Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Review

Colorectal cancer

Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Ricardo Purchio Galletti, Gabriel Andrade Agareno, Lucas de Abreu Sesconetto, Rafael Benjamim Rosa da Silva, Rafael Vaz Pandini, Lucas Soares Gerbasi, Victor Edmond Seid, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Francisco Tustumi; Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(5):375-384. Published online December 20, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00605.0086

6,411 View
157 Download
2 Web of Science
2 Citations

Purpose
This study aimed to review the outcomes of redo procedures for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses.
Methods
A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases. The inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing colectomy with primary colorectal or coloanal anastomosis and studies that assessed the postoperative results. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42021267715).
Results
Eleven articles met the eligibility criteria and were selected. The studied population size ranged from 7 to 78 patients. The overall mortality rate was 0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%–0.01%). The postoperative complication rate was 40% (95% CI, 40%–50%). The length of hospital stay was 13.68 days (95% CI, 11.3–16.06 days). After redo surgery, 82% of the patients were free of stoma (95% CI, 75%–90%), and 24% of patients (95% CI, 0%–39%) had fecal incontinence. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (P=0.002) was associated with a lower probability of being free of stoma in meta-regression.
Conclusion
Redo colorectal and coloanal anastomoses are strategies to restore colonic continuity. The decision to perform a redo operation should be based on a proper evaluation of the morbidity and mortality risks, the probability of remaining free of stoma, the quality of life, and a functional assessment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Abdominoperineal pull-through with delayed coloanal anastomosis for pelvic anastomotic failure—a systematic review
T. J. K. Tan, S.-M. Ng, T. S. Q. Lee, E. K.-W. Tan, I. Seow-En
Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic redo endorectal pull‐through procedure for complex rectovaginal fistula after rectal resection for endometriosis: A Video Vignette
Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Francisco Tustumi, Ana Sarah Portilho, Lucas de Araujo Horcel, Victor Edmond Seid
Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(11): 2284. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search