Purpose Hemorrhoidal disease impacts quality of life, with hemorrhoidectomy being the standard treatment for grades II–III hemorrhoids. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using the Rafaelo technique offers a less invasive alternative; however, comparative data remain limited. This study evaluated short-term outcomes following RFA versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy.
Methods A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at a medical university hospital in Thailand, involving patients who underwent either RFA or hemorrhoidectomy between January 2023 and September 2024. Propensity score matching was utilized to minimize selection bias. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain and opioid consumption.
Results After propensity score matching, 102 patients were analyzed (51 patients in each group). Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the 2 groups. The RFA group had higher pain scores at 8 hours postoperatively (1 vs. 0, P=0.002) but lower scores at 20 hours (0 vs. 1, P<0.001). Opioid consumption was significantly lower in the RFA group (9.8% vs. 31.4%, P=0.007), with a reduced morphine-equivalent dose (0.7 mg vs. 3.5 mg, P=0.003). Additionally, the RFA group had a shorter operative time (20 minutes vs. 30 minutes, P<0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (0 mL vs. 5 mL, P<0.001). Hospital stays and complication rates were comparable between groups.
Conclusion RFA resulted in improved postoperative pain control, reduced opioid use, shorter operative duration, and decreased blood loss compared to hemorrhoidectomy, with similar hospital stay durations and complication rates.
Purpose Postoperative pain is a major concern for patients undergoing ultrasound scalpel-assisted hemorrhoidectomy, potentially exacerbated by delayed wound healing. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of an intimate cleansing gel containing chlorhexidine, hyaluronic acid, and other anti-inflammatory agents (Antroclean Fisioderm) on postoperative pain, itching, and wound healing in patients who had undergone this procedure.
Methods This multicenter observational case-control study involved a cohort of consecutive adult patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy using an ultrasound device. The study compared 2 different postoperative wound management strategies over 1 month after surgery: washing with warm water twice per day (control group) versus a 2-minute topical application of intimate cleansing gel (Antroclean Fisioderm) followed by a warm water wash (intervention group).
Results The median postoperative pain score was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group at each follow-up point (P<0.01). The percentage of patients reporting anal itching was also significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group at each follow-up point (P<0.01). All patients in the intervention group achieved complete wound healing 4 weeks after surgery, compared to 88 (82%) in the control group (P<0.01). No adverse events were reported.
Conclusion The topical application of intimate cleansing gel (Antroclean Fisioderm) twice daily for 1 month following ultrasound scalpel-assisted hemorrhoidectomy appears to be associated with faster healing, reduced pain, decreased itching, and improved quality of life, without any adverse effects. Further larger and prospective randomized trials are recommended to confirm these findings.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Enhancing Proctological Outcomes: The Role of Hyaluronic Acid in Hemorrhoid Care – An Innovative Adjunct to Surgery Riddhi Upadhyay, Akshat Vadaliya, Haryax V. Pathak, Soham Upadhyay Journal of Coloproctology.2025; 45(03): 001. CrossRef
Purpose This study compared the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) vs. conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) in patients with grade II/III hemorrhoids.
Methods PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing LH against CH in grade II/III hemorrhoids. The primary outcomes included postoperative use of analgesia, postoperative morbidity (bleeding, urinary retention, pain, thrombosis), and time of return to work/daily activities.
Results Nine studies totaling 661 patients (LH, 336 and CH, 325) were included. The LH group had shorter operative time (P<0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (P<0.001). Postoperative pain was lower in the LH group, with lower postoperative day 1 (mean difference [MD], –2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], –3.44 to –0.75; P=0.002) and postoperative day 7 (MD, –3.94; 95% CI, –6.36 to –1.52; P=0.001) visual analogue scores and use of analgesia (risk ratio [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42–0.81; P=0.001). The risk of postoperative bleeding was also lower in the LH group (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.12– 0.28; P<0.001), with a quicker return to work or daily activities (P=0.002). The 12-month risks of bleeding (P>0.999) and prolapse (P=0.240), and the likelihood of complete resolution at 12 months, were similar (P=0.240).
Conclusion LH offers more favorable short-term clinical outcomes than CH, with reduced morbidity and pain and earlier return to work or daily activities. Medium-term symptom recurrence at 12 months was similar. Our results should be verified in future well-designed trials with larger samples.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of surgically indicated hemorrhoids in inflammatory bowel patients: a randomized comparative clinical study Reham Zakaria, Mohamed Mahmoud Amin, Heba Alhussein Abo-Alella, Yasmine Hany Hegab Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(1): 249. CrossRef
Best clinical practice recommendations for the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids via laser hemorrhoidoplasty: the LHP recommendations P. C. Ambe, G. P. Martin-Martin, N. Vasas, I. Piponski, I. H. Roman, J. D. P. Hernandez, H. Ma, H.C. Lin, G. Weyand, L. Mazlan, L. J. García Flórez, K. Wolff, M. Dessily, C. Wang, V. Dobricanin, W. Yang, T. Bruketa, X.D. Zeng, S. Avdicausevic, Z.G. Zhang, Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Which Technique is Preferable for Grade 2–3 Hemorrhoidal Disease: Laser vs. Rubber Band Ligation? A Retrospective Study Ahmet Cihangir Emral, Merter Gülen, Bahadır Ege Bratislava Medical Journal.2025; 126(1): 91. CrossRef
Precision cuts time-comparative outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty and open hemorrhoidectomy Shreya, Prajwal Chandrashekar International Surgery Journal.2025; 12(5): 743. CrossRef
Latest Research Trends on the Management of Hemorrhoids Sung Il Kang Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2025; 9(2): 179. CrossRef
Hämorrhoidalleiden und stadienabhängige Behandlung (inklusive Analprolaps) Oliver Schwandner Die Chirurgie.2025; 96(9): 709. CrossRef
Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty: Procedure, Outcomes and Future Directions Michele di Schiano di Visconte ANZ Journal of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of efficacy and safety between surgical and conservative treatments for hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis Longfang Quan, Xuelian Bai, Fang Cheng, Jin Chen, Hangkun Ma, Pengfei Wang, Ling Yao, Shaosheng Bei, Xiaoqiang Jia BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
A Comparative Study of Stapler and Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty in the Treatment of Second-Degree and Third-Degree Hemorrhoids Hemant Bhanarkar, Ashutosh D Jadhao, Bhupesh Tirpude, Vikrant Akulwar, Gayatri Deshpande, Raj Gajbhiye, Nikita Monteiro Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty in focus: A modern alternative to conventional surgical techniques for symptomatic hemorrhoids Alfadl Abdulfattah, Fabricio Doin Paz de Oliveira World Journal of Surgical Procedures.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluating Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty as a Short-Term Approach to Advanced Haemorrhoidal Disease Chin Kiat Tan, Shou Kee Ng, Arijit Mukherjee Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The Outcome of Laser Ablation Hemorrhoidoplasty versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy Mohammed Yousef Alessa, Loai Saleh Albinsaad, Arshadullah Khan, Laila Zamil Alzamil, Raghad Mabrouk Alanazi, Najd Mabrouk Alanazi, Abeer Mabrouk Alanazi Annals of African Medicine.2025; 24(4): 811. CrossRef
Taiwan society of colon and rectal surgeons’ consensus on the management of hemorrhoidal disease Tsung-Kun Chang, Tao-Wei Ke, Pao-Shiu Hsieh, Shih-Ching Chang, Wan Hsiang Hu, Ching-Wen Huang, Feng-Fan Chiang, Hsiang-Lin Tsai, Jin-Tung Liang, Chien-Kuo Liu, Jaw-Yuan Wang International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Quand et comment traiter des hémorroïdes Thierry Higuero La Presse Médicale Formation.2024; 5(1): 24. CrossRef
Spectrum of Diagnoses in Female Patients With Proctologic Symptoms Presenting to the Surgery Unit of a Tertiary Care Center Sana Sahar, Tamjeed Gul, Muhammad Ihtesham Khan Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Precision and Power: A Comprehensive Review of Exploring the Role of Laser Treatment in Hemorrhoidal Management Dheeraj Surya, Pankaj Gharde Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Diode laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoids: Meta-analysis Po-Lung Cheng, Chang-Cyuan Chen, Jian-Syun Chen, Po-Li Wei, Yan-Jiun Huang Asian Journal of Surgery.2024; 47(11): 4681. CrossRef
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty vs. rubber band ligation: a randomized trial comparing 2 mini-invasive treatment for grade II hemorrhoids Lei Jin, Kaijian Qin, Renjie Wu, Haojie Yang, Can Cui, Zhenyi Wang, Jiong Wu BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Quality of Life of Patients Before and After Hemorrhoid Surgery: A Single-Center Study in Vietnam Nguyen Thi Thuy Anh, Nguyen Ngoc Huynh Nhu, Tran Ngoc Hong, Pham Thi Ly, Nguyen Thi Hong Huyen, Doan Thi Minh, Ho Tat Bang, Nguyen Trung Tin Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Propensity-Score Matching Analysis for Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Circumferential Stapler Hemorrhoidectomy: One-Year Outcomes Tran V Hung, Duong V Hai Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty for grade II–IV hemorrhoidal disease in Bangladesh Md. Saiful Islam, Abhigan B. Shrestha, Faisal Chowdhury, Md. R.K. Ziko Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(11): 6514. CrossRef
Lower pain, less itching, and faster healing after ultrasound scalpel-assisted hemorrhoidectomy using an intimate cleaner containing chlorhexidine, acid hyaluronic acid, and natural anti-inflammatories: a multicenter observational case-control study Antonio Brillantino, Luigi Marano, Maurizio Grillo, Alessio Palumbo, Fabrizio Foroni, Luciano Vicenzo, Alessio Antropoli, Michele Lanza, Maria Laura Sandoval Sotelo, Nicola Sangiuliano, Mauro Maglio, Rosanna Filosa, Lucia Abbatiello, Maria Preziosa Romano Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 602. CrossRef
Minimally invasive laser technologies in the surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: problems and prospects (literature review) N. D. Yartseva, L. V. Kornev, E. K. Naumov, G. V. Rodoman, L. A. Laberko Hirurg (Surgeon).2023; (3): 20. CrossRef
Laser interventions in coloproctology. A plea for standardized treatment protocols P. C. Ambe Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(10): 953. CrossRef
Comments on “Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade II/III hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis” Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Amine Gouader, Bassem Krimi, Hani Oweira Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 442. CrossRef
Purpose Traditional therapeutic approaches to the surgical management of hemorrhoid disease such as hemorrhoidectomies are plagued with severe postoperative pain and protracted recovery. Our pilot study aims to the laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) patients with symptomatic hemorrhoid disease that have failed conservative management for the first time in an Australian population.
Methods Thirty patients were prospectively enrolled to undergo LH. Postoperative pain, time to return to function, and quality of life (QoL) were determined through the Hemorrhoid Disease Symptom Score and Short Health Scale adapted for hemorrhoidal disease and compared to a historical group of 43 patients who underwent a Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy by the same surgeon at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Results The LH group had significantly lower mean predicted pain scores on days 1 and 2 and lower defecation pain scores and lower opioid analgesia use on days 1, 2, 3, and 4. The median time to return to normal function was significantly lower in the LH group (2 days vs. 9 days, P<0.001). Similarly, the median days to return to the workplace was significantly lower in the LH group (6 days vs. 13 days, P=0.007). During long-term follow-up (12 months), hemorrhoid symptoms and all QoL measures were significantly improved, especially among those with grade II to III disease.
Conclusion This pilot study demonstrates low pain scores with this revivified procedure in an Australian population, indicating possible expansion of the therapeutic options available for this common condition. Further head-to-head studies comparing LH to other hemorrhoid therapies are required to further determine the most efficacious therapeutic approach.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Best clinical practice recommendations for the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids via laser hemorrhoidoplasty: the LHP recommendations P. C. Ambe, G. P. Martin-Martin, N. Vasas, I. Piponski, I. H. Roman, J. D. P. Hernandez, H. Ma, H.C. Lin, G. Weyand, L. Mazlan, L. J. García Flórez, K. Wolff, M. Dessily, C. Wang, V. Dobricanin, W. Yang, T. Bruketa, X.D. Zeng, S. Avdicausevic, Z.G. Zhang, Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Latest Research Trends on the Management of Hemorrhoids Sung Il Kang Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2025; 9(2): 179. CrossRef
Evaluation of Doppler-guided Hemorrhoid Artery Ligation and Recto anal Repair Procedure: A Single-center Analysis in Indonesia Amanda Putri Halim, Livia Taniwangsa, Joanna A. Kosasih, Anthony Berlim Lioe Indian Journal of Colo-Rectal Surgery.2025; 8(1): 9. CrossRef
Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty: Procedure, Outcomes and Future Directions Michele di Schiano di Visconte ANZ Journal of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluating Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty as a Short-Term Approach to Advanced Haemorrhoidal Disease Chin Kiat Tan, Shou Kee Ng, Arijit Mukherjee Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus LigaSure™ hemorrhoidectomy versus diathermy hemorrhoidectomy in treatment of grade III and IV Hemorrhoids: A non-randomized prospective trial Mohammad Ashour Khadr, Walid Galal El Shazly, Mohamed Mazloum Zakria, Ahmed Mohamed Moaz Surgery Open Digestive Advance.2024; 13: 100129. CrossRef
Comparison of Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty and Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy Techniques in the Treatment of Grade 2 and 3 Hemorrhoidal Disease Adas Cemil, Kesici Ugur, Genc M. Salih, Karadag Merve, Duman M. Guray, Boluk S. Emine The American Surgeon™.2024; 90(4): 662. CrossRef
Global International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons in collaboration with European Society of Coloproctology audit on office‐based and surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease: Study protocol Audrius Dulskas, Dovile Cerkauskaite, Joseph Nunoo‐Mensah, Richard Fortunato, Gaetano Gallo, Alaa El Hussuna, Varut Lohsiriwat, Tomas Aukstikalnis, Narimantas E. Samalavicius Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(6): 1266. CrossRef
Ethnomedical knowledge of plants used in alternative medicine to treat hemorrhoidal diseases in Lubumbashi, Haut-Katanga province, Southern Democratic Republic of Congo Bashige Chiribagula Valentin, Okusa Ndjolo Philippe, Muhona Melman, Manya Mboni Henry, Bakari Amuri Salvius, Lumbu Simbi Jean Baptiste BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty for grade II–IV hemorrhoidal disease in Bangladesh Md. Saiful Islam, Abhigan B. Shrestha, Faisal Chowdhury, Md. R.K. Ziko Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(11): 6514. CrossRef
Jackknife versus Lithotomy Position for Hemorrhoidectomy Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Sina Ghasemi, Behzad Imani, Alireza Jafarkhani, Ashkan Karimi, Ali Yamini Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences.2024; 29(5): 76. CrossRef
The efficacy of laser haemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) in the treatment of symptomatic haemorrhoidal disease: An observational cohort study Nadim H. P. Boerhave, Rutger J. Klicks, Kemal Dogan Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(6): 1202. CrossRef
Comparing outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty and LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy in grade II–III hemorrhoidal disease: a retrospective analysis Haluk Tümer, Mevlüt Harun Ağca ANZ Journal of Surgery.2023; 93(7-8): 1885. CrossRef
Comparison of the efficacy of LigaSure and laser for grade 2-3 hemorrhoids Ali Kemal Taşkin, Bülent Özçetin Journal of Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan.2023; 20(4): 33. CrossRef
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty combined with blind hemorrhoidal artery ligation compared to Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in patients with second and third degree piles; a prospective randomized study Amir F. Abdelhamid, Mohamed M. Elsheikh, Osama H. Abdraboh The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2023; 42(3): 669. CrossRef
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hendry Lie, Evelyn Franca Caesarini, Antonius Agung Purnama, Andry Irawan, Taufik Sudirman, Wifanto Saditya Jeo, Bernardus Parish Budiono, Erik Prabowo, M. Iqbal Rivai, Ryanto Karobuana Sitepu Lasers in Medical Science.2022; 37(9): 3621. CrossRef
Congenital factor V (FV) deficiency is a rare hemorrhagic disorder that can cause excessive bleeding during and after surgery in the affected patient. This report is the case of a patient who had FV deficiency with recurrent posthemorrhoidectomy bleeding treated with the hemostatic procedure and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions. A 45-year-old male patient had previously undergone hemorrhoidectomy for multiple hemorrhoids at a local hospital. Hemorrhoidectomy was successful; however, he was transferred to our hospital for evaluation of the origin of the recurrent posthemorrhoidectomy bleeding and underwent a hemostatic procedure. This bleeding was treated with coagulation using electrocautery, multiple sutures, and FFP transfusion (1,600 mL/day) for 7 consecutive days. The patient’s plasma FV activity was 23%. Early detection of clotting factor deficiency in patients with hemorrhagic events after surgical treatments may prevent unnecessary procedures such as reoperations and minimize the cost of replacement therapy such as large-volume FFP transfusion.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Rare Inherited Coagulation Deficiencies: A Single-center Study Özlem Terzi, Sadik Sami Hatipoğlu Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology.2025; 47(2): e90. CrossRef
Purpose Standard therapy for grade III hemorrhoids is rubber band ligation (RBL) and hemorrhoidectomy. The long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes of these treatments in a tertiary referral center for proctology were evaluated.
Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in all patients with grade III hemorrhoids who were treated between January 2013 and August 2018. Medical history, symptoms, reinterventions, complications, and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROM) were retrieved from individual electronic patient files, which were prospectively entered as standard questionnaires in our clinic.
Results Overall, 327 patients (163 males) were treated by either RBL (n=182) or hemorrhoidectomy (n=145). The median follow-up was 44 months. The severity of symptoms and patient preference led to the treatment of choice. The most commonly experienced symptoms were prolapse (83.2%) and blood loss (69.7%). Hemorrhoidectomy was effective in 95.9% of the cases as a single procedure, while a single RBL procedure was only effective in 51.6%. In the RBL group, 34.6% received a second RBL session. Complications were not significantly different, 11 (7.6%) after hemorrhoidectomy versus 6 (3.3%) after RBL. However, 4 fistulas developed after hemorrhoidectomy and none after RBL (P<0.05). The pre-procedure PROM score was higher in the hemorrhoidectomy group whereas the post-procedure PROM score did not significantly differ between the groups.
Conclusion Treatment of grade III hemorrhoids usually requires more than one session RBL whereas 1-time hemorrhoidectomy suffices. Complications were more common after hemorrhoidectomy. The patient-related outcome did not differ between procedures.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Hämorrhoidalleiden und stadienabhängige Behandlung (inklusive Analprolaps) Oliver Schwandner Die Chirurgie.2025; 96(9): 709. CrossRef
Cost-Effectiveness of Rubber Band Ligation Versus Hemorrhoidectomy for the Treatment of Grade III Hemorrhoids: Analysis Using Evidence From the HOLLAND Randomized Controlled Trial Justin Y. van Oostendorp, Lisette Dekker, Susan van Dieren, Ruben Veldkamp, Willem A. Bemelman, Ingrid J.M. Han-Geurts Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(9): 1100. CrossRef
Efficacy and Safety of a New Technique Combining Injection Sclerotherapy and External Hemorrhoidectomy for Prolapsed Hemorrhoids: A Single-center Observational Study Tatsuya Abe, Masao Kunimoto, Yoshikazu Hachiro, Akane Ito, Kenji Watanabe, Shigenori Ota, Kei Ohara, Mitsuhiro Inagaki, Yusuke Saitoh, Masanori Murakami Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(4): 331. CrossRef
Ten-year multicentric retrospective analysis regarding postoperative complications and impact of comorbidities in hemorrhoidal surgery with literature review Cosmin Moldovan, Elena Rusu, Daniel Cochior, Madalina Elena Toba, Horia Mocanu, Razvan Adam, Mirela Rimbu, Adrian Ghenea, Florin Savulescu, Daniela Godoroja, Florin Botea World Journal of Clinical Cases.2023; 11(2): 366. CrossRef
Purpose This study was performed to analyze the predictors that might contribute to urinary retention following semiclosed hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia.
Methods This retrospective study enrolled 2,176 consecutive patients with symptomatic grade III to IV hemorrhoids who underwent semiclosed hemorrhoidectomy between September 2018 and September 2019.
Results Among the 2,176 patients, 1,878 (86.3%) had no postoperative urinary retention, whereas 298 (13.7%) developed urinary retention after hemorrhoidectomy. The percentage of males was significantly higher in the retention group than in the non-retention group (60.4% vs. 48.1%; P=0.001). The risk of urinary retention was 1.52-fold higher in males than in females (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–2.04; P=0.005), 1.62-fold higher in old age (95% CI, 1.14–2.28; P=0.006), and 1.37-fold higher with high body mass index (BMI) (95% CI, 1.04–1.81; P=0.025). Patients with ≥4 resected hemorrhoids had a higher odds ratio (OR) of 1.46 (95% CI, 1.12–1.89; P=0.005) than patients with <4 resected hemorrhoids. Among the supplementary medication, patients who used analgesics had a higher OR of 2.06 (95% CI, 1.57–2.68; P=0.001) than those who did not.
Conclusion Male sex, age, high BMI, number of resected hemorrhoids, and supplementary analgesics are independent risk factors for urinary retention after semiclosed hemorrhoidectomy.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of pudendal nerve block in post-hemorrhoidectomy pain: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Jun Li, Hai-Qiong Wu, Jun-Tao Zhang, Shi-Jian Liu, Ke-Lin Peng Asian Journal of Surgery.2025; 48(3): 1607. CrossRef
Latest Research Trends on the Management of Hemorrhoids Sung Il Kang Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2025; 9(2): 179. CrossRef
Ice Packing Versus Warm Sitz Baths for Post-hemorrhoidectomy Pain Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial Pin-Chun Chen, Yi-Kai Kao, Po-Wen Yang, Chia-Hung Chen, Chih-I Chen Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(7): 865. CrossRef
Defining the reliability of bladder scan in patients with obesity with postoperative urinary retention Parit T. Mavani, Pranay S. Ajay, Heather B. Wagner, Benjamin I. Meyer, Monali Shah, Caitlin P. Sok, Adriana C. Gamboa, Subir Goyal, Jeffrey M. Switchenko, Shishir K. Maithel, David A. Kooby, Mihir M. Shah Surgery.2025; 185: 109547. CrossRef
Spontaneous rupture of the urinary bladder following hemorrhoidectomy: A case report Hanieh Raghimi, Rahim Jorjani, Sina Mohajernoei, Nasrollah Abian, Hossein Saffari, Ehsan Zolfi International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2025; 134: 111790. CrossRef
Hemorrhoidal Disease Jean H. Ashburn JAMA.2025; 334(17): 1541. CrossRef
Surgical outcomes of modified Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade IV hemorrhoidal disease Ahmet Cihangir Emral, Gökay Çetinkaya, Merter Gülen, Bahadır Ege Anatolian Current Medical Journal.2025; 7(5): 652. CrossRef
Ultrasound-guided trans-perineal pudendal nerve block for post-hemorrhoidectomy voiding complications: a prospective randomized double-blinded study Alrefaey K. Alrefaey, Shaimaa Ezzat Amin, Fahad S AL Amri BMC Anesthesiology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of the effect of hot and cold compresses on post‐operative urinary retention in older patients: A clinical trial study Tayebeh Mirzaei, Farkhondeh Roudbari, Ali Ravari, Sakineh Mirzaei, Elham Hassanshahi International Journal of Urological Nursing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
General anesthesia with local infiltration reduces urine retention rate and prolongs analgesic effect than spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy Chun-Yu Lin, Yi-Chun Liu, Jun-Peng Chen, Pei-Hsuan Hsu, Szu-Ling Chang Frontiers in Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effective non-surgical treatment of hemorrhoids with sclerosing foam and novel injection device Juan Cabrera Garrido, Gonzalo López González Gastroenterology & Endoscopy.2024; 2(4): 176. CrossRef
Effect of incision location and type of fistula on postoperative urinary retention after radical surgery for anal fistula: a retrospective analysis Chen Li, Ningyuan Liu, Zichen Huang, Zijian Wei, Keyi Li, Wenxiao Hou, Sangyu Ye, Lihua Zheng BMC Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Ten-year multicentric retrospective analysis regarding postoperative complications and impact of comorbidities in hemorrhoidal surgery with literature review Cosmin Moldovan, Elena Rusu, Daniel Cochior, Madalina Elena Toba, Horia Mocanu, Razvan Adam, Mirela Rimbu, Adrian Ghenea, Florin Savulescu, Daniela Godoroja, Florin Botea World Journal of Clinical Cases.2023; 11(2): 366. CrossRef
Effect of single spinal anesthesia with two doses ropivacaine on urinary retention after hemorrhoidectomy in male patients Lei-lei Wang, Meng Kang, Li-xin Duan, Xu-fei Chang, Xiao-xin Li, Xiang-yang Guo, Zhi-yu Kang, Yong-zheng Han Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Efficacy of Low-Frequency Electroacupuncture on Urinary Retention After Spinal Anesthesia Mina Olia, Aliakbar Jafarian, Masood Mohseni Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing.2023; 38(5): 745. CrossRef
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty combined with blind hemorrhoidal artery ligation compared to Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in patients with second and third degree piles; a prospective randomized study Amir F. Abdelhamid, Mohamed M. Elsheikh, Osama H. Abdraboh The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2023; 42(3): 669. CrossRef
Tarlov cyst with self-healing cauda equina syndrome following combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a case report Zhexuan Chen, Chuxi Lin BMC Anesthesiology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Active drains, which work by negative pressure, are commonly used to drain closed airtight wounds. Higher negative pressure is used in vacuum-assisted wound closure dressings. Gastrointestinal leaks may be difficult to treat by surgical approach because of their association with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, endoscopic approaches have been applied with several degrees of success. Most recently, endoluminal vacuum-assisted wound closure (EVAC) has been employed with high success rates in decreasing both morbidity and mortality. In the present paper, the authors describe the successful use of Endo-SPONGE (B. Braun Medical B.V.) EVAC system therapy to drain an open rectal wound, following a perforation occurred during stapled hemorrhoidectomy.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Innovative Treatment of Combat-Related Extraperitoneal Penetrating Rectal Injury with Intraluminal Vacuum Therapy: A Case Report Yafa Shani Parnasa, Oded Cohen-Arazi, Gad Marom, Mahmoud Abu-Gazala, Noam Shussman, Miklosh Bala Trauma Care.2025; 5(2): 12. CrossRef
Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy (EVT) for the Treatment of Rectal Perforation Following Cleansing Enema Application Alper Sozutek, Ekin Y Tas, Kemal Yener, Julia Ozcomert Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose While the first defecation pain is a problem following hemorrhoidectomy, it is unknown whether the stool consistency has an influence on pain. This pilot study aimed to investigate whether the intensity of defecation pain varied according to stool consistency.
Methods This prospective cohort study evaluated patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy in combination with injection sclerotherapy for grade III or IV hemorrhoids. The pain intensity and stool form during the first postoperative defecation were self-recorded by the patients using a visual analogue scale (score of 0–10) and Bristol Stool Form Scale, respectively. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to stool consistency, and the intensity of defecation pain was compared among the groups using analysis of variance.
Results A total of 61 patients were eligible for this study and were classified into the hard stool (n=15), normal stool (n=21), and soft stool groups (n=25). No significant intergroup differences were identified in the intensity of pain at defecation (P=0.29).
Conclusion This pilot study demonstrated that there were no clear differences in pain intensity during the first defecation after surgery among the 3 groups with different levels of stool consistency.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Pain at the First Post-hemorrhoidectomy Defecation Is Associated with Stool Form Takaaki Yano, Daijiro Kabata, Seiichi Kimura Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(3): 168. CrossRef
Treatment of Hemorrhoid in Unusual
Condition-Pregnancy Hyo Seon Ryu The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Carlos Walter Sobrado Júnior, Carlos de Almeida Obregon, Afonso Henrique da Silva e Sousa Júnior, Lucas Faraco Sobrado, Sérgio Carlos Nahas, Ivan Cecconello
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):249-255. Published online June 1, 2020
Purpose Present an updated classification for symptomatic hemorrhoids, which not only guides the treatment of internal hemorrhoids but also the treatment of external components. In addition, this new classification includes new treatment alternatives created over the last few years.
Methods Throughout the past 7 years, the authors developed a method to classify patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids. This study, besides presenting this classification proposal, also retrospectively analyzed 149 consecutive patients treated between March 2011 and November 2013 and aimed to evaluate the association between the management adopted with Goligher classification and our proposed BPRST classification.
Results Both classifications had a statistically significant association with the adopted management strategies. However, the BPRST classification tended to have fewer management discrepancies when each stage of disease was individually analyzed.
Conclusion Although there is much disagreement about how the classification of hemorrhoidal disease should be updated, it is accepted that some kind of revision is needed. The BPRST method showed a strong association with the management that should be adopted for each stage of the disease. Further studies are needed for its validation, but the current results are encouraging.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Percepción y conocimiento de la enfermedad hemorroidal en los profesionales sanitarios en España M. Frías Vargas, N. Fontanillas Gamilla, I. Rivera Panizo, D. Fuertes Domínguez, C. Granja Ortega, J.F. Peiró Morant Medicina de Familia. SEMERGEN.2025; 51(3): 102393. CrossRef
Clinical evidence and rationale of topical nifedipine and lidocaine ointment in the treatment of anal fissure and hemorrhoidal disease Gaetano GALLO, Mario TROMPETTO Minerva Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Real-world use of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: insights from an international survey and systematic review with clinical practice recommendations Gaetano Gallo, Ugo Grossi, Veronica De Simone, Arcangelo Picciariello, Elia Diaco, Pin Fan, Hongbo He, Jun Li, Hongcheng Lin, Marco La Torre, Rita Laforgia, Pierluigi Lobascio, Hui Ma, Francesco Pata, Roberto Perinotti, Vincent De Parades, Mauro Pozzo, Al Updates in Surgery.2025; 77(5): 1439. CrossRef
Surgical outcomes of modified Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade IV hemorrhoidal disease Ahmet Cihangir Emral, Gökay Çetinkaya, Merter Gülen, Bahadır Ege Anatolian Current Medical Journal.2025; 7(5): 652. CrossRef
Propensity score–matched comparative study of radiofrequency ablation (with the Rafaelo device) versus hemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of grades II–III internal hemorrhoids Thanat Tantinam, Pawit Sutharat, Suwan Sanmee, Ekkarin Supatrakul, Kullawat Bhatanaprabhabhan, Boonchai Ngamsirimas, Nataphon Santrakul, Rangsima Thiengthiantham, Punnawat Chandrachamnong Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(5): 409. CrossRef
Clinical evidence and rationale of mesoglycan to treat chronic venous disease and hemorrhoidal disease: a narrative review Gaetano Gallo, Arcangelo Picciariello, Antonella Tufano, Giuseppe Camporese Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(2): 423. CrossRef
The role of flavonoids in the pharmacological treatment of haemorrhoids SS Singh, MA Strydom, M Balmith, C Megaw, MJ Nell South African General Practitioner.2024; 5(1): 36. CrossRef
Timing and Modality of Hemorrhoidal Prolapse Impact on Patients’ Quality of Life Carlo Ratto, Angelo Parello, Angelo Alessandro Marra, Paola Campennì, Veronica De Simone, Francesco Litta Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(13): 3946. CrossRef
Topical Lidocaine or Lidocaine/Diltiazem Ointment Following Rubber Band Ligation of Hemorrhoids: A Prospective 3-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial Allan M.F. Kwok, Stephen R. Smith, Jie Zhao, Rosemary Carroll, Lucy Leigh, Brian Draganic Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(8): 1110. CrossRef
Time to change? Present and prospects of hemorrhoidal classification Ling Wang, Jiachun Ni, Changcheng Hou, Di Wu, Li Sun, Qiong Jiang, Zengjin Cai, Wenbin Fan Frontiers in Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk factors for hemorrhoidal disease among healthy young and middle-aged Korean adults Yun Soo Hong, Kyung Uk Jung, Sanjay Rampal, Di Zhao, Eliseo Guallar, Seungho Ryu, Yoosoo Chang, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun, Chong Il Sohn, Hocheol Shin, Juhee Cho Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative pain and symptoms control following laser haemorrhoidoplasty versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic haemorrhoids: a new standard Varen Zhi Zheng Tan, Ern-wei Peck, Sharmini S. Sivarajah, Winson J. Tan, Leonard M. L. Ho, Jia-Lin Ng, Cheryl Chong, Darius Aw, Franky Mainza, Fung-Joon Foo, Frederick H. Koh International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(8): 1759. CrossRef
Treatment of Hemorrhoid in Unusual
Condition-Pregnancy Hyo Seon Ryu The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy vs. hemorrhoid artery ligation and recto-anal repair: a comparative study Dimitrios Symeonidis, Michail Spyridakis, Dimitrios Zacharoulis, George Tzovaras, Athina A. Samara, Alexandros Valaroutsos, Alexandros Diamantis, Konstantinos Tepetes BMC Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Management of Stage 3 Haemorrhoids with Homoeopathy – A case report Jyothi Vijaykumar, Dhanya Deepak Bhat Journal of Integrated Standardized Homoeopathy.2022; 5: 107. CrossRef
The novel BPRST classification for hemorrhoidal disease: A cohort study and an algorithm for treatment Carlos Walter Sobrado, Carlos de Almeida Obregon, Lucas Faraco Sobrado, Lucas Morales Bassi, José Américo Bacchi Hora, Afonso Henrique Silva e Sousa Júnior, Sergio Carlos Nahas, Ivan Cecconello Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2021; 61: 97. CrossRef
Evaluation Of Anti-inflammatory Mediated Anti-hemorrhoidal Activity of
Lawsonia inermis on Croton Oil Induced Hemorrhoidal Rats Sai Krishna Nallajerla, Suhasin Ganta Anti-Inflammatory & Anti-Allergy Agents in Medicinal Chemistry.2021; 21(1): 62. CrossRef
Anal stenosis is a late hemorrhoidectomy complication. Sphincterotomy and various anoplasty techniques are used for treatment severe anal stenosis, such as the C flap, House flap, U flap, and rotational S flap, but no procedure is ideal for every patient. We review 2 cases of severe circular anal stenosis. Their complaints included narrow caliber of the stool and feeling unsatisfied defecation. Excision of scar tissue using the circular technique was followed by reconstruction using the bilateral rotational S flap procedure. At the 1-year follow-up, the patient had complaints about neither defecation nor pain, and no longer needed laxative agents. In conclusion, the bilateral rotational S flap technique should be considered as a viable treatment because it can also prevent the occurrence of restenosis, especially given the consideration of adequate blood supply.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Is anoplasty superior to scar revision surgery for post-hemorrhoidectomy anal stenosis? Six years of experience Yu-Tse Weng, Kuan-Jung Chu, Kuan-Hsun Lin, Chun-Kai Chang, Jung-Cheng Kang, Chao-Yang Chen, Je-Ming Hu, Ta-Wei Pu World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(22): 7698. CrossRef
Anoplasty for anatomical anal stenosis: systematic review of complications and recurrences Gaetano Gallo, Arcangelo Picciariello, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Patrizia Pelizzo, Donato Francesco Altomare, Mario Trompetto, Giulio Aniello Santoro, Franco Roviello, Carla Felice, Ugo Grossi Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(12): 1462. CrossRef
A stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) is widely used for treatment of patients with grades III and IV hemorrhoids. The SH is easy to perform, is associated with less pain and allows early return to normal activities. However, complications, whether severe or not, have been reported. Here, we present the case of a female patient with persistent bleeding after a SH. The bleeding was caused by the formation of granulation tissue at the stapler line, diagnosed with sigmoidoscopy, and successfully treated via transanal excision (TAE) under spinal anesthesia. The biopsy showed inflammatory granulation tissue. After the TAE, her symptom was completely gone.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A comparative study on efficacy and safety of modified partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial Tae Gyu Kim, Chul Seung Lee, Dong Geun Lee, Choon Sik Chung, Seung Han Kim, Sang Hwa Yu, Jeong Eun Lee, Gwan Cheol Lee, Dong Woo Kang, Jeong Sub Kim, Gyu Young Jeong Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(2): 145. CrossRef
A variety of instruments, including circular staplers, ultrasonic scalpels, lasers, and bipolar electrothermal devices, are currently used when performing a hemorrhoidectomy. This study compared outcomes between hemorrhoidectomies performed with an ultrasonic scalpel and conventional methods.
Methods
The study was a randomized prospective review of data available between May 2013 and December 2013, involving 50 patients who had undergone a hemorrhoidectomy for grade III or IV internal hemorrhoids. The hemorrhoidal pedicle was coagulated with an ultrasonic device in the ultrasonic scalpel group (n = 25) and sutured with 3-0 vicryl material after excision in the conventional method group (n = 25).
Results
The patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, and lengths of hospital stay were similar in both groups. The mean ages of the conventional and the ultrasonic scalpel groups were, respectively, 20.8 ± 1.6 and 22.4 ± 5.0 years (P = 0.240). In comparison with the conventional method group, the ultrasonic scalpel group had a shorter operation time (P < 0.005), less postoperative pain on the visual analogue scale score (for example, P = 0.211 on postoperative day 1), and less postoperative bleeding (P = 0.034). No significant differences in postoperative complications were observed between the 2 groups.
Conclusion
A hemorrhoidectomy using an ultrasonic scalpel is an effective and safe procedure. The ultrasonic scalpel reduces the operation time, the postoperative blood loss, and the postoperative pain. Long-term follow-up with larger-scale studies is required to evaluate normal activity after a hemorrhoidectomy performed with an ultrasonic scalpel.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A prospective clinical study comparing the use of conventional electrocautery and harmonic scalpel for hemorrhoidectomy Shweta B. Gupta, Arti S. Mitra International Surgery Journal.2025; 12(9): 1474. CrossRef
Harmonic Scalpel Versus Monopolar Electrotome in Endoscopic-Assisted Transaxillary Dual-Plane Augmentation Mammaplasty: A Retrospective Study in 122 Patients Lu Lu, Qiang Hou, Zheyuan Hu, Zuochao Yao, Jiachao Xiong, Jianghui Ying, Meiqing Sun, Hui Wang, Hua Jiang Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.2024; 48(3): 273. CrossRef
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedure versus harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy: a comparative study for the treatment of grades III and IV hemorrhoids Ehab Loutfy, Hatem Elgohary, Mahmoud E. Elkashlan, Mohamed G. Abdelrahman, Wael Omar The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2024; 43(2): 572. CrossRef
Hemorrhoidectomy Using the Harmonic Scalpel versus the Ferguson Technique Mustafa Abdullah Aldawoodi, Raed Esttaifan Rezqallah Journal of Coloproctology.2024; 44(04): e225. CrossRef
Psychological states could affect postsurgical pain after hemorrhoidectomy: A prospective cohort study Geng Wang, Yuanjue Wu, Yang Cao, Rui Zhou, Kaixiong Tao, Linfang Wang Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Modified ultrasound scalpel haemorrhoidectomy versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy for mixed haemorrhoids: a study protocol for a single-blind randomised controlled trial Keqiang Yu, Haijun Li, Ping Xue, Zhidi Xie, Minghui Tang, Hongbo He, Jing Wu Trials.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
PROSPECT guideline for haemorrhoid surgery Alexis Bikfalvi, Charlotte Faes, Stephan M. Freys, Girish P. Joshi, Marc Van de Velde, Eric Albrecht European Journal of Anaesthesiology Intensive Care.2023; 2(3): e0023. CrossRef
Challenges and prospects of laser haemorrhoidoplasty in a low resource setting: The Luth experience ThomasOlagboyega Olajide, OlanrewajuSamuel Balogun, ChristopherO Bode, OluwoleAyoola Atoyebi Journal of West African College of Surgeons.2023; 13(3): 96. CrossRef
CLINICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING RADIO WAVE AND HIGH-FREQUENCY ELECTROSURGERY TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE TREATMENT OF COMBINED ANORECTAL DISEASES V. V. Balytskyy, M. P. Zakharash, O. G. Kuryk World of Medicine and Biology.2022; 18(80): 19. CrossRef
Pain at the First Post-hemorrhoidectomy Defecation Is Associated with Stool Form Takaaki Yano, Daijiro Kabata, Seiichi Kimura Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(3): 168. CrossRef
PAIN SYNDROME IN PATIENTS AFTER COMBINED OPERATIONS FOR COMBINED ANORECTAL DISEASES USING MODERN SURGICAL TECHNOLOGIES Vitaliy V. Balytskyy Wiadomości Lekarskie.2022; 75(9): 2238. CrossRef
Micronized purified flavonoid fraction in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease Philippe Godeberge, Parvez Sheikh, Varut Lohsiriwat, Abel Jalife, Yury Shelygin Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research.2021; 10(10): 801. CrossRef
Is There a Relationship Between Stool Consistency and Pain at First Defecation After Limited Half Hemorrhoidectomy? A Pilot Study Takaaki Yano Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(5): 306. CrossRef
Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Hemorrhoidectomy in Outpatients Setting Giovanni Tomasicchio, Gennaro Martines, Giuliano Lantone, Rigers Dibra, Giuseppe Trigiante, Michele De Fazio, Arcangelo Picciariello, Donato Francesco Altomare, Marcella Rinaldi Frontiers in Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparative estimation of a pain syndrome in patients after combined operations for coexistent pathology of anal channel and rectum with application of modern and standard surgical technologies V. V. Balytskyy Klinicheskaia khirurgiia.2021; 88(5-6): 36. CrossRef
Comparison of surgical procedures implemented in recent years for patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids: a network meta-analysis Tiancong Du, Shijun Quan, Tao Dong, Qiang Meng International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(6): 1001. CrossRef
Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids: An Updated Meta-Analysis Li Xu, Honglei Chen, Yunfei Gu Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2019; 29(2): 75. CrossRef
Submucosal Hemorrhoidectomy versus Hemorrhoidectomy Utilizing an Energy Device in the Treatment of Grade III and IV Hemorrhoidal Disease MohamedS Amar, MohammedN Nassar World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2019; 8(4): 107. CrossRef
Comparative Analysis of Triple Hemostatic Open Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Traditional Open Hemorrhoidectomy Muhammad Shamim Annals of Colorectal Research.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Is there any benefit of harmonic scalpel for hemorrhoidectomy versus conventional diathermy? Doğan Yıldırım, Turgut Dönmez, Okan Murat Aktürk, Ahmet Kocakuşak, Mikail Çakır, Mustafa Ertuğrul Yurtteri Archives of Clinical and Experimental Medicine.2018; 3(1): 10. CrossRef
A novel technique for the treatment of stages III to IV hemorrhoids Guoqiang Lin, Qiongxiang Ge, Xiaokang He, Haixin Qi, Li Xu Medicine.2017; 96(26): e7309. CrossRef
Have Any Changes in Pain Been Noted After a Hemorrhoidectomy Since the Establishment of the Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy? Do Sun Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(3): 90. CrossRef
Diverticula are frequently seen in the sigmoid, descending, ascending and transverse colons whereas rectal diverticula are extremely rare. The stapled rectal mucosectomy for the treatment of a prolapsed hemorrhoid is less painful and has lower morbidity; therefore, it has been commonly used despite possible complications. This paper reports a case of a rectal diverticulum that developed after a procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH). A 42-year-old man with a history of hemorrhoidectomies came to the hospital because of constipation. On sigmoidoscopy, a 2-cm-sized, feces-filled pocket was located just above the anorectal junction. After removal of the fecal material, a huge rectal diverticulum (-4 cm in diameter) was seen. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the diagnosis of rectal diverticulum outpouching through the muscular layer of the intestine in a left posterolateral direction. The patient was discharged without complication after a transanal diverticulectomy had been performed, and the direct rectal wall had been repaired.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Solitary rectal diverticulum: A rare entity mimicking contained perforation – Imaging and surgical correlation Kassandra G. Tulenko, Samantha H. Epstein, Brett R. Kurpiel, Rachita Khot Case Reports in Clinical Radiology.2025; 0: 1. CrossRef
Rectal Diverticulum as a Rare Complication Following the Longo Procedure: A Case Report and Review of Therapeutic Challenges Arturs Niedritis, Sergejs Lebedjkovs Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
A Novel Method of Treating Rectal Diverticulum Using Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) Yui Kaneko, Neil Strugnell World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2024; 13(2): 46. CrossRef
İnverte rektal divertikül: Nadir bir kolonoskopik bulgu Şehmus ÖLMEZ, Adnan TAŞ, Nevin AKÇAER ÖZTÜRK, Bünyamin SARITAŞ Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi.2023; 22(1): 38. CrossRef
Rectal Pocket Syndrome: A Symptomatic Rectal Pseudodiverticula as a Long-Term Complication of Failed Purse-String Suture During Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Cristopher Varela, Adrian Terán, Sthephfania Lopez, German Millan World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2023; 12(2): 48. CrossRef
Mucocele: a rare complication following stapled haemorrhoidopexy Xing-Yang Wan, Yuan-Ji Fu, Gui-Ming Li, Guo-Zhong Xiao, Zhi-Wei Guo, Dong-Lin Ren, Bo Cao, Hong-Cheng Lin BMC Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Pulsion diverticula of the rectum: Radiological diagnosis and clinical implications Gary G Ghahremani, Ravinder K Mittal Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology.2021; 65(3): 286. CrossRef
Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: “Mucosectomy or Not Only Mucosectomy, This Is the Problem” Chiara Eberspacher, Fabio M. Magliocca, Stefano Pontone, Pietro Mascagni, Lisa Fralleone, Gaetano Gallo, Domenico Mascagni Frontiers in Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A case of solitary rectal diverticulum presenting with a large retrorectal abscess Stefanos Gorgoraptis, Sofia Xenaki, Elias Athanasakis, Anna Daskalaki, Konstantinos Lasithiotakis, Evangelia Chrysou, Emmanuel Chrysos Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2020; 49: 57. CrossRef
Mucocele complicating stapled hemorrhoidopexy Asia Grapsi, Alessandro Sturiale, Bernardina Fabiani, Gabriele Naldini International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2017; 33: 38. CrossRef
PURPOSE The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and the outcome when using the Starion(TM) and the Harmonic Scalpel(TM) vessel sealing systems for a sutureless hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS This study is a randomized, controlled trial.
Patients with Grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoids were categorized into two groups: the Starion(TM) hemorrhoidectomy (30 patients) group and the Harmonic Scalpel(TM) hemorrhoidectomy (30 patients) group. The measures of the primary outcomes were the operating time, the postoperative pain score, and the patient satisfaction score. Secondary outcome criteria included early and delayed complications: postoperative bleeding, anal stenosis, urinary difficulty, and skin tag. RESULTS The satisfaction scores 4 wk postoperatively were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.186). However, the operating time was reduced (P=0.019), the pain score was lower (P=0.009), and the satisfaction score 1 wk postoperatively (P=0.001) was lower in the Starion(TM) hemorrhoidectomy group. In addition, there were no differences in early and delayed postoperative complications between the two groups (all P>0.05). CONCLUSION Both methods were found to be surprisingly equivalent in all major aspects analyzed. A Starion(TM) hemorrhoidectomy with submucosal dissection can provide a safe, fast, bloodless, reduced-pain, and low-priced surgical alternative to hemorrhoidal surgery. More studies are needed to determine whether similar favorable results can be attained in patients with more severe, strangulated hemorrhoids.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes and effectiveness of surgical treatments for haemorrhoids C Simillis, S N Thoukididou, A A P Slesser, S Rasheed, E Tan, P P Tekkis British Journal of Surgery.2015; 102(13): 1603. CrossRef
The open hemorrhoidectomy has been recognized as the treatment of choice for symptomatic prolapsing hemorrhoids.
Although the open hemorrhoidectomy is thought to be associated with more postoperative pain and delayed wound healing compared with other conventional procedures such as a closed hemorrhoidectomy, and a semi- closed or submucosal hemorrhoidectomy, it is still unclear which procedure is preferable in terms of postoperative pain, wound healing, hospital stay, and time off work. To address this issue, several studies have been performed. According to randomized controlled studies comparing an open hemorrhoidectomy to a closed hemorrhoidectomy, there are no significant differences in the severity of pain and the hospital stay between the two procedures; however, the healing time in the closed hemorrhoidectomy is faster and the operation time in the open hemorrhoidectomy is shorter. Since there are few randomized controlled studies comparing an open hemorrhoidectomy with a semi-closed hemorrhoidectomy or submucosal hemorrhoidectomy, it is difficult to conclude which procedure is superior to the others. Yet, there seems to be no significant difference between these procedures. In 1998, a novel procedure, a stapled hemorrhoidopexy, was introduced by Longo. Several randomized controlled studies comparing the open hemorrhoidectomy with the stapled hemorrhoidopexy showed that the latter was associated with less pain, shorter hospital stay, and earlier return to work. However, considering the lack of long- term data and the disastrous complications, such as retroperitoneal sepsis and rectal perforation, there is still controversy about its efficacy and safety as a definitive treatment of hemorrhoids. The open hemorrhoidectomy is time-tested and is comparable to other conventional techniques in terms of postoperative pain, hospital stay, and time off work.
Further study should be performed to assess the long-term results of a stapled hemorrhoidopexy.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Long-term follow-up of Starion™ versus Harmonic Scalpel™ hemorrhoidectomy for grade III and IV hemorrhoids Joo Hyung Kim, Dae Hyun Kim, Yong Pyo Lee, Kwang Wook Suh Asian Journal of Surgery.2019; 42(1): 367. CrossRef
Have Any Changes in Pain Been Noted After a Hemorrhoidectomy Since the Establishment of the Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy? Do Sun Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(3): 90. CrossRef
Randomized Trial Comparing a Starion™ and a Harmonic Scalpel™ Hemorrhoidectomy Joo Hyung Kim, Yong Pyo Lee Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2009; 25(1): 8. CrossRef
PURPOSE We hoped to evaluate the possibility of substitution of the local anesthesia for the spinal anesthesia in hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS We did Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia for the sixty- eight patients from January 1998 to December 2005. These patients were compared with seventy-nine patients of spinal anesthesia, sampled with similar gender, age, a surgeon, retrospectively. We used a mixture of 0.5% lidocaine and 1:200,000 epinephrine into perianal skin and intersphincteric space. RESULTS The male-to-female ratio was 1:1 in local anesthesia group and 1:0.84 in spinal anesthesia group. The mean age was 50 and 46 respectively. The number of excised pile was 3.9 and 3.8 respectively. The frequency of the analgegics injected within first 24 hours was 1.79 and 2.70 respectively (P=0.001). The frequency of the urinary catheterization was 0.07 and 0.69 respectively (P < 0.001).
The first bowel movement after surgery was 1.2 days and 1.6 days respectively. The hospital stay was 6.4 days and 8.1 days respectively (P=0.06).
CONCLUISIONS: Local anesthesia is simple, safe and effective in the hemorrhoidectomy.
Fournier's gangrene is a life-threatening disorder characterized by necrotizing fasciitis of the perineal region. Because delay in diagnosis and treatment of this condition can be fatal, it is important not to overlook the symptoms. We present an unusual case of Fournier's gangrene after excision of a thrombosed hemorrhoid. A previously healthy 74-year-old female patient developed Fournier's gangrene after a hemorrhoidectomy. In spite of aggressive treatment, she eventually died. Here, we emphasize early recognition and prompt treatment of this condition, reporting an unexpected disastrous complication of a hemorrhoidectomy.
Park, Hye Won , Bang, Seung Ho , Kim, Chang Nam , Kang, Yun Jung , Hwang, Sung Eun , Cho, Byung Sun , Lee, Min Ku , Choi, Yoo Shin , Park, Joo Seung , Kim, Jin Cheon
PURPOSE We aimed to identify the need for an adjunctive internal sphincterotomy based on an evaluation of the changes in the symptoms and manometric results after a hemorrhoidectomy for hemorrhoids with difficulty in evacuation. METHODS Twenty-five (25) patients who had hemorrhoids with difficulty in evacuation and 13 patients who had hemorrhoids without difficulty in evacuation were prospectively evaluated. Patients were interviewed about symptoms and underwent anorectal manometry before and 2 months after surgery. Difficulty in evacuation is defined as the difficulty that a patient has when trying to evacuate the rectum. RESULTS There were significant differences in the sex ratio, the frequency of bowel movements, and the duration of bowel movements between the two groups (P<0.05). In cases with difficulty in evacuation, the frequency of bowel movements was significantly higher postoperatively and the duration of bowel movements was significantly shorter (P<0.05). The symptom of difficulty in evacuation disappeared in 21 of the as patients experiencing such a symptom, and was improved in the remaining of patients (P<0.05). Following the hemorrhoidectomy for the patients with difficulty in evacuation in the mean and the maximum resting pressure, and the maximum squeeze pressure decreased significantly (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS An adjunctive internal sphincterotomy was not necessary for patients who had hemorrhoids with difficulty in evacuation because following the hemorrhoidectomy, the resting pressure was significantly decreased, and the difficulty in evacuation had nearly subsided.
PURPOSE The circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a newly introduced treatment modality for hemorrhoids. This study was aimed to prove the clinical efficacy of a stapled hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS This prospective study analyzed 100 patients who underwent a hemorrhoidectomy from Jan 2002 to June 2004 at Ajou University Hospital. Among them, 50 patents underwent a stapled hemorrhoidectomy and the remaining patients underwent Ferguson's closed hemorrhoidectomy. The surgical severity and the postoperative complications were analyzed based on the medical records. RESULTS Neither groups showed significant postoperative complications. In the stapled hemorrhoidectomy group, the hospital stay and the mean operation time were shorten during the postoperative period, and the analagesic requirement was lower (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy is safe, less painful, and those related easy to perform. Also, the complications related to this procedure are similar to those related to a conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Considering the advantages, the circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy is an acceptable modalities for hemorrhoids requiring surgical treatment.
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of local anesthesia compared to spinal anesthesia and the usefulness of pentothal induction before infiltration of a local anesthetic agent. METHODS A concurrent non-randomized prospective study was conducted on 52 patients who underwent a hemorrhoidectomy.
For the spinal anesthesia (SA) group (n=29), 0.5% heavy bupivacaine (Marcaine(R)), 5 mg (1 ml), was used, and for the local anesthesia (LA) group (n=23), pentothal, 3.3 mg/kg, was administrated intravenously prior to infiltration of a mixture of local anesthetics (2% lidocaine, 14 ml, with 0.5% bupivacaine, 7 ml). RESULTS There were no differences between the two groups in terms of operating time, postoperative pain, headache, urinary difficulty, nausea or vomiting, pain-free interval after operation, analgesic requirements, and patient's or surgeon's satisfaction. Postoperative ambulation was earlier in the LA group than in the SA group. CONCLUSIONS Local anesthesia after pentothal induction can be used effectively for a hemorrhoidectomy and may be a safe alternative to spinal anesthesia.
PURPOSE A circular stapler hemorrhoidectomy is widely used to treat hemorrhoids and has the advantages of less pain and an earlier return to work compared with a conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy. This study examined the clinical significance and efficacy of a circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS One hundred eighty-six (186) patients with prolapsed hemorrhoids underwent surgery using a circular stapler. The patients' characteristics, the operation time, the postoperative course, the procedure- related factors, the pain, and the complications were analyzed. All the patients received a follow-up examination at the outpatient clinic, including the time to return to work, and the degree of satisfaction was analyzed. RESULTS Grade-III hemorrhoids were the most common complaint (74.1%), followed by grade-IV hemorrhoids (23.7%).
Twenty-one cases (11.3%) had undergone previous anal operations: hemorrhoids, fissure, and fistula. Regarding the anesthetic method, caudal anesthesia was used in 59.7% of the cases, and spinal or saddle anesthesia was used in 39.2%. The mean operation time was 19.1 minutes (range: 8~50). The postoperative pain scores were 3.4 on the operation day, 2.1 on the postoperative 3rd day, and 0.9 on the postoperative 7th day. During the operation, a hemostatic suture was made at the suture line in 72.0% of the cases. Muscle involvement was detected at a donut specimen grossly in 9% of cases and microscopically in 48.9%. The mean thickness of muscle involvement was 2.5 mm.
In the postoperative course, the time for the first bowel movement was 1.2 days, and the mean hospital stay was 2.1 days. The mean time needed for the patient to return to work was 6.2 days. The most common complication encountered was urinary problems (34.9%). The incidence of postoperative bleeding was 2.2%. Postoperative follow- up revealed one case of a hemorrhoids recurrence and one case of temporary fecal incontinence. CONCLUSIONS The circular stapler hemorrhoidectomy has no disadvantage in terms of operation time and operative course, and has an advantage in terms of operative pain and an earlier return to normal work without any significant or serious complications. Moreover, it has minimal long-term complications. Therefore, a circular stapler hemorrhoidectomy can be performed safely and is recommended as a useful method for treating hemorrhoids.
PURPOSE Post-hemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage is a rare but serious complication after a hemorrhoidectomy. This study analyzed the factors associated with secondary hemorrhage following a surgical hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS A total of 1,751 patients received a semiclosed hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease from May 2001 to January 2004. A retrospective study of 17 patients with post-hemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage was done. Fourteen patients (82 percent) underwent surgery primarily for hemorrhoidal disease, two patients (12 percent) had hemorrhoids removed in addition to a sphincterotomy for anal fissure, and the remaining patient (6 percent) had a hemorrhoidectomy with fistulectomy. The variables analyzed included age, gender, incidence, recurrence, hospitalization, bleeding tendency, blood transfusion, and management. RESULTS The male to female ratio was 1.83:1 (P>0.05), and the mean age was 38.9 (range 19~55) years. The incidence of post-hemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage was 0.98 percent.
The mean interval from the operation to hemorrhage was 8.9 (range 4~18) days. The period of mean hospitalization was 4.5 (range 2~8) days. As predisposing factors, 3 patients had suspected liver disease with normal platelet count. The mean 1.90 gm/dl of Hgb at the time of secondary hemorrhage was lower than the preoperative values. One patient (5.9 percent) required 3 units of red blood cell transfusions.
Treatment modalities included observation alone in three patients (18 percent), and suture ligation in the operating theater in fourteen patients (82 percent). None of the patients developed recurrent bleeding. CONCLUSIONS Post-hemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage is an inevitable and a troublesome complication. The patient will need to be transferred rapidly to a hospital and resuscitated if necessary. The author favors suture ligation in controlling secondary hemorrhage. Suture ligation offers a good outcome with virtually no risk of recurrent bleeding.
Post- hemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage usually occurs at home between the fourth and eighteenth postoperative day and takes place in 0.98 percent of hemorrhoidectomies. In the author's opinion, post-hemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage usually is not a preventable complication.
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to determine the necessity for routine pathologic evaluation of hemorrhoidectomy specimens. METHODS Between March 1998 and February 2001, 280 patients (185 males, 95 females) underwent a hemorrhoidectomy at Seoul National University Hospital. All patients had grade III~IV hemorrhoids, and the mean age of the patients was 51 years (range: 21~74 years). All hemorrhoidectomy specimens were examined with a hematoxylin and eosin stain of one representative section by a pathologist. We performed a retrospective analysis regarding the pathologic results for the hemorrhoidectomy specimens. RESULTS Two hundred sixty-seven specimens (267, 95.4%) had typical hemorrhoids reported as external and internal hemorrhoids, external hemorrhoids, hemorrhoidal varices, and thrombi. Ten patients (10, 3.2%) had additional benign pathologes such as fibroepithelial polyps (6 cases), a flat condyloma (1 case), hypertrophied papillae with a condyloma, like papillomatosis and keratosis (1 case), dyskeratotic squamous cells with koilocytotic atypia (1 case), and an inflammatory polyp (1 case). Interestingly, three patients (3, 1.1%) had carcinomas in the hemorrhoidectomy specimens.
Two patients had squamous- cell carcinomas; one suffered from delayed wound healing after a previous hemorrhoidectomy, and the other had indurated lesions on the hemorrhoids. One patients who had under gone a low anterior resection due to stage-C rectal cancer 7 months before had a adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS Because of the possibility of unsuspected anal cancer, we recommend pathologic examination of hemorr hoidectomy specimens, especially in cases of suspected indurated lesions within the hemorrhoids, delayed wound healing after a previous hemorrhoidectomy, or previous history of colon cancer.
PURPOSE Hemorrhoidal tissues are normal anatomic structures present in every individual, and they act as cushions and are anchored to the internal anal sphincter by a connective tissue system. When the anchoring connective tissues undergo bears degenerative changes, the hemorrhoids not only bulge but also descend into the lumen of the anal canal. The veins also become distended. The previous hemorrhoidectomy methods (excision and ligation methods) tend to remove excessive amounts of hemorrhoidal tissues, possibly causing incontinence or stenosis. This study introduces a modified hemorrhoidectomy method. METHODS A retrospective study was done with 650 patients (358 males, 292 females) who underwent hemorroidectomies from Jan. 1997 to Jan. 2000. Under saddle-block anesthesia, the patient was placed in a prone jack-knife position. After narrow incisions on the mucosa of the selected pile, a bilateral submucosal dissection was performed. The pedicle was ligated by transfixing sutures 2 or 3 times with 2-0 chromic catgut to lift up the mucosa. RESULTS The mean operation time per hemorrhoidal pile was 12.7 minutes, and the mean hospital-stay was 4.3 days. Acute and delayed postoperative anal bleeding occurred in 7 (1.1%) and 3 (0.5%) patients, respectively. The symptoms of both subsided spontaneously. Ninety-three (93) patients (14.3%) reguired nelaton catheterization for voiding difficulty, and one patient (0.2%) showed mild anal stenosis. The most frequent complaint was skin-tag formation (148 cases, 22.8%). In 140 cases, the skin tag was removed under local anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS It is desirable to keep the normal structure of the anal canal by removing as little of the cushions as possible. Our 'lift-up submucosal hemorrhoidectomy' shows good results and is an easy operative method when compared with Parks' original method.
The circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a new treatment modality for hemorrhoids requiring surgical management. This study reviews the available information concerning the present results of this procedure. A medline search and a review of the literature wene conducted to identify available information on the procedure, with a special attention being given to on-going or published randomized clinical trials. The advantages of circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy were analyzed based on different areas of concern, including postoperative pain, operating time, duration of hospital stay and recovery of normal activity, postoperative wound care, and types and rates of complications. Continence status and patient satisfaction following a circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy are also reported. The circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy is safe, easy to perform, and effective in the treatment of advanced hemorrhoids with an external mucosal prolapse. Other advantages include minimal postoperative complications, easier postoperative management, and a shorter time to return to work congenial to a conventional hemorrhoidectomy.
Despite the higher cost and difficult access, this study confirms the feasibility of using a circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. The circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a promising new option in the treatment of all patients eligible for a surgical approach. A longer follow-up is required to confirm the true efficacy of this surgical method.
PURPOSE Secondary bleeding is an inevitable and a troublesome complication of hemorrhoidectomy. This study analyzed the factors related to secondary bleeding after hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS A total of 14,062 patients received a hemorrhoidectomy from Apr. 1999 to Apr. 2001. A retrospective study of 83 patients with secondary bleeding was done. At first, the doctors were divided into two groups. In one group, each doctor had performed more than 500 hemorrhoidectomies; in the other groups, each doctor had performed less than 500 hemorrhoidectomies. The incidence of secondary bleeding of the two groups was compared. Then, 155 patients without secondary bleeding were randomly selected as a control group. Clinical aspects and laboratory data were compared with those of the bleeding group. RESULTS The total incidence of secondary bleeding was 0.6%.
The incidence for the group with experienced doctors was 0.5%, that for the other group was 1.3%. When bleeding patients were compared with the control group, the proportion of patients who received a blood transfusion within 1 week before operation was 12.1% in the bleeding group and 2.6% in the control group. The postoperative WBC count was increased more in the bleeding group. The percentage treated with metronidazole was 12% compared with 25.3% in the control group. The incidences of bleeding according to operation sites were 19.6% in the right anterior, 12.2% in the left lateral, 10.9% in the right posterior, and 8.4% in the posterior portion. CONCLUSIONS Secondary bleeding after a hemorrhoidectomy is more prevalent with less experienced doctors, recent history of blood transfusion, less use of metronidazole, and specific location of the hemorrhoid, such as the right anterior and the left lateral site of the hemorrhoid pile.
PURPOSE Surgical hemorrhoidectomy has a reputation for being a painful procedure. Many surgical methods have been devised for reducing posthemorrhoidectomy pain.
Nevertheless, the result are unsatisfactory. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is performed without leaving painful perianal wounds. The aim of this study was to assess any benefits, compared among three hemorrhoidectomy methods. METHODS A total of 150 consecutive patients with 3rd and 4th degree of prolapsed hemorrhoids underwent hemorrhoidectomy with stapler group (n=50) or hemorrhoidectomy with ultrasonic dissector group (n=50) or Milligan's hemorrhoidectomy using by diathermy (n=50) (by same surgeon between January and September 2001). We evaluated the difference among three techniques in operative time, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction (using visual analogue scale). RESULTS Mean operative time for hemorrhoidectomy with ultrasonic dissector was 19 minute; for stapler group, it was 18 minute; for Milligan's group, it was 23.6 minute (P<0.05). There was significant difference in operative time between stapler and Milligan's group. There were significant difference in pain measurement reported on immediate (5.8 for stapler, 7.2 for ultrasonic dissector, and 9.2 for Milligan's group, P<0.01), day 1 (4.3, 5.5, and 6.8, P<0.01), day 2 (3.7, 4.7, and 6, P<0.01), day 3 (3.0, 3.6, and 4.6, P<0.01), day 4 (3.1, 3.5, and 4.6, P<0.01), day 5 (2.5, 3.4, and 4.6, P<0.01), day 6 (2.0, 3.2, and 4.3, P<0.01), day 7 (1.8, 3, and 4.2, P<0.01), and defecation (4.0, 7.0, and 8.9, P<0.01). The mean analgesic (piroxicam 20 mg) requirement was 0.3 times for stapler, 1.9 for Ultrasonic dissector, and 3.1 for Milligan's group (P<0.01).
Mean hospital stay was 1.6 days for stapler, 1.7 for ultrasonic dissector, 2.8 for Milligan's group (P<0.01).
Patient satisfaction on day 7 was 8.2 for stapler, 6.2 for ultrasonic dissector, and 5.2 for Milligan's group (P<0.01).
There was no difference in catheterization for urinary retention. It is probably due to spinal anesthesia. CONCLUSION The study demonstrates significantly reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital day after stapled hemorrhoidectomy compared among three groups. This resulted in an earlier return to working activities for stapled technique.
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare conventional scissors and Harmonic Scalpel(R) hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS Two hundred and five patients were prospectively assigned to two groups in the consecutive order. The group was divided into Group A (Harmonic Scalpel(R) excision; n=101) and Group B (conventional scissor excision; n=104).
All other aspects of surgery and anesthesia were standardized. Intramuscular opiate was available on demand during the postoperative period, and analgesic requirements were also recorded. All patients noted their pain on a daily basis using a visual analogue scale (0=no pain; 10=worst pain). The length of hospitalization, operative time and postoperative complications were also analyzed. RESULTS The operative time was 16.6 +/- 0.9 minutes 25.3 +/- 0.8 minutes in Group A and B, respectively (p<0.01).
Length of hospital stay was 4.1 +/- 0.1 and 4.5 +/- 0.1 days (p<0.05). Pain scores in the group A were significantly lower than in the group B (p<0.01). Analgesic requirements were also significantly less in group A (p<0.05).
Postoperative complications, such as urinary retention, fecal impaction and skin tags were rarer in group A. One patient in group A and two patients in group B developed secondary hemorrhage, but no patient had anal stricture. CONCLUSIONS The Harmonic Scalpel(R) excision significantly shortens the operative time for hemorrhoidectomy with less blood loss and postoperative pain without remarkable early or late postoperative complications.
PURPOSE Hemorrhoidectomy can be associated with severe pain in the immediate postoperative period. The aim of this study was to evaluate the advantages and feasibility of hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia (pudendal nerve block). METHODS From september 1998 to August 2000 we performed 77 hemorrhoidectomy with local anesthesia in our Colorectal unit under the ambulatory surgery regimen. 0.5% lidocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine mixed by 1:1 ratio were used for pudendal nerve block and local anesthesia. RESULTS Using pudendal nerve block, ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy with or without band ligation were done in 77 patients. Male to female ratio was 46:31, mean age was 35.2 years. 3 major piles plus 1 minor pile were present in 40 patients (51.9%). We injected mixed lidocaine and bupivacaine solution through external sphincter and puborectalis muscle. All patients were successfully operated without conversion to general anesthesia or even intravenous anesthetic injection. Postoperative pain of them were compared the patients who were operated hemorrhoidectomy under general (spinal or caudal) anesthesia during the same time. The pain were assessed using verbal rating pain scale at 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours (1-10, where 1 presented no pain and 10 represented the worst pain imaginable) by phone call examination. Mean pain scores for pudendal anesthesia group at 24, 48, 72 hours were 5.32, 3.07 and 2.21, respectively, compared with other anesthesia group with 6.47, 4.52 and 3.24. These differences were statistically significant (P value<0.05). Post operative pain was successfully controlled with home care and oral medications. CONCLUSIONS Under local anesthesia with pudendal nerve block, ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy were able to decrease pain and urinary retension in comparison to spinal or caudal anesthesia group. Ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy is useful, low cost and feasible.
PURPOSE Hemorrhoidectomy is considered to be a painful operation, therefore some patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids conceal their symptoms to defer a much-needed surgical procedure. Patients who have undergone hemorrhoidectomy have experienced constipation or urinary retention due to postoperative pain. Several interventions have been used to relieve postoperative pain after hemorrhoidectomy. Nevertheless, the results are unsatisfactory. Hemorrhoidectomy with ultrasonic dissector have less thermal injury and can avoid ligation and suture.
This study compared conventional semi-open Milligan hemorrhoidectomy with open ultrasonic dissector hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS One hundred patients with prolapsed symptomatic hemorrhoids were randomly assigned to semi-open Milligan (n=50) or open ultrasonic dissector (n=50) hemorrhoidectomy.
Operation time, postoperative complication, hospital stay, degree and duration of postoperative pain, pain on bowel movement, and urinary retention were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS There was no significant difference in excised pile number. Operation time of open ultrasonic dissector hemorrhoidectomy was shorter than that of semi-open Milligan hemorrhoidectomy (P<0.05). The open ultrasonic dissector hemorrhoidectomy group resulted in less postoperative pain (P<0.05) and shorter duration of pain (P<0.05) and postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05) than semi-open Milligan hemorrhoidectomy. Urinary retention did not occur in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Despite the higher cost, open ultrasonic dissector hemorrhoidectomy results in less postoperative pain, shorter operation time and hospital stay than the conventional hemorrhoidectomy.
PURPOSE The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether additional intraoperative injection of Tarasyn (ketorolac tromethamine) provided a preemptive analgesic effect that improved postoperative pain. METHODS Sixty patients scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy were randomly assigned to the study and control groups. For the control group (n=32), patients were treated with standard intravenous injections of Nubain (Nalbuphine hydrochloride; Jeil Pharmaceuticals Co, Seoul) per 8 hours for three times postoperatively for pain relief. In the study group (Tarasyn group, n=28), 60 mg of Tarasyn (ketorolac tromethamine; Roche Korea, Seoul) was injected into the internal sphincter muscle and around the operative wound at the time of hemorrhoidectomy as well as standard intravenous injections of Nubain . Parameters were measured of pain score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (agonizing pain), painless sound sleep, additional analgesic requirements, time to first bowel movement, and postoperative urinary retention. RESULTS Rate of painless sound sleep was 75.0% and 53.1% in the Tarasyn and the control groups, respectively, which was significant statically between two groups (P<0.05). Time to first bowel movement was 2 and 3.2 days in Tarasyn and the control groups, respectively, which was also significant statistically (P<0.05). Voiding difficulty developed in one case (3.5%) in the Tarasyn group and he needed catheterization. In the control group, however, the number (15 cases, 46.9%; P<0.001) was much higher requiring more catherization (13 cases, 40.9%; P<0.001). Mean pain scores was significant statically between two groups (P<0.001). CONCLUSION The data suggest that the use of intraoperative injection of Tarasyn is associated with a significant decrease in pain and urinary complications after hemorrhoidectomy.
PURPOSE An adequate pain control is one of important factors for obtaining good outcomes in the ambulatory basis of hemorrhoidectomy. There have been many methods for pain control after hemorrhoidectomy such as narcotics, various kinds of analgesics, etc. The aim of this study is to compare intraoperative internal anal sphincter injection of Ketorolac tromethamine and other two conventional methods for pain control. METHODS A total of 56 patients with hemorrhoid grade III or IV underwent surgery between May and October 1999, and prospectively assigned to three groups in the consecutive order. The group was divided in Group 1: [Ketorolac tromethamine (Tarasyn) 60 mg intrasphincteric injection intraoperatively and 30 mg IM/prn?10 mg po/6hrs], Group 2: [No intraoperative injection and maintain pain control with Tarasyn 30 mg IM/prn/10 mg po/6hrs], and Group 3: [No intraoperative injection and maintain pain control with Pethidine (Demerol) 50 mg IM/prn and Ibuprofen 400 mg/Paracetamol 500 mg/Codeine 20 mg (Myprodol) po/8hrs]. The post operative data and pain scoring was performed on the questionnaire with Point box scale (BS-11) and Behavioral rating scale (BRS-6) each 24 hours during 5 days after surgery. RESULTS There are 22 patients in the Group 1, 16 in the Group 2 and 18 patients in the Group 3. The median age of the Group 1 is 42.5, Group 2, 44.5 and Group 3, 45 years.
The pain score on the first day after surgery in group 1 was significantly lower than group 2 (p<0.05) in the both pain scoring scale but was no differences between group 1 and 3.
On the fifth day after surgery group 3 was significantly lower than both group 1 and 2 in the point box scale (p<0.05). The urinary retention rate and the day of first bowel movement after surgery show no differences among three groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative internal anal sphincter injection of Ketorolac tromethamine shows a better pain control than conventional methods in early postoperative period. Therefore it might be helpful for patients to go home on the day after surgery, and strong pain killer to control pain after discharge will be needed.
PURPOSE The ligation and excision method of hemorrhoids is a simple and rapid procedure, but it has a drawback of possible damage to the anal cushion. To solve this problem, we tried to preserve the anal cushion with superficial ligation and excision method of anorectal mucosa including removal of the hemorrhoidal tissues from the anal cushion after submucosal dissection. However, it was difficult to remove hemorrhoidal vessels with this procedure and it was time consuming. To minimize these problems, we originally tried a new cushion preserving procedure in 15 patients during 1 year. METHODS R> After mobilization of the anorectal mucosa, hemorrhoidal tissues and anal cushion from the anal sphincter muscles, the anorectal mucosa was first dissected from the anal cushion, then the hemorrhoidal vessels were removed and the remaining anal cushion was reattached to the anal sphincter muscles. RESULTS The results of this surgery have been satisfactory with only one postoperative bleeding and two anal skin tags. CONCLUSIONS This method is simple and convenient for preservation of anal cushion with minimal complications when compared with the conventional method of anal cushion preservation.
BACKGROUND Even though lasers have been used in hemorrhoidectomies, there has been much debate about their effect. PURPOSE: A prospective randomized study was performed comparing the efficacy of a Nd:YAG laser with that of scalpel excision when performing a ligation excision, semi-closed hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS Sixty patients, who had more than three piles, with 3rd or 4th grade hemorrhoids, were enrolled into this study.
Hemorrhoidectomies were performed under low spinal anesthesia. The ligation excision, semi-closed hemorrhoidectomy technique was used. Data evaluated included age, sex, operative time, postoperative pain scores, postoperative analgesic requirement, wound-healing time, and postoperative complications. Of the sixty patients enrolled into this study, 30 received laser excision and the other 30 scalpel excision. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the two groups, except for operative time (laser, 34.6 8.4 min; scalpel, 24.1 4.8 min). Postoperative complications, such as urinary retention, fecal impaction, skin tags, and postoperative fissure, were more common in the laser group. CONCLUSIONS A hemorrhoidectomy using a Nd:YAG laser takes longer than a conventional hemorrhoidectomy and neither reduces the postoperative pain nor shortens the wound-healing time. For achieving an effective treatment in hemorrhoids by using lasers, improved laser instruments are required, along with more detailed study of lasers and their effects.
PURPOSE A modified technique of pile suture (PS) was introduced with its principle and useful indications. METHODS A transfixing suture was layed onto the base of hemorrhoidal cushion including vessels, submocosal connective tissues, and internal anal sphincter. According to morphological changes in the pile, several (0~2) sutures were added downward upto the level of the dentate line. We have treated 348 patients with third and fourth degree hemorrhoids by either this technique alone (28 patients) or by combination with other techniques (320 patients). The median follow-up period was 39 months. RESULTS This technique showed earlier convalescence and lesser complications than the open hemorroidectomy (OH) (p<0.05): PS vs. OH, hospitalization 2.3 vs. 4.7 days; pain, 4.2 vs. 6.9 days; discharge, 0 vs. 8.6 days; dripping amount of bleeding, 3.8% vs. 13.9%. There was no recurrence in both operative techniques. CONCLUSIONS Because hemorrhoids present diverse shapes and symptoms, various operative techniques may be more efficient than single technique alone. Pile suture appears to be an useful armamentarium in treating hemorrhoids, especially in cases of recurrent or multiple hemorrhoids.
Fifty four patients who received closed hemorrhoidectomy were randomized into two parallel groups and treated with Venitol(R)(a micronized flavonoidic fraction containing diosmin 450 mg and hesperidin 50 mg) (group 1) or placebo (group 2). Venitol(R) was administered at the dosage of three toblets b.i.d. the first four days and two tablets b.i.d following three days. Postoperative analgesia and laxative prescription as well as hospital stay were same in two groups. Though there is no difference of symptoms at D1, improvement of symptoms of complications was greater in group 1 than in group 2 at D18. The clinical severity of postoperative spot-bleeding, pain and anal discharge diminished in both groups but to a greater extent in group 1 (P<0.005). There was no side-effects in using Venitol(R). In summary, Venitol(R) is effective in reducing complications after hemorrhoidectomy.
The incidence of recurrence and anal stricture after surgical hemorrhoidectomy were reported in about 5% and 2.5~13%, respectively Generally, complete and adequate surgery for hemorrhoids was not infrequently neglected because the treatment of hemorrhoids was based on symptoms rather than pathogenesis. This study was performed to analyze the clinical features of recurrent hemorrhoids and to assess the adequate surgical management for the prevention of recurrence. From June 1989 to December 1997, we reviewed 222 (10.6%) recurrent hemorrhoids of surgically treated at Asan Medical Center. Median follow-up period was 38 months (range, 4 months~8 years 9 months). The most common symptom was prolapse (37%). Previous treatment for hemorrhoids was surgical hemouhoidectorny in 99 cases (45%) and sclerotherapy in 111 cases (50%). The most common location and associated complication of recurrent hemorrhoids were sites of major piles (83%) and anal stricture (37%), respectively. Anal stricture was more prevalent in patients with previous sclerotherapy (P<0.05).
In respect to the numbers of combined surgical procedures, one procedure was more frequently performed in the non-complicated recurrent hemorrhoids group (P<0.05) whereas over four in the complicated group (P<0.05). Internal sphincterotomy and anoplasty were frequently needed in the complicated recurrent hemorrhoids (P<0.05). Mean hospital stay and healing time were 5 days (range, 2~26 days) and 21 days (range, 6~180 days), respectively. We had excellent or satisfactory results in 175 of 197 patients (89%). Conclusively, multiple combined surgical procedures in accordance with individual status might be useful in treating the recurrent hemorrhoids. An adequate and complete surgical procedure must be applied during the initial operation of hemorrhoids, especially on major piles.
The pain after a hemorrhoidectomy is widely feared by many patients who are mostly still treated with oral/intramuscular narcotics to control their pain postoperatively. In an effort to decrease posthemorrhoidectomy pain by applying newer methods of analgesia, a prospective trial was conducted to investigate the postoperative analgesic effect of Tarasyn(R) (ketorolac tromethamine) injected into the internal sphincter muscle at the time of the hemorrhoidectomy. Tarasyn(R) is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug introduced for intramuscular injection to control postoperative pain. It's action is peripheral. Therefore, it seems appropriate to inject it directly into the anal sphincter muscles when these are exposed during anorectal procedures. A total loading dose of 60 mg(2 cc, 30 mg/ml) of ketorolac was used intraoperatively. It was injected intramuscularly locally after completion of hemorrhoidectomy. Postoperative pain after a hemorrhoidectomy can be safely controlled in a patient by using newer methods of pain control, including supplemental use of the nonsteroidal analgesic ketorolac, which allows early release of the patient, the day of surgery by diminishing the postoperative pain in our study group. Another important advantage of a local injection of ketorolac was the elimination of urinary retention.
BACKGROUND Various surgical techniques are used for the cure of hemorrhoid according to the extent of disease and severity of symptom. Purpose : We compared the postoperative clinical course after submucosal hemorrhoidectomy and ligation and excision of hemorrhoids.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between February 1995 and May 1997, 221 patients underwent submucosal hemorrhoidectomy and 111 patients underwent ligation and excision of hemorrhoids at the Department of Surgery, Eulji General Hospital. We compared the hospital course and postoperative complications in two group. RESULTS For submucosal hemorrhoidectomy group, mean operation time was 38 minutes, the improvement of postoperative pain, is based on no needs of analgesics after 48 hours of postoperation, was seen in 115 patients(52.0%), wound healing took 19.5 days in average, and mean hospital stay was 6.4 days. For ligation and excision group, these findings were mean operation time 21 minutes, the improvement of postoperative pain in 47 patients(42.3%), wound healing 25.4 days, and hospital stay 7.2 days.
Postoperative complications such as skin tag, edema, and were more common in submucosal hemorrhoidectomy group. But anal fissure, stenosis were more frequent in ligation and excision group, although they did not occur later. CONCLUSION We think that submucosal hemorrhoidectomy is a better method than ligation and excision in respect of postoperative course and complications.
Since Whitehead had described a circular hemorrhoidectomy in 1882, many surgeons adopted it for decades for patients with protruding anal deformity. After a few decades of performing Whitehead operation, devastating complications such as anal stricture, fecal incontinence, and wet anus with mucosal eversion had been reported on the literatures and then it was buried as an abandoned procedure by surgeons for a long period. Recently, a few prominent anal surgeons reported that they could avoid such devastating complications by introducing diverse modifications of the original Whitehead's operation. The authors analyzed 22 patients who had undergone original Whitehead circular hemorrhoidectomy with the technique of preserving most of the perianal skin and W-shaped circular incision during the period from 1991 to 1996, with special regard to the com plications such as anal stricture and anal mucosal eversion which have been debated on so far and reviewed the articles about these issues. In immediate postoperative period, suture failure and resultant non-surgery requiring, mild anal stricture were documented in 3 of the 22 cases(13.6%). On long-term follow-up with the mean period of 44 months (18~79 months) in 14 cases, except those 8 cases that were lost, with phone-call questionaire, 13 patients(93%) had quite normal anal functions. The authors would like to suggest that the original Whitehead's circular hemorrhoidec tomy is a valuable surgical technique to manage the protruding anal deformity if surgeons can avoid well known complications such as anal stricture and anal mucosal eversion by choosing a correct location of initial W-shaped incision to preserve as much perianal skin as possible.
BACKGROUND /AIMS: The caudal anesthesia for anal surgery is simple and effective. Also, it is relatively safe because there is no headache or other neurologic complications. But, during the operation under caudal anesthesia, the unwanted symptoms such as lower abdominal pain or hypotensive symptoms were experienced in some patients. These unwanted symptoms may occur due to anal and lower rectal dilatation.
The precise mechanism is unknown. But we speculated that some sensory nerve endings in rectal submucosa may be involved in this mechanism. So, we think that it is possible to prevent or reduce these symptoms if we block these sensory nerve endings effectively with local anesthetics.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to see whether the locally injected lidocaine can reduce or prevent the unwanted symptoms during anal surgery under caudal anesthesia. METHODS There were 100 consecutive patients in this study who had hemorrhoidectomy with Jack-knife position under caudal anesthesia at our clinic. We divided evenly these 100 patients into two groups, injection and control groups(in each group, 50 patients were included.). In injection-group, We injected 10 cc(100 mg) of 1% lidocaine solution cir cumferentially into the lower rectal submucosa at the beginning of the operation. In control-group, we did not inject lidocaine solution initially, but the lidocaine injection was done during the operation in the same manner in the injection-group if the severe unwanted symptoms occurred. We used Parks-type retractor to dilate the anus and recorded the patient,s complaints. RESULTS In injection-group, male to female ratio was 33:17, mean age was 42.1 years(20~69) and mean operation time was 38.3 minutes(15~80). In control-group, male to female ratio was 25:25, mean age was 43.7 years(17~65) and mean oeration time was 38.5 minutes(15~80). Lower abdominal pain was present in 11 patients(22%) among injection-group and in 37 patients(74%) among control-group(p=0.000). Hypotensive symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, sweating and dizziness were present in 1 patient(2%) among injection-group and in 8 patients(16%) among control-group(p=0.014). We injected lidocaine solution into lower rectal submucosa during the operation in 18 patients with severe symptoms among control-group. The effect of the injected lidocaine solution in 18 control patients was good in 13(72%) and fair in 5(28%). With regard to factors influencing the occurrence of symptoms, there was a tendency of higher occurrence in male, the younger-aged and the longer-operation groups. CONCLUSION The lower rectal submucosal lidocaine injection reduced the unwanted symptoms such as lower abdominal pain and hypotensive symptoms during the anal surgery under the caudal anesthesia.