Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
8 "Ji Won Park"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Benign bowel disease
Development of a home health care service platform for ostomy patient management
Seongwoo Yang, Ji Won Park, Hyuk Hur, Min Jung Kim, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyounghoon Park, Ik Yong Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):36-43.   Published online November 21, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00360.0051
  • 4,332 View
  • 285 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The use of an ostomy for urination and defecation leads to reduced quality of life. Although many ostomy management strategies are needed, such strategies are often implemented by patients. Thus, there is a need for a home health care service platform that can be used in ostomy patient management.
Methods
We developed an ostomy patient management platform by identifying the needs of patients and medical staff through the Chronic Care Ostomy Self-Management Training Program in the United States and from studies conducted in Korea.
Results
The platform encompassed physical management, psychological management, maintenance of social function, spiritual stability, and home medical care. These components were implemented through monitoring, self-care guidance, and a community platform. For the monitoring function, patients entered their health status in a mobile application (app); the medical staff at the affiliated hospital then monitored the stoma status through a web interface.
Conclusion
Our platform allows medical staff to monitor ostomy patients through a web interface and help such patients to fully manage their ostomy at home using an app. We expect that the continued development of patient-oriented functions in our app will allow ostomy patients to experience quality-of-life improvements.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Lebensqualität von Stomapatienten
    Michael S. Kasparek
    coloproctology.2023; 45(4): 242.     CrossRef
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer, Functional outcomes
Validation of Korean Version of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score Questionnaire
Chang Woo Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Gyung Mo Son, Ik Yong Kim, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, Suk-Hwan Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(2):83-87.   Published online February 11, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.08.01
  • 5,189 View
  • 205 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 17 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Patients who undergo radical surgery for rectal cancer often experience low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Symptoms of this syndrome include frequent bowel movements, gas incontinence, fecal incontinence, fragmentation, and urgency. The aim of this study was to investigate the convergent validity, discriminative validity, and reliability of the Korean version of the LARS score questionnaire.
Methods
The English LARS score questionnaire was translated into Korean using the forward-and-back translation method. A total of 146 patients who underwent radical surgery for rectal cancer answered the Korean version of the LARS score questionnaire including an anchor question assessing the impact of bowel function. Participants answered the questionnaire once more after 2 weeks.
Results
The Korean LARS score questionnaire showed high convergent validity in terms of high correlation between the LARS score and quality of life (perfect fit 55.5% vs. moderate fit 37.6% vs. no fit 6.8%, respectively; P < 0.001). The LARS score also showed good discriminative validity between groups of patients differing by sex (29 for males vs. 25 for females; P = 0.014), tumor level (29 for ≤8 cm vs. 24 for >8 cm; P = 0.021), and radiotherapy (32 for yes vs. 24 for no; P = 0.001). The LARS score also demonstrated high reliability at test-retest with no difference between scores at the first and second tests (intraclass correlation coefficient: Q1 = 0.932; Q2 = 0.909, Q3 = 0.944, Q4 = 0.931, and Q5 = 0.942; P < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion
The Korean version of the LARS score questionnaire has proven to be a valid and reliable tool for measuring LARS in Korean patients with rectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Bowel dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms on quality of life after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: A cross-sectional study
    Hyekyung Kim, Hyedan Kim, Ok-Hee Cho
    European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2024; 69: 102524.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of personalized treatment stage-adjusted digital therapeutics in colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial
    Inah Kim, Ji Young Lim, Sun Woo Kim, Dong Wook Shin, Hee Cheol Kim, Yoon Ah Park, Yoon Suk Lee, Jung-Myun Kwak, Seok Ho Kang, Ji Youl Lee, Ji Hye Hwang
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Low anterior resection syndrome
    Seung‐Bum Ryoo
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2023; 7(5): 719.     CrossRef
  • Total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy Versus long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal cancer, Korean trial (TV-LARK trial): study protocol of a multicentre randomized controlled trial
    Min Jung Kim, Dae Won Lee, Hyun-Cheol Kang, Ji Won Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Sae-Won Han, Kyung Su Kim, Eui Kyu Chie, Jae Hwan Oh, Woon Kyung Jeong, Byoung Hyuck Kim, Eun Mi Nam, Seung-Yong Jeong
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Validation of low anterior resection syndrome score in Brazil with Portuguese
    Kelly C.L.R. Buzatti, Andy Petroianu, Søren Laurberg, Rodrigo G. Silva, Beatriz D.S. Rodrigues, Peter Christensen, Antonio Lacerda-Filho, Therese Juul
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 402.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative sequential short-course radiation therapy and FOLFOX chemotherapy versus long-course chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SOLAR trial)
    Min Kyu Kang, Soo Yeun Park, Jun Seok Park, Hye Jin Kim, Jong Gwang Kim, Byung Woog Kang, Jin Ho Baek, Seung Hyun Cho, An Na Seo, Duck-Woo Kim, Jin Kim, Se Jin Baek, Ji Hoon Kim, Ji Yeon Kim, Gi Won Ha, Eun Jung Park, In Ja Park, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyun Kang
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Implication of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022; 45(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Current Management
    Seung Mi Yeo, Gyung Mo Son
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Validation of the Vietnamese version of the low anterior resection syndrome score questionnaire
    Tuong-Anh Mai-Phan, Vu Quang Pham
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analgesic effect of structured anal skin care for perianal dermatitis after low anterior resection in the rectal cancer patients: prospective, single-center, open-label, therapeutic confirmatory, randomized clinical trial
    Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Mi Sook Yun, Jung-Hea Youn, Hong Min An, Kyung Hee Kim, Seung Mi Yeo, Bokyung Ku, Myeong Suk Kwon, Kun Hyung Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(6): 360.     CrossRef
  • Two dominant patterns of low anterior resection syndrome and their effects on patients’ quality of life
    Min Jung Kim, Ji Won Park, Mi Ae Lee, Han-Ki Lim, Yoon-Hye Kwon, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Kyu Joo Park, Seung-Yong Jeong
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anterior resection syndrome: a randomized clinical trial of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (ramosetron) in male patients with rectal cancer
    S -B Ryoo, J W Park, D W Lee, M A Lee, Y -H Kwon, M J Kim, S H Moon, S -Y Jeong, K J Park
    British Journal of Surgery.2021; 108(6): 644.     CrossRef
  • The incidence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rui Sun, Ziyi Dai, Yin Zhang, Junyang Lu, Yuelun Zhang, Yi Xiao
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2021; 29(12): 7249.     CrossRef
  • Defining low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): Scoring tools and patient-reported outcomes
    Dr Rebekka Troller, Dr Jeremy Meyer, Mr Justin Davies
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2021; 32(4): 100847.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Anastomotic Leakage on the Incidence and Severity of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Patients Undergoing Proctectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Sungjin Kim, Sung Il Kang, So Hyun Kim, Jae-Hwang Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(5): 281.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes
    Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon Hahn Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 351.     CrossRef
  • Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164.     CrossRef
Oncologic Outcomes in Patients Who Undergo Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A 14-Year Experience in a Single Institution
Min Jung Kim, Seung-Yong Jeong, Ji Won Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Sang Sik Cho, Ki Young Lee, Kyu Joo Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(2):83-93.   Published online April 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.04.22.1
  • 4,469 View
  • 96 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 17 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study evaluated the oncologic outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer patients who underwent preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery and determined the prognostic significance of pathologic complete response (pCR).
Methods
Between January 2002 and December 2015, 580 patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant CRT were identified. Survival according to tumor response to CRT and pathologic stage was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify factors associated with survival outcomes.
Results
A total of 111 patients (23.7%) achieved pCR while the other 469 patients showed residual disease. Patients with pCR had a lower pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen level and earlier cT classification than those with residual disease. With a median follow-up of 78 months, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the pCR group than in the residual disease group. The 5-year DFS and 5-year OS for patients with ypStage 0, I, II, or III were 92.5%, 85.1%, 72.2%, 54.3% (P < 0.001) and 94.5%, 91.0%, 83.1%, 69.3%, respectively (P < 0.001). Pathologic AJCC stage after CRT was the most statistically significant independent predictor of OS (HR, 6.97 [95% confidence interval, 3.16–15.39] for stage III vs. stage 0) and DFS (HR, 7.30 [95% confidence interval, 3.63–14.67] for stage III vs. stage 0).
Conclusion
Rectal cancer patients who achieved pCR showed improved survival compared to those with residual disease after preoperative CRT. Moreover, pCR was an independent indicator of OS and DFS, and pathologic AJCC stage was correlated with survival after preoperative CRT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Predicting Positive Radial Margin on Restaging MRI of Patients with Low Rectal Cancer: Can We Do Better?
    Anurima Patra, Aisha Lakhani, Antony Augustine, Priyanka Mohapatra, Anu Eapen, Ashish Singh, Dipti Masih, Thomas S. Ram, Mark R. Jesudason, Rohin Mittal, Anuradha Chandramohan
    Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging.2024; 34(01): 85.     CrossRef
  • A Review of Neoadjuvant Therapy and the Watch-and-Wait Protocol in Rectal Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions
    Iulian M Slavu, Octavian Munteanu, Florin Filipoiu, Raluca Tulin, Anca Monica Macovei Oprescu , Ileana Dima, Iulian A Dogaru, Adrian Tulin
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Significant Pathologic Response Following Neoadjuvant Therapy and Curative Resection in Patients With Rectal Cancer: Surgical and Oncological Outcomes From a Retrospective Cohort Study
    Fatemeh Shahabi, Majid Ansari, Khadijeh Najafi Ghobadi, Abolfazl Ghahramani, Amiresmaeil Parandeh, Maryam Saberi‐Karimian, Ala Orafaie, Abbas Abdollahi
    Cancer Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Implication of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022; 45(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early rectal cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Sung Hwan Cho, Byung-Soo Park, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Bum Park, Hyung Wook Kim, Sang Bo Oh, Tae Un Kim, Dong Hoon Shin
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review
    In Ja Park
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91.     CrossRef
  • Patient Survival With ypT0N+ Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer
    Mohamedraed Elshami, Robert N. Goldstone, Lawrence S. Blaszkowsky, James C. Cusack, Theodore S. Hong, Jennifer Y. Wo, Motaz Qadan
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2022; 65(10): 1224.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Dose Escalation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Modern Treatment Approaches and Outcomes
    N. Hearn, D. Atwell, K. Cahill, J. Elks, D. Vignarajah, J. Lagopoulos, M. Min
    Clinical Oncology.2021; 33(1): e1.     CrossRef
  • Can normalized carcinoembryonic antigen following neoadjuvant chemoradiation predict tumour recurrence after curative resection for locally advanced rectal cancer?
    Youngki Hong, Amandeep Ghuman, Keat Seong Poh, Dimitri Krizzuk, Arun Nagarajan, Sudha Amarnath, Juan J. Nogueras, Steven D. Wexner, Giovanna DaSilva
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(6): 1346.     CrossRef
  • Omission of or Poor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Impacts Radial Margin Positivity Rates in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Ana Sofia Ore, Gabrielle E. Dombek, Carlos A. Cordova-Cassia, Jeanne F. Quinn, Thomas E. Cataldo, Benjamin L. Schlechter, Matthew J. Abrams, Evangelos Messaris
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2021; 64(6): 669.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Postoperative Surveillance Strategies for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study
    Min-Young Park, In-Ja Park, Hyo-Seon Ryu, Jay Jung, Min-Sung Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang-Sik Yu, Jin-Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3502.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ypT0–1 rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy
    Ye Won Jeon, In Ja Park, Jeong Eun Kim, Jin-Hong Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Jong Lyul Lee, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2021; 13(9): 1000.     CrossRef
  • Comparison between Local Excision and Radical Resection for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer in ypT0-1 Patients: An Analysis of the Clinicopathological Factors and Survival Rates
    Soo Young Oh, In Ja Park, Young IL Kim, Jong-Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(19): 4823.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant radiotherapy dose escalation for locally advanced rectal cancers in the new era of radiotherapy: A review of literature
    Durim Delishaj, Ilaria Costanza Fumagalli, Stefano Ursino, Agostino Cristaudo, Francesco Colangelo, Antonio Stefanelli, Alessandro Alghisi, Giuseppe De Nobili, Romerai D’Amico, Alessandra Cocchi, Antonio Ardizzoia, Carlo Pietro Soatti
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(30): 9077.     CrossRef
  • Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review
    Min Chul Kim, Jae Hwan Oh
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 382.     CrossRef
  • Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164.     CrossRef
  • From Total Mesorectal Excision to Organ Preservation for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer
    Seong Kyu Baek
    Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(2): 51.     CrossRef
Case Report
Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor of the Retroperitoneum Including Chronic Granulomatous Inflammation Suggesting Tuberculosis: A Case Report
Younglim Kim, Ji Won Park, Sungwhan Kim, Kil-Yong Lee, Jeongmo Bae, Yoon Kyung Jeon, Ji Min Im, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(5):285-288.   Published online March 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.09
  • 4,136 View
  • 106 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
An inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a solid tumor of unknown etiology frequently affecting children and young adults and commonly affecting the lung or orbital region. We present a case involving a 41-year-old man who had an IMT combined with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in the retroperitoneum. He presented with only pain in the right lower abdomen without accompanying symptoms; a retroperitoneal mass was found on computed tomography. The tumor had invaded the end of the ileum and was attached to the omentum, so mass excision could not be performed. The tumor was completely excised surgically and had histological features diagnostic of an IMT. Histologic findings of the omentum were positive for Ziehl-Nielsen staining for acid-fast bacilli and for a positive polymerase chain reaction for M. tuberculosis. The patient had no apparent immune disorder. These findings made this case exceptional because IMTs, which are mostly due to atypical mycobacteria, have been found mainly in immunocompromised patients.
Original Article
Female Sex and Right-Sided Tumor Location Are Poor Prognostic Factors for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer After a Curative Resection
Jung Ho Park, Hyoung-Chul Park, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Seung Chul Heo, Min Jung Kim, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, for the Seoul Colorectal Group (SECOG)
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):286-291.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.29
  • 4,520 View
  • 117 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Stage-IIIC colon cancer is an advanced disease; however, its oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage-IIIC colon cancer.
Methods
From a multicenter database, we retrospectively enrolled 611 patients (355 men and 256 women) who had undergone a potentially curative resection for a stage-IIIC colon adenocarcinoma between 2003 and 2011. The primary end-point was the 5-year DFS.
Results
The median age was 62 years; 213 and 398 patients had right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC), respectively. The 5-year DFS in all patients was 52.0%; median follow-up time was 35 months (range, 1–134 months). A multivariate Cox regression revealed that female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19–1.90; P < 0.01), right-sided tumor location (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.29–2.11; P < 0.01), lymphatic invasion (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.08–2.15; P < 0.01) and a high (≥0.4) metastatic lymph node ratio (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 2.63–5.24; P < 0.01) were independent predictors of worse 5-year DFS. Female patients with RCC were 1.79 fold more likely to experience recurrence than male patients with LCC.
Conclusion
Female sex and right-sided tumor location are associated with higher tumor recurrence rates in patients with stage-IIIC colon cancers. Aggressive treatment and close surveillance should be planned for patients in these groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development and external validation of a nomogram predicting overall survival after curative resection of colon cancer
    Shuanhu Wang, Yakui Liu, Yi Shi, Jiajia Guan, Mulin Liu, Wenbin Wang
    Journal of International Medical Research.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
Erratum
Erratum: Biofeedback Therapy Before Ileostomy Closure in Patients Undergoing Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Pilot Study
Jeong-Ki Kim, Byeong Geon Jeon, Yoon Suk Song, Mi Sun Seo, Yoon-Hye Kwon, JI Won Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(5):205-205.   Published online October 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.5.205
  • 3,437 View
  • 34 Download
PDF
Original Articles
Biofeedback Therapy Before Ileostomy Closure in Patients Undergoing Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Pilot Study
Jeong-Ki Kim, Byeong Geon Jeon, Yoon Suk Song, Mi Sun Seo, Yoon-Hye Kwon, JI Won Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(4):138-143.   Published online August 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.4.138
  • 4,300 View
  • 65 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 12 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study prospectively investigated the effects of biofeedback therapy on objective anorectal function and subjective bowel function in patients after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer.

Methods

Sixteen patients who underwent an ileostomy were randomized into two groups, one receiving conservative management with the Kegel maneuver and the other receiving active biofeedback before ileostomy closure. Among them, 12 patients (mean age, 57.5 years; range, 38 to 69 years; 6 patients in each group) completed the study. Conservative management included lifestyle modifications, Kegel exercises, and medication. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after ileostomy closure by using anal manometry, modified Wexner Incontinence Scores (WISs), and fecal incontinence quality of life (FI-QoL) scores.

Results

Before the ileostomy closure, the groups did not differ in baseline clinical characteristics or resting manometric parameters. After 12 months of follow-up, the biofeedback group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the mean maximum squeezing pressure (from 146.3 to 178.9, P = 0.002). However, no beneficial effect on the WIS was noted for biofeedback compared to conservative management alone. Overall, the FI-QoL scores were increased significantly in both groups after ileostomy closure (P = 0.006), but did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusion

Although the biofeedback therapy group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the maximum squeezing pressure, significant improvements in the WISs and the FI-QoL scores over time were noted in both groups. The study was terminated early because no therapeutic benefit of biofeedback had been demonstrated.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on fecal incontinence and quality of life following colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ming Yan Pun, Pak Ho Leung, Tsz Ching Chan, Chunn Pang, Kin Hei Chan, Priya Kannan
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Application of pelvic floor rehabilitation in patients with colorectal cancer: a scoping review
    Lu Zhou, Changkun Zhong, Yuanyuan Su, Zhengyang Zhang, Ling Wang
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Patients Following Low Anterior Resection
    Young Man Kim, Eui Geum Oh
    Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing.2023; 50(2): 142.     CrossRef
  • ILEOSTIM trial: a study protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of efferent loop stimulation before ileostomy reversal
    N. Blanco, I. Oliva, P. Tejedor, E. Pastor, A. Alvarellos, C. Pastor, J. Baixauli, J. Arredondo
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(12): 1251.     CrossRef
  • Low anterior resection syndrome
    Seung‐Bum Ryoo
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2023; 7(5): 719.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Postoperative Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yuki Nakashima, Kenichi Fudeyasu, Yuki Kataoka, Shunsuke Taito, Takashi Ariie, Yukio Mikami
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • „Low anterior resection syndrome“ – Ursachen und therapeutische Ansätze
    Sigmar Stelzner, Juliane Kupsch, Sören Torge Mees
    Der Chirurg.2021; 92(7): 612.     CrossRef
  • Anterior resection syndrome: a randomized clinical trial of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (ramosetron) in male patients with rectal cancer
    S -B Ryoo, J W Park, D W Lee, M A Lee, Y -H Kwon, M J Kim, S H Moon, S -Y Jeong, K J Park
    British Journal of Surgery.2021; 108(6): 644.     CrossRef
  • Investigating Risk Factors for Complications after Ileostomy Reversal in Low Anterior Rectal Resection Patients: An Observational Study
    Mateusz Rubinkiewicz, Jan Witowski, Michał Wysocki, Magdalena Pisarska, Stanisław Kłęk, Andrzej Budzyński, Michał Pędziwiatr
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2019; 8(10): 1567.     CrossRef
  • Mind–Body Interventions for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients in the Chinese Population: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Weidong Wang, Fang Wang, Feng Fan, Ana Cristina Sedas, Jian Wang
    International Journal of Behavioral Medicine.2017; 24(2): 191.     CrossRef
  • Lentivirus‐mediated shRNA interference of ghrelin receptor blocks proliferation in the colorectal cancer cells
    An Liu, Chenggang Huang, Jia Xu, Xuehong Cai
    Cancer Medicine.2016; 5(9): 2417.     CrossRef
  • Biofeedback Therapy After Sphincter-Preservation Surgery for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer
    Ik Yong Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(4): 119.     CrossRef
Importance of Early Follow-up Colonoscopy in Patients at High Risk for Colorectal Polyps
Sung Taek Jung, Dae Kyung Sohn, Chang Won Hong, Byung Chang Kim, Ji Won Park, Kyung Su Han, Hee Jin Chang, Hyo Sung Choi, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):243-247.   Published online December 31, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.243
  • 3,568 View
  • 27 Download
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Minimizing the polyp miss rate during colonoscopy is important for patients at high risk for colorectal polyps. We investigated the polyp miss rate and the factors associated with it in high-risk patients.

Methods

The medical records of 163 patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopy between January 2001 and April 2010, which was within 9 months after a polypectomy, because the index colonoscopy had shown multiple (more than 3) adenomas or advanced adenoma were retrospectively reviewed. Miss rates were calculated for all polyps, for neoplastic polyps and for advanced adenomas. Factors associated with the miss rates in these patients, such as the location, shape and size of the polyp, were analyzed.

Results

The miss rates for polyps, adenomas, adenomas <5 mm, adenomas ≥5 mm and advanced adenomas were 32.6%, 20.9%, 17.7%, 3.2%, and 0.9%, respectively. No carcinoma, except for one small carcinoid tumor, was missed. Flat shape and small size (<5 mm) were significantly associated with adenoma miss rate. The miss rate was significantly higher for flat-type advanced adenomas than for protruded-type advanced adenomas (27.7% vs 4.1%).

Conclusion

The polyp miss rate in patients at high risk for colorectal polyps was higher than expected. Efforts are needed to reduce miss rates and improve the quality of colonoscopy. Also, early follow-up colonoscopy is mandatory, especially in patients at high risk.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Removal of GIT lesions and the role of impedance of the injection solution—an innovative approach to known methods
    Martina Lösle, K. E. Grund, B. Duckworth-Mothes
    Journal of Molecular Medicine.2024; 102(8): 1009.     CrossRef
  • An eco-friendly synthesis of Enterococcus sp.–mediated gold nanoparticle induces cytotoxicity in human colorectal cancer cells
    Mathivadani Vairavel, Ezhilarasan Devaraj, Rajeshkumar Shanmugam
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research.2020; 27(8): 8166.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the Cost-Effective Use of Follow-Up Colonoscopy Based on Screening Findings and Age
    Grace N. Joseph, Farid Heidarnejad, Eric A. Sherer
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Impact of a new distal attachment on colonoscopy performance in an academic screening center
    Zacharias P. Tsiamoulos, Ravi Misra, Rajaratanam Rameshshanker, Timothy R. Elliott, Iosif Beintaris, Siwan Thomas-Gibson, Adam Haycock, Noriko Suzuki, Colin Rees, Brian P. Saunders
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 87(1): 280.     CrossRef
  • What Matters in Colonoscopy?
    Hyun Shig Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(6): 223.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP