Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications Kheng-Seong Ng, Simon Joseph Gonsalves, Peter Michael Sagar World Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 25(31): 4320. CrossRef
The anorectum is a region with a very complex structure, and surgery for benign or malignant disease of the anorectum is impossible without accurate anatomical knowledge. The conjoined longitudinal muscle consists of smooth muscle from the longitudinal muscle of the rectum and the striate muscle from the levator ani and helps maintain continence; the rectourethralis muscle is connected directly to the conjoined longitudinal muscle at the top of the external anal sphincter. Preserving the rectourethralis muscle without damage to the carvernous nerve or veins passing through it when the abdominoperineal resection is implemented is important. The mesorectal fascia is a multi-layered membrane that surrounds the mesorectum. Because the autonomic nerves also pass between the mesorectal fascia and the parietal fascia, a sharp pelvic dissection must be made along the anatomic fascial plane. With the development of pelvic structure anatomy, we can understand better how we can remove the tumor and the surrounding metastatic lymph nodes without damaging the neural structure. However, because the anorectal anatomy is not yet fully understood, we hope that additional studies of anatomy will enable anorectal surgery to be performed based on complete anatomical knowledge.
Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304. CrossRef
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedure versus harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy: a comparative study for the treatment of grades III and IV hemorrhoids Ehab Loutfy, Hatem Elgohary, Mahmoud E. Elkashlan, Mohamed G. Abdelrahman, Wael Omar The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2024; 43(2): 572. CrossRef
Anatomic Basis of Rectal Cancer Staging: Clarifying Controversies and Misconceptions Harmeet Kaur, Helena Gabriel, Muhammad O. Awiwi, Ekta Maheshwari, Camila Lopes Vendrami, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Melissa W. Taggart, Michael Magnetta, Linda C. Kelahan, Sonia Lee RadioGraphics.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Anal carcinoma - exploring the epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment Kevan J English World Journal of Experimental Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Essential knowledge and technical tips for total mesorectal excision and related procedures for rectal cancer Min Soo Cho, Hyeon Woo Bae, Nam Kyu Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 384. CrossRef
MRI anatomy of the rectum: key concepts important for rectal cancer staging and treatment planning Nino Bogveradze, Petur Snaebjornsson, Brechtje A. Grotenhuis, Baukelien van Triest, Max J. Lahaye, Monique Maas, Geerard L. Beets, Regina G. H. Beets-Tan, Doenja M. J. Lambregts Insights into Imaging.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Non-Healing Perianal Fistulas: A Clinical Model of Tissue Senescence Impairing Both Tissue Fibrosis and Regenerative Potential Jason Llaneras, Caitlyn C. Belza, Samuel Eisenstein, Marek K. Dobke Biomedicines.2023; 11(2): 537. CrossRef
Anorectal Anatomy Quiz: Test Your Knowledge Megan Obi, Scott R. Steele Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 27(6): 1238. CrossRef
Technique, sedation, and clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal tumor with involvement of dentate line: A retrospective cohort study Yoon Kyoo Noh, Jun Lee, Seong Jung Kim Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(6): 365. CrossRef
Characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of anal versus rectal squamous cell carcinoma, a retrospective cohort study Sameh Hany Emile, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Peige Zhou, Victor Strassmann, Steven D. Wexner Surgery.2023; 174(3): 508. CrossRef
Low Rectal Cancers at Initial Staging MRI Matthew H. Lee, David H. Kim RadioGraphics.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Optimal Surgical techniques for curative resection of the Rectal cancer Hyeon Woo Bae, Nam Kyu Kim Formosan Journal of Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Robot-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations with rectourethral and rectovesical fistula: feasibility and short-term outcome Xiaopan Chang, Guoqing Cao, Jiarui Pu, Shuai Li, Xi Zhang, Shao-tao Tang Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(3): 1910. CrossRef
Laparoscopic repair of coccygeal hernia with biological mesh following partial coccygectomy Morgan E. Jones, Matthew Stokes, Satish K. Warrier ANZ Journal of Surgery.2022; 92(4): 912. CrossRef
Anatomy of the vesicovaginal fascia and its relation to branches of the inferior hypogastric plexus Douglas Stupart, Kylie Pickles, Chris Briggs Clinical Anatomy.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Embryology and anatomy of anorectal malformations Yuichiro Miyake, Geoffrey J. Lane, Atsuyuki Yamataka Seminars in Pediatric Surgery.2022; 31(6): 151226. CrossRef
A new membrane anatomy-oriented classification of radical surgery for rectal cancer Jiaqi Wang, Hailong Liu, Ajian Li, Huihong Jiang, Yun Pan, Xin Chen, Lu Yin, Moubin Lin Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Essential anatomy for total mesorectal excision and lateral lymph node dissection, in both trans-abdominal and trans-anal perspective Tak Lit Derek Fung, Yuichiro Tsukada, Masaaki Ito The Surgeon.2021; 19(6): e462. CrossRef
Optimal Complete Rectum Mobilization Focused on the Anatomy of the Pelvic Fascia and Autonomic Nerves: 30 Years of Experience at Severance Hospital Nam Kyu Kim, Ho Seung Kim, Mohmmed Alessa, Radwan Torky Yonsei Medical Journal.2021; 62(3): 187. CrossRef
Understanding the physiology of human defaecation and disorders of continence and evacuation Paul T. Heitmann, Paul F. Vollebregt, Charles H. Knowles, Peter J. Lunniss, Phil G. Dinning, S. Mark Scott Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2021; 18(11): 751. CrossRef
COMPERATIVE STRUCTURE OF MUCOSA COAT OF THE PIG`S AND THE HUMAN`S RECTUM Roman О. Plakhotnyi, Іryna V. Кerechanyn, Larysa Ya. Fedoniuk, Nataliia V. Kovalchuk, Oksana V. Dehtiariova, Gagandeep Singh Wiadomości Lekarskie.2021; 74(7): 1718. CrossRef
Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon Hahn Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 351. CrossRef
Surgical Treatment of Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: Updates Cristopher Varela, Nam Kyu Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 395. CrossRef
Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164. CrossRef
Prognostic Impact of Ventral Versus Dorsal Tumor Location After Total Mesorectal Excision of Rectal Cancer Clemens Franz, Hans M. Lang, Omid Ghamarnejad, Elias Khajeh, Arianeb Mehrabi, Alexis Ulrich, Martin Schneider, Markus W. Büchler, Yakup Kulu Annals of Surgical Oncology.2020; 27(2): 430. CrossRef
Physiological 18F-FDG uptake in the normal adult anal canal: evaluation by PET/CT Yankel Sena, Shunro Matsumoto, Christopher Silman, Kenichiro Otsuka, Takashige Kiyota Annals of Nuclear Medicine.2020; 34(8): 538. CrossRef
Skip lesions in perianal mucinous adenocarcinoma Nirali Shah, Michael Gates, Imran Saeed World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2020; 9(2): 32. CrossRef
Large intestine embryogenesis: Molecular pathways and related disorders (Review) Antonios Kostouros, Ioannis Koliarakis, Konstantinos Natsis, Demetrios Spandidos, Aristidis Tsatsakis, John Tsiaoussis International Journal of Molecular Medicine.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
MRI of rectal cancer—relevant anatomy and staging key points Inês Santiago, Nuno Figueiredo, Oriol Parés, Celso Matos Insights into Imaging.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
High Prevalence of Slow Transit Constipation in Patients With Gastroparesis Thomas A Zikos, Afrin N Kamal, Leila Neshatian, George Triadafilopoulos, John O Clarke, Monica Nandwani, Linda A Nguyen Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2019; 25(2): 267. CrossRef
Rectal cancer lexicon: consensus statement from the society of abdominal radiology rectal & anal cancer disease-focused panel Thomas A. Hope, Marc J. Gollub, Supreeta Arya, David D. B. Bates, Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan, Mukesh Harisinghani, Kartik S. Jhaveri, Zahra Kassam, David H. Kim, Elena Korngold, Neeraj Lalwani, Courtney C. Moreno, Stephanie Nougaret, Viktoriya Paroder, Raj Abdominal Radiology.2019; 44(11): 3508. CrossRef
Multimodality post proctologic surgery pain control Afshin Iranpour, Ramakrishna Boddapati Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2019; 30(4): 100701. CrossRef
Purpose Colostomy creation is an essential procedure for colorectal surgeons, but the preferred method of colostomy varies by surgeon. We compared the outcomes of trephine colostomy creation with open those for the (laparotomy) and laparoscopic methods and evaluated appropriate indications for a trephine colostomy and the advantages of the technique.
Methods We retrospectively evaluated 263 patients who had undergone colostomy creation by trephine, open and laparoscopic approaches between April 2006 and March 2016. We compared the clinical features and the operative and postoperative outcomes according to the approach used for stoma creation.
Results One hundred sixty-three patients (62%) underwent colostomy surgery for obstructive causes and 100 (38%) for fistulous problems. The mean operative time was significantly shorter with the trephine approach (trephine, 46.0 ± 1.9 minutes; open, 78.7 ± 3.9 minutes; laparoscopic, 63.5 ± 5.0 minutes; P < 0.001), as was the time to flatus (1.8 ± 0.1 days, 2.1 ± 0.1 days, 2.2 ± 0.3 days, P = 0.025). Postoperative complications (<30 days) were not different among the 3 approaches (trephine, 4.3%; open, 1.2%; laparoscopic, 0%; P = 0.828). In patients who underwent rectal surgery, a trephine colostomy was feasible for a diversion colostomy (P < 0.001).
Conclusion The trephine colostomy is safe and can be implemented quickly in various situations, and compared to other colostomy procedures, the patient’s recovery is faster. Previous laparotomy history was not a contraindication for a trephine colostomy, and a trephine transverse colostomy is feasible for patients who have undergone previous rectal surgery.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Non-operative management of gallstone sigmoid ileus in a patient with a prostatic cancer Ahmed M AlMuhsin, Abdulaziz Bazuhair, Omar AlKhlaiwy, Rami O Abu Hajar, Thabit Alotaibi Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of blowhole colostomy and loop ostomy for palliation of acute malignant colonic obstruction Yongjun Park, Dong Uk Choi, Hyung Ook Kim, Yong Bog Kim, Chungki Min, Jung Tack Son, Sung Ryol Lee, Kyung Uk Jung, Hungdai Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(4): 319. CrossRef
Minimally invasive colostomy with endoscopy as a novel technique for creation of a trephine stoma Teppei Kamada, Hironori Ohdaira, Junji Takahashi, Wataru Kai, Keigo Nakashima, Yuichi Nakaseko, Norihiko Suzuki, Masashi Yoshida, Yutaka Suzuki Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose The purpose of this study was to present various clinical etiologies of hypermetabolic pelvic lesions on postoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images for patients with rectal and sigmoid cancer.
Methods Postoperative PET/CT images for patients with rectal and sigmoid cancer were retrospectively reviewed to identify hypermetabolic pelvic lesions. Positive findings were detected in 70 PET/CT images from 45 patients; 2 patients who were lost to follow-up were excluded. All PET findings were analyzed in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.
Results A total of 43 patients were classified into 2 groups: patients with a malignancy including local recurrence (n = 30) and patients with other benign lesions (n = 13). Malignant lesions such as a local recurrent tumor, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and incidental uterine malignancy, as well as various benign lesions such as an anastomotic sinus, fistula, abscess, reactive lymph node, and normal ovary, were observed.
Conclusion PET/CT performed during postoperative surveillance of rectal and sigmoid colon cancer showed increased fluorodeoxyglucose uptake not only in local recurrence, but also in benign pelvic etiologies. Therefore, physicians need to be cautious about the broad clinical spectrum of hypermetabolic pelvic lesions when interpreting images.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Variants and Pitfalls in PET/CT Imaging of Gastrointestinal Cancers Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam, Viktoriya Paroder, Heiko Schöder Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.2021; 51(5): 485. CrossRef
Purpose The surgical standard of care for patients with chronic anal fissure is still disputed. We aimed to assess the natural course of idiopathic anal fissure and the long-term outcome of a fissurectomy as a surgical treatment.
Methods All consecutive patients referred to a single expert practitioner in a tertiary centre were primarily included. A fissurectomy was proposed in cases of refractory symptoms after 4 to 6 weeks of standard medical management. Only patients with idiopathic and noninfected anal fissures were included in this second subsample to undergo surgery. Conventional postoperative management was prescribed for all patients who had undergone surgery. The main outcome measures were the success rate (defined as a combination of wound healing and relief of pain) and postoperative anal continence.
Results Three hundred forty-nine patients were primarily recruited. Fifty patients finally underwent surgery for an idiopathic and noninfected fissure. Among them, 47 (94%) were cured at the end of primary follow-up, and 44 of the 47 (93.6%) could be confirmed as being sustainably cured in the longer-term follow-up. The mean time of complete healing was 10.3 weeks (range, 5.7–36.4 weeks). All patients were free of pain at weeks 42. The continence score after surgery was not statistically different from the preoperative score.
Conclusion A fissurectomy for the treatment of patients with an idiopathic noninfected fissure is associated with rapid pain relief and a high success rate even though complete healing may often be delayed. Moreover, it appears to have no adverse effect on continence.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Belgian consensus guideline on the management of anal fissures P Roelandt, G Bislenghi, G Coremans, D De Looze, M.A. Denis, H De Schepper, P Dewint, J Geldof, I Gijsen, N Komen, H Ruymbeke, J Stijns, M Surmont, D Van de Putte, S Van den Broeck, B Van Geluwe, J Wyndaele Acta Gastro Enterologica Belgica.2024; 87(2): 304. CrossRef
Use of Botulinum Toxin Injections for the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: Results From an American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Survey Daniel J. Borsuk, Adam Studniarek, John J. Park, Slawomir J. Marecik, Anders Mellgren, Kunal Kochar The American Surgeon™.2023; 89(3): 346. CrossRef
New Findings at the Internal Anal Sphincter on Cadaveric Dissection and Review of Sphincter-Related Surgery in a Newer Prospective Aswini Kumar Pujahari Indian Journal of Surgery.2023; 85(3): 585. CrossRef
Pelvic floor physical therapy in patients with chronic anal fissure: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial Daniëlle A. van Reijn-Baggen, Henk W. Elzevier, H. Putter, Rob C. M. Pelger, Ingrid J. M. Han-Geurts International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Fissurectomy with mucosal advancement flap anoplasty: The end of a dogma? M. Skoufou, J.H. Lefèvre, A. Fels, N. Fathallah, P. Benfredj, V. de Parades Journal of Visceral Surgery.2023; 160(5): 330. CrossRef
Fissurectomy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: no advantages in terms of post-operative incontinence Roberta Tutino, Casimiro Nigro, Flavia Paternostro, Rosa Federico, Giacomo Lo Secco, Gaetano Gallo, Mauro Santarelli, Gianfranco Cocorullo, Sebastiano Bonventre Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(10): 885. CrossRef
The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of anal fissure Antonio Brillantino, Adolfo Renzi, Pasquale Talento, Francesca Iacobellis, Luigi Brusciano, Luigi Monaco, Domenico Izzo, Alfredo Giordano, Michele Pinto, Corrado Fantini, Marcello Gasparrini, Michele Schiano Di Visconte, Francesca Milazzo, Giovanni Ferrer BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
La fissurectomie avec anoplastie muqueuse : la fin d’un dogme ? Maria Skoufou, Jérémie H. Lefèvre, Audrey Fels, Nadia Fathallah, Paul Benfredj, Vincent de Parades Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale.2023; 160(5): 363. CrossRef
Modified open posterior internal sphincterotomy with sliding skin graft for chronic anal fissure and anal stenosis: Low recurrence rate and no serious faecal incontinence postoperative complication Y. Iida, K. Honda, R. Iida, H. Saitou, Y. Munemoto, A. Tanaka, H. Tanaka Journal of Visceral Surgery.2022; 159(4): 267. CrossRef
Sphinctérotomie interne postérieure modifiée avec un lambeau cutané pour fissure anale et sténose anale : peu de récidives et d’incontinence anale Y. Iida, K. Honda, R. Iida, H. Saitou, Y. Munemoto, A. Tanaka, H. Tanaka Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale.2022; 159(4): 283. CrossRef
Injection of botulinum toxin significantly increases efficiency of fissurectomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures Philip Roelandt, Georges Coremans, Jan Wyndaele International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(2): 309. CrossRef
Clinical Trial Combining Botulinum Toxin A Injection and Fissurectomy for Chronic Anal Fissure: A Dose-Dependent Study Nuha Alsaleh, Abdullah I. Aljunaydil, Gaida A. Aljamili Journal of Coloproctology.2022; 42(02): 167. CrossRef
Fisurectomy and anoplasty with botulinum toxin injection in patients with chronic anal posterior fissure with hypertonia: a long-term evaluation Beatrice D’Orazio, Girolamo Geraci, Guido Martorana, Carmelo Sciumé, Giovanni Corbo, Gaetano Di Vita Updates in Surgery.2021; 73(4): 1575. CrossRef
The comparison between the medical and the surgical management of chronic anal fissures Navneet Mishra, Kamal Kishore Parmar, Tanweerul Huda Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery.2021; 6(1): 11. CrossRef
Anocutaneous advancement flap provides a quicker cure than fissurectomy in surgical treatment for chronic anal fissure—a retrospective, observational study Edgar Hancke, Katrin Suchan, Knut Voelke Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(8): 2861. CrossRef
Fissurectomy Versus Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: A Randomized Control Trial Bipin Kishore Bara, Sujit Kumar Mohanty, Satya Narayan Behera, Ashok Kumar Sahoo, Santanu Kumar Swain Cureus.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Botulinum toxin associated with fissurectomy and anoplasty for hypertonic chronic anal fissure: A case-control study Beatrice D'Orazio, Girolamo Geraci, Fausto Famà, Gloria Terranova, Gaetano Di Vita World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(32): 9722. CrossRef
Scanner-Assisted CO2 Laser Fissurectomy: A Pilot Study Iacopo Giani, Tommaso Cioppa, Chiara Linari, Filippo Caminati, Paolo Dreoni, Gianni Rossi, Cinzia Tanda, Giuseppina Talamo, Federico Bettazzi, Alessandra Aprile, Silvia Grassi, Antonella Pede, Luca Giannoni, Claudio Elbetti Frontiers in Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Fissurectomy combined with botulinum toxin A: a review of short- and long-term efficacy of this treatment strategy for chronic anal fissure; a consecutive proposal of a treatment algorithm for chronic anal fissure M. Trzpis, J. M. Klaase, R. H. Koop, P. M. A. Broens coloproctology.2020; 42(5): 400. CrossRef
Han Jo Kim, Moo-Jun Baek, Dong Hyun Kang, Sang-Cheol Lee, Sang Byung Bae, Kyu Taek Lee, Namsu Lee, Hyungjoo Kim, Dongjun Jeong, Tae Sung Ahn, Moon Soo Lee, Dae Sik Hong, Jong-Ho Won
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):88-93. Published online April 30, 2018
Purpose Animal models show a strong relationship between lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis. However, the clinical significance of lymphangiogenesis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the association between c-Met and lymphangiogenic factors and to elucidate the prognostic significance of c-Met in patients with CRC.
Methods A total of 379 tissue samples were obtained from surgically resected specimens from patients with CRC at Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital between January 2002 and December 2010. The expressions of c-Met, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C, VEGF-D, VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-3, and podoplanin were examined using immunohistochemistry. The expression of c-Met and clinical factors were analyzed.
Results Of the 379 tissues, 301 (79.4%) had c-Met expression. High expression of c-Met in tumor cells was significantly associated with high expression of VEGF-C (P < 0.001) and VEGFR-3 (P = 0.001). However, no statistically significant association with podoplanin (P = 0.587) or VEGF-D (P = 0.096) was found. Of the 103 evaluable patients, expression of c-Met in tumor cells was significantly associated with advanced clinical stage (P = 0.020), positive lymph node status (P = 0.038), and high expression of VEGF-C (P = 0.020). However, no statistically significant association with podoplanin (P = 0.518), VEGFR-3 (P = 0.085), VEGF-D (P = 0.203), or overall survival (P = 0.360) was found.
Conclusion Our results provide indirect evidence for an association and possible regulatory link of c-Met with the lymphangiogenic markers, but c-Met expression in patients with CRC is not a prognostic indicator for overall survival.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Expression Profile of Microenvironmental Factors in the Interface Zone of Colorectal Cancer: Histological-Stromal Biomarkers and Cancer Cell-Cancer-Associated Fibroblast-Related Proteins Combined for the Assessment of Tumor Progression Ricella Souza da Silva, Eduardo M. Queiroga, Cynthia de Toledo Osório, Karin S. Cunha, Fabiana P. Neves, Julieth P. Andrade, Eliane P. Dias Pathobiology.2024; 91(2): 99. CrossRef
Recent progress in the imaging of c‐Met aberrant cancers with positron emission tomography Giuseppe Floresta, Vincenzo Abbate Medicinal Research Reviews.2022; 42(4): 1588. CrossRef
Involvement of Met receptor pathway in aggressive behavior of colorectal cancer cells induced by parathyroid hormone-related peptide María Belén Novoa Díaz, Pedro Carriere, Graciela Gigola, Ariel Osvaldo Zwenger, Natalia Calvo, Claudia Gentili World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(26): 3177. CrossRef
The potential therapeutic and prognostic impacts of the c‐MET/HGF signaling pathway in colorectal cancer Seyed Mostafa Parizadeh, Reza Jafarzadeh‐Esfehani, Danial Fazilat‐Panah, Seyed Mahdi Hassanian, Soodabeh Shahidsales, Majid Khazaei, Seyed Mohammad Reza Parizadeh, Majid Ghayour‐Mobarhan, Gordon A. Ferns, Amir Avan IUBMB Life.2019; 71(7): 802. CrossRef
Purpose Small bowel obstruction (SBO) remains a common complication after pelvic or abdominal surgery. However, the risk factors for SBO in ulcerative colitis (UC) surgery are not well known. The aim of the present study was to clarify the risk factors associated with SBO after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) with a loop ileostomy for patients with UC.
Methods The medical records of 96 patients who underwent IPAA for UC between 1999 and 2011 were reviewed. SBO was confirmed based on the presence of clinical symptoms and radiographic findings. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the SBO group and the non-SBO group. We also analyzed the relationship between SBO and computed tomography (CT) scan image parameters.
Results The study included 49 male and 47 female patients. The median age was 35.5 years (range, 14–72 years). We performed a 2- or 3-stage procedure as a total proctocolectomy and IPAA for patients with UC. SBO in the pretakedown of the loop ileostomy after IPAA occurred in 22 patients (22.9%). Moreover, surgical intervention for SBO was required for 11 patients. In brief, closure of the loop ileostomy was performed earlier than expected. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the 2-stage procedure (odds ratio, 2.850; 95% confidence interval, 1.009–8.044; P = 0.048) was a significant independent risk factor associated with SBO. CT scan image parameters were not significant risk factors of SBO.
Conclusion The present study suggests that a 2-stage procedure is a significant risk factor associated with SBO after IPAA in patients with UC.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Risk Factors for Stoma Outlet Obstruction after Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis Keisuke Ihara, Takatoshi Nakamura, Masashi Takayanagi, Junki Fujita, Yasunori Maeda, Yusuke Nishi, Norisuke Shibuya, Hiroyuki Hachiya, Mitsuru Ishizuka, Keiichi Tominaga, Kazuyuki Kojima, Atsushi Irisawa Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(1): 18. CrossRef
Association Between Advanced T Stage and Thick Rectus Abdominis Muscle and Outlet Obstruction and High-Output Stoma After Ileostomy in Patients With Rectal Cancer Yasuhiro Komatsu, Kunitoshi Shigeyasu, Sho Takeda, Yoshiko Mori, Kazutaka Takahashi, Nanako Hata, Kokichi Miyamoto, Hibiki Umeda, Yoshihiko Kakiuchi, Satoru Kikuchi, Shuya Yano, Shinji Kuroda, Yoshitaka Kondo, Hiroyuki Kishimoto, Fuminori Teraishi, Masahi International Surgery.2022; 106(3): 102. CrossRef
Obstructive and secretory complications of diverting ileostomy Shingo Tsujinaka, Hideyuki Suzuki, Tomoya Miura, Yoshihiro Sato, Chikashi Shibata World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(47): 6732. CrossRef
Risk factors and management of stoma-related obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal surgery with diverting ileostomy Ryo Maemoto, Shingo Tsujinaka, Yasuyuki Miyakura, Rintaro Fukuda, Nao Kakizawa, Tsutomu Takenami, Erika Machida, Nozomi Kikuchi, Rina Kanemitsu, Sawako Tamaki, Hideki Ishikawa, Toshiki Rikiyama Asian Journal of Surgery.2021; 44(8): 1037. CrossRef
RISK FACTORS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLICATIONS OF ILEAL POUCH IN PATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS S. I. Achkasov, O. I. Sushkov, A. E. Kulikov, Sh. A. Binnatli, M. A. Nagudov, A. V. Vardanyan Koloproktologia.2020; 19(1): 51. CrossRef
A Common Complication After an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis With a Loop Ileostomy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Small Bowel Obstruction Chang-Nam Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(2): 57. CrossRef
Elevated risk of stoma outlet obstruction following colorectal surgery in patients undergoing ileal pouch–anal anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study Satoshi Okada, Keisuke Hata, Shigenobu Emoto, Koji Murono, Manabu Kaneko, Kazuhito Sasaki, Kensuke Otani, Takeshi Nishikawa, Toshiaki Tanaka, Kazushige Kawai, Hiroaki Nozawa Surgery Today.2018; 48(12): 1060. CrossRef
We present a patient diagnosed with skin sarcoidosis, breast cancer, pulmonary tuberculosis, and peritoneal sarcoidosis with a past history of colorectal cancer. During stage work up for breast cancer, suspicious lesions on peritoneum were observed in imaging studies. Considering our patient’s history and imaging findings, we initially suspected peritoneal carcinomatosis. However, the peritoneal lesion was diagnosed as sarcoidosis in laparoscopic biopsy. This case demonstrates that abdominal sarcoidosis might be considered as a differential diagnosis when there is a lesion suspected of being peritoneal carcinomatosis with nontypical clinical presentations.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Spontaneous remission of peritoneal sarcoidosis Yosuke Kamiya, Keigo Koda, Mikio Toyoshima, Hitoshi Sumida, Naoko Funai, Takafumi Suda The Japanese Journal of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders.2023; 43(1_2): 112. CrossRef
Rectal cancer combined with abdominal tuberculosis: A case report Pei-Gen Liu, Xiang-Fan Chen, Pan-Feng Feng World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(31): 11523. CrossRef
Hypercalcemia and Acute Renal Failure Indicating Peritoneal Sarcoidosis Claude Bachmeyer, Nicolas Belaube, Valeria Loi, Dominique Wendum, Mathieu Gauthé, Jean Philippe Haymann The American Journal of Medicine.2021; 134(12): e571. CrossRef
Non-neoplastic conditions mimicking peritoneal carcinomatosis at CT imaging Mohab M Elmohr, Khaled M Elsayes, Perry J Pickhardt The British Journal of Radiology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
The intrauterine device (IUD) is a widely used contraceptive method. One of the most serious and rare complications of using an IUD is colon perforation. We report a case of colonoscopic removal of an IUD that had perforated into the rectosigmoid colon in a 42-year-old woman who presented with no symptoms. Colonoscopy showed that the IUD had penetrated into rectosigmoid colon wall and that an arm of the IUD was embedded in the colon wall. We were able to remove the IUD easily by using colonoscopy. The endoscopic approach may be considered the first choice therapy for selected patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Endoscopic Removal of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device From the Descending Colon: A Case Report Muhammad Shabbir, Mishal A Aljohani, Abdurahman Alfaiz, Msab Aldakheel, Zeeshan Ali Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Colonoscopic removal of an intrauterine device with rectal perforation: A case report Lingrun Ye, Yuanyuan Zhu, Fanglai Zhu Medicine.2024; 103(28): e38872. CrossRef
Is It a “Colon Perforation”? A Case Report and Review of the Literature Shuangshuang Lu, Xinyu Yao, Jun Shi, Jian Huang, Shaohua Zhuang, Junfang Ma, Yan Liu, Wei Zhang, Lifei Yu, Ping Zhu, Qiuwei Zhu, Ruxia Shi, Hong Zheng, Dong Shao, Yuyan Pan, Shizhen Bao, Li Qin, Lijie Huang, Wenjia Liu, Jin Huang Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic removal of an intrauterine device from the lumen of the sigmoid colon V. V. Bereshchenko, D. V. Lazarevich, N. N. Goncharov, P. V. Khodanovich Health and Ecology Issues.2022; 19(1): 145. CrossRef
Incomplete Removal of an Intrauterine Device Perforating the Sigmoid Colon Junseak Lee, Jung Hwan Oh, Jinsu Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim, Sung Hoon Jung The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 78(1): 48. CrossRef
Endoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device: Case Report and Review of Literature and Technique Yang Lei, Vadim Iablakov, Riaz J. Karmali, Nauzer Forbes ACG Case Reports Journal.2019; 6(6): e00090. CrossRef