Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
41 "Colonic neoplasms"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Display
Original Articles
Colorectal cancer
How appropriately can generative artificial intelligence platforms, including GPT-4, Gemini, Bing, and Wrtn, answer questions about colon cancer in the Korean language?
Sun Huh
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(3):190-197.   Published online June 25, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00122.0017
  • 5,510 View
  • 56 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This study aims to assess the performance of 4 generative artificial intelligence (AI) platforms—Gemini (formerly Bard), Bing, GPT-4, and Wrtn—in answering questions about colon cancer in the Korean language. Two main research questions guided this study. First, which AI platform provides the most accurate answers? Second, can these AI-generated answers be reliably used to educate patients and their families about colon cancer?
Methods
Ten questions selected by the author were posed to the 4 generative AI platforms on February 22, 2024. Two colorectal surgeons in Korea, each with over 20 years of clinical experience, independently evaluated the answers provided by these generative AI platforms.
Results
The generative AI platforms scored an average of 5.5 out of 10 points. Wrtn achieved the highest score at 6 points, followed by GPT-4 and Gemini, each with 5.5, and Bing, scoring 5 points. The weighted κ for inter-rater reliability was 0.597 (P<0.001). The generative AI platforms performed well in explaining the occult blood test for cancer screening, keyhole surgery, and dietary recommendations for cancer prevention. However, they demonstrated significant limitations in answering more complex topics, such as estimating survival rates following surgery, choosing targeted therapy after surgery, and accurately reporting the mortality rate due to colon cancer in Korea.
Conclusion
The findings suggest that using these generative AI platforms as educational resources for patients and their families regarding colon cancer is premature. Further training on colorectal diseases is required before these AI platforms can be considered reliable information sources for the general public in Korea.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Expert Review on the Quality of Responses to the Questions of Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Validation Study of the Medical Artificial Intelligence System “Myelobot”
    Aleksander Sergeevich Luchinin, O. E. Ochirova, V. G. Potapenko, V. V. Ryabchikova
    Clinical Oncohematology.2026; 19(1): 81.     CrossRef
  • Agentic artificial intelligence is the future of cancer detection and diagnosis
    Sayedur Rahman, Md. Tanzib Hosain, Nafiz Fahad, Md. Kishor Morol, Md. Jakir Hossen
    Array.2026; 29: 100676.     CrossRef
  • Role of Medical Editors in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence
    Sun Huh
    Healthcare Informatics Research.2025; 31(4): 317.     CrossRef
  • Temporal evolution of large language models (LLMs) in oncology
    Zilin Qiu, Aimin Jiang, Chang Qi, Wenyi Gan, Lingxuan Zhu, Weiming Mou, Dongqiang Zeng, Mingjia Xiao, Guangdi Chu, Shengkun Peng, Hank Z. H. Wong, Lin Zhang, Hengguo Zhang, Xinpei Deng, Quan Cheng, Bufu Tang, Yaxuan Wang, Jian Zhang, Anqi Lin, Peng Luo
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
Complications
Improved outcomes with cyanoacrylate glue for ileocolic anastomosis in right colectomy: a multicenter study
Daniela Rega, Ernesto De Giulio, Raffaele De Luca, Andrea Muratore, Marco Milone, Giuseppe Sica, Paolo Millo, Carmela Cervone, Nicola Cillara, Patrizia Marsanic, Brunella Maria Pirozzi, Valeria Grazia Malagnino, Pietro Anoldo, Marcello Calabrò, Giovanni De Palma, Michele Simone, Paolo Delrio
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(4):293-302.   Published online June 4, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00899.0128
  • 5,899 View
  • 153 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Anastomotic leaks (AL) remain a major complication following right colectomy for colon cancer. This multicenter, prospective, observational study evaluated the efficacy of Glubran 2, a cyanoacrylate-based sealant, in reducing the incidence of AL by reinforcing ileocolic anastomoses.
Methods
The study enrolled 380 patients undergoing right colectomy for colon cancer across 7 Italian hospitals. Glubran 2 was applied to reinforce ileocolic anastomoses. The primary endpoint was a 50% reduction in AL incidence from a baseline of 6.18% within 10 days after surgery. Secondary endpoints included examining the correlation between AL and preexisting risk factors and determining the rate of anastomotic bleeding. Statistical analyses employed binomial tests and logistic regression.
Results
The AL rate was reduced to 1.85% compared to the reference rate of 6.18% (P<0.01). Glubran 2 exhibited a protective effect even in patients with preexisting risk factors such as smoking, diabetes, or prior surgeries; none of these factors was significantly associated with AL (P>0.05). Surgical technique (P=0.687), anastomosis technique (P=0.998), and anastomosis type (P=0.998) did not influence AL rates. Operation time was similar across groups (P=0.613), and anastomotic bleeding occurred in 1.3% of cases, with no association with AL (P=0.989).
Conclusion
Glubran 2 was safely applied to ileocolic anastomoses, significantly reducing AL rates and potentially providing a protective effect even in patients with known risk factors. Its hemostatic and bacteriostatic properties support improved postoperative outcomes, highlighting its potential as an effective adjunct in colorectal surgery. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings and explore broader applications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comments on “Improved outcomes with cyanoacrylate glue for ileocolic anastomosis in right colectomy: a multicenter study”
    Nabil Mohammad Azmi, Mohd Firdaus Mohd Hayati, Zairul Azwan Mohd Azwan
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(6): 596.     CrossRef
  • In reply to: Comments on "Improved outcomes with cyanoacrylate glue for ileocolic anastomosis in right colectomy: a multicenter study”
    Daniela Rega, Carmela Cevone, Paolo Delrio
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(6): 598.     CrossRef
Minimally invasive surgery
Impact of single-port laparoscopic approach on scar assessment by patients and observers: a multicenter retrospective study
Sung Uk Bae, Kyeong Eui Kim, Chang-Woo Kim, Ji-Hoon Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Yoon-Suk Lee, Seong Kyu Baek, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(2):154-161.   Published online April 29, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00563.0080
  • 4,494 View
  • 80 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to compare the wound cosmesis of a single-incision approach on scar assessment after laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.
Methods
This study included 32 patients undergoing single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and 61 patients undergoing multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for colon cancer at 3 tertiary referral hospitals between September 2011 and December 2019. We modified and applied the Korean version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) to assess cosmetic outcomes. To assess the interobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient values for the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), the surgeons evaluated 5 images of postoperative scars.
Results
No significant differences were observed in the time before the return of normal bowel function, time to sips of water and soft diet initiation, length of in-hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate. The SPLS group had a shorter total incision length than the MPLS group. The POSAS favored the SPLS approach, revealing significant differences in the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), OSAS, and overall scores. The SPLS approach was an independent factor influencing the POSAS, PSAS, and OSAS scores. Eleven colorectal surgeons had a significantly substantial intraclass coefficient.
Conclusion
The cosmetic outcomes of SPLS as assessed by the patients and surgeons were superior to those of MPLS in colon cancer. Reducing the number of ports is an independent factor affecting scar assessment by patients and observers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Investigating the Efficacy of Layered Moderate Tension Reduction Suturing in Facial Aesthetic Surgery
    Gui H Wang, Jin Y Gang, Yan Li
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
Minimally invasive surgery
Robotic surgery may lead to reduced postoperative inflammatory stress in colon cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis
Eun Ji Park, Gyong Tae Noh, Yong Joon Lee, Min Young Park, Seung Yoon Yang, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Kang Young Lee, Byung Soh Min
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):594-601.   Published online December 6, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00171.0024
  • 3,464 View
  • 93 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Robot-assisted surgery is readily applied to every type of colorectal surgeries. However, studies showing the safety and feasibility of robotic surgery (RS) have dealt with rectal cancer more than colon cancer. This study aimed to investigate how technical advantages of RS can translate into actual clinical outcomes that represent postoperative systemic response.
Methods
This study retrospectively reviewed consecutive cases in a single tertiary medical center in Korea. Patients with primary colon cancer who underwent curative resection between 2006 and 2012 were included. Propensity score matching was done to adjust baseline patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, tumor profile, pathologic stage, operating surgeon, surgery extent) between open surgery (OS), laparoscopic surgery (LS), and RS groups.
Results
After propensity score matching, there were 66 patients in each group for analysis, and there was no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics. Maximal postoperative leukocyte count was lowest in the RS group and highest in the OS group (P=0.021). Similar results were observed for postoperative neutrophil count (P=0.024). Postoperative prognostic nutritional index was highest in the RS group and lowest in the OS group (P<0.001). The time taken to first flatus and soft diet resumption was longest in the OS group and shortest in the RS group (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Among all groups, other short-term postoperative outcomes such as hospital stay and complications did not show significant difference, and oncological survival results were similar.
Conclusion
Better postoperative inflammatory indices in the RS group may correlate with their faster recovery of bowel motility and diet resumption compared to LS and OS groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Open, Laparoscopic, and robotic approaches in colorectal surgery: a comprehensive review with focus on colorectal cancer
    Farhad Shafiei, Fatemeh Kani, Nargess Porkar, Maede Mirzaee, Fatemeh Heidarzadeh, Mahdi Kolivand, Soheila Behdad, Amir Shokri
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Übergangsphase zur roboterassistierten Chirurgie beim kolorektalen Karzinom: eine vergleichende konsekutive Kohortenstudie
    U. A. Dietz, M. Kalisvaart, S. Maksimovic, R. Frey, M. Ramser, B. M. Erhart, U. Pfefferkorn
    Die Chirurgie.2025; 96(11): 942.     CrossRef
  • Comparative clinical efficacy of three surgical modalities for the treatment of malignant tumours of the left hemicolon
    Hao Chen, Dong-Ping Han, Jian-Yang Xiong, Zhen-Sheng Li, Teng-Cheng Hu, Zheng-Rong Li, Yi Cao
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of robotic vs. open distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis of propensity-score-matched studies
    Junjie Wang, Yuanjun Liu, Yakun Wu
    Frontiers in Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Guardix-SG in Preventing Postoperative Bowel Complications After Radical Cystectomy: A Single-Arm Prospective Observational Study
    Jiwoong Yu, Wan Song, Minyong Kang, Hyun Hwan Sung, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong
    Journal of Urologic Oncology.2025; 23(3): 253.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic surgery should be a viable option for T4 colon cancer: evidence from a propensity score matching analysis
    Xiaomei Jiang, Hang Zhou, Zhaoyang Zheng, Xiaodong Wang, Zongguang Zhou, Lie Yang
    Updates in Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
ERAS
Impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program on the management of complications after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer
Victoria Weets, Hélène Meillat, Jacques Emmanuel Saadoun, Marie Dazza, Cécile de Chaisemartin, Bernard Lelong
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(5):440-450.   Published online September 20, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00850.0121
  • 10,691 View
  • 238 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) reduces postoperative complications (POCs) after colorectal surgery; however, its impact on the management of POCs remains unclear. This study compared the diagnosis and management of POCs before and after implementing our ERAS protocol after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer and examined the short- and mid-term oncologic impacts.
Methods
This single-center, retrospective study evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer between 2012 and 2021, focusing on the incidence of POCs within 90 days. We compared outcomes before (standard group) and after (ERAS group) the implementation of our ERAS protocol in January 2016.
Results
Significantly fewer patients in the ERAS group developed POCs (standard vs. ERAS, 136 of 380 patients [35.8%] vs.136 of 660 patients [20.6%]; P<0.01). The ERAS group had a significantly shorter mean total length of stay after POCs (13.1 days vs. 11.4 days, P=0.04), and the rates of life-threatening complications (6.7% vs. 0.7%) and 1-year mortality (7.4% vs. 1.5%) were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the standard group. Among patients with anastomotic complications, laparoscopic reoperation was significantly more common in the ERAS group than in the standard group (8.3% vs. 75.0%, P<0.01). Among patients with postoperative ileus, the diagnosis and recovery times were significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the standard group, resulting in a shorter total length of stay (13.5 days vs. 10 days, P<0.01).
Conclusion
The implementation of an ERAS protocol did not eliminate all POCs, but it did accelerate their diagnosis and management and improved patient outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The ultrasonographic measure of postoperative day 2 gastric volume may be a useful tool to improve the management of colorectal surgery patients: results of an ancillary study
    Aurélien Venara, Anita Paisant, Julien Gillet, Lise Morgado, Emeline Rebmann, Jean-Francois Hamel
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Less is more: simplifying patient-centered cancer care
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(3): 173.     CrossRef
  • Research Progress on the Application of ERAS Concept in the Perioperative Period of Colorectal Cancer Patients
    梦云 孙
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(08): 1208.     CrossRef
  • Can Surgical Approach and Postoperative Factors Impact Survival in Rectal Cancer? Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Insights
    Ahmed Abdelsamad, Seyidali Mirzazada, Karsten Ridwelski, Mohamad Nour Nasif, Florian Gebauer
    Cancer Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimizing postoperative pain management in minimally invasive colorectal surgery
    Soo Young Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 525.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Colonic stenting: is the bridge to surgery worth its cost? A cost-effectiveness analysis at a single Asian institution
Michelle Shi Qing Khoo, Frederick H. Koh, Sharmini Su Sivarajah, Leonard Ming-Li Ho, Darius Kang-Lie Aw, Cheryl Xi-Zi Chong, Fung Joon Foo, Winson Jianhong Tan
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):555-563.   Published online August 5, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00738.0105
  • 8,662 View
  • 151 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
In patients with acute left-sided colonic obstruction, stenting can convert an emergency operation into a semi-elective procedure. However, its use continues to be debated. We performed a cost-effective analysis using our institution’s experiences.
Methods
Endoscopic, surgical, and financial details were prospectively collected for patients who presented with acute colonic obstruction and underwent stenting between 2019 and 2022. Outcomes were defined as technical/clinical success and successful surgical resection. The financial cost of stenting was compared with the expected cost without stenting.
Results
Forty patients were included, with 29 undergoing definitive resection. The most common pathology was primary colon cancer (27 patients, 93%). Endoscopic stenting had high technical (90%) and clinical (83%) success rates, with low rates of complications such as perforation (2 patients, 7%) and migration (0 patients, 0%). As a bridge to surgery, the median procedure time was 226 minutes and the surgical outcomes also showed a low rate of complications (3 patients, 11%), such as anastomotic leakage (0 patients, 0%), intraabdominal abscesses (2 patients, 7%), and 30-day postoperative mortality (0 patients, 0%). The cumulative costs with colonic stenting were $32,900, while the expected costs with emergency surgery, including stoma reversal, were $40,700 (healthcare cost-savings of $7,800 per person). The difference was mainly due to the avoidance of upfront emergency surgery. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 0.81, favoring colonic stenting over upfront emergency surgery.
Conclusion
Colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery is safe and cost-effective for treating left-sided colonic obstruction with high success rates and low complication rates.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Nationwide Analysis of Right-Sided Colonic Stenting: Rarely Used but Reduces Stoma Creation Significantly
    Khalid Ahmed, Ahmed Dirweesh, Zachary D. Leslie, Yasmin Ali, Nabeel Azeem, Eric Wise, Cyrus Jahansouz, Martin Freeman, Stuart K. Amateau
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2026; 28(1): 250952.     CrossRef
  • Global Use and Outcomes of Endoscopic Stenting in Acute Malignant Left-Sided Colonic Obstruction: A Secondary Analysis of APOLLO, An International, Prospective Cohort Study

    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(12): 1458.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Oncologic outcomes and associated factors of colon cancer patients aged 70 years and older
Byeo Lee Lim, In Ja Park, Jun-Soo Ro, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(3):198-206.   Published online August 5, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00367.0052
  • 7,848 View
  • 94 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The aim of this study was to examine the prognosis and associated risk factors, including adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx), in elderly patients with colon cancer.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who underwent radical resection for colon cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 at Asan Medical Center. The effects of stage, risk factors, and chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared in patients aged ≥70 and <70 years.
Results
Of 3,313 patients, 933 (28.1%) was aged ≥70 years. Of the 1,921 patients indicated for adjuvant CTx, 1,294 of 1,395 patients (92.8%) aged <70 years and 369 of 526 patients (70.2%) aged ≥70 years received adjuvant CTx. Old age (≥70 years) was independently associated with RFS in overall cohort. Among patients aged ≥70 years indicated for adjuvant CTx, the 5-year OS (81.6% vs. 50.4%, P<0.001) and RFS (82.9% vs. 67.4%, P=0.025) rates were significantly higher in those who did than did not receive adjuvant CTx. Additionally, adjuvant CTx was confirmed as independent risk factor of both OS and RFS in patients aged ≥70 years indicated for adjuvant CTx.
Conclusion
Old age was associated with poor RFS and adjuvant CTx had benefits in OS as well as RFS in elderly patients eligible for adjuvant CTx.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Immunological changes and recovery-related factors in older patients with colon cancer: A pilot trial
    Byeo Lee Lim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Yousun Ko, Kyung Won Kim, In Ja Park
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2025; 16(3): 102200.     CrossRef
  • Stage II-III colorectal cancer in geriatric patients: Clinicopathological features and chemotherapy utilization
    Yakup Duzkopru, Özlem Doğan
    Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory.2025; 16(1): 118.     CrossRef
  • Does Oxaliplatin-based Adjuvant Therapy Benefit Older Colorectal Cancer Patients?
    Peter Hofland
    Onco Zine - The International Oncology Network.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Disease-Free Survival of Patients with Stage II Stroma-Rich Colorectal Adenocarcinomas with Microsatellite Stability
    Ángel Romo-Navarro, Juan Ruiz Martín, Irene García-Camacha Gutiérrez, Mariano Amo-Salas, María Recuero Pradillo, César Sánchez-Muñoz, Cristina María Murillo Lázaro, Esperanza Carabias López, Raquel Sánchez Simón, Carlos Quimbayo-Arcila, Yasmina Hernández
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2025; 26(24): 11795.     CrossRef
  • Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280.     CrossRef
Video
Video clip
Cranial-first approach for laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy
Kyong-Min Kang, Heung-Kwon Oh, Hong-Min Ahn, Tae-Gyun Lee, Hye-Rim Shin, Mi-Jeong Choi, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):282-284.   Published online June 19, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00661.0094
  • 7,306 View
  • 229 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation with D3 lymphadenectomy are important surgical principles for improving oncological outcomes in colon cancer. The cranial-first approach is a colonic mobilization–first approach to radical right hemicolectomy, which has several advantages, including early feasibility assessment, safe dissection from surrounding organs, preestablished inferior margin of lymph node dissection, and revelation of the tangible anatomy of the tributaries of the gastrocolic trunk. This video demonstrates the cranial-first approach to radical right hemicolectomy in a 66-year-old man with locally advanced cecal cancer.
Original Article
Minimally invasive surgery
Preoperative localization of potentially invisible colonic lesions on the laparoscopic operation field: using autologous blood tattooing
Ji Yeon Mun, Hyunjoon An, Ri Na Yoo, Hyeon-Min Cho, Bong-Hyeon Kye
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):225-233.   Published online June 19, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00059.0008
  • 5,396 View
  • 203 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Preoperative colonoscopic (POC) localization is recommended for patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colectomy for early colon cancer. Among the various localization method, POC tattooing localization has been widely used. Several dyes have been used for tattooing, but dye has disadvantages, including foreign body reactions. For this reason, we have used autologous blood tattooing for POC localization. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the autologous blood tattooing method.
Methods
This study included patients who required POC localization of the colonic neoplasm among the patients who were scheduled for elective colon resection. The indication for localization was early colon cancer (clinically T1 or T2) or colonic neoplasms that could not be resected endoscopically. POC autologous blood tattooing was performed after saline injection, and 2 hemoclips were applied.
Results
A total of 45 patients who underwent autologous blood tattooing and laparoscopic colectomy were included in this study. All POC localization sites were visible in the laparoscopic view. POC localization sites showed almost perfect agreement with intraoperative surgical findings. There were no complications like bowel perforation, peritonitis, hemoperitoneum, and mesenteric hematoma.
Conclusion
Autologous blood is a safe and effective agent for localizing materials that can replace previous dyes. However, a large prospective case-control study is required for the routine application of this procedure in early colon cancer or colonic neoplasms.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Meeting report on the 8th Asian Science Editors’ Conference and Workshop 2024
    Eun Jung Park
    Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 66.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Localization, Margins, and Intraoperative Endoscopy in Minimally Invasive Sigmoid Colectomy: A Matched Cohort
    Chang-Lin Lin, Feng-Fan Chiang, Ming-Cheng Chen, Chun-Yu Lin, Shang-Chih Huang, Ching-Shiang Lin
    Journal of Surgical Research.2025; 315: 847.     CrossRef
Guideline
Colorectal cancer
Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment
Hyo Seon Ryu, Hyun Jung Kim, Woong Bae Ji, Byung Chang Kim, Ji Hun Kim, Sung Kyung Moon, Sung Il Kang, Han Deok Kwak, Eun Sun Kim, Chang Hyun Kim, Tae Hyung Kim, Gyoung Tae Noh, Byung-Soo Park, Hyeung-Min Park, Jeong Mo Bae, Jung Hoon Bae, Ni Eun Seo, Chang Hoon Song, Mi Sun Ahn, Jae Seon Eo, Young Chul Yoon, Joon-Kee Yoon, Kyung Ha Lee, Kyung Hee Lee, Kil-Yong Lee, Myung Su Lee, Sung Hak Lee, Jong Min Lee, Ji Eun Lee, Han Hee Lee, Myong Hoon Ihn, Je-Ho Jang, Sun Kyung Jeon, Kum Ju Chae, Jin-Ho Choi, Dae Hee Pyo, Gi Won Ha, Kyung Su Han, Young Ki Hong, Chang Won Hong, Jung-Myun Kwak, Korean Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary Committee
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):89-113.   Published online April 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00059.0008
  • 17,740 View
  • 474 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 12 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients’ values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Optimal extent of lymph node dissection in clinical early-stage right colon cancer: a retrospective analysis
    Hyeung-min Park, Jaram Lee, Soo Young Lee, Suk Hee Heo, Yong Yeon Jeong, Hyeong Rok Kim, Chang Hyun Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2025; 108(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Microsatellite Instability on the Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of Colon Cancer and the Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative Abdominal CT Scans
    Rıdvan Yavuz, Orhan Aras, Hüseyin Çiyiltepe, Onur İlkay Dinçer, Ahmet Şükrü Alparslan, Tebessüm Çakır
    Diagnostics.2025; 15(2): 190.     CrossRef
  • Epigenetic Regulation of Nuclear Factor Erythroid-2-Related Factor 2 in Colorectal Cancer Cells Resistant to Ionizing Radiation
    Kyoung Ah Kang, Jinny Park, Mei Jing Piao, Pincha Devage Sameera Madushan Fernando, Herath Mudiyanselage Udari Lakmini Herath, Herath Mudiyanselage Maheshika Madhuwanthi Senavirathna, Jung-Hwan Kim, Suk Ju Cho, Jin Won Hyun
    Biomolecules & Therapeutics.2025; 33(1): 182.     CrossRef
  • Meeting report on the 8th Asian Science Editors’ Conference and Workshop 2024
    Eun Jung Park
    Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 66.     CrossRef
  • The Diagnostic Value of Virtual Colonoscopy in Colonic Diseases
    İhsaniye Süer Doğan, Esin Çakmakçı Midia, Yıldıran Songür, Baki Hekimoğlu
    Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory.2025; 16(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • National Guidelines for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Peritoneal Malignancies: A Worldwide Systematic Review and Recommendations of Strength Analysis
    Marco Tonello, Carola Cenzi, Elisa Pizzolato, Manuela Martini, Pierluigi Pilati, Antonio Sommariva
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2025; 32(8): 5795.     CrossRef
  • Advancements in Image‐Based Analyses for Morphology and Staging of Colon Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
    Samuel Arthur Ameyaw, Derrick Adu Afari, John Boateng, Marcello Maida
    BioMed Research International.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Curcumin in colorectal cancer: preventive strategies and therapeutic mechanisms
    Amit Sharma, Bhavin Parekh, Vinay Patil, Usamah Sayed, Renuka Jyothi, Priya Priyadarshini Nayak, Ashish Singh Chauhan, Siya Singla
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 2023 Korean Multidisciplinary Guidelines for Colon Cancer Management: Summary of Radiological Points
    Nieun Seo, Hyo Seon Ryu, Myungsu Lee, Sun Kyung Jeon, Kum Ju Chae, Joon-Kee Yoon, Kyung Su Han, Ji Eun Lee, Jae Seon Eo, Young Chul Yoon, Sung Kyung Moon, Hyun Jung Kim, Jung-Myun Kwak
    Korean Journal of Radiology.2024; 25(9): 769.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping on Improving Diagnostic Values of CT D3 Lymph Node Staging for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Mi Sook Yun, ChangYeop Kim, In Young Lee, Su Bum Park, Dong-Hoon Shin, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3496.     CrossRef
  • Nuclear medicine based multimodal molecular imaging facilitates precision medicine for gastrointestinal tumors
    Jing Zhao, Fei Wang, Rong-Fu Wang
    World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2024; 32(10): 727.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Early Oral Feeding on Postoperative Outcomes after Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Soo Young Lee, Eon Chul Han
    Digestive Surgery.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
Original Article
Minimally invasive surgery
Learning curve for single-port robot-assisted colectomy
Moon Suk Choi, Seong Hyeon Yun, Sung Chul Lee, Jung Kyong Shin, Yoon Ah Park, Jungwook Huh, Yong Beom Cho, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):44-51.   Published online December 20, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00745.0106
  • 6,809 View
  • 260 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Since the introduction of robotic surgery, robots for colorectal cancer have replaced laparoscopic surgery, and a single-port robot (SPR) platform has been launched and is being used to treat patients. We analyzed the learning curve and initial complications of using an SPR platform in colorectal cancer surgery.
Methods
We reviewed 39 patients who underwent SPR colectomy from April to October 2019. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon using an SPR device. A learning curve was generated using the cumulative sum methodology to assess changes in total operation time, docking time, and surgeon console time. We grouped the patients into 3 groups according to the time period: the first 11 were phase 1, the next 11 were phase 2, and the last 17 were phase 3.
Results
The mean age of the patients was 61.28±13.03 years, and they had a mean body mass index of 23.79±2.86 kg/m2. Among the patients, 23 (59.0%) were male, and 16 (41.0%) were female. The average operation time was 186.59±51.30 minutes, the average surgeon console time was 95.49±35.33 minutes, and the average docking time (time from skin incision to robot docking) was 14.87±10.38 minutes. The surgeon console time differed significantly among the different phases (P<0.001). Complications occurred in 8 patients: 2 ileus, 2 postoperation hemoglobin changes, 3 urinary retentions, and 1 complicated fluid collection.
Conclusion
In our experience, the learning curve for SPR colectomy was achieved after the 18th case.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical applications of the da Vinci Single-Port robotic system for treatment of colorectal cancer: a narrative review
    Gyu-Seog Choi, Hye Jin Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2026; 110(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review of the Da Vinci® Single-Port system (DVSP) in the context of colorectal surgery
    Francesco Brucchi, Isacco Montroni, Roberto Cirocchi, Giovanni Taffurelli, Marco Vitellaro, Gianluca Mascianà, Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Sara Lauricella
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessing the learning curve in robot-assisted intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis and transrectal extraction (NICE) procedure: from Initial Learning to Mastery
    Jacques Bistre-Varon, Muhammed Elhadi, Robert Wei, Jimena Alcocer-Barrios, Ryan Gunter, Joshua Coursey, Priya Prakash, Erin McAtee, Haley Lanser, Rachel Ellsworth, Matthew Weaver, Jean-Paul LeFave, Eric M. Haas
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Short-term outcomes of single-port robotic surgery versus single-port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a multicenter matched-cohort analysis
    Gyoung Tae Noh, Young Il Kim, Seung Ho Song, Hye Jin Kim, Song-Soo Yang, Yong Sik Yoon, Ji Hoon Kim, Hyung Jin Kim, Byung Mo Kang, Chang Woo Kim, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun Gi Kim, Yoon Suk Lee
    Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(12): 8444.     CrossRef
  • Application of the Da Vinci Single‐Port (SP) Robot in General Surgery: A First Systematic Review
    Antonio Cubisino, Maurice Chazal, Fabrizio Panaro
    The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Da Vinci single-port robotic system current application and future perspective in general surgery: A scoping review
    Francesco Celotto, Niccolò Ramacciotti, Alberto Mangano, Giacomo Danieli, Federico Pinto, Paula Lopez, Alvaro Ducas, Jessica Cassiani, Luca Morelli, Gaya Spolverato, Francesco Maria Bianco
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(9): 4814.     CrossRef
  • Wristed articulated instrumentation for single‐incision plus one‐port laparoscopic surgery for obstructed sigmoid colon cancer—A video vignette
    Sung Uk Bae
    Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(9): 1782.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the da Vinci single-port system in colorectal cancer surgery: a scoping review
    Arcangelo Picciariello, Alfredo Annicchiarico, Gaetano Gallo, Agnese Dezi, Ugo Grossi
    Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(7): 2515.     CrossRef
Reviews
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Colorectal cancer,Prognosis,Biomarker & risk factor
Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer
Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(2):97-108.   Published online March 29, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.01004.0143
  • 11,769 View
  • 223 Download
  • 38 Web of Science
  • 40 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
We aimed to review whether pretreatment inflammatory markers reflect the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colon cancer, rectal cancer, colon and rectal cancers, and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We found that pretreatment complete blood count and blood chemistry tests reflect short-term and long-term oncological outcomes in patients with CRC. Specifically, in patients with colon cancer, hypoalbuminemia was associated with worse postoperative morbidity, mortality, and inferior survival. In patients with rectal cancer, elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and thrombocytosis were associated with postoperative complications, poor overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). A high C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) was associated with poor OS and DFS. In patients with metastatic CRC, increased NLR and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were associated with poor OS, DFS, and progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, high CAR and a low albumin/globulin ratio on blood chemistry tests were associated with poor OS and PFS. Although universal cut-off values were not available, various types of pretreatment laboratory markers could be utilized as adjuncts to predict prognosis in patients with CRC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Correlation between inflammatory markers and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) failure in laparoscopic colectomy
    Ji Hyeong Song, Yoonsoo Shin, Kyung Ha Lee, Ji Yeon Kim, Jin Soo Kim
    Surgery Today.2025; 55(10): 1353.     CrossRef
  • Albumin-bilirubin score: a promising predictor of postoperative distant metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer
    Xiuying Shi, Shuyi Zhang, Baijun Bao, Hui Cong, Xiaomin Lu, Aijun Shi
    Biomarkers in Medicine.2025; 19(3): 73.     CrossRef
  • Whole transcriptome analysis identifies ALB-EEF1A1 fusion as a novel biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Deeksha Rikhari, Ankit Srivastava, Sandhya Rai, Mubashra, Srinivas Patnaik, Sameer Srivastava
    Cancer Pathogenesis and Therapy.2025; 3(5): 420.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Implications of the C-Reactive Protein–Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer
    Koji Amano, Satomi Okamura, Tomofumi Miura, Vickie E. Baracos, Naoharu Mori, Tatsuma Sakaguchi, Yu Uneno, Hiroto Ishiki, Yusuke Hiratsuka, Naosuke Yokomichi, Jun Hamano, Mika Baba, Masanori Mori, Tatsuya Morita
    Journal of Palliative Medicine.2025; 28(5): 592.     CrossRef
  • Immunological changes and recovery-related factors in older patients with colon cancer: A pilot trial
    Byeo Lee Lim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Yousun Ko, Kyung Won Kim, In Ja Park
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2025; 16(3): 102200.     CrossRef
  • Advancing Colorectal Cancer Diagnostics from Barium Enema to AI-Assisted Colonoscopy
    Dumitru-Dragos Chitca, Valentin Popescu, Anca Dumitrescu, Cristian Botezatu, Bogdan Mastalier
    Diagnostics.2025; 15(8): 974.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic scoring system using inflammation- and nutrition-related biomarkers to predict prognosis in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients
    Ke-Jin Li, Zi-Yi Zhang, Kuan Wang, Subinur Sulayman, Xiang-Yue Zeng, Juan Liu, Yi Chen, Ze-Liang Zhao
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Role of Pre-Treatment Inflammatory Biomarkers in Predicting Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer
    Yunus Emre Altıntaş, Ahmet Bilici, Özcan Yıldız, Oğuzcan Kınıkoğlu, Ömer Fatih Ölmez
    Medicina.2025; 61(5): 865.     CrossRef
  • Combining Preoperative and Postoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index as an Improved Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
    Jong Min Lee, Jeonghyun Kang
    Journal of Inflammation Research.2025; Volume 18: 8935.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic role of preoperative inflammatory markers in postoperative lung metastasis of colorectal cancer: a retrospective study
    Jiukang Sun, Weili Xiong, Zhang Fang, Chuanjun Song
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of predictive models for disease-free survival and overall survival in non-metastatic right-sided colon adenocarcinoma patients based on inflammatory and nutritional indices
    Yifan Zhang, Yun Zhou, Chengjun Wu, Cheng Ma
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Immunomarkers could predict overall survival and disease-free survival after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery due to locally advanced rectal cancer
    Miguel A. Bonilla-Cozar, Anabel Garcia-Leon, Carlos J. Garcia-Sanchez, M. Luisa Reyes-Diaz, Irene Ramallo-Solis, Fernando De la Portilla, Javier Padillo, Rosa M. Jimenez-Rodriguez
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2025; 103(10): 800199.     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory Markers Associated With Radiation-Induced Lung Injury, Metastasis and Mortality After Breast Cancer Treatment
    Jarle Karlsen, Guro Giskeødegård, Torgrim Tandstad, Øyvind Salvesen, Torgeir Wethal, Randi Johansen Reidunsdatter
    Advances in Radiation Oncology.2025; 10(12): 101894.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Cancer—One Disease, Two Fires: Distinct Inflammatory Landscapes in Colon and Rectal Cancer
    Catalin Vladut Ionut Feier, Florin Grama, Georgiana Viorica Moise, Razvan Constantin Vonica, Vasile Gaborean, Alaviana Monique Faur, Vladut Iosif Rus, Calin Muntean
    Diagnostics.2025; 15(18): 2387.     CrossRef
  • Development and external validation of a multivariate model for predicting pneumonia in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: a retrospective study
    Xiao Hua Yang, Ju Zhang, Xi Sheng Xie, Wen Wu Tang
    PeerJ.2025; 13: e20070.     CrossRef
  • Immunomarkers could predict overall survival and disease-free survival after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery due to locally advanced rectal cancer
    Miguel A. Bonilla-Cozar, Anabel Garcia-Leon, Carlos J. Garcia-Sanchez, M. Luisa Reyes-Diaz, Irene Ramallo-Solis, Fernando De la Portilla, Javier Padillo, Rosa M. Jimenez-Rodriguez
    Cirugía Española.2025; 103(10): 800199.     CrossRef
  • Web-based explainable machine-learning tool for predicting five-year recurrence of colorectal cancer after curative resection: multicentre retrospective cohort study
    Chi-Sheng Chen, Tai-Han Lin, Hsing-Yi Chung, Ming-Jr Jian, Chih-Kai Chang, Cherng-Lih Perng, Ping-Ying Chang, Wen-Yen Huang, Chao-Yang Chen, Yu-Chun Lin, Hung-Sheng Shang
    Discover Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Correlation of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and serum cholinesterase in colorectal cancer patients: a cross-sectional study
    Tania A. PRAMUDYAWARDHANI, Uleng BAHRUN, Mutmainnah MUTMAINNAH, Warsinggih WARSINGGIH, Ibrahim A. SAMAD, Burhanuddin BAHAR
    Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • THE ROLE OF SERUM MIDKINE IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS OF THE COLORECTAL CARCINOMA
    Ali H. Abd-Allah, Haider A. Jabbar, Mazen J. Ibrahim
    Military Medical Science Letters.2024; 93(3): 274.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the efficacy and safety of single-port versus multi-port robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis
    Hye Jin Kim, Gyu-Seog Choi, Jun Seok Park, Soo Yeun Park, Seung Ho Song, Sung Min Lee, Min Hye Jeong
    Surgery.2024; 175(2): 297.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of Timely Initiation and Completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II/III Colorectal Adenocarcinoma
    Said Alnajjar, Sami Shoucair, Anyelin Almanzar, Kan Zheng, David Lisle, Vinay Gupta
    The American Surgeon™.2024; 90(11): 2724.     CrossRef
  • Associations of lifestyle characteristics with circulating immune markers in the general population based on NHANES 1999 to 2014
    Linfen Guo, Yating Huang, Jing He, Deng Li, Wei Li, Haitao Xiao, Xuewen Xu, Yange Zhang, Ru Wang
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer with intraoperative use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging
    Tatsunosuke Harada, Masakatsu Numata, Shota Izukawa, Yosuke Atsumi, Keisuke Kazama, Sho Sawazaki, Teni Godai, Hiroyuki Mushiake, Nobuhiro Sugano, Mamoru Uchiyama, Akio Higuchi, Hiroshi Tamagawa, Yusuke Suwa, Jun Watanabe, Tsutomu Sato, Chikara Kunisaki, A
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(8): 4236.     CrossRef
  • The conditional recurrence-free survival after R0 hepatectomy for locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A competing risk analysis based on inflammation-nutritional status
    Guizhong Huang, Pu Xi, Zehui Yao, Chongyu Zhao, Xiaohui Li, Xiaojun Lin
    Heliyon.2024; 10(13): e33931.     CrossRef
  • Predictive value of flexible proctosigmoidoscopy and laboratory findings for complete clinical responses after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Alireza Hadizadeh, Hamed Kazemi-Khaledi, Mohammad-Sadegh Fazeli, Seyed-Mohsen Ahmadi-Tafti, Amir Keshvari, Reza Akbari-Asbagh, Mohammad-Reza Keramati, Alireza Kazemeini, Amir-Reza Fazeli, Behnam Behboudi, Mohammadamin Parsaei
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical significance of positive resection margin for patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors within 20 mm following initial endoscopic resection: A multi-center study
    Mengping Duan, Zhanzhen Liu, Yan Qiao, Pinzhu Huang, Hao Xie, Wei Xiao, Shuangling Luo, Zhuochao Xie, Qiufeng Sun, Liwei Wang, Taixuan Wan, Zhihong Zhang, Huashan Liu, Haoqi Zheng, Yebohao Zhou, Dongxu Lei, Yunxing Shi, Sichong Lai, Ziwei Zhou, Fujin Ye,
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 50(11): 108651.     CrossRef
  • Elevated fibrinogen-albumin ratio is an adverse prognostic factor for patients with primarily resected gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
    Gerd Jomrich, Winny Yan, Dagmar Kollmann, Ivan Kristo, Daniel Winkler, Hannah Puhr, Aysegül lhan-Mutlu, Marlene Hollenstein, Reza Asari, Sebastian F. Schoppmann
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Significance of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in peripheral blood for endometrial cancer
    Di Huo
    American Journal of Translational Research.2024; 16(11): 6689.     CrossRef
  • Machine-Learning Algorithms Using Systemic Inflammatory Markers to Predict the Oncologic Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer After Surgery
    Songsoo Yang, Hyosoon Jang, In Kyu Park, Hye Sun Lee, Kang Young Lee, Ga Eul Oh, Chihyun Park, Jeonghyun Kang
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(13): 8717.     CrossRef
  • Predictive and prognostic value of inflammatory markers in locally advanced rectal cancer (PILLAR) – A multicentric analysis by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Gastrointestinal Study Group
    Giuditta Chiloiro, Angela Romano, Silvia Mariani, Gabriella Macchia, Diana Giannarelli, Luciana Caravatta, Pierfrancesco Franco, Luca Boldrini, Alessandra Arcelli, Almalina Bacigalupo, Liliana Belgioia, Antonella Fontana, Elisa Meldolesi, Giampaolo Montes
    Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology.2023; 39: 100579.     CrossRef
  • A Novel Prognostic Index for Metastatic Colon Cancer: The Prognostic Immune Nutritional Index
    Erkan Kayikcioglu, Gokce Iscan
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Combining prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a valuable prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with stage I–III colorectal cancer
    Harin Kim, Dong-Min Shin, Jae-Hoon Lee, Eun-Suk Cho, Hye Sun Lee, Su-Jin Shin, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Jeonghyun Kang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development of preoperative and postoperative machine learning models to predict the recurrence of huge hepatocellular carcinoma following surgical resection
    Qinghua Zhang, Guoxu Fang, Tiancong Huang, Guangya Wei, Haitao Li, Jingfeng Liu
    Oncology Letters.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancer and Diabetes: Predictive Factors in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
    Mihai Cosmin Stan, Daniel Georgescu, Ciprian Camil Mireștean, Florinel Bădulescu
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(16): 2647.     CrossRef
  • ASO Author Reflections: Could the Application of Machine Learning Enhance the Accuracy of Prognosis Estimation Using Serum Inflammatory Markers in Colorectal Cancer Patients?
    Jeonghyun Kang
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(13): 8522.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic prediction of colorectal cancer using the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio: the importance of inflammatory biomarkers and their association with long-term outcomes
    Chul Seung Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 287.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Significance of Combining Preoperative and Postoperative Albumin-Bilirubin Score in Colorectal Cancer
    Doyoun Kim, Jae-Hoon Lee, Eun-Suk Cho, Su-Jin Shin, Hye Sun Lee, Hwa-Hee Koh, Kang Young Lee, Jeonghyun Kang
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(4): 1261.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
    Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preoperative albumin–bilirubin score as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage III colon cancer
    Hyun Gu Lee, Seok-Byung Lim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer,Minimally invasive surgery,Surgical technique
Is Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation Really Necessary for All Patients With Right-Sided Colon Cancer?
Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyeon-Min Cho, Je-Ho Jang, Chang-Nam Kim, Kil Yeon Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim, On behalf of The Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(6):434-444.   Published online December 8, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00955.0136
  • 10,000 View
  • 301 Download
  • 21 Web of Science
  • 24 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Colon cancer treatment is on the way to evolution over several decades. The minimally invasive surgery has improved postoperative short-term outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy has prolonged the survival of advanced colon cancer patients. Hohenberger proposed the noble concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) which consists of 3 components: plane surgery, sufficient longitudinal bowel resection, and central vascular ligation (CVL). Mesocolic plane surgery shares the same surgical principle of total mesorectal excision, which is maintaining the intact mesothelial envelope. However, there remain debates about the extent of bowel resection and the level of CVL for maximizing lymph node dissection. There is no solid clinical evidence for the oncological necessity and benefit of extended radical dissection in right hemicolectomy. CME with CVL based on open surgery has been adopted in laparoscopic surgery. So, it is also necessary to look at how the CME could be transformed and successfully implanted in the laparoscopic era. Recent rapid advances in surgical technology and cancer biology are preparing for fundamental changes in cancer surgery. In this study, we reviewed the history, oncological necessity, and compatibility of CME for the right hemicolectomy in the laparoscopic era and outline the new perspectives on the evolution of cancer surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Optimal extent of lymph node dissection in clinical early-stage right colon cancer: a retrospective analysis
    Hyeung-min Park, Jaram Lee, Soo Young Lee, Suk Hee Heo, Yong Yeon Jeong, Hyeong Rok Kim, Chang Hyun Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2025; 108(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • Complete mesocolon excision versus conventional colectomy for resectable colon cancer
    Atalel F Awedew, Zelalem Asefa, Mahteme Bekele Muleta
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove tecnologie) network prospective study on the approach to right colon lymphadenectomy in Italy: is there a standard?—CoDIG 2 (ColonDx Italian Group)
    G. Anania, M. Chiozza, A. Campagnaro, F. Bagolini, G. Resta, D. Azzolina, G. Silecchia, R. Cirocchi, A. Agrusa, D. Cuccurullo, M. Guerrieri, V. Adamo, M. Ammendola, P. Angelini, M. Annecchiarico, G. Aprea, F. Autori, G. Baldazzi, A. Balla, G. Baronio, G.
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(3): 1432.     CrossRef
  • Retrocaecal, supracolic and medial dissection (the RESUME approach) as an optimal surgical procedure for right‐sided colon cancer—A Video Vignette
    Hong‐min Ahn, Min Hyeong Jo, Mi Jeong Choi, Heung‐Kwon Oh, Duck‐Woo Kim, Sung‐Bum Kang
    Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(7): 1480.     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatment of right colon cancer
    A. A. Nevolskikh, V. A. Avdeenko, I. P. Reznik, T. P. Pochuev, R. F. Zibirov, S. A. Ivanov, A. D. Kaprin
    Siberian journal of oncology.2024; 23(3): 133.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping on Improving Diagnostic Values of CT D3 Lymph Node Staging for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Mi Sook Yun, ChangYeop Kim, In Young Lee, Su Bum Park, Dong-Hoon Shin, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3496.     CrossRef
  • Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision
    Inci Sahin, Bilgi Baca
    Digestive Disease Interventions.2023; 07(01): 024.     CrossRef
  • A comparison of the efficacy and safety of natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with sigmoid colon/high rectal cancer
    Qiang He, Jing Huang, Liyun Niu, Chunbao Zhai
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 127(7): 1160.     CrossRef
  • Effect of intracorporeal anastomosis on postoperative ileus after laparoscopic right colectomy
    Sangwoo Kim, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Young-Gil Son
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(3): 156.     CrossRef
  • Surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (D3 + CME) for colon cancer: A prospective single-center cohort study
    Xiaolin Wu, Yixin Tong, Daxing Xie, Haijie Li, Jie Shen, Jianping Gong
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(8): 6107.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and survival of adenocarcinoma with mixed subtypes in patients with colorectal cancer
    Fan Zhang, Boqi Xu, Yao Peng, Zhongqi Mao, Shan Tong
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Effectiveness of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping Using ICG for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Prospective Case–Control Study
    Gyung Mo Son, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Sun Bin Im, Kyung Hee Kim, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Dong-Hoon Shin, Armaan M. Nazir, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 4927.     CrossRef
  • Early-Onset Colon Cancer: A Narrative Review of Its Pathogenesis, Clinical Presentation, Treatment, and Prognosis
    Elvina C Lingas
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach
    Ji-Hyun Seo, In-Ja Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5211.     CrossRef
  • Ausmaß und Technik der chirurgischen Resektion beim Kolonkarzinom
    Christoph Holmer
    coloproctology.2022; 44(3): 149.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the Editor Reply: ‘Mesocolon Excision in Right Colon Cancer: Is it a Real Oncological Procedure or a Mere Surgical Act?’
    Tamara Díaz Vico, Luis Joaquín García Flórez
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2022; 29(9): 5855.     CrossRef
  • Medical disease and ambulatory surgery, new insights in patient selection based on medical disease
    Thomas Fuchs-Buder, Jacob Rosenberg
    Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology.2022; 35(3): 385.     CrossRef
  • Is the oncological impact of vascular invasion more important in right colon cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(2): 49.     CrossRef
  • Ileal long-segment ischemia after the unintended ligation of variant ileal branch during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Dong-Hoon Shin, Joo-Young Na, In Young Lee, Shin Hoo Park
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(3): 116.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early colon cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 558.     CrossRef
  • Direction of diagnosis and treatment improvement in colorectal cancer
    In Ja Park
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 540.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Robot-Assisted Colorectal Surgery
    Young Il Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • It Is a Pleasure to Announce the Issue Titled “Master Class 2021” in Annals of Coloproctology
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 349.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Influence of colonic mesenteric area on the number of lymph node retrieval for colon cancer: a prospective cohort study
Nadir Adnan Hacım, Ahmet Akbaş, Yigit Ulgen, Talar Vartanoglu Aktokmakyan, Serhat Meric, Merve Tokocin, Onder Karabay, Yuksel Altinel
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(1):77-84.   Published online September 16, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00444.0063
  • 9,724 View
  • 167 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The minimum harvested 12 lymph nodes (LNs) is regarded as the limit for accurate staging of nodal status in colorectal cancer patients. Besides the association of the lengths of resected intestinal segments and vascular pedicles, the mesocolic mesenteric area’s impact on LN count has not been studied. We aimed to evaluate the associations between metric variables, including the mesocolic mesentery area on the nodal harvest.
Methods
All consecutive patients who underwent elective colectomy with a curative intention for colon adenocarcinoma were prospectively included. The metric variables included the lengths of resected intestinal segments, vascular pedicle, and colonic mesenteric area. The variables influencing the LN count and the correlation between the total LN count and the specimens’ relevant metric measurements were analyzed.
Results
There were 46 patients with a median age of 64 years. The median count for total LNs was 22, and the LN positivity was 59.2%. There was an inadequate LN yield (<12) in 3 patients (6.1%). No significant associations were found between the adequacy of nodal harvest and the demographic, clinical, and tumoral features (P>0.05). There were significant positive correlations between total LN number and length of vascular pedicle and mesenteric area (r=0.576, P<0.001 and r=0.566, P<0.001).
Conclusion
The length of the vascular pedicle and mesenteric area were significantly correlated with total LN counts. Although there was no significant impact on the length of resected segments, the colonic mesenteric area can be used alone as a measure for the assessment of the nodal yield in colon cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Deep learning model for predicting lymph node metastasis around rectal cancer based on rectal tumor core area and mesangial imaging features
    Lili Guo, Kuang Fu, Wenjia Wang, Li Zhou, Lu Chen, Miaomiao Jiang
    BMC Medical Imaging.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping on Improving Diagnostic Values of CT D3 Lymph Node Staging for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Mi Sook Yun, ChangYeop Kim, In Young Lee, Su Bum Park, Dong-Hoon Shin, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3496.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Effectiveness of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping Using ICG for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Prospective Case–Control Study
    Gyung Mo Son, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Sun Bin Im, Kyung Hee Kim, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Dong-Hoon Shin, Armaan M. Nazir, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 4927.     CrossRef
  • The Relationship Between the Resected Colon Length and the Number of Lymph Nodes in Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Ulaş Karabay, Latif Yılmaz, Alper Aytekin, Aziz Bulut
    European Journal of Therapeutics.2023; 29(4): 731.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Is Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation Really Necessary for All Patients With Right-Sided Colon Cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyeon-Min Cho, Je-Ho Jang, Chang-Nam Kim, Kil Yeon Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 434.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Colorectal cancer
Upregulation of prostaglandin E2 by inducible microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 in colon cancer
Young Hun Kim, Kyung Jong Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(2):153-159.   Published online August 31, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00374.0053
  • 5,306 View
  • 158 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 9 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is known to promote carcinogenesis and cancer progression in colon cancer. Enzymes involved in the metabolism of PGE2 include cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1), and 15-prostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH). The current study aims to determine how PGE2 is expressed by examining patients with colorectal cancer and evaluating colon cancer cells to gain insight into changes in relevant enzymes upon induction of PGE2.
Methods
The concentration of PGE2 was measured in tumor tissues and adjacent normal mucosal tissues of 26 patients with colon cancer. The expression of COX-1, COX-2, mPGES-1, and 15-PGDH proteins was measured. The concentration of PGE2 in FET colon cancer cells was measured both in the initial status and after stimulation by tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. The expression levels of PGE2-related enzymes were measured as well.
Results
There was no significant difference in the average concentration of PGE2, which was measured at 453.1 pg/mL in cancer tissues and 401.2 pg/mL in normal mucosa. Among PGE2-related enzymes, 15-PGDH was expressed at a lower level in tumor cells than in normal mucosa. In colon cancer cells, PGE2 was found to be upregulated upon stimulation by TNF-α, which led to strong induction of mPGES-1 without any change in the expression of COX-2 among the PGE2-related enzymes.
Conclusion
These results demonstrated that PGE2 can be induced by stimuli such as TNF-α, and suggest that activation of mPGES-1 is more closely related than that of COX-2 in the induction of PGE2 on colon cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • 5‐methyl‐2‐carboxamidepyrrole‐based novel dual mPGES‐1/sEH inhibitors as promising anticancer candidates
    Ester Colarusso, Gianluigi Lauro, Marianna Potenza, Paola Galatello, Maria Luisa d'Aulisio Garigliota, Maria Grazia Ferraro, Marialuisa Piccolo, Maria Giovanna Chini, Carlo Irace, Pietro Campiglia, Robert Klaus Hoffstetter, Oliver Werz, Anna Ramunno, Gius
    Archiv der Pharmazie.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Furazanopyrazine-based novel promising anticancer agents interfering with the eicosanoid biosynthesis pathways by dual mPGES-1 and sEH inhibition
    Gianluigi Lauro, Michela Aliberti, Mauro De Nisco, Silvana Pedatella, Giacomo Pepe, Manuela Giovanna Basilicata, Maria Giovanna Chini, Katrin Fischer, Robert K. Hofstetter, Oliver Werz, Maria Grazia Ferraro, Marialuisa Piccolo, Carlo Irace, Anella Saviano
    European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.2025; 289: 117402.     CrossRef
  • Antioxidant, Antidiabetic, Anti-Obesity, and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Tomato-Based Functional Snack Bars Enriched with Pea and RuBisCO Proteins
    Elena Tomassi, Morena Gabriele, Agnese Sgalippa, Muhammed Rasim Gul, Ozan Tas, Mecit Halil Oztop, Laura Pucci
    Foods.2025; 14(19): 3340.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Prostaglandins as Major Inflammatory Mediators in Colorectal Cancer
    Mario Macia Guardado, Valentina Lutz, Markus Hengstschläger, Helmut Dolznig
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2025; 26(24): 12191.     CrossRef
  • Prostaglandin E2 in the Tumor Microenvironment, a Convoluted Affair Mediated by EP Receptors 2 and 4
    Ana Santiso, Akos Heinemann, Julia Kargl
    Pharmacological Reviews.2024; 76(3): 388.     CrossRef
  • The calcium-sensing receptor modulates the prostaglandin E2 pathway in intestinal inflammation
    Valeriya Gushchina, Nadja Kupper, Michael Schwarzkopf, Gitta Frisch, Karina Piatek, Cornelia Aigner, Alexandra Michel, Hemma Schueffl, Luca Iamartino, Taha Elajnaf, Teresa Manhardt, Andrea Vlasaty, Petra Heffeter, Marcella Bassetto, Enikö Kállay, Martin S
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Prostaglandin E2 Exposure Disrupts E-Cadherin/Caveolin-1-Mediated Tumor Suppression to Favor Caveolin-1-Enhanced Migration, Invasion, and Metastasis in Melanoma Models
    Lorena Lobos-González, Lorena Oróstica, Natalia Díaz-Valdivia, Victoria Rojas-Celis, America Campos, Eduardo Duran-Jara, Nicole Farfán, Lisette Leyton, Andrew F. G. Quest
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(23): 16947.     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
    Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Rectal cancer, Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer
Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Elderly Stage II High-Risk Colorectal Cancer Patients
Yujin Lee, Inseok Park, Hyunjin Cho, Geumhee Gwak, Keunho Yang, Byung-Noe Bae
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(5):298-305.   Published online July 6, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00829.0118
  • 6,530 View
  • 100 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 20 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is recommended for patients with stage II colorectal cancer with adverse features. However, the effect of adjuvant treatment in elderly patients with high-risk stage II colorectal cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the oncologic outcomes in elderly high-risk stage II colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative resection with or without AC.
Methods
Patients aged over 70 years having stage II colorectal adenocarcinoma with at least 1 adverse feature who underwent radical surgery between 2008 and 2017 at a single center were included. We compared recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients who received more than 80% of the planned AC cycle (the AC+ group) and those who did not receive it (the AC− group).
Results
The AC+ and AC– group contained 46 patients and 50 patients, respectively. The log-rank test revealed no significant intergroup differences in RFS (P = 0.083) and OS (P = 0.122). In the subgroup of 27 patients with more than 2 adverse features, the AC+ group (n = 16) showed better RFS (P = 0.006) and OS (P = 0.025) than the AC− group. In this subgroup, AC was the only significant factor affecting RFS in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.023). AC was significantly associated with OS (P = 0.033) in the univariate analysis, but not in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.332).
Conclusion
Among elderly patients with stage II high-risk colorectal cancer, the AC+ group did not show better RFS or OS than the AC− group. However, selected patients with more than 2 adverse features might benefit from AC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Tumor aggression-defense index–a novel indicator to predicts recurrence and survival in stage II-III colorectal cancer
    Tong Wu, Lin Fang, Yuli Ruan, Mengde Shi, Dan Su, Yue Ma, Ming Ma, Bojun Wang, Yuanyu Liao, Shuling Han, Xiaolin Lu, Chunhui Zhang, Chao Liu, Yanqiao Zhang
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oncologic outcomes and associated factors of colon cancer patients aged 70 years and older
    Byeo Lee Lim, In Ja Park, Jun-Soo Ro, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(3): 198.     CrossRef
  • Predicting venous thromboembolism and determining appropriate prophylaxis in elderly patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) using the adjusted Caprini score
    Young Sun Choi, Hyung Jin Cho, Chul Seung Lee, Dong Geun Lee, Choon Sik Chung, Gwan Cheol Lee, Dong Woo Kang, Jeong Sub Kim, Tae Gyu Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(4): 279.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic outcomes of multivisceral resection for locally advanced colorectal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study
    Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    BMC Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Prognostic Model Based on the Log Odds Ratio of Positive Lymph Nodes Predicts Prognosis of Patients with Rectal Cancer
    Jian Li, Yu zhou Yang, Peng Xu, Cheng Zhang
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2024; 55(3): 1111.     CrossRef
  • Complete Obstruction, a Real Risk Factor: A Comprehensive Study on Obstruction in Stage IIA Colon Cancer With Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Soo Young Oh, Chan Wook Kim, Seonok Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2024; 23(2): 135.     CrossRef
  • Clinical implication of tissue carcinoembryonic antigen expression in association with serum carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer
    Abdulmohsin Fawzi Aldilaijan, Young Il Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jihun Kim, Jun-Soo Ro, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advances in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: A Focus on Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
    Youngbae Jeon, Eun Jung Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oncologic outcomes in elderly patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: a multi-institutional survey in Kinki District, Japan
    Tomohito Tanaka, Suguru Yamashita, Haruo Kuroboshi, Junya Kamibayashi, Atsushi Sugiura, Kaori Yoriki, Taisuke Mori, Kazuharu Tanaka, Aiko Nagashima, Michihide Maeda, Shoji Kamiura, Yukako Mizuno, Noriko Ohtake, Tomoyuki Ichimura, Taiki Kikuchi, Yuri Nobut
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 27(6): 1084.     CrossRef
  • Does adjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes in elderly patients with colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world studies
    Jianbing Chen, Chengda Zhang, Yajuan Wu
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2022; 16(4): 383.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for recurrence in elderly patients with stage II colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study
    Takuki Yagyu, Manabu Yamamoto, Akimitsu Tanio, Kazushi Hara, Ken Sugezawa, Chihiro Uejima, Kyoichi Kihara, Shigeru Tatebe, Yasuro Kurisu, Shunsuke Shibata, Toshio Yamamoto, Hiroshi Nishie, Setsujo Shiota, Hiroaki Saito, Takuji Naka, Kenji Sugamura, Kuniyu
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
    Jeongwon Yeom, Hee-Sook Lim
    Clinical Nutrition Research.2022; 11(2): 75.     CrossRef
  • The Prognostic Reliability of Lymphovascular Invasion for Patients with T3N0 Colorectal Cancer in Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decision Making
    Hayoung Lee, Seung-Yeon Yoo, In Ja Park, Seung-Mo Hong, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2022; 14(12): 2833.     CrossRef
  • Is the oncological impact of vascular invasion more important in right colon cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(2): 49.     CrossRef
  • Molecular analyses of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 586.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention of colorectal cancer
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 549.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Analyses in Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 197.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention of Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 231.     CrossRef
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy benefits on patients with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen in stage IIA colon cancer: a SEER-based analysis
    Huabin Zhou, Songsheng Wang, Zhai Cai, Enming Qiu, Qianyun Chen, Xi Rao, Shuai Han, Zhou Li
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(12): 2481.     CrossRef
  • Elderly High-Risk Stage II Colorectal Cancer Patients: Candidates for Improving Outcome?
    Min Ki Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(5): 267.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Functional outcomes,Postoperative outcome & ERAS
The impact of variations in care and complications within a colorectal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program on length of stay
James Wei Tatt Toh, Jack Cecire, Kerry Hitos, Karen Shedden, Fiona Gavegan, Nimalan Pathmanathan, Toufic El Khoury, Angelina Di Re, Annelise Cocco, Alex Limmer, Tom Liang, Kar Yin Fok, James Rogers, Edgardo Solis, Grahame Ctercteko
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):36-46.   Published online May 6, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.11.23
  • 8,359 View
  • 221 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 18 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become standard of care in colorectal surgery. However, there is not a universally accepted colorectal ERAS protocol and significant variations in care exist between institutions. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of variations in ERAS interventions and complications on length of stay (LOS).
Methods
This study was a single-center review of the first 200 consecutive patients recruited into our prospectively collected ERAS database. The primary outcome of this study was to examine the rate of compliance to ERAS interventions and the impact of these interventions on LOS. The secondary outcome was to assess the impact of complications (anastomotic leak, ileus, and surgical site infections) on LOS. ERAS interventions, rate of adherence, LOS, readmissions, morbidity, and mortality were recorded, and statistical analysis was performed.
Results
ERAS variations and complications significantly influenced patient LOS on both univariate and multivariate analysis. ERAS interventions identified as the most important strategies in reducing LOS included laparoscopic surgery, mobilization twice daily postoperative day (POD) 0 to 1, discontinuation of intravenous fluids on POD 0 to 1, upgrading to solid diet by POD 0 to 2, removal of indwelling catheter by POD 0 to 2, avoiding nasogastric tube reinsertion and removing drains early. Both major and minor complications increased LOS. Anastomotic leak and ileus were associated with the greatest increase in LOS.
Conclusion
Seven high-yield ERAS interventions reduced LOS. Major and minor complications increased LOS. Reducing variations in care and complications can improve outcomes following colorectal surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effects of the Strength, Assistance in walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs, and Falls score on postoperative clinical outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective study
    Young Jae Kim, Sung Uk Bae, Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.2025; 79(4): 358.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Risk of Complications Following Intestinal Surgery After Infliximab, Vedolizumab, or Ustekinumab Treatment: Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
    Alexandra-Eleftheria Menni, Georgios Tzikos, George Petrakis, Patroklos Goulas, Panagiotis V. Karathanasis, Stylianos Apostolidis
    Pharmaceuticals.2025; 18(10): 1466.     CrossRef
  • Post-surgical diets in the ERAS protocol: D-ERAS scoping review
    Camilla Fiorindi, Pauline Raoul, Valentina Moretto, Ilaria Trestini, Laura Rossini, Giovanna Colasanto, Rita Schiano di Cola, Silvia Lazzaris, Benedetta Beltrame, Sara Carnevale, Francesco Giudici, Luca Gianotti
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • So many measures in ERAS protocol: Which matters most?
    Nan Xie, Hua Xie, Wei Li, Zhongxian Zhu, Xu Wang, Weibing Tang
    Nutrition.2024; 122: 112384.     CrossRef
  • Results of selective decontamination with oral neomycin and metronidazole for major colorectal surgery in Australia: A cohort study
    James Wei Tatt Toh, Devansh Shah, Henry Wang, Charlotte Kwik, Joseph Do Woong Choi, Chelsie Leonie Beinke, Paul Morris, Eleni Baird-Gunning, Geoffrey Peter Collins, Fiona Gavegan, Karen Shedden, Toufic El-Khoury, Nimalan Pathma-Nathan, Kerry Hitos
    Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery.2024; 7(2): 72.     CrossRef
  • Influence of additional prophylactic oral antibiotics during mechanical bowel preparation on surgical site infection in patients receiving colorectal surgery
    Hayoung Lee, Jong Lyul Lee, Ji Sung Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok‐Byung Lim
    World Journal of Surgery.2024; 48(6): 1534.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes before and after Implementation of the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery after Surgery) Protocol in Open and Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Comparative Real-World Study from Northern Italy
    Lucia Mangone, Federica Mereu, Maurizio Zizzo, Andrea Morini, Magda Zanelli, Francesco Marinelli, Isabella Bisceglia, Maria Barbara Braghiroli, Fortunato Morabito, Antonino Neri, Massimiliano Fabozzi
    Current Oncology.2024; 31(6): 2907.     CrossRef
  • Current perioperative care in patients undergoing a beyond total mesorectal excision procedure for rectal cancer: What are the differences with the colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery protocol?
    Stefi Nordkamp, Stijn H. J. Ketelaers, Floor Piqeur, Harm J. Scholten, Silvie van de Calseijde, Jip L. Tolenaar, Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, Harm J. T. Rutten, Jacobus W. A. Burger, Johanne G. Bloemen
    Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(11): 1903.     CrossRef
  • Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes and future directions of enhanced recovery after surgery in colorectal surgery: a narrative review
    Ji Hyeong Song, Minsung Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Early Oral Feeding on Postoperative Outcomes after Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Soo Young Lee, Eon Chul Han
    Digestive Surgery.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Beyond the Operating Room: A Narrative Review of Enhanced Recovery Strategies in Colorectal Surgery
    Hamed Ibrahim Hamed Albalawi, Rawshan Khalid A Alyoubi, Nawaf Mohsen Mubarak Alsuhaymi, Farha Abdullah K Aldossary, Alkathiry Abdulrahman Mohammed G, Fayez Mubarak Albishi, Jumana Aljeddawi, Fedaa Ahmed Omar Najm, Neda Ahmed Najem, Mohamed Mirza Ali Alma
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol in Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer Patients after beyond Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery: A Feasibility Study
    Stefi Nordkamp, Davy M. J. Creemers, Sofie Glazemakers, Stijn H. J. Ketelaers, Harm J. Scholten, Silvie van de Calseijde, Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, Jip L. Tolenaar, Hendi W. Crezee, Harm J. T. Rutten, Jacobus W. A. Burger, Johanne G. Bloemen
    Cancers.2023; 15(18): 4523.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery
    Min Ki Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Future direction of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in colorectal surgery
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(1): 1.     CrossRef
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer
The Impact of Primary Tumor Resection on Survival in Asymptomatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Unresectable Metastases
Ki Yoon Doah, Ui Sup Shin, Byong Ho Jeon, Sang Sik Cho, Sun Mi Moon
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(2):94-100.   Published online April 30, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.09.15.1
  • 7,041 View
  • 95 Download
  • 18 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of primary tumor resection (PTR) in asymptomatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with unresectable metastases using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method to minimize selection bias.
Methods
We selected 146 patients diagnosed with stage IV CRC with unresectable metastasis between 2001 and 2018 from our institutional database. In a multivariate logistic regression model using the patients’ baseline covariates associated with PTR, we applied the IPTW method based on a propensity score and performed a weighted Cox proportional regression analysis to estimate survival according to PTR.
Results
Upfront PTR was performed in 98 patients, and no significant differences in baseline factors were detected. The upweighted median survival of the PTR group was 18 months and that of the non-PTR group was 15 months (P = 0.15). After applying the IPTW, the PTR was still insignificant in the univariate Cox regression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5–1.21). However, in the multivariate weighted Cox regression with adjustment for other covariates, the PTR showed a significantly decreased risk of cancer-related death (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40–0.94).
Conclusion
In this study, we showed that asymptomatic CRC patients with unresectable metastases could gain a survival benefit from upfront PTR by analysis with the IPTW method. However, randomized controlled trials are mandatory.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
    Junpei Takashima, Hirotoshi Kobayashi, Daisuke Fujimoto, Fumihiko Miura
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A predictive model to identify optimal candidates for surgery among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Xiqiang Zhang, Zhaoyi Jing, Longchao Wu, Ze Tao, Dandan Lu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recurrence Rates and Postoperative Complications Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A 5-Year Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Peshawar
    Tilal Ahmed Raza, Hussain Jan Abbasi, Farrukh Ozair, Hajra Imtiaz
    Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences.2025; : 120.     CrossRef
  • Primary tumor resection for asymptomatic colorectal cancer patients with synchronous unresectable metastases: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and case-matched studies
    Jun Huang, Jiahao Zhou, Ping Zhang, Qingbin Wu, Ziqiang Wang
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of primary tumor resection on survival in patients with asymptomatic unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chengren Zhang, Cong Cao, Lili Liu, Yaochun Lv, Jingjing Li, Jiyong Lu, Shuai Wang, Binbin Du, Xiongfei Yang
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2023; 23(1): 107.     CrossRef
  • The role of upfront primary tumor resection in asymptomatic patients with unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zongyu Liang, Zhiyuan Liu, Chengzhi Huang, Xin Chen, Zhaojun Zhang, Meijuan Xiang, Weixian Hu, Junjiang Wang, Xingyu Feng, Xueqing Yao
    Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Primary tumor resection in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable distant metastases: a minireview
    Junge Bai, Ming Yang, Zheng Liu, Sergey Efetov, Cuneyt Kayaalp, Audrius Dulskas, Darcy Shaw, Xishan Wang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Palliative primary tumor resection in minimally symptomatic (asymptomatic) patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous unresectable metastases versus chemotherapy alone: a metaanalysis
    Iu. V. Alimova, Yu. A. Shelygin, E. G. Rybakov, M. V. Alekseev
    Koloproktologia.2023; 22(2): 126.     CrossRef
  • The impact of primary tumor resection for asymptomatic colorectal cancer patients with unresectable metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shuyuan Li, Liqiang Ji, Jie Huang, Ye Wang, Peng Liu, Wei Zhang, Zheng Lou
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The impact of palliative primary tumor resection on overall survival in minimally symptomatic (asymptomatic) colorectal cancer and synchronous unresectable metastases vs chemotherapy only: a comparative study of outcomes
    Iu. V. Alimova, S. I. Achkasov, Yu. A. Shelygin, M. V. Alekseev, V. N. Kashnikov, M. Yu. Fedyanin, M. A. Danilov, E. G. Rybakov
    Koloproktologia.2023; 22(4): 10.     CrossRef
  • Recurrence Patterns and Risk Factors after Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Insights for Postoperative Surveillance Strategies
    Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim, Ye Ryung Park, Eun Hae Cho, Jeong Min Choo, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak
    Cancers.2023; 15(24): 5791.     CrossRef
  • Palliative primary tumor resection in minimally symptomatic patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous unresectable metastases: when is it necessary? (systematic review)
    Iu. V. Alimova, Yu. A. Shelygin, E. G. Rybakov
    Koloproktologia.2022; 21(3): 99.     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 568.     CrossRef
  • Recent Advance in the Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 213.     CrossRef
  • Molecular analyses of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 586.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Analyses in Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 197.     CrossRef
  • Primary Tumor Resection in Asymptomatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Unresectable Metastases: Can It Improve Survival?
    Myong Hoon Ihn
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(2): 71.     CrossRef
  • Treatment for Peritoneal Metastasis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer
    Young Jin Kim, Chang Hyun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 425.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Colorectal cancer,Surgical technique
Comparison of Short-term Results after Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Standard Colectomy for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: Analysis of a Western Center Cohort
Cristian Conti, Corrado Pedrazzani, Giulia Turri, Eduardo Fernandes, Enrico Lazzarini, Raffaele De Luca, Alessandro Valdegamberi, Andrea Ruzzenente, Alfredo Guglielmi
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(3):166-173.   Published online April 22, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.05.18
  • 7,254 View
  • 168 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) right colectomy is a technically demanding procedure infrequently employed in Western centers. This retrospective cohort study aims to analyze the safety of laparoscopic CME colectomy compared to standard colectomy for right-sided colon cancer in a Western series.
Methods
Prospectively collected data from 60 patients who underwent laparoscopic CME right colectomy were compared to the ones of 55 patients who underwent laparoscopic standard right colectomy.
Results
No differences in clinical characteristics were observed between the CME and standard right colectomy groups. No differences were demonstrated in terms of blood loss (P = 0.060), intraoperative complications (P = 1), conversion rate (P = 0.102), and operative time (P = 0.473). No deaths were observed in either group, while complication rate was 40.0% in the CME and 49.1% in the standard group (P = 0.353). Severe complications occurred in 10.0% vs. 9.1% (P = 0.842), redo surgery in 5.0% vs. 7.3% (P = 0.708), and unplanned readmission in 5.0% vs. 5.5% (P = 1) after CME and standard colectomy, respectively. A significant difference in favor of CME was observed in the total length of specimen (P < 0.001), proximal (P = 0.018), and distal margins (P = 0.037). The number of lymph nodes harvested was significantly higher in the CME group (27 vs. 22, P = 0.037).
Conclusion
In Western series, where patients have less favorable clinical characteristics, laparoscopic CME allows to obtain better quality surgical specimens and comparable short-term outcomes compared to standard right colectomy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Complete Mesocolic Excision Compared With Conventional Right Hemicolectomy for Colorectal Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Cohorts
    Imran Gul Shiekh, Hafiz Muhammad Ijaz Ul Haq, Syed Hasan Raza
    Cureus.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision versus conventional right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xin Yu Zhuang, Jia Li Zhang, Xue Fei Yang, Zhong Hui Liu
    BMC Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Retrocaecal, supracolic and medial dissection (the RESUME approach) as an optimal surgical procedure for right‐sided colon cancer—A Video Vignette
    Hong‐min Ahn, Min Hyeong Jo, Mi Jeong Choi, Heung‐Kwon Oh, Duck‐Woo Kim, Sung‐Bum Kang
    Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(7): 1480.     CrossRef
  • Complete mesocolic excision (CME) impacts survival only for Stage III right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kengo Hayashi, Roberto Passera, Chiara Meroni, Rebecca Dallorto, Chiara Marafante, Carlo Alberto Ammirati, Alberto Arezzo
    Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies.2024; 33(6): 323.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping on Improving Diagnostic Values of CT D3 Lymph Node Staging for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Mi Sook Yun, ChangYeop Kim, In Young Lee, Su Bum Park, Dong-Hoon Shin, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3496.     CrossRef
  • Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic short- and long-term outcomes in complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colonic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pedja Cuk, Mohamad Jawhara, Issam Al-Najami, Per Helligsø, Andreas Kristian Pedersen, Mark Bremholm Ellebæk
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(3): 171.     CrossRef
  • Influence of colonic mesenteric area on the number of lymph node retrieval for colon cancer: a prospective cohort study
    Nadir Adnan Hacım, Ahmet Akbaş, Yigit Ulgen, Talar Vartanoglu Aktokmakyan, Serhat Meric, Merve Tokocin, Onder Karabay, Yuksel Altinel
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(1): 77.     CrossRef
  • Uptake of robot-assisted colon cancer surgery in the Netherlands
    Marlou F. M. Sterk, Rogier M. P. H. Crolla, Mareille Verseveld, Jan Willem T. Dekker, George P. van der Schelling, Cornelis Verhoef, Pim B. Olthof
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(11): 8196.     CrossRef
  • Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach
    Ji-Hyun Seo, In-Ja Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5211.     CrossRef
  • Direction of diagnosis and treatment improvement in colorectal cancer
    In Ja Park
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 540.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early colon cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 558.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Robot-Assisted Colorectal Surgery
    Young Il Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer,Biomarker & risk factor
Prognostic Factor and Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage IIA Colon Cancer
Mok-Won Lee, Jin-Su Kim, Ji-Yeon Kim, Kyung-ha Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(1):35-43.   Published online September 18, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.09.03
  • 6,337 View
  • 137 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 9 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
There is no clear evidence of the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in stage IIA colon cancer. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors and survival benefit of AC in this disease.
Methods
A retrospective data collection for patients who underwent radical surgery for colon cancer between January 2008 and December 2015 was undertaken. The cohort was divided into the no-AC and AC groups.
Results
We included 227 patients with stage IIA colon cancer in our study cohort, including 67 and 160 patients in the no-AC and AC groups, respectively. The number of retrieved lymph nodes and the presence of tumor complications as obstruction or perforation were independent risk factors for survival. In the no-AC group, there was a significant difference in survival according to the number of retrieved lymph nodes. In the AC group, there were significant differences in survival according to sidedness and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). There was no significant difference in survival between the no-AC and the AC groups.
Conclusion
The number of retrieved lymph nodes and the presence of tumor complications were prognostic factors for stage IIA colon cancer but lymphovascular and perineural invasion were not. Sidedness and preoperative CEA could be used as factors to predict the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Currently, it is believed that there is no benefit of AC for stage IIA colon cancer. Further studies are needed to determine the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIA colon cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Oncologic outcomes of multivisceral resection for locally advanced colorectal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study
    Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    BMC Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Can clinicopathologic high-risk features in T3N0 colon cancer be reliable prognostic factors?
    Hyun Gu Lee, Young IL Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Effectiveness of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping Using ICG for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Prospective Case–Control Study
    Gyung Mo Son, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Sun Bin Im, Kyung Hee Kim, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Dong-Hoon Shin, Armaan M. Nazir, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 4927.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • The Prognostic Reliability of Lymphovascular Invasion for Patients with T3N0 Colorectal Cancer in Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decision Making
    Hayoung Lee, Seung-Yeon Yoo, In Ja Park, Seung-Mo Hong, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2022; 14(12): 2833.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Analyses in Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 197.     CrossRef
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy benefits on patients with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen in stage IIA colon cancer: a SEER-based analysis
    Huabin Zhou, Songsheng Wang, Zhai Cai, Enming Qiu, Qianyun Chen, Xi Rao, Shuai Han, Zhou Li
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(12): 2481.     CrossRef
  • Molecular analyses of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 586.     CrossRef
  • Direction of diagnosis and treatment improvement in colorectal cancer
    In Ja Park
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 540.     CrossRef
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer,Biomarker & risk factor
Surgical Risk and Pathological Results of Emergency Resection in the Treatment of Acutely Obstructing Colorectal Cancers: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Giovanni Domenico Tebala, Andrea Mingoli, Andrea Natili, Abdul Qayyum Khan, Gioia Brachini
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(1):21-28.   Published online March 16, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.03.10.1
  • 5,921 View
  • 160 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The treatment of acutely obstructing colorectal cancers is still a matter of debate. The prevailing opinion is that an immediate resection should be performed whenever possible. This study sought to determine whether immediate resection is safe and oncologically valid.
Methods
We completed a retrospective 2-center cohort study using the medical records of patients admitted for acutely obstructing colorectal cancer under the care of the Colorectal Team, Noble’s Hospital, Isle of Man, and the Emergency Surgery Unit, Umberto I University Hospital, Rome, from March 2013 to May 2017. The primary endpoints were 90-day mortality and morbidity, reoperation rate, and length of stay. The secondary endpoints were status of margins, number of lymph nodes retrieved, and the rate of adequate nodal harvest.
Results
Sixty-three patients were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Mortality was associated with age > 80 years and Dukes B tumors. The length of hospital stay was shorter in patients who had their resection less than 24 hours from their admission, in those who had laparoscopic resection and in those with distal tumors. The number of lymph nodes retrieved and rate of R0 resections were similar to those reported in elective colorectal surgery and were greater in laparoscopic resections and in patients operated on within 24 hours, respectively.
Conclusion
Immediate resection is a safe and reliable option in patients with acutely obstructing colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Complete Obstruction, a Real Risk Factor: A Comprehensive Study on Obstruction in Stage IIA Colon Cancer With Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Soo Young Oh, Chan Wook Kim, Seonok Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2024; 23(2): 135.     CrossRef
  • Can clinicopathologic high-risk features in T3N0 colon cancer be reliable prognostic factors?
    Hyun Gu Lee, Young IL Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
    Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252.     CrossRef
  • Surgical safety in the COVID-19 era: present and future considerations
    Young Il Kim, In Ja Park
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(6): 295.     CrossRef
  • Failure to rescue after reoperation for major complications of elective and emergency colorectal surgery: A population-based multicenter cohort study
    Marie T. Grönroos-Korhonen, Laura E. Koskenvuo, Panu J. Mentula, Selja K. Koskensalo, Ari K. Leppäniemi, Ville J. Sallinen
    Surgery.2022; 172(4): 1076.     CrossRef
  • Quality issues in emergency colorectal surgery
    Tara Russell, Formosa Chen
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2020; 31(4): 100784.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy
Identification of Risk Factors Associated With Stage III Disease in Nonmetastatic Colon Cancer: Results From a Prospective National Cohort Study
Jakob Lykke, Ole Roikjaer, Per Jess, Jacob Rosenberg, On behalf of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(5):316-322.   Published online February 18, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.03.03
  • 4,953 View
  • 120 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to identify possible patient- and tumor-related factors associated with risk of TNM stage III disease in nonmetastatic colon cancer.
Methods
The associations between stage III disease and age, sex, lymph node yield, pathological tumor (pT) stage, tumor subsite, type of surgery, and priority of surgery were assessed in a nationwide cohort of 13,766 patients treated with curative resection of colon cancer. Each level of age, lymph node yield, and pT stage was compared to the preceding level.
Results
Age, lymph node yield, pT stage, tumor subsite, and priority of surgery were associated with stage III disease. Odds ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) were as follows: age < 65/65–75 years: 1.28 (95% CI, 1.15–1.43) and 65–75/ > 75 years: 1.22 (95% CI, 1.13–1.32); lymph node yield 0–5/6–11: 0.60 (95% CI, 0.50–0.72), lymph node yield 6–11/12–17: 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76–0.93), and lymph node yield 12–17/ ≥ 18: 0.97 (95% CI, 0.89–1.05); pT1/pT2: 0.74 (95% CI, 0.57–0.95), pT2/pT3: 0.35 (95% CI, 0.30–0.40), and pT3/pT4: 0.49 (95% CI, 0.47–0.54). Only tumors of the transverse colon were independently associated with lower risk of stage III disease than tumors in the sigmoid colon (sigmoid colon: 1, transverse colon: 0.84 [95% CI, 0.73–0.96]; elective surgery: 1, acute surgery: 1.43 [95% CI, 1.29–1.60]).
Conclusion
In this study, stage III disease in colon cancer was significantly associated with age, lymph node yield, pT stage, tumor subsite, and priority of surgery but was not associated with right-sided location compared with stage I and II cancers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Optimized workup of lymph nodes in regard to UICC classification of colorectal carcinoma
    Moritz Rust, Nabih Farkouh, Piet Beusker, Ali Eissing‐Al‐Mukahal, Clara Böker, Julian Mall, Ludwig Wilkens
    Histopathology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association of the pathomics-collagen signature with lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
    Wei Jiang, Huaiming Wang, Xiaoyu Dong, Yandong Zhao, Chenyan Long, Dexin Chen, Botao Yan, Jiaxin Cheng, Zexi Lin, Shuangmu Zhuo, Hui Wang, Jun Yan
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Can clinicopathologic high-risk features in T3N0 colon cancer be reliable prognostic factors?
    Hyun Gu Lee, Young IL Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Deep learning-based pathology signature could reveal lymph node status and act as a novel prognostic marker across multiple cancer types
    Siteng Chen, Jinxi Xiang, Xiyue Wang, Jun Zhang, Sen Yang, Wei Yang, Junhua Zheng, Xiao Han
    British Journal of Cancer.2023; 129(1): 46.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Effectiveness of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping Using ICG for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Prospective Case–Control Study
    Gyung Mo Son, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Sun Bin Im, Kyung Hee Kim, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Dong-Hoon Shin, Armaan M. Nazir, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 4927.     CrossRef
  • Deep learning can predict lymph node status directly from histology in colorectal cancer
    Lennard Kiehl, Sara Kuntz, Julia Höhn, Tanja Jutzi, Eva Krieghoff-Henning, Jakob N. Kather, Tim Holland-Letz, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Jenny Chang-Claude, Alexander Brobeil, Christof von Kalle, Stefan Fröhling, Elizabeth Alwers, Hermann Brenner, Michael Ho
    European Journal of Cancer.2021; 157: 464.     CrossRef
Review
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer
Current Colorectal Cancer in Thailand
Varut Lohsiriwat, Nopdanai Chaisomboon, Jirawat Pattana-Arun, for the Society of Colorectal Surgeons of Thailand
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(2):78-82.   Published online January 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.01.07
  • 14,370 View
  • 343 Download
  • 22 Web of Science
  • 21 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
This article aimed to summarize the current status of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Thailand. In brief, CRC is the third most common cancer and accounts for 11% of the cancer burden in Thailand. It is the only malignancy with an increased incidence in both sexes in Thailand. Over 10,000 new CRC cases occur annually, and about 40% are rectal cancer. Due to the lack of CRC screening and public awareness, nonmetastatic cancer accounts only for 60%–70% of overall cases. The demand for general or colorectal surgeons outmatches the supply at a ratio of 1 general surgeon to 35,000 individuals. There are about 70 board-certified colorectal surgeons serving Thailand’s population of nearly 70 million. As a result, >25% of cancer patients wait more than 1 month before surgery. Regarding training for colorectal surgery, there are 3 major institutes in Bangkok providing a 2-year fellowship program. Cadaveric workshops are an important part of training – especially in laparoscopy for CRC. Recently, a population-based CRC screening program was launched using a fecal immunochemical test. The Ministry of Public Health of Thailand has established additional platforms for laparoscopy to support the potential detection of early CRC following implementation of this nationwide screening program.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Antitumor Activity of the Ethanolic Extract from Syzygium aromaticum in Colorectal Cancer Xenograft Mice
    Thunyatorn Yimsoo, Weerakit Taychaworaditsakul, Hathaichanok Chuntakaruk, Worapapar Treesuppharat, Sumet Kongkiatpaiboon, Apipu Ariyachayut, Sunee Chansakaow, Teera Chewonarin, Parirat Khonsung, Seewaboon Sireeratawong
    Pharmaceutics.2026; 18(1): 79.     CrossRef
  • Verification of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans for rectal cancer using MCsquare and TOPAS Monte Carlo simulations
    Nipon Saiwong, Sasikarn Chamchod, Thiansin Liamsuwan
    Physica Medica.2026; 142: 105737.     CrossRef
  • Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes
    Thanawin Wong, Tanawat Pattarapuntakul, Nisa Netinatsunton, Jaksin Sottisuporn, Thanapon Yaowmaneerat, Wongsakorn Chaochankit, Siriboon Attasaranya, Pimsiri Sripongpun, Naichaya Chamroonkul, Viraksakdi Chongsuvivatwong
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • New oxepin and dihydrobenzofuran derivatives from Bauhinia saccocalyx roots and their anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, and antioxidant activities
    Lueacha Tabtimmai, Thanyathon Phonchan, Natrinee Thongprik, Sutin Kaennakam, Nuttapon Yodsin, Kiattawee Choowongkomon, Chanikan Sonklin, Supachai Jadsadajerm, Awat Wisetsai
    Journal of Natural Medicines.2025; 79(3): 543.     CrossRef
  • Relationship between the protein expression of ARID1A, ARID1B and ARID2 with the clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer
    Wariya Mongkolwat, Phattarapon Sonthi, Keerakarn Somsuan, Siripat Aluksanasuwan, Ratirath Samol, Natthiya Sakulsak, Sasithorn Wanna‑Udom
    Biomedical Reports.2025; 23(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Photoprotective Property, Bioactivities, and Chemical Composition of Durian Peel Extracts: Agricultural Waste Valorization for Cosmetic and Pharmaceutical Applications
    Awat Wisetsai, Lueacha Tabtimmai, Chanikan Sonklin, Anupong Joompang, Nuttakarn Srisukpachin, Supachai Jadsadajerm, Sutarin Preepram
    Natural Resources for Human Health.2025; 5(3): 449.     CrossRef
  • Estimation of secondary cancer risks following rectal cancer photon and proton therapy: A computational phantom study
    Nipon Saiwong, Sasikarn Chamchod, Pattarakan Suwanbut, Sawanee Suntiwong, Thiansin Liamsuwan
    Physica Medica.2025; 137: 105083.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the advantage of surgeons certified by the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system participating in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection
    Naruhiko Sawada, Tomonori Akagi, Manabu Shimomura, Yukitoshi Todate, Kunihiko Nagakari, Hiroaki Takeshita, Satoshi Maruyama, Manabu Takata, Nobuki Ichikawa, Koya Hida, Hiroaki Iijima, Shigeki Yamaguchi, Akinobu Taketomi, Takeshi Naitoh
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2024; 8(3): 464.     CrossRef
  • Cost-Effectiveness of Increasing Access to Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis: Analysis From Thailand
    Peeradon Wongseree, Zeynep Hasgul, Mohammad S. Jalali
    Value in Health Regional Issues.2024; 43: 101010.     CrossRef
  • Phytochemical Profile of Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf Lemongrass Essential Oil from Northeastern Thailand and Its Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Attributes and Cytotoxic Effects on HT-29 Human Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Cells
    Vijitra Luang-In, Worachot Saengha, Thipphiya Karirat, Chadaporn Senakun, Sirithon Siriamornpun
    Foods.2024; 13(18): 2928.     CrossRef
  • Impact of a Health Promotion Program on Knowledge, Physical Health, Mental Health, and Social Health Behaviors in Individuals at Risk for Colorectal Cancer
    Surachet Fakkiew, Supat Teravecharoenchai, Panit Khemtong, Wanich Suksatan
    Societies.2024; 14(9): 182.     CrossRef
  • Cytotoxic effect of metformin on butyrate-resistant PMF-K014 colorectal cancer spheroid cells
    Kesara Nittayaboon, Kittinun Leetanaporn, Surasak Sangkhathat, Sittirak Roytrakul, Raphatphorn Navakanitworakul
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2022; 151: 113214.     CrossRef
  • Effects of polymorphisms in the MTHFR gene on 5-FU hematological toxicity and efficacy in Thai colorectal cancer patients
    Chalirmporn Atasilp, Rinradee Lenavat, Natchaya Vanwong, Phichai Chansriwong, Ekaphop Sirachainan, Thanyanan Reungwetwattana, Pimonpan Jinda, Somthawin Aiempradit, Suwannee Sirilerttrakul, Monpat Chamnanphon, Apichaya Puangpetch, Nipaporn Sankuntaw, Patom
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Characterization of Butyrate‐Resistant Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines and the Cytotoxicity of Anticancer Drugs against These Cells
    Kesara Nittayaboon, Kittinun Leetanaporn, Surasak Sangkhathat, Sittiruk Roytrakul, Raphatphorn Navakanitworakul, Krzysztof Siemianowicz
    BioMed Research International.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Audit of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in Morocco: A report of the results of a prospective multicentre cohort study
    Aya El Yaakoubi, Salma Lahmadi, Amine Benkabbou, Raouf Mohsine, Abdelkader Belkouchi, Tijani El Harroudi, Hadj Omar El Malki, Abdelmalek Hrora, Amine Souadka, Mohammed Anass Majbar
    Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2022; 80: 104290.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention of colorectal cancer
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 549.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention of Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 231.     CrossRef
  • Opioid-free analgesia: is it achievable in open colorectal surgery without neuraxial block?
    Varut LOHSIRIWAT
    Minerva Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Model of Factors Influencing Health-Related Quality of Life among Thais with Colorectal Cancer and a Permanent Colostomy
    Sukanda Bunkong, Manee Arpanantikul, Yupapin Sirapo-ngam, Supreeda Monkong, Chukiat Viwatwongkasem, Karin Olson
    Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research.2022; 27(1): 185.     CrossRef
  • Current status of IBD and surgery of Crohn's disease in Thailand
    Woramin Riansuwan, Julajak Limsrivilai
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2021; 5(5): 597.     CrossRef
  • TISSUE CLASSIFICATION FOR COLORECTAL CANCER UTILIZING TECHNIQUES OF DEEP LEARNING AND MACHINE LEARNING
    Kasikrit Damkliang, Thakerng Wongsirichot, Paramee Thongsuksai
    Biomedical Engineering: Applications, Basis and Communications.2021; 33(03): 2150022.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Short-term Outcomes After Upfront Chemotherapy Followed by Curative Surgery in Metastatic Colon Cancer: A Comparison With Upfront Surgery Patients
Myung Hyun Han, Youn Young Park, Shiva Pratap, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(6):327-334.   Published online December 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.03.04.1
  • 5,009 View
  • 71 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Upfront systemic chemotherapy with target agents has been recommended for patients with stage IV colon cancer. Some with partial response are considered for curative resection. There is high risk of developing postoperative complications following upfront systemic chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate short-term perioperative outcomes of curative surgery after upfront chemotherapy in comparison with upfront surgery in patients with metastatic colon cancer.
Methods
Between January 2010 and October 2015, 146 patients (80 in the surgery first group, 66 in the upfront chemotherapy group) who underwent surgical resection before or after systemic chemotherapy for metastatic colon cancer were included in the present study. All decisions for treatment were made through a multidisciplinary team. Postoperative clinical outcomes and complications were analyzed to compare the groups.
Results
There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative clinical outcomes. Overall complication rates were not different between the groups (surgery first group: 46.3% vs. upfront chemotherapy group: 60.6%; P = 0.084). When classified according to the Clavien-Dindo method, there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of major complications (grade 3 or more) (surgery first group: 18.9% vs. upfront chemotherapy group: 27.5%; P = 0.374).
Conclusion
There was no significant increase in major postoperative complications in metastatic colon cancer patients who received upfront chemotherapy followed by curative surgery. Careful patient selection and treatment planning are important.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of preoperative chemotherapy on perioperative morbidity in combined resection of colon cancer and liver metastases
    Joy Z. Done, Angelos Papanikolaou, Miloslawa Stem, Shannon N. Radomski, Sophia Y. Chen, Chady Atallah, Jonathan E. Efron, Bashar Safar
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 27(11): 2380.     CrossRef
  • Treatment for Peritoneal Metastasis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer
    Young Jin Kim, Chang Hyun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 425.     CrossRef
Indication for and Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage IIa (T3N0M0) Colon Cancer
Chul-Hyo Jeon, Min Ki Kim, In Kyu Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(5):254-261.   Published online October 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.12.04
  • 10,390 View
  • 95 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in stage IIa colon cancer is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing survival in patients with stage IIa colon cancer, the role of AC, and the indications for AC utilization by surgical oncologists.
Methods
Between January 2004 and December 2010, 736 patients with stage IIa colon cancer underwent curative resection in 1 of 6 participating hospitals. Factors related to survival were identified and analyzed according to whether AC was administered or not. After high- and low-risk groups were identified, their respective results were analyzed.
Results
The 5-year overall survival (OS) of stage IIa colon cancer was 90.3%. With the exception of poorly differentiated histology, indications for AC did not include typical high-risk factors. The indications for AC were significantly younger patients, higher body mass index (BMI), lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, and higher histologic grade. BMI, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, and harvested lymph node (LN) count were significant factors for disease-free survival, while BMI and ASA physical status classification were significant factors for OS in the chemotherapy group. In the high-risk group, AC was associated with increased OS in univariate analysis. BMI and harvested LN count were statistically significant in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
Surgical oncologists consider the patient’s condition and postoperative course rather than high-risk factors to determine use of AC. Regardless of AC use, both the extent of surgery and the patient’s subsequent status affected the survival rate in the high-risk group. None of the factors identified influenced survival rate in the low-risk group.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Use of ascitic CEA levels as a predictive value for distant metastasis in high-risk stage II and III colorectal cancer
    Abdullah Al-Sawat, Jung Hoon Bea, Seung-Rim Han, Hyo Jin Lee, Mi Ran Yoon, Yoon Suk Lee, Do Sang Lee, Chul Seung Lee, In Kyu Lee
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(2): 365.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factor and Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage IIA Colon Cancer
    Mok-Won Lee, Jin-Su Kim, Ji-Yeon Kim, Kyung-ha Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(1): 35.     CrossRef
Bowel Preparation for Surveillance Colonoscopy After Colorectal Resection: A New Perspective
Donghyoun Lee, Ho-Kyung Chun
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(3):129-136.   Published online June 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.11.08
  • 5,635 View
  • 71 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) is commonly observed during surveillance colonoscopy after colorectal resection. We investigated potential risk factors affecting bowel preparation.
Methods
We studied potential factors affecting bowel preparation quality. The Boston bowel preparation score was used to measure bowel preparation quality. Factors affecting IBP were analyzed, including age, body mass index, time elapsed between surgery and colonoscopy, and amount of bowel preparation drug consumed (conventional-volume vs. low-volume). Odds ratios were calculated for IBP.
Results
This retrospective cohort study included 1,317 patients who underwent colorectal resection due to malignancy. Of these patients, 79% had adequate bowel preparation and 21% had IBP. In multivariate regression analysis, a surveillance colonoscopy within 1 year after surgery and age >80 were used as independent predictors of IBP. IBP rate of the low-volume group was significantly higher than that of the conventional-volume group among patients who underwent a surveillance colonoscopy within 1 year after surgery.
Conclusion
For surveillance colonoscopy after colorectal resection, bowel preparation is affected by factors including colonoscopy timing after surgery and age. We recommend the use of conventional-volume 4-L polyethylene glycol solution when performing a surveillance colonoscopy, especially up to 1 year after surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Criteria of qualitative colonoscopy in patients after colorectal surgery (case reports)
    I. Y. Korzheva, K. V. Krasnova, A. A. Likutov
    Koloproktologia.2025; 24(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • A Modified Boston Bowel Preparation Scale After Colorectal Surgery
    Lorenzo Dioscoridi, Edoardo Forti, Francesco Pugliese, Marcello Cintolo, Angelo Italia, Marta Bini, Giulia Bonato, Aurora Giannetti, Massimiliano Mutignani
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(4): 195.     CrossRef
  • Bowel Preparation for Surveillance Colonoscopy After a Colorectal Resection: A New Perspective
    Jin Soo Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(3): 107.     CrossRef
Does the Different Locations of Colon Cancer Affect the Oncologic Outcome? A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis
Kwan Mo Yang, In Ja Park, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Na Young Kim, Shinae Hong, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(1):15-23.   Published online February 28, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.07.25
  • 5,669 View
  • 125 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
We evaluate the prognostic value of primary tumor location for oncologic outcomes in patients with colon cancer (CC).
Methods
CC patients treated with curative surgery between 2009 and 2012 were classified into 2 groups: right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined based on tumor stage. Propensity scores were created using eight variables (age, sex, T stage, N stage, histologic grade, presence of lymphovascular invasion/perineural invasion, and microsatellite instability status).
Results
Overall, 2,329 patients were identified. The 5-year RFSs for RCC and LCC patients were 89.7% and 88.4% (P = 0.328), respectively, and their 5-year OSs were 90.9% and 93.4% (P = 0.062). Multivariate survival analyses were carried out by using the Cox regression proportional hazard model. In the unadjusted analysis, a marginal increase in overall mortality was seen in RCC patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.297; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.987–1.704, P = 0.062); however, after multivariable adjustment, similar OSs were observed in those patients (HR, 1.219; 95% CI, 0.91–1.633; P = 0.183). After propensity-score matching with a total of 1,560 patients, no significant difference was identified (P = 0.183). A slightly worse OS was seen for stage III RCC patients (HR, 1.561; 95% CI, 0.967–2.522; P = 0.068) than for stage III LCC patients. The 5-year OSs for patients with stage III RCC and stage III LCC were 85.5% and 90.5%, respectively (P = 0.133).
Conclusion
Although the results are inconclusive, tumor location tended to be associated with OS in CC patients with lymph node metastasis, but it was not related to oncologic outcome.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic value of primary tumor location in colorectal cancer: an updated meta-analysis
    Hanieh Gholamalizadeh, Nima Zafari, Mahla Velayati, Hamid Fiuji, Mina Maftooh, Elnaz Ghorbani, Seyed Mahdi Hassanian, Majid Khazaei, Gordon A. Ferns, Elham Nazari, Amir Avan
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine.2023; 23(8): 4369.     CrossRef
  • Inhibition of CXCR4 and CXCR7 Is Protective in Acute Peritoneal Inflammation
    Kristian-Christos Ngamsri, Christoph Jans, Rizki A. Putri, Katharina Schindler, Jutta Gamper-Tsigaras, Claudia Eggstein, David Köhler, Franziska M. Konrad
    Frontiers in Immunology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Left colon as a novel high-risk factor for postoperative recurrence of stage II colon cancer
    Liming Wang, Yasumitsu Hirano, Toshimasa Ishii, Hiroka Kondo, Kiyoka Hara, Nao Obara, Shigeki Yamaguchi
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
Review
Differences Regarding the Molecular Features and Gut Microbiota Between Right and Left Colon Cancer
Kwangmin Kim, Ernes John T. Castro, Hongjin Shim, John Vincent G. Advincula, Young-Wan Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):280-285.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.12.17
  • 10,458 View
  • 277 Download
  • 47 Web of Science
  • 46 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
For many years, developmental and physiological differences have been known to exist between anatomic segments of the colorectum. Because of different outcomes, prognoses, and clinical responses to chemotherapy, the distinction between right colon cancer (RCC) and left colon cancer (LCC) has gained attention. Furthermore, variations in the molecular features and gut microbiota between right and LCCs have recently been a hot research topic. CpG island methylator phenotype-high, microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancers are more likely to occur on the right side whereas tumors with chromosomal instability have been detected in approximately 75% of LCC patients and 30% of RCC patients. The mutation rates of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes also differ between RCC and LCC patients. Biofilm is more abundant in RCC patients than LLC patients, as are Prevotella, Selenomonas, and Peptostreptococcus. Conversely, Fusobacterium, Escherichia/Shigella, and Leptotrichia are more abundant in LCC patients compared to RCC patients. Distinctive characteristics are apparent in terms of molecular features and gut microbiota between right and LCC. However, how or to what extent these differences influence diverging oncologic outcomes remains unclear. Further clinical and translational studies are needed to elucidate the causative relationship between primary tumor location and prognosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clostridioides difficile: A suspected pro-carcinogenic bacterium for gastrointestinal tumors
    Ju Zou, Biyue Tian, Yuanyuan Xiao, Anhua Wu, Chunhui Li
    Chinese Medical Journal.2026; 139(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Integrating E-cadherin expression levels with TNM staging for enhanced prognostic prediction in colorectal cancer patients
    Jae-Ghi Lee, Ilkyu Park, Hannah Lee, Seungyoon Nam, Jisup Kim, Won-Suk Lee, Myunghee Kang, Jung Ho Kim
    BMC Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Gut Microbiota and Colorectal Cancer: Understanding the Link and Exploring Therapeutic Interventions
    Imen Zalila-Kolsi, Dhoha Dhieb, Hussam A. Osman, Hadjer Mekideche
    Biology.2025; 14(3): 251.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic utility of the preoperative cachexia index for malnutrition in colorectal cancer: A prospective cohort study
    Katarzyna Chawrylak, Wojciech Górski, Katarzyna Sędłak, Radoslaw Mlak, Marta Kaus, Agnieszka Hotloś, Zuzanna Chilimoniuk, Konrad Gładysz, Katarzyna Mielniczek, Magdalena Leśniewska, Zuzanna Pelc, Michał Bednarz, Wiktor Grela, Natalia Gniaź, Aleksandra Gór
    Surgical Oncology.2025; 62: 102275.     CrossRef
  • Differences in the expression of CMTM3 and SSTR2 genes in right and left colon tumors: A molecular insight into colorectal cancer
    Tuğçe Binen, Etem Akbaş, Tahsin Çolak, Tuba Kara, Aslıhan Bakır, Badel İnce
    Medical Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Distinctive chromosomal, mutational and transcriptional profiling in colon versus rectal cancers
    Maria Teresa De Angelis, Antonia Rizzuto, Angela Amaddeo, Carlo Sagnelli, Niccolò Vono, Michela Reda, Valentina Lise, Luca Parrillo, Carmela De Marco, Donatella Malanga, Gianluca Santamaria, Giuseppe Viglietto
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oral microbiota analysis of tongue coating in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Huijie Wang, Jinfeng Wang, Jinli Liu, Xiaoyang Shi, Zhichao Wang, Xu Cao
    Medicine.2025; 104(41): e45160.     CrossRef
  • Genetic, Epidemiological, Clinical, and Therapeutic Trajectories in Colon and Rectal Cancers
    Maurizio Capuozzo, Carmine Picone, Francesco Sabbatino, Mariachiara Santorsola, Francesco Caraglia, Domenico Iervolino, Roberto Sirica, Oreste Gualillo, Giordana Di Mauro, Rosa Castiello, Monica Ianniello, Alessia Maria Cossu, Angela Nebbioso, Lucia Altuc
    Cancers.2025; 17(21): 3438.     CrossRef
  • Expression of Human Endogenous Retrovirus Env Gene Product Is a Hallmark of Sidedness in Operable Colorectal Cancer
    Maria Dolci, Ivan Civettini, Pietro Francesco Bagnoli, Wafa Toumi, Lucia Signorini, Roberto Crocchiolo, Kevin Kamau Maina, Federica Perego, Pasquale Ferrante, Carolina Scagnolari, Marco Bregni, Serena Delbue
    Oncology.2025; 103(12): 1138.     CrossRef
  • The gut microbiota and its biogeography
    Giselle McCallum, Carolina Tropini
    Nature Reviews Microbiology.2024; 22(2): 105.     CrossRef
  • The role of gut microbiota and probiotics in preventing, treating, and boosting the immune system in colorectal cancer
    Forough Masheghati, Mohammad Reza Asgharzadeh, Abbas Jafari, Naser Masoudi, Hadi Maleki-Kakelar
    Life Sciences.2024; 344: 122529.     CrossRef
  • Diet-mediated gut microbial community modulation and signature metabolites as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis, prognosis, prevention and stage-specific treatment of colorectal cancer
    Mutebi John Kenneth, Hsin-Chi Tsai, Chuan-Yin Fang, Bashir Hussain, Yi-Chou Chiu, Bing-Mu Hsu
    Journal of Advanced Research.2023; 52: 45.     CrossRef
  • Microbiome and metabolic features of tissues and feces reveal diagnostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer
    Jiahui Feng, Zhizhong Gong, Zhangran Sun, Juan Li, Na Xu, Rick F. Thorne, Xu Dong Zhang, Xiaoying Liu, Gang Liu
    Frontiers in Microbiology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Metachronous Colorectal Adenomas Occur Close to the Index Lesion
    Ria Rosser, Bernard M. Corfe, Keith S. Chapple
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2023; 57(9): 937.     CrossRef
  • Genetic heterogeneity of colorectal cancer and the microbiome
    Marina A Senchukova
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2023; 15(3): 443.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Colorectal Cancer Sidedness and Location on Therapy and Clinical Outcomes: Role of Blood-Based Biopsy for Personalized Treatment
    Sasha Waldstein, Marianne Spengler, Iryna V. Pinchuk, Nelson S. Yee
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 13(7): 1114.     CrossRef
  • Fusobacterium nucleatum-Mediated Alteration in Expression of VEGF and CCL3 Genes and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Hataw Jalal Taher, Fouad Kamel
    Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk of developing metachronous colorectal neoplasia after the resection of proximal versus distal adenomas
    Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Youngwoo Kim, Dong Il Park
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2022; 54(4): 537.     CrossRef
  • Faeces from malnourished colorectal cancer patients accelerate cancer progression
    Xu Chao, Zhang Lei, Liu Hongqin, Wang Ziwei, Li Dechuan, Du Weidong, Xu Lu, Chen Haitao, Zhang Bo, Ju Haixing, Yao Qinghua
    Clinical Nutrition.2022; 41(3): 632.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and molecular profile of young adults with early‐onset colorectal cancer: Experience from four Australian tertiary centers
    Derrick Ho Wai Siu, Arwa Ali, Angelina Tjokrowidjaja, Madhawa De Silva, Joanna Lee, Philip R. Clingan, Morteza Aghmesheh, Daniel Brungs, Cristina Mapagu, David Goldstein, Siobhan O'Neill, Winston S. Liauw, Katrin M. Sjoquist, David Thomas, Nick Pavlakis,
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 18(6): 660.     CrossRef
  • Microbial Characteristics of Common Tongue Coatings in Patients with Precancerous Lesions of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract
    Xiaoyu Kang, Bin Lu, Pan Xiao, Zhaolai Hua, Rui Shen, Jianping Wu, Juan Wu, Zhenfeng Wu, Chun Cheng, Junfeng Zhang, Enas Abdulhay
    Journal of Healthcare Engineering.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal microbiota after removal of colorectal cancer
    Peter Cronin, Clodagh L Murphy, Maurice Barrett, Tarini Shankar Ghosh, Paola Pellanda, Eibhlis M O’Connor, Syed Akbar Zulquernain, Shane Kileen, Morgan McCourt, Emmet Andrews, Micheal G O’Riordain, Fergus Shanahan, Paul W O’Toole
    NAR Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer
    Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • Tumor tissue-specific bacterial biomarker panel for colorectal cancer: Bacteroides massiliensis, Alistipes species, Alistipes onderdonkii, Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, Corynebacterium appendicis
    Rizwana Hasan, Sudeep Bose, Rahul Roy, Debarati Paul, Saumitra Rawat, Pravin Nilwe, Neeraj K. Chauhan, Sangeeta Choudhury
    Archives of Microbiology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes with survival depends on primary tumor sidedness in stage III colon cancers (NCCTG N0147) [Alliance]
    B. Saberzadeh-Ardestani, N.R. Foster, H.E. Lee, Q. Shi, S.R. Alberts, T.C. Smyrk, F.A. Sinicrope
    Annals of Oncology.2022; 33(11): 1159.     CrossRef
  • Fecal Luminal Factors from Patients with Gastrointestinal Diseases Alter Gene Expression Profiles in Caco-2 Cells and Colonoids
    Luiza Holst, Cristina Iribarren, Maria Sapnara, Otto Savolainen, Hans Törnblom, Yvonne Wettergren, Hans Strid, Magnus Simrén, Maria K. Magnusson, Lena Öhman
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(24): 15505.     CrossRef
  • Phosphorylated transducer and activator of transcription-3 (pSTAT3) immunohistochemical expression in paired primary and metastatic colorectal cancer
    Esmeralda C. Marginean, Joanna Gotfrit, Horia Marginean, Daniel W. Yokom, Justin J. Bateman, Manijeh Daneshmand, Shelly Sud, Allen M. Gown, Derek Jonker, Timothy Asmis, Rachel A. Goodwin
    Translational Oncology.2021; 14(2): 100996.     CrossRef
  • Construction of a long noncoding RNA-based competing endogenous RNA network and prognostic signatures of left- and right-side colon cancer
    Ke-zhi Li, Yi-xin Yin, Yan-ping Tang, Long Long, Ming-zhi Xie, Ji-lin Li, Ke Ding, Bang-li Hu
    Cancer Cell International.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gut Microbiota as Potential Biomarker and/or Therapeutic Target to Improve the Management of Cancer: Focus on Colibactin-Producing Escherichia coli in Colorectal Cancer
    Julie Veziant, Romain Villéger, Nicolas Barnich, Mathilde Bonnet
    Cancers.2021; 13(9): 2215.     CrossRef
  • Association of Habitual Preoperative Dietary Fiber Intake With Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Dieuwertje E. Kok, Melissa N. N. Arron, Tess Huibregtse, Flip M. Kruyt, Dirk Jan Bac, Henk K. van Halteren, Ewout A. Kouwenhoven, Evertine Wesselink, Renate M. Winkels, Moniek van Zutphen, Fränzel J. B. van Duijnhoven, Johannes H. W. de Wilt, Ellen Kampma
    JAMA Surgery.2021; 156(9): 827.     CrossRef
  • Resectable Colorectal Cancer: Current Perceptions on the Correlation of Recurrence Risk, Microbiota and Detection of Genetic Mutations in Liquid Biopsies
    Andreas Koulouris, Christos Tsagkaris, Ippokratis Messaritakis, Nikolaos Gouvas, Maria Sfakianaki, Maria Trypaki, Vasiliki Spyrou, Manousos Christodoulakis, Elias Athanasakis, Evangelos Xynos, Maria Tzardi, Dimitrios Mavroudis, John Souglakos
    Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3522.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Helicobacter pylori Infection on the Oral Microbiota of Reflux Esophagitis Patients
    Tian Liang, Fang Liu, Lijun Liu, Zhiying Zhang, Wenxue Dong, Su Bai, Lifeng Ma, Longli Kang
    Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Association of Gut Microbiota and Complications in Gastrointestinal-Cancer Therapies
    Kevin M. Tourelle, Sebastien Boutin, Markus A. Weigand, Felix C. F. Schmitt
    Biomedicines.2021; 9(10): 1305.     CrossRef
  • Antibacterial Activity of T22, a Specific Peptidic Ligand of the Tumoral Marker CXCR4
    Naroa Serna, José Vicente Carratalá, Oscar Conchillo-Solé, Carlos Martínez-Torró, Ugutz Unzueta, Ramón Mangues, Neus Ferrer-Miralles, Xavier Daura, Esther Vázquez, Antonio Villaverde
    Pharmaceutics.2021; 13(11): 1922.     CrossRef
  • Gut Microbiota Profiles in Early- and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Potential Diagnostic Biomarker in the Future
    Murdani Abdullah, Ninik Sukartini, Saskia Aziza Nursyirwan, Rabbinu Rangga Pribadi, Hasan Maulahela, Amanda Pitarini Utari, Virly Nanda Muzellina, Agustinus Wiraatmadja, Kaka Renaldi
    Digestion.2021; 102(6): 823.     CrossRef
  • The gut microbiome in epilepsy
    Birol Şafak, Bengü Altunan, Birol Topçu, Aynur Eren Topkaya
    Microbial Pathogenesis.2020; 139: 103853.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic Targeting of the Colorectal Tumor Stroma
    Wolf H. Fridman, Ian Miller, Catherine Sautès-Fridman, Annette T. Byrne
    Gastroenterology.2020; 158(2): 303.     CrossRef
  • Bacterial Biofilm and its Role in the Pathogenesis of Disease
    Lene K. Vestby, Torstein Grønseth, Roger Simm, Live L. Nesse
    Antibiotics.2020; 9(2): 59.     CrossRef
  • Foes or Friends? Bacteria Enriched in the Tumor Microenvironment of Colorectal Cancer
    Siyang Xu, Wen Yin, Yuling Zhang, Qimei Lv, Yijun Yang, Jin He
    Cancers.2020; 12(2): 372.     CrossRef
  • Esophageal microbiome signature in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Loris Riccardo Lopetuso, Marco Severgnini, Silvia Pecere, Francesca Romana Ponziani, Ivo Boskoski, Alberto Larghi, Gianluca Quaranta, Luca Masucci, Gianluca Ianiro, Tania Camboni, Antonio Gasbarrini, Guido Costamagna, Clarissa Consolandi, Giovanni Cammaro
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(5): e0231789.     CrossRef
  • Unsuspected clinical presentation of coronavirus disease 2019: acute bowel disease
    Marco Lotti, Michela Giulii Capponi, Dusanka Dokic, Paolo Bertoli, Alessandro Lucianetti
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2020; 90(9): 1772.     CrossRef
  • Does Sidedness Matter in Unresectable Colorectal Cancer?
    Suneel D. Kamath, Alok A. Khorana
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2019; 26(6): 1588.     CrossRef
  • Morphological characteristics of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the colon and its embryogenetic premises
    Yu. S. Korneva, R. V. Ukrainets
    Colorectal Oncology.2019; 9(2): 16.     CrossRef
  • Primary Tumor Sidedness Predicts Bevacizumab Benefit in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Xia-Hong You, Can Wen, Zi-Jin Xia, Fan Sun, Yao Li, Wei Wang, Zhou Fang, Qing-Gen Chen, Lei Zhang, Yu-Huang Jiang, Xiao-Zhong Wang, Hou-Qun Ying, Zhen Zong
    Frontiers in Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy as a predictor of colorectal polyps: a large scale case-control study
    Yoshinari Kawahara, Masaaki Kodama, Kazuhiro Mizukami, Tomoko Saito, Yuka Hirashita, Akira Sonoda, Kensuke Fukuda, Osamu Matsunari, Kazuhisa Okamoto, Ryo Ogawa, Tadayoshi Okimoto, Kazunari Murakami
    Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition.2019; 65(2): 153.     CrossRef
  • Gut Microbiome: A Promising Biomarker for Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancer
    Sally Temraz, Farah Nassar, Rihab Nasr, Maya Charafeddine, Deborah Mukherji, Ali Shamseddine
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2019; 20(17): 4155.     CrossRef
Original Article
Female Sex and Right-Sided Tumor Location Are Poor Prognostic Factors for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer After a Curative Resection
Jung Ho Park, Hyoung-Chul Park, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Seung Chul Heo, Min Jung Kim, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, for the Seoul Colorectal Group (SECOG)
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):286-291.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.29
  • 6,317 View
  • 120 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Stage-IIIC colon cancer is an advanced disease; however, its oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage-IIIC colon cancer.
Methods
From a multicenter database, we retrospectively enrolled 611 patients (355 men and 256 women) who had undergone a potentially curative resection for a stage-IIIC colon adenocarcinoma between 2003 and 2011. The primary end-point was the 5-year DFS.
Results
The median age was 62 years; 213 and 398 patients had right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC), respectively. The 5-year DFS in all patients was 52.0%; median follow-up time was 35 months (range, 1–134 months). A multivariate Cox regression revealed that female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19–1.90; P < 0.01), right-sided tumor location (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.29–2.11; P < 0.01), lymphatic invasion (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.08–2.15; P < 0.01) and a high (≥0.4) metastatic lymph node ratio (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 2.63–5.24; P < 0.01) were independent predictors of worse 5-year DFS. Female patients with RCC were 1.79 fold more likely to experience recurrence than male patients with LCC.
Conclusion
Female sex and right-sided tumor location are associated with higher tumor recurrence rates in patients with stage-IIIC colon cancers. Aggressive treatment and close surveillance should be planned for patients in these groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development and external validation of a nomogram predicting overall survival after curative resection of colon cancer
    Shuanhu Wang, Yakui Liu, Yi Shi, Jiajia Guan, Mulin Liu, Wenbin Wang
    Journal of International Medical Research.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
Video
Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Proximal Transverse Colon Cancer With Situs Inversus Totalis: A Case Report
Seung-Seop Yeom, Kyung Hwan Kim, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):322-325.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.29.1
  • 8,959 View
  • 100 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Situs inversus is a rare hereditary disorder in which various anomalies have been reported with internal rotation abnormalities. This case involved an 85-year-old woman who had been diagnosed with transverse colon cancer and who underwent reduced-port laparoscopic surgery. All intra-abdominal organs were reversed left to right and right to left. The aberrant midcolic artery was identified during surgery. The total surgery time was 170 minutes, and the patient lost 20 mL of blood. The patient was discharged on the 8th postoperative day without complications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration to treat choledocholithiasis in situs inversus patients: A technical review
    Bo-Ya Chiu, Shu-Hung Chuang, Shih-Chang Chuang, Kung-Kai Kuo
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2023; 11(9): 1939.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic radical resection for situs inversus totalis with colonic splenic flexure carcinoma: A case report
    Zi-Ling Zheng, Shou-Ru Zhang, Hao Sun, Mao-Cai Tang, Jing-Kun Shang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(16): 5435.     CrossRef
  • MicroRNA-129-3p Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Proliferation
    Lei Kang, Dongmei Guo, Yanhai Dong, Xiaowei Chen, Chao Yuan
    Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering.2022; 12(12): 2413.     CrossRef
  • Technique for Improving the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Challenging Cases
    Giorgio Bogani, Francesco Raspagliesi
    Journal of Investigative Surgery.2021; 34(3): 334.     CrossRef
Case Reports
Toxocara canis Mimicking a Metastatic Omental Mass from Sigmoid Colon Cancer: A Case Report
Han-Gil Kim, Jung-Wook Yang, Soon-Chan Hong, Young-Joon Lee, Young-Tae Ju, Chi-Young Jeong, Jin-Kwon Lee, Seung-Jin Kwag
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(3):160-163.   Published online June 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.12.20
  • 6,825 View
  • 84 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Toxocara canis is an important roundworm of canids and a fearsome animal parasite of humans. Human infections can lead to syndromes called visceral larva migrans (VLM), ocular larva migrans, neurotoxocariasis, and covert toxocariasis. VLM is most commonly diagnosed in children younger than 8 years of age, but adult cases are relatively frequent among those infected by ingesting the raw tissue of paratenic hosts in East Asia. This research reports the case of a 59-year-old man with sigmoid colon cancer, who visited our institution for surgery. An intraperitoneal mass was found on preoperative computed tomography, and it was thought to be a metastatic mass from sigmoid colon cancer. A postoperative histologic examination and serum test showed eosinophilic granuloma due to toxocariasis. Diagnosis of VLM is often difficult and highly suspicious in adults. Researchers suggest, although rarely, that VLM be included in the differential diagnosis as a cause of intraperitoneal tumors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Current status of intestinal parasite infections in fecal samples of dogs in Korea
    You-Jeong Lee, Beoul Kim, Dongmi Kwak, Min-Goo Seo
    Parasites, Hosts and Diseases.2024; 62(4): 438.     CrossRef
  • Human Toxocariasis in individuals with blood disorders and cancer patients: the first seroepidemiological study in Iran
    Vahid Raissi, Nasrin Sohrabi, Fatemeh Bayat, Soudabeh Etemadi, Omid Raiesi, Pantea Jalali, Maryam Karami, Ali Abdollahi, Ziba Hoseiny, Mahdi Shayanfard, Gita Alizadeh, Mahmoud E. Gadalla, Asmaa Ibrahim
    Journal of Parasitic Diseases.2021; 45(3): 643.     CrossRef
  • Pulmonary Exacerbation of Undiagnosed Toxocariasis in Intensively-Treated High-Risk Neuroblastoma Patients
    Szymon Janczar, Monika Bulas, Justyna Walenciak, Dobromila Baranska, Marek Ussowicz, Wojciech Młynarski, Beata Zalewska-Szewczyk
    Children.2020; 7(10): 169.     CrossRef
  • Toxocariasis Suspected of Having Infiltrated Directly from the Liver to the Lung through the Diaphragm
    Masaki Kakimoto, Masayuki Murata, Fujiko Mitsumoto-Kaseida, Eiichi Ogawa, Yuji Matsumoto, Akira Kusaga, Kazuhiro Toyoda, Takeo Hayashi, Kazuya Ura, Keishi Kanno, Norihiro Furusyo, Susumu Tazuma
    Internal Medicine.2019; 58(18): 2737.     CrossRef
Incidentally Solitary, Synchronous, Metastatic Left Adrenal Mass From Colon Cancer
Mina Alvandipour, Mohammad Yasin Karami, Mehdi Khalvati, Hamed Khodabakhsh
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(2):79-82.   Published online April 30, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.2.79
  • 7,853 View
  • 50 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

The authors report the case of a 63-year-old man who underwent an open adrenalectomy for a synchronous, malignant, metastatic left adrenal tumor and a total colectomy for T3N0M1 (stage 4) primary, malignant colon cancer. Two polypoid lesions, one measuring 40 mm × 30 mm × 30 mm and the other measuring 20 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm, were found in the ascending colon and rectosigmoid (RS) junction, respectively, and a synchronous, malignant, left adrenal gland lesion measuring 70 mm × 50 mm × 30 mm was incidentally found on abdominal computed tomography scan. Histological examination revealed a metastatic, necrotic adenocarcinoma of the left adrenal mass, an adenocarcinoma of the cecal mass, and an adenomatous polyp (tubulovillous type) of the smallest polypoid lesion in RS junction that had invaded deeply into the submucosal layer. The patient recovered uneventfully, and his condition is now stable, with no evidence of local recurrence or metastatic disease, 2 years after the surgery. To the best of our knowledge, only 25 cases of an adrenalectomy for treating metastatic adrenal gland tumors have been reported to date; physicians should be aware of the possibility of this event.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Surgical resection of adrenal metastasis from colorectal cancers: a systematic review
    Thi Ai Van Terresa Nguyen, Sze Ling Wong, Zi Qin Ng
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(4): 545.     CrossRef
  • An Adrenal Incidentaloma After Colon/Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Primer Lesion or Metastasis—A Case Report
    Adalet Daş, İbrahim Ethem Cakcak, Derya Karabulut, Dicle Tamer Türk
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Solitary metastasis of colorectal cancer in the left adrenal gland 4 years after surgery on the primary tumor. Case report
    Marina D. Budurova, Vladimir S. Trifanov, Vladimir V. Kopylov, Olga S. Kuznetsova, Maria A. Chernichenko, Sergey I. Poluektov
    Journal of Modern Oncology.2023; 25(3): 401.     CrossRef
  • Synchronous contralateral adrenal metastasis of colorectal cancer: case report
    Micaela Raices, Luis Boccalatte, Gustavo Rossi, Fernando Wright
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Article
Age Over 80 is a Possible Risk Factor for Postoperative Morbidity After a Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer
Taekhyun Kang, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun, Won Kon Han, Kyung Uk Jung
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(6):228-234.   Published online December 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.6.228
  • 6,504 View
  • 43 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 18 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

With extended life expectancy, the mean age of patients at the time of diagnosis of colorectal cancer and its treatment, including radical resection, is increasing gradually. We aimed to evaluate the impact of age on postoperative clinical outcomes after a laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancers.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Patients with primary colorectal malignancies or premalignant lesions who underwent laparoscopic colectomies between January 2009 and April 2013 were identified. Patients were divided into 6 groups by age using 70, 75, and 80 years as cutoffs: younger than 70, 70 or older, younger than 75, 75 or older, younger than 80, and 80 or older. Demographics, pathological parameters, and postoperative clinical outcomes, including postoperative morbidity, were compared between the younger and the older age groups.

Results

All 578 patients underwent a laparoscopic colorectal resection. The overall postoperative complication rate was 21.1% (n = 122). There were 4 cases of operative mortality (0.7%). Postoperative complication rates were consistently higher in the older groups at all three cutoffs; however, only the comparison with a cutoff at 80 years showed a statistically significant difference between the younger and the older groups.

Conclusion

Age over 80 is a possible risk factor for postoperative morbidity after a laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Association between flurbiprofen axetil use and operative complications occurring following colorectal surgery
    Weisi Ding, Kai Shen, Wenhui Ren, Xue Tian, Yi Feng
    Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2025; 30(4): 1.     CrossRef
  • Octogenarian patients with colon cancer – postoperative morbidity and mortality are the major challenges
    Øystein Høydahl, Tom-Harald Edna, Athanasios Xanthoulis, Stian Lydersen, Birger Henning Endreseth
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Differential short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection in colon and rectal cancer patients aged 80 and older: an analysis of Nationwide Inpatient Sample
    Kuan-Chih Chung, Ko-Chao Lee, Hong-Hwa Chen, Kung-Chuan Cheng, Kuen-Lin Wu, Ling-Chiao Song
    Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(2): 872.     CrossRef
  • Age and comorbidities do not affect short-term outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection in elderly patients. A multi-institutional cohort study in 287 patients
    Roberto Peltrini, Nicola Imperatore, Filippo Carannante, Diego Cuccurullo, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Umberto Bracale, Marco Caricato, Francesco Corcione
    Updates in Surgery.2021; 73(2): 527.     CrossRef
  • Short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer aged over 80 years: a propensity score matching analysis
    Masako Utsumi, Takeru Matsuda, Kimihiro Yamashita, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Kyosuke Agawa, Naoki Urakawa, Shingo Kanaji, Taro Oshikiri, Tetsu Nakamura, Yoshihiro Kakeji
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(11): 2519.     CrossRef
  • Type and Consequences of Short-Term Complications in Colon Cancer Surgery, Focusing on the Oldest Old
    Marisa Baré, Laura Mora, Miguel Pera, Pablo Collera, Maximino Redondo, Antonio Escobar, Rocío Anula, José María Quintana, M. Redondo, F. Rivas, E. Briones, E. Campano, A.I. Sotelo, F. Medina, A. Del Rey, M.M. Morales, S. Gómez, M. Baré, M. Pont, N. Torà,
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2020; 19(1): e18.     CrossRef
  • Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly versus non-elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nobuaki Hoshino, Yudai Fukui, Koya Hida, Yoshiharu Sakai
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(3): 377.     CrossRef
  • Safety and Prognosis of Transarterial Chemoembolization for Octogenarians with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Hua-Ming Cheng, Toshihiro Tanaka, Hideyuki Nishiofuku, Yuto Chanoki, Katsutoshi Horiuchi, Tetsuya Masada, Shota Tatsumoto, Takeshi Matsumoto, Nagaaki Marugami, Kimihiko Kichikawa
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.2019; 42(10): 1413.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in advanced age patients
    Z. B. Khalilov, A. Yu. Kalinichenko, R. Kh. Azimov, M. A. Chinikov, I. S. Panteleeva, F. S. Kurbanov
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2018; (3): 76.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of video-assisted procedures in advanced age patients with colorectal cancer
    Z. B. Khalilov, A. Yu. Kalinichenko, R. Kh. Azimov, I. S. Panteleeva, M. A. Chinikov, F. S. Kurbanov
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2018; (2): 74.     CrossRef
  • Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening and treatment methods: Mapping of systematic reviews
    Hossein M Abdolahi, Ali S Asiabar, Saber Azami-Aghdash, Fatemeh Pournaghi-Azar, Aziz Rezapour
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing.2018; 5(1): 57.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in elderly patients
    Z. B. Khalilov, A. Yu. Kalinichenko
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2017; (3): 86.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of safety, feasibility and the long-term outcomes of colorectomy for colorectal adenocarcinoma in patients older than 80 years of age
    Norio Yukawa, Toru Aoyama, Tsutomu Sato, Takashi Oshima, Takaki Yoshikawa, Yasushi Rino, Munetaka Masuda
    Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2017; 7(4): 564.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 75 years old: a multi-institutional study (YSURG1401)
    Keisuke Kazama, Toru Aoyama, Tsutomu Hayashi, Takanobu Yamada, Masakatsu Numata, Shinya Amano, Mariko Kamiya, Tsutomu Sato, Takaki Yoshikawa, Manabu Shiozawa, Takashi Oshima, Norio Yukawa, Yasushi Rino, Munetaka Masuda
    BMC Surgery.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The possibility of endovideosurgical interventions for the treatment of the older-age patients presenting with rectal cancer
    Z. B. Khalilov, R. H. Azimov, M. A. Chinikov, I. S. Panteleeva, F. S. Kurbanov
    Dokazatel'naya gastroenterologiya.2017; 6(4): 53.     CrossRef
  • Impact of frailty on approach to colonic resection: Laparoscopy vs open surgery
    Catalina Mosquera, Konstantinos Spaniolas, Timothy L Fitzgerald
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(43): 9544.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Surgery in Elderly Patients
    Byung Chun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(4): 126.     CrossRef
  • Impact of octogenarians on surgical outcome in colorectal cancer
    Basilio Pirrera, Samuele Vaccari, Dajana Cuicchi, Ferdinando Lecce, Emilio De Raffele, Barbara Dalla Via, Marco Di Laudo, Valeria Tonini, Maurizio Cervellera, Bruno Cola
    International Journal of Surgery.2016; 35: 28.     CrossRef
Case Report
Colonic Metastasis Presenting as an Intraluminal Fungating Mass 8 Years After Surgery for Ovarian Cancer
Jeong Rye Kim, Bong Man Kim, You Me Kim, Won Ae Lee, Hwan Namgung
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(5):198-201.   Published online October 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.5.198
  • 7,282 View
  • 45 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

We report a case of colonic metastasis from ovarian cancer presented as an intraluminal fungating mass mimicking primary colon cancer 8 years after surgery for ovarian cancer. A 70-year-old woman presented with constipation. She had undergone an extended total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for an ovarian papillary serous cystadenocarcinoma 8 years earlier. Colonoscopy showed a large fungating mass 10 cm from the anal verge that was suspected to be colorectal cancer. A computed tomography scan showed a bulky intraluminal fungating mass in the rectosigmoid junction. After a lower anterior resection and a pathologic diagnosis, a diagnosis of a papillary serous adenocarcinoma due to metastasis from an ovarian tumor was made for this patient.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Serous Carcinomas Initially Diagnosed on Colon Biopsies: A Case Series Highlighting the Role of p53 to Guide Management
    Brianna Waller, John A. Steinharter, John M. Kennedy, Charles Ashley, Amer K. Abu Alfa, Kristen E. Muller, Bronwyn Bryant
    International Journal of Surgical Pathology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Case Report of Bilateral Endometrioid-Type Ovarian Carcinoma with Synchronous Dual Metastasis to the Colon
    W. T. N. Widanage, K. S. Nathawitharanalage, N. A. Kodithuwakku, A. A. S. Samarathunga, H. M. S. P. Rajaguru, K. P. Dissanayake, L. R. A. Wijesooriya, J. A. S. B. Jayasundara
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Synchronous Tumors in the Cecum and Ovary: Differentiating a Primary Colonic Tumor from Metastasis
    Raksha Ramesh, Shalini Shree Krishnamurthy, Jayashree Natarajan, Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri
    Indian Journal of Colo-Rectal Surgery.2024; 7(3): 54.     CrossRef
  • Metastasis of Ovarian Cancer to the Descending Colon
    Kentaro Abe, Hiroyuki Anzai, Satoko Eguchi, Masako Ikemura, Aya Shinozaki-Ushiku, Takahide Shinagawa, Hirofumi Sonoda, Yuichiro Yoshioka, Yuzo Nagai, Shinya Abe, Hiroyuki Matsuzaki, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Shigenobu Emoto, Koji Murono, Kazuhito Sasaki, Hiroaki
    Case Reports in Gastroenterology.2023; 17(1): 136.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathologic Features of Gynecologic Malignancies Presenting Clinically as Colonic Malignancies
    Lanisha D Fuller, Andrew Dunn, Aaron R Huber, Monika Vyas, Raul S Gonzalez
    American Journal of Clinical Pathology.2022; 157(1): 82.     CrossRef
  • Rectorrhagia revealing colonic metastasis from an ovarian primary, an exceptional case report
    Rachid Jabi, Siham Elmir, Soumia El Arabi, Achraf Merry, Mohammed Bouziane
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2021; 88(C): 106490.     CrossRef
  • Metastatic colon cancer of an ovarian cancer origin mimicking primary colon cancer: A case report
    Ji-Hyeon Park, Dong Hae Jung, Jeong-Heum Baek
    Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2018; 14(1): 53.     CrossRef
Original Articles
The Role of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in a Right Hemicolectomy for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
Sung Uk Bae, Jin Seok Park, Young Jin Choi, Min Ku Lee, Byung Sun Cho, Yoon Jung Kang, Joo Seung Park, Chang Nam Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(1):11-17.   Published online February 28, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.1.11
  • 7,637 View
  • 47 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the perioperative and long-term oncologic outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and standard laparoscopic surgery (SLS) and assess the role of HALS in the management of right-sided colon cancer.

Methods

The study group included 53 patients who underwent HALS and 45 patients who underwent SLS for right-sided colon cancer between April 2002 and December 2008.

Results

The patients in each group were similar in age, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score, body mass index, and history of previous abdominal surgeries. Eight patients in the HALS group and no patient in the SLS group exhibited signs of tumor invasion into adjacent structures. No differences were noted in the time to return of normal bowel function, time to toleration of diet, lengths of hospital stay and narcotic usage, and rate of postoperative complications. The median incision length was longer in the HALS group (HALS: 7.0 cm vs. SLS: 4.8 cm, P < 0.001). The HALS group had a significantly higher pathologic TNM stage and significantly larger tumor size (HALS: 6.0 cm vs. SLS: 3.3 cm, P < 0.001). The 5-year overall, disease-free, and cancer-specific survival rates of the HALS and the SLS groups were 87.3%, 75.2%, and 93.9% and 86.4%, 78.0%, and 90.7%, respectively (P = 0.826, P = 0.574, and P = 0.826).

Conclusion

Although patients in the HALS group had more advanced disease and underwent more complex procedures than those in the SLS group, the short-term benefits and the oncologic outcomes between the two groups were comparable. HALS can, therefore, be considered an alternative to SLS for bulky and fixed right-sided colon cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The terminal ileal vein approach: a novel and simple technique for locating the superior mesenteric vein and en bloc resection of the ileal mesentery in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy
    Yi-Jun Liao, Si-Yuan Mi, Da Kang, Xin Tang, Gong Chen, Zhi-Zhong Pan, Rong-Xin Zhang
    Updates in Surgery.2025; 77(8): 2311.     CrossRef
  • Effect of postoperative complications on 5-year survival following laparoscopic surgery for resectable colorectal cancer: a retrospective study
    Jae Eun Lee, Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Sung Uk Bae
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Right hemicolectomy: a network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic-assisted, total laparoscopic, and robotic approach
    Emanuele Rausa, Michael Eamon Kelly, Emanuele Asti, Alberto Aiolfi, Gianluca Bonitta, Luigi Bonavina
    Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(4): 1020.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgeries in elderly patients with right colon cancers
    Mingtian Wei, Xubing Zhang, Pingfan Ma, Wanbin He, Liang Bi, Ziqiang Wang
    Medicine.2018; 97(35): e11907.     CrossRef
  • Hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation: a novel technique for right colon cancer
    Qing-Bin Wu, Xiang-Bing Deng, Xu-Yang Yang, Bing-Chen Chen, Wan-Bin He, Tao Hu, Ming-Tian Wei, Zi-Qiang Wang
    Surgical Endoscopy.2017; 31(8): 3383.     CrossRef
  • Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis
    Guosen Wang, Jianping Zhou, Weiwei Sheng, Ming Dong
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Intracorporeal Anastomosis Using a Robotic Stapler for Right-Sided Colon Cancer With Reduced-Port Access
    Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2017; 60(4): 456.     CrossRef
  • Advances in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
    James Michael Parker, Timothy F. Feldmann, Kyle G. Cologne
    Surgical Clinics of North America.2017; 97(3): 547.     CrossRef
  • Need for Reappraisal of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Diseases in the Era of Desiring Small Incisions
    Chang-Nam Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(4): 119.     CrossRef
  • Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xubing Zhang, Qingbin Wu, Tao Hu, Chaoyang Gu, Liang Bi, Ziqiang Wang
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2017; 27(12): 1251.     CrossRef
  • Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: Is It Useful?
    Hungdai Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(1): 1.     CrossRef
Short-term Outcomes of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery vs. Open Surgery on Right Colon Cancer: A Case-Controlled Study
Jae-Hoon Sim, Eun-Joo Jung, Chun-Geun Ryu, Jin Hee Paik, Gangmi Kim, Su Ran Kim, Dae-Yong Hwang
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(2):72-76.   Published online April 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.2.72
  • 10,585 View
  • 46 Download
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes by comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for right colon cancer.

Methods

Sixteen patients who underwent a hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (HAL-RHC group) and 33 patients who underwent a conventional open right hemicolectomy (open group) during the same period were enrolled in this study with a case-controlled design.

Results

The operation time was 217 minutes in the HAL-RHC group and 213 minutes in the open group (P = 0.389). The numbers of retrieved lymph nodes were similar between the two groups (31 in the HAL-RHC group and 36 in the open group, P = 0.737). Also, there were no significant difference in the incidence of immediate postoperative leukocytosis, the administration of additional pain killers, and the postoperative recovery parameters. First flatus was shown on postoperative days 3.5 in the HAL-RHC group and 3.4 in the open group (P = 0.486). Drinking water and soft diet were started on postoperative days 4.8 and 5.9, respectively, in the HAL-RHC group and similarly 4.6 and 5.6 in the open group (P = 0.402 and P = 0.551). The duration of hospital stay was shorter in the HAL-RHC group than in the open group (10.3 days vs. 13.5 days, P = 0.048). No significant difference in the complication rates was shown between the two groups, and no postoperative mortality was encountered in either group.

Conclusion

The patients with right colon cancer in the HAL-RHC group had similar pathologic and postoperative recovery parameters to those of the patients in the open group. The patients in the HAL-RHC group had shorter hospital stays than those in the open group. Therefore, hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer is feasible.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Evaluating the learning curves and surgical outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer: A retrospective analysis from a National Registry
    Yunxiao Liu, Xu Guan, Qing Xu, Taiyuan Li, Yangchun Zheng, Chuangang Fu, Sergey Efetov, Xishan Wang, Guiyu Wang
    Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Is Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation Really Necessary for All Patients With Right-Sided Colon Cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyeon-Min Cho, Je-Ho Jang, Chang-Nam Kim, Kil Yeon Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 434.     CrossRef
  • A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer
    Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Mohamed Wejih Dougaz, Meriem Mesbehi, Hichem Jerraya, Ramzi Nouira, Jim S. Khan, Chadli Dziri
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic right-sided colon resection for colon cancer—has the control group so far been chosen correctly?
    Jörg O. W. Pelz, Johanna Wagner, Sven Lichthardt, Johannes Baur, Caroline Kastner, Niels Matthes, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Armin Wiegering
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hand-assisted Laparoscopy: Expensive but Considerable Step Between Laparoscopic and Open Colectomy
    Baris Gulcu, Ozgen Isik, Ersin Ozturk, Tuncay Yilmazlar
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2018; 28(4): 214.     CrossRef
  • Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer
    Xubing Zhang, Qingbin Wu, Chaoyang Gu, Tao Hu, Liang Bi, Ziqiang Wang
    Medicine.2017; 96(33): e7794.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and conventional laparotomy in patients with colorectal cancer: Final results from a single center
    Takayuki Tajima, Masaya Mukai, Daiki Yokoyama, Shigeo Higami, Shuji Uda, Sayuri Hasegawa, Eiji Nomura, Sotaro Sadahiro, Seiei Yasuda, Hiroyasu Makuuchi
    Oncology Letters.2017; 13(6): 4953.     CrossRef
  • Hand‐assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery with double‐glove technique
    Hernán Vaccarezza, Axel Sahovaler, Víctor Im, Gustavo Rossi, Carlos Vaccaro
    Surgical Practice.2016; 20(3): 124.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic resection of right colon cancer—a matched pairs analysis
    M. Zimmermann, C. Benecke, C. Jung, M. Hoffmann, J. Nolde, E. Schlöricke, H. P. Bruch, T. Keck, T. Laubert
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2016; 31(7): 1291.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Study on Therapeutic Efficacy Between Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery and Conventional Laparotomy for Acute Obstructive Right-Sided Colon Cancer
    Zhengrong Li, Daojiang Li, Zhigang Jie, Guoyang Zhang, Yi Liu
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2015; 25(7): 548.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for rectal cancer: Interim results from a single center
    TAKAYUKI TAJIMA, MASAYA MUKAI, WATARU NOGUCHI, SHIGEO HIGAMI, SHUUJI UDA, SOUICHIROU YAMAMOTO, SAYURI HASEGAWA, EIJI NOMURA, SOTARO SADAHIRO, SEIEI YASUDA, HIROYASU MAKUUCHI
    Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2015; 3(3): 533.     CrossRef
  • Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy: a prospective study
    JiaQing Gong, YongKuan Cao, YunMing Li, GuoHu Zhang, PeiHong Wang, GuoDe Luo
    Surgical Endoscopy.2014; 28(10): 2998.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for colorectal cancer: Interim results from a single institution
    TAKAYUKI TAJIMA, MASAYA MUKAI, MASASHI YAMAZAKI, SHIGEO HIGAMI, SOUICHIROU YAMAMOTO, SAYURI HASEGAWA, EIJI NOMURA, SOTARO SADAHIRO, SEIEI YASUDA, HIROYASU MAKUUCHI
    Oncology Letters.2014; 8(2): 627.     CrossRef
  • Should Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Be Placed in the Realm of Minimally Invasive Surgery?
    Hungdai Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(2): 42.     CrossRef
Case Report
A Case of Sigmoid Colon Tuberculosis Mimicking Colon Cancer
Seong-Min Yu, Jong-Hwan Park, Min-Dae Kim, Hee-Ryong Lee, Peel Jung, Tae-Hyun Ryu, Seung-Ho Choi, Il-Seon Lee
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):275-277.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.275
  • 6,403 View
  • 48 Download
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Tuberculosis of the sigmoid colon is a rare disorder. An 80-year-old man visited Bongseng Memorial Hospital for medical examination. A colonoscopy was performed, and a lesion in the sigmoid colon that was suspected to be colon cancer was found. A biopsy was performed, and tuberculous enteritis with chronic granulomatous inflammation was diagnosed. Intestinal tuberculosis is most frequent in the ileocecal area, followed by the ascending colon, transverse colon, duodenum, stomach, and sigmoid colon, in descending order. Hence, we report a case of intestinal tuberculosis in the sigmoid colon, which is rare and almost indistinguishable from colon cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Case Report of Colonic Poorly Differentiated Adenocarcinoma Masquerading as Intestinal Tuberculosis
    慧欣 植
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(11): 1397.     CrossRef
  • Immunohistochemistry and real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction: importance in the diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis in a Peruvian population
    Fernando Arevalo, Soledad Rayme, Rocío Ramírez, Romy Rolando, Jaime Fustamante, Mario Monteghirfo, Rocio Chavez, Eduardo Monge
    BMC Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Infections in the gastrointestinal tract that can mimic malignancy
    David W. Dodington, Klaudia M. Nowak, Runjan Chetty
    Diagnostic Histopathology.2022; 28(10): 435.     CrossRef
  • Colonic Tuberculosis Mimicking Ascending Colon Neoplasm: A Case Report
    Ni Nyoman Ayu Widyanti, Wayan Wahyu Semara Putra, Ni Made Dwita Yaniswari, Novitasari, Kadek Agus Suhardinatha P
    European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences.2022; 4(6): 28.     CrossRef
  • Left-Sided Colonic Tuberculosis Presenting as Colonic Stricture: A Rare Presentation of a Common Disease
    Shabana Abdul Jabbar, B. Selvakumar, Vaibhav Kumar Varshney, Indu Sharma, Sudeep Khera, Sabir Hussain
    ACG Case Reports Journal.2022; 9(11): e00928.     CrossRef
  • More Than Just a Polyp: Diagnosis of Tuberculosis From a Screening Colonoscopy
    Adham E Obeidat, Thomas Namiki, Traci T Murakami
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • “MUCINOUS ADENOCARCINOMA OF COLON MIMICKING CYSTIC LYMPHANGIOMA: REPORT OF AN UNUSUAL PRESENTATION WITH BRIEF REVIEW OF LITERATURE.”
    Manjari Kishore, Prajwala Gupta, Purnima Malhotra, Minakshi Bhardwaj
    GLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS.2021; : 201.     CrossRef
  • Case of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis mycobacterium mimicking a colon cancer
    Jordan Powell, Michael Bath, Heman Joshi, Michael Machesney
    BMJ Case Reports.2020; 13(5): e235486.     CrossRef
  • Tuberculous Enteritis: A Rare Complication of Miliary Tuberculosis
    Danisha Figueroa, Nilmarie Guzman, Carmen Isache
    Case Reports in Infectious Diseases.2016; 2016: 1.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal Tuberculosis
    Eric H. Choi, Walter J. Coyle, David Schlossberg
    Microbiology Spectrum.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tuberculosis intestinal que simula carcinoma colorrectal diseminado
    José Miguel García-Castro, Rosario Javier-Martínez, Manuel López-Gómez, Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio, Miguel Ángel López-Ruz, Juan Jiménez-Alonso
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2013; 36(7): 461.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Oncologic Outcomes of a Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: Results of a 3-Year Follow-up
Jung Hoon Cho, Dae Ro Lim, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):42-48.   Published online February 29, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.42
  • 8,079 View
  • 49 Download
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of a laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for the treatment of colon cancer and compare the results with those of previous randomized trials.

Methods

From June 2006, to December 2008, 156 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with a curative intent for colon cancer were evaluated. The clinicopatholgic outcomes and the oncologic outcomes were evaluated retrospectively by using electronic medical records.

Results

There were 84 male patients and 72 female patients. The mean possible length of stay was 7.0 ± 1.5 days (range, 4 to 12 days). The conversion rate was 3.2%. The total number of complications was 30 (19.2%). Anastomotic leakage was not noted. There was no mortality within 30 days. The 3-year overall survival rate of all stages was 93.3%. The 3-year overall survival rates according to stages were 100% in stage I, 97.3% in stage II, and 84.8% in stage III. The 3-year disease-free survival rate of all stages was 86.1%. The 3-year disease-free survival rates according to stage were 96.2% in stage I, 90.3% in stage II, and 75.6% in stage III. The mean follow-up period was 36.3 (3 to 60) months.

Conclusion

A laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for the treatment of colon cancer is technically feasible and safe to perform in terms of oncologic outcomes. The present data support previously reported randomized trials.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Short-term outcomes and the learning curve for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using the ArtiSential: a multicenter pooled analysis
    Seijong Kim, Jaeim Lee, Heung-Kwon Oh, Dae Hee Pyo, Yoon Suk Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Dong Hwan Bae, Byung Soh Min, Chang Hyun Kim, Jung Wook Huh
    Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(5): 2931.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of outcome and costs of robotic and laparoscopic right hemicolectomies
    Nima Ahmadi, Isabella Mor, Ross Warner
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2022; 16(2): 429.     CrossRef
  • Is Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation Really Necessary for All Patients With Right-Sided Colon Cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyeon-Min Cho, Je-Ho Jang, Chang-Nam Kim, Kil Yeon Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 434.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic Outcomes of Self-Expandable Metallic Stent as a Bridge to Surgery and Safety and Feasibility of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Acute Malignant Colonic Obstruction
    Seung Yoon Yang, Youn Young Park, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2019; 26(9): 2787.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy
    Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh, Mark H. Hanna, Joseph C. Carmichael, Alessio Pigazzi, Michael J. Stamos, Steven Mills
    Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(7): 2792.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative prediction of conversion from laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery: a clinical study of conversion scoring of laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery
    Guang-Dong Zhang, Xu-Ting Zhi, Jian-Li Zhang, Guang-Bo Bu, Gang Ma, Kai-Lei Wang
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2015; 30(9): 1209.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic resection following stent insertion for obstructing left-sided colon cancer
    Seoung Yoon Rho, Sung Uk Bae, Se Jin Baek, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
    Journal of the Korean Surgical Society.2013; 85(6): 290.     CrossRef
  • Totally Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with Intracorporeal Anastomosis is a Technically and Oncologically Safe Procedure
    V. N. N. Kornmann, J. Hagendoorn, S.van Koeverden, B.van Ramshorst, A. B. Smits
    Acta Chirurgica Belgica.2013; 113(6): 439.     CrossRef
Adjuvant Chemotherapy Using the FOLFOX Regimen in Colon Cancer
Hyeong-Joon Jeon, Jin-Hee Woo, Hak-Yoon Lee, Ki-Jae Park, Hong-Jo Choi
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(3):140-146.   Published online June 30, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.3.140
  • 12,824 View
  • 62 Download
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Great progress has been made in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy using the FOLFOX regimen in patients with stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer.

Methods

Eighty-two patients who underwent a potentially curative resection for stage III or high-risk stage II colon cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study. They received FOLFOX4 or modified FOLFOX6. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival.

Results

During the median follow-up of 37 months (range, 21 to 61 months), 14 patients experienced disease relapse. The disease-free survival rate at 3 years was 82.9%: 84.6% for stage II and 82.6% for stage III. At the time of the analysis, 8 patients were dead from recurrence. The probability of overall survival at 5 years was 74.5%: 90% for stage II and 74.6% for stage III. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (40.2%), anemia (2.4%), and thrombocytopenia (1.2%). Gastrointestinal toxicities included grade 3 or 4 nausea (4.9%) and stomatitis (2.4%). Peripheral sensory neuropathy was observed in 81.7% of the patients during treatment. Of the 11 patients (13.4%) who had grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy during treatment, grade 3 symptoms were persistent in 3 patients with gait disturbance at the time of analysis. No treatment-related deaths were recorded.

Conclusion

Postoperative chemotherapy using the FOLFOX regimen, oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, is effective and tolerable in patients with stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy and safety of 3-month versus 6-month oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haiqiong Wu, Jun Li, Jidong Miao, Jiawei Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Management of metastatic colorectal cancer: consensus in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries
    Bazarbashi Shouki, Alnajjar Abdelsalam, Al Sharm Abdullah, Alshammari Kanan, Al Sherhi Ahmed, Dawoud Emad, Heinemann Volker, Aseafan Mohamed, Chehal Aref, Alghamdi Mohammed, Hamza Dina, Khoury Maroun, Venniyoor Ajit, Mahrous Mervat, Rasul Kakil, Elsamany
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cathayanon E induces apoptosis and enhances oxaliplatin sensitivity in colorectal cancer through suppression of MCL1
    Liang Cen, Xin Hu, Guozhen An, Lichao Wang, Yanghao Hu, Junjie He, Hanghang Qin, Yongsen Li, Hongjuan Cui
    Apoptosis.2025; 30(11-12): 2830.     CrossRef
  • Transcriptomic and Cytogenetic Analysis of Oxaliplatin-Resistant Colorectal Adenocarcinoma HCT116 Cells to Identify Markers Associated with Platinum Resistance
    Alisa Morshneva, Olga Gnedina, Ksenia Fedotova, Natalija Yartseva, Nikolay Aksenov, Maria Igotti
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2025; 26(18): 8869.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcome with taxane-based versus non-taxane protocols in gastric cancer
    Shirin Kianersi, Sina Salari, Hamid Rezvani, Mohammad A. Araskhan, Alireza Shirangi, Mohammad R. Fathi, Mahmoud D. Ghorbi
    Journal of Education and Health Promotion.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Extending the boundaries of cancer therapeutic complexity with literature text mining
    Danna Niezni, Hillel Taub-Tabib, Yuval Harris, Hagit Sason, Yakir Amrusi, Dana Meron-Azagury, Maytal Avrashami, Shaked Launer-Wachs, Jon Borchardt, M. Kusold, Aryeh Tiktinsky, Tom Hope, Yoav Goldberg, Yosi Shamay
    Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.2023; 145: 102681.     CrossRef
  • Modified Folfox6 as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Vietnamese Patients With Colorectal Cancer
    T. Quang Nguyen, T. Oanh Bui, P. Thao Tran, V. Thuan Tran, V. Hieu Nguyen, Q. Hoan Chu, T. A. Tuyet Bui, N. Quynh Le, V. Quang Le, V. Tu Dao
    Cancer Control.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Appendicitis: A Long-Term Cost Effectiveness Analysis
    Lindsay A. Sceats, Seul Ku, Alanna Coughran, Britainy Barnes, Emily Grimm, Matthew Muffly, David A. Spain, Cindy Kin, Douglas K. Owens, Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert
    MDM Policy & Practice.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and clinical monitoring strategies for immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted cytokine immunotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer
    Shelby N. Bess, Gage J. Greening, Timothy J. Muldoon
    Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews.2019; 49: 1.     CrossRef
  • Association of baseline patient characteristics with adjuvant chemotherapy toxicities in stage III colorectal cancer patients
    Akie Watanabe, Chang Cheng Yang, Winson Y. Cheung
    Medical Oncology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk Stratification in Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer
    Ramzi Amri, Jonathan England, Liliana G. Bordeianou, David L. Berger
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2016; 23(12): 3907.     CrossRef
  • Anti-Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy-Induced Diarrhoea: Current Treatments and Side-Effects
    Rachel M. McQuade, Joel C. Bornstein, Kulmira Nurgali
    International Journal of Clinical Medicine.2014; 05(07): 393.     CrossRef
  • Multiple Cancers in a Patient with Systemic Sclerosis and Aggravated Interstitial Lung Disease by Chemotherapy
    Chan Kwon Park, Seok Jong Lee, Hyung Jun Cho, Kyeong Soo Lee, Sung Jun Kim, Gu Min Cho, Ha Ni Lee
    Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases.2013; 75(3): 111.     CrossRef
Clinicopathological Correlation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 Protein Expressions in Stage III Colon Cancer.
Cho, Young Kyu , Yu, Chang Sik , Namgung, Hwan , Kim, Hee Chul , Kim, Jung Seon , Lee, Je Hwan , Kim, Tae Won , Kim, Jin C
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2004;20(4):218-224.
  • 1,222 View
  • 3 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Functional loss of mismatch repair has been reported to be the reason for resistance to several chemotherapeutic drugs. The expressions of hMLH1 and hMSH2 were examined to assess whether they correlated with the biological behavior and the chemotherapeutic responsiveness in paflents with sporadic colon cancers.
METHODS
Ninety-one patients with stage III primary colon cancer were included from the tumor registry of the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. All patients underwent a curative operation and postoperative chemotherapy with 5- fluorouracil and leucovorin for 6 cycles between 1993 and 1997. Immunohistochemical staining for hMLH1 and hMSH2 was performed using archival paraffin blocks. A positive expression was determined when unequivocal nuclear staining was identified in more than 10% of the cancer cells. The survival and the clinicopathologic variables regarding hMLH1 and hMSH2 expressions were assessed using the log-rank test and the Cox proportional regression method.
RESULTS
Either hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression was lost in nine cases (9.9%). hMLH1 and hMSH2 expressions were significantly correlated with tumor invasion (P=0.012) and tumor differentiation (P=0.017). The disease-free survival did not differ with respect to hMLH1 and hMSH2 expressions. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the preoperative serum CEA level were independent predictors of disease-free survival on a multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
The loss of hMLH1 or hMSH2 expresscon appears to be involved in the differentiation of and the invasion by colon cancer. However, nether hMLH1 nor hMSH2 expression was correlated withthe 5-fluorouracil responsiveness.
Detection of Cytokeratin 19 and 20 in Portal Bloods in Right Colon Cancer Patients.
Kim, Hong , Kim, Bong Wan , Kim, Hye Jin , Suh, Kwang Wook
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2003;19(5):322-326.
  • 1,299 View
  • 5 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
We planned this prospective study to detect tumor cells in portal venous blood during a curative operation for colon cancer and to identify its clinical implications.
METHODS
From August to December 1998, we collected portal venous blood (10 ml) during curative operations on 20 patients with colon cancer. Cytokeratin (CK) 19 and 20 transcripts were amplified using a reverse transcriptase-PCR assay. As a negative control, 10 ml of portal blood from 10 patients who underwent benign surgery were assayed. The HCT-116 colon cancer cell line was used for the positive control. All patients were closely followed until May 2003 (mean follow-up: 55 months).
RESULTS
CK 19 was positive in 17 (85.0%) patients, and CK 20 was positive in 6 (30.0%) patients. However, CK 19 was also detected in 8 (66.7%) control patients, whereas CK 20 was negative in all control patients. CK 20 was found to be more relevant to the pathologic stage. During the follow-up period, liver metastases were found in 3 patients (50%) who had shown CK 20 in their portal bloods.
CONCLUSIONS
CK 20 is found to be more specific than CK 19 in the detection of epithelial cells from portal blood. Moreover, CK 20 is related to the stage and was predictive of hepatic metastases in 50% of the patients with colon cancer. With further accumulation of cases, the prognostic significance of CK 20 for hepatic metastases may be better evaluated.
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP