Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
5 "Eun Kyung Choe"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Long-term Outcomes and Risk Factors for Reoperation After Surgical Treatment for Gastrointestinal Crohn Disease According to Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor-α Antibody Use: 35 Years of Experience at a Single Institute in Korea
Sang Mok Lee, Eon Chul Han, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Heung-Kwon Oh, Eun Kyung Choe, Sang Hui Moon, Joo Sung Kim, Hyun Chae Jung, Kyu Joo Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(4):144-152.   Published online August 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.4.144
  • 4,215 View
  • 50 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Crohn disease is characterized by high rates of recurrence and reoperations. However, few studies have investigated long-term surgical outcomes in Asian populations. We investigated risk factors for reoperation, particularly those associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) antibody use, and long-term follow-up results.

Methods

We reviewed the records of 148 patients (100 males and 48 females) who underwent surgery for gastrointestinal Crohn disease and retrospectively analyzed long-term outcomes and risk factors.

Results

The mean age at diagnosis was 28.8 years. Thirty-eight patients (25.7%) received monoclonal antibody treatment before reoperation. A small bowel and colon resection was most commonly performed (83 patients, 56.1%). The median follow-up was 149 months, during which 47 patients underwent reoperation. The median interval between the primary and the secondary surgeries was 65 months, with accumulated reoperation rates of 16.5%, 31.8%, and 57.2% after 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Obstruction was the most common indication for reoperation (37 patients, 25.0%). In a multivariable analysis, age <17 years at diagnosis (A1) (odds ratio [OR], 2.20; P = 0.023), penetrating behavior (B3) (OR, 4.39; P < 0.001), and no azathioprine use (OR, 2.87; P = 0.003) were associated with reoperation. Anti-TNF-α antibody use did not affect the reoperation rate (P = 0.767).

Conclusion

We showed a high reoperation rate regardless of treatment with anti-TNF-α antibody, which indicates that recurrent surgery is still needed to cure patients with gastrointestinal Crohn diseases. Younger age at primary operation, penetrating behavior, and no azathioprine use were significant factors associated with reoperation for gastrointestinal Crohn disease.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease Reoperation Rate Has Decreased Over Time If Corrected by Prevalence
    Mafalda Santiago, Fernando Magro, Luís Correia, Francisco Portela, Paula Ministro, Paula Lago, Eunice Trindade, Cláudia Camila Dias
    Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology.2020; 11(9): e00227.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Thiopurine on Potential Surgical Intervention in Crohn’s Disease in Korea: Results from the CONNECT Study
    Hee Man Kim, Jin Woo Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Joo Sung Kim, You Sun Kim, Jae Hee Cheon, Won Ho Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Won Moon, Sung Hee Jung, Young-Ho Kim, Dong Soo Han
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 10(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for postoperative surgical site infections in patients with Crohn’s disease receiving definitive bowel resection
    Song Liu, Ji Miao, Gefei Wang, Meng Wang, Xiuwen Wu, Kun Guo, Min Feng, Wenxian Guan, Jianan Ren
    Scientific Reports.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advanced age impacts surgical characteristics and postoperative course in patients with Crohn's disease
    Stanislaus Argeny, Anton Stift, Martina Mittlböck, Amy C. Lord, Svenja Maschke, Mathias Schneeweiß, Stefan Riss
    International Journal of Surgery.2016; 33: 182.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Tripterygium Wilfordii Polyglycoside on Experimental Prostatitis Caused by Ureaplasma Urealyticum in Rats
    Pingnan Shan, Zhiyong Lu, Lihong Ye, Yaqin Fang, Suhong Tan, Guohong Xuan, Jincheng Ru, Liming Mao
    Medical Science Monitor.2016; 22: 3722.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopy-based management decreases the risk of postoperative recurrences in Crohn’s disease
    Anne-Laure Boucher, Bruno Pereira, Stéphanie Decousus, Marion Goutte, Felix Goutorbe, Anne Dubois, Johan Gagniere, Corinne Borderon, Juliette Joubert, Denis Pezet, Michel Dapoigny, Pierre J Déchelotte, Gilles Bommelaer, Anthony Buisson
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(21): 5068.     CrossRef
  • Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy for Crohn Disease: Friend or Foe to the Surgeon?
    Hungdai Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(4): 121.     CrossRef
Rectourethral Fistula: Systemic Review of and Experiences With Various Surgical Treatment Methods
Ji Hye Choi, Byeong Geon Jeon, Sang-Gi Choi, Eon Chul Han, Heon-Kyun Ha, Heung-Kwon Oh, Eun Kyung Choe, Sang Hui Moon, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Kyu Joo Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(1):35-41.   Published online February 28, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.1.35
  • 5,954 View
  • 113 Download
  • 47 Web of Science
  • 46 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

A rectourethral fistula (RUF) is an uncommon complication resulting from surgery, radiation or trauma. Although various surgical procedures for the treatment of an RUF have been described, none has gained acceptance as the procedure of choice. The aim of this study was to review our experience with surgical management of RUF.

Methods

The outcomes of 6 male patients (mean age, 51 years) with an RUF who were operated on by a single surgeon between May 2005 and July 2012 were assessed.

Results

The causes of the RUF were iatrogenic in four cases (two after radiation therapy for rectal cancer, one after brachytherapy for prostate cancer, and one after surgery for a bladder stone) and traumatic in two cases. Fecal diversion was the initial treatment in five patients. In one patient, fecal diversion was performed simultaneously with definitive repair. Four patients underwent staged repair after a mean of 12 months. Rectal advancement flaps were done for simple, small fistula (n = 2), and flap interpositions (gracilis muscle flap, n = 2; omental flap, n = 1) were done for complex or recurrent fistulae. Urinary strictures and incontinence were observed in patients after gracilis muscle flap interposition, but they were resolved with simple treatments. The mean follow-up period was 28 months, and closure of the fistula was achieved in all five patients (100%) who underwent definitive repairs. The fistula persisted in one patient who refused further definitive surgery after receiving only a fecal diversion.

Conclusion

Depending on the severity and the recurrence status of RUF, a relatively simple rectal advancement flap repair or a more complex gracilis muscle or omental flap interposition can be used to achieve closure of the fistula.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Complex case of granulomatosis with polyangiitis involving the urethra and prostate causing outflow obstruction and ano-urethral fistula
    Mustafa Rashid, Adam Cox
    Journal of Clinical Urology.2024; 17(1): 89.     CrossRef
  • A rare case of fatal rectal perforation and sepsis following traumatic urinary catheterization
    Darshan Sitharthan, Paul Sved
    Urology Case Reports.2024; 54: 102706.     CrossRef
  • Gracilis muscle interposition for complex perineal fistulas: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the literature
    Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Sameh Hany Emile, Emanuela Silva‐Alvarenga, Nir Horesh, Michael R. Freund, Steven D. Wexner
    Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(4): 549.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of gracilis muscle interposition for rectourethral fistulas caused by treatment of prostate cancer
    S. H. Emile, N. Horesh, V. Strassmann, Z. Garoufalia, R. Gefen, P. Zhou, E. Ray-Offor, G. Dasilva, S. D. Wexner
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(10): 937.     CrossRef
  • Case report on a rare complication after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal malignancy vesicorectal fistula
    Sapphire Melody Ho, Kishore Rajaguru, Jing Yu Ng, Choon Sheong Seow
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2023; 105: 108009.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic repair of acquired rectourethral fistula by vesical peritoneal flap
    Christian Mouawad, Elie El Helou, Houssam Dahboul, Rhea Akel, Bilal Chamaa, Rany Aoun, Serge Kassar, Michael Osseis, Roger Noun, Ghassan Chakhtoura
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2023; 16(4): 814.     CrossRef
  • Pelvic Extirpative Surgery for the “End-Stage Irradiated Bladder”
    Nikolas Moring, Seamus Barrett, Andrew C. Peterson, Brian M. Inouye
    Cancers.2023; 15(17): 4238.     CrossRef
  • Radiation-induced recto-urinary fistula: A dreaded complication with devastating consequences
    Kyeong Ri Yu, Lucas Keller-Biehl, Leon Smith-Harrison, Sarah Z. Hazell, William R. Timmerman, Jeannie F. Rivers, Thomas A. Miller
    Surgery in Practice and Science.2023; 15: 100216.     CrossRef
  • Gracilis muscle flap combined with a laparoscopic transabdominal approach is effective in the treatment of post-prostatectomy rectourethral fistula: A case report
    Tomohiro Takeda, Tatsuya Shonaka, Chikayoshi Tani, Toshihiko Hayashi, Hidehiro Kakizaki, Yasuo Sumi
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 92: 106856.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of York-Mason Procedure for a Refractory Rectourethral Fistula that Relapsed after Repair by a Perineal Approach:A Case Report
    Masatsugu Kojima, Toru Miyake, Tomoyuki Ueki, Tomoharu Shimizu, Masaji Tani
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2022; 75(6): 297.     CrossRef
  • Robotic-Assisted Lower Genitourinary Tract Reconstruction
    Alex J. Xu, Kirtishri Mishra, Yeonsoo S. Lee, Lee Cheng Zhao
    Urologic Clinics of North America.2022; 49(3): 507.     CrossRef
  • Rectal Perforation During Pelvic Surgery
    Bernardo Rocco, Gaia Giorgia, Assumma Simone, Calcagnile Tommaso, Sangalli Mattia, Terzoni Stefano, Eissa Ahmed, Bozzini Giorgio, Bernardino De Concilio, Antonio Celia, Micali Salvatore, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi
    European Urology Open Science.2022; 44: 54.     CrossRef
  • Preventing Rectourethral Fistula Recurrence With Gracilis Flap
    Keon Min Park, Yenny Y. Rosli, Allen Simms, Rachel Lentz, Deepak R. Bharadia, Benjamin Breyer, William Y. Hoffman
    Annals of Plastic Surgery.2022; 88(4): S316.     CrossRef
  • Validating the Martini Staging System for Rectourethral Fistula: A Meta-Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes
    Kirtishri Mishra, Amr Mahran, Bissan Abboud, Laura Bukavina, Ahmed Elshafei, Al Ray, Austin Fernstrum, Rayan Abboud, Mohammed Elgammal, Lee C. Zhao, Shubham Gupta
    Urology.2021; 147: 299.     CrossRef
  • Rectourethral Fistula Repair With Endorectal Advancement Flap and Implantation of Biologic Mesh
    Tae David Kim, Gerald Gantt, Kunal Kochar, Slawomir Marecik, John J. Park
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2021; 64(1): e1.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcome and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition for fistula closure over a 10-year period
    M. Grott, A. Rickert, S. Hetjens, P. Kienle
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(3): 569.     CrossRef
  • Urorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issues
    Javier C. Angulo, Ignacio Arance, Yannick Apesteguy, João Felicio, Natália Martins, Francisco E. Martins
    International braz j urol.2021; 47(2): 399.     CrossRef
  • Robotic transanal rectourethral fistula repair—a video vignette
    Thomas Surya Suhardja, Belinda Errington, Amirala Khalessi, Kim‐Chi Phan‐Thien
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(5): 1275.     CrossRef
  • Tratamiento de las fístulas uretrorrectales tras prostatectomía radical mediante la interposición de material biológico vía perineal
    J.U. Juan Escudero, F. Villalba Ferrer, M. Ramos de Campos, M. Fabuel Deltoro, M.J. García Coret, F. Sánchez Ballester, I. Povo Martín, Y. Pallas Costa, P. Pardo Duarte, J. García Ibañez, A. Monzó Cataluña, K. Rechi Sierra, C. Juliá Romero, E. López Alcin
    Actas Urológicas Españolas.2021; 45(5): 398.     CrossRef
  • Treatment for rectourethral fistulas after radical prostatectomy with biological material interposition through a perineal access
    J.U. Juan Escudero, F. Villaba Ferrer, M. Ramos de Campos, M. Fabuel Deltoro, M.J. Garcia Coret, F. Sanchez Ballester, I. Povo Martín, Y. Pallas Costa, P. Pardo Duarte, J. García Ibañez, A. Monzó Cataluña, K. Rechi Sierra, C. Juliá Romero, E. Lopez Alcina
    Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition).2021; 45(5): 398.     CrossRef
  • A Curious Case of Rectal Ejaculation
    Frank L Ventura, Christopher M Nguyen, Alexander Dang, Michelle Baliss, Lindsay K Sonstein
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adverse Features of Rectourethral Fistula Requiring Extirpative Surgery and Permanent Dual Diversion: Our Experience and Recommendations
    Francisco E. Martins, João Felicio, Tiago Ribeiro Oliveira, Natália Martins, Vítor Oliveira, Artur Palmas
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(17): 4014.     CrossRef
  • Fistelchirurgie
    C. M. Rosenbaum, M. W. Vetterlein, M. Fisch
    Der Urologe.2020; 59(4): 489.     CrossRef
  • Conservative treatment of rectovesical fistula after leakage following laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer
    Shunli Yan, Huimin Sun, Zhaohui Li, Shuaifeng Liu, Baowei Han
    Journal of International Medical Research.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A rare case of tubercular recto-prostatic urethral fistula with tuberculous orchitis
    Niramya Pathak, Mohan Keshavamurthy, Karthik Rao, Shakir Tabrez, Mohan Balaiah Ashwathaiya, Premakumar Krishnappa
    Urology Case Reports.2020; 33: 101355.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series
    A.A.J. Grüter, S.E. Van Oostendorp, L.J.H. Smits, M. Kusters, M. Özer, J.A. Nieuwenhuijzen, J.B. Tuynman
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2020; 77: 733.     CrossRef
  • Iatrogenic bowel injury (early vs delayed)
    Elyse Leevan, Joseph C. Carmichael
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2019; 30(3): 100688.     CrossRef
  • Management of acquired rectourethral fistulas in adults
    Shulian Chen, Rang Gao, Hong Li, Kunjie Wang
    Asian Journal of Urology.2018; 5(3): 149.     CrossRef
  • The Place of Transanal Endoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of Rectourethral Fistula
    Xavier Serra-Aracil, Meritxell Labró-Ciurans, Laura Mora-López, Jesús Muñoz-Rodríguez, Raúl Martos-Calvo, Joan Prats-López, Salvador Navarro-Soto
    Urology.2018; 111: 139.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Rectourethal Fistula Caused by a Urethral Foreign Body
    Nobuyuki OKAMOTO, Norimitsu SHIMADA, Raita YANO, Yusuke WATADANI, Hiroki OHGE, Taijiro SUEDA
    Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association).2017; 78(8): 1900.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Treatments for Vesico-Enteric Fistulas: a 2017 Current Review
    Justin W. Fincher, Ehab Eltahawy
    Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports.2017; 12(3): 212.     CrossRef
  • Management of radiation-induced rectovesical fistula in a woman using ileum
    Qiqi Mao, Jindan Luo, Jiajie Fang, Hai Jiang
    Medicine.2017; 96(46): e8553.     CrossRef
  • Treatment Efficacy of Different Surgical Procedures for Postoperative Residual Rectourethral Fistula Following Anoplasty
    Tingchong Zhang, Wei Chen, Wenbo Pang, Chunhui Peng, Yajun Chen, Jinzhe Zhang
    International Surgery.2017; 102(11-12): 560.     CrossRef
  • Rectourethral fistula reconstruction in elderly patients
    Nirmish Singla, Allen F. Morey
    Current Opinion in Urology.2016; 26(2): 171.     CrossRef
  • Rectourethral fistula: A challenging management problem
    Michael Stamatakos, K. Ntzeros, G. Christis, F. Anyfanti, S. Sotirianakos
    Hellenic Journal of Surgery.2016; 88(4): 257.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Uroenteric Fistula
    Harcharan S. Gill
    Surgical Clinics of North America.2016; 96(3): 583.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive treatment of rectovesical fistula: A case report
    Alba Manuel Vázquez, Francisco Javier Jiménez Miramón, José Luis Ramos Rodríguez, José María Jover Navalón
    Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Abordaje perineal de fístulas rectouretrales tras prostatectomía radical laparoscópica
    J. Guimerà-García, E. Pieras-Ayala, J.P. Burgués-Gasion, M. Ozonas-Moragues, V. Tubau-Vidaña, P. Piza-Reus
    Actas Urológicas Españolas.2016; 40(2): 119.     CrossRef
  • Unusual Case of Urethrorectal Fistula in Adolescence in a Patient with a History of Congenital Anorectal Malformation
    Constantinos Nastos, Ira Sotirova, Athanasios Papatsoris, Andreas Skolarikos, Ioannis Papaconstantinou, Athanasios Dellis
    Journal of Endourology Case Reports.2016; 2(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Perineal approach for rectourethral fistulae after radical laparoscopic prostatectomy
    J. Guimerà García, E. Pieras Ayala, J.P. Burgués Gasion, M. Ozonas Moragues, V. Tubau Vidaña, P. Piza Reus
    Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition).2016; 40(2): 119.     CrossRef
  • Testicular Interposition Flap for Repair of Perineal Urinary Fistulae: A Novel Surgical Technique
    Valary T. Raup, Jairam R. Eswara, Stephen D. Marshall, Steven B. Brandes
    Case Reports in Urology.2015; 2015: 1.     CrossRef
  • Fístulas recto-uretrales adquiridas: etiopatogenia, diagnóstico y opciones terapéuticas
    Carlos Cerdán Santacruz, Javier Cerdán Miguel
    Cirugía Española.2015; 93(3): 137.     CrossRef
  • A review of rectal toxicity following permanent low dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and the potential value of biodegradable rectal spacers
    M E Schutzer, P F Orio, M C Biagioli, D A Asher, H Lomas, D Moghanaki
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.2015; 18(2): 96.     CrossRef
  • Acquired Recto-Uretral Fistulas: Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis and Therapeutic Options
    Carlos Cerdán Santacruz, Javier Cerdán Miguel
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2015; 93(3): 137.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Rectourinary Fistulas: Review of the Literature
    Alessandro Crestani, Fabrizio Dal Mora
    Urologia Journal.2015; 82(1): 30.     CrossRef
  • Individualized Treatment for a Rectourethral Fistula: Rare Complications
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(1): 7.     CrossRef
Case Report
Operative Treatment with a Laparotomy for Anorectal Problems Arising from a Self-Inserted Foreign Body
Seung-Bum Ryoo, Heung-Kwon Oh, Heon-Kyun Ha, Eun Kyung Choe, Sang Hui Moon, Kyu Joo Park
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):56-60.   Published online February 29, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.56
  • 5,020 View
  • 37 Download
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

An anorectal foreign body can cause serious complications such as incontinence, rectal perforation, peritonitis, or pelvic abscess, so it should be managed immediately. We experienced two cases of operative treatment for a self-inserted anorectal foreign body. In one, the foreign body could not be removed as it was completely impacted in the anal canal. We failed to remove it through the anus. A laparotomy and removal of the foreign body was performed by using an incision on the rectum. Primary colsure and a sigmoid loop colostomy were done. A colostomy take-down was done after three months. The other was a rectal perforation from anal masturbation with a plastic device. We performed primary repair of the perforated rectosigmoid colon, and we didea sigmoid loop colostom. A colostomy take-down was done three months later. Immediate and proper treatment for a self-inserted anorectal foreign body is important to prevent severe complications, and we report successful surgical treatments for problems caused by anorectal foreign bodies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Rectal foreign bodies. Diagnostic program and emergency care
    M. A. Egorkin, E. E. Bolkvadze, V. K. Obukhov, I. N. Gorbunov, M. Ya. Evloeev
    Koloproktologia.2024; 23(4): 124.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of rectal foreign bodies
    D. A. Khubezov, S. N. Trushin, K. V. Puchkov, D. K. Puchkov, A. Yu. Ogorel’tsev
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2016; (9): 57.     CrossRef
  • Rectal perforation caused by a sharp pig backbone in a middle-aged patient with mild depression
    Hyeong Ju Sun, Jeonghun Lee, Dong Min Kim, Myeong-Su Chu, Kyoung Sun Park, Dong Jin Choi
    Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine.2015; 32(1): 31.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Surgical Treatment of a Parastomal Hernia
Seung Chul Heo, Heung-Kwon Oh, Yoon Suk Song, Mi Sun Seo, Eun Kyung Choe, Seungbum Ryoo, Kyu Joo Park
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(4):174-179.   Published online August 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.4.174
  • 4,478 View
  • 31 Download
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Parastomal hernia is a major complication of an intestinal stoma. This study was performed to compare the results of various operative methods to treat parastomal hernias.

Methods

Results of surgical treatment for parastomal hernias (postoperative recurrence, complications and postoperative hospital stays) were surveyed in 39 patients over an 11-year period. The patients enrolled in this study underwent surgery by a single surgeon to exclude surgeon bias.

Results

Seventeen patients were male, and twenty-two patients were female. The mean age was 65.9 years (range, 36 to 86 years). The stomas were 35 sigmoid-end-colostomies (90%), 2 loop-colostomies (5%), and 2 double-barrel-colostomies. Over half of the hernias developed within two years after initial formation. Stoma relocation was performed in 8 patients, suture repair in 14 patients and mesh repair in 17 patients. Seven patients had recurrence of the hernia, and ten patients suffered from complications. Postoperative complications and recurrence were more frequent in stoma relocation than in suture repair and mesh repair. Emergency operations were performed in four patients (10.3%) with higher incidence of complications but not with increased risk of recurrence. Excluding emergency operations, complications of relocations were not higher than those of mesh repairs. Postoperative hospital stays were shortest in mesh repair patients.

Conclusion

In this study, mesh repair showed low recurrence and a low complication rate with shorter hospital stay than relocation methods, though these differences were not statistically significant. Further studies, including randomized trials, are necessary if more reliable data on the surgical treatment of parastomal hernias are to be obtained.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Long-term outcomes after open parastomal hernia repair at a high-volume center
    Alexis M. Holland, William R. Lorenz, Brittany S. Mead, Gregory T. Scarola, Vedra A. Augenstein, B. Todd Heniford, Monica E. Polcz
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Stoma-Related Complications: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review
    Zalán Benedek, Loránd Kocsis, Orsolya Bauer, Nicolae Suciu, Sorin Sorlea, Călin Crăciun, Rareș Georgescu, Marius Florin Coroș
    Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine.2022; 7(2): 31.     CrossRef
  • The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery
    Andrew S. Miller, Kathryn Boyce, Benjamin Box, Matthew D. Clarke, Sarah E. Duff, Niamh M. Foley, Richard J. Guy, Lisa H. Massey, George Ramsay, Dominic A. J. Slade, James A. Stephenson, Phil J. Tozer, Danette Wright
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(2): 476.     CrossRef
  • Prevention and treatment of parastomal hernia: a position statement on behalf of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

    Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(S2): 5.     CrossRef
  • Repair of complex parastomal hernias
    G. S. Hwang, M. H. Hanna, J. C. Carmichael, S. D. Mills, A. Pigazzi, M. J. Stamos
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2015; 19(3): 127.     CrossRef
  • Systematic review of open techniques for parastomal hernia repair
    J. Al Shakarchi, J. G. Williams
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2014; 18(5): 427.     CrossRef
  • Korrektur der parastomalen Hernie mit Netz
    A. Lampel, N. Runkel
    Der Urologe.2012; 51(7): 965.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Risk Factors for the Development of Incisional and Parastomal Hernias in Patients after Colorectal Surgery
    In Ho Song, Heon-Kyun Ha, Sang-Gi Choi, Byeong Geon Jeon, Min Jung Kim, Kyu Joo Park
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(6): 299.     CrossRef
Management of Appendicitis Presenting with Abscess or Mass
Jeong-Ki Kim, Seungbum Ryoo, Heung-Kwon Oh, Ji Sun Kim, Rumi Shin, Eun Kyung Choe, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(6):413-419.   Published online December 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.6.413
  • 5,474 View
  • 62 Download
  • 24 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Management strategy in acute appendicitis patients initially presenting with abscess or mass is surrounded with controversy. This study was performed to identify the outcomes of management for this condition.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed prospectively registered 76 patients (male:female = 39:37; mean age, 50.8 years) with appendicitis presenting with abscess or mass over a 9-year period at the Seoul National University Hospital. Patients were divided into three groups (emergency operation group, delayed operation group, and follow-up group), and clinical characteristics and outcomes of treatment were investigated.

Results

Twenty-eight patients (36.8%) underwent an emergency operation. Of the remaining 48 patients, 20 (41.7%) were initially treated with conservative management through the use of antibiotics only; the other 28 (58.3%) with and additional ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage of the abscess. Twenty-six (54.2%) patients underwent planned operations after conservative management, and 22 (45.8%) were followed without surgery (median duration, 37.8 month), of which 3 (13%) underwent an appendectomy due to recurrent appendicitis (mean of 56.7 days after initial attack). There were no statistical differences in types of operation performed (appendectomy or ileocecectomy), postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay among the patients who underwent emergency operations, delayed operations and operations for recurrence during follow-up.

Conclusion

Although the recurrence rate was relatively low after conservative management for appendicitis patients presenting with abscess or mass, there was no difference in surgical outcome between the emergent, elective, or recurrent groups. Our results indicate that proper management of appendicitis with abscess or mass can be selected according to surgeon's preference.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Study on the Curative Effect of Different Treatment Methods on 122 Cases of Periappendiceal Abscess
    哲魁 刘
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(03): 85.     CrossRef
  • Early Surgical Management of Appendicular Mass: Evaluation of Surgical Outcome in Selected Private and Government Hospitals, Bangladesh
    Jahangir Sarwar, Abul Shamsuddin, Sirajam Munira
    Clinical Medicine Research.2024; 13(3): 33.     CrossRef
  • Failure to Significantly Reduce Radiation Exposure in Children with Suspected Appendicitis in the United States
    Charbel Chidiac, Oussama Issa, Alejandro V. Garcia, Daniel S. Rhee, Mark B. Slidell
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery.2024; 59(12): 161701.     CrossRef
  • Intra-abdominal abscesses: Microbiological epidemiology and empirical antibiotherapy
    F. Méchaï, A. Kolakowska, E. Carbonnelle, O. Bouchaud, C. Tresallet, F. Jaureguy
    Infectious Diseases Now.2023; 53(1): 104604.     CrossRef
  • Upfront appendectomy vs interval appendectomy in acute appendicitis with mass formation in pediatric age group: Little difference in major outcome
    Hussam Widatella, Ahmed Abdulmanan, Ibraheem Abdelraheem, Fadi Atwan, Sri Paran
    Journal of Pediatrics & Neonatal Care.2023; 13(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ryan Lamm, Sunjay S. Kumar, Amelia T. Collings, Ivy N. Haskins, Ahmed Abou-Setta, Nisha Narula, Pramod Nepal, Nader M. Hanna, Dimitrios I. Athanasiadis, Stefan Scholz, Joel F. Bradley, Arianne T. Train, Philip H. Pucher, Francisco Quinteros, Bethany Slate
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(12): 8933.     CrossRef
  • Thigh and iliopsoas abscess as a rare presentation of perforated mucinous appendix carcinoma. A case report
    Pedro Osácar, Darío Ramallo, Luisina Elizalde
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 96: 107293.     CrossRef
  • Early versus delayed (interval) appendicectomy for the management of appendicular abscess and phlegmon: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Akinfemi A. Akingboye, Fahad Mahmood, Shafquat Zaman, Jenny Wright, Fatima Mannan, Ali Yasen Y. Mohamedahmed
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(5): 1341.     CrossRef
  • Potential Benefit of Nonsurgical Management to Periappendicular Abscess
    Chris Li, Dean Owyang
    JAMA Surgery.2019; 154(9): 882.     CrossRef
  • Potential Benefit of Nonsurgical Management to Periappendicular Abscess—Reply
    Paulina Salminen, Jari Mällinen, Tero Rautio
    JAMA Surgery.2019; 154(9): 883.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes of single‐site laparoscopic interval appendectomy for severe complicated appendicitis: Comparison to conventional emergency appendectomy
    Masaaki Miyo, Shoichiro Urabe, Satoshi Hyuga, Tomo Nakagawa, Toshiya Michiura, Nobuyasu Hayashi, Kazuo Yamabe
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2019; 3(5): 561.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study
    Zaza Demetrashvili, George Kenchadze, Irakli Pipia, Kakhi Khutsishvili, David Loladze, Eka Ekaladze, Giorgi Merabishvili, George Kamkamidze
    Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2019; 48: 48.     CrossRef
  • MANAGEMENT OF APPENDICULAR LUMP AT TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
    Ishfaq Ahmad Gilkar, Umer Mushtaq, Javid Ahmad Peer, Bilal Ahmed Mir, Yaqoob Hassan, Waseem Ahmad Dar
    Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare.2019; 6(3): 135.     CrossRef
  • CLINICAL STUDY AND MANAGEMENT OF APPENDICULAR LUMP
    Farooq Ahmed, Ravindra G Devani, Mohammed Moinuddin, Mohd. Ashfaq Ahmed
    Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare.2018; 5(11): 997.     CrossRef
  • The evolving management of the appendix mass in the era of laparoscopy and interventional radiology
    James Forsyth, Konstantinos Lasithiotakis, Mark Peter
    The Surgeon.2017; 15(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the WSES 2016 consensus conference
    Massimo Sartelli, Fausto Catena, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Luca Ansaloni, Walter L. Biffl, Marja A. Boermeester, Marco Ceresoli, Osvaldo Chiara, Federico Coccolini, Jan J. De Waele, Salomone Di Saverio, Christian Eckmann, Gustavo P. Fraga, Maddalena Giannella,
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Treatment for Appendiceal Mass Formed After Acute Perforated Appendicitis
    Enver Zerem, Suad Kunosić, Almin Handanagić, Dženan Jahić, Dina Zerem, Omar Zerem
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2017; 27(3): 132.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic Consideration of Periappendiceal Abscess: an Evaluation of Non-surgical Treatment Followed by Minimally Invasive Interval Appendectomy
    Yeong-Soo Jo, Song-Soo Yang, Yeong-Chul Im, Dong-Jin Park, Gyu-Yeol Kim
    The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2017; 20(4): 129.     CrossRef
  • The management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections
    Massimo Sartelli, Alain Chichom-Mefire, Francesco M. Labricciosa, Timothy Hardcastle, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Abdulrashid K. Adesunkanmi, Luca Ansaloni, Miklosh Bala, Zsolt J. Balogh, Marcelo A. Beltrán, Offir Ben-Ishay, Walter L. Biffl, Arianna Birindelli, M
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015
    Ramon R. Gorter, Hasan H. Eker, Marguerite A. W. Gorter-Stam, Gabor S. A. Abis, Amish Acharya, Marjolein Ankersmit, Stavros A. Antoniou, Simone Arolfo, Benjamin Babic, Luigi Boni, Marlieke Bruntink, Dieuwertje A. van Dam, Barbara Defoort, Charlotte L. Dei
    Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(11): 4668.     CrossRef
  • Challenges in uncomplicated acute appendicitis
    Fernando Resende, Ana Beatriz Almeida, José Costa Maia, Renato Bessa Melo
    Journal of Acute Disease.2016; 5(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Management of Appendiceal Mass and Abscess. An 11-Year Experience
    Zaza Demetrashvili, Giorgi Kenchadze, Irakli Pipia, Eka Ekaladze, George Kamkamidze
    International Surgery.2015; 100(6): 1021.     CrossRef
  • The role of current methods of X-ray diagnosis in caseof intraabdominal suppurative conplications caused bu colonic diseases
    A. M. Karsanov, A. A. Kul'chiev, T. R. Karaev, I. P. Kokaev, V. V. Vahotskij
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2015; (5): 75.     CrossRef
  • 2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections
    Massimo Sartelli, Pierluigi Viale, Fausto Catena, Luca Ansaloni, Ernest Moore, Mark Malangoni, Frederick A Moore, George Velmahos, Raul Coimbra, Rao Ivatury, Andrew Peitzman, Kaoru Koike, Ari Leppaniemi, Walter Biffl, Clay Cothren Burlew, Zsolt J Balogh,
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2013;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP