Annals of Coloproctology

Volume 30(2); April 2014

Editorials

Invasion and Metastasis in the Viewpoint of Cell Adhesive Molecules: Jong-Woo Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(2):57-58. Published online April 25, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.57

2,228 View
28 Download

PDF

The New Stapler Device Is Good, But Needs More Evaluation: Young Wan Kim, Ik Yong Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(2):59-59. Published online April 25, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.59

2,437 View
34 Download
1 Web of Science

PDF

Preoperative Body Mass Index and Postoperative Complications After Pelvic Exenteration in Recurrent or Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients: Moo-Jun Baek; Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(2):60-60. Published online April 25, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.60

2,580 View
36 Download

PDF

Original Articles

Role of β₁-Integrin in Colorectal Cancer: Case-Control Study: Bo-Young Oh, Kwang Ho Kim, Soon Sup Chung, Kyoung Sook Hong, Ryung-Ah Lee; Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(2):61-70. Published online April 25, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.61

3,950 View
33 Download
12 Web of Science
12 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

In the metastatic process, interactions between circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and the extracellular matrix or surrounding cells are required. β₁-Integrin may mediate these interactions. The aim of this study was to investigate whether β₁-integrin is associated with the detection of CTCs in colorectal cancer.

Methods

We enrolled 30 patients with colorectal cancer (experimental group) and 30 patients with benign diseases (control group). Blood samples were obtained from each group, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) mRNA for CTCs marker and β₁-integrin mRNA levels were estimated by using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and the results were compared between the two groups. In the experimental group, preoperative results were compared with postoperative results for each marker. In addition, we analyzed the correlation between the expressions of β₁-integrin and CEA.

Results

CEA mRNA was detected more frequently in colorectal cancer patients than in control patients (P = 0.008). CEA mRNA was significantly reduced after surgery in the colorectal cancer patients (P = 0.032). β₁-Integrin mRNA was detected more in colorectal cancer patients than in the patients with benign diseases (P < 0.001). In colorectal cancer patients, expression of β₁-integrin mRNA was detected more for advanced-stage cancer than for early-stage cancer (P = 0.033) and was significantly decreased after surgery (P < 0.001). In addition, expression of β₁-integrin mRNA was significantly associated with that of CEA mRNA in colorectal cancer patients (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

In conclusion, β₁-integrin is a potential factor for forming a prognosis following surgical resection in colorectal cancer patients. β₁-Integrin may be a candidate for use as a marker for early detection of micrometastatic tumor cells and for monitoring the therapeutic response in colorectal cancer patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A review on mechanobiology of cell adhesion networks in different stages of sporadic colorectal cancer to explain its tumorigenesis
Siti Hawa Ngalim, Norwahida Yusoff, Rayzel Renitha Johnson, Siti Razila Abdul Razak, Xinyue Chen, Jamie K. Hobbs, Yeong Yeh Lee
Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology.2022; 175: 63. CrossRef
The Expression Pattern of Adhesion G Protein-Coupled Receptor F5 Is Related to Cell Adhesion and Metastatic Pathways in Colorectal Cancer—Comprehensive Study Based on In Silico Analysis
Huining Kang, Jakub Fichna, Ksenia Matlawska-Wasowska, Damian Jacenik
Cells.2022; 11(23): 3876. CrossRef
Functional Interplay Between Collagen Network and Cell Behavior Within Tumor Microenvironment in Colorectal Cancer
Cuong Cao Le, Amar Bennasroune, Benoit Langlois, Stéphanie Salesse, Camille Boulagnon-Rombi, Hamid Morjani, Stéphane Dedieu, Aline Appert-Collin
Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
CRISPR/Cas9 in Cancer Immunotherapy: Animal Models and Human Clinical Trials
Khalil Khalaf, Krzysztof Janowicz, Marta Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska, Greg Hutchings, Claudia Dompe, Lisa Moncrieff, Maurycy Jankowski, Marta Machnik, Urszula Oleksiewicz, Ievgeniia Kocherova, Jim Petitte, Paul Mozdziak, Jamil A. Shibli, Dariusz Iżycki, Małgorz
Genes.2020; 11(8): 921. CrossRef
N-glycosylation-defective splice variants of neuropilin-1 promote metastasis by activating endosomal signals
Xiuping Huang, Qing Ye, Min Chen, Aimin Li, Wenting Mi, Yuxin Fang, Yekaterina Y. Zaytseva, Kathleen L. O’Connor, Craig W. Vander Kooi, Side Liu, Qing-Bai She
Nature Communications.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Epidermal growth factor-mediated Rab25 pathway regulates integrin β1 trafficking in colon cancer
Kyung Sook Hong, Eun-Young Jeon, Soon Sup Chung, Kwang Ho Kim, Ryung-Ah Lee
Cancer Cell International.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Animal models of colorectal cancer with liver metastasis
Bo Young Oh, Hye Kyung Hong, Woo Yong Lee, Yong Beom Cho
Cancer Letters.2017; 387: 114. CrossRef
A New Size-based Platform for Circulating Tumor Cell Detection in Colorectal Cancer Patients
Bo Young Oh, Jhingook Kim, Woo Yong Lee, Hee Cheol Kim
Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2017; 16(3): 214. CrossRef
Twist1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition according to microsatellite instability status in colon cancer cells
Bo Young Oh, So-Young Kim, Yeo Song Lee, Hye Kyung Hong, Tae Won Kim, Seok Hyung Kim, Woo Yong Lee, Yong Beom Cho
Oncotarget.2016; 7(35): 57066. CrossRef
Expression of L1 protein correlates with cluster of differentiation 24 and integrin β1 expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors
YUE DU, HAIHONG ZHANG, ZHONGMIN JIANG, GUOWEI HUANG, WENLI LU, HESHENG WANG
Oncology Letters.2015; 9(6): 2595. CrossRef
Correlation between tumor engraftment in patient-derived xenograft models and clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer patients
Bo Young Oh, Woo Yong Lee, Sungwon Jung, Hye Kyung Hong, Do-Hyun Nam, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Wook Huh, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun, Yong Beom Cho
Oncotarget.2015; 6(18): 16059. CrossRef
Invasion and Metastasis in the Viewpoint of Cell Adhesive Molecules
Jong-Woo Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(2): 57. CrossRef

Comparison of Surgical Skills in Laparoscopic and Robotic Tasks Between Experienced Surgeons and Novices in Laparoscopic Surgery: An Experimental Study: Hye Jin Kim, Gyu-Seog Choi, Jun Seok Park, Soo Yeun Park; Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(2):71-76. Published online April 25, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.71

3,395 View
49 Download
38 Web of Science
35 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Robotic surgery is known to provide an improved technical ability as compared to laparoscopic surgery. We aimed to compare the efficiency of surgical skills by performing the same experimental tasks using both laparoscopic and robotic systems in an attempt to determine if a robotic system has an advantage over laparoscopic system.

Methods

Twenty participants without any robotic experience, 10 laparoscopic novices (LN: medical students) and 10 laparoscopically-experienced surgeons (LE: surgical trainees and fellows), performed 3 laparoscopic and robotic training-box-based tasks. This entire set of tasks was performed twice.

Results

Compared with LN, LEs showed significantly better performances in all laparoscopic tasks and in robotic task 3 during the 2 trials. Within the LN group, better performances were shown in all robotic tasks compared with the same laparoscopic tasks. However, in the LE group, compared with the same laparoscopic tasks, significantly better performance was seen only in robotic task 1. When we compared the 2 sets of trials, in the second trial, LN showed better performances in laparoscopic task 2 and robotic task 3; LE showed significantly better performance only in robotic task 3.

Conclusion

Robotic surgery had better performance than laparoscopic surgery in all tasks during the two trials. However, these results were more noticeable for LN. These results suggest that robotic surgery can be easily learned without laparoscopic experience because of its technical advantages. However, further experimental trials are needed to investigate the advantages of robotic surgery in more detail.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Laparoscopic but not open surgical skills can be transferred to robot‐assisted surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Mona W. Schmidt, Carolyn Fan, Karl F. Köppinger, Leon P. Schmidt, Anna Brechter, Eldrige F. Limen, Johannes A. Vey, Matthes Metz, Beat P. Müller‐Stich, Felix Nickel, Karl‐Friedrich Kowalewski
World Journal of Surgery.2024; 48(1): 14. CrossRef
Transferring laparoscopic skills to robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review
Karishma Behera, Matthew McKenna, Laurie Smith, Gerard McKnight, James Horwood, Michael M. Davies, Jared Torkington, James Ansell
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Looking to the Future; Veterinary Robotic Surgery
Nicole J. Buote
Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice.2024; 54(4): 735. CrossRef
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Stomach: Is There Any Advantage of Robotic Resections? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Carlo Alberto Schena, Andrea-Pierre Luzzi, Vito Laterza, Belinda De Simone, Filippo Aisoni, Paschalis Gavriilidis, Fausto Catena, Federico Coccolini, Francesca Morciano, Fausto Rosa, Francesco Marchegiani, Nicola de’Angelis
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2024; 34(7): 603. CrossRef
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic short- and long-term outcomes in complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colonic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Pedja Cuk, Mohamad Jawhara, Issam Al-Najami, Per Helligsø, Andreas Kristian Pedersen, Mark Bremholm Ellebæk
Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(3): 171. CrossRef
Force-based assessment of tissue handling skills in simulation training for robot-assisted surgery
A. Masie Rahimi, Sem F. Hardon, E. Willuth, F. Lang, Caelan M. Haney, Eleni A. Felinska, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Beat P. Müller-Stich, Tim Horeman, F. Nickel, Freek Daams
Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(6): 4414. CrossRef
The future of robotics in the treatment of abdominal wall hernias: A narrative review
Estella Y Huang, Daniel Chung, Bryan J Sandler, Garth R Jacobsen, Santiago Horgan, Ryan C Broderick
International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery.2023; 6(2): 81. CrossRef
Transfer of skills between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review
Pia Iben Pietersen, Peter Hertz, Rikke Groth Olsen, Louise Birch Møller, Lars Konge, Flemming Bjerrum
Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(12): 9030. CrossRef
Short-term and long-term efficacy in robot-assisted treatment for mid and low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Huiming Wu, Renkai Guo, Huiyu Li
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is superior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the initial training for surgical novices in an ex vivo porcine model: a randomized crossover study
E. Willuth, S. F. Hardon, F. Lang, C. M. Haney, E. A. Felinska, K. F. Kowalewski, B. P. Müller-Stich, T. Horeman, F. Nickel
Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(2): 1064. CrossRef
Minimally invasive pelvic exenteration for gynaecological malignancy: A single-centre case series and review of the literature
Rebecca Karkia, Anil Tailor, Patricia Ellis, Thumuluru Madhuri, Andrea Scala, James Read, Matthew Perry, Krishna Patil, Adam Blackburn, Simon Butler-Manuel, Jayanta Chatterjee
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2022; 274: 56. CrossRef
Patient-Related Functional Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Rectal Surgery Compared With a Laparoscopic Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Julie Flynn, Jose T. Larach, Joseph C.H. Kong, Peadar S. Waters, Jacob J. McCormick, Satish K. Warrier, Alexander Heriot
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2022; 65(10): 1191. CrossRef
Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review
Baldev Chahal, Abdullatif Aydın, Mohammad S. Ali Amin, Kelly Ong, Azhar Khan, Muhammad Shamim Khan, Kamran Ahmed, Prokar Dasgupta
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2022; 17(4): 1207. CrossRef
Robotic training for medical students: feasibility of a pilot simulation curriculum
Anya L. Greenberg, Shareef M. Syed, Adnan Alseidi, Patricia S. O’Sullivan, Hueylan Chern
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2022; 17(3): 1029. CrossRef
Can video games enhance surgical skills acquisition for medical students? A systematic review
Arnav Gupta, Bishoy Lawendy, Mitchell G. Goldenberg, Ethan Grober, Jason Y. Lee, Nathan Perlis
Surgery.2021; 169(4): 821. CrossRef
Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: learning curve, educational programs and outcomes
Charles C. Vining, Kinga B. Skowron, Melissa E. Hogg
Updates in Surgery.2021; 73(3): 799. CrossRef
Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery for Endometrial and Cervical Cancer
C. Uwins, H. Patel, G. Prakash Bhandoria, S. Butler-Manuel, A. Tailor, P. Ellis, J. Chatterjee
Clinical Oncology.2021; 33(9): e372. CrossRef
Robotic and Endoscopic Approaches to Head and Neck Surgery
Andrew J. Holcomb, Jeremy D. Richmon
Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America.2021; 35(5): 875. CrossRef
The learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review
Julie Flynn, José Tomás Larach, Joseph C. H. Kong, Peadar S. Waters, Satish K. Warrier, Alexander Heriot
Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(11): 2806. CrossRef
Robotics vs Laparoscopy—Are They Truly Rivals?
Natalie Liu, Jacob A. Greenberg
JAMA Surgery.2020; 155(5): 388. CrossRef
Robotic radical hysterectomy for stage 1B1 cervical cancer: A case series of survival outcomes from a leading UK cancer centre
Hersha Patel, Kavitha Madhuri, Thomas Rockell, Rugaia Montaser, Patricia Ellis, Jayanta Chatterjee, Simon Butler‐Manuel, Anil Tailor
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
A multi-modal approach to cognitive training and assistance in minimally invasive surgery
Tina Vajsbaher, Tim Ziemer, Holger Schultheis
Cognitive Systems Research.2020; 64: 57. CrossRef
Systematic review and meta‐analysis of robotic versus open hepatectomy
Daniel J. Wong, Michelle J. Wong, Gi Hong Choi, Yao Ming Wu, Paul B. Lai, Brian K. P. Goh
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2019; 89(3): 165. CrossRef
Objective assessment of robotic suturing skills with a new computerized system: A step forward in the training of robotic surgeons
Caleb Busch, Ryu Nakadate, Munenori Uemura, Satoshi Obata, Takahiro Jimbo, Makoto Hashizume
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2019; 12(4): 388. CrossRef
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic major liver resection: analysis of outcomes from a single center
Mike Fruscione, Ryan Pickens, Erin H. Baker, Allyson Cochran, Adeel Khan, Lee Ocuin, David A. Iannitti, Dionisios Vrochides, John B. Martinie
HPB.2019; 21(7): 906. CrossRef
Soft Robotics in Minimally Invasive Surgery
Mark Runciman, Ara Darzi, George P. Mylonas
Soft Robotics.2019; 6(4): 423. CrossRef
Is the Caribbean ready for robotics?
Jorge Rabaza
International Journal of Surgery.2019; 72: 3. CrossRef
Robot-assisted cholecystectomy is a safe but costly approach: A national database review
Bhavani Pokala, Laura Flores, Priscila R. Armijo, Vishal Kothari, Dmitry Oleynikov
The American Journal of Surgery.2019; 218(6): 1213. CrossRef
Does Previous Laparoscopic Experience Influence Basic Robotic Surgical Skills?
Marcelo Pimentel, Renan Desimon Cabral, Márcio Machado Costa, Brasil Silva Neto, Leandro Totti Cavazzola
Journal of Surgical Education.2018; 75(4): 1075. CrossRef
Visuospatial abilities and fine motor experiences influence acquisition and maintenance of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) task performance
Cuan M. Harrington, Patrick Dicker, Oscar Traynor, Dara O. Kavanagh
Surgical Endoscopy.2018; 32(11): 4639. CrossRef
Distraction and proficiency in laparoscopy: 2D versus robotic console 3D immersion
Steven Kim, Audriene May, Heidi Ryan, Adnan Mohsin, Shawn Tsuda
Surgical Endoscopy.2017; 31(11): 4625. CrossRef
Outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic repair of small-sized ventral hernias
Y. Julia Chen, Desmond Huynh, Scott Nguyen, Edward Chin, Celia Divino, Linda Zhang
Surgical Endoscopy.2017; 31(3): 1275. CrossRef
3D straight-stick laparoscopy versus 3D robotics for task performance in novice surgeons: a randomised crossover trial
Fevzi Shakir, Haider Jan, Andrew Kent
Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(12): 5380. CrossRef
Da Vinci© Skills Simulator™: is an early selection of talented console surgeons possible?
Mark Meier, Kevin Horton, Hubert John
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2016; 10(4): 289. CrossRef
Comparison of the learning curves and frustration level in performing laparoscopic and robotic training skills by experts and novices
Carlo C. Passerotti, Felipe Franco, Julio C. C. Bissoli, Bruno Tiseo, Caio M. Oliveira, Carlos A. O. Buchalla, Gustavo N. C. Inoue, Arzu Sencan, Aydin Sencan, Rogerio Ruscitto do Pardo, Hiep T. Nguyen
International Urology and Nephrology.2015; 47(7): 1075. CrossRef

Niti CAR 27 Versus a Conventional End-to-End Anastomosis Stapler in a Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Sigmoid Colon Cancer: Seung-Jin Kwag, Jun-Gi Kim, Won-Kyung Kang, Jin-Kwon Lee, Seong-Taek Oh; Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(2):77-82. Published online April 25, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.77

3,569 View
31 Download
5 Web of Science
5 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The Niti CAR 27 (ColonRing) uses compression to create an anastomosis. This study aimed to investigate the safety and the effectiveness of the anastomosis created with the Niti CAR 27 in a laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer.

Methods

In a single-center study, 157 consecutive patients who received an operation between March 2010 and December 2011 were retrospectively assessed. The Niti CAR 27 (CAR group, 63 patients) colorectal anastomoses were compared with the conventional double-stapled (CDS group, 94 patients) colorectal anastomoses. Intraoperative, immediate postoperative and 6-month follow-up data were recorded.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, tumor location and other clinical characteristics. One patient (1.6%) in the CAR group and 2 patients (2.1%) in the CDS group experienced complications of anastomotic leakage (P = 0.647). These three patients underwent a diverting loop ileostomy. There were 2 cases (2.1%) of bleeding at the anastomosis site in the CDS group. All patients underwent a follow-up colonoscopy (median, 6 months). One patient in the CAR group experienced anastomotic stricture (1.6% vs. 0%; P = 0.401). This complication was solved by using balloon dilatation.

Conclusion

Anastomosis using the Niti CAR 27 device in a laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer is safe and feasible. Its use is equivalent to that of the conventional double-stapler.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques
Jana Steger, Alissa Jell, Stefanie Ficht, Daniel Ostler, Markus Eblenkamp, Petra Mela, Dirk Wilhelm
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management.2022; Volume 18: 523. CrossRef
A systematic analysis of controlled clinical trials using the NiTi CAR™ compression ring in colorectal anastomoses
R. Tabola, R. Cirocchi, A. Fingerhut, A. Arezzo, J. Randolph, V. Grassi, G. A. Binda, V. D’Andrea, I. Abraha, G. Popivanov, S. Di Saverio, A. Zbar
Techniques in Coloproctology.2017; 21(3): 177. CrossRef
Can a nickel–titanium memory-shape device serve as a substitute for the stapler in gastrointestinal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ning-Ning Li, Wen-Tao Zhao, Xiao-Ting Wu
Journal of Surgical Research.2016; 201(1): 82. CrossRef
Efficacy and safety of a NiTi CAR 27 compression ring for end-to-end anastomosis compared with conventional staplers: A real-world analysis in Chinese colorectal cancer patients
Zhenhai Lu, Jianhong Peng, Cong Li, Fulong Wang, Wu Jiang, Wenhua Fan, Junzhong Lin, Xiaojun Wu, Desen Wan, Zhizhong Pan
Clinics.2016; 71(5): 264. CrossRef
The New Stapler Device Is Good, But Needs More Evaluation
Young Wan Kim, Ik Yong Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(2): 59. CrossRef

Preoperative Body Mass Index, 30-Day Postoperative Morbidity, Length of Stay and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Exenteration Surgery for Recurrent and Locally-Advanced Rectal Cancer: Jessica Beaton, Sharon Carey, Michael J Solomon, Ker-Kan Tan, Jane Young; Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(2):83-87. Published online April 25, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.83

3,377 View
45 Download
18 Web of Science
19 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Malnutrition is associated with an increased risk of developing complications following gastrointestinal surgery, especially following radical surgeries such as pelvic exenteration. This study aims to determine if preoperative body mass index (BMI) is associated with 30-day morbidity, length of hospital stay and/or quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration surgery for recurrent and locally-advanced rectal cancer prior to a prospective trial.

Methods

A review of all patients who underwent pelvic exenteration surgery prior to 2008 was performed. Patients were included if they had a documented BMI as well as a QoL measurement (Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Colorectal questionnaire).

Results

Thirty-one patients, with a mean age of 56 years, had preoperative height and weight data, as well as measures of postoperative QoL, and formed the study group. The numbers of patients with recurrent (n = 17) or locally-advanced rectal cancer (n = 14) were similar. The mean length of stay was 21 days while the mean BMI of the patients was 24.3 (± 5.9) kg/m². The majority of the patients were either of normal weight (n = 15) or overweight/obese (n = 11). The average length of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who were underweight compared to those who were of normal weight (F = 6.508, P = 0.006) and those who were overweight and obese (F = 6.508, P = 0.007).

Conclusion

This study suggests that a lower body mass index preoperatively is associated with a longer length of hospital stay. BMI is not associated with long-term QoL in this patient group. However, further prospective research is required.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer
Niamh McKigney, Fergus Houston, Ellen Ross, Galina Velikova, Julia Brown, Deena Pravin Harji
Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(7): 3969. CrossRef
Prevention and management of complications in pelvic exenteration
Pia Persson, Peter Chong, Colin W Steele, Martha Quinn
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 48(11): 2277. CrossRef
Patient‐reported outcomes after pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: A systematic review
Andreas Denys, Yves van Nieuwenhove, Dirk Van de putte, Eva Pape, Piet Pattyn, Wim Ceelen, Gabriëlle H. van Ramshorst
Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(4): 353. CrossRef
Pelvic exenteration: Pre-, intra-, and post-operative considerations
Kheng-Seong Ng, Peter J.M. Lee
Surgical Oncology.2022; 43: 101787. CrossRef
Pelvic exenteration: Pre-, intra-, and post-operative considerations
Kheng-Seong Ng, Peter J.M. Lee
Surgical Oncology.2021; 37: 101546. CrossRef
Functional outcomes following pelvic exenteration: results from a prospective cohort study
Preet G. S. Makker, Cherry E. Koh, Michael J. Solomon, James Ratcliffe, Daniel Steffens
Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(10): 2647. CrossRef
Quality of life outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer
Tamara Glyn, Frank Frizelle
Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2020; 31(3): 100767. CrossRef
The obesity paradox in beyond total mesorectal excision surgery for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer
Daniel L. H. Baird, Constantinos Simillis, Gianluca Pellino, Christos Kontovounisios, Shahnawaz Rasheed, Paris P. Tekkis
Updates in Surgery.2019; 71(2): 313. CrossRef
The effect of preoperative nutritional status on postoperative complications and overall survival in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration: A multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional cohort study
N.J. Lyell, M. Kitano, B. Smith, A.L. Gleisner, F.J. Backes, G. Cheng, M.D. McCarter, S. Abdel-Misih, E.L. Jones
The American Journal of Surgery.2019; 218(2): 275. CrossRef
Preoperative Nutrition Status and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
Lauren Reece, Helen Dragicevich, Claire Lewis, Caila Rothwell, Oliver M. Fisher, Sharon Carey, Nayef A. Alzahrani, Winston Liauw, David L. Morris
Annals of Surgical Oncology.2019; 26(8): 2622. CrossRef
Factors affecting hospital length of stay following pelvic exenteration surgery
Ying Guo, Eugene Chang, Mehtap Bozkurt, Minjeong Park, Diane Liu, Jack B. Fu
Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 117(3): 529. CrossRef
Is BMI associated with post‐operative complication risk among patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for cancer? A systematic review
Tasha M. Hughes, Kejal Shah, Sabrena Noria, Timothy Pawlik
Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 117(5): 1009. CrossRef
A systematic review examining quality of life following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer
E. Rausa, M. E. Kelly, L. Bonavina, P. R. O'Connell, D. C. Winter
Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(5): 430. CrossRef
The Evolution of Pelvic Exenteration Practice at a Single Center: Lessons Learned from over 500 Cases
Cherry E. Koh, Michael J. Solomon, Kilian G. Brown, Kirk Austin, Christopher M. Byrne, Peter Lee, Jane M. Young
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2017; 60(6): 627. CrossRef
Pelvic exenteration for advanced malignancy in elderly patients
R W Radwan, M D Evans, M Davies, D A Harris, J Beynon, O Hatcher, P Bose, M G Lucas, J Featherstone, U Khot, T V Chandrasekaran, N D Carr, S Gwynne, P Drew, M D Phan
British Journal of Surgery.2016; 103(2): e115. CrossRef
Systematic review of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration
D.P. Harji, B. Griffiths, G. Velikova, P.M. Sagar, J. Brown
European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO).2016; 42(8): 1132. CrossRef
Exenteración pélvica total por cáncer primario del recto: resultados inmediatos y alejados
Guillermo Bannura, Alejandro Barrera, Carlos Melo, Felipe Illanes, Cristián Gallardo
Revista Chilena de Cirugía.2016; 68(3): 237. CrossRef
Translation from clinical trials to routine practice: How to demonstrate community benefit
David Roder, Elizabeth Buckley
Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2015; 11(1): 1. CrossRef
Preoperative Body Mass Index and Postoperative Complications After Pelvic Exenteration in Recurrent or Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients
Moo-Jun Baek
Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(2): 60. CrossRef

A Survey of Colonoscopic Surveillance After Polypectomy: Dae Kyung Sohn; Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(2):88-92. Published online April 25, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.88

3,680 View
42 Download
8 Web of Science
6 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Several guidelines have been proposed for surveillance colonoscopy after polypectomy. However, some discrepancies still exist between the guidelines and clinical practice. This study was conducted to identify Korean doctors' recommendations for the colonoscopic surveillance interval after polypectomy.

Methods

A survey of the attendees at the symposium of the 64th Annual Congress of the Korean Surgical Society was conducted. When the prepared clinical scenarios were given, attendees answered using a wireless radio-frequency audience response system. All responders' results were automatically counted immediately. Frequencies of different answers to each question were calculated, and our results were compared with those of previous surveys performed using the same questionnaire in the United States or Japan.

Results

The number of responder varied from 38 to 41. About 50% of valid responders selected 'follow-up in 3 years' for low-risk lesions, such as a 6-mm hyperplastic polyp, a 6-mm tubular adenoma, or two 6-mm tubular adenomas. Responders most-commonly selected 'follow-up in 1 year' for high-risk lesions, such as a 12-mm tubular adenoma with high grade dysplasia or a 12-mm tubulovillous adenoma. The majority of Korean doctors recommend postpolypectomy colonoscopic surveillance more frequently than American physicians did.

Conclusion

A discrepancy between the guidelines and clinical practice for the surveillance after polypectomy still exists in Korea. A surveillance program that can be easily and widely applied in clinical practice needs to be established.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Adherence to Surveillance Guidelines after the Removal of Colorectal Polyps: A Multinational, Multicenter, Prospective Survey
Chang Kyo Oh, Satimai Aniwan, Panida Piyachaturawat, Zhiqin Wong, Thida Soe, Bayasgalan Luvsandagva, Quang Trung Tran, Achmad Fauzi, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Young-Seok Cho
Gut and Liver.2021; 15(6): 878. CrossRef
The current capacity and quality of colonoscopy in Korea
Jae Ho Choi, Jae Myung Cha, Jin Young Yoon, Min Seob Kwak, Jung Won Jeon, Hyun Phil Shin
Intestinal Research.2019; 17(1): 119. CrossRef
Guideline Adherence to Colonoscopic Surveillance Intervals after Polypectomy in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Survey
Seri Hong, Mina Suh, Kui Son Choi, Boyoung Park, Jae Myung Cha, Hyun-Soo Kim, Jae Kwan Jun, Dong Soo Han
Gut and Liver.2018; 12(4): 426. CrossRef
Determining the optimal surveillance interval after a colonoscopic polypectomy for the Korean population?
Jung Lok Lee, Jae Myung Cha, Hye Min Lee, Jung Won Jeon, Min Seob Kwak, Jin Young Yoon, Hyun Phil Shin, Kwang Ro Joo, Joung Il Lee, Dong Il Park
Intestinal Research.2017; 15(1): 109. CrossRef
Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome
Joseph C. Anderson, John A. Baron, Dennis J. Ahnen, Elizabeth L. Barry, Roberd M. Bostick, Carol A. Burke, Robert S. Bresalier, Timothy R. Church, Bernard F. Cole, Marcia Cruz-Correa, Adam S. Kim, Leila A. Mott, Robert S. Sandler, Douglas J. Robertson
Gastroenterology.2017; 152(8): 1933. CrossRef
Association Between Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke at the Workplace and Risk for Developing a Colorectal Adenoma: A Cross-Sectional Study
Seung-Hwa Lee, Ji-Yeon Hong, Jung-Un Lee, Dong Ryul Lee
Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(2): 51. CrossRef

Case Reports

An Extragastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in the Omentum With Peritoneal Seeding Mimicking an Appendiceal Mucinous Cancer With Carcinomatosis: Jeonghyun Kang, Tae Joo Jeon, Sun Och Yoon, Kang Young Lee, Seung-Kook Sohn; Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(2):93-96. Published online April 25, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.93

4,041 View
47 Download
4 Web of Science
5 Citations

Abstract PDF

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. These tumors tend to present most frequently in the stomach, followed by the small intestine. GISTs can also arise from the omentum, retroperitoneum, mesentery, or pleura and are termed extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs) when they do so. EGISTs arising from the omentum are very rare. Due to the limited incidence of EGISTs in the omentum, the diagnostic criteria are not well established, and making a correct diagnosis may be difficult. In this report, we present a case of an EGIST of the omentum with peritoneal metastasis that was initially suspected to be an appendiceal mucinous carcinoma with carcinomatosis on positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Primary Extragastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of Greater Omentum with Intraperitoneal Bleeding
Masatoshi Kataoka, Tsukasa Saitoh, Kousaku Kawashima, Tomotaka Yazaki, Hiroki Sonoyama, Eiko Okimoto, Akihiko Oka, Yoshiyuki Mishima, Tsuyoshi Mishiro, Naoki Oshima, Kotaro Shibagaki, Hiroshi Tobita, Ichiro Moriyama, Norihisa Ishimura, Mamiko Nagase, Nori
Internal Medicine.2021; 60(21): 3413. CrossRef
Recurrent and metastatic extragastrointestinal stromal tumors of the mesentery with C-KIT and PDGFRA mutations: a case report
Huang Yayu, Zhang Changmao, Dai Yijun, Lin Na, Xu Tianwen, Dai Yangbin
Cancer Biology & Therapy.2020; 21(2): 101. CrossRef
Mucinous Carcinomatosis: A Rare Association between an Ovarian Tumor and an E-GIST
Hugo Palma Rios, André Goulart, Pedro Leão
Case Reports in Surgery.2018; 2018: 1. CrossRef
Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Report of primary tumour in the omentum
E.N. Valdes-Peregrina, M. Hernández-González, O. de León-Pacheco, S. Mendoza-Ramírez
Revista Médica del Hospital General de México.2018; 81(4): 221. CrossRef
Clinicopathological features and prognosis of omental gastrointestinal stromal tumor: evaluation of a pooled case series
Fan Feng, Yangzi Tian, Zhen Liu, Shushang Liu, Guanghui Xu, Man Guo, Xiao Lian, Daiming Fan, Hongwei Zhang
Scientific Reports.2016;[Epub] CrossRef

Surgical Management of Unicentric Castleman's Disease in the Abdomen: Min-Sang Kim, Jae-Kyun Ju, Young Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(2):97-100. Published online April 25, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.97

3,259 View
29 Download
6 Web of Science
6 Citations

Abstract PDF

Castleman's disease (CD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder that can involve single or multiple lymph nodes in the body. Especially, the localized form of CD is known to be well-controlled by using a surgical resection. On occasion, the surgeon may confront an abdominal and retroperitoneal mass of unknown origin. Thus, we present this case in which we treated a 16-year-old female patient for CD and investigated how to evaluate and manage the situation from the standpoint of CD. Also, we give a review of the pathology, clinical manifestation, diagnosis, and treatment of CD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Retroperitoneal castleman’s disease in a young Nepalese girl: a rare cause of childhood abdominal mass
Ashish Lal Shrestha, Aakash Mishra, Sagar Khadka, Ramesh Dhakhwa
Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Castleman's disease
Himanshu Srivastava, DulgantiSantosh Reddy, ShreyasN Shah, Vandana Shah
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology.2020; 24(3): 593. CrossRef
Castleman’s Disease: A Unicentric Case of Abdominal Origin and Literature Review
Stavros Tsotsolis, I. A. Ziogas, D. Miliaras, G. Tsoulfas
Hellenic Journal of Surgery.2019; 91(1): 33. CrossRef
Clinical, laboratory and imaging findings in Castleman's disease – The subtype decides
Michael Haap, Julia Wiefels, Marius Horger, Annika Hoyer, Karsten Müssig
Blood Reviews.2018; 32(3): 225. CrossRef
Left Para-Renal Castleman Disease: Case Report
Flavius Mocian, Sorin Sorlea, Marius Coros
Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine.2018; 3(2): 102. CrossRef
Surgical management of isolated retroperitoneal Castleman's disease: A case report
JUN XU, BO ZHOU, HUA-LI CAO, BO WANG, SHENG YAN, SHU-SEN ZHENG
Oncology Letters.2016; 11(3): 2123. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Previous issues