Purpose Because insertion of a foreign body (FB) into the anus is considered a taboo practice, patients with a retained rectal FB may hesitate to obtain medical care, and attending surgeons may lack experience with removing these FBs. We performed this study to evaluate the clinical characteristics of Korean patients with a retained rectal FB and propose management guideline for such cases based on our experience.
Methods We retrospectively investigated 14 patients between January 2006 and December 2018. We assessed demographic features, mechanism of FB insertion, clinical course between diagnosis and management, and outcomes.
Results All patients were male (mean age, 43 years) and presented with low abdominal pain (n = 2), anal bleeding (n = 2), or concern about a retained rectal FB without symptoms (n = 10). FB insertion was most commonly associated with sexual gratification or anal eroticism (n = 11, 78.6%). All patients underwent general anesthesia for anal sphincter relaxation with the exception of 2 who underwent FB removal in the emergency department. FBs were retrieved transanally using a clamp (n = 2), myoma screw (n = 1), clamp application following abdominal wall compression (n = 2), or laparotomy followed by rectosigmoid colon milking (n = 2). Colotomy and primary repair were performed in four patients, and Hartmann operation was performed in one patient with fecal peritonitis. No morbidity or mortality was reported. All patients refused postextraction anorectal functional and anatomical evaluation and psychological counseling.
Conclusion Retained rectal FB is rare; however, colorectal surgeons should be aware of the various methods that can be used for FB retrieval and the therapeutic algorithm applicable in such cases.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Imaging of anorectal and perineal emergencies – a multimodality review Parv Mehta, Sriram Jaganathan, Sree Harsha Tirumani, Arpit Nagar, Devendra Kumar, Vijayanadh Ojili Emergency Radiology.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Impacted drug-packet in the sigmoid colon: a case report in a resource-constrained setting Elroy Patrick Weledji, Verdo Zisuh Anutebeh, Ewang Aurelie Ntoube Research Connections.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
A Perilous Plunge: A Unique Case of Rectal Foreign Body Shehzadi Rimsha, Danish Aslam, Subas Ali, Shehanshah Muhammed Arqam, Ayesha Kausar Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic method for foreign body removal from descending colon: A case report Khairunnisa Che Ghazali, Huzairi Yaacob, Ahmad Shanwani Mohamed Sidek World Journal of Surgical Procedures.2024; 14(1): 1. CrossRef
Minimally invasive techniques as adjuncts in low- versus high-lying retained rectal foreign bodies of autoerotic nature in young men: a tailored management algorithm with two contrasting case reports from India Shubham Kumar Gupta, Vivek Kumar Katiyar, Sumit Sharma, Shashi Prakash Mishra, Satyanam Kumar Bhartiya Journal of Trauma and Injury.2024; 37(3): 238. CrossRef
Rectal foreign body of a cosmetic bottle treated successfully by transanal retrieval: A case report Congcong Liu, Yuantao Li Medicine.2024; 103(47): e40651. CrossRef
Caring for a patient with a rectal foreign body Sophia Parsh, Hyun Ah “Esther” Oh, Bridget Parsh Nursing.2023; 53(9): 11. CrossRef
Proposal of an algorithm for the management of rectally inserted foreign bodies: a surgical single-center experience with review of the literature Stefan Fritz, Hansjörg Killguss, André Schaudt, Christof M. Sommer, Götz M. Richter, Sebastian Belle, Christoph Reissfelder, Steffan Loff, Jörg Köninger Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2022; 407(6): 2499. CrossRef
Deodorant aerosol spray can in the rectum: a potential fire hazard during surgery Sivaraman Kumarasamy, Lileswar Kaman, Azhar Ansari, Amarjyoti Hazarika BMJ Case Reports.2021; 14(5): e241538. CrossRef
A Foreign body in the gastrointestinal tract is a common clinical problem seen in all age groups and rarely produces symptoms. However, the foreign bodies should be removed if they produce symptoms or remain in the gastrointestinal tract. A 31-year-old man with schizophrenia ingested a 20-cm-sized toothbrush. It passed through the ileocecal valve and penetrated the hepatic flexure of the colon and liver. It was removed successfully by using a surgical procedure. We report this unusual case of colonic perforation by an ingested toothbrush and review the related literature.