Purpose We compared the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among Asian populations with localized colorectal cancer undergoing curative resection with and without the use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (PTP).
Methods A comprehensive literature search was undertaken to identify relevant studies published from January 1, 1980 to February 28, 2022. The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent primary tumor resection for localized nonmetastatic colorectal cancer; an Asian population or studies conducted in an Asian country; randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, or cohort studies; and the incidence of symptomatic VTE, deep vein thrombosis, and/or pulmonary embolism as the primary study outcomes. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. This study was registered in PROSPERO on October 11, 2020 (No. CRD42020206793).
Results Seven studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 5 observational cohort studies) were included, encompassing 5,302 patients. The overall incidence of VTE was 1.4%. The use of PTP did not significantly reduce overall VTE incidence: 1.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%–3.1%) versus 1.9% (95% CI, 0.3%–4.4%; P = 0.55). Similarly, PTP was not associated with significantly lower rates of symptomatic VTE, proximal deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism.
Conclusion The benefit of PTP in reducing VTE incidence among Asian patients undergoing curative resection for localized colorectal cancer has not been clearly established. The decision to administer PTP should be evaluated on a case-bycase basis and with consideration of associated bleeding risks.
Purpose This study compared the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) vs. conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) in patients with grade II/III hemorrhoids.
Methods PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing LH against CH in grade II/III hemorrhoids. The primary outcomes included postoperative use of analgesia, postoperative morbidity (bleeding, urinary retention, pain, thrombosis), and time of return to work/daily activities.
Results Nine studies totaling 661 patients (LH, 336 and CH, 325) were included. The LH group had shorter operative time (P<0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (P<0.001). Postoperative pain was lower in the LH group, with lower postoperative day 1 (mean difference [MD], –2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], –3.44 to –0.75; P=0.002) and postoperative day 7 (MD, –3.94; 95% CI, –6.36 to –1.52; P=0.001) visual analogue scores and use of analgesia (risk ratio [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42–0.81; P=0.001). The risk of postoperative bleeding was also lower in the LH group (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.12– 0.28; P<0.001), with a quicker return to work or daily activities (P=0.002). The 12-month risks of bleeding (P>0.999) and prolapse (P=0.240), and the likelihood of complete resolution at 12 months, were similar (P=0.240).
Conclusion LH offers more favorable short-term clinical outcomes than CH, with reduced morbidity and pain and earlier return to work or daily activities. Medium-term symptom recurrence at 12 months was similar. Our results should be verified in future well-designed trials with larger samples.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of surgically indicated hemorrhoids in inflammatory bowel patients: a randomized comparative clinical study Reham Zakaria, Mohamed Mahmoud Amin, Heba Alhussein Abo-Alella, Yasmine Hany Hegab Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(1): 249. CrossRef
Best clinical practice recommendations for the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids via laser hemorrhoidoplasty: the LHP recommendations P. C. Ambe, G. P. Martin-Martin, N. Vasas, I. Piponski, I. H. Roman, J. D. P. Hernandez, H. Ma, H.C. Lin, G. Weyand, L. Mazlan, L. J. García Flórez, K. Wolff, M. Dessily, C. Wang, V. Dobricanin, W. Yang, T. Bruketa, X.D. Zeng, S. Avdicausevic, Z.G. Zhang, Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Which Technique is Preferable for Grade 2–3 Hemorrhoidal Disease: Laser vs. Rubber Band Ligation? A Retrospective Study Ahmet Cihangir Emral, Merter Gülen, Bahadır Ege Bratislava Medical Journal.2025; 126(1): 91. CrossRef
Precision cuts time-comparative outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty and open hemorrhoidectomy Shreya, Prajwal Chandrashekar International Surgery Journal.2025; 12(5): 743. CrossRef
Latest Research Trends on the Management of Hemorrhoids Sung Il Kang Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2025; 9(2): 179. CrossRef
Hämorrhoidalleiden und stadienabhängige Behandlung (inklusive Analprolaps) Oliver Schwandner Die Chirurgie.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty: Procedure, Outcomes and Future Directions Michele di Schiano di Visconte ANZ Journal of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of efficacy and safety between surgical and conservative treatments for hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis Longfang Quan, Xuelian Bai, Fang Cheng, Jin Chen, Hangkun Ma, Pengfei Wang, Ling Yao, Shaosheng Bei, Xiaoqiang Jia BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Quand et comment traiter des hémorroïdes Thierry Higuero La Presse Médicale Formation.2024; 5(1): 24. CrossRef
Spectrum of Diagnoses in Female Patients With Proctologic Symptoms Presenting to the Surgery Unit of a Tertiary Care Center Sana Sahar, Tamjeed Gul, Muhammad Ihtesham Khan Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Precision and Power: A Comprehensive Review of Exploring the Role of Laser Treatment in Hemorrhoidal Management Dheeraj Surya, Pankaj Gharde Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Diode laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoids: Meta-analysis Po-Lung Cheng, Chang-Cyuan Chen, Jian-Syun Chen, Po-Li Wei, Yan-Jiun Huang Asian Journal of Surgery.2024; 47(11): 4681. CrossRef
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty vs. rubber band ligation: a randomized trial comparing 2 mini-invasive treatment for grade II hemorrhoids Lei Jin, Kaijian Qin, Renjie Wu, Haojie Yang, Can Cui, Zhenyi Wang, Jiong Wu BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Quality of Life of Patients Before and After Hemorrhoid Surgery: A Single-Center Study in Vietnam Nguyen Thi Thuy Anh, Nguyen Ngoc Huynh Nhu, Tran Ngoc Hong, Pham Thi Ly, Nguyen Thi Hong Huyen, Doan Thi Minh, Ho Tat Bang, Nguyen Trung Tin Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Propensity-Score Matching Analysis for Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Circumferential Stapler Hemorrhoidectomy: One-Year Outcomes Tran V Hung, Duong V Hai Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty for grade II–IV hemorrhoidal disease in Bangladesh Md. Saiful Islam, Abhigan B. Shrestha, Faisal Chowdhury, Md. R.K. Ziko Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(11): 6514. CrossRef
Lower pain, less itching, and faster healing after ultrasound scalpel-assisted hemorrhoidectomy using an intimate cleaner containing chlorhexidine, acid hyaluronic acid, and natural anti-inflammatories: a multicenter observational case-control study Antonio Brillantino, Luigi Marano, Maurizio Grillo, Alessio Palumbo, Fabrizio Foroni, Luciano Vicenzo, Alessio Antropoli, Michele Lanza, Maria Laura Sandoval Sotelo, Nicola Sangiuliano, Mauro Maglio, Rosanna Filosa, Lucia Abbatiello, Maria Preziosa Romano Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 602. CrossRef
Minimally invasive laser technologies in the surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: problems and prospects (literature review) N. D. Yartseva, L. V. Kornev, E. K. Naumov, G. V. Rodoman, L. A. Laberko Hirurg (Surgeon).2023; (3): 20. CrossRef
Laser interventions in coloproctology. A plea for standardized treatment protocols P. C. Ambe Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(10): 953. CrossRef
Comments on “Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade II/III hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis” Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Amine Gouader, Bassem Krimi, Hani Oweira Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 442. CrossRef