Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
6 "Jungbin Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer
Prognostic Factors Affecting Disease-Free Survival and Overall Survival in T4 Colon Cancer
Taeyeong Eom, Yujin Lee, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(4):259-265.   Published online June 24, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00759.0108
Correction in: Ann Coloproctol 2023;39(5):444
  • 4,790 View
  • 101 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 15 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
It is known that as the T stage of a carcinoma progresses, the prognosis becomes poorer. However, there are few studies about factors that affect the prognosis of T4 advanced colon cancer. This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in T4 colon cancer.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with stage T4 on histopathology after undergoing curative surgery for colon cancer between March 2009 and March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed for factors related to postoperative survival. Primary outcomes were DFS and OS.
Results
Eighty-two patients were included in the study. DFS and OS of the pathologic (p) T4b group were not inferior to that of the pT4a group. Multivariate analysis showed that differentiation (hazard ratio [HR], 4.994; P = 0.005), and laparoscopic surgery (HR, 0.323; P = 0.008) were significant prognostic factors for DFS, while differentiation (HR, 7.904; P ≤ 0.001) and chemotherapy (HR, 0.344; P = 0.038) were significant prognostic factors for OS.
Conclusion
Tumor differentiation, laparoscopic surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy were found to be significant prognostic factors in patients with T4 colon cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy and curative resections by laparoscopy might improve the prognosis in these patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus R0 resection for resectable colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases and low peritoneal cancer index scores: a collaborative observational study from Korea and Japan
    Daichi Kitaguchi, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Shoma Sasaki, Yuichiro Tsukada, Masaaki Ito
    International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(1): 45.     CrossRef
  • Cytotoxicity of Salvigenin from Asterohyptis stellulata in Combination with Clinical Drugs Against Colorectal Cancer
    Briand André Rojas-Castaño, Adriana C. Hernández-Rojas, Rogelio Pereda-Miranda, Mabel Fragoso-Serrano
    Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia.2024; 34(5): 1172.     CrossRef
  • Sorbate metal complexes as newer antibacterial, antibiofilm, and anticancer compounds
    Amira I. Abousaty, Fifi M. Reda, Wessam A. Hassanin, Walaa M. Felifel, Walaa H. El-Shwiniy, Heba M. R. M. Selim, Mahmoud M. Bendary
    BMC Microbiology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Association Between Surgical Site Infection and Prognosis of T4 Colorectal Cancer
    Takuya Koike, Masaya Mukai, Kyoko Kishima, Daiki Yokoyama, Sayuri Hasegawa, Lin Fung Chan, Hideki Izumi, Kazutake Okada, Tomoko Sugiyama, Takuma Tajiri
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Can clinicopathologic high-risk features in T3N0 colon cancer be reliable prognostic factors?
    Hyun Gu Lee, Young IL Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Clinical implication of tissue carcinoembryonic antigen expression in association with serum carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer
    Abdulmohsin Fawzi Aldilaijan, Young Il Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jihun Kim, Jun-Soo Ro, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach
    Ji-Hyun Seo, In-Ja Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5211.     CrossRef
  • Erratum to “Prognostic factors affecting disease-free survival and overall survival in T4 colon cancer”

    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 444.     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
    Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Prognostic Reliability of Lymphovascular Invasion for Patients with T3N0 Colorectal Cancer in Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decision Making
    Hayoung Lee, Seung-Yeon Yoo, In Ja Park, Seung-Mo Hong, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2022; 14(12): 2833.     CrossRef
  • Molecular analyses of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 586.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Analyses in Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 197.     CrossRef
  • Impact on inadequate lymph node harvest on survival in T4N0 colorectal cancer: A would-be medical center experience in Taiwan
    Yi-Kai Kao, Hsin-Pao Chen, Kuang-Wen Liu, Ling-Chiao Song, Yi-Chieh Chen, Yu-Chun Lin, Chih-I Chen
    Medicine.2022; 101(52): e32497.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic risk factors for pT4 colon cancer: A retrospective cohort study
    Tsutomu Kumamoto, Shigeki Yamaguchi, Ryosuke Nakagawa, Yoji Nagashima, Fumi Maeda, Kimitaka Tani, Hiroka Kondo, Kurodo Koshino, Yuka Kaneko, Yoshiko Bamba, Shimpei Ogawa, Yuji Inoue, Michio Itabashi
    Oncology Letters.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Antiproliferative and palliative activity of flavonoids in colorectal cancer
    Javier Fernández, Blanca Silván, Rodrigo Entrialgo-Cadierno, Claudio J. Villar, Raffaele Capasso, José Antonio Uranga, Felipe Lombó, Raquel Abalo
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2021; 143: 112241.     CrossRef
Benign GI diease
Prognostic Factors and Management for Left Colonic Perforation: Can Hartmann’s Procedure Be Preventable?
Yilseok Joo, Yujin Lee, Taeyoung Yoo, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(3):178-185.   Published online June 30, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.11.14.1
  • 3,078 View
  • 77 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
To identify factors significantly associated with the mortality of patients with left colonic perforation, and to compare the outcome of Hartmann’s procedure (HP) and primary repair (PR) or primary anastomosis (PA) in patients with left colonic perforation without factors associated with mortality.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery for left colonic perforation from January 2009 to February 2018. Preoperative factors related to postoperative mortality, including vital signs, laboratory findings, and intraoperative findings, were analyzed by type of operation. The chi-square, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to analyze the data.
Results
Ninety-one patients were included (36 men, 55 women), and 15 (16.5%) died postoperatively. Prognostic factors were age, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, bleeding tendency, acute kidney injury, hemodynamic instability, and the existence of feculent ascites. Leukopenia and longer operative time were independent risk factors for mortality. Seventy-nine patients did not have leukopenia and 30 of these patients who underwent PR without diversion were excluded from the subanalysis. HP was performed in 30 patients, and PR with diversion and PA with or without diversion were performed in 19. Compared to the other operative methods, HP had no advantage in reducing hospital mortality (P=0.458) and morbidity.
Conclusion
Leukopenia could be an objective prognostic factor for left colonic perforation. Although HP is the gold standard for septic left colonic perforation, it did not improve the hospital mortality of the patients without leukopenia. For such patients, PR or PA may be suggested as an alternative option for left colonic perforation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk Factors for Postoperative Major Morbidity, Anastomotic Leakage, Re-Surgery and Mortality in Patients with Colonic Perforation
    Maximilian Brunner, Lara Gärtner, Andreas Weiß, Klaus Weber, Axel Denz, Christian Krautz, Georg F. Weber, Robert Grützmann
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(17): 5220.     CrossRef
  • Patient outcomes and prognostic factors associated with colonic perforation surgery: a retrospective study
    Do-bin Lee, Seonhui Shin, Chun-Seok Yang
    Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science.2022; 39(2): 133.     CrossRef
  • Morbidity and Mortality of Neutropenic Patients in Visceral Surgery: A Narrative Review
    Ann-Kathrin Lederer, Fabian Bartsch, Markus Moehler, Peter Gaßmann, Hauke Lang
    Cells.2022; 11(20): 3314.     CrossRef
Original article
WITHDRAWN: Risk factors and management for left colonic perforation
Yilseok Joo, Yujin Lee, Taeyoung Yoo, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae
Received September 2, 2019  Accepted November 14, 2019  Published online January 31, 2020  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.11.14
  • 1,854 View
  • 93 Download
Original Articles
Benign GI diease
Factors Predicting the Need for Early Surgical Intervention for Small Bowel Obstruction
Young Jae Cho, In Seok Park, Jungbin Kim, Hyun Jin Cho, Geum Hee Gwak, Keun Ho Yang, Byung Noe Bae, Ki Hwan Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):223-228.   Published online January 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.09.30
  • 3,899 View
  • 167 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common disease that requires hospitalization. The most common cause of SBO is postoperative adhesion. Delayed timing of operations in patients who need surgical intervention results in mortality or morbidity. A number of studies on SBO have established criteria for emergency surgery. However, few objective clinical parameters are available for screening patients who need a delayed operation. Therefore, we analyzed factors that affect the clinical course of SBO to select appropriate therapeutic plans for reducing the risk of complications in these patients.
Methods
We investigated the clinical characteristics of patients admitted to the surgery department of our hospital between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016, who were diagnosed with SBO. Patients were divided into an operative treatment group (n = 12) and a conservative treatment group (n = 96). We compared clinical characteristics between the 2 groups.
Results
The operative treatment group underwent more operations before SBO than the conservative treatment group (P = 0.007). Initial leukocyte counts (P = 0.004) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (P = 0.028) were elevated in the operative group. Body mass index (BMI) was lower in the operative group (P = 0.013).
Conclusion
The number of operations before SBO, leukocyte counts, CRP levels, and BMI were useful parameters for selecting patients who needed an urgent operation for SBO.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The predictive role of computed tomography with oral contrast in the successful management of adhesive small bowel obstruction
    Mohamed Khattab, Amr Ayad, Sameh Aziz, Peter Alaa, Marie N. Grace, Mohamed Saber
    The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2024; 43(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Predictive factors for operative intervention and ideal length of non-operative trial in adhesive small bowel obstruction
    Tara van Veen, Purushotham Ramanathan, Lolita Ramsey, Jonathan Dort, Dina Tabello
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(11): 8628.     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: Is it still mandatory to wait? – An update
    R. Demessence, Y. Lyoubi, F. Feuerstoss, A. Hamy, C. Aubé, A. Paisant, A. Venara
    Journal of Visceral Surgery.2022; 159(4): 309.     CrossRef
  • Prise en charge chirurgicale des syndromes occlusifs de l’intestin grêle sur bride et adhérences postopératoires : faut-il toujours attendre ?
    R. Demessence, Y. Lyoubi, F. Feuerstoss, A. Hamy, C. Aubé, A. Paisant, A. Venara
    Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale.2022; 159(4): 326.     CrossRef
  • Small bowel obstruction
    David J. Detz, Jerica L. Podrat, Jose C. Muniz Castro, Yoon K. Lee, Feibi Zheng, Shawn Purnell, Kevin Y. Pei
    Current Problems in Surgery.2021; 58(7): 100893.     CrossRef
Perioperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Ratio Is a Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Stage II Colorectal Cancer
Jinsun Woo, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Hyunjin Cho, Geumhee Gwak, Keun Ho Yang, Byung-Noe Bae, Ki Hwan Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(1):4-10.   Published online February 28, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.34.1.4
  • 4,974 View
  • 78 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ratio could be used as a determinant for adjuvant therapy after curative surgery in stage II colorectal cancer.

Methods

Data for 119 patients with stage II colorectal cancer who underwent radical surgery between 2010 and 2013 were collected. The perioperative CEA ratio was defined as the postoperative/preoperative serum CEA level, and the patients were grouped according to their perioperative CEA ratios: high ratio (≥0.5) and low ratio (<0.5). Overall survival rates were calculated, and their prognostic significances were analyzed.

Results

The overall survival rates of the high and the low perioperative CEA groups were 68.2% and 86.8%, respectively (P = 0.033). In patients with normal preoperative CEA levels (<5 ng/mL), the high perioperative CEA ratio group showed a worse survival rate than the low perioperative CEA ratio group (71.7% vs. 100.0%, P = 0.007). In patients with high preoperative CEA levels (≥5 ng/mL), the high perioperative CEA ratio group showed a worse survival rate than the low perioperative CEA ratio group (33.3% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.036). In the multivariate analysis, perioperative CEA ratio (P = 0.046), age (P = 0.034), and venous invasion (P = 0.015) were independent prognostic factors for survival.

Conclusion

The perioperative CEA ratio is a prognostic indicator for stage II colorectal cancer. Patients with normal preoperative serum CEA levels might also be considered for adjuvant therapy if their perioperative CEA ratios are higher than 0.5.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Tumor regression and immunity in combination therapy with anti-CEA chimeric antigen receptor T cells and anti-CEA-IL2 immunocytokine
    Seung E. Cha, Maciej Kujawski, Paul J. Yazaki, Christine Brown, John E. Shively
    OncoImmunology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Impact of Pretreatment Elevated and Normalized Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Resected Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients
    Jianyuan Song, Zhuhong Chen, Daxin Huang, Benhua Xu
    Cancer Management and Research.2021; Volume 13: 3713.     CrossRef
  • Association between Primary Perioperative CEA Ratio, Tumor Site, and Overall Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
    Thomas A. Odeny, Nicole Farha, Hannah Hildebrandand, Jessica Allen, Wilfred Vazquez, Maximillian Martinez, Ravi Kumar Paluri, Anup Kasi
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(12): 3848.     CrossRef
Predictive Factors Affecting the Clinical Course of Patients With Diverticulitis: Who Needs Hospital Management?
Taeyoung Yoo, Keun Ho Yang, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Hyunjin Cho, Geumhee Gwak, Byung Noe Bae, Ki Hwan Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(1):23-28.   Published online February 28, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.34.1.23
  • 4,879 View
  • 98 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The aim of this study is to determine the predictable factors that affect the clinical course, especially the hospital stay, the operation performed, and to determine factors that will be helpful in deciding whether in-hospital or outpatient treatment is appropriate.

Methods

We retrospectively collected medical data for patients who had been diagnosed with acute diverticulitis at Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital between January and December 2016. In total, 117 patients were enrolled in this study. We examined clinical factors, including age, sex, body mass index, pain, body temperature, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, nil per os (NPO) time, hospital duration, computed tomography (CT) findings, location of diverticulitis, operation performed, and presence of comorbidity (e.g., hypertension and diabetes mellitus).

Results

In the multivariate analysis, the statistically significant factor related with hospital duration was the presence of perforation on the CT scan (P < 0.001). Longer NPO time was related with pain score (>7) (P = 0.011). Operations were mainly performed in patients with left-sided colonic diverticulitis (P = 0.012).

Conclusion

We suggest a perforation finding on the CT scan, a severe pain score at least above 7 on a numeric rating pain scale, and a left-sided lesion are absolute indications for in-hospital management.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Epidemiology, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Diverticulitis in King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
    Hanan M Bamanie, Nadim Malibary, Nada A Algarni, Jumana O Badawi, Lujain M AlNasser, Khadijah A Almalki, Renad F Alnemari
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development of a prediction model for clinically important outcomes of acute diverticulitis
    Stephen Gyung Won Lee, Sang Do Shin, Hui Jai Lee, Gil Joon Suh, Do Joong Park
    The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2021; 50: 27.     CrossRef
  • Diverticulitis: An Update From the Age Old Paradigm
    Alexander T. Hawkins, Paul E. Wise, Tiffany Chan, Janet T. Lee, Tamara Glyn, Verity Wood, Timothy Eglinton, Frank Frizelle, Adil Khan, Jason Hall, M.I. Mohammed Ilyas, Maria Michailidou, Valentine N. Nfonsam, Michelle L. Cowan, Jennifer Williams, Scott R.
    Current Problems in Surgery.2020; 57(10): 100862.     CrossRef
  • Is the outpatient management of acute diverticulitis safe and effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    R. Cirocchi, J. J. Randolph, G. A. Binda, S. Gioia, B. M. Henry, K. A. Tomaszewski, M. Allegritti, A. Arezzo, R. Marzaioli, P. Ruscelli
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2019; 23(2): 87.     CrossRef
  • Clinical presentation and outcomes of acute diverticulitis in a Middle Eastern population
    Jasim Alabbad, Fawaz Abdul Raheem, Saba Al-Saddah, Abdulaziz Al-Mubarak
    Arab Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 20(2): 99.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP