Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Articles

Short-term Outcomes of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery vs. Open Surgery on Right Colon Cancer: A Case-Controlled Study: Jae-Hoon Sim, Eun-Joo Jung, Chun-Geun Ryu, Jin Hee Paik, Gangmi Kim, Su Ran Kim, Dae-Yong Hwang; Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(2):72-76. Published online April 30, 2013; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.2.72

10,369 View
46 Download
14 Citations

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes by comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for right colon cancer.

Methods

Sixteen patients who underwent a hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (HAL-RHC group) and 33 patients who underwent a conventional open right hemicolectomy (open group) during the same period were enrolled in this study with a case-controlled design.

Results

The operation time was 217 minutes in the HAL-RHC group and 213 minutes in the open group (P = 0.389). The numbers of retrieved lymph nodes were similar between the two groups (31 in the HAL-RHC group and 36 in the open group, P = 0.737). Also, there were no significant difference in the incidence of immediate postoperative leukocytosis, the administration of additional pain killers, and the postoperative recovery parameters. First flatus was shown on postoperative days 3.5 in the HAL-RHC group and 3.4 in the open group (P = 0.486). Drinking water and soft diet were started on postoperative days 4.8 and 5.9, respectively, in the HAL-RHC group and similarly 4.6 and 5.6 in the open group (P = 0.402 and P = 0.551). The duration of hospital stay was shorter in the HAL-RHC group than in the open group (10.3 days vs. 13.5 days, P = 0.048). No significant difference in the complication rates was shown between the two groups, and no postoperative mortality was encountered in either group.

Conclusion

The patients with right colon cancer in the HAL-RHC group had similar pathologic and postoperative recovery parameters to those of the patients in the open group. The patients in the HAL-RHC group had shorter hospital stays than those in the open group. Therefore, hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer is feasible.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Evaluating the learning curves and surgical outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer: A retrospective analysis from a National Registry
Yunxiao Liu, Xu Guan, Qing Xu, Taiyuan Li, Yangchun Zheng, Chuangang Fu, Sergey Efetov, Xishan Wang, Guiyu Wang
Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Is Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation Really Necessary for All Patients With Right-Sided Colon Cancer?
Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyeon-Min Cho, Je-Ho Jang, Chang-Nam Kim, Kil Yeon Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 434. CrossRef
A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer
Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Mohamed Wejih Dougaz, Meriem Mesbehi, Hichem Jerraya, Ramzi Nouira, Jim S. Khan, Chadli Dziri
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic right-sided colon resection for colon cancer—has the control group so far been chosen correctly?
Jörg O. W. Pelz, Johanna Wagner, Sven Lichthardt, Johannes Baur, Caroline Kastner, Niels Matthes, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Armin Wiegering
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Hand-assisted Laparoscopy: Expensive but Considerable Step Between Laparoscopic and Open Colectomy
Baris Gulcu, Ozgen Isik, Ersin Ozturk, Tuncay Yilmazlar
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2018; 28(4): 214. CrossRef
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer
Xubing Zhang, Qingbin Wu, Chaoyang Gu, Tao Hu, Liang Bi, Ziqiang Wang
Medicine.2017; 96(33): e7794. CrossRef
Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and conventional laparotomy in patients with colorectal cancer: Final results from a single center
Takayuki Tajima, Masaya Mukai, Daiki Yokoyama, Shigeo Higami, Shuji Uda, Sayuri Hasegawa, Eiji Nomura, Sotaro Sadahiro, Seiei Yasuda, Hiroyasu Makuuchi
Oncology Letters.2017; 13(6): 4953. CrossRef
Hand‐assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery with double‐glove technique
Hernán Vaccarezza, Axel Sahovaler, Víctor Im, Gustavo Rossi, Carlos Vaccaro
Surgical Practice.2016; 20(3): 124. CrossRef
Laparoscopic resection of right colon cancer—a matched pairs analysis
M. Zimmermann, C. Benecke, C. Jung, M. Hoffmann, J. Nolde, E. Schlöricke, H. P. Bruch, T. Keck, T. Laubert
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2016; 31(7): 1291. CrossRef
Comparative Study on Therapeutic Efficacy Between Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery and Conventional Laparotomy for Acute Obstructive Right-Sided Colon Cancer
Zhengrong Li, Daojiang Li, Zhigang Jie, Guoyang Zhang, Yi Liu
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2015; 25(7): 548. CrossRef
Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for rectal cancer: Interim results from a single center
TAKAYUKI TAJIMA, MASAYA MUKAI, WATARU NOGUCHI, SHIGEO HIGAMI, SHUUJI UDA, SOUICHIROU YAMAMOTO, SAYURI HASEGAWA, EIJI NOMURA, SOTARO SADAHIRO, SEIEI YASUDA, HIROYASU MAKUUCHI
Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2015; 3(3): 533. CrossRef
Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy: a prospective study
JiaQing Gong, YongKuan Cao, YunMing Li, GuoHu Zhang, PeiHong Wang, GuoDe Luo
Surgical Endoscopy.2014; 28(10): 2998. CrossRef
Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for colorectal cancer: Interim results from a single institution
TAKAYUKI TAJIMA, MASAYA MUKAI, MASASHI YAMAZAKI, SHIGEO HIGAMI, SOUICHIROU YAMAMOTO, SAYURI HASEGAWA, EIJI NOMURA, SOTARO SADAHIRO, SEIEI YASUDA, HIROYASU MAKUUCHI
Oncology Letters.2014; 8(2): 627. CrossRef
Should Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Be Placed in the Realm of Minimally Invasive Surgery?
Hungdai Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(2): 42. CrossRef

Incidence and Multiplicities of Adenomatous Polyps in TNM Stage I Colorectal Cancer in Korea: Young-Sang Hong, Eun-Joo Jung, Chun-Geun Ryu, Gang-Mi Kim, Su-Ran Kim, Sung-Noh Hong, Dae-Yong Hwang; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(4):213-218. Published online August 31, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.4.213

4,749 View
41 Download
2 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

In recent years, the incidence of early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) has markedly increased in the population within the Republic of Korea. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic features of adenomatous polyps in TNM stage I CRC patients and in the general population.

Methods

Between March 2003 and September 2009, 168 patients with stage I CRC were enrolled in this study. In addition, the records of 4,315 members of the general population without CRC, as determined by colonoscopy during a health check-up, were reviewed.

Results

Of the 168 patients with stage I CRC, 68 (40.5%) had coexisting colorectal adenomatous polyps and of the 4,315 members of the general population, 1,112 (26.0%) had coexisting adenomatous polyps (P = 0.006). The prevalences of adenomatous polyp multiplicity in early CRC and in the general population were 32% and 15%, respectively (P = 0.023). Patients with coexisting adenomatous polyps had a higher frequency of tubulovillous or villous adenomas than members of the general population with polyps (7.5% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.037). Furthermore, a subgroup analysis showed that the occurrence (44% vs. 34%, P = 0.006) and the multiplicity (32% vs. 15%, P = 0.023) of adenomatous polyps were greater for T2 than T1 cancer.

Conclusion

The prevalence and the multiplicity of adenomatous polyps in TNM stage I CRC is higher than it is in the general population. The findings of this study suggest that depth of invasion of early stage CRC affects the prevalence and the number of adenomatous polyps in the remaining colon and rectum.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Treatment of cancer in tubular villous colorectal adenomas
O.I. Kit, Yu.A. Gevorkyan, N.V. Soldatkina, V.M. Legostaev, E.N. Kolesnikov, O.K. Bondarenko, E.N. Mironenko, D.S. Petrov
Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery.2025; (9): 29. CrossRef
Risk factors of recurrence in TNM stage I colorectal cancer
Jin-Hee Paik, Chun-Geun Ryu, Dae-Yong Hwang
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(5): 281. CrossRef

Case Report

Oxaliplatin-induced Pulmonary Fibrosis: Two Case Reports: Chun-Geun Ryu, Eun-Joo Jung, Gangmi Kim, Su Ran Kim, Dae-Yong Hwang; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(5):266-269. Published online October 31, 2011; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.266

5,328 View
32 Download
8 Citations

Abstract PDF

Oxaliplatin with infusional 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FOLFOX regimen) is the one of the standard chemotherapy regimens for treating a colorectal carcinoma. The most common side effects include neutropenia, diarrhea, vomiting and peripheral neuropathy, and these are moderate and manageable. However, pulmonary toxicity is rarely reported to be associated with the FOLFOX regimen. Moreover, there is no established guideline for the management of this side effect. Here, along with a literature review, we report two cases of rapidly developing pulmonary fibrosis related to the use of the FOLFOX regimen in patients with colorectal carcinomas.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The intervention of B. longum metabolites in Fnevs' carcinogenic capacity: A potential double-edged sword
Jingyu Xu, Xinyu Wu, Luyi Yang, Xiaoxi Xu
Experimental Cell Research.2025; 445(1): 114407. CrossRef
Oxaliplatin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Rare but Fatal Reality
Kinnera Sahithi Urlapu, Dmitry Lvovsky
Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Pulmonary Fibrosis Secondary to Oxaliplatin Treatment: From Rarity to Reality: A Case Study and Literature Review
Ana C. Moreira, João Portela, Carlos Couto, José Duarte, Natália Martins, Jorge Soares
Oncology and Therapy.2020; 8(2): 183. CrossRef
A case report of acute pulmonary hypertension after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and review of the literature
Thomas S. Zajonz, Michael Sander, Winfried Padberg, Andreas Hecker, Ruediger Hörbelt, Christian Koch, Emmanuel Schneck
Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2018; 27: 26. CrossRef
Prognosis and treatment of FOLFOX therapy related interstitial pneumonia: a plea for multimodal immune modulating therapy in the respiratory insufficient patient
Annick De Weerdt, Amélie Dendooven, Annemie Snoeckx, Jan Pen, Martin Lammens, Philippe G. Jorens
BMC Cancer.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Oxaliplatin-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity in Gastrointestinal Malignancies: Two Case Reports and Review of the Literature
Mor Moskovitz, Mira Wollner, Nissim Haim
Case Reports in Oncological Medicine.2015; 2015: 1. CrossRef
Pulmonary Fibrosis Secondary to FOLFOX Chemotherapy: A Case Report
Wai Cheong Soon, Kate West, David Gibeon, Elizabeth Frances Bowen
Case Reports in Oncology.2014; 7(3): 662. CrossRef
Granulomatous Lung Disease Requiring Mechanical Ventilation Induced by a Single Application of Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: A Case Report
Dane Wildner, Frank Boxberger, Axel Wein, Kerstin Wolff, Heinz Albrecht, Gudrun Männlein, Rolf Janka, Kerstin Amann, Jürgen Siebler, Werner Hohenberger, Markus F. Neurath, Richard Strauß
Case Reports in Oncological Medicine.2013; 2013: 1. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search