Original Article
Benign GI diease
- Routine Intraoperative Bacterial Culture May Be Needed in Complicated Appendicitis
-
Jung Tack Son, Gue Chun Lee, Hyung Ook Kim, Taewoon Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Sung Ryol Lee, Kyung Uk Jung, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun
-
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(3):155-162. Published online June 30, 2020
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.11.04.1
-
-
4,052
View
-
123
Download
-
9
Web of Science
-
11
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
Choosing the appropriate antibiotic is important for treatment of complicated appendicitis. However, increasing multidrug resistant bacteria have been a serious problem for successful treatment. This study was designed to identify bacteria isolated from patients with complicated appendicitis and reveal their susceptibilities for antibiotics and their relationship with patient clinical course.
Methods
This study included patients diagnosed with complicated appendicitis and examined the bacterial cultures and antimicrobial susceptibilities of the isolates. Data were retrospectively collected from medical records of Kangbuk Samsung Hospital from January 2008 to February 2018.
Results
The common bacterial species cultured in complicated appendicitis were as follows: Escherichia coli (n=113, 48.9%), Streptococcus spp. (n=29, 12.6%), Pseudomonas spp. (n=23, 10.0%), Bacteriodes spp. (n=22, 9.5%), Klebsiella (n=11, 4.8%), and Enterococcus spp. (n=8, 3.5%). In antibiotics susceptibility testing, the positive rate of extended-spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) was 9.1% (21 of 231). The resistance rate to carbapenem was 1.7% (4 of 231), while that to vancomycin was 0.4% (1 of 231). E. coli was 16.8% ESBL positive (19 of 113) and had 22.1% and 19.5% resistance rates to cefotaxime and ceftazidime, respectively. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IEAT) occurred in 55 cases (31.8%) and was significantly related with organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) (7 of 55, P=0.005).
Conclusion
The rate of antibiotic resistance organisms was high in community-acquired complicated appendicitis in Koreans. Additionally, IEAT in complicated appendicitis may lead to increased rates of SSI. Routine intraoperative culture in patients with complicated appendicitis may be an effective strategy for appropriate antibiotic regimen.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Culture-based bacterial evaluation of the appendix lumen and antibiotic susceptibility of acute appendicitis in Japan: A single-center retrospective analysis
Hiroe Kitahara, Yonfan Park, Kai Seharada, Masaki Yoshimura, Akira Horiuchi, Yukihiko Karasawa
Medicine.2024; 103(29): e39037. CrossRef - Do Cultures From Percutaneously Drained Intra-abdominal Abscesses Change Treatment? A Retrospective Review
Andrew C. Esposito, Yuqi Zhang, Nupur Nagarkatti, William D. Laird, Nathan A. Coppersmith, Vikram Reddy, Ira Leeds, Anne Mongiu, Walter Longo, Ritche M. Hao, Haddon Pantel
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(3): 451. CrossRef - Bacterial pathogens in pediatric appendicitis: a comprehensive retrospective study
Julia Felber, Benedikt Gross, Arend Rahrisch, Eric Waltersbacher, Evelyn Trips, Percy Schröttner, Guido Fitze, Jurek Schultz
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - An Update on Acute Appendicitis in Lebanon: Insights From a Single-Center Retrospective Study
Nagham Bazzi, Samer Dbouk, Ahmad Rached, Sadek Jaber, Hala Bazzi, Manal Jrad, Mariam Bazzi
Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Bacterial peritonitis in paediatric appendicitis; microbial epidemiology and antimicrobial management
Keir Bhaskar, Simon Clarke, Luke S. P. Moore, Stephen Hughes
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Aerobic Intraoperative Abdominal Cavity Culture Modifies Antibiotic Therapy and Reduces the Risk of Surgical Site Infection in Complicated Appendicitis with Peritonitis
Víctor Manuel Quintero-Riaza, Romario Chancí-Drago, Natalia Guzmán-Arango, Pablo Posada-Moreno, Tatiana López-Sandoval, Isabel Cristina Ramírez-Sánchez, Johanna Marcela Vanegas-Munera
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 27(11): 2563. CrossRef - Does the Covid-19 pandemic have an effect on wound culture in patients undergoing appendectomy? A Case Control Study
Hacı BOLAT, Tuğba AVAN MUTLU
Journal of Contemporary Medicine.2022; 12(2): 332. CrossRef - Are We Hitting the Target?
Julia Elrod, Fatima Yarmal, Christoph Mohr, Martin Dennebaum, Michael Boettcher, Deirdre Vincent, Konrad Reinshagen, Ingo Koenigs
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal.2022; 41(6): 460. CrossRef - Is Routine Intra-operative Gram Stain, Culture, and Sensitivity during an Appendectomy is Effective in Decreasing the Rate of Post-operative Infective Complications?
Muqdad Fuad, Ahmed Modher, Mohammed Habash
Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences.2022; 10(B): 868. CrossRef - Die Bedeutung mikrobiologischer Ergebnisse für die Therapie der komplizierten Appendizitis – eine monozentrische Fall-Kontroll-Studie
F-X. Anzinger, K. Rothe, S. Reischl, C. Stöss, A. Novotny, D. Wilhelm, H. Friess, P-A. Neumann
Die Chirurgie.2022; 93(10): 986. CrossRef - Implications of bacteriological study in complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis
Sorin Cimpean, Alberto Gonzalez Barranquero, Ion Surdeanu, Benjamin Cadiere, Guy-Bernard Cadiere
Annals of Coloproctology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Case Report
Malignant disease, Benign GI diease,Colorectal cancer,Complication
- An Unusual Case of Colon Perforation With Multiple Transmural Ulcers After Use of Polmacoxib and Everolimus in a Metastatic Breast Cancer Patient
-
In-Gyu Song, Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun
-
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(2):120-124. Published online March 16, 2020
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.08.17
-
-
4,267
View
-
122
Download
-
1
Web of Science
-
2
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- Everolimus (Afinitor) is an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin. Polmacoxib (Acelex) is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that belongs to the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor family and is mainly used for treatment of arthritis. Intestinal perforation has not been reported previously as a complication of everolimus, and perforation of the lower intestinal tract caused by a selective COX-2 inhibitor is extremely rare. We present here a case of colon perforation that occurred after use of polmacoxib in a metastatic breast cancer patient who had been treated with everolimus for the preceding six months.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Multiple ulcers and perforation of small intestine with everolimus use in a patient with rectal neuroendocrine tumor: A case report
Kentaro Abe, Shigenobu Emoto, Kazuhito Sasaki, Hiroaki Nozawa, Yoichi Yasunaga, Soichiro Ishihara
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2023; 106: 108094. CrossRef - Everolimus/polmacoxib
Reactions Weekly.2021; 1869(1): 157. CrossRef
Original Articles
- Bowel Preparation for Surveillance Colonoscopy After Colorectal Resection: A New Perspective
-
Donghyoun Lee, Ho-Kyung Chun
-
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(3):129-136. Published online June 30, 2019
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.11.08
-
-
3,409
View
-
67
Download
-
1
Web of Science
-
2
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
Inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) is commonly observed during surveillance colonoscopy after colorectal resection. We investigated potential risk factors affecting bowel preparation.
Methods
We studied potential factors affecting bowel preparation quality. The Boston bowel preparation score was used to measure bowel preparation quality. Factors affecting IBP were analyzed, including age, body mass index, time elapsed between surgery and colonoscopy, and amount of bowel preparation drug consumed (conventional-volume vs. low-volume). Odds ratios were calculated for IBP.
Results
This retrospective cohort study included 1,317 patients who underwent colorectal resection due to malignancy. Of these patients, 79% had adequate bowel preparation and 21% had IBP. In multivariate regression analysis, a surveillance colonoscopy within 1 year after surgery and age >80 were used as independent predictors of IBP. IBP rate of the low-volume group was significantly higher than that of the conventional-volume group among patients who underwent a surveillance colonoscopy within 1 year after surgery.
Conclusion
For surveillance colonoscopy after colorectal resection, bowel preparation is affected by factors including colonoscopy timing after surgery and age. We recommend the use of conventional-volume 4-L polyethylene glycol solution when performing a surveillance colonoscopy, especially up to 1 year after surgery.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- A Modified Boston Bowel Preparation Scale After Colorectal Surgery
Lorenzo Dioscoridi, Edoardo Forti, Francesco Pugliese, Marcello Cintolo, Angelo Italia, Marta Bini, Giulia Bonato, Aurora Giannetti, Massimiliano Mutignani
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(4): 195. CrossRef - Bowel Preparation for Surveillance Colonoscopy After a Colorectal Resection: A New Perspective
Jin Soo Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(3): 107. CrossRef
- Patient-Controlled Nutrition After Abdominal Surgery: Novel Concept Contrary to Surgical Dogma
-
Hyung Ook Kim, Mingoo Kang, Sung Ryol Lee, Kyung Uk Jung, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun
-
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(5):253-258. Published online October 31, 2018
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.29
-
-
4,731
View
-
135
Download
-
1
Web of Science
-
3
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
According to surgical dogma, patients who are recovering from general anesthesia after abdominal surgery should begin with a clear liquid diet, progress to a full liquid diet and then to a soft diet before taking regular meals. We propose patient-controlled nutrition (PCN), which is a novel concept in postoperative nutrition after abdominal surgery.
Methods
A retrospective pilot study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and effects of PCN. This study was carried out with a total of 179 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy between August 2014 and July 2016. In the PCN group, diet was advanced depending on the choice of the patients themselves; in the traditional group, diet was progressively advanced to a full liquid or soft diet and then a regular diet as tolerated. The primary endpoints were time to tolerance of regular diet and postoperative hospital stay.
Results
Time to tolerance of a regular diet (P < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001) showed statistically significant differences between the groups. Multivariate analysis using linear regression showed that the traditional nutrition pattern was the only factor associated with postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis using logistic regression showed that traditional nutrition was the only risk factor associated with prolonged postoperative hospital stay (≥3 days).
Conclusion
After abdominal surgery, PCN may be a feasible and effective concept in postoperative nutrition. In our Early Recovery after Surgery program, our PCN concept may reduce the time to tolerance of a regular diet and shorten the postoperative hospital stay.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Bilateral Exchange: Enteral Nutrition Clinical Decision Making in Pediatric Surgery Patients
Manisha B. Bhatia, Cassandra M. Anderson, Abdiwahab N. Hussein, Brian Opondo, Nereah Aruwa, Otieno Okumu, Sarah G. Fisher, Tasha Sparks Joplin, JoAnna L. Hunter-Squires, Brian W. Gray, Peter W. Saula
Journal of Surgical Research.2024; 295: 139. CrossRef - Clinical pharmacist intervention in Appendectomy - Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct therapy
Bushra Abdel-Hadi, Sami Raid Abdel-Fattah
Journal Of Advanced Pharmacy Education And Research.2022; 12(2): 1. CrossRef - 外科患者の栄養管理における給食の意義
The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION.2021; 55(2): 57. CrossRef
- Obstructive Left Colon Cancer Should Be Managed by Using a Subtotal Colectomy Instead of Colonic Stenting
-
Chung Ki Min, Hyung Ook Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Kyung Uk Jung, Sung Ryol Lee, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun
-
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(6):215-220. Published online December 31, 2016
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.6.215
-
-
5,024
View
-
75
Download
-
13
Web of Science
-
9
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
This study compared a subtotal colectomy to self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion as a bridge to surgery for patients with left colon-cancer obstruction.
MethodsNinety-four consecutive patients with left colon-cancer obstruction underwent an emergency subtotal colectomy or elective SEMS insertion between January 2007 and August 2014. Using prospectively collected data, we performed a retrospective comparative analysis on an intention-to-treat basis.
ResultsA subtotal colectomy and SEMS insertion were attempted in 24 and 70 patients, respectively. SEMS insertion technically failed in 5 patients (7.1%). The mean age and rate of obstruction in the descending colon were higher in the subtotal colectomy group than the SEMS group. Sex, underlying disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and pathological stage showed no statistical difference. Laparoscopic surgery was performed more frequently in patients in the SEMS group (62 of 70, 88.6%) than in patients in the subtotal colectomy group (4 of 24, 16.7%). The overall rate of postoperative morbidity was higher in the SEMS group. No Clavien-Dindo grade III or IV complications occurred in the subtotal colectomy group, but 2 patients (2.9%) died from septic complications in the SEMS group. One patient (4.2%) in the subtotal colectomy group had synchronous cancer. The total hospital stay was shorter in the subtotal colectomy group. The median number of bowel movements in the subtotal colectomy group was twice per day at postoperative 3–6 months.
ConclusionA subtotal colectomy for patients with obstructive left-colon cancer is a clinically and oncologically safer, 1-stage, surgical strategy compared to SEMS insertion as a bridge to surgery.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Short- and long-term outcomes of subtotal/total colectomy in the management of obstructive left colon cancer
Jung Tak Son, Yong Bog Kim, Hyung Ook Kim, Chungki Min, Yongjun Park, Sung Ryol Lee, Kyung Uk Jung, Hungdai Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(3): 260. CrossRef - Outcomes After Colonic Self-Expanding Metal Stent Insertion Without Fluoroscopy: A Surgeon-Led 10-Year Experience
Tara M. Connelly, Jessica Ryan, Niamh M. Foley, Helen Earley, Shaheel M. Sahebally, Carl O'Brien, Peter McCullough, Peter Neary, Fiachra Cooke
Journal of Surgical Research.2023; 281: 275. CrossRef - Which treatment strategy is optimal for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction? A Bayesian meta-analysis
Kaibo Ouyang, Zifeng Yang, Yuesheng Yang, Junjiang Wang, Deqing Wu, Yong Li
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - New Challenges in Surgical Approaches for Colorectal Cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Dragos Serban, Geta Vancea, Catalin Gabriel Smarandache, Simona Andreea Balasescu, Gabriel Andrei Gangura, Daniel Ovidiu Costea, Mihail Silviu Tudosie, Corneliu Tudor, Dan Dumitrescu, Ana Maria Dascalu, Ciprian Tanasescu, Laura Carina Tribus
Applied Sciences.2022; 12(11): 5337. CrossRef - Functional outcomes of surgery for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Sanne J. Verkuijl, Jara E. Jonker, Monika Trzpis, Johannes G.M. Burgerhof, Paul M.A. Broens, Edgar J.B. Furnée
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 47(5): 960. CrossRef - Short-term outcomes of stents in obstructive rectal cancer
Nora H. Trabulsi, Hajar M. Halawani, Esraa A. Alshahrani, Rawan M. Alamoudi, Sama K. Jambi, Nouf Y. Akeel, Ali H. Farsi, Mohammed O. Nassif, Ali A. Samkari, Abdulaziz M. Saleem, Nadim H. Malibary, Mohammad M. Abbas, Luca Gianotti, Antonietta Lamazza, Jin
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(3): 127. CrossRef - Fluoroscopic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery versus Emergency Management for Malignant Obstruction of the Colon
Fan Xue, Feng Lin, Jun Zhou, Ning Feng, You-Gang Cui, Xu Zhang, Yu-Peng Yi, Wen-Zhi Liu
Emergency Medicine International.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef - Safety of subtotal or total colectomy with primary anastomosis compared to Hartmann procedure for left-sided colon cancer obstruction or perforation
Eun-Do Kim, Jin-Kwon Lee, Jin-Kyu Cho, Jae-Myung Kim, Ji-Ho Park, Ju-Yeon Kim, Sang-Ho Jeong, Young-Tae Ju, Chi-Young Jeong, Eun-Jung Jung, Young-Joon Lee, Soon-Chan Hong, Seung-Jin Kwag
Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2019; 15(2): 106. CrossRef - Laparoscopic assisted insertion of a colonic self-expandable metallic stent
Y. M. Ho, V. Shenoy, J. Alberts, N. Ward
Techniques in Coloproctology.2018; 22(10): 809. CrossRef
- Age Over 80 is a Possible Risk Factor for Postoperative Morbidity After a Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer
-
Taekhyun Kang, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun, Won Kon Han, Kyung Uk Jung
-
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(6):228-234. Published online December 31, 2015
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.6.228
-
-
3,705
View
-
41
Download
-
14
Web of Science
-
17
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
With extended life expectancy, the mean age of patients at the time of diagnosis of colorectal cancer and its treatment, including radical resection, is increasing gradually. We aimed to evaluate the impact of age on postoperative clinical outcomes after a laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancers.
MethodsThis is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Patients with primary colorectal malignancies or premalignant lesions who underwent laparoscopic colectomies between January 2009 and April 2013 were identified. Patients were divided into 6 groups by age using 70, 75, and 80 years as cutoffs: younger than 70, 70 or older, younger than 75, 75 or older, younger than 80, and 80 or older. Demographics, pathological parameters, and postoperative clinical outcomes, including postoperative morbidity, were compared between the younger and the older age groups.
ResultsAll 578 patients underwent a laparoscopic colorectal resection. The overall postoperative complication rate was 21.1% (n = 122). There were 4 cases of operative mortality (0.7%). Postoperative complication rates were consistently higher in the older groups at all three cutoffs; however, only the comparison with a cutoff at 80 years showed a statistically significant difference between the younger and the older groups.
ConclusionAge over 80 is a possible risk factor for postoperative morbidity after a laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Octogenarian patients with colon cancer – postoperative morbidity and mortality are the major challenges
Øystein Høydahl, Tom-Harald Edna, Athanasios Xanthoulis, Stian Lydersen, Birger Henning Endreseth
BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Differential short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection in colon and rectal cancer patients aged 80 and older: an analysis of Nationwide Inpatient Sample
Kuan-Chih Chung, Ko-Chao Lee, Hong-Hwa Chen, Kung-Chuan Cheng, Kuen-Lin Wu, Ling-Chiao Song
Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(2): 872. CrossRef - Age and comorbidities do not affect short-term outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection in elderly patients. A multi-institutional cohort study in 287 patients
Roberto Peltrini, Nicola Imperatore, Filippo Carannante, Diego Cuccurullo, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Umberto Bracale, Marco Caricato, Francesco Corcione
Updates in Surgery.2021; 73(2): 527. CrossRef - Short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer aged over 80 years: a propensity score matching analysis
Masako Utsumi, Takeru Matsuda, Kimihiro Yamashita, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Kyosuke Agawa, Naoki Urakawa, Shingo Kanaji, Taro Oshikiri, Tetsu Nakamura, Yoshihiro Kakeji
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(11): 2519. CrossRef - Type and Consequences of Short-Term Complications in Colon Cancer Surgery, Focusing on the Oldest Old
Marisa Baré, Laura Mora, Miguel Pera, Pablo Collera, Maximino Redondo, Antonio Escobar, Rocío Anula, José María Quintana, M. Redondo, F. Rivas, E. Briones, E. Campano, A.I. Sotelo, F. Medina, A. Del Rey, M.M. Morales, S. Gómez, M. Baré, M. Pont, N. Torà,
Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2020; 19(1): e18. CrossRef - Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly versus non-elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Nobuaki Hoshino, Yudai Fukui, Koya Hida, Yoshiharu Sakai
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(3): 377. CrossRef - Safety and Prognosis of Transarterial Chemoembolization for Octogenarians with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hua-Ming Cheng, Toshihiro Tanaka, Hideyuki Nishiofuku, Yuto Chanoki, Katsutoshi Horiuchi, Tetsuya Masada, Shota Tatsumoto, Takeshi Matsumoto, Nagaaki Marugami, Kimihiko Kichikawa
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.2019; 42(10): 1413. CrossRef - Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in advanced age patients
Z. B. Khalilov, A. Yu. Kalinichenko, R. Kh. Azimov, M. A. Chinikov, I. S. Panteleeva, F. S. Kurbanov
Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2018; (3): 76. CrossRef - Efficacy of video-assisted procedures in advanced age patients with colorectal cancer
Z. B. Khalilov, A. Yu. Kalinichenko, R. Kh. Azimov, I. S. Panteleeva, M. A. Chinikov, F. S. Kurbanov
Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2018; (2): 74. CrossRef - Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening and treatment methods: Mapping of systematic reviews
Hossein M Abdolahi, Ali S Asiabar, Saber Azami-Aghdash, Fatemeh Pournaghi-Azar, Aziz Rezapour
Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing.2018; 5(1): 57. CrossRef - Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in elderly patients
Z. B. Khalilov, A. Yu. Kalinichenko
Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2017; (3): 86. CrossRef - Evaluation of safety, feasibility and the long-term outcomes of colorectomy for colorectal adenocarcinoma in patients older than 80 years of age
Norio Yukawa, Toru Aoyama, Tsutomu Sato, Takashi Oshima, Takaki Yoshikawa, Yasushi Rino, Munetaka Masuda
Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2017; 7(4): 564. CrossRef - Evaluation of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 75 years old: a multi-institutional study (YSURG1401)
Keisuke Kazama, Toru Aoyama, Tsutomu Hayashi, Takanobu Yamada, Masakatsu Numata, Shinya Amano, Mariko Kamiya, Tsutomu Sato, Takaki Yoshikawa, Manabu Shiozawa, Takashi Oshima, Norio Yukawa, Yasushi Rino, Munetaka Masuda
BMC Surgery.2017;[Epub] CrossRef - The possibility of endovideosurgical interventions for the treatment of the older-age patients presenting with rectal cancer
Z. B. Khalilov, R. H. Azimov, M. A. Chinikov, I. S. Panteleeva, F. S. Kurbanov
Dokazatel'naya gastroenterologiya.2017; 6(4): 53. CrossRef - Impact of frailty on approach to colonic resection: Laparoscopy vs open surgery
Catalina Mosquera, Konstantinos Spaniolas, Timothy L Fitzgerald
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(43): 9544. CrossRef - Colorectal Surgery in Elderly Patients
Byung Chun Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(4): 126. CrossRef - Impact of octogenarians on surgical outcome in colorectal cancer
Basilio Pirrera, Samuele Vaccari, Dajana Cuicchi, Ferdinando Lecce, Emilio De Raffele, Barbara Dalla Via, Marco Di Laudo, Valeria Tonini, Maurizio Cervellera, Bruno Cola
International Journal of Surgery.2016; 35: 28. CrossRef
- Oncologic Outcomes of Stage IIIA Colon Cancer for Different Chemotherapeutic Regimens
-
Yoo Sung Lee, Hee Cheol Kim, Kyung Ook Jung, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Woo Yong Lee, Ho-Kyung Chun
-
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):259-264. Published online October 31, 2012
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.259
-
-
3,759
View
-
12
Download
-
2
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
Adjuvant chemotherapy is currently recommended for Stage IIIA colon cancers. This study aimed to elucidate the oncologic outcomes of Stage IIIA colon cancer according to the chemotherapeutic regimen based on a retrospective review.
MethodsFrom 1995 to 2008, Stage IIIA colon cancer patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database at a single institution. Exclusion criteria were as follows: rectal cancer, another malignancy other than colon cancer, no adjuvant chemotherapy and unknown chemotherapeutic regimen. One hundred thirty-one patients were enrolled in the study, and the clinicopathologic and the oncologic characteristics were analyzed. The number of males was 72, and the number of females was 59; the mean age was 59.5 years (range, 25 to 76 years), and the median follow-up period was 33 months (range, 2 to 127 months).
ResultsOf the 131 patients, fluorouracil/leucovorin (FL)/capecitabine chemotherapy was performed in 109 patients, and FOLFOX chemotherapy was performed in 22 patients. When the patients who received FL/capecitabine chemotherapy and the patients who received FOLFOX chemotherapy were compared, there was no significant difference in the clinicopathologic factors between the two groups. The 5-year overall survival and the 5-year disease-free survival were 97.2% and 94.5% in the FL/capecitabine patient group and 95.5% and 90.9% in the FOLFOX patient group, respectively, and no statistically significant differences were noted between the two groups.
ConclusionStage IIIA colon cancer showed good oncologic outcomes, and the chemotherapeutic regimen did not seem to affect the oncologic outcome.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- A New Method for Constructing Macrophage-Associated Predictors of Treatment Efficacy Based on Single-Cell Sequencing Analysis
Jianxiu Lin, Yang Ran, Tengfei Wu, Zishan Wang, Jinjin Zhao, Yun Tian
Journal of Immunotherapy.2024; 47(2): 33. CrossRef - Distinctive oncological features of stage IIIA colorectal cancer: Analysis of prognostic factors for selective adjuvant chemotherapy
Soo Yeun Park, Gyu‐Seog Choi, Jun Seok Park, Hye Jin Kim, Yoshiharu Sakai, Suguru Hasegawa, Toshiaki Watanabe, Seon Hahn Kim
Journal of Surgical Oncology.2015; 111(7): 882. CrossRef
- Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for the Treatment of Well-Differentiated Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors
-
Hyoung Ran Kim, Woo Yong Lee, Kyung Uk Jung, Hyuk Jun Chung, Chul Joong Kim, Hae-Ran Yun, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun
-
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(4):201-204. Published online August 31, 2012
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.4.201
-
-
3,996
View
-
30
Download
-
8
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
Recently, an increase in well-differentiated rectal neuroendocrine tumors (WRNETs) has been noted. We aimed to evaluate transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for the treatment of WRNETs.
MethodsBetween December 1995 and August 2009, 109 patients with WRNETs underwent TEM. TEM was performed for patients with tumors sizes of up to 20 mm and without a lymphadenopathy. These patients had been referred from other clinics after having been diagnosed with WRNETs by using a colonoscopic biopsy; they had undergone a failed endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and exhibited an involved resection margin and remaining tumor after ESD or EMR, regardless of the distance from the anal verge. This study included 38 patients that had more than three years of follow-up.
ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 51.3 ± 11.9 years, the mean tumor size was 8.0 ± 3.9 mm, and no morbidity occurred. Thirty-five patients were asymptomatic. TEM was performed after a colonoscopic resection in 13 cases because of a positive resection margin, a residual tumor or a non-lifting lesion. Complete resections were performed in 37 patients; one patient with a positive margin was considered surgically complete. In one patient, liver metastasis and a recurrent mesorectal node occurred after five and 10 years, respectively.
ConclusionTEM might provide an accessible and effective treatment either as an initial or as an adjunct after a colonoscopic resection for a WRNET.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Oncological outcomes according to the treatment modality based on the size of rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center retrospective study
Jimin Son, In Ja Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Jisup Kim, Kyoung-Jo Kim, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung Mo Hong, Young Il Kim, Jong Beom Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(4): 2445. CrossRef - Long-term outcomes of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors
Wei-Kun Shi, Rui Hou, Yun-Hao Li, Xiao-Yuan Qiu, Yu-Xin Liu, Bin Wu, Yi Xiao, Jiao-Lin Zhou, Guo-Le Lin
BMC Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Non-conventional applications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. A single center experience and a systematic review of literature
Rosita DE VINCENTI, Fabio CIANCHI, Francesco CORATTI
Minerva Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Transanalis műtéti útmutató – második kiadás
Kálmán Almási, Szabolcs Ábrahám, József Baracs, Attila Bursics, Zoltán Jánó, Tamás Sztipits, Áron Szűts, Dezső Tóth, Attila Zaránd, Balázs Bánky
Orvosi Hetilap.2022; 163(Supplement): 3. CrossRef - Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal local excision for rectal carcinoid: a comparative study
Fei-hu Yan, Zheng Lou, Shi-jie Hu, Xiao-dong Xu, Hao Wang, Han-tao Wang, Rong-gui Meng, Chuan-gang Fu, Wei Zhang, Jian He, En-da Yu
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2016;[Epub] CrossRef - Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection Therapies for Rectal Carcinoid Tumors: A Meta-Analysis
Lei He, Tao Deng, Hesheng Luo
Yonsei Medical Journal.2015; 56(1): 72. CrossRef - Full-thickness excision using transanal endoscopic microsurgery for treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors
Wei-Jie Chen
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(30): 9142. CrossRef - Current Issues Involving the Treatment of Small Rectal Carcinoid Tumors
Dae Kyung Sohn
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(4): 176. CrossRef
- Treatment Outcomes of Anorectal Melanoma
-
Byung Min Choi, Hyoung Ran Kim, Hae-Ran Yun, Seung Ho Choi, Yong Beom Cho, Hee Cheol Kim, Seong Hyeon Yun, Woo Yong Lee, Ho-Kyung Chun
-
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(1):27-30. Published online February 28, 2011
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.1.27
-
-
3,251
View
-
40
Download
-
18
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
An anorectal melanoma (AM) is a very rare tumor. However, sufficient data supporting effective surgical options for the disease do not exist. This retrospective review aimed to analyze treatment outcomes for an AM.
MethodsFrom June 1999 to December 2008, we retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected consecutive series of 19 patients who had undergone a surgical resection for an AM at a single institute. Surgical method and clinicopathological factors were analyzed.
ResultsThe median age was 61.4 years (range, 46 to79 years). Main symptoms were an anal mass, hematochezia, perianal pain, tenesmus, fecal incontinence, and bowel habit change. The average duration of symptoms before diagnosis was 7.8 months (range, 1 to 36 months). S-100 and HMB-45 were positive in all patients, even in non-melanin pigmentation. There were 12 abdominoperineal resections (APRs) and 7 wide local excisions (WEs). The APR showed longer overall survival when compared with the WE (64.1 months vs. 10.9 months, P < 0.001). No patients who underwent a WE survived more than 13 months.
ConclusionA high index of suspicion is necessary to establish the diagnosis for an AM in patients with anal symptoms, and S-100 and HMB-45 can be useful markers for an AM. Even with the small number of cases and the short follow-up, our data suggest that an APR for an AM may provide longer survival than a WE.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Optimal surgical management strategy for treatment of primary anorectal malignant melanoma—a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hugo C. Temperley, Niall J. O’Sullivan, Alan Keyes, Dara O. Kavanagh, John O. Larkin, Brian J. Mehigan, Paul H. McCormick, Michael E. Kelly
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2022; 407(8): 3193. CrossRef - Trends in the management of anorectal melanoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study and review of the world literature
Josh Bleicher, Jessica N Cohan, Lyen C Huang, William Peche, T Bartley Pickron, Courtney L Scaife, Tawnya L Bowles, John R Hyngstrom, Elliot A Asare
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(3): 267. CrossRef - Survival following surgical treatment for anorectal melanoma seems similar for local excision and extensive resection regardless of nodal involvement
E. Jutten, S. Kruijff, A.B. Francken, H.L. van Westreenen, K.P. Wevers
Surgical Oncology.2021; 37: 101558. CrossRef - Response to Kahlke et al
Audrius Dulskas
Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(11): 3029. CrossRef - Three Cases of Anorectal Malignant Melanoma Treated with Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection
Shin Yoshida, Nobuaki Suzuki, Shinobu Tomochika, Yoshitaro Shindo, Yukio Tokumitsu, Michihisa Iida, Shigeru Takeda, Tatsuya Ioka, Shoichi Hazama, Tsuzuri Shirahama, Hiroo Kawano, Eiji Ikeda, Hiroaki Nagano
The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery.2021; 54(9): 644. CrossRef - Spectrum of presentation in primary anorectal malignant melanoma and its management
Barun Kumar Singh, Samrat Ray, Shashi Dhawan, Samiran Nundy
BMJ Case Reports.2021; 14(10): e245449. CrossRef - Surgical treatment of anorectal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Esther Jutten, Schelto Kruijff, Anne Brecht Francken, Martijn F Lutke Holzik, Barbara L van Leeuwen, Henderik L van Westreenen, Kevin P Wevers
BJS Open.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Long-term Oncologic Outcome and Its Relevant Factors in Anal Cancer in Korea: A Nationwide Data Analysis
Hyuk Hur, Kyu-Won Jung, Byung-Woo Kim, Chang-Mo Oh, Young-Joo Won, Jae Hwan Oh, Nam Kyu Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(1): 35. CrossRef - Primary anorectal malignant melanoma with laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: a case study and review of the relevant literature
Kentaro Nonaka, Kensuke Kudou, Shun Sasaki, Tomoko Jogo, Kosuke Hirose, Yuta Kasagi, Qingjiang Hu, Yasuo Tsuda, Yuichi Hisamatsu, Koji Ando, Yuichiro Nakashima, Hiroshi Saeki, Eiji Oki, Mitsuo Kamori, Masaki Mori
International Cancer Conference Journal.2020; 9(3): 116. CrossRef - Less is more: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of radical versus conservative primary resection in anorectal melanoma
Henry G. Smith, Jessica Glen, Nancy Turnbull, Howard Peach, Ruth Board, Miranda Payne, Martin Gore, Karen Nugent, Myles J.F. Smith
European Journal of Cancer.2020; 135: 113. CrossRef - Anorectal Malignant Melanoma: Retrospective Analysis of Six Patients and Review of the Literature
Ibrahim Atak
Prague Medical Report.2018; 119(2-3): 97. CrossRef - Extensive surgery and lymphadenectomy do not improve survival in primary melanoma of the anorectum: results from analysis of a large database (SEER)
A. Ciarrocchi, R. Pietroletti, F. Carlei, G. Amicucci
Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(2): 158. CrossRef - Das anorektale maligne Melanom
T. R. Glowka, M. D. Keyver-Paik, T. Thiesler, J. Landsberg, J. C. Kalff, D. Pantelis
Der Chirurg.2016; 87(9): 768. CrossRef - Abdominoperineal Resection Provides Better Local Control But Equivalent Overall Survival to Local Excision of Anorectal Malignant Melanoma
Akihisa Matsuda, Masao Miyashita, Satoshi Matsumoto, Goro Takahashi, Takeshi Matsutani, Takeshi Yamada, Taro Kishi, Eiji Uchida
Annals of Surgery.2015; 261(4): 670. CrossRef - Anorectal malignant melanoma: retrospective analysis of management and outcome in a single Portuguese Institution
Isália Miguel, João Freire, Maria José Passos, António Moreira
Medical Oncology.2015;[Epub] CrossRef - Characteristics and Survival of Korean Anal Cancer From the Korea Central Cancer Registry Data
Hyoung-Chul Park, Kyu-Won Jung, Byung-Woo Kim, Aesun Shin, Young-Joo Won, Jae Hwan Oh, Seung-Yong Jeong, Chang Sik Yu, Bong Hwa Lee
Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(5): 182. CrossRef - Incidence and Survival Patterns of Rare Anal Canal Neoplasms Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Registry
Cristina Metildi, Elisabeth C. McLemore, Thuy Tran, David Chang, Bard Cosman, Sonia L. Ramamoorthy, Sidney L. Saltzstein, Georgia Robins Sadler
The American Surgeon.2013; 79(10): 1068. CrossRef - Rectal melanoma
N. Patelis, P. Marselos, G. Sotiropoulou, S. Georgiou, A. Kominea
Hellenic Journal of Surgery.2012; 84(3): 198. CrossRef
- Oncologic Outcome after Cessation or Dose Reduction of Capecitabine in Patients with Colon Cancer
-
Jung-A Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Hyun-Sook Son, Hyoung Ran Kim, Hae Ran Yun, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Woo Yong Lee, Ho-Kyung Chun
-
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):287-292. Published online August 31, 2010
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.287
-
-
3,333
View
-
38
Download
-
5
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
Oral capecitabine has been used as adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer patients since the 1990s. Patient-initiated cessation or reduced use of capecitabine occurs widely for various reasons, yet the consequences of these actions are unclear. The present study sought to clarify treatment outcomes in such patients.
MethodsThe study included 173 patients who had been diagnosed with stage II or III colon cancer according to the pathologic report after radical surgery at Samsung Medical Center from May 2005 to June 2007 and who had received capecitabine as adjuvant therapy. The patients were divided into groups according to whether the dose was reduced (I, dose maintenance; II, dose reduction) or stopped (A, cycle completion; B, cycle cessation). Recurrence and disease-free survival rates between the two groups each were analyzed.
ResultsOf the 173 patients, 128 (74.6%) experienced complications, most frequently hand-foot syndrome (n = 114). Reduction (n = 35) or cessation (n = 18) of medication was most commonly due to complications. Concerning reduced dosage, both groups displayed no statistically significant differences in recurrence rate and 3-year disease-free survival rate. Concerning discontinued medication use, the cycle completion group showed an improved recurrence rate (P = 0.048) and 3-year disease-free survival rate (P = 0.028).
ConclusionThe results demonstrate that maintaining compliance with capecitabine as an adjuvant treatment for colon cancer to preventing complications positively affects patient prognosis.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- The Value of Pharmacogenetics to Reduce Drug-Related Toxicity in Cancer Patients
Doreen Z. Mhandire, Andrew K. L. Goey
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy.2022; 26(2): 137. CrossRef - Global Cancer Burden and Natural Disasters: A Focus on Asia’s Vulnerability, Resilience Building, and Impact on Cancer Care
Roselle De Guzman, Monica Malik
Journal of Global Oncology.2019; (5): 1. CrossRef - Association Between Adjuvant Chemotherapy Duration and Survival Among Patients With Stage II and III Colon Cancer
Devon J. Boyne, Colleen A. Cuthbert, Dylan E. O’Sullivan, Tolulope T. Sajobi, Robert J. Hilsden, Christine M. Friedenreich, Winson Y. Cheung, Darren R. Brenner
JAMA Network Open.2019; 2(5): e194154. CrossRef - 5-fluorouracil Toxicity Mechanism Determination in Human Keratinocytes: in vitro Study on HaCaT Cell Line
Jan Hartinger, Pavel Veselý, Martin Šíma, Irena Netíková, Eva Matoušková, Luboš Petruželka
Prague Medical Report.2017; 118(4): 128. CrossRef - An exploratory study to identify risk factors for the development of capecitabine‐induced Palmar Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE)
Annie Law, Sue Dyson, Denis Anthony
Journal of Advanced Nursing.2015; 71(8): 1825. CrossRef