Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Abdominal surgery"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Display
Original Article
Patient-Controlled Nutrition After Abdominal Surgery: Novel Concept Contrary to Surgical Dogma
Hyung Ook Kim, Mingoo Kang, Sung Ryol Lee, Kyung Uk Jung, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(5):253-258.   Published online October 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.29
  • 7,433 View
  • 150 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
According to surgical dogma, patients who are recovering from general anesthesia after abdominal surgery should begin with a clear liquid diet, progress to a full liquid diet and then to a soft diet before taking regular meals. We propose patient-controlled nutrition (PCN), which is a novel concept in postoperative nutrition after abdominal surgery.
Methods
A retrospective pilot study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and effects of PCN. This study was carried out with a total of 179 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy between August 2014 and July 2016. In the PCN group, diet was advanced depending on the choice of the patients themselves; in the traditional group, diet was progressively advanced to a full liquid or soft diet and then a regular diet as tolerated. The primary endpoints were time to tolerance of regular diet and postoperative hospital stay.
Results
Time to tolerance of a regular diet (P < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001) showed statistically significant differences between the groups. Multivariate analysis using linear regression showed that the traditional nutrition pattern was the only factor associated with postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis using logistic regression showed that traditional nutrition was the only risk factor associated with prolonged postoperative hospital stay (≥3 days).
Conclusion
After abdominal surgery, PCN may be a feasible and effective concept in postoperative nutrition. In our Early Recovery after Surgery program, our PCN concept may reduce the time to tolerance of a regular diet and shorten the postoperative hospital stay.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly individuals: An international multicenter propensity score–matched study by the PANFRAIL Collaborative group
    Tiziana Marchese, Valentina Valle, Benedetto Ielpo, Marcello Giuseppe Spampinato, Annalisa Comandatore, Leonardo Borgioli, Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti, Luca Morelli, Matteo De Pastena, Alessandro Esposito, Roberto Salvia, Giuseppe Ietto, Roberto Delpini,
    Surgery.2026; : 110153.     CrossRef
  • Bilateral Exchange: Enteral Nutrition Clinical Decision Making in Pediatric Surgery Patients
    Manisha B. Bhatia, Cassandra M. Anderson, Abdiwahab N. Hussein, Brian Opondo, Nereah Aruwa, Otieno Okumu, Sarah G. Fisher, Tasha Sparks Joplin, JoAnna L. Hunter-Squires, Brian W. Gray, Peter W. Saula
    Journal of Surgical Research.2024; 295: 139.     CrossRef
  • Clinical pharmacist intervention in Appendectomy - Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct therapy ‎
    Bushra Abdel-Hadi, Sami Raid Abdel-Fattah
    Journal Of Advanced Pharmacy Education And Research.2022; 12(2): 1.     CrossRef
  • 外科患者の栄養管理における給食の意義

    The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION.2021; 55(2): 57.     CrossRef
Case Report
Incidental Mesenteric Paraganglioma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Jennie Granger, Roy Mahapatra, Bushra Hamid, Katherine Gillespie, Matthew Fok, Dale Vimalachandran
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(5):197-200.   Published online October 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.5.197
  • 5,956 View
  • 65 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Mesenteric paragangliomas are a rare entity; consequently, only 12 cases have been reported to date. Although considered benign and often found incidentally, they have the potential to metastasize and are an important diagnosis to consider for patients with a mesenteric tumor. We report the case of a 71-year-old woman who was found on magnetic resonance imaging to have an incidental, large, complex, intra-abdominal mass that had initially been misdiagnosed as ovarian in origin. She underwent an open resection of the tumor and adjacent small bowel with no perioperative complications; histology confirmed the mass to be a mesenteric paraganglioma. This case report highlights several important key issues regarding paraganglioma, including diagnosis, imaging, genetic testing, and surgical resection. The results of a literature review are also discussed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Mesenteric Paraganglioma: An Unusual Suspect To Consider
    Andreia Martins Fernandes, Raquel Prata Saraiva, Leandro Augusto Silva, Sara Reis, Joana Couto
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hypertensive Crisis in a Patient With a Functioning Mesenteric Paraganglioma: Dramatic Response to Octreotide Treatment
    Omayma T. Elshafie, Abir C. Bou Khalil, Maha A. Alshaibi, Boris L. Itkin, Babikir M. Ismail, Nicholas J. Woodhouse
    AACE Clinical Case Reports.2023; 9(5): 149.     CrossRef
  • Mesenteric Paraganglioma: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Jihoon Lim, Midhir Patel
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Readability of extraspinal organs on scout images of lumbar spine MRI according to different protocols
    Ja Yeon You, Joon Woo Lee, Jiwoon Seo, Jee Won Chai, Hee Dong Chae, Heung Sik Kang, Jan Fritz
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(5): e0251310.     CrossRef
  • A rare case of a 65 year old female with a mesenteric paraganglioma
    Raffaele Rocco, Brittany L. Murphy, Vatsal P. Patel, Oksana Hamidi, Alice Y. Chang, Melanie L. Lyden
    Human Pathology: Case Reports.2020; 19: 200349.     CrossRef
  • An ectopic paraganglioma supplied by the subclavian artery in the right supraclavicular fossa
    Yang Wang, Zhen Liu, Chong Lian, Shenming Wang, Jinsong Wang
    Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques.2019; 5(2): 91.     CrossRef
  • Mesenteric Lesions with Similar or Distinctive Appearances on CT
    Hwajin Cha, Jiyoung Hwang, Seong Sook Hong, Eun Ji Lee, Hyun-joo Kim, Yun-Woo Chang
    Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology.2019; 80(6): 1091.     CrossRef
  • 18F-FDOPA PET/CT of Nonfunctioning Paraganglioma of the Gastroepiploic Pedicle
    Benjamin Leroy Freschini, Pietro Addeo, Gerlinde Averous, Bernard Goichot, Philippe Bachellier, Alessio Imperiale
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2018; 43(9): e326.     CrossRef
Original Article
Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgeries for Patients With Colorectal Cancer Who Have Had a Previous Abdominal Surgery
Soeun Park, Jeonghyun Kang, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(5):184-191.   Published online October 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.5.184
  • 7,771 View
  • 77 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 16 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The impact of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) on surgical outcomes from laparoscopic and robot surgeries is inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the impact of PAS on perioperative outcomes from laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.

Methods

From March 2007 to February 2014, a total of 612 and 238 patients underwent laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, respectively. Patients were divided into 3 groups: those who did not have a PAS (NPAS), those who had a major PAS, and those who had a minor PAS. We further divided the patients so that our final groups for analysis were: patients with NPAS (n = 478), major PAS (n = 19), and minor PAS (n = 115) in the laparoscopy group, and patients with NPAS (n = 202) and minor PAS (n = 36) in the robotic surgery group.

Results

In the laparoscopy group, no differences in the conversion rates between the 3 groups were noted (NPAS = 1.0% vs. major PAS = 0% vs. minor PAS = 1.7%, P = 0.701). In the robotic surgery group, the conversion rate did not differ between the NPAS group and the minor PAS group (1.0% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.390). Among the groups, neither the operation time, blood loss, days to soft diet, length of hospital stay, nor complication rate were affected by PAS.

Conclusion

PAS did not jeopardize the perioperative outcomes for either laparoscopic or robotic colorectal surgeries. Therefore, PAS should not be regarded as an absolute contraindication for minimally invasive colorectal surgeries.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of Previous Abdominal Surgery on the Outcomes of Robotic Resection for Colorectal Cancer: An Analysis of Conversions, Short‐Term Outcomes and Quality of Oncologic Resections
    Serra Bayrakceken, Aria Sarikhani, Volkan Ozben, Nur Ramoglu, Ahmet Anil Sahar, Arda Ulas Mutlu, Ismail Ahmet Bilgin, Bilgi Baca
    The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    S. Gahunia, J. Wyatt, S. G. Powell, S. Mahdi, S. Ahmed, K. Altaf
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of previous abdominal surgery on minimally invasive radical resection of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Wenjun Liu, Fan He, Defei Chen, Xiuping Zhang
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 51(10): 110259.     CrossRef
  • Robotic-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and intracorporeal ileal conduit formation in a patient with prior total colectomy and J-pouch
    Grace S Sutherland, Jodie M McDonald, Amanda C Chung, Justin V Vass, Ahmed G Goolam, Matthew R Winter
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of previous abdominal surgery on robotic-assisted rectal cancer surgery
    Davide Ferrari, Tommaso Violante, Himani Bhatt, Ibrahim A. Gomaa, Anne-Lise D. D’Angelo, Kellie L. Mathis, David W. Larson
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 28(4): 513.     CrossRef
  • The impact of previous abdominal surgery on colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery
    Xu-Rui Liu, Bing-Lan Zhang, Dong Peng, Fei Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Chun-Yi Wang
    Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(4): 1331.     CrossRef
  • Robot‐assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer after low anterior resection: A case report
    Shoutarou Watanabe, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Nao Hiroe, Tomohiro Iwasawa, Michio Kosugi, Masayuki Shimizu, Masaru Ishida
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The risk of postoperative complications is higher in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery: a propensity score matching analysis
    Xu-Rui Liu, Fei Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Xiao-Yu Liu, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2023; 25(12): 3471.     CrossRef
  • Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer
    Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • Current status of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer: A review
    Won Beom Jung
    International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2022; 11(2): 56.     CrossRef
  • Conversions related to adhesions in abdominal surgery. Robotic versus laparoscopic approach: A multicentre experience
    Marco Milone, Nicola de'Angelis, Nassiba Beghdadi, Francesco Brunetti, Michele Manigrasso, Giuseppe De Simone, Giuseppe Servillo, Sara Vertaldi, Giovanni Domenico De Palma
    The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic and laparoscopic liver resection—comparative experiences at a high-volume German academic center
    E. Lorenz, J. Arend, M. Franz, M. Rahimli, A. Perrakis, V. Negrini, A. A. Gumbs, R. S. Croner
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(3): 753.     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgeries
    Anil Heroor, Aysha Khan, Kashish Jain, Akshay Patil, Hitesh Rajendra Singhavi
    Indian Journal of Colo-Rectal Surgery.2021; 4(1): 12.     CrossRef
  • Safety and feasibility of repeat laparoscopic colorectal resection: a matched case–control study
    Alban Zarzavadjian le Bian, Laurent Genser, Christine Denet, Carlotta Ferretti, Anais Laforest, Jean-Marc Ferraz, Candice Tubbax, Philippe Wind, Brice Gayet, David Fuks
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(5): 2120.     CrossRef
  • Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robotic-assisted rectal surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching study
    Ching-Wen Huang, Wei-Chih Su, Tsung-Kun Chang, Cheng-Jen Ma, Tzu-Chieh Yin, Hsiang-Lin Tsai, Po-Jung Chen, Yen-Cheng Chen, Ching-Chun Li, Yi-Chien Hsieh, Jaw-Yuan Wang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An individualized laparoscopic‐assisted approach in a patient with a sigmoid tumour and a giant incisional hernia – a video vignette
    C. Clancy, M. Flanagan, M. Bughio, M. G. O'Riordain
    Colorectal Disease.2019; 21(8): 972.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP