With the advent of checkpoint inhibitors, it has opened up opportunities for numerous cancer patients. However, as is the case with every treatment, complications need to be weighed. Gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as diarrhea and colitis are well-known complications for checkpoint inhibitors. In severe cases, colitis-induced colonic perforation may occur with an estimation of 1.0% to 1.5% in anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. However, only a handful of cases of such devastating complications have been reported in anti-PD-1 antibodies such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab. We here report a case of intestinal perforation in a patient treated with nivolumab.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Intestinal perforation in recurrent cervical cancer following bevacizumab and pembrolizumab therapy: A case report Yuanchun Fan, Shihao Liu, Jiangjing Zhao, Yawei Fu, Jiahui Yang, Chunyang Wang, Hui Zhang Medicine.2025; 104(15): e40473. CrossRef
Iatrogenic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies on the lower gastrointestinal tract Dua Abuquteish, Ahmad Yousef Alazzam, Aws Khalid Abushanab, Omar Amjad Almajdoubah, Sara Aljfout, Mahmoud Taysir Mousa, Mus’ab Theeb Mustafa, Bashar Khater, Maher Sughayer Frontline Gastroenterology.2025; : flgastro-2025-103094. CrossRef
Chemotherapy-associated pneumoperitoneum in cancer patients: a scoping review Renee M. Maina, Caroline Rader, Jeevan Kypa, Constantine Asahngwa, Hilary M. Jasmin, Nia N. Zalamea, John S. Nelson, Jonathan L. Altomar, Mary Brinson Owens, Clarisse S. Muenyi, Denis A. Foretia Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(5): 2828. CrossRef
Gastrointestinal perforation associated with novel antineoplastic agents: A real-world study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Zicheng Yu, Haibin Zhu, Hongjun Chen, Lifei Zhu, Xiaolan Liao Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Immune-related Adverse Events: A Histopathologic Review Zainab I. Alruwaii, Elizabeth A. Montgomery Advances in Anatomic Pathology.2023; 30(3): 230. CrossRef
An updated review of gastrointestinal toxicity induced by PD-1 inhibitors: from mechanisms to management Yiyu Cheng, Fangmei Ling, Junrong Li, Yidong Chen, Mingyang Xu, Shuang Li, Liangru Zhu Frontiers in Immunology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Immune-related Adverse Events: A Histopathologic Review Zainab I. Alruwaii, Elizabeth A. Montgomery Advances in Anatomic Pathology.2022; 29(4): 183. CrossRef
Gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Concomitant cytomegalovirus (CMV) enteritis worsens the prognosis of this condition. We report a case of small bowel perforation associated with gastrointestinal GVHD and CMV enteritis in a patient with leukemia who was successfully treated surgically. A 39-year-old man presented with intestinal perforation necessitating emergency surgical intervention. He was diagnosed with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and developed severe gastrointestinal GVHD and CMV enteritis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. His terminal ileum showed a perforation with diffuse wall thinning, and petechiae were observed over long segments of the distal ileum and the proximal colon. Small bowel segmental resection and a subtotal colectomy with a double-barreled ileocolostomy were performed. The patient recovered uneventfully after the operation. Based on reports described in the literature, surgery plays a minor role in the management of gastrointestinal GVHD; however, timely surgical intervention could be effective in selected patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Cytomegalovirus enteritis resistant to antiviral drugs improved following total colectomy Sae Kawata, Jumpei Takamatsu, Yuichi Yasue, Aya Fukuhara, Jinkoo Kang Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose To identify factors significantly associated with the mortality of patients with left colonic perforation, and to compare the outcome of Hartmann’s procedure (HP) and primary repair (PR) or primary anastomosis (PA) in patients with left colonic perforation without factors associated with mortality.
Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery for left colonic perforation from January 2009 to February 2018. Preoperative factors related to postoperative mortality, including vital signs, laboratory findings, and intraoperative findings, were analyzed by type of operation. The chi-square, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to analyze the data.
Results Ninety-one patients were included (36 men, 55 women), and 15 (16.5%) died postoperatively. Prognostic factors were age, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, bleeding tendency, acute kidney injury, hemodynamic instability, and the existence of feculent ascites. Leukopenia and longer operative time were independent risk factors for mortality. Seventy-nine patients did not have leukopenia and 30 of these patients who underwent PR without diversion were excluded from the subanalysis. HP was performed in 30 patients, and PR with diversion and PA with or without diversion were performed in 19. Compared to the other operative methods, HP had no advantage in reducing hospital mortality (P=0.458) and morbidity.
Conclusion Leukopenia could be an objective prognostic factor for left colonic perforation. Although HP is the gold standard for septic left colonic perforation, it did not improve the hospital mortality of the patients without leukopenia. For such patients, PR or PA may be suggested as an alternative option for left colonic perforation.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Risk Factors for Postoperative Major Morbidity, Anastomotic Leakage, Re-Surgery and Mortality in Patients with Colonic Perforation Maximilian Brunner, Lara Gärtner, Andreas Weiß, Klaus Weber, Axel Denz, Christian Krautz, Georg F. Weber, Robert Grützmann Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(17): 5220. CrossRef
Evaluation of Morbidity and Mortality in Iatrogenic Colonic Perforation During Colonoscopy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Ajibola A Adebisi, Daniel E Onobun, Adeola Adediran, Reginald N Ononye, Ethel O Ojo, Adedayo Oluyi, Ayotunde Ojo, Stephen Oputa Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Patient outcomes and prognostic factors associated with colonic perforation surgery: a retrospective study Do-bin Lee, Seonhui Shin, Chun-Seok Yang Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science.2022; 39(2): 133. CrossRef
Morbidity and Mortality of Neutropenic Patients in Visceral Surgery: A Narrative Review Ann-Kathrin Lederer, Fabian Bartsch, Markus Moehler, Peter Gaßmann, Hauke Lang Cells.2022; 11(20): 3314. CrossRef
Case Reports
Benign GI diease,Rare disease & stoma,Complication
Sung Hoon Kang, Hee Seok Moon, Jae Ho Park, Ju Seok Kim, Sun Hyung Kang, Eaum Seok Lee, Seok Hyun Kim, Byung Seok Lee, Jae Kyu Sung, Hyun Yong Jeong, Kyung Ha Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(Suppl 1):S18-S23. Published online May 15, 2020
Paradoxical reactions to tuberculosis (TB) treatment are characterized by an initial improvement of the clinical symptoms followed by clinical or radiological deterioration of existing tuberculous lesions, or by development of new lesions. Intestinal perforation in gastrointestinal TB can occur as a paradoxical reaction to antitubercular therapy. A 55-year-old man visited the outpatient department with lower abdominal pain and weight loss. He was diagnosed with intestinal TB and started antitubercular therapy. After 3 months of antitubercular therapy, a colonoscopy revealed improvement of the disease. Three days after the colonoscopy, the patient visited the emergency room complaining of abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography revealed extraluminal air-filled spaces in the pelvic cavity. We diagnosed a small bowel perforation and performed an emergency laparotomy and a right hemicolectomy with small bowel resection. This report describes the case of intestinal perforation presenting as a paradoxical reaction to antitubercular and provides a brief literature review.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Paradoxical ileocecal perforation during early anti-tuberculosis therapy: A rare case report Yoseph Mulatu Habte, Binyam Mulatu Habte, Yabetse Alemayehu Kifle, Esimael Musema Abdu, Makida Mulatu Habte, Shimelis Ayalew Yimer International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2025; 137: 112100. CrossRef
Réaction paradoxale tuberculeuse L.-D. Azoulay, A.-L. Houist, E. Feredj, W. Vindrios, S. Gallien La Revue de Médecine Interne.2024; 45(5): 279. CrossRef
Left hand abscess as a paradoxical reaction during treatment of disseminated tuberculosis in immunocompetent patient: case report and review of literature Aisha Alharbi, Aseel Aljahdali, Mohamed Firoze Ahamed, Hassan Almarhabi BMC Infectious Diseases.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Everolimus (Afinitor) is an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin. Polmacoxib (Acelex) is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that belongs to the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor family and is mainly used for treatment of arthritis. Intestinal perforation has not been reported previously as a complication of everolimus, and perforation of the lower intestinal tract caused by a selective COX-2 inhibitor is extremely rare. We present here a case of colon perforation that occurred after use of polmacoxib in a metastatic breast cancer patient who had been treated with everolimus for the preceding six months.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Identification of Drugs Associated With Oral Ulcers Based on Pharmacovigilance Xinyue Zhang, Xueqing Li, Wuda Huoshen, Shiting Li International Dental Journal.2025; 75(6): 103957. CrossRef
Multiple ulcers and perforation of small intestine with everolimus use in a patient with rectal neuroendocrine tumor: A case report Kentaro Abe, Shigenobu Emoto, Kazuhito Sasaki, Hiroaki Nozawa, Yoichi Yasunaga, Soichiro Ishihara International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2023; 106: 108094. CrossRef
The pneumatic colorectal injury caused by high pressure compressed air are rare and can be fatal. Herein, we present a case of 45-year-old male who developed sudden onset of severe abdominal pain after cleaning the dust on his pants with high pressure compressed air gun dust cleaner. Emergent exploratory laparotomy was done which findings are a huge rectal perforation with multiple serosal and subserosal tear in sigmoid to splenic flexure of colon. Anterior resection with left hemicolectomy, and temporary transverse colostomy was performed. Postoperative course was uneventful. Recently, prognosis is generally favorable because of prompt diagnosis and emergent surgical management.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Laparoscopic Repair of Colorectal Perforations Induced by Compressed Air Pressure: A Case Report Ibrahim Elnogoomi, Hoorieh Qasemi, Mariam Aylan Alshamsi, Majid Alhammadi, Omar Elnogoomi Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Air Nozzle Injury: Barotrauma Resulted From an Industrial Accident Ashok N Mhaske, Nishi Gupta, Abhishek Mishra, Shubham Jaiswal, Chirag Dausage, Jyoti Meena, Gourav Goyal Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Emergency laparoscopic resection of the anterior rectum due to rectal trauma secondary to compressed air, case report Daniel Gómez, Luis F. Cabrera, Mauricio Pedraza, Andres Mendoza-Zuchini, Nicolás Sánchez, Hector W. Cure, Héctor O. Cure Bulicie, Jean A. Pulido International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2020; 76: 288. CrossRef
The intrauterine device (IUD) is a widely used contraceptive method. One of the most serious and rare complications of using an IUD is colon perforation. We report a case of colonoscopic removal of an IUD that had perforated into the rectosigmoid colon in a 42-year-old woman who presented with no symptoms. Colonoscopy showed that the IUD had penetrated into rectosigmoid colon wall and that an arm of the IUD was embedded in the colon wall. We were able to remove the IUD easily by using colonoscopy. The endoscopic approach may be considered the first choice therapy for selected patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Migrated Foreign Body Perforating the Colon: Scope for Colonoscopy Aparimita Das, Tarun S Joseph, Gangireddy Siva Sankar Reddy, Amrit Pipara, Sumit Mukhopadhyay Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Retroperitoneal Displacement of an Intrauterine Device (IUD): A Case Report Godwin Silas Macheku, Fidelis Clarence Jungulu, Ezekiel Kalibugwe Kiyogoma, Kheri Kagya, Salehe Mrutu, Michael Johnson Mahande International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology.2025; : 713. CrossRef
Rectal Foreign Body Shaped Like an Endoscopic Clip: Migrated Intrauterine Devices to the Rectum Xinyu Xie, BoYuan, Chunmei Li, Lina Cao Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2025; 70(9): 2899. CrossRef
Endoscopic Removal of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device From the Descending Colon: A Case Report Muhammad Shabbir, Mishal A Aljohani, Abdurahman Alfaiz, Msab Aldakheel, Zeeshan Ali Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Colonoscopic removal of an intrauterine device with rectal perforation: A case report Lingrun Ye, Yuanyuan Zhu, Fanglai Zhu Medicine.2024; 103(28): e38872. CrossRef
Is It a “Colon Perforation”? A Case Report and Review of the Literature Shuangshuang Lu, Xinyu Yao, Jun Shi, Jian Huang, Shaohua Zhuang, Junfang Ma, Yan Liu, Wei Zhang, Lifei Yu, Ping Zhu, Qiuwei Zhu, Ruxia Shi, Hong Zheng, Dong Shao, Yuyan Pan, Shizhen Bao, Li Qin, Lijie Huang, Wenjia Liu, Jin Huang Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic removal of an intrauterine device from the lumen of the sigmoid colon V. V. Bereshchenko, D. V. Lazarevich, N. N. Goncharov, P. V. Khodanovich Health and Ecology Issues.2022; 19(1): 145. CrossRef
Incomplete Removal of an Intrauterine Device Perforating the Sigmoid Colon Junseak Lee, Jung Hwan Oh, Jinsu Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim, Sung Hoon Jung The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 78(1): 48. CrossRef
Endoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device: Case Report and Review of Literature and Technique Yang Lei, Vadim Iablakov, Riaz J. Karmali, Nauzer Forbes ACG Case Reports Journal.2019; 6(6): e00090. CrossRef
The management of a colonoscopic perforation (CP) varies from conservative to surgical. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes between surgical and conservative treatment of patients with a CP.
Methods
From 2003 to 2016, the medical records of patients with CP were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they initially received conservative or surgical treatment.
Results
During the study period, a total of 48 patients with a CP were treated. Among them, 5 patients had underlying colorectal cancer and underwent emergency radical cancer surgery; these patients were excluded. The mean age of the remaining 43 patients was 64.5 years old, and the most common perforation site was the sigmoid colon (15 patients). The initial conservative care group included 16 patients, and the surgery group included 27 patients. In the conservative group, 5 patients required conversion to surgery (failure rate: 5 of 16 [31.3%]). Of the surgery group, laparoscopic surgery was performed on 19 patients and open surgery on 8 patients, including 2 conversion cases. Major postoperative complications developed in 11 patients (34.4%), and postoperative mortality developed in 4 patients (12.5%). The only predictor for poor prognosis after surgery was a high American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification.
Conclusion
In this study, conservative treatment for patients with a CP had a relatively high failure rate. Furthermore, surgical treatment showed significant rates of complications and mortality, which depended on the general status of the patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Multicenter retrospective evaluation of ileocecocolic perforations associated with diagnostic lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in dogs and cats Vanessa L. Woolhead, Jacqueline C. Whittemore, Sarah A. Stewart Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2020; 34(2): 684. CrossRef
We experienced 3 cases of manometry-induced colon perforation. A 75-year-old man (case 1) underwent anorectal manometry (ARM) 3 years after radiotherapy for prostate cancer and a laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. A 70-year-old man (case 2) underwent ARM 3 months after conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and a laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. A 78-year-old man (case 3) underwent ARM 2 months after a laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. In all cases, a colon perforation with fecal peritonitis occurred. All were treated successfully using prompt and active operations and were discharged without any complications. ARM with a balloon, as a measure of rectal compliance, should be performed 2 months or longer after surgery. If a perforation occurs, prompt and active surgical intervention is necessary due to the high possibility of extensive fecal peritonitis.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Effect of low anterior resection syndrome on quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: A retrospective observational study Dong-Ai Jin, Fang-Ping Gu, Tao-Li Meng, Xuan-Xuan Zhang World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 15(10): 2123. CrossRef
Functional anorectal studies in patients with low anterior resection syndrome Ssu‐Chi Chen, Kaori Futaba, Wing Wa Leung, Cherry Wong, Tony Mak, Simon Ng, Hans Gregersen Neurogastroenterology & Motility.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer Bin Zhang, Ke Zhao, Yu‐Juan Zhao, Shu‐Hui Yin, Guang‐Zuan Zhuo, Yong Zhao, Jian‐Hua Ding Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(2): 424. CrossRef
Broken beer bottle as a cause of sigmoid perforation: A summary of causes and predictors in the management of traumatic and non-traumatic colorectal perforation Christian German Ospina-Pérez, Ana Milena Álvarez-Acuña, Lina María López-Álvarez, Rosa María Ospina-Pérez, Ivan David Lozada-Martínez, Sabrina Rahman International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2021; 85: 106261. CrossRef
Assessment of defecation function after sphincter-saving resection for mid to low rectal cancer: A cross-sectional study Bao-Jia Luo, Mei-Chun Zheng, Yang Xia, Zhu Ying, Jian-Hong Peng, Li-Ren Li, Zhi-Zhong Pan, Hui-Ying Qin European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2021; 55: 102059. CrossRef
We report a case of urinary bladder perforation during colonoscopy. A 67-year-old female, who had undergone a transabdominal hysterectomy for uterine myomas 15 years ago, visited the emergency department with complaint of abdominal pain after a screening colonoscopy. Laparoscopic examination revealed severe adhesion between the sigmoid colon and the urinary bladder. The urinary bladder wall was weakened, and several perforation sites were found. The surgery was converted to a laparotomy. After a thorough examination, we performed primary repair for the perforation sites, followed by an omentopexy.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Trauma to the solid abdominal organs: The missed dark box of colonoscopy Mohamed H Emara, Usama Mazid, Yasmine A Elshaer, Mahmoud A Elkerdawy, Dilaver Farooq Malik, Aya M Mahros World Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 30(7): 624. CrossRef
Mesenteric laceration of the sigmoid colon after colonoscopy: A rare complication Min Wu, Yonghua Lin, Zhichao Chen, Jianfeng Wei Asian Journal of Surgery.2023; 46(11): 5391. CrossRef
Intramural colonic hemorrhage is rare and often secondary to trauma or anticoagulation therapy. Idiopathic intramural hemorrhages in the alimentary tract have rarely been reported. While several reports of spontaneous perforation of an intramural rectal hematoma have been published, no reports of spontaneous perforation in the ascending colon due to a hematoma have. We describe a patient with an ascending colonic perforation secondary to spontaneous intramural hemorrhage. The patient is a 35-year-old male, who presented with acute abdominal pain and no history of trauma. An abdominal computed tomography scan showed a high-density area around the ascending colon, and nonoperative management was instituted. On the eighth hospital day, the pain worsened, and abdominal computed tomography scan showed free air. An emergent right hemicolectomy was performed. Intramural hematoma and ischemia with perforation, with no obvious etiology, were found. The patient was discharged on the 14th postoperative day.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A case of gastrointestinal perforation following transarterial embolization for an intramural hematoma after cold snare polypectomy of an adenoma in the transverse colon Yuu Kodama, Yuji Mizokami, Yuzo Toyama, Hiroyasu Kusaka, Gen Maeda, Shingo Asahara, Ryuji Nagahama, Shin‐ichiro Horiguchi, Hiroki Aoyama DEN Open.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Giant Proximal Right Colon Submucosal Hematoma Leading to a Large Bowel Obstruction Arham Siddiqui, Hijab Ahmed, Muhammad H Nazim, Basem Soliman, Izi Obokhare Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Spontaneous colonic perforation in adults: Evaluation of a pooled case series Ren Chongxi, Ji Jinggang, Shi Yan, Wang Hongqiao, Liu Yan, Yang Fengshuo Science Progress.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Idiopathic intramural hematoma of the right colon. A case report and review of the literature Rosario Vecchio, Emma Cacciola, Michele Figuera, Renato Catalano, Giuseppe Giulla, Emanuele Rosario Distefano, Eva Intagliata International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2019; 60: 16. CrossRef
Intramural Hematoma Causing Hematochezia After Colonoscopy With Polypectomy Aleksandar Gavrić, Rok Dežman, Sebastian Stefanović, Jan Drnovšek, Borut Štabuc ACG Case Reports Journal.2019; 6(7): e00129. CrossRef
An endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective and safe therapeutic technique for treating a patient with a laterally-spreading tumor (LST). Colonoscopic-procedure-related complications are noted to be about 2.8% worldwide, and a perforation is the most common. Most colon perforations cause pneumoperitoneum. However, a perforation within the retroperitoneal portion of the colon (rectum and some of sigmoid colon) may cause an extraperitoneal perforation, and the leaking free air may induce pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema, depending on the amount of discharged air. Herein, we present the case of a patient with an extraperitoneal colon microperforation which manifested as pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema after an EMR for a sigmoid LST, which was successfully treated with medical treatment and endoscopic clipping.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Asymptomatic sigmoid diverticulum perforation-induced subcutaneous, mediastinal, and retroperitoneal emphysema: A case report and literature review Daichi Setoguchi, Naoki Iwanaga, Kotaro Nema, Tomoya Hagiwara, Kotaro Hayashida, Koki Yamashita, Tatsuro Hirayama, Masataka Yoshida, Kazuaki Takeda, Shotaro Ide, Masato Tashiro, Takahiro Takazono, Masachika Kitajima, Noriho Sakamoto, Koichi Izumikawa, Kat Respiratory Medicine Case Reports.2025; 56: 102229. CrossRef
Pneumoretroperitoneum mimicking rectal perforation, secondary to vaginal wall laceration following sexual intercourse in a 19-year-old woman in Korea: a case report Sung Pil Choo, Ki Eun Seon, Jae Cheol Jung, Kyeong Deok Kim, Moon Suk Choi Journal of Acute Care Surgery.2025; 15(2): 86. CrossRef
The Close Relationship between Large Bowel and Heart: When a Colonic Perforation Mimics an Acute Myocardial Infarction Maria Francesca Secchi, Carlo Torre, Giovanni Dui, Francesco Virdis, Mauro Podda Case Reports in Surgery.2018; 2018: 1. CrossRef
Pneumoretroperitoneum, Pneumomediastinum, Pneumothorax, and Subcutaneous Emphysema after Diagnostic Colonoscopy Hee Sung Lee, Hwan Hee Park, Ju Seok Kim, Sun Hyung Kang, Hee Seok Moon, Jae Kyu Sung, Byung Seok Lee, Hyun Yong Jeong The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 70(3): 145. CrossRef
Rumi Shin, Sang Mok Lee, Beonghoon Sohn, Dong Woon Lee, Inho Song, Young Jun Chai, Hae Won Lee, Hye Seong Ahn, In Mok Jung, Jung Kee Chung, Seung Chul Heo
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(6):221-227. Published online December 31, 2016
An intestinal perforation is a rare condition, but has a high mortality rate, even after immediate surgical intervention. The clinical predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality are still not well established, so this study attempted to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality after surgery for an intestinal perforation.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 117 patients who underwent surgery for an intestinal perforation at a single institution in Korea from November 2008 to June 2014. Factors related with postoperative mortality at 1 month and other postoperative complications were investigated.
Results
The mean age of enrolled patients was 66.0 ± 15.8 years and 66% of the patients were male. Fifteen patients (13%) died within 1 month after surgical treatment. Univariate analysis indicated that patient-related factors associated with mortality were low systolic and diastolic blood pressure, low serum albumin, low serum protein, low total cholesterol, and high blood urea nitrogen; the surgery-related factor associated with mortality was feculent ascites. Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression indicated that low systolic blood pressure and feculent ascites independently increased the risk for mortality; postoperative complications were more likely in both females and those with low estimated glomerular filtration rates and elevated serum C-reactive protein levels.
Conclusion
Various factors were associated with postoperative clinical outcomes of patients with an intestinal perforation. Morbidity and mortality following an intestinal perforation were greater in patients with unstable initial vital signs, poor nutritional status, and feculent ascites.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Emergency physician ultrasound diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum in intraoperative patients with peritoneal insufflation Amy Sanghvi, Makoto Tanigawa, Michael Danta, Jeff Yang, Mohammad Hamshow, Errel Khordipour, Lawrence Haines, Leily Naraghi The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2025; 90: 120. CrossRef
Prognostic determinants in surgical critial patients undergoing emergency surgery for Stage III or higher colorectal cancer Hyun Ho Kim, Sanguk Hwang, Jinbeom Cho Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Advances in natural biomacromolecule-based Janus materials: preparation, applications and future prospects in food science Ying Xu, Xuan Tao, Liubin Li, Yao Chen, Rong He, Xingrong Ju, Zhigao Wang Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition.2025; : 1. CrossRef
Instruction Video for Endosponge Construction JC Chen, Vijay Raj, Syed Husain Videoscopy.2025; 35(1): 1. CrossRef
In Situ 4D Printing of Polyelectrolyte/Magnetic Composites for Sutureless Gastric Perforation Sealing Yunsong Shi, Sihan Tang, Xi Yuan, Zhuofan Li, Shifeng Wen, Zhongwei Li, Bin Su, Chunze Yan, Lili Chen Advanced Materials.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Small Intestinal Perforation after 360-Degree Liposuction: A Case Report Jenna C. Bekeny, Samuel S. Huffman, Chris Thomas, Mariana Tumminello, Anna Kata, Rajiv Parikh, Laura K. Tom, Grant M. Kleiber Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.2024; 48(5): 946. CrossRef
Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings Forrest Bohler, Allison Garden Journal of Osteopathic Medicine.2024; 124(1): 39. CrossRef
Prevalence, Pattern, Mortality, and Morbidity of Traumatic Small Bowel Perforation at King Abdulaziz Medical City: A Retrospective Cohort Study Fahad Aljehaiman, Faisal J Almalki, Abdulah Alhusain, Faris Alsalamah, Khaled Alzahrani, Abdulkareem Alharbi, Hani Alkhulaiwi Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Abdominal pain after a food crawl Danier Ong, Rajiv Yogendran, Emily Fite Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Case of abdominal whirl sign with small bowel obstruction and free gas successfully managed by conservative management instead of laparoscopic surgery Giuleta Jamsari, James Wei Tatt Toh Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery.2024; 7(3): 128. CrossRef
Emergent Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Malignancy Is Associated with Higher Rates of Perioperative Complications but No Independent Impact on Short-Term Mortality Yahya Alwatari, Devon C. Freudenberger, Jad Khoraki, Lena Bless, Riley Payne, Walker A. Julliard, Rachit D. Shah, Carlos A. Puig Journal of Chest Surgery.2024; 57(2): 160. CrossRef
Urea to Albumin Ratio Is an Excellent Predictor of Death in Patients With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections Evgeni Dimitrov, Krasimira Halacheva, Georgi Minkov, Emil Enchev, Yovcho Yovtchev Surgical Infections.2024; 25(3): 225. CrossRef
Postoperative Complications in Emergency Surgeries at a Referral Hospital in Eastern Venezuela Victor Castañeda-Marquez, Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Enrique Avila-Liendo, Gabriel Gonzalez-Quinde, Wilson Garcia-Cazorla, Georcimar Mendez-Meneses, Yoalkris E Salcedo, Tamara Rodriguez-Rugel, Jackner Antigua-Herrera, Miguel Rivas-Perez, Silvia Agudelo-Mendoz Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Gastrointestinal tract perforation after radiofrequency ablation for hepatic tumor: Incidence and risk factors Kyowon Gu, Tae Wook Kang, Seungchul Han, Dong Ik Cha, Kyoung Doo Song, Min Woo Lee, Hyunchul Rhim, Go Eun Park European Journal of Radiology.2024; 177: 111560. CrossRef
Revisiting Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth-POSSUM (P-POSSUM) Scores: Are They Valid in Cases of Ileal Perforation? Saikrishna Eswaravaka, Chirantan Suhrid, Bhavya Rao, Sundaresh Prabhakar, Jayashri Pandya Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A giant trichobezoar in a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A case report M. Forooghi, R. Shahrokhi, Sh. Yousufzai International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 123: 110283. CrossRef
Factors related to cardiac rupture after acute myocardial infarction Xue Gao, Ying Guo, Xiaoting Zhu, Chunlei Du, Beibei Ma, Yinghua Cui, Shuai Wang Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Investigating the association between osteopenia and bowel perforation through a multicenter radiologic analysis Sebastian Sanduleanu, Koray Ersahin, Jonathan Kottlors, Johannes Bremm, Narmin Talibova, Tim Damer, Merve Erdogan, Nils Groβe Hokamp, Lukas Goertz, Nijat Nasirov, Vilayat Valiyev, Christiane Bruns, David Maintz, Nuran Abdullayev Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Case report: Migratory biliary stent resulting in sigmoid colon perforation Jasmine B Beloy, Nicholas P Lund, Annika M Van Hell, Shyam Allamaneni Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic factors in patients with gastrointestinal perforation under the acute care surgery model : a retrospective cohort study Kiyoung Sung, Sanguk Hwang, Jaeheon Lee, Jinbeom Cho BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with bowel perforation after immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure Antonio Pizuorno Machado, Malek Shatila, Cynthia Liu, Yang Lu, Mehmet Altan, Isabella C. Glitza Oliva, Dan Zhao, Hao Chi Zhang, Anusha Thomas, Yinghong Wang Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(9): 5989. CrossRef
Abdominal emergency surgery in patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective single-center analysis Philipp H. von Kroge, Anna Duprée, Oliver Mann, Jakob R. Izbicki, Jonas Wagner, Paymon Ahmadi, Sören Weidemann, Raissa Adjallé, Nicolaus Kröger, Carsten Bokemeyer, Walter Fiedler, Franziska Modemann, Susanne Ghandili World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Acute Spontaneous Colonic Perforation in a Case of Newly Confirmed Scleroderma: Case Report Glenn Goodwin, Christian Ryckeley, Davide Fox, Michael Ashley, Laurence Dubensky, Mauricio Danckers, Todd Slesinger Interactive Journal of Medical Research.2023; 12: e43295. CrossRef
Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with emergency left colonic surgery Dauda Bawa, Yasser Mohammad Khalifa, Saleem Khan, Waddah Norah, Nibras Noman Annals of Saudi Medicine.2023; 43(2): 97. CrossRef
Fatal Case of Perforated Cytomegalovirus Colitis: Case Report and Systematic Review Andrea T. Fisher, Kovi E. Bessoff, Veronica Nicholas, James Badger, Lisa Knowlton, Joseph D. Forrester Surgical Infections.2022; 23(2): 127. CrossRef
An adhesive and resilient hydrogel for the sealing and treatment of gastric perforation Jing Chen, Julia S. Caserto, Ida Ang, Kaavian Shariati, James Webb, Bo Wang, Xi Wang, Nikolaos Bouklas, Minglin Ma Bioactive Materials.2022; 14: 52. CrossRef
Predictors of mortality in patients with acute small-bowel perforation transferred to ICU after emergency surgery: a single-centre retrospective cohort study Jianzhang Wu, Ping Shu, Hongyong He, Haojie Li, Zhaoqing Tang, Yihong Sun, Fenglin Liu Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Delayed ileal perforation following lollipop-stick ingestion in a two year old Tareq Swedan, Mohamed Morjan, Mulham Jarjanazi, Nafiza Martini, Alaa Aldin Ismail, Hebatullah Awad, Shamseh Benbash Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports.2022; 81: 102276. CrossRef
The Clinical Significance of Shock Index and GFR in the Differential Diagnosis of Perforated Appendicitis Ferhat ÇAY, Ali DURAN Journal of Contemporary Medicine.2022; 12(4): 504. CrossRef
The Impact of Delayed Surgical Care on Patient Outcomes With Alimentary Tract Perforation: Insight From a Low-Middle Income Country Muhammad H Zafar, Taha A Zaka Ur Rehman, Muhammad Sohaib Khan, Shayan Ahmed, Amir Shariff Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Gangrene of the Colon Ascendens, Colon Transversum, and Lienal Flexure in a Massive Strangulated Umbilical Hernia Stanko Baco, Milos Mitric Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Facility of Origin Predicts Mortality After Colonic Perforation Samuel D. Butensky, Emma Gazzara, Gainosuke Sugiyama, Gene F. Coppa, Antonio Alfonso, Paul J. Chung The American Surgeon™.2021; 87(8): 1327. CrossRef
Effect of Malnutrition Assessed by Comprehensive Nutritional Screening Tool on In-Hospital Mortality after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Perforation Seung-Young Oh, Hannah Lee, Ho Geol Ryu, Hyuk-Joon Lee Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition.2021; 12(1): 1. CrossRef
Machine Learning-based Model for Predicting Postoperative Complications among Patients with Colonic Perforation: A Retrospective study Hiroka Hosaka, Masashi Takeuchi, Tomohiro Imoto, Haruka Yagishita, Ayaka Yu, Yusuke Maeda, Yosuke Kobayashi, Yoshie Kadota, Masanori Odaira, Fumiki Toriumi, Takashi Endo, Hirohisa Harada Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2021; 5(3): 274. CrossRef
Bevacizumab and gastrointestinal perforations: a review from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database Thomas A. Wichelmann, Sufyan Abdulmujeeb, Eli D. Ehrenpreis Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2021; 54(10): 1290. CrossRef
A Rare Presentation of Gastric Carcinoma With Gastric Perforation and Septic Shock Reem Moala AlHazmi, Dunya Nasrallah Alfaraj, Shaykhah Nasser AlNaimi, Sarah Mohammed AlQahtani, Mashael Hamed AlJuwayed, Hazem Mohammed Zakriea, Mohammed S Foula Cureus.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
C-Reactive Protein as a Marker of Postoperative Complication of Emergency Colorectal Surgery Luis R. M. Nadal, Artur M. A. da Silva, Larissa Johann, Shuaib H. El Boustani, Maria Beatriz A. S. Medrado, Jose F. M. Farah, Renato A. Lupinacci Journal of Coloproctology.2021; 41(04): 375. CrossRef
Modified frailty index and hypoalbuminemia as predictors of adverse outcomes in older adults presenting to acute general surgical unit Angela Abraham, Sally Burrows, Neelankal John Abraham, Bhaskar Mandal Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología.2020; 55(2): 70. CrossRef
Prognostic Factors and Management for Left Colonic Perforation: Can Hartmann’s Procedure Be Preventable? Yilseok Joo, Yujin Lee, Taeyoung Yoo, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(3): 178. CrossRef
Intestinal Perforation: A Surgeon's Nightmare Enlightened by Scientific Research Byung Soh Min Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(6): 205. CrossRef
Optimal management of colonoscopic perforation (CP) is controversial because early diagnosis and prompt management play critical roles in morbidity and mortality. Herein, we evaluate the outcomes and clinical characteristics of patients with CP according to treatment modality to help establish guidelines for managing CP.
Methods
Our retrospective analysis included 40 CP patients from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2014. Patients with CP were categorized into 2 groups according to therapeutic modality: operation (surgery) and nonoperation (endo-luminal clip application or conservative treatment) groups.
Results
The postoperative morbidity rate was 40%, and no mortalities were noted. The incidence of abdominal pain and tenderness in patients who received only conservative management was significantly lower than in those who underwent surgery (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively). Patients tended to undergo surgery more often for diagnosis times longer than 24 hours and for diagnostic CPs. The mean hospital stays for the operation and nonoperation groups were 14.6 ± 7.77 and 5.9 ± 1.62 days, respectively (P < 0.001). Compared to the operation group, the nonoperation group began intake of liquid diets significantly earlier after perforation (3.8 ± 1.32 days vs. 5.6 ± 1.25 days, P < 0.001) and used antibiotics for a shorter duration (4.7 ± 1.29 days vs. 8.7 ± 2.23 days, P < 0.001).
Conclusion
The time of diagnosis and the injury mechanism may be useful indications for conservative management. Nonoperative management, such as endo-luminal clip application, might be beneficial, when feasible, for the treatment of patients with CP.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Risk Factors for Perforation in Endoscopic Treatment for Early Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide ENTER-K Study Ik Hyun Jo, Hyun Gun Kim, Young-Seok Cho, Hyun Jung Lee, Eun Ran Kim, Yoo Jin Lee, Sung Wook Hwang, Kyeong-Ok Kim, Jun Lee, Hyuk Soon Choi, Yunho Jung, Chang Mo Moon Gut and Liver.2025; 19(1): 95. CrossRef
Luminal electrophysiological neuroprofiling system for gastrointestinal neuromuscular diseases Shriya S. Srinivasan, Sabrina Liu, Ryo Hotta, Sukhada Bhave, Amro Alshareef, Binbin Ying, George Selsing, Johannes Kuosmanen, Keiko Ishida, Joshua Jenkins, Wiam Abdalla Mohammed Madani, Alison Hayward, Niora Fabian, Allan M. Goldstein, Giovanni Traverso Device.2024; 2(7): 100400. CrossRef
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colonoscopic perforation: A systematic review and meta-analysis Wu Zhong, Chuanyuan Liu, Chuanfa Fang, Lei Zhang, Xianping He, Weiquan Zhu, Xueyun Guan Medicine.2023; 102(24): e34057. CrossRef
Analysis of the Characteristics of Colonoscopy Perforation and Risk Factors for Failure of Endoscopic Treatment Zhi Jiehua, Ali Kashif , Che YaoSheng , Sun YunYun , Liang Lanyu Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Iatrogenic colon perforation during colonoscopy, diagnosis/treatment, and follow-up processes: A single-center experience Nihat Gülaydın, Raim İliaz, Atakan Özkan, A Hande Gökçe, Hanifi Önalan, Berrin Önalan, Aziz Arı Turkish Journal of Surgery.2022; 38(3): 221. CrossRef
The analysis of outcomes of surgical management for colonoscopic perforations: A 16-years experiences at a single institution Dae Ro Lim, Jung Kul Kuk, Taehyung Kim, Eung Jin Shin Asian Journal of Surgery.2020; 43(5): 577. CrossRef
Multicenter retrospective evaluation of ileocecocolic perforations associated with diagnostic lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in dogs and cats Vanessa L. Woolhead, Jacqueline C. Whittemore, Sarah A. Stewart Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2020; 34(2): 684. CrossRef
Clinical Characteristics of Colonoscopic Perforation and Risk Factors for Complications After Surgical Treatment Liang Li, Bing Xue, Chunxia Yang, Zhongbo Han, Hongqiang Xie, Meng Wang Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2020; 30(11): 1153. CrossRef
ESTUDO RETROSPECTIVO DA PREVALÊNCIA DE PERFURAÇÕES GASTROINTESTINAIS EM PACIENTES SUBMETIDOS A COLONOSCOPIAS NO HOSPITAL REGIONAL HANS DIETER SCHMIDT Viviane Helena Raimundo, Paula Fernanda Partika, Haroldo Luiz Jordelino da Luz, Eduardo Manoel Pereira Arquivos Catarinenses de Medicina.2020; 49(2): 14. CrossRef
Adverse events related to colonoscopy: Global trends and future challenges Su Young Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Hong Jun Park World Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 25(2): 190. CrossRef
Iatrogenic Colonic Perforations: Changing the Paradigm Jose Luis Ulla-Rocha, Angel Salgado, Raquel Sardina, Raquel Souto, Raquel Sanchez-Santos, Juan Turnes Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2019; 29(3): 173. CrossRef
Diagnosis and Management of Colonoscopy-related Perforation Nam Seok Ham, Jung Ho Bae, Dong-Hoon Yang The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 73(6): 327. CrossRef
Management Outcomes of Colonoscopic Perforations Are Affected by the General Condition of the Patients Jae Ho Park, Kyung Jong Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(1): 16. CrossRef
2017 WSES guidelines for the management of iatrogenic colonoscopy perforation Nicola de’Angelis, Salomone Di Saverio, Osvaldo Chiara, Massimo Sartelli, Aleix Martínez-Pérez, Franca Patrizi, Dieter G. Weber, Luca Ansaloni, Walter Biffl, Offir Ben-Ishay, Miklosh Bala, Francesco Brunetti, Federica Gaiani, Solafah Abdalla, Aurelien Ami World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
A barium enema is a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure commonly used for colon and rectum problems. Rectal perforation with extensive intra- and/or extraperitoneal spillage of barium is a devastating complication of a barium enema that leads to a significant increase in patient mortality. Due to the low number of reported cases in recent scientific literature and the lack of experience with the management of these cases, we would like to present our treatment approach to a rare case of retroperitoneal contamination with barium, followed by its intraperitoneal involvement during a diagnostic barium enema. Our experience with long-term management of the patient and the good outcome will be depicted in this paper.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Barium granuloma formation following barium peritonitis: A case report Baiquan Zhou, Lin Liu, Yufan Tang, Ruifang Fan Asian Journal of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Perforation of barium sulfate enterography in an infant: A case report Yixing Lu, Lixian Mo, Junhong Chen, Wei Peng Medicine.2024; 103(17): e37926. CrossRef
A Case of Sigmoid Colon Perforation Caused by Barium that was Treated by Laparoscopic Surgery Shoichiro HARA, Junichi HAMADA, Kenichi TAKEMOTO, Kei NAITO, Toshiya OCHIAI, Eigo OTSUJI Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association).2024; 85(4): 546. CrossRef
The incidence of complications after colonoscopy is very low. The complications after colonoscopy that are of clinical concern are bleeding and perforation. The present study was conducted to determine the clinical outcomes and the risk factors of a colostomy or a colectomy after colonoscopic colon perforation.
Methods
From March 2009 to December 2012, the records of all patients who were treated for colorectal perforation after colonoscopy were reviewed retrospectively. The following parameters were evaluated: age, sex, purpose of colonoscopy, management of the colonic perforation, and interval from colonoscopy to the diagnosis of a colonic perforation. A retrospective analysis was performed to determine the risk factors associated with major surgery for the treatment of a colon perforation after colonoscopy.
Results
A total 27 patients were included in the present study. The mean age was 62 years, and 16 were males. The purpose of colonoscopy was diagnostic in 18 patients. The most common perforation site was the sigmoid colon. Colonic perforation was diagnosed during colonoscopy in 14 patients, just after colonoscopy in 5 patients, and 24 hours or more after colonoscopy in 8 patients. For the treatment of colonic perforation, endoscopic clipping was performed in 3 patients, primary closure in 15 patients, colon resection in 2 patients, Hartmann's procedures in 4 patients, and diverting colostomy in 3 patients. If the diagnosis of perforation after colonoscopy was delayed for more than 24 hours, the need for major treatment was increased significantly.
Conclusion
Although a colonic perforation after colonoscopy is rare, if the morbidity and the mortality associated with the colonic perforation are to be reduced, prompt diagnosis and management are very important.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Clinical outcomes and risk factors of post-polypectomy microperforation in patients with colorectal neoplasia: a case-control study Seung Yong Shin, Min Soo Cho, Jinhoon Nam, Jie-Hyun Kim, Young Hoon Yoon, Hyojin Park, Jeonghyun Kang, Jae Jun Park Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Iatrogenic colon perforation during colonoscopy, diagnosis/treatment, and follow-up processes: A single-center experience Nihat Gülaydın, Raim İliaz, Atakan Özkan, A Hande Gökçe, Hanifi Önalan, Berrin Önalan, Aziz Arı Turkish Journal of Surgery.2022; 38(3): 221. CrossRef
Multicenter retrospective evaluation of ileocecocolic perforations associated with diagnostic lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in dogs and cats Vanessa L. Woolhead, Jacqueline C. Whittemore, Sarah A. Stewart Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2020; 34(2): 684. CrossRef
Clinical Characteristics of Colonoscopic Perforation and Risk Factors for Complications After Surgical Treatment Liang Li, Bing Xue, Chunxia Yang, Zhongbo Han, Hongqiang Xie, Meng Wang Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2020; 30(11): 1153. CrossRef
Treatment of colonoscopic perforation: outcomes from a major single tertiary institution Carolyn R. Chew, Justin M. C. Yeung, Ian G. Faragher ANZ Journal of Surgery.2019; 89(5): 546. CrossRef
Iatrogenic Colonic Perforations: Changing the Paradigm Jose Luis Ulla-Rocha, Angel Salgado, Raquel Sardina, Raquel Souto, Raquel Sanchez-Santos, Juan Turnes Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2019; 29(3): 173. CrossRef
Concurrent retroperitoneal, mediastinal, cervical and subcutaneous emphysema secondary to iatrogenic sigmoid colon perforation Zehui Wu, Huaping Xu, Yisheng Zhang, Lianghui Shi Postgraduate Medical Journal.2019; 95(1125): 396. CrossRef
Management of colonoscopic perforations: A systematic review Alexander T. Hawkins, Kenneth W. Sharp, Molly M. Ford, Roberta L. Muldoon, M. Benjamin Hopkins, Timothy M. Geiger The American Journal of Surgery.2018; 215(4): 712. CrossRef
2017 WSES guidelines for the management of iatrogenic colonoscopy perforation Nicola de’Angelis, Salomone Di Saverio, Osvaldo Chiara, Massimo Sartelli, Aleix Martínez-Pérez, Franca Patrizi, Dieter G. Weber, Luca Ansaloni, Walter Biffl, Offir Ben-Ishay, Miklosh Bala, Francesco Brunetti, Federica Gaiani, Solafah Abdalla, Aurelien Ami World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Management Outcomes of Colonoscopic Perforations Are Affected by the General Condition of the Patients Jae Ho Park, Kyung Jong Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(1): 16. CrossRef
Managing a Colonoscopic Perforation in a Patient with No Abdominal Wall Jayan George, Michael Peirson, Samuel Birks, Paul Skinner Case Reports in Surgery.2018; 2018: 1. CrossRef
Air and its Sonographic Appearance: Understanding the Artifacts Simran Buttar, Denrick Cooper, Patrick Olivieri, Michael Barca, Aaran B. Drake, Melvin Ku, Gabriel Rose, Sebastian D. Siadecki, Turandot Saul The Journal of Emergency Medicine.2017; 53(2): 241. CrossRef
Colonoscopic Perforations, What is Our Experience in a Training Hospital? Abbas Aras, Ebru Oran, Hakan Seyit, Mehmet Karabulut, İlhan Gök, Halil Aliş Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2016; 26(1): 44. CrossRef
Endoscopic Therapy in Crohnʼs Disease Min Chen, Bo Shen Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2015; 21(9): 2222. CrossRef
Importance of Prompt Diagnosis in the Management of Colonoscopic Perforation In Ja Park Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(5): 208. CrossRef
Transrectal evisceration caused by colorectal injury is an unusual entity. This pathology is more frequent in elderly patients and it is usually produced spontaneously. Rectal prolapse is the principal predisposing factor. An 81-year-old woman was taken to the hospital presenting exit of intestinal loops through the anus. After first reanimation measures, an urgent surgery was indicated. We observed the absence of almost every small intestine loop in the abdominal cavity; these had been moved to the pelvis. After doing the reduction, a 3 to 4 cm linear craniocaudal perforation in upper rectum was objectified, and Hartmann's procedure was performed. We investigated and knew that she frequently manipulate herself to extract her faeces. The fast preoperative management avoided a fatal conclusion or an extensive intestinal resection. Reasons that make us consider rectal self-injury as the etiologic factor are explained.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Transanal evisceration of small bowel in two patients with chronic rectal prolapse: case presentation and literature review S Hajiev, A Ezzat, V Sivarajah, G Reese, N El-Masry The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.2021; 103(1): e29. CrossRef
Evisceración de asas intestinales a través de periné posterior por traumatismo en paciente anciano Ana Alicia Tejera Hernández, David Fernández San Millan, Carlos David Trujillo Flores, Juan Ramón Hernández Hernández Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología.2016; 51(1): 58. CrossRef
Transanal Evisceration of Small Bowel about One Case at the University Hospital Yalgado Ouédraogo of Ouagadougou Adama Sanou, Moussa Bazongo, Edgar Ouangré, Maurice Zida, Gilbert Patindé Bonkoungou, Rodrique Namékinsba Doamba, Sylvain Wendmi Karfo, Elie Yamba Sawadogo, Nayi Zongo, Si Simon Traoré Surgical Science.2016; 07(07): 291. CrossRef
A stercoral perforation of the rectum due to a fecaloma is a rare disease with a high mortality rate. Although multiple case reports of colonic perforations have been published, the data regarding rectal perforations are limited. This case report will highlight one such case of a stercoral rectal perforation that was successfully treated with a laparoscopic operation.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Stercoral Colitis: Review of Imaging Features and Complications Nikitha Karkala, Bertin Mathai, John J. Hines, Sarah Byun, Douglas S. Katz RadioGraphics.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Rectal stercoral perforation: an uncommon anatomical localization of a rare surgical emergency Tom Vandaele, Lisa Dekoninck, Pauline Vanhove, Bart Devos, Mathieu Vandeputte, Marc Philippe, Johan Vlasselaers Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Sepsis de origen abdominal secundaria a perforación estercoral recto-sigmoidea: a propósito de un caso Juan Daniel Serrano-Lizarazo, María Camila Ayala-Gutiérrez, Diana Clemencia Quintero-Gamboa, Andrea Juliana Pinto-Arias, Juan Paulo Serrano-Pastrana Revista Médicas UIS.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The Extremes of Constipation: A Case of Stercoral Perforation From Fecal Impaction in a Teenager Felicia Lee, Jasmin Cao, Evan Lin, Maho Kurashima, Raymond I Okeke, Christian Saliba, Shin Miyata Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Stercoral re-perforation after colostomy takedown: a case report Seunghwan Lee, Chang Woo Kim BMC Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Rare but relevant: a systematic review of stercoral perforation Sherwin Fernando, Diwakar R Sarma British Journal of Hospital Medicine.2021; 82(4): 1. CrossRef
Pelvic Rectal Stercoral Perforation Resulting in Diffuse Pneumatosis Anupam K Gupta, Oscar A Vazquez, Miguel Lopez-Viego Cureus.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Spontaneous colonic perforation in adults: Evaluation of a pooled case series Ren Chongxi, Ji Jinggang, Shi Yan, Wang Hongqiao, Liu Yan, Yang Fengshuo Science Progress.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Acute Spontaneous Perforation of Rectosigmoid Junction in a Patient with Quadriplegia following Spinal Cord Injury Oshan Basnayake, Chiran Rathnaweera, Umesh Jayarajah, Gishanthan Shanthamoorthy, Heshan Dayantha Siriwardena, Asela Jayathilaka, Paola De Nardi Case Reports in Surgery.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef
Stercoral perforation: A rare entity Nisarg Mehta, Ahan Bhatt, Cici Zhang World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2019; 8(4): 114. CrossRef
Stercoral Perforation of the Colon: A Potentially Fatal Complication of Opioid-Induced Constipation Andrew Davies, Katherine Webber Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.2015; 50(2): 260. CrossRef
Stercoral Colitis Maxim Saksonov, Gil N. Bachar, Sara Morgenstern, Abdel-Rauf Zeina, Margarita Vasserman, Orith Protnoy, Ofer Benjaminov Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.2014; 38(5): 721. CrossRef
Inappropriate therapies for hemorrhoids can lead to various complications including anorectal stricture. We report a patient presenting with catastrophic rectal perforation due to severe anal stricture after inappropriate hemorrhoid treatment. A 67-years old man with perianal pain visited the emergency room. The hemorrhoids accompanied by constipation, had tortured him since his youth. Thus he had undergone injection sclerotherapy several times by an unlicensed therapist and hemorrhoidectomy twice at the clinics of private practitioners. His body temperature was as high as 38.5℃. The computed tomographic scan showed a focal perforation of posterior rectal wall. The emergency operation was performed. The fibrotic tissues of the anal canal were excised. And then a sigmoid loop colostomy was constructed. The patient was discharged four days following the operation. This report calls attention to the enormous risk of unlicensed injection sclerotherapy and overzealous hemorrhoidectomy resulting in scarring, progressive stricture, and eventual rectal perforation.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Complications of Hemorrhoidectomy From Patients' Perspective: A Qualitative Study Masoumeh Ebrahimi Tavani, Yegane Partovi, Tahmineh Poursaki, Farid Gharibi Health Science Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hendry Lie, Evelyn Franca Caesarini, Antonius Agung Purnama, Andry Irawan, Taufik Sudirman, Wifanto Saditya Jeo, Bernardus Parish Budiono, Erik Prabowo, M. Iqbal Rivai, Ryanto Karobuana Sitepu Lasers in Medical Science.2022; 37(9): 3621. CrossRef
Foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract often cause serious complications, such as perforation, obstruction, abscess formation, or hemorrhage. This is a case in which a patient visited our hospital and complained of a vague lower abdominal pain that had been present for three months. She had an intrauterine device (IUD) inserted five years earlier. The abdominal X-ray, computed tomography and colonoscopy revealed that the IUD had penetrated into the descending colon. We tried to remove the IUD by colonoscopy but failed due to pain, so we removed the IUD surgically. Thus, we report a case in which a previously inserted IUD had penetrated into the descending colon and was surgically removed. We also present a brief review of the literature.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Missing intrauterine device migrated to terminal ileum resembling adnexal mass: A case report Mohammad Kamal Tani, Wais Farda, Haider Khan, Omer Malikzai, Zabihullah Sharif International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 115: 109279. CrossRef
Robotic assisted removal of migrated intrauterine device Marco Bertucci Zoccali, Osama Jabi Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(8): 1718. CrossRef
Is It a “Colon Perforation”? A Case Report and Review of the Literature Shuangshuang Lu, Xinyu Yao, Jun Shi, Jian Huang, Shaohua Zhuang, Junfang Ma, Yan Liu, Wei Zhang, Lifei Yu, Ping Zhu, Qiuwei Zhu, Ruxia Shi, Hong Zheng, Dong Shao, Yuyan Pan, Shizhen Bao, Li Qin, Lijie Huang, Wenjia Liu, Jin Huang Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Intestinal Perforation by a Migrated Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Review of This Rare but Important Complication Antony Zacharias, Stephanie Clark, Chetan Parmar, Ayo Oshowo SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2021; 3(8): 1759. CrossRef
Incomplete Removal of an Intrauterine Device Perforating the Sigmoid Colon Junseak Lee, Jung Hwan Oh, Jinsu Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim, Sung Hoon Jung The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 78(1): 48. CrossRef
Rectum migration of an intrauterine device Rui Li, Hongmei Li, Jie Zhang, Huiqing Li Journal of Minimal Access Surgery.2021; 17(1): 113. CrossRef
Pelvic abscess complicating sigmoid colon perforation by migrating intrauterine device: A case report and review of the literature Omar Toumi, Houssem Ammar, Abdessalem Ghdira, Amine Chhaidar, Wided Trimech, Rahul Gupta, Randa Salem, Jamel Saad, Ibtissem Korbi, Mohamed Nasr, Faouzi Noomen, Mondher Golli, Khadija Zouari International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2018; 42: 60. CrossRef
Kim, Min Sang , Lim, Seung Woo , Park, Sung Jin , Gwak, Geumhee , Yang, Keun Ho , Bae, Byung Noe , Kim, Ki Hwan , Han, Sewhan , Kim, Hong Joo , Kim, Young Duck , Kim, Hong Yong
PURPOSE Perforations are rare but serious complications in colorectal cancer. Controversy exists over whether to perform a radical operation because colorectal cancer perforation is considered as an advanced stage disease, and septic complications of peritonitis have been identified as being responsible for a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between the survival rate and the clinicopathological parameters that might be used as predictive factors of the prognosis for perforated colorectal cancer. METHODS The analysis was based on 24 cases of perforated colorectal cancer (the case group), 48 cases of matching uncomplicated colorectal cancer (the control group), and 72 cases of the case and the control groups combined together (the combined group), all of which were identified during a 10-yr period in a single institution. RESULTS The five-year survival rates of the perforated colorectal cancer patients and their matching controls were similar (P=0.484). No significant differences in the locations of the cancer, the pre-operative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, the tumor sizes, the resection margins, or the numbers of the lymph nodes harvested were found between the two groups. A univariate analysis of the prognostic factors that influenced the case group revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.004) was significantly correlated to a better five-year survival rate. A univariate analysis of the prognostic factors that influenced the five-year survival rate of the combined group revealed that the stage (P<0.001), the pre-op CEA level (P=0.018), the angio invasion (P=0.019), the perineural invasion (P=0.019), the number of harvested lymph nodes (P=0.004), and adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.001) were significantly correlated to the five-year survival rate. The identified independent prognostic factors in the combined group were the stage (hazard ratio, 5.20), angio-invasion (hazard ratio, 2.81), and adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.17). CONCLUSION The clinical pathway of perforated colorectal cancer is similar to that of uncomplicated colorectal cancer. Therefore, perforated colorectal cancer patients should be recommended for treatment with the appropriate radical operation and adjuvant chemotherapy based on oncologic principles.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio is a Crucial Criterion in Colorectal Cancer Therapy Management and Prognosis Gülçin Harman Kamalı, Sedat Kamalı European Archives of Medical Research.2022; 38(1): 73. CrossRef
Acute Abdomen in the Oncology Patient Katrina McGinty Seminars in Roentgenology.2020; 55(4): 400. CrossRef
Nonobstetrical Acute Abdomen during Pregnancy as a Consequence of Colorectal Carcinoma Perforation: Case Report and Review of the Literature Žana Žegarac, Željko Duić, Sandra Stasenko Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef
Prognostic Value of Perineural Invasion in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Yuchong Yang, Xuanzhang Huang, Jingxu Sun, Peng Gao, Yongxi Song, Xiaowan Chen, Junhua Zhao, Zhenning Wang Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2015; 19(6): 1113. CrossRef
Surgical management of obstructed and perforated colorectal cancer: still debating and unresolved issues Rudra K Maitra, Charles A Maxwell-Armstrong Colorectal Cancer.2013; 2(6): 573. CrossRef
Multivariate Analysis of the Survival Rate for Treatment Modalities in Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Sung Kang Kim, Chang Ho Lee, Min Ro Lee, Jong Hun Kim Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(1): 35. CrossRef
Perforations that occur during colonoscopy are usually managed by surgical repair. When the patient's symptoms are mild and laboratory findings show minor abnormalities, a conservative treatment can be considered. Although an operation is the treatment of choice in patients with generalized peritonitis, in some selected patients, percutaneous abscess drainage can be an alternative to surgical intervention for drainage of deep-infected fluid collections or can act as a temporary measure until the patient becomes sufficiently stable for surgery. We report here on a 53-yr-old male patient who developed signs of localized peritonitis and had a pelvic abscess due to a colonic perforation after colonoscopy and was treated successfully by using percutaneous abscess drainage.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A Case of Buried Bumper Syndrome Complicated by Abdominal Wall Abscess in an Elderly Patient Chul Young Kim, Min Seong Kim, Do Young Kim, Young Bae Lim, Dong Yoon Kang, Tack Su Yun, Sang Seok Yoon, Jung Hyun Lee, Woo Young Kim, Yong Kyu Lee Journal of the Korean Geriatrics Society.2010; 14(4): 265. CrossRef
PURPOSE Despite increased effort for the detection of early colorectal cancer, advanced disease presenting as obstruction or perforation still accounts for 8 to 29% and 3-8% of all colorectal cancers, respectively. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics, the surgical methods, the complications, and the risk factors of obstructive or perforated colorectal cancer that may influence the outcome. METHODS A retrospective study was carried out in 60 patients with colorectal cancer, who underwent surgery due to obstruction or perforation from March 2000 to December 2005. The colorectal cancers were considered to be complicated when clinical signs of peritonitis were observed, the radiologic characteristics of the tumor did not permit preoperative mechanical bowel preparation, or perforation existed, when these observations were confirmed by operative findings. The following data were analyzed: clinical characteristics, surgical methods, complications, and risk factors. RESULTS Thirty-three patients (55%) had obstruction, and 27 patients (45%) had perforation. Overall, major complications occurred in 33.3% and 48.5%, respectively. The mortality rates were 6.1% and 14.8%, respectively. Risk factors for major complication were age, perforation, and transfusion whereas those for mortality were perforation and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class. CONCLUSION The risk factors of complication were old age, transfusion, and perforation and those for mortality was perforation and ASA class. Earlier diagnosis and prompt, intensive, careful management should be attempted in these high-risk patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Prognostic determinants in surgical critial patients undergoing emergency surgery for Stage III or higher colorectal cancer Hyun Ho Kim, Sanguk Hwang, Jinbeom Cho Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical Outcomes and Risk Factors in Patients Who Underwent Emergency Colorectal Surgery Dai Sik Jeong, Young Hun Kim, Kyung Jong Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(6): 239. CrossRef
Emergent Colorectal Surgery: What Should Be Considered? Chang-Nam Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(4): 124. CrossRef
Outcomes and Risk Factors Affecting Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Colorectal Emergency Surgery Nam Ho Oh, Kyung Jong Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(4): 133. CrossRef
Multivariate Analysis of the Survival Rate for Treatment Modalities in Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Sung Kang Kim, Chang Ho Lee, Min Ro Lee, Jong Hun Kim Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(1): 35. CrossRef
PURPOSE The present study was performed to assess the outcomes in patients with colonic perforation and to determine the prognostic factors for mortality. METHODS The cases of 42 patients who underwent surgery for colonic perforation between March 1999 and September 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, presence of preoperative shock, duration of symptoms, cause of perforation, location of perforation, degree of peritonitis, and the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) score were analyzed for their association with early outcome by using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Diverticulitis (46%, 19 patients) and colorectal cancer (36%, 15 patients) were the most common causes of noniatrogenic colonic perforation, and the sigmoid colon was the most common site of perforation (60%, 25 patients). The postoperative mortality was 21.4% (9 patients). The mortality in patients with preoperative shock, with a MPI score of more than 25, and with Hinchey stage III or IV peritonitis were 70.0%, 57.1%, and 53.3%, respectively (P<0.001). No statistical difference was observed in postoperative mortality with regard to age, sex, ASA classification, duration of symptoms, cause of perforation, and location of perforation. According to the multivariate analysis, preoperative shock proved to be the only significant prognostic factor for mortality (P=0.027) (odds ratio: 19.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-276.9). CONCLUSION Preoperative shock, a MPI score of more than 25, and Hinchey stage III or IV peritonitis were associated with high postoperative mortality in patients with colonic perforation. Especially, more intensive management and interest are required for patient s with preoperative shock due to colonic perforation.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Ostomy in Nontraumatic Conditions: Our Experience and Review of the Literature Kenan Büyükaşık, Bünyamin Gürbulak, Emre Özoran, Yiğit Düzköylü, Esin Kabul Gürbulak, Aziz Arı, Hasan Bektaş Indian Journal of Surgery.2016; 78(6): 471. CrossRef
EVALUATION OF MANNHEIM PERITONITIS INDEX (MPI) SCORING SYSTEM IN PROGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH PERITONITIS DUE TO HOLLOW VISCOUS PERFORATION Mahammad Ali Sutar, Ramakrishna Yaradhimmaiah, Nikhath Ingva Arshi Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences.2016; 5(31): 1626. CrossRef
PURPOSE Recently, non-operative conservative management or laparoscopic repair has been reported for the management of colonic perforation during colonoscopy. However, the preferred management strategy remains controversial. The purpose of the present study is to identify an appropriate strategy for the treatment of colon perforation during colonoscopy. METHODS The medical records of patients who developed colon perforation during colonoscopy between May 2003 and November 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. The mechanism and site of perforation, the treatment administered, complications, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS In total, 16 perforations were evaluated. Of these, 11 developed during diagnostic colonoscopy and 5 during therapeutic colonoscopy. The most frequent perforation site was the sigmoid colon (12), followed by the transverse colon (2), the rectum (1), and unknown site (1). Six patients underwent surgery due to signs of diffuse peritonitis 10 were initially treated conservatively. Among the patients who underwent surgery, four underwent laparoscopic repair and two underwent open repair. Among the patients initially treated conservatively two patients required surgery due to clinical deterioration of peritonitis and rectovaginal fistula. These 2 patients underwent repair with proximal diverting stomas. CONCLUSIONS Colon perforation associated with colonoscopy is a rare event, but raises serious complications. Selected patients with colonoscopic perforation may be treated conservatively, but if these patients fail to respond to such treatments, extensive surgical procedures may be warranted.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Management Outcomes of Colonoscopic Perforations Are Affected by the General Condition of the Patients Jae Ho Park, Kyung Jong Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(1): 16. CrossRef
Comparison of the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon perforation during colonoscopy Jeongsoo Kim, Gil Jae Lee, Jeong-Heum Baek, Won-Suk Lee Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2014; 87(3): 139. CrossRef
A Case of Successful Percutaneous Drainage of a Pelvic Abscess Complicating Colonoscopy Youn Si, Shin Young Kim, Seung Bong Choi, Hyung Jin Kim, Yoon Suk Lee, Hyun Min Cho, Jun Gi Kim, Seung Tack Oh, In Kyu Lee Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2009; 25(5): 347. CrossRef
Anorectal manometry is widely used to evaluate anorectal function. Few reports have described complications resulting from this procedure. A 47-year-old male underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy and a low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The patient underwent anorectal manometry at postoperative 8 months. A rectal perforation was diagnosed shortly thereafter. The patient was initially managed conservatively using percutaneous drainage and parenteral antibiotics and then discharged on day 60 after the event. One month later, a colo-cutaneous fistula and expanding abdominal fasciitis developed. The patient underwent surgical exploration, drainage, resection of the rectum including the fistula, and redo-coloanal anastomosis with a diverting ileostomy. The patient discharged without complications on postoperative day 25. Anorectal manometry should be performed with particular care in patients who have undergone radiotherapy and anastomosis at the rectum.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Habit training versus habit training with direct visual biofeedback in adults with chronic constipation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Christine Norton, Anton Emmanuel, Natasha Stevens, S. Mark Scott, Ugo Grossi, Sybil Bannister, Sandra Eldridge, James M. Mason, Charles H. Knowles Trials.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Colorectal Perforation After Anorectal Manometry for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Kyung Ha Lee, Ji Yeon Kim, Young Hoon Sul Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(4): 146. CrossRef
Perforación rectal tras manometría anorrectal sin enfermedad rectal previa: una complicación excepcional resuelta con tratamiento médico Jorge Antonio Núñez Otero, Mariano Gómez Rubio, Ángel R. Durán Aguado, José L. Martínez Albares Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2013; 36(9): 577. CrossRef
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical features that necessitate a temporary stoma for the treatment of colonoscopic perforations. RESULTS Between January 2000 and July 2006, 30 patients were treated for colonoscopic perforation. Based on the perforation sites, we classified these patients into the following groups: proximal colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum; we then reviewed clinical data, including the time to operation and management. RESULTS Seventeen patients had a perforation during the diagnostic colonoscopy. Of these patients, 14 patients had sigmoid colon perforation. Six underwent an operation within 10 hours after perforation. Of these six, four were managed by primary repair or resection with anastomosis, one sigmoid colon cancer patient by anterior resection, and one rectal cancer patient by low anterior resection with diverting ileostomy. Eight patients underwent more than 12 hours after perforation. Of these eight, three were managed by resection with anastomosis and diverting ileostomy and five by resection with end colostomy. Thirteen patients had a perforation during the therapeutic colonoscopy. Of these patients, 10 patients had a proximal colon perforation. Of these 10, 3 without fever or peritonitis symptom were managed by conservative management, 6 by primary repair or resection with anastomosis, and 1 transverse colon cancer patient by right hemicolectomy. Three patients had sigmoid colon perforation. Of these three, one was managed by primary repair, one by resection with anastomosis, and one sigmoid colon cancer patient by anterior resection. CONCLUSIONS The mechanism of perforation, the site of the perforation, and the time to operation are associated with intraperitoneal contamination and have an influence on surgical treatment.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A comparative analysis of traditional meat processing methods Kasun Dissanayake, Mohamed Rifky, Khabibulla Nurmukhamedov, Jasur Makhmayorov, Bakhodir Abdullayev, Jasur Farmanov, Murodjon Samadiy, T. Itao, V. Perskaya, W. Yanmin, D. Morkovkin E3S Web of Conferences.2024; 494: 04023. CrossRef
Comparison of the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon perforation during colonoscopy Jeongsoo Kim, Gil Jae Lee, Jeong-Heum Baek, Won-Suk Lee Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2014; 87(3): 139. CrossRef
Colonoscopic Perforation; A 10-year Experience in Single General Hospital Ji Eun Oh, Sang Goon Shim The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2009; 54(6): 371. CrossRef
Treatment of Colon Perforation Associated with Colonoscopy Hae Ran Park, Seong Kyu Baek, Ok Suk Bae, Sung Dae Park Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2008; 24(5): 322. CrossRef
A stercoral perforation of the colon is a rare phenomenon and is caused by severe prolonged constipation. Since the first reported case in 1894, approximately 80 additional cases have been reported. However, this rare condition seems to have been underestimated because of not only obscure diagnostic standards but also ignorance and failure to notice by surgeons. Due to its high mortality rate of about 35~40%, a stercoral ulcer perforation should be considered in any patient with chronic constipation who presents with peritonitis. We report a case of a 75-year-old female who was diagnosed as having a stercoral perforation of the sigmoid colon and review the clinical features, the diagnosis, and the treatment.
PURPOSE Colonoscopy is a relatively safe procedure.
However, various complications, such as hemorrhage or perforation, can occur, and among them, perforation can lead to death. This study was designed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and the treatment of colonoscopic perforation, as well as the availability of conservative treatment as the initial management. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of the 11 patients who had been treated for colonoscopic perforation from May 2003 to April 2005. RESULTS Six perforations were related to diagnostic colonoscopy whereas five occurred from therapeutic colonoscopy. The sigmoid colon was the most common perforation site (6 patients), followed by the cecum 2 patients and the transverse colon, splenic flexure, and the rectum 1 patient each. Five patients were diagnosed during colonoscopy. Six patients were diagnosed 12~48 hours after the colonoscopy. Three patients who showed definite signs of peritonitis underwent emergency operations. A conservative treatment was done in eight patients; among them, one patient had an operation on the 3rd. day after the perforation. The remaining seven patients underwent conservative treatment and were followed for up to 1 month without complications. Among these patients, one patient had a recurrent perforation on the 33rd day after the initial perforation, and an operation was done. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that conservative treatment in patients with colon perforations is safe and effective unless there are obvious signs of generalized peritonitis.
A Foreign body in the gastrointestinal tract is a common clinical problem seen in all age groups and rarely produces symptoms. However, the foreign bodies should be removed if they produce symptoms or remain in the gastrointestinal tract. A 31-year-old man with schizophrenia ingested a 20-cm-sized toothbrush. It passed through the ileocecal valve and penetrated the hepatic flexure of the colon and liver. It was removed successfully by using a surgical procedure. We report this unusual case of colonic perforation by an ingested toothbrush and review the related literature.
An appendicocolic fistula is a rare disease. It seems likely that the appendix becomes adherent to the viscus either before or after its perforation due to appendicitis, so surgeons may become confused when an emergency appendectomy in done. We report one case of an appendicocolic fistula to draw attention to the importance of this fistula and to describe the clinical, the diagnostic, and the therapeutic aspects of the disease.
Polyarteritis nodosa, one of the necrotizing vasculitis involving predominantly small and medium sized arteries is a rare disease. Gastrointestinal involvements have been reported in more than 50% of patients at some time during its course. The small bowel is the frequent site of involvement in clinically apparent ischemic disease. The colon is less commonly involved, particularly at the initial presentation. We report a rare case of polyarteritis nodosa with ischemic colitis, perforation, and pseudomembrane formation.
PURPOSE The prognosis following colonic perforation is generally regarded as worse than it is for upper gastrointestinal perforation. Moreover, the increasing incidence of colon cancer associated perforation is another reason for the present study of colonic perforation in the present study. We reviewed and analyzed various types of colonic perforations to determine which prognostic factors were still useful for the treatment of colonic perforation. METHODS Thirty six patients (mean age, 51.5; 24 males) with generalized peritonitis secondary to a colonic perforation were studied retrospectively. All the patients had undergone an exploratory laparotomy. The severity of the clinical condition was recorded according to the APACHE III scoring system for all the patients when they were first seen.
Mortality and morbidity were analyzed for possible prognostic factors, such as age, type of operation, association with malignancy, and APACHE-III score. RESULTS Penetrating trauma was the leading cause of perforation (27.8%), and iatrogenic perforations accounted for 19.4% of the total. Among nontraumatic perforations, malignancy was the major pathology (25.0%). The sigmoid colon was the most frequent site of perforation. Types of surgical treatment varied according to the general conditions of the patients. In 22 patients, the operation was finished with primary closure alone. A colonic resection was performed in 14 patients, and a proximal diversion was performed in 19 patients (after either a resection or primary closure). Analysis of the various clinical variables showed that old age (>60), underlying malignancy, and the APACHE III score were significant prognostic factors for the surgical outcome. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that penetrating injuries are still the main cause of colonic perforation and that iatrogenic and malignancy-related perforations are increasing. Among other variables, old age, underlying malignancy and the APACHE III score are significant prognostic factors for the surgical outcome.
PURPOSE Stercoral perforation of colon is a rare disease with poor prognosis. But according to recent reports, the incidence of stercoral perforation in the colon seemed to have been underestimated. The reason might be the lack of recognition and overlook by surgeons. The purposes of this study were to represent the definition of stercoral perforation, and to help the diagnosis and treatment of stercoral perforation. METHODS Among the patients who underwent emergency operation for colon perforation at the Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, from January 1992 to December 2001, 9 patients were diagnosed as stercoral perforation and their medical records were reviewed retrospectively regarding the clinical characteristics, managements and mortality. RESULTS The age distribution of the patients was from 32 to 76 years. Male to female ratio was 1.3:1. All patients had history of chronic constipation. Six cases (33.3%) had free air, and 5 cases (55.6%) had fecaloma at preoperative simple X-ray. The site of perforation were sigmoid colon (8 cases) and descending colon (1 case). The size of perforation ranged from 1 cm to 6.5 cm (mean: 3.1 2.7 cm). The methods of operation were Hartmann's procedure (8 cases), primary repair and sigmoid loop colostomy (1 case). There were two deaths for sepsis. CONCLUSIONS The stercoral perforation is not rare as commonly thought. If elderly patients who had history of chronic constipation and symptoms of panperitonitis visit hospital, surgeon should be aware of the possibility of this fatal disease and do early surgical intervention with the aggressive therapy for reducing the mortality.
Staged procedures are preferred to single stage procedures in emergency based left colonic obstruction or perforation because of the safety.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the single stage procedure in emergency based left colonic pathology is not safe. METHODS We compared medical records of single stage procedure (SP, n=22 male; 10, mean age: 60+/-17, range: 26-82 Yrs) with Hartmanns procedure (HP, n=23 male; 13, mean age: 58+/-16, range: 18-90 Yrs) and diverting loop colostomy (DC, n=19, male; 12, mean age: 59+/-19, range: 19-80 Yrs) in these 4 years. All the patients were admitted via emergency room. Intraoperative colonic irrigation method with newly developed irrigation device (MITech co., Ltd, Seoul, Korea) was used for SP. APACHE III scoring system was applied to evaluate the physiologic status of the patients.
Preoperative data were compared with the 1st and 3rd postoperative day (POD). RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics and preoperative APACHE III scores.
The improvement of APACHE III score was significant in SP and DC on the 3rd POD from 29.6+/-20.9 to 22.9+/-10.2 and 25.7+/-13.3 to 21.4+/-14.8 (P<0.05). There was also a significant improvement in DC (25.7+/-13.3 to 21.9+/-12.9, P<0.05) on the 1st POD, however, there was only a tendency of improvement in SP (29.6+/-20.9 to 26.1+/-12.3) without statistical significance. The scores in HP showed no improvement on the 1st and 3rd POD. There were 3 operative mortalities in HP and one in DC. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the safety of the single stage procedure with newly developed colonic irrigation device is comparable to palliative decompressive loop colostomy and better than Hartmanns procedure in emergency based left colonic pathology.
Natural Killer cell lymphoma pursued a highly aggressive clinical course, with the aggressiveness and poor prognosis in this biologically distinct primary gastrointestinal lymphoma, a more vigorous systemic therapy should be considered in the addition to surgery. We report an unusual case of aggressive primary Natural Killer cell (NK cell) lymphoma of the cecum. A 38-year old man admitted for intractable fever, diarrhea, and hematochezia. The patient diagnosed as primary NK cell cecal lymphoma with perforation after surgical resection. The primary lesion was deep ulceration with perforation and it revealed metastasis to liver. The immunophenotype of the tumor cell were CD56+, CD3+, UCHL-1+, CD45RO+, polyclonal IGH, TCRr, so confirmed NK cell type lymphoma.
While colon perforation as a complication of diseases such as carcinoma, colitis, diverticular disease, or abdominal trauma is not uncommon, spontaneous perforation of the colon is rare. Although spontaneous perforation is classified as either stercoral or idiopathic on the basis of its etiological background, the pathological mechanisms of the lesions have yet to be determined in detail. Stercoral perforation is a very rare cause of acute abdomen, with fewer than 70 cases documented in the literature; and idiopathic perforation is also infrequently reported. Both disease entities have often been grouped together as idiopathic or spontaneous perforation, resulting in confusion. We report herein two cases of stercoral perforation of the sigmoid colon. The clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease are reviewed.
Surgeons should be aware of the possibility of this fatal disease, despite its rare incidence. Furthermore, it is important to recognize the condition at an early stage of the disease because it has significantly high mortality if surgery is delayed.
The use of self-expanding metal stent has been widely reported that its utility can make a palliative decompression treatment and one stage operation without doing colostomy in the patient with unresectable and resectable obstructive colorectal cancer, respectively. It, however, can sometimes cause complications such as intestinal perforation. We report that the conservative treantment could be possible without removing stent or performing laparotomy in case of intestinal perforation during chemoradiotheraphy after insert of stent for relieving colonic obstruction in the 53 years old female patient with stage IV rectal cancer.
PURPOSE To evaluate factors that predict prognosis of colon perforation, we review the hospital records of 37 patients who underwent emergency operation for colon perforation. METHODS Information of clinical findings, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II score), perforation sites and causes, operation methods, and postoperative complications were obtained. RESULTS The causes of perforation were traumatic 11 (29.7%), iatrogenic 10 (27.0%), diverticular 6 (16.2%), cancerous process 6 (16.2%), strangulated hernia 2 (5.4%), ischemic colitis 1 (2.7%) and stercoral 1 (2.7%). The longer duration from colon perforation to operation, the more severe intra-abdominal fecal contamination was seen. The complication rate was increased as the intra-abdominal fecal contamination increased or APACHE II score increased (p<0.05). But there were no correlation between the complication rate and perforation sites and causes. In according to operative managements, one-stage operation (simple closure or resection with anastomosis) group had more lower complication rate than two-stage operation (formation of colostomy) group, unexpectedly (31.3% vs.
52.4%, p>0.05). Also former group had lower complication rate compared to latter group in left colon (40% vs 50%). CONCLUSIONS The factors that predict of mortality and morbidity are not perforation site, causes, and operation method, but preoperative physiologic status (APACHE II score) and intra-abdominal fecal contamination. So preoperative proper and vigorous treatment for improvement of physiologic status and shortening of interval to operation are important for better results. And primary closure and resection with anastomosis is useful for colon perforation in selected circumstance regardless of its site and cause.
Colon has the highest bacterial concentration in the gastrointestinal tract. When the colon is perforated, the operator has to decide whether to perform primary closure, resection with anastomosis, proximal colostomy, and exteriorizatoion. In this retrospective study, from October, 1993, through July 1998, 56 patient with panperitonitis due to colon perforation were operated at Ewha womans University medical center. The rectal perforation was limited the intraperitoneal portion.
Our cases were divided into two groups. Group I included 34 patients who treated with one step operations of primaryrepair or resection anastomosis. Group II included 22 patients who treated with two step operations of proximal colostomy or exteriorization. The one step operations were performed in 34 patients, proximal colostomy in 21 patients, and exteriorization in 1 patient. There was 13.7% in the incidence of motality and 33.3% in the incidence of morbidity. The Chi-square test was used to evaluate the significance of differences between two groups. Independent risk factors for adverse outcomes were compared and used to analyse the probability for adverse outcomes with respect to the mode of treatmen. The mode of treatment was not dependent on the risk factors. These results suggest that one could select positively primary closure or resection with anastomosis for the treatment of patients with panperitonitis due to colon perforation.