Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
40 "Adenoma"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Article
Analysis of adenoma detection rate of colonoscopy among trainees
Young Min Song, Kyung Su Han, Byung Chang Kim, Chang Won Hong, Bun Kim, Min Chul Kim, Myeong Jae Jin, Dae Kyung Sohn
Received March 10, 2023  Accepted July 20, 2023  Published online August 28, 2024  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00199.0028    [Epub ahead of print]
  • 696 View
  • 16 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
To analyze adenoma detection rate (ADR) and related quality indicators of colonoscopy among trainees and make recommendations for appropriate colonoscopy training.
Methods
ADR and related indicators of colonoscopies performed by 3 trainees and 5 colonoscopy experts between March and November 2022 were analyzed. These indicators were analyzed in both the entire patients and the screening/surveillance group. In addition, the training period of the 3 trainees was divided into 3 sections, and the changes in these indicators were examined.
Results
The mean ADR of the 3 trainees was 50.6%. In the screening/surveillance group, the mean ADR of the 3 trainees was 51.8%, showing no significant difference from the experts' ADR (53.4%). When the training period was divided into 3 sections and analyzed in the screening/surveillance group, the mean ADR of the trainees gradually increased to 49.4%, 52.6%, and 53.6%, respectively; however, the difference was insignificant. Analyzing each trainee’s ADR, there was a significant difference among the 3 trainees (58.5% vs. 44.7% vs. 50.2%, P=0.008). However, in the third section of the training period, the 3 trainees’ ADRs were 53.0%, 49.2%, and 57.3%, respectively, showing no significant difference (P=0.606).
Conclusion
In the early stages of training, the ADR was higher than recommended; however, there were variances in ADR between individuals. As the training period passed, the ADR became similar at the expert level, whereas the difference in ADR between trainees decreased. Therefore, efforts to increase ADR should be made actively from the beginning of training and continued during the training period.
Reviews
AI colonoscopy
The imitation game: a review of the use of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy, and endoscopists’ perceptions thereof
Sarah Tham, Frederick H. Koh, Jasmine Ladlad, Koy-Min Chue, SKH Endoscopy Centre, Cui-Li Lin, Eng-Kiong Teo, Fung-Joon Foo
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(5):385-394.   Published online March 10, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00878.0125
  • 3,306 View
  • 113 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
The development of deep learning systems in artificial intelligence (AI) has enabled advances in endoscopy, and AI-aided colonoscopy has recently been ushered into clinical practice as a clinical decision-support tool. This has enabled real-time AI-aided detection of polyps with a higher sensitivity than the average endoscopist, and evidence to support its use has been promising thus far. This review article provides a summary of currently published data relating to AI-aided colonoscopy, discusses current clinical applications, and introduces ongoing research directions. We also explore endoscopists’ perceptions and attitudes toward the use of this technology, and discuss factors influencing its uptake in clinical practice.
Malignant disease,Colorectal cancer,Biomarker & risk factor
Genotypic and Phenotypic Characteristics of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer
Jin Cheon Kim, Walter F. Bodmer
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(6):368-381.   Published online December 22, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00878.0125
  • 5,287 View
  • 222 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
The genomic causes and clinical manifestations of hereditary colorectal cancer (HCRC) might be stratified into 2 groups, namely, familial (FCRC) and a limited sense of HCRC, respectively. Otherwise, FCRC is canonically classified into 2 major categories; Lynch syndrome (LS) or associated spectra and inherited polyposis syndrome. By contrast, despite an increasing body of genotypic and phenotypic traits, some FCRC cannot be clearly differentiated as definitively single type, and the situation has become more complex as additional causative genes have been discovered. This review provides an overview of HCRC, including 6 LS or associated spectra and 8 inherited polyposis syndromes, according to molecular pathogenesis. Variants and newly-identified FCRC are particularly emphasized, including MUTYH (or MYH)-associated polyposis, Muir-Torre syndrome, constitutional mismatch repair deficiency, EPCAM-associated LS, polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis, RNF43- or NTHL1-associated serrated polyposis syndrome, PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome, and hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome. We also comment on the clinical utility of multigene panel tests, focusing on comprehensive cancer panels that include HCRC. Finally, HCRC surveillance strategies are recommended, based on revised or notable concepts underpinned by competent validation and clinical implications, and favoring major guidelines. As hereditary syndromes are mainly attributable to genomic constitutions of distinctive ancestral groups, an integrative national HCRC registry and guideline is an urgent priority.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • An update of the variant spectrum of the APC gene in Iranian familial adenomatous polyposis patients
    Seyed Mohsen Mirabdolhosseini, Leili Rejali, Mohammad Yaghoob Taleghani, Hossein Sadeghi, Seyed Mohammad Hossein Kashfi, Faeghe Behboudi Farahbakhsh, Mina Golmohammadi, Pegah Larki, Nayeralsadat Fatemi, Pardis Ketabi Moghadam, Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojara
    Nucleosides, Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids.2024; 43(1): 40.     CrossRef
  • Performance reporting design in artificial intelligence studies using image-based TNM staging and prognostic parameters in rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Minsung Kim, Taeyong Park, Bo Young Oh, Min Jeong Kim, Bum-Joo Cho, Il Tae Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Sebaceomas in a Muir–Torre-like Phenotype in a Patient with MUTYH-Associated Polyposis
    Julia Guarrera, James C. Prezzano, Kathleen A. Mannava
    Dermatopathology.2024; 11(1): 124.     CrossRef
  • The genomics of sporadic and hereditary colorectal cancer
    ID Sadien, RJ Davies, JMD Wheeler
    The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.2024; 106(4): 313.     CrossRef
  • The Molecular Genetics of Colorectal Cancer, Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes, and Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer
    Joceline V. Vu, Joshua Sommovilla
    Digestive Disease Interventions.2023; 07(01): 058.     CrossRef
  • Reduced expression of alanyl aminopeptidase is a robust biomarker of non‐familial adenomatous polyposis and non‐hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome early‐onset colorectal cancer
    Ye Jin Ha, Yun Jae Shin, Ka Hee Tak, Jong Lyul Park, Jeong Hwan Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Seon Young Kim, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(8): 10091.     CrossRef
  • Case report: POLE (P286R) mutation in a case of recurrent intestinal leakage and its treatment
    Dang Xiang, Gongbo Fu, Yitian Chen, Xiaoyuan Chu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Identification of a novel CNV at the APC gene in a Chinese family with familial adenomatous polyposis
    Juyi Li, Chengzhi He, Jing Gong, Xiufang Wang, Chao Liu, Aiping Deng, Lin Zhu
    Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
    Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Previously Unrecognized Molecular Landscape of Lynch Syndrome in the Mexican Population
    Alejandra Padua-Bracho, José A. Velázquez-Aragón, Verónica Fragoso-Ontiveros, Paulina María Nuñez-Martínez, María de la Luz Mejía Aguayo, Yuliana Sánchez-Contreras, Miguel Angel Ramirez-Otero, Marcela Angélica De la Fuente-Hernández, Silvia Vidal-Millán,
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(19): 11549.     CrossRef
  • Direction of diagnosis and treatment improvement in colorectal cancer
    In Ja Park
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 540.     CrossRef
  • Molecular analyses of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 586.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Analyses in Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 197.     CrossRef
  • It Is a Pleasure to Announce the Issue Titled “Master Class 2021” in Annals of Coloproctology
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 349.     CrossRef
Case Report
Hidradenoma Papilliferum of the Anus: A Report of 2 Cases and Review of the Literature
Guh Jung Seo, Ju Heon Seo, Kyung Jin Cho, Hyung-Suk Cho
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(6):361-363.   Published online December 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.08.03
  • 3,962 View
  • 108 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Hidradenoma papilliferum is a rare benign cystic tumor that originates from apocrine glands or anogenital mammary glands. Here, we describe 2 cases of hidradenoma papilliferum of the anus. Two female patients aged 39 and 35 presented with perianal masses with hemorrhoids. The patients underwent hemorrhoidectomy and excision of the lesion. Histopathology confirmed the masses as hidradenoma papilliferum. The postoperative course was uneventful for both patients, and there were no recurrences after 18 and 12 months of follow-up, respectively. Proctologists should consider hidradenoma papilliferum in their differential diagnosis of benign anal tumors. Surgical excision is necessary for diagnosis and treatment of hidradenoma papilliferum.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Three Cases of Papillary Hidradenoma of the Anus
    Satoka Nasu
    Nihon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2024; 77(6): 360.     CrossRef
  • Hidradenoma papilliferum of the perineum; a rare tumour in a rare location
    Saliha Sağnıç, Sinan Serdar Ay, Hasan Aykut Tuncer, Selen Doğan, Tayup Şimşek
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Articles
Correlation Between Bowel Preparation and the Adenoma Detection Rate in Screening Colonoscopy
Jung Hun Park, Sang Jin Kim, Jong Hee Hyun, Kyung Su Han, Byung Chang Kim, Chang Won Hong, Sang-Jeon Lee, Dae Kyung Sohn
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(3):93-98.   Published online June 30, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.3.93
  • 8,324 View
  • 96 Download
  • 21 Web of Science
  • 23 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The adenoma detection rate is commonly used as a measure of the quality of colonoscopy. This study assessed both the association between the adenoma detection rate and the quality of bowel preparation and the risk factors associated with the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy.

Methods

This retrospective analysis involved 1,079 individuals who underwent screening colonoscopy at the National Cancer Center between December 2012 and April 2014. Bowel preparation was classified by using the Aronchick scale. Individuals with inadequate bowel preparations (n = 47, 4.4%) were excluded because additional bowel preparation was needed. The results of 1,032 colonoscopies were included in the analysis.

Results

The subjects' mean age was 53.1 years, and 657 subjects (63.7%) were men. The mean cecal intubation time was 6.7 minutes, and the mean withdrawal time was 8.7 minutes. The adenoma and polyp detection rates were 28.1% and 41.8%, respectively. The polyp, adenoma, and advanced adenoma detection rates did not correlate with the quality of bowel preparation. The multivariate analysis showed age ≥ 60 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.97; P = 0.040), body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.17–2.08; P = 0.002) and current smoking (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.01–2.06; P = 0.014) to be independent risk factors for adenoma detection.

Conclusion

The adenoma detection rate was unrelated to the quality of bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy. Older age, obesity, and smoking were independent risk factors for adenoma detection.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Evaluating the Efficacy of Resect-and-Discard and Resect-and-Retrieve Strategies for Diminutive Colonic Polyps
    Andrei Lucian Groza, Bogdan Miutescu, Cristian Tefas, Alexandru Popa, Iulia Ratiu, Roxana Sirli, Alina Popescu, Alexandru Catalin Motofelea, Marcel Tantau
    Life.2024; 14(4): 532.     CrossRef
  • Split doses versus whole dose bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy: A multicentric prospective Lebanese randomized trial between 2021 and 2023
    Blaybel Sara, Hammoud Ghinwa, Mourda Layla, Hallal Mahmoud, Khalil Ali, Mckey Remy
    Health Science Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Overall Polyp Detection Rate as a Surrogate Measure for Screening Efficacy Independent of Histopathology: Evidence from National Endoscopy Database
    Mark Aloysius, Hemant Goyal, Tejas Nikumbh, Niraj Shah, Ganesh Aswath, Savio John, Amol Bapaye, Sushovan Guha, Nirav Thosani
    Life.2024; 14(6): 654.     CrossRef
  • Application of linaclotide in bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients with constipation: A prospective randomized controlled study
    Haoxin Xu, Zhu He, Yulin Liu, Hong Xu, Pengfei Liu
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Association Between Time of Day and Colonoscopy Quality
    Zihua Lu, Lihui Zhang, Liwen Yao, Dexin Gong, Lianlian Wu, Meiqing Xia, Jun Zhang, Wei Zhou, Xu Huang, Chunping He, Huiling Wu, Chenxia Zhang, Xun Li, Honggang Yu
    JAMA Network Open.2023; 6(1): e2253840.     CrossRef
  • Correlation between prescribing doctor attributes and intestinal cleanliness in colonoscopy: a study of 22522 patients
    Haibin Zhou, Hayat Khizar, Xiaofeng Zhang, Jianfeng Yang
    Annals of Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Enhancing the Quality of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Current Indicators and Future Trends
    Caesar Ferrari, Micheal Tadros
    Gastroenterology Insights.2023; 15(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Reinforced education by short message service improves the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Peng Li, Xueqian He, Jie Dong, Youwei Chen, Qin Zhou
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(4): 815.     CrossRef
  • Supplementary education can improve the rate of adequate bowel preparation in outpatients: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
    Shicheng Peng, Sixu Liu, Jiaming Lei, Wensen Ren, Lijun Xiao, Xiaolan Liu, Muhan Lü, Kai Zhou, Antonio Z. Gimeno-Garcia
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(4): e0266780.     CrossRef
  • Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopic Screening with Ketamine-based Sedation: A Prospective Observational Study
    Mirza KOVACEVIC, Nermina RIZVANOVIC, Adisa SABANOVIC ADILOVIC, Nedim BARUCIJA, Anida ABAZOVIC
    Medeniyet Medical Journal.2022; 37(1): 79.     CrossRef
  • Colonic bowel prep and body mass index: does one size fit all? A multi-centre review
    Brodie D. Laurie, Mary M. K. Teoh, Alfredo Noches-Garcia, Munyaradzi G. Nyandoro
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(12): 2451.     CrossRef
  • Multimedia based education on bowel preparation improves adenoma detection rate: Systematic review & meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Saurabh Chandan, Sumant Arora, Babu P. Mohan, Shahab R. Khan, Ojasvini C. Chandan, Lena L. Kassab, Arvind R. Murali
    Digestive Endoscopy.2021; 33(5): 730.     CrossRef
  • Role of Bowel Preparation in Adenoma Detection Rate and Follow-up Recommendations in African American Dominant Patient Population
    Hamid-Reza Moein, Eskara Pervez, Salina Faidhalla, Heba Habbal, Hajra Khan, Anshu Wadehra, Mahvish Khalid, Diana Kakos, Paul Naylor, Bashar Mohamad
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation
    Gian E Tontini, Alberto Prada, Sandro Sferrazza, Giorgio Ciprandi, Maurizio Vecchi
    JGH Open.2021; 5(10): 1135.     CrossRef
  • When should we perform colonoscopy to increase the adenoma detection rate?
    Sang Hoon Kim, Jae Hak Kim
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 13(12): 619.     CrossRef
  • Quality of Preoperative Colonoscopy Affects Missed Postoperative Adenoma Detection in Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Jae Ho Park, Hee Seok Moon, In Sun Kwon, Ju Seok Kim, Sun Hyung Kang, Eaum Seok Lee, Seok Hyun Kim, Jae Kyu Sung, Byung Seok Lee, Hyun Yong Jeong
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2020; 65(7): 2063.     CrossRef
  • Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in 2020: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future
    Valentine Ongeri Millien, Nabil M. Mansour
    Current Gastroenterology Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of Sending Educational Video Clips via Smartphone Mobile Messenger on Bowel Preparation before Colonoscopy
    Sung Chan Jeon, Jae Hyun Kim, Sun Jung Kim, Hye Jung Kwon, Youn Jung Choi, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(1): 53.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of 1.2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparations
    Hiroyuki Tamaki, Teruyo Noda, Masahiro Morita, Akina Omura, Atsushi Kubo, Chikara Ogawa, Toshihiro Matsunaka, Mitsushige Shibatoge
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2019; 7(4): 452.     CrossRef
  • Microbiome and morbid obesity increase pathogenic stimulus diversity
    Björn L.D.M. Brücher, Ijaz S. Jamall, Obul R. Bandapalli
    4open.2019; 2: 10.     CrossRef
  • Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate
    Maryan Cavicchi, Gaëlle Tharsis, Pascal Burtin, Philippe Cattan, Franck Venezia, Gilles Tordjman, Agnès Gillet, Joëlle Samama, Karine Nahon-Uzan, David Karsenti
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2019; 64(12): 3579.     CrossRef
  • Impact of diet restriction on bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Seung-Joo Nam, Young Jin Kim, Bora Keum, Jae Min Lee, Seung Han Kim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Eun Sun Kim, Yeon Seok Seo, Yoon Tae Jeen, Hong Sik Lee, Hoon Jai Chun, Soon Ho Um, Chang Duck Kim
    Medicine.2018; 97(41): e12645.     CrossRef
  • Limitation and Value of Using the Adenoma Detection Rate for Colonoscopy Quality Assurance
    Jun Hur, Moo-Jun Baek
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(3): 81.     CrossRef
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Patients With Rectal Tumors: A Single Institution's Experience
Audrius Dulskas, Alfredas Kilius, Kestutis Petrulis, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(1):23-27.   Published online February 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.1.23
  • 4,060 View
  • 48 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The purpose of this study was to look at our complication rates and recurrence rates, as well as the need for further radical surgery, in treating patients with benign and early malignant rectal tumors by using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).

Methods

Our study included 130 patients who had undergone TEM for rectal adenomas and early rectal cancer from December 2009 to December 2015 at the Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Lithuania. Patients underwent digital and endoscopic evaluation with multiple biopsies. For preoperative staging, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging or endorectal ultrasound was performed. We recorded the demographics, operative details, final pathologies, postoperative lengths of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and recurrences.

Results

The average tumor size was 2.8 ± 1.5 cm (range, 0.5–8.3 cm). 102 benign (78.5%) and 28 malignant tumors (21.5%) were removed. Of the latter, 23 (82.1%) were pT1 cancers and 5 (17.9%) pT2 cancers. Of the 5 patients with pT2 cancer, 2 underwent adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 1 underwent an abdominoperineal resection, 1 refused further treatment and 1 was lost to follow up. No intraoperative complications occurred. In 7 patients (5.4%), postoperative complications were observed: urinary retention (4 patients, 3.1%), postoperative hemorrhage (2 patients, 1.5%), and wound dehiscence (1 patient, 0.8%). All complications were treated conservatively. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.3 days.

Conclusion

TEM in our experience demonstrated low complication and recurrence rates. This technique is recommended for treating patients with a rectal adenoma and early rectal cancer and has good prognosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Outcome of Local Excision of Rectal Adenomas with High-Grade Dysplasia by Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery: A Single-Center Experience
    Muhammad Khalifa, Rachel Gingold-Belfer, Nidal Issa
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(5): 1419.     CrossRef
  • Transanal endoscopic rectal resection: immediate and long-term results
    A.A. Maslov, Yu.A. Gevorkyan, N.V. Soldatkina, A.V. Dashkov, S.I. Poluektov, V.E. Kolesnikov, D.O. Kaymakchi, A.V. Snezhko
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2022; (1): 30.     CrossRef
  • Complex Procedures in Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery: Intraperitoneal Entry, Ultra Large Rectal Tumors, High Lesions, and Resection in the Anal Canal
    Xavier Serra-Aracil, Victoria Lucas-Guerrero, Laura Mora-López
    Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2022; 35(02): 129.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early rectal cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Sung Hwan Cho, Byung-Soo Park, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Bum Park, Hyung Wook Kim, Sang Bo Oh, Tae Un Kim, Dong Hoon Shin
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Is Local Resection of Anal Canal Tumors Feasible with Transanal Endoscopic Surgery?
    Xavier Serra‐Aracil, Andrea Campos‐Serra, Laura Mora‐López, Sheila Serra‐Pla, Anna Pallisera‐Lloveras, Roser Flores‐Clotet, Alba Zárate‐Pinedo, Salvador Navarro‐Soto
    World Journal of Surgery.2020; 44(3): 939.     CrossRef
  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for a rectal polyp – a video vignette
    N. E. Samalavicius, P. Kavaliauskas, A. Dulskas
    Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(9): 1203.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic diagnosis of gastrointestinal melanoma
    Sheng Wang, Siyu Sun, Xiang Liu, Nan Ge, Guoxin Wang, Jintao Guo, Wen Liu, Jinlong Hu
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 55(3): 330.     CrossRef
  • Is Previous Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Early Rectal Cancer a Risk Factor of Worse Outcome following Salvage Surgery A Case-Matched Analysis
    Audrius Dulskas, Aivaras Atkociunas, Alfredas Kilius, Kestutis Petrulis, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
    Visceral Medicine.2019; 35(3): 151.     CrossRef
  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal lesions in a specialist regional early rectal cancer centre: the Mersey experience
    M. Ondhia, P. Tamvakeras, P. O'Toole, A. Montazerri, T. Andrews, C. Farrell, S. Ahmed, S. Slawik, S. Ahmed
    Colorectal Disease.2019; 21(10): 1164.     CrossRef
  • Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Patients with Rare Rectal Tumors
    Xin Wu, Guole Lin, Huizhong Qiu, Jiaolin Zhou
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2018; 28(5): 546.     CrossRef
  • Modern management of T1 rectal cancer by transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a 10‐year single‐centre experience
    H. J. S. Jones, R. Hompes, N. Mortensen, C. Cunningham
    Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(7): 586.     CrossRef
  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery as day surgery – a single‐centre experience with 500 patients
    C. J. Brown, J. Q. Gentles, T. P. Phang, A. A. Karimuddin, M. J. Raval
    Colorectal Disease.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery
    Byung Chun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for giant benign rectal tumours: is large size a contraindication?
    Audrius Dulskas, Alfredas Kilius, Kestutis Petrulis, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2017; 32(12): 1759.     CrossRef
Association Between Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke at the Workplace and Risk for Developing a Colorectal Adenoma: A Cross-Sectional Study
Seung-Hwa Lee, Ji-Yeon Hong, Jung-Un Lee, Dong Ryul Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(2):51-57.   Published online April 30, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.2.51
  • 3,795 View
  • 38 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

A colorectal adenoma (CRA) is a well-defined precursor to colorectal cancer (CRC). Additionally, smoking is a potent risk factor for developing a CRA, as well as CRC. However, the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and the risk for developing a CRA has not yet been fully evaluated in epidemiologic studies. We performed a cross-sectional analysis on the association between exposure to ETS at the workplace and the risk for developing a CRA.

Methods

The study was conducted on subjects who had undergone a colonoscopy at a health promotion center from January 2012 to December 2012. After descriptive analyses, overall and subgroup analyses by smoking status were performed by using a multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Among the 1,129 participants, 300 (26.6%) were diagnosed as having CRAs. Exposure to ETS was found to be associated with CRAs in all subjects (fully adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08–2.44; P = 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, exposure to ETS in former smokers increased the risk for developing a CRA (fully adjusted OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 2.07–9.51; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Exposure to occupational ETS at the workplace, independent of the other factors, was associated with increased risk for developing a CRA in all subjects and in former smokers. Further retrospective studies with large sample sizes may be necessary to clarify the causal effect of this relationship.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer patients in tertiary hospital in West Java
    Kiki Lukman, Arrayyan Muhammad, Mohammad Ghozali, Prapanca Nugraha, Yunia Sribudiani, Bistamy Muhammad Nursabur
    Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health.2024; 28: 101688.     CrossRef
  • RISK FACTORS OF COLORECTAL CANCER IN SULAIMANI CITY
    Mohammed Hassan, Kameran Ismail, Zhian Ramzi, Tariq Al-Hadithi
    JOURNAL OF SULAIMANI MEDICAL COLLEGE.2018; 8(1): 47.     CrossRef
  • Plausible Roles for RAGE in Conditions Exacerbated by Direct and Indirect (Secondhand) Smoke Exposure
    Joshua Lewis, Kelsey Hirschi, Juan Arroyo, Benjamin Bikman, David Kooyman, Paul Reynolds
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2017; 18(3): 652.     CrossRef
  • Metformin therapy and the risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis
    Yi-Chao Hou, Qiang Hu, Jiao Huang, Jing-Yuan Fang, Hua Xiong
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(5): 8843.     CrossRef
  • Exposure to Cigarette Smoke Contributes to the Risk of Developing a Colorectal Adenoma, Doesn't It? Are Repeated Exposures to Such Smoke Dangerous?
    Bong Hwa Lee, Min Jung Kim, Hyoung Chul Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(2): 43.     CrossRef
Case Report
Primary Retroperitoneal Mucinous Cystadenoma
Seok Youn Lee, Weon Cheol Han
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(1):33-37.   Published online February 29, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.1.33
  • 3,708 View
  • 62 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 16 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Mucinous cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas of the ovary are clinically and histopathologically well-established common tumors. However, primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystic tumors are extremely rare, and although their histopathogenesis is still uncertain, several theories have been proposed. Most authors suggest that they develop through mucinous metaplasia in a preexisting mesothelium-lined cyst. An accurate preoperative diagnosis of these tumors is difficult because no effective diagnostic measures have been established. Delay in diagnosis and treatment of this tumor may be fatal for the patient because of complications such as rupture, infection, and malignant transformation. We describe the case of a 31-year-old woman with abdominal pain and a palpable mass. Computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a retroperitoneal cystic mass, which was resected successfully through laparoscopy. Histopathological examination of the resected mass confirmed the diagnosis of a primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 without any complications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Imagerie des tumeurs rétropéritonéales primitives
    E. Caseiro, J. Coutureau, J. Delebecq, P. Taourel, I. Millet
    Journal d'imagerie diagnostique et interventionnelle.2024; 7(3): 147.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Primary Retroperitoneal Mucinous Cystadenoma Treated by Laparoscopic Surgery
    Masafumi TAKAHASHI, Takamitsu KATO, Shunsuke NAKAMURA, Hirotoshi TAKASHIMA
    Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association).2024; 85(1): 106.     CrossRef
  • Literature review and robotic management of a rare case of primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma
    Rabar Mudhher, Zina Ziwar Ahmed Agha, Greg Melder, Hosein Shokouh-Amiri, Jeffrey D. Covington, Nicolas T. LaBarre, Eric D. Thomas, Taeyong Choi, Gazi B. Zibari
    Radiology Case Reports.2024; 19(12): 5798.     CrossRef
  • Current management of benign retroperitoneal tumors
    Fabio Tirotta, Andrea Napolitano, Sangkyu Noh, Erika Schmitz, Carolyn Nessim, Dakshesh Patel, Jason K. Sicklick, Myles Smith, Khin Thway, Jos van der Hage, Samuel J. Ford, William W. Tseng
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 49(6): 1081.     CrossRef
  • Primary Retroperitoneal Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma: A Case Report
    Saroja Devi Geetha, Louis Kavoussi, Rebecca Thomas, Deepika Savant
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An enormous benign primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma: a case report and literature review of a seldom seen abdominal pathology
    Omar Al Laham, Amir Adi, Aliaa Alaitouni, Rahaf Sharaf Aldeen, Ali Alshiekh, Hamoud Hamed
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2023; 85(11): 5736.     CrossRef
  • Primary Retroperitoneal Serous Cyst Adenoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Shariful Islam, Aneela Shah, Vijay Naraynsingh, Patrick Harnarayan
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma in a female patient: A case report
    Ali Taherinezhad Ledari, Ghodsieh Kamrani, Tina Rouhi, Novin Nikbakhsh
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 94: 107099.     CrossRef
  • Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma: A case report with review of literature
    Safouane Frini, Seifeddine Ben Hammouda, Ahlem Bellalah, Chiraz Chebanne, Slim Bchir, Leila Njim, Abdelfatteh Zakhama, Rim Hadhri
    Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2022; 84: 104818.     CrossRef
  • Primary peritoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma mimicking possible recurrent ovarian mucinous cystadenoma: coincidental pathology or a spectrum of disease?
    Claire Filippini, Sarah Smyth, Hooman Soleymani Majd, Catherine Johnson
    BMJ Case Reports.2021; 14(7): e242478.     CrossRef
  • Mucinous cystadenoma mimicking appendiceal mucocele
    Xin Yi Goai, Xiau Wei Tay, Niruben Rajasagaram
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2020; 90(5): 889.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Resection and Pre-Operative Imaging of Primary Retroperitoneal Mucinous Neoplasms: A Retrospective Case Series


    Yuyang Zhang, Jiejin Yang, Zeyang Chen, Jiali Sun, Pengyuan Wang
    Cancer Management and Research.2020; Volume 12: 5451.     CrossRef
  • Multiple bilateral malar mucinous cystadenomas in the minor salivary glands
    Jun Ho Choi, Seung Hyun Kim, Jae Ha Hwang, Kwang Seog Kim, Sam Yong Lee
    Archives of Craniofacial Surgery.2020; 21(5): 329.     CrossRef
  • Incidentally discovered huge retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma with successful laparoscopic management: Case report
    Mohammed S. Foula, Abdullah S. AlQattan, Ahmed M. AlQurashi, Hassan M. AlShaqaq, M. Khalid Mirza Gari
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2019; 61: 242.     CrossRef
  • A Case Report and a Literature Review of Primary Retroperitoneal Mucinous Cystadenoma: The Importance of Imaging in Diagnosis and Management
    Filippo Pesapane, Sofie Van Renterghem, Francesca Patella, Pieter De Visschere, Geert Villeirs
    Future Oncology.2018; 14(28): 2923.     CrossRef
  • Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma
    Walter Sebastián Nardi, Pablo Dezanzo, Sergio Damián Quildrian
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2017; 39: 218.     CrossRef
Original Article
Distribution of the Colonoscopic Adenoma Detection Rate According to Age: Is Recommending Colonoscopy Screening for Koreans Over the Age of 50 Safe?
Taeseok Bae, Yunhyung Ha, Changkyun Kim, Jihyun Lee, Kwangil Ha, Sanghyun Shin, Youngcheol Lee, Yoonsik Kang
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(2):46-51.   Published online April 30, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.2.46
  • 4,079 View
  • 46 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 15 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study was conducted to determine the distributions of the polyp detection rate (PDR) and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) according to age by analyzing the polypectomy results.

Methods

A total of 10,098 patients who underwent a colonoscopy in 2013 were included in this study. Chi-square and logistic regression statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 19.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 52.7 years old (median, 54 ± 12.52 years; range, 14 to 92 years). A total of 6,459 adenomatous polyps (61.7%) from a total of 10,462 polyps were eliminated. The PDR was 50.9% (5,136/10,098), and the. ADR was 35.4% (3,579/10,098). The male-to-female ratio was 51.3%:48.7%, with a male-to-female ADR ratio of 42.8% : 27.7% (P < 0.001). In the age distribution, the values of the ADR were 0% for patients in their 10's, 6.3% for those in their 20's, 14.0% for those in their 30's, 28.7% for those in their 40's, 38.4% for those in their 50's, 46.2% for those in their 60's, 55.8% for those in their 70's, 56.1% for those in their 80's, and 33.3% for those in their 90's. In males, the values of the ADR were 0%, 9.1%, 17.1%, 37.8%, 48.2%, 53.6%, 61.7%, 59.1%, and 33.3% for the same age distribution, and a steep increase was found between patients in their 30's and patients in their 40's. Significant (P < 0.001) factors influencing the ADR included sex, previous colonoscopy experience, polypectomy method, and age of more than 40 years.

Conclusion

In considering the adenoma carcinoma sequence, 28.7% of people, especially 37.8% of males in their 40's showed adenomatous polyps. Whether an earlier first-time colonoscopy will have better results in preventing colorectal cancer should be investigated and discussed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Adenoma Detection Rate in Average-Risk Population: An Observational Consecutive Retrospective Study
    Xiaoyan He, Xiangyin Lv, Binbin Zhang, Xiaoxuan Ying, Chiyu Hu, Xiaoying Zhou, Jianwen Hu
    Cancer Control.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adenoma Detection Rates in 45-49 Year Old Persons Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy: Analysis from the GIQuIC Registry
    Mohammad Bilal, Jennifer Holub, David Greenwald, Mark B. Pochapin, Douglas K. Rex, Aasma Shaukat
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopic Screening with Ketamine-based Sedation: A Prospective Observational Study
    Mirza KOVACEVIC, Nermina RIZVANOVIC, Adisa SABANOVIC ADILOVIC, Nedim BARUCIJA, Anida ABAZOVIC
    Medeniyet Medical Journal.2022; 37(1): 79.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal Disease in Patients with Common Variable Immunodeficiency: A Retrospective Observational Study
    Rishad Khan, Mohamad Habbal, Michael A Scaffidi, Abbas A Bukhari, Amir Rumman, Sarah Al Ghamdi, Stephen D Betschel, Samir C Grover
    Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.2020; 3(4): 162.     CrossRef
  • Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence in young adults
    Rebecca L Siegel, Lindsey A Torre, Isabelle Soerjomataram, Richard B Hayes, Freddie Bray, Thomas K Weber, Ahmedin Jemal
    Gut.2019; 68(12): 2179.     CrossRef
  • Anatomical distribution and detection rate of colorectal neoplasms according to age in the colonoscopic screening of a Korean population
    Suk-young Lee, Wan Hee Song, Sang Cheul Oh, Byung-Wook Min, Sun Il Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2018; 94(1): 36.     CrossRef
  • An Adjusted Level of Adenoma Detection Rate is Necessary for Adults Below 50 Years Old
    Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha, Jeong Eun Shin, Kyeong Ok Kim, Hyo-Joon Yang, Hyun Gun Kim, Young-Seok Cho, Sun-Jin Boo, Jun Lee, Yunho Jung, Hyun Jung Lee, Hoon Sup Koo, Young-Eun Joo
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2018; 52(8): 703.     CrossRef
  • Adenoma Detection before and after the age of 50: a retrospective analysis of Lebanese outpatients
    Mohammed Hussein Kamareddine, Youssef Ghosn, Karam Karam, Anwar Andrew Nader, Ahmad El-Mahmoud, Naseem Bou-Ayash, Mansour El-Khoury, Said Farhat
    BMJ Open Gastroenterology.2018; 5(1): e000253.     CrossRef
  • LINE-1 is preferentially hypomethylated within adenomatous polyps in the presence of synchronous colorectal cancer
    Alice Chu Jiang, Lela Buckingham, William Barbanera, Amoah Yeboah Korang, Faraz Bishesari, Joshua Melson
    Clinical Epigenetics.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risks of colorectal advanced neoplasia in young adults versus those of screening colonoscopy in patients aged 50 to 54 years
    Kyeong Ok Kim, Hyo‐Joon Yang, Jae Myung Cha, Jeong Eun Shin, Hyun Gun Kim, Young‐Seok Cho, Sun‐Jin Boo, Jun Lee, Yunho Jung, Hyun Jung Lee, Kyu Chan Huh, Young‐Eun Joo, Jongha Park, Chang Mo Moon
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2017; 32(11): 1825.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Improvement of the Adenoma Detection Rate during Colonoscopy - Where Do We Stand in 2015?
    Martin Floer, Tobias Meister
    Digestion.2016; 93(3): 202.     CrossRef
  • Clinical study of anesthetization by dezocine combined with propofol for indolent colonoscopy
    Bin-Bin Xu, Xiao-Liang Zhao, Gui-Ping Xu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(24): 5609.     CrossRef
  • Role of Colonoscopy in Patients with Hematochezia
    Young Wook Kim, Hwang Choi, Gi Jun Kim, Seung Jee Ryu, Sung Min Park, Joon Sung Kim, Jeong-Seon Ji, Byung-Wook Kim, Bo-in Lee, Myung-Gyu Choi
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 67(2): 87.     CrossRef
  • High prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in the Thai population: a prospective screening colonoscopy of 1,404 cases
    Bunchorn Siripongpreeda, Chulabhorn Mahidol, Navara Dusitanond, Tassanee Sriprayoon, Bunlung Muyphuag, Thaniya Sricharunrat, Narongchai Teerayatanakul, Watanya Chaiwong, Wipra Worasawate, Prassanee Sattayarungsee, Juthamas Sangthongdee, Jirapa Prarom, Gai
    BMC Gastroenterology.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adenoma Detection Rate in Patients Younger Than 50 Years of Age: Relationship of the Adenoma Detection Rate to Interval Cancer
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(2): 41.     CrossRef
Case Report
Regression of Colonic Adenomas After Treatment With Sulindac in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Case With a 2-Year Follow-up Without a Prophylactic Colectomy
Kyu Young Kim, Seong Woo Jeon, Jung Gil Park, Chung Hoon Yu, Se Young Jang, Jae Kwang Lee, Hee Young Hwang
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(4):201-204.   Published online August 26, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.4.201
  • 4,386 View
  • 38 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by hundreds of colorectal adenomatous polyps that progress to colorectal cancer. Management of patients with FAP is with a total colectomy. Chemopreventive strategies have been studied in FAP patients in an effort to delay the development of adenomas in the upper and the lower gastrointestinal tract and to prevent recurrence of adenomas in the retained rectum of patients after prophylactic surgery. Sulindac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, causes regression of colorectal adenomas in the retained rectal segment of FAP patients. However, evidence regarding long-term use of this therapy and its effect on the intact colon has been insufficient. We report a case in which the long-term use of sulindac was effective in reducing the size and the number of colonic polyps in patients with FAP without a prophylactic colectomy and polypectomy; we also present a review of the literature.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Surgical Decision-Making in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
    Allie E. Steinberger, Maggie L. Westfal, Paul E. Wise
    Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2024; 37(03): 191.     CrossRef
  • Chemoprevention in hereditary digestive neoplasia: A comprehensive review
    Eugénie Chevalier, Robert Benamouzig
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancer-preventive Properties of an Anthocyanin-enriched Sweet Potato in the APCMIN Mouse Model
    Khalid Asadi, Lynnette R. Ferguson, Martin Philpott, Nishi Karunasinghe
    Journal of Cancer Prevention.2017; 22(3): 135.     CrossRef
  • Endogenous conversion of ω-6 to ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids infat-1 mice attenuated intestinal polyposis by either inhibiting COX-2/β-catenin signaling or activating 15-PGDH/IL-18
    Young-Min Han, Jong-Min Park, Ji-Young Cha, Migyeong Jeong, Eun-Jin Go, Ki Baik Hahm
    International Journal of Cancer.2016; 138(9): 2247.     CrossRef
  • NOSH-sulindac (AVT-18A) is a novel nitric oxide- and hydrogen sulfide-releasing hybrid that is gastrointestinal safe and has potent anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antipyretic, anti-platelet, and anti-cancer properties
    Khosrow Kashfi, Mitali Chattopadhyay, Ravinder Kodela
    Redox Biology.2015; 6: 287.     CrossRef
  • Sulindac

    Reactions Weekly.2015; 1570(1): 198.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Importance of Early Follow-up Colonoscopy in Patients at High Risk for Colorectal Polyps
Sung Taek Jung, Dae Kyung Sohn, Chang Won Hong, Byung Chang Kim, Ji Won Park, Kyung Su Han, Hee Jin Chang, Hyo Sung Choi, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):243-247.   Published online December 31, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.243
  • 3,468 View
  • 27 Download
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Minimizing the polyp miss rate during colonoscopy is important for patients at high risk for colorectal polyps. We investigated the polyp miss rate and the factors associated with it in high-risk patients.

Methods

The medical records of 163 patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopy between January 2001 and April 2010, which was within 9 months after a polypectomy, because the index colonoscopy had shown multiple (more than 3) adenomas or advanced adenoma were retrospectively reviewed. Miss rates were calculated for all polyps, for neoplastic polyps and for advanced adenomas. Factors associated with the miss rates in these patients, such as the location, shape and size of the polyp, were analyzed.

Results

The miss rates for polyps, adenomas, adenomas <5 mm, adenomas ≥5 mm and advanced adenomas were 32.6%, 20.9%, 17.7%, 3.2%, and 0.9%, respectively. No carcinoma, except for one small carcinoid tumor, was missed. Flat shape and small size (<5 mm) were significantly associated with adenoma miss rate. The miss rate was significantly higher for flat-type advanced adenomas than for protruded-type advanced adenomas (27.7% vs 4.1%).

Conclusion

The polyp miss rate in patients at high risk for colorectal polyps was higher than expected. Efforts are needed to reduce miss rates and improve the quality of colonoscopy. Also, early follow-up colonoscopy is mandatory, especially in patients at high risk.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Removal of GIT lesions and the role of impedance of the injection solution—an innovative approach to known methods
    Martina Lösle, K. E. Grund, B. Duckworth-Mothes
    Journal of Molecular Medicine.2024; 102(8): 1009.     CrossRef
  • An eco-friendly synthesis of Enterococcus sp.–mediated gold nanoparticle induces cytotoxicity in human colorectal cancer cells
    Mathivadani Vairavel, Ezhilarasan Devaraj, Rajeshkumar Shanmugam
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research.2020; 27(8): 8166.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the Cost-Effective Use of Follow-Up Colonoscopy Based on Screening Findings and Age
    Grace N. Joseph, Farid Heidarnejad, Eric A. Sherer
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Impact of a new distal attachment on colonoscopy performance in an academic screening center
    Zacharias P. Tsiamoulos, Ravi Misra, Rajaratanam Rameshshanker, Timothy R. Elliott, Iosif Beintaris, Siwan Thomas-Gibson, Adam Haycock, Noriko Suzuki, Colin Rees, Brian P. Saunders
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 87(1): 280.     CrossRef
  • What Matters in Colonoscopy?
    Hyun Shig Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(6): 223.     CrossRef
Incidence and Multiplicities of Adenomatous Polyps in TNM Stage I Colorectal Cancer in Korea
Young-Sang Hong, Eun-Joo Jung, Chun-Geun Ryu, Gang-Mi Kim, Su-Ran Kim, Sung-Noh Hong, Dae-Yong Hwang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(4):213-218.   Published online August 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.4.213
  • 3,202 View
  • 39 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

In recent years, the incidence of early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) has markedly increased in the population within the Republic of Korea. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic features of adenomatous polyps in TNM stage I CRC patients and in the general population.

Methods

Between March 2003 and September 2009, 168 patients with stage I CRC were enrolled in this study. In addition, the records of 4,315 members of the general population without CRC, as determined by colonoscopy during a health check-up, were reviewed.

Results

Of the 168 patients with stage I CRC, 68 (40.5%) had coexisting colorectal adenomatous polyps and of the 4,315 members of the general population, 1,112 (26.0%) had coexisting adenomatous polyps (P = 0.006). The prevalences of adenomatous polyp multiplicity in early CRC and in the general population were 32% and 15%, respectively (P = 0.023). Patients with coexisting adenomatous polyps had a higher frequency of tubulovillous or villous adenomas than members of the general population with polyps (7.5% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.037). Furthermore, a subgroup analysis showed that the occurrence (44% vs. 34%, P = 0.006) and the multiplicity (32% vs. 15%, P = 0.023) of adenomatous polyps were greater for T2 than T1 cancer.

Conclusion

The prevalence and the multiplicity of adenomatous polyps in TNM stage I CRC is higher than it is in the general population. The findings of this study suggest that depth of invasion of early stage CRC affects the prevalence and the number of adenomatous polyps in the remaining colon and rectum.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk factors of recurrence in TNM stage I colorectal cancer
    Jin-Hee Paik, Chun-Geun Ryu, Dae-Yong Hwang
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(5): 281.     CrossRef
Efficacy of Transparent Cap-attached Colonoscopy: Does It Improve the Quality of Colonoscopy?.
Choi, Dong Hyun , Shin, Hyeon Keun , Lee, Young Chan , Lim, Cheong Ho , Jeong, Seung Kyu , Lee, Suk Hwan , Yang, Hyung Kyu
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(2):116-122.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.2.116
  • 7,458 View
  • 16 Download
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Recently, the use of a transparent cap attached to the tip of the colonoscope has been revealed to be helpful in both detecting colorectal polyps and shortening the intubation time to the cecum. The aim of this study was to examine the usefulness of transparent cap-attached colonoscopy (CAC) as compared with conventional colonoscopy (CC) in terms of the technical ease and efficiency.
METHODS
Colonoscopies from a total of 228 patients between May and October 2008 were prospectively collected. All colonoscopies were performed by single colorectal surgeon whose experience exceeded 3,000 colonoscopies. Patients were assigned to the CAC group (n=114) or to the CC group (n=114). The cecal intubation rate and time, the polyp detection rate, the adenoma detection rate, the withdrawal time, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of the patient's pain were compared.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in the age, sex, body mass index, previous history of abdominal operation, diverticulosis, and the degree of bowel preparation between the two groups. The cecal intubation rate was 100% in both groups. The cecal intubation time was significantly shorter in the CAC group than in the CC group overall (5.3+/-4.0 min vs. 7.6+/-4.3 min, P<0.001), as well as for female (6.1+/-2.8 min vs. 9.1+/-4.7 min, P<0.001) patients. There were no statistically significant differences in the total colonoscopy time (13.1+/-6.3 min vs. 14.5+/-5.2 min, P=0.066), the polyp detection rate (38.6% vs. 33.3%, P=0.408), the adenoma detection rate (28.1% vs. 25.4%, P=0.654), and the VAS scale of pain (2.48 vs. 2.74, P=0.353) between the CAC and the CC groups.
CONCLUSION
The transparent cap is effective in shortening the cecal intubation time, especially in female patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Cap-assisted endoscopy: Do we have enough evidence?
    Thomas Frieling
    Endoscopy International Open.2018; 06(10): E1224.     CrossRef
  • Improving the utility of colonoscopy: Recent advances in practice
    Crispin J Corte, Rupert W Leong
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2016; 31(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Indigocarmine on Improvement of the Polyp Detection Rate during Colonoscopic Examination with Hood Cap
    Sang Chang Kwon, Sung Won Choi, Seong Ho Choi, Hee Seung Park, Seung Heon Lee, Bong Gun Kim, Eun Hee Seo, Mun Jang, Seung Min Ryu, Dong Hyun Kim, Young Hoon Kim, Jun Ouk Ha, Jae Seung Lee
    Intestinal Research.2014; 12(1): 60.     CrossRef
  • Image-enhanced, chromo, and cap-assisted colonoscopy for improving adenoma/neoplasia detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fumio Omata, Sachiko Ohde, Gautam A. Deshpande, Daiki Kobayashi, Katsunori Masuda, Tsuguya Fukui
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2014; 49(2): 222.     CrossRef
  • Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jenna L. Morgan, Kathryn Thomas, Sarah Braungart, Richard L. Nelson
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2013; 17(4): 353.     CrossRef
  • Can Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Be a Savior for Right Side Interval Cancer?
    Hyung Hun Kim
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2013; 58(2): 289.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Hood-cap Assisted Colonoscopy; Comparison with Conventional Colonoscopy
    Sung Won Choi, Hee Seung Park, Jae Seung Lee, Sang Yon Hwang, Sung Dong Kwak, Seong Ho Choi
    Intestinal Research.2012; 10(3): 280.     CrossRef
  • Transparent Cap Colonoscopy versus Standard Colonoscopy to Improve Caecal Intubation
    Jenna Morgan, Kathryn Thomas, Heather Lee-Robichaud, Richard L Nelson, Sarah Braungart
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2012;[Epub]     CrossRef
Case Report
Adult Sigmoido-recto-anal Intussusception by a Sigmoid Colon Adenoma.
Park, Young Jin
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2009;25(2):121-124.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2009.25.2.121
  • 1,920 View
  • 10 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Although rectal procidentia is not an uncommon disease, presentation of more proximal segments of the large bowel through the anus is extremely rare. A case with sigmoido-recto-anal prolapse secondary to a large adenoma of the sigmoid colon is reported herein. A 28-yr-old man with an anal prolapsing mass was admitted to our hospital. Preoperative CT scan showed a sigmoid-recto-anal prolapse. An emergency operation was decided upon because the prolapsed segment was irreducible and because its viability was questionable. After a manual reduction of the mass, an anterior resection was performed under general anesthesia. The pathologic diagnosis of the resected specimen was a large villo-tubular adenoma.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laparoscopic Treatment of Adult Sigmoidorectal Intussusception Caused by a Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Sigmoid Colon: A Case Report
    Seok Youn Lee, Won Cheol Park, Jeong Kyun Lee, Dong Baek Kang, Young Kim, Ki Jung Yun
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2011; 27(1): 44.     CrossRef
Original Article
Desmoid Tumor in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP).
Kim, Dae Dong , Yu, Chang Sik , Hong, Dong Hyun , Jung, Sang Hun , Choi, Pyong Wha , Park, In Ja , Kim, Hee Cheol , Kim, Jin Cheon
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(1):20-26.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.1.20
  • 1,712 View
  • 12 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
This research was conducted to assess the incidence, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes for desmoid tumors in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). METHODS: At Medical Center, we recruited 47 patients who had been diagnosed as having intraabdominal or abdominal wall desmoid tumor between Aug. 1995 and Dec. 2005. We compared FAP-associated desmoid tumors with non-FAP-associated desmoid tumors according to clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Desmoid tumors developed 12/46 (26.1%) in FAP, 1/14 (7.1%) in attenuated FAP and 34 in non-FAP associated. Unlike non-FAP-associated desmoid tumors, the occurrence of FAP-associated desmoid tumors in tended to be higher in the earlier age groups (< or =40 yrs, 92.3% vs 67.6%, P=0.082) and no sexual predominancy was observed (male:female ratio of 1.2:1 vs a tumor ratio 1:3.9, P=0.033). Intraabdominal-type desmoid tumors associated for the majority of FAP-associated desmoid tumors (92.3% vs 38.2%, P=0.002), and 70% of the desmoid tumors occurred within 3 years after total proctocolectomy. In the treatment of FAP-associated intraabdominal desmoid tumors, surgery was performed in 7 cases (58.3%), and complete resections were done in only 3 cases (25%), with one recurrence. In non-FAP-associated desmoid tumors, complete resection was possible in 10 cases (76.9%), and there was no recurrence (P=0.036). The medical treatment for unresectable or incompletely resectable cases in cases of non-FAP-associated desmoid tumor was good, but for FAP-associated desmoid tumors, the effectiveness was not good, and further investigation was needed. CONCLUSIONS: Intraabdominal desmoid tumors in FAP patients occurred frequently in the early (< or =3 yrs) postoperative period, and the treatment, outcome including surgery and medication, outcome was not good in patients with FAP-associated desmoid tumors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical Characteristics and Adequate Treatment of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Combined with Desmoid Tumors
    Won Beom Jung, Chan Wook Kim, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2014; 46(4): 366.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP