Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Previous issues

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Previous issues
9 Previous issues
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Authors
Funded articles
Volume 34(6); December 2018
Prev issue Next issue
Editorial
What Are the Major Changes in Korean Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery?
Chang-Nam Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):277-279.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.11.23
  • 2,892 View
  • 62 Download
PDF
Review
Differences Regarding the Molecular Features and Gut Microbiota Between Right and Left Colon Cancer
Kwangmin Kim, Ernes John T. Castro, Hongjin Shim, John Vincent G. Advincula, Young-Wan Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):280-285.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.12.17
  • 6,581 View
  • 261 Download
  • 38 Web of Science
  • 37 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
For many years, developmental and physiological differences have been known to exist between anatomic segments of the colorectum. Because of different outcomes, prognoses, and clinical responses to chemotherapy, the distinction between right colon cancer (RCC) and left colon cancer (LCC) has gained attention. Furthermore, variations in the molecular features and gut microbiota between right and LCCs have recently been a hot research topic. CpG island methylator phenotype-high, microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancers are more likely to occur on the right side whereas tumors with chromosomal instability have been detected in approximately 75% of LCC patients and 30% of RCC patients. The mutation rates of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes also differ between RCC and LCC patients. Biofilm is more abundant in RCC patients than LLC patients, as are Prevotella, Selenomonas, and Peptostreptococcus. Conversely, Fusobacterium, Escherichia/Shigella, and Leptotrichia are more abundant in LCC patients compared to RCC patients. Distinctive characteristics are apparent in terms of molecular features and gut microbiota between right and LCC. However, how or to what extent these differences influence diverging oncologic outcomes remains unclear. Further clinical and translational studies are needed to elucidate the causative relationship between primary tumor location and prognosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The gut microbiota and its biogeography
    Giselle McCallum, Carolina Tropini
    Nature Reviews Microbiology.2024; 22(2): 105.     CrossRef
  • The role of gut microbiota and probiotics in preventing, treating, and boosting the immune system in colorectal cancer
    Forough Masheghati, Mohammad Reza Asgharzadeh, Abbas Jafari, Naser Masoudi, Hadi Maleki-Kakelar
    Life Sciences.2024; 344: 122529.     CrossRef
  • Diet-mediated gut microbial community modulation and signature metabolites as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis, prognosis, prevention and stage-specific treatment of colorectal cancer
    Mutebi John Kenneth, Hsin-Chi Tsai, Chuan-Yin Fang, Bashir Hussain, Yi-Chou Chiu, Bing-Mu Hsu
    Journal of Advanced Research.2023; 52: 45.     CrossRef
  • Microbiome and metabolic features of tissues and feces reveal diagnostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer
    Jiahui Feng, Zhizhong Gong, Zhangran Sun, Juan Li, Na Xu, Rick F. Thorne, Xu Dong Zhang, Xiaoying Liu, Gang Liu
    Frontiers in Microbiology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Metachronous Colorectal Adenomas Occur Close to the Index Lesion
    Ria Rosser, Bernard M. Corfe, Keith S. Chapple
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2023; 57(9): 937.     CrossRef
  • Genetic heterogeneity of colorectal cancer and the microbiome
    Marina A Senchukova
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2023; 15(3): 443.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Colorectal Cancer Sidedness and Location on Therapy and Clinical Outcomes: Role of Blood-Based Biopsy for Personalized Treatment
    Sasha Waldstein, Marianne Spengler, Iryna V. Pinchuk, Nelson S. Yee
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 13(7): 1114.     CrossRef
  • Fusobacterium nucleatum-Mediated Alteration in Expression of VEGF and CCL3 Genes and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Hataw Jalal Taher, Fouad Kamel
    Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk of developing metachronous colorectal neoplasia after the resection of proximal versus distal adenomas
    Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Youngwoo Kim, Dong Il Park
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2022; 54(4): 537.     CrossRef
  • Faeces from malnourished colorectal cancer patients accelerate cancer progression
    Xu Chao, Zhang Lei, Liu Hongqin, Wang Ziwei, Li Dechuan, Du Weidong, Xu Lu, Chen Haitao, Zhang Bo, Ju Haixing, Yao Qinghua
    Clinical Nutrition.2022; 41(3): 632.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and molecular profile of young adults with early‐onset colorectal cancer: Experience from four Australian tertiary centers
    Derrick Ho Wai Siu, Arwa Ali, Angelina Tjokrowidjaja, Madhawa De Silva, Joanna Lee, Philip R. Clingan, Morteza Aghmesheh, Daniel Brungs, Cristina Mapagu, David Goldstein, Siobhan O'Neill, Winston S. Liauw, Katrin M. Sjoquist, David Thomas, Nick Pavlakis,
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 18(6): 660.     CrossRef
  • Microbial Characteristics of Common Tongue Coatings in Patients with Precancerous Lesions of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract
    Xiaoyu Kang, Bin Lu, Pan Xiao, Zhaolai Hua, Rui Shen, Jianping Wu, Juan Wu, Zhenfeng Wu, Chun Cheng, Junfeng Zhang, Enas Abdulhay
    Journal of Healthcare Engineering.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal microbiota after removal of colorectal cancer
    Peter Cronin, Clodagh L Murphy, Maurice Barrett, Tarini Shankar Ghosh, Paola Pellanda, Eibhlis M O’Connor, Syed Akbar Zulquernain, Shane Kileen, Morgan McCourt, Emmet Andrews, Micheal G O’Riordain, Fergus Shanahan, Paul W O’Toole
    NAR Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer
    Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • Tumor tissue-specific bacterial biomarker panel for colorectal cancer: Bacteroides massiliensis, Alistipes species, Alistipes onderdonkii, Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, Corynebacterium appendicis
    Rizwana Hasan, Sudeep Bose, Rahul Roy, Debarati Paul, Saumitra Rawat, Pravin Nilwe, Neeraj K. Chauhan, Sangeeta Choudhury
    Archives of Microbiology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes with survival depends on primary tumor sidedness in stage III colon cancers (NCCTG N0147) [Alliance]
    B. Saberzadeh-Ardestani, N.R. Foster, H.E. Lee, Q. Shi, S.R. Alberts, T.C. Smyrk, F.A. Sinicrope
    Annals of Oncology.2022; 33(11): 1159.     CrossRef
  • Fecal Luminal Factors from Patients with Gastrointestinal Diseases Alter Gene Expression Profiles in Caco-2 Cells and Colonoids
    Luiza Holst, Cristina Iribarren, Maria Sapnara, Otto Savolainen, Hans Törnblom, Yvonne Wettergren, Hans Strid, Magnus Simrén, Maria K. Magnusson, Lena Öhman
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(24): 15505.     CrossRef
  • Phosphorylated transducer and activator of transcription-3 (pSTAT3) immunohistochemical expression in paired primary and metastatic colorectal cancer
    Esmeralda C. Marginean, Joanna Gotfrit, Horia Marginean, Daniel W. Yokom, Justin J. Bateman, Manijeh Daneshmand, Shelly Sud, Allen M. Gown, Derek Jonker, Timothy Asmis, Rachel A. Goodwin
    Translational Oncology.2021; 14(2): 100996.     CrossRef
  • Construction of a long noncoding RNA-based competing endogenous RNA network and prognostic signatures of left- and right-side colon cancer
    Ke-zhi Li, Yi-xin Yin, Yan-ping Tang, Long Long, Ming-zhi Xie, Ji-lin Li, Ke Ding, Bang-li Hu
    Cancer Cell International.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gut Microbiota as Potential Biomarker and/or Therapeutic Target to Improve the Management of Cancer: Focus on Colibactin-Producing Escherichia coli in Colorectal Cancer
    Julie Veziant, Romain Villéger, Nicolas Barnich, Mathilde Bonnet
    Cancers.2021; 13(9): 2215.     CrossRef
  • Association of Habitual Preoperative Dietary Fiber Intake With Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Dieuwertje E. Kok, Melissa N. N. Arron, Tess Huibregtse, Flip M. Kruyt, Dirk Jan Bac, Henk K. van Halteren, Ewout A. Kouwenhoven, Evertine Wesselink, Renate M. Winkels, Moniek van Zutphen, Fränzel J. B. van Duijnhoven, Johannes H. W. de Wilt, Ellen Kampma
    JAMA Surgery.2021; 156(9): 827.     CrossRef
  • Resectable Colorectal Cancer: Current Perceptions on the Correlation of Recurrence Risk, Microbiota and Detection of Genetic Mutations in Liquid Biopsies
    Andreas Koulouris, Christos Tsagkaris, Ippokratis Messaritakis, Nikolaos Gouvas, Maria Sfakianaki, Maria Trypaki, Vasiliki Spyrou, Manousos Christodoulakis, Elias Athanasakis, Evangelos Xynos, Maria Tzardi, Dimitrios Mavroudis, John Souglakos
    Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3522.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Helicobacter pylori Infection on the Oral Microbiota of Reflux Esophagitis Patients
    Tian Liang, Fang Liu, Lijun Liu, Zhiying Zhang, Wenxue Dong, Su Bai, Lifeng Ma, Longli Kang
    Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Association of Gut Microbiota and Complications in Gastrointestinal-Cancer Therapies
    Kevin M. Tourelle, Sebastien Boutin, Markus A. Weigand, Felix C. F. Schmitt
    Biomedicines.2021; 9(10): 1305.     CrossRef
  • Antibacterial Activity of T22, a Specific Peptidic Ligand of the Tumoral Marker CXCR4
    Naroa Serna, José Vicente Carratalá, Oscar Conchillo-Solé, Carlos Martínez-Torró, Ugutz Unzueta, Ramón Mangues, Neus Ferrer-Miralles, Xavier Daura, Esther Vázquez, Antonio Villaverde
    Pharmaceutics.2021; 13(11): 1922.     CrossRef
  • Gut Microbiota Profiles in Early- and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Potential Diagnostic Biomarker in the Future
    Murdani Abdullah, Ninik Sukartini, Saskia Aziza Nursyirwan, Rabbinu Rangga Pribadi, Hasan Maulahela, Amanda Pitarini Utari, Virly Nanda Muzellina, Agustinus Wiraatmadja, Kaka Renaldi
    Digestion.2021; 102(6): 823.     CrossRef
  • The gut microbiome in epilepsy
    Birol Şafak, Bengü Altunan, Birol Topçu, Aynur Eren Topkaya
    Microbial Pathogenesis.2020; 139: 103853.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic Targeting of the Colorectal Tumor Stroma
    Wolf H. Fridman, Ian Miller, Catherine Sautès-Fridman, Annette T. Byrne
    Gastroenterology.2020; 158(2): 303.     CrossRef
  • Bacterial Biofilm and its Role in the Pathogenesis of Disease
    Lene K. Vestby, Torstein Grønseth, Roger Simm, Live L. Nesse
    Antibiotics.2020; 9(2): 59.     CrossRef
  • Foes or Friends? Bacteria Enriched in the Tumor Microenvironment of Colorectal Cancer
    Siyang Xu, Wen Yin, Yuling Zhang, Qimei Lv, Yijun Yang, Jin He
    Cancers.2020; 12(2): 372.     CrossRef
  • Esophageal microbiome signature in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Loris Riccardo Lopetuso, Marco Severgnini, Silvia Pecere, Francesca Romana Ponziani, Ivo Boskoski, Alberto Larghi, Gianluca Quaranta, Luca Masucci, Gianluca Ianiro, Tania Camboni, Antonio Gasbarrini, Guido Costamagna, Clarissa Consolandi, Giovanni Cammaro
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(5): e0231789.     CrossRef
  • Unsuspected clinical presentation of coronavirus disease 2019: acute bowel disease
    Marco Lotti, Michela Giulii Capponi, Dusanka Dokic, Paolo Bertoli, Alessandro Lucianetti
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2020; 90(9): 1772.     CrossRef
  • Does Sidedness Matter in Unresectable Colorectal Cancer?
    Suneel D. Kamath, Alok A. Khorana
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2019; 26(6): 1588.     CrossRef
  • Morphological characteristics of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the colon and its embryogenetic premises
    Yu. S. Korneva, R. V. Ukrainets
    Colorectal Oncology.2019; 9(2): 16.     CrossRef
  • Primary Tumor Sidedness Predicts Bevacizumab Benefit in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Xia-Hong You, Can Wen, Zi-Jin Xia, Fan Sun, Yao Li, Wei Wang, Zhou Fang, Qing-Gen Chen, Lei Zhang, Yu-Huang Jiang, Xiao-Zhong Wang, Hou-Qun Ying, Zhen Zong
    Frontiers in Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy as a predictor of colorectal polyps: a large scale case-control study
    Yoshinari Kawahara, Masaaki Kodama, Kazuhiro Mizukami, Tomoko Saito, Yuka Hirashita, Akira Sonoda, Kensuke Fukuda, Osamu Matsunari, Kazuhisa Okamoto, Ryo Ogawa, Tadayoshi Okimoto, Kazunari Murakami
    Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition.2019; 65(2): 153.     CrossRef
  • Gut Microbiome: A Promising Biomarker for Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancer
    Sally Temraz, Farah Nassar, Rihab Nasr, Maya Charafeddine, Deborah Mukherji, Ali Shamseddine
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2019; 20(17): 4155.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Female Sex and Right-Sided Tumor Location Are Poor Prognostic Factors for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer After a Curative Resection
Jung Ho Park, Hyoung-Chul Park, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Seung Chul Heo, Min Jung Kim, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, for the Seoul Colorectal Group (SECOG)
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):286-291.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.29
  • 4,329 View
  • 117 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Stage-IIIC colon cancer is an advanced disease; however, its oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage-IIIC colon cancer.
Methods
From a multicenter database, we retrospectively enrolled 611 patients (355 men and 256 women) who had undergone a potentially curative resection for a stage-IIIC colon adenocarcinoma between 2003 and 2011. The primary end-point was the 5-year DFS.
Results
The median age was 62 years; 213 and 398 patients had right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC), respectively. The 5-year DFS in all patients was 52.0%; median follow-up time was 35 months (range, 1–134 months). A multivariate Cox regression revealed that female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19–1.90; P < 0.01), right-sided tumor location (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.29–2.11; P < 0.01), lymphatic invasion (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.08–2.15; P < 0.01) and a high (≥0.4) metastatic lymph node ratio (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 2.63–5.24; P < 0.01) were independent predictors of worse 5-year DFS. Female patients with RCC were 1.79 fold more likely to experience recurrence than male patients with LCC.
Conclusion
Female sex and right-sided tumor location are associated with higher tumor recurrence rates in patients with stage-IIIC colon cancers. Aggressive treatment and close surveillance should be planned for patients in these groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development and external validation of a nomogram predicting overall survival after curative resection of colon cancer
    Shuanhu Wang, Yakui Liu, Yi Shi, Jiajia Guan, Mulin Liu, Wenbin Wang
    Journal of International Medical Research.2021; 49(5): 030006052110150.     CrossRef
Clinical Outcomes of Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Sigmoid Colon Cancer: Surgery With 1 Surgeon and 1 Camera Operator
Jung Ryul Oh, Sung Chan Park, Sung Sil Park, Beonghoon Sohn, Hyoung Min Oh, Bun Kim, Min Jung Kim, Chang Won Hong, Kyung Su Han, Dae Kyung Sohn, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):292-298.   Published online December 3, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.04.06
  • 6,975 View
  • 107 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study compared the perioperative clinical outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) with those of conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for patients with sigmoid colon cancer and investigated the safety and feasibility of RPLS performed by 1 surgeon and 1 camera operator.
Methods
From the beginning of 2010 until the end of 2014, 605 patients underwent a colectomy for sigmoid colon cancer. We compared the characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and pathologic results for the patients who underwent RPLS and for the patients who underwent MPLS. We also compared the clinical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and 3-port laparoscopic surgery.
Results
Of the 115 patients in the RPLS group, 59 underwent SILS and 56 underwent 3-port laparoscopic surgery. The MPLS group included 490 patients. The RPLS group had shorter operating time (137.4 ± 43.2 minutes vs. 155.5 ± 47.9 minutes, P < 0.001) and shorter incision length (5.3 ± 2.2 cm vs. 7.8 ± 1.2 cm, P < 0.001) than the MPLS group. In analyses of SILS and 3-port laparoscopic surgery, the SILS group showed younger age, longer operating time, and shorter incision length than the 3-port surgery group and exhibited a more advanced T stage, more lymphatic invasion, and larger tumor size.
Conclusion
RPLS performed by 1 surgeon and 1 camera operator appears to be a feasible and safe surgical option for the treatment of patients with sigmoid colon cancer, showing comparable clinical outcomes with shorter operation time and shorter incision length than MPLS. SILS can be applied to patients with favorable tumor characteristics.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a propensity-matched cohort study with conventional laparoscopic surgery
    Mingyi Wu, Hao Wang, Xuehua Zhang, Jiaolong Shi, Xiaoliang Lan, Tingyu Mou, Yanan Wang
    BMC Gastroenterology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Single-Incision Plus One-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    Yasumitsu Hirano, Chikashi Hiranuma, Masakazu Hattori, Kenji Douden
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2021; 83(3): 691.     CrossRef
  • LongTerm Outcomes of Three-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy Versus Five-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Retrospective Study
    Tao Zhang, Yaqi Zhang, Xiaonan Shen, Yi Shi, Xiaopin Ji, Shaodong Wang, Zijia Song, Xiaoqian Jing, Feng Ye, Ren Zhao
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Short‐ And medium‐term outcomes of reduced‐port laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with upper rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study
    Huawen Wu, Zhijian Zheng, Lewei Xu, Yingying Wu, Ziyi Guan, Wenhuan Li, Guofu Chen
    Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(15): 5320.     CrossRef
Current Status and Trends in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery in Korea: Analysis of Data in a Nationwide Registry
Se-Jin Baek, Kil Yeon Lee, Ki Hwan Song, Chang Sik Yu, for the Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Study Group of the Korean Society of Coloproctology
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):299-305.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.07.21
  • 5,302 View
  • 151 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Korea has been increasing in recent years, but accurate statistics about operations for IBD are lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trends and current status of IBD surgeries in Korea.
Methods
Using a national database from the Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, we analyzed data from patients who underwent surgery for Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis from January 2009 to October 2016. Results: The mean number of patients who underwent surgery for Crohn disease was 791.8 per year. Colorectal surgery, small bowel surgery, and anal surgery were performed fairly often (31.2%, 29.4%, 39.4%, respectively), and laparoscopic surgery continued to increase, recently exceeding 30%. About 50% of Crohn patients used biologics before and after surgery, and those patients also underwent a relatively high rate of anal surgeries (44.2%). The mean number of patients who underwent surgery for ulcerative colitis was 247.6 per year. Colorectal surgery accounted for more than half of all operations, and laparoscopic surgery has been increasing rapidly, having been performed in about 60% of patients in recent years. The incidence of colorectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis was very high and increased rapidly during the study period, reaching about 80%.
Conclusion
The number of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for IBD in Korea has increased significantly. Biologics are actively used by patients with Crohn disease, with a high proportion of anal surgeries required. Many of the surgical indications for ulcerative colitis have shifted into colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical Significance of Prognostic Nutrition Index in Patients with Crohn’s Disease after Primary Bowel Resection
    Hyeon Woo Bae, Yong Joon Lee, Min Young Park, Seung Yoon Yang, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Kang Young Lee, Jae Hee Cheon, Joseph C. Carmichael, Byung Soh Min
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2024; 65(7): 380.     CrossRef
  • Increased Proportion of Colorectal Cancer in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Undergoing Surgery in the Netherlands
    Lianne Heuthorst, Houda Harbech, Harmanna J. Snijder, Aart Mookhoek, Geert R. D'Haens, Séverine Vermeire, André D'Hoore, Willem A. Bemelman, Christianne J. Buskens
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(5): 848.     CrossRef
  • Optimal surgical management of duodenal fistula in Crohn’s disease: a Korean multicenter cohort study
    Soo Young Oh, Young Il Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Min Soo Cho, Min Young Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Molecular characterization of dysplasia-initiated colorectal cancer with assessing matched tumor and dysplasia samples
    Sungwon Jung, Jong Lyul Lee, Tae Won Kim, Jongmin Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Kil Yeon Lee, Ki-hwan Song, Chang Sik Yu, Yong Beom Cho
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(1): 72.     CrossRef
  • New insights on the surgical management of ulcerative colitis in the 21st century
    Paulo G Kotze, Lianne Heuthorst, Amy L Lightner, Aderson O M C Damião, Willem A Bemelman
    The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2022; 7(7): 679.     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of Crohn’s disease: a state of the art review
    Elise Maria Meima - van Praag, Christianne Johanna Buskens, Roel Hompes, Wilhelmus Adrianus Bemelman
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(6): 1133.     CrossRef
  • Surgical options for perianal fistula in patients with Crohn's disease: A comparison of seton placement, fistulotomy, and stem cell therapy
    Min Young Park, Yong Sik Yoon, Hyoung Eun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2021; 44(11): 1383.     CrossRef
  • Improving the care of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients: perspectives and strategies for IBD center management
    Jihye Park, Sinyoung Park, Shin Ae Lee, Soo Jung Park, Jae Hee Cheon
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2021; 36(5): 1040.     CrossRef
  • Short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open ileocolic resection in patients with Crohn's disease: Propensity-score matching analysis
    Shin Jeong Pak, Young Il Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Jong Lyul Lee, Jung Bok Lee, Chang Sik Yu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(41): 7159.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Age on the Initiation of Biologic Agent Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Korean Common Data Model Cohort Study
    Youn I Choi, Yoon Jae Kim, Jun-Won Chung, Kyoung Oh Kim, Hakki Kim, Rae Woong Park, Dong Kyun Park
    JMIR Medical Informatics.2020; 8(4): e15124.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Crohn Disease: A Long Way to Go to Identify the Optimal Method
    Soo Yeun Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(4): 207.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Characteristics and Postoperative Outcomes of Patients Presenting With Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Crohn Disease
    Joon Suk Moon, Jong Lyul Lee, Chang Sik Yu, Seok-Byung Lim, In Ja Park, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Suk-Kyun Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Sang Hyoung Park, Hassan Abdullah Alsaleem, Jin Cheon Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(4): 243.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Thiopurine on Potential Surgical Intervention in Crohn’s Disease in Korea: Results from the CONNECT Study
    Hee Man Kim, Jin Woo Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Joo Sung Kim, You Sun Kim, Jae Hee Cheon, Won Ho Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Won Moon, Sung Hee Jung, Young-Ho Kim, Dong Soo Han
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 10(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • What Are the Major Changes in Korean Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery?
    Chang-Nam Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(6): 277.     CrossRef
Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Hartmann Colostomy Reversal
Won Park, Won Cheol Park, Keun Young Kim, Seok Youn Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):306-311.   Published online December 20, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.07
  • 7,369 View
  • 159 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Hartmann operation is widely recognized as a useful procedure, especially in emergencies involving the rectosigmoid colon. One of the surgeon’s foremost concerns after Hartmann operation is future colostomy reversal, as colostomy reversal after a Hartmann procedure is associated with relatively high morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic surgical techniques continue to prove useful for an ever-increasing variety of indications. We analyzed the outcomes of laparoscopic Hartmann colostomy reversals at our center.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the hospital records of 170 patients who had undergone Hartmann operation between January 2010 and June 2017 at Wonkwang University Hospital. Among 68 Hartmann colostomy reversals, we evaluated and compared the outcomes of 3 groups of patients: 29 patients in the open colostomy reversal group (OG) who had undergone laparotomies for Hartmann reversals, 19 patients in the conversion group (CG) whose laparoscopic procedures had required conversion to a laparotomy, and 20 patients in the laparoscopy group (LG).
Results
The overall reversal rate for Hartmann colostomies was 40.5% during this time period. The duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter among LG patients (10.15 ± 2.94 days) than among OG patients (16 ± 9.5 days). The overall complication rate among OG patients was higher than that among LG patients (adjusted odds ratio, 8.78; P = 0.01). The most common complication was postoperative ileus (19.1%).
Conclusion
If no contraindications to laparoscopy exist, surgeons should favor a laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann operation over an open reversal.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Surgical Outcomes of Open and Laparoscopic Hartmann Reversal: A Single-Center Comparative Study
    Mu-Han Tsai, Ming-Jenn Chen, Khaa-Hoo Ong, Chih-Ying Lu, Chung-Han Ho, Hsuan-Yi Huang, Yu-Feng Tian, I-Ning Yang
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann reversal: a propensity score matching analysis
    Li Tan, Xiao-Yu Liu, Bin Zhang, Lian-Lian Wang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic and open Hartmann's reversal: A single‐center retrospective study in Japan
    Aya Sato, Ken Imaizumi, Hiroyuki Kasajima, Keisuke Obuchi, Kentaro Sato, Daisuke Yamana, Yosuke Tsuruga, Minoru Umehara, Michihiro Kurushima, Kazuaki Nakanishi
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2022; 15(1): 137.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Laparoscopic Hartmann's Procedure Followed by Laparoscopic Reversal for Perforated Diverticulitis
    Ryo Maemoto, Shingo Tsujinaka, Ryotaro Sakio, Nao Kakizawa, Rei Takahashi, Yuuri Hatsuzawa, Yasuaki Kimura, Erika Machida, Sawako Tamaki, Hideki Ishikawa, Yasuyuki Miyakura, Toshiki Rikiyama
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2022; 75(1): 36.     CrossRef
  • Is laparoscopy a reliable alternative to laparotomy in Hartmann's reversal? An updated meta-analysis
    D. Chavrier, A. Alves, B. Menahem
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2022; 26(4): 239.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal has better clinical outcomes compared to open surgery: An international multicenter cohort study involving 502 patients
    Anwar Medellin Abueta, Nairo Javier Senejoa, Mauricio Pedraza Ciro, Lina Fory, Carlos Perez Rivera, Carlos Edmundo Martinez Jaramillo, Lina Maria Mateus Barbosa, Heinz Orlando Ibañez Varela, Javier A. Carrera, Rafael Garcia Duperly, Luis A Sanchez, Ivan D
    Health Science Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Hartmann reversal: experiences from a developing country
    Dung Anh Nguyen, Tuong-Anh Mai-Phan, Truc Thanh Thai, Hai Van Nguyen
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(4): 297.     CrossRef
  • Open versus laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yingjia Zhang, Chunxi Liu, Kameswara Rishi Yeshayahu Nistala, Choon Seng Chong
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(12): 2421.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Versus Open Hartmann Reversal: A Case-Control Study
    Paolo Panaccio, Tommaso Grottola, Rossana Percario, Federico Selvaggi, Severino Cericola, Alfonso Lapergola, Maira Farrukh, Giuseppe Di Martino, Marco Ricciardiello, Pierluigi Di Sebastiano, Fabio Francesco Di Mola, Todd Pesavento
    Surgery Research and Practice.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Laparoscopic Hartmann Reversal on Short-term Operative Outcomes Among Vietnamese Patients
    Viet Van Ung, Bang Cong Huynh, Vinh Chi Le, Dang Ngoc Tran, Trung Nguyen Vo, Tan Van Pham, Bac Hoang Nguyen
    Journal of Coloproctology.2021; 41(02): 117.     CrossRef
  • A comparative study between open versus laparoscopic Hartmann reversal
    Hye Jung Cho, Woo Ram Kim, Jong Woo Kim
    Medicine.2021; 100(47): e27976.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal reconstructions following Hartmann’s procedure: challenges and solutions
    A. N. Igolkin, V. V. Polovinkin
    Innovative medicine of Kuban.2020; (4): 51.     CrossRef
  • Emergency Hartmann’s Procedure and its Reversal: A Totally Laparoscopic 2-Step Surgery for the Treatment of Hinchey III and IV Diverticulitis
    Diletta Cassini, Michelangelo Miccini, Farshad Manoochehri, Matteo Gregori, Gianandrea Baldazzi
    Surgical Innovation.2019; 26(6): 770.     CrossRef
Chemotherapeutic Response and Survival for Patients With an Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Low Hemoglobin Levels
Ali Zain Naqvi, Esther Platt, Maki Jitsumura, Martyn Evans, Mark Coleman, Sebastian Smolarek
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):312-316.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.12
  • 3,135 View
  • 70 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Anemia is associated with poor treatment results for a variety of cancers. The effect of low hemoglobin levels on long-term outcomes after the treatment of patients with an anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains unclear. For that reason, this study aimed to investigate the effect of anemia on treatment outcomes following chemoradiation for an anal SCC.
Methods
This was a retrospective study of all patients who underwent curative treatment for an anal SCC between 2009 and 2015 at 2 trusts in the United Kingdom. Data were collated from prospectively collected cancer databases and were cross-checked with operating-room records and records in the hospitals’ patient management systems.
Results
We identified 103 patients with a median age of 63 years (range, 36–84 years). The median overall survival was 39 months (range, 9–90 months), and the disease-free survival was 36 months (range, 2–90 months). During the follow-up period, 16.5% patients died and 13.6% patients developed recurrence. Twenty-two people were anemic prior to treatment, with a female preponderance (20 of 22). No differences in disease-free survival (P = 0.74) and overall survival (P = 0.12) were noted between patients with anemia and those with normal hemoglobin levels. On regression the analysis, the combination of anemia, the presence of a defunctioning colostomy, lymph-node involvement and higher tumor stage correlated with poor overall survival.
Conclusion
In this study, anemia did not influence disease-free survival or overall survival. We suggest that the interaction between anemia and survival is more complex than previously demonstrated and potentially reliant on other coexisting factors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic and Predictive Clinical and Biological Factors in HPV Malignancies
    Shivani Sud, Ashley A. Weiner, Andrew Z. Wang, Gaorav P. Gupta, Colette J. Shen
    Seminars in Radiation Oncology.2021; 31(4): 309.     CrossRef
Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection
Mostafa Shalaby, Waleed Thabet, Oreste Buonomo, Nicola Di Lorenzo, Mosaad Morshed, Giuseppe Petrella, Mohamed Farid, Pierpaolo Sileri
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):317-321.   Published online December 20, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.18
  • 5,415 View
  • 176 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
We evaluate the role of transanal tube drainage (TD) as a conservative treatment for patients with anastomotic leakage (AL).
Methods
Patients treated for AL who had undergone a low or an ultralow anterior resection with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis for the treatment of rectal cancer between January 2013 and January 2017 were enrolled in this study. The data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcomes were the diagnosis and the management of AL.
Results
Two hundred thirteen consecutive patients, 122 males and 91 females, were included. The mean age was 66.91 ± 11.15 years, and the median body mass index was 24 kg/m2 (range, 20–35 kg/m2 ). The median tumor distance from the anal verge was 8 cm (range, 4–12 cm). Ninety-three patients (44%) received neoadjuvant therapy for nodal disease and/or locally advanced rectal cancer. Only 13 patients (6%) developed AL. Six patients developed subclinical AL as they had a defunctioning ileostomy at the time of the initial procedure. They were treated conservatively with TD under endoscopic guidance in the endoscopy unit and received intravenous antibiotics. Six weeks after discharge, these 6 patients underwent follow-up flexible sigmoidoscopy which showed a completely healed anastomotic defect with no residual stenosis. Seven patients developed a clinically significant AL and required reoperation with pelvic abscess drainage and Hartmann colostomy formation.
Conclusion
These results suggest that TD for management of patients with AL is safe, cheap, and effective. Salvaging the anastomosis will help decrease the need for Hartmann colostomy formation. Proper patient selection is important.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Challenges in the interdisciplinary treatment of leakages after left-sided colorectal surgery: endoscopic negative pressure therapy, open-pore film drainage therapy and beyond
    Pasquale Scognamiglio, Anja Seeger, Matthias Reeh, Nathaniel Melling, Karl F Karstens, Thomas Rösch, Jakob R Izbicki, Marcus Kantowski, Michael Tachezy
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Significance of information obtained during transanal drainage tube placement after anterior resection of colorectal cancer
    Yuki Okazaki, Masatsune Shibutani, Hisashi Nagahara, Tatsunari Fukuoka, Yasuhito Iseki, En Wang, Kiyoshi Maeda, Kosei Hirakawa, Masaichi Ohira, Zubing Mei
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(8): e0271496.     CrossRef
  • The usefulness of transanal tube for reducing anastomotic leak in mid rectal cancer: compared to diverting stoma
    Seok Hyeon Cho, In Kyu Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Min Ki Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2021; 100(2): 100.     CrossRef
  • Treatment Modalities for Anastomotic Leakage in Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Deborah S. Keller, K. Talboom, C.P.M van Helsdingen, Roel Hompes
    Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2021; 34(06): 431.     CrossRef
  • Retrospective study of active drainage in the management of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Xiaojie Tan, Mei Zhang, Lai Li, He Wang, Xiaodong Liu, Haitao Jiang
    Journal of International Medical Research.2021; 49(12): 030006052110659.     CrossRef
  • Improved colorectal anastomotic leakage healing by transanal rinsing treatment after endoscopic vacuum therapy using a novel patient-applied rinsing catheter
    Marcus Kantowski, Andreas Kunze, Eugen Bellon, Thomas Rösch, Utz Settmacher, Michael Tachezy
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(1): 109.     CrossRef
  • Surgical complications in colorectal cancer patients
    Haleh Pak, Leila Haji Maghsoudi, Ali Soltanian, Farshid Gholami
    Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2020; 55: 13.     CrossRef
  • Effect comparison of three different types of transanal drainage tubes after anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Yun Luo, Chang-Kang Zhu, Ding-Quan Wu, Liang-Bi Zhou, Chong-Shu Wang
    BMC Surgery.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing for the management of anastomotic leakage after upper GI surgery: a report of two clinical cases
    Yutaka Tamamori, Katsunobu Sakurai, Naoshi Kubo, Ken Yonemitsu, Yasuhiro Fukui, Junya Nishimura, Kiyoshi Maeda, Yukio Nishiguchi
    Surgical Case Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Results after Anastomotic Leakage following Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparison of Treatment with Endo-Sponge and Transanal Irrigation
    Alice Weréen, Martin Dahlberg, Göran Heinius, Emil Pieniowski, Deborah Saraste, Karolina Eklöv, Jonas Nygren, Klas Pekkari, Åsa H. Everhov
    Digestive Surgery.2020; 37(6): 456.     CrossRef
  • Preventive strategies for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resections: A review
    Mostafa Shalaby, Waleed Thabet, Mosaad Morshed, Mohamed Farid, Pierpaolo Sileri
    World Journal of Meta-Analysis.2019; 7(8): 389.     CrossRef
  • Transanal surgery: A tool in colorectal anastomotic leakage
    Pere Planellas Giné, Júlia Gil Garcia, Ramon Farrés Coll, Antoni Codina Cazador
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2019; 97(10): 590.     CrossRef
  • La cirugía transanal como herramienta en la dehiscencia de la anastomosis colorrectal
    Pere Planellas Giné, Júlia Gil Garcia, Ramon Farrés Coll, Antoni Codina Cazador
    Cirugía Española.2019; 97(10): 590.     CrossRef
Video
Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Proximal Transverse Colon Cancer With Situs Inversus Totalis: A Case Report
Seung-Seop Yeom, Kyung Hwan Kim, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):322-325.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.29.1
  • 7,033 View
  • 95 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Situs inversus is a rare hereditary disorder in which various anomalies have been reported with internal rotation abnormalities. This case involved an 85-year-old woman who had been diagnosed with transverse colon cancer and who underwent reduced-port laparoscopic surgery. All intra-abdominal organs were reversed left to right and right to left. The aberrant midcolic artery was identified during surgery. The total surgery time was 170 minutes, and the patient lost 20 mL of blood. The patient was discharged on the 8th postoperative day without complications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration to treat choledocholithiasis in situs inversus patients: A technical review
    Bo-Ya Chiu, Shu-Hung Chuang, Shih-Chang Chuang, Kung-Kai Kuo
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2023; 11(9): 1939.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic radical resection for situs inversus totalis with colonic splenic flexure carcinoma: A case report
    Zi-Ling Zheng, Shou-Ru Zhang, Hao Sun, Mao-Cai Tang, Jing-Kun Shang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(16): 5435.     CrossRef
  • MicroRNA-129-3p Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Proliferation
    Lei Kang, Dongmei Guo, Yanhai Dong, Xiaowei Chen, Chao Yuan
    Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering.2022; 12(12): 2413.     CrossRef
  • Technique for Improving the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Challenging Cases
    Giorgio Bogani, Francesco Raspagliesi
    Journal of Investigative Surgery.2021; 34(3): 334.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP