Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
8 "Rumi Shin"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Benign GI diease
Surgical Management of Sigmoid Volvulus: A Multicenter Observational Study
Keunchul Lee, Heung-Kwon Oh, Jung Rae Cho, Minhyun Kim, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Hyung-Jin Kim, Hyoung-Chul Park, Rumi Shin, Seung Chul Heo, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Kyu Joo Park, Seoul Colorectal Research Group (SECOG)
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(6):403-408.   Published online December 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.03.23
  • 4,146 View
  • 152 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes from surgically treated patients for sigmoid volvulus.
Methods
Five tertiary centers participated in this retrospective study with data collected from October 2003 through September 2018, including demographic information, preoperative clinical data, and information on laparoscopic/open and elective/emergency procedures. Outcome measurements included operation time, postoperative hospitalization, and postoperative morbidity.
Results
Among 74 patients, sigmoidectomy was the most common procedure (n = 46), followed by Hartmann’s procedure (n = 23), and subtotal colectomy (n = 5). Emergency surgery was performed in 35 cases (47.3%). Of the 35 emergency patients, 34 cases (97.1%) underwent open surgery, and a stoma was established for 26 patients (74.3%). Elective surgery was performed in 39 cases (52.7%), including 21 open procedures (53.8%), and 18 laparoscopic surgeries (46.2%). Median laparoscopic operation time was 180 minutes, while median open surgery time was 130 minutes (P < 0.001). Median postoperative hospitalization was 11 days for laparoscopy and 12 days for open surgery. There were 20 postoperative complications (27.0%), and all were resolved with conservative management. Emergency surgery cases had a higher complication rate than elective surgery cases (40.0% vs. 15.4%, P = 0.034).
Conclusion
Relative to elective surgery, emergency surgery had a higher rate of postoperative complications, open surgery, and stoma formation. As such, elective laparoscopic surgery after successful sigmoidoscopic decompression may be the optimal clinical option.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Patience is key: Association of surgical timing with clinical outcomes in elderly patients with sigmoid volvulus
    Suzanne C. Arnold, Wardah Rafaqat, May Abiad, Emanuele Lagazzi, Anne H. Hoekman, Vahe S. Panossian, Ikemsinachi C. Nzenwa, Charudutt N. Paranjape, George C. Velmahos, Haytham M.A. Kaafarani, John O. Hwabejire
    The American Journal of Surgery.2024; 232: 81.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology and age-related trends in surgical outcomes for sigmoid volvulus: a 17-year analysis
    Lukas Schabl, Stefan D. Holubar, Kamil Erozkan, Ali Alipouriani, Himani Sancheti, Scott R. Steele, Hermann Kessler
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Unveiling a Coalescing Catastrophe: Pre-pyloric Perforation Co-existing With Sigmoid Volvulus in a Middle-Aged Patient
    Mihir Patil, Pankaj Gharde
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Navigating Abdominal Volvulus: A Comprehensive Review of Management Strategies
    Simran Chauhan, Raju K Shinde, Yashraj Jain
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic redo surgery for sigmoid volvulus following laparoscopic sigmoidectomy
    Hideyuki Masui, Kenji Kawada, Susumu Inamoto, Toshiaki Wada, Yoshiharu Sakai, Kazutaka Obama
    Surgical Case Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sigmoid volvulus as a rare cause of intestinal obstruction in the pediatric population: case series and literature review
    Isabel C. Brito Rojas, Mayra A. Hernández Peñuela, Vanessa Medina Gaviria, Martin La Rotta, John M. Escobar Echeverri
    International Journal of Surgery Open.2024; 62(2): 149.     CrossRef
  • Metachronous volvulus of the descending colon after resection of the sigmoid volvulus; a case report
    Molla Asnake Kebede, Sisay Mengistu Mohammed, Yilkal Teshome Numaro, Yohanes Yoseph Mesfine, Adugnaw Bogale Worku, Anteneh Messele Birhanu
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 123: 110212.     CrossRef
  • Mesopexy instead of colectomy successfully treated an elderly patient with sigmoid volvulus, a case report
    Jin Qian, Shu-Qing Hua
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Outcomes for sigmoid volvulus managed with and without early definitive surgery: 20‐year experience in a tertiary referral centre
    Shriranshini Satheakeerthy, Priscilla Leow, Benjamin Hall, Damien Ah Yen, Jesse Fischer
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Bowel Preparation Before Nonelective Sigmoidectomy for Sigmoid Volvulus: Highly Beneficial but Vastly Underused
    Natalie Schudrowitz, C Patrick Shahan, Tovah Moss, John E Scarborough
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2023; 236(4): 649.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative Adverse Outcome and Its Predictors After Emergency Laparotomy Among Sigmoid Volvulus Patients: Retrospective Follow-Up Study
    Tilahun Deresse, Esubalew Tesfahun, Zenebe Gebreegziabher, Mandante Bogale, Dawit Alemayehu, Megbar Dessalegn, Tewodros Kifleyohans, George Eskandar
    Open Access Emergency Medicine.2023; Volume 15: 383.     CrossRef
  • Colonic pseudo-obstruction in a patient with dyssynergic defecation: A case report
    Yejun Jeong, Yongjae Kim, Wonhyun Kim, Seoyeon Park, Su-Jin Shin, Eun Jung Park
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 98: 107524.     CrossRef
  • Comments on “Surgical Management of Sigmoid Volvulus: A Multicenter Observational Study”
    Sabri Selcuk Atamanalp
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(2): 73.     CrossRef
Unexpected Appendiceal Pathologies and Their Changes With the Expanding Use of Preoperative Imaging Studies
Hong Yeol Yoo, Jaewoo Choi, Jongjin Kim, Young Jun Chai, Rumi Shin, Hye Seong Ahn, Chang-Sup Lim, Hae Won Lee, Ki-Tae Hwang, In Mok Jung, Jung Kee Chung, Seung Chul Heo
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(3):99-105.   Published online June 30, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.3.99
  • 3,864 View
  • 49 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis is often challenging. Sometimes, pathologic results of the appendix embarrass or confuse surgeons. Therefore, more and more imaging studies are being performed to increase the accuracy of appendicitis diagnoses preoperatively. However, data on the effect of this increase in preoperative imaging studies on diagnostic accuracy are limited. We performed this study to explore unexpected appendiceal pathologies and to delineate the role of preoperative imaging studies in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Methods

The medical records of 4,673 patients who underwent an appendectomy for assumed appendicitis between 1997 and 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Pathological results and preoperative imaging studies were surveyed, and the frequencies of pathological results and preoperative imaging studies were investigated.

Results

The overall rate of pathology compatible with acute appendicitis was 84.4%. Unexpected pathological findings, such as normal histology, specific inflammations other than acute appendicitis, neoplastic lesions, and other pathologies, comprised 9.6%, 3.3%, 1.2%, and 1.5%, respectively. The rate of unexpected pathological results was significantly reduced because of the increase in preoperative imaging studies. The decrease in normal appendices contributed the most to the reduction while other unexpected pathologies did not change significantly despite the increased use of imaging studies. This decrease in normal appendices was significant in both male and female patients under the age of 60 years, but the differences in females were more prominent.

Conclusion

Unexpected appendiceal pathologies comprised 15.6% of the cases. Preoperative imaging studies reduced them by decreasing the negative appendectomy rate of patients with normal appendices.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The appendix: An unexpected band obstruction
    Rowan Klein Nulend, Rakesh Quinn, Kar Yin Fok, Nimalan Pathmanathan
    Journal of Case Reports and Images in Surgery.2024; 10(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • The Vermiform Appendix and Its Pathologies
    Marian Constantin, Livia Petrescu, Cristina Mătanie, Corneliu Ovidiu Vrancianu, Adelina-Gabriela Niculescu, Octavian Andronic, Alexandra Bolocan
    Cancers.2023; 15(15): 3872.     CrossRef
  • Rising incidence of appendiceal neoplasms over time: Does pathological handling of appendectomy specimens play a role?
    Hisham F. Bahmad, Abed Alhalim Aljamal, Juan Carlos Alvarez Moreno, Ali Salami, Philip Bao, Sarah Alghamdi, Robert J. Poppiti
    Annals of Diagnostic Pathology.2021; 52: 151724.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Pathological Criteria on Pediatric Negative Appendectomy Rate
    Caroline Maloney, Morris C. Edelman, Alexandra C. Bolognese, Aaron M. Lipskar, Barrie S. Rich
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery.2019; 54(9): 1794.     CrossRef
  • Communication and management of incidental pathology in 1,214 consecutive appendicectomies; a cohort study
    Ned Kinnear, Bridget Heijkoop, Eliza Bramwell, Alannah Frazzetto, Amy Noll, Prajay Patel, Derek Hennessey, Greg Otto, Christopher Dobbins, Tarik Sammour, James Moore
    International Journal of Surgery.2019; 72: 185.     CrossRef
  • Unexpected Appendiceal Pathologies and Preoperative Imaging Studies on Patients With Acute Appendicitis
    Byung Chun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(3): 82.     CrossRef
Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality After Surgery for Intestinal Perforation
Rumi Shin, Sang Mok Lee, Beonghoon Sohn, Dong Woon Lee, Inho Song, Young Jun Chai, Hae Won Lee, Hye Seong Ahn, In Mok Jung, Jung Kee Chung, Seung Chul Heo
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(6):221-227.   Published online December 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.6.221
  • 8,528 View
  • 80 Download
  • 29 Web of Science
  • 33 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

An intestinal perforation is a rare condition, but has a high mortality rate, even after immediate surgical intervention. The clinical predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality are still not well established, so this study attempted to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality after surgery for an intestinal perforation.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 117 patients who underwent surgery for an intestinal perforation at a single institution in Korea from November 2008 to June 2014. Factors related with postoperative mortality at 1 month and other postoperative complications were investigated.

Results

The mean age of enrolled patients was 66.0 ± 15.8 years and 66% of the patients were male. Fifteen patients (13%) died within 1 month after surgical treatment. Univariate analysis indicated that patient-related factors associated with mortality were low systolic and diastolic blood pressure, low serum albumin, low serum protein, low total cholesterol, and high blood urea nitrogen; the surgery-related factor associated with mortality was feculent ascites. Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression indicated that low systolic blood pressure and feculent ascites independently increased the risk for mortality; postoperative complications were more likely in both females and those with low estimated glomerular filtration rates and elevated serum C-reactive protein levels.

Conclusion

Various factors were associated with postoperative clinical outcomes of patients with an intestinal perforation. Morbidity and mortality following an intestinal perforation were greater in patients with unstable initial vital signs, poor nutritional status, and feculent ascites.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • In Situ 4D Printing of Polyelectrolyte/Magnetic Composites for Sutureless Gastric Perforation Sealing
    Yunsong Shi, Sihan Tang, Xi Yuan, Zhuofan Li, Shifeng Wen, Zhongwei Li, Bin Su, Chunze Yan, Lili Chen
    Advanced Materials.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Small Intestinal Perforation after 360-Degree Liposuction: A Case Report
    Jenna C. Bekeny, Samuel S. Huffman, Chris Thomas, Mariana Tumminello, Anna Kata, Rajiv Parikh, Laura K. Tom, Grant M. Kleiber
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.2024; 48(5): 946.     CrossRef
  • Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings
    Forrest Bohler, Allison Garden
    Journal of Osteopathic Medicine.2024; 124(1): 39.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence, Pattern, Mortality, and Morbidity of Traumatic Small Bowel Perforation at King Abdulaziz Medical City: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Fahad Aljehaiman, Faisal J Almalki, Abdulah Alhusain, Faris Alsalamah, Khaled Alzahrani, Abdulkareem Alharbi, Hani Alkhulaiwi
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Abdominal pain after a food crawl
    Danier Ong, Rajiv Yogendran, Emily Fite
    Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Case of abdominal whirl sign with small bowel obstruction and free gas successfully managed by conservative management instead of laparoscopic surgery
    Giuleta Jamsari, James Wei Tatt Toh
    Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery.2024; 7(3): 128.     CrossRef
  • Emergent Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Malignancy Is Associated with Higher Rates of Perioperative Complications but No Independent Impact on Short-Term Mortality
    Yahya Alwatari, Devon C. Freudenberger, Jad Khoraki, Lena Bless, Riley Payne, Walker A. Julliard, Rachit D. Shah, Carlos A. Puig
    Journal of Chest Surgery.2024; 57(2): 160.     CrossRef
  • Urea to Albumin Ratio Is an Excellent Predictor of Death in Patients With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
    Evgeni Dimitrov, Krasimira Halacheva, Georgi Minkov, Emil Enchev, Yovcho Yovtchev
    Surgical Infections.2024; 25(3): 225.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative Complications in Emergency Surgeries at a Referral Hospital in Eastern Venezuela
    Victor Castañeda-Marquez, Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Enrique Avila-Liendo, Gabriel Gonzalez-Quinde, Wilson Garcia-Cazorla, Georcimar Mendez-Meneses, Yoalkris E Salcedo, Tamara Rodriguez-Rugel, Jackner Antigua-Herrera, Miguel Rivas-Perez, Silvia Agudelo-Mendoz
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal tract perforation after radiofrequency ablation for hepatic tumor: Incidence and risk factors
    Kyowon Gu, Tae Wook Kang, Seungchul Han, Dong Ik Cha, Kyoung Doo Song, Min Woo Lee, Hyunchul Rhim, Go Eun Park
    European Journal of Radiology.2024; 177: 111560.     CrossRef
  • Revisiting Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth-POSSUM (P-POSSUM) Scores: Are They Valid in Cases of Ileal Perforation?
    Saikrishna Eswaravaka, Chirantan Suhrid, Bhavya Rao, Sundaresh Prabhakar, Jayashri Pandya
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A giant trichobezoar in a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A case report
    M. Forooghi, R. Shahrokhi, Sh. Yousufzai
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 123: 110283.     CrossRef
  • Factors related to cardiac rupture after acute myocardial infarction
    Xue Gao, Ying Guo, Xiaoting Zhu, Chunlei Du, Beibei Ma, Yinghua Cui, Shuai Wang
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with bowel perforation after immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure
    Antonio Pizuorno Machado, Malek Shatila, Cynthia Liu, Yang Lu, Mehmet Altan, Isabella C. Glitza Oliva, Dan Zhao, Hao Chi Zhang, Anusha Thomas, Yinghong Wang
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(9): 5989.     CrossRef
  • Abdominal emergency surgery in patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective single-center analysis
    Philipp H. von Kroge, Anna Duprée, Oliver Mann, Jakob R. Izbicki, Jonas Wagner, Paymon Ahmadi, Sören Weidemann, Raissa Adjallé, Nicolaus Kröger, Carsten Bokemeyer, Walter Fiedler, Franziska Modemann, Susanne Ghandili
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Acute Spontaneous Colonic Perforation in a Case of Newly Confirmed Scleroderma: Case Report
    Glenn Goodwin, Christian Ryckeley, Davide Fox, Michael Ashley, Laurence Dubensky, Mauricio Danckers, Todd Slesinger
    Interactive Journal of Medical Research.2023; 12: e43295.     CrossRef
  • Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with emergency left colonic surgery
    Dauda Bawa, Yasser Mohammad Khalifa, Saleem Khan, Waddah Norah, Nibras Noman
    Annals of Saudi Medicine.2023; 43(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • Fatal Case of Perforated Cytomegalovirus Colitis: Case Report and Systematic Review
    Andrea T. Fisher, Kovi E. Bessoff, Veronica Nicholas, James Badger, Lisa Knowlton, Joseph D. Forrester
    Surgical Infections.2022; 23(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • An adhesive and resilient hydrogel for the sealing and treatment of gastric perforation
    Jing Chen, Julia S. Caserto, Ida Ang, Kaavian Shariati, James Webb, Bo Wang, Xi Wang, Nikolaos Bouklas, Minglin Ma
    Bioactive Materials.2022; 14: 52.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of mortality in patients with acute small-bowel perforation transferred to ICU after emergency surgery: a single-centre retrospective cohort study
    Jianzhang Wu, Ping Shu, Hongyong He, Haojie Li, Zhaoqing Tang, Yihong Sun, Fenglin Liu
    Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Delayed ileal perforation following lollipop-stick ingestion in a two year old
    Tareq Swedan, Mohamed Morjan, Mulham Jarjanazi, Nafiza Martini, Alaa Aldin Ismail, Hebatullah Awad, Shamseh Benbash
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports.2022; 81: 102276.     CrossRef
  • The Clinical Significance of Shock Index and GFR in the Differential Diagnosis of Perforated Appendicitis
    Ferhat ÇAY, Ali DURAN
    Journal of Contemporary Medicine.2022; 12(4): 504.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Delayed Surgical Care on Patient Outcomes With Alimentary Tract Perforation: Insight From a Low-Middle Income Country
    Muhammad H Zafar, Taha A Zaka Ur Rehman, Muhammad Sohaib Khan, Shayan Ahmed, Amir Shariff
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gangrene of the Colon Ascendens, Colon Transversum, and Lienal Flexure in a Massive Strangulated Umbilical Hernia
    Stanko Baco, Milos Mitric
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Facility of Origin Predicts Mortality After Colonic Perforation
    Samuel D. Butensky, Emma Gazzara, Gainosuke Sugiyama, Gene F. Coppa, Antonio Alfonso, Paul J. Chung
    The American Surgeon™.2021; 87(8): 1327.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Malnutrition Assessed by Comprehensive Nutritional Screening Tool on In-Hospital Mortality after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Perforation
    Seung-Young Oh, Hannah Lee, Ho Geol Ryu, Hyuk-Joon Lee
    Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition.2021; 12(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning-based Model for Predicting Postoperative Complications among Patients with Colonic Perforation: A Retrospective study
    Hiroka Hosaka, Masashi Takeuchi, Tomohiro Imoto, Haruka Yagishita, Ayaka Yu, Yusuke Maeda, Yosuke Kobayashi, Yoshie Kadota, Masanori Odaira, Fumiki Toriumi, Takashi Endo, Hirohisa Harada
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2021; 5(3): 274.     CrossRef
  • Bevacizumab and gastrointestinal perforations: a review from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database
    Thomas A. Wichelmann, Sufyan Abdulmujeeb, Eli D. Ehrenpreis
    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2021; 54(10): 1290.     CrossRef
  • A Rare Presentation of Gastric Carcinoma With Gastric Perforation and Septic Shock
    Reem Moala AlHazmi, Dunya Nasrallah Alfaraj, Shaykhah Nasser AlNaimi, Sarah Mohammed AlQahtani, Mashael Hamed AlJuwayed, Hazem Mohammed Zakriea, Mohammed S Foula
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • C-Reactive Protein as a Marker of Postoperative Complication of Emergency Colorectal Surgery
    Luis R. M. Nadal, Artur M. A. da Silva, Larissa Johann, Shuaib H. El Boustani, Maria Beatriz A. S. Medrado, Jose F. M. Farah, Renato A. Lupinacci
    Journal of Coloproctology.2021; 41(04): 375.     CrossRef
  • Modified frailty index and hypoalbuminemia as predictors of adverse outcomes in older adults presenting to acute general surgical unit
    Angela Abraham, Sally Burrows, Neelankal John Abraham, Bhaskar Mandal
    Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología.2020; 55(2): 70.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors and Management for Left Colonic Perforation: Can Hartmann’s Procedure Be Preventable?
    Yilseok Joo, Yujin Lee, Taeyoung Yoo, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(3): 178.     CrossRef
  • Intestinal Perforation: A Surgeon's Nightmare Enlightened by Scientific Research
    Byung Soh Min
    Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(6): 205.     CrossRef
Individualized Cutoff Value of the Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level is Necessary for Optimal Use as a Prognostic Marker
Byeong Geon Jeon, Rumi Shin, Jung Kee Chung, In Mok Jung, Seung Chul Heo
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(3):106-114.   Published online June 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.3.106
  • 4,432 View
  • 37 Download
  • 18 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is an important prognostic marker in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, in some stages, it does not work. We performed this study to find a way in which preoperative CEA could be used as a constant prognostic marker in harmony with the TNM staging system.

Methods

Preoperative CEA levels and recurrences in CRC were surveyed. The distribution of CEA levels and the recurrences in each TNM stage of CRC were analyzed. An optimal cutoff value for each TNM stage was calculated and tested for validity as a prognostic marker within the TNM staging system.

Results

The conventional cutoff value of CEA (5 ng/mL) was an independent prognostic factor on the whole. However, when evaluated in subgroups, it was not a prognostic factor in stage I or stage III of N2. A subgroup analysis according to TNM stage revealed different CEA distributions and recurrence rates corresponding to different CEA ranges. The mean CEA levels were higher in advanced stages. In addition, the recurrence rates of corresponding CEA ranges were higher in advanced stages. Optimal cutoff values from the receiver operating characteristic curves were 7.4, 5.5, and 4.5 ng/mL for TNM stage I, II, and III, respectively. Those for N0, N1, and N2 stages were 5.5, 4.8, and 3.5 ng/mL, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survivals were significantly different according to these cutoff values for each TNM and N stage. The multivariate analysis confirmed the new cutoff values to be more efficient in discriminating the prognosis in the subgroups of the TNM stages.

Conclusion

Individualized cutoff values of the preoperative CEA level are a more practical prognostic marker following and in harmony with the TNM staging system.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Cell-free circulating ALU repeats in serum have a prognostic value for colorectal cancer patients
    Isabel Anzinger, Dorothea Nagel, Enrico N. De Toni, Andrea Ofner, Alexander B. Philipp, Lesca M. Holdt, Daniel Teupser, Frank T. Kolligs, Andreas Herbst
    Cancer Biomarkers.2023; 37(4): 237.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and D-dimer concentrations in patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer
    Yasutomo Ojima, Masao Harano, Daisuke Sumitani, Masanori Yoshimitsu, Masazumi Okajima
    Surgery Today.2021; 51(7): 1108.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of and Risk Factors for Gastroepiploic Lymph Node Involvement in Patients with Cancer of the Transverse Colon Including the Hepatic Flexure
    Xiaojie Wang, Shenghui Huang, Xingrong Lu, Ying Huang, Pan Chi
    World Journal of Surgery.2021; 45(5): 1514.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic accuracy of follow‐up tests for detecting colorectal cancer recurrences in primary care: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Geertje B. Liemburg, Daan Brandenbarg, Marjolein Y. Berger, Saskia F.A. Duijts, Gea A. Holtman, Geertruida H. Bock, Joke C. Korevaar, Annette J. Berendsen
    European Journal of Cancer Care.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Serum carcinoembryonic antigen pre‐operative level in colorectal cancer: revisiting risk stratification
    Cristiana Iacuzzo, Paola Germani, Marina Troian, Tommaso Cipolat Mis, Fabiola Giudici, Edoardo Osenda, Marina Bortul, Nicolò de Manzini
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The role of preoperative CEA in the management of colorectal cancer: A cohort study from two cancer centres
    Ali Riaz Baqar, Simon Wilkins, Margaret Staples, Chun Hin Angus Lee, Karen Oliva, Paul McMurrick
    International Journal of Surgery.2019; 64: 10.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Four Automated Carcinoembryonic Antigen Immunoassays: ADVIA Centaur XP, ARCHITECT I2000sr, Elecsys E170, and Unicel Dxi800
    Joonhong Park, Seungok Lee, Yeongsic Kim, Aeran Choi, Hyeyoung Lee, Jihyang Lim, Yonggoo Kim, Kyungja Han, Eun-jee Oh
    Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2018; 38(4): 355.     CrossRef
  • Potential of quantitative SEPT9 and SHOX2 methylation in plasmatic circulating cell-free DNA as auxiliary staging parameter in colorectal cancer: a prospective observational cohort study
    Julia Bergheim, Alexander Semaan, Heidrun Gevensleben, Susanne Groening, Andreas Knoblich, Jörn Dietrich, Julia Weber, Jörg C. Kalff, Friedrich Bootz, Glen Kristiansen, Dimo Dietrich
    British Journal of Cancer.2018; 118(9): 1217.     CrossRef
  • Pre‐operative carcinoembryonic antigen predicts survival following colorectal cancer surgery with curative intent
    Ashok Gunawardene, Peter Larsen, Ali Shekouh, Elizabeth Dennett
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2018; 88(12): 1311.     CrossRef
  • Accessing new prognostic significance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer receiving tumor resection: More than positive and negative
    Zerong Cai, Jian Xiao, Xiaosheng He, Jia Ke, Yifeng Zou, Yufeng Chen, Xianrui Wu, Xiaoling Li, Lei Wang, Jianping Wang, Ping Lan, Xiaojian Wu
    Cancer Biomarkers.2017; 19(2): 161.     CrossRef
  • A nanobody targeting carcinoembryonic antigen as a promising molecular probe for non-small cell lung cancer
    Hao Wang, Ai-Min Meng, Sheng-Hua Li, Xiao-Liang Zhou
    Molecular Medicine Reports.2017; 16(1): 625.     CrossRef
  • Valor pronóstico pretratamiento del antígeno carcinoembrionario en el cáncer colorrectal operado. ¿Es útil en todos los estadios del tumor?
    Ana Borda, Carlos Prieto, Javier Jiménez, Juan Vila, José Manuel Zozaya, Fernando Borda
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2016; 39(3): 191.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of preoperative carcinoembryogenic antigen: Is it useful in all stages of colorectal cancer?
    Ana Borda, Carlos Prieto, Javier Jiménez, Juan Vila, José Manuel Zozaya, Fernando Borda
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition).2016; 39(3): 191.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of colorectal cancer glyco‐secretome identifies laminin β‐1 (LAMB1) as a potential serological biomarker for colorectal cancer
    Qifeng Lin, Hannah S.R. Lim, Hui Ling Lin, Hwee Tong Tan, Teck Kwang Lim, Wai Kit Cheong, Peh Yean Cheah, Choong Leong Tang, Pierce K. H. Chow, Maxey C. M. Chung
    PROTEOMICS.2015; 15(22): 3905.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer. An Independent Prognostic Factor Still Reliable
    Giovanni Li Destri, Antonio Salvatore Rubino, Rosalia Latino, Fabio Giannone, Raffaele Lanteri, Beniamino Scilletta, Antonio Di Cataldo
    International Surgery.2015; 100(4): 617.     CrossRef
  • Carcinoembryonic antigen levels in colorectal cancer: Are we too preoccupied?
    G Aggarwal, MK Roy, S Banerjee
    Indian Journal of Cancer.2014; 51(4): 452.     CrossRef
  • Lectin approaches for glycoproteomics in FDA-approved cancer biomarkers
    Haitham A Badr, Dina MM AlSadek, Ashraf A Darwish, Abdelaleim I ElSayed, Bakhytzhan O Bekmanov, Elmira M Khussainova, Xueji Zhang, William CS Cho, Leyla B Djansugurova, Chen-Zhong Li
    Expert Review of Proteomics.2014; 11(2): 227.     CrossRef
  • Individualized Cutoff Value of the Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level According to TNM Stage in Colorectal Cancer
    Byung-Kwon Ahn
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(3): 91.     CrossRef
Case Report
Rectal Perforation Caused by Anal Stricture After Hemorrhoid Treatment
Yong Joon Suh, Heon-Kyun Ha, Heung-Kwon Oh, Rumi Shin, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(1):28-30.   Published online February 28, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.1.28
  • 3,938 View
  • 38 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Inappropriate therapies for hemorrhoids can lead to various complications including anorectal stricture. We report a patient presenting with catastrophic rectal perforation due to severe anal stricture after inappropriate hemorrhoid treatment. A 67-years old man with perianal pain visited the emergency room. The hemorrhoids accompanied by constipation, had tortured him since his youth. Thus he had undergone injection sclerotherapy several times by an unlicensed therapist and hemorrhoidectomy twice at the clinics of private practitioners. His body temperature was as high as 38.5℃. The computed tomographic scan showed a focal perforation of posterior rectal wall. The emergency operation was performed. The fibrotic tissues of the anal canal were excised. And then a sigmoid loop colostomy was constructed. The patient was discharged four days following the operation. This report calls attention to the enormous risk of unlicensed injection sclerotherapy and overzealous hemorrhoidectomy resulting in scarring, progressive stricture, and eventual rectal perforation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laser hemorrhoidoplasty for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hendry Lie, Evelyn Franca Caesarini, Antonius Agung Purnama, Andry Irawan, Taufik Sudirman, Wifanto Saditya Jeo, Bernardus Parish Budiono, Erik Prabowo, M. Iqbal Rivai, Ryanto Karobuana Sitepu
    Lasers in Medical Science.2022; 37(9): 3621.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Does T3 Subdivision Correlate with Nodal or Distant Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer?
Hong Yeol Yoo, Rumi Shin, Heon-Kyun Ha, Heung-Kwon Oh, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, Gyeong Hoon Kang, Woo Ho Kim, Jae-Gahb Park
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(3):160-164.   Published online June 30, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.3.160
  • 3,848 View
  • 32 Download
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

We analyzed the clinical data of T3 colorectal cancer patients to assess whether T3 subdivision correlates with node (N) or metastasis (M) staging and stage-independent factors.

Methods

Five hundred fifty-five patients who underwent surgery for primary colorectal cancer from January 2003 to December 2009 were analyzed for T3 subdivision. T3 subdivision was determined by the depth of invasion beyond the outer border of the proper muscle (T3a, <1 mm; T3b, 1 to 5 mm; T3c, >5 to 15 mm; T3d, >15 mm). We investigated the correlation between T3 subdivision and N, M staging and stage-independent prognostic factors including angiolymphatic invasion (ALI), venous invasion (VI) and perineural invasion (PNI).

Results

The tumors of the 555 patients were subclassified as T3a in 86 patients (15.5%), T3b in 209 patients (37.7%), T3c in 210 patients (37.8%) and T3d in 50 patients (9.0%). The nodal metastasis rates were 39.5% for T3a, 56.5% for T3b, 75.7% for T3c and 74.0% for T3d. The distant metastasis rates were 7.0% for T3a 9.1% for T3b, 27.1% for T3c and 40.0% for T3d. Both N and M staging correlated with T3 subdivision (Spearman's rho = 0.288, 0.276, respectively; P < 0.001). Other stage-independent prognostic factors correlated well with T3 subdivision (Spearman's rho = 0.250, P < 0.001 for ALI; rho = 0.146, P < 0.001 for VI; rho = 0.271, P < 0.001 for PNI).

Conclusion

Subdivision of T3 colorectal cancer correlates with nodal and metastasis staging. Moreover, it correlates with other prognostic factors for colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Facteurs pronostiques : degré d’invasion de la sous-séreuse, distance tumeur-séreuse et invasion de la limitante élastique de la sous-séreuse dans l’adénocarcinome colique
    Arnaud Ronfaut, Christophe Attencourt, Jean-Rene Tesson, Charles Sabbagh, Jean-Marc Regimbeau, Denis Chatelain
    Annales de Pathologie.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Do treated rectal tumors appear differently on MRI after chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy?
    Yu Shen, Yanqiong Wen, Liang Bi, Xuyang Yang, Xiaoling Gong, Xiangbing Deng, Wenjian Meng, Ziqiang Wang
    Abdominal Radiology.2023; 49(3): 774.     CrossRef
  • Pathology and Prognosis of Colonic Adenocarcinomas With Intermediate Primary Tumor Stage Between pT2 and pT3
    John D. Paulsen, Alexandros D. Polydorides
    Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2022; 146(5): 591.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of additional histologic features for subclassification of pathological T3 colon cancer
    Lorenzo Macchi, Quoc Riccardo Bao, Laura Albertoni, Matteo Fassan, Valentina Chiminazzo, Marco Scarpa, Gaya Spolverato, Salvatore Pucciarelli
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 27(9): 1428.     CrossRef
  • The value of diffusion kurtosis imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion quantitative parameters in predicting synchronous distant metastasis of rectal cancer
    Xue Ding, Danqi Sun, Qiuchen Guo, Yeting Li, Hao Chen, Xiaoxiao Dai, Guohua Fan, Yongyou Wu, Guangqiang Chen, Yonggang Li
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The 2017 Assisi Think Tank Meeting on rectal cancer: A positioning paper
    Vincenzo Valentini, Corrie Marijnen, Geerard Beets, Krzysztof Bujko, Berardino De Bari, Andres Cervantes, Giuditta Chiloiro, Claudio Coco, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Robert Glynne-Jones, Karin Haustermans, Elisa Meldolesi, Femke Peters, Claus Rödel, Har
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2020; 142: 6.     CrossRef
  • Whole-lesion Apparent Diffusion Coefficient First- and Second-Order Texture Features for the Characterization of Rectal Cancer Pathological Factors
    Weifeng Li, Zhuoran Jiang, Yue Guan, Ying Chen, Xiaolin Huang, Song Liu, Jian He, Zhengyang Zhou, Yun Ge
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.2018; 42(4): 642.     CrossRef
  • A meta-analysis assessing the survival implications of subclassifying T3 rectal tumours
    M.R.S. Siddiqui, C. Simillis, J. Bhoday, N.J. Battersby, J. Mok, S. Rasheed, P. Tekkis, A.M. Abulafi, G. Brown
    European Journal of Cancer.2018; 104: 47.     CrossRef
  • Extramural extension as indicator for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage IIA (pT3N0) colon cancer
    Yoshito Akagi, Kazuo Shirouzu, Tetsushi Kinugasa
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2013; 108(6): 358.     CrossRef
  • T3 Subdivision Correlation with Nodal or Distant Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer; Is It Practically Useful?
    Nam Kyu Kim
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(3): 119.     CrossRef
Clinical Features of Colorectal Cancer Detected by the National Cancer Screening Program
Dae-Do Park, Rumi Shin, Ji-Sun Kim, Heung-Kwon Oh, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, Jae-Gahb Park
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(6):420-423.   Published online December 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.6.420
  • 2,948 View
  • 24 Download
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Since 2004, the National Cancer Screening Program of Korea has included colorectal cancer screening based on primary screening with the fecal occult blood test (FOBT). We report on the clinical features of colorectal cancer detected by the National Cancer Screening Program.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 577 patients who underwent elective surgery for colorectal cancer at the Seoul National University Hospital between January 2008 and December 2009. We compared the clinical features of colorectal cancers detected by the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP group) with those of the control group in terms of age, gender, preoperative symptom, location of the tumor, surgical technique and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage.

Results

Age, gender, location of the tumor and operation types were not different between the two groups. The proportion of asymptomatic patients was significantly higher in the NCSP group than it was in the control group (86.5% vs. 20.0%; P < 0.001). The proportion of less invasive lesions (T1 or T2) was significantly higher in the NCSP group (46.3% vs. 27.7%; P = 0.002). The pathologic stages of the colorectal cancers in the NCSP group were I, 40.3%; II, 17.9%; III, 40.3% and IV, 1.5% whereas in the control group, they were I, 20.8%; II, 32.9%; III, 34.9% and IV, 11.4%. The proportion of stage I cancer was significantly higher in the NCSP group than in the control group (40.3% vs. 20.8%; P = 0.006).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates the FOBT in the NCSP is effective in early detection of colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinicopathological Characteristics of Colorectal Adenomas and Cancers Detected by FIT-positive Colonoscopy
    Seiji Kimura, Shinichiro Yamagishi, Shinsaku Fukuda
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2020; 74(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Nomogram for Recurrence of Stage I Colorectal Cancer After Curative Resection
    Chan Kim, Woo Ram Kim, Ki-Yeol Kim, Hong Jae Chon, Seung Hoon Beom, Hyojoong Kim, Minkyu Jung, Sang Joon Shin, Nam Kyu Kim, Joong Bae Ahn
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2018; 17(3): e513.     CrossRef
  • Early Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasm in Korea: A Multicenter Survey of Pathologic Diagnosis
    Yun Kyung Kang, So-Young Jin, Mee Soo Chang, Jung Yeon Kim, Gyeong Hoon Kang, Hye Seung Lee, Jin Hee Sohn, Ho Sung Park, Kye Won Kwon, Mi Jin Gu, Young Hee Maeng, Jong Eun Joo, Haeng Ji Kang, Hee Kyung Kim, Kee-Taek Jang, Mi Ja Lee, Hee Kyung Chang, Joon
    Korean Journal of Pathology.2013; 47(3): 245.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathologic Factors Affecting Recurrence after Curative Surgery for Stage I Colorectal Cancer
    Min Ae Keum, Seok-Byung Lim, Sun A Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(1): 49.     CrossRef
Management of Appendicitis Presenting with Abscess or Mass
Jeong-Ki Kim, Seungbum Ryoo, Heung-Kwon Oh, Ji Sun Kim, Rumi Shin, Eun Kyung Choe, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(6):413-419.   Published online December 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.6.413
  • 5,287 View
  • 61 Download
  • 24 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Management strategy in acute appendicitis patients initially presenting with abscess or mass is surrounded with controversy. This study was performed to identify the outcomes of management for this condition.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed prospectively registered 76 patients (male:female = 39:37; mean age, 50.8 years) with appendicitis presenting with abscess or mass over a 9-year period at the Seoul National University Hospital. Patients were divided into three groups (emergency operation group, delayed operation group, and follow-up group), and clinical characteristics and outcomes of treatment were investigated.

Results

Twenty-eight patients (36.8%) underwent an emergency operation. Of the remaining 48 patients, 20 (41.7%) were initially treated with conservative management through the use of antibiotics only; the other 28 (58.3%) with and additional ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage of the abscess. Twenty-six (54.2%) patients underwent planned operations after conservative management, and 22 (45.8%) were followed without surgery (median duration, 37.8 month), of which 3 (13%) underwent an appendectomy due to recurrent appendicitis (mean of 56.7 days after initial attack). There were no statistical differences in types of operation performed (appendectomy or ileocecectomy), postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay among the patients who underwent emergency operations, delayed operations and operations for recurrence during follow-up.

Conclusion

Although the recurrence rate was relatively low after conservative management for appendicitis patients presenting with abscess or mass, there was no difference in surgical outcome between the emergent, elective, or recurrent groups. Our results indicate that proper management of appendicitis with abscess or mass can be selected according to surgeon's preference.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Study on the Curative Effect of Different Treatment Methods on 122 Cases of Periappendiceal Abscess
    哲魁 刘
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(03): 85.     CrossRef
  • Early Surgical Management of Appendicular Mass: Evaluation of Surgical Outcome in Selected Private and Government Hospitals, Bangladesh
    Jahangir Sarwar, Abul Shamsuddin, Sirajam Munira
    Clinical Medicine Research.2024; 13(3): 33.     CrossRef
  • Failure to Significantly Reduce Radiation Exposure in Children with Suspected Appendicitis in the United States
    Charbel Chidiac, Oussama Issa, Alejandro V. Garcia, Daniel S. Rhee, Mark B. Slidell
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery.2024; : 161701.     CrossRef
  • Intra-abdominal abscesses: Microbiological epidemiology and empirical antibiotherapy
    F. Méchaï, A. Kolakowska, E. Carbonnelle, O. Bouchaud, C. Tresallet, F. Jaureguy
    Infectious Diseases Now.2023; 53(1): 104604.     CrossRef
  • Upfront appendectomy vs interval appendectomy in acute appendicitis with mass formation in pediatric age group: Little difference in major outcome
    Hussam Widatella, Ahmed Abdulmanan, Ibraheem Abdelraheem, Fadi Atwan, Sri Paran
    Journal of Pediatrics & Neonatal Care.2023; 13(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ryan Lamm, Sunjay S. Kumar, Amelia T. Collings, Ivy N. Haskins, Ahmed Abou-Setta, Nisha Narula, Pramod Nepal, Nader M. Hanna, Dimitrios I. Athanasiadis, Stefan Scholz, Joel F. Bradley, Arianne T. Train, Philip H. Pucher, Francisco Quinteros, Bethany Slate
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(12): 8933.     CrossRef
  • Thigh and iliopsoas abscess as a rare presentation of perforated mucinous appendix carcinoma. A case report
    Pedro Osácar, Darío Ramallo, Luisina Elizalde
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 96: 107293.     CrossRef
  • Early versus delayed (interval) appendicectomy for the management of appendicular abscess and phlegmon: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Akinfemi A. Akingboye, Fahad Mahmood, Shafquat Zaman, Jenny Wright, Fatima Mannan, Ali Yasen Y. Mohamedahmed
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(5): 1341.     CrossRef
  • Potential Benefit of Nonsurgical Management to Periappendicular Abscess
    Chris Li, Dean Owyang
    JAMA Surgery.2019; 154(9): 882.     CrossRef
  • Potential Benefit of Nonsurgical Management to Periappendicular Abscess—Reply
    Paulina Salminen, Jari Mällinen, Tero Rautio
    JAMA Surgery.2019; 154(9): 883.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes of single‐site laparoscopic interval appendectomy for severe complicated appendicitis: Comparison to conventional emergency appendectomy
    Masaaki Miyo, Shoichiro Urabe, Satoshi Hyuga, Tomo Nakagawa, Toshiya Michiura, Nobuyasu Hayashi, Kazuo Yamabe
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2019; 3(5): 561.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study
    Zaza Demetrashvili, George Kenchadze, Irakli Pipia, Kakhi Khutsishvili, David Loladze, Eka Ekaladze, Giorgi Merabishvili, George Kamkamidze
    Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2019; 48: 48.     CrossRef
  • MANAGEMENT OF APPENDICULAR LUMP AT TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
    Ishfaq Ahmad Gilkar, Umer Mushtaq, Javid Ahmad Peer, Bilal Ahmed Mir, Yaqoob Hassan, Waseem Ahmad Dar
    Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare.2019; 6(3): 135.     CrossRef
  • CLINICAL STUDY AND MANAGEMENT OF APPENDICULAR LUMP
    Farooq Ahmed, Ravindra G Devani, Mohammed Moinuddin, Mohd. Ashfaq Ahmed
    Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare.2018; 5(11): 997.     CrossRef
  • The evolving management of the appendix mass in the era of laparoscopy and interventional radiology
    James Forsyth, Konstantinos Lasithiotakis, Mark Peter
    The Surgeon.2017; 15(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the WSES 2016 consensus conference
    Massimo Sartelli, Fausto Catena, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Luca Ansaloni, Walter L. Biffl, Marja A. Boermeester, Marco Ceresoli, Osvaldo Chiara, Federico Coccolini, Jan J. De Waele, Salomone Di Saverio, Christian Eckmann, Gustavo P. Fraga, Maddalena Giannella,
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Treatment for Appendiceal Mass Formed After Acute Perforated Appendicitis
    Enver Zerem, Suad Kunosić, Almin Handanagić, Dženan Jahić, Dina Zerem, Omar Zerem
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2017; 27(3): 132.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic Consideration of Periappendiceal Abscess: an Evaluation of Non-surgical Treatment Followed by Minimally Invasive Interval Appendectomy
    Yeong-Soo Jo, Song-Soo Yang, Yeong-Chul Im, Dong-Jin Park, Gyu-Yeol Kim
    The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2017; 20(4): 129.     CrossRef
  • The management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections
    Massimo Sartelli, Alain Chichom-Mefire, Francesco M. Labricciosa, Timothy Hardcastle, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Abdulrashid K. Adesunkanmi, Luca Ansaloni, Miklosh Bala, Zsolt J. Balogh, Marcelo A. Beltrán, Offir Ben-Ishay, Walter L. Biffl, Arianna Birindelli, M
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015
    Ramon R. Gorter, Hasan H. Eker, Marguerite A. W. Gorter-Stam, Gabor S. A. Abis, Amish Acharya, Marjolein Ankersmit, Stavros A. Antoniou, Simone Arolfo, Benjamin Babic, Luigi Boni, Marlieke Bruntink, Dieuwertje A. van Dam, Barbara Defoort, Charlotte L. Dei
    Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(11): 4668.     CrossRef
  • Challenges in uncomplicated acute appendicitis
    Fernando Resende, Ana Beatriz Almeida, José Costa Maia, Renato Bessa Melo
    Journal of Acute Disease.2016; 5(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Management of Appendiceal Mass and Abscess. An 11-Year Experience
    Zaza Demetrashvili, Giorgi Kenchadze, Irakli Pipia, Eka Ekaladze, George Kamkamidze
    International Surgery.2015; 100(6): 1021.     CrossRef
  • The role of current methods of X-ray diagnosis in caseof intraabdominal suppurative conplications caused bu colonic diseases
    A. M. Karsanov, A. A. Kul'chiev, T. R. Karaev, I. P. Kokaev, V. V. Vahotskij
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2015; (5): 75.     CrossRef
  • 2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections
    Massimo Sartelli, Pierluigi Viale, Fausto Catena, Luca Ansaloni, Ernest Moore, Mark Malangoni, Frederick A Moore, George Velmahos, Raul Coimbra, Rao Ivatury, Andrew Peitzman, Kaoru Koike, Ari Leppaniemi, Walter Biffl, Clay Cothren Burlew, Zsolt J Balogh,
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2013;[Epub]     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP