Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Previous issues

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Previous issues
8 Previous issues
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Authors
Volume 33(2); April 2017
Prev issue Next issue
Editorials
Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery After Chemoradiotherapy: Widening Scope of Indications for Local Excision
Min Jung Kim, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(2):43-43.   Published online April 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.2.43
  • 2,713 View
  • 27 Download
PDF
Mucinous Subtype in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
Hyung Jin Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(2):44-45.   Published online April 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.2.44
  • 3,182 View
  • 44 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Survival after curative resection for stage I colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma
    Liang Huang, Shuangling Luo, Sicong Lai, Zhanzhen Liu, Huanxin Hu, Mian Chen, Liang Kang
    BMC Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
Review
Synthetic Versus Biological Mesh-Related Erosion After Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy: A Systematic Review
Andrea Balla, Silvia Quaresima, Sebastian Smolarek, Mostafa Shalaby, Giulia Missori, Pierpaolo Sileri
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(2):46-51.   Published online April 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.2.46
  • 6,327 View
  • 128 Download
  • 42 Web of Science
  • 38 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This review reports the incidence of mesh-related erosion after ventral mesh rectopexy to determine whether any difference exists in the erosion rate between synthetic and biological mesh.

Methods

A systematic search of the MEDLINE and the Ovid databases was conducted to identify suitable articles published between 2004 and 2015. The search strategy capture terms were laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, laparoscopic anterior rectopexy, robotic ventral rectopexy, and robotic anterior rectopexy.

Results

Eight studies (3,956 patients) were included in this review. Of those patients, 3,517 patients underwent laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) using synthetic mesh and 439 using biological mesh. Sixty-six erosions were observed with synthetic mesh (26 rectal, 32 vaginal, 8 recto-vaginal fistulae) and one (perineal erosion) with biological mesh. The synthetic and the biological mesh-related erosion rates were 1.87% and 0.22%, respectively. The time between rectopexy and diagnosis of mesh erosion ranged from 1.7 to 124 months. No mesh-related mortalities were reported.

Conclusion

The incidence of mesh-related erosion after LVR is low and is more common after the placement of synthetic mesh. The use of biological mesh for LVR seems to be a safer option; however, large, multicenter, randomized, control trials with long follow-ups are required if a definitive answer is to be obtained.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Ventral mesh rectopexy for recurrent rectal prolapse after Altemeier perineal proctosigmoidectomy: feasibility and outcomes
    Lukas Schabl, Tracy Hull, Kamil Erozkan, Ali Alipouriani, Kristen A. Ban, Scott R. Steele, Anna R. Spivak
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Treatment of complete rectal prolapse using the TEO® platform (transanal endoscopic operation) – a video vignette
    Antonio D'Urso, Alfonso Lapergola, Jacques Marescaux, Didier Mutter, Xavier Serra‐Aracil
    Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(4): 820.     CrossRef
  • Now is the time to establish a registry for mesh rectopexy
    Yui Kaneko, Corina Behrenbruch, James Keck
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(7-8): 1209.     CrossRef
  • Anatomic and functional results of ventral biological mesh rectopexy for posterior pelvic floor disorders
    F. Rogier-Mouzelas, F. Drissi, J. Podevin, E. Duchalais, G. Meurette
    Journal of Visceral Surgery.2023; 160(3): 188.     CrossRef
  • Building a Multidisciplinary Pelvic Floor Clinic: Why Bother?
    Alison Hainsworth, Linda Ferrari, Sachin Malde, Lucia Berry
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2023; 34(1): 100933.     CrossRef
  • Management of full thickness rectal prolapse
    Charlotte M. Rajasingh, Brooke H. Gurland
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2023; 34(1): 100938.     CrossRef
  • Résultats anatomiques et fonctionnels de la rectopexie ventrale avec renfort par bio-prothèse pour trouble de la statique rectale
    F. Rogier-Mouzelas, F. Drissi, J. Podevin, E. Duchalais, G. Meurette
    Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale.2023; 160(3): 203.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Modified Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse
    Rina Takahashi, Tetsuo Yamana, Risa Nishio, Kazuhiro Sakamoto, Shuko Nojiri, Kiichi Sugimoto
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2023; 7(2): 102.     CrossRef
  • Comparing the Outcomes and Complication Rates of Biologic vs Synthetic Meshes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Nathan Makarewicz, David Perrault, Ayushi Sharma, Mohammed Shaheen, Jessica Kim, Christian Calderon, Brian Sweeney, Rahim Nazerali
    Annals of Plastic Surgery.2023; 90(5): 516.     CrossRef
  • Current diagnostic tools and treatment modalities for rectal prolapse
    Mustafa Oruc, Timucin Erol
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2023; 11(16): 3680.     CrossRef
  • Moving from Laparoscopic Synthetic Mesh to Robotic Biological Mesh for Ventral Rectopexy: Results from a Case Series
    Farouk Drissi, Fabien Rogier-Mouzelas, Sebastian Fernandez Arias, Juliette Podevin, Guillaume Meurette
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(17): 5751.     CrossRef
  • Robotic mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: The Geneva technique—A video vignette
    Jeremy Meyer, Emilie Liot, Vaihere Delaune, Alexandre Balaphas, Bruno Roche, Guillaume Meurette, Frédéric Ris
    Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(12): 2469.     CrossRef
  • The international variability of surgery for rectal prolapse
    Jesse K Kelley, Edward R Hagen, Brooke Gurland, Andrew RL Stevenson, James W Ogilvie
    BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies.2023; 5(1): e000198.     CrossRef
  • Trends in the surgical management of rectal prolapse: An Asian experience
    Yvonne Ying‐Ru Ng, Emile John Kwong Wei Tan, Cherylin Wan Pei Fu
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2022; 15(1): 110.     CrossRef
  • Mesh-related complications and recurrence after ventral mesh rectopexy with synthetic versus biologic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    E. M. van der Schans, M. A. Boom, M. El Moumni, P. M. Verheijen, I. A. M. J. Broeders, E. C. J. Consten
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2022; 26(2): 85.     CrossRef
  • Case series of mesh migration after rectopexy surgery for rectal prolapse
    Omar Marghich, Benjamin Benichou, Efoé-Ga Yawod Olivier Amouzou, Alexandre Maubert, Jean Hubert Etienne, Emmanuel Benizri, Mohamed Amine Rahili
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mesh erosion into the rectum after laparoscopic posterior rectopexy: A case report
    Shun Yamanaka, Tsuyoshi Enomoto, Shoko Moue, Yohei Owada, Yusuke Ohara, Tatsuya Oda
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 95: 107136.     CrossRef
  • Patients’ Perception of Long-term Outcome After Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy; Single Tertiary Center Experience
    Sandeep Singh, Keshara Ratnatunga, Roel Bolckmans, Naeem Iqbal, Oliver Jones, Ian Lindsey, Kim Gorissen, Chris Cunningham
    Annals of Surgery.2022; 276(5): e459.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic posterior rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse
    Senthil Kumar Ganapathi, Rajapandian Subbiah, Sathiyamoorthy Rudramurthy, Harish Kakkilaya, Parthasarathi Ramakrishnan, Palanivelu Chinnusamy
    Journal of Minimal Access Surgery.2022; 18(2): 295.     CrossRef
  • Polyvinylidene Fluoride Mesh Use in Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy in Patients with Obstructive Defecation Syndrome for the First Time
    Mahdi Alemrajabi, Behnam Darabi, Behrouz Banivaheb, Nima Hemmati, Sepideh Jahanian, Mohammad Moradi
    Journal of Investigative Surgery.2021; 34(10): 1083.     CrossRef
  • Ventral Rectopexy
    Kenneth C. Loh, Konstantin Umanskiy
    Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2021; 34(01): 062.     CrossRef
  • Thulium laser to endoscopically manage a rectal erosion and intraluminal mesh migration after ventral rectopexy
    Lorenzo Dioscoridi, Francesco Pugliese, Camillo Leonardo Bertoglio, Massimiliano Mutignani
    BMJ Case Reports.2021; 14(1): e235807.     CrossRef
  • Operationstechniken aus viszeralchirurgischer Sicht
    Mia Kim
    coloproctology.2021; 43(5): 314.     CrossRef
  • Suture rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for complete full-thickness rectal prolapse and intussusception: systematic review and meta-analysis
    H S Lobb, C C Kearsey, S Ahmed, R Rajaganeshan
    BJS Open.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of a Novel Absorbable Mesh in a Porcine Model of Abdominal Wall Repair
    Alexei S. Mlodinow, Ketan Yerneni, Michelle E. Hasse, Todd Cruikshank, Markian J. Kuzycz, Marco F. Ellis
    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open.2021; 9(5): e3529.     CrossRef
  • Approaching Combined Rectal and Vaginal Prolapse
    Shannon Wallace, Brooke Gurland
    Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2021; 34(05): 302.     CrossRef
  • What happens to the biological prosthesis implanted during laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy? – a video vignette
    A. Di Leo, J. Andreuccetti
    Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(11): 1754.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive organ‐preserving approaches in the management of mesh erosion after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy
    K. Ratnatunga, S. Singh, R. Bolckmans, S. Goodbrand, K. Gorissen, O. Jones, I. Lindsey, C. Cunningham
    Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(11): 1642.     CrossRef
  • Position statement by the Pelvic Floor Society on behalf of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland on the use of mesh in ventral mesh rectopexy
    M. A. Mercer‐Jones, S. R. Brown, C. H. Knowles, A. B. Williams
    Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(10): 1429.     CrossRef
  • Outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness external rectal prolapse: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of the predictors for recurrence
    Sameh Hany Emile, Hossam Elfeki, Mostafa Shalaby, Ahmad Sakr, Pierpaolo Sileri, Steven D. Wexner
    Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(8): 2444.     CrossRef
  • Ventral rectopexy with biological mesh for recurrent disorders of the posterior pelvic organ compartment
    M. Brunner, H. Roth, K. Günther, R. Grützmann, Klaus E. Matzel
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(10): 1763.     CrossRef
  • Ventral rectopexy with biological mesh: short-term functional results
    M. Brunner, H. Roth, K. Günther, R. Grützmann, K. E. Matzel
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2018; 33(4): 449.     CrossRef
  • Short‐ and long‐term clinical and patient‐reported outcomes following laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy using biological mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective cohort study of 224 consecutive patients
    R. McLean, M. Kipling, E. Musgrave, M. Mercer‐Jones
    Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(5): 424.     CrossRef
  • Chirurgische Therapie des Rektumprolapses
    J. Hardt, P. Kienle
    coloproctology.2018; 40(3): 187.     CrossRef
  • Chirurgische Therapie beim Rektumprolaps
    A. J. Kroesen
    coloproctology.2018; 40(3): 181.     CrossRef
  • A Delorme operation for full‐thickness complete rectal prolapse – a video vignette
    W. Omar, H. Elfeki, M. A. Abdel‐Razik, M. Shalaby
    Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(12): 1156.     CrossRef
  • Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse
    G. Gallo, J. Martellucci, G. Pellino, R. Ghiselli, A. Infantino, F. Pucciani, M. Trompetto
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2018; 22(12): 919.     CrossRef
  • Erosion after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy with a biological mesh
    M. Shalaby, A. Matarangolo, I. Capuano, G. Petrella, P. Sileri
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2017; 21(12): 985.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Transanal Minimally-Invasive Surgery for Treating Patients With Regressed Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
Byoung Chul Lee, Seonok Oh, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(2):52-56.   Published online April 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.2.52
  • 4,031 View
  • 69 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Although the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer managed by preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a radical resection, local excisions are used in highly-selective cases. Recently, transanal minimally-invasive surgery (TAMIS) has emerged as a feasible technique for local excision of midrectal lesions. We assess the feasibility of using TAMIS to treat patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who showed good response to CRT.

Methods

From October 2010 to June 2013, 35 consecutive patients with rectal cancer managed by using preoperative CRT underwent TAMIS. After a single-incision laparoscopic surgery port had been introduced into the anal canal, a full-thickness local excision with conventional laparoscopic instruments was performed. We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of these cases.

Results

Of the 35 patients analyzed, 18 showed pathologic complete responses and 17 had residual lesions (2 ypTis, 4 ypT1, 9 ypT2, and 2 ypT3); 34 (97.1%) showed clear deep, lateral margins. The median distance of lesions from the anal verge was 5 cm. All procedures were completed laparoscopically, and the median operating time was 84 minutes. No intraoperative events or morbidities were seen in any of the patients, except one with wound dehiscence, who was treated conservatively. The median postoperative hospital stay and follow-up period were 4 days and 36 months, respectively. During the study period, no patients died, but 5 (14.3%) experienced recurrence, including one recurrence at the TAMIS site.

Conclusion

TAMIS seems to be a feasible, safe modality for treating patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who show good response to preoperative CRT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early rectal cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Sung Hwan Cho, Byung-Soo Park, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Bum Park, Hyung Wook Kim, Sang Bo Oh, Tae Un Kim, Dong Hoon Shin
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Treatment of a Completely Obstructed Rectal Anastomosis by Using a Transanal Plasmakinetic Resectoscope: a Case Report and Review of Literature
    Na Wang, Daguang Wang, Weihua Tong, Jinguo Wang
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2021; 83(5): 1127.     CrossRef
  • Transanal minimally invasive surgery using laparoscopic instruments of the rectum: A review
    Myung Jo Kim, Taek-Gu Lee
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2021; 13(10): 1149.     CrossRef
  • Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Promising Alternative for Certain Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients
    Hernan A. Sanchez-Trejo, Daniel Hakakian, Terrence Curran, Luca Antonioli, Balazs Csoka, Zoltan H. Nemeth
    Journal of Investigative Surgery.2019; 32(4): 377.     CrossRef
  • Transanal minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for a completely occluded anastomosis after low anterior resection: A new approach to severe anastomotic stenosis
    Jun Woo Bong, Seok‐Byung Lim
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2019; 12(2): 175.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of pT2 rectal cancer spread and recurrence pattern: Implications for target design in radiation therapy for organ preservation
    Joanna Socha, Lucyna Pietrzak, Anna Zawadzka, Anna Paciorkiewicz, Anna Krupa, Krzysztof Bujko
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2019; 133: 20.     CrossRef
  • Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery After Chemoradiotherapy: Widening Scope of Indications for Local Excision
    Min Jung Kim, Jae Hwan Oh
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(2): 43.     CrossRef
Prognostic Significance of Mucinous Histologic Subtype on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
Sare Hosseini, Ali Mohammad Bananzadeh, Roham Salek, Mohammad Zare-Bandamiri, Ali Taghizadeh Kermani, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(2):57-63.   Published online April 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.2.57
  • 4,614 View
  • 50 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 12 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Mucinous adenocarcinomas account for about 10% of all colorectal cancers. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of mucinous histologic subtype on oncologic outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

This retrospective study was performed at two large tertiary university hospitals. We analyzed the characteristics, prognostic factors, and survival of patients with colorectal cancer who were treated and followed up between 2000 and 2013.

Results

Totally, 144 of 1,268 patients with a colorectal adenocarcinoma (11.4%) had mucinous histologic subtype. Statistically significant results found in this research are as follows: Mucinous histologic subtype tended to present in younger patients and to have larger tumor size, higher histologic grade, higher node stage, larger number of positive nodes, and higher rate of perineural invasion compared to nonmucinous histologic subtype. On the univariate analysis, mucinous subtype was a prognostic factor for disease-free and overall survival. On the multivariate analysis, primary tumor location, node stage and lymphatic-vascular invasion were independent prognostic factors for the local control rate. Rectal tumor location, higher disease stage, tumor grade II, and presence of lymphatic-vascular invasion had negative influences on disease-free survival, as did rectal tumor location, higher disease stage and presence of lymphatic-vascular invasion on overall survival.

Conclusion

Mucinous histologic subtype was associated with some adverse pathologic features in patients with colorectal cancer; however, it was not an independent prognostic factor for oncologic outcome.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinicopathological and prognostic features of colorectal mucinous adenocarcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiao Wang, Haoran Wang, Haoqing He, Kai Lv, Wenguang Yuan, Jingbo Chen, Hui Yang
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multi gene mutation signatures in colorectal cancer patients: predict for the diagnosis, pathological classification, staging and prognosis
    Yan Zhuang, Hailong Wang, Da Jiang, Ying Li, Lixia Feng, Caijuan Tian, Mingyu Pu, Xiaowei Wang, Jiangyan Zhang, Yuanjing Hu, Pengfei Liu
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological Features and Survival of Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma and Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of Right Colon, Left Colon, and Rectum
    Lili Zhu, Chunrun Ling, Tao Xu, Jinglin Zhang, Yujie Zhang, Yingjie Liu, Chao Fang, Lie Yang, Wen Zhuang, Rui Wang, Jie Ping, Mojin Wang
    Pathology and Oncology Research.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Identification of Potential Biomarkers and Biological Pathways for Poor Clinical Outcome in Mucinous Colorectal Adenocarcinoma
    Chang Woo Kim, Jae Myung Cha, Min Seob Kwak
    Cancers.2021; 13(13): 3280.     CrossRef
  • Clinical significance of mucinous component in colorectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched study
    Chuanwang Yan, Hui Yang, Lili Chen, Ran Liu, Wei Shang, Wenguang Yuan, Fei Yang, Qing Sun, Lijian Xia
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Incidence and prognosis of pulmonary metastasis in colorectal cancer: a population-based study
    Yizhi Ge, Shijun Lei, Bo Cai, Xiang Gao, Guobin Wang, Lin Wang, Zheng Wang
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(2): 223.     CrossRef
  • Association between aberrant dynein cytoplasmic�1 light intermediate chain�1 expression levels, mucins and chemosensitivity in colorectal cancer
    Chun‑Chao Chang, Kuo‑Ching Chao, Chi‑Jung Huang, Chih‑Sheng Hung, Yen‑Chieh Wang
    Molecular Medicine Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical impact of non-predominant histopathological subtypes on the long-term prognosis of colorectal cancer patients in Japan
    Heita Ozawa, Shinichi Yamauchi, Hiroki Nakanishi, Junichi Sakamoto, Shin Fujita, Kenichi Sugihara
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(12): 2257.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Significance of Mucinous Histology on Pathologic Complete Response Rate Following Capecitabine-Based Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer: a Comparative Study
    Sare Hosseini, NamPhong Nguyen, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah, Sepideh Mirzaei, Ali Mohammad Bananzadeh
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2019; 50(4): 716.     CrossRef
  • Impact of histological subtype on the prognosis of patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer
    Fabio Bagante, Gaya Spolverato, Eliza Beal, Katiuscha Merath, Qinyu Chen, Ozgür Akgül, Robert A. Anders, Timothy M. Pawlik
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 117(7): 1355.     CrossRef
  • SCF/c-KIT Signaling Increased Mucin2 Production by Maintaining Atoh1 Expression in Mucinous Colorectal Adenocarcinoma
    Ping Shen, Shu Yang, Haimei Sun, Guilan Li, Bo Wu, Fengqing Ji, Tingyi Sun, Deshan Zhou
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2018; 19(5): 1541.     CrossRef
  • Mucinous Subtype in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
    Hyung Jin Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(2): 44.     CrossRef
Laparoscopic Vaginal Suspension and Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse
Shi-Jun Yang, Seo-Gue Yoon, Ki-Yun Lim, Jong-Kyun Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(2):64-69.   Published online April 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.2.64
  • 5,479 View
  • 93 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Laparoscopic procedures for the treatment of patients with a rectal prolapse have gained increasing worldwide acceptance because they have lower recurrence and better functional outcome than perineal procedures. Nevertheless, ideal surgical methods are still not available. We propose a new surgical technique, laparoscopic vaginal suspension and rectopexy, for correcting a full-thickness rectal prolapse and/or middle-compartment prolapse. This study assessed the short-term outcomes for patients who underwent laparoscopic vaginal suspension and rectopexy.

Methods

Between April 2014 and April 2016, 69 female patients underwent laparoscopic vaginal suspension and rectopexy to correct a rectal prolapse. Demographics, medical histories, and surgical and follow-up details were collected from their medical records. In addition to the clinical outcome, we repeated defecation proctography and a questionnaire regarding functional results three months after surgery.

Results

No major morbidities or no mortalities occurred. The defecation proctography confirmed excellent anatomical result in all cases. Of 7 patients with combined middle-compartment prolapses, we observed good anatomical correction. During follow-up, full-thickness recurrence occurred in one patient. Preoperative fecal incontinence was improved significantly at 3 months (mean Wexner score: 12.35 vs. 7.71; mean FISI: 33.29 vs. 21.07; P < 0.001). Analysis of responses to the fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQOL) questionnaire showed overall improvement at 3 months compared to the preoperative baseline (mean pre- and postoperative FIQOL scores: 12.11 vs. 14.39; P < 0.004).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic vaginal suspension and rectopexy is a new combined procedure for the treatment of patients with rectal prolapses. It has excellent functional outcomes and minimal morbidity and can correct and prevent middlecompartment prolapses.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Surgical and Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic Vaginal Suspension Combined with Suture Rectopexy for Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Mohamed I. Abuelnasr, Ahmed M. F. Salama, Ahmed M. Nawar
    Journal of Coloproctology.2024; 44(01): e1.     CrossRef
  • Modified robotic ventral rectopexy with folded single titanized mesh suspension for the treatment of complex pelvic organ prolapse
    Bernardina Fabiani, Alessandro Sturiale, Lisa Fralleone, Claudia Menconi, Vittorio d'Adamo, Gabriele Naldini
    Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(3): 453.     CrossRef
  • Natural Orifice Transanal Endoscopic Rectopexy for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Prospective Evolution of a New Technique and Short-term Outcomes
    Abhijit Chandra, Pritheesh Rajan, Vivek Gupta, Saket Kumar, Mahesh Rajashekhara, Ravi Patel, Bharat Sangal, Vikram Singh
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(1): 118.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of feasibility of abdominal mesh vaginorectopexy in the repair of multiple pelvic organ prolapse
    Mohamed Mazloum Zakareya, Walid Galal Elshazly, Ahmed Mohamed Moaz, Bassem Khamis Hegazy
    Alexandria Journal of Medicine.2023; 59(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • A quantitative study to explore functional outcomes following laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse
    O Olatunbode, S Rangarajan, V Russell, YKS Viswanath, A Reddy
    The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.2022; 104(6): 449.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative complications and pelvic organ prolapse recurrence following combined pelvic organ prolapse and rectal prolapse surgery compared with pelvic organ prolapse only surgery
    Shannon L. Wallace, Youngwu Kim, Erica Lai, Shailja Mehta, Bertille Gaigbe-Togbe, Chiyuan Amy Zhang, Emily C. Von Bargen, Eric R. Sokol
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2022; 227(2): 317.e1.     CrossRef
  • A Collaborative Approach to Multicompartment Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Brooke Gurland, Kavita Mishra
    Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2021; 34(01): 069.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative complications and recurrence rates after rectal prolapse surgery versus combined rectal prolapse and pelvic organ prolapse surgery
    Shannon L. Wallace, Ekene A. Enemchukwu, Kavita Mishra, Leila Neshatian, Bertha Chen, Lisa Rogo-Gupta, Eric R. Sokol, Brooke H. Gurland
    International Urogynecology Journal.2021; 32(9): 2401.     CrossRef
  • European Society of Coloproctology guidance on the use of mesh in the pelvis in colorectal surgery
    Yasuko Maeda, Eloy Espin‐Basany, Kim Gorissen, Mia Kim, Paul‐Antoine Lehur, Lilli Lundby, Ionut Negoi, Gregor Norcic, P. Ronan O’Connell, Tero Rautio, Bart van Geluwe, Gabrielle H. van Ramshorst, Andrea Warwick, Carolynne J. Vaizey
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(9): 2228.     CrossRef
  • Transvaginal rectopexy using the Flex® Colorectal Drive Robotic System: a proof-of-concept approach to rectal prolapse
    J. O. Paull, A. Graham, S. Parascandola, S. Hota, S. Stein, B. Umapathi, A. Abdullah, N. Pudalov, V. Obias
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2020; 24(5): 471.     CrossRef
  • Clinical efficacy of integral theory–guided laparoscopic integral pelvic floor/ligament repair in the treatment of internal rectal prolapse in females
    Yang Yang, Yong-Li Cao, Yuan-Yao Zhang, Shou-Sen Shi, Wei-Wei Yang, Nan Zhao, Bing-Bing Lyu, Wen-Li Zhang, Dong Wei
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2020; 8(23): 5873.     CrossRef
  • Clinical efficacy of integral theory–guided laparoscopic integral pelvic floor/ligament repair in the treatment of internal rectal prolapse in females
    Yang Yang, Yong-Li Cao, Yuan-Yao Zhang, Shou-Sen Shi, Wei-Wei Yang, Nan Zhao, Bing-Bing Lyu, Wen-Li Zhang, Dong Wei
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2020; 8(23): 5876.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Outcome and Surgical Technique of Laparoscopic Posterior Rectopexy Using the Mesh With Anti-adhesion Coating
    Yasunori Matsuda, Masahiro Nishikawa, Satoshi Nishizawa, Yoshinori Yane, Hokuto Ushijima, Taigo Tokuhara
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2019; 29(4): e41.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Delorme-Thiersch Operation Outcomes in Men and Women With Rectal Prolapse
    Keehoon Hyun, Seo-Gue Yoon
    Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(5): 262.     CrossRef
Case Reports
Multiple Myeloma Mimics Bone Metastasis From a Rectal Adenocarcinoma
Im-Kyung Kim, Jeonghyun Kang, Yu Ri Kim, Tae Joo Jeon, Seung Hyuk Baik, Seung-Kook Sohn
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(2):70-73.   Published online April 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.2.70
  • 3,795 View
  • 35 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

A presumptive diagnosis of bone metastasis can be easily made when a patient with a history of colorectal cancer develops bone lesions that are seen on follow-up imaging. In this case report, we describe a patient whose multiple bone lesions were wrongly attributed to a recurrence of rectal cancer rather than being identified as multiple myeloma lesions. When clinicians detect new, abnormal, bony lesions in a patient with a previous history of cancer, they should consider diseases such as multiple myeloma in their differential diagnosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Capecitabine/fluorouracil/oxaliplatin

    Reactions Weekly.2017; 1661(1): 71.     CrossRef
Pulmonary Sarcoidosis That Developed During the Treatment of a Patient With Crohn Disease by Using Infliximab
Tae Kyun Kim, Sun Hyung Kang, Hee Seok Moon, Jae Kyu Sung, Hyun Yong Jeong, Hyuk Soo Eun
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(2):74-77.   Published online April 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.2.74
  • 3,948 View
  • 54 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

For inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), antitumor necrosis factor treatment offers a new direction for both patients and medical doctors. This treatment has dramatically improved the quality of life for patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease (CD). However, with increasing usage and longer follow-up periods, a wider range of possible adverse effects may be encountered. We report an unusual case of pulmonary sarcoidosis developed during the treatment of a patient with CD by using infliximab. A 30-year-old male who had been treated for CD with infliximab for 18 months was admitted due to abnormal opacities on chest radiography. Chest computed tomography displayed clustered small nodules in both lobes and enlarged multiple lymph nodes. The patient was diagnosed with sarcoidosis from the results of a biopsy of the subcarinal lymph node. Lung lesions were improved five months after infliximab was stopped.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Persistent Constitutional Symptoms and Cholestasis During Anti-TNF Therapy as a Harbinger of a Surprising Condition
    Julio Maria Fonseca Chebli, Rogerio Khalil Akkari Evangelista, Liliana Andrade Chebli
    Gastroenterology.2024; 166(2): e1.     CrossRef
  • Sarcoidosis: federal clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment
    A. G. Chuchalin, S. N. Avdeev, Z. R. Aisanov, O. P. Baranova, S. E. Borisov, N. A. Geppe, A. A. Vizel’, I. Yu. Vizel’, A. A. Zaicev, N. Y. Kravchenko, M. M. Ilkovich, O. V. Lovacheva, A. B. Malakhov, A. G. Malyavin, D. V. Petrov, V. V. Romanov, I. V. Sivo
    PULMONOLOGIYA.2022; 32(6): 806.     CrossRef
  • Development of pulmonary sarcoidosis in Crohn’s disease patient under infliximab biosimilar treatment after long-term original infliximab treatment: a case report and literature review
    Shin Kashima, Kentaro Moriichi, Katsuyoshi Ando, Nobuhiro Ueno, Hiroki Tanabe, Sayaka Yuzawa, Mikihiro Fujiya
    BMC Gastroenterology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An update on the diagnosis and management of ocular sarcoidosis
    De-Kuang Hwang, Shwu-Jiuan Sheu
    Current Opinion in Ophthalmology.2020; 31(6): 521.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of the effect of alpha-tocopherol on the course of newly diagnosed pulmonary sarcoidosis: a comparative study
    A. A. Vizel, D. A. Culver, I. Yu. Vizel, G. R. Shakirova, E. A. Bakunina
    Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases.2020; 98(10): 33.     CrossRef
  • Radiological Patterns of Lung Involvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Diletta Cozzi, Chiara Moroni, Gloria Addeo, Ginevra Danti, Monica Marina Lanzetta, Edoardo Cavigli, Massimo Falchini, Fabio Marra, Claudia Lucia Piccolo, Luca Brunese, Vittorio Miele
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
  • Infliximab

    Reactions Weekly.2017; 1657(1): 238.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP