Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Varut Lohsiriwat"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Display
Original Articles
Benign proctology
Long-term outcomes after anal fistula surgery: results from two university hospitals in Thailand
Weeraput Chadbunchachai, Varut Lohsiriwat, Krisada Paonariang
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(2):133-140.   Published online June 7, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.01.06
  • 8,722 View
  • 217 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes after anal fistula surgery from university hospitals in Thailand.
Methods
A prospectively collected database of patients with cryptoglandular anal fistula undergoing surgery from 2011 to 2017 in 2 university hospitals was reviewed. Outcomes were treatment failure (persistent or recurrent fistula), fecal continence status, and chronic postsurgical pain.
Results
This study included 247 patients; 178 (72.1%) with new anal fistula and 69 (27.9%) with recurrent fistula. One hundred twenty-one patients (49.0%) had complex fistula; 53 semi-horseshoe (21.5%), 41 high transsphincteric (16.6%), 24 horseshoe (9.7%), and 3 suprasphincteric (1.2%). Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) was the most common operation performed (n=88, 35.6%) followed by fistulotomy (n=79, 32.0%). With a median follow-up of 23 months (interquartile range, 12–45 months), there were 18 persistent fistulas (7.3%) and 33 recurrent fistulae (13.4%)—accounting for 20.6% overall failure. All recurrence occurred within 24 months postoperatively. Complex fistula was the only significant predictor for recurrent fistula with a hazard ratio of 4.81 (95% confidence interval, 1.82–12.71). There was no significant difference in healing rates of complex fistulas among seton staged fistulotomy (85.0%), endorectal advancement flap (72.7%), and LIFT (65.9%) (P=0.239). Four patients (1.6%) experienced chronic postsurgical pain. Seventeen patients (6.9%) reported worse fecal continence.
Conclusion
Overall failure for anal fistula surgery was 20.6%. Complex fistula was the only predictor for recurrent fistula. At least 2-year period of follow-up is suggested for detecting recurrent diseases and assessing patient-reported outcomes such as chronic pain and continence status.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Clinical Utility of Anorectal Manometry: A Review of Current Practices
    Eleanor Aubrey Belilos, Zoë Post, Sierra Anderson, Mark DeMeo
    Gastro Hep Advances.2025; 4(2): 100562.     CrossRef
  • Mucosal advancement flap versus ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract for management of trans-sphincteric perianal fistulas in the elderly: a retrospective study
    Tamer A. A. M. Habeeb, Massimo Chiaretti, Igor A. Kryvoruchko, Antonio Pesce, Aristotelis Kechagias, Abd Al-Kareem Elias, Abdelmonem A. M. Adam, Mohamed A. Gadallah, Saad Mohamed Ali Ahmed, Ahmed Khyrallh, Mohammed H. Alsayed, Esmail Tharwat Kamel Awad, M
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Exploring Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Anal Fistulas: A Comprehensive Study
    Tudor Mateescu, Lazar Fulger, Durganjali Tummala, Aditya Nelluri, Manaswini Kakarla, Lavinia Stelea, Catalin Dumitru, George Noditi, Amadeus Dobrescu, Cristian Paleru, Ana-Olivia Toma
    Life.2023; 13(10): 2008.     CrossRef
  • Lower Fistula Recurrence with Pulling Seton: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Ahmad Izadpanah, Ali Reza Safarpour, Mohammad Rezazadehkermani, Ali Zahedian, Reza Barati-Boldaji
    Shiraz E-Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
Benign GI diease,Benign diesease & IBD,Complication
High Compliance With Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Prevention Bundle Reduces Incisional SSI After Colorectal Surgery
Varut Lohsiriwat
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(3):146-152.   Published online May 15, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.04.10.2
  • 6,274 View
  • 256 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate association between compliance with surgical site infection (SSI) prevention bundle and the development of superficial or deep incisional SSI following colorectal surgery and to evaluate the impact of incisional SSI on surgical outcomes.
Methods
A prospectively collected database of consecutive patients undergoing elective colectomy and/or proctectomy from 2011 to 2019 in a university hospital was reviewed. The association between compliance with Thailand’s SSI Prevention Bundle (10 level-1A interventions) and the incidence of incisional SSI was determined. Surgical outcomes were compared between those with incisional SSI and those without.
Results
This study included 600 patients with a median age of 64 years (range, 18–102 years). Some 126 patients (21.0%) had stoma formation and 52 (8.7%) underwent laparoscopy. The incidence of incisional SSI was 5.5% (n = 33; 32 superficial incisional SSI and 1 deep incisional SSI). Higher compliance with care bundle tended to decrease incisional SSI (P = 0.20). In multivariate analysis, compliance of 70% or more was the only dependent factor for reducing incisional SSI (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 0.99; P = 0.047). None of individual interventions were significantly associated with a lower probability of incisional SSI. Compared with counterparts, patients with incisional SSI had a 2-day longer length of postoperative stay (6 day vs. 4 day, P < 0.001) but comparable time for gastrointestinal recovery and similar rate of 30-day mortality or readmission.
Conclusion
High compliance with SSI prevention bundle (especially ≥ 70%) reduced incisional SSI after colorectal surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Surgical site infection prevention care bundles in colorectal surgery: a scoping review
    T. Cunha, S. Miguel, J. Maciel, C. Zagalo, P. Alves
    Journal of Hospital Infection.2025; 155: 221.     CrossRef
  • Empowering patients through a perioperative prevention bundle to reduce surgical site infections in colorectal surgery
    Vladimir Nikolic, Ljiljana Markovic-Denic, Stefan Kmezic, Aleksandar Radovanovic, Djordje Nektarijevic, Jelena Djokic-Kovac, Djordje Knezevic, Andrija Antic
    American Journal of Infection Control.2025; 53(7): 753.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Site Infection Prevention Using “Strike Teams”: The Experience of an Academic Colorectal Surgical Department
    Buddhi Hatharaliyadda, Michelle Schmitz, Anne Mork, Fauzia Osman, Charles Heise, Nasia Safdar, Aurora Pop-Vicas
    Journal for Healthcare Quality.2024; 46(1): 22.     CrossRef
  • Interventions to reduce surgical site infection following elective colorectal surgery: protocol for a systematic review with narrative synthesis and GRADE recommendations
    Harry Dean, Ioanna Drami, Amira Shamsiddinova, Eman Alkizwini, James Kinross, Ana Wilson, Phil Tozer, Carolynne Vaizey
    Journal of Surgical Protocols and Research Methodologies.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of a colorectal bundle in an entire healthcare region in Switzerland: results from a prospective cohort study (EvaCol study)
    Benjamin Wiesler, Robert Rosenberg, Raffaele Galli, Jürg Metzger, Mathias Worni, Mark Henschel, Mark Hartel, Christian Nebiker, Carsten T. Viehl, Alexandra Müller, Lukas Eisner, Martina Pabst, Urs Zingg, Daniel Stimpfle, Beat P. Müller, Markus von Flüe, R
    International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(12): 7763.     CrossRef
  • Information technologies for supporting prevention, diagnosis and management of surgical site infections in trauma and orthopedic patients
    Anton G. Nazarenko, Elena B. Kleimenova, Mikhail A. Dronov, Dmitry S. Gorbatyuk, Nodari M. Kakabadze, Archil V. Tsiskarashvili, Natalia P. Gerasimova, Ekaterina S. Yurchenkova, Liubov P. Yashina
    N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics.2024; 31(4): 467.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
    Jennifer L. Irani, Traci L. Hedrick, Timothy E. Miller, Lawrence Lee, Emily Steinhagen, Benjamin D. Shogan, Joel E. Goldberg, Daniel L. Feingold, Amy L. Lightner, Ian M. Paquette
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
    Jennifer L. Irani, Traci L. Hedrick, Timothy E. Miller, Lawrence Lee, Emily Steinhagen, Benjamin D. Shogan, Joel E. Goldberg, Daniel L. Feingold, Amy L. Lightner, Ian M. Paquette
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery
    Min Ki Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Strategies to Reduce Post-Hemorrhoidectomy Pain: A Systematic Review
    Varut Lohsiriwat, Romyen Jitmungngan
    Medicina.2022; 58(3): 418.     CrossRef
  • Robot-Assisted Colorectal Surgery
    Young Il Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
Review
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer
Current Colorectal Cancer in Thailand
Varut Lohsiriwat, Nopdanai Chaisomboon, Jirawat Pattana-Arun, for the Society of Colorectal Surgeons of Thailand
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(2):78-82.   Published online January 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.01.07
  • 11,238 View
  • 318 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 17 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
This article aimed to summarize the current status of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Thailand. In brief, CRC is the third most common cancer and accounts for 11% of the cancer burden in Thailand. It is the only malignancy with an increased incidence in both sexes in Thailand. Over 10,000 new CRC cases occur annually, and about 40% are rectal cancer. Due to the lack of CRC screening and public awareness, nonmetastatic cancer accounts only for 60%–70% of overall cases. The demand for general or colorectal surgeons outmatches the supply at a ratio of 1 general surgeon to 35,000 individuals. There are about 70 board-certified colorectal surgeons serving Thailand’s population of nearly 70 million. As a result, >25% of cancer patients wait more than 1 month before surgery. Regarding training for colorectal surgery, there are 3 major institutes in Bangkok providing a 2-year fellowship program. Cadaveric workshops are an important part of training – especially in laparoscopy for CRC. Recently, a population-based CRC screening program was launched using a fecal immunochemical test. The Ministry of Public Health of Thailand has established additional platforms for laparoscopy to support the potential detection of early CRC following implementation of this nationwide screening program.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective study on survival and outcomes
    Thanawin Wong, Tanawat Pattarapuntakul, Nisa Netinatsunton, Jaksin Sottisuporn, Thanapon Yaowmaneerat, Wongsakorn Chaochankit, Siriboon Attasaranya, Pimsiri Sripongpun, Naichaya Chamroonkul, Viraksakdi Chongsuvivatwong
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • New oxepin and dihydrobenzofuran derivatives from Bauhinia saccocalyx roots and their anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, and antioxidant activities
    Lueacha Tabtimmai, Thanyathon Phonchan, Natrinee Thongprik, Sutin Kaennakam, Nuttapon Yodsin, Kiattawee Choowongkomon, Chanikan Sonklin, Supachai Jadsadajerm, Awat Wisetsai
    Journal of Natural Medicines.2025; 79(3): 543.     CrossRef
  • Relationship between the protein expression of ARID1A, ARID1B and ARID2 with the clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer
    Wariya Mongkolwat, Phattarapon Sonthi, Keerakarn Somsuan, Siripat Aluksanasuwan, Ratirath Samol, Natthiya Sakulsak, Sasithorn Wanna‑Udom
    Biomedical Reports.2025; 23(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the advantage of surgeons certified by the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system participating in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection
    Naruhiko Sawada, Tomonori Akagi, Manabu Shimomura, Yukitoshi Todate, Kunihiko Nagakari, Hiroaki Takeshita, Satoshi Maruyama, Manabu Takata, Nobuki Ichikawa, Koya Hida, Hiroaki Iijima, Shigeki Yamaguchi, Akinobu Taketomi, Takeshi Naitoh
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2024; 8(3): 464.     CrossRef
  • Cost-Effectiveness of Increasing Access to Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis: Analysis From Thailand
    Peeradon Wongseree, Zeynep Hasgul, Mohammad S. Jalali
    Value in Health Regional Issues.2024; 43: 101010.     CrossRef
  • Phytochemical Profile of Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf Lemongrass Essential Oil from Northeastern Thailand and Its Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Attributes and Cytotoxic Effects on HT-29 Human Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Cells
    Vijitra Luang-In, Worachot Saengha, Thipphiya Karirat, Chadaporn Senakun, Sirithon Siriamornpun
    Foods.2024; 13(18): 2928.     CrossRef
  • Impact of a Health Promotion Program on Knowledge, Physical Health, Mental Health, and Social Health Behaviors in Individuals at Risk for Colorectal Cancer
    Surachet Fakkiew, Supat Teravecharoenchai, Panit Khemtong, Wanich Suksatan
    Societies.2024; 14(9): 182.     CrossRef
  • Cytotoxic effect of metformin on butyrate-resistant PMF-K014 colorectal cancer spheroid cells
    Kesara Nittayaboon, Kittinun Leetanaporn, Surasak Sangkhathat, Sittirak Roytrakul, Raphatphorn Navakanitworakul
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2022; 151: 113214.     CrossRef
  • Effects of polymorphisms in the MTHFR gene on 5-FU hematological toxicity and efficacy in Thai colorectal cancer patients
    Chalirmporn Atasilp, Rinradee Lenavat, Natchaya Vanwong, Phichai Chansriwong, Ekaphop Sirachainan, Thanyanan Reungwetwattana, Pimonpan Jinda, Somthawin Aiempradit, Suwannee Sirilerttrakul, Monpat Chamnanphon, Apichaya Puangpetch, Nipaporn Sankuntaw, Patom
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Characterization of Butyrate‐Resistant Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines and the Cytotoxicity of Anticancer Drugs against These Cells
    Kesara Nittayaboon, Kittinun Leetanaporn, Surasak Sangkhathat, Sittiruk Roytrakul, Raphatphorn Navakanitworakul, Krzysztof Siemianowicz
    BioMed Research International.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Audit of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in Morocco: A report of the results of a prospective multicentre cohort study
    Aya El Yaakoubi, Salma Lahmadi, Amine Benkabbou, Raouf Mohsine, Abdelkader Belkouchi, Tijani El Harroudi, Hadj Omar El Malki, Abdelmalek Hrora, Amine Souadka, Mohammed Anass Majbar
    Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2022; 80: 104290.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention of colorectal cancer
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 549.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention of Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 231.     CrossRef
  • Opioid-free analgesia: is it achievable in open colorectal surgery without neuraxial block?
    Varut LOHSIRIWAT
    Minerva Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Model of Factors Influencing Health-Related Quality of Life among Thais with Colorectal Cancer and a Permanent Colostomy
    Sukanda Bunkong, Manee Arpanantikul, Yupapin Sirapo-ngam, Supreeda Monkong, Chukiat Viwatwongkasem, Karin Olson
    Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research.2022; 27(1): 185.     CrossRef
  • Current status of IBD and surgery of Crohn's disease in Thailand
    Woramin Riansuwan, Julajak Limsrivilai
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2021; 5(5): 597.     CrossRef
  • TISSUE CLASSIFICATION FOR COLORECTAL CANCER UTILIZING TECHNIQUES OF DEEP LEARNING AND MACHINE LEARNING
    Kasikrit Damkliang, Thakerng Wongsirichot, Paramee Thongsuksai
    Biomedical Engineering: Applications, Basis and Communications.2021; 33(03): 2150022.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP