Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
306 "Neoplasms"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Display
Original Articles
Colorectal cancer
Palliative resection versus palliative stenting for intestinal obstruction in patients with metastatic left-sided colonic cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis
Ruby Siu Ting Lau, Sophie Sok Fei Hon, Man Fung Ho, Simon Chu, Dennis CK Ng, Simon SM Ng
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(6):528-536.   Published online December 29, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00535.0076
  • 232 View
  • 21 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Palliative resection and palliative stenting are established options for managing obstruction in patients with metastatic left-sided colonic cancer. This retrospective study investigated the long-term outcomes and survival associated with each treatment modality.
Methods
Patients with left-sided colon cancer complicated by intestinal obstruction and unresectable metastatic lesions were included. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance demographic characteristics. The primary outcome was long-term survival. Secondary outcomes included short-term morbidity, length of hospital stay, clinical success rate, stoma formation rate, and number of readmissions due to tumor-related complications.
Results
Initially, 131 patients who underwent palliative resection or stenting between 2015 and 2022 were included. After propensity score matching, 98 patients remained (49 in each group). Survival was significantly better among patients receiving palliative resection compared to stenting (median, 19.6 months vs. 9.6 months; P=0.003). However, subgroup analysis for patients older than 70 years demonstrated no statistically significant survival benefit (median, 11.5 months vs. 10.2 months; P=0.240). The resection group experienced significantly higher rates of stoma formation and longer postoperative hospital stays. Readmission rates were similar. Cox regression analysis identified low carcinoembryonic antigen levels, tumor resection, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy as independent predictors of longer survival.
Conclusion
For metastatic colon cancer patients presenting with intestinal obstruction, palliative resection may offer a survival advantage. However, this benefit diminishes in patients over 70 years of age. Additionally, resection is associated with a higher rate of stoma formation. Therefore, individualized treatment decisions are warranted when choosing between palliative resection and palliative stenting in metastatic colonic cancer patients.
Anorectal benign disease
New anatomical insight into the muscular structure of the anal canal: revealing Treitz muscle as a directional shift of the internal anal sphincter
Satoru Muro, Kumiko Yamaguchi, Naoko Inoshita, Yasuo Nakajima, Danyo Jennifer Edinam, Akimoto Nimura, Keiichi Akita
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(6):501-509.   Published online December 29, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00647.0092
  • 310 View
  • 33 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Understanding the muscular structure of the anal canal is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of anorectal diseases. Treitz muscle is a vital yet poorly understood component. It supports the anal venous plexus and contributes to anal cushion formation. However, its anatomical details remain unclear, and various theories suggest different origins for its muscle bundles, which affects our understanding of the pathophysiology of hemorrhoids. In this study, we sought to clarify the origin and localization of Treitz muscle to provide an anatomical foundation for understanding anal function.
Methods
In this descriptive cadaveric study of 11 cadavers, we performed macroscopic examinations and immunohistological analyses on tissues from the anterior, lateral, and posterior walls of the anal canal. The origin and localization of Treitz muscle were qualitatively evaluated.
Results
Treitz muscle is a smooth muscle formed by a directional change in the muscle bundles of the internal anal sphincter, running longitudinally along its surface. A shift in the direction of muscle bundles originating from the internal anal sphincter, giving rise to Treitz muscle, was frequently observed in the anterolateral wall of the anal canal.
Conclusion
In summary, Treitz muscle, a smooth muscle extending from the internal anal sphincter, is considered part of the muscularis propria. Its directional shift was localized to the anterolateral wall, indicating that Treitz muscle is not uniformly distributed around the anal canal. This site-specific localization may influence the risk of hemorrhoids or cancer invasion depending on its anatomical position.
Complications
Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging–based radiomics nomogram model for predicting postoperative anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer
Junfeng Yan, Qiushuang Wang, Qiang Li, Jiatong Lu, Qiang Tong
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(6):554-564.   Published online December 26, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00689.0098
  • 178 View
  • 11 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious postoperative complication after colorectal cancer surgery, and accurate preoperative prediction remains challenging. This study aimed to develop and validate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–based radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of AL.
Methods
A total of 146 patients with colorectal cancer, including 11 with AL, were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts at a 7:3 ratio. Clinical variables and preoperative MRI-based radiomic features were analyzed. A clinical model was constructed using logistic regression. Radiomic features were selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method to develop a radiomics model, from which a radiomic score was calculated. A combined radiomics nomogram integrating the radiomic score and significant clinical factors was subsequently established. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in both cohorts.
Results
The clinical model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.766 in the training cohort and 0.583 in the validation cohort. The radiomics model demonstrated improved discrimination, with AUCs of 0.822 and 0.800, respectively. The combined radiomics nomogram showed the best predictive performance, yielding AUCs of 0.869 in the training cohort and 0.858 in the validation cohort.
Conclusion
The proposed MRI-based radiomics nomogram demonstrates good predictive performance for postoperative anastomotic leakage and may serve as a useful tool for preoperative risk stratification in patients with colorectal cancer.
Complications
Effects of prune consumption on the incidence of low anterior resection syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
Dae Hee Pyo, Jung Kyong Shin, Jung Wook Huh, Hee Cheol Kim, Seong Hyeon Yun, Woo Yong Lee, Yoonah Park, Yong Beom Cho
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(6):510-518.   Published online December 12, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00514.0073
  • 924 View
  • 38 Download
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is common and devastating complication for patients with rectal cancer who have undergone sphincter-sparing surgery. Prunes are a fiber-rich fruit being effective in treating chronic constipation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prune consumption on the incidence of LARS.
Methods
A prospective, double-arm, parallel, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted from September 2019 to March 2021 at a single tertiary center for patients who underwent low anterior resection. Patients randomized to the prune group consumed prune daily for 2 weeks after surgery, while those in the no-prune group did not. The primary outcome was the incidence of major LARS at 3 weeks after surgery.
Results
A total of 130 patients were randomized and 118 completed the study (81 men, 37 women), including 55 patients (46.6%) in the prune group and 63 patients (53.4%) in the no-prune group. LARS was confirmed in 15 patients (27.3%) in the prune group and 47 patients (74.6%) in the no-prune group (P<0.001). The incidence of major LARS was also significantly lower in the prune group (18.2% vs. 61.9%, P<0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that the level of anastomosis and prune consumption were significantly associated with the incidence of LARS. The prune group had higher emotional scores and lower symptom scores for constipation, sleep disturbance, and loss of appetite in the quality-of-life questionnaire.
Conclusion
Prune consumption significantly reduced the incidence of LARS and improved quality of life after low anterior resection. Trial registration: CRIS identifier: KCT0006085 (registered on September 1, 2019).
Metastasis or chemotherapy
Comparative effectiveness of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab for improving outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer: a propensity overlap weighting analysis
Yi-Chia Su, Chien-Chou Su, Pei-Ting Lee, Chih-Chien Wu
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(5):462-472.   Published online October 27, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00059.0008
  • 1,487 View
  • 54 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality despite advancements in targeted therapies. Monoclonal antibody medications—namely, bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab—are widely used in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatments for unresectable mCRC in patients harboring wild-type KRAS tumors. However, the comparative effectiveness of these treatments in improving survival outcomes has not been clearly evaluated. This study aimed to directly compare the effectiveness of these 3 targeted therapies on survival outcomes in patients with unresectable mCRC.
Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, we utilized Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Database and Taiwan Cancer Registry to identify patients newly diagnosed with mCRC who were treated with at least 6 cycles of bevacizumab, cetuximab, or panitumumab between 2011 and 2021. Propensity score overlap weighting was applied to adjust for baseline differences, and outcomes were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed separately for left- and right-sided tumors.
Results
Among 4,849 patients, treatment with cetuximab and panitumumab was associated with improved overall survival compared to bevacizumab, particularly in patients with left-sided tumors (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.77 and 0.75, respectively). Both cetuximab and panitumumab also showed significantly higher rates of conversion surgery, with panitumumab demonstrating the strongest effect. For right-sided tumors, however, the effectiveness of all 3 agents was limited, and no significant differences were observed in overall survival.
Conclusion
Cetuximab and panitumumab were more effective than bevacizumab at improving survival outcomes and facilitating conversion surgery in left-sided mCRC. These findings highlight the importance of tumor laterality and molecular profiling in guiding therapeutic strategies.
Complications
Muscle loss phenotype predicts poor postoperative outcomes of colorectal cancer in US inpatients: a population-based analysis
Ko-Chao Lee, Sin-Ei Juang, Kuen-Lin Wu, Kung-Chuan Cheng, Ling-Chiao Song, Chien-En Tang, Hong-Hwa Chen, Kuan-Chih Chung
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(5):443-452.   Published online October 24, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00129.0018
  • 750 View
  • 19 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Muscle loss may lead to reduced therapy tolerance and survival. We aimed to assess whether colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with a muscle loss phenotype experience worse outcomes.
Methods
Data were extracted from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample for hospitalized patients aged ≥20 years who underwent surgical resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) between 2005 and 2018. CRC and muscle loss phenotypes were identified using validated International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis and procedure codes. Propensity score matching was performed to balance characteristics. Regression analyses determined associations between muscle loss and in-hospital outcomes.
Results
A total of 209,171 patients were included, with a mean age of 67.9 years; 7.1% exhibited muscle loss phenotype. After matching, 60,295 patients remained in the sample. After adjustment, patients with muscle loss had significantly increased risks of postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.85–3.15), unfavorable discharge (aOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 2.30–2.53), prolonged length of stay (aOR, 4.34; 95% CI, 4.13–4.55), and higher total hospital costs (adjusted β, 70.86; 95% CI, 67.11–74.61) compared to patients without muscle loss. When stratified by age (≥65 years), results remained consistent. Among complications, muscle loss phenotype was most strongly associated with shock, sepsis, and respiratory failure.
Conclusion
Muscle loss phenotype among patients with CRC is strongly associated with poor postoperative outcomes, including higher complication rates, longer stays, and increased costs. These findings highlight the importance of preoperative muscle loss assessments and the necessity for targeted interventions.
Colorectal cancer
Prognostic significance of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) change during immediate postoperative periods in patients with stage I–III colorectal cancer
Wooram Choi, Yongjung Park, Jeonghyun Kang
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(5):400-408.   Published online October 23, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00528.0075
  • 3,173 View
  • 71 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Although carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) may exhibit low sensitivity in tumor screening, its prognostic significance has been highlighted. This study assessed the significance of preoperative CA19-9 and early postoperative CA19-9 levels in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).
Methods
Patients diagnosed with stage I–III CRC between January 2004 and April 2014 were included. Preoperative CA19-9 was assessed within 2 months of operation, whereas postoperative CA19-9 was measured 4 to 7 days after operation. The optimal cutoff values for preoperative and postoperative CA19-9 were established to maximize the differences in overall survival. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on the CA19-9 change (CA19-9 trend): group 1, low preoperative CA19-9; group 2, high preoperative and low postoperative CA19-9; and group 3, high preoperative and postoperative CA19-9. The discriminatory powers of all variables were compared using the concordance index.
Results
A total of 816 patients were included. The determined cutoff values for preoperative and postoperative CA19-9 were 18.9 and 21.4 U/mL, respectively. Subgroup dichotomization revealed associations of preoperative CA19-9, postoperative CA19-9, and CA19-9 trend with overall survival in univariable analysis. The CA19-9 trend emerged as an independent prognostic factor in the multivariable analysis (group 1 vs. group 2: hazard ratio, 1.682 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.043–2.710], P=0.032; group 1 vs. group 3: hazard ratio, 2.882 [95% CI, 1.899–4.371], P<0.001). The concordance index value of the CA19-9 trend (0.636; 95% CI, 0.509–0.682) surpassed those of preoperative and postoperative CA19-9.
Conclusion
The amalgamation of preoperative and postoperative CA19-9 levels demonstrated enhanced prognostic stratification, allowing for a more detailed classification of patients with nonmetastatic CRC.
Review
Translation/basic research
Extracellular vesicles in colorectal cancer
Young Il Kim, Chungyeop Lee, Hakho Lee, In Ja Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(5):379-392.   Published online October 16, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00745.0106
  • 2,024 View
  • 54 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major global health issue, with challenges including early detection and recurrence monitoring. While colonoscopy and fecal-based tests are standard screening tools, their limitations have driven interest in less invasive alternatives. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) present in patient liquid biopsy samples have emerged as potential biomarkers and therapeutic tools in CRC. EVs carry molecular cargo, including nucleic acids and proteins, that reflect the status of their cells of origin and can be readily accessed through minimally invasive liquid biopsy. This review outlines the role of EVs in the initiation and progression of CRC, summarizes recent advances in EV isolation techniques, and highlights candidate EV-derived biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring. By providing an updated synthesis of current research, this review aims to inform future studies and support clinical translation of EV-based approaches in CRC.
