Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
15 "Aged"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Oncologic outcomes and associated factors of colon cancer patients aged 70 years and older
Byeo Lee Lim, In Ja Park, Jun-Soo Ro, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Received June 7, 2023  Accepted September 11, 2023  Published online August 5, 2024  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00367.0052    [Epub ahead of print]
  • 2,310 View
  • 34 Download
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The aim of this study was to examine the prognosis and associated risk factors, including adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx), in elderly patients with colon cancer.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who underwent radical resection for colon cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 at Asan Medical Center. The effects of stage, risk factors, and chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared in patients aged ≥70 and <70 years.
Results
Of 3,313 patients, 933 (28.1%) was aged ≥70 years. Of the 1,921 patients indicated for adjuvant CTx, 1,294 of 1,395 patients (92.8%) aged <70 years and 369 of 526 patients (70.2%) aged ≥70 years received adjuvant CTx. Old age (≥70 years) was independently associated with RFS in overall cohort. Among patients aged ≥70 years indicated for adjuvant CTx, the 5-year OS (81.6% vs. 50.4%, P<0.001) and RFS (82.9% vs. 67.4%, P=0.025) rates were significantly higher in those who did than did not receive adjuvant CTx. Additionally, adjuvant CTx was confirmed as independent risk factor of both OS and RFS in patients aged ≥70 years indicated for adjuvant CTx.
Conclusion
Old age was associated with poor RFS and adjuvant CTx had benefits in OS as well as RFS in elderly patients eligible for adjuvant CTx.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Immunological changes and recovery-related factors in older patients with colon cancer: A pilot trial
    Byeo Lee Lim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Yousun Ko, Kyung Won Kim, In Ja Park
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2025; 16(3): 102200.     CrossRef
  • Stage II-III colorectal cancer in geriatric patients: Clinicopathological features and chemotherapy utilization
    Yakup Duzkopru, Özlem Doğan
    Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory.2025; 16(1): 118.     CrossRef
  • Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Functional outcomes,Colorectal cancer,Postoperative outcome & ERAS
Clinical validation of implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol in elderly colorectal cancer patients
Wooree Koh, Chul Seung Lee, Jung Hoon Bae, Abdullah Al-Sawat, In Kyu Lee, Hyeong Yong Jin
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):47-52.   Published online July 21, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00283.0040
  • 4,810 View
  • 192 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 15 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of applying enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in elderly colorectal cancer patients.
Methods
The medical records of patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer surgery at our institution, from January 2017 to December 2017, were reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the young group (YG, patients aged 70 and under 70 years) and the old group (OG, patients over 70 years old). Perioperative outcomes and length of hospital stay were compared between both groups.
Results
In total, 335 patients were enrolled; 237 were YG and 98 were OG. Despite the poorer baseline characteristics of OG, the perioperative outcomes were similar. Length of hospital stay was not different between the groups (YG, 5 days vs. OG, 5 days; P=0.320). When comparing the postoperative complications using the comprehensive complication index (CCI), there was no significant difference (YG, 8.0±13.2 vs. OG, 11.7±23.0; P=0.130). In regression analysis, old age (>70 years) was not a risk factor for high CCI in all patients. In multivariate analysis, C-reactive protein (CRP) level on postoperative day (POD) 3 to 4 was the only strong predictive factor for high CCI in elderly patients.
Conclusion
Implementing the ERAS protocol in patients aged >70 years is safe and feasible. High CRP (≥6.47 mg/dL) on POD 3 to 4 can be used as a safety index to postpone discharge in elderly patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential® versus robotic approach in patients with rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    I. K. Kim, C. S. Lee, J. H. Bae, S. R. Han, W. Alshalawi, B. C. Kim, I. K. Lee, D. S. Lee, Y. S. Lee
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Challenging issues of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery programs in South Korea
    Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Ho-Jin Lee
    Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.2024; 19(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Effects of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on the postoperative stress state and short‐term complications in elderly patients with colorectal cancer
    He Han, Rong Wan, Jixiang Chen, Xin Fan, LiWen Zhang
    Cancer Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Application of ERAS in older patients with gastric cancer
    Kuanxuan You, He Han
    Medicine.2024; 103(22): e38409.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes and future directions of enhanced recovery after surgery in colorectal surgery: a narrative review
    Ji Hyeong Song, Minsung Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Correlation between inflammatory markers and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) failure in laparoscopic colectomy
    Ji Hyeong Song, Yoonsoo Shin, Kyung Ha Lee, Ji Yeon Kim, Jin Soo Kim
    Surgery Today.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Beyond the Operating Room: A Narrative Review of Enhanced Recovery Strategies in Colorectal Surgery
    Hamed Ibrahim Hamed Albalawi, Rawshan Khalid A Alyoubi, Nawaf Mohsen Mubarak Alsuhaymi, Farha Abdullah K Aldossary, Alkathiry Abdulrahman Mohammed G, Fayez Mubarak Albishi, Jumana Aljeddawi, Fedaa Ahmed Omar Najm, Neda Ahmed Najem, Mohamed Mirza Ali Alma
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Early Oral Feeding on Postoperative Outcomes after Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Soo Young Lee, Eon Chul Han
    Digestive Surgery.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery is a safe and effective pathway for older patients: a pooling up analysis
    Xu-Rui Liu, Xiao-Yu Liu, Bin Zhang, Fei Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Chao Yuan, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of preoperative bicarbonate and lactate levels on short-term outcomes and prognosis in elderly patients with colorectal cancer
    Xiao-Yu Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Bin Zhang, Fei Liu, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng
    BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery
    Min Ki Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Future direction of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in colorectal surgery
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Implementation and improvement of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for colorectal cancer surgery
    Bo Yoon Choi, Jung Hoon Bae, Chul Seung Lee, Seung Rim Han, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyu Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(4): 223.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Rectal cancer, Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer
Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Elderly Stage II High-Risk Colorectal Cancer Patients
Yujin Lee, Inseok Park, Hyunjin Cho, Geumhee Gwak, Keunho Yang, Byung-Noe Bae
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(5):298-305.   Published online July 6, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00829.0118
  • 4,120 View
  • 97 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 17 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is recommended for patients with stage II colorectal cancer with adverse features. However, the effect of adjuvant treatment in elderly patients with high-risk stage II colorectal cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the oncologic outcomes in elderly high-risk stage II colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative resection with or without AC.
Methods
Patients aged over 70 years having stage II colorectal adenocarcinoma with at least 1 adverse feature who underwent radical surgery between 2008 and 2017 at a single center were included. We compared recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients who received more than 80% of the planned AC cycle (the AC+ group) and those who did not receive it (the AC− group).
Results
The AC+ and AC– group contained 46 patients and 50 patients, respectively. The log-rank test revealed no significant intergroup differences in RFS (P = 0.083) and OS (P = 0.122). In the subgroup of 27 patients with more than 2 adverse features, the AC+ group (n = 16) showed better RFS (P = 0.006) and OS (P = 0.025) than the AC− group. In this subgroup, AC was the only significant factor affecting RFS in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.023). AC was significantly associated with OS (P = 0.033) in the univariate analysis, but not in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.332).
Conclusion
Among elderly patients with stage II high-risk colorectal cancer, the AC+ group did not show better RFS or OS than the AC− group. However, selected patients with more than 2 adverse features might benefit from AC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Tumor aggression-defense index–a novel indicator to predicts recurrence and survival in stage II-III colorectal cancer
    Tong Wu, Lin Fang, Yuli Ruan, Mengde Shi, Dan Su, Yue Ma, Ming Ma, Bojun Wang, Yuanyu Liao, Shuling Han, Xiaolin Lu, Chunhui Zhang, Chao Liu, Yanqiao Zhang
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Prognostic Model Based on the Log Odds Ratio of Positive Lymph Nodes Predicts Prognosis of Patients with Rectal Cancer
    Jian Li, Yu zhou Yang, Peng Xu, Cheng Zhang
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2024; 55(3): 1111.     CrossRef
  • Complete Obstruction, a Real Risk Factor: A Comprehensive Study on Obstruction in Stage IIA Colon Cancer With Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Soo Young Oh, Chan Wook Kim, Seonok Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2024; 23(2): 135.     CrossRef
  • Clinical implication of tissue carcinoembryonic antigen expression in association with serum carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer
    Abdulmohsin Fawzi Aldilaijan, Young Il Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jihun Kim, Jun-Soo Ro, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advances in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: A Focus on Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
    Youngbae Jeon, Eun Jung Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oncologic outcomes in elderly patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: a multi-institutional survey in Kinki District, Japan
    Tomohito Tanaka, Suguru Yamashita, Haruo Kuroboshi, Junya Kamibayashi, Atsushi Sugiura, Kaori Yoriki, Taisuke Mori, Kazuharu Tanaka, Aiko Nagashima, Michihide Maeda, Shoji Kamiura, Yukako Mizuno, Noriko Ohtake, Tomoyuki Ichimura, Taiki Kikuchi, Yuri Nobut
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 27(6): 1084.     CrossRef
  • Does adjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes in elderly patients with colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world studies
    Jianbing Chen, Chengda Zhang, Yajuan Wu
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2022; 16(4): 383.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for recurrence in elderly patients with stage II colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study
    Takuki Yagyu, Manabu Yamamoto, Akimitsu Tanio, Kazushi Hara, Ken Sugezawa, Chihiro Uejima, Kyoichi Kihara, Shigeru Tatebe, Yasuro Kurisu, Shunsuke Shibata, Toshio Yamamoto, Hiroshi Nishie, Setsujo Shiota, Hiroaki Saito, Takuji Naka, Kenji Sugamura, Kuniyu
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
    Jeongwon Yeom, Hee-Sook Lim
    Clinical Nutrition Research.2022; 11(2): 75.     CrossRef
  • The Prognostic Reliability of Lymphovascular Invasion for Patients with T3N0 Colorectal Cancer in Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decision Making
    Hayoung Lee, Seung-Yeon Yoo, In Ja Park, Seung-Mo Hong, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2022; 14(12): 2833.     CrossRef
  • Is the oncological impact of vascular invasion more important in right colon cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(2): 49.     CrossRef
  • Molecular analyses of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 586.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention of colorectal cancer
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 549.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Analyses in Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 197.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention of Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 231.     CrossRef
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy benefits on patients with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen in stage IIA colon cancer: a SEER-based analysis
    Huabin Zhou, Songsheng Wang, Zhai Cai, Enming Qiu, Qianyun Chen, Xi Rao, Shuai Han, Zhou Li
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(12): 2481.     CrossRef
  • Elderly High-Risk Stage II Colorectal Cancer Patients: Candidates for Improving Outcome?
    Min Ki Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(5): 267.     CrossRef
Malignant disease
Colorectal Cancer in Octogenarian and Nonagenarian Patients: Clinicopathological Features and Survivals
Soo Min Lee, Jun Sang Shin
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(5):323-329.   Published online October 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.01.19.2
  • 4,322 View
  • 82 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 16 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Elderly population will comprise a substantial proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We examined patients older than 80 years according to their clinical and pathological characteristics to fully understand the elderly patients.
Methods
CRC patients, 60 years or older at diagnosis, admitted between 2009 and 2014 at our hospital were enrolled. The patients were divided into 2 groups: elderly (aged > 80 years, n = 133), and controls (aged 60 to 79 years, n = 596). Patient’s demographics, risk factors for prognosis of CRC, Clinicopathological parameters, treatment, and survival rates were compared.
Results
The mean ages were 83.9 and 64.8 years, respectively. Male-to-female ratio and tumor sidedness were comparable in both groups. Prognostic factors found in univariate analysis; differentiation, stage, lymphovascular invasion, and carcinoembryonic antigen showed no statistical difference. The microsatellite instability status and number of retrieved lymph nodes were also similar (17.2 vs 21.6, P = 0.505). A significant difference was found in the treatment approach for chemotherapy as the elderly patients with stage III and IV tend to have omitted adjuvant (43.6% vs. 92.8%, P < 0.001) or palliative (35.8% vs. 89.4%, P = 0.016) chemotherapy. Except in stage I, elderly patients showed significantly lower overall survival rates.
Conclusion
Current study shows far-elderly patients with CRC were less likely to receive standard treatments, which might have resulted in an inferior outcome. As the number of elderly patients with CRC increase, our results provide a basis for further clinical and molecular investigations of elderly CRC patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Surgical risk and cause of death among octogenarian and nonagenarian patients with colorectal cancer: a Japanese multicenter study
    Shintaro Hashimoto, Takashi Nonaka, Tetsuro Tominaga, Toshio Shiraishi, Keisuke Noda, Rika Ono, Makoto Hisanaga, Hiroaki Takeshita, Hidetoshi Fukuoka, Kazuo To Fukuoka, Kenji Tanaka, Masaki Kunizaki, Terumitsu Sawai, Keitaro Matsumoto
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2025; 55(4): 341.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics, Treatment and Outcomes of Stage I to III Colorectal Cancer in Patients Aged over 80 Years Old
    Melissa R. Yeo, Ioannis A. Voutsadakis
    Cancers.2025; 17(2): 247.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics, Therapeutic Approaches and Outcomes of Patients Older than 80 Years Old with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Compared with Younger Patients
    Melissa R. Yeo, Ioannis A. Voutsadakis
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(4): 1099.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic outcomes of surgically treated colorectal cancer in octogenarians: a comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)
    Soo Young Oh, Jung Yun Park, Kwan Mo Yang, Seong-A Jeong, Yong Jae Kwon, Yun Tae Jung, Chung Hyeun Ma, Keong Won Yun, Kwang Hyun Yoon, Jae Young Kwak, Chang Sik Yu
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mortality and morbidity after colorectal cancer resection surgery in elderly patients: a retrospective population-based study in Sweden
    Maria Normann, Niklas Ekerstad, Eva Angenete, Mattias Prytz
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians: an analysis of the US nationwide inpatient sample 2005–2018
    Chien-Chang Lu, Chi-Tung Lu, Kai-Yen Chang, Wang Chun-Li, Chien-Ying Wu
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Can clinicopathologic high-risk features in T3N0 colon cancer be reliable prognostic factors?
    Hyun Gu Lee, Young IL Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Presentation, Molecular Characteristics, Treatment, and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in Patients Older than 80 Years Old
    Ioannis A. Voutsadakis
    Medicina.2023; 59(9): 1574.     CrossRef
  • Octogenarian patients with colon cancer – postoperative morbidity and mortality are the major challenges
    Øystein Høydahl, Tom-Harald Edna, Athanasios Xanthoulis, Stian Lydersen, Birger Henning Endreseth
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early rectal cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Sung Hwan Cho, Byung-Soo Park, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Bum Park, Hyung Wook Kim, Sang Bo Oh, Tae Un Kim, Dong Hoon Shin
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Oncological liver resection in elderly – A retrospective comparative study
    Carina E. Riediger, Steffen Löck, Laura Frohneberg, Raphael Hoffmann, Christoph Kahlert, Jürgen Weitz
    International Journal of Surgery.2022; 104: 106729.     CrossRef
  • Direction of diagnosis and treatment improvement in colorectal cancer
    In Ja Park
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 540.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention of colorectal cancer
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 549.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention of Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 231.     CrossRef
  • Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
    Chan Wook Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive Approach for Older Cancer Patients: New Challenge in an Aging Society
    Do Young Lee, Jung-Myun Kwak
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(5): 289.     CrossRef
The Impact of the Outcome of Treating a High Anal Fistula by Using a Cutting Seton and Staged Fistulotomy on Saudi Arabian Patients
Bader Hamza Shirah, Hamza Asaad Shirah
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(5):234-240.   Published online October 10, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.03.23
  • 11,259 View
  • 171 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
A cutting seton is used after a partial distal fistulotomy to treat patients with a high exrasphincteric fistula in ano to avoid fecal incontinence and recurrence. In Saudi Arabia, religious practices necessitate complete cleanness, which makes conditions affecting anal continence a major concern to patients affected by an anal fistula. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the cutting seton in treating a high anal fistula among Saudi Arabians.
Methods
Between January 2005 and December 2014, a prospective study was done for 372 Saudi Arabian patients diagnosed as having a high anal fistula and treated with a cutting seton at Al-Ansar General Hospital, Medina, Saudi Arabia. 0-silk sutures were used. All patients underwent the same preoperative assessment, operative technique, and postoperative follow-up. Weekly, the seton was tightened in outpatient clinics.
Results
Two hundred ninety-eight patients (80.1%) were males and 74 (19.9%) females. The duration of symptoms varied from 3–21 months. The fistula healed completely in 363 patients (97.6%); 58 patients (15.6%) reported some degree of incontinence to flatus, but none to feces. In 9 patients (2.4%) the fistula recurred.
Conclusion
The utilization of the cutting seton method in the treatment of patients with a high anal fistula is highly efficient as it simultaneously drains the abscess, cuts the fistulous tract, and causes fibrosis along the tract. Treatment of a high anal fistula by using a staged fistulotomy with a cutting seton was very rewarding to Saudi Arabian patients who feared anal incontinence for religious reasons and was associated with low postoperative complication and recurrence rates.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Cutting seton for the treatment of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    J. Khamar, A. Sachdeva, T. McKechnie, Y. Lee, L. Tessier, D. Hong, C. Eskicioglu
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation surgical strategies in perianal fistulas treatment: Efficacy draining seton compared to other surgical approaches; a case‐control study
    Amir Ghasemlouei, Amirhosein Naseri, Ali Ashjaei, Shahryar Sadeghi, Amir Keshvari
    Health Science Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessing the suitability of video-assisted anal fistula treatment for obese patients compared to conventional surgery: a question worth investigating
    Xiao-Li Tang, Zi-Yang Xu, Jun Yang, Zhe Yang, Zhi-Gang Wang, Zheng-Yun Zhang, Jing Yao
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparative Evaluation Between Cutting of the Intersphincteric Space vs Cutting Seton in High Anal Fistula: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jiawei Qin, Yanlan Wu, Xueping Zheng, Kunlan Wu, Gongjian Dai, Yanyan Tan, Xu Yang, Yuqing Sun
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2024; 239(6): 563.     CrossRef
  • Fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty in complex anal fistula treatment: a hospital-based long-term follow-up study
    Fakhrosadat Anaraki, Mohammad Reza Nikshoar, Arsh Haj Mohamad Ebrahim Ketabforoush, Rojin Chegini, Nasrin Borumandnia, Mehdi Tavallaei
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(2): 145.     CrossRef
  • Exploring Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Anal Fistulas: A Comprehensive Study
    Tudor Mateescu, Lazar Fulger, Durganjali Tummala, Aditya Nelluri, Manaswini Kakarla, Lavinia Stelea, Catalin Dumitru, George Noditi, Amadeus Dobrescu, Cristian Paleru, Ana-Olivia Toma
    Life.2023; 13(10): 2008.     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatment of anal fistula
    A. Ya. Ilkanich, V. V. Darwin, E. A. Krasnov, F. Sh. Aliyev, K. Z. Zubailov
    Сибирский научный медицинский журнал.2023; 43(5): 74.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the Cutting Seton Technique in Treating High Anal Fistula
    Asim M Almughamsi, Mohamed Khaled S Zaky, Abdullatif M Alshanqiti, Ibrahim S Alsaedi, Hamed I Hamed, Tariq E Alharbi, Ali A Elian
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of loose combined cutting seton and traditional cutting seton for high anal fistula: a meta-analysis
    Yi SUN, Chunqiang WANG, Tianye HUANG, Xuebing WANG
    Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the Efficacy of Cutting Setons for the Treatment of Anal Fistulas
    Miguel E. Gomez, Koianka Trencheva, Matthew Symer, Kelly Garrett, Jeffrey W. Milsom, Parul J. Shukla
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2022; 84(5): 961.     CrossRef
  • Advancing standard techniques for treatment of perianal fistula; when tissue engineering meets seton
    Hojjatollah Nazari, Zahra Ebrahim Soltani, Reza Akbari Asbagh, Amirsina Sharifi, Abolfazl Badripour, Asieh Heirani Tabasi, Majid Ebrahimi Warkiani, Mohammad Reza Keramati, Behnam Behboodi, Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Amir Keshvari, Mojgan Rahimi, Seyed Mohsen
    Health Sciences Review.2022; 3: 100026.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of the fistula tract with laser ablation in high anal fistula
    Erkan Karacan, Eyüp Murat Yılmaz
    Journal of Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan.2022; 19(6): 43.     CrossRef
  • Influence of the cotton and silastic seton on the distance of the anal sphincter cables after fistulotomy in rats
    Ana Laura Sanches Lima, Beatriz Schorro Gianini, Bruna Miranda Santana, Carlos Henrique Marques dos Santos, Doroty Mesquita Dourado, Juliano Seger Falcão, Lucas Bannwart, Sara Jéssica Falcão Câmara
    Journal of Coloproctology.2020; 40(01): 056.     CrossRef
  • A Commentary on the article: “Risk factors for recurrence after anal fistula surgery: A meta-analysis”, Int J Surg 2019;69:153–164
    F. Karimian
    International Journal of Surgery.2019; 71: 79.     CrossRef
Outcome of Colorectal Surgery in Elderly Populations
Mostafa Shalaby, Nicola Di Lorenzo, Luana Franceschilli, Federico Perrone, Giulio P. Angelucci, Silvia Quareisma, Achille L. Gaspari, Pierpaolo Sileri
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(4):139-143.   Published online August 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.4.139
  • 4,699 View
  • 48 Download
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of age on short-term outcomes after colorectal surgery in terms of the 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality rates.

Methods

The subjects for the study were patients who had undergone colorectal surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to age; groups A and B patients were ≥80 and <80 years old of age, respectively. Both groups were manually matched for body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Charlson Comorbidity Index and procedure performed.

Results

A total of 200 patients, 91 men (45.5%) and 109 women (54.5%), were included in this retrospective study. These patients were equally divided into 2 groups. The mean ages were 85 years in group A (range, 80 to 104 years) and 55.3 years in group B (range, 13 to 79 years). The overall 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1% of total 200 patients; both of these 2 patients were in group A. However, this observation had no statistical significance. No intraoperative complications were encountered in either group. The overall 30-day postoperative morbidity rate was 27% (54 of 200) for both groups. The 30-day postoperative morbidity rates in groups A and B were 28% (28 of 100) and 26% (26 of 100), respectively. However, these differences between the groups had no statistical significance importance.

Conclusion

Age alone should not be considered to be more of a contraindication or a worse predictor than other factors for the outcome after colorectal surgery on elderly patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Preoperative management in octogenarian patients with rectal cancer
    Arthur M. Damasceno, Rubens Kesley, Marcus Valadão, Fabrício Braga, Cristiane A. D'Almeida, Marcos B. Pitombo
    Heliyon.2025; 11(1): e41469.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of complicated course of perioperative period in patients with rectal cancer and rectosigmoid junction
    E. P. Kulikov, S. A. Mertsalov, N. I. Verkin, Yu. D. Kaminskiy, I. S. Pikushin
    Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology.2023; (10): 77.     CrossRef
  • Oncological and surgical outcomes of radical surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients with intestinal obstruction
    Qingbiao Ma, Hongyu Li, Yujuan Jiang, Yingfei Wang, Jianwei Liang
    Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficiency of pre-operative preparation of intestines at treatment of sharp intestinal impassability tumoral genesis
    H. Sh. Nazarov, Sh. К. Nazarov, N. Sh. Hasanov
    Health care of Tajikistan.2022; (2): 59.     CrossRef
  • Before-and-After Study of the First Four Years of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®) Programme in Older Adults Undergoing Elective Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Cristina Martínez-Escribano, Francisco Arteaga Moreno, David Cuesta Peredo, Francisco Javier Blanco Gonzalez, Juan Maria De la Cámara-de las Heras, Francisco J. Tarazona Santabalbina
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(22): 15299.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative score for octogenarian patients eligible for rectal cancer surgery
    Arthur Mota Damasceno, Rubens Kesley, Bruno Souza Paolino, Marcelo Rubens dos Santos do Amaral, Marcos Bettini Pitombo
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 124(8): 1409.     CrossRef
  • Prehabilitation: finally utilizing frailty screening data
    Francesco Carli, Amal Bessissow, Rashami Awasthi, Sender Liberman
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020; 46(3): 321.     CrossRef
  • Video‐assisted anal fistula treatment for complex anal fistula: a long‐term follow‐up study
    G. Giarratano, M. Shalaby, C. Toscana, P. Sileri
    Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(8): 939.     CrossRef
  • New prognostic risk score for predicting in-hospital mortality in geriatric patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis
    Xiaohong Zhao, Yunmei Yang, Haifeng Gu, Wenjing Zhou, Qin Zhang
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2020; 11(8): 1250.     CrossRef
  • Impact of ASA-score, age and learning curve on early outcome in the initiation phase of an oncological robotic colorectal program
    Hülya Sarikaya, Tahar Benhidjeb, Sergiu I. Iosivan, Theodoros Kolokotronis, Christine Förster, Stephan Eckert, Ludwig Wilkens, Alaa Nasser, Sebastian Rehberg, Martin Krüger, Jan Schulte am Esch
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prediction of overall survival following colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients
    Isaac Seow-En, Winson Jianhong Tan, Sreemanee Raaj Dorajoo, Sharon Hui Ling Soh, Yi Chye Law, Soo Yeun Park, Gyu-Seok Choi, Wah Siew Tan, Choong Leong Tang, Min Hoe Chew
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2019; 11(5): 247.     CrossRef
  • Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults with Colorectal Cancer
    Evan Lapinsky, Lillian C. Man, Amy R. MacKenzie
    Current Oncology Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 75 years old: a multi-institutional study (YSURG1401)
    Keisuke Kazama, Toru Aoyama, Tsutomu Hayashi, Takanobu Yamada, Masakatsu Numata, Shinya Amano, Mariko Kamiya, Tsutomu Sato, Takaki Yoshikawa, Manabu Shiozawa, Takashi Oshima, Norio Yukawa, Yasushi Rino, Munetaka Masuda
    BMC Surgery.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Surgery in Elderly Patients
    Byung Chun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(4): 126.     CrossRef
Age Over 80 is a Possible Risk Factor for Postoperative Morbidity After a Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer
Taekhyun Kang, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun, Won Kon Han, Kyung Uk Jung
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(6):228-234.   Published online December 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.6.228
  • 4,516 View
  • 41 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 17 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

With extended life expectancy, the mean age of patients at the time of diagnosis of colorectal cancer and its treatment, including radical resection, is increasing gradually. We aimed to evaluate the impact of age on postoperative clinical outcomes after a laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancers.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Patients with primary colorectal malignancies or premalignant lesions who underwent laparoscopic colectomies between January 2009 and April 2013 were identified. Patients were divided into 6 groups by age using 70, 75, and 80 years as cutoffs: younger than 70, 70 or older, younger than 75, 75 or older, younger than 80, and 80 or older. Demographics, pathological parameters, and postoperative clinical outcomes, including postoperative morbidity, were compared between the younger and the older age groups.

Results

All 578 patients underwent a laparoscopic colorectal resection. The overall postoperative complication rate was 21.1% (n = 122). There were 4 cases of operative mortality (0.7%). Postoperative complication rates were consistently higher in the older groups at all three cutoffs; however, only the comparison with a cutoff at 80 years showed a statistically significant difference between the younger and the older groups.

Conclusion

Age over 80 is a possible risk factor for postoperative morbidity after a laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Octogenarian patients with colon cancer – postoperative morbidity and mortality are the major challenges
    Øystein Høydahl, Tom-Harald Edna, Athanasios Xanthoulis, Stian Lydersen, Birger Henning Endreseth
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Differential short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection in colon and rectal cancer patients aged 80 and older: an analysis of Nationwide Inpatient Sample
    Kuan-Chih Chung, Ko-Chao Lee, Hong-Hwa Chen, Kung-Chuan Cheng, Kuen-Lin Wu, Ling-Chiao Song
    Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(2): 872.     CrossRef
  • Age and comorbidities do not affect short-term outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection in elderly patients. A multi-institutional cohort study in 287 patients
    Roberto Peltrini, Nicola Imperatore, Filippo Carannante, Diego Cuccurullo, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Umberto Bracale, Marco Caricato, Francesco Corcione
    Updates in Surgery.2021; 73(2): 527.     CrossRef
  • Short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer aged over 80 years: a propensity score matching analysis
    Masako Utsumi, Takeru Matsuda, Kimihiro Yamashita, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Kyosuke Agawa, Naoki Urakawa, Shingo Kanaji, Taro Oshikiri, Tetsu Nakamura, Yoshihiro Kakeji
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(11): 2519.     CrossRef
  • Type and Consequences of Short-Term Complications in Colon Cancer Surgery, Focusing on the Oldest Old
    Marisa Baré, Laura Mora, Miguel Pera, Pablo Collera, Maximino Redondo, Antonio Escobar, Rocío Anula, José María Quintana, M. Redondo, F. Rivas, E. Briones, E. Campano, A.I. Sotelo, F. Medina, A. Del Rey, M.M. Morales, S. Gómez, M. Baré, M. Pont, N. Torà,
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2020; 19(1): e18.     CrossRef
  • Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly versus non-elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nobuaki Hoshino, Yudai Fukui, Koya Hida, Yoshiharu Sakai
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(3): 377.     CrossRef
  • Safety and Prognosis of Transarterial Chemoembolization for Octogenarians with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Hua-Ming Cheng, Toshihiro Tanaka, Hideyuki Nishiofuku, Yuto Chanoki, Katsutoshi Horiuchi, Tetsuya Masada, Shota Tatsumoto, Takeshi Matsumoto, Nagaaki Marugami, Kimihiko Kichikawa
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.2019; 42(10): 1413.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in advanced age patients
    Z. B. Khalilov, A. Yu. Kalinichenko, R. Kh. Azimov, M. A. Chinikov, I. S. Panteleeva, F. S. Kurbanov
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2018; (3): 76.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of video-assisted procedures in advanced age patients with colorectal cancer
    Z. B. Khalilov, A. Yu. Kalinichenko, R. Kh. Azimov, I. S. Panteleeva, M. A. Chinikov, F. S. Kurbanov
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2018; (2): 74.     CrossRef
  • Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening and treatment methods: Mapping of systematic reviews
    Hossein M Abdolahi, Ali S Asiabar, Saber Azami-Aghdash, Fatemeh Pournaghi-Azar, Aziz Rezapour
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing.2018; 5(1): 57.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in elderly patients
    Z. B. Khalilov, A. Yu. Kalinichenko
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2017; (3): 86.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of safety, feasibility and the long-term outcomes of colorectomy for colorectal adenocarcinoma in patients older than 80 years of age
    Norio Yukawa, Toru Aoyama, Tsutomu Sato, Takashi Oshima, Takaki Yoshikawa, Yasushi Rino, Munetaka Masuda
    Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2017; 7(4): 564.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 75 years old: a multi-institutional study (YSURG1401)
    Keisuke Kazama, Toru Aoyama, Tsutomu Hayashi, Takanobu Yamada, Masakatsu Numata, Shinya Amano, Mariko Kamiya, Tsutomu Sato, Takaki Yoshikawa, Manabu Shiozawa, Takashi Oshima, Norio Yukawa, Yasushi Rino, Munetaka Masuda
    BMC Surgery.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The possibility of endovideosurgical interventions for the treatment of the older-age patients presenting with rectal cancer
    Z. B. Khalilov, R. H. Azimov, M. A. Chinikov, I. S. Panteleeva, F. S. Kurbanov
    Dokazatel'naya gastroenterologiya.2017; 6(4): 53.     CrossRef
  • Impact of frailty on approach to colonic resection: Laparoscopy vs open surgery
    Catalina Mosquera, Konstantinos Spaniolas, Timothy L Fitzgerald
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(43): 9544.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Surgery in Elderly Patients
    Byung Chun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(4): 126.     CrossRef
  • Impact of octogenarians on surgical outcome in colorectal cancer
    Basilio Pirrera, Samuele Vaccari, Dajana Cuicchi, Ferdinando Lecce, Emilio De Raffele, Barbara Dalla Via, Marco Di Laudo, Valeria Tonini, Maurizio Cervellera, Bruno Cola
    International Journal of Surgery.2016; 35: 28.     CrossRef
Delorme's Procedure: An Effective Treatment for a Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse in Young Patients
Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Ali Reza Kazemeini, Amir Keshvari, Mohammad Reza Keramati
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(2):60-65.   Published online April 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.2.60
  • 6,059 View
  • 52 Download
  • 17 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Delorme's procedure is infrequently applied in young adults because of its assumed higher recurrence rate. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of the Delorme's technique in younger adults.

Methods

Fifty-two consecutive patients were entered in our study. We followed patients for at least 30 months. Their complaints and clinical exam results were noted.

Results

Our study included 52 patients (mean age, 38.44 years; standard deviation, 13.7 years). Of the included patients, 41 (78.8%) were younger than 50 years of age, and 11 (21.1%) were older than 50 years of age. No postoperative mortalities or major complications were noted. Minor complications were seen in 5 patients (9.6%) after surgery. The mean hospital stay was 2.5 days. In the younger group (age ≤50 years), fecal incontinence was improved in 92.3% (12 out of 13 with previous incontinence) of the patients, and recurrence was seen in 9.75% (4 patients). In the older group (age >50 years), fecal incontinence was improved in 20% (1 out of 5 with previous incontinence) of the patients, and recurrence was seen in 18.2% (2 patients). In 50% of the patients with a previous recurrence (3 out of 6 patients) following Delorme's procedure as a secondary procedure, recurrence was observed.

Conclusion

Delorme's procedure, especially in younger patients, is a relatively safe and effective treatment and should not be restricted to older frail patients. This procedure may not be suitable for recurrent cases.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Long-Term Outcomes of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Suture Rectopexy
    Henry H. Chill, Alireza Hadizadeh, Angela Leffelman, Claudia Paya Ten, Cecilia Chang, Roger P. Goldberg, Ghazaleh Rostaminia
    International Urogynecology Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Safety of concurrent transvaginal rectopexy at time of transvaginal apical prolapse repair: A comparative study
    Henry H. Chill, Sonia Gilani, Alireza Hadizadeh, Cecilia Chang, Nani P. Moss, Roger P. Goldberg, Ghazaleh Rostaminia
    European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2025; 312: 114512.     CrossRef
  • Management of recurrent external rectal prolapse. A single center experience
    Alessandro Sturiale, Lisa Fralleone, Bernardina Fabiani, Claudia Menconi, Vittorio d'Adamo, Gabriele Naldini
    Surgery Open Digestive Advance.2024; 14: 100137.     CrossRef
  • Delorme's procedure for urgent rectal prolapse – A video vignette
    A. Teresa Calderón Duque, Esther María Cano Pecharromán, Javier Broekhuizen Benítez, Laura Arriero Ollero, Lourdes Gómez Ruiz, Tomas Balsa Marín
    Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(3): 513.     CrossRef
  • External rectal prolapse: more than meets the eye
    M. Yiasemidou, C. Yates, E. Cooper, R. Goldacre, I. Lindsey
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(10): 783.     CrossRef
  • Delorme’s vs. Altemeier’s in the management of rectal procidentia: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pratik Bhattacharya, Mohammad Iqbal Hussain, Shafquat Zaman, Sophie Randle, Yousaf Tanveer, Nameer Faiz, Diwakar Ryali Sarma, Rajeev Peravali
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What are the surgical options for recurrent rectal prolapse – retrospective single-center experience
    Tomasz Kościński, Krzysztof Szmyt
    Polish Journal of Surgery.2023; 96(1): 22.     CrossRef
  • Trends in the surgical management of rectal prolapse: An Asian experience
    Yvonne Ying‐Ru Ng, Emile John Kwong Wei Tan, Cherylin Wan Pei Fu
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2022; 15(1): 110.     CrossRef
  • Longer prolapsed rectum length increases recurrence risk after Delorme’s procedure
    Taro Tanabe, Emi Yamaguchi, Takuya Nakada, Risa Nishio, Kinya Okamoto, Tetsuo Yamana
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(4): 314.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse (FTRP): a Case Series Analysis
    Przemysław Ciesielski, Magdalena Szczotko, Małgorzata Kołodziejczak
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2021; 83(3): 634.     CrossRef
  • Procedimiento de Altemeier para la reparación de prolapso rectal tras resección anterior de recto interesfinteriana con escisión mesorrectal total por vía transanal
    Eloy Maldonado Marcos, Pere Planellas Giné, Júlia Gil Garcia, Ramon Farrés Coll, Antoni Codina Cazador
    Cirugía Española.2021; 99(5): 389.     CrossRef
  • Altemeier procedure for rectal prolapse after intersphincteric low anterior resection with transanal total mesorectal excision
    Eloy Maldonado Marcos, Pere Planellas Giné, Júlia Gil Garcia, Ramon Farrés Coll, Antoni Codina Cazador
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2021; 99(5): 389.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs Delorme's operation in management of complete rectal prolapse: a prospective randomized study
    S. H. Emile, H. Elbanna, M. Youssef, W. Thabet, W. Omar, A. Elshobaky, T. M. Abd El‐Hamed, M. Farid
    Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(1): 50.     CrossRef
  • The evolution of evaluation and management of urinary or fecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse
    Scott R. Steele, Madhulika G. Varma, David Prichard, Adil E. Bharucha, Sarah A. Vogler, Askin Erdogan, Satish S.C. Rao, Ann C. Lowry, Erin O. Lange, Glen M. Hall, Joshua I.S. Bleier, Anthony J. Senagore, Justin Maykel, Sook Y. Chan, Ian M. Paquette, Marie
    Current Problems in Surgery.2015; 52(2): 17.     CrossRef
  • Komplikationen nach Rektumprolapsoperationen
    T.H.K. Schiedeck
    Der Chirurg.2015; 86(8): 747.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review of the literature on the surgical management of recurrent rectal prolapse
    A. Hotouras, Y. Ribas, S. Zakeri, C. Bhan, S. D. Wexner, C. L. Chan, J. Murphy
    Colorectal Disease.2015; 17(8): 657.     CrossRef
  • Outcome of the Delorme procedure for the management of complete rectal prolapse in children
    Mohamed Rabae
    The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2014; 33(4): 260.     CrossRef
Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Safety in Patients with Acute Appendicitis Aged over 80
Kwon Sang Moon, Yong Hwan Jung, Eun Hun Lee, Yong Hee Hwang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(2):94-99.   Published online April 30, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.2.94
  • 3,308 View
  • 41 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes, including surgical safety, in patients over 80 years of age who underwent an appendectomy.

Methods

This study involved 160 elderly patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis: 28 patients over 80 years old and 132 patients between 65 and 79 years old.

Results

The rate of positive rebound tenderness was significantly higher in the over 80 group (P = 0.002). Comparisons of comorbidity, diagnostic tool and delay in surgical treatment between the two groups were not statistically different. American Society of Anesthesiologists score was significantly higher in the over 80 group than in the 65 to 79 group (2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 1.6 ± 0.5; P < 0.00005). Comparisons of operative times and use of drainage between the two groups were not statistically different. In the pathologic findings, periappendiceal abscess was more frequent in the over 80 group (P = 0.011). No significant differences existed between the two groups when comparing the results of gas out and the time to liquid diet, but the postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the over 80 group (P = 0.001). Among the postoperative complications, pulmonary complication was significantly higher in the over 80 group (P = 0.005). However, operative mortality was zero in each group.

Conclusion

In case of suspicious appendicitis in elderly patients, efforts should be made to use aggressive diagnostic intervention, do appropriate surgery and prevent pulmonary complications especially in patients over 80 years of age.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Scheduled Surgery and Antibiotic Therapy in Catarrhal Acute Appendicitis
    Rahantasoa Prudence, Rakotonaivo Judicael, Razafimandimby M., Rasoaherinomenjanahary Fanjandrainy, Samison Hervé
    European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences.2024; 10(3): 38.     CrossRef
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Appendicitis in Elderly Patients
Hyun Nam Baek, Yong Hwan Jung, Yong Hee Hwang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(5):241-245.   Published online October 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.241
  • 5,461 View
  • 53 Download
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The appendectomy is the most common emergent surgical procedure in elderly patients. The increasing number of elderly persons has been accompanied by an increase in the number of cases of acute appendicitis in the elderly. In order to understand the clinical significance of a laparoscopic appendectomy for elderly patients with appendicitis, we investigated the results of a laparoscopic appendectomy for treating patients over 60 years of age with appendicitis and compared them with the results for an open technique.

Methods

We studied retrospectively patients over 60 years of age who underwent an appendectomy with either a laparoscopic (LA) or open (OA) technique for appendicitis between July 2007 and December 2009. There were 30 patients in the LA group and 47 patients in the OA group. The demographic data, operative time, length of the hospital stay, bowel movement, pain control, cost, complications and pre-existing disease were assessed.

Results

There were no significant differences between the LA and the OA groups with respect to pre-existing diseases, gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and the number of cases of complicated appendicitis, operative time, length of hospital stay, and times of analgesics use. However, the proportion of early gas out (within POD #2) was significantly greater in the LA group (80% vs. 57%, P < 0.05), and postoperative complications were significantly lower in the LA group (7% vs. 32%, P < 0.01). The costs for the two groups were not significantly different.

Conclusion

A laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and effective procedure in elderly patients and is not associated with any increase in morbidity. It can be recommended for routine use in treating elderly patients with appendicitis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Therapeutic effectiveness and influencing factors of laparoscopic appendectomy with mesoappendix dissection in the treatment of acute appendicitis
    Jiang Yuan, Qiang Liu, Bo-Yu Wu
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults
    Deborah S. Keller, Nathan Curtis, Holly Ann Burt, Carlo Alberto Ammirati, Amelia T. Collings, Hiram C. Polk, Francesco Maria Carrano, Stavros A. Antoniou, Nader Hanna, Laure-Meline Piotet, Sarah Hill, Anne C. M. Cuijpers, Patricia Tejedor, Marco Milone, E
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(8): 4104.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic and robotic surgery for colorectal cancer in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Carlo Alberto Ammirati, Roberto Passera, Elsa Beltrami, Chiara Peluso, Nader Francis, Alberto Arezzo
    Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies.2024; 33(5): 253.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Basic Laboratory Parameters in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis and Determining Disease Severity in the Elderly
    Mustafa Yeni, Rıfat Peksöz
    Turkish Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 32(2): 110.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury Between Laparoscopic and Laparotomy Procedures in Elderly Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery
    Shun Huang, Zheng Li, Nan Zou, Ting Dai, Xiang Long Cao, Zhe Jia, Wen Ping Peng, Ning Yang, Rui Fang Jia, Ming Zhang Zuo
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2021; 31(2): 160.     CrossRef
  • GERİATRİK AKUT APANDİSİTLERİN TANI VE TEDAVİSİNDEKİ FARKLILIKLAR: TEK MERKEZ DENEYİMİ
    Ahmet TÜRKAN, Ahmet ERDOĞAN, Uğur KILINÇ
    Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi.2021; 23(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly: A Literature Review on an Increasingly Frequent Surgical Problem
    Sintija Lapsa, Arturs Ozolins, Ilze Strumfa, Janis Gardovskis
    Geriatrics.2021; 6(3): 93.     CrossRef
  • Perforated vs. nonperforated acute appendicitis: evaluation of short-term surgical outcomes in an elderly population
    Fabio Rondelli, Michele De Rosa, Paolo Stella, Marcello Boni, Graziano Ceccarelli, Ruben Balzarotti, Andrea Polistena, Alessandro Sanguinetti, Walter Bugiantella, Nicola Avenia
    Minerva Chirurgica.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of appendectomy in elderly veteran patients
    Oswaldo Renteria, Zain Shahid, Sergio Huerta
    Surgery.2018; 164(3): 460.     CrossRef
  • Independent Preoperative Predictors of Prolonged Length of Stay after Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Patients over 30 Years of Age: Experience from a Single Institution
    Eric S. Wise, Stephen P. Gadomski, Annette M. Ilg, Camilo Bermudez, Emily W. Chan, Michelle L. Izmaylov, Samantha J. Gridley, Jessica V. Kaczmarek, Norman T. Melancon, Sarwat Ahmad, Kyle M. Hocking, Jose J. Diaz, Stephen M. Kavic
    The American Surgeon™.2016; 82(11): 1092.     CrossRef
  • Conventional Laparoscopic Appendicectomy and Laparoscope-Assisted Appendicectomy: a Comparative Study
    Mayank Baid, Manoranjan Kar, Utpal De, Mrityunjay Mukhopadhyay
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2015; 77(S2): 330.     CrossRef
  • Acute appendicitis: position paper, WSES, 2013
    Ferdinando Agresta, Luca Ansaloni, Fausto Catena, Luca Andrea Verza, Daniela Prando
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Thirty-day outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in elderly using ACS/NSQIP database
    Ashkan Moazzez, Rodney J. Mason, Namir Katkhouda
    Surgical Endoscopy.2013; 27(4): 1061.     CrossRef
The Characteristics of Colorectal Cancer in Patients Older than 80 Years.
Lee, Jae Myeong , Kim, Hee Cheol , Park, In Ja , Kim, Dae Dong , Yu, Chang Sik , Kim, Jin Cheon
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2007;23(6):490-496.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2007.23.6.490
  • 2,034 View
  • 10 Download
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The frequency of surgery for elderly Koreans with colorectal cancer has increased because of the current life expectancy rates. The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics of colorectal cancer in very elderly patients, to determine the optimal treatment decision, and to evaluate the patients prognosis.
METHODS
Between 1989~2005, 181 patients (96 men and 85 women, median age 82) over the age of 80 with colorectal cancer underwent surgery at OO hospital, Korea. Medical records with these patients' co-morbidities, symptoms, clinico-pathologic characteristics, complications, survival, and other relevant data were obtained and analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS
The principal clinical symptoms were bleeding (45.3%) and bowel habit change (40.9%). Of these patients, 126 had at least one preoperative co-morbidity, and hypertension (29.3%), and cardiac disease (16.0%) were common. Curative surgery was performed in 82.9% (n=150). Emergency surgery was performed in 6.1% (n=11), and the principal cause was obstruction. The most common location of the colorectal cancer was the rectum (39.8%). There were postoperative complications in 36.4% of the patients, including voiding difficulty (12.2%) and wound infection (9.9%). The thirty-day mortality rate was 0.6% (n=1). A preoperative, low PaO2 level significantly increased the incidence of postoperative complications (P=0.036). The five-year survival rate of the curative resection group was higher than that in the remaining patients (44.3% vs. 38.8%, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Although the preoperative morbidity was high in these very elderly patients, it could be lowered with strict patient management. In addition, these patients showed a relatively good survival rate. Therefore, we believe that major, curative, colorectal surgery should be performed in selected very elderly patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prediction of early postoperative desaturation in extreme older patients after spinal anesthesia for femur fracture surgery: a retrospective analysis
    Youn Yi Jo, Chun Gon Park, Ji Yeon Lee, Sun Koo Kwon, Hyun Jeong Kwak
    Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2019; 72(6): 599.     CrossRef
  • Can Elderly Patients Older than 75 Years with Colorectal Cancer Tolerate Planned Laparoscopic Surgery?
    Kang San Lee, Young Wan Kim, Joo Hee Kim, Hyun Jun Kwon, Ik Yong Kim
    The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2012; 15(4): 126.     CrossRef
  • The Outcome and Propriety of Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Cancer in the Elderly
    Hye-Won Hwang, Min-Young Koo, Jeong-Eun Lee, Ryung-Ah Lee, Kwang-Ho Kim
    Journal of the Korean Surgical Society.2010; 78(2): 93.     CrossRef
Safety of a One-stage Operation for an Obstructed Left Colon Carcinoma.
Oh, Soo Youn , Ahn, Eun Jung , Chung, Soon Sup , Lee, Ryung Ah , Kim, Kwang Ho , Park, Eung Bum
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2005;21(4):207-212.
  • 1,020 View
  • 4 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
For a left-sided colonic obstruction, the traditional method of a staged defunctioning colostomy and resection has been performed. Recently, there has been a trend towards a one-stage primary resection and anastomosis. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and the efficacy of a one-stage resection and anastomosis for obstructed left colon cancer.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the records of 29 patients who had been diagnosed as having an obstructed left-sided colon cancer during the period from January 1995 to December 2003 at Ewha Womans University Hospital. We compared two techniques, a one-stage operation (10 cases) and a staged operation (13 cases).
RESULTS
The mean age of the one-stage group was 58.5+/-16.1, and that of the staged operation group was 65.0+/-13.4. Both groups had similar co-morbidities, TNM stages, and tumor locations. In the one-stage operation group, a subtotal colectomy (n=3), a resection and anastomosis with intraoperative lavage (n=5), and a resection and anastomosis following stent insertion (n=2) had been performed. Patients who had undergone a colostomy as the first operation, resection and anastomosis (n=3), and a resection and anastomosis following a defunctioning colostomy (n=10) were included in the staged operation group. The mean postoperative hospital stay showed no significant differences between the two groups. One patient who had undergone a one-stage operation presented with an intestinal partial obstruction five months later. There were no anastomotic leakages, intraabdominal absceses, and wound infections, nor were there any mortalities.
CONCLUSIONS
A one-stage resection and primary anastomosis for obstructed left-sided colon cancer can be done safely without significant morbidity.
Temporary Indwelling of Self-expandable Metal Stent may Obviate the Need of Staged Operation for Malignant Colonic Obstruction.
Kim, Bong Wan , Lee, Kwang Jae , Kim, Jin Hong , Suh, Kwang Wook
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2001;17(2):91-96.
  • 1,243 View
  • 18 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Staged operation employing temporary enterostomy is still the standard treatment of malignant colonic obstruction (MCO). Expandable metal stent has been used for the palliation of unresectable gastrointestinal obstruction. We applied this metal stent technique to the MCO to achieve temporary alleviation of the obstruction so that the bowel preparation and one-stage operation were enabled. In this study we examined the efficacy of temporary indwelling of metal stent to obviate the need of staged operation in the treatment of MCO.
METHODS
From December 1998 to January 2001, 35 MCO patients were treated. Patients had typical symptoms of colonic obstruction such as abdominal pain and distension. When they were admitted, an self-expandable metal stent was introduced under the guide of flexible colonoscopy. For three days, formal bowel preparation (both chemical and mechanical) were followed. With regard to achievement of bowel preparation, postoperative complications and hospital stay, these 35 patients were compared with control group (N=20) of patients who underwent two staged operations for MCO.
RESULTS
The tumor locations were upper rectum (N=10), sigmoid colon (N=22) and left colon (N=3). Metal stent slipped off in one patient. Double contrast barium enema was possible in 34 patients. One stage operation was performed in all patients. Anastomotic complications were not observed in both groups. Intraabdominal abscess requiring reoperation was noted in one patient in each group. Wound infection was noted in 3 (8.6%) stent patients whereas 16 (80%) patients had wound complication in the control group (P<0.05). Mean hospital stay was 12.2 days in stent group and 29.4 days in control group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Even though our series is limited in patient number, these data suggested that temporary indwelling of self-expandable metal stent may obviate the need of staged operation in the treatment of MCO.
Clinical Analysis of Colorectal Cancer in the Elderly.
Yoo, Kwang Real , Jeong, Yeon Jun , Kim, Jong Hun , Hwang, Yong
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2000;16(2):99-108.
  • 1,136 View
  • 10 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Elderly patients of colorectal cancer compose a steadily expanding portion of the population in Korea. The decision whether or not to operate on elderly patients who have carcinoma of colon and rectum is often unduly complicated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of the operations for colorectal cancers in the elderly.
METHODS
This report is a retrospective clinical analysis for 365 cases of colorectal cancer who were treated surgically at the Department of surgery, Chonbuk National University Medical School from January 1994 to December 1998. To evaluate the age factor in colorectal cancer, the patients were divided into two groups: The elderly group included 79 patients who were aged > or =70 years on first presentation; The control group comprised 286 patients aged <70.
RESULTS
There is no significant difference between the two group with regard to the mode of presentation, gender, location of tumor, clinical symptom and sign, duration of symptom, coexistent disease, operation method, tumor size, histopathologic findings, the Astler-Coller classification, lymphatic and distant metastasis, perioperative complication and 5-year survival. The emergency operation is significantly higher incidence in the elderly group.
CONCLUSIONS
It is concluded that surgical resection of colorectal cancer in elderly is standard method and should not be restricted on the basis of age alone.
Comparison of One Stage Operation with Staged Operation in Malignant Obstruction of the Left Colon and Rectum.
Kim, Hyun Ho , Kim, Byung Seok , Moon, Duk Jin , Park, Ju Sup
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 1998;14(2):189-198.
  • 1,102 View
  • 2 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
BACKGROUND
The optimal management of malignant obstruction of the left colon and rectum is controversial.
METHODS
A retrospective study was performed of 33 patients who underwent one-stage operation(n=11), staged operation(n=20), and palliative colostomy(n=2) at Kwangju Christian Hospital between January 1992 and December 1996.
RESULTS
Eleven patients underwent one-stage operations(7 cases with anterior resection, 3 cases with left hemicolectomy, 1 case with Miles' operation). In this group, postoperative morbidity was 36.3% including 1 wound infection(9.0%), 1 anastomotic leakage (9.0%), 1 postoperative intestinal obstruction and 1 pulmonary complication, but there was no postoperative death. The average of hospital stay in this group was 18.1 days and the first day of normal diet was 6.0 days. Twenty patients underwent staged operations including 12 cases of Hartmann's procedure. In this group, postoperative morbidity was 35.0% including 3 wound infections(15.0%), 2 pulmonary complications(10.0%), 1 parastomal hernia and 1 fistula. There were two postoperative deaths as a result of sepsis. The average of hospital stay in this group was 34.9 days and the first day of normal diet was 6.8 days.
CONCLUSION
We believe that one-stage operation was of value in management of malignant obstruction of the left colon and rectum in selected patients.
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP