Annals of Coloproctology

Original Articles

Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer

Comparison of the oncological outcomes of stenting as a bridge to surgery and surgery alone in stages II to III obstructive colorectal cancer: a retrospective study: Hiroaki Uehara, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Hitoshi Kameyama, Masaru Komatsu, Motoharu Hirai; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):235-243. Published online July 13, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.01067.0152

5,424 View
206 Download
8 Web of Science
8 Citations

Purpose
We evaluated the oncological outcomes of bridge to surgery (BTS) using stent compared with surgery alone for obstructive colorectal cancer.
Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for stages II to III obstructive colorectal cancer at our institution from January 2009 to March 2020, were registered retrospectively and divided into 43 patients in the BTS group and 65 patients in the surgery alone group. We compared the surgical and oncological outcomes between the 2 groups.
Results
Stent-related perforation did not occur. One patient in whom the stent placement was unsuccessful underwent emergency surgery with poor decompression (clinical success rate, 97.7%). The pathological characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. The following surgical outcomes in the BTS group were superior to those in the surgery alone group; nonemergency surgery (P<0.001), surgical approach (P=0.006), and length of hospital stay (P=0.020). The median follow-up time was 44.9 months (range, 1.1–126.5 months). The 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 68.4% and 58.2% (P=0.411), and the overall survival rates were 78.3% and 88.2% (P=0.255) in the surgery alone and BTS groups, respectively. The 3-year locoregional recurrence rates were 10.2% and 8.0% (P=0.948), and distant metastatic recurrence rates were 13.3% and 30.4% (P=0.035) in the surgery alone and BTS groups, respectively.
Conclusion
This study revealed that BTS with stent may be associated with a higher frequency of distant metastatic recurrence. Stent for stages II to III obstructive colorectal cancer potentially worsens oncological outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Complete Obstruction, a Real Risk Factor: A Comprehensive Study on Obstruction in Stage IIA Colon Cancer With Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Soo Young Oh, Chan Wook Kim, Seonok Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2024; 23(2): 135. CrossRef
Can we use colon stenting in accelerated recovery programs for surgical treatment colon cancer complicated by obstructive intestinal obstruction? A literature review
Saday A. Aliyev, Emil S. Aliyev
Russian Journal of Oncology.2024; 29(2): 130. CrossRef
Oncologic impact of colonic stents for obstructive left-sided colon cancer
Hideyuki Suzuki, Shingo Tsujinaka, Yoshihiro Sato, Tomoya Miura, Chikashi Shibata
World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2023; 14(1): 1. CrossRef
5-year oncological outcomes in left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: stent as bridge to surgery
Noura S Alhassan, Sulaiman A AlShammari, Razan N AlRabah, Amirah M AlZahrani, Maha-Hamadien Abdulla, Thamer A Bin Traiki, Ahmad M Zubaidi, Omar A Al-Obeed, Khayal A Alkhayal
BMC Gastroenterology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098. CrossRef
Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach
Ji-Hyun Seo, In-Ja Park
Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5211. CrossRef
Recurrence Patterns and Risk Factors after Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Insights for Postoperative Surveillance Strategies
Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim, Ye Ryung Park, Eun Hae Cho, Jeong Min Choo, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak
Cancers.2023; 15(24): 5791. CrossRef
Colonic stent for bridge to surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: A review of the literature after 2020
Margherita Binetti, Augusto Lauro, Valeria Tonini
World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 13(12): 957. CrossRef

Small Bowel Obstruction After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis With a Loop Ileostomy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Hitoshi Kameyama, Yoshifumi Hashimoto, Yoshifumi Shimada, Saki Yamada, Ryoma Yagi, Yosuke Tajima, Takuma Okamura, Masato Nakano, Kohei Miura, Masayuki Nagahashi, Jun Sakata, Takashi Kobayashi, Shin-ichi Kosugi, Toshifumi Wakai; Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):94-100. Published online April 30, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.06.14

7,884 View
113 Download
11 Web of Science
10 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Small bowel obstruction (SBO) remains a common complication after pelvic or abdominal surgery. However, the risk factors for SBO in ulcerative colitis (UC) surgery are not well known. The aim of the present study was to clarify the risk factors associated with SBO after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) with a loop ileostomy for patients with UC.
Methods
The medical records of 96 patients who underwent IPAA for UC between 1999 and 2011 were reviewed. SBO was confirmed based on the presence of clinical symptoms and radiographic findings. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the SBO group and the non-SBO group. We also analyzed the relationship between SBO and computed tomography (CT) scan image parameters.
Results
The study included 49 male and 47 female patients. The median age was 35.5 years (range, 14–72 years). We performed a 2- or 3-stage procedure as a total proctocolectomy and IPAA for patients with UC. SBO in the pretakedown of the loop ileostomy after IPAA occurred in 22 patients (22.9%). Moreover, surgical intervention for SBO was required for 11 patients. In brief, closure of the loop ileostomy was performed earlier than expected. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the 2-stage procedure (odds ratio, 2.850; 95% confidence interval, 1.009–8.044; P = 0.048) was a significant independent risk factor associated with SBO. CT scan image parameters were not significant risk factors of SBO.
Conclusion
The present study suggests that a 2-stage procedure is a significant risk factor associated with SBO after IPAA in patients with UC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Management of J-pouch Complications
Beatrix H. Choi, David Cohen, Caleah Kitchens, David M. Schwartzberg
Surgical Clinics of North America.2025; 105(2): 357. CrossRef
Influence of the rotation of the diverting loop ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery on small-bowel obstruction: A multicenter prospective study conducted by the Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Colorectal Group
Masaaki Miyo, Mamoru Uemura, Yuki Ozato, Junichi Nishimura, Ken Nakata, Yozo Suzuki, Yoshinori Kagawa, Taishi Hata, Koji Munakata, Mitsuyoshi Tei, Genta Sawada, Shinichi Yoshioka, Yusuke Takahashi, Koji Oba, Tsuyoshi Hata, Takayuki Ogino, Norikatsu Miyosh
Surgery.2025; 178: 108874. CrossRef
Risk Factors for Stoma Outlet Obstruction after Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis
Keisuke Ihara, Takatoshi Nakamura, Masashi Takayanagi, Junki Fujita, Yasunori Maeda, Yusuke Nishi, Norisuke Shibuya, Hiroyuki Hachiya, Mitsuru Ishizuka, Keiichi Tominaga, Kazuyuki Kojima, Atsushi Irisawa
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(1): 18. CrossRef
Ileostomy volvulus as an underreported problem causing small bowel obstruction in patients living with ostomy: a case report and literature review
Julianna Seo, Ishith Seth, Dilshad Dooreemeah, Chun Hin Angus Lee
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 424. CrossRef
Association Between Advanced T Stage and Thick Rectus Abdominis Muscle and Outlet Obstruction and High-Output Stoma After Ileostomy in Patients With Rectal Cancer
Yasuhiro Komatsu, Kunitoshi Shigeyasu, Sho Takeda, Yoshiko Mori, Kazutaka Takahashi, Nanako Hata, Kokichi Miyamoto, Hibiki Umeda, Yoshihiko Kakiuchi, Satoru Kikuchi, Shuya Yano, Shinji Kuroda, Yoshitaka Kondo, Hiroyuki Kishimoto, Fuminori Teraishi, Masahi
International Surgery.2022; 106(3): 102. CrossRef
Obstructive and secretory complications of diverting ileostomy
Shingo Tsujinaka, Hideyuki Suzuki, Tomoya Miura, Yoshihiro Sato, Chikashi Shibata
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(47): 6732. CrossRef
Risk factors and management of stoma-related obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal surgery with diverting ileostomy
Ryo Maemoto, Shingo Tsujinaka, Yasuyuki Miyakura, Rintaro Fukuda, Nao Kakizawa, Tsutomu Takenami, Erika Machida, Nozomi Kikuchi, Rina Kanemitsu, Sawako Tamaki, Hideki Ishikawa, Toshiki Rikiyama
Asian Journal of Surgery.2021; 44(8): 1037. CrossRef
RISK FACTORS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLICATIONS OF ILEAL POUCH IN PATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS
S. I. Achkasov, O. I. Sushkov, A. E. Kulikov, Sh. A. Binnatli, M. A. Nagudov, A. V. Vardanyan
Koloproktologia.2020; 19(1): 51. CrossRef
A Common Complication After an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis With a Loop Ileostomy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Small Bowel Obstruction
Chang-Nam Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(2): 57. CrossRef
Elevated risk of stoma outlet obstruction following colorectal surgery in patients undergoing ileal pouch–anal anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study
Satoshi Okada, Keisuke Hata, Shigenobu Emoto, Koji Murono, Manabu Kaneko, Kazuhito Sasaki, Kensuke Otani, Takeshi Nishikawa, Toshiaki Tanaka, Kazushige Kawai, Hiroaki Nozawa
Surgery Today.2018; 48(12): 1060. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search