Original Articles
Metastasis or chemotherapy
Short-term surgical outcomes following neoadjuvant immunotherapy in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer: initial experience from a tertiary referral center
Ejaz Ahmed Latif, Ayman Abdelhafiz Ahmed, Mahmood Saad Al-Dhaheri, Ammar Aleter, Ali Toffaha, Mohamed Kurer, Tausief Fatima, Amjad Parvaiz, Mohmmad Hosni Abunada
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(4):338-345.   Published online August 28, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00381.0054
  • 1,358 View
  • 44 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Immunotherapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in mismatch repair-deficient (MMR-D) colorectal cancer (CRC). Due to their significant response rates, immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as a promising neoadjuvant therapy. However, data regarding short-term surgical outcomes following immunotherapy remain limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of surgical resection after immunotherapy, as well as its short-term clinical outcomes.
Methods
A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed at a tertiary referral center from January 2020 to July 2024. Fifteen consecutive patients with MMR-D CRC treated with pembrolizumab were analyzed. The patients’ demographics, tumor characteristics, clinical outcomes, and histopathological responses were assessed.
Results
In total, 15 patients diagnosed with MMR-D locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancers received neoadjuvant immunotherapy followed by surgery. Of the 15 patients, 11 (73.3%) were male, 12 (80.0%) presented with T3/T4 tumors, and 3 (20.0%) had metastatic disease at diagnosis. The median number of immunotherapy cycles was 5 (range, 3–13). Surgery was performed without any anastomotic leaks or 30-day mortality. The median length of hospital stay was 5 days (range, 3–14 days). All surgical specimens had negative resection margins. Major pathological response was observed in 11 patients (73.3%), including complete response in 8 (53.3%) and near-complete response in 3 (20.0%). The median follow-up was 14 months (range, 1–56 months). One patient developed liver metastasis, which was successfully resected.
Conclusion
Surgical resection of MMR-D CRC following neoadjuvant immunotherapy is safe and associated with low morbidity. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in MMR-D CRC facilitates high rates of major pathological response.
Colorectal cancer
Evaluation of the utility of a nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer in shared decision-making in clinical practice: a survey-based study
Hyeon Seung Kim, Kyung Su Han, Min Wan Lee, Dae Kyung Sohn, Chang Won Hong, Dong Woon Lee, Kiho You, Sung Chan Park, Byung Chang Kim, Bun Kim, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(4):303-309.   Published online August 25, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00318.0045
  • 1,503 View
  • 39 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
In 2019, we reported a novel nomogram to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) in T1 colorectal cancer. Herein, we conducted a survey-based study to evaluate the clinical utility of this nomogram in determining the need for additional surgery after endoscopic resection for high-risk T1 colorectal cancer.
Methods
A survey was conducted among 77 members of the Korean Society of Coloproctology and 25 members of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The survey assessed decision-making regarding additional surgery after endoscopic resection for high-risk T1 colorectal cancer according to various predicted LNM rates (3%, 10%, and 27%) and tumor locations (anal verge [AV] 2, 7, and 25 cm). Additionally, participants provided feedback regarding the reliability, usefulness, and potential adoptability of the prediction model in patient counseling.
Results
Of the 2,314 surveys distributed, 102 responses were analyzed. A trend was observed in which tumors located closer to the anus and associated with a lower predicted risk of LNM were less likely to lead respondents to opt for surgery (e.g., AV 2 cm and 3% of predicted LNM risk, 21.6% opt for surgery vs. AV 25 cm and 27% of predicted LNM risk, 98.0% opt for surgery). Additionally, 94.1% of the respondents reported that the prediction model would be helpful in clinical decision-making and patient counseling.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that the nomogram is an effective and reliable tool for guiding treatment strategies and enhancing consultations in patients with T1 colorectal cancer.
Minimally invasive surgery
Propensity score–matched comparison of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery using hinotori and da Vinci
Hidetoshi Katsuno, Koji Morohara, Tomoyoshi Endo, Kenji Kikuchi, Kenichi Nakamura, Kazuhiro Matsuo, Takahiko Higashiguchi, Tetsuya Koide, Hiromi Kanai, Satoshi Arakawa, Tsunekazu Hanai, Zenichi Morise
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(4):310-318.   Published online August 25, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00136.0019
  • 2,642 View
  • 44 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The hinotori Surgical Robot System (hereafter “hinotori”) is a novel platform for robot-assisted surgery, while the da Vinci Surgical System (“da Vinci”) remains the field standard. This study compared short-term surgical outcomes of rectal cancer surgery between these systems using propensity score–matched analysis.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted of 209 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery with the da Vinci and 58 patients with the hinotori system. After 2:1 propensity score matching, 108 da Vinci and 54 hinotori cases were included. Surgical outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and pathological findings, were compared.
Results
After matching, the baseline demographics were well balanced between groups. The hinotori system was associated with significantly longer operative time (266 minutes vs. 227 minutes, P=0.014) and console time (156 minutes vs. 110 minutes, P=0.001). However, estimated blood loss and postoperative complication rate did not differ significantly. Pathological findings, including the number of lymph nodes retrieved and the incidence of positive surgical margins, were comparable between systems.
Conclusion
In rectal surgery, the hinotori system demonstrates comparable short-term safety outcomes to da Vinci. Despite longer operative times and limited integrated instrumentation, hinotori‐assisted procedures may be feasible in selected patients. Further research should address long-term oncological outcomes and strategies to improve procedural efficiency.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Racing toward the future of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study of hinotori and da Vinci
    Sung Uk Bae
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(4): 259.     CrossRef
Metastasis or chemotherapy
Effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based second-line therapy following cetuximab+FOLFIRI or bevacizumab+FOLFIRI in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer without primary tumor resection
Yi-Chia Su, Chien-Chou Su, Pei-Ting Lee, Chih-Chien Wu
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(4):319-329.   Published online August 21, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00087.0012
  • 1,285 View
  • 46 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Wild-type unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) poses challenges for treatment optimization. Effective first-line targeted therapies are crucial for improving outcomes, particularly when combined with second-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapies. This study examined the effects of first-line cetuximab+FOLFIRI versus bevacizumab+FOLFIRI, followed by second-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, on survival among patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC without primary tumor resection (PTR).
Methods
A retrospective analysis of Taiwanese data (2013–2019) included patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable mCRC who received first-line cetuximab+FOLFIRI or bevacizumab+FOLFIRI, followed by second-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Survival outcomes—overall survival (OS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD)—were compared between these regimens using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for potential confounders, followed by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to account for clinical and biological variables.
Results
In patients without PTR, first-line cetuximab+FOLFIRI with second-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improved OS from the start dates of first- and second-line treatment compared to first-line bevacizumab+FOLFIRI with second-line oxaliplatin-based therapy, yielding adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46–0.78) and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.42–0.73), respectively. No significant difference in TTD was observed (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65–1.04).
Conclusion
First-line cetuximab+FOLFIRI followed by second-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy offers superior OS compared to bevacizumab+FOLFIRI followed by second-line oxaliplatin‑based chemotherapy in KRAS wild-type mCRC without PTR. These findings underscore the importance of personalized treatment sequencing, highlighting the need for further research to optimize mCRC management.
Colorectal cancer
Effects of clinical information on the treatment decisions for good responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy among rectal cancer patients
Eon Bin Kim, In Ja Park, Hwa Jung Kim, Jong Keon Jang, Seong Ho Park, Young Il Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(5):473-482.   Published online July 10, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00276.0039
  • 1,413 View
  • 31 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The decision for treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal cancer is intricately linked to tumor response and clinical parameters. This study was designed to elucidate determinants influencing treatment decisions for good responders to nCRT, while concurrently evaluating the ramifications of modifications in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tumor response evaluation protocols.
Methods
A survey was constructed with 5 cases of good responder after nCRT based on the magnetic resonance–based tumor regression grade (mrTRG) criteria. A total of 35 colorectal surgeons in Korea participated in the survey via email, and they were introduced to 2 discrete MRI-based tumor response evaluation methodologies: the conventional mrTRG and an emergent complete response (CR)/non-CR classification system. Surgeons were directed to select between total mesorectal excision, local excision, or a watch and wait strategy.
Results
Treatment decisions varied significantly (P<0.01), as gradually more clinical information was provided with mrTRG. The paradigm shift from mrTRG to CR/non-CR evaluation criterion instigated the highest alteration in decision (P<0.01). Even comparing with other sets of information, decision change with different tumor response assessment (i.e., mrTRG vs. CR/non-CR) was statistically significant (P<0.01). Three particular cases consistently displayed a declining predilection for total mesorectal excision, favoring a more pronounced inclination towards watch and wait strategy or local excision. Nonetheless, the magnitude of these decisional shifts oscillated depending on the specific endoscopic imagery present.
Conclusion
Our current findings underscore the significant role of tumor response assessment methods in shaping treatment decisions for rectal cancer patients who respond well to nCRT. This highlights the need for clear and accurate tools to interpret MRI results.
Colorectal cancer
How appropriately can generative artificial intelligence platforms, including GPT-4, Gemini, Bing, and Wrtn, answer questions about colon cancer in the Korean language?
Sun Huh
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(3):190-197.   Published online June 25, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00122.0017
  • 5,135 View
  • 55 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This study aims to assess the performance of 4 generative artificial intelligence (AI) platforms—Gemini (formerly Bard), Bing, GPT-4, and Wrtn—in answering questions about colon cancer in the Korean language. Two main research questions guided this study. First, which AI platform provides the most accurate answers? Second, can these AI-generated answers be reliably used to educate patients and their families about colon cancer?
Methods
Ten questions selected by the author were posed to the 4 generative AI platforms on February 22, 2024. Two colorectal surgeons in Korea, each with over 20 years of clinical experience, independently evaluated the answers provided by these generative AI platforms.
Results
The generative AI platforms scored an average of 5.5 out of 10 points. Wrtn achieved the highest score at 6 points, followed by GPT-4 and Gemini, each with 5.5, and Bing, scoring 5 points. The weighted κ for inter-rater reliability was 0.597 (P<0.001). The generative AI platforms performed well in explaining the occult blood test for cancer screening, keyhole surgery, and dietary recommendations for cancer prevention. However, they demonstrated significant limitations in answering more complex topics, such as estimating survival rates following surgery, choosing targeted therapy after surgery, and accurately reporting the mortality rate due to colon cancer in Korea.
Conclusion
The findings suggest that using these generative AI platforms as educational resources for patients and their families regarding colon cancer is premature. Further training on colorectal diseases is required before these AI platforms can be considered reliable information sources for the general public in Korea.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Expert Review on the Quality of Responses to the Questions of Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Validation Study of the Medical Artificial Intelligence System “Myelobot”
    Aleksander Sergeevich Luchinin, O. E. Ochirova, V. G. Potapenko, V. V. Ryabchikova
    Clinical Oncohematology.2026; 19(1): 81.     CrossRef
  • Agentic artificial intelligence is the future of cancer detection and diagnosis
    Sayedur Rahman, Md. Tanzib Hosain, Nafiz Fahad, Md. Kishor Morol, Md. Jakir Hossen
    Array.2026; 29: 100676.     CrossRef
  • Role of Medical Editors in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence
    Sun Huh
    Healthcare Informatics Research.2025; 31(4): 317.     CrossRef
  • Temporal evolution of large language models (LLMs) in oncology
    Zilin Qiu, Aimin Jiang, Chang Qi, Wenyi Gan, Lingxuan Zhu, Weiming Mou, Dongqiang Zeng, Mingjia Xiao, Guangdi Chu, Shengkun Peng, Hank Z. H. Wong, Lin Zhang, Hengguo Zhang, Xinpei Deng, Quan Cheng, Bufu Tang, Yaxuan Wang, Jian Zhang, Anqi Lin, Peng Luo
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
ERAS
Early urinary catheter removal in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial on silodosin versus no pharmacological treatment on urinary function in the early postoperative period
Žilvinas Gricius, Justas Kuliavas, Eugenijus Stratilatovas, Bronius Buckus, Audrius Dulskas
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(3):239-245.   Published online June 20, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00703.0100
  • 3,215 View
  • 62 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the α1 adrenergic receptor antagonist silodosin in preventing lower urinary tract symptoms after rectal cancer surgery.
Methods
We conducted a 2-arm, double-blind, single-center randomized controlled trial. The study included 150 patients with rectal cancer who underwent radical surgery between 2019 and 2022. On the first postoperative day, the urinary catheter was removed for all patients. Of these, 100 patients were administered silodosin, while 50 patients (control group) receive placebo (glucose tablet). Urinary dysfunction (urinary retention, infection, dysuria) and other complications were monitored.
Results
Among the 150 patients, 84 (56.0%) were male and 66 (44.0%) were female. Surgical procedures included abdominoperineal resection in 33 patients, partial mesorectal excision in 45, and total mesorectal excision in 72. A laparoscopic approach was used in 69 patients, while the remaining 81 underwent open surgery. Urinary tract symptoms developed in 10 patients (6.7%): 7 (7.0%) in the silodosin group and 3 (6.0%) in the control group (P=0.92). In the silodosin group, there was 1 case (1.0%) of urinary retention, 3 cases (3.0%) of urinary tract infection, and 3 cases (3.0%) of dysuria. In the control group, there was 1 case (2.0%) each of urinary retention, urinary tract infection, and dysuria (all P=0.92).
Conclusion
Early urinary catheter removal on the first postoperative day was safe in both groups. The use of the oral α-antagonist silodosin did not provide additional benefits in preventing lower urinary tract symptoms in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03607370

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Less is more: simplifying patient-centered cancer care
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(3): 173.     CrossRef
Complications
Improved outcomes with cyanoacrylate glue for ileocolic anastomosis in right colectomy: a multicenter study
Daniela Rega, Ernesto De Giulio, Raffaele De Luca, Andrea Muratore, Marco Milone, Giuseppe Sica, Paolo Millo, Carmela Cervone, Nicola Cillara, Patrizia Marsanic, Brunella Maria Pirozzi, Valeria Grazia Malagnino, Pietro Anoldo, Marcello Calabrò, Giovanni De Palma, Michele Simone, Paolo Delrio
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(4):293-302.   Published online June 4, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00899.0128
  • 5,236 View
  • 150 Download
  • 2 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Anastomotic leaks (AL) remain a major complication following right colectomy for colon cancer. This multicenter, prospective, observational study evaluated the efficacy of Glubran 2, a cyanoacrylate-based sealant, in reducing the incidence of AL by reinforcing ileocolic anastomoses.
Methods
The study enrolled 380 patients undergoing right colectomy for colon cancer across 7 Italian hospitals. Glubran 2 was applied to reinforce ileocolic anastomoses. The primary endpoint was a 50% reduction in AL incidence from a baseline of 6.18% within 10 days after surgery. Secondary endpoints included examining the correlation between AL and preexisting risk factors and determining the rate of anastomotic bleeding. Statistical analyses employed binomial tests and logistic regression.
Results
The AL rate was reduced to 1.85% compared to the reference rate of 6.18% (P<0.01). Glubran 2 exhibited a protective effect even in patients with preexisting risk factors such as smoking, diabetes, or prior surgeries; none of these factors was significantly associated with AL (P>0.05). Surgical technique (P=0.687), anastomosis technique (P=0.998), and anastomosis type (P=0.998) did not influence AL rates. Operation time was similar across groups (P=0.613), and anastomotic bleeding occurred in 1.3% of cases, with no association with AL (P=0.989).
Conclusion
Glubran 2 was safely applied to ileocolic anastomoses, significantly reducing AL rates and potentially providing a protective effect even in patients with known risk factors. Its hemostatic and bacteriostatic properties support improved postoperative outcomes, highlighting its potential as an effective adjunct in colorectal surgery. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings and explore broader applications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comments on “Improved outcomes with cyanoacrylate glue for ileocolic anastomosis in right colectomy: a multicenter study”
    Nabil Mohammad Azmi, Mohd Firdaus Mohd Hayati, Zairul Azwan Mohd Azwan
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(6): 596.     CrossRef
  • In reply to: Comments on "Improved outcomes with cyanoacrylate glue for ileocolic anastomosis in right colectomy: a multicenter study”
    Daniela Rega, Carmela Cevone, Paolo Delrio
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(6): 598.     CrossRef
Minimally invasive surgery
Impact of single-port laparoscopic approach on scar assessment by patients and observers: a multicenter retrospective study
Sung Uk Bae, Kyeong Eui Kim, Chang-Woo Kim, Ji-Hoon Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Yoon-Suk Lee, Seong Kyu Baek, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(2):154-161.   Published online April 29, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00563.0080
  • 4,093 View
  • 76 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to compare the wound cosmesis of a single-incision approach on scar assessment after laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.
Methods
This study included 32 patients undergoing single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and 61 patients undergoing multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for colon cancer at 3 tertiary referral hospitals between September 2011 and December 2019. We modified and applied the Korean version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) to assess cosmetic outcomes. To assess the interobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient values for the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), the surgeons evaluated 5 images of postoperative scars.
Results
No significant differences were observed in the time before the return of normal bowel function, time to sips of water and soft diet initiation, length of in-hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate. The SPLS group had a shorter total incision length than the MPLS group. The POSAS favored the SPLS approach, revealing significant differences in the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), OSAS, and overall scores. The SPLS approach was an independent factor influencing the POSAS, PSAS, and OSAS scores. Eleven colorectal surgeons had a significantly substantial intraclass coefficient.
Conclusion
The cosmetic outcomes of SPLS as assessed by the patients and surgeons were superior to those of MPLS in colon cancer. Reducing the number of ports is an independent factor affecting scar assessment by patients and observers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Investigating the Efficacy of Layered Moderate Tension Reduction Suturing in Facial Aesthetic Surgery
    Gui H Wang, Jin Y Gang, Yan Li
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
CRC
Relationships between MMP-2, MMP-9, and ADAMDEC1 serum and tissue levels in patients with colorectal cancer
Zahra Mozooni, Kiana Khajeh Amiri, Nafiseh Golestani, Alireza Shahmohammadi, Sara Minaeian, Leyla Bahadorizadeh
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(2):136-144.   Published online April 29, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00227.0032
  • 3,747 View
  • 87 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common malignancy of the gastrointestinal system globally. Identifying specific gene expression patterns indicative of early-stage CRC could enable early diagnosis and rapid treatment initiation. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) play crucial roles in extracellular matrix degradation and tissue remodeling. Among them, MMP-2 and MMP-9 have been found to be upregulated in various cancers, including CRC, and are associated with tumor invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. In contrast, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase like decysin 1 (ADAMDEC1) is a relatively newly discovered gene with demonstrated involvement in immune response and inflammation. This study investigated serum levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9, along with tissue expression of MMP-2, MMP-9, and ADAMDEC1, and explored potential associations with pathological and clinical factors in patients with CRC.
Methods
This study included 100 patients with CRC and 100 control participants. Tissue and blood samples were collected. Serum MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels were analyzed using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was employed to assess the expression levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, and ADAMDEC1 in CRC tissue samples compared to adjacent control tissue.
Results
The expression levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, and ADAMDEC1 were significantly upregulated in CRC relative to adjacent control tissues. Analysis of clinicopathological features revealed statistically significant differences in the expression levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, and ADAMDEC1 between patients with CRC with and without lymphovascular invasion (P<0.001). Based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, these genes represent promising candidate diagnostic biomarkers for CRC.
Conclusion
MMP-2, MMP-9, and ADAMDEC1 levels may serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers for CRC.
CRC
Impact of iron-deficiency anemia on short-term outcomes after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a US National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) analysis
Ko-Chao Lee, Yu-Li Su, Kuen-Lin Wu, Kung-Chuan Cheng, Ling-Chiao Song, Chien-En Tang, Hong-Hwa Chen, Kuan-Chih Chung
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(2):119-126.   Published online April 24, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00591.0084
  • 3,717 View
  • 89 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Colorectal cancer (CRC) often spreads to the liver, necessitating surgical treatment for CRC liver metastasis (CRLM). Iron-deficiency anemia is common in CRC patients and is associated with fatigue and weakness. This study investigated the effects of iron-deficiency anemia on the outcomes of surgical resection of CRLM.
Methods
This population-based, retrospective study evaluated data from adults ≥20 years old with CRLM who underwent hepatic resection. All patient data were extracted from the 2005–2018 US National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. The outcome measures were in-hospital outcomes including 30-day mortality, unfavorable discharge, and prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS), and short-term complications such as bleeding and infection. Associations between iron-deficiency anemia and outcomes were determined using logistic regression analysis.
Results
Data from 7,749 patients (representing 37,923 persons in the United States after weighting) were analyzed. Multivariable analysis revealed that iron-deficiency anemia was significantly associated with an increased risk of prolonged LOS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.30–3.30), unfavorable discharge (aOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.83–3.19), bleeding (aOR, 5.05; 95% CI, 2.92–8.74), sepsis (aOR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.04–2.46), pneumonia (aOR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.72–3.74), and acute kidney injury (aOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.24–2.35). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent associations between iron-deficiency anemia and prolonged LOS across age, sex, and obesity status categories.
Conclusion
In patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM, iron-deficiency anemia is an independent risk factor for prolonged LOS, unfavorable discharge, and several critical postoperative complications. These findings underscore the need for proactive anemia management to optimize surgical outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A commentary on “Individualized blood pressure regulation and acute kidney injury in older patients having major abdominal surgery: a pilot randomized trial”
    Fu-Shan Xue, Dan-Feng Wang, Xiao-Chun Zheng
    International Journal of Surgery.2025; 111(12): 9993.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Is clinical complete response as accurate as pathological complete response in patients with mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer?
Niyaz Shadmanov, Vusal Aliyev, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Barıs Bakır, Suha Goksel, Oktar Asoglu
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(1):57-67.   Published online February 28, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00339.0048
  • 9,651 View
  • 301 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer involves neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by total mesorectal excision surgery. A subset of patients achieves pathologic complete response (pCR), representing the optimal treatment outcome. This study compares the long-term oncological outcomes of patients who achieved pCR with those who attained clinical complete response (cCR) after total neoadjuvant therapy, managed using a watch-and-wait approach.
Methods
This study retrospectively evaluated patients with mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant treatment from January 1, 2005, to May 1, 2023. The pCR and cCR groups were compared based on demographic, clinical, histopathological, and long-term survival outcomes.
Results
The median follow-up times were 54 months (range, 7–83 months) for the cCR group (n=73), 96 months (range, 7–215 months) for the pCR group (n=63), and 72 months (range, 4–212 months) for the pathological incomplete clinical response (pICR) group (n=627). In the cCR group, 15 patients (20.5%) experienced local regrowth, and 5 (6.8%) developed distant metastasis (DM). The pCR group had no cases of local recurrence, but 3 patients (4.8%) developed DM. Among the pICR patients, 58 (9.2%) experienced local recurrence, and 92 (14.6%) had DM. Five-year disease-free survival rates were 90.0% for cCR, 92.0% for pCR, and 69.5% for pICR (P=0.022). Five-year overall survival rates were 93.1% for cCR, 92.0% for pCR, and 78.1% for pICR. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the cCR and pCR groups (P=0.810); however, the pICR group exhibited poorer outcomes (P=0.002).
Conclusion
This study shows no significant long-term oncological differences between patients who exhibited cCR and those who experienced pCR.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: The FOREST protocol, a patient‐centered approach that clusters two cohorts with different outcomes
    Hector Guadalajara, Jose Luis Domínguez‐Tristancho, Raquel Fuentes Mateo, Miguel Leon‐Arellano, Raquel Sanz‐Baro, Eleonora Geraldi, Ana Isabel Hormigo‐Sanchez, Víctor Manuel Castellano Megías, Marta Pérez Cobos, Patricia Mellado Miras, Begoña Lopez‐Botet
    International Journal of Cancer.2026; 158(3): 697.     CrossRef
  • The Shifting and Evolving Neoadjuvant Treatments and Surgical Platforms on Oncological Outcomes and Sphincter Preservation in Distal Rectal Cancer: A 23-Year Retrospective Experience
    Niyaz Shadmanov, Vusal Aliyev, Barıs Bakır, Suha Goksel, Oktar Asoglu
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Organ preservation in rectal cancer: Clinical basis of the watch-and-wait strategy
    Rosa M. Jimenez-Rodriguez, Fátima Aguilar-del-Castillo, Felipe Quezada-Diaz, Julio García-Aguilar
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2025; : 800248.     CrossRef
  • Clinical implications of radiologic criteria and prognostic factors for lateral lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(6): 489.     CrossRef
Guideline
ERAS
The 2024 Korean Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines for colorectal cancer: a secondary publication
Kil-yong Lee, Soo Young Lee, Miyoung Choi, Moonjin Kim, Ji Hong Kim, Ju Myung Song, Seung Yoon Yang, In Jun Yang, Moon Suk Choi, Seung Rim Han, Eon Chul Han, Sang Hyun Hong, Do Joong Park, Sang-Jae Park, the Korean Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Committee within the Korean Society of Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(1):3-26.   Published online February 20, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00836.0119
  • 19,244 View
  • 364 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
The Korean Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Committee within the Korean Society of Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition was established to develop ERAS guidelines tailored to the Korean context. This guideline focuses on creating the most current evidence-based practice guidelines for ERAS purposes, based on systematic reviews. All key questions targeted randomized controlled trials exclusively, and if fewer than 2 were available, studies employing propensity score matching were also included. Recommendations for each key question were marked with strength of recommendation and level of evidence following internal and external review processes by the committee.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Abdullah M. Alharran, Waleed Bader Alazemi, Saad A. Alajmi, Yousiff A. Bahman, Osamah Alhajri, Ali A. Alenezi, Jarrah J. Alenezi, Duaij Salman Saif
    Medicina.2026; 62(1): 92.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of preoperative immunonutrition in malnourished patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a study protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial
    Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Gi Won Ha, Soo Yeun Park, In Jun Yang, Jin Soo Kim, Gyung Mo Son, Sung Il Kang, Sung Uk Bae
    Trials.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oral antibiotics alone for bowel preparation in colorectal surgery: time to rethink tradition?
