Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Previous issues

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Previous issues
11 Previous issues
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Authors
Volume 28(5); October 2012
Prev issue Next issue
Editorials
Risk Factors of Parastomal Hernia and Creation of an Ostomy
Jin Kwon Lee, Won Kyung Kang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):225-225.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.225
  • 2,646 View
  • 37 Download
PDF
Cyclooxygenase and Prostaglandin in Cancer
Jong-Woo Kim
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):226-227.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.226
  • 2,302 View
  • 37 Download
PDF
From Evidence-based Medicine to Personalized Medicine
Suk-Hwan Lee
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):228-229.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.228
  • 2,453 View
  • 20 Download
PDF
Review
Update and Debate Issues in Surgical Treatment of Middle and Low Rectal Cancer
Nam Kyu Kim, Min Sung Kim, Sami F. AL-Asari
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):230-240.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.230
  • 3,773 View
  • 37 Download
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Based on a review of the literature, this paper provides an update on surgical treatment of middle and low rectal cancer and discusses issues of debate surrounding that treatment. The main goal of the surgical treatment of rectal cancer is radical resection of the tumor and surrounding lymphatic tissue. Local excision of early rectal cancer can be another treatment option, in which the patient can avoid possible complications related to radical surgery. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) has been recommended for patients with cT3-4N0 or any T N+ rectal cancer because CRT shows better local control and less toxicity than adjuvant CRT. However, recent clinical trials showed promising results for local excision after neoadjuvant CRT in selected patients with low rectal cancer. In addition, the "wait and see" concept is another modality that has been reported for the management of tumors that show complete clinical remission after neoadjuvant CRT. Although radical surgery for middle and low rectal cancer is the cornerstone therapy, an ultralow anterior resection with or without intersphincteric resection (ISR) has become an alternative standard surgical method for selected patients. Many studies have reported on the oncological safety of the ISR, but few of them have addressed the issue the functional outcome. Furthermore, an abdominoperineal resection (APR) has problems with high rates of tumor perforations and positive circumferential resection margins, and those factors have contributed to its having a high rate of local recurrence and a poor survival rate for rectal cancer compared with sphincter-saving procedures. Recently, great efforts have been made to reduce these problems, and the total levator excision or the extended APR concept has emerged. Surgical management for low rectal cancer should aim to radically excise the tumor and to preserve as much of the sphincter function as possible by using multidisciplinary approaches. However, further prospective clinical trials are needed for tailored treatment of rectal cancer patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Neoadjuvant chemoradiation alters biomarkers of anticancer immunotherapy responses in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Incheol Seo, Hye Won Lee, Sang Jun Byun, Jee Young Park, Hyeonji Min, Sung Hwan Lee, Ju-Seog Lee, Shin Kim, Sung Uk Bae
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.2021; 9(3): e001610.     CrossRef
  • Anus-Preserving Surgery in Advanced Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: A Perspective on Oncological Safety of Intersphincteric Resection
    Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak, Jin Kim, Seon Hahn Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(19): 4793.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: Updates
    Cristopher Varela, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 395.     CrossRef
  • Factors influencing changing bowel habits in patients undergoing sphincter‐saving surgery for rectal cancer
    Hyeonju Jeong, JeongYun Park
    International Wound Journal.2019; 16(S1): 71.     CrossRef
  • Critical and Challenging Issues in the Surgical Management of Low-Lying Rectal Cancer
    Aeris Jane D. Nacion, Youn Young Park, Seung Yoon Yang, Nam Kyu Kim
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2018; 59(6): 703.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of tumor regression in locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy
    Mirko Omejc, Maja Potisek
    Radiology and Oncology.2017; 52(1): 30.     CrossRef
  • The influence of the distal resection margin length on local recurrence and long- term survival in patients with rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy and sphincter- preserving rectal resection
    Jan Grosek, Vaneja Velenik, Ibrahim Edhemovic, Mirko Omejc
    Radiology and Oncology.2017; 51(2): 169.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision using a Wristed Suction-irrigation Device for Efficient Traction and Visualization
    Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2017; 20(3): 120.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Overcoming Technical Challenges in Laparoscopic Surgery by Advanced Techniques
    Seungwan Park, Nam Kyu Kim
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2015; 30(7): 837.     CrossRef
  • Oncological superiority of extralevator abdominoperineal resection over conventional abdominoperineal resection: a meta-analysis
    Ao Huang, Hongchao Zhao, Tianlong Ling, Yingjun Quan, Minhua Zheng, Bo Feng
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2014; 29(3): 321.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Incidence and Risk Factors of Parastomal Hernia
Yeun Ju Sohn, Sun Mi Moon, Ui Sup Shin, Sun Hee Jee
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):241-246.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.241
  • 4,517 View
  • 56 Download
  • 52 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Among the various stoma complications, the parastomal hernia (PSH) is the most common. Prevention of PSH is very important to improve the quality of life and to prevent further serious complications. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and the risk factors of PSH.

Methods

From January 2002 and October 2008, we retrospectively reviewed 165 patients who underwent an end colostomy. As a routine oncologic follow-up, abdomino-pelvic computed tomography was used to examine the occurrence of the PSH. The associations of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), history of steroid use and comorbidities to the development of the PSH were analyzed. The median duration of the follow-up was 36 months (0 to 99 months).

Results

During follow-up, 50 patients developed a PSH and the 5-year cumulative incidence rate of a PSH, obtained by using the Kaplan-Meier method, was 37.8%. In the multivariate COX analysis, female gender (hazard ratio [HR], 3.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.77 to 6.11; P < 0.0001), age over 60 years (HR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.26 to 4.46; P = 0.01), BMI more than 25 kg/m2 (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.02 to 3.16; P = 0.04), and hypertension (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.81; P = 0.02) were all independent risk factors for the development of a PSH.

Conclusion

The 5-year incidence rate of a PSH was 37.8%. The significant risk factors of a PSH were as follows: female gender, age over 60 years, BMI more than 25 kg/m2, and hypertension. Using a prophylactic mesh during colostomy formation might be advisable when the patients have these factors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development and validation of a nomogram prediction model for the risk of parastomal hernia
    Huasheng Liu, Weiqin Wang, Chen Qin, Hongxia Wang, Wei Qi, Yanhua Wei, Longbo Zheng, Jilin Hu
    Intelligent Medicine.2024; 4(2): 128.     CrossRef
  • The clinical applications of D-type parastomal hernia repair surgery
    Y. Y. Fu, Y. Ma, C. K. Zhang, L. H. Sun, D. Tang, W. Wang, D. R. Wang
    Hernia.2024; 28(2): 427.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the 3-D mesh and Sugarbaker repair for parastomal hernia: a single center experience in China
    Hekai Shi, Shaochun Li, Yiming Lin, Dongchao Yang, Wenpei Dong, Zhicheng Song, Heng Song, Yan Gu
    Updates in Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluating EHS parastomal hernia classification for surgical planning: a retrospective analysis of 160 consecutive cases in a single center
    Marek Szczepkowski, Mateusz Zamkowski, Suwała Alicja, Witkowski Piotr, Maciej Śmietański
    Hernia.2024; 28(5): 1915.     CrossRef
  • Lap-re-Do Keyhole versus Lap-re-Do Sugarbaker techniques in large parastomal hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study
    Xiaojian Fu, Minglei Li, Rong Hua, Qiyuan Yao
    Hernia.2024; 28(5): 1945.     CrossRef
  • A giant parastomal hernia in a high risk patient: preparation to make surgery worthwhile
    Seda Gunes, Ali Bohlok, Antoine El Asmar, Thibaut Engels, Marie Magdelaine Lefort, Eleonora Farinella, Issam El Nakadi
    Acta Chirurgica Belgica.2023; 123(3): 309.     CrossRef
  • Sugarbaker Versus Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies
    Andrew M. Fleming, Alisa L. Phillips, Justin A. Drake, Megan G. Gross, Danny Yakoub, Justin Monroe, Nathan M. Hinkle, David Shibata, Elizabeth H. Wood
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 27(3): 573.     CrossRef
  • Contemporary Outcomes of Elective Parastomal Hernia Repair in Older Adults
    Ryan Howard, Farizah Rob, Jyothi Thumma, Anne Ehlers, Sean O’Neill, Justin B. Dimick, Dana A. Telem
    JAMA Surgery.2023; 158(4): 394.     CrossRef
  • The Risk Factors for Parastomal Hernia Development: A 8-year Retrospective Study in Colorectal Surgery
    Tayfun BİŞGİN, Cahide AYİK, Deniz CENAN, Berke MANOĞLU, Dilek ÖZDEN, Selman SÖKMEN
    Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences.2023; 7(2): 773.     CrossRef
  • 67/w mit Vorwölbung um das Stoma
    F. Köhler, Michael Meir
    Die Chirurgie.2023; 94(S1): 35.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Obesity Classification on Complications after Sigmoidostomy for Low-Grade Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    慧 王
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2023; 13(07): 11825.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for the Development of Parastomal Hernia: A Narrative Review
    Teodora Elena Manole, Ion Daniel, Bolocan Alexandra, Păduraru N. Dan, Octavian Andronic
    Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences.2023; 11(3): 187.     CrossRef
  • Modified Approach for Extraperitoneal Colostomy Creation in Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection
    Xiang Zhang, Xin Li, Zhiqiang Cheng, Kexin Wang, Yong Dai, Yanlei Wang
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prophylactic retromuscular mesh placement for parastomal hernia prevention: a retrospective cohort study of permanent colostomies and ileostomies
    Jonathan Frigault, Simon Lemieux, Dominic Breton, Philippe Bouchard, Alexandre Bouchard, Roger C. Grégoire, François Letarte, Gilles Bouchard, Vincent Boun, Katia Massé, Sébastien Drolet
    Hernia.2022; 26(2): 495.     CrossRef
  • Stoma creation is associated with a low incidence of midline incisional hernia after colorectal surgery: the “fighting over the fascia” theory concerning the incision and stoma hole
    Noriaki Ohara, Kay Uehara, Atsushi Ogura, Masanori Sando, Toshisada Aiba, Yuki Murata, Takashi Mizuno, Kokuryo Toshio, Yukihiro Yokoyama, Satoko Ishigaki, Yuanying Li, Hiroshi Yatsuya, Tomoki Ebata
    Surgery Today.2022; 52(6): 953.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for the development of a parastomal hernia in patients with enterostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Niu Niu, Shizheng Du, Dongliang Yang, Liuliu Zhang, Bainv Wu, Xiaoxu Zhi, Jun Li, Dejing Xu, Yinan Zhang, Aifeng Meng
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(3): 507.     CrossRef
  • An Analysis of the Risk Factors for the Development of Parastomal Hernia: A Single Institutional Experience
    Faiza H Soomro, Sufyan Azam, Sritharan Ganeshmoorthy, Peter Waterland
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Is absorbable mesh useful in preventing parastomal hernia after emergency surgery? The PARTHENOPE study
    F. Pizza, D. D’Antonio, F. S. Lucido, P. Del Rio, C. Dell’Isola, L. Brusciano, S. Tolone, L. Docimo, C. Gambardella
    Hernia.2022; 26(2): 507.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the extraperitoneal and transperitoneal routes for permanent colostomy: a meta-analysis with RCTs and systematic review
    Jinlong Luo, Dujanand Singh, Faqiang Zhang, Xinting Yang, Xiaoying Zha, Huaiwu Jiang, Lie Yang, Hua Yang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Existing Ostomy: A Preliminary Feasibility Study
    Ray Portela, Ahmet Vahibe, Joseph N. Badaoui, Omer U.I. Hassan, Travis J. Mckenzie, Todd A. Kellogg, Omar M. Ghanem
    Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care.2022; 17(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Use of prophylactic stoma mesh is a risk factor for developing rectus abdominis muscle atrophy
    S. Täckström, A. Chabok, K. Smedh, M. Nikberg
    Hernia.2022; 26(2): 517.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and risk factors for parastomal hernia with a permanent colostomy
    Lei Liu, Longbo Zheng, Maoshen Zhang, Jilin Hu, Yun Lu, Dongsheng Wang
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 126(3): 535.     CrossRef
  • Obesity Stratification Predicts Short-Term Complications After Parastomal Hernia Repair
    Mustafa Tamim Alam Khan, Ronit Patnaik, Lee Hausman-Cohen, Olivia Panchal, Mackenzie Ewart, Rehana Sultana Lovely, Aashish Rajesh
    Journal of Surgical Research.2022; 280: 27.     CrossRef
  • Stoma-Related Complications: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review
    Zalán Benedek, Loránd Kocsis, Orsolya Bauer, Nicolae Suciu, Sorin Sorlea, Călin Crăciun, Rareș Georgescu, Marius Florin Coroș
    Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine.2022; 7(2): 31.     CrossRef
  • Permanent end-colostomy parastomal hernia prevention using a novel three-dimensional mesh
    Camillo Leonardo Bertoglio, Marianna Maspero, Lorenzo Morini, Andrea Zironda, Bruno Domenico Alampi, Michele Mazzola, Carmelo Magistro, Pietro Carnevali, Giovanni Ferrari
    Hernia.2021; 25(3): 655.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for Parastomal Hernia Associated with Covering Stoma in Rectal Surgery
    Kazuhiro Ishimaru, Yasutaka Shuno, Hiroaki Nozawa, Kazushige Kawai, Koji Murono, Soichiro Ishihara
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2021; 83(S3): 749.     CrossRef
  • The role of radiological classification of parastomal hernia as a predictor of the need for surgical hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study
    Jonathan Frigault, Simon Lemieux, Dominic Breton, Gilles Bouchard, Sébastien Drolet
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(5): 1643.     CrossRef
  • Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair of parastomal hernia
    Hữu Thịnh Nguyễn, Ngọc Trường Vinh Nguyễn
    Vietnam Journal of Endolaparoscopic Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Use of prophylactic mesh during initial stoma creation to prevent parastomal herniation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Syed Mohiuddin, William Hollingworth, Niroshini Rajaretnam, Barnaby C. Reeves, Neil J. Smart
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(11): 2821.     CrossRef
  • A semi‐Markov model comparing the lifetime cost‐effectiveness of mesh prophylaxis to prevent parastomal hernia in patients undergoing end colostomy creation for rectal cancer
    Syed Mohiuddin, Barnaby C. Reeves, Neil J. Smart, William Hollingworth
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(11): 2967.     CrossRef
  • Abdominal Oblique Internal and External Muscles Gap Colostomy for Lower Incidence of Parastomal Hernia and Higher Quality of Life: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Yongjian Huang, Hengkai Chen, Qiajun Zheng, Xiaohan Lin, Guangwei Zhu, Jinzhou Wang, Changli Huang, Jianxin Ye
    World Journal of Surgery.2021; 45(12): 3623.     CrossRef
  • Patient-Related Factors Associated With Stoma and Peristomal Complications Following Fecal Ostomy Surgery
    Piotr Zelga, Piotr Kluska, Marta Zelga, Joanna Piasecka-Zelga, Adam Dziki
    Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing.2021; 48(5): 415.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of different modalities for the diagnosis of parastomal hernia: a systematic review
    Gijs H. J. de Smet, Daniël P. V. Lambrichts, Sjoerd van den Hoek, Leonard F. Kroese, Stefan Buettner, Anand G. Menon, Gert-Jan Kleinrensink, Johan F. Lange
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(2): 199.     CrossRef
  • Stoma-Related Complications Following Ostomy Surgery in 3 Acute Care Hospitals
    Robert Pearson, Stephen R. Knight, James C. K. Ng, Isabell Robertson, Clare McKenzie, Angus M. Macdonald
    Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing.2020; 47(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Stomach in a parastomal hernia: a rare complication of stomas
    Onyekachi Ezekiel Ekowo, Ammar Al Midani, Yasser Abdulaal, Mohamed Boshnaq
    BMJ Case Reports.2020; 13(8): e234325.     CrossRef
  • Parastomal Hernia Following Abdominoperineal Resection
    Alimohammad Bananzadeh, Ibrahim Jaweek, Mohammad Rezazadehkermani, Leila Ghahramani, Faranak Bahrami, Seyed Vahid Hosseini, Ahmad Izadpanah, Seyed Mohammad Kazem Tadayon
    Journal of Coloproctology.2020; 40(04): 311.     CrossRef
  • Radiological progression of end colostomy trephine diameter and area
    K. K. Ho, T. Economou, N. J. Smart, I. R. Daniels
    BJS Open.2019; 3(1): 112.     CrossRef
  • Colostomy on CT and fluoroscopy: What the radiologist needs to know
    Shari Friedman, Zina J. Ricci, Marjorie W. Stein, Ellen L. Wolf, Tulay Ekinci, Fernanda S. Mazzariol, Mariya Kobi
    Clinical Imaging.2019; 56: 17.     CrossRef
  • Parastomal hernias causing symptoms or requiring surgical repair after colorectal cancer surgery—a national population-based cohort study
    Mathilda Tivenius, Pia Näsvall, Gabriel Sandblom
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(7): 1267.     CrossRef
  • Prevention of parastomal hernia after abdominoperineal excision with a prophylactic three‐dimensional funnel mesh
    J. López‐Borao, Z. Madrazo‐González, E. Kreisler, S. Biondo
    Colorectal Disease.2019; 21(11): 1326.     CrossRef
  • Parastomal Hernia Repair Outcomes: A Nine-Year Experience
    You Wei Lin, Patrick Keller, Daniel L. Davenport, Margaret A. Plymale, Crystal F. Totten, John Scott Roth
    The American Surgeon.2019; 85(7): 738.     CrossRef
  • European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias
    S. A. Antoniou, F. Agresta, J. M. Garcia Alamino, D. Berger, F. Berrevoet, H.-T. Brandsma, K. Bury, J. Conze, D. Cuccurullo, U. A. Dietz, R. H. Fortelny, C. Frei-Lanter, B. Hansson, F. Helgstrand, A. Hotouras, A. Jänes, L. F. Kroese, J. R. Lambrecht, I. K
    Hernia.2018; 22(1): 183.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and risk factors for parastomal bulging in patients with ileostomy or colostomy: a register‐based study using data from the Danish Stoma Database Capital Region
    R. M. Andersen, T. W. Klausen, A. K. Danielsen, A. Vinther, I. Gögenur, T. Thomsen
    Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(4): 331.     CrossRef
  • Relationship between stoma creation route for end colostomy and parastomal hernia development after laparoscopic surgery
    Hitoshi Hino, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Yusuke Kinugasa, Akio Shiomi, Hiroyasu Kagawa, Yushi Yamakawa, Masakatsu Numata, Akinobu Furutani, Takuya Suzuki, Kakeru Torii
    Surgical Endoscopy.2017; 31(4): 1966.     CrossRef
  • Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia after end colostomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    M. López-Cano, H.-T. Brandsma, K. Bury, B. Hansson, I. Kyle-Leinhase, J. G. Alamino, F. Muysoms
    Hernia.2017; 21(2): 177.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic prosthetic parastomal and perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal resection
    G. Dapri, L. Gerard, L. Cardinali, D. Repullo, I. Surdeanu, S. H. Sondji, G.-B. Cadière, S. Saussez
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2017; 21(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of quality-of-life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis
    Sherif Abolfotouh, Tero Rautio, Kai Klintrup, Ilona Helavirta, Jyrki Mäkelä
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 52(10): 1078.     CrossRef
  • An Evaluation of Parastomal Hernia Repair Using the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative
    Sarah S. Fox, Randy Janczyk, Jeremy A. Warren, Alfredo M. Carbonell, Benjamin K. Poulose, Michael J. Rosen, William W. Hope
    The American Surgeon.2017; 83(8): 881.     CrossRef
  • Parastomal hernias after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion
    Timothy F. Donahue, Bernard H. Bochner
    Investigative and Clinical Urology.2016; 57(4): 240.     CrossRef
  • Parastomal Hernia Containing Stomach
    Sebastian Barber-Millet, Salvador Pous, Vicente Navarro, Jose Iserte, Eduardo García-Granero
    International Surgery.2014; 99(4): 404.     CrossRef
  • Paracolostomy Hernia Repair: Who and When?
    Zachary A. Gregg, Haisar E. Dao, Steven Schechter, Nishit Shah
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2014; 218(6): 1105.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for parastomal hernia in Japanese patients with permanent colostomy
    Kimihiko Funahashi, Takayuki Suzuki, Yasuo Nagashima, Satoshi Matsuda, Junichi Koike, Hiroyuki Shiokawa, Mitsunori Ushigome, Kenichiro Arai, Tomoaki Kaneko, Akiharu Kurihara, Hironori Kaneko
    Surgery Today.2014; 44(8): 1465.     CrossRef
Hyperbilirubinemia Is a Significant Indicator for the Severity of Acute Appendicitis
Young Ran Hong, Chul-Woon Chung, Jong Woo Kim, Chang Il Kwon, Dae Ho Ahn, Sung Won Kwon, Seong Ki Kim
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):247-252.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.247
  • 4,264 View
  • 66 Download
  • 23 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study aims to reveal more effective clinical or laboratory markers for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and to score the severity based on a sufficiently large number of patients with acute appendicitis.

Methods

We identified 1,195 patients with acute appendicitis after excluding those with other causes of hyperbilirubinemia among the 1,271 patients that underwent a laparoscopic or an open appendectomy between 2009 and 2010. A retrospective chart review of the medical records, including laboratory and histologic results, was conducted. We then analyzed the data using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Among the 1,195 patients, a laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 685 cases (57.32%), and an open appendectomy was performed in 510 cases (42.68%). The univariate analysis demonstrated significant differences for white blood cell count (P < 0.0001), segmented neutrophils (P = 0.0035), total bilirubin (P < 0.0001), and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score between groups (P < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that total bilirubin (odds ratio, 1.772; 95% confidence interval, 1.320 to 2.379; P = 0.0001) and SIRS score (odds ratio, 1.583; 95% confidence interval, 1.313 to 1.908; P < 0.0001) have statistically significant diagnostic value for perforated appendicitis.

Conclusion

Hyperbilirubinemia is a statistically significant diagnostic marker for acute appendicitis and the likelihood of perforation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Diagnostic value of laboratory parameters for complicated appendicitis: A two‑center study
    Qian Zhang, Hongwei Zhao, Fangli Wang, Wenqiang Li, Peng Zhang
    Biomedical Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Letter to the Editor regarding “A novel Appendicitis TriMOdal prediction Score (ATMOS) for acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a retrospective observational study”
    Rıfat Peksöz, Ferdi Cambaztepe, Sabri Selçuk Atamanalp
    Updates in Surgery.2023; 75(1): 265.     CrossRef
  • Individual biomarkers in the blood are not yet applicable in diagnosing complicated appendicitis: A scoping review
    Binyamin Sikander, Jacob Rosenberg, Siv Fonnes
    The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2023; 67: 100.     CrossRef
  • Elevated total and direct bilirubin are associated with acute complicated appendicitis: a single-center based study in Saudi Arabia
    Mohammed S. Alfehaid, Ayman M. Babiker, Abdullah Hamad Alkharraz, Hamad yousef Alsaeed, Ali Abdullah Alzunaydi, Adi Abdulaziz Aldubaiyan, Hanan Abdalla Sinyan, Bshayr K. Alkhalaf, Rakan Alshuwaykan, Rehana Khalil, Osama Al-Wutayd
    BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Significance of laboratory parameters in diagnosing acute appendicitis during pregnancy
    Rıfat Peksöz, Esra Dişçi, Abdulkadir Kaya, Enes Ağırman, Ercan Korkut, Nurhak Aksungur, Necip Altundaş, Salih Kara, Sabri Selçuk Atamanalp
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2022; 92(1-2): 121.     CrossRef
  • Hyperbilirubinemia and Hyponatremia as Predictors of Complicated Appendicitis
    Abdullah Shuaib, Nour Alhamdan, Husain Arian, Mohamed Alaa Sallam, Ali Shuaib
    Medical Sciences.2022; 10(3): 36.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of role of hyperbilirubinemia as a new diagnostic marker of complicated appendicitis
    Sabyasachi Bakshi, Nilay Mandal
    BMC Gastroenterology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical predictors of gangrenous appendicitis: elevated total bilirubin level and computed tomography scan findings
    Itsuki Naya, Kensuke Adachi, Koichi Takeuchi, Yuno Ariyama, Akihiro Hosaka, Kazuhiro Imamura, Yasuhiro Morita, Shigeki Matsubara, Alan Kawarai Lefor, Hisanaga Horie
    Acute Medicine & Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • THE UTILITY OF SERUM BILIRUBIN AS A MARKER IN ACUTE ABDOMEN
    P N Sreeramulu, Shashidhar K N, Varsha A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH.2021; : 16.     CrossRef
  • Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly: A Literature Review on an Increasingly Frequent Surgical Problem
    Sintija Lapsa, Arturs Ozolins, Ilze Strumfa, Janis Gardovskis
    Geriatrics.2021; 6(3): 93.     CrossRef
  • Obstructive-Type Jaundice without Bile Duct Dilatation in Generalized Peritonitis Is a Specific Sign of Spontaneous Gall Bladder Perforation
    Vicky Sumarki Budipramana, Maria Meilita
    Case Reports in Medicine.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin for overall and complicated acute appendicitis in children: a meta-analysis
    Wei Cui, Haipeng Liu, Hong Ni, Xianhui Qin, Liran Zhu
    Italian Journal of Pediatrics.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Role of Serum Bilirubin in Acute Appendicitis
    Siva Kumar Puligundla, Gandikota Venkata Prakash, Ajay Babu, Boddukura Sahithi Priya, Sreedhar Sreedhar, Anugna Anugna, Sumesh Raja, Tejaswi S.
    Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare.2019; 6(48): 3039.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Serum Bilirubin as a Predictive Marker for Simple and Complicated Appendicitis in Sulaimani Emergency Teaching Hospital
    Seerwan Hama Shareef, Dara Ahmed Mohammed, Goran Ameer Ahmed
    Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research.2018; : 15.     CrossRef
  • Lack of utility of measuring serum bilirubin concentration in distinguishing perforation status of pediatric appendicitis
    William Bonadio, Santina Bruno, David Attaway, Logesh Dharmar, Derek Tam, Peter Homel
    The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2017; 35(6): 885.     CrossRef
  • Hyperbilirubinaemia: its utility in non‐perforated appendicitis
    Anna Sandstrom, David A. Grieve
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2017; 87(7-8): 587.     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers of acute appendicitis: systematic review and cost–benefit trade-off analysis
    Amish Acharya, Sheraz R. Markar, Melody Ni, George B. Hanna
    Surgical Endoscopy.2017; 31(3): 1022.     CrossRef
  • Hyperbilirubinaemia alone cannot distinguish a perforation in acute appendicitis
    Fábio R. Silva, Maria Inês da Rosa, Bruno R. Silva, Carla Simon, Maria Cecília Alexandre, Lidia R. Medeiros, Fabrício S. Bitencourt, Maria Eduarda Fernandes dos Reis
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2016; 86(4): 255.     CrossRef
  • Predictive value of abnormally raised serum bilirubin in acute appendicitis: A cohort study
    A.C. Chambers, S.L. Bismohun, H. Davies, P. White, A.V. Patil
    International Journal of Surgery.2015; 13: 207.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic markers in acute appendicitis
    Yahya A. Al-Abed, Nasser Alobaid, Fiona Myint
    The American Journal of Surgery.2015; 209(6): 1043.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic accuracy of hyperbilirubinaemia in anticipating appendicitis and its severity
    Sven Muller, Claudius Falch, Steffen Axt, Peter Wilhelm, Dirk Hein, Alfred Königsrainer, Andreas Kirschniak
    Emergency Medicine Journal.2015; 32(9): 698.     CrossRef
  • Serum total bilirubin elevation is a predictor of the clinicopathological severity of acute appendicitis
    Satoshi Nomura, Masanori Watanabe, Osamu Komine, Takeshi Shioya, Tetsutaka Toyoda, Hideki Bou, Tetsuo Shibuya, Hideyuki Suzuki, Eiji Uchida
    Surgery Today.2014; 44(6): 1104.     CrossRef
  • Elevated serum bilirubin in assessing the likelihood of perforation in acute appendicitis: A diagnostic meta-analysis
    Salvatore Giordano, Markus Pääkkönen, Paulina Salminen, Juha M. Grönroos
    International Journal of Surgery.2013; 11(9): 795.     CrossRef
Prognostic Implication of 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase Down-Regulation in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
Pil Sung Kang, Jin Ha Kim, Ok In Moon, Sung Chul Lim, Kyung Jong Kim
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):253-258.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.253
  • 3,195 View
  • 49 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Prostaglandin (PG) E2 is known to be closely related to cancer progression and is inactivated by 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (PGDH). 15-PGDH is shown to have tumor suppressor activity and to be down-regulated in various cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, we evaluated the expression of 15-PGDH and its prognostic effect in patients with CRC.

Methods

15-PGDH expression was examined by using immunohistochemistry in 77 patients with CRC. Its prognostic significance was statistically evaluated.

Results

Negative 15-PGDH expression was noted in 55.8% of the 77 cases of CRC. 15-PGDH expression showed no correlation with any of the various clinicopathologic parameters. The status of lymph node metastasis, tumor-node-metastasis stages, and pre-operative carcinoembryonic antigen levels showed significant prognostic effect. However, univariate analysis revealed down-regulation of 15-PGDH not to be a predictor of poor survival. The 5-year overall survival rate was 71.7% in the group with positive expression of 15-PGDH and 67.1% in the group with negative expression of 15-PGDH, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.751).

Conclusion

15-PGDH was down-regulated in 55.8% of the colorectal cancer patients. However, down-regulation of 15-PGDH showed no prognostic value in patients with CRC. Further larger scale or prospective studies are needed to clarify the prognostic effect of 15-PGDH down-regulation in patients with colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Molecular Targets in Precision Chemoprevention of Colorectal Cancer: An Update from Pre-Clinical to Clinical Trials
    Nagendra S. Yarla, Venkateshwar Madka, Gopal Pathuri, Chinthalapally V. Rao
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2020; 21(24): 9609.     CrossRef
Oncologic Outcomes of Stage IIIA Colon Cancer for Different Chemotherapeutic Regimens
Yoo Sung Lee, Hee Cheol Kim, Kyung Ook Jung, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Woo Yong Lee, Ho-Kyung Chun
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):259-264.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.259
  • 3,758 View
  • 12 Download
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Adjuvant chemotherapy is currently recommended for Stage IIIA colon cancers. This study aimed to elucidate the oncologic outcomes of Stage IIIA colon cancer according to the chemotherapeutic regimen based on a retrospective review.

Methods

From 1995 to 2008, Stage IIIA colon cancer patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database at a single institution. Exclusion criteria were as follows: rectal cancer, another malignancy other than colon cancer, no adjuvant chemotherapy and unknown chemotherapeutic regimen. One hundred thirty-one patients were enrolled in the study, and the clinicopathologic and the oncologic characteristics were analyzed. The number of males was 72, and the number of females was 59; the mean age was 59.5 years (range, 25 to 76 years), and the median follow-up period was 33 months (range, 2 to 127 months).

Results

Of the 131 patients, fluorouracil/leucovorin (FL)/capecitabine chemotherapy was performed in 109 patients, and FOLFOX chemotherapy was performed in 22 patients. When the patients who received FL/capecitabine chemotherapy and the patients who received FOLFOX chemotherapy were compared, there was no significant difference in the clinicopathologic factors between the two groups. The 5-year overall survival and the 5-year disease-free survival were 97.2% and 94.5% in the FL/capecitabine patient group and 95.5% and 90.9% in the FOLFOX patient group, respectively, and no statistically significant differences were noted between the two groups.

Conclusion

Stage IIIA colon cancer showed good oncologic outcomes, and the chemotherapeutic regimen did not seem to affect the oncologic outcome.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A New Method for Constructing Macrophage-Associated Predictors of Treatment Efficacy Based on Single-Cell Sequencing Analysis
    Jianxiu Lin, Yang Ran, Tengfei Wu, Zishan Wang, Jinjin Zhao, Yun Tian
    Journal of Immunotherapy.2024; 47(2): 33.     CrossRef
  • Distinctive oncological features of stage IIIA colorectal cancer: Analysis of prognostic factors for selective adjuvant chemotherapy
    Soo Yeun Park, Gyu‐Seog Choi, Jun Seok Park, Hye Jin Kim, Yoshiharu Sakai, Suguru Hasegawa, Toshiaki Watanabe, Seon Hahn Kim
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2015; 111(7): 882.     CrossRef
Initial Clinical Experience with Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer
Ju-A Park, Gyu-Seog Choi, Jun Seok Park, Soo Yeun Park
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):265-270.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.265
  • 4,403 View
  • 64 Download
  • 31 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study was conducted to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of robotic extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

Methods

A review of a prospectively-collected database at Kyungpook National University Medical Center from January 2011 to November revealed a series of 8 consecutive robotic LPLD cases with a preoperative diagnosis of lateral node metastasis. Data regarding patient demographics, operating time, perioperative blood loss, surgical morbidity, lateral lymph node status, and functional outcome were analyzed.

Results

In all eight patients, the procedures were completed without conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time of extended pelvic node dissection was 38 minutes (range, 20 to 51 minutes), the mean number of lateral lymph nodes harvested was 4.1 (range, 1 to 13), and 3 patients (38%) were found to have lymph node metastases. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 0% and 25%, respectively, but, there was no LPLD-related morbidity. The mean hospital stay was 7.5 days (range, 5 to 12 days).

Conclusion

Robotic LPLD is safe and feasible, with the advantage of being a minimally invasive approach. Further large-scale studies comparing robotic and conventional surgery with long-term follow-up evaluation are needed to confirm these findings.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Mohammad Iqbal Hussain, Adriano Carneiro da Costa, Alessandro Mazzotta, Bassem Krimi, Amine Gouader, Eddy Cotte, Jim Khan, Hani Oweira, Tsutomu Kumamoto
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(5): e0304031.     CrossRef
  • The role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and outcomes
    Gyu-Seog Choi, Hye Jin Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 363.     CrossRef
  • Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted extended mesorectal excision: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of perioperative and long-term outcomes
    Ahmed Abdelsamad, Mohammed Khaled Mohammed, Aya Sayed Ahmed Said Serour, Ibrahim Khalil, Zeyad M. Wesh, Laila Rashidi, Mike Ralf Langenbach, Florian Gebauer, Khaled Ashraf Mohamed
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robot-assisted lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with advanced rectal cancer: a single-center experience of 65 cases
    Eon Bin Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Min Hyun Kim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2023; 17(4): 1697.     CrossRef
  • Robotic pelvic side‐wall dissection and en‐bloc excision for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer: outcomes on feasibility and safety
    Naradha Lokuhetty, José Tomás Larach, Amrish K. S. Rajkomar, Helen Mohan, Peadar S. Waters, Alexander G. Heriot, Satish K. Warrier
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2022; 92(9): 2185.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery with robotic platforms
    Se-Jin Baek, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon-Hahn Kim
    Surgical Oncology.2022; 43: 101786.     CrossRef
  • Standardized Step-by-step Technique Using Surgical Landmarks in Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
    Jung Hoon Bae, Wooree Koh, Hyun Ho Kim, Yoon Suk Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(1): 58.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery with robotic platforms
    Se-Jin Baek, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon-Hahn Kim
    Surgical Oncology.2021; 37: 101559.     CrossRef
  • Long-term clinical outcomes of total mesorectal excision and selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced low rectal cancer: a comparative study of a robotic versus laparoscopic approach
    S. H. Song, G.-S. Choi, H. J. Kim, J. S. Park, S. Y. Park, S.-M. Lee, J. A. Choi, H. A. Seok
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2021; 25(4): 413.     CrossRef
  • Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review
    Min Chul Kim, Jae Hwan Oh
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 382.     CrossRef
  • Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives
    Jong Lyul Lee, Hassan A. Alsaleem, Jin Cheon Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2020; 98(1): 31.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic and robotic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer
    Ryota Nakanishi, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Takashi Akiyoshi, Toshiya Nagasaki, Satoshi Nagayama, Toshiki Mukai, Masashi Ueno, Yosuke Fukunaga, Tsuyoshi Konishi
    Surgery Today.2020; 50(3): 209.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Operative Technique and Review of the Literature
    Hidetoshi Katsuno, Tsunekazu Hanai, Koji Masumori, Yoshikazu Koide, Keigo Ashida, Hiroshi Matsuoka, Yosuke Tajima, Tomoyoshi Endo, Masahiro Mizuno, Yeongcheol Cheong, Kotaro Maeda, Ichiro Uyama
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2020; 4(1): 14.     CrossRef
  • Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of locally advanced low rectal cancer: Summary of the current evidence
    Mootaz Elhusseini, Emad H. Aly
    Surgical Oncology.2020; 35: 418.     CrossRef
  • Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation to Clinically Involved Pelvic Sidewall Lymph Nodes in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Pehr E. Hartvigson, Smith Apisarnthanarax, Stephanie Schaub, Stacey Cohen, Greta Bernier, Wui-Jin Koh, Edward Y. Kim
    Advances in Radiation Oncology.2019; 4(3): 478.     CrossRef
  • Robotic rectal surgery in Korea: Analysis of a nationwide registry
    Se‐Jin Baek, Jung‐Myun Kwak, Jin Kim, Seon‐Hahn Kim, Sungsoo Park
    The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: a comparative study of the robotic versus laparoscopic approach
    Hye Jin Kim, Gyu-Seog Choi, Jun Seok Park, Soo Yeun Park, Hee Jae Lee, In Taek Woo, In Kyu Park
    Surgical Endoscopy.2018; 32(5): 2466.     CrossRef
  • Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer
    Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Yusuke Kinugasa, Akio Shiomi, Hiroyasu Kagawa, Yushi Yamakawa, Akinobu Furutani, Shoichi Manabe, Yusuke Yamaoka, Hitoshi Hino
    Surgical Endoscopy.2018; 32(11): 4498.     CrossRef
  • Learning Curve of Robotic Rectal Surgery With Lateral Lymph Node Dissection: Cumulative Sum and Multiple Regression Analyses
    Kazushige Kawai, Keisuke Hata, Toshiaki Tanaka, Takeshi Nishikawa, Kensuke Otani, Koji Murono, Kazuhito Sasaki, Manabu Kaneko, Shigenobu Emoto, Hiroaki Nozawa
    Journal of Surgical Education.2018; 75(6): 1598.     CrossRef
  • Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid–low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy
    Dae Ro Lim, Sung Uk Bae, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2017; 31(4): 1728.     CrossRef
  • Optimal treatment strategies for clinically suspicious lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer
    Hye Jin Kim, Gyu-Seog Choi, Jun Seok Park, Soo Yeun Park, Seung Hyun Cho, Soo Jung Lee, Byung Woog Kang, Jong Gwang Kim
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(59): 100724.     CrossRef
  • Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer
    Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Yusuke Kinugasa, Akio Shiomi, Hiroyuki Tomioka, Hiroyasu Kagawa
    Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(2): 721.     CrossRef
  • Technical feasibility of laparoscopic extended surgery beyond total mesorectal excision for primary or recurrent rectal cancer
    Takashi Akiyoshi
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(2): 718.     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of extra-regional lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer
    Mahdi H. Albandar, Min Soo Cho, Sung Uk Bae, Nam Kyu Kim
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2016; 16(5): 503.     CrossRef
  • Robotic-assisted lateral lymph node dissection for lower rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in 50 consecutive patients
    Hiroyasu Kagawa, Yusuke Kinugasa, Akio Shiomi, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Syunsuke Tsukamoto, Hiroyuki Tomioka, Yushi Yamakawa, Sumito Sato
    Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(4): 995.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Techniques for an Intersphincteric Resection and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer
    Jung Wook Huh
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(4): 163.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    Matthew Crapko, James Fleshman
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2014; 21(1): 173.     CrossRef
  • Robotic and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of 21 consecutive series
    Sung Uk Bae, Avanish P. Saklani, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2014; 86(2): 76.     CrossRef
  • Robotics in general surgery: An evidence‐based review
    Se‐Jin Baek, Seon‐Hahn Kim
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2014; 7(2): 117.     CrossRef
  • Robotic-Assisted Abdominoperineal Resection With Obturator Lymph Node Dissection
    Kevin R. Kasten, Jean V. Joseph, Todd D. Francone
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2014; 57(11): 1329.     CrossRef
  • Current Status and Future Perspectives of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
    Hidetoshi Katsuno, Koutarou Maeda, Tsunekaze Hanai, Harunobu Sato, Koji Masumori, Yoshikazu Koide, Hiroshi Matsuoka, Miho Shiota, Tomoyoshi Endo, Shinji Matsuoka, Kohei Hatta, Masahiro Mizuno, Kunihiro Tohyama
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2013; 66(10): 982.     CrossRef
Case Reports
A New Technique Using Ultra-slim Endoscopy for High-Grade Crohn's Stricture
Ga Hee Kim, Kyung-Jo Kim, Gi Ae Kim, Jee Eun Yang, Hee Jung Park, Byong Duk Ye, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):271-274.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.271
  • 3,086 View
  • 32 Download
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease of unknown etiology. Most patients with CD will eventually develop a stricturing or penetrating complication. Colonoscopic findings may predict the clinical course in patients with CD. Moreover, since CD patients are at increased risk for developing dysplasia and colorectal cancer, surveillance colonoscopy is necessary for the detection of malignancies. We describe here a CD patient with a high-grade anorectal stricture who successfully underwent a total colon examination with an ultra-slim upper endoscope after an insertion failure with a standard colonoscope and gastroscope.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • ECCO Topical Review Optimising Reporting in Surgery, Endoscopy, and Histopathology
    Michel Adamina, Roger Feakins, Marietta Iacucci, Antonino Spinelli, Rosanna Cannatelli, André D’Hoore, Ann Driessen, Konstantinos Katsanos, Aart Mookhoek, Pär Myrelid, Gianluca Pellino, Georgios Peros, Gian Eugenio Tontini, Monika Tripathi, Henit Yanai, M
    Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2021; 15(7): 1089.     CrossRef
  • Super-slim endoscopy, in a patient with a Crohn’s ileocecal valve stricture, for assessment of mucosal healing
    S. Pontone, C. Cicerone, F. M. Magliocca, P. Vernia
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2016; 20(4): 259.     CrossRef
  • Clinical impact of ultrathin colonoscopy for Crohn's disease patients with strictures
    Kenichi Morimoto, Kenji Watanabe, Atsushi Noguchi, Takako Miyazaki, Yasuaki Nagami, Satoshi Sugimori, Noriko Kamata, Mitsue Sogawa, Tetsuya Tanigawa, Hirokazu Yamagami, Masatsugu Shiba, Kazunari Tominaga, Toshio Watanabe, Yasuhiro Fujiwara, Tetsuo Arakawa
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2015; 30(S1): 66.     CrossRef
A Case of Sigmoid Colon Tuberculosis Mimicking Colon Cancer
Seong-Min Yu, Jong-Hwan Park, Min-Dae Kim, Hee-Ryong Lee, Peel Jung, Tae-Hyun Ryu, Seung-Ho Choi, Il-Seon Lee
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):275-277.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.275
  • 4,293 View
  • 41 Download
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Tuberculosis of the sigmoid colon is a rare disorder. An 80-year-old man visited Bongseng Memorial Hospital for medical examination. A colonoscopy was performed, and a lesion in the sigmoid colon that was suspected to be colon cancer was found. A biopsy was performed, and tuberculous enteritis with chronic granulomatous inflammation was diagnosed. Intestinal tuberculosis is most frequent in the ileocecal area, followed by the ascending colon, transverse colon, duodenum, stomach, and sigmoid colon, in descending order. Hence, we report a case of intestinal tuberculosis in the sigmoid colon, which is rare and almost indistinguishable from colon cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Immunohistochemistry and real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction: importance in the diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis in a Peruvian population
    Fernando Arevalo, Soledad Rayme, Rocío Ramírez, Romy Rolando, Jaime Fustamante, Mario Monteghirfo, Rocio Chavez, Eduardo Monge
    BMC Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Infections in the gastrointestinal tract that can mimic malignancy
    David W. Dodington, Klaudia M. Nowak, Runjan Chetty
    Diagnostic Histopathology.2022; 28(10): 435.     CrossRef
  • Colonic Tuberculosis Mimicking Ascending Colon Neoplasm: A Case Report
    Ni Nyoman Ayu Widyanti, Wayan Wahyu Semara Putra, Ni Made Dwita Yaniswari, Novitasari, Kadek Agus Suhardinatha P
    European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences.2022; 4(6): 28.     CrossRef
  • Left-Sided Colonic Tuberculosis Presenting as Colonic Stricture: A Rare Presentation of a Common Disease
    Shabana Abdul Jabbar, B. Selvakumar, Vaibhav Kumar Varshney, Indu Sharma, Sudeep Khera, Sabir Hussain
    ACG Case Reports Journal.2022; 9(11): e00928.     CrossRef
  • More Than Just a Polyp: Diagnosis of Tuberculosis From a Screening Colonoscopy
    Adham E Obeidat, Thomas Namiki, Traci T Murakami
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • “MUCINOUS ADENOCARCINOMA OF COLON MIMICKING CYSTIC LYMPHANGIOMA: REPORT OF AN UNUSUAL PRESENTATION WITH BRIEF REVIEW OF LITERATURE.”
    Manjari Kishore, Prajwala Gupta, Purnima Malhotra, Minakshi Bhardwaj
    GLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS.2021; : 201.     CrossRef
  • Case of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis mycobacterium mimicking a colon cancer
    Jordan Powell, Michael Bath, Heman Joshi, Michael Machesney
    BMJ Case Reports.2020; 13(5): e235486.     CrossRef
  • Tuberculous Enteritis: A Rare Complication of Miliary Tuberculosis
    Danisha Figueroa, Nilmarie Guzman, Carmen Isache
    Case Reports in Infectious Diseases.2016; 2016: 1.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal Tuberculosis
    Eric H. Choi, Walter J. Coyle, David Schlossberg
    Microbiology Spectrum.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tuberculosis intestinal que simula carcinoma colorrectal diseminado
    José Miguel García-Castro, Rosario Javier-Martínez, Manuel López-Gómez, Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio, Miguel Ángel López-Ruz, Juan Jiménez-Alonso
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2013; 36(7): 461.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP