Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Articles

Anorectal benign disease

The importance of compression time in stapled hemorrhoidopexy: is patience a virtue?: Byung Eun Yoo, Wook Ho Kang, Yong Teak Ko, Young Chan Lee, Cheong Ho Lim; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):176-181. Published online December 20, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00556.0079

4,143 View
149 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Citations

Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether longer compression time before firing the stapler reduced the postoperative complications related to staple line formation in stapled hemorrhoidopexy.
Methods
This retrospective case-control study was conducted at a colorectal-anal specialty hospital. Consecutive patients with grades III and IV hemorrhoids who underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy between January 2016 and November 2019 were included. According to the compression time, patients were assigned to the long compression time group (2 minutes) or the typical compression time group (30 seconds). The primary outcome measure was incidence of staple line complications such as dehiscence, bleeding, and stenosis.
Results
A total of 348 patients treated with stapled hemorrhoidopexy were evaluated. Seventy-three and 275 patients were included in the long compression time group and the typical compression time group, respectively. No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics between the groups. However, additional procedures were performed more frequently in the typical compression time group (78.1% vs. 92.0%, P=0.001). Bleeding occurred more frequently in the typical compression time group (1.4% vs. 8.4%, P=0.030). The rates of dehiscence and stenosis were not significantly different between the groups. Fecal urgency developed more frequently in the typical compression time group (0% vs. 5.1%, P=0.040). In logistic regression analysis, typical compression time (30 seconds) was the only risk factor for bleeding (odds ratio, 8.496; P=0.040).
Conclusion
Longer compression time was associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative bleeding after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Latest Research Trends on the Management of Hemorrhoids
Sung Il Kang
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2025; 9(2): 179. CrossRef

The Use of a Staged Drainage Seton for the Treatment of Anal Fistulae or Fistulous Abscesses: Cheong Ho Lim, Hyeon Keun Shin, Wook Ho Kang, Chan Ho Park, Sa Min Hong, Seung Kyu Jeong, June Young Kim, Hyung Kyu Yang; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(6):309-314. Published online December 31, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.6.309

9,305 View
68 Download
29 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the rate of recurrence and incontinence after the treatment of fistulae or fistulous abscesses by using the staged drainage seton method.

Methods

According to the condition, a drainage seton alone or a drainage seton combined with internal opening (IO) closure and relocation of the seton was used. After a period of time, the seton was changed with 3-0 nylon; then, after another period of time, the authors terminated the treatment by removing the 3-0 nylon. Telephone interviews were used for follow-up. The following were evaluated: the relationship between the type of fistula and recurrence; the relationship between the type of fistula and the period of treatment; the relationship between the recurrence and presence of abscess; the relationship between IO closure and recurrence; the relationship between the period of seton change and recurrence; reported continence for flatus, liquid stool, and solid stool.

Results

The recurrence rate of fistulae or suppuration was 6.5%, but for cases of horseshoe extension, the recurrence rate was 57.1%. The rate of recurrence was related to the type of fistula (P = 0.001). Incontinence developed in 3.8% of the cases. No statistically significant relationship was found between the rate of recurrence and the presence of an abscess or between the closure of the IO and the period of seton change or removal.

Conclusion

In the treatment of anal fistulae or fistulous abscesses, the use of a staged drainage seton can reduce the rate of recurrence and incontinence.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Efficacy and safety of video-assisted anal fistula treatment in anorectal fistula: a meta-analysis
Chunqiang WANG, Tianye HUANG, Xuebing WANG
Minerva Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Loose seton in the treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulas complicated by additional fistula tracks (randomized trial)
A. G. Khitaryan, A. Z. Alibekov, A. A. Golovina, S. A. Adizov, X. S. Oplimakh
Koloproktologia.2024; 23(4): 94. CrossRef
A Large Study on Lifestyle Factors Increasing Probability of Fistula and Factors Responsible for Recurrent Fistula
Hitender Suri, Deepika Suri, Kamalpreet Bansal, Sauvik Suri, Virendera Ghodke
International Journal of Medical and Oral Research.2022; 7(1): 4. CrossRef
Fistula in Ano: Evolution of Treatment and Present Scenario
Nisar A. Chowdri
Indian Journal of Colo-Rectal Surgery.2022; 5(3): 37. CrossRef
Ambulatory seton placement followed by fistulotomy: efficacy and safety for perianal fistula treatment
Verónica Gamelas, Guilherme Simões, Sara Santos, Rafaela Loureiro, Isabel Seves, João Costa Simões, Maria João Bettencourt
European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2021; 33(7): 956. CrossRef
Influence of the cotton and silastic seton on the distance of the anal sphincter cables after fistulotomy in rats
Ana Laura Sanches Lima, Beatriz Schorro Gianini, Bruna Miranda Santana, Carlos Henrique Marques dos Santos, Doroty Mesquita Dourado, Juliano Seger Falcão, Lucas Bannwart, Sara Jéssica Falcão Câmara
Journal of Coloproctology.2020; 40(01): 056. CrossRef
How to deal with complex anal fistula in an immunosuppressed patient
Marie S. De Robles, Robert D. R. Winn
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2020; 90(9): 1764. CrossRef
Relocation and silastic tension only (RASTO) procedure for very long anal fistula tracts: Initial case series with results of a new surgical technique
John Alfred Carr
International Journal of Surgery Open.2020; 26: 1. CrossRef
Comparison of the Efficacy of the Various Treatment Modalities in the Management of Perianal Crohn’s Fistula: A Review
Shah Huzaifa Feroz, Asma Ahmed, Abilash Muralidharan, Pragatheeshwar Thirunavukarasu
Cureus.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Nigam′s Modified Roeder′s Knot in Cutting Seton in High Fistula-in-ano Prevents Rethreading and Reapplication of Seton
VK Nigam, Siddharth Nigam
World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2020; 9(4): 64. CrossRef
Loose Seton Technique as a Conventional Procedure for the Treatment of Anal Fistula and Long-Term Results
Hasan Calis
Acta Medica Alanya.2019; 3(1): 67. CrossRef
Ligature method for the treatment of anal fistula: a modern view on the old approach (literature review)
A. I. Musin, E. V. Antipova, A. A. Ulyanov, D. E. Kuznetsov
Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery.2019; 178(2): 79. CrossRef
Drainage Seton Versus External Anal Sphincter–Sparing Seton After Rerouting of the Fistula Tract in the Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Waleed Omar, Abdallah Alqasaby, Mahmoud Abdelnaby, Mohamed Youssef, Mostafa Shalaby, Mohamed Anwar Abdel-Razik, Sameh Hany Emile
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2019; 62(8): 980. CrossRef
What every PA needs to know about anorectal pain
Yasmine Hubbard, Denise Rizzolo
JAAPA.2019; 32(1): 1. CrossRef
Draining Setons as Definitive Management of Fistula-in-Ano
Oluwatomilayo O. Daodu, Julia O’Keefe, John A. Heine
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2018; 61(4): 499. CrossRef
Gender-based analysis of the characteristics and outcomes of surgery for anal fistula: analysis of more than 560 cases
Sameh Hany Emile, Hesham Elgendy, Ahmad Sakr, Mohamed Youssef, Waleed Thabet, Waleed Omar, Wael Khafagy, Mohamed Farid
Journal of Coloproctology.2018; 38(03): 199. CrossRef
The treatment of anal fistula: secondACPGBIPosition Statement – 2018
G. Williams, A. Williams, P. Tozer, R. Phillips, A. Ahmad, D. Jayne, C. Maxwell‐Armstrong
Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(S3): 5. CrossRef
Seton drainage in sphincter-sparing treatment of rectal fistulas
A. I. Musin, I. V. Kostarev
Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2018; (8): 65. CrossRef
High ligation of the anal fistula tract by lateral approach: A prospective cohort study on a modification of the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) technique
Wook Ho Kang, Hyung Kyu Yang, Han Jeong Chang, Yong Taek Ko, Byung Eun Yoo, Cheong Ho Lim, Jae Kwan Hwang, Young Chan Lee, Hyeon Keun Shin, Hae Jung Son
International Journal of Surgery.2018; 60: 9. CrossRef
Anal Fistula Laser Closure: the length of fistula is the Achilles’ heel
A. Lauretta, N. Falco, E. Stocco, R. Bellomo, A. Infantino
Techniques in Coloproctology.2018; 22(12): 933. CrossRef
Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) for Complex Anal Fistula: A Preliminary Evaluation in China
Hui-hong Jiang, Hai-long Liu, Zhen Li, Yi-hua Xiao, A-jian Li, Yi Chang, Yong Zhang, Liang Lv, Mou-bin Lin
Medical Science Monitor.2017; 23: 2065. CrossRef
Predictive factors for recurrence of high transsphincteric anal fistula after placement of seton
Sameh Hany Emile, Hossam Elfeki, Waleed Thabet, Ahmed Sakr, Alaa Magdy, Tito M Abd El-Hamed, Waleed Omar, Wael Khafagy
Journal of Surgical Research.2017; 213: 261. CrossRef
Retrospective analysis of patients submitted to surgical treatment of perianal fistula in Santa Marcelina Hospital, São Paulo
Isaac José Felippe Corrêa Neto, Janaína Wercka, Diego Palmeira Rangel, Eduardo Augusto Lopes, Hugo Henriques Watté, Rogério Freitas Lino Souza, Alexander Sá Rolim, Laercio Robles
Journal of Coloproctology.2017; 37(03): 193. CrossRef
Evaluation of the cutting seton as a method of treatment for perianal fistula
Salah M. Raslan, Mohammed Aladwani, Nasser Alsanea
Annals of Saudi Medicine.2016; 36(3): 210. CrossRef
Adapting fistula surgery to fistula tract and patient condition: towards a tailored treatment
I. Pascual Miguelañez, M. Alvarez Gallego, I. Rubio Perez, T. Funes Dueñas, J. A. Gazo Martinez
European Surgery.2016; 48(1): 4. CrossRef
Evaluation of the inflammatory response induced by different materials in the treatment of perianal fistulas: experimental study in rats
Mariana Ocampos Galvão, Carlos Henrique Marques dos Santos, Gustavo Ribeiro Falcão
Journal of Coloproctology.2016; 36(01): 016. CrossRef
Pulling Seton: Combination of mechanisms
Ahmad Izadpanah, Mohammad Rezazadehkermani, Seyed Mohammad Hosseiniasl, Afrouz Farghadin, Leila Ghahramani, Alimohammad Bananzadeh, Reza Roshanravan, Ahad Izadpanah
Advanced Biomedical Research.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
The role of loose seton in the management of anal fistula: a multicenter study of 200 patients
M. E. Kelly, H. M. Heneghan, F. D. McDermott, G. J. Nason, C. Freeman, S. T. Martin, D. C. Winter
Techniques in Coloproctology.2014; 18(10): 915. CrossRef
Management of Fistula-in-Ano—The Current Evidence
Parvez Sheikh, Atef Baakza
Indian Journal of Surgery.2014; 76(6): 482. CrossRef

Is There Any Relationship between the Chronicity of Chronic Anal Fissure and Endothelin-1?: Cheong Ho Lim, Hyeon Keun Shin, Wook Ho Kang, Seung Kyu Jeong, Hyung Kyu Yang; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(5):237-240. Published online October 31, 2011; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.237

4,539 View
34 Download
3 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Many kinds of substances are produced on vascular endothelial activation. The aim of this study is to confirm an increase in Endothelin-1 (ET-1), the most potent vasoconstrictor, which is produced by endothelial activation, in patients with chronic anal fissure and to infer the relationship between ET-1 and anal fissure chronicity.

Methods

The study groups are divided into three different groups with 30 subjects each. Group 1 is comprised of healthy volunteers, group 2 of chronic anal fissure patients, and Group 3 of patients with higher than 3rd degree hemorrhoids. Blood samples were taken to measure the ET-1 levels in subject's serum and to compare the results with those for the control groups.

Results

Among the 90 subjects, 38 were male, and 52 were female. The average age was 36.8. The average ET-1 level marked 1.47 ± 0.78 pg/mL for male subjects and 1.16 ± 0.47 pg/mL for female subjects (P = 0.02). The average ET-1 level in the patient groups is as follow: 1.21 ± 0.44 pg/mL in group 1, 1.46 ± 0.83 pg/mL in group 2, and 1.20 ± 0.56 pg/mL in group 3 (P = 0.14).

Conclusion

Group 2, the chronic anal fissure patient group, showed a higher ET-1 level than groups 1 and 3, the control group and the hemorrhoid patient group, but this difference had no statistical significance.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Impact of Anal Fissure on Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness: A Case-Control Study
Paloma Luri-Prieto, Asunción Candela-Gomis, Antonio Palazón-Bru, Felipe Navarro-Cremades, Vicente Francisco Gil-Guillén, Antonio Fernando Compañ-Rosique
Visceral Medicine.2021; 37(2): 128. CrossRef
Anatomie und Pathogenese der Analfissur
Martin Mitteregger
coloproctology.2020; 42(6): 441. CrossRef
Cost considerations in the treatment of anal fissures
Giuseppe Brisinda, Giuseppe Bianco, Nicola Silvestrini, Giorgio Maria
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research.2014; 14(4): 511. CrossRef

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Rectal Resection: Dong Hyun Choi, Jae Kwan Hwang, Yong Tak Ko, Han Jeong Jang, Hyeon Keun Shin, Young Chan Lee, Cheong Ho Lim, Seung Kyu Jeong, Hyung Kyu Yang; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):265-273. Published online August 31, 2010; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.265

8,212 View
64 Download
60 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The anastomotic leakage rate after rectal resection has been reported to be approximately 2.5-21 percent, but most results were associated with open surgery. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and their relationship to the experience of the surgeon for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection.

Methods

Between March 2003 and December 2008, 156 patients underwent a laparoscopic rectal resection without a diverting ileostomy. The patients' characteristics, the details of treatment, the intraoperative results, and the postoperative results were recorded prospectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage.

Results

The majority of operations were performed for malignant disease (n = 150; 96.2%), and 96 patients (61.5%) were males. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 1 case (0.6%). The anastomotic leak rate was 10.3% (16/156), and there were no mortalities. In the univariate analysis, tumor location, anastomotic level, intraoperative events, and operation time were associated with increased anastomotic leakage rate. In the multivariate analysis, anastomotic level (odds ratio [OR], 6.855; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.271 to 36.964) and operation time (OR, 8.115; 95% CI, 1.982 to 33.222) were significantly associated with anastomotic leakage.

Conclusion

The important risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection without a diverting ileostomy were low anastomosis and long operation time. An additional procedure, such as diverting stoma, may reduce the anastomotic leakage if it is selectively applied in cases with these risk factors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Anastomotic Leak Following Colorectal Surgery
Olivia Ziegler, Audrey S. Kulaylat
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2026; 39(01): 024. CrossRef
Creating and validating an anastomotic leakage risk prediction model after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer
Wenqiang Li, Susu Zhou, Qikai Zhong, Luqiao Huang, Ning Li, Chengyu Sun, Liang Zhang, Zhengguo Zhang
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology.2026; 50(1): 102745. CrossRef
Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage: A Comprehensive Single-Center Analysis of Colorectal Anastomoses for Ovarian and Gastrointestinal Cancers
Francesco Santullo, Virginia Vargiu, Andrea Rosati, Barbara Costantini, Valerio Gallotta, Claudio Lodoli, Carlo Abatini, Miriam Attalla El Halabieh, Valentina Ghirardi, Federica Ferracci, Lorena Quagliozzi, Angelica Naldini, Fabio Pacelli, Giovanni Scambi
Annals of Surgical Oncology.2025; 32(4): 2620. CrossRef
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery reflecting current practices
Tatsunosuke Harada, Masakatsu Numata, Yosuke Atsumi, Toshiyuki Fukuda, Shota Izukawa, Yusuke Suwa, Jun Watanabe, Tsutomu Sato, Aya Saito
Surgery Today.2025; 55(8): 1043. CrossRef
Laparoscopic versus open ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes
Xiao-Qiang Zhang, Run-xi Tang, Dong-Hao Pan, Chao-Fu Zhang, Ming-Yang Xia, Lei-Yuan Shuai, Hua Tang, Guang-Yan Ji
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study in Powered and Manual Stapler in Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer
Siripong Sirikurnpiboon
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comments on “Folic acid deficiency as a modifiable risk factor for anastomotic leak in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery”
Eda Karapelit Agitoglu, Beliz Bahar Karaoglan, Kadriye Bir Yucel
Updates in Surgery.2025; 77(8): 2371. CrossRef
Risk factors for anastomotic fistula after total mesorectal excision: A monocentric retrospective study of 78 patients
Amine Majdoubi, Anass El Aachi, Mohammed El Hammouti, Haïtam Aabalou, Ayoub Kharkhach, Tariq Bouhout, Badr Serji
Clinical Surgical Oncology.2025; 4(3): 100096. CrossRef
Extracellular Matrix Hydrogel Reduces Anastomotic Leaks in a Rodent Model of Rectal Anastomosis
Vincent Antonelli, Charles Patterson, Catalina Pineda Molina, Scott A. Johnson, Michael Hu, George S. Hussey, David S. Medich, Stephen F. Badylak
Journal of Surgical Research.2025; 315: 241. CrossRef
Clinical Safety and Effectiveness of COLO-BT™, an Intraluminal Fecal Diverting Device, as an Alternative to Defunctioning Ileostomy After Proctectomy
Ho Yung Lee, Sung Il Kang, Sohyun Kim
Surgical Innovation.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluation of risk factors for early complications following bowel anastomosis
A. K. M. Zahedul Islam, M. Farhad Hossain, Masuma Sultana, M. Oliul Islam, Tanvir Ahmad, M. Jayer Haque
International Surgery Journal.2025; 13(1): 19. CrossRef
Colonic Anastomotic Leakage: Current State of the Problem and Prospects for Early Diagnosis
M. A. Chernykh, A. M. Belousov, K. G. Shostka
Innovative Medicine of Kuban.2024; (3): 131. CrossRef
Vorhersagbarkeit von Anastomoseninsuffizienzen in der Viszeralchirurgie
Jin-On Jung, Georg Dieplinger, Christiane Bruns
Die Chirurgie.2024; 95(11): 901. CrossRef
Anastomotic Leak Rate and Prolonged Postoperative Paralytic Ileus in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery for Colo-Rectal Cancer After Placement of No-Coil Endoanal Tube
Michele Ammendola, Giorgio Ammerata, Francesco Filice, Rosalinda Filippo, Michele Ruggiero, Roberto Romano, Riccardo Memeo, Patrick Pessaux, Giuseppe Navarra, Severino Montemurro, Giuseppe Currò
Surgical Innovation.2023; 30(1): 20. CrossRef
Potential short-term outcome advantage of low vs. high ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for sigmoid and rectal cancer: propensity score matching analysis
Chia-Chen Hsu, Yu-Jen Hsu, Yih-Jong Chern, Bor-Kang Jong, Chun-Kai Liao, Pao-Shiu Hsieh, Wen-Sy Tsai, Jeng-Fu You
BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?
Christos Tsalikidis, Athanasia Mitsala, Vasileios I. Mentonis, Konstantinos Romanidis, George Pappas-Gogos, Alexandra K. Tsaroucha, Michail Pitiakoudis
Current Oncology.2023; 30(3): 3111. CrossRef
Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term prognosis after colorectal cancer surgery
Valeria Tonini, Manuel Zanni
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 15(5): 745. CrossRef
Efficacy and Safety of Transanal Drainage Tube for Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Surgery for Rectal Cancer
Tatsunosuke Harada, Yasuhiro Ishiyama, Yume Minagawa, Shingo Ito, Masataka Oneyama, Kazuhiro Narita
Nihon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2023; 76(6): 420. CrossRef
Preservation of the left colic artery in modified laparoscopic anterior rectal resections without auxiliary abdominal incisions for transanal specimen retrieval
Yulin Liu, Peng Yu, Han Li, Lijian Xia, Xiangmin Li, Meijuan Zhang, Zhonghui Cui, Jingbo Chen
BMC Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The Role of Indocyanine Near-Infrared Fluorescence in Colorectal Surgery
Francesco Maione, Michele Manigrasso, Alessia Chini, Sara Vertaldi, Pietro Anoldo, Anna D’Amore, Alessandra Marello, Carmen Sorrentino, Grazia Cantore, Rosa Maione, Nicola Gennarelli, Salvatore D’Angelo, Nicola D’Alesio, Giuseppe De Simone, Giuseppe Servi
Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leakage and preventive measures: a retrospective cohort study
M. S. Lebedko, S. S. Gordeev, E. V. Alieva, M. D. Sivolob, Z. Z. Mamedli, S. G. Gaydarov, V. Yu. Kosyrev
Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2022; 12(2): 17. CrossRef
Intracorporeal reinforcement with barbed suture is associated with low anastomotic leakage rates after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a retrospective study
Haiping Lin, Minhao Yu, Guangyao Ye, Shaolan Qin, Hongsheng Fang, Ran Jing, Tingyue Gong, Yang Luo, Ming Zhong
BMC Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors Contributing to Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Surgery: Why, When, and Who Leaks?
Shravani Sripathi, Mashal I Khan, Naomi Patel, Roja T Meda, Surya P Nuguru, Sriker Rachakonda
Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Anastomotic Leak in Ovarian Cancer Cytoreduction Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Massimiliano Fornasiero, Georgios Geropoulos, Konstantinos S. Kechagias, Kyriakos Psarras, Konstantinos Katsikas Triantafyllidis, Panagiotis Giannos, Georgios Koimtzis, Nikoletta A. Petrou, James Lucocq, Christos Kontovounisios, Dimitrios Giannis
Cancers.2022; 14(21): 5464. CrossRef
Association between circular stapler size and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer
Yugang Jiang, Hongyuan Chen, Meng Kong, Dong Sun, Hongguang Sheng
Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2022; 18(7): 1931. CrossRef
Preliminary surgical outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transrectal specimen extraction: a propensity score matching study of 120 cases (with video)
Mingguang Zhang, Zheng Liu, Peng Sun, Xiyue Hu, Haitao Zhou, Zheng Jiang, Jianqiang Tang, Qian Liu, Xishan Wang
Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery: Predictive Factors and Survival
Swetha Prabhakaran, Sowmya Prabhakaran, Wei Mou Lim, Glen Guerra, Alexander G. Heriot, Joseph C. Kong
Polish Journal of Surgery.2022; 95(5): 56. CrossRef
Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Colectomy: Who Will Require Emergency Fecal Diversion?
Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, Nicolas Tabchouri, Christine Denet, Théophile Guilbaud, Anaïs Laforest, Christophe Tresallet, Jean-Marc Ferraz, Brice Gayet, David Fuks
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2021; 31(9): 1040. CrossRef
Postoperative morbidity and mortality after anterior resection with preventive diverting loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for rectal cancer: A updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Rui Du, Jiajie Zhou, Guifan Tong, Yue Chang, Dongliang Li, Feng Wang, Xu Ding, Qi Zhang, Wei Wang, Liuhua Wang, Daorong Wang
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 47(7): 1514. CrossRef
Risk factors of symptomatic anastomotic leakage and its impacts on a long-term survival after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a retrospective single-center study
Xinyu Qi, Maoxing Liu, Kai Xu, Pin Gao, Fei Tan, Zhendan Yao, Nan Zhang, Hong Yang, Chenghai Zhang, Jiadi Xing, Ming Cui, Xiangqian Su
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A Novel Nomogram for Prediction of Early Postoperative Complications of Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
Jiawen Zhang, Linhua Jiang, Xinguo Zhu
Cancer Management and Research.2021; Volume 13: 7579. CrossRef
A Retrospective Study of Risk Factors for Symptomatic Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Anterior Resection of the Rectal Cancer without a Diverting Stoma
Zhi-Jie Wang, Qian Liu
Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef
Impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Z. Balciscueta, N. Uribe, L. Caubet, M. López, I. Torrijo, J. Tabet, M. C. Martín
Techniques in Coloproctology.2020; 24(9): 919. CrossRef
Computed tomography based cross-sectional anatomy of the pelvis predicts surgical outcome after rectal cancer surgery
Gyoung Tae Noh, Soon Sup Chung, Kwang Ho Kim, Ryung-Ah Lee
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2020; 99(2): 90. CrossRef
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and its impact on long-term survival in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery
Marius Kryzauskas, Augustinas Bausys, Austeja Elzbieta Degutyte, Vilius Abeciunas, Eligijus Poskus, Rimantas Bausys, Audrius Dulskas, Kestutis Strupas, Tomas Poskus
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after lower rectal Cancer resection, including drain type: a retrospective single-center study
Tetsushi Kinugasa, Sachiko Nagasu, Kenta Murotani, Tomoaki Mizobe, Takafumi Ochi, Taro Isobe, Fumihiko Fujita, Yoshito Akagi
BMC Gastroenterology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Prediction model for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection
Enesh Shiwakoti, Jianning Song, Jun Li, Shanshan Wu, Zhongtao Zhang
Journal of International Medical Research.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Drainage smell and peritonitis are efficient indicators of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection
Enesh Shiwakoti, Jianning Song, Jun Li, Shanshan Wu, Zhongtao Zhang
Journal of International Medical Research.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal with intracorporeal anastomosis is associated with shorter length of stay without increased direct cost
Sarath Sujatha-Bhaskar, Matthew Whealon, Colette S. Inaba, Christina Y. Koh, Mehraneh D. Jafari, Steven Mills, Alessio Pigazzi, Michael J. Stamos, Joseph C. Carmichael
Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(2): 644. CrossRef
Risk and early predictive factors of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer
Masahiro Fukada, Nobuhisa Matsuhashi, Takao Takahashi, Hisashi Imai, Yoshihiro Tanaka, Kazuya Yamaguchi, Kazuhiro Yoshida
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Male gender is associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak in rectal cancer patients after total mesorectal excision
Chi Zhou, Xian-rui Wu, Xuan-hui Liu, Yu-feng Chen, Jia Ke, Xiao-wen He, Xiao-sheng He, Tuo Hu, Yi-feng Zou, Xiao-bin Zheng, Hua-shan Liu, Jian-cong Hu, Xiao-jian Wu, Jian-ping Wang, Ping Lan
Gastroenterology Report.2018; 6(2): 137. CrossRef
Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Antonio Sciuto, Giovanni Merola, Giovanni D De Palma, Maurizio Sodo, Felice Pirozzi, Umberto M Bracale, Umberto Bracale
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(21): 2247. CrossRef
Predictive Factors for Small Intestinal and Colonic Anastomotic Leak: a Multivariate Analysis
Ahmad Sakr, Sameh Hany Emile, Emad Abdallah, Waleed Thabet, Wael Khafagy
Indian Journal of Surgery.2017; 79(6): 555. CrossRef
Smoking and tumor obstruction are risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection during rectal cancer treatment
Hiroyuki Matsuzaki, Soichiro Ishihara, Kazushige Kawai, Koji Murono, Kensuke Otani, Koji Yasuda, Takeshi Nishikawa, Toshiaki Tanaka, Tomomichi Kiyomatsu, Keisuke Hata, Hiroaki Nozawa, Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2017; 1(1): 7. CrossRef
De Prefectos a Mandatarios de la Nación. La violencia en la política peruana (1829-1836)
Víctor Peralta Ruiz
Revista de Indias.2016; 76(266): 173. CrossRef
New technique of compression anastomosis in colorectal surgery – first results in 25 patients in Macedonia
Svetozar Antovic, Aleksandar Mitevski, Aleksandar Karagozov, Biljana Kuzmanovska, Nikola Jankulovski
PRILOZI.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis
Kenji Kawada, Yoshiharu Sakai
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(25): 5718. CrossRef
Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hui Qu, Yao Liu, Dong-song Bi
Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(12): 3608. CrossRef
Safe anastomosis in laparoscopic and robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A narrative review and outcomes study from an expert tertiary center
S. AL Asari, M.S. Cho, N.K. Kim
European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO).2015; 41(2): 175. CrossRef
Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
H.‐C. Pommergaard, B. Gessler, J. Burcharth, E. Angenete, E. Haglind, J. Rosenberg
Colorectal Disease.2014; 16(9): 662. CrossRef
Incidence and Mortality of Anastomotic Dehiscence Requiring Reoperation After Rectal Carcinoma Resection
Zhi-jie Cong, Liang-hao Hu, Jun-jie Xing, Zheng-qian Bian, Chuan-gang Fu, En-da Yu, Zhao-shen Li, Ming Zhong
International Surgery.2014; 99(2): 112. CrossRef
Anastomotic leakage as an outcome measure for quality of colorectal cancer surgery
H S Snijders, D Henneman, N L van Leersum, M ten Berge, M Fiocco, T M Karsten, K Havenga, T Wiggers, J W Dekker, R A E M Tollenaar, M W J M Wouters
BMJ Quality & Safety.2013; 22(9): 759. CrossRef
Systematic review of perioperative selective decontamination of the digestive tract in elective gastrointestinal surgery
D Roos, L M Dijksman, J G Tijssen, D J Gouma, M F Gerhards, H M Oudemans-van Straaten
British Journal of Surgery.2013; 100(12): 1579. CrossRef
Systematic Review of Anastomotic Leakage Rate According to an International Grading System Following Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
Zhi-Jie Cong, Liang-Hao Hu, Zheng-Qian Bian, Guang-Yao Ye, Min-Hao Yu, Yun-He Gao, Zhao-Shen Li, En-Da Yu, Ming Zhong, Georgina L Hold
PLoS ONE.2013; 8(9): e75519. CrossRef
A systematic review of outcome reporting in colorectal cancer surgery
R. N. Whistance, R. O. Forsythe, A. G. K. McNair, S. T. Brookes, K. N. L. Avery, A. M. Pullyblank, P. A. Sylvester, D. G. Jayne, J. E. Jones, J. Brown, M. G. Coleman, S. J. Dutton, R. Hackett, R. Huxtable, R. H. Kennedy, D. Morton, A. Oliver, A. Russell,
Colorectal Disease.2013;[Epub] CrossRef
Compression anastomosis ring device in colorectal anastomosis: a review of 1,180 patients
Hossein Masoomi, Ruihong Luo, Steven Mills, Joseph C. Carmichael, Anthony J. Senagore, Michael J. Stamos
The American Journal of Surgery.2013; 205(4): 447. CrossRef
Spontaneous Healing of a Rectovaginal Fistula Developing after Laparoscopic Segmental Bowel Resection for Intestinal Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis
William Kondo, Reitan Ribeiro, Carlos Henrique Trippia, Monica Tessmann Zomer
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology.2013; 2013: 1. CrossRef
A Novel Rodent Model Modifying Perioperative Temperature and Humidity during Bowel Surgery and Mimicking Laparoscopic Conditions
Torben Glatz, Gabriel Seifert, Philipp A. Holzner, S. Chikhladze, Birte Kulemann, Olivia Sick, Jens Höppner, Ulrich Theodor Hopt, Goran Marjanovic
Surgical Science.2012; 03(07): 353. CrossRef
Randomized clinical trial of perioperative selective decontamination of the digestive tract versus placebo in elective gastrointestinal surgery
D Roos, L M Dijksman, H M Oudemans-van Straaten, L T de Wit, D J Gouma, M F Gerhards
British Journal of Surgery.2011; 98(10): 1365. CrossRef
Ghost Ileostomy with or without abdominal parietal split
Michele Cerroni, Roberto Cirocchi, Umberto Morelli, Stefano Trastulli, Jacopo Desiderio, Mario Mezzacapo, Chiara Listorti, Luigi Esperti, Diego Milani, Nicola Avenia, Nino Gullà, Giuseppe Noya, Carlo Boselli
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2011;[Epub] CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search