    Soo Young Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(5): 367.     CrossRef
Original Article
Colorectal cancer
Comparison of colorectal cancer surgery patients in intensive care between rural and metropolitan hospitals in Australia: a national cohort study
Jessica A. Paynter, Zakary Doherty, Chun Hin Angus Lee, Kirby R. Qin, Janelle Brennan, David Pilcher
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(1):68-76.   Published online January 24, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00269.0038
  • 2,892 View
  • 122 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
A small proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) surgical patients will require an admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) within the early postoperative period. This study aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to an ICU following CRC surgery per hospital type (metropolitan vs. rural) over a decade in Australia.
Methods
A retrospective cohort analysis was undertaken of all adult patients admitted to a participating Australian ICUs following CRC surgery between January 2011 and December 2021. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.
Results
Over the 10-year period, 19,611 patients were treated in 122 metropolitan ICUs and 4,108 patients were treated in 42 rural ICUs. Rural ICUs had a lower proportion of annual admissions following CRC surgery (20 vs. 36, P<0.001). Patients admitted to a rural ICU were more likely to have undergone emergency CRC surgery compared to those admitted to a metropolitan cohort (28.5% vs. 13.8%, P<0.001). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between metropolitan and rural hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73–1.35; P=0.500). There was a general trend for lower mortality in later years of the study with the odds of death in the final year of the study (2021) almost half that of the first study year (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34–0.80; P=0.003).
Conclusion
There was no difference between in-hospital mortality outcomes for CRC surgical patients requiring ICU admission between metropolitan and rural hospitals. These findings may contribute to discussions regarding rural scope of colorectal practice within Australia and globally.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Intensive care unit outcomes and prognostic factors of colorectal cancer
    Qian Dong, Rui Xia, Xue-Zhong Xing, Chang-Song Wang, Gang Ma, Hong-Zhi Wang, Biao Zhu, Jiang-Hong Zhao, Dong-Min Zhou, Li Zhang, Ming-Guang Huang, Rong-Xi Quan, Yong Ye, Guo-Xing Zhang, Zheng-Ying Jiang, Bing Huang, Shan-Ling Xu, Yun Xiao, Lin-Lin Zhang,
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
Review
Colorectal cancer
Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients
Won Beom Jung
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):527-537.   Published online December 20, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00745.0106
  • 8,245 View
  • 171 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Rectal cancer is one of the most common carcinomas and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Although significant advancements have been made in the treatment of rectal cancer, the deterioration of quality of life (QoL) remains a challenging issue. Various tools have been developed to assess QoL, including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) scale, the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Factors such as the lower location of the tumor, radiation therapy, chemoradiotherapy, and chemotherapy are associated with a decline in QoL. Furthermore, anastomotic leakage following rectal cancer resection is an important risk factor affecting QoL. With the development of novel treatment approaches, including neoadjuvant therapies such as chemoradiotherapy and total neoadjuvant therapy, the rate of clinical complete remission has increased, leading to the emergence of organ-preserving strategies. Both local excision and the “watch-and-wait” approach following neoadjuvant therapy improved functional outcomes and QoL. Efforts to improve QoL after rectal cancer surgery are ongoing in surgical techniques for rectal cancer. Since QoL is determined by a complex interplay of factors, including the patient's physical condition, surgical techniques, and psychological and social elements, a comprehensive approach is necessary to understand and enhance it. This review aims to describe the methods for measuring QoL in rectal cancer patients after surgery, the key risk factors involved, and various strategies and efforts to improve QoL outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Meeting report on the 8th Asian Science Editors’ Conference and Workshop 2024
    Eun Jung Park
    Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 66.     CrossRef
  • Editorial: Organ preservation for rectal cancer patients
    Ionut Negoi, John R. T. Monson, Leonardo Bustamante-Lopez, Zoe Garoufalia, Vito D'Andrea, Sameh Hany Emile
    Frontiers in Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sphincter-preserving surgical techniques in low rectal cancer management: A systematic review of contemporary evidence
    Song Wang, A-Jian Li, Hui-Hong Jiang, Yin Lin, Hai-Bo Ding
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-operative management of locally advanced rectal cancer with an emphasis on outcomes and quality of life: a narrative review
    In Ja Park
    Ewha Medical Journal.2025; 48(3): e40.     CrossRef
  • Strategies to reduce intestinal toxicity in neoadjuvant management of locally advanced rectal cancer
    Hoda Mahdavi, Sahar Dashti, Shima Jafari
    Discover Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Articles
Minimally invasive surgery
Robotic surgery may lead to reduced postoperative inflammatory stress in colon cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis
Eun Ji Park, Gyong Tae Noh, Yong Joon Lee, Min Young Park, Seung Yoon Yang, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Kang Young Lee, Byung Soh Min
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):594-601.   Published online December 6, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00171.0024
  • 3,247 View
  • 91 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Robot-assisted surgery is readily applied to every type of colorectal surgeries. However, studies showing the safety and feasibility of robotic surgery (RS) have dealt with rectal cancer more than colon cancer. This study aimed to investigate how technical advantages of RS can translate into actual clinical outcomes that represent postoperative systemic response.
Methods
This study retrospectively reviewed consecutive cases in a single tertiary medical center in Korea. Patients with primary colon cancer who underwent curative resection between 2006 and 2012 were included. Propensity score matching was done to adjust baseline patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, tumor profile, pathologic stage, operating surgeon, surgery extent) between open surgery (OS), laparoscopic surgery (LS), and RS groups.
Results
After propensity score matching, there were 66 patients in each group for analysis, and there was no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics. Maximal postoperative leukocyte count was lowest in the RS group and highest in the OS group (P=0.021). Similar results were observed for postoperative neutrophil count (P=0.024). Postoperative prognostic nutritional index was highest in the RS group and lowest in the OS group (P<0.001). The time taken to first flatus and soft diet resumption was longest in the OS group and shortest in the RS group (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Among all groups, other short-term postoperative outcomes such as hospital stay and complications did not show significant difference, and oncological survival results were similar.
Conclusion
Better postoperative inflammatory indices in the RS group may correlate with their faster recovery of bowel motility and diet resumption compared to LS and OS groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Übergangsphase zur roboterassistierten Chirurgie beim kolorektalen Karzinom: eine vergleichende konsekutive Kohortenstudie
    U. A. Dietz, M. Kalisvaart, S. Maksimovic, R. Frey, M. Ramser, B. M. Erhart, U. Pfefferkorn
    Die Chirurgie.2025; 96(11): 942.     CrossRef
  • Comparative clinical efficacy of three surgical modalities for the treatment of malignant tumours of the left hemicolon
    Hao Chen, Dong-Ping Han, Jian-Yang Xiong, Zhen-Sheng Li, Teng-Cheng Hu, Zheng-Rong Li, Yi Cao
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of robotic vs. open distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis of propensity-score-matched studies
    Junjie Wang, Yuanjun Liu, Yakun Wu
    Frontiers in Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Guardix-SG in Preventing Postoperative Bowel Complications After Radical Cystectomy: A Single-Arm Prospective Observational Study
    Jiwoong Yu, Wan Song, Minyong Kang, Hyun Hwan Sung, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong
    Journal of Urologic Oncology.2025; 23(3): 253.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic surgery should be a viable option for T4 colon cancer: evidence from a propensity score matching analysis
    Xiaomei Jiang, Hang Zhou, Zhaoyang Zheng, Xiaodong Wang, Zongguang Zhou, Lie Yang
    Updates in Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Preventive efficacy of hydrocortisone enema for radiation proctitis in rectal cancer patients undergoing short-course radiotherapy: a phase II randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial
Mohammad Mohammadianpanah, Maryam Tazang, Nam Phong Nguyen, Niloofar Ahmadloo, Shapour Omidvari, Ahmad Mosalaei, Mansour Ansari, Hamid Nasrollahi, Behnam Kadkhodaei, Nezhat Khanjani, Seyed Vahid Hosseini
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(5):506-514.   Published online October 22, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00192.0027
  • 5,760 View
  • 103 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of hydrocortisone enema in preventing radiation proctitis in patients with rectal cancer undergoing short-course radiotherapy (SCRT).
Methods
This phase II randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced rectal cancer (clinically staged T3–4 and/or N1–2M0). Participants received a median of 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) followed by 3-dimensional conformal SCRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions). Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a hydrocortisone enema (n=50) or a placebo (n=51) once daily for 5 consecutive days during SCRT. The primary endpoint was the incidence and severity of acute proctitis.
Results
Of the 111 eligible patients, 101 were included in the study. Baseline characteristics, including sex, age, performance status, and tumor location, were comparable across the treatment arms. None of the patients experienced grade 4 acute gastrointestinal toxicity or had to discontinue treatment due to treatment-related adverse effects. Patients in the hydrocortisone arm experienced significantly less severe proctitis (P<0.001), diarrhea (P=0.023), and rectal pain (P<0.001) than those in the placebo arm. Additionally, the duration of acute gastrointestinal toxicity following SCRT was significantly shorter in patients receiving hydrocortisone (P<0.001).
Conclusion
Hydrocortisone enema was associated with a significant reduction in the severity of proctitis, diarrhea, and rectal pain compared to placebo. Additionally, patients treated with hydrocortisone experienced shorter durations of gastrointestinal toxicity following SCRT. This study highlights the potential benefits of hydrocortisone enema in managing radiation-induced toxicity in rectal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280.     CrossRef
ERAS
Impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program on the management of complications after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer
Victoria Weets, Hélène Meillat, Jacques Emmanuel Saadoun, Marie Dazza, Cécile de Chaisemartin, Bernard Lelong
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(5):440-450.   Published online September 20, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00850.0121
  • 10,124 View
  • 226 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) reduces postoperative complications (POCs) after colorectal surgery; however, its impact on the management of POCs remains unclear. This study compared the diagnosis and management of POCs before and after implementing our ERAS protocol after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer and examined the short- and mid-term oncologic impacts.
Methods
This single-center, retrospective study evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer between 2012 and 2021, focusing on the incidence of POCs within 90 days. We compared outcomes before (standard group) and after (ERAS group) the implementation of our ERAS protocol in January 2016.
Results
Significantly fewer patients in the ERAS group developed POCs (standard vs. ERAS, 136 of 380 patients [35.8%] vs.136 of 660 patients [20.6%]; P<0.01). The ERAS group had a significantly shorter mean total length of stay after POCs (13.1 days vs. 11.4 days, P=0.04), and the rates of life-threatening complications (6.7% vs. 0.7%) and 1-year mortality (7.4% vs. 1.5%) were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the standard group. Among patients with anastomotic complications, laparoscopic reoperation was significantly more common in the ERAS group than in the standard group (8.3% vs. 75.0%, P<0.01). Among patients with postoperative ileus, the diagnosis and recovery times were significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the standard group, resulting in a shorter total length of stay (13.5 days vs. 10 days, P<0.01).
Conclusion
The implementation of an ERAS protocol did not eliminate all POCs, but it did accelerate their diagnosis and management and improved patient outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Less is more: simplifying patient-centered cancer care
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(3): 173.     CrossRef
  • Research Progress on the Application of ERAS Concept in the Perioperative Period of Colorectal Cancer Patients
    梦云 孙
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(08): 1208.     CrossRef
  • Can Surgical Approach and Postoperative Factors Impact Survival in Rectal Cancer? Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Insights
    Ahmed Abdelsamad, Seyidali Mirzazada, Karsten Ridwelski, Mohamad Nour Nasif, Florian Gebauer
    Cancer Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimizing postoperative pain management in minimally invasive colorectal surgery
    Soo Young Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 525.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
The impact of short-course total neoadjuvant therapy, long-course chemoradiotherapy, and upfront surgery on the technical difficulty of total mesorectal excision: an observational study with an intraoperative perspective
Cheryl Xi-Zi Chong, Frederick H. Koh, Hui-Lin Tan, Sharmini Su Sivarajah, Jia-Lin Ng, Leonard Ming-Li Ho, Darius Kang-Lie Aw, Wen-Hsin Koo, Shuting Han, Si-Lin Koo, Connie Siew-Poh Yip, Fu-Qiang Wang, Fung-Joon Foo, Winson Jianhong Tan
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(5):451-458.   Published online September 19, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00899.0128
  • 4,712 View
  • 102 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is becoming the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, surgery is deferred for months after completion, which may lead to fibrosis and increased surgical difficulty. The aim of this study was to assess whether TNT (TNT-RAPIDO) is associated with increased difficulty of total mesorectal excision (TME) compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) and upfront surgery.
Methods
Twelve laparoscopic videos of low anterior resection with TME for rectal cancer were prospectively collected from January 2020 to October 2021, with 4 videos in each arm. Seven colorectal surgeons assessed the videos independently, graded the difficulty of TME using a visual analog scale and attempted to identify which category the videos belonged to.
Results
The median age was 67 years, and 10 patients were male. The median interval to surgery from radiotherapy was 13 weeks in the LCRT group and 24 weeks in the TNT-RAPIDO group. There was no significant difference in the visual analog scale for difficulty in TME between the 3 groups (LCRT, 3.2; TNT-RAPIDO, 4.6; upfront, 4.1; P=0.12). A subgroup analysis showed similar difficulty between groups (LCRT 3.2 vs. TNT-RAPIDO 4.6, P=0.05; TNT-RAPIDO 4.6 vs. upfront 4.1, P=0.54). During video assessments, surgeons correctly identified the prior treatment modality in 42% of the cases. TNT-RAPIDO videos had the highest recognition rate (71%), significantly outperforming both LCRT (29%) and upfront surgery (25%, P=0.01).
Conclusion
TNT does not appear to increase the surgical difficulty of TME.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Left colic artery–preserving radical rectal cancer surgery: a literature review
    Xiyin Yang, Yuanshui Sun, Qiang Hu
    Frontiers in Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-operative management of locally advanced rectal cancer with an emphasis on outcomes and quality of life: a narrative review
    In Ja Park
    Ewha Medical Journal.2025; 48(3): e40.     CrossRef
  • Clinical implications of radiologic criteria and prognostic factors for lateral lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(6): 489.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280.     CrossRef
Reviews
Colorectal cancer
The role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and outcomes
Gyu-Seog Choi, Hye Jin Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):363-374.   Published online August 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00521.0074
  • 16,972 View
  • 751 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 12 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs) in rectal cancer significantly impact the prognosis and treatment strategies. Western practices emphasize neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), whereas Eastern approaches often rely on LPN dissection (LPND). This review examines the evolving role of LPND in the context of modern treatments, including total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and the impact of CRT on the management of clinically suspicious LPNs. We comprehensively reviewed the key literature comparing the outcomes of LPND versus preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, focusing on recent advancements and ongoing debates. Key studies, including the JCOG0212 trial and recent multicenter trials, were analyzed to assess the efficacy of LPND, particularly in conjunction with preoperative CRT or TNT. Current evidence indicates that LPND can reduce local recurrence rates compared to total mesorectal excision alone in patients not receiving radiation therapy. However, the benefit of LPND in the context of neoadjuvant CRT is influenced by the size and pretreatment characteristics of LPNs. While CRT can effectively control smaller metastatic LPNs, larger or clinically suspicious LPNs may require LPND for optimal outcomes. Advances in surgical techniques, such as robotic-assisted LPND, offer potential benefits but also present challenges and complications. The role of TNT in controlling metastatic LPNs and improving patient outcomes is emerging but remains underexplored. The decision to perform LPND should be individualized based on patient-specific factors, including LPN size, response to neoadjuvant treatment, and surgeon expertise. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and further evaluating the role of TNT in managing metastatic LPNs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Who is a candidate at the initial presentation? Prediction of positive lateral lymph node and survival after dissection
    Y. Lee
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The oncologic benefits of lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant therapy – local control or survival?
    T. Sammour
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Locally‐Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Cohort Study Comparing Perioperative Morbidity and Short‐Term Oncological Outcomes
    Joseph Mathew, Yogesh Kisan Bansod, Nishant Yadav, Janesh Murugan, Kovvuru Bhaskar Reddy, Mufaddal Kazi, Ashwin DeSouza, Avanish Saklani
    Cancer Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in colorectal cancer management: a narrative review of clinical efficacy and multidisciplinary integration
    Engeng Chen, Li Chen, Wei Zhang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cirugía por cáncer de recto más allá del mesorrecto: indicaciones, preparación límites y resultados
    Blas Flor-Lorente, Mario Javier de Miguel Valencia
    Cirugía Española.2025; 103(9): 800202.     CrossRef
  • Surgery for rectal cancer beyond the mesorectum: Indications, preparation, limits, and results
    Blas Flor-Lorente, Mario J. de Miguel-Valencia
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2025; 103(9): 800202.     CrossRef
  • Cancer-associated fibroblasts enhance colorectal cancer lymphatic metastasis via CLEC11A/LGR5-mediated WNT pathway activation
    Chuhan Zhang, Teng Pan, Yuyuan Zhang, Yushuai Wu, Anning Zuo, Shutong Liu, Yuhao Ba, Benyu Liu, Shuaixi Yang, Yukang Chen, Hui Xu, Peng Luo, Quan Cheng, Siyuan Weng, Long Liu, Xing Zhou, Jingyuan Ning, Xinwei Han, Jinhai Deng, Zaoqu Liu
    Journal of Clinical Investigation.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer—A video vignette
    D. Castrodá, M. Paniagua, L. Pérez Corbal, L. Otalora, R. Oubiña, A. Parajó
    Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Learning curve for lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer – a systematic review of literature
    D. Kehagias, L. Baldari, E. Cassinotti, L. Boni, C. Lampropoulos, I. Kehagias
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pelvic Neuroanatomy in Colorectal Surgery: Advances in Nerve Preservation for Optimized Functional Outcomes
    Asim M. Almughamsi, Yasir Hassan Elhassan
    Surgeries.2025; 6(4): 94.     CrossRef
  • Targeting lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: response to neoadjuvant therapy and artificial intelligence driven clinical decision support
    Ruiqing Liu, Yun Lu, Luca Stocchi
    Intelligent Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 285.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Dissection layer selection based on an understanding of pelvic fascial anatomy in transanal total mesorectal excision
Daichi Kitaguchi, Masaaki Ito
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):375-383.   Published online August 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00178.0025
  • 5,610 View
  • 149 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
This study aimed to review the historical transition of rectal cancer surgery and recent evidence regarding transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Additionally, it outlined the anatomical landmarks and technical considerations essential for successful TaTME. Anatomical studies and surgical techniques were analyzed to identify key landmarks and procedural steps crucial for TaTME. TaTME offers improved visibility and maneuverability even in the deep and narrow pelvis and is expected to contribute to tumor radical cure rates. By securing the circumferential resection margin and distal margin while preserving pelvic autonomic nerve function, TaTME holds promise for maintaining postoperative urinary and sexual functions. Key anatomical landmarks include the endopelvic fascia posteriorly, the S4-pelvic splanchnic nerve laterally, and the prostate or posterior vaginal wall anteriorly. Selecting the appropriate dissection layer based on tumor depth and ensuring precise incision of the tendinous arch of the pelvic fascia contributes to successful TaTME outcomes. TaTME represents a significant advancement in rectal cancer surgery, offering improved outcomes through meticulous attention to anatomical detail and precise dissection techniques. Understanding the historical context of rectal cancer surgery alongside recent evidence on TaTME is essential for optimizing patient outcomes and expanding the safe implementation of this innovative approach.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of Two‐Team Surgery on Short‐ and Long‐Term Outcomes of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
    Nobuaki Hoshino, Koya Hida, Yukinari Tokoro, Kazutaka Obama, Takeru Matsuda, Ichiro Takemasa, Tomonori Akagi, Masafumi Inomata, Shigenori Homma, Nobuki Ichikawa, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Seiichiro Yamamoto, Takeshi Naitoh
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 285.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Colorectal cancer
Colonic stenting: is the bridge to surgery worth its cost? A cost-effectiveness analysis at a single Asian institution
Michelle Shi Qing Khoo, Frederick H. Koh, Sharmini Su Sivarajah, Leonard Ming-Li Ho, Darius Kang-Lie Aw, Cheryl Xi-Zi Chong, Fung Joon Foo, Winson Jianhong Tan
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):555-563.   Published online August 5, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00738.0105
  • 8,155 View
  • 148 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
In patients with acute left-sided colonic obstruction, stenting can convert an emergency operation into a semi-elective procedure. However, its use continues to be debated. We performed a cost-effective analysis using our institution’s experiences.
Methods
Endoscopic, surgical, and financial details were prospectively collected for patients who presented with acute colonic obstruction and underwent stenting between 2019 and 2022. Outcomes were defined as technical/clinical success and successful surgical resection. The financial cost of stenting was compared with the expected cost without stenting.
Results
Forty patients were included, with 29 undergoing definitive resection. The most common pathology was primary colon cancer (27 patients, 93%). Endoscopic stenting had high technical (90%) and clinical (83%) success rates, with low rates of complications such as perforation (2 patients, 7%) and migration (0 patients, 0%). As a bridge to surgery, the median procedure time was 226 minutes and the surgical outcomes also showed a low rate of complications (3 patients, 11%), such as anastomotic leakage (0 patients, 0%), intraabdominal abscesses (2 patients, 7%), and 30-day postoperative mortality (0 patients, 0%). The cumulative costs with colonic stenting were $32,900, while the expected costs with emergency surgery, including stoma reversal, were $40,700 (healthcare cost-savings of $7,800 per person). The difference was mainly due to the avoidance of upfront emergency surgery. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 0.81, favoring colonic stenting over upfront emergency surgery.
Conclusion
Colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery is safe and cost-effective for treating left-sided colonic obstruction with high success rates and low complication rates.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Nationwide Analysis of Right-Sided Colonic Stenting: Rarely Used but Reduces Stoma Creation Significantly
    Khalid Ahmed, Ahmed Dirweesh, Zachary D. Leslie, Yasmin Ali, Nabeel Azeem, Eric Wise, Cyrus Jahansouz, Martin Freeman, Stuart K. Amateau
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2026; 28(1): 250952.     CrossRef
  • Global Use and Outcomes of Endoscopic Stenting in Acute Malignant Left-Sided Colonic Obstruction: A Secondary Analysis of APOLLO, An International, Prospective Cohort Study

    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(12): 1458.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Oncologic outcomes and associated factors of colon cancer patients aged 70 years and older
Byeo Lee Lim, In Ja Park, Jun-Soo Ro, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(3):198-206.   Published online August 5, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00367.0052
  • 7,372 View
  • 89 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The aim of this study was to examine the prognosis and associated risk factors, including adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx), in elderly patients with colon cancer.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who underwent radical resection for colon cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 at Asan Medical Center. The effects of stage, risk factors, and chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared in patients aged ≥70 and <70 years.
Results
Of 3,313 patients, 933 (28.1%) was aged ≥70 years. Of the 1,921 patients indicated for adjuvant CTx, 1,294 of 1,395 patients (92.8%) aged <70 years and 369 of 526 patients (70.2%) aged ≥70 years received adjuvant CTx. Old age (≥70 years) was independently associated with RFS in overall cohort. Among patients aged ≥70 years indicated for adjuvant CTx, the 5-year OS (81.6% vs. 50.4%, P<0.001) and RFS (82.9% vs. 67.4%, P=0.025) rates were significantly higher in those who did than did not receive adjuvant CTx. Additionally, adjuvant CTx was confirmed as independent risk factor of both OS and RFS in patients aged ≥70 years indicated for adjuvant CTx.
Conclusion
Old age was associated with poor RFS and adjuvant CTx had benefits in OS as well as RFS in elderly patients eligible for adjuvant CTx.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Immunological changes and recovery-related factors in older patients with colon cancer: A pilot trial
    Byeo Lee Lim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Yousun Ko, Kyung Won Kim, In Ja Park
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2025; 16(3): 102200.     CrossRef
  • Stage II-III colorectal cancer in geriatric patients: Clinicopathological features and chemotherapy utilization
    Yakup Duzkopru, Özlem Doğan
    Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory.2025; 16(1): 118.     CrossRef
  • Does Oxaliplatin-based Adjuvant Therapy Benefit Older Colorectal Cancer Patients?
    Peter Hofland
    Onco Zine - The International Oncology Network.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Disease-Free Survival of Patients with Stage II Stroma-Rich Colorectal Adenocarcinomas with Microsatellite Stability
    Ángel Romo-Navarro, Juan Ruiz Martín, Irene García-Camacha Gutiérrez, Mariano Amo-Salas, María Recuero Pradillo, César Sánchez-Muñoz, Cristina María Murillo Lázaro, Esperanza Carabias López, Raquel Sánchez Simón, Carlos Quimbayo-Arcila, Yasmina Hernández
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2025; 26(24): 11795.     CrossRef
  • Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280.     CrossRef
Review
Benign bowel disease
Colorectal screening following appendectomy in adult patients: a systematic review
Francesco Esposito, Marco Del Prete, Matilde Magri, Fanny Dufour, Alexandre Cortes
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(5):417-423.   Published online August 1, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00528.0075
  • 8,450 View
  • 215 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Although the association between appendicitis and colorectal cancer in older patients has received attention, postoperative colorectal screening through endoscopy is not currently recommended. This study conducted a systematic review of the literature on colorectal screening following appendectomy in adult patients.
Methods
A literature search was performed using online databases. Studies reporting colorectal surveillance after appendectomy in adult patients were retrieved for assessment.
Results
Eight articles including a total of 3,995 patients were published between 2013 and 2023. An age of 40 years was the lower threshold in 6 of the 8 articles. Postoperative colorectal screening occurred in 771 patients (19.3%). Endoscopy was performed in 95.2% of cases and computed tomography–colonography in 4.8%. During endoscopic examinations, a lesion was discovered in 184 of 771 patients (24.0%), and an adenomatous polyp was found in 154 of 686 patients (22.5%). The overall cancer rate was 3.9% (30 of 771 patients). The tumor was located in the right-sided colon in 46.7% of the patients, in the cecum in 20.0%, in the rectum in 16.7%, in the left-sided colon in 10.0%, and in the sigmoid colon in 6.7%.
Conclusion
Performing post-appendectomy colorectal screening in patients >40 years of age could allow early detection of an underlying lesion.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • An Unusual Culprit Behind Right Lower Quadrant Pain: Cecal Adenocarcinoma Initially Suspected as Appendicitis in an Elderly Female Patient
    Michail Angelos Papaoikonomou, Europi Michailidou, Aggeliki Chlorou, Nikolaos Krokos
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of CT‐Detected Appendiceal Fecoliths on Clinical and Histopathological Outcomes in Acute Appendicitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Taeyoung Son, Ekua Brenu, Sergei Tsakanov, Lynne Mann
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2025; 95(12): 2550.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Colorectal cancer
Obstructing colorectal cancer: a population-based review of colonic stenting in Queensland, Australia
Cian Keogh, Julie Moore, Danica Cossio, Nick Smith, David A. Clark
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):268-275.   Published online June 25, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00640.0091
  • 2,966 View
  • 173 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Stenting is a useful treatment option for malignant colonic obstruction, but its role remains unclear. This study was designed to establish how stents have been used in Queensland, Australia, and to review outcomes.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Queensland from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2014, who underwent colonic stent insertion were reviewed. Primary outcomes of 5-year survival, 30-day mortality, and overall length of survival were calculated. The secondary outcomes included patient and tumor factors, and stoma rates.
Results
In total, 319 patients were included, and distant metastases were identified in 183 patients (57.4%). The 30-day mortality rate was 6.6% (n=21), and the 5-year survival was 11.9% (n=38). Median survival was 11 months (interquartile range, 4–27 months). A further operation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; P<0.001) and chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (HR, 0.718; P=0.046) reduced the risk of 5-year mortality. The presence of distant metastases (HR, 2.052; P<0.001) and a comorbidity score of 3 or more (HR, 1.572; P=0.20) increased mortality. Surgery was associated with a reduced risk of mortality even in patients with metastatic disease (HR, 0.14; P<0.001). Twenty-two patients (6.9%) ended the study period with a stoma.
Conclusion
Colorectal stenting was used in Queensland in several diverse scenarios, in both localized and metastatic disease. Surgery had a survival advantage, even in patients with metastatic disease. There was no survival difference according to whether patients were socioeconomically disadvantaged, diagnosed in a major city or not, or treated at private or public hospitals. Stenting proved a valid treatment option with low stoma rates.
Anorectal benign disease
Long-term outcomes of sacral neuromodulation for low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery
Mario J. de Miguel Valencia, Gabriel Marin, Ana Acevedo, Ana Hernando, Alfonso Álvarez, Fabiola Oteiza, Mario J. de Miguel Velasco
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):234-244.   Published online June 25, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00542.0077
  • 6,457 View
  • 236 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study assessed the long-term outcomes and quality of life in patients who underwent sacral neuromodulation (SNM) due to low anterior resection syndrome (LARS).
Methods
This single-center retrospective study, conducted from 2005 to 2021, included 30 patients (21 men; median age, 70 years) who had undergone total mesorectal excision with stoma closure and had no recurrence at inclusion. All patients were diagnosed with LARS refractory to conservative treatment. We evaluated clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after SNM through a stool diary, Wexner score, LARS score, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) questionnaire, and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire.
Results
Peripheral nerve stimulation was successful in all but one patient. Of the 29 patients who underwent percutaneous nerve evaluation, 17 (58.62%) responded well to SNM and received permanent implants. The median follow-up period was 48 months (range, 18–153 months). The number of days per week with fecal incontinence episodes decreased from a median of 7 (range, 2–7) to 0.38 (range, 0–1). The median number of bowel movements recorded in patient diaries fell from 5 (range, 4–12) to 2 (range, 1–6). The median Wexner score decreased from 18 (range, 13–20) to 6 (range, 0–16), while the LARS score declined from 38.5 (range, 37–42) to 19 (range, 4–28). The FIQL and EQ-5D questionnaires demonstrated enhanced quality of life.
Conclusion
SNM may benefit patients diagnosed with LARS following rectal cancer surgery when conservative options have failed, and the treatment outcomes may possess long-term sustainability.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS): A Contemporary Surgical Review of Incidence, Pathophysiology, Risk Stratification and Functional Outcomes
    Supreet Kumar, Vivek Tandon, Deepak Govil
    Apollo Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancers: can we predict it preoperatively?
Elbrus Zarbaliyev, Nihan Turhan, Sebahattin Çelik, Mehmet Çağlıkülekçi
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):245-252.   Published online June 25, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00458.0065
  • 4,938 View
  • 193 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to investigate preoperative predictors of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), which is a poor prognostic factor usually detected postoperatively in patients with colorectal cancer.
Methods
Results for all patients operated on for colorectal cancer between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. Potential preoperative factors and postoperative pathology results were recorded. The patients were categorized as those with LVI and those without LVI. Potential factors that may be associated with LVI were compared between the 2 groups.
Results
The study included 335 patients. The incidence of LVI was 3.11 times higher in patients with ascending colon tumors (odds ratio [OR], 3.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34–7.23; P=0.008) and 4.28 times higher in those with metastatic tumors (OR, 4.28; 95% CI, 2.18–8.39; P<0.001). Diabetes mellitus was inversely related to LVI in colorectal cancer patients; specifically, LVI was 56% less common in colorectal cancer patients with diabetes mellitus, irrespective of its duration (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25–0.76; P<0.001).
Conclusion
The presence of preoperative LVI in colorectal cancer patients is difficult to predict. In particular, the effect of the effect of factors such as chronic disease accompanied by microvascular pathologies on LVI is still unclear. Advances in the neoadjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer patients, who are becoming more widespread every day, will encourage the investigation of different methods of preoperatively predicting LVI as a poor prognostic factor in these patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Immunohistochemical Expression of MLH1, PMS2 and P53 in Colorectal Carcinoma with Clinicopathologic Correlation
    Saif Raghad Saleem Alhamadani, Zainab Khalid Shehab Almukhtar
    Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN 2789-3219 ).2025; 9(1): 222.     CrossRef
Video
Video clip
Cranial-first approach for laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy
Kyong-Min Kang, Heung-Kwon Oh, Hong-Min Ahn, Tae-Gyun Lee, Hye-Rim Shin, Mi-Jeong Choi, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):282-284.   Published online June 19, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00661.0094
  • 6,976 View
  • 226 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation with D3 lymphadenectomy are important surgical principles for improving oncological outcomes in colon cancer. The cranial-first approach is a colonic mobilization–first approach to radical right hemicolectomy, which has several advantages, including early feasibility assessment, safe dissection from surrounding organs, preestablished inferior margin of lymph node dissection, and revelation of the tangible anatomy of the tributaries of the gastrocolic trunk. This video demonstrates the cranial-first approach to radical right hemicolectomy in a 66-year-old man with locally advanced cecal cancer.
Original Article
Minimally invasive surgery
Preoperative localization of potentially invisible colonic lesions on the laparoscopic operation field: using autologous blood tattooing
Ji Yeon Mun, Hyunjoon An, Ri Na Yoo, Hyeon-Min Cho, Bong-Hyeon Kye
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):225-233.   Published online June 19, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00059.0008
  • 4,973 View
  • 201 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Preoperative colonoscopic (POC) localization is recommended for patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colectomy for early colon cancer. Among the various localization method, POC tattooing localization has been widely used. Several dyes have been used for tattooing, but dye has disadvantages, including foreign body reactions. For this reason, we have used autologous blood tattooing for POC localization. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the autologous blood tattooing method.
Methods
This study included patients who required POC localization of the colonic neoplasm among the patients who were scheduled for elective colon resection. The indication for localization was early colon cancer (clinically T1 or T2) or colonic neoplasms that could not be resected endoscopically. POC autologous blood tattooing was performed after saline injection, and 2 hemoclips were applied.
Results
A total of 45 patients who underwent autologous blood tattooing and laparoscopic colectomy were included in this study. All POC localization sites were visible in the laparoscopic view. POC localization sites showed almost perfect agreement with intraoperative surgical findings. There were no complications like bowel perforation, peritonitis, hemoperitoneum, and mesenteric hematoma.
Conclusion
Autologous blood is a safe and effective agent for localizing materials that can replace previous dyes. However, a large prospective case-control study is required for the routine application of this procedure in early colon cancer or colonic neoplasms.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Meeting report on the 8th Asian Science Editors’ Conference and Workshop 2024
    Eun Jung Park
    Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 66.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Localization, Margins, and Intraoperative Endoscopy in Minimally Invasive Sigmoid Colectomy: A Matched Cohort
    Chang-Lin Lin, Feng-Fan Chiang, Ming-Cheng Chen, Chun-Yu Lin, Shang-Chih Huang, Ching-Shiang Lin
    Journal of Surgical Research.2025; 315: 847.     CrossRef
Reviews
Colorectal cancer
Postoperative outcomes after prehabilitation for colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies
Ian Jun Yan Wee, Isaac Seow-En, Aik Yong Chok, Eileen Sim, Chee Hoe Koo, Wenjie Lin, Chang Meihuan, Emile Kwong-Wei Tan
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):191-199.   Published online May 16, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01095.0156
  • 5,482 View
  • 237 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Prehabilitation (PH) is purported to improve patients’ preoperative functional status. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to compare short-term postoperative outcomes between patients who underwent a protocolized PH program and the existing standard of care among colorectal cancer patients awaiting surgery.
Methods
A search in MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL was conducted to identify relevant articles. Repetitive and exhaustive combinations of MeSH search terms (“prehabilitation,” “colorectal cancer,” “colon cancer,” and “rectal cancer”) were used to identify randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing PH versus standard of care for colorectal cancer patients awaiting surgery. The primary outcomes included postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, and readmission rates.
Results
Seven studies including 1,042 colorectal cancer patients (PH, 382) were included. No significant differences were found in intraoperative outcomes. The postoperative complication rates were comparable between groups (Clavien-Dindo grades I and II: risk ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.62–1.07; P=0.15; Clavien-Dindo grades ≥III: risk ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–1.44; P=0.92). There were also no significant differences in length of hospital stay (P=0.21) or the risk of 30-day readmission (P=0.68).
Conclusion
Although PH does not appear to improve short-term postoperative outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery, the quality of evidence is impaired by the limited trials and heterogeneity. Thus, further large-scale trials are warranted to draw definitive conclusions and establish the long-term effects of PH.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The inequalities and challenges of prehabilitation before cancer surgery: a narrative review
    Hilary Stewart, Sophie Stanley, Xiubin Zhang, Lisa Ashmore, Christopher Gaffney, Jo Rycroft‐Malone, Andrew F. Smith, Laura Wareing, Cliff Shelton
    Anaesthesia.2025; 80(S2): 75.     CrossRef
  • Prehabilitation in surgery – an update with a focus on nutrition
    Chelsia Gillis, Arved Weimann
    Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care.2025; 28(3): 224.     CrossRef
  • The role of exercise-based prehabilitation in enhancing surgical outcomes for patients with digestive system cancers: a meta-analysis
    Shasha Xu, Rong Yin, Haiou Zhu, Yin Gong, Jing Zhu, Changxian Li, Qin Xu
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Less is more: simplifying patient-centered cancer care
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(3): 173.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative Morbidity Is Not Associated with a Worse Mid-Term Quality of Life After Colorectal Surgery for Colorectal Carcinoma
    Maximilian Brunner, Theresa Jendrusch, Henriette Golcher, Klaus Weber, Axel Denz, Georg F. Weber, Robert Grützmann, Christian Krautz
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(14): 5167.     CrossRef
  • Identifying and optimizing psychosocial frailty in surgical practice
    Kurt S. Schultz, Caroline E. Richburg, Emily Y. Park, Ira L. Leeds
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2024; 35(4): 101061.     CrossRef
ERAS
Venous thromboembolism among Asian populations with localized colorectal cancer undergoing curative resection: is pharmacological thromboprophylaxis required? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Shih Jia Janice Tan, Emile Kwong-Wei Tan, Yvonne Ying Ru Ng, Rehena Sultana, John Carson Allen, Isaac Seow-En, Ronnie Mathew, Aik Yong Chok
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):200-209.   Published online May 16, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01046.0149
  • 4,856 View
  • 193 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
We compared the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among Asian populations with localized colorectal cancer undergoing curative resection with and without the use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (PTP).
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was undertaken to identify relevant studies published from January 1, 1980 to February 28, 2022. The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent primary tumor resection for localized nonmetastatic colorectal cancer; an Asian population or studies conducted in an Asian country; randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, or cohort studies; and the incidence of symptomatic VTE, deep vein thrombosis, and/or pulmonary embolism as the primary study outcomes. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. This study was registered in PROSPERO on October 11, 2020 (No. CRD42020206793).
Results
Seven studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 5 observational cohort studies) were included, encompassing 5,302 patients. The overall incidence of VTE was 1.4%. The use of PTP did not significantly reduce overall VTE incidence: 1.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%–3.1%) versus 1.9% (95% CI, 0.3%–4.4%; P = 0.55). Similarly, PTP was not associated with significantly lower rates of symptomatic VTE, proximal deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism.
Conclusion
The benefit of PTP in reducing VTE incidence among Asian patients undergoing curative resection for localized colorectal cancer has not been clearly established. The decision to administer PTP should be evaluated on a case-bycase basis and with consideration of associated bleeding risks.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effectiveness and Safety of Long-Term Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study
    Ying Zhang, Xiaozhu Zhou, Yi Wu, Shicai Chen, Xiangli Cui, Ying Zhao
    Drugs - Real World Outcomes.2025; 12(3): 479.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning-based risk prediction of postoperative deep vein thrombosis in Chinese patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery
    Likui Huang, Lihua Gong, Jun Chen, Xiaojing Chen, Bicha Yao, Zhengrong Wang, Shuwei Weng
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
Guideline
Colorectal cancer
Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment
Hyo Seon Ryu, Hyun Jung Kim, Woong Bae Ji, Byung Chang Kim, Ji Hun Kim, Sung Kyung Moon, Sung Il Kang, Han Deok Kwak, Eun Sun Kim, Chang Hyun Kim, Tae Hyung Kim, Gyoung Tae Noh, Byung-Soo Park, Hyeung-Min Park, Jeong Mo Bae, Jung Hoon Bae, Ni Eun Seo, Chang Hoon Song, Mi Sun Ahn, Jae Seon Eo, Young Chul Yoon, Joon-Kee Yoon, Kyung Ha Lee, Kyung Hee Lee, Kil-Yong Lee, Myung Su Lee, Sung Hak Lee, Jong Min Lee, Ji Eun Lee, Han Hee Lee, Myong Hoon Ihn, Je-Ho Jang, Sun Kyung Jeon, Kum Ju Chae, Jin-Ho Choi, Dae Hee Pyo, Gi Won Ha, Kyung Su Han, Young Ki Hong, Chang Won Hong, Jung-Myun Kwak, Korean Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary Committee
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):89-113.   Published online April 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00059.0008
  • 16,081 View
  • 446 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients’ values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Optimal extent of lymph node dissection in clinical early-stage right colon cancer: a retrospective analysis
    Hyeung-min Park, Jaram Lee, Soo Young Lee, Suk Hee Heo, Yong Yeon Jeong, Hyeong Rok Kim, Chang Hyun Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2025; 108(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Microsatellite Instability on the Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of Colon Cancer and the Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative Abdominal CT Scans
    Rıdvan Yavuz, Orhan Aras, Hüseyin Çiyiltepe, Onur İlkay Dinçer, Ahmet Şükrü Alparslan, Tebessüm Çakır
    Diagnostics.2025; 15(2): 190.     CrossRef
  • Epigenetic Regulation of Nuclear Factor Erythroid-2-Related Factor 2 in Colorectal Cancer Cells Resistant to Ionizing Radiation
    Kyoung Ah Kang, Jinny Park, Mei Jing Piao, Pincha Devage Sameera Madushan Fernando, Herath Mudiyanselage Udari Lakmini Herath, Herath Mudiyanselage Maheshika Madhuwanthi Senavirathna, Jung-Hwan Kim, Suk Ju Cho, Jin Won Hyun
    Biomolecules & Therapeutics.2025; 33(1): 182.     CrossRef
  • Meeting report on the 8th Asian Science Editors’ Conference and Workshop 2024
    Eun Jung Park
    Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 66.     CrossRef
  • The Diagnostic Value of Virtual Colonoscopy in Colonic Diseases
    İhsaniye Süer Doğan, Esin Çakmakçı Midia, Yıldıran Songür, Baki Hekimoğlu
    Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory.2025; 16(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • National Guidelines for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Peritoneal Malignancies: A Worldwide Systematic Review and Recommendations of Strength Analysis
    Marco Tonello, Carola Cenzi, Elisa Pizzolato, Manuela Martini, Pierluigi Pilati, Antonio Sommariva
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2025; 32(8): 5795.     CrossRef
  • Advancements in Image‐Based Analyses for Morphology and Staging of Colon Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
    Samuel Arthur Ameyaw, Derrick Adu Afari, John Boateng, Marcello Maida
    BioMed Research International.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 2023 Korean Multidisciplinary Guidelines for Colon Cancer Management: Summary of Radiological Points
    Nieun Seo, Hyo Seon Ryu, Myungsu Lee, Sun Kyung Jeon, Kum Ju Chae, Joon-Kee Yoon, Kyung Su Han, Ji Eun Lee, Jae Seon Eo, Young Chul Yoon, Sung Kyung Moon, Hyun Jung Kim, Jung-Myun Kwak
    Korean Journal of Radiology.2024; 25(9): 769.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping on Improving Diagnostic Values of CT D3 Lymph Node Staging for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Mi Sook Yun, ChangYeop Kim, In Young Lee, Su Bum Park, Dong-Hoon Shin, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3496.     CrossRef
  • Nuclear medicine based multimodal molecular imaging facilitates precision medicine for gastrointestinal tumors
    Jing Zhao, Fei Wang, Rong-Fu Wang
    World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2024; 32(10): 727.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Early Oral Feeding on Postoperative Outcomes after Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Soo Young Lee, Eon Chul Han
    Digestive Surgery.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Colorectal cancer
Comparing the efficacy of combined versus single immune cell adaptive therapy targeting colorectal cancer
Denis Nchang Che, NaHye Lee, Hyo-Jung Lee, Yea-Won Kim, Solongo Battulga, Ha Na Lee, Won-Kook Ham, Hyunah Lee, Mi Young Lee, Dawoon Kim, Haengji Kang, Subin Yun, Jinju Park, Daeyoun David Won, Jong Kyun Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):121-135.   Published online April 22, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00402.0057
  • 4,455 View
  • 150 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most frequent cancer with limited therapeutic achievements. Recently, adoptive cellular immunotherapy has been developed as an antitumor therapy. However, its efficacy has not been tested in CRC. This study investigated the ability of an immune cell cocktail of dendritic cells (DCs), T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells to overcome immunological hurdles and improve the therapeutic efficacy of cell therapy for CRC.
Methods
CRC lysate-pulsed monocyte-derived DCs (Mo-DCs), CRC antigen-specifically expanded T cells (CTL), and in vitro-expanded NK cells were cultured from patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). The ability of the combined immune cells to kill autologous tumor cells was investigated by co-culturing the combined immune cells with patient-derived tumor cells.
Results
The Mo-DCs produced expressed T cell co-stimulating molecules like CD80, CD86, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR and HLA-ABC, at high levels and were capable of activating naive T cells. The expanded T cells were predominantly CD8 T cells with high levels of CD8 effector memory cells and low levels of regulatory T cells. The NK cells expressed high levels of activating receptors and were capable of killing other cancer cell lines (K562 and HT29). The immune cell cocktail demonstrated a higher ability to kill autologous tumor cells than single types. An in vivo preclinical study confirmed the safety of the combined immune cell adaptive therapy showing no therapy-related death or general toxicity symptoms.
Conclusion
The results suggested that combined immune cell adaptive therapy could overcome the limited efficacy of cell immunotherapy.
Colorectal cancer
Estimation of risk posed by malignant polyps amongst colorectal surgeons in Australia and New Zealand
Andrew P. Zammit, Ian Brown, John D. Hooper, David A. Clark, Andrew D. Riddell
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):114-120.   Published online March 25, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00178.0025
  • 4,959 View
  • 135 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The estimation of the risk posed by malignant polyps for residual or lymphatic disease plays a central role. This study investigated colorectal surgeons’ assessment of these risks associated with malignant polyps.
Methods
A cross-sectional questionnaire was electronically administered to colorectal surgeons in Australia and New Zealand in October 2022. The questionnaire contained 17 questions on demographics, when surgeons consider colorectal resection appropriate, and the risk assessment for 5 hypothetical malignant polyps.
Results
The mean risk of residual or lymphatic disease that would prompt surgeons to recommend colonic resection was 5%. However, this increased to a mean risk of 10% if the malignant polyp was located in the rectum, and the only resection option was abdominoperineal resection with end-colostomy. There was high concordance between the estimated risk of residual or lymphatic disease by colorectal surgeons and the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) guidelines for the 5 hypothetical malignant polyps, with the ACPGBI estimated risk lying within the 95% confidence interval for 4 of the 5 malignant polyps. Nonetheless, 96.6% of surgeons felt that an online risk calculator would improve clinical practice.
Conclusion
Colorectal surgeons in Australia and New Zealand accurately estimated the risk posed by malignant polyps. An online risk calculator may assist in better conveying risk to patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Management of the Malignant Rectal Polyp—A Narrative Review
    Zhen Hao Ang, Shing Wai Wong
    Cancers.2025; 17(9): 1464.     CrossRef
Review
Colorectal cancer
Performance reporting design in artificial intelligence studies using image-based TNM staging and prognostic parameters in rectal cancer: a systematic review
Minsung Kim, Taeyong Park, Bo Young Oh, Min Jeong Kim, Bum-Joo Cho, Il Tae Son
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):13-26.   Published online February 28, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00892.0127
  • 6,461 View
  • 202 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer has the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy by identifying subtle patterns and aiding tumor delineation and lymph node assessment. According to our systematic review focusing on convolutional neural networks, AI-driven tumor staging and the prediction of treatment response facilitate tailored treat­ment strategies for patients with rectal cancer.
Methods
This paper summarizes the current landscape of AI in the imaging field of rectal cancer, emphasizing the performance reporting design based on the quality of the dataset, model performance, and external validation.
Results
AI-driven tumor segmentation has demonstrated promising results using various convolutional neural network models. AI-based predictions of staging and treatment response have exhibited potential as auxiliary tools for personalized treatment strategies. Some studies have indicated superior performance than conventional models in predicting microsatellite instability and KRAS status, offer­ing noninvasive and cost-effective alternatives for identifying genetic mutations.
Conclusion
Image-based AI studies for rectal can­cer have shown acceptable diagnostic performance but face several challenges, including limited dataset sizes with standardized data, the need for multicenter studies, and the absence of oncologic relevance and external validation for clinical implantation. Overcoming these pitfalls and hurdles is essential for the feasible integration of AI models in clinical settings for rectal cancer, warranting further research.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Artificial intelligence in CT for predicting lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis
    D. Hou, H. Her, W. Han, X. Ge
    Clinical Radiology.2026; 92: 107001.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing the role of MRI in rectal cancer: advances from staging to prognosis prediction
    Xiaoling Gong, Zheng Ye, Yu Shen, Bin Song
    European Radiology.2025; 35(9): 5714.     CrossRef
  • Non-operative management of locally advanced rectal cancer with an emphasis on outcomes and quality of life: a narrative review
    In Ja Park
    Ewha Medical Journal.2025; 48(3): e40.     CrossRef
  • L’intelligence artificielle pourrait-elle aider le chirurgien digestif dans la prise en charge du cancer du rectum ?
    Arnaud Alves, Karem Slim
    Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale.2024; 161(4): 253.     CrossRef
  • Can artificial intelligence help a digestive surgeon in management of rectal cancer?
    Arnaud Alves, Karem Slim
    Journal of Visceral Surgery.2024; 161(4): 231.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence for the colorectal surgeon in 2024 – A narrative review of Prevalence, Policies, and (needed) Protections
    Kurt S. Schultz, Michelle L. Hughes, Warqaa M. Akram, Anne K. Mongiu
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2024; 35(3): 101037.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence in Coloproctology: A Review of Emerging Technologies and Clinical Applications
    Joana Mota, Maria João Almeida, Miguel Martins, Francisco Mendes, Pedro Cardoso, João Afonso, Tiago Ribeiro, João Ferreira, Filipa Fonseca, Manuel Limbert, Susana Lopes, Guilherme Macedo, Fernando Castro Poças, Miguel Mascarenhas
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(19): 5842.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Colorectal cancer
Long-term bowel functional outcomes following anal sphincter-preserving surgery for upper and middle rectal cancer: a single-center longitudinal study
Ahmad Sakr, Seung Yoon Yang, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):27-35.   Published online February 28, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01067.0152
  • 5,390 View
  • 207 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Despite advances in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and anal sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer, bowel dysfunction is still unavoidable and negatively affects patients’ quality of life. In this longitudinal study, we aimed to investigate the changes in bowel function with follow-up time and the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on bowel function following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Methods
In this study, 171 patients with upper or middle rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection between 2012 and 2018 were included. Bowel function was assessed longitudinally with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument and Wexner scores every 6 months after restoration of bowel continuity. Patients with at least 2 follow-up visits were included.
Results
Overall, 100 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Urgency, soilage, and fecal incontinence were noted within 24 months in the patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. After 2 years of follow-up, significant bowel dysfunction and fecal incontinence were observed in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group. Low tumor level and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were associated with delayed bowel dysfunction.
Conclusion
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in combination with low tumor level was significantly associated with delayed bowel dysfunction even after 2 years of follow-up. Therefore, careful selection and discussion with patients are paramount.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Funktionelle Folgen von Radiotherapie, Chemotherapie und Operation bei der Behandlung des Rektumkarzinoms
    Philipp Rhode, Matthias Mehdorn, Undine Gabriele Lange, Sebastian Murad Rabe, Johannes Quart, Robert Nowotny, Patrick Sven Plum, Stefan Niebisch, Sigmar Stelzner
    Zentralblatt für Chirurgie - Zeitschrift für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie.2025; 150(04): 353.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280.     CrossRef
  • Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients
    Won Beom Jung
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Long-term clinical outcomes after high and low ligations with lymph node dissection around the root of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients with rectal cancer
Min Wan Lee, Sung Sil Park, Kiho You, Dong Eun Lee, Dong Woon Lee, Sung Chan Park, Kyung Su Han, Dae Kyung Sohn, Chang Won Hong, Bun Kim, Byung Chang Kim, Hee Jin Chang, Dae Yong Kim, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):62-73.   Published online February 26, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00094.0013
  • 6,422 View
  • 251 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes based on the ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in patients with rectal cancer.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database that included all patients who underwent elective low anterior resection for rectal cancer between January 2013 and December 2019. The clinical outcomes included oncological outcomes, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes. The oncological outcomes included overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). The functional outcomes, including defecatory and urogenital functions, were analyzed using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, International Prostate Symptom Score, and International Index of Erectile Function questionnaires.
Results
In total, 545 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 244 patients underwent high ligation (HL), whereas 301 underwent low ligation (LL). The tumor size was larger in the HL group than in the LL group. The number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) was higher in the HL group than in the LL group. There were no significant differences in complication rates and recurrence patterns between the groups. There were no significant differences in 5-year RFS and OS between the groups. Cox regression analysis revealed that the ligation level (HL vs. LL) was not a significant risk factor for oncological outcomes. Regarding functional outcomes, the LL group showed a significant recovery in defecatory function 1 year postoperatively compared with the HL group.
Conclusion
LL with LNs dissection around the root of the IMA might not affect the oncologic outcomes comparing to HL; however, it has minimal benefit for defecatory function.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Meeting report on the 8th Asian Science Editors’ Conference and Workshop 2024
    Eun Jung Park
    Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 66.     CrossRef
  • Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Is restrictive transfusion sufficient in colorectal cancer surgery? A retrospective study before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea
Hyeon Kyeong Kim, Ho Seung Kim, Gyoung Tae Noh, Jin Hoon Nam, Soon Sup Chung, Kwang Ho Kim, Ryung-Ah Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):493-501.   Published online December 28, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00437.0062
  • 4,594 View
  • 109 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Blood transfusion is one of the most common procedures used to treat anemia in colorectal surgery. Despite controversy regarding the adverse effects of blood products, surgeons have maintained standards for administering blood transfusions. However, this trend was restrictive during the COVID-19 pandemic because of a shortage of blood products. In this study, we conducted an analysis to investigate whether the restriction of blood transfusions affected postoperative surgical outcomes.
Methods
Medical records of 318 patients who underwent surgery for colon and rectal cancer at Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital between June 2018 and March 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. The surgical outcomes between the liberal and restrictive transfusion strategies in pre– and post–COVID-19 groups were analyzed.
Results
In univariate analysis, postoperative transfusion was associated with infectious complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.705; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.015–2.865; P=0.044). However, postoperative transfusion was not an independent risk factor for the development of infectious complications in multivariate analysis (OR, 1.305; 95% CI, 0.749–2.274; P=0.348). In subgroup analysis, there was no significant association between infectious complications and the hemoglobin threshold level for the administration of a transfusion (OR, 1.249; 95% CI, 0.928–1.682; P=0.142).
Conclusion
During colorectal surgery, the decision to perform a blood transfusion is an important step in ensuring favorable surgical outcomes. According to the results of this study, restrictive transfusion is sufficient for favorable surgical outcomes compared with liberal transfusion. Therefore, modification of guidelines is suggested to minimize unnecessary transfusion-related side effects and prevent the overuse of blood products.
Translational/basic research
Exfoliate cancer cell analysis in rectal cancer surgery: comparison of laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision, a pilot study
Kiho You, Jung-Ah Hwang, Dae Kyung Sohn, Dong Woon Lee, Sung Sil Park, Kyung Su Han, Chang Won Hong, Bun Kim, Byung Chang Kim, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):502-512.   Published online December 26, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00479.0068
  • 3,752 View
  • 117 Download
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is currently the standard treatment for rectal cancer. However, its limitations include complications and incomplete total mesorectal resection (TME) due to anatomical features and technical difficulties. Transanal TME (TaTME) has been practiced since 2010 to improve this, but there is a risk of local recurrence and intra-abdominal contamination. We aimed to analyze samples obtained through lavage to compare laparoscopic TME (LapTME) and TaTME.
Methods
From June 2020 to January 2021, 20 patients with rectal cancer undergoing MIS were consecutively and prospectively recruited. Samples were collected at the start of surgery, immediately after TME, and after irrigation. The samples were analyzed for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 20 (CK20) through a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The primary outcome was to compare the detected amounts of CEA and CK20 immediately after TME between the surgical methods.
Results
Among the 20 patients, 13 underwent LapTME and 7 underwent TaTME. Tumor location was lower in TaTME (7.3 cm vs. 4.6 cm, P=0.012), and negative mesorectal fascia (MRF) was more in LapTME (76.9% vs. 28.6%, P=0.044). CEA and CK20 levels were high in 3 patients (42.9%) only in TaTME. There was 1 case of T4 with incomplete purse-string suture and 1 case of positive MRF with dissection failure. All patients were followed up for an average of 32.5 months without local recurrence.
Conclusion
CEA and CK20 levels were high only in TaTME and were related to tumor factors or intraoperative events. However, whether the detection amount is clinically related to local recurrence remains unclear.
Technical Note
Minimally invasive surgery
Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for anterior resection
Toan Duc Pham, Tomas Larach, Bushra Othman, Amrish Rajkomar, Alexander G. Heriot, Satish K. Warrier, Philip Smart
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):526-530.   Published online December 19, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00458.0065
  • 7,736 View
  • 124 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Minimally invasive colorectal surgery is currently well-accepted, with open techniques being reserved for very difficult cases. Laparoscopic colectomy has been proven to have lower mortality, complication, and ostomy rates; a shorter median length of stay; and lower overall costs when compared to its open counterpart. This trend is seen in both benign and malignant indications. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) in colorectal surgery was first described in the early 1990s. Three recent meta-analyses comparing transabdominal extraction against NOSES concluded that NOSES was superior in terms of overall postoperative complications, recovery of gastrointestinal function, postoperative pain, aesthetics, and hospital stay. However, NOSES was associated with a longer operative time. Herein, we present our technique of robotic NOSES anterior resection using the da Vinci Xi platform in diverticular disease and sigmoid colon cancers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction for diverticular disease: a systematic review
    Jasmine Mui, Mina Sarofim, Ernest Cheng, Andrew Gilmore
    Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(5): 3049.     CrossRef
  • Current Application Status and Innovative Development of Surgical Robot
    Aimin Jiang, Zhao Tang, Hanzhong Zhang, Jinxin Li, Jialin Meng, Ying Liu, Yu Fang, Juan Lu, Xu Zhang, Le Qu, Anqi Lin, Linhui Wang
    Med Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Precision and Power: A Comprehensive Review of Exploring the Role of Laser Treatment in Hemorrhoidal Management
    Dheeraj Surya, Pankaj Gharde
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients
    Won Beom Jung
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527.     CrossRef
Original Article
Colorectal cancer
Computed tomography–assessed presarcopenia and clinical outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
Ji Hyeong Song, Rak Kyun Oh, Jeong Eun Lee, Kyung Ha Lee, Ji Yeon Kim, Jin Soo Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):513-520.   Published online December 12, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00031.0004
  • 3,230 View
  • 112 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Previous studies have reported that presarcopenia negatively affects rectal cancer treatment. However, most studies have analyzed patients including majority of open surgery, and the association between presarcopenia and clinical outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of presarcopenia on the clinical and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.
Methods
Three hundred and one patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery between December 2009 and May 2016 were enrolled. Body composition was assessed using computed tomography by measuring the muscle and fat areas at the third lumbar (L3) vertebra. The L3 skeletal muscle area was used to calculate the skeletal muscle index and evaluate presarcopenia.
Results
Presarcopenia was more common in older ( ≥ 70 years, P = 0.008) or female patients (P = 0.045). Patients with presarcopenia had decreased skeletal muscle area (P < 0.001), lower hemoglobin level (P = 0.034), longer time to first flatus (P < 0.001), and more frequent surgical site infection (P = 0.001). However, survival rates were not significantly different between those with and without presarcopenia.
Conclusion
Computed tomography-assessed presarcopenia was associated with delayed functional recovery and increased surgical site infection, although it was not revealed as a prognostic factor for oncological outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Exploring potential predictors of low muscle mass and muscle loss in adults with cancer: A scoping review
    Annie R. Curtis, Carla M. Prado, Liliana Orellana, Robin M. Daly, Judy Bauer, Linda Denehy, Lara Edbrooke, Brenton J. Baguley, Laura Alston, Nicholas Hardcastle, Jenelle Loeliger, Louise Moodie, Sharad Sharma, Nicole Kiss
    Clinical Nutrition.2026; 56: 106531.     CrossRef
  • Stress response, complications, and postoperative recovery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and comorbid anxiety/depression undergoing ultrasound-guided intervention
    Shuang Xu, Liu-Wei Hao, Xia Li, Xiao-Ning Zhou
    World Journal of Psychiatry.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
Review
Colorectal cancer
Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: evidence and challenge
Suk-Hwan Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(4):301-306.   Published online August 29, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00269.0038
  • 12,925 View
  • 243 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 9 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Recent advances in the management of rectal cancer have dramatically changed the clinical practice of colorectal surgeons because the main focus of rectal cancer treatment has changed from sphincter-saving to an organ-preserving strategies. Modifying the delivery of systemic chemotherapy to improve patients’ survival is another progress in colorectal cancer management, known as total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). TNT is a new strategy used by colorectal surgeons to improve the quality of life and survival of patients after treatment. TNT poses limitations or obstacles, such as overtreatment issues in patients with stage I rectal cancer. However, considering the quality-of-life issues in patients with low-lying rectal cancer necessitating a permanent colostomy, the indication for TNT will be expanded. This review summarizes the recently conducted clinical trials and foresees future perspectives on TNT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Reply to the Letter to the Editor ‘Circulating tumor DNA after definitive therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer’ by Drs Sorscher and Rocha Lima
    A. Bercz, J.J. Smith, P.B. Romesser
    Annals of Oncology.2025; 36(2): 224.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer from 2015 to 2024: a visual analysis and bibliometric analysis
    Boyu Kang, Yihuan Qiao, Jun Zhu, Jipeng Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current Surgical Methods in Local Rectal Excision
    Kristina Šemanjski, Karla Lužaić, Jure Brkić
    Gastrointestinal Tumors.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Tailoring rectal cancer surgery: Surgical approaches and anatomical insights during deep pelvic dissection for optimal outcomes in low‐lying rectal cancer
    Youn Young Park, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2024; 8(5): 761.     CrossRef
  • A nomogram for predicting the overall survival in rectal cancer patients after total neoadjuvant therapy
    Z. Liu, M. He, X. Wang
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of the laparoscopic approach, early closure and preoperative stimulation on outcomes of ileostomy closure after rectal resection
    Andrea Norte, Carmen Martínez, Ana Pasalodos, Ivette Tort, Anna Sánchez, Pilar Hernández, Jesús Bollo, Eduard Maria Targarona
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2024; 102(11): 590.     CrossRef
  • Impact of the laparoscopic approach, early closure and preoperative stimulation on outcomes of ileostomy closure after rectal resection
    Andrea Norte, Carmen Martínez, Ana Pasalodos, Ivette Tort, Anna Sánchez, Pilar Hernández, Jesús Bollo, Eduard Maria Targarona
    Cirugía Española.2024; 102(11): 590.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP