Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
32 "In Ja Park"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Editorial
From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology
In Ja Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):285-286.   Published online August 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00514.0073
  • 940 View
  • 77 Download
PDF
Original Articles
Oncologic outcomes and associated factors of colon cancer patients aged 70 years and older
Byeo Lee Lim, In Ja Park, Jun-Soo Ro, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Received June 7, 2023  Accepted September 11, 2023  Published online August 5, 2024  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00367.0052    [Epub ahead of print]
  • 763 View
  • 17 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The aim of this study was to examine the prognosis and associated risk factors, including adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx), in elderly patients with colon cancer.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who underwent radical resection for colon cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 at Asan Medical Center. The effects of stage, risk factors, and chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared in patients aged ≥70 and <70 years.
Results
Of 3,313 patients, 933 (28.1%) was aged ≥70 years. Of the 1,921 patients indicated for adjuvant CTx, 1,294 of 1,395 patients (92.8%) aged <70 years and 369 of 526 patients (70.2%) aged ≥70 years received adjuvant CTx. Old age (≥70 years) was independently associated with RFS in overall cohort. Among patients aged ≥70 years indicated for adjuvant CTx, the 5-year OS (81.6% vs. 50.4%, P<0.001) and RFS (82.9% vs. 67.4%, P=0.025) rates were significantly higher in those who did than did not receive adjuvant CTx. Additionally, adjuvant CTx was confirmed as independent risk factor of both OS and RFS in patients aged ≥70 years indicated for adjuvant CTx.
Conclusion
Old age was associated with poor RFS and adjuvant CTx had benefits in OS as well as RFS in elderly patients eligible for adjuvant CTx.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Partial mesorectal excision can be a primary option for middle rectal cancer: a propensity score–matched retrospective analysis
Ee Jin Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):253-267.   Published online March 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00689.0098
  • 2,820 View
  • 187 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Although partial mesorectal excision (PME) and total mesorectal excision (TME) is primarily indicated for the upper and lower rectal cancer, respectively, few studies have evaluated whether PME or TME is more optimal for middle rectal cancer.
Methods
This study included 671 patients with middle and upper rectal cancer who underwent robot-assisted PME or TME. The 2 groups were optimized by propensity score matching of sex, age, clinical stage, tumor location, and neoadjuvant treatment.
Results
Complete mesorectal excision was achieved in 617 of 671 patients (92.0%), without showing a difference between the PME and TME groups. Local recurrence rate (5.3% vs. 4.3%, P>0.999) and systemic recurrence rate (8.5% vs. 16.0%, P=0.181) also did not differ between the 2 groups, in patients with middle and upper rectal cancer. The 5-year disease-free survival (81.4% vs. 74.0%, P=0.537) and overall survival (88.0% vs. 81.1%, P=0.847) also did not differ between the PME and TME groups, confined to middle rectal cancer. Moreover, 5-year recurrence and survival rates were not affected by distal resection margins of 2 cm (P=0.112) to 4 cm (P>0.999), regardless of pathological stages. Postoperative complication rate was higher in the TME than in the PME group (21.4% vs. 14.5%, P=0.027). Incontinence was independently associated with TME (odds ratio [OR], 2.009; 95% confidence interval, 1.015–3.975; P=0.045), along with older age (OR, 4.366, P<0.001) and prolonged operation time (OR, 2.196; P=0.500).
Conclusion
PME can be primarily recommended for patients with middle rectal cancer with lower margin of >5 cm from the anal verge.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Review of definition and treatment of upper rectal cancer
    Elias Karam, Fabien Fredon, Yassine Eid, Olivier Muller, Marie Besson, Nicolas Michot, Urs Giger-Pabst, Arnaud Alves, Mehdi Ouaissi
    Surgical Oncology.2024; 57: 102145.     CrossRef
  • Tumour-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and functional outcomes
    Fabio Carbone, Wanda Petz, Simona Borin, Emilio Bertani, Stefano de Pascale, Maria Giulia Zampino, Uberto Fumagalli Romario
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 49(11): 107069.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Epidemiology & etiology
Colorectal cancer mortality trends in the era of cancer survivorship in Korea: 2000–2020
Min Hyun Kim, Sanghee Park, Nari Yi, Bobae Kang, In Ja Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(5):343-352.   Published online October 28, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00535.0076
  • 5,046 View
  • 161 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 15 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Korea has implemented an early screening for colorectal cancer since 2004. However, it is not known whether this has translated into improved survival over the years.
Methods
We acquired colorectal cancer mortality data from the Cause of Death Statistics in Korea from 2000 to 2020. We characterized the data into year of death, cancer-specific loci, and age group. We analyzed age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) according to year of death, age group, and primary location to find trends in colorectal cancer mortality over a 20-year period.
Results
The crude mortality rate of colorectal cancer increased from 8.78 per 100,000 in 2000 to 17.27 per 100,000 in 2020. The second decade was slower in increments compared to the first decade. ASMR showed a decrease over the second decade after an initial increase in the first decade. The decrease was primarily from the lowering of ASMR for rectosigmoid cancers. Age group analysis showed a lowering of ASMR mainly in the 45–59-year, 60–74-year, and ≥ 75-year age groups; however, 0–29-year and 30–44-year age groups showed generally unchanged ASMR over the total period.
Conclusion
After a brief incline of age-specific mortality of colorectal cancers during the early 2000s, colorectal cancer mortality has gradually been decreasing in the past decade. This was mainly due to decreased mortalities in rectosigmoid colon cancers especially in the age groups that were the target of early screening.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Performance reporting design in artificial intelligence studies using image-based TNM staging and prognostic parameters in rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Minsung Kim, Taeyong Park, Bo Young Oh, Min Jeong Kim, Bum-Joo Cho, Il Tae Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • In-Hospital Mortality and Associated Factors among Colorectal Cancer Patients in Germany
    Karel Kostev, Sarah Krieg, Andreas Krieg, Tom Luedde, Sven H. Loosen, Christoph Roderburg
    Cancers.2024; 16(6): 1219.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping on Improving Diagnostic Values of CT D3 Lymph Node Staging for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Mi Sook Yun, ChangYeop Kim, In Young Lee, Su Bum Park, Dong-Hoon Shin, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3496.     CrossRef
  • Gochujang suppresses cell survival and changes reactive oxygen species metabolism in colorectal cancer cells
    Eun-Bi Seo, So-Min Oh, Anna Han
    Food & Nutrition Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical implication of tissue carcinoembryonic antigen expression in association with serum carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer
    Abdulmohsin Fawzi Aldilaijan, Young Il Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jihun Kim, Jun-Soo Ro, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of nomogram models to predict radiotherapy or chemotherapy benefit in stage III/IV gastric adenocarcinoma with surgery
    Xiangqing Ren, Tian Huang, Xiaolong Tang, Qian Ma, Ya Zheng, Zenan Hu, Yuping Wang, Yongning Zhou
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic prediction of colorectal cancer using the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio: the importance of inflammatory biomarkers and their association with long-term outcomes
    Chul Seung Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 287.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
  • National cancer screening program for colorectal cancer in Korea
    Seung Min Baik, Ryung-Ah Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 333.     CrossRef
  • Recurrence Patterns and Risk Factors after Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Insights for Postoperative Surveillance Strategies
    Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim, Ye Ryung Park, Eun Hae Cho, Jeong Min Choo, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak
    Cancers.2023; 15(24): 5791.     CrossRef
  • Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • How Can We Improve the Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?
    Jeonghee Han
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
    Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
    Hyun Gu Lee
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Editorial
Malignant disease,Rectal cancer
Precision medicine for primary rectal cancer will become a reality
In Ja Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(4):281-282.   Published online August 29, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00500.0071
  • 2,133 View
  • 119 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Performance reporting design in artificial intelligence studies using image-based TNM staging and prognostic parameters in rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Minsung Kim, Taeyong Park, Bo Young Oh, Min Jeong Kim, Bum-Joo Cho, Il Tae Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
  • Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
    Hyun Gu Lee
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • How Can We Improve the Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?
    Jeonghee Han
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
    Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Articles
Colorecal cancer
Prognostic significance of lymph node yield on oncologic outcomes according to tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients
Hyo Seon Ryu, In Ja Park, Bo Kyung Ahn, Min Young Park, Min Sung Kim, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(5):410-420.   Published online April 28, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00143.0020
  • 3,264 View
  • 114 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of lymph node yield (LNY) for survival outcomes according to tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) in patients with rectal cancer.
Methods
This study was a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary center. A total of 1,240 patients with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer who underwent curative resection after PCRT between 2007 and 2016 were included. Patients were categorized into the good response group (tumor regression grade [TRG], 0–1) or poor response group (TRG, 2–3). Propensity score matching was performed for age, sex, and pathologic stage between LNY of ≥12 and LNY of <12 within tumor response group. The primary outcome was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results
LNY and positive lymph nodes were inversely correlated with TRG. In good responders, 5-year DFS and 5-year OS of patients with LNY of <12 were better than those with LNY of ≥12, but there was no statistical significance. In poor responders, the LNY of <12 group had worse survival outcomes than the LNY of ≥12 group, but there was also no statistical significance. LNY of ≥12 was not associated with DFS and OS in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
LNY of <12 showed contrasting outcomes between the good and poor responders in 5-year DFS and OS. LNY of 12 may not imply adequate oncologic surgery or proper staging in rectal cancer patients treated by PCRT. Furthermore, a decrease in LNY should be comprehended differently according to tumor response.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effects of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients With Stage ⅡA Rectal Cancer Above the Peritoneal Reflection Who Did Not Undergo Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Hyo Seon Ryu, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Yong Sang Hong, Tae Won Kim, Chang Sik Yu
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2024; 23(4): 392.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence-Driven Volumetric Analysis of Muscle Mass as a Predictor of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer
    Minsung Kim, Sang Min Lee, Il Tae Son, Jaewoong Kang, Gyoung Tae Noh, Bo Young Oh
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(23): 7018.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT2N0 distal rectal cancer
Min Young Park, Chang Sik Yu, Tae Won Kim, Jong Hoon Kim, Jin-hong Park, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(3):250-259.   Published online April 4, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00066.0009
  • 3,293 View
  • 146 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This study was designed to determine the feasibility of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) in patients with clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer.
Methods
Patients who underwent surgery for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer between January 2008 and December 2016 were included. Patients were divided into PCRT and non-PCRT groups. Non-PCRT patients underwent radical resection or local excision (LE) according to the surgeon’s decision, and PCRT patients underwent surgery according to the response to PCRT. Patients received 50.0 to 50.4 gray of preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy.
Results
Of 127 patients enrolled, 46 underwent PCRT and 81 did not. The mean distance of lesions from the anal verge was lower in the PCRT group (P=0.004). The most frequent operation was transanal excision and ultralow anterior resection in the PCRT and non-PCRT groups, respectively. Of the 46 patients who underwent PCRT, 21 (45.7%) achieved pathologic complete response, including 15 of the 24 (62.5%) who underwent LE. Rectal sparing rate was significantly higher in the PCRT group (11.1% vs. 52.2%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in 3- and 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival regardless of PCRT or surgical procedures.
Conclusion
PCRT in clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer patients increased the rectal sparing rate via LE and showed acceptable oncologic outcomes. PCRT may be a feasible therapeutic option to avoid abdominoperineal resection in clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Performance reporting design in artificial intelligence studies using image-based TNM staging and prognostic parameters in rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Minsung Kim, Taeyong Park, Bo Young Oh, Min Jeong Kim, Bum-Joo Cho, Il Tae Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Comparative analysis of organ preservation attempt and radical surgery in clinical T2N0 mid to low rectal cancer
    Hyeung-min Park, Jaram Lee, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Organ preservation for early rectal cancer using preoperative chemoradiotherapy
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(3): 191.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
Editorial
Malignant disease,Postoperative outcome & ERAS,Functional outcome
Future direction of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in colorectal surgery
In Ja Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):1-2.   Published online February 23, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00094.0013
  • 2,936 View
  • 128 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Multidisciplinary approach toward enhanced recovery after surgery for total knee arthroplasty improves outcomes
    Deb Sanjay Nag, Amlan Swain, Seelora Sahu, Ayaskant Sahoo, Gunjan Wadhwa
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2024; 12(9): 1549.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes and future directions of enhanced recovery after surgery in colorectal surgery: a narrative review
    Ji Hyeong Song, Minsung Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery
    Min Ki Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Comment from Editor-in-Chief: Master Class 2021
It Is a Pleasure to Announce the Issue Titled “Master Class 2021” in Annals of Coloproctology
In Ja Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(6):349-350.   Published online December 22, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00997.0142
  • 2,597 View
  • 118 Download
PDF
Original Article
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Colorectal cancer,Epidemiology & etiology
Clinicopathological Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes of Crohn Disease-Associated Colorectal Malignancy
Yoo Na Lee, Jong Lyul Lee, Chang Sik Yu, Jong Beom Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, In Ja Park, Young Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Suk-Kyun Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Sang Hyoung Park, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(2):101-108.   Published online April 30, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.11.02
  • 3,484 View
  • 102 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Carcinoma arising from Crohn disease (CD) is rare, and there is no clear guidance on how to properly screen for at-risk patients and choose appropriate care. This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, and oncologic outcomes of CD patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC).
Methods
Using medical records, we retrospectively enrolled a single-center cohort of 823 patients who underwent abdominal surgery for CD between January 2006 and December 2015. CD-associated CRC patients included those with adenocarcinoma, lymphoma, or neuroendocrine tumors of the colon and rectum.
Results
Nineteen patients (2.3%) underwent abdominal surgery to treat CD-associated CRC. The mean duration of CD in the CD-associated CRC group was significantly longer than that in the benign CD group (124.7 ± 77.7 months vs. 68.9 ± 60.2 months, P = 0.006). The CD-associated CRC group included a higher proportion of patients with a history of perianal disease (73.7% vs. 50.2%, P = 0.035) and colonic location (47.4% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.001). Among 19 CD-associated CRC patients, 17 (89.5%) were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, and of the 17 cases, 15 (88.2%) were rectal adenocarcinoma. On multivariable analyses for developing CRC, only colonic location was a risk factor (relative risk, 7.735; 95% confidence interval, 2.862–20.903; P = 0.001).
Conclusion
Colorectal malignancy is rare among CD patients, even among patients who undergo abdominal surgery. Rectal adenocarcinoma accounted for most of the CRC, and colonic location was a risk factor for developing CRC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Perianal Fistulizing Crohn’s Disease–Associated Anorectal and Fistula Cancers: Systematic Review and Expert Consensus
    Serre-Yu Wong, Cathy Rowan, Elvira Diaz Brockmans, Cindy C.Y. Law, Elisabeth Giselbrecht, Celina Ang, Sergey Khaitov, David Sachar, Alexandros D. Polydorides, Leon Shin-han Winata, Bram Verstockt, Antonino Spinelli, David T. Rubin, Parakkal Deepak, Dermot
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Reduced expression of alanyl aminopeptidase is a robust biomarker of non‐familial adenomatous polyposis and non‐hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome early‐onset colorectal cancer
    Ye Jin Ha, Yun Jae Shin, Ka Hee Tak, Jong Lyul Park, Jeong Hwan Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Seon Young Kim, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(8): 10091.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer
    Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 97.     CrossRef
Review
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy
Survival and Operative Outcomes After Salvage Surgery for Recurrent or Persistent Anal Cancer
In Ja Park, George Chang
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(6):361-373.   Published online December 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.12.29
  • 4,866 View
  • 136 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 16 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a relatively rare cancer comprising less than 2.5% of all gastrointestinal malignancies. The standard treatment for anal SCC is primary chemoradiation therapy which can result in complete regression. After successful treatment, the 5-year survival is approximately 80%. However, up to 30% of patients experience recurrent persistent or recurrent disease. The role of surgery in the treatment of anal cancer, therefore, is limited to the management of recurrent or persistent disease with abdominoperineal resection and/or en bloc adjacent organ excision. Salvage surgery after irradiated anal cancer can be technically demanding in terms of acquisition of oncologically safe surgical margins and minimization of postoperative morbidity. In addition, 5-year survival outcomes after salvage resection have been reported to vary from 23% to 69%. Positive resection margins are generally regarded as the important risk factor associated with poor survival outcome. Perineal wound complications are the most common major postoperative morbidity. Because of the challenges of primary wound closure after salvage abdominoperineal resection, myocutaneous flap reconstruction has been performed to reduce the severity of perianal would complications. We, therefore, descriptively reviewed contemporary published evidence describing the treatment and outcomes after salvage surgery for persistent or recurrent anal SCC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Management of Recurrent Anal Cancer
    James Blake Littlejohn, Kelly Ann Brister
    Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America.2025; 34(1): 91.     CrossRef
  • Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology: Guidelines for the management of anal canal cancer
    Marcus Valadão, Rachel P. Riechelmann, José Antonio Cunha e Silva, Jorge Mali, Bruno Azevedo, Samuel Aguiar, Rodrigo Araújo, Mario Feitoza, Eid Coelho, Arthur Accioly Rosa, Naomi Jay, Alexcia Camila Braun, Rodrigo Pinheiro, Héber Salvador
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 130(4): 810.     CrossRef
  • Improving R0 Resection Rates With a Posterior-First, 2-Stage Approach for En Bloc Resection of Locally Advanced Primary and Recurrent Anorectal Cancers Involving the Deep Pelvic Sidewall
    Shinichiro Sakata, S. Mohammed Karim, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, David W. Larson, Kellie L. Mathis, Scott R. Kelley, Peter S. Rose, Eric J. Dozois
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(1): 90.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic Outcomes of Salvage Abdominoperineal Resection for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Initially Managed with Chemoradiation
    Roni Rosen, Felipe F. Quezada-Diaz, Mithat Gönen, Georgios Karagkounis, Maria Widmar, Iris H. Wei, J. Joshua Smith, Garrett M. Nash, Martin R. Weiser, Philip B. Paty, Andrea Cercek, Paul B. Romesser, Francisco Sanchez-Vega, Mohammad Adileh, Diana Roth O’B
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(8): 2156.     CrossRef
  • Anal carcinoma - exploring the epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment
    Kevan J English
    World Journal of Experimental Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A systematic review on the role of interventional radiotherapy for treatment of anal squamous cell cancer: multimodal and multidisciplinary therapeutic approach
    Maria Concetta Campisi, Valentina Lancellotta, Bruno Fionda, Martina De Angeli, Stefania Manfrida, Patrizia Cornacchione, Gabriella Macchia, Alessio Giuseppe Morganti, Gian Carlo Mattiucci, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Roberto Iezzi, Luca Tagliaferri
    La radiologia medica.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • SURVIVAL AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF ANAL CANCER: A STUDY BASED ON DATA FROM THE HOSPITAL-BASED CANCER REGISTRY OF A HIGH-COMPLEXITY ONCOLOGY CARE CENTER
    Wallace Henrique Pinho da PAIXÃO, Gelcio Luiz Quintella MENDES, Débora Santos da SILVA, Rosyane Garcês Moreira Lima de SOUZA, Rodrigo Otavio de Castro ARAUJO, Karina Cardoso MEIRA, Rafael Tavares JOMAR
    ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo).2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Perineal Closure Techniques after Abdominoperineal Resections for Carcinoma of the Anus
    Jose L. Cataneo, Sydney A. Mathis, Sabreen Faqihi, Diana D. del Valle, Alejandra M. Perez-Tamayo, Anders F. Mellgren, Lee W. T. Alkureishi, Gerald GanttJr
    The American Surgeon™.2023; 89(2): 238.     CrossRef
  • Follow-up imaging of anal cancer after treatment
    Maria El Homsi, Shannon P. Sheedy, Gaiane M. Rauch, Dhakshina M. Ganeshan, Randy D. Ernst, Jennifer S. Golia Pernicka
    Abdominal Radiology.2023; 48(9): 2888.     CrossRef
  • Survival outcomes following salvage abdominoperineal resection for recurrent and persistent anal squamous cell carcinoma
    Daichi Kitaguchi, Yuichiro Tsukada, Masaaki Ito, Satoshi Horasawa, Hideaki Bando, Takayuki Yoshino, Kazutaka Yamada, Yoichi Ajioka, Kenichi Sugihara
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 49(9): 106929.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors and outcome following salvage surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus
    Julie Borg, Karen-Lise Garm Spindler, Birgitte Mayland Havelund, Mette Møller Sørensen, Jonas Amstrup Funder
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 49(10): 107050.     CrossRef
  • Pelvic Exenteration for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus: Oncological, Morbidity, and Quality of Life Outcomes
    Kilian G.M. Brown, Michael J. Solomon, Daniel Steffens, Kheng-Seong Ng, Christopher Byrne, Kirk K.S. Austin, Peter J. Lee
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value of Fusobacterium nucleatum after Abdominoperineal Resection for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Marc Hilmi, Cindy Neuzillet, Jérémie H. Lefèvre, Magali Svrcek, Sophie Vacher, Leonor Benhaim, Peggy Dartigues, Emmanuelle Samalin, Julien Lazartigues, Jean-François Emile, Eugénie Rigault, Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq, Christelle de La Fouchardière, David Tou
    Cancers.2022; 14(7): 1606.     CrossRef
  • Failure of Initial Curative Treatment for Non-Metastatic Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From Prognostic Factors Analysis to Stratified Treatment
    Claire Jaraudias, Lucile Montagneb Angélique Saint, Renaud Schiappa, David Baron, Léa Marie, Karen Benezery, Cyrielle Scouarnec, Éric François, Ludovic Evesque
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2022; 21(4): 362.     CrossRef
  • Rekonstruktion onkologischer Defekte der Perianalregion
    Raymund E. Horch, Ingo Ludolph, Andreas Arkudas
    Der Chirurg.2021; 92(12): 1159.     CrossRef
  • Rekonstruktion onkologischer Defekte der Perianalregion
    Raymund E. Horch, Ingo Ludolph, Andreas Arkudas
    coloproctology.2021; 43(6): 431.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy
Beware of Early Relapse in Rectal Cancer Patients Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
Seul Gi Oh, In Ja Park, Ji-hyun Seo, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Jong Lyul Lee, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(6):382-389.   Published online June 17, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.06.11
  • 3,940 View
  • 99 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Recurrence patterns in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) are needed to evaluate for establishing tailored surveillance protocol.
Methods
This study included 2,215 patients with locally-advanced mid and low rectal cancer treated with radical resection between January 2005 and December 2012. Recurrence was evaluated according to receipt of PCRT; PCRT group (n = 1,258) and no-PCRT group (n = 957). Early recurrence occurred within 1 year of surgery and late recurrence after 3 years. The median follow-up duration was 65.7 ± 29 months.
Results
The overall recurrence rate was similar between the PCRT and no-PCRT group (25.8% vs. 24.9%, P = 0.622). The most common initial recurrence site was the lungs in both groups (50.6% vs. 49.6%, P = 0.864), followed by the liver, which was more common in the no-PCRT group (22.5% vs. 33.6%, P = 0.004). Most of the recurrence occurred within 3 years after surgery in both groups (85.3% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.862). Early recurrence was more common in the PCRT group than in the no-PCRT group (43.1% vs. 32.4%, P = 0.020). Recurrence within the first 6 months after surgery was significantly higher in the PCRT group than in the no-PCRT group (18.8% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.003). Lung (n = 27, 44.3%) and liver (n = 22, 36.1%) were the frequent the first relapsed site within 6 months after surgery in PCRT group.
Conclusion
Early recurrence within the first 1 year after surgery was more common in patients treated with PCRT. This difference would be considered for surveillance protocols and need to be evaluated in further studies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review
    In Ja Park
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91.     CrossRef
  • Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
    Chan Wook Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The watch-and-wait strategy versus radical resection for rectal cancer patients with a good response (≤ycT2) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(6): 350.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Postoperative Surveillance Strategies for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study
    Min-Young Park, In-Ja Park, Hyo-Seon Ryu, Jay Jung, Min-Sung Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang-Sik Yu, Jin-Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3502.     CrossRef
  • Comparison between Local Excision and Radical Resection for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer in ypT0-1 Patients: An Analysis of the Clinicopathological Factors and Survival Rates
    Soo Young Oh, In Ja Park, Young IL Kim, Jong-Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(19): 4823.     CrossRef
  • Shifting Treatment Strategies to Prevent Early Relapse of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Eun Jung Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(6): 357.     CrossRef
Benign GI diease, Inflammatory bowel disease
Clinical Characteristics and Postoperative Outcomes of Patients Presenting With Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Crohn Disease
Joon Suk Moon, Jong Lyul Lee, Chang Sik Yu, Seok-Byung Lim, In Ja Park, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Suk-Kyun Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Sang Hyoung Park, Hassan Abdullah Alsaleem, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):243-248.   Published online March 16, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.10.16.1
  • 3,546 View
  • 119 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract involvement in Crohn disease (CD) is rare and effectiveness of surgical treatment is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate characteristics and surgical outcomes of upper GI CD.
Methods
Medical records of 811 patients who underwent intestinal surgery for CD between January 2006 and December 2015 at a single institution were reviewed. Upper GI CD was defined by involvement of the stomach to the fourth portion of duodenum, with or without concomitant small/large bowel CD involvement according to a modification of the Montreal classification.
Results
We identified 24 patients (21 males, 3 females) who underwent surgery for upper GI CD. The mean age at diagnosis was 27 ± 12 years, the mean age at surgery was 33 ± 11 years, and the mean duration of CD was 73.6 ± 56.6 months. Fifteen patients (62.5%) had history of previous perianal surgery. Ten patients (41.7%) had duodenal or gastric stricture and 14 patients (58.3%) had penetrating fistula; patients with fistula were significantly more likely to develop complications (57.1% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.035). One patient with stricture had surgical recurrence. In seven patients with fistula, fistula was related to previous anastomosis. Patients with fistula had significantly longer hospital stays than those with stricture (16 days vs. 11 days, P = 0.01).
Conclusion
Upper GI CD is rare among CD types (2.96%). In patients with upper GI CD, penetrating fistula was associated with longer hospital stay and more complications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Update S2k-Guideline Helicobacter pylori and gastroduodenal ulcer disease of the German Society of Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS)
    Wolfgang Fischbach, Jan Bornschein, Jörg C. Hoffmann, Sibylle Koletzko, Alexander Link, Lukas Macke, Peter Malfertheiner, Kerstin Schütte, Dieter-Michael Selgrad, Sebastian Suerbaum, Christian Schulz
    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2024; 62(02): 261.     CrossRef
  • Aktualisierte S2k-Leitlinie Helicobacter pylori und gastroduodenale Ulkuskrankheit der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) – Juli 2022 – AWMF-Registernummer: 021–001

    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2023; 61(05): 544.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review and meta‐analysis of prevalence and clinical features of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract Crohn's disease in adults compared to non‐UGI types
    Babak Tamizifar, Peyman Adibi, Maryam Hadipour, Vahid Mohamadi
    JGH Open.2023; 7(5): 325.     CrossRef
  • Upper gastrointestinal tract involvement of Crohn disease: clinical implications in children and adolescents
    Eun Sil Kim, Mi Jin Kim
    Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics.2022; 65(1): 21.     CrossRef
  • Profiling non-coding RNA levels with clinical classifiers in pediatric Crohn’s disease
    Ranjit Pelia, Suresh Venkateswaran, Jason D. Matthews, Yael Haberman, David J. Cutler, Jeffrey S. Hyams, Lee A. Denson, Subra Kugathasan
    BMC Medical Genomics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Crohn Disease: A Long Way to Go to Identify the Optimal Method
    Soo Yeun Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(4): 207.     CrossRef
Benign GI diease, Inflammatory bowel disease
Short-term Outcomes of Elective 2-Stage Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis in Korea: Does Laparoscopy Have Benefits?
Jun Woo Bong, Yong Sik Yoon, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(1):41-47.   Published online February 29, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.03.29
  • 3,423 View
  • 83 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of the open and laparoscopic approaches to 2-stage restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for Korean patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 73 patients with UC who underwent elective RPC between 2009 and 2016. Patient characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications within 30 days were compared between the open and laparoscopic groups.
Results
There were 26 cases (36%) in the laparoscopic group, which had a lower mean body mass index (P = 0.025), faster mean time to recovery of bowel function (P = 0.004), less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.004), and less pain on the first and seventh postoperative days (P = 0.029 and P = 0.027, respectively) compared to open group. There were no deaths, and the overall complication rate was 43.8%. There was no between-group difference in the overall complication rate; however, postoperative ileus was more frequent in the open group (27.7% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.043). Current smoking (odds ratio [OR], 44.4; P = 0.003) and open surgery (OR, 5.4; P = 0.014) were the independent risk factors for postoperative complications after RPC.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic RPC was associated with acceptable morbidity and faster recovery than the open approach. The laparoscopic approach is a feasible and safe option for surgical treatment for UC in selective cases.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Ileoanal Pouch Surgery: a Systematic Review
    Zakary Ismail Warsop, Carlo Alberto Manzo, Natalie Yu, Bilal Yusuf, Christos Kontovounisios, Valerio Celentano
    Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2024; 18(3): 479.     CrossRef
  • Creation of an institutional preoperative checklist to support clinical risk assessment in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) considering ileoanal pouch surgery
    Bruno Augusto Alves Martins, Amira Shamsiddinova, Manal Mubarak Alquaimi, Guy Worley, Phil Tozer, Kapil Sahnan, Zarah Perry-Woodford, Ailsa Hart, Naila Arebi, Manmeet Matharoo, Janindra Warusavitarne, Omar Faiz
    Frontline Gastroenterology.2024; 15(3): 203.     CrossRef
  • Benefits of Elective Laparoscopic 2-Stage Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis in Korea
    Sun Min Park, Won-Kyung Kang
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(1): 3.     CrossRef
Original article
Defunctioning Protective Stoma Can Reduce the Rate of Anastomotic Leakage after Low Anterior Resection in Rectal Cancer Patients
Byoung Chul Lee, Seok-Byung Lim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Received October 22, 2019  Accepted November 19, 2019  Published online January 16, 2020  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.11.19.1
  • 3,827 View
  • 226 Download
  • 16 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
This study aimed to identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage and to evaluate the impact of protective stoma on the rate of anastomotic leakage and subsequent management.
METHODS
This retrospective study analyzed data from 4,282 patients who underwent low anterior resection between 2007 and 2014. Among these, 1,367 (31.9%) underwent surgery to create protective diverting stoma and 232 (5.4%) experienced anastomotic leakage. At 6-month timepoints, data were evaluated to identify any correlation between the presence of diverting stoma and the incidence of anastomotic leakage. In addition, clinicopathological parameters were investigated to identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage.
RESULTS
Diverting stomas significantly reduced the rate of anastomotic leakage [HR 0.334, 95% CI 0.212

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Machine learning model for prediction of permanent stoma after anterior resection of rectal cancer: A multicenter study
    Yang Su, Yanqi Li, Heng Zhang, Wangshuo Yang, Mengdie Liu, Xuelai Luo, Lu Liu
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 50(7): 108386.     CrossRef
  • A nomogram of anastomotic stricture after rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis
    Yifan Cheng, Zhen Tian, Shuyang Gao, Shuai Zhao, Ruiqi Li, Jiajie Zhou, Qiannan Sun, Daorong Wang
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(7): 3661.     CrossRef
  • Factors associated with leakage after reversal of protective stoma in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following curative resection and anastomosis
    Miao-Ling Tsai, Ji-Shiang Hung, John Huang, Been-Ren Lin
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; : 108698.     CrossRef
  • Impact of diversion ileostomy on postoperative complications and recovery in the treatment of locally advanced upper-half rectal cancer
    Yangyang Wang, Xiaojie Wang, Shenghui Huang, Heyuan Zhu, Ying Huang
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The role of transanal drainage tube in preventing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery without a defunctioning stoma: A meta-analysis
    Yue-Xin Zhang, Tao Jin, Kun Yang
    The Surgeon.2023; 21(4): e164.     CrossRef
  • Sarcopenic Obesity Is a Risk Factor for Worse Oncological Long-Term Outcome in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study
    Peter Tschann, Markus P. Weigl, Patrick Clemens, Philipp Szeverinski, Christian Attenberger, Matthias Kowatsch, Tarkan Jäger, Klaus Emmanuel, Thomas Brock, Ingmar Königsrainer
    Nutrients.2023; 15(11): 2632.     CrossRef
  • One Decade of Declining Use of Defunctioning Stomas After Rectal Cancer Surgery in the Netherlands: Are We on the Right Track?
    Erik W. Ingwersen, Paulien J.K. van der Beek, Jan Willem T. Dekker, Susan van Dieren, Freek Daams
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(7): 1003.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy on Postoperative Complications in Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Jianguo Yang, Yajun Luo, Tingting Tian, Peng Dong, Zhongxue Fu, Irena Ilic
    Journal of Oncology.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort
    Philippe Rouanet, Marie Selvy, Marta Jarlier, Caroline Bugnon, Guillaume Carrier, Anne Mourregot, Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo, Christophe Taoum
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2022; 29(4): 2514.     CrossRef
  • Are risk factors for anastomotic leakage influencing long-term oncological outcomes after low anterior resection of locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant therapy? A single-centre cohort study
    Peter Tschann, Markus P. Weigl, Philipp Szeverinski, Daniel Lechner, Thomas Brock, Stephanie Rauch, Jana Rossner, Helmut Eiter, Paolo N. C. Girotti, Tarkan Jäger, Jaroslav Presl, Klaus Emmanuel, Alexander De Vries, Ingmar Königsrainer, Patrick Clemens
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2022; 407(7): 2945.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer and Construction of a Nomogram Prediction Model
    Keli Wang, Meijiao Li, Rui Liu, Yang Ji, Jin Yan
    Cancer Management and Research.2022; Volume 14: 2243.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after colectomy for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    VINÍCIUS EVANGELISTA DIAS, PEDRO ALVES SOARES VAZ DE CASTRO, HOMERO TERRA PADILHA, LARA VICENTE PILLAR, LAURA BOTELHO RAMOS GODINHO, AUGUSTO CLAUDIO DE ALMEIDA TINOCO, RODRIGO DA COSTA AMIL, ALEIDA NAZARETH SOARES, GERALDO MAGELA GOMES DA CRUZ, JULIANA MA
    Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Fatores de risco pré-operatórios associados à fístula anastomótica após colectomia para câncer colorretal: revisão sistemática e metanálise
    VINÍCIUS EVANGELISTA DIAS, PEDRO ALVES SOARES VAZ DE CASTRO, HOMERO TERRA PADILHA, LARA VICENTE PILLAR, LAURA BOTELHO RAMOS GODINHO, AUGUSTO CLAUDIO DE ALMEIDA TINOCO, RODRIGO DA COSTA AMIL, ALEIDA NAZARETH SOARES, GERALDO MAGELA GOMES DA CRUZ, JULIANA MA
    Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors of Anastomotic Leakage After Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer Patients
    Xiang-nan Yu, Lu-ming Xu, Ya-wen Bin, Ye Yuan, Shao-bo Tian, Bo Cai, Kai-xiong Tao, Lin Wang, Guo-bin Wang, Zheng Wang
    Current Medical Science.2022; 42(6): 1256.     CrossRef
  • Effect of pelvic drain displacement on anastomotic leakage-related morbidity after rectal cancer surgery
    Ho Yung Lee, Sung Il Kang, So Hyun Kim, Jae-Hwang Kim
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2021; 24(3): 158.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus surgery alone for advanced low rectal cancer: a large multicenter cohort study in Japan
    Tomonori Akagi, Masafumi Inomata, Hajime Fujishima, Meiki Fukuda, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Shunsuke Tsukamoto, Fuminori Teraishi, Heita Ozawa, Keitaro Tanaka, Koya Hida, Yoshiharu Sakai, Masahiko Watanabe
    Surgery Today.2020; 50(11): 1507.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP