Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Editorials

Less is more: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic in transfusion strategies after colorectal surgery: Eun Jung Park; Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):445-446. Published online December 28, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00878.0125

2,550 View
95 Download

PDF

Malignant disease,Colorectal cancer

Tailoring strategies for colorectal cancer screening and treatment based on age in colorectal cancer patients: Eun Jung Park; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):181-182. Published online June 27, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00395.0056

4,131 View
119 Download
5 Web of Science
6 Citations

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Xinyu Wang, Rui Ma, Tiewei Hou, Hao Xu, Cheng Zhang, Chun Ye
Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies.2025; 34(1): 35. CrossRef
Long-term outcomes and lymph node metastasis following endoscopic resection with additional surgery or primary surgery for T1 colorectal cancer
Pin-Chun Chen, Yi-Kai Kao, Po-Wen Yang, Chia-Hung Chen, Chih-I Chen
Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Recurrence Rates and Postoperative Complications Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A 5-Year Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Peshawar
Tilal Ahmed Raza, Hussain Jan Abbasi, Farrukh Ozair, Hajra Imtiaz
Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences.2025; : 120. CrossRef
Machine learning-based model for CD4+ conventional T cell genes to predict survival and immune responses in colorectal cancer
Zijing Wang, Zhanyuan Sun, Hengyi Lv, Wenjun Wu, Hai Li, Tao Jiang
Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Recurrence Patterns and Risk Factors after Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Insights for Postoperative Surveillance Strategies
Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim, Ye Ryung Park, Eun Hae Cho, Jeong Min Choo, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak
Cancers.2023; 15(24): 5791. CrossRef
Advancements and application of sustainable nanotechnology-based biomedical products in cancer therapeutics
Vinita Sharma, Jurnal Reang, Vivek Yadav, Archana Sharma, Jaseela Majeed, Prabodh Chander Sharma
Nanofabrication.2023;[Epub] CrossRef

Original Article

Malignant disease,Colorectal cancer,Prognosis,Epidemiology & etiology

Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of patients with double primary malignancies: breast and colorectal cancer: Hyundo Lee, Hae Won Lee, Eun Jung Park, Jeonghyun Kang, Seung Hyuk Baik; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):197-206. Published online October 18, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00640.0091

5,123 View
170 Download
3 Web of Science
2 Citations

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathologic features and survival in patients with both breast cancer (BrC) and colorectal cancer (CRC).
Methods
Between 1996 and 2019, patients who were diagnosed with both BrC and CRC were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with distant metastasis, palliative resection, and previous cancer histories except for BrCs or CRCs were excluded. Altogether, 105 patients were divided into the B=C group (n=21), B-first group (n=40), and C-first group (n=44) according to the definition of synchronous and metachronous cancers. The clinicopathologic features and overall survival were evaluated.
Results
TNM stages and histologic types were comparable among the 3 groups (P=0.434). The interval of diagnosis was 67.1±40.4 and 59.3±47.2 months in the B- and C-first groups, respectively. The incidence of adjuvant chemotherapy in the B-first group was 57.5%, which was higher than the B=C and C-first groups (P<0.001). The estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and HER-2 molecular markers were not significantly different among the groups. The overall survival of the B-first group showed lower survival rates than the C-first group (P=0.039). In the logistic regression, HER-2 status (hazard ratio [HR], 11.9; P=0.032) and lymph node metastasis of CRC (HR, 5.8; P=0.036) were prognostic factors affecting overall survival.
Conclusion
B-first group had poorer survival outcomes than the C-first group in patients with the metachronous BrC and CRC. HER2 positivity and CRC lymph node metastasis may be prognostic factors that affect overall survival in these patients. The findings support that a colorectal cancer screening program should be included during BrC surveillance.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Synchronous or metachronous breast and colorectal cancers in younger-than-average-age patients: a case series
Jordyn Silverstein, Francis Wright, Dalila Stanfield, Amy Jo Chien, Jasmine M Wong, John W Park, Amie Blanco, Katherine Van Loon, Chloe E Atreya
The Oncologist.2024; 29(9): e1159. CrossRef
Synchronous Breast and Colorectal Malignant Tumors—A Systematic Review
Cristian Iorga, Cristina Raluca Iorga, Alexandru Grigorescu, Iustinian Bengulescu, Traian Constantin, Victor Strambu
Life.2024; 14(8): 1008. CrossRef

Editorial

Malignant disease, Rectal cancer

Shifting Treatment Strategies to Prevent Early Relapse of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Eun Jung Park; Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(6):357-358. Published online December 31, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.11.21

4,123 View
80 Download
2 Web of Science
2 Citations

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2/Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1 as a Predictor of Prognosis and Radiotherapy Resistance in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Analysis
Ji Min Park, Shin Kim, Sung Uk Bae, Sang Jun Byun, Incheol Seo, Hye Won Lee
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical safety in the COVID-19 era: present and future considerations
Young Il Kim, In Ja Park
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(6): 295. CrossRef

Original Article

Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgeries for Patients With Colorectal Cancer Who Have Had a Previous Abdominal Surgery: Soeun Park, Jeonghyun Kang, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee; Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(5):184-191. Published online October 31, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.5.184

6,661 View
74 Download
13 Web of Science
14 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The impact of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) on surgical outcomes from laparoscopic and robot surgeries is inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the impact of PAS on perioperative outcomes from laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.

Methods

From March 2007 to February 2014, a total of 612 and 238 patients underwent laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, respectively. Patients were divided into 3 groups: those who did not have a PAS (NPAS), those who had a major PAS, and those who had a minor PAS. We further divided the patients so that our final groups for analysis were: patients with NPAS (n = 478), major PAS (n = 19), and minor PAS (n = 115) in the laparoscopy group, and patients with NPAS (n = 202) and minor PAS (n = 36) in the robotic surgery group.

Results

In the laparoscopy group, no differences in the conversion rates between the 3 groups were noted (NPAS = 1.0% vs. major PAS = 0% vs. minor PAS = 1.7%, P = 0.701). In the robotic surgery group, the conversion rate did not differ between the NPAS group and the minor PAS group (1.0% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.390). Among the groups, neither the operation time, blood loss, days to soft diet, length of hospital stay, nor complication rate were affected by PAS.

Conclusion

PAS did not jeopardize the perioperative outcomes for either laparoscopic or robotic colorectal surgeries. Therefore, PAS should not be regarded as an absolute contraindication for minimally invasive colorectal surgeries.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
S. Gahunia, J. Wyatt, S. G. Powell, S. Mahdi, S. Ahmed, K. Altaf
Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of previous abdominal surgery on minimally invasive radical resection of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
Wenjun Liu, Fan He, Defei Chen, Xiuping Zhang
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 51(10): 110259. CrossRef
Effect of previous abdominal surgery on robotic-assisted rectal cancer surgery
Davide Ferrari, Tommaso Violante, Himani Bhatt, Ibrahim A. Gomaa, Anne-Lise D. D’Angelo, Kellie L. Mathis, David W. Larson
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 28(4): 513. CrossRef
The impact of previous abdominal surgery on colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery
Xu-Rui Liu, Bing-Lan Zhang, Dong Peng, Fei Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Chun-Yi Wang
Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(4): 1331. CrossRef
Robot‐assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer after low anterior resection: A case report
Shoutarou Watanabe, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Nao Hiroe, Tomohiro Iwasawa, Michio Kosugi, Masayuki Shimizu, Masaru Ishida
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The risk of postoperative complications is higher in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery: a propensity score matching analysis
Xu-Rui Liu, Fei Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Xiao-Yu Liu, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng
Clinical and Translational Oncology.2023; 25(12): 3471. CrossRef
Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer
Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 97. CrossRef
Current status of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer: A review
Won Beom Jung
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2022; 11(2): 56. CrossRef
Conversions related to adhesions in abdominal surgery. Robotic versus laparoscopic approach: A multicentre experience
Marco Milone, Nicola de'Angelis, Nassiba Beghdadi, Francesco Brunetti, Michele Manigrasso, Giuseppe De Simone, Giuseppe Servillo, Sara Vertaldi, Giovanni Domenico De Palma
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic and laparoscopic liver resection—comparative experiences at a high-volume German academic center
E. Lorenz, J. Arend, M. Franz, M. Rahimli, A. Perrakis, V. Negrini, A. A. Gumbs, R. S. Croner
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(3): 753. CrossRef
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgeries
Anil Heroor, Aysha Khan, Kashish Jain, Akshay Patil, Hitesh Rajendra Singhavi
Indian Journal of Colo-Rectal Surgery.2021; 4(1): 12. CrossRef
Safety and feasibility of repeat laparoscopic colorectal resection: a matched case–control study
Alban Zarzavadjian le Bian, Laurent Genser, Christine Denet, Carlotta Ferretti, Anais Laforest, Jean-Marc Ferraz, Candice Tubbax, Philippe Wind, Brice Gayet, David Fuks
Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(5): 2120. CrossRef
Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robotic-assisted rectal surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching study
Ching-Wen Huang, Wei-Chih Su, Tsung-Kun Chang, Cheng-Jen Ma, Tzu-Chieh Yin, Hsiang-Lin Tsai, Po-Jung Chen, Yen-Cheng Chen, Ching-Chun Li, Yi-Chien Hsieh, Jaw-Yuan Wang
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
An individualized laparoscopic‐assisted approach in a patient with a sigmoid tumour and a giant incisional hernia – a video vignette
C. Clancy, M. Flanagan, M. Bughio, M. G. O'Riordain
Colorectal Disease.2019; 21(8): 972. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search