Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
6 "Min Ki Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Editorial
Malignant disease,Colorectal cancer,Prognosis
Elderly High-Risk Stage II Colorectal Cancer Patients: Candidates for Improving Outcome?
Min Ki Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(5):267-268.   Published online October 29, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00864.0123
  • 2,441 View
  • 55 Download
  • 1 Citations
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effects of linalyl acetate on oxidative stress, inflammation and endothelial dysfunction: can linalyl acetate prevent mild cognitive impairment?
    You Kyoung Shin, Geun Hee Seol
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Article
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer
Influence of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol on Postoperative Inflammation and Short-term Postoperative Surgical Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Heba Essam Jaloun, In Kyu Lee, Min Ki Kim, Na Young Sung, Suhail Abdullah Al Turkistani, Sun Min Park, Dae Youn Won, Sang Hyun Hong, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Yoon Suk Lee, Hae Myung Jeon
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):264-272.   Published online May 15, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.03.25
  • 7,756 View
  • 167 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 15 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Many studies have shown that the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols improve postoperative surgical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to observe the effects on postoperative inflammatory markers and to explore the effects of a high degree of compliance and the use of epidural anesthesia on inflammation and surgical outcomes.
Methods
Four hundred patients underwent colorectal cancer surgery at 2 hospitals during 2 different periods, namely, from January 2006 to December 2009 and from January 2017 to July 2017. Data related to the patient’s clinicopathological features, inflammatory markers, percentage of compliance with elements of the ERAS protocol, and use of epidural anesthesia were collected from a prospectively maintained database.
Results
The complication rate and the length of hospital stay (LOS) were less in the ERAS group than in the conventional group (P = 0.005 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively). The postoperative white blood cell count and the duration required for leukocytes to normalize were reduced in patients following the ERAS protocol (P ≤ 0.001). Other inflammatory markers, such as lymphocyte count (P = 0.008), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.032), and C-reactive protein level (P ≤ 0.001), were lower in the ERAS protocol group. High compliance ( ≥ 70%) was strongly associated with the complication rate and the LOS (P = 0.008 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion
ERAS protocols decrease early postoperative inflammation and improves short-term postoperative recovery outcomes such as complication rate and the LOS. High compliance ( ≥ 70%) with the ERAS protocol elements accelerates the positive effects of ERAS on surgical outcomes; however, the effect on inflammation was very small.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Challenging issues of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery programs in South Korea
    Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Ho-Jin Lee
    Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.2024; 19(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Effect of different anesthetic modalities with multimodal analgesia on postoperative pain level in colorectal tumor patients
    Ji-Chun Tang, Jia-Wei Ma, Jin-Jin Jian, Jie Shen, Liang-Liang Cao
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 16(2): 364.     CrossRef
  • Enhanced recovery pathway in open and minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective study on feasibility, compliance, and outcomes in a high-volume resource limited tertiary cancer center
    Martin Thomas, Vandana Agarwal, Ashwin DeSouza, Riddhi Joshi, Minal Mali, Karuna Panhale, Omkar K. Salvi, Reshma Ambulkar, Shailesh Shrikhande, Avanish Saklani
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Initial experience of abdominal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system
    Wed Alshalawi, Chul Seung Lee, In Kyeong Kim, Yoon Suk Lee
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2023; 26(4): 208.     CrossRef
  • Association between enrollment in an enhanced recovery program for colorectal cancer surgery and long‐term recurrence and survival
    Andres Zorrilla‐Vaca, Javier Ripolles‐Melchor, Ane Abad‐Motos, Inés Rubiera Mingu, Nekane Moreno‐Jurado, Fátima Martínez‐Durán, Isabel Pérez‐Martínez, Alfredo Abad‐Gurumeta, María L. FuenMayor‐Varela, Gabriel E. Mena, Michael C. Grant
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 125(8): 1269.     CrossRef
  • Implementation and improvement of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for colorectal cancer surgery
    Bo Yoon Choi, Jung Hoon Bae, Chul Seung Lee, Seung Rim Han, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyu Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(4): 223.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine on Postoperative Stress Response of Patients with Gastrointestinal Tumors
    Haiping Zhao, Wenhui Sun, Tao Huang
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early colon cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 558.     CrossRef
  • Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577.     CrossRef
  • Commentary: Preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts complications after esophageal resection that can be used as inclusion criteria for enhanced recovery after surgery
    Cheng Shen, Qiang Pu, Guowei Che
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221.     CrossRef
  • A propensity score-matched analysis of advanced energy devices and conventional monopolar device for colorectal cancer surgery: comparison of clinical and oncologic outcomes
    Woo Jin Song, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(5): 290.     CrossRef
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery: importance of compliance audits
    Jung Hoon Bae
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2021; 64(12): 820.     CrossRef
  • Effect of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Dae Ro Lim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(4): 209.     CrossRef
Review
Reconsideration of the Safety of Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery for Cancer
Gyung Mo Son, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Min Ki Kim, Jun-Gi Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(5):229-237.   Published online October 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.10.16
  • 3,967 View
  • 115 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
The oncological outcomes of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery were evaluated in recent multicenter randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The MRC-CLASSIC, COLOR II, and COREAN trials found no differences in local recurrence or diseasefree survival rate between laparoscopic and open surgery. However, the noninferiority of laparoscopic surgery with respect to open surgery for rectal cancer was not established on statistical analysis in the ACOSOG Z6051 and the ALaCaRT trials. Quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) is one of the most important prognostic factors. Incomplete TME had unfavorable oncologic outcomes compared to complete TME. Although TME quality can be clearly identified on pathologic evaluation, there is controversy regarding the acceptable range of oncologically safe TME for laparoscopic surgery. It is not certain whether near-complete TME has an unfavorable oncologic impact and whether laparoscopic surgery with near-complete TME is an oncological threat. Therefore, the surgical community will be interested in the long-term outcomes and meta-analyses of ongoing large-scale RCTs. Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery has been steadily improving its safety for oncology surgery, which has been reported consistently in various multicenter RCTs. To improve surgical quality, colorectal surgeons should choose the most appropriate surgical technique, including laparoscopic surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Operative and Survival Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Elderly and Very Elderly Patients: A Study in a Tertiary Hospital in South Korea
    Hugo Cuellar-Gomez, Siti Mayuha Rusli, María Esther Ocharan-Hernández, Tae-Hoon Lee, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon-Hahn Kim, Cruz Vargas-De-León, Yazhou He
    Journal of Oncology.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Evidenz in der minimal-invasiven onkologischen Chirurgie des Kolons und des Rektums
    Carolin Kastner, Joachim Reibetanz, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Armin Wiegering
    Der Chirurg.2021; 92(4): 334.     CrossRef
  • The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery for Very Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Single Center’s Experience
    Hyuk-Jun Chung, Jun-Gi Kim, Hyung-Jin Kim, Hyeon-Min Cho, Bong-Hyeon Kye
    Biomedicines.2021; 9(11): 1720.     CrossRef
  • Reoperative laparoscopic rectal surgery: Another potential tool for the expert’s toolbox
    Marc D. Basson
    The American Journal of Surgery.2020; 219(6): 894.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Indication for and Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage IIa (T3N0M0) Colon Cancer
Chul-Hyo Jeon, Min Ki Kim, In Kyu Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(5):254-261.   Published online October 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.12.04
  • 3,914 View
  • 92 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in stage IIa colon cancer is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing survival in patients with stage IIa colon cancer, the role of AC, and the indications for AC utilization by surgical oncologists.
Methods
Between January 2004 and December 2010, 736 patients with stage IIa colon cancer underwent curative resection in 1 of 6 participating hospitals. Factors related to survival were identified and analyzed according to whether AC was administered or not. After high- and low-risk groups were identified, their respective results were analyzed.
Results
The 5-year overall survival (OS) of stage IIa colon cancer was 90.3%. With the exception of poorly differentiated histology, indications for AC did not include typical high-risk factors. The indications for AC were significantly younger patients, higher body mass index (BMI), lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, and higher histologic grade. BMI, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, and harvested lymph node (LN) count were significant factors for disease-free survival, while BMI and ASA physical status classification were significant factors for OS in the chemotherapy group. In the high-risk group, AC was associated with increased OS in univariate analysis. BMI and harvested LN count were statistically significant in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
Surgical oncologists consider the patient’s condition and postoperative course rather than high-risk factors to determine use of AC. Regardless of AC use, both the extent of surgery and the patient’s subsequent status affected the survival rate in the high-risk group. None of the factors identified influenced survival rate in the low-risk group.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Use of ascitic CEA levels as a predictive value for distant metastasis in high-risk stage II and III colorectal cancer
    Abdullah Al-Sawat, Jung Hoon Bea, Seung-Rim Han, Hyo Jin Lee, Mi Ran Yoon, Yoon Suk Lee, Do Sang Lee, Chul Seung Lee, In Kyu Lee
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(2): 365.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factor and Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage IIA Colon Cancer
    Mok-Won Lee, Jin-Su Kim, Ji-Yeon Kim, Kyung-ha Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(1): 35.     CrossRef
Efficacy and Safety of Ramosetron Injection for Nausea and Vomiting in Colorectal-Cancer Patients Undergoing a Laparoscopic Colectomy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study
Han Eol Park, Min Ki Kim, Won-Kyung Kang
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(1):36-41.   Published online February 28, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.34.1.36
  • 4,325 View
  • 68 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

A laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal-cancer patients is usually associated with a high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of injection of long-acting 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist for the reduction of PONV in patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

A total of 48 patients scheduled to undergo a laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer were randomized in a double-blinded fashion. Patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups and assigned to receive either 0.3 mg of ramosetron intravenously (group A, n = 25) or 2 mL of normal saline (placebo) (group B, n = 22) immediately after the operation. The incidence of PONV, the nausea severity scale score, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, the total amount of patient-controlled analgesia used, the recovery of bowel function, and morbidities were assessed at 1 hour and at 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery.

Results

The baseline and the operative characteristics were similar between the groups (P > 0.05). The number of cases without PONV (complete response) was higher for group A (ramosetron) than group B (normal saline): 24 hours after surgery, 92.0% (23 of 25) for group A versus 54.5% (12 of 22) for group B; 48 hours after surgery, 92% (23 of 25) for group A versus 81.8% (18 of 22) for group B (both P < 0.05). No serious adverse events occurred.

Conclusion

Postoperative ramosetron injection is effective for the prevention of PONV after a laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal-cancer patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Postoperative ileus after digestive surgery: Network meta‐analysis of pharmacological intervention
    Etienne Buscail, Thibault Planchamp, Guillaume Le Cosquer, Manon Bouchet, Julie Thevenin, Nicolas Carrere, Fabrice Muscari, Olivier Abbo, Charlotte Maulat, Ariane Weyl, Jean Pierre Duffas, Antoine Philis, Laurent Ghouti, Cindy Canivet, Jean Paul Motta, Na
    British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.2024; 90(1): 107.     CrossRef
  • A Clinical Risk Analysis of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Masatsugu Hiraki, Toshiya Tanaka, Mika Koga, Daisuke Miura, Eiji Sadashima, Hirofumi Sato, Shinji Mitsumizo, Kenji Kitahara
    Journal of Coloproctology.2022; 42(03): 203.     CrossRef
  • Comparing the effects of continuous infusion of esmolol and ramosetron alone and in combination on nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study
    Jae Young Ji, Nan Seol Kim, Yong Han Seo, Ho Soon Jung, Hea Rim Chun, Jin Soo Park, Jeong Soo Choi, Jae Min Ahn, Woo Jong Kim
    Medicine.2022; 101(35): e30105.     CrossRef
  • Levosulpiride and Ramosetron for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Surgery
    R. T. Ranjithkumar, Imran Sholapur, Ravi Bhat, C. Chandan Kumar
    Anesthesia Essays & Researches.2022; 16(3): 307.     CrossRef
  • Reducing ileus after colorectal surgery: A network meta-analysis of therapeutic interventions
    James Ashcroft, Aminder Anthony Singh, Bhavna Ramachandran, Amir Habeeb, Victoria Hudson, Jeremy Meyer, Constantinos Simillis, Richard Justin Davies
    Clinical Nutrition.2021; 40(7): 4772.     CrossRef
  • Management strategies for the treatment and prevention of postoperative/postdischarge nausea and vomiting: an updated review
    Ofelia Loani Elvir-Lazo, Paul F. White, Roya Yumul, Hillenn Cruz Eng
    F1000Research.2020; 9: 983.     CrossRef
  • Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis
    Stephanie Weibel, Gerta Rücker, Leopold HJ Eberhart, Nathan L Pace, Hannah M Hartl, Olivia L Jordan, Debora Mayer, Manuel Riemer, Maximilian S Schaefer, Diana Raj, Insa Backhaus, Antonia Helf, Tobias Schlesinger, Peter Kienbaum, Peter Kranke
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing colorectal surgery within an institutional enhanced recovery after surgery protocol: comparison of two prophylactic antiemetic regimens
    Jennifer Holder-Murray, Stephen A Esper, Michael L Boisen, Julie Gealey, Katie Meister, David S Medich, Kathirvel Subramaniam
    Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2019; 72(4): 344.     CrossRef
Editorial
Effect of Laparoscopic Surgery on the Initiation and Completion of Chemotherapy in Patients With Colon Cancer
Min-Ki Kim, Won-Kyung Kang
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(6):250-250.   Published online December 31, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.6.250
  • 2,311 View
  • 24 Download
PDF

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP