Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Foreign body"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Display
Original Article
Benign GI diease
The Management of Retained Rectal Foreign Body
Ju Hun Kim, Eunhae Um, Sung Min Jung, Yong Chan Shin, Sung-Won Jung, Jae Il Kim, Tae Gil Heo, Myung Soo Lee, Heungman Jun, Pyong Wha Choi
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(5):335-343.   Published online January 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.10.03.1
  • 21,815 View
  • 260 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 9 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Because insertion of a foreign body (FB) into the anus is considered a taboo practice, patients with a retained rectal FB may hesitate to obtain medical care, and attending surgeons may lack experience with removing these FBs. We performed this study to evaluate the clinical characteristics of Korean patients with a retained rectal FB and propose management guideline for such cases based on our experience.
Methods
We retrospectively investigated 14 patients between January 2006 and December 2018. We assessed demographic features, mechanism of FB insertion, clinical course between diagnosis and management, and outcomes.
Results
All patients were male (mean age, 43 years) and presented with low abdominal pain (n = 2), anal bleeding (n = 2), or concern about a retained rectal FB without symptoms (n = 10). FB insertion was most commonly associated with sexual gratification or anal eroticism (n = 11, 78.6%). All patients underwent general anesthesia for anal sphincter relaxation with the exception of 2 who underwent FB removal in the emergency department. FBs were retrieved transanally using a clamp (n = 2), myoma screw (n = 1), clamp application following abdominal wall compression (n = 2), or laparotomy followed by rectosigmoid colon milking (n = 2). Colotomy and primary repair were performed in four patients, and Hartmann operation was performed in one patient with fecal peritonitis. No morbidity or mortality was reported. All patients refused postextraction anorectal functional and anatomical evaluation and psychological counseling.
Conclusion
Retained rectal FB is rare; however, colorectal surgeons should be aware of the various methods that can be used for FB retrieval and the therapeutic algorithm applicable in such cases.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Imaging of anorectal and perineal emergencies – a multimodality review
    Parv Mehta, Sriram Jaganathan, Sree Harsha Tirumani, Arpit Nagar, Devendra Kumar, Vijayanadh Ojili
    Emergency Radiology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impacted drug-packet in the sigmoid colon: a case report in a resource-constrained setting
    Elroy Patrick Weledji, Verdo Zisuh Anutebeh, Ewang Aurelie Ntoube
    Research Connections.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Perilous Plunge: A Unique Case of Rectal Foreign Body
    Shehzadi Rimsha, Danish Aslam, Subas Ali, Shehanshah Muhammed Arqam, Ayesha Kausar
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic method for foreign body removal from descending colon: A case report
    Khairunnisa Che Ghazali, Huzairi Yaacob, Ahmad Shanwani Mohamed Sidek
    World Journal of Surgical Procedures.2024; 14(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive techniques as adjuncts in low- versus high-lying retained rectal foreign bodies of autoerotic nature in young men: a tailored management algorithm with two contrasting case reports from India
    Shubham Kumar Gupta, Vivek Kumar Katiyar, Sumit Sharma, Shashi Prakash Mishra, Satyanam Kumar Bhartiya
    Journal of Trauma and Injury.2024; 37(3): 238.     CrossRef
  • Rectal foreign body of a cosmetic bottle treated successfully by transanal retrieval: A case report
    Congcong Liu, Yuantao Li
    Medicine.2024; 103(47): e40651.     CrossRef
  • Caring for a patient with a rectal foreign body
    Sophia Parsh, Hyun Ah “Esther” Oh, Bridget Parsh
    Nursing.2023; 53(9): 11.     CrossRef
  • Proposal of an algorithm for the management of rectally inserted foreign bodies: a surgical single-center experience with review of the literature
    Stefan Fritz, Hansjörg Killguss, André Schaudt, Christof M. Sommer, Götz M. Richter, Sebastian Belle, Christoph Reissfelder, Steffan Loff, Jörg Köninger
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2022; 407(6): 2499.     CrossRef
  • Deodorant aerosol spray can in the rectum: a potential fire hazard during surgery
    Sivaraman Kumarasamy, Lileswar Kaman, Azhar Ansari, Amarjyoti Hazarika
    BMJ Case Reports.2021; 14(5): e241538.     CrossRef
Case Report
Perforation of the Hepatic Flexure of Colon by an Ingested Toothbrush.
Lee, Min Joo , Cho, En Jung , Lee, Min Ro , Kim, Jong Hun , Hwang, Yong
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2005;21(5):333-336.
  • 1,639 View
  • 11 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
A Foreign body in the gastrointestinal tract is a common clinical problem seen in all age groups and rarely produces symptoms. However, the foreign bodies should be removed if they produce symptoms or remain in the gastrointestinal tract. A 31-year-old man with schizophrenia ingested a 20-cm-sized toothbrush. It passed through the ileocecal valve and penetrated the hepatic flexure of the colon and liver. It was removed successfully by using a surgical procedure. We report this unusual case of colonic perforation by an ingested toothbrush and review the related literature.
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP