Annals of Coloproctology

Volume 28(1); February 2012

Editorials

Robotic Colorectal Surgery: Is It Still on the Way to a Landmark?: Nam Kyu Kim; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):1-2. Published online February 29, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.1

2,852 View
34 Download
1 Citations

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Robot-Assisted Colectomy for Left-Sided Colon Cancer: Comparison of Reduced-Port and Conventional Multi-Port Robotic Surgery
Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2017; 27(4): 398. CrossRef

Will the Stroma-derived Factor-1α (CXCL12)/CXCR4 Pathway Become a Major Concern for Advanced Colorectal Cancer?: Hungdai Kim; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):3-4. Published online February 29, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.3

2,298 View
23 Download
2 Citations

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Chemokine receptor 7 mediates miRNA‐182 to regulate cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats
Qi Wang, Sifan Xu, Bin Wang, Yu Qin, Yachen Ji, Qian Yang, Yang Xu, Zhiming Zhou
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics.2023; 29(2): 712. CrossRef
Clinicopathologic Significance of CXCL12 and CXCR4 Expressions in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
Naomi Yoshuantari, Didik Setyo Heriyanto, Susanna Hilda Hutajulu, Johan Kurnianda, Ahmad Ghozali
Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2018; 2018: 1. CrossRef

Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: Technically Feasible and Safe to Perform in Terms of Oncologic Outcomes: Moo Jun Baek; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):5-5. Published online February 29, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.5

2,333 View
21 Download
1 Citations

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Procedural and post-operative complications associated with laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery for right-sided colonic cancer resection
Yong Sheng Li, Fan Chun Meng, Jun Kai Lin
Medicine.2020; 99(40): e22431. CrossRef

Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer, Is It a Guarantee for the Cure of Cancer?: Kang Young Lee; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):6-6. Published online February 29, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.6

2,300 View
21 Download
1 Citations

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Diminutif ve Küçük Kolorektal Poliplerde Kanser Riskinin Değerlendirilmesi
Nurhan DEMİR
Artuklu International Journal of Health Sciences.2022; 2(3): 20. CrossRef

Review

New Techniques for Treating an Anal Fistula: Kee Ho Song; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):7-12. Published online February 29, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.7

13,269 View
120 Download
19 Citations

Abstract PDF

Surgery for an anal fistula may result in recurrence or impairment of continence. The ideal treatment for an anal fistula should be associated with low recurrence rates, minimal incontinence and good quality of life. Because of the risk of a change in continence with conventional techniques, sphincter-preserving techniques for the management complex anal fistulae have been evaluated. First, the anal fistula plug is made of lyophilized porcine intestinal submucosa. The anal fistula plug is expected to provide a collagen scaffold to promote tissue in growth and fistula healing. Another addition to the sphincter-preserving options is the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure. This technique is based on the concept of secure closure of the internal opening and concomitant removal of infected cryptoglandular tissue in the intersphincteric plane. Recently, cell therapy for an anal fistula has been described. Adipose-derived stem cells have two biologic properties, namely, ability to suppress inflammation and differentiation potential. These properties are useful for the regeneration or the repair of damaged tissues. This article discusses the rationales for, the estimated efficacies of, and the limitations of new sphincter-preserving techniques for the treatment of anal fistulae.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Sensitivity of Diffusion-Weighted Image Combined with T2 Turbo Inversion Recovery Magnitude Sequence and as an Alternative to Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Detection of Perianal Fistula
Noor Fadhil Baqir, Rasha Sabeeh Ahmed, Khaleel Ibraheem Mohsen
Advanced Engineering Research (Rostov-on-Don).2023; 23(3): 307. CrossRef
A PILOT STUDY on the Clinical and Functional Outcomes of an Improvised Technique of Core-cut Fistulectomy for Fistula-in-ano
Masoom Parwez, Tanweerul Huda, Moorat S. Yadav, Kamal Gupta, Kushal Mital, Bharati Pandya
Surgical Innovation.2022; 29(3): 426. CrossRef
Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detection of Perianal Fistula keeping Surgical Findings as Gold Standard
Haider Ali, Uzma Azmat, Manoj Kumar , Khadijah Abid
Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences.2022; : 181. CrossRef
Surgical technique: an improvisation in application of the technique of core-cut fistulectomy for fistula-in-ano
Masoom Parwez, Tanweerul Huda, Kushal Mital, Bharati Pandya
Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
External sphincter-sparing anal fistulotomy (ESSAF): a simplified technique for the treatment of fistula-in-ano
S. Y. Parnasa, B. Helou, I. Mizrahi, R. Gefen, M. Abu-Gazala, A. J. Pikarsky, N. Shussman
Techniques in Coloproctology.2021; 25(12): 1311. CrossRef
Management of transsphincteric fistula-in-ano by modified conventional Ksharasutra therapy
Khusboo Faridi, P. Sreenadh, Vyasadeva Mahanta, Rahul Sherkhane
Journal of Ayurveda Case Reports.2021; 4(3): 95. CrossRef
Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) for complex anorectal fistula: efficacy and risk factors for failure at 3-year follow-up
L. Regusci, F. Fasolini, P. Meinero, G. Caccia, G. Ruggeri, M. Serati, A. Braga
Techniques in Coloproctology.2020; 24(7): 741. CrossRef
Video-assisted Treatment of Rectal Fistulas: the Experience and Treatment Results
Vitalii S. Groshilin, Viktoria G. Brizhak, Evgeny Y. Khoronko, Petr V. Tsygankov, Yuri V. Khoronko
Lietuvos chirurgija.2020; 19(1-2): 27. CrossRef
Innovative Use of Endotracheal Tube to Find Out Internal Opening in Fistula in Ano
Anil Kumar, Ajeet Kumar, Bindey Kumar, Shiv Kishor
SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2019; 1(9): 712. CrossRef
Ayurvedic Management of Fistula in Ano
KM Pratap Shankar, GN SreeDeepthi, Rohit KS, GK Swamy
Journal of Research in Ayurvedic Sciences.2019; 3(3): 100. CrossRef
Decellularized and matured esophageal scaffold for circumferential esophagus replacement: Proof of concept in a pig model
Guillaume Luc, Guillaume Charles, Caroline Gronnier, Magali Cabau, Charlotte Kalisky, Mallory Meulle, Reine Bareille, Samantha Roques, Lionel Couraud, Johanna Rannou, Laurence Bordenave, Denis Collet, Marlène Durand
Biomaterials.2018; 175: 1. CrossRef
Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications
Ahmed Mohamed Elsayed Metwalli Ali Gendia, Mahmmad Ahmad Abd-erRazik, Hanna Habib Hanna
Journal of Coloproctology.2018; 38(04): 324. CrossRef
High ligation of the anal fistula tract by lateral approach: A prospective cohort study on a modification of the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) technique
Wook Ho Kang, Hyung Kyu Yang, Han Jeong Chang, Yong Taek Ko, Byung Eun Yoo, Cheong Ho Lim, Jae Kwan Hwang, Young Chan Lee, Hyeon Keun Shin, Hae Jung Son
International Journal of Surgery.2018; 60: 9. CrossRef
S3-Leitlinie: Kryptoglanduläre Analfisteln
A. Ommer, A. Herold, E. Berg, S. Farke, A. Fürst, F. Hetzer, A. Köhler, S. Post, R. Ruppert, M. Sailer, T. Schiedeck, O. Schwandner, B. Strittmatter, B. H. Lenhard, W. Bader, S. Krege, H. Krammer, E. Stange
coloproctology.2017; 39(1): 16. CrossRef
What happens after a failed LIFT for anal fistula?
Moriah Wright, Alan Thorson, Garnet Blatchford, Maniamparampil Shashidharan, Jennifer Beaty, Noelle Bertelson, Piyush Aggrawal, Lindsay Taylor, Charles A. Ternent
The American Journal of Surgery.2017; 214(6): 1210. CrossRef
Fistula tract curettage and the use of biological dermal plugs improve high transsphincteric fistula healing in an animal model
Cigdem Benlice, Merve Yildiz, Semih Baghaki, Ilknur Erguner, Deniz Cebi Olgun, Sebnem Batur, Sibel Erdamar, Pinar Ambarcioglu, Ismail Hamzaoglu, Tayfun Karahasanoglu, Bilgi Baca
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2016; 31(2): 291. CrossRef
Management of complex anorectal fistulas with seton drainage plus partial fistulotomy and subsequent ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT)
B. Schulze, Y.-H. Ho
Techniques in Coloproctology.2015; 19(2): 89. CrossRef
New Techniques in Anal Fistula Management
Rasoul Azizi, Saman Mohammadipour
Annals of Colorectal Research.2014;[Epub] CrossRef
Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Tissue Regeneration: A Review
Patricia Zuk
ISRN Stem Cells.2013; 2013: 1. CrossRef

Original Articles

Delorme's Procedure for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Does It Still Have It's Own Role?: Sooho Lee, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyung-Jin Kim, Hyeon-Min Cho, Jun-Gi Kim; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):13-18. Published online February 29, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.13

9,796 View
38 Download
8 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Although there are more than a hundred techniques, including the transabdominal and the perineal approaches, for the repair of the rectal prolapsed, none of them is perfect. The best repair should be chosen not only to correct the prolapse but also to restore defecatory function and to improve fecal incontinence throughout the patient's lifetime. The aim of this retrospective review is to evaluate clinical outcomes of the Delorme's procedure for the management of the complete rectal prolapse.

Methods

A total of 19 patients (13 females and 6 males) with complete rectal prolapses were treated by using the Delorme's procedure in St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, from February 1997 to February 2007. Postoperative anal incontinence was evaluated using the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score.

Results

All 19 patients had incontinence to liquid stool, solid stool, and/or flatus preoperatively. Three (15.8%) patients reported recurrence of the rectal prolapse (at 6, 18, 29 months, respectively, after the operation). Information on postoperative incontinence was available for 16 of the 19 patients. Twelve of the 16 patients (75%) reported improved continence (5 [31.3%] were improved and 7 [43.7%] completely recovered from incontinence) while 4 patients had unchanged incontinence symptoms. One (6.3%) patient who did not have constipation preoperatively developed constipation after the operation.

Conclusion

The Delorme's procedure is associated with a marked improvement in anal continence, relatively low recurrence rates, and low incidence of postoperative constipation. This allows us to conclude that this procedure still has its own role in selected patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Transanal rectopexy for external rectal prolapse
Shantikumar Dhondiram Chivate, Meghana Vinay Chougule, Rahul Shantikumar Chivate, Palak Harshuk Thakrar
Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(6): 415. CrossRef
Epidemiological trends in surgery for rectal prolapse in England 2001–2012: an adult hospital population‐based study
Y. El‐Dhuwaib, A. Pandyan, C. H. Knowles
Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(10): 1359. CrossRef
Surgical Treatment of Rectal Prolapse in the Laparoscopic Era; A Review of the Literature
Akira Tsunoda
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2020; 4(3): 89. CrossRef
Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs Delorme's operation in management of complete rectal prolapse: a prospective randomized study
S. H. Emile, H. Elbanna, M. Youssef, W. Thabet, W. Omar, A. Elshobaky, T. M. Abd El‐Hamed, M. Farid
Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(1): 50. CrossRef
Perineal resectional procedures for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse: A systematic review of the literature
Sameh Hany Emile, Hossam Elfeki, Mostafa Shalaby, Ahmad Sakr, Pierpaolo Sileri, Steven D. Wexner
International Journal of Surgery.2017; 46: 146. CrossRef
Delorme’s Procedure for Complete Rectal Prolapse: A Study of Recurrence Patterns in the Long Term
Carlos Placer, Jose M. Enriquez-Navascués, Ander Timoteo, Garazi Elorza, Nerea Borda, Lander Gallego, Yolanda Saralegui
Surgery Research and Practice.2015; 2015: 1. CrossRef
Surgical treatments for rectal prolapse: how does a perineal approach compare in the laparoscopic era?
Monica T. Young, Mehraneh D. Jafari, Michael J. Phelan, Michael J. Stamos, Steven Mills, Alessio Pigazzi, Joseph C. Carmichael
Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(3): 607. CrossRef
Simultaneous Delorme's procedure and inter-sphinteric prosthetic implant for the treatment of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence: Preliminary experience and literature review
Emanuel Cavazzoni, Emanuele Rosati, Valentina Zavagno, Luigina Graziosi, Annibale Donini
International Journal of Surgery.2015; 14: 45. CrossRef

Comparison of Short-term Surgical Outcomes between a Robotic Colectomy and a Laparoscopic Colectomy during Early Experience: Jin Yong Shin; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):19-26. Published online February 29, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.19

4,568 View
55 Download
43 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Although robotic surgery was invented to overcome the technical limitations of laparoscopic surgery, the role of a robotic (procto)colectomy (RC) for the treatment of colorectal cancer compared to that of a laparoscopic (procto)colectomy (LC) was not well defined during the initial adoption periods of both procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of a RC for the treatment of colorectal cancer by comparing the authors' initial experiences with both a RC and a LC.

Methods

The first 30 patients treated by using a RC for colorectal cancer from July 2010 to March 2011 were compared with the first 30 patients treated by using a LC for colorectal cancer from December 2006 to June 2007 by the same surgeon. Perioperative variables and short-term outcomes were analyzed. In addition, the 30 RC and the 30 LC cases involved were divided into rectal cancer (n = 17 and n = 12, respectively), left-sided colon cancer (n = 7 and n = 12, respectively) and right-sided colon cancer (n = 6 and n = 6, respectively) for subgroup analyses.

Results

The mean operating times for RC and LC were significantly different at 371.8 and 275.5 minutes, respectively, but other perioperative parameters (rates of open conversion, numbers of retrieved lymph node, estimated blood losses, times to first flatus, maximal pain scores before discharge and postoperative hospital stays) were not significantly different in the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed that the mean operative times for a robotic proctectomy and a laparoscopic proctectomy were 396.5 and 298.8 minutes, respectively (P < 0.000). Postoperative complications occurred in five patients in the RC group and in six patients in the LC group (P = 0.739).

Conclusion

Although the short-term outcomes of a RC during its initial use were better than those of a LC (with the exception of operating time), differences were not found to be significantly different. On the other hand, the longer operation time of a robotic proctectomy compared to that of a laparoscopic proctectomy during the early period may be problematic.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Comparison of Operative Time Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Zhen Chen, Hua Yu, Huaping Wu, Pingxi Wang, Fanwei Zeng
Surgical Innovation.2023; 30(3): 390. CrossRef
Comparison of robotic right colectomy and laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Jianchun Zheng, Shuai Zhao, Wei Chen, Ming Zhang, Jianxiang Wu
Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(7): 521. CrossRef
Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients in terms of recovery time: a monocentric experience
Giuseppe Palomba, Vincenza Paola Dinuzzi, Marianna Capuano, Pietro Anoldo, Marco Milone, Giovanni Domenico De Palma, Giovanni Aprea
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2022; 16(4): 981. CrossRef
Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Leonardo Solaini, Antonio Bocchino, Andrea Avanzolini, Domenico Annunziata, Davide Cavaliere, Giorgio Ercolani
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(7): 1497. CrossRef
The Senhance Surgical System in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review
Tyler McKechnie, Jigish Khamar, Ryan Daniel, Yung Lee, Lily Park, Aristithes G. Doumouras, Dennis Hong, Mohit Bhandari, Cagla Eskicioglu
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2022; 17(2): 325. CrossRef
Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Colectomies Using the 2019 ACS NSQIP Database
Sara S. Soliman, Joseph Flanagan, Yun Hsiang Wang, Patricia B. Stopper, Rolando H. Rolandelli, Zoltan H. Nemeth
Southern Medical Journal.2022; 115(12): 887. CrossRef
Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy with extra-corporeal or intra-corporeal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Pietro Genova, Gianni Pantuso, Calogero Cipolla, Mario Adelfio Latteri, Solafah Abdalla, Jean-Christophe Paquet, Francesco Brunetti, Nicola de’Angelis, Salomone Di Saverio
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(5): 1317. CrossRef
Urological and sexual function after robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review, meta‐analysis and meta‐regression
Ian Jun Yan Wee, Li‐Jen Kuo, James Chi‐Yong Ngu
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2021; 17(1): 1. CrossRef
Comparison of clinical efficacy of robotic right colectomy and laparoscopic right colectomy for right colon tumor
Quan Li Zhu, Xin Xu, Zhi Jian Pan
Medicine.2021; 100(33): e27002. CrossRef
Safety with Innovation in Colon and Rectal Robotic Surgery
Deborah S. Keller, Christina N. Jenkins
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2021; 34(05): 273. CrossRef
Robotic and robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis of short-term and long-term results
Guojun Tong, Guiyang Zhang, Zhaozheng Zheng
Asian Journal of Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives
Jong Lyul Lee, Hassan A. Alsaleem, Jin Cheon Kim
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2020; 98(1): 31. CrossRef
The “Micro Hand S” Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: Short-Term Outcomes at a Single Center
Yijia Zeng, Guohui Wang, Yong Liu, Zheng Li, Bo Yi, Shaihong Zhu
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2020; 30(4): 363. CrossRef
Robotic right colonic resection. Is the robotic third arm a game-changer?
Alberto Mangano, Federico Gheza, Roberto Bustos, Mario Masrur, Francesco Bianco, Eduardo Fernandes, Valentina Valle, Pier C. Giulianotti
Minerva Chirurgica.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic Right Colectomy for Colon Cancer; Two Case Reports
Ryosuke Fukuyo, Hironobu Baba, Takatoshi Matsuyama, Akifumi Kikuchi, Shinichi Yamauchi, Ayumi Takaoka, Yuriko Matsumiya, Yudai Yamamoto, Masanori Tokunaga, Yusuke Kinugasa
The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery.2020; 53(2): 164. CrossRef
Impact of ASA-score, age and learning curve on early outcome in the initiation phase of an oncological robotic colorectal program
Hülya Sarikaya, Tahar Benhidjeb, Sergiu I. Iosivan, Theodoros Kolokotronis, Christine Förster, Stephan Eckert, Ludwig Wilkens, Alaa Nasser, Sebastian Rehberg, Martin Krüger, Jan Schulte am Esch
Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic or laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer - which is the best answer? a comprehensive review of non-oncological outcomes and learning curve
Sandra L. Kavalukas, Amandeep Ghuman, Stephen P. Sharp, Steven D. Wexner
Mini-invasive Surgery.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Right hemicolectomy: a network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic-assisted, total laparoscopic, and robotic approach
Emanuele Rausa, Michael Eamon Kelly, Emanuele Asti, Alberto Aiolfi, Gianluca Bonitta, Luigi Bonavina
Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(4): 1020. CrossRef
Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study
Jun Seok Park, Hyun Kang, Soo Yeun Park, Hye Jin Kim, In Teak Woo, In-Kyu Park, Gyu-Seog Choi
Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(9): 2975. CrossRef
Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
Ka Ting Ng, Azlan Kok Vui Tsia, Vanessa Yu Ling Chong
World Journal of Surgery.2019; 43(4): 1146. CrossRef
A standardized suprapubic bottom-to-up approach in robotic right colectomy: technical and oncological advances for complete mesocolic excision (CME)
Jan Schulte am Esch, Sergio-I. Iosivan, Fabian Steinfurth, Ammar Mahdi, Christine Förster, Ludwig Wilkens, Alaa Nasser, Hülya Sarikaya, Tahar Benhidjeb, Martin Krüger
BMC Surgery.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Leonardo Solaini, Francesca Bazzocchi, Davide Cavaliere, Andrea Avanzolini, Alessandro Cucchetti, Giorgio Ercolani
Surgical Endoscopy.2018; 32(3): 1104. CrossRef
Short-Term Outcomes with Robotic Right Colectomy
Scott R. Kelley, Emilie Duchalais, David W. Larson
The American Surgeon.2018; 84(11): 1768. CrossRef
Robot-Assisted Colectomy for Left-Sided Colon Cancer: Comparison of Reduced-Port and Conventional Multi-Port Robotic Surgery
Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2017; 27(4): 398. CrossRef
Colorectal surgery in elderly patients: our experience with DaVinci Xi® System
A. Oldani, P. Bellora, M. Monni, B. Amato, S. Gentilli
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.2017; 29(S1): 91. CrossRef
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
Xuan Zhang, ZhengQiang Wei, MengJun Bie, XuDong Peng, Cheng Chen
Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(12): 5601. CrossRef
Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
Yanlai Sun, Huirong Xu, Zengjun Li, Jianjun Han, Wentao Song, Junwei Wang, Zhongfa Xu
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of perioperative and short-term outcomes between robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Sungwon Lim, Jin Hee Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Seon-Hahn Kim, Seon Heui Lee
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2016; 90(6): 328. CrossRef
Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions
Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(6): 1975. CrossRef
Effect of BMI on Short-Term Outcomes with Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: a Case-Matched Study
Deborah S. Keller, Nisreen Madhoun, Juan Ramon Flores-Gonzalez, Sergio Ibarra, Reena Tahilramani, Eric M. Haas
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2016; 20(3): 488. CrossRef
Robotic single docking total colectomy for ulcerative colitis: First experience with a novel technique
Franco Roviello, Riccardo Piagnerelli, Francesco Ferrara, Maximilian Scheiterle, Lorenzo De Franco, Daniele Marrelli
International Journal of Surgery.2015; 21: 63. CrossRef
Is robot-assisted laparoscopic right colectomy more effective than the conventional laparoscopic procedure? A meta-analysis of short-term outcomes
Fabio Rondelli, Ruben Balzarotti, Fabio Villa, Adriano Guerra, Nicola Avenia, Enrico Mariani, Walter Bugiantella
International Journal of Surgery.2015; 18: 75. CrossRef
Robotic colonic resection
Emmanouil P. Pappou, Martin R. Weiser
Journal of Surgical Oncology.2015; 112(3): 315. CrossRef
European association of endoscopic surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery
Amir Szold, Roberto Bergamaschi, Ivo Broeders, Jenny Dankelman, Antonello Forgione, Thomas Langø, Andreas Melzer, Yoav Mintz, Salvador Morales-Conde, Michael Rhodes, Richard Satava, Chung-Ngai Tang, Ramon Vilallonga
Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(2): 253. CrossRef
Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
Seon Heui Lee, Sungwon Lim, Jin Hee Kim, Kil Yeon Lee
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2015; 89(4): 190. CrossRef
Robot-assisted single-incision total colectomy: a case report
Yen-Yi Juo, Vincent Obias
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2015; 11(1): 104. CrossRef
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colonic disease: a meta-analysis of postoperative variables
Alberto Zarak, Alvaro Castillo, Kandace Kichler, Lucy de la Cruz, Leonardo Tamariz, Srinivas Kaza
Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(6): 1341. CrossRef
Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Colorectal Surgery Compared with Laparoscopic and Open Surgery: a Systematic Review
Chang Woo Kim, Chang Hee Kim, Seung Hyuk Baik
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2014; 18(4): 816. CrossRef
Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
Ioannis G. Papanikolaou
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2014; 24(6): 478. CrossRef
Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis
Huirong Xu, Jianning Li, Yanlai Sun, Zengjun Li, Yanan Zhen, Bin Wang, Zhongfa Xu
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2014; 12(1): 274. CrossRef
Outcomes and Costs Associated With Robotic Colectomy in the Minimally Invasive Era
Joshua A. Tyler, Justin P. Fox, Mayur M. Desai, W. Brian Perry, Sean C. Glasgow
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2013; 56(4): 458. CrossRef
Robotic Colonic Surgery
Andrew Kai-Yip Fung, Emad H. Aly
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2013; 56(6): 786. CrossRef
Lap Colectomy and Robotics for Colon Cancer
Eduardo Parra-Davila, Sonia Ramamoorthy
Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America.2013; 22(1): 143. CrossRef

Stromal-cell-derived Factor 1-α Promotes Tumor Progression in Colorectal Cancer: Se Jun Park, Tae Sung Ahn, Sung Woo Cho, Chang Jin Kim, Dong Jun Jung, Myung Won Son, Sang Ho Bae, Eung Jin Shin, Moon Soo Lee, Chang Ho Kim, Moo Jun Baek; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):27-34. Published online February 29, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.27

3,132 View
24 Download
1 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Although stromal-cell-derived factor (SDF)-1α is suggested to be involved in tumorigenicity and tumor angiogenesis, the clinicopathological significance of its expression in colorectal cancers is not fully understood. We examined SDF-1α expression in colorectal cancers and investigated its relationship to clinicopathological features such as tumor staging, lymph-node metastasis, vascular invasion (VI), lymphatic invasion (LI) and neural invasion (NI).

Methods

Specimens of 83 primary colorectal cancers were examined immunohistochemically, and the relationships between clinicopathological features and SDF-1α expression were analyzed. To compare the expressions between the normal colon tissue and colorectal cancer tissues, we performed Western blot analyses.

Results

According to the Western blot analyses, SDF-1α was more highly expressed in colorectal carcinoma tissues than in normal colonic mucosa (20/21). According to the immunohistochemical stain, SDF-1α was associated with nodal status, distant metastasis, tumor staging, VI and LI. SDF-1α expression had a significant prognostic value for overall survival. Kaplan-Meier plots of survival in patients with high SDF-1α showed that high SDF-1α expression was associated with a shorter overall survival. However, no association was found between SDF-1α expression and other pathologic or clinical variables, including age, gender, degree of differentiation, and presence of perineural invasion.

Conclusion

The expression of SDF-1α might be associated with tumor progression in colorectal cancer. Inhibition of SDF-1α could be a therapeutic option in colorectal cancer patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Human CD133-positive hematopoietic progenitor cells initiate growth and metastasis of colorectal cancer cells
Chao Zhang, Chang Zhou, Xiao-Jin Wu, Min Yang, Zhao-hui Yang, Han-zhen Xiong, Chun-ping Zhou, Yan-xia Lu, Yuan Li, Xue-nong Li
Carcinogenesis.2014; 35(12): 2771. CrossRef

Multivariate Analysis of the Survival Rate for Treatment Modalities in Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: Sung Kang Kim, Chang Ho Lee, Min Ro Lee, Jong Hun Kim; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):35-41. Published online February 29, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.35

4,326 View
38 Download
13 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare survival in patients that underwent palliative resection treatment versus non-resection for incurable colorectal cancer (ICRC).

Methods

The case records of 201 patients with ICRC between January 2000 and December 2009 were reviewed. Demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, the location of the colon cancer, histology, metastasis, treatment options and median survival were analyzed retrospectively. We divided the patients into four groups according to the treatment modalities: resection alone, resection with post-operative chemotherapy, non-resection treatment by chemotherapy alone, and stent or bypass. Median survival times were compared according to each treatment option, and the survival rates were analyzed.

Results

105 patients underwent palliative resection whereas 96 were treated with non-resection modalities. A palliative resection was performed in 44 cases for resection alone and in 61 cases for resection with post-operative chemotherapy. In patients treated with non-resection of the primary tumor, chemotherapy alone was done in 65 cases and stent or bypass in 31 cases. Multivariate analysis showed a median survival of 14 months in patients with palliative resections with post-operative chemotherapy, which was significantly higher than those for chemotherapy alone (8 months), primary tumor resection alone (5 months), and stent or bypass (5 months). Gender, age, ASA score, CEA level, the location of colon cancer, histology and the presence of multiple metastases were not independent factors in association with the median survival rate.

Conclusion

In the treatment of ICRC, palliative resection followed by post-operative chemotherapy shows the most favorable median survival compared to other treatment options.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Biopsy sampling during self-expandable metallic stent placement in acute malignant colorectal obstruction: a narrative review
Sigrid Skov Bennedsgaard, Lene Hjerrild Iversen
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
National statistics about resection of the primary tumor in asymptomatic patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer and unresectable metastases. Need for improvement in data collection. A systematic review with meta-analysis
Antonio V. Sterpetti, Umberto Costi, Giuseppe D'Ermo
Surgical Oncology.2020; 33: 11. CrossRef
Primary Tumor Resection in Patients with Incurable Localized or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Constantinos Simillis, Eliana Kalakouti, Thalia Afxentiou, Christos Kontovounisios, Jason J. Smith, David Cunningham, Michel Adamina, Paris P. Tekkis
World Journal of Surgery.2019; 43(7): 1829. CrossRef
Long-Chain Noncoding RNAPVT1Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with the Risk and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer in the Han Chinese Population
Lei Zhang, Jiehong Mao
Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers.2019; 23(10): 728. CrossRef
Meta-analysis of outcomes following resection of the primary tumour in patients presenting with metastatic colorectal cancer
U Nitsche, C Stöß, L Stecher, D Wilhelm, H Friess, G O Ceyhan
Journal of British Surgery.2018; 105(7): 784. CrossRef
A systematic analysis highlighting deficiencies in reported outcomes for patients with stage IV colorectal cancer undergoing palliative resection of the primary tumour
Deena P. Harji, Abigail Vallance, Jenny Selgimann, Simon Bach, Faheez Mohamed, Julia Brown, Nicola Fearnhead
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 44(10): 1469. CrossRef
Meta-analysis of oncologic effect of primary tumor resection in patients with unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer in the era of modern systemic chemotherapy
Gi Won Ha, Jong Hun Kim, Min Ro Lee
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2018; 95(2): 64. CrossRef
Prognostic Implications of Primary Tumor Resection in Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer in Elderly Patients
Heui-June Ahn, Ho-Suk Oh, Yongchel Ahn, Sang Jin Lee, Hyun Joong Kim, Moon Ho Kim, Dae-Woon Eom, Jae Young Kwak, Myoung Sik Han, Jae Seok Song
Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(4): 175. CrossRef
A Meta-Analysis to Determine the Effect of Primary Tumor Resection for Stage IV Colorectal Cancer with Unresectable Metastases on Patient Survival
Cillian Clancy, John P. Burke, Mitchel Barry, Matthew F. Kalady, J. Calvin Coffey
Annals of Surgical Oncology.2014; 21(12): 3900. CrossRef
Palliative laparoscopic bowel resection in stage IV colorectal cancer patients with unresectable metastasis
Kwan Mo Yang, Seok-Byung Lim, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2013; 9(2): 134. CrossRef
Recent Advances in the Management of Stage IV Colon Cancer
Rani Kanthan, Jenna-Lynn Senger, Shahid Ahmed, Selliah Kanthan
Journal of Cancer Therapy.2012; 03(06): 1104. CrossRef
Kolonstents als «Bridge to Surgery»
Karl E. Grund, Annette Zipfel
Visceral Medicine.2012; 28(6): 412. CrossRef
Review and Evaluation of Methods Correcting for Population Stratification with a Focus on Underlying Statistical Principles
Hemant K. Tiwari, Jill Barnholtz-Sloan, Nathan Wineinger, Miguel A. Padilla, Laura K. Vaughan, David B. Allison
Human Heredity.2008; 66(2): 67. CrossRef

Oncologic Outcomes of a Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: Results of a 3-Year Follow-up: Jung Hoon Cho, Dae Ro Lim, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):42-48. Published online February 29, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.42

4,965 View
45 Download
6 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of a laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for the treatment of colon cancer and compare the results with those of previous randomized trials.

Methods

From June 2006, to December 2008, 156 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with a curative intent for colon cancer were evaluated. The clinicopatholgic outcomes and the oncologic outcomes were evaluated retrospectively by using electronic medical records.

Results

There were 84 male patients and 72 female patients. The mean possible length of stay was 7.0 ± 1.5 days (range, 4 to 12 days). The conversion rate was 3.2%. The total number of complications was 30 (19.2%). Anastomotic leakage was not noted. There was no mortality within 30 days. The 3-year overall survival rate of all stages was 93.3%. The 3-year overall survival rates according to stages were 100% in stage I, 97.3% in stage II, and 84.8% in stage III. The 3-year disease-free survival rate of all stages was 86.1%. The 3-year disease-free survival rates according to stage were 96.2% in stage I, 90.3% in stage II, and 75.6% in stage III. The mean follow-up period was 36.3 (3 to 60) months.

Conclusion

A laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for the treatment of colon cancer is technically feasible and safe to perform in terms of oncologic outcomes. The present data support previously reported randomized trials.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Comparison of outcome and costs of robotic and laparoscopic right hemicolectomies
Nima Ahmadi, Isabella Mor, Ross Warner
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2022; 16(2): 429. CrossRef
Is Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation Really Necessary for All Patients With Right-Sided Colon Cancer?
Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyeon-Min Cho, Je-Ho Jang, Chang-Nam Kim, Kil Yeon Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 434. CrossRef
Oncologic Outcomes of Self-Expandable Metallic Stent as a Bridge to Surgery and Safety and Feasibility of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Acute Malignant Colonic Obstruction
Seung Yoon Yang, Youn Young Park, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
Annals of Surgical Oncology.2019; 26(9): 2787. CrossRef
Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy
Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh, Mark H. Hanna, Joseph C. Carmichael, Alessio Pigazzi, Michael J. Stamos, Steven Mills
Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(7): 2792. CrossRef
Preoperative prediction of conversion from laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery: a clinical study of conversion scoring of laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery
Guang-Dong Zhang, Xu-Ting Zhi, Jian-Li Zhang, Guang-Bo Bu, Gang Ma, Kai-Lei Wang
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2015; 30(9): 1209. CrossRef
Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic resection following stent insertion for obstructing left-sided colon cancer
Seoung Yoon Rho, Sung Uk Bae, Se Jin Baek, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society.2013; 85(6): 290. CrossRef

Clinicopathologic Factors Affecting Recurrence after Curative Surgery for Stage I Colorectal Cancer: Min Ae Keum, Seok-Byung Lim, Sun A Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):49-55. Published online February 29, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.49

4,229 View
48 Download
29 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The objective of the current study was to identify the clinicopathological risk factors affecting recurrence after a curative resection for stage I colorectal cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 434 patients who underwent a curative resection for stage I colorectal cancer between January 1999 and December 2004. Postoperative oral chemotherapy was performed in 189 patients (45.3%). The following prognostic factors were correlated with recurrence: age, gender, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, location of tumor, T stage, size of tumor, histologic differentiation, growth pattern, and lymphovascular invasion. The median follow-up duration was 65 months.

Results

The overall recurrence rate was 4.6% (20/434). The median time to recurrence was 33 months. Two-thirds of the recurrence occurred more than two years after surgery. Risk factors associated with recurrence were rectal cancer (P = 0.009), T2 stage (P = 0.010), and infiltrative growth pattern (P = 0.020). A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that the infiltrative growth pattern was an independent predictor for recurrence. Tumor cell budding was observed in all pathologic reviews with recurrence.

Conclusion

Long-term follow-up is necessary for stage I colorectal patients with high risk factors like rectal cancer, T2 stage, and infiltrative growth pattern.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA for Minimal Residual Disease Detection in the Management of Colorectal Cancer
Oluwadunni E. Emiloju, Michael Storandt, Tyler Zemla, Nguyen Tran, Krishan Jethwa, Amit Mahipal, Jessica Mitchell, Cornelius Thiels, Kellie Mathis, Robert McWilliams, Joleen Hubbard, Frank Sinicrope, Qian Shi, Zhaohui Jin
JCO Precision Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Determinants of survival and recurrence in patients with stage I colorectal cancer
Alimohammad Bananzadeh, Mahshid Bahadori, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah, Faramarz Pakravan, Sara Shojaei-Zarghani, Ali Reza Safarpour
Frontiers in Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A systematic review of population‐based studies on metachronous metastases of colorectal cancer
Karin Nyström, Louise Olsson
World Journal of Surgery.2024; 48(6): 1521. CrossRef
Survival outcomes of stage I colorectal cancer: development and validation of the ACEPLY model using two prospective cohorts
Qingbin Wu, Pengju Chen, Chi Shu, Lin Chen, Zechuan Jin, Jun Huang, Xin Wang, Xue Li, Mingtian Wei, Tinghan Yang, Xiangbing Deng, Aiwen Wu, Yazhou He, Ziqiang Wang
BMC Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk factors of recurrence in TNM stage I colorectal cancer
Jin-Hee Paik, Chun-Geun Ryu, Dae-Yong Hwang
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(5): 281. CrossRef
Postoperative recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer: how does neoadjuvant treatment affect recurrence pattern?
Ryosuke Okamura, Yoshiro Itatani, Yusuke Fujita, Nobuaki Hoshino, Shintaro Okumura, Kazuhiro Nishiyama, Koya Hida, Kazutaka Obama
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Immediate Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-Metastatic Colon Cancer: Phase I Trial Evaluating a Novel Treatment Protocol
Mehraneh D. Jafari, Joseph C. Carmichael, Farshid Dayyani, Chelsea McKinney, Lari Wenzel, Jason A. Zell, Alessio Pigazzi
Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2022; 21(2): 114. CrossRef
The clinic factors in evaluating long-term outcomes of patients with stage I colorectal cancer
Zechuan Jin, Qingbin Wu, Xiangbing Deng, Ziqiang Wang
Asian Journal of Surgery.2022; 45(11): 2231. CrossRef
Identification of high-risk stage I colon and rectal cancer patients: a retrospective analysis of a large Japanese cohort
Yudai Fukui, Koya Hida, Nobuaki Hoshino, Daisuke Nishizaki, Ryosuke Okamura, Shinichi Yamauchi, Kenichi Sugihara, Yoshiharu Sakai, I. Takemasa, K. Hakamada, H. Kameyama, Y. Takii, H. Ueno, H. Ozawa, S. Ishihara, K. Takahashi, Y. Kanemitsu, M. Itabashi, T.
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(6): 1403. CrossRef
Predicting liver metastases growth patterns: Current status and future possibilities
Rui Caetano Oliveira, Henrique Alexandrino, Maria Augusta Cipriano, Filipe Caseiro Alves, José Guilherme Tralhão
Seminars in Cancer Biology.2021; 71: 42. CrossRef
Improved Outcomes and Staging in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Guided by A Molecular Assay
Alexander R Gupta, Gavitt A Woodard, David M Jablons, Michael J Mann, Johannes R Kratz
Future Oncology.2021; 17(34): 4785. CrossRef
Tumor Size >5 cm and Harvested LNs <12 Are the Risk Factors for Recurrence in Stage I Colon and Rectal Cancer after Radical Resection
Hye-Sol Jung, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Han-Ki Lim, Min Jung Kim, Sang Hui Moon, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
Cancers.2021; 13(21): 5294. CrossRef
High-grade intratumoral tumor budding is a predictor for lymphovascular invasion and adverse outcome in stage II colorectal cancer
Andreas H Marx, Claudius Mickler, Guido Sauter, Ronald Simon, Luigi M Terracciano, Jakob R Izbicki, Till S Clauditz
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(2): 259. CrossRef
Factors influencing recurrence of stage I–III rectal cancer in regional Australia
Lucy Haggstrom, Sharlyn Kang, Robert Winn, Soni Putnis, Elias Nasser, James Chen, Morteza Aghmesheh, Daniel Brungs
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2020; 90(12): 2490. CrossRef
Pathological risk factors and predictive endoscopic factors for lymph node metastasis of T1 colorectal cancer: a single-center study of 846 lesions
Chihiro Yasue, Akiko Chino, Manabu Takamatsu, Ken Namikawa, Daisuke Ide, Shoichi Saito, Masahiro Igarashi, Junko Fujisaki
Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 54(8): 708. CrossRef
Influence of gross tumor morphology on clinicopathological profile of colorectal cancers
Mudassir Ahmad Khan, Nisar A. Chowdri, Showkat Ali Bhat, Fazl Q. Parray, Rauf A. Wani, Asif Mehraj
Current Medicine Research and Practice.2019; 9(5): 172. CrossRef
Predictive Nomogram for Recurrence of Stage I Colorectal Cancer After Curative Resection
Chan Kim, Woo Ram Kim, Ki-Yeol Kim, Hong Jae Chon, Seung Hoon Beom, Hyojoong Kim, Minkyu Jung, Sang Joon Shin, Nam Kyu Kim, Joong Bae Ahn
Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2018; 17(3): e513. CrossRef
Emergency resection surgery for colorectal cancer: Patterns of recurrent disease and survival
Joe Littlechild, Muneer Junejo, Anne-Marie Simons, Finlay Curran, Darren Subar
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology.2018; 9(1): 8. CrossRef
Identification of Recurrence—Predictive Indicators in Stage I Colorectal Cancer
Jun Ho Lee, Jong Lyul Lee, In Ja Park, Seok‐Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
World Journal of Surgery.2017; 41(4): 1126. CrossRef
Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016
Alessandro Lugli, Richard Kirsch, Yoichi Ajioka, Fred Bosman, Gieri Cathomas, Heather Dawson, Hala El Zimaity, Jean-François Fléjou, Tine Plato Hansen, Arndt Hartmann, Sanjay Kakar, Cord Langner, Iris Nagtegaal, Giacomo Puppa, Robert Riddell, Ari Ristimäk
Modern Pathology.2017; 30(9): 1299. CrossRef
Tumor budding in colorectal cancer—ready for diagnostic practice?
Viktor H. Koelzer, Inti Zlobec, Alessandro Lugli
Human Pathology.2016; 47(1): 4. CrossRef
Loss of CDH1 (E-cadherin) expression is associated with infiltrative tumour growth and lymph node metastasis
Sun A Kim, Kentaro Inamura, Mai Yamauchi, Reiko Nishihara, Kosuke Mima, Yasutaka Sukawa, Tingting Li, Mika Yasunari, Teppei Morikawa, Kathryn C Fitzgerald, Charles S Fuchs, Kana Wu, Andrew T Chan, Xuehong Zhang, Shuji Ogino, Zhi Rong Qian
British Journal of Cancer.2016; 114(2): 199. CrossRef
Recurrence in patients with stage I colorectal cancer
Patrick Ely Teloken, David Ransom, Ian Faragher, Ian Jones, Peter Gibbs, Cameron Platell
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2016; 86(1-2): 49. CrossRef
Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer. An Independent Prognostic Factor Still Reliable
Giovanni Li Destri, Antonio Salvatore Rubino, Rosalia Latino, Fabio Giannone, Raffaele Lanteri, Beniamino Scilletta, Antonio Di Cataldo
International Surgery.2015; 100(4): 617. CrossRef
Factors affecting sphincter-preserving resection treatment for patients with low rectal cancer
ZHENQIANG SUN, XIANBO YU, HAIJIANG WANG, MING MA, ZELIANG ZHAO, QISAN WANG
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2015; 10(2): 484. CrossRef
Tumour border configuration in colorectal cancer: proposal for an alternative scoring system based on the percentage of infiltrating margin
Eva Karamitopoulou, Inti Zlobec, Viktor Hendrik Koelzer, Rupert Langer, Heather Dawson, Alessandro Lugli
Histopathology.2015; 67(4): 464. CrossRef
Tumor budding in the clinical management of colon and rectal cancer
Viktor H Koelzer, Inti Zlobec, Alessandro Lugli
Colorectal Cancer.2014; 3(4): 387. CrossRef
Clinical Management of Localized Colon Cancer with Capecitabine
J. Quidde, D. Arnold, A. Stein
Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology.2012; 6: CMO.S8194. CrossRef
Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer, Is It a Guarantee for the Cure of Cancer?
Kang Young Lee
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(1): 6. CrossRef

Case Reports

Operative Treatment with a Laparotomy for Anorectal Problems Arising from a Self-Inserted Foreign Body: Seung-Bum Ryoo, Heung-Kwon Oh, Heon-Kyun Ha, Eun Kyung Choe, Sang Hui Moon, Kyu Joo Park; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):56-60. Published online February 29, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.56

4,879 View
37 Download
2 Citations

Abstract PDF

An anorectal foreign body can cause serious complications such as incontinence, rectal perforation, peritonitis, or pelvic abscess, so it should be managed immediately. We experienced two cases of operative treatment for a self-inserted anorectal foreign body. In one, the foreign body could not be removed as it was completely impacted in the anal canal. We failed to remove it through the anus. A laparotomy and removal of the foreign body was performed by using an incision on the rectum. Primary colsure and a sigmoid loop colostomy were done. A colostomy take-down was done after three months. The other was a rectal perforation from anal masturbation with a plastic device. We performed primary repair of the perforated rectosigmoid colon, and we didea sigmoid loop colostom. A colostomy take-down was done three months later. Immediate and proper treatment for a self-inserted anorectal foreign body is important to prevent severe complications, and we report successful surgical treatments for problems caused by anorectal foreign bodies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Treatment of rectal foreign bodies
D. A. Khubezov, S. N. Trushin, K. V. Puchkov, D. K. Puchkov, A. Yu. Ogorel’tsev
Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2016; (9): 57. CrossRef
Rectal perforation caused by a sharp pig backbone in a middle-aged patient with mild depression
Hyeong Ju Sun, Jeonghun Lee, Dong Min Kim, Myeong-Su Chu, Kyoung Sun Park, Dong Jin Choi
Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine.2015; 32(1): 31. CrossRef

Extensive Bowel Ischemia with Heavy Alcohol Consumption: Report of a Case: Ji Hyoun Lee, Gyoung Tae Noh, Ryung-Ah Lee; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):61-65. Published online February 29, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.61

2,877 View
28 Download
2 Citations

Abstract PDF

Alcohol is well-recognized systemic toxin that causes numerous adverse effects, including psychosocial problems, fatal myocardial infarction, stroke and atherosclerosis. The intra-abdominal complications caused by acute alcohol consumption have not been defined. We report an 80-year-old man with sub-acute small bowel and colonic ischemia after heavy alcohol intake in one sitting. We performed a resection of gangrenous bowel segments. Microscopically, there were diffuse infarction, with vasoconstriction of the mesenteric vessels in the ileum and colon without any thrombotic occlusion of the intestinal vessels. The clinicians should always be assured by confirmation of a history of recent substance abuse in patients with unexplained abdominal pain, and mesenteric ischemia should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute or chronic abdominal pain in consumers of alcohol.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Alcohol use disorders associated with an increased risk of mesenteric ischemia: A nationwide cohort study
Chieh-Fan Chen, Wei-Tsung Kao, Kuan-Ting Liu, Shu-Ling Chen, Yu-Tung Huang, Chun-Che Huang
Drug and Alcohol Dependence.2019; 194: 264. CrossRef
Increased Risk of Mesenteric Ischemia in Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder
Chih-Wei Wei, Yu-Chiao Wang, Dong-Zong Hung, Yu-Ting Chung, Wei-Kung Chen, Chia-Hung Kao
Mayo Clinic Proceedings.2016; 91(2): 189. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Previous issues