Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
10 "Yoon Suk Lee"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
New double-stapling technique without staple-crossing line in laparoscopic low anterior resection: effort to reduce anastomotic leakage
Nam Seok Kim, Ji Hoon Kim, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyu Lee, Won Kyung Kang
Received June 8, 2022  Accepted November 21, 2023  Published online November 22, 2024  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00409.0058    [Epub ahead of print]
  • 156 View
  • 6 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to demonstrate the safety of new double-stapling technique (nDST), without a crossing line and dog ears, by comparing with conventional DST (cDST) in laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 98 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR for rectal cancer from January 2018 to December 2020. The inclusion criterion was an anastomosis level below the peritoneal reflection and 4 cm above the anal verge. In the nDST group, the staple line of the linear cutter was sutured using barbed sutures to shorten the staple line before firing the circular stapler. Therefore, there were no crossing lines after firing the circular stapler. A 2:1 propensity score matching was performed between the cDST and nDST groups.
Results
After propensity score matching, 39 patients were in the cDST group and 20 were in the nDST group. There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the total operation time between the cDST and nDST groups (124.0±26.2 minutes vs. 125.2±20.3 minutes, P=0.853). Morbidity rates were similar between the 2 groups (9 cases [23.1%] vs. 5 cases [25.0%], P=0.855). There was no significant difference in leakage rate (4 cases [10.3%] vs. 1 case [5.0%], P=0.847) and anastomotic bleeding rate (1 case [2.6%] vs. 3 cases [15.0%], P=0.211).
Conclusion
The nDST to eliminate the crossing line and dog ears in laparoscopic LAR is technically feasible and safe. However, more attention should be paid to anastomotic bleeding in such cases.
ERAS
Clinical impact of a multimodal pain management protocol for loop ileostomy reversal
Jeong Sub Kim, Chul Seung Lee, Jung Hoon Bae, Seung Rim Han, Do Sang Lee, In Kyu Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyeong Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):210-216.   Published online June 19, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01137.0162
  • 2,091 View
  • 186 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
As introduced, multimodal pain management bundle for ileostomy reversal may be considered to reduce postoperative pain and hospital stay. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical efficacy of perioperative multimodal pain bundle for ileostomy.
Methods
Medical records of patients who underwent ileostomy reversal after rectal cancer surgery from April 2017 to March 2020 were analyzed. Sixty-seven patients received multimodal pain bundle protocol with ileostomy reversal (group A) and 41 patients underwent closure of ileostomy with conventional pain management (group B).
Results
Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, diabetes mellitus, and smoking history, were not significantly different between the groups. The pain score on postoperative day 1 was significant lower in group A (visual analog scale, 2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 3.2 ± 1.2; P = 0.013). Overall consumption of opioid in group A was significant less than group B (9.7 ± 9.5 vs. 21.2 ± 8.8, P < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in group A (2.3 ± 1.5 days vs. 4.1 ± 1.5 days, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in postoperative complication rate.
Conclusion
Multimodal pain protocol for ileostomy reversal could reduce postoperative pain, usage of opioid and hospital stay compared to conventional pain management.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain: pursuing liberation from pain, not redemption
    Soo Yeun Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(3): 189.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes and future directions of enhanced recovery after surgery in colorectal surgery: a narrative review
    Ji Hyeong Song, Minsung Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
Review
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer,Minimally invasive surgery,Surgical technique
Is Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation Really Necessary for All Patients With Right-Sided Colon Cancer?
Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyeon-Min Cho, Je-Ho Jang, Chang-Nam Kim, Kil Yeon Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim, On behalf of The Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(6):434-444.   Published online December 8, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00955.0136
  • 5,172 View
  • 273 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 22 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Colon cancer treatment is on the way to evolution over several decades. The minimally invasive surgery has improved postoperative short-term outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy has prolonged the survival of advanced colon cancer patients. Hohenberger proposed the noble concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) which consists of 3 components: plane surgery, sufficient longitudinal bowel resection, and central vascular ligation (CVL). Mesocolic plane surgery shares the same surgical principle of total mesorectal excision, which is maintaining the intact mesothelial envelope. However, there remain debates about the extent of bowel resection and the level of CVL for maximizing lymph node dissection. There is no solid clinical evidence for the oncological necessity and benefit of extended radical dissection in right hemicolectomy. CME with CVL based on open surgery has been adopted in laparoscopic surgery. So, it is also necessary to look at how the CME could be transformed and successfully implanted in the laparoscopic era. Recent rapid advances in surgical technology and cancer biology are preparing for fundamental changes in cancer surgery. In this study, we reviewed the history, oncological necessity, and compatibility of CME for the right hemicolectomy in the laparoscopic era and outline the new perspectives on the evolution of cancer surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove tecnologie) network prospective study on the approach to right colon lymphadenectomy in Italy: is there a standard?—CoDIG 2 (ColonDx Italian Group)
    G. Anania, M. Chiozza, A. Campagnaro, F. Bagolini, G. Resta, D. Azzolina, G. Silecchia, R. Cirocchi, A. Agrusa, D. Cuccurullo, M. Guerrieri, V. Adamo, M. Ammendola, P. Angelini, M. Annecchiarico, G. Aprea, F. Autori, G. Baldazzi, A. Balla, G. Baronio, G.
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Retrocaecal, supracolic and medial dissection (the RESUME approach) as an optimal surgical procedure for right‐sided colon cancer—A Video Vignette
    Hong‐min Ahn, Min Hyeong Jo, Mi Jeong Choi, Heung‐Kwon Oh, Duck‐Woo Kim, Sung‐Bum Kang
    Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(7): 1480.     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatment of right colon cancer
    A. A. Nevolskikh, V. A. Avdeenko, I. P. Reznik, T. P. Pochuev, R. F. Zibirov, S. A. Ivanov, A. D. Kaprin
    Siberian journal of oncology.2024; 23(3): 133.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping on Improving Diagnostic Values of CT D3 Lymph Node Staging for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Mi Sook Yun, ChangYeop Kim, In Young Lee, Su Bum Park, Dong-Hoon Shin, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3496.     CrossRef
  • Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision
    Inci Sahin, Bilgi Baca
    Digestive Disease Interventions.2023; 07(01): 024.     CrossRef
  • A comparison of the efficacy and safety of natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with sigmoid colon/high rectal cancer
    Qiang He, Jing Huang, Liyun Niu, Chunbao Zhai
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 127(7): 1160.     CrossRef
  • Effect of intracorporeal anastomosis on postoperative ileus after laparoscopic right colectomy
    Sangwoo Kim, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Young-Gil Son
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(3): 156.     CrossRef
  • Surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (D3 + CME) for colon cancer: A prospective single-center cohort study
    Xiaolin Wu, Yixin Tong, Daxing Xie, Haijie Li, Jie Shen, Jianping Gong
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(8): 6107.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and survival of adenocarcinoma with mixed subtypes in patients with colorectal cancer
    Fan Zhang, Boqi Xu, Yao Peng, Zhongqi Mao, Shan Tong
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Effectiveness of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping Using ICG for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Prospective Case–Control Study
    Gyung Mo Son, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Sun Bin Im, Kyung Hee Kim, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Dong-Hoon Shin, Armaan M. Nazir, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 4927.     CrossRef
  • Early-Onset Colon Cancer: A Narrative Review of Its Pathogenesis, Clinical Presentation, Treatment, and Prognosis
    Elvina C Lingas
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach
    Ji-Hyun Seo, In-Ja Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5211.     CrossRef
  • Ausmaß und Technik der chirurgischen Resektion beim Kolonkarzinom
    Christoph Holmer
    coloproctology.2022; 44(3): 149.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the Editor Reply: ‘Mesocolon Excision in Right Colon Cancer: Is it a Real Oncological Procedure or a Mere Surgical Act?’
    Tamara Díaz Vico, Luis Joaquín García Flórez
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2022; 29(9): 5855.     CrossRef
  • Medical disease and ambulatory surgery, new insights in patient selection based on medical disease
    Thomas Fuchs-Buder, Jacob Rosenberg
    Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology.2022; 35(3): 385.     CrossRef
  • Is the oncological impact of vascular invasion more important in right colon cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(2): 49.     CrossRef
  • Ileal long-segment ischemia after the unintended ligation of variant ileal branch during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Dong-Hoon Shin, Joo-Young Na, In Young Lee, Shin Hoo Park
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(3): 116.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early colon cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 558.     CrossRef
  • Direction of diagnosis and treatment improvement in colorectal cancer
    In Ja Park
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 540.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Robot-Assisted Colorectal Surgery
    Young Il Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • It Is a Pleasure to Announce the Issue Titled “Master Class 2021” in Annals of Coloproctology
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 349.     CrossRef
Original Article
Benign GI diease,Benign diesease & IBD,Postoperative outcome & ERAS,Minimally invasive surgery
Comparing the Postoperative Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Three Port Appendectomy With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Acute Appendicitis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Won Jong Kim, Hyeong Yong Jin, Hyojin Lee, Jung Hoon Bae, Wooree Koh, Ji Yeon Mun, Hee Ju Kim, In Kyu Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Chul Seung Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(4):232-238.   Published online September 30, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.09.15
  • 4,334 View
  • 105 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 18 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The objective of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes between single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) and 3-port conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol.
Methods
Of 101 laparoscopic appendectomy with ERAS protocol cases for appendicitis from March 2019 to April 2020, 54 patients underwent SILA with multimodal analgesic approach (group 1) while 47 patients received CLA with multimodal analgesic approach (group 2). SILA and CLA were compared with the single institution’s ERAS protocol. To adjust for baseline differences and selection bias, operative outcomes and complications were compared after propensity score matching (PSM).
Results
After 1:1 PSM, well-matched 35 patients in each group were evaluated. Postoperative hospital stays for patients in group 1 (1.2 ± 0.8 vs. 1.6 ± 0.8 days, P = 0.037) were significantly lesser than those for patients in group 2. However, opioid consumption (2.0 mg vs. 1.4 mg, P=0.1) and the postoperative scores of visual analogue scale for pain at 6 hours (2.4±1.9 vs. 2.8 ± 1.4, P = 0.260) and 12 hours (2.4 ± 2.0 vs. 2.9 ± 1.5, P = 0.257) did not show significant difference between the 2 groups.
Conclusion
SILA resulted in shortening the length of hospitalization without increase in complications or readmission rates compared to CLA with ERAS protocol.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential® versus robotic approach in patients with rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    I. K. Kim, C. S. Lee, J. H. Bae, S. R. Han, W. Alshalawi, B. C. Kim, I. K. Lee, D. S. Lee, Y. S. Lee
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Challenging issues of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery programs in South Korea
    Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Ho-Jin Lee
    Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.2024; 19(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • A Single Site Approach to Appendicitis: A Review of a Single Center
    Yoshito Tsuji, Yujiro Nishizawa, Yuki Ozato, Akira Inoue, Yoshinori Kagawa
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2024; 77(3): 161.     CrossRef
  • The “Hansol-roll” folding method for placement of self-gripping (ProGrip™) mesh in single-port inguinal hernia repair using ArtiSential®
    Gwan Chul Lee, Dong Woo Kang, Choon Sik Chung, Chul Seung Lee
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2024; 47(7): 3272.     CrossRef
  • Comparison between liquid skin adhesive and wound closure strip for skin closure after subcuticular suturing in single-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a single-center retrospective study in Korea
    Kyeong Eui Kim, Yu Ra Jeon, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2024; 27(1): 14.     CrossRef
  • Progress in Clinical Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in Children
    珊 白
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(04): 471.     CrossRef
  • Single-incision laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal-hernia repair using the new articulating instruments: A video vignette
    Chul Seung Lee, Gwan Chul Lee, Choon Sik Chung, Dong Keun Lee
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2024; 47(8): 3586.     CrossRef
  • Single-incision versus conventional multi-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis
    Ahmer Irfan, Ahsan Rao, Irfan Ahmed
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for prolonged hospitalization and delayed treatment completion after laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis
    Jiyoung Shin, Myong Hoon Ihn, Kyung Sik Kim, Sang Hyun Kim, Jihyoun Lee, Sangchul Yun, Sung Woo Cho
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(1): 50.     CrossRef
  • A prospective randomized controlled study comparing patient-reported scar evaluation of single-port versus multiport laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis
    Kyeong Eui Kim, In Soo Cho, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Hyung Jin Kim, Seong Kyu Baek
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2023; 26(2): 55.     CrossRef
  • The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery
    Min Ki Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analyzing the conversion factors associated with switching from a single-incision, one-puncture procedure to a two-site, three-port procedure in pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy
    Keisuke Yano, Mitsuru Muto, Toshio Harumatsu, Taichiro Nagai, Masakazu Murakami, Chihiro Kedoin, Ayaka Nagano, Mayu Matsui, Koshiro Sugita, Shun Onishi, Koji Yamada, Waka Yamada, Makoto Matsukubo, Tatsuru Kaji, Satoshi Ieiri
    Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery.2022; 4(2): 49.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using the Surgical-Glove Port Through an Umbilical Incision: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Tran Que Son, Tran Hieu Hoc, Vu Duc Long, Tran Thanh Tung, Nguyen Minh Tuan, Bui Minh Hue, Nguyen Van Minh, Nguyen Toan Thang
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Single-port robotic totally extraperitoneal(TEP) inguinal hernia repair using the da Vinci SP platform: A video vignette
    Dongjun Kim, Chul Seung Lee
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2022; 45(10): 2062.     CrossRef
  • Single-incision compared with conventional laparoscopy for appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Changjia Li, Yukun Liu, Yumin Jiang, Yongjing Xu, Zhiwei Wang
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(9): 1925.     CrossRef
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways for patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy
    Abhijit Nair, Hamed Humayid Mohammed Al-Aamri, Osama Azmy Ishaq, Parwez Waseemul Haque
    Journal of Acute Disease.2022; 11(5): 173.     CrossRef
  • Robot-Assisted Colorectal Surgery
    Young Il Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery: importance of compliance audits
    Jung Hoon Bae
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2021; 64(12): 820.     CrossRef
Video
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Minimally invasive surgery,Surgical technique
Standardized Step-by-step Technique Using Surgical Landmarks in Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
Jung Hoon Bae, Wooree Koh, Hyun Ho Kim, Yoon Suk Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(1):58-60.   Published online September 18, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.08.05
  • 6,975 View
  • 258 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
We aimed to show that a standardized step-by-step robotic approach using surgical landmarks could make lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) less complicated. We performed robot-assisted LPND consisting of 4 steps using surgical landmarks. The first step is a dissection of uretero-hypogastric fascia, which envelopes the ureter and the hypogastric nerve. The second step is a dissection of the medial side of the external iliac vein located at the lateral border of the obturator lymph nodes (LNs) group. The third step is a dissection of the vesico-hypogastric fascia, which is at the medial border of the obturator LNs group. The final step is a dissection of the internal iliac artery until the Alcock’s canal. Indocyanine green was injected just before surgery around the dentate line to identify the lateral pelvic LNs. Standardization using a robotic approach for LPND guided by surgical landmarks allows a safer and more effective surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The use of indocyanine green for lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer—preliminary data from an emerging procedure: a systematic review of the literature
    D. Kehagias, C. Lampropoulos, A. Bellou, I. Kehagias
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Japanese expert consensus on the standardization of robot‐assisted pelvic lymph node dissection in urological surgery: Extent of pelvic lymph node and surgical technique
    Shuichi Morizane, Jun Miki, Masaki Shimbo, Toru Kanno, Noriyoshi Miura, Yuta Yamada, Takeshi Yamasaki, Takashi Saika, Atsushi Takenaka
    International Journal of Urology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Simplified approach to the medial internal iliac region using a uretero‐hypogastric nerve fascia development procedure for extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy for high‐risk prostate cancer
    Masaki Shimbo, Takehiro Ohyama, Fumiyasu Endo, Kenji Komatsu, Yoko Kyono, Masayuki Sano, Kazutaka Narimoto, Kazunori Hattori
    International Journal of Urology.2023; 30(2): 190.     CrossRef
  • Lateral Lymph Node Size and Tumor Distance From Anal Verge Accurately Predict Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study
    Jung Hoon Bae, Jumyung Song, Ji Hoon Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, In Kyu Lee, Hyeon-Min Cho, Yoon Suk Lee
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(6): 785.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Could Harvest More Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes over Laparoscopic Approach for Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study
    Jung Hoon Bae, Jumyung Song, Ri Na Yoo, Ji Hoon Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, In Kyu Lee, Hyeon-Min Cho, Yoon Suk Lee
    Biomedicines.2023; 11(6): 1556.     CrossRef
  • Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robot-Assisted Colorectal Surgery
    Young Il Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery: importance of compliance audits
    Jung Hoon Bae
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2021; 64(12): 820.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer
Influence of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol on Postoperative Inflammation and Short-term Postoperative Surgical Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Heba Essam Jaloun, In Kyu Lee, Min Ki Kim, Na Young Sung, Suhail Abdullah Al Turkistani, Sun Min Park, Dae Youn Won, Sang Hyun Hong, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Yoon Suk Lee, Hae Myung Jeon
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):264-272.   Published online May 15, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.03.25
  • 7,982 View
  • 170 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 17 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Many studies have shown that the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols improve postoperative surgical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to observe the effects on postoperative inflammatory markers and to explore the effects of a high degree of compliance and the use of epidural anesthesia on inflammation and surgical outcomes.
Methods
Four hundred patients underwent colorectal cancer surgery at 2 hospitals during 2 different periods, namely, from January 2006 to December 2009 and from January 2017 to July 2017. Data related to the patient’s clinicopathological features, inflammatory markers, percentage of compliance with elements of the ERAS protocol, and use of epidural anesthesia were collected from a prospectively maintained database.
Results
The complication rate and the length of hospital stay (LOS) were less in the ERAS group than in the conventional group (P = 0.005 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively). The postoperative white blood cell count and the duration required for leukocytes to normalize were reduced in patients following the ERAS protocol (P ≤ 0.001). Other inflammatory markers, such as lymphocyte count (P = 0.008), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.032), and C-reactive protein level (P ≤ 0.001), were lower in the ERAS protocol group. High compliance ( ≥ 70%) was strongly associated with the complication rate and the LOS (P = 0.008 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion
ERAS protocols decrease early postoperative inflammation and improves short-term postoperative recovery outcomes such as complication rate and the LOS. High compliance ( ≥ 70%) with the ERAS protocol elements accelerates the positive effects of ERAS on surgical outcomes; however, the effect on inflammation was very small.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Challenging issues of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery programs in South Korea
    Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Ho-Jin Lee
    Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.2024; 19(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Effect of different anesthetic modalities with multimodal analgesia on postoperative pain level in colorectal tumor patients
    Ji-Chun Tang, Jia-Wei Ma, Jin-Jin Jian, Jie Shen, Liang-Liang Cao
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 16(2): 364.     CrossRef
  • Dysregulation of systemic immunity in colorectal cancer and its clinical applications as biomarkers and therapeutics
    Changqin Li, Jian Li
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2024; 204: 104543.     CrossRef
  • The role of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chenxiong Zhang, Hao Tan, Han Xu, Jiaming Ding
    International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(10): 6282.     CrossRef
  • Enhanced recovery pathway in open and minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective study on feasibility, compliance, and outcomes in a high-volume resource limited tertiary cancer center
    Martin Thomas, Vandana Agarwal, Ashwin DeSouza, Riddhi Joshi, Minal Mali, Karuna Panhale, Omkar K. Salvi, Reshma Ambulkar, Shailesh Shrikhande, Avanish Saklani
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Initial experience of abdominal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system
    Wed Alshalawi, Chul Seung Lee, In Kyeong Kim, Yoon Suk Lee
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2023; 26(4): 208.     CrossRef
  • Association between enrollment in an enhanced recovery program for colorectal cancer surgery and long‐term recurrence and survival
    Andres Zorrilla‐Vaca, Javier Ripolles‐Melchor, Ane Abad‐Motos, Inés Rubiera Mingu, Nekane Moreno‐Jurado, Fátima Martínez‐Durán, Isabel Pérez‐Martínez, Alfredo Abad‐Gurumeta, María L. FuenMayor‐Varela, Gabriel E. Mena, Michael C. Grant
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 125(8): 1269.     CrossRef
  • Implementation and improvement of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for colorectal cancer surgery
    Bo Yoon Choi, Jung Hoon Bae, Chul Seung Lee, Seung Rim Han, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyu Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(4): 223.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine on Postoperative Stress Response of Patients with Gastrointestinal Tumors
    Haiping Zhao, Wenhui Sun, Tao Huang
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early colon cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 558.     CrossRef
  • Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577.     CrossRef
  • Commentary: Preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts complications after esophageal resection that can be used as inclusion criteria for enhanced recovery after surgery
    Cheng Shen, Qiang Pu, Guowei Che
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221.     CrossRef
  • A propensity score-matched analysis of advanced energy devices and conventional monopolar device for colorectal cancer surgery: comparison of clinical and oncologic outcomes
    Woo Jin Song, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(5): 290.     CrossRef
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery: importance of compliance audits
    Jung Hoon Bae
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2021; 64(12): 820.     CrossRef
  • Effect of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Dae Ro Lim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(4): 209.     CrossRef
Impact of Patient’s Pain and Fatigue on Decision of Discharge After Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
Gyeora Lee, Jun-Suh Lee, Ji Hoon Kim, Duk Yeon Hwang, Yoon-Suk Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(4):209-215.   Published online August 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.11.29
  • 3,797 View
  • 117 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Hospital stays after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer tend to be much shorter than those after conventional open surgery. Many factors, including surgical outcomes and complications, are associated with patient discharge planning. However, few studies have analyzed the impact of patient subjective discomfort (including pain and fatigue) on the decision to discharge after surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine how patient pain and fatigue play a role in the decision to discharge after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.
Methods
Between March 2014 and February 2015, we conducted a questionnaire survey of 91 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer to estimate the expectation criteria for discharge and patient subjective discomfort at that time. Patients were divided into the following 2 groups: group A, those who complied with the medical professional’s decision to discharge; and group B, those who refused discharge despite the medical professional’s decision. The participants’ subjective factors were analyzed.
Results
Preoperatively, 78 of 91 patients (85.7%) identified activity level, amount of food (tolerance), and bowel movements as important factors that should be considered in the decision to discharge a patient postoperatively. Postoperatively, 17 patients (18.7%) refused discharge despite a discharge recommendation. Subjective pain and fatigue were significantly different in linear-by-linear association between the group of patients who agreed to be discharge and those who disagreed. Despite this difference, there was no significant difference in mean length of hospital stay between the 2 groups.
Conclusion
A patient’s subjective feelings of pain and fatigue can impact their decision regarding hospital discharge.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in a High-Risk Population Undergoing Colon Cancer Surgery
    Denise L. Wong, Alexis Holland, Mehmet Kocak, Mace Coday, Caroline Brown, Justin J. Monroe, Nathan M. Hinkle, Jeremiah L. Deneve, Evan S. Glazer, David Shibata
    The American Surgeon™.2023; 89(11): 4485.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Aromatherapy on Ameliorating Fatigue in Adults: A Meta-Analysis
    Qiuting Wang, Lin Wei, Yueming Luo, Lijun Lin, Chong Deng, Ping Hu, Lijia Zhu, Yangchen Liu, Meizhen Lin, Azizah Ugusman
    Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Reducing hospital stay for colorectal surgery in ERAS setting by means of perioperative patient education of expected day of discharge
    Thaís T. T. Tweed, Carmen Woortman, Stan Tummers, Maikel J. A. M. Bakens, James van Bastelaar, Jan H. M. B. Stoot
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(7): 1535.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Patient’s Pain and Fatigue on the Discharge Decision After Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
    Won Beom Jung
    Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(4): 158.     CrossRef
Effect of Gum Chewing on the Recovery From Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Duk Yeon Hwang, Ho Young Kim, Ji Hoon Kim, In Gyu Lee, Jun Ki Kim, Seung Taek Oh, Yoon Suk Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):248-251.   Published online December 31, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.248
  • 3,571 View
  • 37 Download
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

We aimed to examine the effect of gum chewing after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine. We divided the patients into 2 groups: group A consisted of 67 patients who did not chew gum; group B consisted of 65 patients who chewed gum. We analyzed the short-term clinical outcomes between the two groups to evaluate the effect of gum chewing.

Results

The first passage of gas was slightly earlier in group B, but the difference was not significant. However, the length of hospital stay was 6.7 days in group B, which was significantly shorter than that in group A (7.3 days, P = 0.018).

Conclusion

This study showed that length of postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the gum-chewing group. In future studies, we expect to elucidate the effect of gum chewing on the postoperative recovery more clearly.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Postoperative Ileus and Nonpharmacological Nursing Interventions for Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Hande Nur Arslan, Sevilay Şenol Çelik, Gamze Bozkul
    Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • https://medcraveonline.com/IJCAM/IJCAM-14-00535.pdf
    Nahima Miah, Sanjay Noonan, Emma Copeland, Eastern Road, Elaine Macaninch
    International Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine.2021; 14(2): 69.     CrossRef
  • Chewing Gum for Intestinal Function Recovery after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Binbin Mei, Wenting Wang, Feifei Cui, Zunjia Wen, Meifen Shen
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2017; 2017: 1.     CrossRef
  • Chewing gum for postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function
    Vaneesha Short, Georgia Herbert, Rachel Perry, Charlotte Atkinson, Andrew R Ness, Christopher Penfold, Steven Thomas, Henning Keinke Andersen, Stephen J Lewis
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sham Feeding? Same Feeding?
    Hungdai Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(6): 224.     CrossRef
Is Conservative Treatment with Antibiotics the Correct Strategy for Management of Right Colonic Diverticulitis?: A Prospective Study
Tae Jung Kim, In Kyu Lee, Jong Kyung Park, Yoon Suk Lee, Youn Si, Hun Jung, Hyung Jin Kim, Sang Chul Lee, Dae Young Cheung, Lee D. Gorden, Seung Taek Oh
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(4):188-193.   Published online August 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.4.188
  • 3,694 View
  • 41 Download
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The goals of this study were to identify whether conservative treatment with antibiotics in right colonic diverticulitis (RCD) patients, our empirical method used until now, is adequate and to determine how the natural history of RCD is affected by conservative treatment.

Methods

This study was designed as a case-control study. Group I was comprised of 12 patients who were managed conservatively, and clinical data were retrospectively collected. In group II, a total of 49 patients, diagnosed by using diagnostic criteria for RCD and managed conservatively, were prospectively included.

Results

The period of fasting was 2.7 days, and the hospital stay was 4.6 days in all patients. The intravenous and the oral antibiotic periods were 3.8 days and 9.8 days, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in treatment results between the two groups except the duration of fasting and the hospitalization, and there were no complications under conservative treatment. Eight patients (13.1%) had recurrent diverticulitis during the follow-up period. The recurrence risk showed no significant difference between the groups. The RCD-free period after management was 60.1 months, and patients with recurrent RCD were treated by conservative treatment or laparoscopic surgery.

Conclusion

Conservative treatment with antibiotics is the optimal treatment of choice for RCD and shows no increase in complications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Unusual Variations and Atypical Presentations of Diverticulitis
    Sarah Kling, Simran Kripalani, Joceline V. Vu
    Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The outcomes of right-sided and left-sided colonic diverticulitis following non-operative management: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sih-Shiang Huang, Chih-Wei Sung, Hsiu-Po Wang, Wan-Ching Lien
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Caecal diverticulitis can be misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis: a systematic review of the literature
    Isabelle Uhe, Jeremy Meyer, Manuela Viviano, Surrennaidoo Naiken, Christian Toso, Frédéric Ris, Nicolas C. Buchs
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(10): 2515.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic diverticulectomy versus non-operative treatment for uncomplicated right colonic diverticulitis
    Le Huy Luu, Nguyen Lam Vuong, Vo Thi Hong Yen, Do Thi Thu Phuong, Bui Khac Vu, Nguyen Viet Thanh, Nguyen Thien Khanh, Nguyen Van Hai
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(5): 2019.     CrossRef
  • Recurrence of Acute Right Colon Diverticulitis Following Nonoperative Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Yongjin F. Lee, Dalun D. Tang, Samik H. Patel, Michael A. Battaglia, Beth-Ann Shanker, Robert K. Cleary
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2020; 63(10): 1466.     CrossRef
  • Reste-t-il des indications pour la chirurgie à froid ?
    B. Schiltz, C. Dumont, N. C. Buchs, Ph. Morel, F. Ris
    Côlon & Rectum.2017; 11(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Right colonic diverticulitis in Caucasians: presentation and outcomes versus left-sided disease
    Laura Valbousquet Schneider, Ingrid Millet, Isabelle Boulay-Coletta, Patrice Taourel, Jérôme Loriau, Marc Zins
    Abdominal Radiology.2017; 42(3): 810.     CrossRef
  • Diagnóstico y tratamiento de la enfermedad diverticular del colon derecho: revisión de conjunto
    Francesco Ferrara, Jesús Bollo, Letizia V Vanni, Eduardo M Targarona
    Cirugía Española.2016; 94(10): 553.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Management of Right Colonic Diverticular Disease: A Review
    Francesco Ferrara, Jesús Bollo, Letizia V. Vanni, Eduardo M. Targarona
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2016; 94(10): 553.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for recurrence of right colonic uncomplicated diverticulitis after first attack
    Hyoung-Chul Park, Byung Seup Kim, Kwanseop Lee, Min Jeong Kim, Bong Hwa Lee
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2014; 29(10): 1217.     CrossRef
  • Solitary Cecal Diverticulitis: An Unusual Cause of Acute Right Iliac Fossa Pain—A Case Report and Review of the Literature
    Nikolaos Mudatsakis, Marinos Nikolaou, Konstantinos Krithinakis, Michail Matalliotakis, Nikolaos Politis, Emmanouil Andreadakis
    Case Reports in Surgery.2014; 2014: 1.     CrossRef
  • Prediction and management of recurrent right colon diverticulitis
    Sun Min Park, Taek Soo Kwon, Dong Jin Kim, Yoon Suk Lee, Dae Young Cheung, Seong Taek Oh, Jun-Gi Kim, In Kyu Lee
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2014; 29(11): 1355.     CrossRef
  • Mesalamine Did Not Prevent Recurrent Diverticulitis in Phase 3 Controlled Trials
    Jeffrey B. Raskin, Michael A. Kamm, M. Mazen Jamal, Juan Márquez, Ehud Melzer, Robert E. Schoen, Tibor Szalóki, Karen Barrett, Paul Streck
    Gastroenterology.2014; 147(4): 793.     CrossRef
Surgical Resection for Lung Metastases from Colorectal Cancer
Hyung Jin Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Jae Im Lee, Sang Chul Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyu Lee, Won Kyung Kang, Hyeon-Min Cho, Seok Whan Moon, Seong Taek Oh
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(5):354-358.   Published online October 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.5.354
  • 3,734 View
  • 35 Download
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The lung is the second most common site of metastasis from colorectal cancer. Of all patients who undergo a curative resection for colorectal cancer, 10% to 15% will develop lung metastasis. As a hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases results in improved survival, many reports have suggested that a pulmonary resection of a colorectal lung metastasis would also improve survival. The aim of this study was to analyze the postoperative outcomes of and the prognostic factors for a surgical resection of a lung metastasis.

Methods

Between August 1997 and March 2006, 27 patients underwent surgical resections for colorectal lung metastases at Seoul St. Mary's hospital. A retrospective review of patients' characteristics and various tumor factors was performed.

Results

The mean interval between colorectal resection and lung metastasis was 24.0 ± 15.1 months. The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 76.5% and 22.2%, respectively. The mean follow-up after pulmonary resection was 39.5 ± 21.6 months (range, 3.3 to 115 months). Except for the existence of hilar-lymph-node metastasis (P < 0.001), no risk factors that we studied were statistically significant. Two patients had hilar-lymph-node metastasis. They survived for only for 3.3- and 11.6-months, respectively.

Conclusion

In our study, we found that a pulmonary resection for metastases from colorectal cancer may improve survival in selected patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic factors of para-aortic lymph node metastasis from colorectal cancer in highly selected patients undergoing para-aortic lymph node dissection
    Shin Emoto, Yosuke Fukunaga, Manabu Takamatsu, Hiroshi Kawachi, Shuhei Sano, Tetsuro Tominaga, Toshiki Mukai, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Toshiya Nagasaki, Takashi Akiyoshi, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Satoshi Nagayama, Masashi Ueno
    Surgery Today.2024; 54(4): 356.     CrossRef
  • Distant Lung Recurrence of Rectal Cancer 20 Years After Primary Surgery
    Sreekanthan Gobishangar, Sivakumaran Gobinath, Antony J Thanenthiran, Subramaniyam Bakeerathan
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pulmonary metastasectomy with lymphadenectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases: A systematic review
    Martijn van Dorp, Jelle Egbert Bousema, Bart Torensma, Christian Dickhoff, Frank Jozef Christiaan van den Broek, Wilhelmina Hendrika Schreurs, Michel Gonzalez, Geert Kazemier, David Jonathan Heineman
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 48(1): 253.     CrossRef
  • Safety and efficacy of combined resection of colorectal peritoneal and liver metastases
    Stephanie Downs-Canner, Yongli Shuai, Lekshmi Ramalingam, James F. Pingpank, Matthew P. Holtzman, Herbert J. Zeh, David L. Bartlett, Haroon A. Choudry
    Journal of Surgical Research.2017; 219: 194.     CrossRef
  • CT-guided percutaneous laser ablation of metastatic lung cancer: three cases report and literature review
    Qiyu Zhao, Guo Tian, Fen Chen, Liyun Zhong, Tian’an Jiang
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(2): 2187.     CrossRef
  • Simultaneous Laparoscopic Resection for Synchronous Pulmonary Metastases of Colorectal Cancers
    Byung-Kwon Ahn
    Gastroenterology & Hepatology: Open Access.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP