Annals of Coloproctology

Original Articles

Minimally invasive surgery

New double-stapling technique without staple-crossing line in laparoscopic low anterior resection: effort to reduce anastomotic leakage: Nam Seok Kim, Ji Hoon Kim, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyu Lee, Won Kyung Kang; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):573-579. Published online November 22, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00409.0058

1,035 View
91 Download

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF: Purpose
This study aimed to demonstrate the safety of new double-stapling technique (nDST), without a crossing line and dog ears, by comparing with conventional DST (cDST) in laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 98 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR for rectal cancer from January 2018 to December 2020. The inclusion criterion was an anastomosis level below the peritoneal reflection and 4 cm above the anal verge. In the nDST group, the staple line of the linear cutter was sutured using barbed sutures to shorten the staple line before firing the circular stapler. Therefore, there were no crossing lines after firing the circular stapler. A 2:1 propensity score matching was performed between the cDST and nDST groups.
Results
After propensity score matching, 39 patients were in the cDST group and 20 were in the nDST group. There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the total operation time between the cDST and nDST groups (124.0±26.2 minutes vs. 125.2±20.3 minutes, P=0.853). Morbidity rates were similar between the 2 groups (9 cases [23.1%] vs. 5 cases [25.0%], P=0.855). There was no significant difference in leakage rate (4 cases [10.3%] vs. 1 case [5.0%], P=0.847) and anastomotic bleeding rate (1 case [2.6%] vs. 3 cases [15.0%], P=0.211).
Conclusion
The nDST to eliminate the crossing line and dog ears in laparoscopic LAR is technically feasible and safe. However, more attention should be paid to anastomotic bleeding in such cases.

Complication

Early warning model to detect anastomotic leakage following colon surgery: a clinical observational study: Pooya Rajabaleyan, Ravish Jootun, Sören Möller, Ulrik Deding, Mark Bremholm Ellebæk, Issam al-Najami, Ian Lindsey; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(5):431-439. Published online October 8, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00745.0106

2,964 View
222 Download
1 Web of Science
2 Citations

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF

Purpose
We aimed to develop a predictive tool for anastomotic leakage (AL) following colon cancer surgery by combining a clinical early warning score (EWS) with the C-reactive protein (CRP) level.
Methods
The records of 1,855 patients who underwent colon cancer surgery at the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust between January 2013 and December 2018, with or without AL, were retrospectively reviewed. EWS and CRP levels were assessed daily from the first postoperative day until discharge. AL was defined as an anastomotic defect observed at reoperation, the presence of feculent fluid in a pelvic drain, or evidence of AL on computed tomography. The tool incorporated postoperative EWS and CRP levels for the accurate early detection of AL.
Results
From postoperative days 3 to 7, the mean CRP level exceeded 200 mg/L in patients with AL and was under 200 mg/L in those without AL (P<0.05). From postoperative days 1 to 5, the mean EWS among patients with leakage exceeded 2, while scores were below 2 among those without leakage (P<0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified postoperative day 3 as the most predictive of early leakage, with cutoff values of 2.4 for EWS and 180 mg/L for CRP; this yielded an area under the curve of 0.87 (sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 70%).
Conclusion
We propose using an EWS of 2.4 and a CRP level of 180 mg/L on postoperative day 3 following colon surgery with anastomosis as threshold values to prompt investigation and treatment of AL.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415. CrossRef
Predictive Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Anastomotic Leaks in Colorectal Surgeries: A Systematic Review
Wahidullah Dost, Mohammad Qaher Rasully , Mohammad Nazir Zaman, Wahida Dost, Wahida Ali, Sami A Ayobi, Raisa Dost, Jamaluddin Niazi, Kinza Bakht, Asma Iqbal, Syed Faqeer Hussain Bokhari
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef

Colorectal cancer

Long-term clinical outcomes after high and low ligations with lymph node dissection around the root of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients with rectal cancer: Min Wan Lee, Sung Sil Park, Kiho You, Dong Eun Lee, Dong Woon Lee, Sung Chan Park, Kyung Su Han, Dae Kyung Sohn, Chang Won Hong, Bun Kim, Byung Chang Kim, Hee Jin Chang, Dae Yong Kim, Jae Hwan Oh; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):62-73. Published online February 26, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00094.0013

3,095 View
212 Download
1 Web of Science
2 Citations

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF

Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes based on the ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in patients with rectal cancer.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database that included all patients who underwent elective low anterior resection for rectal cancer between January 2013 and December 2019. The clinical outcomes included oncological outcomes, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes. The oncological outcomes included overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). The functional outcomes, including defecatory and urogenital functions, were analyzed using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, International Prostate Symptom Score, and International Index of Erectile Function questionnaires.
Results
In total, 545 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 244 patients underwent high ligation (HL), whereas 301 underwent low ligation (LL). The tumor size was larger in the HL group than in the LL group. The number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) was higher in the HL group than in the LL group. There were no significant differences in complication rates and recurrence patterns between the groups. There were no significant differences in 5-year RFS and OS between the groups. Cox regression analysis revealed that the ligation level (HL vs. LL) was not a significant risk factor for oncological outcomes. Regarding functional outcomes, the LL group showed a significant recovery in defecatory function 1 year postoperatively compared with the HL group.
Conclusion
LL with LNs dissection around the root of the IMA might not affect the oncologic outcomes comparing to HL; however, it has minimal benefit for defecatory function.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Meeting report on the 8th Asian Science Editors’ Conference and Workshop 2024
Eun Jung Park
Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 66. CrossRef
Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415. CrossRef

Technical Note

Can the Heald anal stent help to reduce anastomotic or rectal stump leak in elective and emergency colorectal surgery? A single-center experience: Michael Jones, Brendan Moran, Richard John Heald, John Bunni; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):82-85. Published online February 26, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00038.0005

2,490 View
194 Download

Abstract PDF: Anastomotic and rectal stump leaks are feared complications of colorectal surgery. Diverting stomas are commonly used to protect low rectal anastomoses but can have adverse effects. Studies have reported favorable outcomes for transanal drainage devices instead of diverting stomas. We describe our use of the Heald anal stent and its potential impact in reducing anastomotic or rectal stump leak after elective or emergency colorectal surgery. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of patients in whom a Heald anal stent had been used to “protect” a colorectal anastomosis or a rectal stump, in an elective or emergency context, for benign and malignant pathology. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were reviewed using clinical and radiological records. The Heald anal stent was used in 93 patients over 4 years. Forty-six cases (49%) had a colorectal anastomosis, and 47 (51%) had an end stoma with a rectal stump. No anastomotic or rectal stump leaks were recorded. We recommend the Heald anal stent as a simple and affordable adjunct that may decrease anastomotic and rectal stump leak by reducing intraluminal pressure through drainage of fluid and gas.

Review

Optimal anastomotic technique in rectal surgery to prevent anastomotic leakage: Daichi Kitaguchi, Masaaki Ito; Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(2):97-105. Published online January 3, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00787.0112

5,388 View
419 Download
10 Web of Science
10 Citations

Abstract PDF

Complications after colorectal surgery remain inevitable, and anastomotic leakage is one of the most severe and potentially fatal complications. Generally, anastomotic leakage is associated with severe peritonitis, the need for emergency reoperation, and an increased mortality rate. Additionally, particularly after rectal cancer surgery, it has a negative impact on long-term outcomes, including postoperative anorectal function, local recurrence, and survival. To prevent anastomotic leakage, understanding the characteristics of each anastomotic technique and establishing a stable anastomotic procedure are important. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a relatively new advanced surgical access technique for pelvic dissection and facilitates different anastomotic techniques without the need for transabdominal rectal transection. Especially, stapled anastomosis in TaTME, also known as double purse-string circular stapled anastomosis or the single stapling technique (SST), has gained much attention as an alternative to the conventional double stapling technique (DST). In this article, we describe the DST, SST, and hand-sewn anastomosis as anastomotic techniques after rectal surgery, focusing mainly on the differences between conventional anastomotic techniques and SST in TaTME. Furthermore, the blood flow evaluation method for the reconstructive colon before anastomosis, which is extremely important in anastomotic leakage prevention regardless of the anastomotic type, is also described.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Dissection layer selection based on an understanding of pelvic fascial anatomy in transanal total mesorectal excision
Daichi Kitaguchi, Masaaki Ito
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 375. CrossRef
Successful Clinical Avoidance of Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage through Local Decontamination
Gerhard Ernst Steyer, Markus Puchinger, Johann Pfeifer
Antibiotics.2024; 13(1): 79. CrossRef
Combined Robotic Transanal Transection Single-Stapled Technique in Ultralow Rectal Endometriosis Involvement Associated With Parametrial and Vaginal Infiltration
Gianmarco D'Ancona, Benjamin Merlot, Quentin Denost, Stefano Angioni, Thomas Dennis, Horace Roman
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2024; 31(4): 267. CrossRef
Risk factors for the failure of endoscopic balloon dilation to manage anastomotic stricture from colorectal surgery: retrospective cohort study
Young Il Kim, Seung Wook Hong, Seok-Byung Lim, Dong-Hoon Yang, Eon Bin Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Chang Sik Yu
Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(4): 1775. CrossRef
The impact of powered circular staplers on anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal cancer surgeries
Hayoung Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Young Il Kim, Eun Jung Park, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim
Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(10): 6111. CrossRef
Effect of powered circular stapler in colorectal anastomosis after left-sided colic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis
Andrea Scardino, Carlo Galdino Riva, Luca Sorrentino, Sara Lauricella, Alberto Aiolfi, Matteo Rottoli, Gianluca Bonitta, Marco Vitellaro, Luigi Bonavina, Davide Bona, Michael Kelly, Emanuele Rausa
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415. CrossRef
Optimal Indocyanine Green Dosage for Repetitive Angiography for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
Gyung Mo Son, Sang-Ho Park, Nam Su Kim, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Myeong-Sook Kwon, Tae Kyun Kim, Eun Hwa Lee, Eun Jung Hwang, Kwang-Ryul Baek
Medicina.2024; 60(12): 1966. CrossRef
The Safe Values of Quantitative Perfusion Parameters of ICG Angiography Based on Tissue Oxygenation of Hyperspectral Imaging for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study
Gyung Son, Armaan Nazir, Mi Yun, In Lee, Sun Im, Jae Kwak, Sang-Ho Park, Kwang-Ryul Baek, Ines Gockel
Biomedicines.2023; 11(7): 2029. CrossRef
Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098. CrossRef

Original Articles

Colorectal cancer

Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life: Angelina Di Re, Salam Tooza, Jason Diab, Charbel Karam, Mina Sarofim, Kevin Ooi, Catherine Turner, Daniel Kozman, David Blomberg, Matthew Morgan; Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(5):395-401. Published online April 14, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00073.0010

4,333 View
136 Download
6 Web of Science
7 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Anastomotic leak (AL) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication after rectal resection. We aim to provide an updated assessment of bowel function and quality of life after AL, as well as associated short- and long-term outcomes.
Methods
A retrospective audit of all rectal resections performed at a colorectal unit and associated private hospitals over the past 10 years was performed. Relevant demographic, operative, and histopathological data were collected. A prospective survey was performed regarding patients’ quality of life and fecal continence. These patients were matched with nonAL patients who completed the same survey.
Results
One hundred patients (out of 1,394 resections) were included. AL was contained in 66.0%, not contained in 10.0%, and only anastomotic stricture in 24.0%. Management was antibiotics only in 39.0%, percutaneous drainage in 9.0%, operative abdominal drainage in 19.0%, transrectal drainage in 6.0%, combination of percutaneous drainage and transrectal drainage in 2.0%, and combination abdominal/transrectal drainage in 1.0%. The 1-year stoma rate was 15.0%. Overall, mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Instrument scores were higher for AL patients than their matched counterparts (8.06±10.5 vs. 2.92±4.92, P=0.002). Patients with an AL had a mean EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) of 76.23±19.85; this was lower than the matched mean EQ-VAS for non-AL patients of 81.64±18.07, although not statistically significant (P=0.180).
Conclusion
The majority of AL patients in this study were managed with antibiotics only. AL was associated with higher fecal incontinence scores in the long-term; however, this did not equate to lower quality of life scores.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Impact of Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Cancer Surgery on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review
Anke H.C. Gielen, Danique J.I. Heuvelings, Patricia Sylla, Yu-Ting van Loon, Jarno Melenhorst, Nicole D. Bouvy, Merel L. Kimman, Stephanie O. Breukink
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(2): 154. CrossRef
Fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green for low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective before and after study
J. Charbonneau, É. Papillon-Dion, R. Brière, N. Singbo, A. Legault-Dupuis, S. Drolet, F. Rouleau-Fournier, P. Bouchard, A. Bouchard, C. Thibault, F. Letarte
Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The Effect of Post‐Treatment Combined Lifestyle Interventions on Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Patients – A Systematic Review
Anke H. C. Gielen, Britt J. M. Thomassen, Tim J. Bult, Jarno Melenhorst, Merel L. Kimman, Stephanie O. Breukink
Lifestyle Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Serum nutritional predictive biomarkers and risk assessment for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patients
Paerhati Shayimu, Maitisaidi Awula, Chang-Yong Wang, Rexida Jiapaer, Yi-Peng Pan, Zhi-Min Wu, Yi Chen, Ze-Liang Zhao
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(10): 3142. CrossRef
Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415. CrossRef
Optimal Indocyanine Green Dosage for Repetitive Angiography for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
Gyung Mo Son, Sang-Ho Park, Nam Su Kim, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Myeong-Sook Kwon, Tae Kyun Kim, Eun Hwa Lee, Eun Jung Hwang, Kwang-Ryul Baek
Medicina.2024; 60(12): 1966. CrossRef
Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients
Won Beom Jung
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527. CrossRef

Malignant disease,Rectal cancer,Complication,Biomarker & risk factor

Cross-sectional area of psoas muscle as a predictive marker of anastomotic failure in male rectal cancer patients: Japanese single institutional retrospective observational study: Yusuke Mizuuchi, Yoshitaka Tanabe, Masafumi Sada, Koji Tamura, Kinuko Nagayoshi, Shuntaro Nagai, Yusuke Watanabe, Sadafumi Tamiya, Kohei Nakata, Kenoki Ohuchida, Toru Nakano, Masafumi Nakamura; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(5):353-361. Published online April 12, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00122.0017

4,527 View
168 Download
8 Web of Science
9 Citations

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
Preoperative sarcopenia worsens postoperative outcomes in various cancer types including colorectal cancer. However, we often experienced postoperative anastomotic leakage in muscular male patients such as Judo players, especially in rectal cancer surgery with lower anastomosis. It is controversial whether the whole skeletal muscle mass impacts the potential for anastomotic failure in male rectal cancer patients. Thus, the purpose of this study was to clarify whether skeletal muscle mass impacts anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer in men.
Methods
We reviewed the medical charts of male patients suffering from rectal cancer who underwent colo-procto anastomosis below the peritoneal reflection without a protective diverting stoma. We measured the psoas muscle area and calculated the psoas muscle index.
Results
One hundred ninety-seven male rectal cancer patients were enrolled in this study. The psoas muscle index was significantly higher in patients with anastomotic leakage (P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve determined the optimal cut-off value of the psoas muscle index for predicting anastomotic leakage as 812.67 cm²/m² (sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 74.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that high psoas muscle index (risk ratio [RR], 3.933; P<0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.917–8.070) and super low anastomosis (RR, 2.792; P=0.015; 95% CI, 1.221–6.384) were independent predictive factors of anastomotic leakage.
Conclusion
This study showed that male rectal cancer patients with a large psoas muscle mass who underwent lower anastomosis had a higher rate of postoperative anastomotic leakage.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304. CrossRef
Unraveling the role of computed tomography derived body composition metrics on anastomotic leakages rates in rectal cancer surgery: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Mark Broekman, Charlotte M. S. Genders, Ritchie T. J. Geitenbeek, Klaas Havenga, Schelto Kruijff, Joost M. Klaase, Alain R. Viddeleer, Esther C. J. Consten, Ozlem Boybeyi-Turer
PLOS ONE.2024; 19(7): e0307606. CrossRef
Association of computed tomography‐derived body composition and complications after colorectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Claire P.M. van Helsdingen, Job G.A. van Wijlick, Ralph de Vries, Nicole D. Bouvy, Mariska M.G. Leeflang, Robert Hemke, Joep P.M. Derikx
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle.2024; 15(6): 2234. CrossRef
Prognostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Driven, Computed Tomography-Based, Volumetric Assessment of the Volume and Density of Muscle in Patients With Colon Cancer
Minsung Kim, Sang Min Lee, Il Tae Son, Taeyong Park, Bo Young Oh
Korean Journal of Radiology.2023; 24(9): 849. CrossRef
Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098. CrossRef
Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252. CrossRef
Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
Hyun Gu Lee
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Can the cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle be a predictor of anastomotic failure in male rectal cancer patients?
Myong Hoon Ihn
Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(5): 333. CrossRef
Psoas Muscle Index – Could It Be an Indicator of Postoperative Complications in Colorectal Cancer? Case Presentation and Review of the Literature
Georgiana Alexandra Scurtu, Zsolt Zoltán Fülöp, Botond Kiss, Patricia Simu, Diana Burlacu, Tivadar Bara
Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine.2022; 7(4): 100. CrossRef

Technical Notes

Benign GI diease,Surgical technique

Double-layered hand-sewn anastomosis: a valuable resource for the colorectal surgeon: Cristopher Varela, Manar Nassr, Azharuddin Razak, Nam Kyu Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):271-275. Published online March 17, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00990.0141

9,330 View
229 Download
3 Web of Science
2 Citations

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Hand-sewn anastomosis is an essential and fundamental skill for surgeons dealing with any gastrointestinal anastomosis. Despite the advances in minimally invasive surgery and stapling devices, there are still complex surgical circumstances when the surgeon’s surgical know-how are necessary. Therefore, a safe hand-sewn technique for bowel anastomosis is required to establish a tension-free, well-perfused, and sealed anastomosis that allows gastrointestinal continuity with no unexpected complications. We describe a step-by-step procedure for hand-sewn double-layered anastomosis that reflects these principles and is practical for small and large bowel anastomosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252. CrossRef
Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
Hyun Gu Lee
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef

Original Articles

Malignant disease, Rectal cancer, Functional outcomes

Introduction of a handmade vacuum-assisted sponge drain for the treatment of anastomotic leakage after low anterior rectal resection: Amir Keshvari, Abolfazl Badripour, Mohammad Reza Keramati, Alireza Kazemeini, Behnam Behboudi, Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Ehsan Rahimpour, Parisa Ghaffari, Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi Tafti; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):230-234. Published online June 10, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00059.0008

5,759 View
210 Download
4 Web of Science
5 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Anastomotic leakage, a known major postoperative complication, potentially leads to readmission, reoperation, and increased mortality rates in patients, such as rectal cancer patients following a low anterior resection (LAR). Currently, vacuum-assisted closure, as featured by B-Braun (B-Braun Medical B.V.), is already being used for the treatment of gastrointestinal leakages and fistulas. The main aim of this study was to introduce a novel method for creating a vacuum-assisted drain for the treatment of anastomotic leakage after LAR.
Methods
All 10 patients, who underwent LAR surgery from 2018 to 2019, were diagnosed with anastomotic leakage and had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery. Therefore, patients were treated with a handmade vacuum-assisted drain and were revisited every 5 to 7 days for further evaluations and drain replacement until leakage resolution. Physical features of cavity, time of diagnose, and duration of treatment were analyzed correspondingly. The handmade vacuum-assisted sponge drain was prepared for each patient in each session of follow-up.
Results
Eight out of 10 patients experienced complete closure of the defect. The mean delay time from the day of operation to the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage was 61.0±80.4 days while the mean time for leakage closure was 117.6±68.3 days. Eventually, 7 cases underwent ileostomy reversal with no complications during a 3-month follow-up.
Conclusion
In this study, we evaluated the healing process of anastomotic leakage after the usage of a handmade vacuum-assisted sponge drain in a case series method. In our trial, we provided an innovative cost-benefit method easily applicable in the operating room.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Optimal Indocyanine Green Dosage for Repetitive Angiography for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
Gyung Mo Son, Sang-Ho Park, Nam Su Kim, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Myeong-Sook Kwon, Tae Kyun Kim, Eun Hwa Lee, Eun Jung Hwang, Kwang-Ryul Baek
Medicina.2024; 60(12): 1966. CrossRef
Assessment of the efficacy of Handmade Vacuum-Assisted Sponge Drain for Treatment of Anastomotic leakage after Low Anterior Rectal Resection
Amir Keshvari, Leila mollamohammadi, Mohammad Reza Keramati, Behnam Behboudi, Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Alireza Kazemeini, Amirhossein Naseri, Elnaz Shahmohammadi, Laleh Foroutani, Aryan Ayati, Amirhossein Tayebi, Zahra Sajjadian, Alireza Hadizadeh, Seyed-M
Updates in Surgery.2023; 75(4): 847. CrossRef
Endoscopic vacuum therapy and early surgical closure after pelvic anastomotic leak: meta-analysis of bowel continuity rates
F. Borja de Lacy, Kevin Talboom, Sapho X. Roodbeen, Robin Blok, Anna Curell, Pieter J. Tanis, Wilhelmus A. Bemelman, Roel Hompes
British Journal of Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Outpatient closure in a late colo-cutaneous postoperative anastomotic leak managed with EVAC in Bucaramanga, Colombia. Case report.
Jairo Enrique Mendoza Saavedra, Cesar Andrés Torres Carrillo, Gloria Liliana Mendoza Valbuena
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 100: 107737. CrossRef
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy determines the prognostic impact of anastomotic leakage in advanced rectal cancer
Bo Young Oh, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Wook Huh, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(4): 235. CrossRef

Malignant disease, Rectal cancer, Functional outcomes,Colorectal cancer

The Effect of Anastomotic Leakage on the Incidence and Severity of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Patients Undergoing Proctectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis: Sungjin Kim, Sung Il Kang, So Hyun Kim, Jae-Hwang Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(5):281-290. Published online June 7, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.03.15

4,159 View
70 Download
19 Web of Science
19 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Proctectomy for the treatment of rectal cancer results in inevitable changes to bowel habits. Symptoms such as fecal incontinence, constipation, and tenesmus are collectively referred to as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Among the several risk factors that cause LARS, anastomotic leakage (AL) is a strong risk factor for permanent stoma formation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the severity of LARS and AL in patients with rectal cancer based on the LARS score and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) defecation symptom questionnaires.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer since January 2010. Patients who completed the questionnaire were classified into the AL group and control group based on medical and imaging records. Major LARS and MSKCC scores were analyzed as primary endpoints.
Results
Among the 179 patients included in this study, 37 were classified into the AL group. After propensity score matching, there were significant differences in the ratio of major LARS and MSKCC scores of the control group and AL group (ratio of major LARS: 11.1% and 37.8%, P<0.001; MSKCC score: 67.29±10.4 and 56.49±7.2, respectively, P<0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that AL was an independent factor for major LARS occurrence and MSKCC score.
Conclusion
This study showed that AL was a significant factor in the occurrence of major LARS and defecation symptoms after proctectomy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The effect of robotic surgery on low anterior resection syndrome in patients with lower rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
Lei Zhang, Chenhao Hu, Jiamian Zhao, Chenxi Wu, Zhe Zhang, Ruizhe Li, Ruihan Liu, Junjun She, Feiyu Shi
Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(4): 1912. CrossRef
Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304. CrossRef
Innovációk a colorectalis sebészetben
Balázs Bánky, András Fülöp, Viktória Bencze, Lóránd Lakatos, Petra Rozman, Attila Szijártó
Orvosi Hetilap.2024; 165(2): 43. CrossRef
Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415. CrossRef
The Diagnosis and Evolution of Patients with LARS Syndrome: A Five-Year Retrospective Study from a Single Surgery Unit
Cosmin Vasile Obleagă, Sergiu Marian Cazacu, Tiberiu Ștefăniță Țenea Cojan, Cecil Sorin Mirea, Dan Nicolae Florescu, Cristian Constantin, Mircea-Sebastian Șerbănescu, Mirela Marinela Florescu, Liliana Streba, Dragoș Marian Popescu, Ionică Daniel Vîlcea, M
Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4175. CrossRef
Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life
Angelina Di Re, Salam Tooza, Jason Diab, Charbel Karam, Mina Sarofim, Kevin Ooi, Catherine Turner, Daniel Kozman, David Blomberg, Matthew Morgan
Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 395. CrossRef
The status of low anterior resection syndrome: data from a single-center in China
Jing Su, Qianhui Liu, Dagui Zhou, Xiaofeng Yang, Guiru Jia, Lijun Huang, Xiao Tang, Jiafeng Fang
BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome: is it predictable?
Dong Hyun Kang
Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 373. CrossRef
Validation of low anterior resection syndrome score in Brazil with Portuguese
Kelly C.L.R. Buzatti, Andy Petroianu, Søren Laurberg, Rodrigo G. Silva, Beatriz D.S. Rodrigues, Peter Christensen, Antonio Lacerda-Filho, Therese Juul
Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 402. CrossRef
Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252. CrossRef
How Can We Improve the Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?
Jeonghee Han
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer
Gyoung Tae Noh
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
Hyun Gu Lee
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Early vs. standard reversal ileostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
N. J. O’Sullivan, H. C. Temperley, T. S. Nugent, E. Z. Low, D. O. Kavanagh, J. O. Larkin, B. J. Mehigan, P. H. McCormick, M. E. Kelly
Techniques in Coloproctology.2022; 26(11): 851. CrossRef
A predictive nomogram model for low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer resection
Mingfang Yan, Zhenmeng Lin, Zhiying Wu, Huizhe Zheng, Meiqin Shi
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2022; 92(12): 3224. CrossRef
Recycling of Iron Slag Waste in the Production of Ceramic Roof Tiles
M. M. Ahmed, K. A. M. El Naggar, M. F. Abadir, W. Abbas, E. M. Abdel Hamid, Ajaya Kumar Singh
Journal of Chemistry.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Current Management
Seung Mi Yeo, Gyung Mo Son
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The watch-and-wait strategy versus radical resection for rectal cancer patients with a good response (≤ycT2) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(6): 350. CrossRef
Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review
Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164. CrossRef

Benign GI diease,Benign diesease & IBD,Complication,Biomarker & risk factor

A development study of drain fluid gastrografin as a biomarker of anastomotic leak: David A. Clark, Edward Yeoh, Aleksandra Edmundson, Craig Harris, Andrew Stevenson, Daniel Steffens, Michael Solomon; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(2):124-132. Published online January 11, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.12.24

4,186 View
177 Download
5 Web of Science
5 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the anathema of colorectal surgery. Its occurrence leads to increased morbidity and mortality and a prolonged hospital stay. Much work has gone into studying various biomarkers in drain fluid to facilitate early detection of AL. This stage 2a development study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of reliably detecting the iodine in Gastrografin (GG; Bayer Australia Ltd.) in drain fluid and stool samples by dual-energy computed tomography (DECT).
Methods
This is a prospective, observational, controlled, consecutive cohort study establishing the safety and feasibility of the detection of GG in surgical drain fluid and stool as a biomarker of AL when patients with a low pelvic colorectal anastomosis undergo luminal flushing of the rectal tube with GG.
Results
Ten consecutive patients were allocated to the saline flush group and the following 10 to the GG flush group. Three patients in the saline flush group developed an AL. One patient in the GG flush group developed an AL. An elevation in the drain fluid GG was detected using DECT on the day of clinical deterioration. None of the patients in the control group were found to have a positive result on DECT.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the safety of a novel approach to the early detection of AL from extraperitoneal colorectal anastomoses. The technique requires validation in a larger cohort and a multicenter study is planned to investigate the efficacy of GG rectal tube flushes as an early biomarker of AL in low pelvic anastomoses.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Drain fluid iodine as a biomarker of anastomotic leak after low anterior resection in patients undergoing Gastrografin rectal tube flushes and omission of a diverting ileostomy: The GUSH study
David A. Clark, Karen Dobeli, Darren Allen, Brett McWhinney, Michael Lonne, Aleksandra Edmundson
Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098. CrossRef
Successful colorectal anastomotic leakage management: a two oncological centres' 12-year experience
Kiril G. KIROV, Tsvetomir M. IVANOV, Nadya S. IVANOVA
Chirurgia.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy determines the prognostic impact of anastomotic leakage in advanced rectal cancer
Bo Young Oh, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Wook Huh, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(4): 235. CrossRef
Does an ileostomy cover the surgeon or the anastomosis?
David A. Clark, Andrew Stevenson, John Lumley, Damien Petersen, Craig Harris, Daniel Steffens, Michael Solomon
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2022; 92(1-2): 19. CrossRef

Benign GI diease,Benign diesease & IBD,Rare disease & stoma

Geographical Variation in the Use of Diverting Loop Ileostomy in Australia and New Zealand Colorectal Surgeons: David A. Clark, Bree Stephensen, Aleksandra Edmundson, Daniel Steffens, Michael Solomon; Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(5):337-345. Published online September 18, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.09.14.1

3,521 View
71 Download
8 Web of Science
9 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Anastomotic leak (AL) after a low pelvic anastomosis is a devastating complication, with short- and long-term morbidity and increased mortality. Surgeons may employ various adjuncts in an attempt to reduce AL rates or mitigate their impact. These include the use of temporary diverting ileostomy (TDI), transanal or rectal tubes and pelvic drains. This questionnaire evaluates the preferences and routine use of these adjuncts in Australasian colorectal surgeons.
Methods
A cross-sectional survey was administered to Australian and New Zealand colorectal surgeons on September 20, 2018. The study survey consisted of 15 questions exploring basic demographics and the number of rectal resections and ileal pouches performed in 12 months, along with the surgeon’s preference for the use of diverting stomas, rectal tubes, and pelvic drains.
Results
There were 90 respondents to the survey (31.6%). Surgeons in Western Australia (71.4%) were more likely to use a mandatory TDI in colorectal extraperitoneal anastomoses than surgeons in Queensland (14.3%). South Australian surgeons are more likely to employ a mandatory TDI (100%) for ileal pouches than Queensland surgeons (42.9%). Rectal tubes are not commonly utilized (40.0% never use them), and pelvic drains are (45.6% in all cases). Surgeons consider a median AL rate of 15% was felt to justify the use of a TDI in low pelvic anastomoses and a median AL rate of 10% for ileal pouches
Conclusion
There is considerable geographical variation in colorectal surgical practice throughout Australia and New Zealand. While surgeons interrogate the same literature, there are presumably other factors that see translation into variations in clinical practice.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Drain fluid iodine as a biomarker of anastomotic leak after low anterior resection in patients undergoing Gastrografin rectal tube flushes and omission of a diverting ileostomy: The GUSH study
David A. Clark, Karen Dobeli, Darren Allen, Brett McWhinney, Michael Lonne, Aleksandra Edmundson
Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Feasibility of triple assessment of the anastomosis using an anastomotic checklist
Madeleine Louise Kelly, Amy Cao, Ruben Rajan, David A Clark
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(10): 1812. CrossRef
Predictors of pouch failure and quality of life following ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a retrospective multicenter study
Ahmet Rencuzogullari, Cihangir Akyol, Ismail Hamzaoglu, Tahsin Colak, Tayfun Karahasanoglu, Ugur Sungurtekin, Sezai Leventoglu, Ersin Ozturk, Mustafa Ali Korkut, Selman Sokmen
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Drain fluid amylase as a biomarker for the detection of anastomotic leakage after rectal resection without a diverting ileostomy
David A. Clark, Aleksandra Edmundson, Daniel Steffens, Craig Harris, Andrew Stevenson, Michael Solomon
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2022; 92(4): 813. CrossRef
Surgical management and long‐term functional outcomes after anastomotic leak in patients undergoing minimally invasive restorative rectal resection and without a diverting ileostomy
Tony McGiffin, David A. Clark, Aleks Edmundson, Daniel Steffens, Andrew Stevenson, Michael Solomon
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2022; 92(4): 806. CrossRef
Does an ileostomy cover the surgeon or the anastomosis?
David A. Clark, Andrew Stevenson, John Lumley, Damien Petersen, Craig Harris, Daniel Steffens, Michael Solomon
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2022; 92(1-2): 19. CrossRef
Risk taking propensity: Nurse, surgeon and patient preferences for diverting ileostomy
Ian Mackay, David A. Clark, James Nicholson, Aleks Edmundson, Daniel Steffens, Michael Solomon
Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(9): 1073. CrossRef
Multicenter Study of Drain Fluid Amylase as a Biomarker for the Detection of Anastomotic Leakage After Ileal Pouch Surgery Without a Diverting Ileostomy
David A. Clark, • Aleksandra Edmundson, Daniel Steffens, Graham Radford-Smith, Michael Solomon
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2022; 65(11): 1335. CrossRef
An umbrella systematic review of drain fluid analysis in colorectal surgery for the detection of anastomotic leak: Not yet ready to translate research studies into clinical practice
David A. Clark, Daniel Steffens, Michael Solomon
Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(11): 2795. CrossRef

Review

Malignant disease

How to Prevent Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review: Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Tarek Kellil, Camillia Jeddi, Ahmed Saidani, Faouzi Chebbi, Khadija Zouari; Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):213-222. Published online August 31, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.05.14.2

7,534 View
351 Download
21 Web of Science
29 Citations

Abstract PDF

Anastomosis leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery is an embarrassing problem. It is associated with poor consequence. This review aims to summarize published evidence on prevention of AL after colorectal surgery and provide recommendations according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. We conducted bibliographic research on January 15, 2020, of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We retained meta-analysis, reviews, and randomized clinical trials. We concluded that mechanical bowel preparation did not reduce AL. It seems that oral antibiotic or oral antibiotic with mechanical bowel preparation could reduce the risk of AL. The surgical approach did not affect the AL rate. The low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery could reduce the AL rate. The mechanical anastomosis is superior to handsewn anastomosis only in case of right colectomies, with similar results in rectal surgery between the 2 anastomosis techniques. In the case of right colectomies, this anastomosis could be performed intracorporeally or extracorporeally with similar outcomes. The air leak test did not reduce AL. There is no interest of external drainage in colonic surgery but drains reduced the rate of AL and rate of reoperation after low anterior resection. The transanal tube reduced the rate of AL.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Caring for a patient with appendiceal cancer
Richard L. Pullen
Nursing.2025; 55(2): 16. CrossRef
Collagen patch cover facilitates recovery of bowel function after laparoscopic colectomy
Pin-Yang Huang, Meng-Che Tsai, Kee-Thai Kiu, Min-Hsuan Yen, Tung-Cheng Chang
BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of the starch-based anti-adhesive agent 4DryField PH on anastomotic healing after rectal surgery
Simon Stoerzer, Markus Winny, Oliver Beetz, Severin Jacobi, Juergen Klempnauer, Daniel Poehnert
International Journal of Surgery Open.2024; 62(1): 6. CrossRef
Bowel preparation for elective colectomy in Crohn's disease: results from a global cohort study using the NSQIP database
Gustavo Yano Callado, Rodrigo Moisés de Almeida Leite, Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Leandro Cardoso Barchi, Waleed Seddiq, Isabela Passarin Correa, Ulysses Ribeiro Junior, Rocco Ricciardi
Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(4): 709. CrossRef
Does transanal endomicrosurgery affects the results of “salvage mesorectumectomy” for patients with early rectal cancer? Systematic review and meta-analysis
Ph. I. Kirgizov, S. V. Chernyshov, M. A. Nagudov, E. G. Rybakov
Surgery and Oncology.2024; 14(1): 11. CrossRef
Anastomotic leak rate following the implementation of a powered circular stapler in elective colorectal surgeries: a retrospective cohort study
Jessica J. Lie, Nadeesha Samarasinghe, Ahmer A. Karimuddin, Carl J. Brown, P. Terry Phang, Manoj J. Raval, Amandeep Ghuman
Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(10): 5541. CrossRef
Morbidity and Mortality after Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC in a National Reference Center: A Six-Year Experience under Independent Evaluation
Miguel Enrique Alberto Vilchez, Sebastian Halskov, Axel Winter, Johann Pratschke, Beate Rau, Safak Gül
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(17): 5182. CrossRef
Recommendations for the perioperative management of pancreatic and colorectal cancer patients
Tim O. Vilz, Stefan Post, Thomas Langer, Markus Follmann, Monika Nothacker, Maria A. Willis
Deutsches Ärzteblatt international.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Entre luces y sombras: Factores clave en la fuga anastomótica en cirugía colorrectal, estudio de casos y controles en dos centros de alto volumen en Bogotá
Carolina Riscanevo-Bobadilla, Diego Efrain Valbuena, Andrés Felipe Salcedo-Young, Ronel Eduardo Barbosa, Wilmar Martin, Angela Navas, Daniel Franco
Revista Colombiana de Cirugía.2024; : 99. CrossRef
UNEXPECTED FINDINGS DURING LAPAROTOMY SURGERY AND URGENT SURGICAL INDICATIONS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH CROHN’S DISEASE
Guilherme Zupo TEIXEIRA, Magaly Gemio TEIXEIRA, Marina Carla GIMENEZ, Silvia Caroline Neves RIBEIRO, Nathacia Bernardo CHIMELLO, Vania Aparecida LEANDRO-MERHI
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo).2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic colectomy with CME versus laparoscopic colon resection with or without CME for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
H Oweira, C Reissfelder, H Elhadedy, N Rahbari, A Mehrabi, W Fattal, JS Khan, MA Chaouch
The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.2023; 105(2): 113. CrossRef
The Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Anastomotic Leak Prevention during Elective Colorectal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Lidia Castagneto-Gissey, Maria Francesca Russo, James Casella-Mariolo, Angelo Serao, Rosa Marcellinaro, Vito D’Andrea, Massimo Carlini, Giovanni Casella
Antibiotics.2023; 12(2): 397. CrossRef
Refractory Retroperitoneal Abscess Due to Anastomosis Leakage after Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Combined with Robotic Rectal Resection with Diverting Ileostomy: A Case Report
Yuichiro Nishida, Yuto Hozaka, Shinichiro Mori, Masumi Wada, Kan Tanabe, Yoshiaki Kita, Takaaki Arigami, Akihiro Nakajo, Michiyo Higashi, Hiroshi Kurahara, Takao Ohtsuka
The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery.2023; 56(3): 180. CrossRef
Efficacy of transanal drainage tube in preventing anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis
Shiki Fujino, Masayoshi Yasui, Masayuki Ohue, Norikatsu Miyoshi
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 15(6): 1202. CrossRef
Surgical aspects of stoma formation in oncology. Literature review
A. S. Gorbunova, D. V. Kuzmichev, Z. Z. Mamedli, A. A. Aniskin, A. V. Polinovsky, D. V. Aleksantsev, A. V. Korshak
Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2023; 13(2): 54. CrossRef
How to prevent postoperative ileus in colorectal surgery? a systematic review
Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Mohamed Aziz Daghmouri, Abdallah Lahdheri, Mohammad Iqbal Hussain, Salsabil Nasri, Amine Gouader, Faouzi Noomen, Hani Oweira
Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2023; 85(9): 4501. CrossRef
Possible role of features of the intestinal microbiome in patients with colorectal cancer as a cause of anastomotic leak
P. V. Kosareva, R. A. Konev, A. P. Godovalov, L. V. Sivakova, E. I. Samodelkin
Bulletin of Siberian Medicine.2023; 22(3): 120. CrossRef
Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252. CrossRef
Pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: The experience of a tertiary center from Greece
Dimitrios Haidopoulos, Vasilios Pergialiotis, Kyveli Aggelou, Nikolaos Thomakos, Nikolaos Alexakis, Emmanouil Stamatakis, Alexandros Rodolakis
Surgical Oncology.2022; 40: 101702. CrossRef
Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin on POD3 for the early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review
Zheng'ao Xu, Rui Zong, Yu Zhang, Jie Chen, Weidong Liu
International Journal of Surgery.2022; 100: 106592. CrossRef
Immediate results of rectal resections for cancer in depending on the restoration of the integrity of the pelvic peritoneal floor: retrospective study
M. S. Lebedko, S. S. Gordeev, S. G. Gaydarov, Z. Z. Mamedli, V. Yu. Kosyrev, A. A. Aniskin, S. O. Kochkina
Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2022; 11(3-4): 23. CrossRef
Laparoscopic PME with colorectal anstomosis with transanal control – A video vignette
Francesco Crafa, Serafino Vanella, Adele Noviello, Giuseppe Longo, Francesco Longo
Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(7): 887. CrossRef
Risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leakage and preventive measures: a retrospective cohort study
M. S. Lebedko, S. S. Gordeev, E. V. Alieva, M. D. Sivolob, Z. Z. Mamedli, S. G. Gaydarov, V. Yu. Kosyrev
Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2022; 12(2): 17. CrossRef
Surgical safety in the COVID-19 era: present and future considerations
Young Il Kim, In Ja Park
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(6): 295. CrossRef
Colonic splenic flexure resection with an end‐to‐end intracorporeal anastomosis using a circular stapler – A video vignette
Roberto Secchi del Rio, Jose Ignacio Ortiz de Elguea‐Lizarraga, Paulina Muñoz‐Ledo Ceron, Eli Castillo, Victor Gerardo Pena, Diego Marines Copado
Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(11): 1447. CrossRef
Как предотвратить несостоятельность кишечных анастомозов «высокого риска»
Эльчин Агаев, Зульфия Исмайылова, Мушвиг Гасанов
InterConf.2022; (26(129)): 283. CrossRef
Safe Anastomoses without Ostomies in Cytoreductive Surgery with Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Technical Considerations and Modifications
Pedro Barrios, Isabel Ramos, Oriol Crusellas, Domenico Sabia, Sergio Mompart, Lana Bijelic
Annals of Surgical Oncology.2021; 28(12): 7784. CrossRef
Early salvage total mesorectal excision (sTME) after organ preservation failure in rectal cancer does not worsen postoperative outcomes compared to primary TME: systematic review and meta-analysis
Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Jim Khan, Talvinder Singh Gill, Arianeb Mehrabi, Christoph Reissfelder, Nuh Rahberi, Hazem Elhadedy, Hani Oweira
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(11): 2375. CrossRef
Regional techniques for pain management following laparoscopic elective colonic resection: A systematic review
Mohamed Aziz Daghmouri, Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Maroua Oueslati, Lotfi Rebai, Hani Oweira
Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2021; 72: 103124. CrossRef

Original Articles

Benign GI diease

Early Metabolic and Inflammatory Intraperitoneal Changes After Rectum Perforation: Ioannis Oikonomakis, Tal M. Horer, Per Skoog, Kristofer F. Nilsson, Kjell Jansson; Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(6):374-381. Published online February 25, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.09.30.1

3,911 View
70 Download

Abstract PDF: Purpose
Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most dreaded complication in rectal surgery. It has a great impact on postoperative morbidity and mortality. This animal model, in which we have studied postoperative metabolic and inflammatory changes, is designed to imitate an AL.
Methods
Twelve pigs were randomized into 2 groups. In the experimental group, an iatrogenic rectal perforation was performed, with the control group having a sham operation. The 2 groups were followed for 10 hours after operation with regard to vital parameters, arterial lactate, and cytokines interleukin (IL) 1, IL6, and IL10 in the blood and intraperitoneally. Intraperitoneal microdialysis analyses of glucose, lactate, glycerol, and pyruvate were performed and the lactate/pyruvate ratio was calculated.
Results
Glucose levels were lower in the experimental group after 4 hours. After 7 hours, lactate and lactate/pyruvate ratio was higher in the experimental group. At the same time intraperitoneal cytokines IL6 and IL10 were higher in the experimental group. Blood samples showed higher IL6 after 7 hours in the experimental group. Conclusion: In this study, several significant differences between the groups in metabolic and inflammatory values were detected. Further clinical studies are recommended to evaluate the importance of intraperitoneal metabolic and inflammatory analyses as a diagnostic tool for early identification of an AL.

Benign GI diease,Benign diesease & IBD,Complication,Surgical technique

Triple-Staple Technique Effectively Reduces Operating Time for Rectal Anastomosis: Marie Shella De Robles, Christopher John Young; Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(1):16-20. Published online February 5, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.06.30

4,863 View
161 Download
9 Web of Science
9 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Stapled anastomotic techniques to the distal rectum have gained widespread acceptance due to their procedural advantages. Various modifications in the stapling techniques have evolved since their inception. The triple-staple technique utilizing stapled closure of both the proximal colon and distal rectal stump provides a rapid and secure colorectal anastomosis. The aims of this study were to determine the safety and efficacy of the triple-staple technique and to compare the clinical outcomes with a historical control group for which the conventional double-staple technique had been performed.
Methods
One hundred consecutive patients operated on by a single surgeon were included in the study; 50 patients who underwent a double-staple (DSA) procedure and 50 patients undergoing triple-staple anastomosis (TSA).
Results
The most common indication for surgery in both groups was rectal cancer followed by diverticular disease and distal sigmoid cancer. There was no significant difference in number of patients requiring loop ileostomy formation in the groups (TSA, 56.0% vs. DSA, 68.0%; P = 0.621). The mean operating time for the TSA group was significantly shorter compared to that of the DSA group (TSA, 242.8 minutes vs. DSA, 306.1 minutes; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in complication rate (TSA, 40% vs. DSA, 50%; P = 0.315) or length of hospital stay between the two groups (TSA, 11.3 days vs. DSA, 13.0 days; P = 0.246). Postoperative complications included anastomotic leak, prolonged ileus, bleeding, wound infection, and pelvic collection.
Conclusion
The triple-staple technique is a safe alternative to double-staple anastomosis after anterior resection and effectively shortens operating time.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Single versus double stapled anastomosis in natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) laparoscopic anterior resection
Abdus Salam Raju, Seyed Mohammad Javad Taghavi, Andrew James Gilmore
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304. CrossRef
Double-row staple technology versus triple-row staple technology for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Tyler McKechnie, Victoria Shi, Elena Huang, Bright Huo, Aristithes Doumouras, Nalin Amin, Cagla Eskicioglu, Dennis Hong
Surgery.2024; 176(3): 633. CrossRef
The Colorectal Anastomosis: A Timeless Challenge
Alexander A. Gaidarski III, Marco Ferrara
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2023; 36(01): 011. CrossRef
Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252. CrossRef
Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
Hyun Gu Lee
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
Sung Uk Bae
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577. CrossRef
Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
Sung Uk Bae
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221. CrossRef
Effort to Improve Rectal Anastomosis: the Triple-Stapled Technique for Rectal Anastomosis
Sung Il Kang
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(1): 1. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 3
Next
Last

Search