Purpose This study aimed to compare the wound cosmesis of a single-incision approach on scar assessment after laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.
Methods This study included 32 patients undergoing single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and 61 patients undergoing multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for colon cancer at 3 tertiary referral hospitals between September 2011 and December 2019. We modified and applied the Korean version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) to assess cosmetic outcomes. To assess the interobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient values for the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), the surgeons evaluated 5 images of postoperative scars.
Results No significant differences were observed in the time before the return of normal bowel function, time to sips of water and soft diet initiation, length of in-hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate. The SPLS group had a shorter total incision length than the MPLS group. The POSAS favored the SPLS approach, revealing significant differences in the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), OSAS, and overall scores. The SPLS approach was an independent factor influencing the POSAS, PSAS, and OSAS scores. Eleven colorectal surgeons had a significantly substantial intraclass coefficient.
Conclusion The cosmetic outcomes of SPLS as assessed by the patients and surgeons were superior to those of MPLS in colon cancer. Reducing the number of ports is an independent factor affecting scar assessment by patients and observers.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Investigating the Efficacy of Layered Moderate Tension Reduction Suturing in Facial Aesthetic Surgery Gui H Wang, Jin Y Gang, Yan Li Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Tae-Gyun Lee, Gil-Hyeon Song, Hong-min Ahn, Heung-Kwon Oh, Moonkyoung Byun, Eon Chul Han, Sohyun Kim, Chang Woo Kim, Hye Jin Kim, Samin Hong, Kee-Ho Song, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Beom Cho, on behalf of the Public Relations Committee of the Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP)
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):145-153. Published online April 28, 2023
Purpose The Korean Society of Coloproctology has been conducting Colorectal Cancer Awareness Campaign, also known as the Gold Ribbon Campaign, every September since 2007. The 2022 campaign was held through a metaverse platform targeting the younger age group under the slogan of raising awareness of early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to analyze the impact of the 2022 campaign on a metaverse platform.
Methods Anonymized survey data were collected from participants in the metaverse campaign from September 1 to 15, 2022. The satisfaction score of the participants was evaluated by sex, age group, and previous campaign participation status.
Results During the campaign, 2,770 people visited the metaverse. Among them, 455 people participated in the survey (response rate, 16.4%). Approximately 95% of the participants reported being satisfied with the information provided by the campaign, understood the necessity of undergoing screening for and prevention of early-onset CRC, and were familiar with the structure of the metaverse. The satisfaction score for campaign information tended to decrease as the participants’ age increased. When the participants’ overall level of satisfaction with the metaverse platform was assessed, teenagers scored particularly lower than the other age groups. The satisfaction scores for CRC information provided in the metaverse, as well as the scores for recognizing the seriousness and necessity of screening for early-onset CRC, indicated a high positive tendency (P<0.001).
Conclusion Most of the 2022 Gold Ribbon Campaign participants were satisfied with the metaverse platform. Medical society should pay attention to increasing participation in and satisfaction with future public campaigns.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Meeting report on the 8th Asian Science Editors’ Conference and Workshop 2024 Eun Jung Park Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 66. CrossRef
Toward Diagnosis of Diseases Using Emerging Technologies: A Comprehensive Survey of the State of the Art in Metaverse Nasim Aslani, Ali Garavand, Riccardo Ortale International Journal of Intelligent Systems.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Global perspectives on young-onset colorectal cancer: epidemiology, challenges, and advances Drew Goldberg, Erica Pettke Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2025; 36(3): 101118. CrossRef
#CRCandMe: results of a pre-post quasi-experimental study of a mass media campaign to increase early-onset colorectal cancer awareness in Utah and Wisconsin Ami E Sedani American Journal of Cancer Research.2024; 14(8): 3873. CrossRef
Metaverse in surgery — origins and future potential Enrico Checcucci, Alessandro Veccia, Stefano Puliatti, Pieter De Backer, Pietro Piazza, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Severin Rodler, Mark Taratkin, Ines Rivero Belenchon, Loic Baekelandt, Sabrina De Cillis, Alberto Piana, Ahmed Eissa, Juan Gomez Rivas, Giov Nature Reviews Urology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Metaverso: perspectivas, possibilidades e limitações Walter Rodrigues Marques, Maria Neuraildes Gomes Viana, Anderson Boás Viana, Luís Claúdio Azevedo Gomes, Francilene Silva Cruz, Bruna Monique Cunha Rodrigues, Andréa Luísa Frazão Silva, Regeanne Santos Guaianaz, Daiane Leite Chaves Bezerra, Diêgo Jorge Lo Caderno Pedagógico.2024; 21(13): e12984. CrossRef
Purpose Recently, laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s colostomy was performed with favorable outcomes by many surgeons. We partially applied the concepts of single-port laparoscopic procedure through the colostomy site to remove intraperitoneal adhesion during initial step of the laparoscopic Hartmann’s reversal. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s colostomy with the application of single-port laparoscopic techniques through the colostomy site.
Methods From October 2008 to November 2018, the laparoscopic Hartmann’s reversal was attempted in 20 patients. After colostomy take-downs, the single-port device was installed at the colostomy site and the single-port laparoscopic procedure was performed to remove intraperitoneal adhesions to provide space for additional trocars. After additional trocars were inserted, the descending colon and rectal stump were mobilized, and the colorectal anastomosis was completed. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and analyzed the data to identify the perioperative complication rates as the primary outcome.
Results Of the 20 patients, 3 patients (15.0%) had open conversions due to severe adhesions. Intraoperative small bowel injuries occurred in 2 patients (10.0%) and these were repaired through the colostomy site. Postoperative complications developed in 4 patients (20.0%) and were managed with medical treatments or wound closures under local anesthesia.
Conclusion The single-port laparoscopic procedure through the colostomy site is sufficiently safe in order to complete the Hartmann’s reversal. We recommend that the colostomy site should be used as the access route into the abdominal cavity for the Hartmann’s reversal.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Single‐port laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure through the colostomy site: technical aspects and early postoperative outcomes Ahmet Akmercan, Tayfun Akmercan, Tevfik Kıvılcım Uprak ANZ Journal of Surgery.2025; 95(1-2): 151. CrossRef
Handmade Single-Port Laparoscopic Hartmann’s Stoma Reversal Procedure Ahmet Akmercan, Ali Hajali, Tevfik Kıvılcım Uprak Videoscopy.2025; 35(1): 1. CrossRef
Impact of single-port laparoscopic approach on scar assessment by patients and observers: a multicenter retrospective study Sung Uk Bae, Kyeong Eui Kim, Chang-Woo Kim, Ji-Hoon Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Yoon-Suk Lee, Seong Kyu Baek, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(2): 154. CrossRef
Comparison between liquid skin adhesive and wound closure strip for skin closure after subcuticular suturing in single-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a single-center retrospective study in Korea Kyeong Eui Kim, Yu Ra Jeon, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2024; 27(1): 14. CrossRef
The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery Min Ki Kim The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoskopische Kontinuitätswiederherstellung nach der Hartmann-Operation Andreas Türler, Nicola Cerasani, Haug-Lambert Loriz, Xenia Kemper, Moritz Weckbecker, Maike Derenbach, Anna Krappitz coloproctology.2022; 44(1): 35. CrossRef
Purpose To delineate the learning curve (LC) for laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) performed by residents according to seniority in training.
Methods Between October 2015 and November 2016, 150 patients underwent LA by three residents (in their first, second, and third year of training) under supervision. The patients were non-randomly assigned to each resident. The data were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively from prospectively collected database. The perioperative outcomes were compared between the three residents including operation time, complication, conversion, and so on. The LCs were evaluated by the moving average method and cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) for operation time and surgical completion.
Results Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were similar except for age and location of the appendix among the three groups. Operation time was not different among the three residents (43.9, 45.3, and 48.4 min for A, B, and C, respectively). The moving average method for operation time showed a decreasing tendency for all residents. CUSUM for operation time showed that the peak points occurred at the 24th, 18th, and 31st cases for resident A, B, and C, respectively. In terms of surgical failure, residents A, B, and C reached steady states after the 35th, 11th, and 16th cases, respectively. Perforation of the appendix base was the only risk factor for surgical failure.
Conclusion The LC for LA by residents was 11-35 cases according to multidimensional statistical analyses. The accumulation of surgical experience of residents might affect the LC, especially for surgical completion rather than for operation time.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy performed by six surgeons with different subspecialties: a retrospective cohort study using risk-adjusted cumulative summation Ji Hyeong Song, Inyoung Na, Song-Yi Kim, Youn Ju Lee, Sun Jong Han, Sang Il Youn, Sa-Hong Min, Jin Soo Kim Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2025; 109(3): 207. CrossRef
The Influence of Surgical Teaching on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Outcomes: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched National Cohort Study Joana Rodrigues Ribeiro, André Silva Alves, Pascal Probst, Samuel A. Käser, Christian Toso, Beat Moeckli Journal of Surgical Education.2025; 82(11): 103744. CrossRef
Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing perioperative outcomes of emergency appendectomy performed by trainee vs trained surgeon Theophilus TK. Anyomih, Thomas Jennings, Alok Mehta, J Robert O'Neill, Ioanna Panagiotopoulou, Stavros Gourgiotis, Elizabeth Tweedle, John Bennett, R Justin Davies, Constantinos Simillis The American Journal of Surgery.2023; 225(1): 168. CrossRef
Graded operative autonomy in emergency appendectomy mirrors case-complexity: surgical training insights from the SnapAppy prospective observational study Nathalie Young, Rebecka Ahl Hulme, Maximilian Peter Forssten, Lewis Jay Kaplan, Thomas Noel Walsh, Yang Cao, Shahin Mohseni, Gary Alan Bass, Alan Biloslavo, Hayato Kurihara, Isidro Martinez-Casas, Jorge Pereira, Arvid Pourlotfi, Éanna J. Ryan, Matti Tolon European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.2023; 49(1): 33. CrossRef
Training curriculum in minimally invasive emergency digestive surgery: 2022 WSES position paper Nicola de’Angelis, Francesco Marchegiani, Carlo Alberto Schena, Jim Khan, Vanni Agnoletti, Luca Ansaloni, Ana Gabriela Barría Rodríguez, Paolo Pietro Bianchi, Walter Biffl, Francesca Bravi, Graziano Ceccarelli, Marco Ceresoli, Osvaldo Chiara, Mircea Chiri World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
How does the number of training years in pediatric surgery affect appendectomy outcomes? Carlos Delgado-Miguel, Miriam Miguel-Ferrero, María San Basilio, Carla Ramírez, Juan Camps, Francisco Hernández Oliveros Pediatric Surgery International.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical outcomes of locking polymeric clip for laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with appendicitis: a retrospective comparison with loop ligature Seokwon Kim, Byong Ho Jeon, Sang Sik Cho, Ui Sup Shin, Sun Mi Moon Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 160. CrossRef
Laparoscopic appendicectomy without the use of disposable materials - a low-cost alternative - 1,552 cases operated in 20 years CARLOS EDUARDO DOMENE, PAULA VOLPE, ANDRÉ VALENTE SANTANA Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Learning curve in laparoscopic appendectomy: training strategy of laparoscopic surgery Hyung Ook Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(3): 276. CrossRef
Factors Influencing the Difficulty and Need for External Help during Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Analysis of 485 Procedures from the Resident-1 Multicentre Trial Stefano Cioffi, Andrea Spota, Michele Altomare, Stefano Granieri, Roberto Bini, Francesco Virdis, Federica Renzi, Elisa Reitano, Osvaldo Chiara, Stefania Cimbanassi Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(11): 1904. CrossRef
Impact of COVID-19 on the care of acute appendicitis: a single-center experience in Korea Chang Woo Kim, Suk-Hwan Lee Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2021; 101(4): 240. CrossRef
Purpose Patients who undergo radical surgery for rectal cancer often experience low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Symptoms of this syndrome include frequent bowel movements, gas incontinence, fecal incontinence, fragmentation, and urgency. The aim of this study was to investigate the convergent validity, discriminative validity, and reliability of the Korean version of the LARS score questionnaire.
Methods The English LARS score questionnaire was translated into Korean using the forward-and-back translation method. A total of 146 patients who underwent radical surgery for rectal cancer answered the Korean version of the LARS score questionnaire including an anchor question assessing the impact of bowel function. Participants answered the questionnaire once more after 2 weeks.
Results The Korean LARS score questionnaire showed high convergent validity in terms of high correlation between the LARS score and quality of life (perfect fit 55.5% vs. moderate fit 37.6% vs. no fit 6.8%, respectively; P < 0.001). The LARS score also showed good discriminative validity between groups of patients differing by sex (29 for males vs. 25 for females; P = 0.014), tumor level (29 for ≤8 cm vs. 24 for >8 cm; P = 0.021), and radiotherapy (32 for yes vs. 24 for no; P = 0.001). The LARS score also demonstrated high reliability at test-retest with no difference between scores at the first and second tests (intraclass correlation coefficient: Q1 = 0.932; Q2 = 0.909, Q3 = 0.944, Q4 = 0.931, and Q5 = 0.942; P < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion The Korean version of the LARS score questionnaire has proven to be a valid and reliable tool for measuring LARS in Korean patients with rectal cancer.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Impact of sleep disturbances due to low anterior resection syndrome on the quality of life of patients with rectal cancer Do Kyoon Moon, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Mi Suk Kim, Jae Hyun Park, Jesung Park, Jong Sung Ahn, Hyo Jun Kim, Minjung Kim, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park The American Journal of Surgery.2025; 246: 116399. CrossRef
Validation of the Vietnamese version of the low anterior resection syndrome score questionnaire Tuong-Anh Mai-Phan, Vu Quang Pham Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 588. CrossRef
Bowel dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms on quality of life after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: A cross-sectional study Hyekyung Kim, Hyedan Kim, Ok-Hee Cho European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2024; 69: 102524. CrossRef
Effectiveness of personalized treatment stage-adjusted digital therapeutics in colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial Inah Kim, Ji Young Lim, Sun Woo Kim, Dong Wook Shin, Hee Cheol Kim, Yoon Ah Park, Yoon Suk Lee, Jung-Myun Kwak, Seok Ho Kang, Ji Youl Lee, Ji Hye Hwang BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy Versus long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal cancer, Korean trial (TV-LARK trial): study protocol of a multicentre randomized controlled trial Min Jung Kim, Dae Won Lee, Hyun-Cheol Kang, Ji Won Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Sae-Won Han, Kyung Su Kim, Eui Kyu Chie, Jae Hwan Oh, Woon Kyung Jeong, Byoung Hyuck Kim, Eun Mi Nam, Seung-Yong Jeong BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Validation of low anterior resection syndrome score in Brazil with Portuguese Kelly C.L.R. Buzatti, Andy Petroianu, Søren Laurberg, Rodrigo G. Silva, Beatriz D.S. Rodrigues, Peter Christensen, Antonio Lacerda-Filho, Therese Juul Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 402. CrossRef
Preoperative sequential short-course radiation therapy and FOLFOX chemotherapy versus long-course chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SOLAR trial) Min Kyu Kang, Soo Yeun Park, Jun Seok Park, Hye Jin Kim, Jong Gwang Kim, Byung Woog Kang, Jin Ho Baek, Seung Hyun Cho, An Na Seo, Duck-Woo Kim, Jin Kim, Se Jin Baek, Ji Hoon Kim, Ji Yeon Kim, Gi Won Ha, Eun Jung Park, In Ja Park, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyun Kang BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical Implication of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy In Ja Park The Ewha Medical Journal.2022; 45(1): 3. CrossRef
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Current Management Seung Mi Yeo, Gyung Mo Son The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Analgesic effect of structured anal skin care for perianal dermatitis after low anterior resection in the rectal cancer patients: prospective, single-center, open-label, therapeutic confirmatory, randomized clinical trial Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Mi Sook Yun, Jung-Hea Youn, Hong Min An, Kyung Hee Kim, Seung Mi Yeo, Bokyung Ku, Myeong Suk Kwon, Kun Hyung Kim Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(6): 360. CrossRef
Two dominant patterns of low anterior resection syndrome and their effects on patients’ quality of life Min Jung Kim, Ji Won Park, Mi Ae Lee, Han-Ki Lim, Yoon-Hye Kwon, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Kyu Joo Park, Seung-Yong Jeong Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Anterior resection syndrome: a randomized clinical trial of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (ramosetron) in male patients with rectal cancer S -B Ryoo, J W Park, D W Lee, M A Lee, Y -H Kwon, M J Kim, S H Moon, S -Y Jeong, K J Park British Journal of Surgery.2021; 108(6): 644. CrossRef
The incidence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Rui Sun, Ziyi Dai, Yin Zhang, Junyang Lu, Yuelun Zhang, Yi Xiao Supportive Care in Cancer.2021; 29(12): 7249. CrossRef
Defining low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): Scoring tools and patient-reported outcomes Dr Rebekka Troller, Dr Jeremy Meyer, Mr Justin Davies Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2021; 32(4): 100847. CrossRef
The Effect of Anastomotic Leakage on the Incidence and Severity of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Patients Undergoing Proctectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Sungjin Kim, Sung Il Kang, So Hyun Kim, Jae-Hwang Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(5): 281. CrossRef
Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon Hahn Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 351. CrossRef
Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164. CrossRef
Purpose Stoma takedown is a frequently performed procedure with considerable postoperative morbidities. Various skin closure techniques have been introduced to reduce surgical site infections. The aim of this study was to assess postoperative outcomes after stoma takedown during a long-term follow-up period.
Methods Between October 2006 and December 2015, 84 consecutive patients underwent a colostomy or ileostomy takedown at our institution. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed through retrospective reviews of medical records.
Results The proportion of male patients was 60.7%, and the mean age of the patients was 59.0 years. The overall complication rate was 28.6%, with the most common complication being prolonged ileus, followed by incisional hernia, anastomotic leakage, surgical site infection, anastomotic stenosis, and entero-cutaneous fistula. The mean follow-up period was 64.3 months. The univariate analysis revealed no risk factors related to overall complications or prolonged ileus.
Conclusion The postoperative clinical course and long-term outcomes following stoma takedown were acceptable. Stoma takedown is a procedure that can be performed safely.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Complicated diverticulitis: Diagnostic precision and surgical solutions in a patient with chronic kidney disease Sharon L. Hsieh, Nathaniel Grabill, Mena Louis, Bradley Kuhn Radiology Case Reports.2025; 20(1): 346. CrossRef
Comparing Surgical Site Infection Rate Between Primary Closure and Rhomboid Flap After Stoma Reversal Che-Ming Chu, Chih-Cheng Chen, Yu-Yao Chang, Kai-Jyun Syu, Shih-Lung Lin Annals of Plastic Surgery.2024; 92(1S): S33. CrossRef
TIMING OF THE STOMA REVERSAL, WHAT IS THE SAFE PERIOD?: A RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY GIRIDHAR ASHWATH, ESHWAR KATHIRESAN MANASIJAN, ANTHONY P ROZARIO Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research.2024; : 181. CrossRef
Diverting ileostomy in benign colorectal surgery: the real clinical cost analysis F. Ascari, G. Barugola, G. Ruffo Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(5): 1761. CrossRef
Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann reversal: a propensity score matching analysis Li Tan, Xiao-Yu Liu, Bin Zhang, Lian-Lian Wang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Defunctioning stoma in anterior resection for rectal cancer does not impact anastomotic leakage: a national population-based cohort study Eihab Munshi, Marie-Louise Lydrup, Pamela Buchwald BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical Site Infection After Stoma Reversal: A Comparison Between Linear and Purse-String Closure Muhammad Awais Khan, Khurram Niaz, Shahzeb Asghar, Maaz A Yusufi, Mohtamam Nazir, Syed Muhammad Ali, Aryan Ahmed, Akeel Ahamed Salahudeen, Talha Kareem Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors Predicting the Reversal of Hartmann’s Procedure Ömer Yalkın, Fatih Altıntoprak, Mustafa Yener Uzunoğlu, Yasin Alper Yıldız, Muhammet Burak Kamburoğlu, Necattin Fırat, Fehmi Çelebi, Mihajlo Jakovljevic BioMed Research International.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
This study aimed to identify the risk factors for surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery and to determine whether significantly different SSI rates existed between the short prophylactic antibiotic use group (within 24 hours) and the long prophylactic antibiotic use group (beyond 24 hours).
Methods
The medical records of 327 patients who underwent colorectal resection due to colorectal cancer from January 2010 to May 2014 at a single center were retrospectively reviewed, and their characteristics as well as the surgical factors known to be risk factors for SSIs, were identified.
Results
Among the 327 patients, 45 patients (13.8%) developed SSIs. The patients were divided into two groups according to the duration of antibiotic use: group S (within 24 hours) and group L (beyond 24 hours). Of the 327 patients, 114 (34.9%) were in group S, and 213 (65.1%) were in group L. Twelve patients (10.5%) in group S developed SSIs while 33 patients (15.5%) in group L developed SSIs (P = 0.242). History of diabetes mellitus and lung disease, long operation time, and perioperative transfusion were independent risk factors for SSIs.
Conclusion
This study shows that discontinuation of prophylactic antibiotics within 24 hours after colorectal surgery has no significant influence on the incidence of SSIs. This study also showed that history of diabetes mellitus and lung disease, long operation time, and perioperative transfusion were associated with increased SSI rates.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
RETRACTED: A meta‐analysis of the risk factors for surgical site infection in patients with colorectal cancer Yani Chen, Hua Guo, Tian Gao, Jiale Yu, Yujia Wang, Haiquan Yu International Wound Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluation after implementation of chemical bowel preparation for surgical site infections in elective colorectal cancer surgery and role of antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist: Retrospective cohort study Yasuhiro Sasaki, Akira Kurishima, Chieko Miyamoto, Kenichiro Hataji, Toru Tezuka, Hideo Katsuragawa Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Antibiotic use during radical surgery in stage I-III colorectal cancer: correlation with outcomes? Mingyue Xu, Yuanyuan Chen, Panhua Li, Qianwen Ye, Shouhan Feng, Bing Yan BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical Site Infections in Colorectal Cancer Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Surgical Approach and Associated Risk Factors Valentin Calu, Catalin Piriianu, Adrian Miron, Valentin Titus Grigorean Life.2024; 14(7): 850. CrossRef
Potent antibacterial activity in surgical wounds with local administration of D-PLEX100 Noam Emanuel, Goldi A. Kozloski, Shlomo Nedvetzki, Sefi Rosenfeld European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.2023; 188: 106504. CrossRef
Worldwide incidence of surgical site infections in general surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 488,594 patients Brigid M. Gillespie, Emma Harbeck, Megan Rattray, Rhea Liang, Rachel Walker, Sharon Latimer, Lukman Thalib, Annette Erichsen Andersson, Bronwyn Griffin, Robert Ware, Wendy Chaboyer International Journal of Surgery.2021; 95: 106136. CrossRef
Risk factors for surgical site infection in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis of observational studies ZhaoHui Xu, Hui Qu, ZeZhong Gong, George Kanani, Fan Zhang, YanYing Ren, Shuai Shao, XiaoLiang Chen, Xin Chen, Zubing Mei PLOS ONE.2021; 16(10): e0259107. CrossRef
Update on risk factors of surgical site infection in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhaohui Xu, Hui Qu, George Kanani, Zhong Guo, Yanying Ren, Xin Chen International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(12): 2147. CrossRef
Appropriate Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Clean Wound Surgery Under Local Anesthesia Han Gyu Cha, Jin Geun Kwon, Hyun Ho Han, Jin Sup Eom, Eun Key Kim Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Patterns of antibiotics and pathogens for anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery Geunhyeok Yang, Chang Woo Kim, Suk-Hwan Lee Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2019; 15(2): 79. CrossRef
Challenging surgical dogma in the management of proximal esophageal atresia with distal tracheoesophageal fistula: Outcomes from the Midwest Pediatric Surgery Consortium Dave R. Lal, Samir K. Gadepalli, Cynthia D. Downard, Daniel J. Ostlie, Peter C. Minneci, Ruth M. Swedler, Thomas H. Chelius, Laura Cassidy, Cooper T. Rapp, Deborah Billmire, Steven Bruch, R. Carland Burns, Katherine J. Deans, Mary E. Fallat, Jason D. Fras Journal of Pediatric Surgery.2018; 53(7): 1267. CrossRef
Comparison of intraoperative handling and wound healing between (NEOSORB® plus) and coated polyglactin 910 suture (NEOSORB®): a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial Bum Sik Tae, Ju Hyun Park, Jung Kwon Kim, Ja Hyeon Ku, Cheol Kwak, Hyeon Hoe Kim, Chang Wook Jeong BMC Surgery.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of a change in duration of prophylactic antibiotics on infectious complications after radical cystectomy with a neobladder Chung-Jong Kim, Kwang Hyun Kim, Wan Song, Dong Hyeon Lee, Hee Jung Choi Medicine.2018; 97(47): e13196. CrossRef
Colorectal surgery and surgical site infection: is a change of attitude necessary? Manuela Elia-Guedea, Elena Cordoba-Diaz de Laspra, Estibaliz Echazarreta-Gallego, María Isabel Valero-Lazaro, Jose Manuel Ramirez-Rodriguez, Vicente Aguilella-Diago International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2017; 32(7): 967. CrossRef
Influence of a Shorter Duration of Post-Operative Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Infectious Complications in Patients Undergoing Elective Liver Resection Masahiko Sakoda, Satoshi Iino, Yuko Mataki, Yota Kawasaki, Hiroshi Kurahara, Kosei Maemura, Shinichi Ueno, Shoji Natsugoe Surgical Infections.2017; 18(2): 149. CrossRef
Efforts to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery Byung Wook Min Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(6): 211. CrossRef
The incidence of extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) is very low. An 84-year-old Korean man was treated with topical and oral medications at a local dermatologic clinic for a year, but the symptoms did not improve. He visited Severance Hospital and underwent a perianal skin biopsy and was finally diagnosed with EMPD. The authors performed a wide local excision according to a 1-cm margin around the lesion. For the skin and the soft tissue defects, bilateral inferior gluteal artery perforator flap transpositions were performed. The size of the lesion was 14 cm2 × 9 cm2, and the lateral and the basal margins were all disease free.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Vulvar Adenocarcinoma With Pagetoid Spread: A Case Report Kazuaki Nishimura, Seiji Kagami, Haruka Kajio, Tamaki Wada, Naoyuki Toki, Kiyoshi Yoshino Cancer Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Rectal Adenocarcinoma With Pagetoid Spread: A Novel Entity Lefika Bathobakae, Pasha Shenasan, Aakash Trivedi, Ruhin Yuridullah, Sohail Qayyum, Abraham El-Sedfy, Hirotada Akiho Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Perianal Paget’s Disease; Surgery and Non-surgical Interventions, Untreated Patient: a Report of Two Cases Ümit Özdemir, Mustafa Salış, İlter Özer, Bülent Ünal Indian Journal of Surgery.2023; 85(1): 169. CrossRef
Perianal paget’s disease: A case report Hernández Pilar Navajas, Delgado Teresa Valdés, Aguado Jesús Machuca, González-Cámpora Ricardo, Arias Federico Argüelles Archives of Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; 8(3): 050. CrossRef
Perianal Paget's disease Pilar Navajas Hernández, Teresa Valdés Delgado , Jesús Machuca Aguado, Ricardo González-Cámpora, Federico Argüelles Arias Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Enfermedad de Paget perianal Mireia Merichal Resina, Carlos Cerdan Santacruz, Enrique Sierra Grañón, Jordi Antoni Tarragona Foradada, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler Cirugía Española.2019; 97(3): 179. CrossRef
Perianal Paget Disease Mireia Merichal Resina, Carlos Cerdan Santacruz, Enrique Sierra Grañón, Jordi Antoni Tarragona Foradada, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler Cirugía Española (English Edition).2019; 97(3): 179. CrossRef
Enfermedad de Paget extramamaria de la región perianal, reporte de caso Lucía Giraldo Mordecay, Joanna Cajamarca Rueda, Edgar Olmos Olmos, Jenny Gonzalez Arboleda Piel.2017; 32(3): 178. CrossRef
Bilateral V-Y flap for a perianal basal cell carcinoma: A case report José P. Rivera-Chavarría, Francisco Vargas-Villalobos, Silvia Riggioni-Víquez International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2016; 24: 153. CrossRef
Tumours and inflammatory lesions of the anal canal and perianal skin revisited: an update and practical approach Heather Dawson, Stefano Serra Journal of Clinical Pathology.2015; 68(12): 971. CrossRef