Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
1 "Radek Vrba"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Display
Original Article
Effect of reinforcement suture on anastomotic healing in rectal and sigmoid tumor resections, single-center experience: a retrospective case-controlled study
Tomáš Řezáč, Petr Špička, Pavel Zbořil, Martin Stašek, Radek Vrba, Dušan Klos
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(2):139-146.   Published online March 11, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00948.0135
  • 5,866 View
  • 144 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Healing of colorectal anastomosis is burdened with a number of risk factors and the development of leak carries with it higher morbidity and mortality associated not only with worse quality of life but also worse oncological outcomes. The purpose of the study was an evaluation of the effect of reinforcement suture in the healing of stapler rectal anastomosis and risk factors for anastomotic leakage in mid, upper rectal and sigmoid tumors.
Methods
A total of 357 patients who underwent curative resection for rectal or sigmoid tumor over 5 years were analyzed. Risk factors, baseline demographic and clinical data, and presence of leak were recorded. All statistical analyses were carried out at a significance level of P<0.05.
Results
One hundred fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. The overall incidence of leak was 2.8% in the group with reinforcement suture and 6.3% in the group without reinforcement suture. Because of the low incidence of leak the results were not statistically significant. Further results also show that none of the monitored parameters (age, weight, body mass index, tumor distance, preoperative radiotherapy, tumor stage, type of surgery) were significant predictors of anastomotic leakage.
Conclusion
Although the reinforcement suture is a safe and simple option for anastomosis protection after rectal or sigmoid resections, its statistical significance was not demonstrated in our study.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk Factors for Sigmoid Colonic Anastomosis: A Comparative and Cross-Sectional Analysis
    Tutkun Talih, Gokhan Sonmez, Erdogan Sozuer, Sevket Tombul, Mahmut Kulturoglu, Dogan Islam, Hızır Akyıldız, Abdullah Demirtas, Mustafa Karaagac, Fatih Dal
    Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management.2025; Volume 21: 1219.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive evaluation of reinforcement strategies for anastomotic leak prevention in rectal cancer surgery: an umbrella review of meta-analyses
    Arcangelo Picciariello, Gianpiero Gravante, Alfredo Annicchiarico, Rossella Melcarne, Leonardo Vincenti
    Updates in Surgery.2025; 77(8): 2195.     CrossRef
  • Defining key interventions for rectal cancer surgery: a literature review and expert panel consensus
    Cédric Schraepen, Gabriele Bislenghi, Kris Vanhaecht, André D’Hoore, Albert Wolthuis, Ellen Coeckelberghs
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP