Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Article

Conventional Linear versus Purse-string Skin Closure after Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Comparison of Wound Infection Rates and Operative Outcomes: Jung Ryeol Lee, Young Wan Kim, Jong Je Sung, Ok-Pyung Song, Hyung Chul Kim, Cheol-Wan Lim, Gyu-Seok Cho, Jun Chul Jung, Eung-Jin Shin; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(2):58-63. Published online April 30, 2011; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.2.58

10,429 View
70 Download
34 Citations

Purpose

Wound infection after an ileostomy reversal is a common problem. To reduce wound-related complications, purse-string skin closure was introduced as an alternative to conventional linear skin closure. This study is designed to compare wound infection rates and operative outcomes between linear and purse-string skin closure after a loop ileostomy reversal.

Methods

Between December 2002 and October 2010, a total of 48 consecutive patients undergoing a loop ileostomy reversal were enrolled. Outcomes were compared between linear skin closure (group L, n = 30) and purse string closure (group P, n = 18). The operative technique for linear skin closure consisted of an elliptical incision around the stoma, with mobilization, and anastomosis of the ileum. The rectus fascia was repaired with interrupted sutures. Skin closure was performed with vertical mattress interrupted sutures. Purse-string skin closure consisted of a circumstomal incision around the ileostomy using the same procedures as used for the ileum. Fascial closure was identical to linear closure, but the circumstomal skin incision was approximated using a purse-string subcuticular suture (2-0 Polysorb).

Results

Between group L and P, there were no differences of age, gender, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores. Original indication for ileostomy was 23 cases of malignancy (76.7%) in group L, and 13 cases of malignancy (77.2%) in group P. The median time duration from ileostomy to reversal was 4.0 months (range, 0.6 to 55.7 months) in group L and 4.1 months (range, 2.2 to 43.9 months) in group P. The median operative time was 103 minutes (range, 45 to 260 minutes) in group L and 100 minutes (range, 30 to 185 minutes) in group P. The median hospital stay was 11 days (range, 5 to 4 days) in group L and 7 days (range, 4 to 14 days) in group P (P < 0.001). Wound infection was found in 5 cases (16.7%) in group L and in one case (5.6%) in group L (P = 0.26).

Conclusion

Based on this study, purse-string skin closure after a loop ileostomy reversal showed comparable outcomes, in terms of wound infection rates, to those of linear skin closure. Thus, purse-string skin closure could be a good alternative to the conventional linear closure.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Primary Wound Suturing after Intestinal Ostomy Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Michał Kisielewski, Karolina Richter, Magdalena Pisarska-Adamczyk, Michał Wysocki, Nikola Kłos, Tomasz Stefura, Tomasz Wojewoda, Wojciech M. Wysocki
Advances in Wound Care.2025; 14(4): 199. CrossRef
Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications of Ileostomy Reversal
Si-Qi Li, Quan Lv, Zheng Xiang, Xiao-Su Hui
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2025; 35(8): 664. CrossRef
Higher BMI increases risk of stoma-site incisional hernia and other complications following diverting loop ileostomy and reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Kaiser O’Sahil Sadiq, Swetha Lakshminarayanan, Patricia Ruiz Cota, Eugenia Marquez Castillo
Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(8): 5198. CrossRef
Primary closure of ileostomy site after irrigation with betaine–polyhexanide: a case series
Henry Krasner, Abigail W Cheng, Lance Horner, Ovunc Bardakcioglu
Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Micro-power negative pressure wound technique reduces risk of incision infection following loop ileostomy closure
Deng-Yong Xu, Bing-Jun Bai, Lina Shan, Hui-Yan Wei, Deng-Feng Lin, Ya Wang, Da Wang
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(1): 186. CrossRef
Comparison of purse-string technique vs linear suture for skin closure after ileostomy reversal. A randomized controlled trial
Filippo Carannante, Gianluca Costa, Valentina Miacci, Gianfranco Bianco, Gianluca Masciana, Sara Lauricella, Marco Caricato, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of modified gunsight suture technique and traditional interrupted suture in enterostomy closure
Chang Chen, Xiang Zhang, Zhi-Qiang Cheng, Bin-Bin Zhang, Xin Li, Ke-Xin Wang, Yong Dai, Yan-Lei Wang
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(29): 4571. CrossRef
Wound Infection After Ileostomy Closure: An Interim Analysis of a Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Primary Versus Circumferential Subcuticular Closure Techniques
Sumesh Kaistha, Rajesh Panwar, Sujoy Pal, Nihar Ranjan Dash, Peush Sahni, Tushar Kanti Chattopadhyay
Surgical Infections.2023; 24(9): 797. CrossRef
A comparison of surgical site infections in children after stoma reversal between purse-string and linear closure
Chanathip Sayuen, Ratiyaporn Phannua, Sinobol Chusilp, Patchareeporn Tanming, Suchat Areemit, Katawaetee Decharun, Paisarn Vejchapipat, Kanokrat Thaiwatcharamas
Pediatric Surgery International.2022; 38(1): 149. CrossRef
Comparative study of wound healing following purse-string closure versus conventional linear closure for stoma reversal
Vivek Kumar Roy, Pradeep Jaiswal, Mukesh Kumar, Sukalyan Saha Roy, Saumya Sinha, Anjili Kumari, Krishna Gopal
Southeast Asian Journal of Case Report and Review.2022; 9(1): 1. CrossRef
COMPARISON BETWEEN OSTOMY CLOSURE USING PURSE-STRING VERSUS LINEAR IN CHILDREN
Shahnam Askarpour, Mehran Peyvasteh, Farbod Farhadi, Hazhir Javaherizadeh
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo).2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Gunsight sutures significantly reduce surgical-site infection after ileostomy reversal compared with linear sutures
Chuang-Kun Li, Wei-Wen Liang, Huai-Ming Wang, Wen-Tai Guo, Xiu-Sen Qin, Jie Zhao, Wen-Bin Zhou, Yang Li, Hui Wang, Rong-Kang Huang
Gastroenterology Report.2021; 9(4): 357. CrossRef
Evidence-based adoption of purse-string skin closure for stoma wounds
Nilotpal Behuria, Jayant Kumar Banerjee, Sita Ram Ghosh, Shrirang Vasant Kulkarni, Ramanathan Saranga Bharathi
Medical Journal Armed Forces India.2020; 76(2): 185. CrossRef
Purse-string vs. linear skin closure at loop ileostomy reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis
M. Gachabayov, H. Lee, A. Chudner, A. Dyatlov, N. Zhang, R. Bergamaschi
Techniques in Coloproctology.2019; 23(3): 207. CrossRef
The Effectiveness of Contralateral Drainage in Reducing Superficial Incisional Surgical Site Infection in Loop Ileostomy Closure: Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
Anna Serracant, Xavier Serra‐Aracil, Laura Mora‐López, Anna Pallisera‐Lloveras, Sheila Serra‐Pla, Alba Zárate‐Pinedo, Salvador Navarro‐Soto
World Journal of Surgery.2019; 43(7): 1692. CrossRef
Does Wound Irrigation with Clorhexidine Gluconate Reduce the Surgical Site Infection Rate in Closure of Temporary Loop Ileostomy? A Prospective Clinical Study
Mustafa Goztok, Mustafa Cem Terzi, Tufan Egeli, Naciye Cigdem Arslan, Aras Emre Canda
Surgical Infections.2018; 19(6): 634. CrossRef
Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure techniques in stoma closure: a comprehensive meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomised trials
Shahab Hajibandeh, Shahin Hajibandeh, Andrew Kennedy-Dalby, Sheik Rehman, Reza Arsalani Zadeh
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2018; 33(10): 1319. CrossRef
Construction and Closure of Umbilical Ileostomy in Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery
Masahiro Hada, Masanori Kotake, Daiki Kakiuchi, Kengo Hayashi, Sho Yamada, Koichiro Sawada, Masahiro Oshima, Yosuke Kato, Chikashi Hiranuma, Yuko Yamada, Chiharu Hiraki, Takuo Hara
The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery.2017; 50(11): 857. CrossRef
Purse-String Versus Linear Conventional Skin Wound Closure of an Ileostomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Mina Alvandipour, Babak Gharedaghi, Hamed Khodabakhsh, Mohammad Yasin Karami
Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(4): 144. CrossRef
Subcutaneous vacuum drains reduce surgical site infection after primary closure of defunctioning ileostomy
Hong-Da Pan, Lin Wang, Yi-Fan Peng, Ming Li, Yun-Feng Yao, Jun Zhao, Tian-Cheng Zhan, Chang-Zheng Du, Jin Gu
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2015; 30(7): 977. CrossRef
Temporary Diverting Ileostomy via the Umbilicus: a Small Case Series
C. D. Mushaya, Raaj Chandra, Wendy Sansom, James Keck
International Surgery.2015; 100(3): 436. CrossRef
Laparoscopic Versus Open Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Is there an Advantage to a Minimally Invasive Approach?
Monica T. Young, Grace S. Hwang, Gopal Menon, Timothy F. Feldmann, Mehraneh D. Jafari, Fariba Jafari, Eden Perez, Alessio Pigazzi
World Journal of Surgery.2015; 39(11): 2805. CrossRef
Clinical Trial on the Incidence of Wound Infection and Patient Satisfaction After Stoma Closure: Comparison of Two Skin Closure Techniques
Sang Il Yoon, Sun Mi Bae, Hwan Namgung, Dong Guk Park
Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(1): 29. CrossRef
Comparison of surgical techniques for stoma closure: A retrospective study of purse-string skin closure versus conventional skin closure following ileostomy and colostomy reversal
YUMA WADA, NORIKATSU MIYOSHI, MASAYUKI OHUE, SHINGO NOURA, SHIKI FUJINO, KEIJIROU SUGIMURA, HIROFUMI AKITA, MASAAKI MOTOORI, KUNIHITO GOTOH, HIDENORI TAKAHASHI, SHOGO KOBAYASHI, TAKESHI OHMORI, YOSHIYUKI FUJIWARA, MASAHIKO YANO
Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2015; 3(3): 619. CrossRef
A beneficial effect of purse-string skin closure after ileostomy takedown: A retrospective cohort study
Yong Joon Suh, Ji Won Park, Yong Sok Kim, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh
International Journal of Surgery.2014; 12(6): 615. CrossRef
Abdominal Wall Closure After a Stomal Reversal Procedure
Manuel López-Cano, José Antonio Pereira, Borja Villanueva, Francesc Vallribera, Eloy Espin, Manuel Armengol Carrasco, María Antonia Arbós Vía, Xavier Feliu, Salvador Morales-Conde
Cirugía Española (English Edition).2014; 92(6): 387. CrossRef
Cierre de la pared abdominal después del cierre de un estoma temporal
Manuel López-Cano, José Antonio Pereira, Borja Villanueva, Francesc Vallribera, Eloy Espin, Manuel Armengol Carrasco, María Antonia Arbós Vía, Xavier Feliu, Salvador Morales-Conde
Cirugía Española.2014; 92(6): 387. CrossRef
The use of purse-string skin closure in loop ileostomy reversals leads to lower wound infection rates—a single high-volume centre experience
Nils Habbe, Sabine Hannes, Juliane Liese, Guido Woeste, Wolf Otto Bechstein, Christoph Strey
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2014; 29(6): 709. CrossRef
Pursestring Closure of the Stoma Site Leads to Fewer Wound Infections
Janet T. Lee, Thao T. Marquez, Daniel Clerc, Olivier Gie, Nicolas Demartines, Robert D. Madoff, David A. Rothenberger, Dimitrios Christoforidis
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2014; 57(11): 1282. CrossRef
Complications after Loop Ileostomy Closure: A Retrospective Analysis of 132 Patients
Eligijus Poskus, Edvinas Kildusis, Edgaras Smolskas, Marijus Ambrazevicius, Kestutis Strupas
Visceral Medicine.2014; 30(4): 276. CrossRef
Randomized controlled trial: comparison of two surgical techniques for closing the wound following ileostomy closure: purse string vs direct suture
N. Dusch, D. Goranova, F. Herrle, M. Niedergethmann, P. Kienle
Colorectal Disease.2013; 15(8): 1033. CrossRef
Influence of skin closure technique on surgical site infection after loop ileostomy reversal: Retrospective cohort study
C.D. Klink, M. Wünschmann, M. Binnebösel, H.P. Alizai, A. Lambertz, G. Boehm, U.P. Neumann, C.J. Krones
International Journal of Surgery.2013; 11(10): 1123. CrossRef
Purse-string approximation is superior to primary skin closure following stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis
D. P. McCartan, J. P. Burke, S. R. Walsh, J. C. Coffey
Techniques in Coloproctology.2013; 17(4): 345. CrossRef
Primary linear closure with closed suction wound drain after ileostomy takedown
Mi Kyoung Hong, Min-Su Park, Sun Jin Park, Kil Yeon Lee
Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2013; 9(1): 38. CrossRef

Case Report

Transvaginal Endoscopic Appendectomy: Eung Jin Shin, Gui Ae Jeong, Jun Chul Jung, Gyu Seok Cho, Chul Wan Lim, Hyung Chul Kim, Ok Pyung Song; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(6):429-432. Published online December 31, 2010; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.6.429

6,959 View
26 Download
20 Citations

Abstract PDF

Since Kalloo and colleagues first reported the feasibility and safety of a peroral transgastric approach in the porcine model in 2004, various groups have reported more complex natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures, such as the cholecystectomy, splenectomy and liver biopsy, in the porcine model. Natural orifice access to the abdominal cavity, such as transgastric, transvesical, transcolonic, and transvaginal, has been described. Although a novel, minimally invasive approach to the abdominal cavity is a peroral endoscopic transgastric approach, there are still some challenging issues, such as the risk of infection and leakage, and the method of gastric closure. Hybrid-NOTES is an ideal first step in humans. Human hybrid transvaginal access has been used for years by many surgeons for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Here, we report a transvaginal flexible endoscopic appendectomy, with a 5-mm umbilical port using ultrasonic scissors in a 74-year-old woman with acute appendicitis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The History of Minimally Invasive Surgery
Victoria L. Walker, Sullivan A. Ayuso, Michael B. Ujiki
Surgical Clinics of North America.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Transvaginal Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Systematic Review
Ethan Slouha, Stefan J Biput, Brandon Krumbach, Lucy A Clunes, Theofanis F Kollias
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Recent Technical Developments in the Field of Laparoscopic Surgery: A Literature Review
Lama Islem Basunbul, Lenah Sulaiman S Alhazmi, Shahad Amro Almughamisi, Najd Muhammed Aljuaid, Hisham Rizk, Rana Moshref
Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Transvaginal laparoscopic appendectomy using innovative submucosal tunnels: a conducive modification for improving hybrid NOTES access and its critical appraisal
Priyadarshan A Jategaonkar, Sudeep P Yadav, Dilip Gupta
Tropical Doctor.2020; 50(3): 209. CrossRef
Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Korea
Dae Kyung Sohn
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2016; 19(2): 52. CrossRef
Clinical NOTES appendectomy study: comparison of transvaginal NOTES appendectomy in hybrid technique with laparoscopic appendectomy
Joern Bernhardt, Holger Steffen, Sylke Schneider-Koriath, Kaja Ludwig
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2015; 30(2): 259. CrossRef
Transvaginal Approach for Nongynecologic Intraperitoneal Procedures
José F. Noguera, Gonzalo Martín, José M. Muñoz, Antonio Melero, Raúl Sánchez, Javier Valdivia, Marcos Bruna, Antonio Salvador, Cristóbal Zaragoza
International Journal of Clinical Medicine.2014; 05(21): 1417. CrossRef
Transvaginal hybrid-NOTES appendectomy in routine clinical use: prospective analysis of 13 cases and description of the procedure
Jurgen Knuth, Markus Maria Heiss, Dirk Rolf Bulian
Surgical Endoscopy.2014; 28(9): 2661. CrossRef
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for intra-abdominal emergency conditions
J Bingener, I Ibrahim-zada
Journal of British Surgery.2014; 101(1): e80. CrossRef
Transvaginal Appendectomy: A Systematic Review
Mehmet Ali Yagci, Cuneyt Kayaalp
Minimally Invasive Surgery.2014; 2014: 1. CrossRef
Colorectal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and transvaginal/transrectal specimen extraction
J. E. Sanchez, J. E. Marcet
Techniques in Coloproctology.2013; 17(S1): 69. CrossRef
Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) second-look peritoneoscopy for staging of limited peritoneal carcinomatosis
Mircea Beuran, Ionut Negoi, Sorin Paun, Adrian Lobontiu, Florin Filipoiu, Alin Moldoveanu, Ruxandra Negoi, Sorin Hostiuc
Medical Hypotheses.2013; 80(6): 745. CrossRef
Comparison between single-incision and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis from eight RCTs
Jun Gao, Ping Li, Qingguo Li, Dong Tang, Dao-Rong Wang
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2013; 28(10): 1319. CrossRef
Comparative Study Between Single-Incision and Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Bong-Hyeon Kye, Junhyun Lee, Wook Kim, Dongjae Kim, Dosang Lee
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2013; 23(5): 431. CrossRef
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for adnexal masses
Yun Seok Yang, Myung Haeng Hur, Kwoan Young Oh, Soo Young Kim
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research.2013; 39(12): 1604. CrossRef
Endoscopic approach to pancreatic pseudocyst, abscess and necrosis: Review on recent progress
Jie Chen, Norio Fukami, Zhaoshen Li
Digestive Endoscopy.2012; 24(5): 299. CrossRef
Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery applications in clinical practice
Ross S Coomber
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2012; 4(3): 65. CrossRef
The Performance of Multiple Transgastric Procedures Using the Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Technique: Is Pure NOTES Satisfactory?
Tae Jun Song, Dong Wan Seo, Su Hui Kim, Do Hyun Park, Sang Soo Lee, Sung Koo Lee, Myung-Hwan Kim
Gut and Liver.2012; 6(4): 457. CrossRef
Transvaginal Sigmoid Cancer Resection: First Case with 12 Months of Follow-Up—Technique Description
Francisco Alba Mesa, Antonio Amaya Cortijo, Jose Manuel Romero Fernandez, Andrzej L. Komorowski, Miguel Angel Sanchez Hurtado, Enrique Fernandez Ortega, Francisco Miguel Sanchez Margallo
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2012; 22(6): 587. CrossRef
Disinfection of the Access Orifice in NOTES: Evaluation of the Evidence Base
Mikael H. Sodergren, Philip Pucher, James Clark, David R. C. James, Jenny Sockett, Nagy Matar, Julian Teare, Guang-Zhong Yang, Ara Darzi
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy.2011; 2011: 1. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search