Annals of Coloproctology

Guideline

Colorectal cancer

Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment: Hyo Seon Ryu, Hyun Jung Kim, Woong Bae Ji, Byung Chang Kim, Ji Hun Kim, Sung Kyung Moon, Sung Il Kang, Han Deok Kwak, Eun Sun Kim, Chang Hyun Kim, Tae Hyung Kim, Gyoung Tae Noh, Byung-Soo Park, Hyeung-Min Park, Jeong Mo Bae, Jung Hoon Bae, Ni Eun Seo, Chang Hoon Song, Mi Sun Ahn, Jae Seon Eo, Young Chul Yoon, Joon-Kee Yoon, Kyung Ha Lee, Kyung Hee Lee, Kil-Yong Lee, Myung Su Lee, Sung Hak Lee, Jong Min Lee, Ji Eun Lee, Han Hee Lee, Myong Hoon Ihn, Je-Ho Jang, Sun Kyung Jeon, Kum Ju Chae, Jin-Ho Choi, Dae Hee Pyo, Gi Won Ha, Kyung Su Han, Young Ki Hong, Chang Won Hong, Jung-Myun Kwak, Korean Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary Committee; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):89-113. Published online April 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00059.0008

5,727 View
308 Download
8 Web of Science
9 Citations

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients’ values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Optimal extent of lymph node dissection in clinical early-stage right colon cancer: a retrospective analysis
Hyeung-min Park, Jaram Lee, Soo Young Lee, Suk Hee Heo, Yong Yeon Jeong, Hyeong Rok Kim, Chang Hyun Kim
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2025; 108(1): 49. CrossRef
Effects of Microsatellite Instability on the Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of Colon Cancer and the Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative Abdominal CT Scans
Rıdvan Yavuz, Orhan Aras, Hüseyin Çiyiltepe, Onur İlkay Dinçer, Ahmet Şükrü Alparslan, Tebessüm Çakır
Diagnostics.2025; 15(2): 190. CrossRef
Epigenetic Regulation of Nuclear Factor Erythroid-2-Related Factor 2 in Colorectal Cancer Cells Resistant to Ionizing Radiation
Kyoung Ah Kang, Jinny Park, Mei Jing Piao, Pincha Devage Sameera Madushan Fernando, Herath Mudiyanselage Udari Lakmini Herath, Herath Mudiyanselage Maheshika Madhuwanthi Senavirathna, Jung-Hwan Kim, Suk Ju Cho, Jin Won Hyun
Biomolecules & Therapeutics.2025; 33(1): 182. CrossRef
Meeting report on the 8th Asian Science Editors’ Conference and Workshop 2024
Eun Jung Park
Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 66. CrossRef
The Diagnostic Value of Virtual Colonoscopy in Colonic Diseases
İhsaniye Süer Doğan, Esin Çakmakçı Midia, Yıldıran Songür, Baki Hekimoğlu
Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory.2025; 16(1): 27. CrossRef
2023 Korean Multidisciplinary Guidelines for Colon Cancer Management: Summary of Radiological Points
Nieun Seo, Hyo Seon Ryu, Myungsu Lee, Sun Kyung Jeon, Kum Ju Chae, Joon-Kee Yoon, Kyung Su Han, Ji Eun Lee, Jae Seon Eo, Young Chul Yoon, Sung Kyung Moon, Hyun Jung Kim, Jung-Myun Kwak
Korean Journal of Radiology.2024; 25(9): 769. CrossRef
Effect of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping on Improving Diagnostic Values of CT D3 Lymph Node Staging for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Mi Sook Yun, ChangYeop Kim, In Young Lee, Su Bum Park, Dong-Hoon Shin, Gi Won Ha
Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3496. CrossRef
Nuclear medicine based multimodal molecular imaging facilitates precision medicine for gastrointestinal tumors
Jing Zhao, Fei Wang, Rong-Fu Wang
World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2024; 32(10): 727. CrossRef
Impact of Early Oral Feeding on Postoperative Outcomes after Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Soo Young Lee, Eon Chul Han
Digestive Surgery.2024; : 1. CrossRef

Technical Note

Technical tips

Introduction of extraperitoneal tunneling method: a way to secure the drain tube in the pelvic cavity after proctectomy: Sung Il Kang, Sohyun Kim, Jae Hwang Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):182-185. Published online March 25, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00073.0010

1,931 View
113 Download

Abstract PDF: The effectiveness of closed drainage tube insertion after low anterior resection has been controversial. We believe that drain tube displacement, which occurs up to 35% in real clinical practice, reduces the effectiveness of the drain tube. We report in this video a simple way to secure the drain tube in the pelvic cavity after low anterior resection and introduce a case that used the drain fixation method and treated anastomotic leakage without interventional procedure.

Original Article

Malignant disease, Rectal cancer, Functional outcomes,Colorectal cancer

The Effect of Anastomotic Leakage on the Incidence and Severity of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Patients Undergoing Proctectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis: Sungjin Kim, Sung Il Kang, So Hyun Kim, Jae-Hwang Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(5):281-290. Published online June 7, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.03.15

4,435 View
70 Download
20 Web of Science
21 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Proctectomy for the treatment of rectal cancer results in inevitable changes to bowel habits. Symptoms such as fecal incontinence, constipation, and tenesmus are collectively referred to as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Among the several risk factors that cause LARS, anastomotic leakage (AL) is a strong risk factor for permanent stoma formation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the severity of LARS and AL in patients with rectal cancer based on the LARS score and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) defecation symptom questionnaires.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer since January 2010. Patients who completed the questionnaire were classified into the AL group and control group based on medical and imaging records. Major LARS and MSKCC scores were analyzed as primary endpoints.
Results
Among the 179 patients included in this study, 37 were classified into the AL group. After propensity score matching, there were significant differences in the ratio of major LARS and MSKCC scores of the control group and AL group (ratio of major LARS: 11.1% and 37.8%, P<0.001; MSKCC score: 67.29±10.4 and 56.49±7.2, respectively, P<0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that AL was an independent factor for major LARS occurrence and MSKCC score.
Conclusion
This study showed that AL was a significant factor in the occurrence of major LARS and defecation symptoms after proctectomy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Repeated Treatments for Chronic Colorectal and Coloanal Anastomotic Leaks are Associated With a Higher Chance of a Permanent Stoma
Justin Dourado, Sameh Hany Emile, Anjelli Wignakumar, Brett Weiss, Nir Horesh, Victoria DeTrolio, Rachel Gefen, Zoe Garoufalia, Peter Rogers, Victor Strassmann, Steven D. Wexner
The American Surgeon™.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The effect of robotic surgery on low anterior resection syndrome in patients with lower rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
Lei Zhang, Chenhao Hu, Jiamian Zhao, Chenxi Wu, Zhe Zhang, Ruizhe Li, Ruihan Liu, Junjun She, Feiyu Shi
Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(4): 1912. CrossRef
Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304. CrossRef
Innovációk a colorectalis sebészetben
Balázs Bánky, András Fülöp, Viktória Bencze, Lóránd Lakatos, Petra Rozman, Attila Szijártó
Orvosi Hetilap.2024; 165(2): 43. CrossRef
Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415. CrossRef
The Diagnosis and Evolution of Patients with LARS Syndrome: A Five-Year Retrospective Study from a Single Surgery Unit
Cosmin Vasile Obleagă, Sergiu Marian Cazacu, Tiberiu Ștefăniță Țenea Cojan, Cecil Sorin Mirea, Dan Nicolae Florescu, Cristian Constantin, Mircea-Sebastian Șerbănescu, Mirela Marinela Florescu, Liliana Streba, Dragoș Marian Popescu, Ionică Daniel Vîlcea, M
Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4175. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome after radical surgical treatment of rectal cancer: interim results of a multicenter interuniversity clinical trial
A. A. Zakharenko, M. A. Belyaev, A. A. Trushin, A. A. Svechkova, I. A. Paltyshev, A. Kh. Khamid, O. A. Ten, T. V. Kupenskaya, M. V. Zavgorodnyaya, I. A. Filatova, F. Ya. Dzhafarzadeh, K. I. Vladimirova, N. M. Guseinova, L. A. Khamid, Ya. O. Baskova, Z. U.
The Scientific Notes of the Pavlov University.2024; 31(4): 55. CrossRef
Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life
Angelina Di Re, Salam Tooza, Jason Diab, Charbel Karam, Mina Sarofim, Kevin Ooi, Catherine Turner, Daniel Kozman, David Blomberg, Matthew Morgan
Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 395. CrossRef
The status of low anterior resection syndrome: data from a single-center in China
Jing Su, Qianhui Liu, Dagui Zhou, Xiaofeng Yang, Guiru Jia, Lijun Huang, Xiao Tang, Jiafeng Fang
BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome: is it predictable?
Dong Hyun Kang
Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 373. CrossRef
Validation of low anterior resection syndrome score in Brazil with Portuguese
Kelly C.L.R. Buzatti, Andy Petroianu, Søren Laurberg, Rodrigo G. Silva, Beatriz D.S. Rodrigues, Peter Christensen, Antonio Lacerda-Filho, Therese Juul
Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 402. CrossRef
Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252. CrossRef
How Can We Improve the Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?
Jeonghee Han
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer
Gyoung Tae Noh
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
Hyun Gu Lee
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Early vs. standard reversal ileostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
N. J. O’Sullivan, H. C. Temperley, T. S. Nugent, E. Z. Low, D. O. Kavanagh, J. O. Larkin, B. J. Mehigan, P. H. McCormick, M. E. Kelly
Techniques in Coloproctology.2022; 26(11): 851. CrossRef
A predictive nomogram model for low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer resection
Mingfang Yan, Zhenmeng Lin, Zhiying Wu, Huizhe Zheng, Meiqin Shi
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2022; 92(12): 3224. CrossRef
Recycling of Iron Slag Waste in the Production of Ceramic Roof Tiles
M. M. Ahmed, K. A. M. El Naggar, M. F. Abadir, W. Abbas, E. M. Abdel Hamid, Ajaya Kumar Singh
Journal of Chemistry.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Current Management
Seung Mi Yeo, Gyung Mo Son
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The watch-and-wait strategy versus radical resection for rectal cancer patients with a good response (≤ycT2) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(6): 350. CrossRef
Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review
Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164. CrossRef

Editorial

Rectal cancer,Benign diesease & IBD,Complication,Surgical technique

Effort to Improve Rectal Anastomosis: the Triple-Stapled Technique for Rectal Anastomosis: Sung Il Kang; Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(1):1-2. Published online February 28, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.02.25

3,316 View
99 Download
2 Web of Science
2 Citations

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Double-row staple technology versus triple-row staple technology for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Tyler McKechnie, Victoria Shi, Elena Huang, Bright Huo, Aristithes Doumouras, Nalin Amin, Cagla Eskicioglu, Dennis Hong
Surgery.2024; 176(3): 633. CrossRef
The effect of circular stapler size on anastomotic stricture formation in colorectal surgery: A propensity score matched study
Kil-yong Lee, Jaeim Lee, Youn Young Park, Hyung-Jin Kim, Seong Taek Oh, Fabrizio D’Acapito
PLOS ONE.2023; 18(10): e0287595. CrossRef

Case Report

Malignant disease

Abdominopelvic Actinomycosis Mimicking Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Case Report: Sungjin Kim, Sung Il Kang, Sohyun Kim, Min Hye Jang, Jae Hwang Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(6):417-420. Published online November 13, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.11.07

4,015 View
143 Download
1 Web of Science
2 Citations

Abstract PDF

Actinomycosis is a rare chronic bacterial infection primarily caused by Actinomyces israelii. A 47-year-old woman presented to our clinic with a 1-week history of lower abdominal pain. Preoperative imaging studies revealed multiple peritoneal and pelvic masses suggestive of malignancy. The primary tumor could not be identified despite further endoscopic and gynecological evaluation. On exploration for tissue confirmation, excisional biopsies from multiple masses were performed because complete excision was not possible. Histopathological examination confirmed actinomycosis with multiple abscesses, and the patient was treated with antibiotics. We present a case of disseminated peritoneal actinomycosis that mimicked malignant peritoneal carcinomatosis on imaging studies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Carcinomatosis peritoneal, como medirla
A. Mesa Álvarez, M. da Silva Torres, A. Fernández del Valle, A. Cernuda García, E. Turienzo Santos, L. Sanz Álvarez
Radiología.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Abdominopelvic Actinomycosis—The Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge of the Most Misdiagnosed Disease
Alin Mihai Vasilescu, Eugen Târcoveanu, Cristian Lupascu, Mihaela Blaj, Corina Lupascu Ursulescu, Costel Bradea
Life.2022; 12(3): 447. CrossRef

Original Articles

Discrepancy of Medical Terminology Regarding Colorectal Surgery Between South and North Korea: Dayoung Ko, Heung-Kwon Oh, Jangwhan Jo, Hyun Hui Yang, Min-Hyun Kim, Myung Jo Kim, Sung Il Kang, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang; Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(5):248-252. Published online October 31, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.01

4,433 View
106 Download
2 Web of Science
2 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
We aimed to investigate the extent of heterogeneity in medical terminology between South and North Korea by comparing medical terms related to the colorectal system.
Methods
North Korean medical terms were collected from the sections on diseases of the small intestine and colon in a surgery textbook from North Korea, and those terms were compared with their corresponding terms in a South Korean medical terminology textbook. The terms were categorized as either identical, similar, showing disparity, or not used in South Korea. In a subsection analysis, the terms were allocated to pathophysiology, diagnosis, symptoms and examination, drugs, testing, treatment, or others according to the categorization used in the textbook.
Results
We found 705 terms in the North Korean textbook, most of which were pathophysiological terms (206, 29.2%), followed by diagnostic terms (165, 23.4%) and symptom and examination terms (122, 17.3%). Treatment-, drug-, and testing-related terms constituted 15.5%, 5.8%, and 4.1% of the 705 terms, respectively. There were 331 identical terms (47.0%) and 146 similar terms (20.7%); 126 terms (17.9%) showed disparity. Another 102 terms (14.5%) were not used in South Korea. The pathophysiological terms were the least heterogeneous, with 61.2% being identical terms used in both countries. However, 26.8% of the terms in the drug category were not used in South Korea.
Conclusion
The present study showed that less than 50% of the terms for the colorectal system used in South and North Korea were identical. As the division between South and North Korea persists, the heterogeneity of medical terminology is expected to increase.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Characteristics and Distribution of Surgical Diseases in North Korean Research Papers Published between 2006 and 2017
Yo Han Lee, Namkee Oh, Hyerim Kim, Shin Ha
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Assessing the pharmacy students’ knowledge of common medical terms after a curricular change in Saudi Arabia
Yazed AlRuthia, Monira Alwhaibi, Haya Almalag, Hadeel Alkofide, Bander Balkhi, Amani Almejel, Fahad Alshammari, Fawaz Alharbi, Ibrahim Sales, Yousif Asiri
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal.2020; 28(6): 763. CrossRef

Transmissibility of the Campaign for Colorectal Cancer Awareness in Korea Among Twitter Users: Keun Chul Lee, Heung-Kwon Oh, Gibeom Park, SoHyun Park, Bongwon Suh, Woo Kyung Bae, Jin Won Kim, Hyuk Yoon, Myung Jo Kim, Sung-Il Kang, Il Tae Son, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang; Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(5):184-189. Published online October 31, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.5.184

5,792 View
52 Download
11 Web of Science
11 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The Korean Society of Coloproctology holds its annual colorectal awareness month every September. This study analyzed the users and the contents of Korean tweets regarding colorectal cancer and estimated the transmissibility of the awareness campaign among Twitter users.

Methods

Prospective data collection was employed to accumulate Korean tweets containing the keywords "colorectal cancer," "colorectal cancer awareness campaign," "gold ribbon," and/or "love handle," from August 1 to September 30, 2014. Twitter users and contents were analyzed, and the credibility of information-sharing tweets throughout the study period was evaluated.

Results

In total, 10,387 tweets shared by 1,452 unique users were analyzed. As for users, 57.8% were individuals whereas 5.8% were organizations/communities; spambots accounted for a considerable percentage (36.4%). As for content, most tweets were spam (n = 8,736, 84.1%), repetitively advertising unverified commercial folk remedies, followed by tweets that shared information (n = 1,304, 12.6%) and non-information (n = 347, 3.3%). In the credibility assessment, only 80.6% of the information-sharing tweets were medically correct. After spam tweets had been excluded, a significant increase was seen in the percentage of information-sharing tweets (77.1% to 81.1%, P = 0.045) during the awareness campaign month.

Conclusion

Most Korean tweets regarding colorectal cancer during the study months were commercial spam tweets; informative public tweets accounted for an extremely small percentage. The transmissibility of the awareness campaign among Twitter users was questionable at best. To expand the reach of credible medical information on colorectal cancer, public health institutions and organizations must pay greater attention to social media.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Public effect of the 2022 Colorectal Cancer Awareness Campaign delivered through a metaverse platform
Tae-Gyun Lee, Gil-Hyeon Song, Hong-min Ahn, Heung-Kwon Oh, Moonkyoung Byun, Eon Chul Han, Sohyun Kim, Chang Woo Kim, Hye Jin Kim, Samin Hong, Kee-Ho Song, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Beom Cho
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(2): 145. CrossRef
Perspectives and Experiences of Patients With Thyroid Cancer at a Global Level: Retrospective Descriptive Study of Twitter Data
Sununtha Meksawasdichai, Tassanee Lerksuthirat, Boonsong Ongphiphadhanakul, Chutintorn Sriphrapradang
JMIR Cancer.2023; 9: e48786. CrossRef
Network’s reciprocity: a key determinant of information diffusion over Twitter
Mahima Gupta, Tripti Ghosh Sharma, Vinu Cheruvil Thomas
Behaviour & Information Technology.2022; 41(11): 2355. CrossRef
Are social networks effective in promoting healthy behaviors? A systematic review of evaluations of public health campaigns broadcast on Twitter
Mireia Faus, Francisco Alonso, Arash Javadinejad, Sergio A. Useche
Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The value of health awareness days, weeks and months: A systematic review
Erin Vernon, Zachary Gottesman, Raechel Warren
Social Science & Medicine.2021; 268: 113553. CrossRef
Use of Social Media to Promote Cancer Screening and Early Diagnosis: Scoping Review
Ruth Plackett, Aradhna Kaushal, Angelos P Kassianos, Aaron Cross, Douglas Lewins, Jessica Sheringham, Jo Waller, Christian von Wagner
Journal of Medical Internet Research.2020; 22(11): e21582. CrossRef
Diffusion of blockchain technology
Purva Grover, Arpan Kumar Kar, Marijn Janssen
Journal of Enterprise Information Management.2019; 32(5): 735. CrossRef
The impact of social media on citation rates in coloproctology
J. W. Jeong, M. J. Kim, H.‐K. Oh, S. Jeong, M. H. Kim, J. R. Cho, D.‐W. Kim, S.‐B. Kang
Colorectal Disease.2019; 21(10): 1175. CrossRef
Social media and colorectal cancer: A systematic review of available resources
Gianluca Pellino, Constantinos Simillis, Shengyang Qiu, Shahnawaz Rasheed, Sarah Mills, Oliver Warren, Christos Kontovounisios, Paris P. Tekkis, Deanna J. Attai
PLOS ONE.2017; 12(8): e0183031. CrossRef
Disease-specific hashtags and the creation of Twitter medical communities in hematology and oncology
Naveen Pemmaraju, Michael A. Thompson, Muzaffar Qazilbash
Seminars in Hematology.2017; 54(4): 189. CrossRef
How Can We Ameliorate the Role of Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month?
Weon-Young Chang
Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(5): 160. CrossRef

Use of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment to Predict Short-Term Postoperative Outcome in Elderly Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Yoon Hyun Lee, Heung-Kwon Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Myong Hoon Ihn, Jee Hyun Kim, Il Tae Son, Sung Il Kang, Gwang Il Kim, Soyeon Ahn, Sung-Bum Kang; Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(5):161-169. Published online October 31, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.5.161

5,394 View
60 Download
37 Web of Science
30 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

This study was conducted to identify the effectiveness of a preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for predicting postoperative morbidity in elderly patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer.

Methods

Elderly patients (≥70 years old) who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer at a tertiary hospital in Korea were identified, and their cases were analyzed using data from a prospectively collected database to establish an association between major postsurgical complications and 'high-risk' patient as defined by the CGA.

Results

A total of 240 patients, with a mean age of 76.7 ± 5.2 years, were enrolled. Ninety-five patients (39.6%) were classified as "high-risk" and 99 patients (41.3%) as having postoperative complications. The univariate analysis indicated that risk factors for postoperative complications were age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, serum hemoglobin, carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer stage, and "high-risk" status. The multivariable analyses indicated that "high-risk" status (odds ratio, 2.107; 95% confidence interval, 1.168–3.804; P = 0.013) and elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (odds ratio, 2.561; 95% confidence interval, 1.346–4.871, P = 0.004) were independently associated with postoperative complications. A multivariable analysis of the individual CGA domains indicated that high comorbidities and low activities of daily living were significantly related with postoperative complications.

Conclusion

A preoperative CGA indicating "high-risk" was associated with major postoperative complications in elderly patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer. Thus, using the CGA to identify elderly colorectal-cancer patients who should be given more care during postoperative management may be clinically beneficial.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Comorbidity assessment methods and their significance in predicting the results of treatment of older patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries for cancer – A scoping review
Urszula Skorus-Zadęcka, Apolonia Miążek, Natalia Zmysłowska, Kuba Kupniewski, Jakub Kenig
Cancer Epidemiology.2024; 91: 102597. CrossRef
Postoperative Delirium in Patients Receiving Hip Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures: The Risk Factors and Further Clinical Outcomes
Deng Horng Lee, Chih-Hsun Chang, Chih-Wei Chang, Yi-Chen Chen, Ta-Wei Tai
The Journal of Arthroplasty.2023; 38(4): 737. CrossRef
Postoperative Outcomes in Elderly Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Preoperative Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Emily Au, Gowtham Thangathurai, Aparna Saripella, Ellene Yan, Marina Englesakis, Mahesh Nagappa, Frances Chung
Anesthesia & Analgesia.2023; 136(6): 1016. CrossRef
The association of blood biomarkers with treatment response and adverse health outcomes in older patients with solid tumors: A systematic review
Yara van Holstein, P. Janne E. van den Berkmortel, Stella Trompet, Diana van Heemst, Frederiek van den Bos, Marieke Roemeling-van Rhijn, Nienke A. de Glas, Marian Beekman, P. Eline Slagboom, Johanneke E.A. Portielje, Simon P. Mooijaart, Barbara C. van Mun
Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2023; 14(7): 101567. CrossRef
Differential use of postoperative psychosocial and physical services among older adults with head and neck cancer
Gabriel T. Raab, Daniel Restifo, Amy L. Tin, Andrew J. Vickers, Sean M. McBride, Richard J. Wong, Nancy Y. Lee, Kaveh Zakeri, Armin Shahrokni
Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2023; 14(8): 101609. CrossRef
An evaluation of postoperative outcomes and treatment changes after frailty screening and geriatric assessment and management in a cohort of older patients with colorectal cancer
Stijn H.J. Ketelaers, Anne Jacobs, Carolien M.J. van der Linden, Grard A.P. Nieuwenhuijzen, Jip L. Tolenaar, Harm J.T. Rutten, Jacobus W.A. Burger, Johanne G. Bloemen
Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2023; 14(8): 101647. CrossRef
Incidence of delirium in older people with cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Francisco Miguel Martínez-Arnau, Cristina Buigues, Pilar Pérez-Ros
European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2023; 67: 102457. CrossRef
Short- and long-term survival after curative resection for colorectal cancer in nonagenarian patients
Shintaro Hashimoto, Kiyoaki Hamada, Yorihisa Sumida, Masato Araki, Kouki Wakata, Tota Kugiyama, Ayako Shibuya, Masato Nishimuta, Shigeyuki Morino, Masayuki Baba, Soichiro Kiya, Keisuke Ozeki, Akihiro Nakamura
Asian Journal of Surgery.2022; 45(1): 208. CrossRef
Use of the comprehensive geriatric assessment for the prediction of postoperative complications in elderly patients with head and neck cancer
Seung Hoon Han, Deuktae Cho, Ramla Mohammad, Young Ho Jung, Soon‐Hyun Ahn, Wonjae Cha, Woo‐Jin Jeong
Head & Neck.2022; 44(3): 672. CrossRef
Geriatric approach to the treatment of senile patients with colorectal cancer
V. M. Nekoval, S. K. Efetov, P. V. Tsarkov
Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council.2022; (21-2): 72. CrossRef
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Associations of Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medication With Adverse Outcomes in Older Cancer Patients
Li-Ju Chen, Kira Trares, Dana Clarissa Laetsch, Thi Ngoc Mai Nguyen, Hermann Brenner, Ben Schöttker, Anne Newman
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A.2021; 76(6): 1044. CrossRef
Frailty screening by Geriatric-8 and 4-meter gait speed test is feasible and predicts postoperative complications in elderly colorectal cancer patients
Stan A.M. Bessems, Joop L.M. Konsten, Jeroen F.J. Vogelaar, Reka Csepán-Magyar, Huub A.A.M. Maas, Yes A.J. van de Wouw, Maryska L.G. Janssen-Heijnen
Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2021; 12(4): 592. CrossRef
Integration of geriatric assessment into clinical oncology practice: A scoping review
George N. Okoli, Morgan Stirling, Florentin Racovitan, Otto LT Lam, Viraj K. Reddy, Leslie Copstein, Tina Hsu, Ahmed M. Abou-Setta, David E. Dawe
Current Problems in Cancer.2021; 45(3): 100699. CrossRef
Associations between the Geriatric-8 and 4-meter gait speed test and subsequent delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients with colon cancer
K. Beukers, S.A.M. Bessems, A.J. van de Wouw, F.W.P.J. van den Berkmortel, H.J. Belgers, J.L.M. Konsten, W.M.W.H. Sipers, M.L.G. Janssen-Heijnen
Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2021; 12(8): 1166. CrossRef
Geriatric principles for patients with cancer
Ana Patricia Navarrete-Reyes, Karla Animas-Mijangos, Jimena Gómez-Camacho, Yoselin Juárez-Carrillo, Ana Cristina Torres-Pérez, Daniela Josefina Cataneo-Piña, Juan Pablo Negrete-Najar, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Association Between Chronologic Age and Geriatric Assessment–Identified Impairments: Findings From the CARE Registry
Smith Giri, Mustafa Al-Obaidi, Alice Weaver, Kelly M. Kenzik, Andrew McDonald, Deanna Clark, Crystal Young-Smith, Ravi Paluri, Lakshmin Nandagopal, Olumide Gbolahan, Mackenzi Pergolotti, Smita Bhatia, Grant R. Williams
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.2021; 19(8): 922. CrossRef
Association of Polypharmacy with Colorectal Cancer Survival Among Older Patients
Li-Ju Chen, Thi Ngoc Mai Nguyen, Jenny Chang-Claude, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner, Ben Schöttker
The Oncologist.2021; 26(12): e2170. CrossRef
A novel geriatric assessment tool that predicts postoperative complications in older adults with cancer
YaoYao Pollock, Chiao-Li Chan, Karen Hall, Michael Englesbe, Kathleen M. Diehl, Lillian Min
Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2020; 11(5): 866. CrossRef
Cognitive impairment assessment and interventions to optimize surgical patient outcomes
Tasneem F. Hasan, Roger E. Kelley, Elyse M. Cornett, Richard D. Urman, Alan D. Kaye
Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology.2020; 34(2): 225. CrossRef
Frailty is a better predictor than age for outcomes in geriatric patients with rectal cancer undergoing proctectomy
Samuel M. Miller, J. Wolf, M. Katlic, C.R. D'Adamo, J. Coleman, V. Ahuja
Surgery.2020; 168(3): 504. CrossRef
Does Preoperative Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Frailty Predict Postoperative Complications?
Rana Tuna Dogrul, Ahmet Bulent Dogrul, Ali Konan, Omur Caglar, Fatih Sumer, Hatice Caliskan, Muhammet Cemal Kizilarslanoglu, Mustafa Kemal Kilic, Cafer Balci, Gunes Arik, Gozde Sengul Aycicek, Cemile Ozsurekci, Meltem Halil, Mustafa Cankurtaran, Burcu Bal
World Journal of Surgery.2020; 44(11): 3729. CrossRef
Effect of Age on Laparoscopic Surgery and Postoperative Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Colorectal Cancer
Hyun Hee Kim, Myong Hoon Ihn, Yun Hee Lee, Jihyoun Lee, Sangchul Yun, Sung Woo Cho
Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(4): 229. CrossRef
Functional status in a geriatric oncology setting: A review
Anne-Laure Couderc, Rabia Boulahssass, Emilie Nouguerède, Nirvina Gobin, Olivier Guérin, Patrick Villani, Fabrice Barlesi, Elena Paillaud
Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2019; 10(6): 884. CrossRef
A multicomponent prehabilitation pathway to reduce the incidence of delirium in elderly patients in need of major abdominal surgery: study protocol for a before-and-after study
Ties L. Janssen, Christina A. Mosk, Chantal C. H. A. van Hoof-de Lepper, Daphne Wielders, Tom C. J. Seerden, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Adriaan J. van Gammeren, Dominique C. de Lange, René van Alphen, Martine van der Zee, René M. de Bruijn, Jolanda de Vries, Ja
BMC Geriatrics.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical approach and geriatric evaluation for elderly patients with colorectal cancer
Marco Vacante, Erika Cristaldi, Francesco Basile, Antonio Maria Borzì, Antonio Biondi
Updates in Surgery.2019; 71(3): 411. CrossRef
Preventing Treatment-Related Functional Decline: Strategies to Maximize Resilience
Armin Shahrokni, Koshy Alexander, Tanya M. Wildes, Martine T. E. Puts
American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book.2018; (38): 415. CrossRef
Value of geriatric screening and assessment in predicting postoperative complications in patients older than 70 years undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer
Katleen Fagard, Julie Casaer, Albert Wolthuis, Johan Flamaing, Koen Milisen, Jean-Pierre Lobelle, Hans Wildiers, Cindy Kenis
Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2017; 8(5): 320. CrossRef
Polypharmacy in Older Adults with Cancer: Evaluating Polypharmacy as Part of the Geriatric Assessment
Ginah Nightingale, Emily Skonecki, Manpreet K. Boparai
Current Geriatrics Reports.2017; 6(4): 219. CrossRef
Socioeconomic disparities and comorbidities, not race, affect salivary gland malignancy survival outcomes
Ayaka J. Iwata, Amy M. Williams, Andrew R. Taylor, Steven S. Chang
The Laryngoscope.2017; 127(11): 2545. CrossRef
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Caring for the Older Person with Cancer
Janine Overcash, Mary Alice Momeyer
Seminars in Oncology Nursing.2017; 33(4): 440. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search