Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Articles

Benign proctology,Surgical technique

Transperineal rectocele repair is ideal for patients presenting with fecal incontinence: Marie Shella De Robles, Christopher J. Young; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(5):376-379. Published online October 19, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00157.0022

7,362 View
184 Download
4 Web of Science
4 Citations

Purpose
Rectocele can be associated with both obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. There exists a great variety of operative techniques to treat patients with rectocele. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome in a consecutive series of patients who underwent transperineal repair of rectocele when presenting with fecal incontinence as the predominant symptom.
Methods
Twenty-three consecutive patients from April 2000 to July 2015 with symptomatic rectocele underwent transperineal repair by a single surgeon.
Results
All patients had a history of vaginal delivery, with or without evidence of associated anal sphincter injury at the time. The median age of the cohort was 53 years (range, 21–90 years). None were fully continent preoperatively. However, continence improved to just rare mucus soiling or loss of flatus in all patients 6 months after their surgery. There was no operative mortality. Postoperative complications including urinary retention and wound dehiscence occurred in 3 patients.
Conclusion
Fecal incontinence associated with rectocele is multifactorial and may be caused by preexisting anal sphincteric damage and attenuation. Our experience suggests that transperineal repair provides excellent anatomic and physiologic results with minimal morbidity in selected patients presenting with combined rectocele and anal sphincter defect.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

IUGA Opinion Paper on Obstructed Defecation: Management of Clinical and Proctographic Rectoceles
Suneetha Rachaneni, Hans Peter Dietz, Pallavi Latthe, Annie Sirany, Anna Spivak, Anupreet Dua
International Urogynecology Journal.2026; 37(1): 75. CrossRef
Beyond stapled transanal rectal resection vs ventral rectopexy dichotomy: Toward a phenotype-guided surgical paradigm for obstructed defecation syndrome
Michele Schiano di Visconte, Sonia Sarnari
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Fecal Incontinence Outcomes Following Transvaginal Posterior Vaginal Wall Repair
Jersey B. Burns, Amr El Haraki, Jesseca Crawford, Candace Y. Parker-Autry
International Urogynecology Journal.2025; 36(5): 1061. CrossRef
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Constipation
Karim Alavi, Amy J. Thorsen, Sandy H. Fang, Pamela L. Burgess, Gino Trevisani, Amy L. Lightner, Daniel L. Feingold, Ian M. Paquette
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(10): 1244. CrossRef

Diagnosis of Anal Sphincter Injuries by Manometric Radial Asymmetry.: Seong, Moo Kyung , Cha, Hyung Hwan , Park, Ung Chae; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 1999;15(2):131-136.

1,416 View
2 Download

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
This study was undertaken to evaluate how well anorectal manometry diagnose anal sphincter injury, especially with regard to the parameter of radial asymmetry. METHODS: Anorectal manometry were performed in 27 male patients with anal fistula of transsphincteric type. The postoperative values of each manometric parameter including radial asymmetry (RA) were compared with preoperative ones. And also, the association between the sites of functional defect assessed by cross-sectional pressure data under station pull-through (SPT) technique and those of anatomical defect made by fistulotomy operation were determined.
RESULTS
Under rapid pull-through (RPT) technique, maximum resting pressure (MRP); 113.1 21.3 mmHg (preoperative value) vs 68.0 18.5 mmHg (p=.000) (postoperative value), RA of MRP; 16.7 3.7% vs 24.1 7.5% (p=.002), Maximum squeeze pressures (MSP); 199.0 35.2 mmHg, 169.6 48.7 mmHg (p=.006), RA of MSP; 15.5 3.7%, 22.8 3.5% (p=.000). Under SPT technique, MRP; 100.4 39.5 mmHg vs 71.2 34.6 mmHg (p=.000), RA of MRP; 16.3 7.9% vs 24.2 10.8% (p=.026), MSP; 299.1 71.6 mmHg vs 231.4 90.3 mmHg (p=.004), RA of MSP; 13.0 6.1% vs 22.0 8.4% (p=.001). Sites of functional defects interpreted upon SPT data were coincidental with sites of anatomical defects made by fistulotomy in 88.9% (MRP) and 92.6% (MSP) of cases.
CONCLUSIONS
Manometric radial asymmetry could be a useful parameter in diagnosing anal sphincter injury and locating the site of defect.

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search