Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
4 "Jeong Sub Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Display
Original Articles
ERAS
Predicting venous thromboembolism and determining appropriate prophylaxis in elderly patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) using the adjusted Caprini score
Young Sun Choi, Hyung Jin Cho, Chul Seung Lee, Dong Geun Lee, Choon Sik Chung, Gwan Cheol Lee, Dong Woo Kang, Jeong Sub Kim, Tae Gyu Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(4):279-286.   Published online August 26, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00857.0122
  • 4,486 View
  • 71 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Age and postoperative complications are known risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Minimally invasive surgery and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol has been implemented to reduce these risks. The purpose of this study was to assess the short- and long-term effects of a VTE prophylaxis program using the Caprini score in elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery with the ERAS protocol.
Methods
This retrospective cross-sectional study included 1,043 colorectal cancer patients requiring surgery from January 2017 to December 2019, divided into a control group (≤75 years) and an elderly group (>75 years), with 827 and 216 patients, respectively. The primary outcome was the incidence of VTE; secondary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications, particularly bleeding.
Results
The incidence of VTE was 1.5% in the control group and 3.7% in the elderly group (P=0.061). Five patients (0.5%) experienced symptomatic VTE, and the Caprini score for all VTE patients was ≤8 points; thus, only mechanical prophylaxis was used. In the multivariable logistic regression, the Caprini score (P=0.024) and cancer stage (P=0.004) were selected. The odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of the Caprini score and TNM staging were 1.758 (1.078–2.867) and 6.152 (2.045–26.510), respectively.
Conclusion
When the ERAS protocol was used for patients with colorectal cancer as perioperative care, the VTE risk was lower than that estimated by the Caprini score. Given that age is a recognized risk factor for major bleeding, criteria for the use of anticoagulation to prevent VTE, particularly in elderly patients, should be carefully evaluated, considering both the bleeding risks and the potential benefits of pharmacologic prophylaxis. Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS; cris.nih.go.kr) identifier: KCT0007804

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Pushing the boundaries - perioperative risk assessment and short-term surgical outcomes in octogenarian patients with head and neck cancer: comparison with non-oncological elderlies
    Małgorzata Wierzbicka, Dorota Świątek, Maria Makuszewska, Kazimierz Niemczyk, Karolina Dżaman, Katarzyna Czerwaty, Bogusław Mikaszewski, Dominik Stodulski, Maciej Kawczyński, Magdalena Rękawek, Małgorzata Wierzchowska, Paweł Burduk, Kamila Sroka, Wioletta
    Frontiers in Oncology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Caprini score for venous thromboembolism risk assessment: A scoping review of applications, validation, and future directions
    Junbao Zhang, Yuanyi Jiang, Daibing Zhou, Ning Zhu
    Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders.2026; 14(4): 102483.     CrossRef
Anorectal benign disease
A comparative study on efficacy and safety of modified partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Tae Gyu Kim, Chul Seung Lee, Dong Geun Lee, Choon Sik Chung, Seung Han Kim, Sang Hwa Yu, Jeong Eun Lee, Gwan Cheol Lee, Dong Woo Kang, Jeong Sub Kim, Gyu Young Jeong
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(2):145-153.   Published online April 28, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00535.0076
  • 5,744 View
  • 132 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The long-term outcomes and efficacy of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH) compared with those of conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) are not fully understood. This study aimed to introduce a modified PSH (mPSH) and compare its clinical efficacy and safety with those of CH.
Methods
A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. This study was performed at a single hospital and involved 6 colorectal surgeons. In total, 110 patients were enrolled between July 2019 and September 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either mPSH group (n=55) or CH group (n=55). The primary outcome was to compare postoperative average pain and postoperative peak pain using visual analog scale score between the 2 groups.
Results
The required duration of analgesia was shorter in the mPSH group than in the CH group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.096). However, the laxative requirement duration (P<0.010), return to work (P<0.010), satisfaction score (P<0.010), and Vaizey score (P=0.014) were significantly better in the mPSH group. The average and peak postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the mPSH group during the 15 days after surgery (P<0.001). The overall complication rate in both groups was 9.1%, with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.867).
Conclusion
The mPSH group demonstrated better improvement in symptoms, lower pain scores, and greater patient early satisfaction after surgery than the CH group. Therefore, this surgical technique appears to be a safe and effective alternative for CH.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Ligasure versus voyant hemorrhoidectomy: comparison of 30-day postoperative complications
    Fabio MARINO, Rossella DONGHIA
    Minerva Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
ERAS
Clinical impact of a multimodal pain management protocol for loop ileostomy reversal
Jeong Sub Kim, Chul Seung Lee, Jung Hoon Bae, Seung Rim Han, Do Sang Lee, In Kyu Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyeong Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):210-216.   Published online June 19, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01137.0162
  • 7,532 View
  • 255 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
As introduced, multimodal pain management bundle for ileostomy reversal may be considered to reduce postoperative pain and hospital stay. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical efficacy of perioperative multimodal pain bundle for ileostomy.
Methods
Medical records of patients who underwent ileostomy reversal after rectal cancer surgery from April 2017 to March 2020 were analyzed. Sixty-seven patients received multimodal pain bundle protocol with ileostomy reversal (group A) and 41 patients underwent closure of ileostomy with conventional pain management (group B).
Results
Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, diabetes mellitus, and smoking history, were not significantly different between the groups. The pain score on postoperative day 1 was significant lower in group A (visual analog scale, 2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 3.2 ± 1.2; P = 0.013). Overall consumption of opioid in group A was significant less than group B (9.7 ± 9.5 vs. 21.2 ± 8.8, P < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in group A (2.3 ± 1.5 days vs. 4.1 ± 1.5 days, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in postoperative complication rate.
Conclusion
Multimodal pain protocol for ileostomy reversal could reduce postoperative pain, usage of opioid and hospital stay compared to conventional pain management.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in high-risk patients undergoing colon cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study
    Reem Mohammed H. Alshiakh, In Kyeong Kim, Jung Hoon Bae, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyu Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2026; 110(4): 205.     CrossRef
  • Immunological changes and recovery-related factors in older patients with colon cancer: A pilot trial
    Byeo Lee Lim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Yousun Ko, Kyung Won Kim, In Ja Park
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2025; 16(3): 102200.     CrossRef
  • Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing ileostomy closure: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
    Su Jin Kang, Soo Yeun Park, Jun Seok Park, Jinseok Yeo
    Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science.2025; 43: 5.     CrossRef
  • Multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain: pursuing liberation from pain, not redemption
    Soo Yeun Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(3): 189.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes and future directions of enhanced recovery after surgery in colorectal surgery: a narrative review
    Ji Hyeong Song, Minsung Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimizing postoperative pain management in minimally invasive colorectal surgery
    Soo Young Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 525.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer,Epidemiology & etiology
Characteristics and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery by age in a tertiary center in Korea: a retrospective review
Tae-Hoon Lee, Jeong Min Choo, Jeong Sub Kim, Seon Hui Shin, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak, Jin Kim, Seon-Hahn Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):244-252.   Published online November 4, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00619.0088
  • 7,697 View
  • 172 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 16 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Colorectal cancer (CRC) occurs in all age groups, and the application of treatment may vary according to age. The study was designed to identify the characteristics of CRC by age.
Methods
A total of 4,326 patients undergoing primary resection for CRC from September 2006 to July 2019 were reviewed. Patient and tumor characteristics, operative and postoperative data, and oncologic outcome were compared
Results
Patients aged 60 to 69 years comprised the largest age group (29.7%), followed by those aged 50 to 59 and 70 to 79 (24.5% and 23.9%, respectively). Rectal cancer was common in all age groups, but right-sided colon cancer tended to be more frequent in older patients. In very elderly patients, there were significant numbers of emergency surgeries, and the frequencies of open surgery and permanent stoma were greater. In contrast, total abdominal colectomy or total proctocolectomy was performed frequently in patients in their teens and twenties. The elderly patients showed more advanced tumor stages and postoperative ileus. The incidence of adjuvant treatment was low in elderly patients, who also had shorter follow-up periods. Overall survival was reduced in older patients with stages 0 to 3 CRC (P<0.001), but disease-free survival did not differ by age (P=0.391).
Conclusion
CRC screening at an earlier age than is currently undertaken may be necessary in Korea. In addition, improved surgical and oncological outcomes can be achieved through active treatment of the growing number of elderly CRC patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on the Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study
    Eui Myung Kim, Il Son, Byung Chun Kim, Jun Park, Jin Won Lee, Jong Wan Kim
    Cancer Management and Research.2026; Volume 18: 1.     CrossRef
  • Effects of the Strength, Assistance in walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs, and Falls score on postoperative clinical outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective study
    Young Jae Kim, Sung Uk Bae, Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.2025; 79(4): 358.     CrossRef
  • Immunological changes and recovery-related factors in older patients with colon cancer: A pilot trial
    Byeo Lee Lim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Yousun Ko, Kyung Won Kim, In Ja Park
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2025; 16(3): 102200.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of body composition changes and nutritional status after surgery between older Japanese patients with upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer
    Eiko Takano, Tsukasa Aritake, Kakeru Hashimoto, Yumi Suzuki, Yuichi Kitagawa, Ken Fujishiro, Yasuji Kawabata, Shinichirou Kobayashi, Izumi Kondo
    The Journal of Aging Research & Lifestyle.2025; 14: 100006.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic outcomes of surgically treated colorectal cancer in octogenarians: a comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)
    Soo Young Oh, Jung Yun Park, Kwan Mo Yang, Seong-A Jeong, Yong Jae Kwon, Yun Tae Jung, Chung Hyeun Ma, Keong Won Yun, Kwang Hyun Yoon, Jae Young Kwak, Chang Sik Yu
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oncologic outcomes and associated factors of colon cancer patients aged 70 years and older
    Byeo Lee Lim, In Ja Park, Jun-Soo Ro, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(3): 198.     CrossRef
  • Influence of additional prophylactic oral antibiotics during mechanical bowel preparation on surgical site infection in patients receiving colorectal surgery
    Hayoung Lee, Jong Lyul Lee, Ji Sung Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok‐Byung Lim
    World Journal of Surgery.2024; 48(6): 1534.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping on Improving Diagnostic Values of CT D3 Lymph Node Staging for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Mi Sook Yun, ChangYeop Kim, In Young Lee, Su Bum Park, Dong-Hoon Shin, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3496.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
  • The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery
    Min Ki Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer
    Gyoung Tae Noh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Is the oncological impact of vascular invasion more important in right colon cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(2): 49.     CrossRef
  • Tailoring strategies for colorectal cancer screening and treatment based on age in colorectal cancer patients
    Eun Jung Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(3): 181.     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 568.     CrossRef
  • Recent Advance in the Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 213.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP