Annals of Coloproctology

Reviews

Colorectal cancer

Postoperative outcomes after prehabilitation for colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies: Ian Jun Yan Wee, Isaac Seow-En, Aik Yong Chok, Eileen Sim, Chee Hoe Koo, Wenjie Lin, Chang Meihuan, Emile Kwong-Wei Tan; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):191-199. Published online May 16, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01095.0156

2,348 View
193 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Citations

Purpose
Prehabilitation (PH) is purported to improve patients’ preoperative functional status. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to compare short-term postoperative outcomes between patients who underwent a protocolized PH program and the existing standard of care among colorectal cancer patients awaiting surgery.
Methods
A search in MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL was conducted to identify relevant articles. Repetitive and exhaustive combinations of MeSH search terms (“prehabilitation,” “colorectal cancer,” “colon cancer,” and “rectal cancer”) were used to identify randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing PH versus standard of care for colorectal cancer patients awaiting surgery. The primary outcomes included postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, and readmission rates.
Results
Seven studies including 1,042 colorectal cancer patients (PH, 382) were included. No significant differences were found in intraoperative outcomes. The postoperative complication rates were comparable between groups (Clavien-Dindo grades I and II: risk ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.62–1.07; P=0.15; Clavien-Dindo grades ≥III: risk ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–1.44; P=0.92). There were also no significant differences in length of hospital stay (P=0.21) or the risk of 30-day readmission (P=0.68).
Conclusion
Although PH does not appear to improve short-term postoperative outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery, the quality of evidence is impaired by the limited trials and heterogeneity. Thus, further large-scale trials are warranted to draw definitive conclusions and establish the long-term effects of PH.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Identifying and optimizing psychosocial frailty in surgical practice
Kurt S. Schultz, Caroline E. Richburg, Emily Y. Park, Ira L. Leeds
Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2024; 35(4): 101061. CrossRef

Colorectal cancer

Survival outcomes of salvage surgery in the watch-and-wait approach for rectal cancer with clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Wenjie Lin, Ian Jun Yan Wee, Isaac Seow-En, Aik Yong Chok, Emile Kwong-Wei Tan; Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):447-456. Published online December 28, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01221.0174

2,968 View
158 Download
3 Web of Science
5 Citations

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the outcomes of the watch-and-wait (WW) approach versus radical surgery (RS) in rectal cancers with clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Methods
This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. Major databases were searched to identify relevant articles. WW and RS were compared through meta-analyses of pooled proportions. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence, and distant metastasis rates. Pooled salvage surgery rates and outcomes were also collected. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was employed to assess the risk of bias.
Results
Eleven studies including 1,112 rectal cancer patients showing cCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation were included. Of these patients, 378 were treated nonoperatively with WW, 663 underwent RS, and 71 underwent local excision. The 2-year OS (risk ratio [RR], 0.95; P = 0.94), 5-year OS (RR, 2.59; P = 0.25), and distant metastasis rates (RR, 1.05; P = 0.80) showed no significant differences between WW and RS. Local recurrence was more frequent in the WW group (RR, 6.93; P < 0.001), and 78.4% of patients later underwent salvage surgery (R0 resection rate, 97.5%). The 2-year DFS (RR, 1.58; P = 0.05) and 5-year DFS (RR, 2.07; P = 0.02) were higher among RS cases. However, after adjustment for R0 salvage surgery, DFS showed no significant between-group difference (RR, 0.82; P = 0.41).
Conclusion
Local recurrence rates are higher for WW than RS, but complete salvage surgery is often possible with similar long-term outcomes. WW is a viable strategy for rectal cancer with cCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, but further research is required to improve patient selection.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Advancing Personalized Medicine in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Francesco Giulio Sullo, Alessandro Passardi, Chiara Gallio, Chiara Molinari, Giorgia Marisi, Eleonora Pozzi, Leonardo Solaini, Alessandro Bittoni
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(9): 2562. CrossRef
Tailoring rectal cancer surgery: Surgical approaches and anatomical insights during deep pelvic dissection for optimal outcomes in low‐lying rectal cancer
Youn Young Park, Nam Kyu Kim
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2024; 8(5): 761. CrossRef
Combined Transanal and Laparoscopic Approach for Full-Thickness Local Excision of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following Near-Complete Response after Chemotherapy
Joshua S. H. Lim, Si-Lin Koo, Iain Beehuat Tan, Isaac Seow-En
World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2024; 13(3): 95. CrossRef
Watch‐and‐Wait Approach Following Neoadjuvant Chemo‐Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Single‐Center Cohort Study
Georgi Kalev, Sylvia Buettner, Tianzuo Zhan, Ralf‐Dieter Hofheinz, Judit Boda‐Heggemann, Christoph Reissfelder, Steffen Seyfried, Georgi Vassilev, Julia Hardt
Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-label, Nonrandomized Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Liposomal Irinotecan With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin, Followed by Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer in a Watch-and-Wait Program
César Muñoz, María-C. Riesco Martinez, Lisardo Ugidos, Pilar García-Alfonso, Rafael Alvarez-Gallego, Paloma Peinado, Carmen Toledano, Luka Mihic-Góngora, Justo Gabriel Ortega Anselmi, Enrique Sanz Garcia, Emilio Vicente, Yolanda Quijano, Hipólito J. Durán
American Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef

Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade II/III hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Ian Jun Yan Wee, Chee Hoe Koo, Isaac Seow-En, Yvonne Ying Ru Ng, Wenjie Lin, Emile John Kwong-Wei Tan; Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(1):3-10. Published online January 3, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00598.0085

4,487 View
334 Download
8 Web of Science
14 Citations

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
This study compared the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) vs. conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) in patients with grade II/III hemorrhoids.
Methods
PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing LH against CH in grade II/III hemorrhoids. The primary outcomes included postoperative use of analgesia, postoperative morbidity (bleeding, urinary retention, pain, thrombosis), and time of return to work/daily activities.
Results
Nine studies totaling 661 patients (LH, 336 and CH, 325) were included. The LH group had shorter operative time (P<0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (P<0.001). Postoperative pain was lower in the LH group, with lower postoperative day 1 (mean difference [MD], –2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], –3.44 to –0.75; P=0.002) and postoperative day 7 (MD, –3.94; 95% CI, –6.36 to –1.52; P=0.001) visual analogue scores and use of analgesia (risk ratio [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42–0.81; P=0.001). The risk of postoperative bleeding was also lower in the LH group (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.12– 0.28; P<0.001), with a quicker return to work or daily activities (P=0.002). The 12-month risks of bleeding (P>0.999) and prolapse (P=0.240), and the likelihood of complete resolution at 12 months, were similar (P=0.240).
Conclusion
LH offers more favorable short-term clinical outcomes than CH, with reduced morbidity and pain and earlier return to work or daily activities. Medium-term symptom recurrence at 12 months was similar. Our results should be verified in future well-designed trials with larger samples.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of surgically indicated hemorrhoids in inflammatory bowel patients: a randomized comparative clinical study
Reham Zakaria, Mohamed Mahmoud Amin, Heba Alhussein Abo-Alella, Yasmine Hany Hegab
Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(1): 249. CrossRef
Best clinical practice recommendations for the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids via laser hemorrhoidoplasty: the LHP recommendations
P. C. Ambe, G. P. Martin-Martin, N. Vasas, I. Piponski, I. H. Roman, J. D. P. Hernandez, H. Ma, H.C. Lin, G. Weyand, L. Mazlan, L. J. García Flórez, K. Wolff, M. Dessily, C. Wang, V. Dobricanin, W. Yang, T. Bruketa, X.D. Zeng, S. Avdicausevic, Z.G. Zhang,
Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Quand et comment traiter des hémorroïdes
Thierry Higuero
La Presse Médicale Formation.2024; 5(1): 24. CrossRef
Spectrum of Diagnoses in Female Patients With Proctologic Symptoms Presenting to the Surgery Unit of a Tertiary Care Center
Sana Sahar, Tamjeed Gul, Muhammad Ihtesham Khan
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Precision and Power: A Comprehensive Review of Exploring the Role of Laser Treatment in Hemorrhoidal Management
Dheeraj Surya, Pankaj Gharde
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Diode laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoids: Meta-analysis
Po-Lung Cheng, Chang-Cyuan Chen, Jian-Syun Chen, Po-Li Wei, Yan-Jiun Huang
Asian Journal of Surgery.2024; 47(11): 4681. CrossRef
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty vs. rubber band ligation: a randomized trial comparing 2 mini-invasive treatment for grade II hemorrhoids
Lei Jin, Kaijian Qin, Renjie Wu, Haojie Yang, Can Cui, Zhenyi Wang, Jiong Wu
BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Quality of Life of Patients Before and After Hemorrhoid Surgery: A Single-Center Study in Vietnam
Nguyen Thi Thuy Anh, Nguyen Ngoc Huynh Nhu, Tran Ngoc Hong, Pham Thi Ly, Nguyen Thi Hong Huyen, Doan Thi Minh, Ho Tat Bang, Nguyen Trung Tin
Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Propensity-Score Matching Analysis for Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Circumferential Stapler Hemorrhoidectomy: One-Year Outcomes
Tran V Hung, Duong V Hai
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty for grade II–IV hemorrhoidal disease in Bangladesh
Md. Saiful Islam, Abhigan B. Shrestha, Faisal Chowdhury, Md. R.K. Ziko
Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(11): 6514. CrossRef
Lower pain, less itching, and faster healing after ultrasound scalpel-assisted hemorrhoidectomy using an intimate cleaner containing chlorhexidine, acid hyaluronic acid, and natural anti-inflammatories: a multicenter observational case-control study
Antonio Brillantino, Luigi Marano, Maurizio Grillo, Alessio Palumbo, Fabrizio Foroni, Luciano Vicenzo, Alessio Antropoli, Michele Lanza, Maria Laura Sandoval Sotelo, Nicola Sangiuliano, Mauro Maglio, Rosanna Filosa, Lucia Abbatiello, Maria Preziosa Romano
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 602. CrossRef
Minimally invasive laser technologies in the surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: problems and prospects (literature review)
N. D. Yartseva, L. V. Kornev, E. K. Naumov, G. V. Rodoman, L. A. Laberko
Hirurg (Surgeon).2023; (3): 20. CrossRef
Laser interventions in coloproctology. A plea for standardized treatment protocols
P. C. Ambe
Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(10): 953. CrossRef
Comments on “Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade II/III hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis”
Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Amine Gouader, Bassem Krimi, Hani Oweira
Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 442. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search