KSCP
APFCP
SIUCP-ETS
Previous issues
- Page Path
- HOME > Browse Articles > Previous issues
- Volume 29(6); December 2013
-
- What Is the Role of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in the Single-Port Surgery Era?
- Chang-Nam Kim
- Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):217-218. Published online December 31, 2013
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.217
- 2,405 View
- 24 Download
- 3 Citations
-
PDF -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Changing trends in the minimally invasive surgery for corrosive esophagogastric stricture
Raja Kalayarasan, Satish Durgesh
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 15(5): 799. CrossRef - Hand‐assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer – a video vignette
N. E. Samalavicius, P. Kavaliauskas, A. Dulskas
Colorectal Disease.2019; 21(11): 1336. CrossRef - Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and its applications in gynecology
Yueqian Wu, Zhiyuan Dai, Xipeng Wang
Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.2016; 5(1): 12. CrossRef
- Changing trends in the minimally invasive surgery for corrosive esophagogastric stricture
- Safe Distal Resection Margin in Patients With T3 Mid and Distal Rectal Cancer Who Underwent a Sphincter-Saving Resection Without Preoperative Radiotherapy
- Bong Hwa Lee, Hyoung Chul Park, Min Jeong Kin, Mi Young Jang
- Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):219-220. Published online December 31, 2013
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.219
- 2,888 View
- 37 Download
- 2 Citations
-
PDF
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Computational fluid dynamics modeling of an inter-parallel flow field for proton ceramic fuel cell stack
Yaw Dwamena Akenteng, Xinglin Yang, Yuan Zhao, Anatoly Lysyakov, Anton Matveev, Daifen Chen
Ionics.2022; 28(7): 3367. CrossRef - The Effects of Preoperative Endoscopic Tattooing on Distal Surgical Margin and Ileostomy Rates in Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study
Gokhan Cipe, Merve B. Cengiz, Ufuk O. Idiz, Erkan Yardimci, Umit Malya, Deniz Firat, Mahmut Muslumanoglu
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2016; 26(4): 301. CrossRef
- Computational fluid dynamics modeling of an inter-parallel flow field for proton ceramic fuel cell stack
- Preemptive Analgesia in Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery
- Eui Gon Youk
- Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):221-222. Published online December 31, 2013
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.221
- 2,627 View
- 26 Download
- What Matters in Colonoscopy?
- Hyun Shig Kim
- Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):223-223. Published online December 31, 2013
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.223
- 2,418 View
- 40 Download
- Sham Feeding? Same Feeding?
- Hungdai Kim
- Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):224-224. Published online December 31, 2013
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.224
- 2,352 View
- 30 Download
- Clinical Outcomes of 103 Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgeries for Left-Sided Colon and Rectal Cancer: Single Institutional Review
- Narimantas Evaldas Samalavicius, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Audrius Dulskas, Darius Kazanavicius, Kestutis Petrulis, Raimundas Lunevicius
- Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):225-230. Published online December 31, 2013
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.225
- 3,959 View
- 39 Download
- 12 Citations
-
Abstract
PDF Purpose The laparoscopic colectomy is avoided principally because of its technical difficulty, steep learning curve, and increased operative time. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is an alternative technique that addresses these problems while preserving the short-term benefits of a laparoscopic colectomy. Our study was aimed to describe the characteristics of patients admitted due to left-sided colon and rectal cancer for HALS.
Methods A prospectively maintained database was used to identify patients who underwent HALS at the Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, from July 1, 2009, to October 1, 2012.
Results One hundred-three HALS colorectal resections were performed. The patients' mean age was 64 ± 13.4 years. There were 46 male and 57 female patients. The body mass index was 27.3 ± 5.8 kg/m2. Forty-three patients (41.8%) had experienced prior abdominal surgery. The mean HALS time was 105 minutes (range, 55-85 minutes). The conversion rate was 2.7% (3/103). The median of return of gastrointestinal function was 2.5 days (range, 2.2-4.5 days). The median length of hospital stay was 9 days. The postoperative complication and mortality rates were 10.7% and 0.97%, respectively. Four incisional hernias (3.9%) were seen at a mean follow-up of 7.0 ± 3.4 months. None of the patients had a trocar or a hand-port site recurrence.
Conclusion A HALS colorectal resection is a safe and effective technique, and it provides all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Hand Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Surgical and Oncological Outcomes from a Single Tertiary Referral Centre
Narimantas Evaldas Samalavicius, Zygimantas Kuliesius, Robertas Stasys Samalavičius, Renatas Tikuisis, Edgaras Smolskas, Zilvinas Gricius, Povilas Kavaliauskas, Audrius Dulskas
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(13): 3781. CrossRef - Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer—Comparative Study Between Two Centres
Audrius Dulskas, Mahdi Albandar, Narimantas E. Samalavicius, Yoon Dae Han, Nam Kyu Kim
Indian Journal of Surgery.2021; 83(1): 48. CrossRef - Laparoscopic hand‐assisted total mesorectal excision for mid rectal cancer using the Gelport system—a video vignette
Narimantas E. Samalavicius, Vita Klimasauskiene, Audrius Dulskas
Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(4): 1018. CrossRef - Hand‐assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer – a video vignette
N. E. Samalavicius, P. Kavaliauskas, A. Dulskas
Colorectal Disease.2019; 21(11): 1336. CrossRef - High vascular ligation in left-sided colon cancer surgery is safe and adequate
Narimantas E. Samalavicius, Audrius Dulskas, Simonas Uselis, Edgaras Smolskas, Giedre Smailyte, Raimundas Lunevicius
European Surgery.2018; 50(5): 221. CrossRef - Laparoscopic colectomy in obese patients: a comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques
Douglas M. Overbey, Michelle L. Cowan, Patrick W. Hosokawa, Brandon C. Chapman, Jon D. Vogel
Surgical Endoscopy.2017; 31(10): 3912. CrossRef - HAND-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY FOR THE CANCER OF THE LEFT COLON AND RECTUM - AN IDEAL OPTION OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY? SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE WITH 459 CASES
Narimantas E. Samalavicius, Zygimantas Kuliesius, Audrius Dulskas, Justas Kuliavas, Giedre Rudinskaite, Edgaras Smolskas, Afredas Kilius, Kestutis Petrulis
Koloproktologia.2017; (4): 7. CrossRef - Is There Still a Role for Video-Assisted Laparoscopic Gastric Banding in Severe Obesity?
Nicola Zampieri, Roberto Castellani, Lorenzo Francia
Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care.2016; 11(1): 25. CrossRef - Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: Are all laparoscopic techniques created equal?
Emily F. Midura, Dennis J. Hanseman, Bradley R. Davis, Bobby L. Johnson, Joshua W. Kuethe, Janice F. Rafferty, Ian M. Paquette
Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(8): 3567. CrossRef - Preoperative prediction of conversion from laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery: a clinical study of conversion scoring of laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery
Guang-Dong Zhang, Xu-Ting Zhi, Jian-Li Zhang, Guang-Bo Bu, Gang Ma, Kai-Lei Wang
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2015; 30(9): 1209. CrossRef - Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Approach in Colon Surgery
Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh, Joseph C. Carmichael, Steven Mills, Alessio Pigazzi, Ninh T. Nguyen, Michael J. Stamos
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2015; 19(11): 2045. CrossRef - What Is the Role of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in the Single-Port Surgery Era?
Chang-Nam Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(6): 217. CrossRef
- Hand Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Surgical and Oncological Outcomes from a Single Tertiary Referral Centre
- Association Between a Close Distal Resection Margin and Recurrence After a Sphincter-Saving Resection for T3 Mid- or Low-Rectal Cancer Without Radiotherapy
- Jae Woong Han, Min Jae Lee, Ha Kyung Park, Jae Ho Shin, Min Sung An, Tae Kwun Ha, Kwang Hee Kim, Ki Beom Bae, Tae Hyun Kim, Chang Soo Choi, Sang Hoon Oh, Min Kyung Oh, Mi Seon Kang, Kwan Hee Hong
- Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):231-237. Published online December 31, 2013
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.231
- 3,470 View
- 22 Download
- 7 Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
Purpose To maintain the patient's quality of life, surgeons strive to preserve the sphincter during rectal cancer surgery. This study evaluated the oncologic safety of a sphincter-saving resection with a distal resection margin (DRM) <1 cm without radiotherapy in T3, mid- or low-rectal cancer.
Methods This retrospective study enrolled 327 patients who underwent a sphincter-saving resection for proven T3 rectal cancer located <10 cm from the anal verge and without radiotherapy between January 1995 and December 2011. The oncologic outcomes included the 5-year cancer-specific survival, the local recurrence, and the systemic recurrence rates.
Results In groups A (DRM ≤1 cm) and B (DRM >1 cm), the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 81.57% and 80.03% (P = 0.8543), the 5-year local recurrence rates were 6.69% and 9.52% (P = 0.3981), and the 5-year systemic recurrence rates were 19.46% and 23.11% (P = 0.5750), respectively.
Conclusion This study showed that the close DRM itself should not be a contraindication for a sphincter-saving resection for T3 mid- or low-rectal cancer without radiotherapy. However, a prospective randomized controlled trial including the effect of adjuvant therapy will be needed.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- The Impact of Narrow and Infiltrated Distal Margin After Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer on Patients’ Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Islam H. Metwally, Mohammad Zuhdy, Omar Hamdy, Ahmed M. Fareed, Saleh S. Elbalka
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 13(4): 750. CrossRef - Association of levels of metabolites with the safe margin of rectal cancer surgery: a metabolomics study
Shaopeng Zhang, Guoqiang Pan, Zhifeng Liu, Yuan Kong, Daguang Wang
BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Distal resection margins in rectal cancer specimens: differences in assessment between surgeons and pathologists and the influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiation
T. L. Ghezzi, C. Tarta, P. C. Contu, A. R. Lazzaron, B. M. Contin, L. M. Kliemann, D. C. Damin
Updates in Surgery.2021; 73(5): 1787. CrossRef - Surgical margins in squamous cell carcinoma, different for the vulva?
Noortje Pleunis, Maria E.J. Leermakers, Anneke A. van der Wurff, Paul J.J.M. Klinkhamer, Nicole P.M. Ezendam, Dorry Boll, Joanne A. de Hullu, Johanna M.A. Pijnenborg
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 44(10): 1555. CrossRef - Continuous Effect of Radial Resection Margin on Recurrence and Survival in Rectal Cancer Patients Who Receive Preoperative Chemoradiation and Curative Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis
SooYoon Sung, Sung Hwan Kim, Joo Hwan Lee, Taek Keun Nam, Songmi Jeong, Hong Seok Jang, Jin Ho Song, Jeong Won Lee, Jung Min Bae, Jong Hoon Lee
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2017; 98(3): 647. CrossRef - Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy as a Boost to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Distal Rectal Cancer: A Phase-II Clinical Trial
Shapour Omidvari, Shadi Zohourinia, Mansour Ansari, Leila Ghahramani, Mohammad Zare-Bandamiri, Ahmad Mosalaei, Niloofar Ahmadloo, Saeedeh Pourahmad, Hamid Nasrolahi, Sayed Hasan Hamedi, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(4): 123. CrossRef - Safe Distal Resection Margin in Patients With T3 Mid and Distal Rectal Cancer Who Underwent a Sphincter-Saving Resection Without Preoperative Radiotherapy
Bong Hwa Lee, Hyoung Chul Park, Min Jeong Kin, Mi Young Jang
Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(6): 219. CrossRef
- The Impact of Narrow and Infiltrated Distal Margin After Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer on Patients’ Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- Postoperative Pain Relief Using Wound Infiltration With 0.5% Bupivacaine in Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for an Appendectomy
- So Ra Ahn, Dong Baek Kang, Cheol Lee, Won Cheol Park, Jeong Kyun Lee
- Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):238-242. Published online December 31, 2013
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.238
- 4,956 View
- 57 Download
- 8 Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
Purpose Recently, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been popular for minimally invasive surgery and cosmetic improvement. However, some papers have reported that SILS for an appendectomy (SILS-A) has had the more postoperative complaints of pain. We investigated postoperative pain relief using wound infiltration with 0.5% bupivacaine in SILS-A and compared the result with that for conventional SILS-A.
Methods Between July 2010 and September 2012, 75 patients who underwent SILS-A were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: conventional SILS-A group (C-SILS-A) or wound infiltrated with 0.5% bupivacaine in SILS-A group (W-SILS-A). Forty-five patients were in the C-SILS-A, and 30 patients were in the W-SILS-A. Patients with perforated appendicitis were excluded. The clinical outcomes were compared between the groups by using the verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS).
Results Clinical outcomes were similar in both study groups except for the pain score. The W-SILS-A group showed significantly lower numbers of additional pain killers and lower VNRS scores 1, 6, and 12 hours after surgery than the C-SILS-A group.
Conclusion W-SILS-A is a technically simple and effective method of reducing early postoperative pain. It may be applicable in SILS-A for pain control system.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Updates on Wound Infiltration Use for Postoperative Pain Management: A Narrative Review
Dusica M. Stamenkovic, Mihailo Bezmarevic, Suzana Bojic, Dragana Unic-Stojanovic, Dejan Stojkovic, Damjan Z. Slavkovic, Vladimir Bancevic, Nebojsa Maric, Menelaos Karanikolas
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(20): 4659. CrossRef - Determination of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane (US-TAP) block in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of unilateral hernia surgeries: A randomized controlled trial
Vijayalakshmi Sivapurapu, SriVengadesh Gopal, Ashley Solomon
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology.2021; 37(3): 475. CrossRef - Effect of bupivacaine on postoperative pain and analgesics use after single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: double-blind randomized study
Heon-Kyun Ha, Kyung-Goo Lee, Kang Kook Choi, Wan Sung Kim, Hyung Rae Cho
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2020; 98(2): 96. CrossRef - Unilateral transversus abdominis plane block and port-site infiltration
Emine Arık, T. Akkaya, S. Ozciftci, A. Alptekin, Ş. Balas
Der Anaesthesist.2020; 69(4): 270. CrossRef - Effect of Local Anesthesia on the Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Samir Čustovic, Haris Pandža, Samir Delibegovic
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2019; 29(1): 65. CrossRef - Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015
Ramon R. Gorter, Hasan H. Eker, Marguerite A. W. Gorter-Stam, Gabor S. A. Abis, Amish Acharya, Marjolein Ankersmit, Stavros A. Antoniou, Simone Arolfo, Benjamin Babic, Luigi Boni, Marlieke Bruntink, Dieuwertje A. van Dam, Barbara Defoort, Charlotte L. Dei
Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(11): 4668. CrossRef - Is transverse abdominis plane block effective following local anesthetic infiltration in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair?
Mun Gyu Kim, Soon Im Kim, Si Young Ok, Sang Ho Kim, Se-Jin Lee, Sun Young Park, Jae-Hwa Yoo, Ana Cho, Kyung Yul Hur, Myung Jin Kim
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2014; 67(6): 398. CrossRef - Preemptive Analgesia in Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery
Eui Gon Youk
Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(6): 221. CrossRef
- Updates on Wound Infiltration Use for Postoperative Pain Management: A Narrative Review
- Importance of Early Follow-up Colonoscopy in Patients at High Risk for Colorectal Polyps
- Sung Taek Jung, Dae Kyung Sohn, Chang Won Hong, Byung Chang Kim, Ji Won Park, Kyung Su Han, Hee Jin Chang, Hyo Sung Choi, Jae Hwan Oh
- Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):243-247. Published online December 31, 2013
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.243
- 3,456 View
- 27 Download
- 5 Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
Purpose Minimizing the polyp miss rate during colonoscopy is important for patients at high risk for colorectal polyps. We investigated the polyp miss rate and the factors associated with it in high-risk patients.
Methods The medical records of 163 patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopy between January 2001 and April 2010, which was within 9 months after a polypectomy, because the index colonoscopy had shown multiple (more than 3) adenomas or advanced adenoma were retrospectively reviewed. Miss rates were calculated for all polyps, for neoplastic polyps and for advanced adenomas. Factors associated with the miss rates in these patients, such as the location, shape and size of the polyp, were analyzed.
Results The miss rates for polyps, adenomas, adenomas <5 mm, adenomas ≥5 mm and advanced adenomas were 32.6%, 20.9%, 17.7%, 3.2%, and 0.9%, respectively. No carcinoma, except for one small carcinoid tumor, was missed. Flat shape and small size (<5 mm) were significantly associated with adenoma miss rate. The miss rate was significantly higher for flat-type advanced adenomas than for protruded-type advanced adenomas (27.7% vs 4.1%).
Conclusion The polyp miss rate in patients at high risk for colorectal polyps was higher than expected. Efforts are needed to reduce miss rates and improve the quality of colonoscopy. Also, early follow-up colonoscopy is mandatory, especially in patients at high risk.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Removal of GIT lesions and the role of impedance of the injection solution—an innovative approach to known methods
Martina Lösle, K. E. Grund, B. Duckworth-Mothes
Journal of Molecular Medicine.2024; 102(8): 1009. CrossRef - An eco-friendly synthesis of Enterococcus sp.–mediated gold nanoparticle induces cytotoxicity in human colorectal cancer cells
Mathivadani Vairavel, Ezhilarasan Devaraj, Rajeshkumar Shanmugam
Environmental Science and Pollution Research.2020; 27(8): 8166. CrossRef - Evaluating the Cost-Effective Use of Follow-Up Colonoscopy Based on Screening Findings and Age
Grace N. Joseph, Farid Heidarnejad, Eric A. Sherer
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef - Impact of a new distal attachment on colonoscopy performance in an academic screening center
Zacharias P. Tsiamoulos, Ravi Misra, Rajaratanam Rameshshanker, Timothy R. Elliott, Iosif Beintaris, Siwan Thomas-Gibson, Adam Haycock, Noriko Suzuki, Colin Rees, Brian P. Saunders
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 87(1): 280. CrossRef - What Matters in Colonoscopy?
Hyun Shig Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(6): 223. CrossRef
- Removal of GIT lesions and the role of impedance of the injection solution—an innovative approach to known methods
- Effect of Gum Chewing on the Recovery From Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery
- Duk Yeon Hwang, Ho Young Kim, Ji Hoon Kim, In Gyu Lee, Jun Ki Kim, Seung Taek Oh, Yoon Suk Lee
- Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):248-251. Published online December 31, 2013
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.248
- 3,441 View
- 36 Download
- 5 Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
Purpose We aimed to examine the effect of gum chewing after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.
Methods We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine. We divided the patients into 2 groups: group A consisted of 67 patients who did not chew gum; group B consisted of 65 patients who chewed gum. We analyzed the short-term clinical outcomes between the two groups to evaluate the effect of gum chewing.
Results The first passage of gas was slightly earlier in group B, but the difference was not significant. However, the length of hospital stay was 6.7 days in group B, which was significantly shorter than that in group A (7.3 days, P = 0.018).
Conclusion This study showed that length of postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the gum-chewing group. In future studies, we expect to elucidate the effect of gum chewing on the postoperative recovery more clearly.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Postoperative Ileus and Nonpharmacological Nursing Interventions for Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review
Hande Nur Arslan, Sevilay Şenol Çelik, Gamze Bozkul
Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - https://medcraveonline.com/IJCAM/IJCAM-14-00535.pdf
Nahima Miah, Sanjay Noonan, Emma Copeland, Eastern Road, Elaine Macaninch
International Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine.2021; 14(2): 69. CrossRef - Chewing Gum for Intestinal Function Recovery after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Binbin Mei, Wenting Wang, Feifei Cui, Zunjia Wen, Meifen Shen
Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2017; 2017: 1. CrossRef - Chewing gum for postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function
Vaneesha Short, Georgia Herbert, Rachel Perry, Charlotte Atkinson, Andrew R Ness, Christopher Penfold, Steven Thomas, Henning Keinke Andersen, Stephen J Lewis
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2015;[Epub] CrossRef - Sham Feeding? Same Feeding?
Hungdai Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(6): 224. CrossRef
- Postoperative Ileus and Nonpharmacological Nursing Interventions for Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review
- Rhabdoid Carcinoma of the Rectum
- Narimantas Evaldas Samalavicius, Rokas Stulpinas, Valdas Gasilionis, Edita Baltruskeviciene, Eduardas Aleknavicius, Ugnius Mickys
- Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):252-255. Published online December 31, 2013
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.252
- 3,660 View
- 47 Download
- 10 Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
Rhabdoid colonic tumors are very rare lesions with just a few publications describing such neoplasms. Even more unusual for these lesions are their primary rectal locations, with only two brief case reports having been published on that subject to date. We present a case of a composite rhabdoid rectal carcinoma in a 49-year-old male. The tumor behaved very aggressively, with rapid patient demise despite radical surgery and intensive postoperative chemotherapy (FOLFIRI [folinic acid {leucovorin}, fluorouracil {5-fluorouracil}, and irinotecan] and FOLFOX4 [folinic acid {leucovorin}, fluorouraci {5-fluorouracil}, and oxaliplatin]). Pathologic examination was supportive of a rhabdoid carcinoma, with a compatible immunohistochemical profile, demonstrating synchronous expression of vimentin and epithelial markers in the tumor cells. In addition,
BRAF V600E gene mutation, together with a wild-typeKRAS gene, was identified, and no evidence of microsatellite instability based on MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 immunophenotypes, i.e., no loss of expression for all 4 markers, was observed. Our reported case confirms previously published observations of the clinical aggressiveness and the poor therapeutic response for rhabdoid tumors.-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- SMARCB1/INI1-Deficient Poorly Differentiated Carcinoma of the Colon With Rhabdoid Features—A Rare Tumor With Serrated Phenotype: Case Report and Review of Literature
Shivali Maurya, Sujata Yadav, Subham Bhowmik, Jasmine Dhal, Lalita Mehra, Raju Sharma, Asuri Krishna, Atul Sharma, Adarsh Barwad, Prasenjit Das
International Journal of Surgical Pathology.2024; 32(1): 187. CrossRef - Elusive and Aggressive: Unraveling SMARCB1/INI1-Deficient Undifferentiated Carcinoma With Rhabdoid Features Arising From the Colon: A Case Report and Comprehensive Literature Review
Xiaoqin (Lucy) Liu, Diana Agostini-Vulaj
International Journal of Surgical Pathology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Case report: administration of immune checkpoint inhibitor for SMARCB1 (INI1)-negative rhabdoid carcinoma with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high in the right colon
Toshinori Kobayashi, Yuki Matsui, Hisanori Miki, Masahiko Hatta, Mitsuaki Ishida, Hironaga Satake, Mitsugu Sekimoto
Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - A Rare Case of Undifferentiated Rhabdoid Carcinoma of the Colon
Syed Alishan Nasir, Ronak Patel, Lalaine Ruiz, Michael Bush
Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - INI1-negative colorectal undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid features and postoperative rapidly growing liver metastases: a case report and review of the literature
Masatsugu Kojima, Toru Miyake, Tomoyuki Ueki, Hiroyuki Ohta, Ryoji Kushima, Masanori Shiohara, Hiroo Mizuta, Hiroya Iida, Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi, Sachiko Kaida, Katsushi Takebayashi, Hiromitsu Maehira, Yusuke Nishina, Tomoharu Shimizu, Eiji Mekata, Masaji Tan
Surgical Case Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - BRAF Mutation in Colorectal Rhabdoid and Poorly Differentiated Medullary Carcinomas
Elena Bolzacchini, Nunzio Digiacomo, Cristina Marrazzo, Nora Sahnane, Roberta Maragliano, Anthony Gill, Luca Albarello, Fausto Sessa, Daniela Furlan, Carlo Capella
Cancers.2019; 11(9): 1252. CrossRef - Pathologic complete response to bevacizumab-FOLFIRI in metastatic colonic undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid features
Tien-Chan Hsieh, Hung-Wei Liu, Chao-Wen Hsu
Journal of Cancer Research and Practice.2019; 6(3): 140. CrossRef - Extraordinary disease-free survival in a rare malignant extrarenal rhabdoid tumor: a case report and review of the literature
Francesco D’Amico, Alessandra Bertacco, Maurizio Cesari, Claudia Mescoli, Giorgio Caturegli, Gabriel Gondolesi, Umberto Cillo
Journal of Medical Case Reports.2018;[Epub] CrossRef - SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcoma: a distinctive clinicopathological entity with undifferentiated rhabdoid morphology and aggressive behavior
Jennifer L Sauter, Rondell P Graham, Brandon T Larsen, Sarah M Jenkins, Anja C Roden, Jennifer M Boland
Modern Pathology.2017; 30(10): 1422. CrossRef - Case Report of Rhabdoid Colon Cancer and Review of Literature
Aparna Kalyan, Gurleen Pasricha, Dulabh Monga, Aatur Singhi, Nathan Bahary
Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2015; 14(1): e5. CrossRef
- SMARCB1/INI1-Deficient Poorly Differentiated Carcinoma of the Colon With Rhabdoid Features—A Rare Tumor With Serrated Phenotype: Case Report and Review of Literature
- Pneumoretroperitoneum After Procedure for Prolapsed Hemorrhoid
- Young Jin Park
- Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):256-258. Published online December 31, 2013
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.256
- 5,294 View
- 39 Download
- 3 Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
Procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoid (PPH) is well recognized alternative to the traditional hemorrhoidectomy, and is associated with reduced pain and earlier return to normal activity. Over the past decade, there have been reports of severe life-threatening complications after a PPH, although the incidence is very low. Rectal perforation due to staple-line dehiscence is one of the serious complications that can cause severe pelvic sepsis or a pneumoretroperitoneum. Here, the first Korean case of a pneumoretroperitoneum due to staple-line dehiscence is described.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- The Effort to Reduce Vasovagal Reaction and Abdominal Pain During Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
Hyeonseok Jeong
Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(5): 291. CrossRef - Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circular Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
Jin Sub Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(1): 7. CrossRef - Early Experience With a Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Treating Patients With Grades III–IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids
Hyeonseok Jeong, Sunghwan Hwang, Kil O Ryu, Jiyong Lim, Hyun Tae Kim, Hye Mi Yu, Jihoon Yoon, Ju-Young Lee, Hyoung Rae Kim, Young Gil Choi
Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(1): 28. CrossRef
- The Effort to Reduce Vasovagal Reaction and Abdominal Pain During Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
First
Prev
TOP
