Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Ki Jung Ahn"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Display
Original Articles
Difference in Tumor Area as a Predictor of a Pathological Complete Response for Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Ji Hyeong Song, Yo-Han Park, Sang Hyuk Seo, Anbok Lee, Kwang Hee Kim, Min Sung An, Ki Beom Bae, Kwan Hee Hong, Jin Won Hwang, Ji Hyun Kim, Hyun Seok Jung, Ki Jung Ahn
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(6):219-226.   Published online December 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.6.219
  • 5,661 View
  • 62 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study was conducted to discover the clinical factors that can predict pathologically complete remission (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), so that those factors may help in deciding on a treatment program for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods

A total of 137 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were retrospectively enrolled in this study, and data were collected retrospectively. The patients had undergone a total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant CRT. Histologic response was categorized as pCR vs. non-pCR. The tumor area was defined as (tumor length) × (maximum tumor depth). The difference in tumor area was defined as pre-CRT tumor area – post-CRT tumor area. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to find the factors affecting pCR. A P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Twenty-three patients (16.8%) achieved pCR. On the univariate analysis, endoscopic tumor circumferential rate <50%, low pre-CRT T & N stage, low post-CRT T & N stage, small pretreatment tumor area, and large difference in tumor area before and after neoadjuvant CRT were predictive factors of pCR. A multivariate analysis found that only the difference in tumor area before and after neoadjuvant CRT was an independent predictor of pCR (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The difference in tumor area, as determined using radiologic tools, before and after neoadjuvant CRT may be important predictor of pCR. This clinical factor may help surgeons to determine which patients who received neoadjuvant CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer should undergo surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Particular aspects of treating rectal cancer: The watch and wait approach
    Diana Andreea Draghici, Alexandru Rares Stoian, Vlad Andrei Porojan, Oana Ilona David, Ştefan Bedereag, Anda Natalia Ciuhu, Andrei Haidar, Dragoş Crețoiu, Carmen Elena Condrat, Valentin Titus Grigorean
    Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2023; 19(2): 461.     CrossRef
  • Predicting stage ypT0–1N0 for nonradical management in patients with middle or low rectal cancer who undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study
    Jeehye Lee, In Jun Yang, Jung Wook Suh, Hong-min Ahn, Heung-Kwon Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Young-Hoon Kim, Kyoung Ho Lee, Sung-Bum Kang
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Radiotherapy after local excision of rectal cancer may offer reduced local recurrence rates
    H. J. S. Jones, S. Goodbrand, R. Hompes, N. Mortensen, C. Cunningham
    Colorectal Disease.2019; 21(4): 451.     CrossRef
  • ‘Watch and wait’ in rectal cancer: summary of the current evidence
    Jason On, Emad H Aly
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2018; 33(9): 1159.     CrossRef
Efficacy of Dose-Escalated Radiotherapy for Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
Sunmi Jo, Yunseon Choi, Sung-Kwang Park, Jin-Young Kim, Hyun Jung Kim, Yun-Han Lee, Won Yong Oh, Heunglae Cho, Ki Jung Ahn
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(2):66-72.   Published online April 30, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.2.66
  • 5,732 View
  • 36 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of radiotherapy (RT) on progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with recurrent colorectal cancer.

Methods

We reviewed the records of 22 patients with recurrent colorectal cancer treated with RT between 2008 and 2014. The median radiation dose for recurrent disease was 57.6 Gy (range, 45–75.6 Gy). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the type of RT: patients underwent RT without previous history of irradiation (n = 14) and those treated with secondary RT (reirradiation: n = 8) at the time of recurrence.

Results

The median follow-up period was 24.9 months (range, 4.5–66.6 months). Progression was observed in 14 patients (including 8 with loco-regional failure and 9 with distant metastases). Distant metastases were related to the RT dose (<70 Gy, P = 0.031). The 2-year loco-regional control (LRC), PFS, and overall survival (OS) rates were 74.6%, 45.1%, and 82.0%, respectively. The LRC rate was not different between the patients treated with RT for the first time and those treated with reirradiation (P = 0.101, 2-year LRC 79.5% vs. 41.7%). However, reirradiation was related to poor PFS (P = 0.022) and OS (P = 0.002). An escalated RT dose (≥70 Gy) was associated with a higher PFS (P = 0.014, 2-year PFS 63.5% vs. 20.8%).

Conclusion

Salvage RT for locally recurrent colorectal cancer can be offered when surgery is impossible. Dose-escalated RT shows a possible benefit in reducing the risk of progression.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Colorectal Cancer
    Shigeru Yamada, Hirotoshi Takiyama, Yuka Isozaki, Makoto Shinoto, Hirokazu Makishima, Naoyoshi Yamamoto, Hiroshi Tsuji
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2021; 5(2): 113.     CrossRef
  • LncRNA TTN‐AS1/miR‐134‐5p/PAK3 axis regulates the radiosensitivity of human large intestine cancer cells through the P21 pathway and AKT/GSK‐3β/β‐catenin pathway
    Zhenkui Zuo, Shuling Ji, Lulu He, Yage Zhang, Zining Peng, Jiarui Han
    Cell Biology International.2020; 44(11): 2284.     CrossRef
  • A Review on the Special Radiotherapy Techniques of Colorectal Cancer
    Shing Yau Tam, Vincent W. C. Wu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of overall survival and quality of life between patients undergoing anal reconstruction and patients undergoing traditional lower abdominal stoma after radical resection
    P. Du, S.-Y. Wang, P.-F. Zheng, J. Mao, H. Hu, Z.-B. Cheng
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2019; 21(10): 1390.     CrossRef
  • Prospective Observational Study of High-Dose Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Pelvic Recurrence of Rectal Cancer (GUNMA 0801)
    Shintaro Shiba, Masahiko Okamoto, Hiroki Kiyohara, Tatsuya Ohno, Takuya Kaminuma, Takayuki Asao, Hitoshi Ojima, Ken Shirabe, Hiroyuki Kuwano, Takashi Nakano
    Frontiers in Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of varying radiation dosages on MMP1 expression, and MMP1 knockdown on the viability and migration of SW620 cells
    Fang Ju, Na Li, Wenming Wang, Haicheng Yuan
    Molecular Medicine Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dose-Escalated Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
    Hyung Jin Kim, Seong Taek Oh
    Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(2): 47.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP