Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
1 "Open hemorrhoidectomy;Closed hemorrhoidectomy;Semi-closed hemorrhoidectomy;Submucosal hemorrhoidectomy;PPH"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Display
Review
Open Hemorrhoidectomy.
Kim, Do Sun
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2007;23(4):279-285.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2007.23.4.279
  • 3,099 View
  • 42 Download
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
The open hemorrhoidectomy has been recognized as the treatment of choice for symptomatic prolapsing hemorrhoids. Although the open hemorrhoidectomy is thought to be associated with more postoperative pain and delayed wound healing compared with other conventional procedures such as a closed hemorrhoidectomy, and a semi- closed or submucosal hemorrhoidectomy, it is still unclear which procedure is preferable in terms of postoperative pain, wound healing, hospital stay, and time off work. To address this issue, several studies have been performed. According to randomized controlled studies comparing an open hemorrhoidectomy to a closed hemorrhoidectomy, there are no significant differences in the severity of pain and the hospital stay between the two procedures; however, the healing time in the closed hemorrhoidectomy is faster and the operation time in the open hemorrhoidectomy is shorter. Since there are few randomized controlled studies comparing an open hemorrhoidectomy with a semi-closed hemorrhoidectomy or submucosal hemorrhoidectomy, it is difficult to conclude which procedure is superior to the others. Yet, there seems to be no significant difference between these procedures. In 1998, a novel procedure, a stapled hemorrhoidopexy, was introduced by Longo. Several randomized controlled studies comparing the open hemorrhoidectomy with the stapled hemorrhoidopexy showed that the latter was associated with less pain, shorter hospital stay, and earlier return to work. However, considering the lack of long- term data and the disastrous complications, such as retroperitoneal sepsis and rectal perforation, there is still controversy about its efficacy and safety as a definitive treatment of hemorrhoids. The open hemorrhoidectomy is time-tested and is comparable to other conventional techniques in terms of postoperative pain, hospital stay, and time off work. Further study should be performed to assess the long-term results of a stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Long-term follow-up of Starion™ versus Harmonic Scalpel™ hemorrhoidectomy for grade III and IV hemorrhoids
    Joo Hyung Kim, Dae Hyun Kim, Yong Pyo Lee, Kwang Wook Suh
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2019; 42(1): 367.     CrossRef
  • Have Any Changes in Pain Been Noted After a Hemorrhoidectomy Since the Establishment of the Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy?
    Do Sun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(3): 90.     CrossRef
  • Randomized Trial Comparing a Starion™ and a Harmonic Scalpel™ Hemorrhoidectomy
    Joo Hyung Kim, Yong Pyo Lee
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2009; 25(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP