Malignant disease,Rectal cancer,Postoperative outcome & ERAS,Complication,Surgical technique
- Effectiveness and early postoperative outcomes of palliative endoluminal stenting versus Hartmann’s procedure in acute malignant bowel obstruction in high-risk patients
-
Mohammed Fayek Mahfouz, Tamer M. Saeid Salama, Amr H. Afifi, Hany Mansour Khalil Dabous
-
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(2):141-145. Published online May 11, 2021
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.01.28
-
-
3,499
View
-
161
Download
-
4
Web of Science
-
4
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
The emergency intervention for acute malignant left-sided colonic obstruction remains controversial. Conflicting reports exist regarding the efficacy and safety of endoscopic placement of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) vs. primary surgery. Most reports focus on SEMS insertion as a bridge to surgery.
Methods
An observational nonrandomized study at a single center in Cairo, Egypt included 65 high-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ≥ III, age > 60 years) with acute malignant metastatic (stage IV) colonic obstruction. Twenty-nine patients underwent primary surgery (Hartmann’s procedure, HP), and 35 patients underwent SEMS insertion.
Results
All cases that underwent SEMS insertion were technically successful. The 2 procedures were comparable in clinical success rates but a statistically significant difference existed between them regarding the duration of postoperative hospital stay in the HP and SEMS group (7.7 ± 3.1 days vs. 3.5 ± 0.6 days, retrospectively; P < 0.001), the interval before regaining oral feeding (41.8 ± 26.8 hours vs. 27.6 ± 18.5 hours, retrospectively; P = 0.015), and the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) admission (5.0 ± 1.7 days vs. 1.5 ± 0.7 days, retrospectively; P = 0.035). Six patients (20.7%) in the HP group and 2 patients (5.7%) in the SEMS group required postoperative ICU admission.
Conclusion
SEMS placement provides comparable efficacy and safety to HP in managing acute malignant obstruction of the rectosigmoid region in high-risk individuals, with faster recovery and less hospital and ICU admission time.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Management of obstructed colorectal carcinoma in an emergency setting: An update
Efstathios T Pavlidis, Ioannis N Galanis, Theodoros E Pavlidis
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 16(3): 598. CrossRef - Palliative procedures for advanced obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bingqing Ma, Tianxing Ren, Chengjun Cai, Biao Chen, Jinxiang Zhang
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Laparoscopic Hartmann Procedure—A Surgery That Still Saves Lives
Costel Bradea, Eugen Tarcoveanu, Valentina Munteanu, Cristian Dumitru Lupascu, Florina Delia Andriesi-Rusu, Delia Gabriela Ciobanu, Alin Mihai Vasilescu
Life.2023; 13(4): 914. CrossRef - Recurrence Patterns and Risk Factors after Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Insights for Postoperative Surveillance Strategies
Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim, Ye Ryung Park, Eun Hae Cho, Jeong Min Choo, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak
Cancers.2023; 15(24): 5791. CrossRef