infection in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhaohui Xu, Hui Qu, George Kanani, Zhong Guo, Yanying Ren, Xin Chen International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(12): 2147. CrossRef
Does Mechanical Bowel Preparation Ameliorate Surgical Performance in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion? Chang-Hoon Jeon, Han-Dong Lee, Nam-Su Chung Global Spine Journal.2019; 9(7): 692. CrossRef
Mechanical Bowel Preparation Does Not Affect Clinical Severity of Anastomotic Leakage in Rectal Cancer Surgery Woong Bae Ji, Koo Yong Hahn, Jung Myun Kwak, Dong Woo Kang, Se Jin Baek, Jin Kim, Seon Hahn Kim World Journal of Surgery.2017; 41(5): 1366. CrossRef
Comparing Mechanical Bowel Preparation With Both Oral and Systemic Antibiotics Versus Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Systemic Antibiotics Alone for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Elective Colorectal Surgery Min Chen, Xue Song, Liang-zhou Chen, Zhi-dong Lin, Xue-li Zhang Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2016; 59(1): 70. CrossRef
Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasms According to Clinical Indications Eui-Gon Youk, Dae Kyng Sohn, Chang Won Hong, Seong Dae Lee, Kyung Su Han, Byung Chang Kim, Hee Jin Chang, Mi-Jung Kim Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2016; 59(5): 403. CrossRef
Benefit of mechanical bowel preparation prior to elective colorectal surgery: current insights A. C. A. Murray, R. P. Kiran Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2016; 401(5): 573. CrossRef
Is mechanical bowel preparation still necessary for gynecologic laparoscopic surgery? A meta‐analysis Huaping Huang, Haiyan Wang, Mei He Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2015; 8(2): 171. CrossRef
Nationwide Analysis of Outcomes of Bowel Preparation in Colon Surgery Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh, Mark H. Hanna, Joseph C. Carmichael, Steven D. Mills, Alessio Pigazzi, Ninh T. Nguyen, Michael J. Stamos Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2015; 220(5): 912. CrossRef
Influence of Shorter Duration of Prophylactic Antibiotic Use on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery Youn Young Park, Chang Woo Kim, Sun Jin Park, Kil Yeon Lee, Jung Joo Lee, Hye Ok Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(6): 235. CrossRef
Mechanical Bowel Preparation: Keep It or Abandon It? Hungdai Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(4): 136. CrossRef
A stercoral perforation of the rectum due to a fecaloma is a rare disease with a high mortality rate. Although multiple case reports of colonic perforations have been published, the data regarding rectal perforations are limited. This case report will highlight one such case of a stercoral rectal perforation that was successfully treated with a laparoscopic operation.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Stercoral Colitis: Review of Imaging Features and Complications Nikitha Karkala, Bertin Mathai, John J. Hines, Sarah Byun, Douglas S. Katz RadioGraphics.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Rectal stercoral perforation: an uncommon anatomical localization of a rare surgical emergency Tom Vandaele, Lisa Dekoninck, Pauline Vanhove, Bart Devos, Mathieu Vandeputte, Marc Philippe, Johan Vlasselaers Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Sepsis de origen abdominal secundaria a perforación estercoral recto-sigmoidea: a propósito de un caso Juan Daniel Serrano-Lizarazo, María Camila Ayala-Gutiérrez, Diana Clemencia Quintero-Gamboa, Andrea Juliana Pinto-Arias, Juan Paulo Serrano-Pastrana Revista Médicas UIS.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The Extremes of Constipation: A Case of Stercoral Perforation From Fecal Impaction in a Teenager Felicia Lee, Jasmin Cao, Evan Lin, Maho Kurashima, Raymond I Okeke, Christian Saliba, Shin Miyata Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Stercoral re-perforation after colostomy takedown: a case report Seunghwan Lee, Chang Woo Kim BMC Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Rare but relevant: a systematic review of stercoral perforation Sherwin Fernando, Diwakar R Sarma British Journal of Hospital Medicine.2021; 82(4): 1. CrossRef
Pelvic Rectal Stercoral Perforation Resulting in Diffuse Pneumatosis Anupam K Gupta, Oscar A Vazquez, Miguel Lopez-Viego Cureus.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Spontaneous colonic perforation in adults: Evaluation of a pooled case series Ren Chongxi, Ji Jinggang, Shi Yan, Wang Hongqiao, Liu Yan, Yang Fengshuo Science Progress.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Acute Spontaneous Perforation of Rectosigmoid Junction in a Patient with Quadriplegia following Spinal Cord Injury Oshan Basnayake, Chiran Rathnaweera, Umesh Jayarajah, Gishanthan Shanthamoorthy, Heshan Dayantha Siriwardena, Asela Jayathilaka, Paola De Nardi Case Reports in Surgery.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef
Stercoral perforation: A rare entity Nisarg Mehta, Ahan Bhatt, Cici Zhang World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2019; 8(4): 114. CrossRef
Stercoral Perforation of the Colon: A Potentially Fatal Complication of Opioid-Induced Constipation Andrew Davies, Katherine Webber Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.2015; 50(2): 260. CrossRef
Stercoral Colitis Maxim Saksonov, Gil N. Bachar, Sara Morgenstern, Abdel-Rauf Zeina, Margarita Vasserman, Orith Protnoy, Ofer Benjaminov Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.2014; 38(5): 721. CrossRef
Inappropriate therapies for hemorrhoids can lead to various complications including anorectal stricture. We report a patient presenting with catastrophic rectal perforation due to severe anal stricture after inappropriate hemorrhoid treatment. A 67-years old man with perianal pain visited the emergency room. The hemorrhoids accompanied by constipation, had tortured him since his youth. Thus he had undergone injection sclerotherapy several times by an unlicensed therapist and hemorrhoidectomy twice at the clinics of private practitioners. His body temperature was as high as 38.5℃. The computed tomographic scan showed a focal perforation of posterior rectal wall. The emergency operation was performed. The fibrotic tissues of the anal canal were excised. And then a sigmoid loop colostomy was constructed. The patient was discharged four days following the operation. This report calls attention to the enormous risk of unlicensed injection sclerotherapy and overzealous hemorrhoidectomy resulting in scarring, progressive stricture, and eventual rectal perforation.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Complications of Hemorrhoidectomy From Patients' Perspective: A Qualitative Study Masoumeh Ebrahimi Tavani, Yegane Partovi, Tahmineh Poursaki, Farid Gharibi Health Science Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hendry Lie, Evelyn Franca Caesarini, Antonius Agung Purnama, Andry Irawan, Taufik Sudirman, Wifanto Saditya Jeo, Bernardus Parish Budiono, Erik Prabowo, M. Iqbal Rivai, Ryanto Karobuana Sitepu Lasers in Medical Science.2022; 37(9): 3621. CrossRef
Recent literature has shown that lymph node ratio is superior to the absolute number of metastatic lymph nodes in predicting the prognosis in several malignances other than colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with stage III colorectal cancer.
Methods
We included 186 stage III colorectal cancer patients who underwent a curative resection over a 10-year period in one hospital. The cutoff point of LNR was chosen as 0.07 because there was significant survival difference at that LNR. The Kaplan-Meier and the Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the prognostic effect according to LNR.
Results
There was statistically significant longer overall survival in the group of LNR > 0.07 than in the group of LNR ≤ 7 (P = 0.008). Especially, there was a survival difference for the N1 patients group (LN < 4) according to LNR (5-year survival of N1 patients was lower in the group of LNR > 0.07, P = 0.025), but there was no survival difference for the N2 group (4 ≥ LN) according to LNR. The multivariate analysis showed that the LNR is an independent prognostic factor.
Conclusions
LNR can be considered as a more accurate and potent modality for prognostic stratifications in patients with stage III colorectal cancer.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The prognostic performance of the log odds of positive lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A population study of the US SEER database and a Chinese single‐institution cohort Hongdian Zhang, Wanyi Xiao, Peng Ren, Kai Zhu, Ran Jia, Yueyang Yang, Lei Gong, Zhentao Yu, Peng Tang Cancer Medicine.2021; 10(17): 6149. CrossRef
Lymph Node Ratio and Liver Metachronous Metastases in Colorectal Cancer Giovanni Li Destri, Giuseppe Privitera, Gaetano La Greca, Roberto Scilletta, Antonio Pesce, Teresa Rosanna Portale, Erminia Conti, Stefano Puleo International Surgery.2021; 105(1-3): 122. CrossRef
Rectal cancers with microscopic circumferential resection margin involvement (R1 resections): Survivals, patterns of recurrence, and prognostic factors Gianpiero Gravante, David Hemingway, James Andrew Stephenson, David Sharpe, Ahmed Osman, Melissa Haines, Vafa Pirjamali, Roberto Sorge, Justin Ming Yeung, Michael Norwood, Andrew Miller, Kirsten Boyle Journal of Surgical Oncology.2016; 114(5): 642. CrossRef
Prognostic Impact of the Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio on Survival in Rectal Cancer Wafi Attaallah, Omer Gunal, Manuk Manukyan, Gulden Ozden, Cumhur Yegen Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(3): 100. CrossRef
Prognostic Value of Total Lymph Node Identified and Ratio of Lymph Nodes in Resected Colorectal Cancer Leila Ghahramani, Leila Moaddabshoar, Samira Razzaghi, Sayed Hasan Hamedi, Saeedeh Pourahmad, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah Annals of Colorectal Research.2013; 1(3): 81. CrossRef
Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratios in Node Positive Rectal Cancer Treated with Preoperative Chemoradiation Jamal Jafari Nadoshan, Ramesh Omranipour, Omid Beiki, Kazem Zendedel, Abbas Alibakhshi, Habibollah Mahmoodzadeh Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2013; 14(6): 3769. CrossRef
Proposal of a New Classification for Stage III Colorectal Cancer Based on the Number and Ratio of Metastatic Lymph Nodes Li‐Ping Wang, Hong‐Yan Wang, Rui Cao, Cong Zhu, Xiong‐Zhi Wu World Journal of Surgery.2013; 37(5): 1094. CrossRef
An appraisal of lymph node ratio in colon and rectal cancer: not one size fits all M. Medani, Niall Kelly, George Samaha, G. Duff, Vourneen Healy, Elizabeth Mulcahy, Eoghan Condon, David Waldron, Jean Saunders, J. Calvin Coffey International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2013; 28(10): 1377. CrossRef
Even though the importance of micrometastases (MMS) and isolated tumor cells (ITC) has been brought up by many physicians, its impact on the prognosis in stage II colorectal cancer is uncertain. In this research, we tried to investigate the clinical features of MMS and ITC and to prove any correlation with prognosis.
Methods
The research pool was 124 colorectal cancer patients who underwent a curative resection from April 2005 to November 2009. A total of 2,379 lymph nodes (LNs) were examined, and all retrieved LNs were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining with anti-cytokeratin antibody panel. Clinicopathologic parameters and survival rates were compared based on the presence of MMS or ITC and on the micrometastatic lymph node ratio (mmLNR), which is defined as the number of micrometastatic LNs divided by the number of retrieved LNs.
Results
Out of 124 patients (26.6%) 33 were found to have MMS or ITC. There were no significant differences in clinicopathologic features, such as gender, tumor location and size, depth of invasion, histologic grade, except for age (P = 0.04). The three-year disease-free survival rate for the MMS or ITC positive group was 85.7%, and that for MMS and ITC negative group was 92.8% (P = 0.209). The three-year disease-free survival rate for the mmLNR > 0.25 group was 73.3%, and that for the mmLNR ≤ 0.25 group was 92.9% (P = 0.03).
Conclusion
The presence of MMS or ITC was not closely correlated to the prognosis. However, mmLNR is thought to be a valuable marker of prognosis in cases of stage II colorectal cancer.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Are deeper sections and immunohistochemistry useful in detecting micrometastases and isolated tumour cells in colorectal cancer? David W. Dodington, Keegan Guidolin, Fayez Quereshy, Runjan Chetty, Stefano Serra, Klaudia M. Nowak Pathology.2025; 57(6): 696. CrossRef
Fluorescence indocyanine green (ICG) for sentinel-lymph-node mapping in colorectal cancer: a systematic review Alexis Litchinko, Jeremy Meyer, Leo Buhler, Frederic Ris, Michel Adamina Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Feasibility of isosulfan blue in sentinel lymph node visualization for gastric cancer Xudong Zhu, Zhiyan Li, Wenxuan Zheng, Qingwei Zeng, Xingzhou Wang, Kai Chen, Qi Chen, Hanxiao Xu, Song Liu, Wenxian Guan Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2025; 87(12): 8257. CrossRef
Presumed early ovarian cancer with isolated tumor cells in para-aortic sentinel nodes Stefano Uccella, Anna Fagotti, Gian Franco Zannoni, Robert L Coleman International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2019; 29(1): 216. CrossRef
Impact of compliance with an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway on patient outcomes in open gynecologic surgery Maria D Iniesta, Javier Lasala, Gabriel Mena, Andrea Rodriguez-Restrepo, Gloria Salvo, Brandelyn Pitcher, Lakisha D Washington, Melinda Harris, Larissa A Meyer, Pedro T Ramirez International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.2019; 29(9): 1417. CrossRef
Lymph Node Micrometastasis Cannot be Considered as Positive Lymph Node in Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer Kwang Dae Hong, Jun Won Um, Byung Wook Min, Woong-Bae Ji, Jung-Woo Choi, Young-Sik Kim The American Surgeon™.2017; 83(2): 127. CrossRef
Prognostic significance of isolated tumor cells in patients with colorectal cancer in recent 10-year studies YOSHITO AKAGI, TETSUSHI KINUGASA, YOSUKE ADACHI, KAZUO SHIROUZU Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2013; 1(4): 582. CrossRef
Prognostic significance of histologically detected lymph node micrometastases of sizes between 0.2 and 2 mm in colorectal cancer Bruno Märkl, C. Herbst, C. Cacchi, T. Schaller, I. Krammer, G. Schenkirsch, A. Probst, H. Spatz International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2013; 28(7): 977. CrossRef
Molecular Detection of Tumor Cells in Regional Lymph Nodes Is Associated With Disease Recurrence and Poor Survival in Node-Negative Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Nuh N. Rahbari, Ulrich Bork, Edith Motschall, Kristian Thorlund, Markus W. Büchler, Moritz Koch, Jürgen Weitz Journal of Clinical Oncology.2012; 30(1): 60. CrossRef
Prognostic Significance of EpCAM-Positive Disseminated Tumor Cells in Rectal Cancer Patients With Stage I Disease Sameer Dhayat, Sorina Sorescu, Daniel Vallböhmer, Sebastian Kraus, Stephan Ernst Baldus, Alexander Rehders, Feride Kröpil, Andreas Krieg, Wolfram Trudo Knoefel, Nikolas Hendrik Stoecklein American Journal of Surgical Pathology.2012; 36(12): 1809. CrossRef
Prognostic Signifi cance of the Lymph Node Ratio Regarding Recurrence and Survival in Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy Ji-Yoon Kim, Su-Mi Chung, Byung-Ock Choi, In-Kyu Lee, Chang-Hyeok An, Jong-Man Won, Mi-Ryeong Ryu Gut and Liver.2012; 6(2): 203. CrossRef
Foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract often cause serious complications, such as perforation, obstruction, abscess formation, or hemorrhage. This is a case in which a patient visited our hospital and complained of a vague lower abdominal pain that had been present for three months. She had an intrauterine device (IUD) inserted five years earlier. The abdominal X-ray, computed tomography and colonoscopy revealed that the IUD had penetrated into the descending colon. We tried to remove the IUD by colonoscopy but failed due to pain, so we removed the IUD surgically. Thus, we report a case in which a previously inserted IUD had penetrated into the descending colon and was surgically removed. We also present a brief review of the literature.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Missing intrauterine device migrated to terminal ileum resembling adnexal mass: A case report Mohammad Kamal Tani, Wais Farda, Haider Khan, Omer Malikzai, Zabihullah Sharif International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 115: 109279. CrossRef
Robotic assisted removal of migrated intrauterine device Marco Bertucci Zoccali, Osama Jabi Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(8): 1718. CrossRef
Is It a “Colon Perforation”? A Case Report and Review of the Literature Shuangshuang Lu, Xinyu Yao, Jun Shi, Jian Huang, Shaohua Zhuang, Junfang Ma, Yan Liu, Wei Zhang, Lifei Yu, Ping Zhu, Qiuwei Zhu, Ruxia Shi, Hong Zheng, Dong Shao, Yuyan Pan, Shizhen Bao, Li Qin, Lijie Huang, Wenjia Liu, Jin Huang Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Intestinal Perforation by a Migrated Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Review of This Rare but Important Complication Antony Zacharias, Stephanie Clark, Chetan Parmar, Ayo Oshowo SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2021; 3(8): 1759. CrossRef
Incomplete Removal of an Intrauterine Device Perforating the Sigmoid Colon Junseak Lee, Jung Hwan Oh, Jinsu Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim, Sung Hoon Jung The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 78(1): 48. CrossRef
Rectum migration of an intrauterine device Rui Li, Hongmei Li, Jie Zhang, Huiqing Li Journal of Minimal Access Surgery.2021; 17(1): 113. CrossRef
Pelvic abscess complicating sigmoid colon perforation by migrating intrauterine device Omar Toumi, Houssem Ammar, Abdessalem Ghdira, Amine Chhaidar, Wided Trimech, Rahul Gupta, Randa Salem, Jamel Saad, Ibtissem Korbi, Mohamed Nasr, Faouzi Noomen, Mondher Golli, Khadija Zouari International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2018; 42(C): 60. CrossRef
Kim, Min Sang , Lim, Seung Woo , Park, Sung Jin , Gwak, Geumhee , Yang, Keun Ho , Bae, Byung Noe , Kim, Ki Hwan , Han, Sewhan , Kim, Hong Joo , Kim, Young Duck , Kim, Hong Yong
PURPOSE Perforations are rare but serious complications in colorectal cancer. Controversy exists over whether to perform a radical operation because colorectal cancer perforation is considered as an advanced stage disease, and septic complications of peritonitis have been identified as being responsible for a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between the survival rate and the clinicopathological parameters that might be used as predictive factors of the prognosis for perforated colorectal cancer. METHODS The analysis was based on 24 cases of perforated colorectal cancer (the case group), 48 cases of matching uncomplicated colorectal cancer (the control group), and 72 cases of the case and the control groups combined together (the combined group), all of which were identified during a 10-yr period in a single institution. RESULTS The five-year survival rates of the perforated colorectal cancer patients and their matching controls were similar (P=0.484). No significant differences in the locations of the cancer, the pre-operative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, the tumor sizes, the resection margins, or the numbers of the lymph nodes harvested were found between the two groups. A univariate analysis of the prognostic factors that influenced the case group revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.004) was significantly correlated to a better five-year survival rate. A univariate analysis of the prognostic factors that influenced the five-year survival rate of the combined group revealed that the stage (P<0.001), the pre-op CEA level (P=0.018), the angio invasion (P=0.019), the perineural invasion (P=0.019), the number of harvested lymph nodes (P=0.004), and adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.001) were significantly correlated to the five-year survival rate. The identified independent prognostic factors in the combined group were the stage (hazard ratio, 5.20), angio-invasion (hazard ratio, 2.81), and adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.17). CONCLUSION The clinical pathway of perforated colorectal cancer is similar to that of uncomplicated colorectal cancer. Therefore, perforated colorectal cancer patients should be recommended for treatment with the appropriate radical operation and adjuvant chemotherapy based on oncologic principles.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio is a Crucial Criterion in Colorectal Cancer Therapy Management and Prognosis Gülçin Harman Kamalı, Sedat Kamalı European Archives of Medical Research.2022; 38(1): 73. CrossRef
Acute Abdomen in the Oncology Patient Katrina McGinty Seminars in Roentgenology.2020; 55(4): 400. CrossRef
Nonobstetrical Acute Abdomen during Pregnancy as a Consequence of Colorectal Carcinoma Perforation: Case Report and Review of the Literature Žana Žegarac, Željko Duić, Sandra Stasenko Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef
Prognostic Value of Perineural Invasion in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Yuchong Yang, Xuanzhang Huang, Jingxu Sun, Peng Gao, Yongxi Song, Xiaowan Chen, Junhua Zhao, Zhenning Wang Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2015; 19(6): 1113. CrossRef
Surgical management of obstructed and perforated colorectal cancer: still debating and unresolved issues Rudra K Maitra, Charles A Maxwell-Armstrong Colorectal Cancer.2013; 2(6): 573. CrossRef
Multivariate Analysis of the Survival Rate for Treatment Modalities in Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Sung Kang Kim, Chang Ho Lee, Min Ro Lee, Jong Hun Kim Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(1): 35. CrossRef
Perforations that occur during colonoscopy are usually managed by surgical repair. When the patient's symptoms are mild and laboratory findings show minor abnormalities, a conservative treatment can be considered. Although an operation is the treatment of choice in patients with generalized peritonitis, in some selected patients, percutaneous abscess drainage can be an alternative to surgical intervention for drainage of deep-infected fluid collections or can act as a temporary measure until the patient becomes sufficiently stable for surgery. We report here on a 53-yr-old male patient who developed signs of localized peritonitis and had a pelvic abscess due to a colonic perforation after colonoscopy and was treated successfully by using percutaneous abscess drainage.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A Case of Buried Bumper Syndrome Complicated by Abdominal Wall Abscess in an Elderly Patient Chul Young Kim, Min Seong Kim, Do Young Kim, Young Bae Lim, Dong Yoon Kang, Tack Su Yun, Sang Seok Yoon, Jung Hyun Lee, Woo Young Kim, Yong Kyu Lee Journal of the Korean Geriatrics Society.2010; 14(4): 265. CrossRef
PURPOSE Although most randomized trials demonstrated no advantage of mechanical bowel preparation for colorectal resection, an oral solution is still widely used. The aims of this study were to evaluate whether a single phosphate enema is as effective as oral polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution in preventing anastomotic complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery and to examine the clinical courses of anastomotic complications. METHODS Between September 2006 and December 2007, 309 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection with primary anastomosis. The bowel preparation used was PEG solution during initial period (PEG group), but since February 2007, a single phosphate enema (enema group) was utilized. Postoperative data were prospectively recorded. In patients with anastomotic complications, the clinical course was compared between the two groups. RESULTS There were 150 patients in the PEG group and 159 patients in the enema group. Demographics did not differ between the two groups. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 3.3 percent of the patients in the PEG group and 5.7 percent of the patients in the enema group (P=0.326). The rates of anastomotic bleeding were 2.0 and 2.5 percent, respectively (P=0.761). The hospital stays for patients with anastomotic complication were not different between the two groups (P=0.137), but patients in the PEG group (80%) needed reoperation more frequently than those in the enema group (11.1%) (P=0.023). CONCLUSION These results suggest that laparoscopic colorectal surgery may be safely performed with a single phosphate enema instead of oral polyethylene glycol.
PURPOSE The York-Mason operation has been used as local therapy for benign rectal tumors not easily excised with a conventional transanal excision and for T1 rectal cancers having a low risk of lymph-node metastasis. This study evaluated whether a York-Mason operation could be an alternative therapy for selected patients with T2 or T3 rectal cancers. METHODS From February 2004 to March 2008, 11 patients with T2 or T3 rectal cancer, who refused rectal excision due to fear of abdominal surgery itself and perioperative side effects or unwillingness to have a permanent stoma, underwent a York-Mason operation. The data on the patients were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS The distance from the anal verge to the tumor was 5 cm (median, 2-8 cm), and the tumor size was 3 cm (median, 1.5-4 cm). Histological examination revealed a pathological tumor (pT) stage 2 in eight patients, stage pT3 in one patient, and stage pTx in two patients. The distance from the resection margin to the tumor was 0.3 cm (median, 0.1-0.5 cm). Six patients (55%) had incomplete tumor excision. Radiotherapy was performed in one patient preoperatively and in eight postoperatively. Postoperative morbidity occurred in four patients (36%). During a median of 38.2 months, two patients (18%) developed local recurrence and liver metastasis. Postoperative mortality, which was not related to the procedure, occurred in one patient (9%). CONCLUSION The York-Mason operation could be considered as an alternative therapy for selected T2 or T3 rectal cancer patients who refuse rectal excision.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Trans-Sacral Local Resection as a Posterior Approach Bong Hwa Lee, Hyoung-Chul Park, Hae Wan Lee, Chang Nam An, Taeik Um, Young A Lim, Byoung Sup Kim, Mi Young Chang, Soo Hyoung Kim, Sung Wook Cho Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2010; 26(3): 197. CrossRef
PURPOSE Despite increased effort for the detection of early colorectal cancer, advanced disease presenting as obstruction or perforation still accounts for 8 to 29% and 3-8% of all colorectal cancers, respectively. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics, the surgical methods, the complications, and the risk factors of obstructive or perforated colorectal cancer that may influence the outcome. METHODS A retrospective study was carried out in 60 patients with colorectal cancer, who underwent surgery due to obstruction or perforation from March 2000 to December 2005. The colorectal cancers were considered to be complicated when clinical signs of peritonitis were observed, the radiologic characteristics of the tumor did not permit preoperative mechanical bowel preparation, or perforation existed, when these observations were confirmed by operative findings. The following data were analyzed: clinical characteristics, surgical methods, complications, and risk factors. RESULTS Thirty-three patients (55%) had obstruction, and 27 patients (45%) had perforation. Overall, major complications occurred in 33.3% and 48.5%, respectively. The mortality rates were 6.1% and 14.8%, respectively. Risk factors for major complication were age, perforation, and transfusion whereas those for mortality were perforation and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class. CONCLUSION The risk factors of complication were old age, transfusion, and perforation and those for mortality was perforation and ASA class. Earlier diagnosis and prompt, intensive, careful management should be attempted in these high-risk patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Prognostic determinants in surgical critial patients undergoing emergency surgery for Stage III or higher colorectal cancer Hyun Ho Kim, Sanguk Hwang, Jinbeom Cho Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical Outcomes and Risk Factors in Patients Who Underwent Emergency Colorectal Surgery Dai Sik Jeong, Young Hun Kim, Kyung Jong Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(6): 239. CrossRef
Emergent Colorectal Surgery: What Should Be Considered? Chang-Nam Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(4): 124. CrossRef
Outcomes and Risk Factors Affecting Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Colorectal Emergency Surgery Nam Ho Oh, Kyung Jong Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(4): 133. CrossRef
Multivariate Analysis of the Survival Rate for Treatment Modalities in Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Sung Kang Kim, Chang Ho Lee, Min Ro Lee, Jong Hun Kim Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(1): 35. CrossRef
PURPOSE The present study was performed to assess the outcomes in patients with colonic perforation and to determine the prognostic factors for mortality. METHODS The cases of 42 patients who underwent surgery for colonic perforation between March 1999 and September 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, presence of preoperative shock, duration of symptoms, cause of perforation, location of perforation, degree of peritonitis, and the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) score were analyzed for their association with early outcome by using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Diverticulitis (46%, 19 patients) and colorectal cancer (36%, 15 patients) were the most common causes of noniatrogenic colonic perforation, and the sigmoid colon was the most common site of perforation (60%, 25 patients). The postoperative mortality was 21.4% (9 patients). The mortality in patients with preoperative shock, with a MPI score of more than 25, and with Hinchey stage III or IV peritonitis were 70.0%, 57.1%, and 53.3%, respectively (P<0.001). No statistical difference was observed in postoperative mortality with regard to age, sex, ASA classification, duration of symptoms, cause of perforation, and location of perforation. According to the multivariate analysis, preoperative shock proved to be the only significant prognostic factor for mortality (P=0.027) (odds ratio: 19.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-276.9). CONCLUSION Preoperative shock, a MPI score of more than 25, and Hinchey stage III or IV peritonitis were associated with high postoperative mortality in patients with colonic perforation. Especially, more intensive management and interest are required for patient s with preoperative shock due to colonic perforation.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Ostomy in Nontraumatic Conditions: Our Experience and Review of the Literature Kenan Büyükaşık, Bünyamin Gürbulak, Emre Özoran, Yiğit Düzköylü, Esin Kabul Gürbulak, Aziz Arı, Hasan Bektaş Indian Journal of Surgery.2016; 78(6): 471. CrossRef
EVALUATION OF MANNHEIM PERITONITIS INDEX (MPI) SCORING SYSTEM IN PROGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH PERITONITIS DUE TO HOLLOW VISCOUS PERFORATION Mahammad Ali Sutar, Ramakrishna Yaradhimmaiah, Nikhath Ingva Arshi Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences.2016; 5(31): 1626. CrossRef
PURPOSE Recently, non-operative conservative management or laparoscopic repair has been reported for the management of colonic perforation during colonoscopy. However, the preferred management strategy remains controversial. The purpose of the present study is to identify an appropriate strategy for the treatment of colon perforation during colonoscopy. METHODS The medical records of patients who developed colon perforation during colonoscopy between May 2003 and November 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. The mechanism and site of perforation, the treatment administered, complications, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS In total, 16 perforations were evaluated. Of these, 11 developed during diagnostic colonoscopy and 5 during therapeutic colonoscopy. The most frequent perforation site was the sigmoid colon (12), followed by the transverse colon (2), the rectum (1), and unknown site (1). Six patients underwent surgery due to signs of diffuse peritonitis 10 were initially treated conservatively. Among the patients who underwent surgery, four underwent laparoscopic repair and two underwent open repair. Among the patients initially treated conservatively two patients required surgery due to clinical deterioration of peritonitis and rectovaginal fistula. These 2 patients underwent repair with proximal diverting stomas. CONCLUSIONS Colon perforation associated with colonoscopy is a rare event, but raises serious complications. Selected patients with colonoscopic perforation may be treated conservatively, but if these patients fail to respond to such treatments, extensive surgical procedures may be warranted.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Management Outcomes of Colonoscopic Perforations Are Affected by the General Condition of the Patients Jae Ho Park, Kyung Jong Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(1): 16. CrossRef
Comparison of the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon perforation during colonoscopy Jeongsoo Kim, Gil Jae Lee, Jeong-Heum Baek, Won-Suk Lee Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2014; 87(3): 139. CrossRef
A Case of Successful Percutaneous Drainage of a Pelvic Abscess Complicating Colonoscopy Youn Si, Shin Young Kim, Seung Bong Choi, Hyung Jin Kim, Yoon Suk Lee, Hyun Min Cho, Jun Gi Kim, Seung Tack Oh, In Kyu Lee Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2009; 25(5): 347. CrossRef
Anorectal manometry is widely used to evaluate anorectal function. Few reports have described complications resulting from this procedure. A 47-year-old male underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy and a low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The patient underwent anorectal manometry at postoperative 8 months. A rectal perforation was diagnosed shortly thereafter. The patient was initially managed conservatively using percutaneous drainage and parenteral antibiotics and then discharged on day 60 after the event. One month later, a colo-cutaneous fistula and expanding abdominal fasciitis developed. The patient underwent surgical exploration, drainage, resection of the rectum including the fistula, and redo-coloanal anastomosis with a diverting ileostomy. The patient discharged without complications on postoperative day 25. Anorectal manometry should be performed with particular care in patients who have undergone radiotherapy and anastomosis at the rectum.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Habit training versus habit training with direct visual biofeedback in adults with chronic constipation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Christine Norton, Anton Emmanuel, Natasha Stevens, S. Mark Scott, Ugo Grossi, Sybil Bannister, Sandra Eldridge, James M. Mason, Charles H. Knowles Trials.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Colorectal Perforation After Anorectal Manometry for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Kyung Ha Lee, Ji Yeon Kim, Young Hoon Sul Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(4): 146. CrossRef
Perforación rectal tras manometría anorrectal sin enfermedad rectal previa: una complicación excepcional resuelta con tratamiento médico Jorge Antonio Núñez Otero, Mariano Gómez Rubio, Ángel R. Durán Aguado, José L. Martínez Albares Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2013; 36(9): 577. CrossRef