Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Article

Association Between c-Met and Lymphangiogenic Factors in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Han Jo Kim, Moo-Jun Baek, Dong Hyun Kang, Sang-Cheol Lee, Sang Byung Bae, Kyu Taek Lee, Namsu Lee, Hyungjoo Kim, Dongjun Jeong, Tae Sung Ahn, Moon Soo Lee, Dae Sik Hong, Jong-Ho Won; Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):88-93. Published online April 30, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.10

7,320 View
118 Download
5 Web of Science
4 Citations

Purpose
Animal models show a strong relationship between lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis. However, the clinical significance of lymphangiogenesis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the association between c-Met and lymphangiogenic factors and to elucidate the prognostic significance of c-Met in patients with CRC.
Methods
A total of 379 tissue samples were obtained from surgically resected specimens from patients with CRC at Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital between January 2002 and December 2010. The expressions of c-Met, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C, VEGF-D, VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-3, and podoplanin were examined using immunohistochemistry. The expression of c-Met and clinical factors were analyzed.
Results
Of the 379 tissues, 301 (79.4%) had c-Met expression. High expression of c-Met in tumor cells was significantly associated with high expression of VEGF-C (P < 0.001) and VEGFR-3 (P = 0.001). However, no statistically significant association with podoplanin (P = 0.587) or VEGF-D (P = 0.096) was found. Of the 103 evaluable patients, expression of c-Met in tumor cells was significantly associated with advanced clinical stage (P = 0.020), positive lymph node status (P = 0.038), and high expression of VEGF-C (P = 0.020). However, no statistically significant association with podoplanin (P = 0.518), VEGFR-3 (P = 0.085), VEGF-D (P = 0.203), or overall survival (P = 0.360) was found.
Conclusion
Our results provide indirect evidence for an association and possible regulatory link of c-Met with the lymphangiogenic markers, but c-Met expression in patients with CRC is not a prognostic indicator for overall survival.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Expression Profile of Microenvironmental Factors in the Interface Zone of Colorectal Cancer: Histological-Stromal Biomarkers and Cancer Cell-Cancer-Associated Fibroblast-Related Proteins Combined for the Assessment of Tumor Progression
Ricella Souza da Silva, Eduardo M. Queiroga, Cynthia de Toledo Osório, Karin S. Cunha, Fabiana P. Neves, Julieth P. Andrade, Eliane P. Dias
Pathobiology.2024; 91(2): 99. CrossRef
Recent progress in the imaging of c‐Met aberrant cancers with positron emission tomography
Giuseppe Floresta, Vincenzo Abbate
Medicinal Research Reviews.2022; 42(4): 1588. CrossRef
Involvement of Met receptor pathway in aggressive behavior of colorectal cancer cells induced by parathyroid hormone-related peptide
María Belén Novoa Díaz, Pedro Carriere, Graciela Gigola, Ariel Osvaldo Zwenger, Natalia Calvo, Claudia Gentili
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(26): 3177. CrossRef
The potential therapeutic and prognostic impacts of the c‐MET/HGF signaling pathway in colorectal cancer
Seyed Mostafa Parizadeh, Reza Jafarzadeh‐Esfehani, Danial Fazilat‐Panah, Seyed Mahdi Hassanian, Soodabeh Shahidsales, Majid Khazaei, Seyed Mohammad Reza Parizadeh, Majid Ghayour‐Mobarhan, Gordon A. Ferns, Amir Avan
IUBMB Life.2019; 71(7): 802. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search