Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
90 "Ratio"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Display
Original Articles
ERAS
Safety and patient’s satisfaction of preoperative carbohydrate drink until 2 hours before colorectal cancer surgery: a single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial
Yun Min Lee, Kyeong Eui Kim, Sung Uk Bae, Seong Kyu Baek, Woon Kyung Jeong
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(6):519-527.   Published online December 24, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00521.0074
  • 754 View
  • 36 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Traditionally, fasting from midnight has been a standard practice in elective surgery for reduce the risk of aspiration. However, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs recommend clear fluid intake until 2 hours before anesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and patient satisfaction of preoperative carbohydrate drink intake until 2 hours before colorectal cancer surgery.
Methods
Sixty patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery between April 2021 and February 2023 at Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center were enrolled. This study included 30 patients who fasted from midnight (nothing by mouth [NPO] group) and 30 patients who consumed a high concentration of complex carbohydrate fluids (New Care NO-NPO) until 2 hours before surgery (No-NPO group). Patient satisfaction was assessed using a visual analog scale. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared.
Results
Basic characteristics of patients were similar for the 2 groups. The No-NPO group had a significantly higher patient satisfaction score than the NPO group (3.7 vs. 2.2, P=0.040). Scores of operative difficulty, operation time, blood loss, postoperative recovery parameters, and postoperative complication rates were similar for the 2 groups. Pathological outcomes were also comparable. No mortality occurred in either group.
Conclusion
High-concentration carbohydrate fluid intake until 2 hours before induction of anesthesia could improve patient satisfaction without increasing postoperative complications, demonstrating its safety and feasibility in colorectal cancer surgery. Trial registration CRIS (cris.nih.go.kr) identifier: KCT0011323.
Complications
Effect of oral antibiotic bowel preparation versus no preparation on surgical site infections in elective colorectal surgery: a randomized trial
Kavyashree Mallesh, Rajendran Theakarajan, Balasubramanian G, Prashant Penumadu, Raja Kalayarasan, Rajkumar Nagarajan
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(5):393-399.   Published online October 20, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00633.0090
  • 2,510 View
  • 80 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a significant cause of morbidity following colorectal surgery. While mechanical bowel preparation combined with oral antibiotics is known to reduce SSIs, the independent effect of oral antibiotics alone remains unclear. This study compared the efficacy of oral antibiotic bowel preparation (OABP) versus no bowel preparation (NBP) in reducing SSIs among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.
Methods
A prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial was performed at a tertiary care center in India. Eighty-six patients scheduled for elective colorectal surgery were randomized to receive either OABP (oral ciprofloxacin and metronidazole) or placebo, in addition to standard intravenous antibiotics. The primary outcome was the rate of SSIs. Secondary outcomes included anastomotic leak, length of hospital stay, overall morbidity, and readmission rates.
Results
Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The incidence of SSI was significantly lower in the OABP group compared to the NBP group (14.0% vs. 41.9%, P<0.01). The severity of infections and postoperative complications was also reduced in the OABP group (P<0.01). Although rates of anastomotic leak, readmission, and reoperation were higher in the NBP group, these differences were not statistically significant. The mean duration of hospital stay was shorter for patients in the OABP group (8.09 days vs. 11.28 days, P<0.01). No adverse effects related to oral antibiotics were observed.
Conclusion
OABP without mechanical cleansing significantly reduces SSIs, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay in elective colorectal surgery. This approach is safe and effective, offering a strategy to improve surgical outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Oral antibiotics alone for bowel preparation in colorectal surgery: time to rethink tradition?
    Soo Young Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(5): 367.     CrossRef
Review
Colorectal cancer
Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ricardo Purchio Galletti, Gabriel Andrade Agareno, Lucas de Abreu Sesconetto, Rafael Benjamim Rosa da Silva, Rafael Vaz Pandini, Lucas Soares Gerbasi, Victor Edmond Seid, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Francisco Tustumi
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(5):375-384.   Published online December 20, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00605.0086
  • 6,150 View
  • 157 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This study aimed to review the outcomes of redo procedures for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses.
Methods
A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases. The inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing colectomy with primary colorectal or coloanal anastomosis and studies that assessed the postoperative results. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42021267715).
Results
Eleven articles met the eligibility criteria and were selected. The studied population size ranged from 7 to 78 patients. The overall mortality rate was 0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%–0.01%). The postoperative complication rate was 40% (95% CI, 40%–50%). The length of hospital stay was 13.68 days (95% CI, 11.3–16.06 days). After redo surgery, 82% of the patients were free of stoma (95% CI, 75%–90%), and 24% of patients (95% CI, 0%–39%) had fecal incontinence. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (P=0.002) was associated with a lower probability of being free of stoma in meta-regression.
Conclusion
Redo colorectal and coloanal anastomoses are strategies to restore colonic continuity. The decision to perform a redo operation should be based on a proper evaluation of the morbidity and mortality risks, the probability of remaining free of stoma, the quality of life, and a functional assessment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Abdominoperineal pull-through with delayed coloanal anastomosis for pelvic anastomotic failure—a systematic review
    T. J. K. Tan, S.-M. Ng, T. S. Q. Lee, E. K.-W. Tan, I. Seow-En
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic redo endorectal pull‐through procedure for complex rectovaginal fistula after rectal resection for endometriosis: A Video Vignette
    Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Francisco Tustumi, Ana Sarah Portilho, Lucas de Araujo Horcel, Victor Edmond Seid
    Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(11): 2284.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Colorectal cancer
Evaluating prognostic significance of preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in older patients with pathological stage II or III colorectal cancer
Koji Numata, Yukari Ono, Mihwa Ju, Shizune Onuma, Ayano Tanaka, Taichi Kawabe, Sho Sawazaki, Akio Higuchi, Kazuki Yamanaka, Shinsuke Hatori, Hiroyuki Saeki, Hiroshi Matsukawa, Yasushi Rino, Kazuyuki Tani
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):161-168.   Published online October 11, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00367.0052
  • 5,792 View
  • 159 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) in older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing curative resection.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 244 older patients (aged 75 years or higher) with pathological stage II or III CRC who underwent curative surgery between 2008 and 2016. The optimal value of CAR was calculated and its correlation with the clinicopathological factors and prognosis was examined.
Results
The optimal cutoff value of the CAR was 0.085. High preoperative CAR was significantly associated with high carcinoembryonic antigen levels (P=0.001), larger tumor size (P<0.001), and pT factor (P=0.001). On multivariate analysis, high CAR was independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival (P=0.042) and overall survival (P=0.001).
Conclusion
Preoperative elevated CAR could be considered as an adverse predictor of both relapse-free survival and overall survival in older patients with CRC undergoing curative surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio Is an Independent Risk Factor for Recurrence and Survival Following Curative Resection of Stage I–III Colorectal Cancer in Older Patients
    Tomoaki Bekki, Manabu Shimomura, Minoru Hattori, Saki Sato, Atsuhiro Watanabe, Sho Ishikawa, Kouki Imaoka, Kosuke Ono, Keiso Matsubara, Tetsuya Mochizuki, Shintaro Akabane, Takuya Yano, Hideki Ohdan
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(7): 4812.     CrossRef
  • Towards a Gradual Optimization of Oncologic Prognostic Factors in the Era of the Frail Patient: The Potential Role of Preoperative Inflammation and Nutritional Status
    Giuseppe Zimmitti
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(8): 4853.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic role of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis
    Menglu Dai, Wei Wu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The association of blood biomarkers with treatment response and adverse health outcomes in older patients with solid tumors: A systematic review
    Yara van Holstein, P. Janne E. van den Berkmortel, Stella Trompet, Diana van Heemst, Frederiek van den Bos, Marieke Roemeling-van Rhijn, Nienke A. de Glas, Marian Beekman, P. Eline Slagboom, Johanneke E.A. Portielje, Simon P. Mooijaart, Barbara C. van Mun
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2023; 14(7): 101567.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic prediction of colorectal cancer using the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio: the importance of inflammatory biomarkers and their association with long-term outcomes
    Chul Seung Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 287.     CrossRef
Right-sided acute diverticulitis in the West: experience at a university hospital in Argentina
René M. Palacios Huatuco, Diana A. Pantoja Pachajoa, Julian E. Liaño, Héctor A. Picón Molina, Rafael Palencia, Alejandro M. Doniquian, Matías Parodi
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(2):123-130.   Published online November 24, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00402.0057
  • 8,274 View
  • 162 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
In the West, diverticular disease is located mainly in the left colon. However, it can also present in the right colon, with an incidence of 1% to 2% in Caucasians. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience in right-sided acute diverticulitis (RD).
Methods
In this retrospective study, 410 patients with acute diverticulitis treated from 2013 to 2020 were included in a university hospital in Córdoba, Argentina. Colonic diverticulitis was stratified into 2 groups; RD and left-sided acute diverticulitis. Demographic and clinical variables, laboratory and imaging findings, type of treatment, follow-up, and recurrence were analyzed.
Results
Sixteen patients (3.9%) with RD were identified; 62.5% were male and the mean age was 40.7±11.7 years. A total of 81.3% were Caucasian and 18.7% Native American. Significant differences were found between both groups of diverticulitis; patients with RD were younger (P=0.001), with lower BMI (P=0.01), comorbidity rate (P=0.01), Charlson comorbidity index (P=0.02), hospital stay (P=0.01), severity according to the Hinchey classification (P=0.001) and had a lower recurrence rate (P=0.001). There were no significant differences in sex (P=0.95), duration of pain until admission (P=0.05), laboratory findings (P=0.23) and treatment (P=0.34).
Conclusion
Conservative treatment predominated in RD, with a lower rate of complications and recurrences, providing data that support conservative therapy as initial treatment in RD in our environment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of surgical management and outcomes of acute right colic and sigmoid diverticulitis: a French national retrospective cohort study
    E. Karam, C. Sabbagh, L. Beyer-Bergeot, P. Zerbib, V. Bridoux, G. Manceau, Y. Panis, E. Buscail, A. Venara, I. Khaoudy, M. Gaillard, M. Viennet, A. Thobie, B. Menahem, C. Eveno, C. Bonnel, J.-Y. Mabrut, B. Badic, C. Godet, Y. Eid, E. Duchalais, Z. Lakkis,
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
Predisposing factors for high output stoma in patients with a diverting loop ileostomy after colorectal surgeries
Dan Assaf, David Hazzan, Almog Ben-Yaacov, Shachar Laks, Douglas Zippel, Lior Segev
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(2):168-174.   Published online August 6, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00241.0034
  • 9,874 View
  • 268 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
One of the most common ileostomy-related complications is high output stoma (HOS) which causes significant fluids and electrolytes disturbances. We aimed to analyze the incidence, severity, and risk factors for readmission for HOS.
Methods
We reviewed all patients who underwent loop ileostomy closure in a single institution between 2010 and 2020. Patients that were readmitted for dehydration due to HOS during the time interval between the creation and the closure of the stoma were identified and divided into a study (HOS) group. The remaining patients constructed the control group.
Results
A total of 307 patients were included in this study, out of which, 41 patients were readmitted 73 times (23.7% readmission rate) for the HOS group, and the remaining 266 patients constructed the control group. Multivariate analysis identified; advanced American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (PS) classification, elevated baseline creatinine, and open surgery as risk factors for HOS. Renal function worsened among the entire cohort between the construction of the stoma to its closure (mean creatinine of 0.82 vs. 0.96, P<0.0001).
Conclusion
Loop ileostomy formation is associated with a substantial readmission rate for dehydration as a result of HOS, and increasing the risk for renal impairment during the duration of the diversion. We identified advanced ASA PS classification, open surgery, and elevated baseline creatinine as predictors for HOS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • High output stoma after surgery for rectal cancer - a risk factor for low anterior resection syndrome?
    Xuena Zhang, Qingyu Meng, Jianna Du, Zhongtao Tian, Yinju Li, Bin Yu, Wenbo Niu
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Atrial Flutter With Intraventricular Conduction Delay, Hypotension, and Bradycardia in the Setting of High-Output Ileostomy With Renal Failure, Hyperkalemia, and Metabolic Acidosis: A Case Report With Brief Literature Review
    Edinen Asuka, Barbara Odac, Andrew Ndakotsu, Anastasia Postoev
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preoperative High Agatston Score in Aorta Leads to Postoperative High-Output Ileostomy
    Yusuke Kono, Manabu Yamamoto, Chiharu Yasui, Ryo Ishiguro, Takuki Yagyu, Kyoichi Kihara, Tomoyuki Matsunaga, Shuichi Takano, Naruo Tokuyasu, Teruhisa Sakamoto, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
    Journal of Surgical Research.2025; 314: 139.     CrossRef
  • A review of chyme reinfusion: new tech solutions for age old problems
    Chen Liu, Sameer Bhat, Ian Bissett, Gregory O'Grady
    Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand.2024; 54(2): 161.     CrossRef
  • Knowledge, attitudes, practices and associated factors regarding high output stoma of ileostomy among colorectal surgical nurses: a multicentre cross-sectional study
    Qing Zhang, Jianan Sun, Dongxue Wang, Quan Wang, Haiyan Hu
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Morphological predictors of water-electrolyte disorders in patients with preventive ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer
    A.I. Maksimkin, Z.A. Bagatelia, V.M. Kulushev, E.N. Gordienko, M.S. Lebedko, S.S. Anikina, E.P. Shin
    Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery.2024; (4): 16.     CrossRef
  • The Frequency of Stoma-Related Readmissions After Emergency and Elective Ileostomy Formation: The Leicester Experience
    Ting-Wei Wu, Wen Yuan Chung, Hui En Jewel Ng, Ashley Yap, Konstantinos Baronos, Deepak Paul, Christopher P Neal, David Bowrey
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictors of High-output Stoma in Diverting Ileostomy for Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Hiroaki Uehara, Hitoshi Kameyama, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Yuya Enoki
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2023; 76(3): 286.     CrossRef
  • Morpho-functional aspects of various parts of the intestine and risk factors associated with the preventive ileostomy (review)
    A. I. Maksimkin, Z. A. Bagatelia, E. N. Gordienko, E. B. Emelyanova, D. M. Sakaeva
    Koloproktologia.2023; 22(4): 147.     CrossRef
  • Obstructive and secretory complications of diverting ileostomy
    Shingo Tsujinaka, Hideyuki Suzuki, Tomoya Miura, Yoshihiro Sato, Chikashi Shibata
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(47): 6732.     CrossRef
Case Report
Malignant disease,Rare disease & stoma,Complication
Colonic Perforation After Treatment With Nivolumab in Esophageal Cancer: A Case Report
Hye Jung Cho, Woo Ram Kim, Joo-Hang Kim, Duk Hwan Kim, Dae Jung Kim, Haeyoun Kang
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(Suppl 1):S39-S43.   Published online June 24, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00213.0030
  • 11,103 View
  • 100 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 9 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
With the advent of checkpoint inhibitors, it has opened up opportunities for numerous cancer patients. However, as is the case with every treatment, complications need to be weighed. Gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as diarrhea and colitis are well-known complications for checkpoint inhibitors. In severe cases, colitis-induced colonic perforation may occur with an estimation of 1.0% to 1.5% in anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. However, only a handful of cases of such devastating complications have been reported in anti-PD-1 antibodies such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab. We here report a case of intestinal perforation in a patient treated with nivolumab.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Intestinal perforation in recurrent cervical cancer following bevacizumab and pembrolizumab therapy: A case report
    Yuanchun Fan, Shihao Liu, Jiangjing Zhao, Yawei Fu, Jiahui Yang, Chunyang Wang, Hui Zhang
    Medicine.2025; 104(15): e40473.     CrossRef
  • Iatrogenic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies on the lower gastrointestinal tract
    Dua Abuquteish, Ahmad Yousef Alazzam, Aws Khalid Abushanab, Omar Amjad Almajdoubah, Sara Aljfout, Mahmoud Taysir Mousa, Mus’ab Theeb Mustafa, Bashar Khater, Maher Sughayer
    Frontline Gastroenterology.2025; : flgastro-2025-103094.     CrossRef
  • Chemotherapy-associated pneumoperitoneum in cancer patients: a scoping review
    Renee M. Maina, Caroline Rader, Jeevan Kypa, Constantine Asahngwa, Hilary M. Jasmin, Nia N. Zalamea, John S. Nelson, Jonathan L. Altomar, Mary Brinson Owens, Clarisse S. Muenyi, Denis A. Foretia
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(5): 2828.     CrossRef
  • Update on immunotherapy‐mediated colitis: Clinical features, mechanisms, and management
    Dandan Wang, Yiwei Zhao, Yiyun Zeng, Lanlin Hu, Chuan Xu
    Malignancy Spectrum.2024; 1(4): 225.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal perforation associated with novel antineoplastic agents: A real-world study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
    Zicheng Yu, Haibin Zhu, Hongjun Chen, Lifei Zhu, Xiaolan Liao
    Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Immune-related Adverse Events: A Histopathologic Review
    Zainab I. Alruwaii, Elizabeth A. Montgomery
    Advances in Anatomic Pathology.2023; 30(3): 230.     CrossRef
  • An updated review of gastrointestinal toxicity induced by PD-1 inhibitors: from mechanisms to management
    Yiyu Cheng, Fangmei Ling, Junrong Li, Yidong Chen, Mingyang Xu, Shuang Li, Liangru Zhu
    Frontiers in Immunology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nivolumab

    Reactions Weekly.2022; 1892(1): 181.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Immune-related Adverse Events: A Histopathologic Review
    Zainab I. Alruwaii, Elizabeth A. Montgomery
    Advances in Anatomic Pathology.2022; 29(4): 183.     CrossRef
Original Article
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Colorectal cancer,Biomarker & risk factor
Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Obstructing Colorectal Cancer Treated by Endoscopic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery
Jiwei Guo, Aik Yong Chok, Hui Jun Lim, Wei Xuan Tay, Weng Kit Lye, Lasitha Bhagya Samarakoon, Emile John Tan, Ronnie Mathew
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(3):159-165.   Published online May 28, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.05.25
  • 6,295 View
  • 77 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported to predict adverse survival outcomes among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study evaluates the prognostic value of NLR among patients with obstructing CRC who successfully underwent stenting before curative surgery.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent stenting before surgery. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative outcomes, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. NLR was calculated from the differential white blood cell counts at least 4 days after successful stenting, before elective surgery. Optimal cutoff to dichotomize NLR was obtained by maximizing log-rank test statistic with recursive partitioning of KaplanMeier RFS and OS curves. The optimal cutoff for high NLR was ≥ 5 at presentation before stenting, and ≥ 4 after stenting.
Results
Fifty-seven patients with localized obstructing CRC underwent successful endoscopic stenting before curative surgery. High NLR was associated with lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.006) and apical lymph node involvement (P = 0.034). Major perioperative complication(s) (hazard ratio [HR], 11.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.49 to 51.56; P < 0.01) and high NLR (HR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.46 to 9.35; P < 0.01) negatively impacted OS on univariate and multivariate analyses. High NLR negatively impacted RFS on univariate analysis (HR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.29 to 6.60; P = 0.01).
Conclusion
NLR of ≥ 4 after stenting is an independent prognostic factor among patients with obstructing localized CRC who are successfully decompressed by endoscopic stenting before curative surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
    Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer
    Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 97.     CrossRef
Case Report
Benign GI diease
Small Bowel Perforation Associated With Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Cytomegalovirus Enteritis in a Patient With Leukemia: A Case Report With Literature Review
Kwang-Seop Song, Min Jung Kim, Han-Ki Lim, Yoon Hwa Hong, Sung Sil Park, Chang Won Hong, Sung Chan Park, Dae Kyung Sohn, Kyung Su Han, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):281-284.   Published online August 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.01.1
  • 4,856 View
  • 92 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Concomitant cytomegalovirus (CMV) enteritis worsens the prognosis of this condition. We report a case of small bowel perforation associated with gastrointestinal GVHD and CMV enteritis in a patient with leukemia who was successfully treated surgically. A 39-year-old man presented with intestinal perforation necessitating emergency surgical intervention. He was diagnosed with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and developed severe gastrointestinal GVHD and CMV enteritis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. His terminal ileum showed a perforation with diffuse wall thinning, and petechiae were observed over long segments of the distal ileum and the proximal colon. Small bowel segmental resection and a subtotal colectomy with a double-barreled ileocolostomy were performed. The patient recovered uneventfully after the operation. Based on reports described in the literature, surgery plays a minor role in the management of gastrointestinal GVHD; however, timely surgical intervention could be effective in selected patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Cytomegalovirus enteritis resistant to antiviral drugs improved following total colectomy
    Sae Kawata, Jumpei Takamatsu, Yuichi Yasue, Aya Fukuhara, Jinkoo Kang
    Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Article
Benign GI diease
Prognostic Factors and Management for Left Colonic Perforation: Can Hartmann’s Procedure Be Preventable?
Yilseok Joo, Yujin Lee, Taeyoung Yoo, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(3):178-185.   Published online June 30, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.11.14.1
  • 43,595 View
  • 85 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
To identify factors significantly associated with the mortality of patients with left colonic perforation, and to compare the outcome of Hartmann’s procedure (HP) and primary repair (PR) or primary anastomosis (PA) in patients with left colonic perforation without factors associated with mortality.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery for left colonic perforation from January 2009 to February 2018. Preoperative factors related to postoperative mortality, including vital signs, laboratory findings, and intraoperative findings, were analyzed by type of operation. The chi-square, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to analyze the data.
Results
Ninety-one patients were included (36 men, 55 women), and 15 (16.5%) died postoperatively. Prognostic factors were age, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, bleeding tendency, acute kidney injury, hemodynamic instability, and the existence of feculent ascites. Leukopenia and longer operative time were independent risk factors for mortality. Seventy-nine patients did not have leukopenia and 30 of these patients who underwent PR without diversion were excluded from the subanalysis. HP was performed in 30 patients, and PR with diversion and PA with or without diversion were performed in 19. Compared to the other operative methods, HP had no advantage in reducing hospital mortality (P=0.458) and morbidity.
Conclusion
Leukopenia could be an objective prognostic factor for left colonic perforation. Although HP is the gold standard for septic left colonic perforation, it did not improve the hospital mortality of the patients without leukopenia. For such patients, PR or PA may be suggested as an alternative option for left colonic perforation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk Factors for Postoperative Major Morbidity, Anastomotic Leakage, Re-Surgery and Mortality in Patients with Colonic Perforation
    Maximilian Brunner, Lara Gärtner, Andreas Weiß, Klaus Weber, Axel Denz, Christian Krautz, Georg F. Weber, Robert Grützmann
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(17): 5220.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Morbidity and Mortality in Iatrogenic Colonic Perforation During Colonoscopy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ajibola A Adebisi, Daniel E Onobun, Adeola Adediran, Reginald N Ononye, Ethel O Ojo, Adedayo Oluyi, Ayotunde Ojo, Stephen Oputa
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Patient outcomes and prognostic factors associated with colonic perforation surgery: a retrospective study
    Do-bin Lee, Seonhui Shin, Chun-Seok Yang
    Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science.2022; 39(2): 133.     CrossRef
  • Morbidity and Mortality of Neutropenic Patients in Visceral Surgery: A Narrative Review
    Ann-Kathrin Lederer, Fabian Bartsch, Markus Moehler, Peter Gaßmann, Hauke Lang
    Cells.2022; 11(20): 3314.     CrossRef
Review
Benign GI diease,Epidemiology & etiology
A Review of Bowel Preparation Before Colorectal Surgery
Yeon Uk Ju, Byung Wook Min
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(2):75-84.   Published online May 15, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.04.01
  • 13,043 View
  • 307 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Infectious complications are the biggest problem during bowel surgery, and one of the approaches to minimize them is the bowel cleaning method. It was expected that bowel cleaning could facilitate bowel manipulation as well as prevent infectious complications and further reduce anastomotic leakage. In the past, with the development of antibiotics, bowel cleaning and oral antibiotics (OA) were used together. However, with the success of emergency surgery and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, bowel cleaning was not routinely performed. Consequently, bowel cleaning using OA was gradually no longer used. Recently, there have been reports that only bowel cleaning is not helpful in reducing infectious complications such as surgical site infection (SSI) compared to OA and bowel cleaning. Accordingly, in order to reduce SSI, guidelines are changing the trend of only intestinal cleaning. However, a consistent regimen has not yet been established, and there is still controversy depending on the location of the lesion and the surgical method. Moreover, complications such as Clostridium difficile infection have not been clearly analyzed. In the present review, we considered the overall bowel preparation trends and identified the areas that require further research.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • General Principles of Risk Mitigation before Colorectal Surgery
    Sarah Atoui, A. Sender Liberman
    Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2026; 39(01): 015.     CrossRef
  • Curiosity and the Cat
    Lester Gottesman
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2026; 69(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Advanced Protocols for Preoperative Colon Preparation: Enhancing Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery
    Marian Cerny, Ľudovít Danihel, Milan Schnorrer, Stefan Durdik
    Polish Journal of Surgery.2025; 97(5): 37.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) Protocol in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgeries in a Tertiary Care Hospital—A Prospective Interventional Study
    Surya Theja, Seema Mishra, Sandeep Bhoriwal, Rakesh Garg, Sachidanand Jee Bharati, Vinod Kumar, Nishkarsh Gupta, Saurabh Vig, Sunil Kumar, S. V. S. Deo, Sushma Bhatnagar
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 15(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Influence of additional prophylactic oral antibiotics during mechanical bowel preparation on surgical site infection in patients receiving colorectal surgery
    Hayoung Lee, Jong Lyul Lee, Ji Sung Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok‐Byung Lim
    World Journal of Surgery.2024; 48(6): 1534.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Surgical Bowel Preparation on the Microbiome in Colon and Rectal Surgery
    Lauren Weaver, Alexander Troester, Cyrus Jahansouz
    Antibiotics.2024; 13(7): 580.     CrossRef
  • Pre-Operative Mechanical Bowel Preparation Does Not Affect the Impact of Anastomosis Leakage in Left-Side Colorectal Surgery—A Single Center Observational Study
    Ludovít Danihel, Marian Cerny, Ivor Dropco, Petra Zrnikova, Milan Schnorrer, Marek Smolar, Miloslav Misanik, Stefan Durdik
    Life.2024; 14(9): 1092.     CrossRef
  • Bowel cleansing, dysbiosis, and postoperative infection: the dots are starting to connect
    John C Alverdy
    British Journal of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A prospective, randomized assessment of a novel, local antibiotic releasing platform for the prevention of superficial and deep surgical site infections
    O. Zmora, Y. Stark, O. Belotserkovsky, M. Reichert, G. A. Kozloski, N. Wasserberg, H. Tulchinsky, L. Segev, A. J. Senagore, N. Emanuel
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(3): 209.     CrossRef
  • Bacterial Decontamination: Bowel Preparation and Chlorhexidine Bathing
    Yadin Bornstein, Elizabeth C. Wick
    Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2023; 36(03): 201.     CrossRef
  • Effect of non-mechanical bowel preparation on postoperative gastrointestinal recovery following surgery on malignant gynecological tumors: A randomized controlled trial
    Shan-shan Wang, Hong-yan Xu, Xing-xia Li, Su-wen Feng
    European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2023; 64: 102320.     CrossRef
  • The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery
    Min Ki Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Impact of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol on Colorectal Surgery in a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital
    Catarina Lopes, Mariana Vaz Gomes, Manuel Rosete, Ana Almeida, Luisa Isabel Silva, José Guilherme Tralhão
    Acta Médica Portuguesa.2022; 36(4): 254.     CrossRef
Case Reports
Benign GI diease,Rare disease & stoma,Complication
Intestinal Perforation as a Paradoxical Reaction to Antitubercular Therapy: A Case Report
Sung Hoon Kang, Hee Seok Moon, Jae Ho Park, Ju Seok Kim, Sun Hyung Kang, Eaum Seok Lee, Seok Hyun Kim, Byung Seok Lee, Jae Kyu Sung, Hyun Yong Jeong, Kyung Ha Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(Suppl 1):S18-S23.   Published online May 15, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.03.16.1
  • 6,919 View
  • 124 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Paradoxical reactions to tuberculosis (TB) treatment are characterized by an initial improvement of the clinical symptoms followed by clinical or radiological deterioration of existing tuberculous lesions, or by development of new lesions. Intestinal perforation in gastrointestinal TB can occur as a paradoxical reaction to antitubercular therapy. A 55-year-old man visited the outpatient department with lower abdominal pain and weight loss. He was diagnosed with intestinal TB and started antitubercular therapy. After 3 months of antitubercular therapy, a colonoscopy revealed improvement of the disease. Three days after the colonoscopy, the patient visited the emergency room complaining of abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography revealed extraluminal air-filled spaces in the pelvic cavity. We diagnosed a small bowel perforation and performed an emergency laparotomy and a right hemicolectomy with small bowel resection. This report describes the case of intestinal perforation presenting as a paradoxical reaction to antitubercular and provides a brief literature review.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Paradoxical ileocecal perforation during early anti-tuberculosis therapy: A rare case report
    Yoseph Mulatu Habte, Binyam Mulatu Habte, Yabetse Alemayehu Kifle, Esimael Musema Abdu, Makida Mulatu Habte, Shimelis Ayalew Yimer
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2025; 137: 112100.     CrossRef
  • Réaction paradoxale tuberculeuse
    L.-D. Azoulay, A.-L. Houist, E. Feredj, W. Vindrios, S. Gallien
    La Revue de Médecine Interne.2024; 45(5): 279.     CrossRef
  • Left hand abscess as a paradoxical reaction during treatment of disseminated tuberculosis in immunocompetent patient: case report and review of literature
    Aisha Alharbi, Aseel Aljahdali, Mohamed Firoze Ahamed, Hassan Almarhabi
    BMC Infectious Diseases.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Paradoxical Reaction to Antitubercular Treatment Causing Colonic Obstruction
    Akira Hokama, Yuiko Oishi, Erika Koga, Sayuri Takehara, Jiro Fujita
    Chonnam Medical Journal.2022; 58(1): 52.     CrossRef
  • Multiple drugs

    Reactions Weekly.2021; 1881(1): 189.     CrossRef
Malignant disease, Benign GI diease,Colorectal cancer,Complication
An Unusual Case of Colon Perforation With Multiple Transmural Ulcers After Use of Polmacoxib and Everolimus in a Metastatic Breast Cancer Patient
In-Gyu Song, Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(2):120-124.   Published online March 16, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.08.17
  • 6,134 View
  • 128 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Everolimus (Afinitor) is an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin. Polmacoxib (Acelex) is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that belongs to the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor family and is mainly used for treatment of arthritis. Intestinal perforation has not been reported previously as a complication of everolimus, and perforation of the lower intestinal tract caused by a selective COX-2 inhibitor is extremely rare. We present here a case of colon perforation that occurred after use of polmacoxib in a metastatic breast cancer patient who had been treated with everolimus for the preceding six months.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Identification of Drugs Associated With Oral Ulcers Based on Pharmacovigilance
    Xinyue Zhang, Xueqing Li, Wuda Huoshen, Shiting Li
    International Dental Journal.2025; 75(6): 103957.     CrossRef
  • Multiple ulcers and perforation of small intestine with everolimus use in a patient with rectal neuroendocrine tumor: A case report
    Kentaro Abe, Shigenobu Emoto, Kazuhito Sasaki, Hiroaki Nozawa, Yoichi Yasunaga, Soichiro Ishihara
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2023; 106: 108094.     CrossRef
  • Everolimus/polmacoxib

    Reactions Weekly.2021; 1869(1): 157.     CrossRef
Review
Clinical Implications of Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Hye Jin Kim, Gyu–Seog Choi
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(3):109-117.   Published online June 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.06.12
  • 24,669 View
  • 384 Download
  • 65 Web of Science
  • 63 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Lymph node metastasis is regarded as an indubitable prognostic factor for predicting disease recurrence and survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Lymph node status based on examination of a resected specimen is a key element of the current staging system and is also a crucial factor to determine use of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection. However, the current tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system only incorporates the number of metastatic lymph nodes in the N category. Numerous attempts have been made to supplement this simplified N staging including lymph node ratio, distribution of metastatic lymph nodes, tumor deposits, or extracapsular invasion. In addition, several attempts have been made to identify more specific prognostic factors in resected colorectal specimens than lymph node status. In this review, we will discuss controversies in lymph node staging and factors that may influence survival beyond lymph node status.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Dual RPA-CRISPR/Cas13a parallel detection of serum cell-free RNA and internal SDK1 m7G for diagnosis of early colorectal cancer metastasis
    Chenxi Wu, Jie Zhang, Huirong Wu, Min Jiang, Jiaqi Cui, Lin Huang, Xiaofeng Zeng, Yun Lan, Haoyu Xiao, Tiantian Zhou, Jianfeng Zhang, Weifeng Ding
    Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical.2026; 450: 139236.     CrossRef
  • Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Surgical Resection of Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer—A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Hiroaki Nozawa, Sono Ito, Kazuhito Sasaki, Koji Murono, Shigenobu Emoto, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Shinichi Yamauchi, Yusuke Kinugasa, Yoichi Ajioka, Soichiro Ishihara
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2025; 32(4): 2282.     CrossRef
  • Lighthouses illuminating tumor metastasis: The application of fluorescent probes in the localization and imaging metastatic lymph nodes across various tumors
    Qi Dang, Linhao Zhang, Huipeng Ma, Xiaoshan Sun, Anguo Ren, Jiuyang Chen, Xiaohua Huang, Boyu Zhang, Wen Sun
    Biomaterials.2025; 316: 123020.     CrossRef
  • Lymph node yield does not affect the cancer-specific survival of patients with T1 colorectal cancer: a population-based retrospective study of the U.S. database and a Chinese registry
    Jiyun Li, Ruoxi Tian, Fei Huang, Pu Cheng, Fuqiang Zhao, Zhixun Zhao, Qian Liu, Zhaoxu Zheng
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long‐Term Outcomes of Sigmoid, Rectosigmoid, and Rectal Cancers: A Matched Analysis
    Cigdem Benlice, Atilla Halil Elhan, Emre Gorgun, Mehmet Ayhan Kuzu
    World Journal of Surgery.2025; 49(4): 819.     CrossRef
  • The Value of Spectroscopic CT for Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer
    冬冬 穆
    Journal of Clinical Personalized Medicine.2025; 04(01): 501.     CrossRef
  • A novel pN stage prediction model for resectable rectal adenocarcinoma based on preoperative MRI features and multiregional apparent diffusion coefficients
    Hui Luo, Yue-qin Gou, Yue-su Wang, Hui-lin Qin, Hai-ying Zhou, Xiao-ming Zhang, Tian-wu Chen
    European Radiology.2025; 35(9): 5760.     CrossRef
  • Indocyanine Green Near-Infrared Fluorescence-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Colon Cancer
    Vlad Fagarasan, Vasile V. Bintintan, Radu I. Seicean, Giorgiana Fagarasan, David Andras, Emil Botan, Gabriel Samasca, George C. Dindelegan, Calin I. Cainap
    Biomedicines.2025; 13(4): 902.     CrossRef
  • Performance and Prognostic Relevance of Lymph Node Assessment by One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification Assay in Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study
    Qing Liu, Sandra Lopez-Prades, Karmele Saez de Gordoa, Maite Rodrigo-Calvo, Mireia Garcia, Juan Ruiz Martin, Angel Romo, Ignacio Pinilla, Jordi Tarragona, Begoña Otero Alen, Jordi Camps, Ivan Archilla, Miriam Cuatrecasas
    Cancers.2025; 17(13): 2141.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of metastatic lymph node ratio and its effect on disease-free survival in colon cancer
    Orhan Aslan, Ramazan Topcu, İsmail Sezikli, Mahmut A. Yüksek, Aşkın K. Perçem, Furkan Uğur
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • B7-H3: a consistent marker in metastatic colorectal cancer with potential for targeted treatment
    Julia M. Ott, Verena Gassenmaier, Michael Bitzer, Christian M. Schürch, Jonas S. Heitmann, Ilona Hagelstein
    Pathology and Oncology Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The application of random forest-based models in prognostication of gastrointestinal tract malignancies: a systematic review
    Zhina Mohamadi, Ahmad Shafizadeh, Yasaman Aliyan, Seyedeh Fatemeh Shayesteh, Parsa Goudarzi, Alireza Khodabandeh, Amirali Vaghari, Helma Ashrafi, Omid Bahrami, Armin ZarinKhat, Yalda Khodabandeh, Kimia Pouyan
    Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mutation profiling of KRAS and BRAF in primary tumours and circulating tumour cells of colorectal cancer patients using PNA-LNA molecular switch
    Md Sajedul Islam, Eliza Ranjit, Sharmin Aktar, Neda Moetamedirad, Cu Tai Lu, Muhammad J.A. Shiddiky, Vinod Gopalan, Alfred K. Lam
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease.2025; 1871(7): 167982.     CrossRef
  • Utilizing tumor deposit count as a stratification criterion in revising TNM staging system for patients with colorectal cancer: a nomogram review study
    Lifei Zhang, Yunna Ma, Jiantao Dong, Jianhui Cai
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An Uncharted Path of Metastasis: A Case Report of Sigmoid Colon Cancer with Synchronous Vaginal and Urethral Spread
    John Fernando Montenegro, Giovanna Patricia Rivas Tafur, Miguel Diaz, Diego Fernando Alzate, María Camila Faria, Daniel Florez, Richard Andrés Acuña, Cesar Eduardo, Yamil Liscano
    Diseases.2025; 13(8): 251.     CrossRef
  • Construction of a risk prediction model for early postoperative recurrence in stage II/III colorectal cancer
    Feng-Chun Xiong, Ming-Peng Luo, Shan-Ming Ruan
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Peritoneal Lavage Cytology Predicts Peritoneal Metastasis and is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Dewei Kong, Yingjie Li, Shenyi Yin, Yunfei Tan, Boyang Qu, Lei Huang, Jianzhong Jeff Xi, Aiwen Wu
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2025; 32(13): 9712.     CrossRef
  • Insights from the Muk and Maseb Radiotherapy Centre in Kinshasa: A Study of 43 Cases of Rectal Cancer
    Abou Dao, Emmanuel Franck Elame, Mahomed Yessoufou, Ismael Coulibaly, Kanta Ka, Vandrome Nakundi, Ruth Rosine Mapenya Mekah, Anne-Marthe Maison Mayeh, Guilaine Mopoh, Nicolas A. A. Minoungou, Franck Mukeng, Mah-Soune Apithy, Babaka Donatien Batalansi, Sta
    Journal of Cancer Therapy.2025; 16(12): 472.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning-based survival prediction in colorectal cancer combining clinical and biological features
    Lucas M. Vieira, Natasha A.N. Jorge, João B. Sousa, João C. Setubal, Peter F. Stadler, Maria E.M.T. Walter
    Oncotarget.2025; 16(1): 834.     CrossRef
  • TRAIL‐conjugated liposomes that bind natural killer cells to induce colorectal cancer cell apoptosis
    Joshua D. Greenlee, Zhenjiang Zhang, Tejas Subramanian, Kevin Liu, Michael R. King
    Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A.2024; 112(1): 110.     CrossRef
  • Lymph Node Ratio as a Predictor of Survival for Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Simarpreet Ichhpuniani, Tyler McKechnie, Jay Lee, Jeremy Biro, Yung Lee, Lily Park, Aristithes Doumouras, Dennis Hong, Cagla Eskicioglu
    The American Surgeon™.2024; 90(4): 840.     CrossRef
  • Acetone compression improves lymph node yield and metastasis detection in colorectal cancer
    Christina Schnoz, Katrin Schmid, Guacimara Ortega Sanchez, Sabina Schacher-Kaufmann, Michel Adamina, Georgios Peros, Dieter Erdin, Peter Karl Bode
    Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.2024; 41(1): 45.     CrossRef
  • Computational methods for metastasis detection in lymph nodes and characterization of the metastasis-free lymph node microarchitecture: A systematic-narrative hybrid review
    Elzbieta Budginaite, Derek R. Magee, Maximilian Kloft, Henry C. Woodruff, Heike I. Grabsch
    Journal of Pathology Informatics.2024; 15: 100367.     CrossRef
  • Sequential Lateral Lymphatic Metastasis Shows Similar Oncologic Outcomes to Upward Spread in Advanced Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Hye Jin Kim, Gyu-Seog Choi, Seung Hyun Cho, Min Kyu Kang, Jun Seok Park, Soo Yeun Park, Byung Woog Kang, Jong Gwang Kim
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(3): 359.     CrossRef
  • The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Histopathology: An Update
    D. Chamil Codipilly, Shahriar Faghani, Catherine Hagan, Jason Lewis, Bradley J. Erickson, Prasad G. Iyer
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 22(6): 1170.     CrossRef
  • INFLUENCE OF NEOADJUVANT THERAPY ON THE RATIO OF LYMPH NODES
    Laura CREDIDIO, Carlos Augusto Real MARTINEZ, Daniéla Oliveira MAGRO, Rita Barbosa de CARVALHO, Maria de Lourdes Setsuko AYRIZONO, Cláudio Saddy Rodrigues COY
    Arquivos de Gastroenterologia.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • National screening for colorectal cancer is associated with stage shift to earlier diagnosis
    Mina Sarofim, Amir Ashrafizadeh, Anthony J. Gill, Keshani de Silva, Justin Evans, Stephen Clarke, Nick Pavlakis, Ian Norton, Alexander Engel
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(7-8): 1279.     CrossRef
  • Competing‐risks model for predicting the prognosis of patients with regressive melanoma based on the SEER database
    Chaodi Huang, Liying Huang, Jianguo Huang, Xinkai Zheng, Congjun Jiang, Kong Ching Tom, U. Tim Wu, WenHsien Ethan Huang, Yunfei Gao, Fangmin Situ, Hai Yu, Liehua Deng, Jun Lyu
    Malignancy Spectrum.2024; 1(2): 123.     CrossRef
  • The Relationship between Tumor Budding and Tumor Deposits in Patients with Stage III Colorectal Carcinoma
    Zdenko Bilić, Mario Zovak, Goran Glavčić, Dubravka Mužina, Amir Ibukić, Andro Košec, Davor Tomas, Alma Demirović
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(9): 2583.     CrossRef
  • Standardizing data collection in adjuvant colon cancer trials: A consensus project from the IDEA and ACCENT international consortia and national experts
    Julien Taieb, Debora Basile, Jenny Seligmann, Guillem Argiles, Thierry André, Claire Gallois, Richard M. Goldberg, Greg Yothers, Alberto Sobrero, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt, John Souglakos, Roberto Labianca, Tim Iveson, David N. Church, Dirk Arnold, Jeanne Tie
    European Journal of Cancer.2024; 206: 114118.     CrossRef
  • GLI1 and PTTG1 expression in colorectal carcinoma patients undergoing radical surgery and their correlation with lymph node metastasis
    Feng Cao, Yang-Yan Chen, Hong-Cheng Wang
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(5): 1328.     CrossRef
  • Application of radiomics for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Elahe Abbaspour, Sahand Karimzadhagh, Abbas Monsef, Farahnaz Joukar, Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei, Soheil Hassanipour
    International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(6): 3795.     CrossRef
  • A pathologist–AI collaboration framework for enhancing diagnostic accuracies and efficiencies
    Zhi Huang, Eric Yang, Jeanne Shen, Dita Gratzinger, Frederick Eyerer, Brooke Liang, Jeffrey Nirschl, David Bingham, Alex M. Dussaq, Christian Kunder, Rebecca Rojansky, Aubre Gilbert, Alexandra L. Chang-Graham, Brooke E. Howitt, Ying Liu, Emily E. Ryan, Tr
    Nature Biomedical Engineering.2024; 9(4): 455.     CrossRef
  • OPTIMIZATION OF THE DIAGNOSIS OF LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL CANCER USING RADIOLOGICAL IMAGING METHODS
    S.V. Maliborska, V.V. Holotiuk
    Art of Medicine.2024; : 63.     CrossRef
  • Low muscle mass-to-fat ratio is an independent factor that predicts worse overall survival and complications in patients with colon cancer: a retrospective single-center cohort study
    Jiabao Tang, Jingwen Xu, Xiaohua Li, Chun Cao
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2024; 107(2): 68.     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: update
    Xiao Zhu, Shui-quan Lin, Jun Xie, Li-hui Wang, Li-juan Zhang, Ling-ling Xu, Jian-guang Xu, Yang-bo Lv
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • SURGICAL TREATMENT OF RECTAL CANCER WITH PRESERVATION OF THE LEFT COLIC ARTERY AND ICG NAVIGATION
    S.V. Maliborska
    Art of Medicine.2024; : 86.     CrossRef
  • Assessing the clinical utility of tumor invasion proportion of lymph nodes for enhanced risk stratification in N1 colorectal cancer
    Ru-Jie Chen
    American Journal of Cancer Research.2024; 14(12): 5826.     CrossRef
  • Survival outcomes after synchronous para‐aortic lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Conor Aylward, Jawed Noori, Jack Tyrrell, Niall O'sullivan, Dara O. Kavanagh, John O. Larkin, Brian J. Mehigan, Paul H. McCormick, Michael E. Kelly
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 127(4): 645.     CrossRef
  • National assessment of lymph node status indicators & predictors in pediatric head and neck rhabdomyosarcomas in the US
    David J. Fei-Zhang, Asher C. Park, Joseph M. Berry, Rebecca S. Arch, Daniel C. Chelius, Anthony M. Sheyn, Jeffrey C. Rastatter
    International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology.2023; 164: 111419.     CrossRef
  • Increased Kremen2 predicts worse prognosis in colon cancer
    Junxian Long, Fengyun Cong, Yousheng Wei, Jungang Liu, Weizhong Tang
    Pathology and Oncology Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictors and survival outcomes of having less than 12 harvested lymph nodes in proctectomy for rectal cancer
    Sameh Hany Emile, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Peige Zhou, Steven D. Wexner
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lymph node metastasis in cancer progression: molecular mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic interventions
    Haoran Ji, Chuang Hu, Xuhui Yang, Yuanhao Liu, Guangyu Ji, Shengfang Ge, Xiansong Wang, Mingsong Wang
    Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Role of Nonmetastatic Lymph Nodes in the Survival of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Alexander J. Pennings, Brecht A. van der Velden, Maximilian Kloft, Loes F. S. Kooreman, Jos M. P. Kleijnen, Stephanie O. Breukink, Geerard L. Beets, Heike I. Grabsch, Jarno Melenhorst
    Annals of Surgery Open.2023; 4(4): e336.     CrossRef
  • Multicenter study of prognostic factors in paraaortic lymph node dissection for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Jun Woo Bong, Sanghee Kang, Pyoungjae Park
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 271.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Resection of Pathologically Confirmed Isolated Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Maurizio Zizzo, Maria Pia Federica Dorma, Magda Zanelli, Francesca Sanguedolce, Maria Chiara Bassi, Andrea Palicelli, Stefano Ascani, Alessandro Giunta
    Cancers.2022; 14(3): 661.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for long-term survival in patients with ypN+ M0 rectal cancer after radical anterior resection
    Marcin Zeman, Władysław Skałba, Piotr Szymański, Grzegorz Hadasik, Dmytro Żaworonkow, Dominik A. Walczak, Agnieszka Czarniecka
    BMC Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review
    In Ja Park
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91.     CrossRef
  • An unusual case of right-sided colon cancer with isolated lateral pelvic side wall lymph node metastases
    Rishaan Pawaskar, James Wei Tatt Toh
    Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery.2022; 5(3): 121.     CrossRef
  • High-resolution MRI-based radiomics analysis to predict lymph node metastasis and tumor deposits respectively in rectal cancer
    Yan-song Yang, Feng Feng, Yong-juan Qiu, Gui-hua Zheng, Ya-qiong Ge, Yue-tao Wang
    Abdominal Radiology.2021; 46(3): 873.     CrossRef
  • Extricating the Association Between the Prognostic Factors of Colorectal Cancer
    Younis Mohd, Balamuralikrishnan Balasubramanian, Arun Meyyazhagan, Haripriya Kuchi Bhotla, Suresh Kumar Shanmugam, Mithun Kumar Ramesh Kumar, Manikantan Pappusamy, Karthick Kumar Alagamuthu, Sasikala Keshavarao, Vijaya Anand Arumugam
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2021; 52(3): 1022.     CrossRef
  • Retrospective survival analysis of stage II–III rectal cancer: tumour regression grade, grading and lymphovascular invasion are the only predictors
    Andrea Morini, Alfredo Annicchiarico, Andrea Romboli, Matteo Ricco', Pellegrino Crafa, Filippo Montali, Paolo Dell'Abate, Renato Costi
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Competitive Risk Analysis of Prognosis in Patients With Cecum Cancer: A Population-Based Study
    Wentao Wu, Jin Yang, Daning Li, Qiao Huang, Fanfan Zhao, Xiaojie Feng, Hong Yan, Jun Lyu
    Cancer Control.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Increased Expression of VANGL1 is Predictive of Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: Results from a 20-Gene Expression Signature
    Noshad Peyravian, Stefania Nobili, Zahra Pezeshkian, Meysam Olfatifar, Afshin Moradi, Kaveh Baghaei, Fakhrosadat Anaraki, Kimia Nazari, Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei, Mohammad Reza Zali, Enrico Mini, Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojarad
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(2): 126.     CrossRef
  • Management of indeterminate hepatic nodules and evaluation of factors predicting their malignant potential in patients with colorectal cancer
    Mizelle D’Silva, Jai Young Cho, Ho-Seong Han, Taupyk Yerlan, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Hae Won Lee, Jun Suh Lee, Boram Lee, Moonhwan Kim
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimal Postoperative Surveillance Strategies for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study
    Min-Young Park, In-Ja Park, Hyo-Seon Ryu, Jay Jung, Min-Sung Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang-Sik Yu, Jin-Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3502.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of Level of Ligation of Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Colorectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pavan Kumar Jonnada, Monish Karunakaran, Dayakar Rao
    Future Oncology.2021; 17(27): 3645.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal cancer classification and prognostication from histology using deep learning: Systematic review
    Sara Kuntz, Eva Krieghoff-Henning, Jakob N. Kather, Tanja Jutzi, Julia Höhn, Lennard Kiehl, Achim Hekler, Elizabeth Alwers, Christof von Kalle, Stefan Fröhling, Jochen S. Utikal, Hermann Brenner, Michael Hoffmeister, Titus J. Brinker
    European Journal of Cancer.2021; 155: 200.     CrossRef
  • One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) of Sentinel Lymph Node in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Spanish Multicenter Study (ENDO-OSNA)
    María Diestro, Alberto Berjón, Ignacio Zapardiel, Laura Yébenes, Irune Ruiz, Arantza Lekuona, Marta Rezola, Ibon Jaunarena, Jaime Siegrist, Margarita Sánchez-Pastor, María Cuadra, Amaia Sagasta, Isabel Guerra, Luis Lete, Fernando Roldán, Carlo Marta, Marí
    Cancers.2021; 13(17): 4465.     CrossRef
  • Deep learning can predict lymph node status directly from histology in colorectal cancer
    Lennard Kiehl, Sara Kuntz, Julia Höhn, Tanja Jutzi, Eva Krieghoff-Henning, Jakob N. Kather, Tim Holland-Letz, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Jenny Chang-Claude, Alexander Brobeil, Christof von Kalle, Stefan Fröhling, Elizabeth Alwers, Hermann Brenner, Michael Ho
    European Journal of Cancer.2021; 157: 464.     CrossRef
  • Pathological Features and Prognostication in Colorectal Cancer
    Kabytto Chen, Geoffrey Collins, Henry Wang, James Wei Tatt Toh
    Current Oncology.2021; 28(6): 5356.     CrossRef
  • Distant Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer Patients—Do We Have New Predicting Clinicopathological and Molecular Biomarkers? A Comprehensive Review
    Stanislav Filip, Veronika Vymetalkova, Jiri Petera, Ludmila Vodickova, Ondrej Kubecek, Stanislav John, Filip Cecka, Marketa Krupova, Monika Manethova, Klara Cervena, Pavel Vodicka
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2020; 21(15): 5255.     CrossRef
  • Small Molecules for Multi-Wavelength Near-Infrared Fluorescent Mapping of Regional and Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Colorectal Cancer Staging
    Victor M. Baart, Marion M. Deken, Mark W. Bordo, Shadhvi S. Bhairosingh, Daniela C. F. Salvatori, Hoon Hyun, Maged Henary, Hak Soo Choi, Cornelis F. M. Sier, Peter J. K. Kuppen, Anton G. T. Terwisscha van Scheltinga, Taryn L. March, Adrianus R. P. M. Vale
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
Case Report
Pneumatic Colorectal Injury Caused by High Pressure Compressed Air
Jin Young Lee, Young Hoon Sul, Seung Je Go, Jin Bong Ye, Jung Hee Choi
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(6):357-360.   Published online May 22, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.08.19
  • 12,359 View
  • 103 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
The pneumatic colorectal injury caused by high pressure compressed air are rare and can be fatal. Herein, we present a case of 45-year-old male who developed sudden onset of severe abdominal pain after cleaning the dust on his pants with high pressure compressed air gun dust cleaner. Emergent exploratory laparotomy was done which findings are a huge rectal perforation with multiple serosal and subserosal tear in sigmoid to splenic flexure of colon. Anterior resection with left hemicolectomy, and temporary transverse colostomy was performed. Postoperative course was uneventful. Recently, prognosis is generally favorable because of prompt diagnosis and emergent surgical management.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laparoscopic Repair of Colorectal Perforations Induced by Compressed Air Pressure: A Case Report
    Ibrahim Elnogoomi, Hoorieh Qasemi, Mariam Aylan Alshamsi, Majid Alhammadi, Omar Elnogoomi
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Air Nozzle Injury: Barotrauma Resulted From an Industrial Accident
    Ashok N Mhaske, Nishi Gupta, Abhishek Mishra, Shubham Jaiswal, Chirag Dausage, Jyoti Meena, Gourav Goyal
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Emergency laparoscopic resection of the anterior rectum due to rectal trauma secondary to compressed air, case report
    Daniel Gómez, Luis F. Cabrera, Mauricio Pedraza, Andres Mendoza-Zuchini, Nicolás Sánchez, Hector W. Cure, Héctor O. Cure Bulicie, Jean A. Pulido
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2020; 76(C): 288.     CrossRef
Original Article
Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio: A Predictive Marker for Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Rectal Cancer Who Underwent Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by Surgery
Byong Ho Jeon, Ui Sup Shin, Sun Mi Moon, Jung Il Choi, Mi-Sook Kim, Kie Hwan Kim, Se-Jin Sung
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(2):100-106.   Published online April 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.01
  • 6,829 View
  • 134 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 21 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
In this study, we investigated the role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictor of tumor response and as a prognostic factor in patients with rectal cancer who had undergone curative surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT).
Methods
Between January 2009 and July 2016, we collected 140 consecutive patients who had undergone curative intent surgery after nCRT due to rectal adenocarcinoma. We obtained the pre- and post-nCRT NLR by dividing the neutrophil count by the lymphocyte count. The cutoff value was obtained using receiver operating characteristic analysis for tumor response and using maximally selected rank analysis for recurrence-free survival (RFS). The relationship among NLR, tumor response, and RFS was assessed by adjusting the possible clinico-pathological confounding factors.
Results
The possibility of pathologic complete response (pCR) was significantly decreased in high pre- (>2.77) and postnCRT NLR (>3.23) in univariate regression analysis. In multivariate analysis, high post-nCRT NLR was an independent negative predictive factor for pCR (adjusted odds ratio, 0.365; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.145–0.918). The 5-year RFS of all patients was 74.6% during the median 37 months of follow-up. Patients with higher pre- (>2.66) and post-nCRT NLR (>5.21) showed lower 5-year RFS rates (53.1 vs. 83.3%, P = 0.006) (69.2 vs. 75.7%, P = 0.054). In multivariate Cox analysis, high pre-nCRT NLR was an independent poor prognostic factor for RFS (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.300; 95% CI, 1.061–4.985).
Conclusion
Elevated NLR was a negative predictive marker for pCR and was independently associated with decreased RFS. For confirmation, a large-scale study with appropriate controls is needed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Recurrence risk following rectal cancer surgery: a survival analysis of key predictors
    Neda Gorjizadeh, Reza Hajebi, Matin Vahedi, Mahsa Mottahedi, Elham Nazar
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2025; 55(8): 880.     CrossRef
  • Circulating Markers of Systemic Inflammation, Measured After Completion of Neoadjuvant Therapy, Associated With Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Ross K. McMahon, Sean M. O’Cathail, Colin W. Steele, Harikrishnan S. Nair, Jonathan J. Platt, Donald C. McMillan, Paul G. Horgan, Campbell S. Roxburgh
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(6): 713.     CrossRef
  • Response Prediction to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Based on Systemic Inflammatory Markers (NLR, PLR, and LMR)
    Roger Beltrati Coser, Caio Sergio R. Nahas, Alex Jones Flores Cassenote, Omar S. T. Ghani, Rafaela B. B. Pinheiro, Sergio Carlos Nahas, Carlos Frederico S. Marques
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value of Dynamic Changes in Immune-Inflammatory and Tumor Biomarkers Following Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Mahmoud Al-Masri, Yasmin Safi, Mohammad Almasri, Ramiz Kardan, Daliana Mustafa, Osama Alayyan, Bilal Kahalah, Rama AlMasri
    Cancers.2025; 17(20): 3383.     CrossRef
  • Hematological markers as prognostic predictors in patients undergoing colon cancer surgery
    Jessica Patricia Gonzales Stuva, Carlos Pérez-López, Marcelo Sebastian Ramírez Romero, Ana Bernabeu García, Pamela Vivas Angeles, Diana Escolà Ripoll, Sandra López Gordo
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Landscape of Biomarkers and Pathologic Response in Rectal Cancer: Where We Stand?
    Abrahams Ocanto, Macarena Teja, Francesco Amorelli, Felipe Couñago, Ariel Gomez Palacios, Diego Alcaraz, Ramón Cantero
    Cancers.2024; 16(23): 4047.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in operated rectal cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Giuseppe Portale, Patrizia Bartolotta, Danila Azzolina, Dario Gregori, Valentino Fiscon
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • NEUTROPHIL-LYMPHOCYTE RATIO (NLR) AND LYMPHOPENIAAS PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF OVERALL SURVIVAL IN LOCALADVANCED RECTAL CANCER
    Ocanto A, Morera R, Rodríguez I, Cantero R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH.2023; : 11.     CrossRef
  • Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts survival of patients with rectal cancer receiving neo-adjuvant chemoradiation followed by radical resection: a meta-analysis
    Giuseppe Colloca, Antonella Venturino, Domenico Guarneri
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2023; 23(4): 421.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous metastasis receiving systemic therapy
    Tzu-Chieh Yin, Po-Jung Chen, Yung-Sung Yeh, Ching-Chun Li, Yen-Cheng Chen, Wei-Chih Su, Tsung-Kun Chang, Ching-Wen Huang, Chun-Ming Huang, Hsiang-Lin Tsai, Jaw-Yuan Wang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Crying Need for a Better Response Assessment in Rectal Cancer
    Samuel Amintas, Nicolas Giraud, Benjamin Fernandez, Charles Dupin, Quentin Denost, Aurelie Garant, Nora Frulio, Denis Smith, Anne Rullier, Eric Rullier, Te Vuong, Sandrine Dabernat, Véronique Vendrely
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology.2023; 24(11): 1507.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Role of Peripheral Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) in Patients with Rectal Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
    Şefika Arzu Ergen, Ceren Barlas, Cumhur Yıldırım, Didem Çolpan Öksüz
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2022; 53(1): 151.     CrossRef
  • Deep regional hyperthermia combined with modern concurrent chemoradiotherapy increases T-downstaging rate in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Yuxia Wang, Siyi Lu, Yuxia Shao, Ran Peng, Xuemin Li, Junjie Wang, Hao Wang
    International Journal of Hyperthermia.2022; 39(1): 431.     CrossRef
  • High Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio and Low Lymphocyte Levels Are Correlated With Worse Pathological Complete Response Rates
    Serdar Karakaya, İbrahim Karadağ, Mehmet Emin Yılmaz, Ömür Berna Çakmak Öksüzoğlu
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer
    Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review
    In Ja Park
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91.     CrossRef
  • Histopathological and Haemogram Features Correlate with Prognosis in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation without Pathological Complete Response
    Yu-Ming Huang, Hsi-Hsien Hsu, Chien-Kuo Liu, Ching-Kuo Yang, Po-Li Tsai, Tzu-Yin Tang, Shih-Ming Hsu, Yu-Jen Chen
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(17): 4947.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after curative rectal cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hytham K.S. Hamid, George N. Davis, Mario Trejo-Avila, Patrick O. Igwe, Andrés Garcia-Marín
    Surgical Oncology.2021; 37: 101556.     CrossRef
  • The prognostic utility of pre‐treatment neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte‐ratio (NLR) in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Mate Naszai, Alina Kurjan, Timothy S. Maughan
    Cancer Medicine.2021; 10(17): 5983.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Ability of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Determining Tumor Staging in Colorectal Cancer
    Chirag Pereira, Jiju Mohan, Shankar Gururaj, Prajwal Chandrashekhara
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An inflammation index-based prediction of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma
    Yanwu Sun, Zhekun Huang, Pan Chi
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2020; 25(7): 1299.     CrossRef
Case Report
Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor of the Retroperitoneum Including Chronic Granulomatous Inflammation Suggesting Tuberculosis: A Case Report
Younglim Kim, Ji Won Park, Sungwhan Kim, Kil-Yong Lee, Jeongmo Bae, Yoon Kyung Jeon, Ji Min Im, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(5):285-288.   Published online March 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.09
  • 5,341 View
  • 111 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
An inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a solid tumor of unknown etiology frequently affecting children and young adults and commonly affecting the lung or orbital region. We present a case involving a 41-year-old man who had an IMT combined with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in the retroperitoneum. He presented with only pain in the right lower abdomen without accompanying symptoms; a retroperitoneal mass was found on computed tomography. The tumor had invaded the end of the ileum and was attached to the omentum, so mass excision could not be performed. The tumor was completely excised surgically and had histological features diagnostic of an IMT. Histologic findings of the omentum were positive for Ziehl-Nielsen staining for acid-fast bacilli and for a positive polymerase chain reaction for M. tuberculosis. The patient had no apparent immune disorder. These findings made this case exceptional because IMTs, which are mostly due to atypical mycobacteria, have been found mainly in immunocompromised patients.
Original Article
Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Hartmann Colostomy Reversal
Won Park, Won Cheol Park, Keun Young Kim, Seok Youn Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):306-311.   Published online December 20, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.07
  • 10,234 View
  • 168 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Hartmann operation is widely recognized as a useful procedure, especially in emergencies involving the rectosigmoid colon. One of the surgeon’s foremost concerns after Hartmann operation is future colostomy reversal, as colostomy reversal after a Hartmann procedure is associated with relatively high morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic surgical techniques continue to prove useful for an ever-increasing variety of indications. We analyzed the outcomes of laparoscopic Hartmann colostomy reversals at our center.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the hospital records of 170 patients who had undergone Hartmann operation between January 2010 and June 2017 at Wonkwang University Hospital. Among 68 Hartmann colostomy reversals, we evaluated and compared the outcomes of 3 groups of patients: 29 patients in the open colostomy reversal group (OG) who had undergone laparotomies for Hartmann reversals, 19 patients in the conversion group (CG) whose laparoscopic procedures had required conversion to a laparotomy, and 20 patients in the laparoscopy group (LG).
Results
The overall reversal rate for Hartmann colostomies was 40.5% during this time period. The duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter among LG patients (10.15 ± 2.94 days) than among OG patients (16 ± 9.5 days). The overall complication rate among OG patients was higher than that among LG patients (adjusted odds ratio, 8.78; P = 0.01). The most common complication was postoperative ileus (19.1%).
Conclusion
If no contraindications to laparoscopy exist, surgeons should favor a laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann operation over an open reversal.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Complete prevention of anastomotic leakage using total enteric flow diversion
    Tao Hu, Jing Wang, Nan-Hui Yu
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical Outcomes of Open and Laparoscopic Hartmann Reversal: A Single-Center Comparative Study
    Mu-Han Tsai, Ming-Jenn Chen, Khaa-Hoo Ong, Chih-Ying Lu, Chung-Han Ho, Hsuan-Yi Huang, Yu-Feng Tian, I-Ning Yang
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann reversal: a propensity score matching analysis
    Li Tan, Xiao-Yu Liu, Bin Zhang, Lian-Lian Wang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic and open Hartmann's reversal: A single‐center retrospective study in Japan
    Aya Sato, Ken Imaizumi, Hiroyuki Kasajima, Keisuke Obuchi, Kentaro Sato, Daisuke Yamana, Yosuke Tsuruga, Minoru Umehara, Michihiro Kurushima, Kazuaki Nakanishi
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2022; 15(1): 137.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Laparoscopic Hartmann's Procedure Followed by Laparoscopic Reversal for Perforated Diverticulitis
    Ryo Maemoto, Shingo Tsujinaka, Ryotaro Sakio, Nao Kakizawa, Rei Takahashi, Yuuri Hatsuzawa, Yasuaki Kimura, Erika Machida, Sawako Tamaki, Hideki Ishikawa, Yasuyuki Miyakura, Toshiki Rikiyama
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2022; 75(1): 36.     CrossRef
  • Is laparoscopy a reliable alternative to laparotomy in Hartmann's reversal? An updated meta-analysis
    D. Chavrier, A. Alves, B. Menahem
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2022; 26(4): 239.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal has better clinical outcomes compared to open surgery: An international multicenter cohort study involving 502 patients
    Anwar Medellin Abueta, Nairo Javier Senejoa, Mauricio Pedraza Ciro, Lina Fory, Carlos Perez Rivera, Carlos Edmundo Martinez Jaramillo, Lina Maria Mateus Barbosa, Heinz Orlando Ibañez Varela, Javier A. Carrera, Rafael Garcia Duperly, Luis A Sanchez, Ivan D
    Health Science Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Hartmann reversal: experiences from a developing country
    Dung Anh Nguyen, Tuong-Anh Mai-Phan, Truc Thanh Thai, Hai Van Nguyen
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(4): 297.     CrossRef
  • Open versus laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yingjia Zhang, Chunxi Liu, Kameswara Rishi Yeshayahu Nistala, Choon Seng Chong
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(12): 2421.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Versus Open Hartmann Reversal: A Case-Control Study
    Paolo Panaccio, Tommaso Grottola, Rossana Percario, Federico Selvaggi, Severino Cericola, Alfonso Lapergola, Maira Farrukh, Giuseppe Di Martino, Marco Ricciardiello, Pierluigi Di Sebastiano, Fabio Francesco Di Mola, Todd Pesavento
    Surgery Research and Practice.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Laparoscopic Hartmann Reversal on Short-term Operative Outcomes Among Vietnamese Patients
    Viet Van Ung, Bang Cong Huynh, Vinh Chi Le, Dang Ngoc Tran, Trung Nguyen Vo, Tan Van Pham, Bac Hoang Nguyen
    Journal of Coloproctology.2021; 41(02): 117.     CrossRef
  • A comparative study between open versus laparoscopic Hartmann reversal
    Hye Jung Cho, Woo Ram Kim, Jong Woo Kim
    Medicine.2021; 100(47): e27976.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal reconstructions following Hartmann’s procedure: challenges and solutions
    A. N. Igolkin, V. V. Polovinkin
    Innovative medicine of Kuban.2020; (4): 51.     CrossRef
  • Emergency Hartmann’s Procedure and its Reversal: A Totally Laparoscopic 2-Step Surgery for the Treatment of Hinchey III and IV Diverticulitis
    Diletta Cassini, Michelangelo Miccini, Farshad Manoochehri, Matteo Gregori, Gianandrea Baldazzi
    Surgical Innovation.2019; 26(6): 770.     CrossRef
Case Report
Colonoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device That Had Perforated the Rectosigmoid Colon
Jin Myeong Huh, Ki Seok Kim, Yong Seok Cho, Dong Kwon Suh, Jae Uk Lee, Seong Deuk Baek, Sin Kil Moon
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):106-108.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.30
  • 12,175 View
  • 128 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
The intrauterine device (IUD) is a widely used contraceptive method. One of the most serious and rare complications of using an IUD is colon perforation. We report a case of colonoscopic removal of an IUD that had perforated into the rectosigmoid colon in a 42-year-old woman who presented with no symptoms. Colonoscopy showed that the IUD had penetrated into rectosigmoid colon wall and that an arm of the IUD was embedded in the colon wall. We were able to remove the IUD easily by using colonoscopy. The endoscopic approach may be considered the first choice therapy for selected patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Migrated Foreign Body Perforating the Colon: Scope for Colonoscopy
    Aparimita Das, Tarun S Joseph, Gangireddy Siva Sankar Reddy, Amrit Pipara, Sumit Mukhopadhyay
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Retroperitoneal Displacement of an Intrauterine Device (IUD): A Case Report
    Godwin Silas Macheku, Fidelis Clarence Jungulu, Ezekiel Kalibugwe Kiyogoma, Kheri Kagya, Salehe Mrutu, Michael Johnson Mahande
    International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology.2025; : 713.     CrossRef
  • Rectal Foreign Body Shaped Like an Endoscopic Clip: Migrated Intrauterine Devices to the Rectum
    Xinyu Xie, BoYuan, Chunmei Li, Lina Cao
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2025; 70(9): 2899.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Removal of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device From the Descending Colon: A Case Report
    Muhammad Shabbir, Mishal A Aljohani, Abdurahman Alfaiz, Msab Aldakheel, Zeeshan Ali
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colonoscopic removal of an intrauterine device with rectal perforation: A case report
    Lingrun Ye, Yuanyuan Zhu, Fanglai Zhu
    Medicine.2024; 103(28): e38872.     CrossRef
  • Is It a “Colon Perforation”? A Case Report and Review of the Literature
    Shuangshuang Lu, Xinyu Yao, Jun Shi, Jian Huang, Shaohua Zhuang, Junfang Ma, Yan Liu, Wei Zhang, Lifei Yu, Ping Zhu, Qiuwei Zhu, Ruxia Shi, Hong Zheng, Dong Shao, Yuyan Pan, Shizhen Bao, Li Qin, Lijie Huang, Wenjia Liu, Jin Huang
    Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic removal of an intrauterine device from the lumen of the sigmoid colon
    V. V. Bereshchenko, D. V. Lazarevich, N. N. Goncharov, P. V. Khodanovich
    Health and Ecology Issues.2022; 19(1): 145.     CrossRef
  • Incomplete Removal of an Intrauterine Device Perforating the Sigmoid Colon
    Junseak Lee, Jung Hwan Oh, Jinsu Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim, Sung Hoon Jung
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 78(1): 48.     CrossRef
  • Chronic nodules of sigmoid perforation caused by incarcerated intrauterine contraception device
    Xiaohui Huang, Rui Zhong, Liqin Zeng, Xuhui He, Qingshan Deng, Xiuhong Peng, Jieming Li, Xiping Luo
    Medicine.2019; 98(4): e14117.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device: Case Report and Review of Literature and Technique
    Yang Lei, Vadim Iablakov, Riaz J. Karmali, Nauzer Forbes
    ACG Case Reports Journal.2019; 6(6): e00090.     CrossRef
Original Article
Management Outcomes of Colonoscopic Perforations Are Affected by the General Condition of the Patients
Jae Ho Park, Kyung Jong Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(1):16-22.   Published online February 28, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.34.1.16
  • 6,132 View
  • 110 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The management of a colonoscopic perforation (CP) varies from conservative to surgical. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes between surgical and conservative treatment of patients with a CP.

Methods

From 2003 to 2016, the medical records of patients with CP were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they initially received conservative or surgical treatment.

Results

During the study period, a total of 48 patients with a CP were treated. Among them, 5 patients had underlying colorectal cancer and underwent emergency radical cancer surgery; these patients were excluded. The mean age of the remaining 43 patients was 64.5 years old, and the most common perforation site was the sigmoid colon (15 patients). The initial conservative care group included 16 patients, and the surgery group included 27 patients. In the conservative group, 5 patients required conversion to surgery (failure rate: 5 of 16 [31.3%]). Of the surgery group, laparoscopic surgery was performed on 19 patients and open surgery on 8 patients, including 2 conversion cases. Major postoperative complications developed in 11 patients (34.4%), and postoperative mortality developed in 4 patients (12.5%). The only predictor for poor prognosis after surgery was a high American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification.

Conclusion

In this study, conservative treatment for patients with a CP had a relatively high failure rate. Furthermore, surgical treatment showed significant rates of complications and mortality, which depended on the general status of the patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Multicenter retrospective evaluation of ileocecocolic perforations associated with diagnostic lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in dogs and cats
    Vanessa L. Woolhead, Jacqueline C. Whittemore, Sarah A. Stewart
    Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2020; 34(2): 684.     CrossRef
Case Report
Colorectal Perforation After Anorectal Manometry for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
Kyung Ha Lee, Ji Yeon Kim, Young Hoon Sul
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(4):146-149.   Published online August 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.4.146
  • 5,924 View
  • 76 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

We experienced 3 cases of manometry-induced colon perforation. A 75-year-old man (case 1) underwent anorectal manometry (ARM) 3 years after radiotherapy for prostate cancer and a laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. A 70-year-old man (case 2) underwent ARM 3 months after conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and a laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. A 78-year-old man (case 3) underwent ARM 2 months after a laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. In all cases, a colon perforation with fecal peritonitis occurred. All were treated successfully using prompt and active operations and were discharged without any complications. ARM with a balloon, as a measure of rectal compliance, should be performed 2 months or longer after surgery. If a perforation occurs, prompt and active surgical intervention is necessary due to the high possibility of extensive fecal peritonitis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Japan Society of Coloproctology Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence 2024 (Revised Second Edition)
    Keiji Koda, Toshiki Mimura, Tetsuo Yamana, Mitsuru Ishizuka, Tomoko Takahashi, Shota Takano, Tatsuya Abe, Yuji Nishizawa, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Masami Sato, Kaoru Nishimura, Masahiro Yoshida, Kotaro Maeda
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2026; 10(1): 64.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal perforation following anorectal manometry in a patient with anal stenosis post rectal prolapse repair: a rare complication
    Leanne Iorio, Monique Couto Matos, Benjamin Linkous, Marco Ferrara, Antonio Caycedo
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of low anterior resection syndrome on quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: A retrospective observational study
    Dong-Ai Jin, Fang-Ping Gu, Tao-Li Meng, Xuan-Xuan Zhang
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 15(10): 2123.     CrossRef
  • Functional anorectal studies in patients with low anterior resection syndrome
    Ssu‐Chi Chen, Kaori Futaba, Wing Wa Leung, Cherry Wong, Tony Mak, Simon Ng, Hans Gregersen
    Neurogastroenterology & Motility.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer
    Bin Zhang, Ke Zhao, Yu‐Juan Zhao, Shu‐Hui Yin, Guang‐Zuan Zhuo, Yong Zhao, Jian‐Hua Ding
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(2): 424.     CrossRef
  • Broken beer bottle as a cause of sigmoid perforation
    Christian German Ospina-Pérez, Ana Milena Álvarez-Acuña, Lina María López-Álvarez, Rosa María Ospina-Pérez, Ivan David Lozada-Martínez, Sabrina Rahman
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2021; 85(C): 106261.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of defecation function after sphincter-saving resection for mid to low rectal cancer: A cross-sectional study
    Bao-Jia Luo, Mei-Chun Zheng, Yang Xia, Zhu Ying, Jian-Hong Peng, Li-Ren Li, Zhi-Zhong Pan, Hui-Ying Qin
    European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2021; 55: 102059.     CrossRef
Original Article
Correlation Between Bowel Preparation and the Adenoma Detection Rate in Screening Colonoscopy
Jung Hun Park, Sang Jin Kim, Jong Hee Hyun, Kyung Su Han, Byung Chang Kim, Chang Won Hong, Sang-Jeon Lee, Dae Kyung Sohn
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(3):93-98.   Published online June 30, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.3.93
  • 13,559 View
  • 109 Download
  • 25 Web of Science
  • 28 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The adenoma detection rate is commonly used as a measure of the quality of colonoscopy. This study assessed both the association between the adenoma detection rate and the quality of bowel preparation and the risk factors associated with the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy.

Methods

This retrospective analysis involved 1,079 individuals who underwent screening colonoscopy at the National Cancer Center between December 2012 and April 2014. Bowel preparation was classified by using the Aronchick scale. Individuals with inadequate bowel preparations (n = 47, 4.4%) were excluded because additional bowel preparation was needed. The results of 1,032 colonoscopies were included in the analysis.

Results

The subjects' mean age was 53.1 years, and 657 subjects (63.7%) were men. The mean cecal intubation time was 6.7 minutes, and the mean withdrawal time was 8.7 minutes. The adenoma and polyp detection rates were 28.1% and 41.8%, respectively. The polyp, adenoma, and advanced adenoma detection rates did not correlate with the quality of bowel preparation. The multivariate analysis showed age ≥ 60 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.97; P = 0.040), body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.17–2.08; P = 0.002) and current smoking (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.01–2.06; P = 0.014) to be independent risk factors for adenoma detection.

Conclusion

The adenoma detection rate was unrelated to the quality of bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy. Older age, obesity, and smoking were independent risk factors for adenoma detection.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Age and Sex Adenoma Detection Rates in Colonoscopy and Optimization of Screening Age: A Retrospective Analysis
    Burak Sakar, Osman Zekai Oner, Ali Celik, Omer Celik, Turan Can Yıldız, Ugur Dogan, Onur Ilkay Dincer
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2025; 35(8): 596.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of L-Menthol During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Dorottya Gergő, Andrea Tóth-Mészáros, Alexander Schulze Wenning, Péter Fehérvári, Uyen Nguyen Do To, Péter Hegyi, Bálint Erőss, Attila Ványolós, Dezső Csupor
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(12): 4296.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation With Mannitol for Colonoscopy: The SATISFACTION Study
    Gian Eugenio Tontini, Cristiano Spada, Peter Uebel, Renato Cannizzaro, Giorgio Ciprandi, Maurizio Vecchi
    JGH Open.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes of bowel preparation education strategies in colonoscopy: An evidence map of systematic reviews
    Ningning Li, Mengdan Ye, Qihan Wu, Bingru Li, Yingying Wang, Wen Li
    Medicine.2025; 104(39): e44644.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the Efficacy of Resect-and-Discard and Resect-and-Retrieve Strategies for Diminutive Colonic Polyps
    Andrei Lucian Groza, Bogdan Miutescu, Cristian Tefas, Alexandru Popa, Iulia Ratiu, Roxana Sirli, Alina Popescu, Alexandru Catalin Motofelea, Marcel Tantau
    Life.2024; 14(4): 532.     CrossRef
  • Split doses versus whole dose bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy: A multicentric prospective Lebanese randomized trial between 2021 and 2023
    Blaybel Sara, Hammoud Ghinwa, Mourda Layla, Hallal Mahmoud, Khalil Ali, Mckey Remy
    Health Science Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Overall Polyp Detection Rate as a Surrogate Measure for Screening Efficacy Independent of Histopathology: Evidence from National Endoscopy Database
    Mark Aloysius, Hemant Goyal, Tejas Nikumbh, Niraj Shah, Ganesh Aswath, Savio John, Amol Bapaye, Sushovan Guha, Nirav Thosani
    Life.2024; 14(6): 654.     CrossRef
  • Application of linaclotide in bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients with constipation: A prospective randomized controlled study
    Haoxin Xu, Zhu He, Yulin Liu, Hong Xu, Pengfei Liu
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(12): 2752.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of the Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Adenoma Detection Rate in Screening Colonoscopy: A Multicenter Study
    Altaf Ahmad, Muhammad Ishaq, Shafaq Farooq, Hafeez Ullah, Muhammad Adil Raza, Asma Abdul Razzak, Syed Kumail Abbas Razvi
    Indus Journal of Bioscience Research.2024; 3(2): 478.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Association Between Time of Day and Colonoscopy Quality
    Zihua Lu, Lihui Zhang, Liwen Yao, Dexin Gong, Lianlian Wu, Meiqing Xia, Jun Zhang, Wei Zhou, Xu Huang, Chunping He, Huiling Wu, Chenxia Zhang, Xun Li, Honggang Yu
    JAMA Network Open.2023; 6(1): e2253840.     CrossRef
  • Correlation between prescribing doctor attributes and intestinal cleanliness in colonoscopy: a study of 22522 patients
    Haibin Zhou, Hayat Khizar, Xiaofeng Zhang, Jianfeng Yang
    Annals of Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Enhancing the Quality of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Current Indicators and Future Trends
    Caesar Ferrari, Micheal Tadros
    Gastroenterology Insights.2023; 15(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Reinforced education by short message service improves the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Peng Li, Xueqian He, Jie Dong, Youwei Chen, Qin Zhou
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(4): 815.     CrossRef
  • Supplementary education can improve the rate of adequate bowel preparation in outpatients: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
    Shicheng Peng, Sixu Liu, Jiaming Lei, Wensen Ren, Lijun Xiao, Xiaolan Liu, Muhan Lü, Kai Zhou, Antonio Z. Gimeno-Garcia
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(4): e0266780.     CrossRef
  • Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopic Screening with Ketamine-based Sedation: A Prospective Observational Study
    Mirza KOVACEVIC, Nermina RIZVANOVIC, Adisa SABANOVIC ADILOVIC, Nedim BARUCIJA, Anida ABAZOVIC
    Medeniyet Medical Journal.2022; 37(1): 79.     CrossRef
  • Colonic bowel prep and body mass index: does one size fit all? A multi-centre review
    Brodie D. Laurie, Mary M. K. Teoh, Alfredo Noches-Garcia, Munyaradzi G. Nyandoro
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(12): 2451.     CrossRef
  • Multimedia based education on bowel preparation improves adenoma detection rate: Systematic review & meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Saurabh Chandan, Sumant Arora, Babu P. Mohan, Shahab R. Khan, Ojasvini C. Chandan, Lena L. Kassab, Arvind R. Murali
    Digestive Endoscopy.2021; 33(5): 730.     CrossRef
  • Role of Bowel Preparation in Adenoma Detection Rate and Follow-up Recommendations in African American Dominant Patient Population
    Hamid-Reza Moein, Eskara Pervez, Salina Faidhalla, Heba Habbal, Hajra Khan, Anshu Wadehra, Mahvish Khalid, Diana Kakos, Paul Naylor, Bashar Mohamad
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation
    Gian E Tontini, Alberto Prada, Sandro Sferrazza, Giorgio Ciprandi, Maurizio Vecchi
    JGH Open.2021; 5(10): 1135.     CrossRef
  • When should we perform colonoscopy to increase the adenoma detection rate?
    Sang Hoon Kim, Jae Hak Kim
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 13(12): 619.     CrossRef
  • Quality of Preoperative Colonoscopy Affects Missed Postoperative Adenoma Detection in Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Jae Ho Park, Hee Seok Moon, In Sun Kwon, Ju Seok Kim, Sun Hyung Kang, Eaum Seok Lee, Seok Hyun Kim, Jae Kyu Sung, Byung Seok Lee, Hyun Yong Jeong
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2020; 65(7): 2063.     CrossRef
  • Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in 2020: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future
    Valentine Ongeri Millien, Nabil M. Mansour
    Current Gastroenterology Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of Sending Educational Video Clips via Smartphone Mobile Messenger on Bowel Preparation before Colonoscopy
    Sung Chan Jeon, Jae Hyun Kim, Sun Jung Kim, Hye Jung Kwon, Youn Jung Choi, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(1): 53.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of 1.2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparations
    Hiroyuki Tamaki, Teruyo Noda, Masahiro Morita, Akina Omura, Atsushi Kubo, Chikara Ogawa, Toshihiro Matsunaka, Mitsushige Shibatoge
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2019; 7(4): 452.     CrossRef
  • Microbiome and morbid obesity increase pathogenic stimulus diversity
    Björn L.D.M. Brücher, Ijaz S. Jamall, Obul R. Bandapalli
    4open.2019; 2: 10.     CrossRef
  • Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate
    Maryan Cavicchi, Gaëlle Tharsis, Pascal Burtin, Philippe Cattan, Franck Venezia, Gilles Tordjman, Agnès Gillet, Joëlle Samama, Karine Nahon-Uzan, David Karsenti
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2019; 64(12): 3579.     CrossRef
  • Impact of diet restriction on bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Seung-Joo Nam, Young Jin Kim, Bora Keum, Jae Min Lee, Seung Han Kim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Eun Sun Kim, Yeon Seok Seo, Yoon Tae Jeen, Hong Sik Lee, Hoon Jai Chun, Soon Ho Um, Chang Duck Kim
    Medicine.2018; 97(41): e12645.     CrossRef
  • Limitation and Value of Using the Adenoma Detection Rate for Colonoscopy Quality Assurance
    Jun Hur, Moo-Jun Baek
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(3): 81.     CrossRef
Case Reports
Urinary Bladder Injury During Colonoscopy Without Colon Perforation
Jung Wook Suh, Jun Won Min, Hwan Namgung, Dong-Guk Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(3):112-114.   Published online June 30, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.3.112
  • 8,109 View
  • 66 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

We report a case of urinary bladder perforation during colonoscopy. A 67-year-old female, who had undergone a transabdominal hysterectomy for uterine myomas 15 years ago, visited the emergency department with complaint of abdominal pain after a screening colonoscopy. Laparoscopic examination revealed severe adhesion between the sigmoid colon and the urinary bladder. The urinary bladder wall was weakened, and several perforation sites were found. The surgery was converted to a laparotomy. After a thorough examination, we performed primary repair for the perforation sites, followed by an omentopexy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Trauma to the solid abdominal organs: The missed dark box of colonoscopy
    Mohamed H Emara, Usama Mazid, Yasmine A Elshaer, Mahmoud A Elkerdawy, Dilaver Farooq Malik, Aya M Mahros
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 30(7): 624.     CrossRef
  • Mesenteric laceration of the sigmoid colon after colonoscopy: A rare complication
    Min Wu, Yonghua Lin, Zhichao Chen, Jianfeng Wei
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2023; 46(11): 5391.     CrossRef
  • Massive retroperitoneal hematoma following colonoscopy
    Reo Ohtsuka, Hodaka Amano, Kei Niida, Takeaki Yoshino, Michiyo Owari, Ryotaro Takano, Yuichi Akama, Yohei Watanabe, Toshiyasu Iwao
    Medicine.2018; 97(31): e11723.     CrossRef
Colonic Perforation Secondary to Idiopathic Intramural Hemorrhage
Takashi Sakamoto, Akira Saito, Alan Kawarai Lefor, Tadao Kubota
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(6):239-242.   Published online December 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.6.239
  • 5,031 View
  • 42 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Intramural colonic hemorrhage is rare and often secondary to trauma or anticoagulation therapy. Idiopathic intramural hemorrhages in the alimentary tract have rarely been reported. While several reports of spontaneous perforation of an intramural rectal hematoma have been published, no reports of spontaneous perforation in the ascending colon due to a hematoma have. We describe a patient with an ascending colonic perforation secondary to spontaneous intramural hemorrhage. The patient is a 35-year-old male, who presented with acute abdominal pain and no history of trauma. An abdominal computed tomography scan showed a high-density area around the ascending colon, and nonoperative management was instituted. On the eighth hospital day, the pain worsened, and abdominal computed tomography scan showed free air. An emergent right hemicolectomy was performed. Intramural hematoma and ischemia with perforation, with no obvious etiology, were found. The patient was discharged on the 14th postoperative day.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A case of gastrointestinal perforation following transarterial embolization for an intramural hematoma after cold snare polypectomy of an adenoma in the transverse colon
    Yuu Kodama, Yuji Mizokami, Yuzo Toyama, Hiroyasu Kusaka, Gen Maeda, Shingo Asahara, Ryuji Nagahama, Shin‐ichiro Horiguchi, Hiroki Aoyama
    DEN Open.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Giant Proximal Right Colon Submucosal Hematoma Leading to a Large Bowel Obstruction
    Arham Siddiqui, Hijab Ahmed, Muhammad H Nazim, Basem Soliman, Izi Obokhare
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Spontaneous colonic perforation in adults: Evaluation of a pooled case series
    Ren Chongxi, Ji Jinggang, Shi Yan, Wang Hongqiao, Liu Yan, Yang Fengshuo
    Science Progress.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Idiopathic intramural hematoma of the right colon. A case report and review of the literature
    Rosario Vecchio, Emma Cacciola, Michele Figuera, Renato Catalano, Giuseppe Giulla, Emanuele Rosario Distefano, Eva Intagliata
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2019; 60(C): 16.     CrossRef
  • Intramural Hematoma Causing Hematochezia After Colonoscopy With Polypectomy
    Aleksandar Gavrić, Rok Dežman, Sebastian Stefanović, Jan Drnovšek, Borut Štabuc
    ACG Case Reports Journal.2019; 6(7): e00129.     CrossRef
Pneumoretroperitoneum, Pneumomediastinum, Subcutaneous Emphysema After a Rectal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Hee Cheul Jung, Hyun Jin Kim, Sung Bok Ji, Jun Hyeong Cho, Ji Hye Kwak, Chang Min Lee, Wan Soo Kim, Jin Ju Kim, Jae Min Lee, Sang Su Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(6):234-238.   Published online December 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.6.234
  • 7,035 View
  • 73 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

An endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective and safe therapeutic technique for treating a patient with a laterally-spreading tumor (LST). Colonoscopic-procedure-related complications are noted to be about 2.8% worldwide, and a perforation is the most common. Most colon perforations cause pneumoperitoneum. However, a perforation within the retroperitoneal portion of the colon (rectum and some of sigmoid colon) may cause an extraperitoneal perforation, and the leaking free air may induce pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema, depending on the amount of discharged air. Herein, we present the case of a patient with an extraperitoneal colon microperforation which manifested as pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema after an EMR for a sigmoid LST, which was successfully treated with medical treatment and endoscopic clipping.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Asymptomatic sigmoid diverticulum perforation-induced subcutaneous, mediastinal, and retroperitoneal emphysema: A case report and literature review
    Daichi Setoguchi, Naoki Iwanaga, Kotaro Nema, Tomoya Hagiwara, Kotaro Hayashida, Koki Yamashita, Tatsuro Hirayama, Masataka Yoshida, Kazuaki Takeda, Shotaro Ide, Masato Tashiro, Takahiro Takazono, Masachika Kitajima, Noriho Sakamoto, Koichi Izumikawa, Kat
    Respiratory Medicine Case Reports.2025; 56: 102229.     CrossRef
  • Pneumoretroperitoneum mimicking rectal perforation, secondary to vaginal wall laceration following sexual intercourse in a 19-year-old woman in Korea: a case report
    Sung Pil Choo, Ki Eun Seon, Jae Cheol Jung, Kyeong Deok Kim, Moon Suk Choi
    Journal of Acute Care Surgery.2025; 15(2): 86.     CrossRef
  • The Close Relationship between Large Bowel and Heart: When a Colonic Perforation Mimics an Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Maria Francesca Secchi, Carlo Torre, Giovanni Dui, Francesco Virdis, Mauro Podda
    Case Reports in Surgery.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
  • Pneumoretroperitoneum, Pneumomediastinum, Pneumothorax, and Subcutaneous Emphysema after Diagnostic Colonoscopy
    Hee Sung Lee, Hwan Hee Park, Ju Seok Kim, Sun Hyung Kang, Hee Seok Moon, Jae Kyu Sung, Byung Seok Lee, Hyun Yong Jeong
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 70(3): 145.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality After Surgery for Intestinal Perforation
Rumi Shin, Sang Mok Lee, Beonghoon Sohn, Dong Woon Lee, Inho Song, Young Jun Chai, Hae Won Lee, Hye Seong Ahn, In Mok Jung, Jung Kee Chung, Seung Chul Heo
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(6):221-227.   Published online December 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.6.221
  • 16,015 View
  • 107 Download
  • 41 Web of Science
  • 42 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

An intestinal perforation is a rare condition, but has a high mortality rate, even after immediate surgical intervention. The clinical predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality are still not well established, so this study attempted to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality after surgery for an intestinal perforation.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 117 patients who underwent surgery for an intestinal perforation at a single institution in Korea from November 2008 to June 2014. Factors related with postoperative mortality at 1 month and other postoperative complications were investigated.

Results

The mean age of enrolled patients was 66.0 ± 15.8 years and 66% of the patients were male. Fifteen patients (13%) died within 1 month after surgical treatment. Univariate analysis indicated that patient-related factors associated with mortality were low systolic and diastolic blood pressure, low serum albumin, low serum protein, low total cholesterol, and high blood urea nitrogen; the surgery-related factor associated with mortality was feculent ascites. Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression indicated that low systolic blood pressure and feculent ascites independently increased the risk for mortality; postoperative complications were more likely in both females and those with low estimated glomerular filtration rates and elevated serum C-reactive protein levels.

Conclusion

Various factors were associated with postoperative clinical outcomes of patients with an intestinal perforation. Morbidity and mortality following an intestinal perforation were greater in patients with unstable initial vital signs, poor nutritional status, and feculent ascites.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Emergency physician ultrasound diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum in intraoperative patients with peritoneal insufflation
    Amy Sanghvi, Makoto Tanigawa, Michael Danta, Jeff Yang, Mohammad Hamshow, Errel Khordipour, Lawrence Haines, Leily Naraghi
    The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2025; 90: 120.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic determinants in surgical critial patients undergoing emergency surgery for Stage III or higher colorectal cancer
    Hyun Ho Kim, Sanguk Hwang, Jinbeom Cho
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advances in natural biomacromolecule-based Janus materials: preparation, applications and future prospects in food science
    Ying Xu, Xuan Tao, Liubin Li, Yao Chen, Rong He, Xingrong Ju, Zhigao Wang
    Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition.2025; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Instruction Video for Endosponge Construction
    JC Chen, Vijay Raj, Syed Husain
    Videoscopy.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Marine predator strikes rectally inserted eel fish causing colonic perforation: a rare case report and review of literature
    Akash Saha, Mohammad Mashiur Rahman, Abidur Rahman, Israt Jahan, Faisal Nasim Sunny, Md. Imran Ahmed, A. M. Zubayed Hassan
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2025; 87(12): 8909.     CrossRef
  • A sharp plant stem causing terminal ileal perforation with clinical presentation resembling acute appendicitis: a case report
    Pirada Yincharoen, Weeratian Tawanwongsri
    Frontiers in Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • In Situ 4D Printing of Polyelectrolyte/Magnetic Composites for Sutureless Gastric Perforation Sealing
    Yunsong Shi, Sihan Tang, Xi Yuan, Zhuofan Li, Shifeng Wen, Zhongwei Li, Bin Su, Chunze Yan, Lili Chen
    Advanced Materials.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Small Intestinal Perforation after 360-Degree Liposuction: A Case Report
    Jenna C. Bekeny, Samuel S. Huffman, Chris Thomas, Mariana Tumminello, Anna Kata, Rajiv Parikh, Laura K. Tom, Grant M. Kleiber
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.2024; 48(5): 946.     CrossRef
  • Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings
    Forrest Bohler, Allison Garden
    Journal of Osteopathic Medicine.2024; 124(1): 39.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence, Pattern, Mortality, and Morbidity of Traumatic Small Bowel Perforation at King Abdulaziz Medical City: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Fahad Aljehaiman, Faisal J Almalki, Abdulah Alhusain, Faris Alsalamah, Khaled Alzahrani, Abdulkareem Alharbi, Hani Alkhulaiwi
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Abdominal pain after a food crawl
    Danier Ong, Rajiv Yogendran, Emily Fite
    Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Case of abdominal whirl sign with small bowel obstruction and free gas successfully managed by conservative management instead of laparoscopic surgery
    Giuleta Jamsari, James Wei Tatt Toh
    Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery.2024; 7(3): 128.     CrossRef
  • Emergent Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Malignancy Is Associated with Higher Rates of Perioperative Complications but No Independent Impact on Short-Term Mortality
    Yahya Alwatari, Devon C. Freudenberger, Jad Khoraki, Lena Bless, Riley Payne, Walker A. Julliard, Rachit D. Shah, Carlos A. Puig
    Journal of Chest Surgery.2024; 57(2): 160.     CrossRef
  • Urea to Albumin Ratio Is an Excellent Predictor of Death in Patients With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
    Evgeni Dimitrov, Krasimira Halacheva, Georgi Minkov, Emil Enchev, Yovcho Yovtchev
    Surgical Infections.2024; 25(3): 225.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative Complications in Emergency Surgeries at a Referral Hospital in Eastern Venezuela
    Victor Castañeda-Marquez, Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Enrique Avila-Liendo, Gabriel Gonzalez-Quinde, Wilson Garcia-Cazorla, Georcimar Mendez-Meneses, Yoalkris E Salcedo, Tamara Rodriguez-Rugel, Jackner Antigua-Herrera, Miguel Rivas-Perez, Silvia Agudelo-Mendoz
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal tract perforation after radiofrequency ablation for hepatic tumor: Incidence and risk factors
    Kyowon Gu, Tae Wook Kang, Seungchul Han, Dong Ik Cha, Kyoung Doo Song, Min Woo Lee, Hyunchul Rhim, Go Eun Park
    European Journal of Radiology.2024; 177: 111560.     CrossRef
  • Revisiting Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth-POSSUM (P-POSSUM) Scores: Are They Valid in Cases of Ileal Perforation?
    Saikrishna Eswaravaka, Chirantan Suhrid, Bhavya Rao, Sundaresh Prabhakar, Jayashri Pandya
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A giant trichobezoar in a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A case report
    M. Forooghi, R. Shahrokhi, Sh. Yousufzai
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 123: 110283.     CrossRef
  • Factors related to cardiac rupture after acute myocardial infarction
    Xue Gao, Ying Guo, Xiaoting Zhu, Chunlei Du, Beibei Ma, Yinghua Cui, Shuai Wang
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Investigating the association between osteopenia and bowel perforation through a multicenter radiologic analysis
    Sebastian Sanduleanu, Koray Ersahin, Jonathan Kottlors, Johannes Bremm, Narmin Talibova, Tim Damer, Merve Erdogan, Nils Groβe Hokamp, Lukas Goertz, Nijat Nasirov, Vilayat Valiyev, Christiane Bruns, David Maintz, Nuran Abdullayev
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Case report: Migratory biliary stent resulting in sigmoid colon perforation
    Jasmine B Beloy, Nicholas P Lund, Annika M Van Hell, Shyam Allamaneni
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors in patients with gastrointestinal perforation under the acute care surgery model : a retrospective cohort study
    Kiyoung Sung, Sanguk Hwang, Jaeheon Lee, Jinbeom Cho
    BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with bowel perforation after immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure
    Antonio Pizuorno Machado, Malek Shatila, Cynthia Liu, Yang Lu, Mehmet Altan, Isabella C. Glitza Oliva, Dan Zhao, Hao Chi Zhang, Anusha Thomas, Yinghong Wang
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(9): 5989.     CrossRef
  • Abdominal emergency surgery in patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective single-center analysis
    Philipp H. von Kroge, Anna Duprée, Oliver Mann, Jakob R. Izbicki, Jonas Wagner, Paymon Ahmadi, Sören Weidemann, Raissa Adjallé, Nicolaus Kröger, Carsten Bokemeyer, Walter Fiedler, Franziska Modemann, Susanne Ghandili
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Acute Spontaneous Colonic Perforation in a Case of Newly Confirmed Scleroderma: Case Report
    Glenn Goodwin, Christian Ryckeley, Davide Fox, Michael Ashley, Laurence Dubensky, Mauricio Danckers, Todd Slesinger
    Interactive Journal of Medical Research.2023; 12: e43295.     CrossRef
  • Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with emergency left colonic surgery
    Dauda Bawa, Yasser Mohammad Khalifa, Saleem Khan, Waddah Norah, Nibras Noman
    Annals of Saudi Medicine.2023; 43(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • Fatal Case of Perforated Cytomegalovirus Colitis: Case Report and Systematic Review
    Andrea T. Fisher, Kovi E. Bessoff, Veronica Nicholas, James Badger, Lisa Knowlton, Joseph D. Forrester
    Surgical Infections.2022; 23(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • An adhesive and resilient hydrogel for the sealing and treatment of gastric perforation
    Jing Chen, Julia S. Caserto, Ida Ang, Kaavian Shariati, James Webb, Bo Wang, Xi Wang, Nikolaos Bouklas, Minglin Ma
    Bioactive Materials.2022; 14: 52.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of mortality in patients with acute small-bowel perforation transferred to ICU after emergency surgery: a single-centre retrospective cohort study
    Jianzhang Wu, Ping Shu, Hongyong He, Haojie Li, Zhaoqing Tang, Yihong Sun, Fenglin Liu
    Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Delayed ileal perforation following lollipop-stick ingestion in a two year old
    Tareq Swedan, Mohamed Morjan, Mulham Jarjanazi, Nafiza Martini, Alaa Aldin Ismail, Hebatullah Awad, Shamseh Benbash
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports.2022; 81: 102276.     CrossRef
  • The Clinical Significance of Shock Index and GFR in the Differential Diagnosis of Perforated Appendicitis
    Ferhat ÇAY, Ali DURAN
    Journal of Contemporary Medicine.2022; 12(4): 504.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Delayed Surgical Care on Patient Outcomes With Alimentary Tract Perforation: Insight From a Low-Middle Income Country
    Muhammad H Zafar, Taha A Zaka Ur Rehman, Muhammad Sohaib Khan, Shayan Ahmed, Amir Shariff
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gangrene of the Colon Ascendens, Colon Transversum, and Lienal Flexure in a Massive Strangulated Umbilical Hernia
    Stanko Baco, Milos Mitric
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Facility of Origin Predicts Mortality After Colonic Perforation
    Samuel D. Butensky, Emma Gazzara, Gainosuke Sugiyama, Gene F. Coppa, Antonio Alfonso, Paul J. Chung
    The American Surgeon™.2021; 87(8): 1327.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Malnutrition Assessed by Comprehensive Nutritional Screening Tool on In-Hospital Mortality after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Perforation
    Seung-Young Oh, Hannah Lee, Ho Geol Ryu, Hyuk-Joon Lee
    Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition.2021; 12(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning-based Model for Predicting Postoperative Complications among Patients with Colonic Perforation: A Retrospective study
    Hiroka Hosaka, Masashi Takeuchi, Tomohiro Imoto, Haruka Yagishita, Ayaka Yu, Yusuke Maeda, Yosuke Kobayashi, Yoshie Kadota, Masanori Odaira, Fumiki Toriumi, Takashi Endo, Hirohisa Harada
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2021; 5(3): 274.     CrossRef
  • Bevacizumab and gastrointestinal perforations: a review from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database
    Thomas A. Wichelmann, Sufyan Abdulmujeeb, Eli D. Ehrenpreis
    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2021; 54(10): 1290.     CrossRef
  • A Rare Presentation of Gastric Carcinoma With Gastric Perforation and Septic Shock
    Reem Moala AlHazmi, Dunya Nasrallah Alfaraj, Shaykhah Nasser AlNaimi, Sarah Mohammed AlQahtani, Mashael Hamed AlJuwayed, Hazem Mohammed Zakriea, Mohammed S Foula
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • C-Reactive Protein as a Marker of Postoperative Complication of Emergency Colorectal Surgery
    Luis R. M. Nadal, Artur M. A. da Silva, Larissa Johann, Shuaib H. El Boustani, Maria Beatriz A. S. Medrado, Jose F. M. Farah, Renato A. Lupinacci
    Journal of Coloproctology.2021; 41(04): 375.     CrossRef
  • Modified frailty index and hypoalbuminemia as predictors of adverse outcomes in older adults presenting to acute general surgical unit
    Angela Abraham, Sally Burrows, Neelankal John Abraham, Bhaskar Mandal
    Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología.2020; 55(2): 70.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors and Management for Left Colonic Perforation: Can Hartmann’s Procedure Be Preventable?
    Yilseok Joo, Yujin Lee, Taeyoung Yoo, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(3): 178.     CrossRef
  • Intestinal Perforation: A Surgeon's Nightmare Enlightened by Scientific Research
    Byung Soh Min
    Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(6): 205.     CrossRef
The Outcomes of Management for Colonoscopic Perforation: A 12-Year Experience at a Single Institute
Jung Yun Park, Pyong Wha Choi, Sung Min Jung, Nam-Hoon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(5):175-183.   Published online October 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.5.175
  • 8,172 View
  • 87 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 15 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Optimal management of colonoscopic perforation (CP) is controversial because early diagnosis and prompt management play critical roles in morbidity and mortality. Herein, we evaluate the outcomes and clinical characteristics of patients with CP according to treatment modality to help establish guidelines for managing CP.

Methods

Our retrospective analysis included 40 CP patients from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2014. Patients with CP were categorized into 2 groups according to therapeutic modality: operation (surgery) and nonoperation (endo-luminal clip application or conservative treatment) groups.

Results

The postoperative morbidity rate was 40%, and no mortalities were noted. The incidence of abdominal pain and tenderness in patients who received only conservative management was significantly lower than in those who underwent surgery (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively). Patients tended to undergo surgery more often for diagnosis times longer than 24 hours and for diagnostic CPs. The mean hospital stays for the operation and nonoperation groups were 14.6 ± 7.77 and 5.9 ± 1.62 days, respectively (P < 0.001). Compared to the operation group, the nonoperation group began intake of liquid diets significantly earlier after perforation (3.8 ± 1.32 days vs. 5.6 ± 1.25 days, P < 0.001) and used antibiotics for a shorter duration (4.7 ± 1.29 days vs. 8.7 ± 2.23 days, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The time of diagnosis and the injury mechanism may be useful indications for conservative management. Nonoperative management, such as endo-luminal clip application, might be beneficial, when feasible, for the treatment of patients with CP.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk Factors for Perforation in Endoscopic Treatment for Early Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide ENTER-K Study
    Ik Hyun Jo, Hyun Gun Kim, Young-Seok Cho, Hyun Jung Lee, Eun Ran Kim, Yoo Jin Lee, Sung Wook Hwang, Kyeong-Ok Kim, Jun Lee, Hyuk Soon Choi, Yunho Jung, Chang Mo Moon
    Gut and Liver.2025; 19(1): 95.     CrossRef
  • Cold Versus Hot Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for ≥15 mm Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps
    Sneh Sonaiya, Dushyant S. Dahiya, Raj Patel, Shahryar Khan, Charmy Parikh, Karan Yagnik, Chun-Han Lo, Kyaw Min Tun, Pranav D. Patel, Bradley Confer, Harshit S. Khara, Sumant Inamdar, Babu P. Mohan
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Luminal electrophysiological neuroprofiling system for gastrointestinal neuromuscular diseases
    Shriya S. Srinivasan, Sabrina Liu, Ryo Hotta, Sukhada Bhave, Amro Alshareef, Binbin Ying, George Selsing, Johannes Kuosmanen, Keiko Ishida, Joshua Jenkins, Wiam Abdalla Mohammed Madani, Alison Hayward, Niora Fabian, Allan M. Goldstein, Giovanni Traverso
    Device.2024; 2(7): 100400.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colonoscopic perforation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu Zhong, Chuanyuan Liu, Chuanfa Fang, Lei Zhang, Xianping He, Weiquan Zhu, Xueyun Guan
    Medicine.2023; 102(24): e34057.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the Characteristics of Colonoscopy Perforation and Risk Factors for Failure of Endoscopic Treatment
    Zhi Jiehua, Ali Kashif , Che YaoSheng , Sun YunYun , Liang Lanyu
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Iatrogenic colon perforation during colonoscopy, diagnosis/treatment, and follow-up processes: A single-center experience
    Nihat Gülaydın, Raim İliaz, Atakan Özkan, A Hande Gökçe, Hanifi Önalan, Berrin Önalan, Aziz Arı
    Turkish Journal of Surgery.2022; 38(3): 221.     CrossRef
  • The analysis of outcomes of surgical management for colonoscopic perforations: A 16-years experiences at a single institution
    Dae Ro Lim, Jung Kul Kuk, Taehyung Kim, Eung Jin Shin
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2020; 43(5): 577.     CrossRef
  • Multicenter retrospective evaluation of ileocecocolic perforations associated with diagnostic lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in dogs and cats
    Vanessa L. Woolhead, Jacqueline C. Whittemore, Sarah A. Stewart
    Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2020; 34(2): 684.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Characteristics of Colonoscopic Perforation and Risk Factors for Complications After Surgical Treatment
    Liang Li, Bing Xue, Chunxia Yang, Zhongbo Han, Hongqiang Xie, Meng Wang
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2020; 30(11): 1153.     CrossRef
  • ESTUDO RETROSPECTIVO DA PREVALÊNCIA DE PERFURAÇÕES GASTROINTESTINAIS EM PACIENTES SUBMETIDOS A COLONOSCOPIAS NO HOSPITAL REGIONAL HANS DIETER SCHMIDT
    Viviane Helena Raimundo, Paula Fernanda Partika, Haroldo Luiz Jordelino da Luz, Eduardo Manoel Pereira
    Arquivos Catarinenses de Medicina.2020; 49(2): 14.     CrossRef
  • Adverse events related to colonoscopy: Global trends and future challenges
    Su Young Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Hong Jun Park
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 25(2): 190.     CrossRef
  • Iatrogenic Colonic Perforations: Changing the Paradigm
    Jose Luis Ulla-Rocha, Angel Salgado, Raquel Sardina, Raquel Souto, Raquel Sanchez-Santos, Juan Turnes
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2019; 29(3): 173.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Management of Colonoscopy-related Perforation
    Nam Seok Ham, Jung Ho Bae, Dong-Hoon Yang
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 73(6): 327.     CrossRef
  • Management Outcomes of Colonoscopic Perforations Are Affected by the General Condition of the Patients
    Jae Ho Park, Kyung Jong Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • 2017 WSES guidelines for the management of iatrogenic colonoscopy perforation
    Nicola de’Angelis, Salomone Di Saverio, Osvaldo Chiara, Massimo Sartelli, Aleix Martínez-Pérez, Franca Patrizi, Dieter G. Weber, Luca Ansaloni, Walter Biffl, Offir Ben-Ishay, Miklosh Bala, Francesco Brunetti, Federica Gaiani, Solafah Abdalla, Aurelien Ami
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
Long-term Outcomes and Risk Factors for Reoperation After Surgical Treatment for Gastrointestinal Crohn Disease According to Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor-α Antibody Use: 35 Years of Experience at a Single Institute in Korea
Sang Mok Lee, Eon Chul Han, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Heung-Kwon Oh, Eun Kyung Choe, Sang Hui Moon, Joo Sung Kim, Hyun Chae Jung, Kyu Joo Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(4):144-152.   Published online August 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.4.144
  • 6,648 View
  • 53 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Crohn disease is characterized by high rates of recurrence and reoperations. However, few studies have investigated long-term surgical outcomes in Asian populations. We investigated risk factors for reoperation, particularly those associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) antibody use, and long-term follow-up results.

Methods

We reviewed the records of 148 patients (100 males and 48 females) who underwent surgery for gastrointestinal Crohn disease and retrospectively analyzed long-term outcomes and risk factors.

Results

The mean age at diagnosis was 28.8 years. Thirty-eight patients (25.7%) received monoclonal antibody treatment before reoperation. A small bowel and colon resection was most commonly performed (83 patients, 56.1%). The median follow-up was 149 months, during which 47 patients underwent reoperation. The median interval between the primary and the secondary surgeries was 65 months, with accumulated reoperation rates of 16.5%, 31.8%, and 57.2% after 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Obstruction was the most common indication for reoperation (37 patients, 25.0%). In a multivariable analysis, age <17 years at diagnosis (A1) (odds ratio [OR], 2.20; P = 0.023), penetrating behavior (B3) (OR, 4.39; P < 0.001), and no azathioprine use (OR, 2.87; P = 0.003) were associated with reoperation. Anti-TNF-α antibody use did not affect the reoperation rate (P = 0.767).

Conclusion

We showed a high reoperation rate regardless of treatment with anti-TNF-α antibody, which indicates that recurrent surgery is still needed to cure patients with gastrointestinal Crohn diseases. Younger age at primary operation, penetrating behavior, and no azathioprine use were significant factors associated with reoperation for gastrointestinal Crohn disease.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease Reoperation Rate Has Decreased Over Time If Corrected by Prevalence
    Mafalda Santiago, Fernando Magro, Luís Correia, Francisco Portela, Paula Ministro, Paula Lago, Eunice Trindade, Cláudia Camila Dias
    Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology.2020; 11(9): e00227.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Thiopurine on Potential Surgical Intervention in Crohn’s Disease in Korea: Results from the CONNECT Study
    Hee Man Kim, Jin Woo Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Joo Sung Kim, You Sun Kim, Jae Hee Cheon, Won Ho Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Won Moon, Sung Hee Jung, Young-Ho Kim, Dong Soo Han
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 10(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for postoperative surgical site infections in patients with Crohn’s disease receiving definitive bowel resection
    Song Liu, Ji Miao, Gefei Wang, Meng Wang, Xiuwen Wu, Kun Guo, Min Feng, Wenxian Guan, Jianan Ren
    Scientific Reports.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advanced age impacts surgical characteristics and postoperative course in patients with Crohn's disease
    Stanislaus Argeny, Anton Stift, Martina Mittlböck, Amy C. Lord, Svenja Maschke, Mathias Schneeweiß, Stefan Riss
    International Journal of Surgery.2016; 33: 182.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Tripterygium Wilfordii Polyglycoside on Experimental Prostatitis Caused by Ureaplasma Urealyticum in Rats
    Pingnan Shan, Zhiyong Lu, Lihong Ye, Yaqin Fang, Suhong Tan, Guohong Xuan, Jincheng Ru, Liming Mao
    Medical Science Monitor.2016; 22: 3722.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopy-based management decreases the risk of postoperative recurrences in Crohn’s disease
    Anne-Laure Boucher, Bruno Pereira, Stéphanie Decousus, Marion Goutte, Felix Goutorbe, Anne Dubois, Johan Gagniere, Corinne Borderon, Juliette Joubert, Denis Pezet, Michel Dapoigny, Pierre J Déchelotte, Gilles Bommelaer, Anthony Buisson
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(21): 5068.     CrossRef
  • Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy for Crohn Disease: Friend or Foe to the Surgeon?
    Hungdai Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(4): 121.     CrossRef
Colovesical Fistula: Should It Be Considered a Single Disease?
Qamar Hafeez Kiani, Mark L. George, Emin A. Carapeti, Alexis M. P. Schizas, Andrew B. Williams
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(2):57-62.   Published online April 30, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.2.57
  • 8,985 View
  • 55 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 19 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This research was conducted to compare the management and the outcome of patients with colovesical fistulae of different aetiologies.

Methods

Retrospective data were collected from 2002 to 2012 and analyzed with SPSS ver. 17. Age, gender, aetiology, management, hospital stay, postoperative complications, and mortality were studied and compared among colovesical fistulae of different aetiologies.

Results

A total of 55 patients, 46 males (84%) and 9 females (16%), with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 48-75 years) were studied. Diverticular disease was the most common benign cause and recto-sigmoid cancer the most common malignancy. Anterior resection and bladder repair were the most frequent operations in benign cases, as was total pelvic exenteration in the malignant group. Multiple intestinal loop involvement and subsequent resection were significantly higher in those with Crohn disease than it was in patients of colovesical fistula due to all other causes collectively (60% vs. 6%, P = 0.006). Patients with malignancy had a higher postoperative complication rate than patients who did not (12 [80%] vs. 7 [32%], P = 0.0005). Pelvic collection (11, 22%) was the most frequent early complication (predominantly in the malignant group) whereas incisional hernia (8, 22%) was the most common late complication, with a predominance in the benign group. The median hospital stay was significantly prolonged in the malignant group (32 days; IQR, 17-70 days vs. 16 days; IQR, 11-25 days; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Despite their having similar clinical presentation, colovesical fistulae of various aetiologies differ significantly in management and outcome.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laparoscopic management of colovesical fistula in different clinical scenarios
    Davide Campobasso, Maurizio Zizzo, Federico Biolchini, Carolina Castro-Ruiz, Antonio Frattini, Alessandro Giunta
    Journal of Minimal Access Surgery.2024; 20(2): 175.     CrossRef
  • Successful management of malignant colovesical fistula using covered colonic self-expanding metallic stent: a case report
    Goro Takahashi, Akihisa Matsuda, Takeshi Yamada, Kay Uehara, Seiichi Shinji, Yasuyuki Yokoyama, Takuma Iwai, Kohki Takeda, Sho Kuriyama, Toshimitsu Miyasaka, Shintaro Kanaka, Tai Terayachi, Tetsuya Okino, Hiroshi Yoshida
    Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Emphysematous cystitis as a potential marker of severe Crohn's disease
    S. M. Mahmudul Hasan, Baljinder S. Salh
    BMC Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Management of colovesical fistula: a systematic review
    Maurizio ZIZZO, David TUMIATI, Maria C. BASSI, Magda ZANELLI, Francesca SANGUEDOLCE, Francesco PORPIGLIA, Cristian FIORI, Davide CAMPOBASSO, Carolina CASTRO RUIZ, Franco A. BERGAMASCHI, Umberto V. MAESTRONI, Giuseppe CARRIERI, Luigi CORMIO, Federico BIOLC
    Minerva Urology and Nephrology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Burden of Colovesical Fistula and Changing Treatment Pathways: A Systematic Literature Review
    Caterina Froiio, Daniele Bernardi, Emanuele Asti, Giulia Bonavina, Andrea Conti, Luca Carmignani, Luigi Bonavina
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2022; 32(5): 577.     CrossRef
  • Colovesical Fistulae: The Varying Aetiologies
    Mansoor Zafar, Sara Lee, Serena Tieger, William Sacre, Mark Whitehead
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Urinary bladder fistulae and the role of CT cystography: a pictorial review
    Daniel F. Fouladi, Shahab Shayesteh, Elliot K. Fishman, Linda C. Chu
    Abdominal Radiology.2020; 45(6): 1883.     CrossRef
  • Fístula colovesical: aplicabilidad del abordaje laparoscópico y resultados según su etiología
    Noa de la Fuente Hernández, Carmen Martínez Sánchez, Mireia Solans Solerdelcoll, Pilar Hernández Casanovas, Jesús Bollo Rodríguez, Josep María Gaya Sopena, Eduard Targarona Soler
    Cirugía Española.2020; 98(6): 336.     CrossRef
  • Colovesical Fistula: Applicability of the Laparoscopic Approach and Results According to Etiology
    Noa de la Fuente Hernández, Carmen Martínez Sánchez, Mireia Solans Solerdelcoll, Pilar Hernández Casanovas, Jesús Bollo Rodríguez, Josep María Gaya Sopena, Eduard Targarona Soler
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2020; 98(6): 336.     CrossRef
  • Manejo laparoscópico de fístulas colovesicales de origen benigno, resultados y revisión de la literatura
    José Nicolás García Martin del Campo, José Luis Serna Soto, Carolina León Mancilla, Rogelio Romero Pérez, Jorge Alberto Cancino, Betsabé López Vázquez, Julio César Sotelo Estévez
    Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica.2020; 21(3): 149.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative Management of Patients with Colovesical Fistula
    Scott C. Dolejs, Alyssa J. Penning, Michael J. Guzman, Alyssa D. Fajardo, Bryan K. Holcomb, Bruce W. Robb, Joshua A. Waters
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2019; 23(9): 1867.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic approaches to complicated diverticulitis
    M. Gachabayov, R. Essani, R. Bergamaschi
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2018; 403(1): 11.     CrossRef
  • A colovesical fistula with a persistent descending mesocolon due to partial situs inversus: A case report
    Tetsuya Mochizuki, Hirofumi Tazawa, Yuzo Hirata, Yoshio Kuga, Tomohiro Miwata, Sotaro Fukuhara, Kouki Imaoka, Seiji Fujisaki, Mamoru Takahashi, Saburo Fukuda, Toshihiro Nishida, Hideto Sakimoto
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2017; 37: 109.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Treatments for Vesico-Enteric Fistulas: a 2017 Current Review
    Justin W. Fincher, Ehab Eltahawy
    Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports.2017; 12(3): 212.     CrossRef
  • Incidental adenocarcinoma in patients undergoing surgery for stricturing Crohn's disease
    Ivan Kristo, Stefan Riss, Stanislaus Argeny, Svenja Maschke, Praminthra Chitsabesan, Anton Stift
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 23(3): 472.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors associated with postoperative morbidity in over 500 colovesical fistula patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a retrospective cohort study from ACS-NSQIP database
    H. Hande Aydinli, Cigdem Benlice, Gokhan Ozuner, Emre Gorgun, Maher A. Abbas
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2017; 32(4): 469.     CrossRef
  • Different Strategies for Treating a Colovesical Fistula
    Moo Jun Baek
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(2): 45.     CrossRef
  • Is laparoscopic surgery the best treatment in fistulas complicating diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon? A systematic review
    Roberto Cirocchi, Alberto Arezzo, Claudio Renzi, Giovanni Cochetti, Vito D'Andrea, Abe Fingerhut, Ettore Mearini, Gian Andrea Binda
    International Journal of Surgery.2015; 24: 95.     CrossRef
  • Colovesical fistula caused by glucocorticoid therapy for IgG4-related intrapelvic mass
    Yohei Yabuuchi
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2015; 3(12): 1000.     CrossRef
Case Reports
Acute Hyponatremia With Seizure and Mental Change After Oral Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate Bowel Preparation
Young Sun Cho, Kyung Min Nam, Jang Ho Park, Sang Hwan Byun, Jin Suck Ryu, Hyun Ju Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(6):290-293.   Published online December 31, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.6.290
  • 7,728 View
  • 67 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (Picolight Powder), which is used as a bowel preparation for the colon and the rectum, can cause a severe electrolyte imbalance like hyponatremia. When hyponatremia gets severe or occurs rapidly, it can lead to death due to associated complications. We have experienced a case of hyponatremia associated with seizure and loss of consciousness in a 76-year-old woman, who took sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy. She was taking thiazide and synthroid for the treatment of hypertension and hypothyroidism, respectively, and she had other underlying medical conditions such as a history of seizure and dementia. Following the diagnosis of hyponatremia, we used an intravenous injection of 3% NaCl to normalize the sodium level in her serum, and her associated symptoms soon disappeared.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Using the Cardiac–Electrophysiological Balance Index to Predict Arrhythmia Risk After Colonoscopy
    Seyit Ali Volkan Polatkan, Seyda Gunay-Polatkan, Ozgen Isik, Deniz Sigirli
    Medicina.2024; 61(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Hyponatremia‐induced generalized seizure after taking polyethylene glycol for colon preparation—A case report and brief review of the literature
    Shiva Seyrafian, Vahid Sebghatollahi, Bahar Bastani
    Clinical Case Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hyponatremic Seizure after Ingestion of an Oral Sulfate Tablet for Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
    Sung Hyun Hong, Dong Seok Lee, Ji Won Kim, Kook Lae Lee, Hyoun Woo Kang, Su Hwan Kim
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(3): 154.     CrossRef
  • Seizure from water intoxication following bowel preparation: a case report
    Ting-Hsuan Chiang, Jui-Hsiang Tan, Chun-Chao Chang, Kuan-Chieh Fang
    BMC Nephrology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Severe symptomatic hyponatraemia secondary to bowel preparation
    Krishan Pratap, Manasi Jiwrajka, Liam Weber, Alan Richardson
    BMJ Case Reports.2019; 12(10): e230385.     CrossRef
  • Preparation for colonoscopy: Recommendations by an expert panel in Italy
    Cristiano Spada, Renato Cannizzaro, Maria Antonietta Bianco, Rita Conigliaro, Emilio Di Giulio, Cesare Hassan, Riccardo Marmo, Pietro Occhipinti, Franco Radaelli, Alessandro Repici, Enrico Ricci, Guido Costamagna
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2018; 50(11): 1124.     CrossRef
  • Severe hyponatremia secondary to preparation for colonoscopy with sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate
    Olatz Azcune Echeverria
    Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • “Bowel prep hyponatremia“ – a state of acute water intoxication facilitated by low dietary solute intake: case report and literature review
    Martin Windpessl, Christoph Schwarz, Manfred Wallner
    BMC Nephrology.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Severe Hyponatremia with Mental Change after Ingestion of Picosulfate Sodium/Magnesium Citrate for Bowel Preparation
    Woojung Kim, Sang Young Park, Mi Jeoung Kim, Hyang Mo Koo
    The Korean Journal of Medicine.2016; 91(2): 206.     CrossRef
  • Upper airway obstruction resulting from acute mucosal injury induced by direct ingestion of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate powder
    Gyeong Bo Kim, Sung Yeon Hwang, Tae Gun Shin, Tae Rim Lee, Won Chul Cha, Min Seob Sim, Ik Joon Jo, Keun Jeong Song, Joong Eui Rhee, Yeon Kwon Jeong
    Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine.2016; 3(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Combination could be another tool for bowel preparation?
    Jae Seung Soh, Kyung-Jo Kim
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(10): 2915.     CrossRef
  • A randomized trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate solution vs. 4 L polyethylene glycol solution as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Miguel Muñoz-Navas, José Luis Calleja, Guillermo Payeras, Antonio José Hervás, Luis Esteban Abreu, Víctor Orive, Pedro L. Menchén, José María Bordas, José Ramón Armengol, Cristina Carretero, Vicente Pons Beltrán, Inmaculada Alonso-Abreu, Román Manteca, Ad
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2015; 30(10): 1407.     CrossRef
  • Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate/ hydrochlorothiazide

    Reactions Weekly.2015; 1549(1): 223.     CrossRef
Proper Management for Morbid Iatrogenic Retroperitoneal Barium Insufflation
Jalal Vahedian-Ardakani, Shahram Nazerani, Amir Saraee, Ali Sarmast, Ehsan Saraee, Mohammad Reza Keramati
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(6):285-289.   Published online December 31, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.6.285
  • 6,092 View
  • 42 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

A barium enema is a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure commonly used for colon and rectum problems. Rectal perforation with extensive intra- and/or extraperitoneal spillage of barium is a devastating complication of a barium enema that leads to a significant increase in patient mortality. Due to the low number of reported cases in recent scientific literature and the lack of experience with the management of these cases, we would like to present our treatment approach to a rare case of retroperitoneal contamination with barium, followed by its intraperitoneal involvement during a diagnostic barium enema. Our experience with long-term management of the patient and the good outcome will be depicted in this paper.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Barium granuloma formation following barium peritonitis: A case report
    Baiquan Zhou, Lin Liu, Yufan Tang, Ruifang Fan
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Perforation of barium sulfate enterography in an infant: A case report
    Yixing Lu, Lixian Mo, Junhong Chen, Wei Peng
    Medicine.2024; 103(17): e37926.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Sigmoid Colon Perforation Caused by Barium that was Treated by Laparoscopic Surgery
    Shoichiro HARA, Junichi HAMADA, Kenichi TAKEMOTO, Kei NAITO, Toshiya OCHIAI, Eigo OTSUJI
    Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association).2024; 85(4): 546.     CrossRef
  • Barium sulfate

    Reactions Weekly.2015; 1549(1): 45.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Comparative Study of Postoperative Complications in Patients With and Without an Obstruction Who Had Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer and Underwent a Single-Stage Operation After Mechanical Bowel Preparation
Sang Hun Jung, Jae Hwang Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(6):251-258.   Published online December 31, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.6.251
  • 5,330 View
  • 47 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative complications for single-stage surgery after mechanical bowel preparation in patients who experienced obstruction and those who did not.

Methods

From 2000 to 2011, 1,224 patients underwent a single-stage operation for left colorectal cancer after bowel preparation. Nonobstruction (NOB) and obstruction (OB) colorectal cancer patients were 1,053 (86.0%) and 171 (14.0%), respectively. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were compared between groups.

Results

The OB group had poor preoperative conditions (age, white blood cell, hemoglobin, albumin level, and advanced tumor stage) compared with the NOB group (P < 0.05). Mean on-table lavage time for the OB group was 17.5 minutes (range, 14-60 minutes). Mean operation time for the OB group was statistically longer than that of the NOB group (OB: 210 minutes; range, 120-480 minutes vs. NOB: 180 minutes; range, 60-420 minutes; P < 0.001). Overall morbidity was similar between groups (NOB: 19.7% vs. OB: 23.4%, P = 0.259). Major morbidity was more common in the OB group than in the NOB group, but the difference was without significance (OB: 11.7% vs. NOB: 7.6%, P = 0.070). Postoperative death occurred in 16 patients (1.3%), and death in the OB group (n = 7) was significantly higher than it was in the NOB group (n = 9) (4.1% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.001). Twelve patients had surgical complications, which were the leading cause of postoperative death: postoperative bleeding in five patients and leakage in seven patients.

Conclusion

Postoperative morbidity for a single-stage operation for obstructive left colorectal cancer is comparable to that for NOB, regardless of poor conditions of the patient.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Associated factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality following surgery of obstructive colon tumors
    Mseddi Mohamed Ali, Siala Rakia, Yakoubi Chaima, Hsairi Mariem, Hssin Hajer, Krifa Nesrine, Trifa Fatma, Boubaker Radhia, Sallemi Karim, Khemakhem Emna, Mghirbi Abdelwaheb, Bhira Amal, Yosra Yahia, Mestiri Souhir, Guizeni Rami, Ghariani Brahim, Sassi Kari
    F1000Research.2025; 14: 875.     CrossRef
  • Clinical characteristics and risk factors of post-operative intestinal flora disorder following laparoscopic colonic surgery: A propensity-score-matching analysis
    Gan-Bin Li, Chen-Tong Wang, Xiao Zhang, Xiao-Yuan Qiu, Wei-Jie Chen, Jun-Yang Lu, Lai Xu, Bin Wu, Yi Xiao, Guo-Le Lin
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(5): 1259.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic versus open surgery for obese patients with rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Hiroyuki Matsuzaki, Soichiro Ishihara, Kazushige Kawai, Koji Murono, Kensuke Otani, Koji Yasuda, Takeshi Nishikawa, Toshiaki Tanaka, Tomomichi Kiyomatsu, Keisuke Hata, Hiroaki Nozawa, Hironori Yamaguchi, Toshiaki Watanabe
    Surgery Today.2017; 47(5): 627.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Obstructed Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Young Jin Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(6): 245.     CrossRef
Prompt Management Is Most Important for Colonic Perforation After Colonoscopy
Hyun-Ho Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyung-Jin Kim, Hyeon-Min Cho
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(5):228-231.   Published online October 28, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.5.228
  • 10,881 View
  • 93 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 16 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The incidence of complications after colonoscopy is very low. The complications after colonoscopy that are of clinical concern are bleeding and perforation. The present study was conducted to determine the clinical outcomes and the risk factors of a colostomy or a colectomy after colonoscopic colon perforation.

Methods

From March 2009 to December 2012, the records of all patients who were treated for colorectal perforation after colonoscopy were reviewed retrospectively. The following parameters were evaluated: age, sex, purpose of colonoscopy, management of the colonic perforation, and interval from colonoscopy to the diagnosis of a colonic perforation. A retrospective analysis was performed to determine the risk factors associated with major surgery for the treatment of a colon perforation after colonoscopy.

Results

A total 27 patients were included in the present study. The mean age was 62 years, and 16 were males. The purpose of colonoscopy was diagnostic in 18 patients. The most common perforation site was the sigmoid colon. Colonic perforation was diagnosed during colonoscopy in 14 patients, just after colonoscopy in 5 patients, and 24 hours or more after colonoscopy in 8 patients. For the treatment of colonic perforation, endoscopic clipping was performed in 3 patients, primary closure in 15 patients, colon resection in 2 patients, Hartmann's procedures in 4 patients, and diverting colostomy in 3 patients. If the diagnosis of perforation after colonoscopy was delayed for more than 24 hours, the need for major treatment was increased significantly.

Conclusion

Although a colonic perforation after colonoscopy is rare, if the morbidity and the mortality associated with the colonic perforation are to be reduced, prompt diagnosis and management are very important.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Iatrogenic colon perforation: endoscopic management or surgery
    Seung Bum Lee
    Clinical Endoscopy.2026; 59(1): 33.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes and risk factors of post-polypectomy microperforation in patients with colorectal neoplasia: a case-control study
    Seung Yong Shin, Min Soo Cho, Jinhoon Nam, Jie-Hyun Kim, Young Hoon Yoon, Hyojin Park, Jeonghyun Kang, Jae Jun Park
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Iatrogenic colon perforation during colonoscopy, diagnosis/treatment, and follow-up processes: A single-center experience
    Nihat Gülaydın, Raim İliaz, Atakan Özkan, A Hande Gökçe, Hanifi Önalan, Berrin Önalan, Aziz Arı
    Turkish Journal of Surgery.2022; 38(3): 221.     CrossRef
  • Multicenter retrospective evaluation of ileocecocolic perforations associated with diagnostic lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in dogs and cats
    Vanessa L. Woolhead, Jacqueline C. Whittemore, Sarah A. Stewart
    Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2020; 34(2): 684.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Characteristics of Colonoscopic Perforation and Risk Factors for Complications After Surgical Treatment
    Liang Li, Bing Xue, Chunxia Yang, Zhongbo Han, Hongqiang Xie, Meng Wang
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2020; 30(11): 1153.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of colonoscopic perforation: outcomes from a major single tertiary institution
    Carolyn R. Chew, Justin M. C. Yeung, Ian G. Faragher
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2019; 89(5): 546.     CrossRef
  • Iatrogenic Colonic Perforations: Changing the Paradigm
    Jose Luis Ulla-Rocha, Angel Salgado, Raquel Sardina, Raquel Souto, Raquel Sanchez-Santos, Juan Turnes
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2019; 29(3): 173.     CrossRef
  • Concurrent retroperitoneal, mediastinal, cervical and subcutaneous emphysema secondary to iatrogenic sigmoid colon perforation
    Zehui Wu, Huaping Xu, Yisheng Zhang, Lianghui Shi
    Postgraduate Medical Journal.2019; 95(1125): 396.     CrossRef
  • Management of colonoscopic perforations: A systematic review
    Alexander T. Hawkins, Kenneth W. Sharp, Molly M. Ford, Roberta L. Muldoon, M. Benjamin Hopkins, Timothy M. Geiger
    The American Journal of Surgery.2018; 215(4): 712.     CrossRef
  • 2017 WSES guidelines for the management of iatrogenic colonoscopy perforation
    Nicola de’Angelis, Salomone Di Saverio, Osvaldo Chiara, Massimo Sartelli, Aleix Martínez-Pérez, Franca Patrizi, Dieter G. Weber, Luca Ansaloni, Walter Biffl, Offir Ben-Ishay, Miklosh Bala, Francesco Brunetti, Federica Gaiani, Solafah Abdalla, Aurelien Ami
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Management Outcomes of Colonoscopic Perforations Are Affected by the General Condition of the Patients
    Jae Ho Park, Kyung Jong Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Managing a Colonoscopic Perforation in a Patient with No Abdominal Wall
    Jayan George, Michael Peirson, Samuel Birks, Paul Skinner
    Case Reports in Surgery.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
  • Air and its Sonographic Appearance: Understanding the Artifacts
    Simran Buttar, Denrick Cooper, Patrick Olivieri, Michael Barca, Aaran B. Drake, Melvin Ku, Gabriel Rose, Sebastian D. Siadecki, Turandot Saul
    The Journal of Emergency Medicine.2017; 53(2): 241.     CrossRef
  • Colonoscopic Perforations, What is Our Experience in a Training Hospital?
    Abbas Aras, Ebru Oran, Hakan Seyit, Mehmet Karabulut, İlhan Gök, Halil Aliş
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2016; 26(1): 44.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Therapy in Crohnʼs Disease
    Min Chen, Bo Shen
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2015; 21(9): 2222.     CrossRef
  • Importance of Prompt Diagnosis in the Management of Colonoscopic Perforation
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(5): 208.     CrossRef
Effectiveness of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate (PICO) for Colonoscopy Preparation
Ki Hwan Song, Wu Seok Suh, Jin Sik Jeong, Dong Sik Kim, Sang Woo Kim, Dong Min Kwak, Jong Seong Hwang, Hyun Jin Kim, Man Woo Park, Min Chul Shim, Ja-Il Koo, Jae Hwang Kim, Dae Ho Shon
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(5):222-227.   Published online October 28, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.5.222
  • 9,348 View
  • 52 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Bowel preparation with sodium phosphate was recently prohibited by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is safe and effective; however, it is difficult to drink. To identify an easy bowel preparation method for colonoscopy, we evaluated three different bowel preparation regimens regarding their efficacy and patient satisfaction.

Methods

In this randomized, comparative study, 892 patients who visited a secondary referral hospital for a colonoscopy between November 2012 and February 2013 were enrolled. Three regimens were evaluated: three packets of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (PICO, group A), two packets of PICO with 1 L of PEG (PICO + PEG 1 L, group B), and two packets of PICO with 2 L of PEG (PICO + PEG 2 L, group C). A questionnaire survey regarding the patients' preference for the bowel preparation regimen and satisfaction was conducted before the colonoscopies. The quality of bowel cleansing was scored by the colonoscopists who used the Aronchick scoring scale and the Ottawa scale.

Results

The patients' satisfaction rate regarding the regimens were 72% in group A, 64% in group B, and 45.9% in group C. Nausea and abdominal bloating caused by the regimens were more frequent in group C than in group A or group B (P < 0.01). Group C showed the lowest preference rate compared to the other groups (P < 0.01). Group C showed better right colon cleansing efficacy than group A or group B.

Conclusion

Group A exhibited a better result than group B or group C in patient satisfaction and preference. In the cleansing quality, no difference was noted between groups A and C.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Rehabilitation for Chronic Constipation: Integrative Approaches to Diagnosis and Treatment
    Luana Alexandrescu, Ionut Eduard Iordache, Alina Mihaela Stanigut, Laura Maria Condur, Doina Ecaterina Tofolean, Razvan Catalin Popescu, Andreea Nelson Twakor, Eugen Dumitru, Andrei Dumitru, Cristina Tocia, Alexandra Herlo, Ionut Tiberiu Tofolean
    Gastrointestinal Disorders.2025; 7(1): 11.     CrossRef
  • Acidifying agents impact erlotinib and gefitinib pharmacokinetic parameters and elevate liver enzymes in Wistar rats
    Amsha S. Alsegiani, Aliyah Almomen, Maria Arafah, Nourah Z. Alzoman, Abdullah K.Alshememry
    Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • White Diet with split‐dose Picosalax is preferred, better tolerated, and non‐inferior to day‐before clear fluids with polyethylene glycol plus sodium picosulfate‐magnesium citrate for morning colonoscopy: A randomized, non‐inferiority trial
    Jeremy P Dwyer, Jonathan Y C Tan, Eldho Paul, Catherine Bunn, Dileep Mangira, Robyn Secomb, Peter R Gibson, Gregor Brown
    JGH Open.2017; 1(1): 38.     CrossRef
  • Randomized clinical trial comparing fixed-time split dosing and split dosing of oral Picosulfate regimen for bowel preparation
    Jae Hyuck Jun, Koon Hee Han, Jong Kyu Park, Hyun Il Seo, Young Don Kim, Sang Jin Lee, Baek Gyu Jun, Min Sik Hwang, Yoon Kyoo Park, Myeong Jong Kim, Gab Jin Cheon
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 23(32): 5986.     CrossRef
  • Upper airway obstruction resulting from acute mucosal injury induced by direct ingestion of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate powder
    Gyeong Bo Kim, Sung Yeon Hwang, Tae Gun Shin, Tae Rim Lee, Won Chul Cha, Min Seob Sim, Ik Joon Jo, Keun Jeong Song, Joong Eui Rhee, Yeon Kwon Jeong
    Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine.2016; 3(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Combination could be another tool for bowel preparation?
    Jae Seung Soh, Kyung-Jo Kim
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(10): 2915.     CrossRef
  • Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial of Combined Oral laxatives Medication for BOwel PREParation (COMBO-PREP study)
    Min Jung Kim, Chang Won Hong, Byung Chang Kim, Sung Chan Park, Kyung Su Han, Jungnam Joo, Jae Hwan Oh, Dae Kyung Sohn
    Medicine.2016; 95(7): e2824.     CrossRef
  • Frustration Still Exists
    Hyun Shig Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(5): 207.     CrossRef
Preoperative Body Mass Index, 30-Day Postoperative Morbidity, Length of Stay and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Exenteration Surgery for Recurrent and Locally-Advanced Rectal Cancer
Jessica Beaton, Sharon Carey, Michael J Solomon, Ker-Kan Tan, Jane Young
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(2):83-87.   Published online April 25, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.83
  • 5,392 View
  • 50 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 22 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Malnutrition is associated with an increased risk of developing complications following gastrointestinal surgery, especially following radical surgeries such as pelvic exenteration. This study aims to determine if preoperative body mass index (BMI) is associated with 30-day morbidity, length of hospital stay and/or quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration surgery for recurrent and locally-advanced rectal cancer prior to a prospective trial.

Methods

A review of all patients who underwent pelvic exenteration surgery prior to 2008 was performed. Patients were included if they had a documented BMI as well as a QoL measurement (Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Colorectal questionnaire).

Results

Thirty-one patients, with a mean age of 56 years, had preoperative height and weight data, as well as measures of postoperative QoL, and formed the study group. The numbers of patients with recurrent (n = 17) or locally-advanced rectal cancer (n = 14) were similar. The mean length of stay was 21 days while the mean BMI of the patients was 24.3 (± 5.9) kg/m2. The majority of the patients were either of normal weight (n = 15) or overweight/obese (n = 11). The average length of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who were underweight compared to those who were of normal weight (F = 6.508, P = 0.006) and those who were overweight and obese (F = 6.508, P = 0.007).

Conclusion

This study suggests that a lower body mass index preoperatively is associated with a longer length of hospital stay. BMI is not associated with long-term QoL in this patient group. However, further prospective research is required.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prospective longitudinal trajectory of cancer survivorship among patients with recurrent rectal cancer: impact of treatment modalities and resection status
    Tarik Sammour, Oliver Peacock, Brian K. Bednarski, Arvind Dasari, Prajnan Das, Benny Johnson, Grace L. Smith, George J. Chang, John Skibber, Y. Nancy You
    Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Living After Pelvic Exenteration: A Mixed-Methods Synthesis of Quality-of-Life Outcomes and Patient Perspectives
    Vlad Rotaru, Elena Chitoran, Aisa Gelal, Giuseppe Gullo, Daniela-Cristina Stefan, Laurentiu Simion
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(18): 6541.     CrossRef
  • Defining Standard Data Reporting in Pelvic Exenteration Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A PelvEx Collaborative Review of Current Data Reporting

    Cancers.2025; 17(17): 2764.     CrossRef
  • Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer
    Niamh McKigney, Fergus Houston, Ellen Ross, Galina Velikova, Julia Brown, Deena Pravin Harji
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(7): 3969.     CrossRef
  • Prevention and management of complications in pelvic exenteration
    Pia Persson, Peter Chong, Colin W Steele, Martha Quinn
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 48(11): 2277.     CrossRef
  • Patient‐reported outcomes after pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Andreas Denys, Yves van Nieuwenhove, Dirk Van de putte, Eva Pape, Piet Pattyn, Wim Ceelen, Gabriëlle H. van Ramshorst
    Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(4): 353.     CrossRef
  • Pelvic exenteration: Pre-, intra-, and post-operative considerations
    Kheng-Seong Ng, Peter J.M. Lee
    Surgical Oncology.2022; 43: 101787.     CrossRef
  • Pelvic exenteration: Pre-, intra-, and post-operative considerations
    Kheng-Seong Ng, Peter J.M. Lee
    Surgical Oncology.2021; 37: 101546.     CrossRef
  • Functional outcomes following pelvic exenteration: results from a prospective cohort study
    Preet G. S. Makker, Cherry E. Koh, Michael J. Solomon, James Ratcliffe, Daniel Steffens
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(10): 2647.     CrossRef
  • Quality of life outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer
    Tamara Glyn, Frank Frizelle
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2020; 31(3): 100767.     CrossRef
  • The obesity paradox in beyond total mesorectal excision surgery for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer
    Daniel L. H. Baird, Constantinos Simillis, Gianluca Pellino, Christos Kontovounisios, Shahnawaz Rasheed, Paris P. Tekkis
    Updates in Surgery.2019; 71(2): 313.     CrossRef
  • The effect of preoperative nutritional status on postoperative complications and overall survival in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration: A multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional cohort study
    N.J. Lyell, M. Kitano, B. Smith, A.L. Gleisner, F.J. Backes, G. Cheng, M.D. McCarter, S. Abdel-Misih, E.L. Jones
    The American Journal of Surgery.2019; 218(2): 275.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Nutrition Status and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
    Lauren Reece, Helen Dragicevich, Claire Lewis, Caila Rothwell, Oliver M. Fisher, Sharon Carey, Nayef A. Alzahrani, Winston Liauw, David L. Morris
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2019; 26(8): 2622.     CrossRef
  • Factors affecting hospital length of stay following pelvic exenteration surgery
    Ying Guo, Eugene Chang, Mehtap Bozkurt, Minjeong Park, Diane Liu, Jack B. Fu
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 117(3): 529.     CrossRef
  • Is BMI associated with post‐operative complication risk among patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for cancer? A systematic review
    Tasha M. Hughes, Kejal Shah, Sabrena Noria, Timothy Pawlik
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 117(5): 1009.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review examining quality of life following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer
    E. Rausa, M. E. Kelly, L. Bonavina, P. R. O'Connell, D. C. Winter
    Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(5): 430.     CrossRef
  • The Evolution of Pelvic Exenteration Practice at a Single Center: Lessons Learned from over 500 Cases
    Cherry E. Koh, Michael J. Solomon, Kilian G. Brown, Kirk Austin, Christopher M. Byrne, Peter Lee, Jane M. Young
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2017; 60(6): 627.     CrossRef
  • Pelvic exenteration for advanced malignancy in elderly patients
    R W Radwan, M D Evans, M Davies, D A Harris, J Beynon, O Hatcher, P Bose, M G Lucas, J Featherstone, U Khot, T V Chandrasekaran, N D Carr, S Gwynne, P Drew, M D Phan
    Journal of British Surgery.2016; 103(2): e115.     CrossRef
  • Systematic review of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration
    D.P. Harji, B. Griffiths, G. Velikova, P.M. Sagar, J. Brown
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO).2016; 42(8): 1132.     CrossRef
  • Exenteración pélvica total por cáncer primario del recto: resultados inmediatos y alejados
    Guillermo Bannura, Alejandro Barrera, Carlos Melo, Felipe Illanes, Cristián Gallardo
    Revista Chilena de Cirugía.2016; 68(3): 237.     CrossRef
  • Translation from clinical trials to routine practice: How to demonstrate community benefit
    David Roder, Elizabeth Buckley
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2015; 11(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Body Mass Index and Postoperative Complications After Pelvic Exenteration in Recurrent or Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients
    Moo-Jun Baek
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(2): 60.     CrossRef
Case Report
Transanal Evisceration Caused by Rectal Laceration
Aleix Martínez Pérez, María Teresa Torres Sánchez, Jose Manuel Richart Aznar, Eva María Martí Martínez, Manuel Martínez-Abad
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(1):47-49.   Published online February 28, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.1.47
  • 18,725 View
  • 55 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Transrectal evisceration caused by colorectal injury is an unusual entity. This pathology is more frequent in elderly patients and it is usually produced spontaneously. Rectal prolapse is the principal predisposing factor. An 81-year-old woman was taken to the hospital presenting exit of intestinal loops through the anus. After first reanimation measures, an urgent surgery was indicated. We observed the absence of almost every small intestine loop in the abdominal cavity; these had been moved to the pelvis. After doing the reduction, a 3 to 4 cm linear craniocaudal perforation in upper rectum was objectified, and Hartmann's procedure was performed. We investigated and knew that she frequently manipulate herself to extract her faeces. The fast preoperative management avoided a fatal conclusion or an extensive intestinal resection. Reasons that make us consider rectal self-injury as the etiologic factor are explained.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Transanal evisceration of small bowel in two patients with chronic rectal prolapse: case presentation and literature review
    S Hajiev, A Ezzat, V Sivarajah, G Reese, N El-Masry
    The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.2021; 103(1): e29.     CrossRef
  • Evisceración de asas intestinales a través de periné posterior por traumatismo en paciente anciano
    Ana Alicia Tejera Hernández, David Fernández San Millan, Carlos David Trujillo Flores, Juan Ramón Hernández Hernández
    Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología.2016; 51(1): 58.     CrossRef
  • Transanal Evisceration of Small Bowel about One Case at the University Hospital Yalgado Ouédraogo of Ouagadougou
    Adama Sanou, Moussa Bazongo, Edgar Ouangré, Maurice Zida, Gilbert Patindé Bonkoungou, Rodrique Namékinsba Doamba, Sylvain Wendmi Karfo, Elie Yamba Sawadogo, Nayi Zongo, Si Simon Traoré
    Surgical Science.2016; 07(07): 291.     CrossRef
Original Article
Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Prophylactic Antibiotic Administration in Colorectal Surgery: A Survey of the Current Status in Korea
Byung Mo Kang, Kil Yeon Lee, Sun Jin Park, Suk-Hwan Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(4):160-166.   Published online August 29, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.4.160
  • 7,028 View
  • 50 Download
  • 19 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The usefulness of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) in colon surgery was recently challenged by many multicenter clinical trials and meta-analyses. The objectives of this study were to investigate current national opinions about MBP and prophylactic antibiotics (PA) and to provide preliminary data for developing future Korean guidelines for MBP and PA administration in colorectal surgery.

Methods

A questionnaire was mailed to 129 colorectal specialists. The questionnaires addressed the characteristics of the hospital, the MBP methods, and the uses of oral and intravenous antibiotics.

Results

A total of 73 questionnaires (56.6%) were returned. First, in regard to MBP methods, most surgeons (97.3%) used MBP for a mean of 1.36 days. Most surgeons (98.6%) implemented whole bowel irrigation and used polyethylene glycol (83.3%). Oral antibiotic use was indicated in over half (52.1%) of the responses, the average number of preoperative doses was three, and the mean time of administration was 24.2 hours prior to the operation. Finally, the majority of responders stated that they used intravenous antibiotics (95.9%). The responses demonstrated that second-generation cephalosporin-based regimens were most commonly prescribed, and 75% of the surgeons administered these regimens until three days after the operation.

Conclusion

The results indicate that most surgeons used MBP and intravenous antibiotics and that half of them administered oral PA in colorectal surgery preparations. The study recommends that the current Korean guidelines should be adapted to adequately reflect the medical status in Korea, to consider the medical environment of the various hospitals, and to establish more accurate and relevant guidelines.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • RETRACTED: A meta‐analysis of the risk factors for surgical site infection in patients with colorectal cancer
    Yani Chen, Hua Guo, Tian Gao, Jiale Yu, Yujia Wang, Haiquan Yu
    International Wound Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical Site Infections in Colorectal Cancer Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Surgical Approach and Associated Risk Factors
    Valentin Calu, Catalin Piriianu, Adrian Miron, Valentin Titus Grigorean
    Life.2024; 14(7): 850.     CrossRef
  • Uncovering the Function of MBP and Antibiotics in Preventing Surgical Site Infections during Colorectal Procedures
    Agnes Sara Shibu, Rojin G. Raj, Rohit Singh Deo
    Journal of Coloproctology.2024; 44(03): e209.     CrossRef
  • Single-Dose Versus Multiple-Dose Prophylactic Antibiotics in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis
    Ga Yoon Ku, Beom-jin Kim, Ji Won Park, Min Jung Kim, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation using conventional versus hyperosmolar polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution before laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer (TLUMP test): a phase III, multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiori
    Tadashi Yoshida, Shigenori Homma, Nobuki Ichikawa, Yosuke Ohno, Yoichi Miyaoka, Hiroki Matsui, Ken Imaizumi, Hiroyuki Ishizu, Tohru Funakoshi, Masahiko Koike, Hirofumi Kon, Yo Kamiizumi, Yasuhiro Tani, Yoichi Minagawa Ito, Kazufumi Okada, Akinobu Taketomi
    Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 58(9): 883.     CrossRef
  • The risk of surgical site infection of oral sulfate tablet versus sodium picosulfate for bowel preparation in colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial
    Sung Sil Park, Sung Chan Park, Dong-Eun Lee, Dong Woon Lee, Kiho Yu, Hyoung-Chul Park, Chang Won Hong, Dae Kyung Sohn, Kyung Su Han, Bun Kim, Byung Chang Kim, Jae Hwan Oh
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(2): 96.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Elemental Diet before Laparoscopic Anterior Resection in Patients with Advanced Stenotic Rectal Cancer
    Tadashi Yoshida, Shigenori Homma, Nobuki Ichikawa, Hiroaki Iijima, Akinobu Taketomi
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2021; 5(4): 395.     CrossRef
  • Orale Antibiotikaprophylaxe zur Darmdekontamination vor elektiver kolorektaler Chirurgie
    S. Flemming, C.-T. Germer
    Der Chirurg.2020; 91(2): 128.     CrossRef
  • Role of Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Surgery
    Ik Yong Kim
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 75(2): 79.     CrossRef
  • Update on risk factors of surgical site infection in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhaohui Xu, Hui Qu, George Kanani, Zhong Guo, Yanying Ren, Xin Chen
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(12): 2147.     CrossRef
  • Does Mechanical Bowel Preparation Ameliorate Surgical Performance in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Chang-Hoon Jeon, Han-Dong Lee, Nam-Su Chung
    Global Spine Journal.2019; 9(7): 692.     CrossRef
  • Mechanical Bowel Preparation Does Not Affect Clinical Severity of Anastomotic Leakage in Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Woong Bae Ji, Koo Yong Hahn, Jung Myun Kwak, Dong Woo Kang, Se Jin Baek, Jin Kim, Seon Hahn Kim
    World Journal of Surgery.2017; 41(5): 1366.     CrossRef
  • Comparing Mechanical Bowel Preparation With Both Oral and Systemic Antibiotics Versus Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Systemic Antibiotics Alone for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Elective Colorectal Surgery
    Min Chen, Xue Song, Liang-zhou Chen, Zhi-dong Lin, Xue-li Zhang
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2016; 59(1): 70.     CrossRef
  • Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasms According to Clinical Indications
    Eui-Gon Youk, Dae Kyng Sohn, Chang Won Hong, Seong Dae Lee, Kyung Su Han, Byung Chang Kim, Hee Jin Chang, Mi-Jung Kim
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2016; 59(5): 403.     CrossRef
  • Benefit of mechanical bowel preparation prior to elective colorectal surgery: current insights
    A. C. A. Murray, R. P. Kiran
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2016; 401(5): 573.     CrossRef
  • Is mechanical bowel preparation still necessary for gynecologic laparoscopic surgery? A meta‐analysis
    Huaping Huang, Haiyan Wang, Mei He
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2015; 8(2): 171.     CrossRef
  • Nationwide Analysis of Outcomes of Bowel Preparation in Colon Surgery
    Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh, Mark H. Hanna, Joseph C. Carmichael, Steven D. Mills, Alessio Pigazzi, Ninh T. Nguyen, Michael J. Stamos
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2015; 220(5): 912.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Shorter Duration of Prophylactic Antibiotic Use on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Youn Young Park, Chang Woo Kim, Sun Jin Park, Kil Yeon Lee, Jung Joo Lee, Hye Ok Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(6): 235.     CrossRef
  • Mechanical Bowel Preparation: Keep It or Abandon It?
    Hungdai Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(4): 136.     CrossRef
Case Reports
A Stercoral Perforation of the Rectum
Seung-Jin Kwag, Sang-Kyung Choi, Ji-Ho Park, Eun-Jung Jung, Chi-Young Jung, Sang-Ho Jung, Young-Tae Ju
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(2):77-79.   Published online April 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.2.77
  • 6,713 View
  • 39 Download
  • 12 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

A stercoral perforation of the rectum due to a fecaloma is a rare disease with a high mortality rate. Although multiple case reports of colonic perforations have been published, the data regarding rectal perforations are limited. This case report will highlight one such case of a stercoral rectal perforation that was successfully treated with a laparoscopic operation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Stercoral Colitis: Review of Imaging Features and Complications
    Nikitha Karkala, Bertin Mathai, John J. Hines, Sarah Byun, Douglas S. Katz
    RadioGraphics.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Rectal stercoral perforation: an uncommon anatomical localization of a rare surgical emergency
    Tom Vandaele, Lisa Dekoninck, Pauline Vanhove, Bart Devos, Mathieu Vandeputte, Marc Philippe, Johan Vlasselaers
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sepsis de origen abdominal secundaria a perforación estercoral recto-sigmoidea: a propósito de un caso
    Juan Daniel Serrano-Lizarazo, María Camila Ayala-Gutiérrez, Diana Clemencia Quintero-Gamboa, Andrea Juliana Pinto-Arias, Juan Paulo Serrano-Pastrana
    Revista Médicas UIS.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Extremes of Constipation: A Case of Stercoral Perforation From Fecal Impaction in a Teenager
    Felicia Lee, Jasmin Cao, Evan Lin, Maho Kurashima, Raymond I Okeke, Christian Saliba, Shin Miyata
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Stercoral re-perforation after colostomy takedown: a case report
    Seunghwan Lee, Chang Woo Kim
    BMC Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Rare but relevant: a systematic review of stercoral perforation
    Sherwin Fernando, Diwakar R Sarma
    British Journal of Hospital Medicine.2021; 82(4): 1.     CrossRef
  • Pelvic Rectal Stercoral Perforation Resulting in Diffuse Pneumatosis
    Anupam K Gupta, Oscar A Vazquez, Miguel Lopez-Viego
    Cureus.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Spontaneous colonic perforation in adults: Evaluation of a pooled case series
    Ren Chongxi, Ji Jinggang, Shi Yan, Wang Hongqiao, Liu Yan, Yang Fengshuo
    Science Progress.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Acute Spontaneous Perforation of Rectosigmoid Junction in a Patient with Quadriplegia following Spinal Cord Injury
    Oshan Basnayake, Chiran Rathnaweera, Umesh Jayarajah, Gishanthan Shanthamoorthy, Heshan Dayantha Siriwardena, Asela Jayathilaka, Paola De Nardi
    Case Reports in Surgery.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • Stercoral perforation: A rare entity
    Nisarg Mehta, Ahan Bhatt, Cici Zhang
    World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2019; 8(4): 114.     CrossRef
  • Stercoral Perforation of the Colon: A Potentially Fatal Complication of Opioid-Induced Constipation
    Andrew Davies, Katherine Webber
    Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.2015; 50(2): 260.     CrossRef
  • Stercoral Colitis
    Maxim Saksonov, Gil N. Bachar, Sara Morgenstern, Abdel-Rauf Zeina, Margarita Vasserman, Orith Protnoy, Ofer Benjaminov
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.2014; 38(5): 721.     CrossRef
Rectal Perforation Caused by Anal Stricture After Hemorrhoid Treatment
Yong Joon Suh, Heon-Kyun Ha, Heung-Kwon Oh, Rumi Shin, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(1):28-30.   Published online February 28, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.1.28
  • 11,489 View
  • 38 Download
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Inappropriate therapies for hemorrhoids can lead to various complications including anorectal stricture. We report a patient presenting with catastrophic rectal perforation due to severe anal stricture after inappropriate hemorrhoid treatment. A 67-years old man with perianal pain visited the emergency room. The hemorrhoids accompanied by constipation, had tortured him since his youth. Thus he had undergone injection sclerotherapy several times by an unlicensed therapist and hemorrhoidectomy twice at the clinics of private practitioners. His body temperature was as high as 38.5℃. The computed tomographic scan showed a focal perforation of posterior rectal wall. The emergency operation was performed. The fibrotic tissues of the anal canal were excised. And then a sigmoid loop colostomy was constructed. The patient was discharged four days following the operation. This report calls attention to the enormous risk of unlicensed injection sclerotherapy and overzealous hemorrhoidectomy resulting in scarring, progressive stricture, and eventual rectal perforation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Complications of Hemorrhoidectomy From Patients' Perspective: A Qualitative Study
    Masoumeh Ebrahimi Tavani, Yegane Partovi, Tahmineh Poursaki, Farid Gharibi
    Health Science Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laser hemorrhoidoplasty for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hendry Lie, Evelyn Franca Caesarini, Antonius Agung Purnama, Andry Irawan, Taufik Sudirman, Wifanto Saditya Jeo, Bernardus Parish Budiono, Erik Prabowo, M. Iqbal Rivai, Ryanto Karobuana Sitepu
    Lasers in Medical Science.2022; 37(9): 3621.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Clinical Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Colorectal Cancer
Yo Han Park, Jae Im Lee, Jong Kyung Park, Hang Ju Jo, Won Kyung Kang, Chang Hyeok An
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(5):260-265.   Published online October 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.260
  • 8,746 View
  • 28 Download
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Recent literature has shown that lymph node ratio is superior to the absolute number of metastatic lymph nodes in predicting the prognosis in several malignances other than colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with stage III colorectal cancer.

Methods

We included 186 stage III colorectal cancer patients who underwent a curative resection over a 10-year period in one hospital. The cutoff point of LNR was chosen as 0.07 because there was significant survival difference at that LNR. The Kaplan-Meier and the Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the prognostic effect according to LNR.

Results

There was statistically significant longer overall survival in the group of LNR > 0.07 than in the group of LNR ≤ 7 (P = 0.008). Especially, there was a survival difference for the N1 patients group (LN < 4) according to LNR (5-year survival of N1 patients was lower in the group of LNR > 0.07, P = 0.025), but there was no survival difference for the N2 group (4 ≥ LN) according to LNR. The multivariate analysis showed that the LNR is an independent prognostic factor.

Conclusions

LNR can be considered as a more accurate and potent modality for prognostic stratifications in patients with stage III colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The prognostic performance of the log odds of positive lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A population study of the US SEER database and a Chinese single‐institution cohort
    Hongdian Zhang, Wanyi Xiao, Peng Ren, Kai Zhu, Ran Jia, Yueyang Yang, Lei Gong, Zhentao Yu, Peng Tang
    Cancer Medicine.2021; 10(17): 6149.     CrossRef
  • Lymph Node Ratio and Liver Metachronous Metastases in Colorectal Cancer
    Giovanni Li Destri, Giuseppe Privitera, Gaetano La Greca, Roberto Scilletta, Antonio Pesce, Teresa Rosanna Portale, Erminia Conti, Stefano Puleo
    International Surgery.2021; 105(1-3): 122.     CrossRef
  • Rectal cancers with microscopic circumferential resection margin involvement (R1 resections): Survivals, patterns of recurrence, and prognostic factors
    Gianpiero Gravante, David Hemingway, James Andrew Stephenson, David Sharpe, Ahmed Osman, Melissa Haines, Vafa Pirjamali, Roberto Sorge, Justin Ming Yeung, Michael Norwood, Andrew Miller, Kirsten Boyle
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2016; 114(5): 642.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Impact of the Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio on Survival in Rectal Cancer
    Wafi Attaallah, Omer Gunal, Manuk Manukyan, Gulden Ozden, Cumhur Yegen
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(3): 100.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value of Total Lymph Node Identified and Ratio of Lymph Nodes in Resected Colorectal Cancer
    Leila Ghahramani, Leila Moaddabshoar, Samira Razzaghi, Sayed Hasan Hamedi, Saeedeh Pourahmad, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
    Annals of Colorectal Research.2013; 1(3): 81.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratios in Node Positive Rectal Cancer Treated with Preoperative Chemoradiation
    Jamal Jafari Nadoshan, Ramesh Omranipour, Omid Beiki, Kazem Zendedel, Abbas Alibakhshi, Habibollah Mahmoodzadeh
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2013; 14(6): 3769.     CrossRef
  • Proposal of a New Classification for Stage III Colorectal Cancer Based on the Number and Ratio of Metastatic Lymph Nodes
    Li‐Ping Wang, Hong‐Yan Wang, Rui Cao, Cong Zhu, Xiong‐Zhi Wu
    World Journal of Surgery.2013; 37(5): 1094.     CrossRef
  • An appraisal of lymph node ratio in colon and rectal cancer: not one size fits all
    M. Medani, Niall Kelly, George Samaha, G. Duff, Vourneen Healy, Elizabeth Mulcahy, Eoghan Condon, David Waldron, Jean Saunders, J. Calvin Coffey
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2013; 28(10): 1377.     CrossRef
Impact on Prognosis of Lymph Node Micrometastasis and Isolated Tumor Cells in Stage II Colorectal Cancer
Tai Young Oh, Sun Mi Moon, Ui Sup Shin, Hyang Ran Lee, Sun Hoo Park
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(2):71-77.   Published online April 30, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.2.71
  • 6,550 View
  • 34 Download
  • 12 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Even though the importance of micrometastases (MMS) and isolated tumor cells (ITC) has been brought up by many physicians, its impact on the prognosis in stage II colorectal cancer is uncertain. In this research, we tried to investigate the clinical features of MMS and ITC and to prove any correlation with prognosis.

Methods

The research pool was 124 colorectal cancer patients who underwent a curative resection from April 2005 to November 2009. A total of 2,379 lymph nodes (LNs) were examined, and all retrieved LNs were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining with anti-cytokeratin antibody panel. Clinicopathologic parameters and survival rates were compared based on the presence of MMS or ITC and on the micrometastatic lymph node ratio (mmLNR), which is defined as the number of micrometastatic LNs divided by the number of retrieved LNs.

Results

Out of 124 patients (26.6%) 33 were found to have MMS or ITC. There were no significant differences in clinicopathologic features, such as gender, tumor location and size, depth of invasion, histologic grade, except for age (P = 0.04). The three-year disease-free survival rate for the MMS or ITC positive group was 85.7%, and that for MMS and ITC negative group was 92.8% (P = 0.209). The three-year disease-free survival rate for the mmLNR > 0.25 group was 73.3%, and that for the mmLNR ≤ 0.25 group was 92.9% (P = 0.03).

Conclusion

The presence of MMS or ITC was not closely correlated to the prognosis. However, mmLNR is thought to be a valuable marker of prognosis in cases of stage II colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Are deeper sections and immunohistochemistry useful in detecting micrometastases and isolated tumour cells in colorectal cancer?
    David W. Dodington, Keegan Guidolin, Fayez Quereshy, Runjan Chetty, Stefano Serra, Klaudia M. Nowak
    Pathology.2025; 57(6): 696.     CrossRef
  • Fluorescence indocyanine green (ICG) for sentinel-lymph-node mapping in colorectal cancer: a systematic review
    Alexis Litchinko, Jeremy Meyer, Leo Buhler, Frederic Ris, Michel Adamina
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of isosulfan blue in sentinel lymph node visualization for gastric cancer
    Xudong Zhu, Zhiyan Li, Wenxuan Zheng, Qingwei Zeng, Xingzhou Wang, Kai Chen, Qi Chen, Hanxiao Xu, Song Liu, Wenxian Guan
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2025; 87(12): 8257.     CrossRef
  • Presumed early ovarian cancer with isolated tumor cells in para-aortic sentinel nodes
    Stefano Uccella, Anna Fagotti, Gian Franco Zannoni, Robert L Coleman
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2019; 29(1): 216.     CrossRef
  • Impact of compliance with an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway on patient outcomes in open gynecologic surgery
    Maria D Iniesta, Javier Lasala, Gabriel Mena, Andrea Rodriguez-Restrepo, Gloria Salvo, Brandelyn Pitcher, Lakisha D Washington, Melinda Harris, Larissa A Meyer, Pedro T Ramirez
    International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.2019; 29(9): 1417.     CrossRef
  • Lymph Node Micrometastasis Cannot be Considered as Positive Lymph Node in Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Kwang Dae Hong, Jun Won Um, Byung Wook Min, Woong-Bae Ji, Jung-Woo Choi, Young-Sik Kim
    The American Surgeon™.2017; 83(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Lymph node micrometastasis in gastrointestinal tract cancer—a clinical aspect
    Shoji Natsugoe, Takaaki Arigami, Yoshikazu Uenosono, Shigehiro Yanagita, Akihiro Nakajo, Masataka Matsumoto, Hiroshi Okumura, Yuko Kijima, Masahiko Sakoda, Yuko Mataki, Yasuto Uchikado, Shinichiro Mori, Kosei Maemura, Sumiya Ishigami
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2013; 18(5): 752.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of isolated tumor cells in patients with colorectal cancer in recent 10-year studies
    YOSHITO AKAGI, TETSUSHI KINUGASA, YOSUKE ADACHI, KAZUO SHIROUZU
    Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2013; 1(4): 582.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of histologically detected lymph node micrometastases of sizes between 0.2 and 2 mm in colorectal cancer
    Bruno Märkl, C. Herbst, C. Cacchi, T. Schaller, I. Krammer, G. Schenkirsch, A. Probst, H. Spatz
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2013; 28(7): 977.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Detection of Tumor Cells in Regional Lymph Nodes Is Associated With Disease Recurrence and Poor Survival in Node-Negative Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nuh N. Rahbari, Ulrich Bork, Edith Motschall, Kristian Thorlund, Markus W. Büchler, Moritz Koch, Jürgen Weitz
    Journal of Clinical Oncology.2012; 30(1): 60.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Significance of EpCAM-Positive Disseminated Tumor Cells in Rectal Cancer Patients With Stage I Disease
    Sameer Dhayat, Sorina Sorescu, Daniel Vallböhmer, Sebastian Kraus, Stephan Ernst Baldus, Alexander Rehders, Feride Kröpil, Andreas Krieg, Wolfram Trudo Knoefel, Nikolas Hendrik Stoecklein
    American Journal of Surgical Pathology.2012; 36(12): 1809.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Signifi cance of the Lymph Node Ratio Regarding Recurrence and Survival in Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Ji-Yoon Kim, Su-Mi Chung, Byung-Ock Choi, In-Kyu Lee, Chang-Hyeok An, Jong-Man Won, Mi-Ryeong Ryu
    Gut and Liver.2012; 6(2): 203.     CrossRef
Case Report
Penetration of the Descending Colon by a Migrating Intrauterine Contraceptive Device
Jung Min Park, Chang Seog Lee, Min Seong Kim, Do Young Kim, Chul Young Kim, Young Bae Lim, Yong Kyu Lee, Dong Eun Park, Dong Hyun Lee
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(6):433-436.   Published online December 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.6.433
  • 5,708 View
  • 41 Download
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract often cause serious complications, such as perforation, obstruction, abscess formation, or hemorrhage. This is a case in which a patient visited our hospital and complained of a vague lower abdominal pain that had been present for three months. She had an intrauterine device (IUD) inserted five years earlier. The abdominal X-ray, computed tomography and colonoscopy revealed that the IUD had penetrated into the descending colon. We tried to remove the IUD by colonoscopy but failed due to pain, so we removed the IUD surgically. Thus, we report a case in which a previously inserted IUD had penetrated into the descending colon and was surgically removed. We also present a brief review of the literature.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Missing intrauterine device migrated to terminal ileum resembling adnexal mass: A case report
    Mohammad Kamal Tani, Wais Farda, Haider Khan, Omer Malikzai, Zabihullah Sharif
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 115: 109279.     CrossRef
  • Robotic assisted removal of migrated intrauterine device
    Marco Bertucci Zoccali, Osama Jabi
    Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(8): 1718.     CrossRef
  • Is It a “Colon Perforation”? A Case Report and Review of the Literature
    Shuangshuang Lu, Xinyu Yao, Jun Shi, Jian Huang, Shaohua Zhuang, Junfang Ma, Yan Liu, Wei Zhang, Lifei Yu, Ping Zhu, Qiuwei Zhu, Ruxia Shi, Hong Zheng, Dong Shao, Yuyan Pan, Shizhen Bao, Li Qin, Lijie Huang, Wenjia Liu, Jin Huang
    Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Intestinal Perforation by a Migrated Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Review of This Rare but Important Complication
    Antony Zacharias, Stephanie Clark, Chetan Parmar, Ayo Oshowo
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2021; 3(8): 1759.     CrossRef
  • Incomplete Removal of an Intrauterine Device Perforating the Sigmoid Colon
    Junseak Lee, Jung Hwan Oh, Jinsu Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim, Sung Hoon Jung
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 78(1): 48.     CrossRef
  • Rectum migration of an intrauterine device
    Rui Li, Hongmei Li, Jie Zhang, Huiqing Li
    Journal of Minimal Access Surgery.2021; 17(1): 113.     CrossRef
  • Pelvic abscess complicating sigmoid colon perforation by migrating intrauterine device
    Omar Toumi, Houssem Ammar, Abdessalem Ghdira, Amine Chhaidar, Wided Trimech, Rahul Gupta, Randa Salem, Jamel Saad, Ibtissem Korbi, Mohamed Nasr, Faouzi Noomen, Mondher Golli, Khadija Zouari
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2018; 42(C): 60.     CrossRef
Original Article
Survival Rate and Prognostic Factors in Perforated Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Case-Control Study.
Kim, Min Sang , Lim, Seung Woo , Park, Sung Jin , Gwak, Geumhee , Yang, Keun Ho , Bae, Byung Noe , Kim, Ki Hwan , Han, Sewhan , Kim, Hong Joo , Kim, Young Duck , Kim, Hong Yong
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(1):69-75.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.1.69
  • 2,700 View
  • 14 Download
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Perforations are rare but serious complications in colorectal cancer. Controversy exists over whether to perform a radical operation because colorectal cancer perforation is considered as an advanced stage disease, and septic complications of peritonitis have been identified as being responsible for a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between the survival rate and the clinicopathological parameters that might be used as predictive factors of the prognosis for perforated colorectal cancer.
METHODS
The analysis was based on 24 cases of perforated colorectal cancer (the case group), 48 cases of matching uncomplicated colorectal cancer (the control group), and 72 cases of the case and the control groups combined together (the combined group), all of which were identified during a 10-yr period in a single institution.
RESULTS
The five-year survival rates of the perforated colorectal cancer patients and their matching controls were similar (P=0.484). No significant differences in the locations of the cancer, the pre-operative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, the tumor sizes, the resection margins, or the numbers of the lymph nodes harvested were found between the two groups. A univariate analysis of the prognostic factors that influenced the case group revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.004) was significantly correlated to a better five-year survival rate. A univariate analysis of the prognostic factors that influenced the five-year survival rate of the combined group revealed that the stage (P<0.001), the pre-op CEA level (P=0.018), the angio invasion (P=0.019), the perineural invasion (P=0.019), the number of harvested lymph nodes (P=0.004), and adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.001) were significantly correlated to the five-year survival rate. The identified independent prognostic factors in the combined group were the stage (hazard ratio, 5.20), angio-invasion (hazard ratio, 2.81), and adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.17).
CONCLUSION
The clinical pathway of perforated colorectal cancer is similar to that of uncomplicated colorectal cancer. Therefore, perforated colorectal cancer patients should be recommended for treatment with the appropriate radical operation and adjuvant chemotherapy based on oncologic principles.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio is a Crucial Criterion in Colorectal Cancer Therapy Management and Prognosis
    Gülçin Harman Kamalı, Sedat Kamalı
    European Archives of Medical Research.2022; 38(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • Acute Abdomen in the Oncology Patient
    Katrina McGinty
    Seminars in Roentgenology.2020; 55(4): 400.     CrossRef
  • Nonobstetrical Acute Abdomen during Pregnancy as a Consequence of Colorectal Carcinoma Perforation: Case Report and Review of the Literature
    Žana Žegarac, Željko Duić, Sandra Stasenko
    Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value of Perineural Invasion in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Yuchong Yang, Xuanzhang Huang, Jingxu Sun, Peng Gao, Yongxi Song, Xiaowan Chen, Junhua Zhao, Zhenning Wang
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2015; 19(6): 1113.     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of obstructed and perforated colorectal cancer: still debating and unresolved issues
    Rudra K Maitra, Charles A Maxwell-Armstrong
    Colorectal Cancer.2013; 2(6): 573.     CrossRef
  • Multivariate Analysis of the Survival Rate for Treatment Modalities in Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer
    Sung Kang Kim, Chang Ho Lee, Min Ro Lee, Jong Hun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(1): 35.     CrossRef
Case Report
A Case of Successful Percutaneous Drainage of a Pelvic Abscess Complicating Colonoscopy.
Si, Youn , Kim, Shin Young , Choi, Seung Bong , Kim, Hyung Jin , Lee, Yoon Suk , Cho, Hyun Min , Kim, Jun Gi , Oh, Seung Tack , Lee, In Kyu
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2009;25(5):347-351.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2009.25.5.347
  • 2,532 View
  • 10 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Perforations that occur during colonoscopy are usually managed by surgical repair. When the patient's symptoms are mild and laboratory findings show minor abnormalities, a conservative treatment can be considered. Although an operation is the treatment of choice in patients with generalized peritonitis, in some selected patients, percutaneous abscess drainage can be an alternative to surgical intervention for drainage of deep-infected fluid collections or can act as a temporary measure until the patient becomes sufficiently stable for surgery. We report here on a 53-yr-old male patient who developed signs of localized peritonitis and had a pelvic abscess due to a colonic perforation after colonoscopy and was treated successfully by using percutaneous abscess drainage.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Case of Buried Bumper Syndrome Complicated by Abdominal Wall Abscess in an Elderly Patient
    Chul Young Kim, Min Seong Kim, Do Young Kim, Young Bae Lim, Dong Yoon Kang, Tack Su Yun, Sang Seok Yoon, Jung Hyun Lee, Woo Young Kim, Yong Kyu Lee
    Journal of the Korean Geriatrics Society.2010; 14(4): 265.     CrossRef
Original Articles
The Impact of Bowel Preparation on Anastomotic Complications after Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection: A Prospective Comparative Study between Oral Polyethylene Glycol and Phosphate Enema.
Baek, Se Jin , Choi, Dong Jin , Kim, Jin , Woo, Si Uk , Min, Byung Wook , Kim, Seon Hahn , Moon, Hong Young
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2009;25(5):294-299.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2009.25.5.294
  • 2,054 View
  • 8 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Although most randomized trials demonstrated no advantage of mechanical bowel preparation for colorectal resection, an oral solution is still widely used. The aims of this study were to evaluate whether a single phosphate enema is as effective as oral polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution in preventing anastomotic complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery and to examine the clinical courses of anastomotic complications.
METHODS
Between September 2006 and December 2007, 309 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection with primary anastomosis. The bowel preparation used was PEG solution during initial period (PEG group), but since February 2007, a single phosphate enema (enema group) was utilized. Postoperative data were prospectively recorded. In patients with anastomotic complications, the clinical course was compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
There were 150 patients in the PEG group and 159 patients in the enema group. Demographics did not differ between the two groups. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 3.3 percent of the patients in the PEG group and 5.7 percent of the patients in the enema group (P=0.326). The rates of anastomotic bleeding were 2.0 and 2.5 percent, respectively (P=0.761). The hospital stays for patients with anastomotic complication were not different between the two groups (P=0.137), but patients in the PEG group (80%) needed reoperation more frequently than those in the enema group (11.1%) (P=0.023).
CONCLUSION
These results suggest that laparoscopic colorectal surgery may be safely performed with a single phosphate enema instead of oral polyethylene glycol.
Feasibility of York-Mason Operation for Selective Advanced Rectal Cancer.
Jeong, Woon Kyung , Baek, Seong Kyu , Bae, Ok Suk
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2009;25(3):178-185.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2009.25.3.178
  • 2,480 View
  • 12 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The York-Mason operation has been used as local therapy for benign rectal tumors not easily excised with a conventional transanal excision and for T1 rectal cancers having a low risk of lymph-node metastasis. This study evaluated whether a York-Mason operation could be an alternative therapy for selected patients with T2 or T3 rectal cancers.
METHODS
From February 2004 to March 2008, 11 patients with T2 or T3 rectal cancer, who refused rectal excision due to fear of abdominal surgery itself and perioperative side effects or unwillingness to have a permanent stoma, underwent a York-Mason operation. The data on the patients were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS
The distance from the anal verge to the tumor was 5 cm (median, 2-8 cm), and the tumor size was 3 cm (median, 1.5-4 cm). Histological examination revealed a pathological tumor (pT) stage 2 in eight patients, stage pT3 in one patient, and stage pTx in two patients. The distance from the resection margin to the tumor was 0.3 cm (median, 0.1-0.5 cm). Six patients (55%) had incomplete tumor excision. Radiotherapy was performed in one patient preoperatively and in eight postoperatively. Postoperative morbidity occurred in four patients (36%). During a median of 38.2 months, two patients (18%) developed local recurrence and liver metastasis. Postoperative mortality, which was not related to the procedure, occurred in one patient (9%).
CONCLUSION
The York-Mason operation could be considered as an alternative therapy for selected T2 or T3 rectal cancer patients who refuse rectal excision.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Trans-Sacral Local Resection as a Posterior Approach
    Bong Hwa Lee, Hyoung-Chul Park, Hae Wan Lee, Chang Nam An, Taeik Um, Young A Lim, Byoung Sup Kim, Mi Young Chang, Soo Hyoung Kim, Sung Wook Cho
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2010; 26(3): 197.     CrossRef
Multivariate Analysis of the Risk Factors Associated with Complications and Mortality after and Emergency Operation for Obstructive, Perforated Colorectal Cancer.
Kang, Dong Baek , Shin, Chang Yeol , Lee, Jeong Kyun , Park, Won Cheol
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2009;25(3):165-171.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2009.25.3.165
  • 6,839 View
  • 31 Download
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Despite increased effort for the detection of early colorectal cancer, advanced disease presenting as obstruction or perforation still accounts for 8 to 29% and 3-8% of all colorectal cancers, respectively. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics, the surgical methods, the complications, and the risk factors of obstructive or perforated colorectal cancer that may influence the outcome.
METHODS
A retrospective study was carried out in 60 patients with colorectal cancer, who underwent surgery due to obstruction or perforation from March 2000 to December 2005. The colorectal cancers were considered to be complicated when clinical signs of peritonitis were observed, the radiologic characteristics of the tumor did not permit preoperative mechanical bowel preparation, or perforation existed, when these observations were confirmed by operative findings. The following data were analyzed: clinical characteristics, surgical methods, complications, and risk factors.
RESULTS
Thirty-three patients (55%) had obstruction, and 27 patients (45%) had perforation. Overall, major complications occurred in 33.3% and 48.5%, respectively. The mortality rates were 6.1% and 14.8%, respectively. Risk factors for major complication were age, perforation, and transfusion whereas those for mortality were perforation and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class.
CONCLUSION
The risk factors of complication were old age, transfusion, and perforation and those for mortality was perforation and ASA class. Earlier diagnosis and prompt, intensive, careful management should be attempted in these high-risk patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic determinants in surgical critial patients undergoing emergency surgery for Stage III or higher colorectal cancer
    Hyun Ho Kim, Sanguk Hwang, Jinbeom Cho
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical Outcomes and Risk Factors in Patients Who Underwent Emergency Colorectal Surgery
    Dai Sik Jeong, Young Hun Kim, Kyung Jong Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(6): 239.     CrossRef
  • Emergent Colorectal Surgery: What Should Be Considered?
    Chang-Nam Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(4): 124.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes and Risk Factors Affecting Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Colorectal Emergency Surgery
    Nam Ho Oh, Kyung Jong Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(4): 133.     CrossRef
  • Multivariate Analysis of the Survival Rate for Treatment Modalities in Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer
    Sung Kang Kim, Chang Ho Lee, Min Ro Lee, Jong Hun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(1): 35.     CrossRef
Prognostic Factors for Complication and Mortality of Colonic Perforation.
Park, Keon Hwan , Choi, Pyong Wha , Kim, Jae Il , Noh, Tae Ho , Heo, Tae Gil , Park, Je Hoon , Lee, Myung Soo , Kim, Chul Nam , Chang, Surk Hyo
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2009;25(3):143-149.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2009.25.3.143
  • 2,632 View
  • 18 Download
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The present study was performed to assess the outcomes in patients with colonic perforation and to determine the prognostic factors for mortality.
METHODS
The cases of 42 patients who underwent surgery for colonic perforation between March 1999 and September 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, presence of preoperative shock, duration of symptoms, cause of perforation, location of perforation, degree of peritonitis, and the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) score were analyzed for their association with early outcome by using univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS
Diverticulitis (46%, 19 patients) and colorectal cancer (36%, 15 patients) were the most common causes of noniatrogenic colonic perforation, and the sigmoid colon was the most common site of perforation (60%, 25 patients). The postoperative mortality was 21.4% (9 patients). The mortality in patients with preoperative shock, with a MPI score of more than 25, and with Hinchey stage III or IV peritonitis were 70.0%, 57.1%, and 53.3%, respectively (P<0.001). No statistical difference was observed in postoperative mortality with regard to age, sex, ASA classification, duration of symptoms, cause of perforation, and location of perforation. According to the multivariate analysis, preoperative shock proved to be the only significant prognostic factor for mortality (P=0.027) (odds ratio: 19.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-276.9).
CONCLUSION
Preoperative shock, a MPI score of more than 25, and Hinchey stage III or IV peritonitis were associated with high postoperative mortality in patients with colonic perforation. Especially, more intensive management and interest are required for patient s with preoperative shock due to colonic perforation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Ostomy in Nontraumatic Conditions: Our Experience and Review of the Literature
    Kenan Büyükaşık, Bünyamin Gürbulak, Emre Özoran, Yiğit Düzköylü, Esin Kabul Gürbulak, Aziz Arı, Hasan Bektaş
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2016; 78(6): 471.     CrossRef
  • EVALUATION OF MANNHEIM PERITONITIS INDEX (MPI) SCORING SYSTEM IN PROGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH PERITONITIS DUE TO HOLLOW VISCOUS PERFORATION
    Mahammad Ali Sutar, Ramakrishna Yaradhimmaiah, Nikhath Ingva Arshi
    Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences.2016; 5(31): 1626.     CrossRef
Treatment of Colon Perforation Associated with Colonoscopy.
Park, Hae Ran , Baek, Seong Kyu , Bae, Ok Suk , Park, Sung Dae
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(5):322-328.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.5.322
  • 4,160 View
  • 47 Download
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Recently, non-operative conservative management or laparoscopic repair has been reported for the management of colonic perforation during colonoscopy. However, the preferred management strategy remains controversial. The purpose of the present study is to identify an appropriate strategy for the treatment of colon perforation during colonoscopy.
METHODS
The medical records of patients who developed colon perforation during colonoscopy between May 2003 and November 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. The mechanism and site of perforation, the treatment administered, complications, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS
In total, 16 perforations were evaluated. Of these, 11 developed during diagnostic colonoscopy and 5 during therapeutic colonoscopy. The most frequent perforation site was the sigmoid colon (12), followed by the transverse colon (2), the rectum (1), and unknown site (1). Six patients underwent surgery due to signs of diffuse peritonitis 10 were initially treated conservatively. Among the patients who underwent surgery, four underwent laparoscopic repair and two underwent open repair. Among the patients initially treated conservatively two patients required surgery due to clinical deterioration of peritonitis and rectovaginal fistula. These 2 patients underwent repair with proximal diverting stomas.
CONCLUSIONS
Colon perforation associated with colonoscopy is a rare event, but raises serious complications. Selected patients with colonoscopic perforation may be treated conservatively, but if these patients fail to respond to such treatments, extensive surgical procedures may be warranted.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Management Outcomes of Colonoscopic Perforations Are Affected by the General Condition of the Patients
    Jae Ho Park, Kyung Jong Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon perforation during colonoscopy
    Jeongsoo Kim, Gil Jae Lee, Jeong-Heum Baek, Won-Suk Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2014; 87(3): 139.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Successful Percutaneous Drainage of a Pelvic Abscess Complicating Colonoscopy
    Youn Si, Shin Young Kim, Seung Bong Choi, Hyung Jin Kim, Yoon Suk Lee, Hyun Min Cho, Jun Gi Kim, Seung Tack Oh, In Kyu Lee
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2009; 25(5): 347.     CrossRef
Case Report
Rectal Perforation after Anorectal Manometry Following Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Low Anterior Resection: Report of a Cases.
Jeong, Woon Kyung , Chung, Tae Sung , Lim, Sang Woo , Park, Ji Won , Lim, Seok Byung , Choi, Hyo Seong , Jeong, Seung Yong
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(4):298-301.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.4.298
  • 2,707 View
  • 15 Download
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Anorectal manometry is widely used to evaluate anorectal function. Few reports have described complications resulting from this procedure. A 47-year-old male underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy and a low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The patient underwent anorectal manometry at postoperative 8 months. A rectal perforation was diagnosed shortly thereafter. The patient was initially managed conservatively using percutaneous drainage and parenteral antibiotics and then discharged on day 60 after the event. One month later, a colo-cutaneous fistula and expanding abdominal fasciitis developed. The patient underwent surgical exploration, drainage, resection of the rectum including the fistula, and redo-coloanal anastomosis with a diverting ileostomy. The patient discharged without complications on postoperative day 25. Anorectal manometry should be performed with particular care in patients who have undergone radiotherapy and anastomosis at the rectum.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Habit training versus habit training with direct visual biofeedback in adults with chronic constipation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Christine Norton, Anton Emmanuel, Natasha Stevens, S. Mark Scott, Ugo Grossi, Sybil Bannister, Sandra Eldridge, James M. Mason, Charles H. Knowles
    Trials.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Perforation After Anorectal Manometry for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
    Kyung Ha Lee, Ji Yeon Kim, Young Hoon Sul
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(4): 146.     CrossRef
  • Perforación rectal tras manometría anorrectal sin enfermedad rectal previa: una complicación excepcional resuelta con tratamiento médico
    Jorge Antonio Núñez Otero, Mariano Gómez Rubio, Ángel R. Durán Aguado, José L. Martínez Albares
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2013; 36(9): 577.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP