Annals of Coloproctology

Original Articles

Malignant disease,Rectal cancer, Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer

Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Elderly Stage II High-Risk Colorectal Cancer Patients: Yujin Lee, Inseok Park, Hyunjin Cho, Geumhee Gwak, Keunho Yang, Byung-Noe Bae; Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(5):298-305. Published online July 6, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00829.0118

3,278 View
96 Download
13 Web of Science
16 Citations

Purpose
Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is recommended for patients with stage II colorectal cancer with adverse features. However, the effect of adjuvant treatment in elderly patients with high-risk stage II colorectal cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the oncologic outcomes in elderly high-risk stage II colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative resection with or without AC.
Methods
Patients aged over 70 years having stage II colorectal adenocarcinoma with at least 1 adverse feature who underwent radical surgery between 2008 and 2017 at a single center were included. We compared recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients who received more than 80% of the planned AC cycle (the AC+ group) and those who did not receive it (the AC− group).
Results
The AC+ and AC– group contained 46 patients and 50 patients, respectively. The log-rank test revealed no significant intergroup differences in RFS (P = 0.083) and OS (P = 0.122). In the subgroup of 27 patients with more than 2 adverse features, the AC+ group (n = 16) showed better RFS (P = 0.006) and OS (P = 0.025) than the AC− group. In this subgroup, AC was the only significant factor affecting RFS in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.023). AC was significantly associated with OS (P = 0.033) in the univariate analysis, but not in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.332).
Conclusion
Among elderly patients with stage II high-risk colorectal cancer, the AC+ group did not show better RFS or OS than the AC− group. However, selected patients with more than 2 adverse features might benefit from AC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A Prognostic Model Based on the Log Odds Ratio of Positive Lymph Nodes Predicts Prognosis of Patients with Rectal Cancer
Jian Li, Yu zhou Yang, Peng Xu, Cheng Zhang
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2024; 55(3): 1111. CrossRef
Complete Obstruction, a Real Risk Factor: A Comprehensive Study on Obstruction in Stage IIA Colon Cancer With Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Soo Young Oh, Chan Wook Kim, Seonok Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2024; 23(2): 135. CrossRef
Clinical implication of tissue carcinoembryonic antigen expression in association with serum carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer
Abdulmohsin Fawzi Aldilaijan, Young Il Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jihun Kim, Jun-Soo Ro, Jin Cheon Kim
Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Advances in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: A Focus on Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
Youngbae Jeon, Eun Jung Park
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Oncologic outcomes in elderly patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: a multi-institutional survey in Kinki District, Japan
Tomohito Tanaka, Suguru Yamashita, Haruo Kuroboshi, Junya Kamibayashi, Atsushi Sugiura, Kaori Yoriki, Taisuke Mori, Kazuharu Tanaka, Aiko Nagashima, Michihide Maeda, Shoji Kamiura, Yukako Mizuno, Noriko Ohtake, Tomoyuki Ichimura, Taiki Kikuchi, Yuri Nobut
International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 27(6): 1084. CrossRef
Does adjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes in elderly patients with colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world studies
Jianbing Chen, Chengda Zhang, Yajuan Wu
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2022; 16(4): 383. CrossRef
Risk factors for recurrence in elderly patients with stage II colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study
Takuki Yagyu, Manabu Yamamoto, Akimitsu Tanio, Kazushi Hara, Ken Sugezawa, Chihiro Uejima, Kyoichi Kihara, Shigeru Tatebe, Yasuro Kurisu, Shunsuke Shibata, Toshio Yamamoto, Hiroshi Nishie, Setsujo Shiota, Hiroaki Saito, Takuji Naka, Kenji Sugamura, Kuniyu
BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Effects of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
Jeongwon Yeom, Hee-Sook Lim
Clinical Nutrition Research.2022; 11(2): 75. CrossRef
The Prognostic Reliability of Lymphovascular Invasion for Patients with T3N0 Colorectal Cancer in Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decision Making
Hayoung Lee, Seung-Yeon Yoo, In Ja Park, Seung-Mo Hong, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Cancers.2022; 14(12): 2833. CrossRef
Is the oncological impact of vascular invasion more important in right colon cancer?
Gyung Mo Son
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(2): 49. CrossRef
Molecular analyses of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer
Chang Hyun Kim
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 586. CrossRef
Epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention of colorectal cancer
Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 549. CrossRef
Molecular Analyses in Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer: A Review-An English Version
Chang Hyun Kim
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 197. CrossRef
Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention of Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 231. CrossRef
Adjuvant chemotherapy benefits on patients with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen in stage IIA colon cancer: a SEER-based analysis
Huabin Zhou, Songsheng Wang, Zhai Cai, Enming Qiu, Qianyun Chen, Xi Rao, Shuai Han, Zhou Li
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(12): 2481. CrossRef
Elderly High-Risk Stage II Colorectal Cancer Patients: Candidates for Improving Outcome?
Min Ki Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(5): 267. CrossRef

Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer

Prognostic Factors Affecting Disease-Free Survival and Overall Survival in T4 Colon Cancer: Taeyeong Eom, Yujin Lee, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae; Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(4):259-265. Published online June 24, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00759.0108; Correction in: Ann Coloproctol 2023;39(5):444

5,033 View
103 Download
16 Web of Science
16 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
It is known that as the T stage of a carcinoma progresses, the prognosis becomes poorer. However, there are few studies about factors that affect the prognosis of T4 advanced colon cancer. This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in T4 colon cancer.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with stage T4 on histopathology after undergoing curative surgery for colon cancer between March 2009 and March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed for factors related to postoperative survival. Primary outcomes were DFS and OS.
Results
Eighty-two patients were included in the study. DFS and OS of the pathologic (p) T4b group were not inferior to that of the pT4a group. Multivariate analysis showed that differentiation (hazard ratio [HR], 4.994; P = 0.005), and laparoscopic surgery (HR, 0.323; P = 0.008) were significant prognostic factors for DFS, while differentiation (HR, 7.904; P ≤ 0.001) and chemotherapy (HR, 0.344; P = 0.038) were significant prognostic factors for OS.
Conclusion
Tumor differentiation, laparoscopic surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy were found to be significant prognostic factors in patients with T4 colon cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy and curative resections by laparoscopy might improve the prognosis in these patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Cytotoxicity of Salvigenin from Asterohyptis stellulata in Combination with Clinical Drugs Against Colorectal Cancer
Briand André Rojas-Castaño, Adriana C. Hernández-Rojas, Rogelio Pereda-Miranda, Mabel Fragoso-Serrano
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia.2024; 34(5): 1172. CrossRef
Sorbate metal complexes as newer antibacterial, antibiofilm, and anticancer compounds
Amira I. Abousaty, Fifi M. Reda, Wessam A. Hassanin, Walaa M. Felifel, Walaa H. El-Shwiniy, Heba M. R. M. Selim, Mahmoud M. Bendary
BMC Microbiology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The Association Between Surgical Site Infection and Prognosis of T4 Colorectal Cancer
Takuya Koike, Masaya Mukai, Kyoko Kishima, Daiki Yokoyama, Sayuri Hasegawa, Lin Fung Chan, Hideki Izumi, Kazutake Okada, Tomoko Sugiyama, Takuma Tajiri
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Utilizing stimuli-responsive nanoparticles to deliver and enhance the anti-tumor effects of bilirubin
Elaheh Mirhadi, Alexandra E. Butler, Prashant Kesharwani, Amirhossein Sahebkar
Biotechnology Advances.2024; 77: 108469. CrossRef
Can clinicopathologic high-risk features in T3N0 colon cancer be reliable prognostic factors?
Hyun Gu Lee, Young IL Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(2): 109. CrossRef
Clinical implication of tissue carcinoembryonic antigen expression in association with serum carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer
Abdulmohsin Fawzi Aldilaijan, Young Il Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jihun Kim, Jun-Soo Ro, Jin Cheon Kim
Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach
Ji-Hyun Seo, In-Ja Park
Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5211. CrossRef
Erratum to “Prognostic factors affecting disease-free survival and overall survival in T4 colon cancer”

Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 444. CrossRef
Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus R0 resection for resectable colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases and low peritoneal cancer index scores: A collaborative observational study from Korea and Japan
Daichi Kitaguchi, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Shoma Sasaki, Yuichiro Tsukada, Masaaki Ito
International Journal of Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The Prognostic Reliability of Lymphovascular Invasion for Patients with T3N0 Colorectal Cancer in Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decision Making
Hayoung Lee, Seung-Yeon Yoo, In Ja Park, Seung-Mo Hong, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Cancers.2022; 14(12): 2833. CrossRef
Molecular analyses of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer
Chang Hyun Kim
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 586. CrossRef
Molecular Analyses in Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer: A Review-An English Version
Chang Hyun Kim
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 197. CrossRef
Impact on inadequate lymph node harvest on survival in T4N0 colorectal cancer: A would-be medical center experience in Taiwan
Yi-Kai Kao, Hsin-Pao Chen, Kuang-Wen Liu, Ling-Chiao Song, Yi-Chieh Chen, Yu-Chun Lin, Chih-I Chen
Medicine.2022; 101(52): e32497. CrossRef
Prognostic risk factors for pT4 colon cancer: A retrospective cohort study
Tsutomu Kumamoto, Shigeki Yamaguchi, Ryosuke Nakagawa, Yoji Nagashima, Fumi Maeda, Kimitaka Tani, Hiroka Kondo, Kurodo Koshino, Yuka Kaneko, Yoshiko Bamba, Shimpei Ogawa, Yuji Inoue, Michio Itabashi
Oncology Letters.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Antiproliferative and palliative activity of flavonoids in colorectal cancer
Javier Fernández, Blanca Silván, Rodrigo Entrialgo-Cadierno, Claudio J. Villar, Raffaele Capasso, José Antonio Uranga, Felipe Lombó, Raquel Abalo
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2021; 143: 112241. CrossRef

Benign GI diease

Prognostic Factors and Management for Left Colonic Perforation: Can Hartmann’s Procedure Be Preventable?: Yilseok Joo, Yujin Lee, Taeyoung Yoo, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae; Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(3):178-185. Published online June 30, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.11.14.1

3,210 View
78 Download
4 Web of Science
4 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
To identify factors significantly associated with the mortality of patients with left colonic perforation, and to compare the outcome of Hartmann’s procedure (HP) and primary repair (PR) or primary anastomosis (PA) in patients with left colonic perforation without factors associated with mortality.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery for left colonic perforation from January 2009 to February 2018. Preoperative factors related to postoperative mortality, including vital signs, laboratory findings, and intraoperative findings, were analyzed by type of operation. The chi-square, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to analyze the data.
Results
Ninety-one patients were included (36 men, 55 women), and 15 (16.5%) died postoperatively. Prognostic factors were age, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, bleeding tendency, acute kidney injury, hemodynamic instability, and the existence of feculent ascites. Leukopenia and longer operative time were independent risk factors for mortality. Seventy-nine patients did not have leukopenia and 30 of these patients who underwent PR without diversion were excluded from the subanalysis. HP was performed in 30 patients, and PR with diversion and PA with or without diversion were performed in 19. Compared to the other operative methods, HP had no advantage in reducing hospital mortality (P=0.458) and morbidity.
Conclusion
Leukopenia could be an objective prognostic factor for left colonic perforation. Although HP is the gold standard for septic left colonic perforation, it did not improve the hospital mortality of the patients without leukopenia. For such patients, PR or PA may be suggested as an alternative option for left colonic perforation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Risk Factors for Postoperative Major Morbidity, Anastomotic Leakage, Re-Surgery and Mortality in Patients with Colonic Perforation
Maximilian Brunner, Lara Gärtner, Andreas Weiß, Klaus Weber, Axel Denz, Christian Krautz, Georg F. Weber, Robert Grützmann
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(17): 5220. CrossRef
Evaluation of Morbidity and Mortality in Iatrogenic Colonic Perforation During Colonoscopy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Ajibola A Adebisi, Daniel E Onobun, Adeola Adediran, Reginald N Ononye, Ethel O Ojo, Adedayo Oluyi, Ayotunde Ojo, Stephen Oputa
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Patient outcomes and prognostic factors associated with colonic perforation surgery: a retrospective study
Do-bin Lee, Seonhui Shin, Chun-Seok Yang
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science.2022; 39(2): 133. CrossRef
Morbidity and Mortality of Neutropenic Patients in Visceral Surgery: A Narrative Review
Ann-Kathrin Lederer, Fabian Bartsch, Markus Moehler, Peter Gaßmann, Hauke Lang
Cells.2022; 11(20): 3314. CrossRef

Original article

WITHDRAWN: Risk factors and management for left colonic perforation: Yilseok Joo, Yujin Lee, Taeyoung Yoo, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae; Received September 2, 2019 Accepted November 14, 2019 Published online January 31, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.11.14

1,915 View
93 Download

Original Article

Comparative Study of a Single-Incision Laparoscopic and a Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy for the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis: Jungwoo Kang, Byung Noe Bae, Geumhee Gwak, Inseok Park, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Ki Whan Kim, Sehwan Han, Hong-Joo Kim, Young-Duck Kim; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(6):304-308. Published online December 31, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.6.304

4,650 View
33 Download
9 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

For the treatment of acute appendicitis, a conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been widely performed. Recently, the use of single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is increasing because it is believed to have advantages over conventional laparoscopic surgery. In this study, we compared SILS and a conventional LA.

Methods

We analyzed the 217 patients who received laparoscopy-assisted appendectomies between August 2010 and April 2012 at Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital. One hundred-twelve patients underwent SILS, and 105 patients underwent LA. For the two groups, we compared the operation times, postoperative laboratory results, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and postoperative complications.

Results

The patients' demographics, including body mass index, were not significantly different between the two groups. There were 6 perforated appendicitis cases in the SILS group and 5 cases in the LA group. The mean operative time in the SILS group was 65.88 ± 22.74 minutes whereas that in the LA group was 61.70 ± 22.27 minutes (P = 0.276). There were no significant differences in the mean hospital stays, use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and wound infections between the two groups.

Conclusion

Postoperative pain, complications and hospital stay showed no statistically significant differences between the SILS and the LA groups. However, our SILS method uses a single trocar and two latex tubes, so cost savings and reduced interference during surgery are expected.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A Randomized Trial to Compare the Conventional Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Procedure to Single-Incision and One-Puncture Procedure That Was Safe and Feasible, Even for Surgeons in Training
Tomoe Moriguchi, Seiro Machigashira, Koshiro Sugita, Masato Kawano, Keisuke Yano, Shun Onishi, Koji Yamada, Waka Yamada, Ryuta Masuya, Takafumi Kawano, Kazuhiko Nakame, Motoi Mukai, Tatsuru Kaji, Satoshi Ieiri
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2019; 29(3): 392. CrossRef
European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery
Salvador Morales-Conde, Andrea Peeters, Yannick M. Meyer, Stavros A. Antoniou, Isaías Alarcón del Agua, Alberto Arezzo, Simone Arolfo, Amir Ben Yehuda, Luigi Boni, Elisa Cassinotti, Giovanni Dapri, Tao Yang, Sofie Fransen, Antonello Forgione, Shahab Hajib
Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(4): 996. CrossRef
Single-port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Beyond the Learning Curve: A Retrospective Comparison With Multi-port Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Sarah Assali, Sarah Eapen, Terry Carman, Sophia Horattas, Christopher R. Daigle, Charudutt Paranjape
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2018; 28(5): 291. CrossRef
Minimally invasive surgery and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer
Heather L. Yeo, Jonathan S. Abelson, Jialin Mao, Meera Cheerharan, Jeffrey Milsom, Art Sedrakyan
Journal of Surgical Research.2016; 202(2): 299. CrossRef
Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancers: Experience of 258 Consecutive Cases with Rational Manipulation of Instrument for Safety and Benefit
Sho Hirabayashi, Kenji Hibi, Yoshihiro Hotta, Ryohei Fukumoto, Takuya Watanabe, Junichi Sakamoto, Yasuhiro Kodera
Annals of Cancer Research and Therapy.2016; 24(1): 7. CrossRef
Gasless transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy as a safe and cost-effective alternative surgical procedure for mild acute appendicitis
Koji Munakata, Mamoru Uemura, Junzo Shimizu, Masakazu Miyake, Taishi Hata, Kimimasa Ikeda, Keizo Dono, Masashi Kitada, Yuichiro Doki, Masaki Mori
Surgery Today.2016; 46(3): 319. CrossRef
Patient and parental scar assessment after single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: Long-term follow-up from a prospective randomized trial
Alessandra C. Gasior, E. Marty Knott, George W. Holcomb, Daniel J. Ostlie, Shawn D. St. Peter
Journal of Pediatric Surgery.2014; 49(1): 120. CrossRef
Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Single Incision versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Michael Clerveus, Antonio Morandeira‐Rivas, Carlos Moreno‐Sanz, Maria Luz Herrero‐Bogajo, Joaquin Salvelio Picazo‐Yeste, Gloria Tadeo‐Ruiz
World Journal of Surgery.2014; 38(8): 1937. CrossRef
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Seung-Yong Jeong
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(6): 282. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search